20160978 Ver 1_Baseline Monitoring Report_20180701

fires
July 19, 2018
Samantha Dailey
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Division
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
302 Jefferson St. Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Corporate Headquarters
5020 Montrose Blvd. Suite 650
Houston, TX 77006
Main: 713.520.5400
RE: Polecat Baseline Monitoring Document and As -Built Report (SAW — 2016-01986)
Ms. Dailey,
Please find attached the Polecat Baseline Monitoring Document and As -Built Report. RES is
requesting a 30% credit release. A Monitoring/Maintenance Bond will be submitted prior to the
August 2nd site visit.
Thank you,
rl�_A&O_L
Ryan Medric I Ecologist
CC: Andrea Hughes (USACE)
Mac Haupt (DWR)

POLECAT STREAM
MITIGATION SITE
JOHNSTON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
BASELINE MONITORING DOCUMENT & AS -BUILT REPORT
-01
Provided by:
fires
Bank Sponsor: EBX-Neuse I, LLC
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
919-209-1056
July 2018

Table of Contents
1.0 Project Summary.................................................................................................................................
1.1 Project Location and Description..........................................................................................
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives................................................................................................
1.3 Project Success Criteria.........................................................................................................
StreamSuccess Criteria...............................................................................................................
Vegetation Success Criteria.........................................................................................................
1.4 Project Components.....................................................................................................................
1.5 Design/Approach..........................................................................................................................
1.6 Construction and As -Built Conditions.........................................................................................
1.7 Baseline Monitoring Performance..............................................................................................
Vegetation................................................................................................................................... .
StreamGeomorphology...............................................................................................................
StreamHydrology........................................................................................................................
2.0 Methods..............................................................................................................................................
3.0 References...........................................................................................................................................
Appendix A: Background Tables
Table 1: Project Mitigation Components
Table 2: Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3: Project Contacts Table
Table 4: Project Contacts Table
Figure 1: Site Location Map
Appendix B: Visual Assessment Data
Figure 2: Current Conditions Plan View
Vegetation Plot Photos
Monitoring Device Photos
Appendix C: Vegetation Plot Data
Table 5: Planted Species Summary
Table 6: Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary
Table 7a. Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species
Table 7b. Random Vegetation Monitoring Plot Data
Annendix D: Stream Measurement and Geomorbhologv Data
Baseline Cross -Section Plots
Table 8. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Table 9. Cross Section Morphology Data Table
Table 10. Stream Reach Morphology Data Table
Appendix E: As -Built Plan Sheets
1
1
2
2
2
3
4
4
5
5
5
6
6
6
7
Polecat i Baseline Monitoring Report
Stream Mitigation Site July 2018

1.0 Proiect Summary
1.1 Project Location and Description
The Polecat Mitigation Site (the "Site") is located within a watershed dominated by agricultural land use
in Johnston County, North Carolina, approximately two miles southeast of Smithfield. The project
streams were significantly impacted by livestock access, row crop production, and nearby urbanization.
The project involves the restoration and protection of streams in the Neuse River watershed. The purpose
of this Site is to restore and enhance a stream complex located within the Neuse River Basin.
The Site lies within USGS Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) 03020201140010 (USGS, 2012). The 2010
Neuse River Basin Restoration Plan (RBRP) identified the Neuse River watershed (HUC
03 020201140010) as a Targeted Local Watershed (TLW), a watershed that exhibits both the need and
opportunity for wetland, stream, and riparian buffer restoration. The Site supports many of the Neuse
River RBRP and Neuse Regional Watershed Plan (RWP) goals. The Project's watershed is primarily rural
with Interstate 95 occupying the western portion of the watershed. The Project parcels have been in
agricultural use for several decades.
The Site is located within HUC 03020201 and includes streams that directly discharge into the Neuse
River. Many of the project design goals and objectives, including restoration of riparian buffers to filter
runoff from agricultural operations and improve terrestrial habitat, and construction of in -stream
structures to improve habitat diversity, will address the degraded water quality and nutrient input from
farming that were identified as major watershed stressors in the 2010 Neuse RBRP. Water quality
stressors currently affecting the Site include livestock access, row crop production, and impervious
surface. The project presents 8,178 linear feet of stream restoration and enhancement generating 6,567
Stream Mitigation Units (SMU).
The site consists of agricultural fields, cattle pastures and wooded areas. The total easement area is 53.63
acres. The wooded areas along the easement corridor designated for restoration activities are classified as
mixed hardwoods. Invasive species are present throughout the wooded areas and will continue to be
treated throughout the monitoring period. Channels restored were incised, both laterally and vertically
unstable, impacted by cattle, lack riparian buffers, and aquatic life was not supported. Stream conditions
along the restoration reaches exhibited habitat degradation because of impacts from livestock and nearby
impervious surfaces because of urbanization.
After completion of all construction and planting activities the Site will be monitored on a regular basis
and a physical inspection of the Site will be conducted at a minimum of twice per year throughout the
seven-year post -construction monitoring period, or until performance standards are met. These site
inspections will identify site components and features that require routine maintenance. The measure of
stream restoration success will be documented by bankfull flows and no change in stream channel
classification. Sand bed channels are dynamic and minor adjustments to dimension and profile are
expected. The measure of vegetative success for the Site will be the survival of at least 210 seven-year old
planted trees per acre with an average height of 10 feet at the end of year seven of the monitoring period.
Upon approval for closeout by the Interagency Review Team (IRT), the Site will be transferred to the
North Carolina Wildlife Habitat Foundation (NCWHF). The NCWHF will be responsible for periodic
inspection of the Site to ensure that restrictions required in the Conservation Easement or the deed
restriction document(s) are upheld. Endowment funds required to uphold easement and deed restrictions
will be negotiated prior to site transfer to the responsible party.
Polecat 1 Baseline Monitoring Report
Stream Mitigation Site July 2018

1.2 Project Goals and Objectives
The 2010 Neuse River RBRP identified several restoration needs for the entire Neuse River Basin, as well
as for 14UC 03020201. The Polecat Creek watershed (HUC 03020201140010) was identified as a TLW, a
watershed that exhibits both the need and opportunity for wetland, stream, and riparian buffer restoration.
The Polecat Creek watershed includes 42 square miles of watershed area. Twenty percent of the
watershed is used for agricultural purposes and three percent is currently developed.
The Site was identified as a stream and buffer restoration opportunity to improve water quality, habitat,
and hydrology within the Neuse River Basin. The Site is located within HUC 03020201 and includes
streams that directly discharge into the Neuse River. Many of the project design goals and objectives,
including restoration of riparian buffers to filter runoff from agricultural operations and improve
terrestrial habitat, and construction of in -stream structures to improve habitat diversity, will address the
degraded water quality and nutrient input from farming that were identified as major watershed stressors
in the 2010 Neuse RBRP.
The project goals address stressors identified in the TLW and include the following:
• Nutrient removal,
• Sediment removal,
Invasive species treatment,
Filtration of runoff, and
Improved aquatic and terrestrial habitat.
The project goals will be addressed through the following project objectives:
• Exclusion of livestock,
• Treatment of exotic invasive species,
• Restoration of forested riparian stream buffers,
• Stabilization of eroding stream banks due to lack of vegetation and livestock hoof shear,
• Addition of large woody debris, such as log vanes, log weirs, and root wads,
• Preservation and enhancement of hydrology in existing riparian wetlands, and
• Restoration of appropriate pattern, dimension, and profile in stream channels.
1.3 Project Success Criteria
The Site follows the USACE 2003 Stream Mitigation Guidelines and the "Wilmington District Stream
and Wetland Compensatory Mitigation Update" dated October 24, 2016. Cross section and vegetation
plot data will be collected in Years 0, 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7. Stream hydrology data and visual monitoring will
be reported annually.
Stream Success Criteria
Four bankf ill flow events must be documented within the seven-year monitoring period. The bankfull
events must occur in separate years. Otherwise, the stream monitoring will continue until four bankf ill
events have been documented in separate years.
Stream restoration reaches will be monitored to document intermittent or seasonal surface flow. This will
be accomplished through direct observation and the use of stream flow gauges with data loggers. Reaches
must demonstrate a minimum of 30 consecutive days of flow.
Polecat 2 Baseline Monitoring Report
Stream Mitigation Site July 2018

There should be little change in as -built cross-sections. If changes do take place, they should be evaluated
to determine if they represent a movement toward a less stable condition (for example down -cutting or
erosion), or are minor changes that represent an increase in stability (for example settling, vegetative
changes, deposition along the banks, or decrease in width/depth ratio). Cross-sections shall be classified
using the Rosgen stream classification method, and all monitored cross-sections should fall within the
quantitative parameters defined for channels of the design stream type. Bank height ratio shall not exceed
1.2, and the entrenchment ratio shall be no less than 1.4 within restored reaches. Channel stability should
be demonstrated through a minimum of four bankfull events documented in the seven-year monitoring
period.
Digital images will be used to subjectively evaluate channel aggradation or degradation, bank erosion,
success of riparian vegetation, and effectiveness of erosion control measures. Longitudinal images should
not indicate the absence of developing bars within the channel or an excessive increase in channel depth.
Lateral images should not indicate excessive erosion or continuing degradation of the banks over time. A
series of images over time should indicate successional maturation of riparian vegetation.
Vegetation Success Criteria
Specific and measurable success criteria for plant density within the riparian buffers on the Site will
follow IRT Guidance. Vegetation monitoring plots will be a minimum of 0.02 acres in size, and cover a
minimum of two percent of the planted area. Vegetation monitoring will occur between July 1St and leaf
drop and includes 11 permanent vegetation plots and three random vegetation plots. The interim
measures of vegetative success for the site will be the survival of at least 320 planted three-year old trees
per acre at the end of Year 3, 260 five-year old trees at the end of Year 5, and the final vegetative
success criteria will be 210 trees per acre with an average height of 10 feet at the end of Year 7.
Volunteer trees will be counted, identified to species, and included in the yearly monitoring reports, but
will not be counted towards the success criteria of total planted stems.
Polecat 3 Baseline Monitoring Report
Stream Mitigation Site July 2018

1.4 Project Components
The project area is comprised of a single easement location along multiple drainage features that flow into
the Neuse River. The northern easement area captures two tributaries to Polecat Branch and a portion of
its headwaters. The southeastern easement area is separated from the northern area by a 100 -foot crossing,
and is divided into three different areas due to a gas line easement and a telephone line easement. The
stream mitigation components are summarized in Table 1, as well as Figure 2.
PC2 Enhancement II 7+00 to 10+73 373 373 2.5: 1 149 149
PC3 Enhancement III 11+35 to 14+94 359 359 5: 1 72 72
Total 7,707 8,178 6,256 6,567
* SMUs are adjusted in accordance with Section XI(C)- `Procedures to Calculate Credits for Non-standard Buffer Widths",
published in the October 2016 Wilmington District Stream and Wetland Compensatory Mitigation Update. A detailed description
of the methodology and calculations is included in Section 6 and Figure(s) 11.
** 30 foot break in easement/stream length for existing culvert crossing
t 74 foot break in easement/stream length for future Atlantic Coast Pipeline
tf 30 foot break in easement/stream length for existing overhead powerline
100 foot in easement/stream length for proposed farm crossing
1. S Design/Approach
The stream design approach for the Site was to combine the analog method of natural channel design with
analytical methods to evaluate stream flows and hydraulic performance of the channel and floodplain.
The analog method involves the use of a "template" stream adjacent to, nearby, or previously in the same
location as the design reach. The template parameters of the analog reach are replicated to create the
features of the design reach. The analog approach is useful when watershed and boundary conditions are
Polecat 4 Baseline Monitoring Report
Stream Mitigation Site July 2018
Existing
ProposedMitigation
Mitigation
Stationing
Base
Adjusted
Reach
Type
(Proposed)
Length
Length
Ratio
SMUs
SMUs*
(LF)
(LF)
KZO**
Enhancement II
0+22
to
2+74
252
252
2.5 : 1
101
101
KZO
Enhancement II
3+05
to
3+94
89
89
2.5 : 1
36
36
KZlt
Enhancement III
0+35
to
5+20
485
485
5:1
97
97
KZl
Enhancement III
5+94
to
9+72
378
378
5:1
76
76
KZ2
P1 Restoration
9+72
to
15+93
575
621
1 : 1
621
699
KZ3
P2 Restoration
6+73
to
8+56
126
183
1: 1
183
183
KZ4tf
P1/P2 Restoration
15+93
to
27+38
1,028
1,145
1:1
1,145
1,258
KZ4
Enhancement I
27+75
to
28+64
99
99
1.5 :1
66
66
KZ5
P2 Restoration
8+65
to
10+17
123
152
1: 1
152
152
KZ6
P2 Restoration
29+29
to
41+87
1,260
1,258
1: 1
1,258
1,306
MIl$
P1 Restoration
41+87
to
54+14
1,046
1,227
1: 1
1,227
1,227
MIl
P1 Restoration
55+15
to
64+67
878
952
1: 1
952
1,014
PO
Enhancement III
0+95
to
7+00
605
605
5: 1
121
131
PC2 Enhancement II 7+00 to 10+73 373 373 2.5: 1 149 149
PC3 Enhancement III 11+35 to 14+94 359 359 5: 1 72 72
Total 7,707 8,178 6,256 6,567
* SMUs are adjusted in accordance with Section XI(C)- `Procedures to Calculate Credits for Non-standard Buffer Widths",
published in the October 2016 Wilmington District Stream and Wetland Compensatory Mitigation Update. A detailed description
of the methodology and calculations is included in Section 6 and Figure(s) 11.
** 30 foot break in easement/stream length for existing culvert crossing
t 74 foot break in easement/stream length for future Atlantic Coast Pipeline
tf 30 foot break in easement/stream length for existing overhead powerline
100 foot in easement/stream length for proposed farm crossing
1. S Design/Approach
The stream design approach for the Site was to combine the analog method of natural channel design with
analytical methods to evaluate stream flows and hydraulic performance of the channel and floodplain.
The analog method involves the use of a "template" stream adjacent to, nearby, or previously in the same
location as the design reach. The template parameters of the analog reach are replicated to create the
features of the design reach. The analog approach is useful when watershed and boundary conditions are
Polecat 4 Baseline Monitoring Report
Stream Mitigation Site July 2018

similar between the design and analog reaches (Skidmore et al., 2001). Hydraulic geometry was
developed using analytical methods to identify the design discharge.
The Site includes Restoration, Enhancement Level I, Enhancement Level II and Enhancement Level III.
Restoration was done along reaches MI I, KZ2, KZ3, KZ4, KZ5, and KZ6. Restoration reaches typically
include a meandering single -thread stream pattern constructed to mimic the natural planform of a low -
gradient, sand/gravel bed channel. Sinuosity depends on local reference reach conditions and hydrologic
and hydraulic modeling. As a result of the restoration of planform and dimension, periodic flooding and
restored riparian buffer provide the appropriate hydrology and sediment transport throughout this
watershed.
Enhancement Level I was done on Reach KZ4; Enhancement Level 11 and III was done along Reaches
KZO, KZ1, PCI, PC2, and PC3. Enhancement Level I includes adjustments to the cross-sectional area of
the existing channel and floodplains, as well as installations of wood and rock structures to adjust and
enhance bedform. Enhancement Level 11 treatments include livestock exclusion and bank stabilization.
Enhancement Level III allows high quality aquatic habitat to be protected and enhanced through invasive
species treatments and supplemental plantings in the riparian buffer.
1.6 Construction and As -Built Conditions
Stream construction and planting was completed in May 2018. The Polecat Mitigation Site was built to
design plans and guidelines. No major changes or modifications were made during construction activities.
The fence and crossings were completed in June 2018. Baseline channel length and stationing is based on
design centerline.
1.7 Baseline Monitoring Performance
The Polecat Baseline Monitoring activities were completed in May and June 2018. All Baseline
Monitoring data is present below and in the appendices. The Site is on track to meeting vegetation and
stream interim success criteria.
Vegetation _
Monitoring of the 11 permanent vegetation plots and three random vegetation plots was completed during
May and June 2018. Vegetation data are in Appendix C, associated photos are in Appendix B, and plot
locations are in Appendix B. MYO monitoring data indicates that all plots are exceeding the interim
success criteria of 320 planted stems per acre. Planted stem densities ranged from 890 to 1,295 planted
stems per acre with a mean of 1,049 planted stems per acre across the permanent plots. A total of 10
species were documented within the plots. Volunteer species were not noted at baseline monitoring but
are expected to establish in upcoming years. The average tree height observed was 1.7 feet. Data from the
three 50x2 meter random vegetation plots showed 1,052 stems/acre in Random Plot 1, 931 stems/acre in
Random Plot 2, and 1,255 stems/acre in Random Plot 3.
Visual assessment of vegetation outside of the monitoring plots indicates that the herbaceous vegetation is
becoming well established throughout the project.
Polecat 5 Baseline Monitoring Report
Stream Mitigation Site July 2018

