20180990 Ver 1_401 Application_20180716

Action History (UTC -05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
Submit by Anonymous User 7/16/2018 10:40:46 AM (Start Event)
Accept by Montalvo, Sheri A 7/18/2018 11:11:17 AM (Non DOT Initial Review)
The task was assigned to Montalvo, Sheri A. The due date is: July 19, 2018 5:00 PM
7/16/2018 10:41 AM

DWR
Division of water Resources
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
January 31, 2018 Ver 2.3
Please note: fields marked with a red asterisk below are required. You will not be able to submit the form until all mandatory questions are answered.
Also, if at any point you wish to print a copy of the E -PCN, all you need to do is right -click on the document and you can print a copy of the form.
Below is a link to the online help file.
https://edocs.deq.nc.govMaterResources/0/edocl6247041PCN%20Help%20File%202018-1-30.pdf
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:*
Franklin
Is this project a public transportation project?*
f Yes f• No
This is any publicly funded by nunicipal,state or federal funds road, rail, airport transportation project.
1a. Type (s) of approval sought from the Corps:*
V Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
F Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?*
IJ Nationwide Permit (NWP)
r Regional General Permit (RGP)
r Standard (IP)
This form may be Corps to initiate the standard/individual permit process. Please contact your Corps representative for submittal of standard permits.
All required items that are not provided in the E -PCN and be added to the miscellaneous upload located at the bottom of this form.
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: 29 - Residential Developments
NWP Number Other:
List all IWV nurrbers you are applying for not on the drop down list.
1c. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:*
check all that apply
IJ 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular r 401 Water Quality Certification - Express
F Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit IJ Riparian Buffer Authorization
r Individual Permit
*
1d. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
O Yes O No
For the record only for Corps Permit: O Yes O No

1e. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program
f Yes C No
1f. Is the project located in anyof NC's twentycoastal counties?*
r Yes C No
1h. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?*
t' Yes f• No
Link to trout information: http://vmw.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-ProgranVAgency-Coordination/Trout.aspx
B. Applicant Information
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Julie Davidson
1b. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
(XXX)XXX-XXXX
[phone]
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
❑ Owner r Applicant (other than owner) rJ Agent/Consultant
(Check all that apply)
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Ridgemont LLC
2b. Deed book and page no.:
Book 1593 Page 947 via County Website
2c. Responsible party:
(for Corporations)
Steve Gould
2d. Address
Street Address
833-A Wake Forest Business Park
Address Line 2
city
Wake Forest
Postal / Zip Code
27587
2e. Telephone Number:
(XXX)XXX-XXXX
[phone]
2f. Fax Number:
(XXX)XXX-)O=
2g. Email Address:*
goulddevelopment1 @gmail.com
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
State/ Province/ Fbgion
NC
Country
USA -Wake

Julie Davidson
4b. Business Name:
(if applicable)
Agriwaste Technology, Inc. (AWT)
4c. Address
Street Address
501 N Salem St.
Address Line 2
#203
City
State / Province / Fbgion
Apex
NC
Fbstal / Zip Code
Country
27502
USA-WAke
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
(xxx)xxx-xxxx
4e. Fax Number:
(xxx)xxx-xxxx
4f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Agent Authorization Letter*
Rease provide the Agent Authorization Letter if you are subrritting this docunent.
_AGENT_AUTHORIZATION_FORM (2).pdf 37.78KB
RLE TYPE MUST BE FDF
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
1a. Name of project:*
Ridgemont
1b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
Ridgemont Subdivision
1c. Nearest municipality/ town:*
Franklinton
1d. Driving directions*
f it is a new project and can not easily be found in a GPS napping system Rease provide directions.
This project is in an existing subdivision, Ridgemont Subdivision. it can be found on the right if you travel north on Mount Olivet Church Road
in Franklinton NC.
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
(tax RN or parcel ID)
6932
2b. Property size:
(in acres)
33.8 acres
2c. Project Address