Stream Geomorphology
Geomorphology data for MYO was collected during June 2018. Summary tables and cross section/profile
plots are in Appendix D. Overall the baseline cross sections and profile relatively match the proposed
design. The as -built conditions show that shear stress and velocities have been reduced for all
restoration/enhancement reaches. All reaches were designed as gravel/sand bed channels and remain
classified as gravel/sand bed channels post -construction.
Visual assessment of the stream channel was performed to document signs of instability, such as eroding
banks, structural instability, or excessive sedimentation. The channel is transporting sediment as designed
and will continue to be monitored for aggradation and degradation.
Stream Hydrology
Flow and crest gauge data for 2018 will be included in the Monitoring Year 1 Report in this section and
in the appendices. Gauge locations can be found on Figure 2 and photos are in Appendix B.
2.0 Methods
Stream monitoring was conducted using a Topcon GTS -312 Total Station. Three-dimensional coordinates
associated with cross-section data was collected in the field (NAD83 State Plane feet FIPS 3200).
Morphological data was collected at 22 cross-sections. Survey data was imported into CAD, ArcGIS®,
and Microsoft Excel® for data processing and analysis. In May 2018 three sets of crest gauges and flow
gauges were installed along the main project channel. The flow gauges were installed within the channel
and will record flow conditions at an hourly interval. The crest gauges were installed on the bank at the
bankfull elevation. During quarterly visits to the Site, the height of the corkline will be recorded. HOBO
data from the flow gauges will be corrected using bankfull recordings from the crest gauges.
Vegetation success is being monitored at 11 permanent monitoring plots and three random monitoring
plots. Vegetation plot monitoring follows the CVS-EEP Level 2 Protocol for Recording Vegetation,
version 4.2 (Lee et al. 2008) and includes analysis of species composition and density of planted species.
Data is processed using the CVS data entry tool. In the field, the four corners of each plot were
permanently marked with PVC at the origin and metal conduit at the other corners. Photos of each plot
are to be taken from the origin each monitoring year. The random plots are collected in the planted Non -
Standard Buffer Width areas as 50 -meter by 2 -meter transects. To measure these transects, a 50 -meter
tape is stretched diagonally across the rows of trees and any tree that falls within one meter of either side
of the tape is recorded. The transects will be mapped and new locations will be monitored in subsequent
years.
Polecat 6 Baseline Monitoring Report
Stream Mitigation Site July 2018

3.0 References
Environmental Laboratory. 1987. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual,
Technical Report Y-87-1. U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi.
Harman, W., R. Starr, M. Carter, K. Tweedy, M. Clemmons, K. Suggs, C. Miller. 2012. A Function -
Based Framework for Stream Assessment and Restoration Projects. US Environmental Protection
Agency, Office of Wetlands, Oceans, and Watersheds, Washington, DC EPA 843-K-12-006.
Lee Michael T., Peet Robert K., Roberts Steven D., and Wentworth Thomas R., 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol
for Recording Vegetation Level. Version 4.2
North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (NCDMS). "Broad River Basin Restoration Priorities
2009." (September 2014).
Peet, R.K., Wentworth, T.S., and White, P.S. (1998), A flexible, multipurpose method for recording
vegetation composition and structure. Castanea 63:262-274
Resource Environmental Solutions (2017). Mallard Water Quality Improvement Site Final Mitigation
Plan.
Rosgen, D. (1996), Applied River Morphology, 2nd edition, Wildland Hydrology, Pagosa Springs, CO.
Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley. 2012. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina,
Third Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation,
NCDENR, Raleigh, NC.
US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), 2003. April 2003 NC Stream Mitigation Guidelines.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 2010. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland
Delineation Manual: Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region (Version 2.0), ed. J. S. Wakeley, R. W.
Lichvar, and C. V. Noble. ERDC/EL TR -10-20. Vicksburg, MS: U.S. Army Engineer Research and
Development Center.
US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), 2016. Wilmington District Stream and Wetland Compensatory
Mitigation Update.
Polecat 7 Baseline Monitoring Report
Stream Mitigation Site July 2018

Appendix A
Background Tables

Table 1. Polecat Stream Mitigation Site - Mitigation Assets and Components
Project
Component
(reach ID, etc.)'
Wetland
Position and
HydroType2
Existing
Footage
or
Acreage
Stationing
Mitigation
Plan
Footage or
Acreage
Restoration
Level
Approach
Priority
Level
Mitigation
Ratio (X:1)
Mitigation
Credits
Adjusted
Mitigation
Credits°
Notes/Comments
KZ0
Enhancement
252
0+22 to 2+74
252
E II
-
2.5: 1
101
101
Bank Stabilization, Planted Buffer, Permanent Conservation Easement
KZ0
89
3+05 to 3+94
89
E II
-
2.5: 1
36
36
Bank Stabilization, Planted Buffer, Permanent Conservation Easement
KZ1
485
0+35 to 5+20
485
E III
-
5 : 1
97
97
Invasive Species Treatment, Supplemental Buffer Plantings, Permanent Conservation Easement
KZ1
378
5+94 to 9+72
378
E III
-
5 : 1
76
76
Invasive Species Treatment, Supplemental Buffer Plantings, Permanent Conservation Easement
KZ2
575
9+72 to 15+93
621
R
P1
1 :1
621
699
Full Channel Restoration, Channel Relocation, Planted Buffer, Exclusion of Livestock, Permanent
Conservation Easement
KZ3
126
6+73 to 8+56
183
R
P2
1 :1
183
183
Full Channel Restoration, Planted Buffer, Permanent Conservation Easement
KZ4
1,028
15+93 to 27+38
1,145
R
P1 / P2
1 :1
1,145
1,258
Full Channel Restoration, Channel Relocation, Planted Buffer, Exclusion of Livestock, Permanent
Conservation Easement
KZ4
99
27+75 to 28+64
99
El
-
1.5: 1
66
66
Bank Modification, Installation of Structures, Planted Buffer, Permanent Conservation Easement
KZ5
123
8+65 to 10+17
152
R
P2
1 :1
152
152
Full Channel Restoration, Planted Buffer, Permanent Conservation Easement
KZ6
1,260
29+29 to 41+8
1,258
R
P2
1 :1
1,258
1,306
Full Channel Restoration, Planted Buffer, Permanent Conservation Easement
M11
1,046
41+87 to 54+14
1,227
R
P1
1 :1
1,227
1,227
Full Channel Restoration, Channel Relocation, Planted Buffer, Exclusion of Livestock, Permanent
Conservation Easement
Mil
878
55+15 to 64+67
952
R
P1
1:1
952
1,014
Full Channel Restoration, Channel Relocation, Planted Buffer, Exclusion of Livestock, Permanent
Conservation Easement
PC1
605
0+95 to 7+00
605
E III
-
5 : 1
121
131
Invasive Species Treatment, Supplemental Buffer Plantings, Permanent Conservation Easement
PC2
373
1 7+00 to 10+73
373 1
E II
-
2.5: 1
149
149
Bank Stabilization, Planted Buffer, Permanent Conservation Easement
PC3
359
11+35 to 14+94
359 1
E III
-
5 : 1
72 172
Invasive Species Treatment, Supplemental Buffer Plantings, Permanent Conservation Easement
Length and Area Summations by Mitigation Category
Restoration Level
Stream
(linear feet)
Riparian Wetland
(acres)
on-npanan
Wetland
(acres)
Stream
6,567
Riverine Non-Riverine
Restoration
5,538
Enhancement
Enhancement
99
Enhancement 11
714
Enhancement III
1 827
Creation
Preservation
High Quality Pres
Overall Assets Summary
General Note- The above component table is intended to be a close complement to the asset map. Each
entry in the above table should have clear distinction and appropriate symbology in the asset map.
1- Wetland Groups represent pooled wetland polygons in the map with the same wetland type and
restoration level. If some of the wetland polygons within a group are in meaningfully different
landscape positions, soil types or have different community targets (as examples), then further
segmentation in the table may be warranted. Wetland features impacted by credit modifiers such as
utilities shall be listed as a distinct record with the impacted acreage tallied as discreet records in the
table (See Wetland 7 above)
2 - Wetland Position and Hydro Type - Indicates Riparian Riverine, (RR), riparinan non-riverine (RNR) or
Non-Riverine (NR)
3- Buffer Assets- due to the complex nature of buffer and nutrient offset assets they are not included
in this example table. Please see the DMS buffer mitigation plan template for the required asset table
information.
4 - Adjusted Mitigation Credits are based on the non-standard buffer widths.
Overall
Asset Category
Credits
Stream
6,567
RNR Wetland
NR Wetland
General Note- The above component table is intended to be a close complement to the asset map. Each
entry in the above table should have clear distinction and appropriate symbology in the asset map.
1- Wetland Groups represent pooled wetland polygons in the map with the same wetland type and
restoration level. If some of the wetland polygons within a group are in meaningfully different
landscape positions, soil types or have different community targets (as examples), then further
segmentation in the table may be warranted. Wetland features impacted by credit modifiers such as
utilities shall be listed as a distinct record with the impacted acreage tallied as discreet records in the
table (See Wetland 7 above)
2 - Wetland Position and Hydro Type - Indicates Riparian Riverine, (RR), riparinan non-riverine (RNR) or
Non-Riverine (NR)
3- Buffer Assets- due to the complex nature of buffer and nutrient offset assets they are not included
in this example table. Please see the DMS buffer mitigation plan template for the required asset table
information.
4 - Adjusted Mitigation Credits are based on the non-standard buffer widths.

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Polecat Stream Mitigation Site
Elapsed Time Since grading complete: 1 months
Elapsed Time Since planting complete: 6 weeks
Number of reporting Years : 0
Activity or Deliverable
Data Collection
Complete
Completion or
Delivery
Restoration Plan
NA
Jul -17
Final Design — Construction Plans
NA
Jan -18
Construction
NA
Jun -18
Containerized, bare root and B&B plantings for reach/segments 1 &2
NA
May -18
As -built (Year 0 Monitoring — baseline)
Jul -18
Jul -18
Year 1 Monitoring
Year 2 Monitoring
Year 3 Monitoring
Year 4 Monitoring
Year 5 Monitoring
Year 6 Monitoring
Year 7 Monitoring
= The number of reports or data points produced excluding the baseline

Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Selma Mill Stream Mitigation Site
Designer
WK Dickson and Co., Inc. / 720 Corporate Center Dr., Raleigh,
NC 27607
Primary project design POC
Frasier Mullen [phone]
Construction Contractor
KBS Earthwork Inc. / 5616 Coble Church Rd., Julian, NC
27283
Construction contractor POC
[phone]
Survey Contractor
Matrix East, PLLC / 906 N. Queen St., Suite A, Kinston, NC
28501
Survey contractor POC
James R. Watson, PLS / [phone]
Planting Contractor
H&J Forestry
Planting contractor POC
Matt Hitch
Seeding Contractor
KBS Earthwork Inc. / 5616 Coble Church Rd., Julian, NC
27283
Contractor point of contact
[phone]
Seed Mix Sources
Green Resource [phone]
Nursery Stock Suppliers
Arborgen [phone]
Monitoring Performers
RES / 302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110, Raleigh, NC 27605
Stream Monitoring POC
Ryan Medric [phone]
Vegetation Monitoring POC
Ryan Medric [phone]
Wetland Monitoring POC
N/A

Table 4. Project Background Information
Project Name
Polecat
County
Johnston
Project Area (acres)
53.63
Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude)
Latitude: 35.4754 N Longitude: -78.3117 W
Planted Acreage (Acres of Woody Stems Planted)
17.72
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province
Coastal Plain
River Basin
Neuse
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8 -digit 3020201 USGS Hydrologic Unit 14 -digit
3020201140010
DWR Sub -basin
03-04-02
Project Drainage Area (Acres and Square Miles)
3,059
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious Area
<2%
CGIA Land Use Classification
Agriculture; Forest
Reach Summary Information
Parameters
IQO IQ1 KZ2 KZ3
ICA
IQ5
I¢6
Mil
PC1
PC2 PC3
Length of reach (linear feet)
341 863 621 183
1244
152
1258
2179
605
373 359
Valley confinement (Confined, moderately confined, unconfined)
C UC It C
C
C
MC
C
WA
UC UC
Drainage area (Acres and Square Miles)
217 524 533 88
735
88
787
825
WA
3046 3059
Perennial, Intermittent, Ephemeral
I I I I
P
I
P
P
P
P P
NCDWR Water Quality Classification
WA WA WA WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
C;NSW
QWSW C;NSW
Stream Classification (existing)
E6 E5 E4 G5
C4/G4c
Cb
G5
RES
WA
E5 E5
Stream Classification (proposed)
E6 E E4 E
E4
E5
B
R
WA
E5 E5
Evolutionary trend (Simon)
WA WA WA WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA WA
FEMA classification
L WA WA WA I WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
AE
hE I AE
Regulatory Considerations
Parameters
Applicable?
Resolved?
Supporting
Docs?
Water of the United States - Section 404
Yes
Yes
SAW -2016-
01986
Water of the United States - Section 401
Yes
Yes
DWR # 16-
0978v2
Endangered Species Act
Yes
Yes
USFWS
(Corr. Letter)
Historic Preservation Act
Yes
Yes
SHPO (Corr.
Letter)
Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA or CAMA)
No
N/A
N/A
FEMA Floodplain Compliance
Yes
Yes
N/A
Essential Fisheries Habitat
No
N/A
N/A

Legend
Conservation Easement
q-66
0
I►j
J
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri
y Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esti (Thailand), NGCC,
OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
N
Figure 1 -Site Location Map
Date: 7/17/2018
"' a Drawn by: D res
Polecat Stream Mitigation Site
s Checked by:: DPI
0 500 1,000
Johnston County, North Carolina
1 inch = 1,000 feet
Feet

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data

3
a,
P�2 Restoration
Restoration
fires
sy.
w E
0 250 500
+k
�...�--_. Feet
Proposength
Figure 2
Proposed Reach
Nlitigation Type
NEtlgatlonRatio
BaseSMUs
AdjustedSNIUs
Overview
KZ1
Enhancement III
485
1 :5.0
97
97
KZl
Enhancement III
378
1:5.0
76
76
KZ2
PI Restoration
621
1:1.0
621
699
1KZ4
PI/ P2 Restoration
1,145
1:1.0
1,145
1,258
1KZ4
Enhancement I
99
1:1.5
66
66
1KZ6
P2 Restoration
1,258
1:1.0
1,258
1,306
NIB
PI Restoration
1,227
1:1.0
1,227
1,227
Mil
PI Restoration
952
1:1.0
952
1,014
KZ3
P2 Restoration
183
1:1.0
183
183
1KZ5
P2 Restoration
152
1:1.0
152
152
PCI
Enhancement 111
605
1:5.0
121
131
PC2
Enhancement II
373
1:2.5
149
149
PC3
Enhancement III
359
1 :5.0
72
72
1KZ0
Enhancement II
252
1 :2.5
101
11
1KZ0
Total
Enhancement II
89
8,178
1 :2.5
36
6,256
36
6,567
P�2 Restoration
Restoration
fires
sy.
w E
0 250 500
+k
�...�--_. Feet
c Information &
Figure 2
Current Conditions
Overview
Polecat Stream
Restoration Site
Johnston County, NC
KZ 1
i
i�
Date: 7/17/2018
Drawn by: MDD
Lat:35.4754
Long: -78.3117
'
LEGEND
Conservation Easement
,r
Restoration
t
Enhancement
Enhancement 11
g
lt Enhancement III
*4� Top of Bank
Cross Section
Z„2
' ® Flow/Crest Gauge
01 U
tai,
O Rain Gauge
0 Vegetation Plot
Random Vegetation Plot MYO
1
REFERENCE
„
1.) Aerial imagery from NC One Map 2017.
2.) Horizontal Datum is NAD83 UTM Z17N.
A
3.) The parcel data information/property
„
.
boundaries depicted on this map is for
�k
I
prospect assessment purposes only.
It is not to be used as final boundaries.
c Information &

At
Wl
r v lop. i 7�1r
1 �� ; :t, �'+7• 4;!` �c., i rr ' •� 1 N 't ,1 � r !'�'tMy r ,.�4'�'�.� �•
3 i
-10
•+�� Via_ IG.t'.r �` ''�% �r...af '�,''� YIv�� �•Y' li"
�;moi j. � f�Ir'1.' �I)c,rJ/1 S, 1, ' + *�•lPA
1. ��� • �.* ,� i M • � J+Y
rpm _`► � � ,tom FSi�'� it.?�:�• x-`.•'1w�'_ ,�• r
~ .i �• : j � ..�". i:. � "' ' :.$ \. � r+�/� T! � ��-{{• is 7
jM fires
� � Z
m
0 50 100
Feet
Figure 2
(Page 1)
Current Conditions
Plan View
Polecat Stream
Restoration Site
Johnston County, NC
Date: 7/17/2018 Drawn by: MDD
t, -
Let: 35.4754 Long: -78.3117
to LEGEND
O Conservation Easement
— Restoration
'!`." _�'" _"• Enhancement I
Y ►',r �' Enhancement II
— Enhancement III
aTop of Bank
Cross Section
(DFlow/Crest Gauge
10 i'>. �. Rain Gauge
Vegetation Plot
Random Vegetation Plot MYO
ra
�«, �'�'�'• Riparian Buffer Conditions
8 Target Community
7 Present Mar inal Absent
•a Absent Na Fill
r
y — — — —
Present — — — —
Common ----
REFERENCE
1.) Aerial imagery from NC One Map 2017.
' 2.) Horizontal Datum is NAD83 UTM Z17N.
1 3.) The parcel data information/property
boundaries depicted on this map is for
t? prospect assessment purposes only.
It is not to be used as final boundaries.
1
+ `
. r
Kms? •^rn=.-.;r'• •
. "'�. ,WWW. R' ♦��,y ,�:.. . �f sJ .
jM fires
� � Z
m
0 50 100
Feet
Figure 2
(Page 1)
Current Conditions
Plan View
Polecat Stream
Restoration Site
Johnston County, NC
Date: 7/17/2018 Drawn by: MDD
t, -
Let: 35.4754 Long: -78.3117
to LEGEND
O Conservation Easement
— Restoration
'!`." _�'" _"• Enhancement I
Y ►',r �' Enhancement II
— Enhancement III
aTop of Bank
Cross Section
(DFlow/Crest Gauge
10 i'>. �. Rain Gauge
Vegetation Plot
Random Vegetation Plot MYO
ra
�«, �'�'�'• Riparian Buffer Conditions
8 Target Community
7 Present Mar inal Absent
•a Absent Na Fill
r
y — — — —
Present — — — —
Common ----
REFERENCE
1.) Aerial imagery from NC One Map 2017.
' 2.) Horizontal Datum is NAD83 UTM Z17N.
1 3.) The parcel data information/property
boundaries depicted on this map is for
t? prospect assessment purposes only.
It is not to be used as final boundaries.

1 res
N\ _
N
'nJ / W
l S
- 0 50 100
Feet
ti Figure 2
(Page 3)
Current Conditions
Plan View
�. • ? -' Polecat Stream
a + ;
Restoration Site
Johnston County, NC
Date. 7/17/2018 Drawn by. MDD
Let: 35.4754 Long: -78.3117
t, "hAl
K•
rrj ' LEGEND
r �~ • "( : O Conservation Easement
— Restoration
Enhancement I
MI1. y, Enhancement II
Enhancement III
Top of Bank
Cross Section
(D Flow/Crest Gauge
Rain Gauge
o Vegetation Plot
Random Vegetation Plot MYO
Riparian Buffer Conditions
�.y.
Target Community
Present Marginal Absent
'Q Absent Na Fill
+ i a
Present — — — —
m ---
� = r Common
REFERENCE
1.) Aerial imagery from NC One Map 2017.
2.) Horizontal Datum is NAD83 UTM Z17N.
3.) The parcel data information/property
boundaries depicted on this map is for
prospect assessment purposes only.
It is not to be used as final boundaries.

\ s iii':,
` �f
Mr � •
Ir'
� fires
Ee
y14 A -''r'
N
E
.N
5
0 50 100
Feet
Figure 2
(Page 4)
Current Conditions
Plan View
Polecat Stream
Restoration Site
Johnston County, NC
Date: 7/17/2018 Drawn by: MDD
Iat:35.4754 Long: -78.3117
LEGEND
O Conservation Easement
— Restoration
Enhancement I
Enhancement II
— Enhancement III
Top of Bank
Cross Section
® Flow/Crest Gauge
Rain Gauge
O Vegetation Plot
[ Random Vegetation Plot MYO
Riparian Buffer Conditions
Target Community
Present Mar inal Absent
w_
•o Absent Na Fill
CL
(0
i Present
2
Common ----
REFERENCE
1.) Aerial imagery from NC One Map 2017.
2.) Horizontal Datum is NAD83 UTM Z17N.
3.) The parcel data information/property
boundaries depicted on this map is for
prospect assessment purposes only.
It is not to be used as final boundaries.

1�
0
ores
/V
INA.
0 50 100
Feet
Figure 2
(Page 6)
L
g Current Conditions
Plan View
Polecat Stream
Restoration Site
Johnston County, NC
.0.
Date: 111"1'12111" Drawn '1', IDD
-IN. L
it t
iv Let: 35.4754 Long: -78.3117
f" LEGEND
C3 Conservation Easement
Restoration
ni-
Enhancement I
A
Enhancement 11
Enhancement III
Top of Bank
Cross Section
Flow/Crest Gauge
Rain Gauge
Vegetation Plot
Random Vegetation Plot MYO
Riparian Buffer Conditions
Target Community
it
Present Mar inal Absent
0Absent Na Fill
14
Present
2
_4 r Common
REFERENCE
1.) Aerial imagery from NC One Map 2017.
4.
-'W 2.) Horizontal Datum is NAD83 LITM Z17N.
3.) The parcel data information/property
boundaries depicted on this map is for
prospect assessment purposes only.
It is not to be used as final boundaries.

ores
l A t w f' t r1 + l 0 50 100
4S^1 f S Z ' •*^ Feet
Figure 2
(Page 7)
Current Conditions
Plan View
Polecat Stream
Restoration Site
Johnston County, NC
Date: 7/17/2018 Drawn by: MDD
Let: 35.4754 Long: -78.3117
LEGEND
O Conservation Easement
: — Restoration
�.� Enhancement I
Enhancement II
— Enhancement III
Top of Bank
t
Cross Section
+ , � ®Flow/Crest Gauge
14` .i � Rain Gauge
�' _{ • , F o Vegetation Plot
W a Random Vegetation Plot MYO
Riparian Buffer Conditions
N • _
it ', a�'t 1 • N Target Community
Present Mar final Absent
b - ♦ i. ,w_
m �, - ",� �j •v • ♦ � 0 Absent Na Fill
*' y�w Present
r Common
REFERENCE
r
1.) Aerial imagery from NC One Map 2017.
2.) Horizontal Datum is NAD83 UTM Z17N.
` F _ 3.) The parcel data information/property
boundaries depicted on this map is for
prospect assessment purposes only.
y It is not to be used as final boundaries.
s"t� , ; �� NC Center for Geographic Infor i i

Polecat MYO Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Plot 1
Vegetation Plot 2
Vegetation Plot 3
Vegetation Plot 5
Vegetation Plot 4
Vegetation Plot 6
I
Vegetation Plot 6

Vegetation Plot 7
Vegetation Plot 9
Vegetation Plot 11
Vegetation Plot 8
Vegetation Plot 10

Random Plot 1 (6/12/2018)
Random Plot 3 (6/12/2018)
Random Plot 2 (6/12/2018)

Polecat Monitoring Device Photos
Crest/Flow Gauge 1 (KZ2)
Flow Gauge 3 (Ml I)
Crest/Flow Gauge 2 (KZ6)

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data

Appendix C. Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 5. Planted Species Summary
Common Name
Scientific Name
Total Stems Planted
Green Ash
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
2400
Sycamore
Platanus occidentalis
2400
Willow Oak
Quercus phellos
2400
Blackgum
Nyssa sylvatica
2400
River Birch
Betula nigra
2400
Baldcypress
Taxodium distichum
2400
Water Oak
Quercus nigra
2000
Swamp Chestnut Oak
Quercus michouxii
2000
Overcup Oak
Quercus lyrata
2000
5
Total
20,400
Table 6. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary
Plot #
Planted
Stems/Acre
Volunteer
Stems/Acre
Total
Stems/Acre
Success
Criteria
Met?
Average
Stem
Height (ft)
1
1093
0
1093
Yes
1.6
2
971
0
971
Yes
1.6
3
931
0
931
Yes
1.4
4
971
0
971
Yes
1.3
5
890
0
890
Yes
1.7
6
1093
0
1093
Yes
1.8
7
1214
0
1214
Yes
1.8
8
1295
0
1295
Yes
1.7
9
1052
0
1052
Yes
1.7
10
971
0
971
Yes
1.9
11
1052
0
1052
Yes
1.6
Project Avg
1049
0
1049
Yes
1.7

Appendix C. Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 7a. Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species
Polecat
Current Plot Data (MYO2018)
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
0210-01-0001
0210-01-0002
0210-01-0003
0210-01-0004
0210-01-0005
0210-01-0006
0210-01-0007
0210-01-0008
0210-01-0009
0210-01-0010
0210-01-0011
MYO (2018)
Pnol-S P -all T Pnol-S P -all T Pnol-S P -all T Pnol-S P -all T Pnol-S P -all T Pnol-S P -all T Pnol-S P -all T Pnol-S P -all T PnoLS P -all T Pnol-S P -all T Pnol-S P -all T Pnol-S P -all T
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
2 2
2
3 3
3
4 4
4
4
4
4
6
6
6
4
4
4
5
5
5
30 30
30
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
11
11
11
6 6
6
15
15
15
15 15
15
1
1
1
48 48
48
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
5
5
5
3 3
3
2
2
2
1 1
1
2 2
2
7
7
7
5
5
5
2
2
2
27 27
27
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore Tree
8
8
8
1 1
1
1
1
1
3 3
3
1 1
1
3 3
3
7
7
7
5
5
5
2
2
2
31 31
31
Quercus
oak
Tree
3 3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
6
6
6
15 15
15
Quercus lyrata
overcup oak
Tree
1 1
1
2
2
21
1
11
1
4 4
4
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak Tree
5 5
5
2
2
2
1 1
1
4
41
4
4
41
4
5
S1
5
3
31
3
41
4
4
28 28
28
Quercus nigra
water oak
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
4 4
4
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
2
2
2
9 9
9
2
2
2
3 3
3
2 21
2
41 41
4
14
14
14
10
10
10
10
10
10
5
5
5
5
51
5
66 66
66
Taxodium distichum
bald cypress
Tree
1
14 14
14
11 11
11
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
32 32
32
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
27
271 27 241 241 24 231 231 23 241 241 24 221 221 22
271 27 27
30
30 30
32
32 32
26
26 26 24 24 24
26
26 26
2851 2851 285
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11
0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.020.02 0.27
7 7 10 10 10
51 51 5 51 S1 5 61 61 6 5 5 5 5 51 51 71 71 71 61 61 6 71 71 7 41 41 4 71 71 7h1052
1093 1093 1093 971.2 971.2 971.2 930.8 930.8 930.8 971.2 971.2 971.2 890.3 890.3 890.3 1093 1093 1093 1214 1214 1214 1295 1295 1295 1052 1052 1052 971.2 971.2 971.210521 10521 10491 10491 1049

Table 7b. Random Vegetation Monitoring Plot Data
Appendix C. Vegetation Assessment Data
Random Plot 1
#
Species
Height (cm)
1
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
50
2
Quercus phellos
61
3
Quercus michauxii
58
4
Quercus phellos
57
5
Quercus michauxii
52
6
Platanus occidentalis
53
7
Quercus michauxii
65
8
Platanus occidentalis
57
9
Platanus occidentalis
60
10
Quercus phellos
41
11
Taxodium distichum
65
12
Quercus phellos
56
13
Betula nigra
54
14
Quercus phellos
56
15
Taxodium distichum
58
16
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
48
17
Betula nigra
50
18
Quercus phellos
60
19
Quercus phellos
60
20
Platanus occidentalis
85
21
Betula nigra
51
22
Quercus phellos
58
23
Quercus sp.
62
24
Taxodium distichum
65
25
Taxodium distichum
66
26
Quercus phellos
51
Stems/Acre
1052
55
Average Height (cm)
57.7
55
Average Height (ft)
1.9
59
Appendix C. Vegetation Assessment Data
Random Plot 2
#
Species
Height (cm)
1
Quercus michauxii
58
2
Quercus lyrata
60
3
Taxodium distichum
62
4
Quercus michauxii
57
5
Platanus occidentalis
40
6
Platanus occidentalis
61
7
Platanus occidentalis
50
8
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
40
9
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
45
10
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
40
11
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
60
12
Quercus phellos
62
13
Quercus phellos
41
14
Quercus lyrata
58
15
Platanus occidentalis
57
16
Platanus occidentalis
75
17
Platanus occidentalis
52
18
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
38
19
Platanus occidentalis
60
20
Platanus occidentalis
60
21
Quercus phellos
37
22
Quercus michauxii
55
23
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
35
Stems/Acre
931
55
Average Height (cm)
52.3
48
Average Height (ft)
1.7
57
Appendix C. Vegetation Assessment Data
Random Plot 3
#
Species
Height (cm)
1
Taxodium distichum
60
2
Quercus michauxii
54
3
Quercus lyrata
57
4
Quercus lyrata
51
5
Platanus occidentalis
66
6
Quercus michauxii
45
7
Nyssa sylvatica
51
8
Nyssa sylvatica
45
9
Quercus phellos
54
10
Quercus michauxii
45
11
Quercus michauxii
57
12
Nyssa sylvatica
55
13
Quercus phellos
52
14
Taxodium distichum
61
15
Quercus sp.
50
16
Quercus phellos
60
17
Quercus phellos
52
18
Nyssa sylvatica
60
19
Betula nigra
55
20
Betula nigra
60
21
Quercus sp.
60
22
Nyssa sylvatica
61
23
Quercus phellos
44
24
Taxodium distichum
55
25
Nyssa sylvatica
48
26
Taxodium distichum
57
27
Taxodium distichum
55
28
Taxodium distichum
55
29
Taxodium distichum
59
30
Nyssa sylvatica
62
31
Quercus phellos
65
Stems/Acre
1255
Average Height (cm)
55.2
Average Height (ft)
1.8

Appendix D
Stream Measurement and
Geomorphology Data

Upstream
Downstream
140.5
Polecat - Reach KZ2 - Cross Section 1 - Pool
140
139.5
139
138.5
— — — — — — — —
�
0
138
>
0
LU
137.5
137
136.5
136
0
10
MYO-2018
20
Distance (ft)
— — •Approx.Bankfull
30 40 50
FloodproneArea
Cross Section 1 (Pool)
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area
Base MY1
MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
138.9
Bankfull Width ft
11.9
Floodprone Width ft
50.1
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.4
Bankfall Max Depth ft
2.4
Low Bank Height ft
2.4
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (fl)
16.3
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
8.8
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
N/A
Bankf ill Bank Height Ratio
N/A

141
140.5
140
139.5
c
.6
139
W 138.5
138
137.5
137
Upstream
Polecat - Reach KZ2 - Cross Section 2 - Shallow
Downstream
0 10 20 30 40 50
Distance (ft)
MYO-2018 — — •Approx.Bankfull FloodproneArea
Cross Section 2 Shallow
Based on fixedlraseline cross sectional area
Base MYl MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
138.9
Bankfull Width (ft)
12.4
Floodprone Width (ft)
49.5
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.6
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.6
BankfullCross Sectional Area ft2
15.0
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
10.2
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
4.0
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1
1.0

Upstream
Downstream
Cross Section 3 Shallow
Polecat - Reach KZ2 - Cross Section 3 - Shallow
Base MYl MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
139
137.0
Bankfull Width (ft)
11.7
Floodprone Width (ft)
49.9
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
138.5
Bankfull MaxDepth (ft)
1.5
Low Bank Height (ft)
138
—
11.8
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
137.5
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratiol
4.3
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1
1.0
c
137
136.5
LU
136
135.5
135
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
MYO-2018 — — •Approx.Bankfull FloodproneArea
Cross Section 3 Shallow
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area
Base MYl MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
137.0
Bankfull Width (ft)
11.7
Floodprone Width (ft)
49.9
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.0
Bankfull MaxDepth (ft)
1.5
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.5
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
11.8
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
11.5
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratiol
4.3
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1
1.0

Upstream
Downstream
137.5
Polecat - Reach KZ3 - Cross Section 4 - Run
v
0
m
0
w
137
136.5
136
135.5
–
135
0 5 10 15
MYO-2018
20 25
Distance (ft)
— — •Approx.Bankfull
30 35 40 45 50
Floodprone Area
Cross Section 4 (Bun)
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area
Base MYl
MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
136.2
Bankfull Width (ft)
6.8
Floodprone Width (ft)
49.9
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.6
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.0
LowBank Height (ft)
1.0
Bankfull CrossSectional Area (ft2)
4.4
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
10.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratiol
7.3
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0

Upstream
Downstream
Cross Section 5 Shallow
Polecat - Reach KZ4 - Cross Section 5 - Shallow
Base MYl MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY]
138
135.5
Bankfull Width (ft)
16.3
Floodprone Width (ft)
74.2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
137.5
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.9
Low Bank Height (ft)
137
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (82)
17.0
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
136.5
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
4.5
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
136
c
135.5
.52
135
a�
W
134.5
134
133.5
133
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Distance (ft)
MYO-2018 — — •Approx.Bankfull FloodproneArea
Cross Section 5 Shallow
Basedon fixed baseline cross sectional area
Base MYl MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY]
Record elevation (datum) used
135.5
Bankfull Width (ft)
16.3
Floodprone Width (ft)
74.2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.0
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.9
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.9
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (82)
17.0
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
15.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
4.5
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0

Upstream
Downstream
137
Polecat - Reach KZ4 - Cross Section 6 - Pool
136
135
_ _ _
v
c
0
134
Lu
133
132
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75
Distance (ft)
MYO-2018 — — •Approx.Bankfull FloodproneArea
Cross Section 6 Pool
Basedon fixedbaseline cross sectional area
Base MYl MY2 MY3 MY5 MY 7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
135.2
Bankfull Width (ft)
13.4
Floodprone Width (ft)
72.2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.5
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.5
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.0
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
19.6
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
9.2
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
N/A

136
135
134
W
133
132 1
0
Upstream
Polecat - Reach KZ5 - Cross Section 7 - Shallow
5 10 15 20 25
Distance (ft)
MYO-2018 — — -Approx. Bankfull
�:war�w
Downstream
30 35 40 45 50
Floodprone Area
Cross Section 7 (Shallow)
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area
Base MYl MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
134.1
Bankfull Width (ft)
6.5
Flood rove Width (ft)
49.8
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.6
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.0
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.0
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
3.8
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
11.1
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratiol
7.7
Bankfull Bank Height Ratiol
1.0

Upstream
Downstream
137
Polecat - Reach KZ4 - Cross Section 8- Pool
iR
136
135
134
c
0
133
Lu
132
131
130
0 5 10 15 20 25
MYO-2018
30 35 40 45
Distance (ft)
— — •Approx.Bankfull
50 55 60 65 70 75 80
FloodproneArea
Cross Section 8 Pool
Basedon fixedbaseline bankfull elevation
Base MYl
MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
133.3
Bankfull Width (ft)
13.1
Floodprone Width (ft)
72.4
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.3
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.1
Low Bank Height (ft)
2.1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
16.7
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
10.4
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height RatiolN/A

Upstream
Downstream
136
Polecat - Reach KZ4 - Cross Section 9 - Shallow
x
c
0
135
134
133
w
132
131
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80
Distance (ft)
MYO-2018 — —-Approx. Bankfull FloodproneArea
Cross Section 9 Shallow
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area Base MYl MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used 133.4
Bankfull Width (ft) 13.3
Floodprone Width (ft) 76.4
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 1.2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 1.7
Low Bank Height (ft) 1.7
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2) 15.6
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 11.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratiol 5.8
Bankfull Bank Height Ratiol 1.0

Upstream
Downstream
137
Polecat - Reach KZ4 (EI) - Cross Section 10 - Shallow
0
136
135
134
133
132
131
130
0 5 10 15
MYO-2018
20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
— —-Approx.Bankfull FloodproneArea
Cross Section 10 Shallow
Bas ed on fixed baseline cross sectional area
Base MY] MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
132.6
Bankfull Width (ft)
8.5
Flood rove Width (ft)
27.8
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.7
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.7
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (f42)
10.0
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
7.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
3.3
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0

Upstream
Downstream
134
Polecat - Reach KZ6 - Cross Section 11 - Shallow
133
132
x
o
.6
131
— — —
— —
— —
w
130
129
0 5 10 15
MYO-2018
20 25
Distance (ft)
— —-Approx.Bankfull
30 35 40 45 50
FloodproneArea
Cross Section 11 (Shallow)
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area
Base MYl
MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
131.7
Bankfull Width (ft)
13.1
Floodprone Width (ft)
48.6
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.2
Bankfull MaxDepth (ft)
1.7
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.7
Bankfull Cro s s Sectional Area (ft2)
15.1
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
11.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 1
3.7
Bankfull Bank Height Ratiol
1.0

134
133
132
c
131
a�
LU 130
129
128 L
0
Upstream
Polecat - Reach KZ6 - Cross Section 12 - Pool
Downstream
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Distance (ft)
MYO-2018 — — •Approx.Bankfull Floodprone Area
45 50
Cross Section 12(Pool)
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area
Base MYl MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) use
130.8
Bankfull Width (ft)
10.7
Floodprone Width (ft)
45.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.3
BankfullMaxDepth (ft)
1.9
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.9
BankfullCross Sectional Area (ft2)
13.7
BankfuH Width/Depth Ratio
8.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio I
N/A

Upstream
Downstream
134
Polecat - Reach KZ6 - Cross Section 13 - Shallow
c
0
w131
133
132
130
129
— — — — —
—
— — — — — — — — — —
— — —
— —
0 5 10 15
MYO-2018
20 25
Distance (ft)
— —- Approx.Bankfull
30 35 40 45 50
FloodproneArea
Cross Section 13 (Shallow)
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area
Base MY]
MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY—
Record elevation (datum) used
131.1
Bankfull Width (ft)
12.5
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.3
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.9
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.9
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
14.7
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
10.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
4.0
BankfullBank Height Ratio!
1.0

Upstream
,..- .A
i.
Downstream
132
Polecat - Reach KZ6 - Cross Section 14 - Pool
c
131
130
129
a�
Lu
128
127
126
0 5 10 15
MYO-2018
20 25
Distance (ft)
— — •Approx.Bankfull
30 35 40 45 50
Floodprone Area
Cross Section 14 Pool
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation
Base MYl
MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
129.6
BankfuH Width (ft)
14.0
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.9
BankfullMax Depth (ft)
2.8
Low Bank Height (ft)
2.8
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
263
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
7.5
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
N/A

Upstream
Downstream
132
Polecat - Reach KZ6 - Cross Section 15 - Shallow
x
c
0
W
131
130
129
128
—
–
—
127
0 5 10 15
MYO-2018
20 25
Distance (ft)
— —-Approx.Bankfull
30 35 40 45 50
FloodproneArea
Cross Section 15 (Shallow)
Basedon fixedbaseline cross sectional area
Base MYl
MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY]
Record elevation (datum) used
129.3
Bankfull Width (ft)
14.0
Flood rove Width (ft)
50.1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.3
Bankfull Max Depth (8)
2.0
Low Bank Height (ft)
2.0
BankfullCross Sectional Area (ft2)
18.1
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
10.8
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 1
3.6
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1
1.0

Upstream
Downstream
Polecat - Reach M11 - Cross Section 16 - Shallow
132
131
130
x
c
129
__ __
a�
W
128
127
126
0 5 10 15
20 25
30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
MYO-2018
— —-Approx. Bankfull
Floodprone Area
Cross Section 16 1 Shallow
Basedonfixe dbas elinebank fulIelevation
Base MYl
MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY]
Record elevation (datum) used
128.9
Bankfull Width (ft)
14.1
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.4
BankfullMaxDe th(ft)
2.1
Low Bank Height (ft)
2.1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
19.9
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
10.0
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
3.5
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0

Upstream
Downstream
Cross Section 17(Pool)
Polecat - Reach M11 - Cross Section 17 - Pool
Base MYl MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
131
128.8
Bankfull Width (ft)
14.3
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.7
Bankfull MaxDepth (ft)
130
—
2.6
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
24.5
Bankftrll Width/Depth Ratio
8.3
Bankfull Fntrenchment Ratio
N/A
Bankftrll Bank Height Ratio I
129
c
76
128
OF
LU
127
126
125
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
MYO-2018 — — •Approx.Bankfull Floodprone Area
Cross Section 17(Pool)
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area
Base MYl MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Recordelevution (datum) used
128.8
Bankfull Width (ft)
14.3
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.7
Bankfull MaxDepth (ft)
2.6
Low Bank Height (ft)
2.6
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
24.5
Bankftrll Width/Depth Ratio
8.3
Bankfull Fntrenchment Ratio
N/A
Bankftrll Bank Height Ratio I
N/A

Upstream
Downstream
Cross Section 18 Pool
Polecat - Reach M11 - Cross Section 18 - Pool
Base MYl MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY]
128
126.3
Bankfull Width (ft)
12.7
Floodprone Width (ft)
51.7
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
4.1
127
2.6
LOW Bank Height (ft)
2.6
BankfullCross Sectional Area (ft2)
19.0
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
126
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
N/A
c
0
125
LU
124
123
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
MYO-2018 — — •Approx.Bankfull FloodproneArea
Cross Section 18 Pool
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation
Base MYl MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY]
Record elevation (datum) used
126.3
Bankfull Width (ft)
12.7
Floodprone Width (ft)
51.7
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
4.1
Bankfull MaxDepth (ft)
2.6
LOW Bank Height (ft)
2.6
BankfullCross Sectional Area (ft2)
19.0
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
8.5
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
N/A

129
128
127
c
O
a 126
W
125
124
Upstream
Polecat - Reach Mill - Cross Section 19 - Shallow
0 5 10 15 20 25
Distance (ft)
MYO-2018 — — -Approx. Bankfull
J.
Downstream
30 35 40 45 50
Floodprone Area
Cross Section 19 Shallow
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area
Base MYl MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY]
Record elevation (datum) used
126.4
Bankfull Width (ft)
14.8
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.1
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.7
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.7
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
16.6
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
13.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratiol
3.4
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0

128
127
126
c
125
a�
LU 124
123
122
Upstream
Polecat - Reach Mill - Cross Section 20 - Pool
Downstream
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Distance (ft)
MYO-2018 — — •Approx.Bankfull FloodproneArea
m�
45 50
Cross Section 20 Pool
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area
Base MYl MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY[
Record elevation (datum) used
125.5
Bankfull Width (ft)
12.7
Floodprone Width (ft)
-
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.6
BankfullMaxDepth (ft)
2.5
Low Bank Height (ft)
2.5
BankfullCross Sectional Area (ft2)
20.5
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
7.9
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
N/A

Upstream
Downstream
128
Polecat - Reach Mil - Cross Section 21 - Shallow
a
c
o
W
127
126
125
124
123
�
0 5 10 15
MYO-2018
20 25
Distance (ft)
— —-Approx. Bankfull
30 35 40 45 50
Floo 1prone Area
Cross Section 21 Shallow
Based on fixedbaseline cross sectional area
Base MYl
MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
125.3
Bankfull Width (ft)
12.9
Floodprone Width (ft)
49.9
BankfullMean Depth (ft)
1.1
Bankfull MaxDe th (ft)
1.7
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.7
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
14.2
Bankfull W idth/Depth Ratio
11.8
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
3.9
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0

Upstream
Downstream
128
Polecat - Reach M11 (Reconnected Channel) - Cross Section 22 - Run
c
0
W
127
126
125
124
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _
_ _ _ _
123
0 5 10
Baseline
15 20 25 30 35
Distance (ft)
— —-Approx. Bankfull FloodproneArea
Cross Section 22 Run
Bas ed on fixed baseline cross sectional area
Base MYl
MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
124.9
BankfullWidth (ft)
11.6
Floodprone Width (ft)
32.9
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.4
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.8
Low Bank Height (ft)
0.8
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
4.7
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
28.6
Bankfull Fntrenchment Ratioll
2.8
Bankfull Bank Height Ratiol
1.0

Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
* - Reach was split into 4 segments for the purpose of pre-existing data collection.
1 - The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile. 2 - For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in-line with the project reach (added hankfult verification - rare).
3. Utilizing XS measurement data produce an estimate of the bankfull Floodplain area in acres, which should be the area from the top of bank to the toe of the terrace riser/slope.
4 - Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5. Ofvalue/needed only if the n exceeds 3
Table 8. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Polecat Mitigation Site - Reaches KZ2, KZ4, KZ6, M11:
5,203 feet
Parameter Gauge Regional Curve
Pre -Existing Condition*
Reference Reach(es) Data
Design
Monitoring Baseline
Dimension and Substrate - Shallow Only
LL UL Eq.
Min
Mean Med Max SD
n
Min Mean Med
Max SD
n Min
Med
Max
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
--- --- ---
8.1
11.3 11.9 13.6 2.0
6
--- --- 12.2
--- ---
--- 7.0
13.2
14.0
11.6
13.3
13.1
16.3
1.4
11
Floodprone Width ft
16.0
24.0 24.0 30.0 5.5
6
--- --- >50
--- ---
--- 27.0
30.0
31.0
>32.9
>52.9
>50
>76.4
12.2
11
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
--- --- ---
1.0
1.4 1.4 1.7 0.3
6
--- --- 1.0
--- ---
--- 1.1
1.3
1.4
0.4
1.1
1.2
1.4
0.3
11
lBankfull Max Depth ft
1.4
1.9 2.0 2.4 0.4
6
--- --- 2.3
--- ---
--- 1.4
1.6
1.8
0.8
1.7
1.7
2.1
0.3
11
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)1
-- --- --
12.0
1 14.8 1 15.1 1 18.2 1 2.5 1
6
--- I --- 1 12.2
1 --- I --- I
--- 13.2
1 16.6 1
19.3
1 4.7
14.8
1 15.1
19.9
4.0
11
Width/Depth Ratio
4.7
8.9 9.9 11.8 3.1
6
---td12.1
--- ---
--- 10.2
10.5
10.9
10.0
13.2
11.3
28.6
5.4
11
Entrenchment Ratio
1.2
2.2 2.1 3.1 0.7
6
--- >2.2
--- ---
--- >2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.8
>4.0
>3.9
>5.8
0.8
11
'Bank Height Rati
---
--- --- --- ---
---------
-- ---
--
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.0
11
Profile
Shallow Length (ft)
4
--- 7.5 16 ---
---
2 --- 7.5
22 ---
--- 5
14.5
27
21.8
20.3
62.6
11.8
70
Shallow Slope (ft/ft)
---
--- --- --- ---
---
--- --- ---
--- ---
--- ---
---
---
0.0058
0.0050
0.07613 0.01189
70
Pool Length (ft)
3
--- 10 26 ---
---
3 --- 10
41 ---
--- 4
22.5
47
E26707
19.5
17.7
44.1
10.3
72
Pool Max depth (ft)
---
--- --- --- ---
---
--- --- ---
--- ---
--- ---
---
---
2.5
2.6
3.3
0.5
71
Pool Spacing (ft)
21
--- 39.5 67 ---
---
5 --- 34
47 ---
--- 30
45
64
71.1
67.4
333.4
42.1
69
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
23
--- 30 52 ---
---
--- --- ---
--- ---
--- 31
59
95
31
---
59
95
---
Radius of Curvature (ft)
9
--- 15 45 ---
---
--- --- ---
--- ---
--- 15
72.5
149
15
---
72.5
149
---
---
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
---
--- --- --- ---
---
--- --- ---
--- ---
--- ---
---
---
---
---
--
---
Meander Wavelength (ft)
50
--- 57 151 ---
---
--- --- ---
--- ---
--- 62
185
347
62
185
347
---
---
Meander Width Ratio
1.8
--- 2.8 4.3 ---
---
--- ---
--- ---
--- 4
8
12
4
---
8
12
---
---
Transport parameters
Reach Shear Stress (competency) Ib/f2
---
---
---
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
--
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/m2
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
E4 / C4 / G4c / G5 / E4 / E5
E4/5
E4 / E5
E4 / E5
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
---
---
20-25
---
---
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
--- ---
---
19 / 30 / 32 / 34
Valley length (ft)
513/1136/1170/1936
901
513/1136/1170/1936
---
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
556/1193/1287/1958
1074
621 / 1281 / 1264 / 2286
---
Sinuosity (ft)
1.08 / 1.05 / 1.1 / 1.01
1.19
1.21 / 1.13 / 1.08 / 1.18
1.07
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.0032 / 0.0042 / 0.0028 / 0.0057
0.008
---
---
Channel slope (ft/ft)
0.0017 / 0.0038 / 0.0022 / 0.0051
0.008
0.0023 / 0.0021
0.0028
3Bankfull Floodplain Area acres
---
---
---
---
4% of Reach with Eroding Banksl
I-
-
Channel Stability or Habitat Metrici
I-
-
-
Biological or Otherl
I-
-
- -
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
* - Reach was split into 4 segments for the purpose of pre-existing data collection.
1 - The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile. 2 - For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in-line with the project reach (added hankfult verification - rare).
3. Utilizing XS measurement data produce an estimate of the bankfull Floodplain area in acres, which should be the area from the top of bank to the toe of the terrace riser/slope.
4 - Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5. Ofvalue/needed only if the n exceeds 3

Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
I - The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile. 2 - For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in-line with the project reach (added bankfull verification - rare).
3. Utilizing XS measurement data produce an estimate of the bankfull Floodplain area in acres, which should be the area from the top ofbank to the toe of the terrace riser/slope.
4 - Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5. Ofvalue/needed only if the n exceeds 3
Table 8. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Polecat Mitigation Site - Reach KZ3: 183 feet
Parameter Gauge' Regional Curve
Pre -Existing Condition
Reference Reach(es) Data
Design
Monitoring Baseline
Dimension and Substrate - Shallow Only
LL UL Eq.
Min Mean Med Max SD
n Min Mean Med Max SD
n Min Med Max
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
--- --- ---
--- --- 3.0 --- ---
--- --- --- --- --- ---
--- --- 7.0 ---
---
---
6.8 ---
---
---
Floodprone Width (ft)
--- --- 6.0 --- ---
--- --- --- --- --- ---
--- --- >16 ---
---
49.9
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
--- --- --
--- --- 1.1 --- ---
--- --- --- --- --- ---
--- --- 0.6 ---
---
--
0.6 ---
---
---
'Bankfull Max Depth ft
--- 1.4 --- ---
--- --- --- --- --- ---
--- --- 0.8 ---
---
---
1.0
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft'
-- --- --
-- -- 3.3 1 --- I ---
I --- --- I --- --- --- --
--- --- 1 4.4 1 ---
--
4.4
Width/Depth Ratio
--- --- 2.7 --- ---
--- --- --- --- ---
--- --- 7.4 ---
---
---
10.6 ---
---
---
Ratio
EntrenHHh
--- 2.0 ---
--- --- --- ---
>2.2 ---
---
7.3
Bank Rati
- -- --- --- ---
-- --- -- - -- --
---
---
1.0 ---
---
---
Profile
Shallow Length (ft)
--- --- --- --- ---
--- --- --- --- --- ---
--- --- --- ---
4.9
9.0
8.0 15.0
4.5
4
Shallow Slope (ft/ft)
--- --- --- --- ---
--- --- --- --- --- ---
--- --- --- ---
-0.00879
0.00783
0.00681 0.02651 0.01464
4
Pool Length (ft)
--- --- --- --- ---
--- --- --- --- --- ---
--- --- --- ---
3.0
5.5
4.8 9.2
2.7
4
Pool Max depth (ft)
--- --- --- --- ---
--- --- --- --- --- ---
--- --- --- ---
1.4
1.6
1.6 1.9
0.2
4
Pool Spacing (ft)
--- --- --- --- ---
--- --- --- --- --- ---
--- --- --- ---
15.4
28.8
24.4 46.5
16.0
3
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
--- --- --- --- ---
-- --- --- --- --- ---
--- --- --- ---
---
---
--- ---
---
---
Radius of Curvature (ft)
--- --- --- --- ---
--- --- --- --- --- ---
-- --- --- ---
---
---
--- ---
---
---
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
--- --- --- --- ---
--- --- --- --- --- ---
--- --- --
---
---
---
Meander Wavelength (ft)
--- --- --- --- ---
--- --- --- --- -- ---
--- --- --- ---
---
---
--- ---
---
---
Meander Width Ratio
--- --- --- --- ---
--- --- --- --- -- ---
-- --- --- ---
---
---
--- ---
---
---
Transport parameters
Reach Shear Stress (competency) Ib/f'
---
---
---
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
--
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/m'
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
G5
---
E5
Bankfull Velocity (fps) ---
Bankfull Discharge (cfs) ---
---
6
Valley length (ft)
471
---
174
---
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
476
---
183
---
Sinuosity (ft)
1.01
---
1.05
1.03
Water Surface Slope(Channel) ft
---
---
--
---
Channel slope (ft/ft)
0.0085
---
0.0042
0.0063
3Bankfull Floodplain Area acres
---
---
---
---
4% of Reach with Eroding Bank
---
---
Channel Stability or Habitat Metrici I-
-
-
Biological or Other!
---
---
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
I - The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile. 2 - For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in-line with the project reach (added bankfull verification - rare).
3. Utilizing XS measurement data produce an estimate of the bankfull Floodplain area in acres, which should be the area from the top ofbank to the toe of the terrace riser/slope.
4 - Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5. Ofvalue/needed only if the n exceeds 3

Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
I - The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile. 2 - For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in-line with the project reach (added bankfull verification - rare).
3. Utilizing XS measurement data produce an estimate of the bankfull Floodplain area in acres, which should be the area from the top ofbank to the toe of the terrace riser/slope.
4 - Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5. Ofvalue/needed only if the n exceeds 3
Table 8. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Polecat Mitigation Site - Reach KZ5: 152 feet
Parameter Gauge Regional Curve
Pre -Existing Condition
Reference Reach(es) Data
Design
Monitoring Baseline
Dimension and Substrate - Shallow Only
LL UL Eq.
Min Mean Med Max SD
n Min Mean Med Max SD
n Min Med
Max Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
--- --- --
--- 4.6 --- ---
--- --- --- --- --- ---
--- --- 6.0
--- ---
---
6.5
---
Floodprone Width (ft)
--- --- 8.0 --- ---
--- --- --- --- --- ---
--- --- >14
--- ---
>49.8
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
--- --- --
--- --- 0.5 --- ---
--- --- --- --- --- ---
--- --- 0.7
--- ---
--
0.6 ---
---
---
'Bankfull Max Depth ft
--- 1.0 --- ---
--- --- --- --- --- ---
--- --- 0.9
--- ---
---
1.0
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)1
--- --- --
-- -- 2.2 1 --- I ---
I --- --- ---
4.1
3.8
Width/Depth Ratio
9.8 --- ---
--- --- --- --- ---
--- ---
--- ---
---
11.1 ---
---
---
Ratio
EntrenHHh
--- 5.4 ---
--- --- --- ---
t22
---
>7.7
Bank Rati
- -- --- --- ---
-- --- -- - -- ---
--- ---
1.0 ---
---
---
Profile
Shallow Length (ft)
--- --- --- --- ---
--- --- --- --- --- ---
--- --- ---
---
9.7
8.7 13.7
2.7
4
Shallow Slope (ft/ft)
--- --- --- --- ---
--- --- --- --- --- ---
--- --- ---
--- 78
0.01047 0.01069 0.01571
0.0051
4
Pool Length (ft)
--- --- --- --- ---
--- --- --- --- --- ---
--- --- ---
---
E26.8
5.6
5.3 9.2
3.5
3
Pool Max depth (ft)
--- --- --- --- ---
--- --- --- --- --- ---
--- --- ---
---
1.4
1.5 1.5
0.2
3
Pool Spacing (ft)
--- --- --- --- ---
--- --- --- --- --- ---
--- --- ---
---
41.4
41.4 56.1
20.8
2
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
--- ---
--- ----- --- --- ---
--- --- ---
--- ---
---
--- ---
---
---
Radius of Curvature (ft)
--- ---
--- --- --- --- --- ---
--- -----
--- ---
---
--- ---
---
---
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
--- --- --- --- ---
--- --- --- --- --- ---
--- --- --
---
--
---
Meander Wavelength (ft)
--- ---
--- --- --- --- --- --
--- --- ---
--- ---
---
--- ---
---
---
Meander Width Ratio
--- ---
--- --- --- --- --- ---
--- -----
--- ---
---
--- ---
---
---
Transport parameters
Reach Shear Stress (competency) Ib/f2
---
---
---
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
--
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/m2
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
G5
---
E5
E5
Bankfull Velocity (fps) ---
Bankfull Discharge (cfs) ---
---
4
Valley length (ft)
473
---
148
---
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
482
---
152
---
Sinuosity (ft)
1.02
---
1.03
1.06
Water Surface Slope(Channel) ft
---
---
--
---
Channel slope (ft/ft)
0.0096
---
0.0034
0.0079
3Bankfull Floodplain Area acres
---
---
---
---
4% of Reach with Eroding Bank
---
---
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
- -
-
Biological or Other!-
-
- -
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
I - The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile. 2 - For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in-line with the project reach (added bankfull verification - rare).
3. Utilizing XS measurement data produce an estimate of the bankfull Floodplain area in acres, which should be the area from the top ofbank to the toe of the terrace riser/slope.
4 - Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5. Ofvalue/needed only if the n exceeds 3

* Annual measurements are based on fixed baseline cross sectional area.
Table 9. Cross Section Morphology Data Table
Polecat Site
Cross Section 1 (Pool)
Cross Section 2 (Shallow)
Cross Section 3 (Shallow)
Cross Section 4 (Run)
Cross Section 5 (Shallow)
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area.
Base
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7
MY+
Base
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7
MY+ Base
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7
MY+
Base
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7
MY+
Base
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
138.9
138.9
137.0
136.2
135.5
Bankfull Width (ft)
11.9
12.4
11.7
6.8
16.3
Floodprone Width (ft) >50.1
>49.5
>49.9
>49.9
>74.2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.4
1.2
1.0
0.6
1.0
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.4
1.6
1.5
LO
1.9
Low Bank Height (ft)
2.4
1.6
1.5
1.0
1.9
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (fe)
16.3
15.0
11.8
4.4
17.0
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
8.8
10.2
11.5
10.6
15.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
N/A
>4.0
>4.3
>7.3
>4.5
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
N/A
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Cross Section 6 (Pool)
Cross Section 7 (Shallow)
Cross Section 8 (Pool)
Cross Section 9 (Shallow)
Cross Section 10 (Shallow)
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area*
Base
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7
MY+
Base
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7
MY+ Base
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7
MY+
Base
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7
MY +
Base
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
135.2
134.1
133.3
133.4
132.6
Bankfull Width (ft)
13.4
6.5
13.1
1 13.3
8.5
Floodprone Width (ft) >72.2
>49.8
>72.4
>76.4
>27.8
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.5
0.6
1.3
L2
1.2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.5
1.0
2.1
1.7
1.7
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.0
1.0
2.1
1.7
1.7
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2
19.6
3.8
16.7
15.6
10.0
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
9.2
11.1
10.4
1 L3
7.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
N/A
>7.7
N/A
>5.8
>3.3
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
N/A
LO
N/A
1.0
1.0
Cross Section 11 (Shallow)
Cross Section 12 (Pool)
Cross Section 13 (Shallow)
Cross Section 14 (Pool)
Cross Section 15 (Shallow)
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area.
Base
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7
MY+
Base
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7
MY+ Base
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7
MY+
Base
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7
MY+
Base
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
131.7
130.8
131.1
129.6
129.3
Bankfull Width ft
3.1
10.7
12.5
14.0
14.0
Floodprone Width ft
>48.6
>45
>50.3
>50.1
>50.1
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.2
1.3
1.2
1.9
1.3
Bankfull Max Depth ft
1.7
1.9
1.9
2.8
2.0
Low Bank Height ft
1.7
1.9
1.9
2.8
2.0
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ftp
15.1
13.7
14.7
26.3
18.1
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
11.3
8.3
10.6
7.5
10.8
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>3.7
N/A
>4.0
N/A
>3.6
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
N/A
1.0
N/A
1.0
Cross Section 16 (Shallow)
Cross Section 17 (Pool)
Cross Section 18 (Pool)
Cross Section 19 (Shallow)
Cross Section 20 (Pool)
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area*
Base
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7
MY+
Base
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7
MY+ Base
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7
MY+
Base
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7
MY+
Base
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
128.9
128.8
126.3
126.4
125.5
Bankfull Width ft
14.1
14.3
12.7
14.8
12.7
Floodprone Width ft
>50
>50
>51.7
>50.1
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.4
1.7
4.1
1.1
1.6
Bankfull Max Depth ft
2.1
1 1 1
2.6 1
1 1 1
2.6 1
1 1
1.7
1 1 1
2.5
Low Bank Height ft
2.1
2.6
2.6
1.7
2.5
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (fe)
19.9
24.5
19.0
16.6
20.5
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
10.0
8.3
8.5
13.3
7.9
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>3.5
N/A
N/A
>3.4
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
N/A
N/A
1.0
N/A
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area*
Record elevation (datum) used
Bankfull Width ft
Floodprone Width ft
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
Bankfull Max Depth ft
Low Bank Height ft
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (fe)
Bankfull Width/De th Ratio
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
Base
125.3
12.9
>49.9
1.1
1.7 1
1.7
14.2
11.8
>3.9
1.0
Cross Section 21 (Shallow)
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7
1 1 1
MY+
Base
124.9
11.6
>32.9
0.4
0.8
0.8
4.7
28.6
>2.8
1.0
Cross Section 22 (Run)
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7
MY+
* Annual measurements are based on fixed baseline cross sectional area.

Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3
Table 10. Stream Reach Data Summary
Polecat Mitigation Site - Reaches KZ2, KZ4, KZ6, Mll: 5,203 feet
Parameter
Baseline
MY-1
MY-2
MY- 3
MY- 5
MY- 7
Dimension and Substrate -Shallow only Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n Min Mean Med Max SID
n
Min Mean Med Max SID n
Min Mean Med Max SID n
Min Mean Med Max SID n
Min Mean Med Max SID n
Bankfull Width (ft) 11.6
13.3
13.1 16.3
1.4
11
Floodprone Width (ft) >32.9
>52.9
>50 >76.4
12.2
11
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.4
1.1
1.2 1.4
0.3
11
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 0.8
1.7
1.7 2.1
0.3
11
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (fe) 4.7 1
14.8
15.1 19.9
4.0
11
Width/Depth Ratio 10.0
13.2
11.3 28.6
5.4
11
Entrenchment Rati >2.8
>4.0
>3.9 >5.8
0.8
11
'Bank Height Rati 1.0
1.0
1.0 1 1.0
1 0.0
11
Profile
Shallow Length (ft) 4.59
21.83
20.31 62.62
11.81
70
Shallow Slope (ft/ft) -0.02
0.006
0.005 0.076
0.012
70
Pool Length (ft) 3.75
19.47
17.74 44.13
10.32
72
Pool Max depth (ft) 1.364
2.499
2.554 3.321
0.457
71
Pool Spacing (ft)l 26.73171.12167.451333.4142.151
69
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft) 31
---
59 95
---
Radius of Curvature (ft) 15
---
72.5 149
---
---
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft) ---
---
--- ---
---
---
Meander Wavelength (ft) 62
185
347
---
---
Meander Width Ratio 4 1
Additional Reach Parameters
--- 1
8 1 12
1-
Rosgen Classification
E4 / E5
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
---
Sinuosity (ft)
1.07
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
---
Channel slope (ft/ft)
0.0028
RI% / Ru% / P% / G% / S% ---
---
--- ---
SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95
2% of Reach with Eroding Bank
---
Channel Stability or Habitat Metri
---
Biological or Othe
---
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3

Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3
Table 10. Stream Reach Data Summary
Polecat Mitigation Site - Reach KZ3: 183 feet
Parameter
Baseline
MY-1
MY-2
MY- 3
MY- 5
MY- 7
Dimension and Substrate -Shallow only
Min
Mean
Med Max
SID
n
Min Mean Med Max SID n
Min
Mean Med Max SID n
Min Mean Med Max SD n
Min Mean Med Max SID n
Min Mean Med Max SID n
Bankfull Width (ft)
---
---
6.8 ---
---
---
Floodprone Width (ft)
---
---
49.9 ---
---
---
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
---
---
0.6 ---
---
---
'Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
---
---
1.0 --
---
---
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (fe)
---
---
4.4 ---
---
---
Width/Depth Ratio
---
---
10.6 ---
---
---
Entrenchment Ratio
---
---
>7.3 ---
---
---
IBank Height Rati
--
---
1.0 ---
---
---
Profile
Shallow Length (ft) 4.89
Shallow Slope (ft/ft) -0.01
Pool Length (ft) 3
Pool Max depth (ft) 1.446
Pool Spacing (ft)l 15.38128.76124.42146.491
8.975 8.02 14.97
0.008 0.007 0.027
5.465 4.815 9.23
1.615 1.569 1.876
4.486
0.015
2.694
0.185
16 1
4
4
4
4
3
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
---
---
--- ---
---
---
Radius of Curvature (ft)
---
---
--- ---
---
---
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
---
---
--- ---
---
---
Meander Wavelength (ft)
---
---
--- ---
---
---
Meander Width Ratio
--
--
-- --
---
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
---
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
---
Sinuosity (ft)
1.03
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
---
Channel slope (ft/ft)
0.0063
RI% / Ru% / P% / G% / S%
------
--- ---
--
SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95
Z% of Reach with Eroding Bank
---
Channel Stability or Habitat Metri
---
Biological or Othe
---
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3

Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3
Table 10. Stream Reach Data Summary
Polecat Mitigation Site - Reach KZ5: 152 feet
Parameter
Baseline
MY-1
MY-2
MY- 3
MY- 5
MY- 7
Dimension and Substrate -Shallow only Min
Mean
Med Max
SID
n
Min Mean Med Max SID n
Min
Mean Med Max SID n
Min Mean Med Max SID n
Min Mean Med Max SID n
Min Mean Med Max SID n
Bankfull Width (ft) ---
---
6.5 ---
---
---
Floodprone Width (ft) ---
---
>49.8 ---
---
---
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) ---
---
0.6 ---
---
---
'Bankfull Max Depth (ft) ---
---
1.0 --
---
---
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (fe) ---
---
3.8 ---
---
---
Width/Depth Ratio ---
---
11.1 ---
---
---
Entrenchment Ratio ---
---
>7.7 ---
---
---
Bank Height Rati --
---
1.0 ---
---
---
Profile
Shallow Length (ft) 7.88
Shallow Slope (ft/ft)0.005
Pool Length (ft) 2.16
Pool Max depth (ft) 1.186
Pool Spacing (ft)l 26.76141.44141.44156.12120.761
9.723
0.01
5.553
1.408
8.665 13.68
0.011 0.016
5.35 9.15
1.506 1.532
2.677
0.005
3.499
0.193
4
4
3
3
2
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft) ---
---
--- ---
---
Radius of Curvature (ft) ---
---
--- ---
---
---
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft) ---
---
--- ---
---
---
Meander Wavelength (ft) ---
---
--- ---
---
---
LL
Meander Width Ratio ---
6mm
---
--- ---
---
---
I I I
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
E5
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
---
Sinuosity (ft)
1.06
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
---
Channel slope (ft/ft)
0.0079
RI% / Ru% / P% / G% / S% ------
--- ---
--
SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95
Z% of Reach with Eroding Bank
---
Channel Stability or Habitat Metri
---
Biological or Othe
---
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3

Appendix E
As -Built Plan Sheets

POLECAT STREAM
MITIGATION PROJECT
JOHNSTON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
NEUSE RIVER BASIN:
CU 03020201
AS -BUILT SURA/EY
2509
2507 2508
2509 2510
SITE
1007 2561
1007
2508 2511
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
PROJECT COORDINATES:
LATITUDE: 35.47541' N
LONGITUDE' 78.31173' W
PROJECT
DIRECTORY
DESIGNER:
MONITORING PERFORMERS•
W. K. DICKSON
RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, LLC
720 CORPORATE CENTER DR.
302 JEFFERSON ST•, SUITE 110
RALEIGH, NC 27607
RALEIGH. NC 2760
(919) 782--0495
(979)209-•7061
COFISTRUCTICIN CONTR4CTOR•
WRIGHT CONTRACTING, LLC
SURVE17NG:
MATRIX EAST, PLLC
8? 1 ARCHE JOHNSON ROAD
906 N. QUEEN ST., SUITE A
S1LER CITY, NC 27344
KWSTON, NC 28501
[phone]
(252)522--2500
�AI(c
NEU—CON WETLAND & STREAM
j%wK SPONSOR
FDX NEUSE L LLC
UMBRELLA BANK
�I=Z
302 JEFFERSON Sr_ SU17E
110
a0
RALEIGH, NC 27605
c
[phone]
0
SHEET INDEX
COVER SHEET S?
LEGEND, (VOTES, & CROSS SECTION CONTROL SZ
STREAM BASELINE OVERVIEW S3
STREAM MONITORING OVERVIEW S4
STREAM BASELINE AS-BUILTS S5 THROUGH S14
CROSS-SECTION CHARTS S15
�w
���`p4S'�'rcSR+ �lrJrirrr
OF 0�4%-p
�
L4712
gCRty 0}
rLhlleFij� �11$1�Y
■
�3
Z
W
�7
Wp
�I=Z
a0
c
0
v
Z
-Z
�o
La
4%
-
L
�Z
20
n
N
_ l
="r]ryN y
X a
N N O ti
cN
0.
Q
6 ci
ooJa,
Lu
N
� Q
NW
u7
N
J
W
r
RESOURCE
ENVIRONMENTAL
SOLUTIONS,
INC.
302 JEFFERSON
ST., SUITE 110
RALEIGH, NC 27605
4'6LLCAT ASBUILT.DWG
uv.++ or oAs� aruicn
JRW 7 1 2918
sccr Ira
1 OF 15
'RODEO
JR'N
120150085
p vw NOL
sl
�.

BASELINE MONITORING CROSS SECTION CONTROL
DESCRIPTION
NORTHING
EASTING
ELEVATION
XS -01 LEFT PIN
628,352.69
2,206,349.07
140.19
XS -01 RIGHT PIN
628,387.24
2,206,312.92
139.51
XS -02 LEFT PIN
628,342.94
2,206,346.56
139.88
XS -02 RI GHT PI N
628,361.41
2,206, 300.53
139.74
XS -03 LEFT PIN
628,197.26
2,206,084.56
138.00
XS -03 RIGHT PIN
628,203.06
2,206,034.99
137.73
XS -04 LEFT PIN
628,039.41
2,205,866.33
137.37
XS -04 RIGHT PIN
628,088.21
2,205,877.57
136.51
XS -05 RIGHT PIN
628,216.39
2,205,638.60
136.43
XS -05/06 LEFT PIN
628,201.49
2,205,565.69
135.98
XS -06 LEFT PIN
628,273.36
2,205,565.15
135.48
XS -07 LEFT PIN
628,448.26
2,205,326.57
134.51
XS -07 RIGHT PIN
628,496.33
2,205,313.53
134.74
XS -08 RIGHT PIN
628,619.25
2,205,162.15
136.34
XS -08/09 LEFT PIN
628,541.12
2,205,152.60
134.71
XS -09 RIGHT PIN
628,617.61
2,205,138.78
135.69
XS -10 LEFT PIN
628,625.70
2,204,999.52
133.71
XS -10 RIGHT PIN
628,670.56
2,205,020.96
136.58
XS -11 LEFT PIN
628,718.23
2,204,772.40
132.44
XS -11 RIGHT PIN
628,747.75
2,204,812.93
133.70
XS -12 LEFT PIN
628,894.13
2,204,582.77
133.20
XS -12 RIGHT PIN
628,932.64
2,204,614.80
131.72
X5-13 LEFT PIN
628,935.80
2,204,560.13
131.89
X5-13 RIGHT PIN
628,953.10
2,204,607.07
131.91
X5-14 LEFT PIN
629,239.53
2,204,057.39
129.83
X5-14 RIGHT PIN
629,285.89
2,204,076.02
130.72
XS -15 LEFT PIN
629,236.18
2,204,030.65
130.20
X5-15 RIGHT PIN
629,285.79
2,204,025.10
130.83
X5--16 LEFT PIN
629,230.27
2,203,743.84
129.79
X5--16 RIGHT PIN
629,277.47
2,203,727.62
129.36
X5--17 LEFT PIN
629,235.18
2,203,675.45
129.51
XS -17 RI GHT PIN
629,274.02
2,203,706.87
129.28
X5--18 LEFT P I N
629,428.07
2,203,203.55
127.12
X5--18 RIGHT P IN
629,479.44
2,203,198.21
127.57
XS -19 LEFT PIN
629,436.37
2,203,148.76
126.99
XS -19 RIGHT PIN
629,485.26
2,203,159.05
127.15
XS -20 LEFT PIN
629,712.26
2,202,869.07
126.15
XS -20 RIGHT PIN
629,735.94
2,202,913.02
125.88
XS -21 LEFT PIN
629,753.56
2,202,864.15
125.78
XS -21 RIGHT PIN
629,748.03
2,202,913.79
125.77
XS -22 LEFT PIN
630,104.43
2,202,638.93
124.61
XS -22 RIGHT PIN
630,117.53
2,202,670.88
123.81
LEGEND
CIL = CENTERLINE
R/W = RIGHT OF WAY
N/F = NOW OR FORMERLY
CMP = CORRUGATED METAL, PIPE
TC = TERRA COTTA PIPE
RCP a REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE
XS = CROSS-SECTION
VP a VECETATTON PLOT
CG = CREST GAUGE
APG = AMBIENT PRESSURE GAUGE
LOG STRUCTURE
C=:; = LOG VALVE STRUCTURE
= LOG J -BOOK STRUCTURE
M - BRUSH roE-
I = RIFFLE GRADE CONTROL
® MEANDER BOULDER STRUCTURE
®= GRAVEL AREA
-LCE-= CONSERVATION EASEMENT LINE
ADJOINER BOUNDARY LINE
• �J,,, • WOODUNE
WIRE FENCE
n = WOOD FENCE
-R P- CHAIN LINK FENCE
e OVERHEAD UTLLITY LINE
FAU DSIM ES ARE "2LVr& 4aau,47 O6rMCE5 MM OtVEN01W NOM
2. ME M7MZOWr DATU i 6 W-W201IJ A&V Ng 1VRrpp, ZKR CS AMM aq
3. IN6 1 15 ACTT ra R{OOR&AiR.W, SNL(y OR CuaVvFYAY=
A R PlIRP0.5E of Ti NS MP •6 tv SNOW POSt maWftfJ IM AS-&M.r COA0n7:Aff Of
n "tAW Ra-W)NI ANO MY NOT &Valu ALL vrYm4 SMCTWE; *0
aooffiqmm
i NO FMXTRN "WE$ KTRE $Vft W gad V RY$ SWKY AU LYASIXdIXx1
EAnw&vf£ PRPPEWY !A'E£ ANp ALICAHRA^ PROPEAIY ORNEIPS ARE &Avm or PRYYK X6
SfAR'E]S 6f mmx E . F u RPLURb A' i .CHASM COMYrv>iYLsw.
SfK
.=n�H CIF rRJ�.9'=
c
SGU.
T4 Sear_
r _
��Itx
■
J
O
F
z
W
0umm
=
W
CC
ZW
N
a_
N
�Wa�
o
0
z
W
r
Z
W
_
MID
n
v
cv _
A
XL
m
a
N N N
x X
CN
V
F rM
aYI
o
oQC)
�W
zYN�H
fO N� J
O Orl Q
w
J `1
7
N
N
C4
w
RESOURCE
ENVIRONMENTAL
SOLUTIONS, INC.
302 JEFFERSON
ST., SUITE 110
RALEIGH, NC 27605
AA -G -A
POLECAT ASSUILT.D G
xr
jrRW
wrc sr.Rrm
7 2018
mrt* Ru
2 OF 15
?»CO
NAWNC No.
1JRW
scwc �3��M�
PAQCGT NG
SZ
20150085

riAALC carte MY
M
'
DB f82 J71
y PG 2
luxe a, rwwv
wYWe G fACYe iAl15t E8x-7k715[ t !iG
m I r, PC w -'• DBA
4,m pu lot
P9 12, PC 1Qr i8 fL^ JIY-
-9 Y!1 w
{ Cf
DR 46Mnguu et
P PcC ls
�i Pe n. ++c
+HF
DO
9 M S OCr]�1
- # S7S23 PCC SOS
Ally Lslr'MV
DR 5271, PO W
VR mu
I. PC so
212
7R 4TON
TO 15+93
70
70
K23
STOR47ON
P73 TO 8+56
= LJ712 _=
o
��i1111�
■
Wn
an
W W0ro
cc W IC
Z
IL
W CA
0
W
a a�
m � �
Z
Q
W W a
0
�
o -
L
z
0
n
n
I
N
is
�u] Ng
cv
c
N o
y
XL
V N
xx
2,?'
I
R
N U 4
a a
Hy
a
zacain
N
z
�
- W
Zylu-
N
H
u- J
�
0, I
�
.Id
N
N
Wi
W
H
RESOURCE
ENVIRONMENTAL
SOLUTIONS, INC.
302 JEFFERSON ST., SUITE
110
RALEIGH, NC 27605
ORANIHC NAPE
POLECAT ASUUILTA)WO
aee�w ar DATE sr.R.Ep
JRW 1 4 10t8
rs �[* 3 +b OF 15
ranrtrnEp
JRW
M—K..
S3
x
20150085

� AWLWq WFONat
off?04 GIIZCH WYCIIEU
w F&IJ pl; W
pv m PC 46
� mp
m�.V
PlAWIM rALMN
pe -wi. m jpd
pe m pa 45
CARLnW PV��
AKNCY ROOM DAU0ffDZr
Do ?J7. Po F42
cm%s� wsg�
ht?m A Arm
29 JWA po 192
-4.7
CAMON OVFRge
00 2951 PC
ovxmn L� a4umm"
0, 639. po 60
REACH JW? I
010 WA�H l7j
'tf� ks- 0
PI RESTORAWN
VA8+4%s
r4ft h%L
im- 0 OLP
STA 41497 M 64+67
anugm
DO Mt'� A
XZ4
rw:�
o& j:74�%� 7-m
3; PG 273
001M WW9 Of
840�a & CORBETr
112
00 0244 PC AV
43
VIP
AWN QLAUDE h%L
Ul
REACH KZ6
n- Da Wv' po "ps
PR REVORATION
SrA 29+29 TO 41+87
� W� mnuo&L
8ftwat cftwc" Wrcoqu
Be � �f
�17
17
,Alin ArLsav Affrewu
� 4w� wmkxu
W t= PC 46F
mmmT'll.m.
w Di� Fouw
PA"MW Wj
AtCE & DVIAM
va o8z - 114
Do f42f.
P�;
D6 Mi� PC MY
aWW4 AMMEW
AkE
DO 4W, FG W
ll -u
vp-rj ps 82, po 229
0 &Mw RfAcff xu
VP- f4
REACH KZ4
PlIP2 REST0124TAP)
STA 15+9J TO 71
w 4= po 822,
L't
Do 4AX Po 8"
P5 pv Rz vs
REAC Z5
1\11A
DO 46M PG 161
PH TZ PC fal
PC Pit PC 34;�,
fif
w 7w. PQ 342
SKVRM.% PARRWH
W-02
STEPHM 4AR9MO
1�k L� � som9W.?
OB 527P. PC 7#2
WV ...
M 3p;% PC �
Cc, REACH KZ2
P7 RESTORAWN
\,79-f-72 TO 15-P93
R CH K'2
p ' R� T"RA"ON
\:9 'o "5_p�
IA 72
r4
010 WA�H l7j
'tf� ks- 0
gk_l
VA8+4%s
r4ft h%L
im- 0 OLP
.51 N,�F
EARL M.4
jq&3� � 2"
P8 74 PG 4S
=pc
po 74 po
XZ4
o& j:74�%� 7-m
3; PG 273
sx-29.�
112
43
VIP
AWN QLAUDE h%L
Ul
do" �,p -P
n- Da Wv' po "ps
Lu CC
� � AXL
AU -00 CiAUW �
Do 4m PC 40
P3 76; PO 0
R4FACy KZJ
P2 RESTORAWN
STA 647J TO 8456
r A 4 0
110
EAL
L-4712
vi
Jill
2i
Ul
Lu CC
Z
0
a
z
0
Z
0
z
LLI
4%
0
mj
0
CL
E
z
z
20
OW)
j
<
X L
0 E
T3
LLJ
N
N
RESOURCE
ENVIRONMENTAL
SOLUTIONS,
INC.
302 JEFFERSON
ST.. SUITE' 110
RALEIGH, NC 27605
�� N�
POLECAT ASBUILT.DM
M�M � MM STM�
7/l/2018
4 OF
15
JRW
_S4
20150085

NFklf
a•n
lIIGGOm � -
�-0jjpl • � 55� � 1
1
,T--o,W 1
r
139 •� '
»OOOED
_�J 9 _rx—
��i�3Ji�3JT � ����SI� naoam
� E x5-GfRP
' dECaI Rf-ACYr KZi
r5+A7
--,,,--
__
o am ren
wAwzsvrAe sure'
r • ..w'
h S n S n
N w w v h h h
iso
145
140
135
130
'72S
wvrn^.u- .sour
r• . r
sF�
, \0', K IG A+grO�
�r0�pfw83�oy
ry
rA seal r; –
L3717 g
'r�8I6iY�Op �ti
1, fig
iirlr� •_••IwyA' c ``�.
■
W
W
m Z
aw L
Lu m
z0 Z0
W d
49 a 0
mz �Z
W4 ~ 0
H
N
V
�a�z
0
n
w
n
N
N
X L V1aoNN x
N ]t C) 'C
F I
w NL7 4 a o
FZZ tm--ft
F y
W Z [] T❑
- r2 W zYN� H
N l� J
CA
Q � Q
N W
W
F -
RESOURCE
ENVIRONMENTAL
SOLUTIONS, INC.
302 JEFFERSON ST., SUITE 110
RALEIGH, NC 27605
MANN N" - - -
POLECAT ASBUILT.DWG
JRW 7 1 M8 5 OF 15
Apphm ORAI Na
JRW
Sr r
vxuccr Na
zal5vas5
q
ISO
145
a
140
TUA
IS
135
130
125
��i�3Ji�3JT � ����SI� naoam
� E x5-GfRP
' dECaI Rf-ACYr KZi
r5+A7
--,,,--
__
o am ren
wAwzsvrAe sure'
r • ..w'
h S n S n
N w w v h h h
iso
145
140
135
130
'72S
wvrn^.u- .sour
r• . r
sF�
, \0', K IG A+grO�
�r0�pfw83�oy
ry
rA seal r; –
L3717 g
'r�8I6iY�Op �ti
1, fig
iirlr� •_••IwyA' c ``�.
■
W
W
m Z
aw L
Lu m
z0 Z0
W d
49 a 0
mz �Z
W4 ~ 0
H
N
V
�a�z
0
n
w
n
N
N
X L V1aoNN x
N ]t C) 'C
F I
w NL7 4 a o
FZZ tm--ft
F y
W Z [] T❑
- r2 W zYN� H
N l� J
CA
Q � Q
N W
W
F -
RESOURCE
ENVIRONMENTAL
SOLUTIONS, INC.
302 JEFFERSON ST., SUITE 110
RALEIGH, NC 27605
MANN N" - - -
POLECAT ASBUILT.DWG
JRW 7 1 M8 5 OF 15
Apphm ORAI Na
JRW
Sr r
vxuccr Na
zal5vas5

r 7
nco f �+ 301 30l7�37!
f 301 3n-- 3�7
-_ G9PD 7f, PO PC g
t -v _ _
•�� - ice%$^M!P V \ f / .135 f ~ ~ �. �._��_+ip -
�. rJT
_` 7dFildf xA ✓ rpm _ v — 1, rJ>'
22.00 _
555 �
`` xs-0iRP nGCr A74
1 �L AD&W AZ. x
ado W,6cyy
'7 I �� +y0 — •, _� r� ` _ ham]
MOW
137 ..�
_n�
145-
120
45-
140
135
130
F25
120
h S
S
$
S
h
$
}}
8
+
+
S
+
J
h
30 6D
nnerzoreru srv.5
co
+cil
+
"
W
a�"
145
140
Wff MP t r M K
C.
Z
�
W U)
Z 0
0
Lucc N
L+ L a
Z
Ci
m= a
0
err W OP OW
Z
�a W
a
0
Tp•
0
W L
r
z
IN
-
0
135
VN
n
n
_
C
W r
AS&my "w
7
VlN p
�
Hz
F D
t
w Q
w U_
N
- W
2 Y a
Q
rn 7
w
f�l7.
N
LO
N
J
W
r
RESOURCE
ENVIRONMENTAL
SOLUTIONS,
INC.
eue
ST., SUITE 110
RALEIGH, NC 27605
.RANNQ HAYS
POLECAT ASBUILT.OWG
n? m 0, 112 STreim
7 2018
—T Nw
6 OF
t5
wvlmrco
JRW
auric Na
ss
W
FR"0T Na.
20150085
730
125
120
.�QQ•i `CAR,, fj/i4
=O�O�fcSSlp���9
t
– is sFE1 r
—L
k- H2 p
�r
11111111�444V1NV��_
. -
co
+cil
+
"
W
a�"
C.
Z
W U)
Z 0
0
Lucc N
L+ L a
Z
Ci
m= a
0
a�
Z
�a W
a
0
0
W L
r
z
0
VN
n
n
_
C
W r
x
7
VlN p
�
Hz
F D
t
w Q
w U_
N
- W
2 Y a
Q
rn 7
w
f�l7.
N
LO
N
J
W
r
RESOURCE
ENVIRONMENTAL
SOLUTIONS,
INC.
302 JEFFERSON
ST., SUITE 110
RALEIGH, NC 27605
.RANNQ HAYS
POLECAT ASBUILT.OWG
n? m 0, 112 STreim
7 2018
—T Nw
6 OF
t5
wvlmrco
JRW
auric Na
ss
W
FR"0T Na.
20150085

t�
7 -
ST'S
N
a
}
m
On
m 4 R
N h h N N N N
,q,
_ .154 � , ,•
,y \
"moi•
SLC
.��LGE LCE
a R
140
135
130
125
120
140
AR
125
120
t-. m
9
YE1PIkMl. 9GLLf
3r gsarp '7
�u
. 1
W
0
30 60
t-. m
9
YE1PIkMl. 9GLLf
3r gsarp '7
�u
. 1
W
co
0
Z
N
�co
Wp
�+
NN ccccZ
aW �a0
zo
0
Z
CiW
as
�
0
mZ
Q
1.0
Z
ad
w� WQN
0�z
�acc
20 _=
S�
7
I
[V
I S
L
7NN [V pCj
to ry x
X C
F
rn�wa
�
zZ 7�o
H H
W Z U T
_
a V1 1OC7 r:
- W
Y"a
C,4 J
p
C) tr) .<
LI
N
N
w
F
RESOURCE
ENVIRONMENTAL
SOLUTIONS,
INC.
302 JEFFERSON
ST., SUITE 110
RALEIGH, NC 27605
�OPnMN6 NATE
POLECAT A58111LT.0WG
�m BT SAE STARm
JRW 7/l/2018
9 MT My
7 OF 15
T
S7
JRW
scrc
20159085

r+a
sa
wrest S. PG W
08 TM. PG J89
l} —tJ6f — -
I
-154 — 1 ` T 317—
-oar_
Y15
AN- 1}!% ` ` 16-rHP f r r �9rGlf XyS. ,1, M1
\�
im, ow
135
\
14
\X
\ Y lrr� LCE — X33 G ` �t"�� 'f 's 1
R
C�LrCNAvr
3
rL��\ u V Rocas DUAV DW
. \ , LN 737. M Wts3" 1 _
0 as ba
ncwmrvru save
r•...w•
140
135
IJO
125
120
i
Zp �0��881p
i n SEAL r =
IN
■
IN
a�
J IN
W
0
'N
m
I
Z
a J
iL
C
0
J
W Q
4
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■�■■■■■■I
m=
a
Z
�WQo
cc 0
N
I■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■m■■■m■■■■■■I
i■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■I
■■■■■■■■■■■■!■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■.■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■I
o
-
W
L
z
cc
x0
I■■■■■
i■■■■■■■
I ■■■■■■■
I■■■■m■■■■■■■■■■■■■■m■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■m■■■■■■■■■■■■I
■ ■ ■■■m■
■■■■■
■■■■■
■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■ ■■■■■■■m■
■ ■
■■■■■■■■
■■■■■
m■■■■
■■■■■
■ ■■■■
■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■mm■■
■ ■■■■m■mm■
■ ■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■ ■■■■■■■■■
n
n
■ ■ ■■■■■
■■■■■
■ ■■■m
■■■■■■■■
■■■m■■■■
m■■■m■■■
N
■ ■ I
■ ■ I
■ ■ I
I■Af
mmmum■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■EmE5m■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■I
ts�
NMN 6 x
x�
ilr
I
z z �
a
LJ
�ato>
�
N �
2 La
� N
N 4
_
0�
_
q
N
w
RESOURCE
ENVIRONMENTAL
SOLUTIONS,
INC.
302 JEFFERSON
ST., SUITE 110
RALEIGH,
NC 27605
se•wtc �a¢
POLECAT ASBUILT.OWG
Wrr s
JRW
vx,c snxnn
7/1/201,5
s T .ro.
8 OF
15
•PPROMP
JRW
D... as
CyA�
Yy
swc
I" 3 0'
ssaecr xo
20150085
■■
llrr■�.r
r
r■■■r..�
■r■�111r�rr■■
■■���■■■��■_■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■ ■■■■■
���■'�■■■
140
135
IJO
125
120
i
Zp �0��881p
i n SEAL r =
IN
■
IN
a�
J IN
W
0
'N
m
I
Z
a J
iL
C
0
J
W Q
4
m=
a
Z
�WQo
cc 0
N
o
-
W
L
z
cc
x0
n
n
V
N
J
x a
ts�
NMN 6 x
x�
ilr
I
z z �
a
LJ
�ato>
�
N �
2 La
� N
N 4
_
0�
_
q
N
w
RESOURCE
ENVIRONMENTAL
SOLUTIONS,
INC.
302 JEFFERSON
ST., SUITE 110
RALEIGH,
NC 27605
se•wtc �a¢
POLECAT ASBUILT.OWG
Wrr s
JRW
vx,c snxnn
7/1/201,5
s T .ro.
8 OF
15
•PPROMP
JRW
D... as
CyA�
Yy
swc
I" 3 0'
ssaecr xo
20150085

140
135
130
725
120
140
135
130
y—r 120
0
rrm>we. savr
a
+
w so
m M
"
M"NfZLWI;iL SC-0LE
� IL
W W
Z 0
L
/A
M!0
m
Z
az
0
Lu
W Q
IM=
"
CJ
opZ
�acc
�=
0
�
V
n
n
a
I
N _
i
Y
I �
WEl; Fu�7'"n o
N y
N 10
•;
143
140
135
130
y—r 120
0
rrm>we. savr
Z
+
� Wr
m M
"
a �
� IL
W W
Z 0
L
/A
M!0
m
Z
az
0
Lu
W Q
IM=
"
CJ
opZ
�acc
�=
0
�
V
n
n
a
I
N _
i
Y
I �
WEl; Fu�7'"n o
N y
N 10
x
w
a L
L d
N Ucc
QC
D
W Zq_U T
�UJ�
W
IN
N
4]
RESOURCE
ENVIRONMENTAL
SOLUTIONS, INC.
302 JEFFERSON ST., SOITE 110
RALEIGH, NC 27605
POLECAT ASSUILT.DWG
MAWW
JRW
"M ST,
7/1/2018
9 UT N.
8 OF
15
JRW
_
p}u6 NQ .
CQ
20150085

140
735
130
125
120
115
740
735
130
725
120
115
rtxn-,v. sra,e
r^ s'
9EH sc,y
3r ¢oFks810� 9�4
SEAL Yi
LJ712
o
■
g
h
H S h
S
a h S
k�
h
UP
+
W
140
735
130
125
120
115
740
735
130
725
120
115
rtxn-,v. sra,e
r^ s'
9EH sc,y
3r ¢oFks810� 9�4
SEAL Yi
LJ712
■
N
UP
+
W
.,
a
��
�+
W
p
m
Q j
Lu
L
chZ
J
W It
4
a�
Q0
Z
aj
IL
0
LL,
W
14
CC v -
o
C7
W
d�2
0
n
n
a
N
Q
N
U) 00
N
N
Z
=4h
y
Q0
O 01C]
N
J
�Wxl�N
Z
rp N
� J
k
W
N
u7
N
J
LN
r
RESOURCE
ENVIRONMENTAL
SOLUTIONS,
INC.
302 JEFFERSON
ST., SUITE
I10
RALEIGH,
NC 27605
m'"" N�IIE
POLECAT ASSUILT.DWG
;W0 er
JR
0AW sTN
7 1 2018
944
10 OF 17
MFRWIM
3RW
ortairc wo.
c
s l o
30'
rRofc* ria-
20150085

yzaao
,n
54161CD
;ro
x
f ieomApt 1 NK -123.42, 10- f [!I
wi V
0
$ g $ � g S R $
tr) t2
140 140
135 135
sop
730 130
L� S/ RLP
LP B4h{1'
7pPb, A4btwowff/LV W aw
mm _ IDP
125 125
7
120 720
115 115
,x-Rncv. 5raec
r• s'
sek
0'0 *'i's �p'••rti c
F 7
- =4 sFa� T•r}SSlttt —
1 :r L47122 7 Ei
ryry���llWiP11��\��
?Iri rra
Z
+
Lu
" a
-�
�+ W
Z
a� Fd0
z W N
0
cl
J
W L
4
a
0
Z
Z
W
a
oZ
V
W
I=
z
0
n
n
a
■ �
V
I
N
J
I �
W ^ N
x
s r [ ] N n
N a,,N C V❑ X
XI L
li
z zz �
a
L0
2 W
2"� N
fC N 4
O uN7 Q
Q ! �
W
N
u7
N
J
RESOURCE
ENVIRONMENTAL
SOLUTIONS,
INC.
302 JEFFERSON
ST., SUITE 1 10
RALEIGH, NC 27605
D�Tw
POLECAT ASDi71L7•pWG
m. 6 DATE 5fu
JRW 17/l/2018
P -q-, Hn
11 OF 15
aeF.r+o 2,q.
c
V 1
aaaAo�m
JRW
scuE 1' a 30•
vr+wccr >ta.
20150085

{ 1
4
V
125
c_� f 42 1
r �r
?5-229P
(q
L
.L�
1 M1 _�o£ 1
$ 8 $
140 h 140
135p 1135
130 T30
LET
1P°
OF @ux
OF
Lor TMWWP DWI
725 - 125
•s- r
rm Im
120 120
715 115
0 3
YWIA:IL .BOLL[
r • . a'
�agE83 Or'br�
ro
—_ L4712 _—
�IIillilt
U ,
Z
us
m Lo
T�r
a�
Na0
W LL.
z a
JL
/A
■
W L
N
99 07 Z
0
Z
2.4�
aL
�
WL
W
Q
N
p
-
W
L
Z
20
r_
J
N
_ N _
=L]NN y
N 7NOx ND L
M
ccz
Q k
E
a Z z a� �
W
�Y I rx N
Ip N�.J
d � Q
cy W
rA
dy.
E[1
N
4i
r
RESOURCE
ENVIRONMENTAL
SOLUTIONS,
INC.
302 JEFFERSON
ST., SUITE 110
RAtEfGH,
NC 27605
N"NG HANE
POLECAT ASBUILT.DWG
GRAPH 6T
JRW
OATE STHPRY
7/1/2018
g NT xe� -
iz c 13
c
S 12
JRW
1" = 30'
PFOLct NG.
20150085

h
�O h
750 r-i--r�
iV-j
140
�"�'
raa
125
h
h
o h
{ b
m m
� 150
140
135
130
125
36 60
MTWZ�HIN. cryr
� • ..ia•
C f 6
'Is4n:i-' S..4E
-"6 -c A R0
=p a OF rssr0 �'y7
S SEAL r
_ LJ712
f//LlF?,; W
l r
�
■
ti
Z
W
a�
.j +
Wp
m�
CCCCZ
a�
�L�
LLI
a0
H
0
J
�
a
o
J
m=
dWa�
1.37
Z
a
LW
z
cc
_
20
X
n
1-
HOODED
N
C
W
X L
~ Q uN7 H
a
N N N z
N O •�
R
I
N U
E Z
H
a
:l O��z
f� W
ZR O N
N L�.
�
4 Lo Q
_
N W
Ln
N
E.k
M
RESOURCE
ENVIRONMENTAL
-'N —"
SOLUTIONS,
INC.
302 JEFFERSON
ST., SUITE 110
RALEIGH, NC 27605
MEWN A74
�, 0r
JRw
DAT SiNlIEA
7 1 2018
g�ZT Nn
13 OF 15
"P^ero`.m
daw
pu WL
S13
scut 1" 30'
^XWELi N0.
20150085
10
r
I J
f
J6
—,l _
e
hyo
s
\_
--
- ----
-, rm
W"Azs
1
,
_ - ___.iM
-
MARK Mt
HkL
;5-&w
08 470.. K b
`
A?
\
.a
fi'ID FEACM X27
rs+afwoom
�6�
/%4p
! 4
,p
XV
re.pf 11
11
Rciw A22 s
j
11
r
Seri
�J
11
I
'
h
�O h
750 r-i--r�
iV-j
140
�"�'
raa
125
h
h
o h
{ b
m m
� 150
140
135
130
125
36 60
MTWZ�HIN. cryr
� • ..ia•
C f 6
'Is4n:i-' S..4E
-"6 -c A R0
=p a OF rssr0 �'y7
S SEAL r
_ LJ712
f//LlF?,; W
d
■
ti
Z
W
a�
.j +
Wp
m�
CCCCZ
a�
�L�
LLI
a0
H
0
J
a
o
m=
dWa�
Z
a
LW
z
cc
_
20
X
n
1-
N
C
W
X L
~ Q uN7 H
a
N N N z
N O •�
R
I
N U
E Z
H
a
:l O��z
f� W
ZR O N
N L�.
�
4 Lo Q
_
N W
Ln
N
E.k
M
RESOURCE
ENVIRONMENTAL
SOLUTIONS,
INC.
302 JEFFERSON
ST., SUITE 110
RALEIGH, NC 27605
NME
POLECAT ASSUILT.OW0
�, 0r
JRw
DAT SiNlIEA
7 1 2018
g�ZT Nn
13 OF 15
"P^ero`.m
daw
pu WL
S13
scut 1" 30'
^XWELi N0.
20150085

110
DO M745; PC 7M
1 , ue agm ac 9717za rz vs iia
x5-oAp �� r
___ter 11 l� �'— v--.,� ,'•1 �� � 1 � � � ��_ c �
t _
I Is
' 11 • ' 1 RF. W K74 f 1 1 1
z I _
a av so
nrawmrvmr. scut'
-
aati`�ZN 0A 4
2p�pf�8810 S�y9
�F
=a BFiLL
L1712
r
1■■■■■■■■■■■■
1■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
1■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
1■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1
I■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1
1■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■f
q
■
.
,1■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1
1■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1
1■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1
1■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1
..
Ill■■■■■��©■■■■■■1
1■i■■■■■TzOC1\■■■■1
�
�
Z
N
o
W
N W
1 ■■■��r■rrrl�■:1!�
1■■■■■MEllso■■■■■1
Z
■ 01
L
z C
U)
W d
1■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1
1■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1
I■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1
Z0
ci
m=
Q
-
aati`�ZN 0A 4
2p�pf�8810 S�y9
�F
=a BFiLL
L1712
r
q
�
�
Z
N
o
W
N W
Z
aw
L
z C
U)
W d
Z0
ci
m=
Q
-z
H
W d
Lo
a
0
cc
�
�
�
v
W
a
�z
Ic
x
0
J
n
N
a �
x an
N
'01
N
cc
- X
Q I
2 '
U)
a
LWLI
V)
Z N
- W
p N J
'D
❑ le% Q
N W
N
J
Lai
RESOURCE
ENVIRONMENTAL
SOLUTIONS,
INC.
302 JEFFERSON
ST., SUITE 110
RALEIGH,
NC 27605
-F WM NT
POLECAT ASBUILT.DWC
NAM 9T
JRW
IE IRR➢
7oA1 Sr2018
g1g7 N6
74 OF 15
—0N
JR W
W.r m
S14
PROECi N0.
20150085

..........H... ■
iRlu■■■■■ ■■■■■■l■f■rrrrw■E■!■■■■■■ arlilllilHlllllllll■CC: , ::::CCCCCi:CCC: ,
■1■■■■■■■1■i it
.■a■■a■■■■■ ER■■l!w■■■l■■■l■l■!■l■■■l a■■■■■■E■ONr■■■wrwr
■l■1■1■■■1■1■■ 1
R RlllNlli {!
Ir■aa■■■■ ......■l�O■r■■■■■■■■1■■■■■ ' rr����wwwllllllfll�e�� __rMilllC::::::::■':■':::::RiaCCCl.:www
,.w■■■1R■■1■i■■wl■■aa■■■ P.
, 1■■���■■■■i:lC _ ■wrwwr---�■■■w-__- ._. _ /�l.�rwwi ■
•••_ - �•••lr ^--'= ---- u 0lllll liilr.rrllElifiiii �:i:;:i:::*irCa:C:i::::::ii■isiiiiiiiiiiiia::bi�rsrliFA2 IV ii:::
■■■E��OE�Ew�-'El���lH��l ��1�rr� ' iR■lllMllllilllllllllllll ■
■■■■■■■i■■■IIAR!!E■■a■1■ Ir■■w■■■i■■:: ICMRRRrr■■" ::::ORlrlC::■:::::::IV
1:;::::::::
■■RO!!!E!!rr■■■■■■■■■!OR■ "la■■1■li■■
!
!■r■■■■■■r■w■■■r■r■ ■
,1■■E■i■1■■■R!!w
R Rwr■a■■ol■■■■■I ' ■■
Rlrr■I
■r■■■■■■■■■ _
. 'lIIua■�NR1C���AAI�r��■■■r���RMRr '1■■1.■N:=wal■■■■■■■■l■■■Rll HuR■R■il!■■■■1R■1■.w ..•■lrri■■■-�-■,■■�l.■-"■!a■■uuaoM■■ ■■r
"lww
Ow■ORM lI .H;.:O.rrr■.■-■■rirRRwaw•■C C■I.��.'R.CCC:��:':rr:.iNr� Y �Il�■�■�■�r�■�:■�■�aR■!_NlCrl■:AwiC�y■:yC■rw
l::C::::..aaaC::::::::::R%!■aCdpCIri:■�1 :tl :::::::::::,:: :f:::CCCC:C:::::;::::l1I
.
1■:::m::::!!!■!■■■■w■:91:m
S r'
= r 1A 712 p: _
4///,/�ry�
'
enema
ii�ii■■
u■R!lMENMEN■■■MRM!
101002000000011111"
!M!■r■■■li
■
E::::::Cnir■■■MI
MOM Y-_--ri■i17
H
ME
_..
:101010M
Z
��■:::::::1
_EMEMMM08;81
,lu■■l■■■e■l■r■.■■■1■■■■ll
,
1■:::m::::!!!■!■■■■w■:91:m
S r'
= r 1A 712 p: _
4///,/�ry�
Iw■■■1■■■la■■■O!!■!■
.awl■■
!M!■r■■■li
■
i
MOM Y-_--ri■i17
H
ME
Iml..a.■law�:..R
Z
no
W
,lu■■l■■■e■l■r■.■■■1■■■■ll
,
!Rlrr
M an 3
■E■l■■!■■■■■■Orr■■■w■■■■■
.■■RR1■1■Mr■rr■lll■■■■l■1■
'■arR■1■■�=Rfli■■■■w■l■!■'
.1■w,--wwlawww
■l■■■■■1■! RR■■M ■■■lMUM
a
01--is-111mi
:E~a::::::1::1:::::
www1R r■Ir■■■■■E■■■■■■■■■■RI ' ■■■■■■l■MrrrM.Noam l
-•■■■■ w.----�-
mom ila.■■ r�rlYlIG�i io
vae ::::::;:::o:::: e�
:1::::::::No: C:.011%
xss�4
` a■■■■■■■1■iRRrwrwp r■H
■■■■Owrr■■■■l�E■w■■■■■■■■
■■E■Rlrr:■l■w■■■■■■■■■i■■
y It■■a n I ■■!!r■■■■■aa■■H
iia�Arllr.!-�rr■■
ME
I■■!■■CImClarrrr!■■■■■1■■
IUE■R r ■ouur ■ERon
IEuaa■■u■i■ ON
EM
'Me uigGp.!i■ ::M11
u■■■■EMOMER!
!r1
` 1!■■■■■■■ia■■u■li■■:::ll
S r'
= r 1A 712 p: _
4///,/�ry�
Iw■■■1■■■la■■■O!!■!■
.awl■■
!M!■r■■■li
■
1■■■r.rr.:�alllr�
■
H
.■■lllYi
■■RRR■■■RNlrwri■■■1■■■awl
ur■uuEm:m:::::::::::::
Z
RR■rw■■■■I
W
,lu■■l■■■e■l■r■.■■■1■■■■ll
,
■E■l■■!■■■■■■Orr■■■w■■■■■
.■■RR1■1■Mr■rr■lll■■■■l■1■
'■arR■1■■�=Rfli■■■■w■l■!■'
.1■w,--wwlawww
■l■■■■■1■! RR■■M ■■■lMUM
a
01--is-111mi
:E~a::::::1::1:::::
www1R r■Ir■■■■■E■■■■■■■■■■RI ' ■■■■■■l■MrrrM.Noam l
-•■■■■ w.----�-
mom ila.■■ r�rlYlIG�i io
vae ::::::;:::o:::: e�
:1::::::::No: C:.011%
xss�4
` a■■■■■■■1■iRRrwrwp r■H
■■■■Owrr■■■■l�E■w■■■■■■■■
■■E■Rlrr:■l■w■■■■■■■■■i■■
y It■■a n I ■■!!r■■■■■aa■■H
iia�Arllr.!-�rr■■
ME
I■■!■■CImClarrrr!■■■■■1■■
IUE■R r ■ouur ■ERon
IEuaa■■u■i■ ON
EM
'Me uigGp.!i■ ::M11
u■■■■EMOMER!
!r1
` 1!■■■■■■■ia■■u■li■■:::ll
S r'
= r 1A 712 p: _
4///,/�ry�
Iw■■■1■■■la■■■O!!■!■
.awl■■
!M!■r■■■li
■
1■■■r.rr.:�alllr�
■
H
.■■lllYi
I■■M■M■■■E�rlr■■w■■■■■■I
�IMEMEMEM...■■�■1
Z
RR■rw■■■■I
W
,lu■■l■■■e■l■r■.■■■1■■■■ll
a
cc
` Il■■■laao■■■■■RRR..n■!i
S r'
= r 1A 712 p: _
4///,/�ry�
.I■■■■E■■■la■NRr!■1■■■w■ll
1■■==M2104
.awl■■
!M!■r■■■li
'
iiil.y�E.i:?w.w......�
IiiiM■M■M■r--.ERIllrrrMM■i
■
H
I■■M■M■■■E�rlr■■w■■■■■■I
�IMEMEMEM...■■�■1
Z
RR■rw■■■■I
W
I■■■■l■■■l■RR■::Hu■1■■■I
a
cc
1```p 1LLL1111Ifflylll� 4
S r'
= r 1A 712 p: _
4///,/�ry�
klll�lhhllll�a�"`~
N
■
H
x
N
Z
=
W
a
cc
W
Z
o
L
0
a
z
Z
o
a
'\
y
W
H
Wa
L
W
2
)
n
a
N
L
I �
N Ol
O
t] N N y
ah
1.
N U E
ZX 4�z®
l�
ay/
W 2 CJ a0.
-3O0J w
W
toC4 NILS
N
_
w
cq
1
RESOURCE
ENVIRONMENTAL
SOLUTIONS, INC.
302 JEFFERSON ST., SUITE 110
RALEIGH,
NC 27605
v W% Na
POLECAT ASWILT.OWG
PR.1rr IT
IOW
"'t sT.r M
7/1/2018
a I
15 OF 15
Ap�
JRW
o..Irrn wa
S 5
1" � 20'
PIIWT NO-
20150085