Street Address
End of Road (Naxos Way) in Ridgemont Sub
Address Line 2
aty
State/ Province/ Region
Franklinton
NC
Postal / Zip Code
Country
27525
USA -Franklin
2d. Site coordinates in decimal degrees
Please collect site coordinates in decimal degrees. Use between 4-6 digits (unless you are using a survey -grade GPS device) after the decimal place as
appropriate, based on how the location was determined. (For example, most mobile phones with GPS provide locational precision in decimal degrees to
map coordinates to 5 or 6 digits after the decimal place.)
Latitude:* Longitude:*
36.136 -78.501
ex: 34.208504 -77.796371
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Middle Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
C:NSW
Surface Water Lookup
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Tar -Pamlico
River Basin Lookup
4. Project Description
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
Currently, the site has been surveyed into lots for the last phase of the subdivision. Naxon Way is an existing road
however, it is planned to reach to the undeveloped lots and turn into a shared driveway to access two lots on the
other side of the unnamed tributary to Middle Creek.
4b. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for
DWR)
nick the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach docurrent
Topo Map.pdf 777.95KB
File type mast be pdf
4c. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site.
(for DWR)
nick the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach docurrent
Soils Map.pdf 607.69KB
File type mast be pdf
4d. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
there are no wetlands on this property
4e. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
(intern ittent and perennial)
- 1,155 feet (South to North)
4f. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
Access is needed to lots 24 and 25 of Ridgemont Subdivision. This project is a stream crossing (shared driveway)
across an unnamed tributary of Middle Creek.

4g. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
This project is planned to develop the last phase of the ebsting Ridgemont Subdivision. This development will
involve a stream crossing for a driveway to access two lots. Impacts are minimized by making it a shared driveway,
designing the stream crossing perpendicular to the stream, and using headwalls instead of culverts.
4h. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
(.lick the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach docurrent
Site Map Stream Crossing.pdf 1.66MB
RIDGEMONT SUBDIVISION.pdf 974.88KB
File type mast be pdf
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
r Yes r No O Unknown
Comments:
Wetland and stream evals completed by AWT in 12/2017 and 3/2018.
Wetland are not present and the eiasting stream is a definite perennial
stream.
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
r Preliminary r Approved r Unknown IT N/A
Corps AID Number:
Exarrple: SAWt-2017-99999
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
Julie Davidson and Jeff Vaughan
Agriwaste Technology
5d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach docurrent
File type mast be FDF
6. Project History
6a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
f Yes r No r Unknown
7. Future Project Plans
7a. Is this a phased project?*
r Yes G No
7b. If yes, explain.
Yes, this is the final phase of this subdivision.
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the
proposed project or related activity? This includes other separate and distant crossing for linear projects that require Department of the
Army authorization but don't require pre -construction notification.
No. A search was completed by Andy Williams 5/24/18 via phone call
request by Julie Davidson
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory

1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
r- Wetlands W Streams -tributaries r,T Buffers
r- Open Waters F Pond Construction
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites
impacted.
3a. Reason for impact*3b.lmpact 3c. Type of impact*3d. Stream name*
type *
S1 Road Crossing P Other unnamed tributary
lvep label (e.g. Road Crossing Permanent (F) or
1) Tenporary (T)
S2 Road Crossing P Fill unnamed tributary
lvbp label (e.g. Road Crossing Permanent (P) or
1) Tenporary (T)
3e. Stream
3f. Type of
3g. Stream 3h. Impact
Type*
Jurisdiction*
width*
length*
Perennial
Both
7
64
Perennial (PEF� or
un -named tributary
Average
(linear feet)
internittent (INT)
(feet)
(square feet)
Perennial
Both
7
64
Perennial (PT3:� or
6h. Total buffer impacts:
Average
(linear feet)
internittent (INT)
(feet)
Zone 1
`" All Perennial or Intermittent streams must be verified by DWR or delegated local government.
31. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
3i. Total permanent stream impacts:
128
3i. Total temporarystream impacts:
0
3i. Total stream and tributary impacts:
128
3j. Comments:
There will be headwalls in the design of this driveway therefore stabilization was not chosen above.
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWR)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. Individually list all buffer impacts below
6a. Project is in which protect basin(s)?*
Check all that appy.
❑ Neuse rJ Tar -Pamlico
❑ Catawba F Randleman
Goose Creek F Jordan Lake
r Other
6b. Impact Type *
6c. Per or
6d. Stream name*
6e. Buffer mitigation 6f. Zone 1
6g. Zone 2
Temp*
required?* impact*
impact*
Allowable
P
un -named tributary
No 3,840
2,560
Location and Exempt, Allowable, allowable w/ Permanent (P) or
(square feet)
(square feet)
mitigation
Tenporary (T)
6h. Total buffer impacts:
Zone 1
Zone 2
Temporary impacts:
0.00
0.00

Zone 1 Zone 2
Permanent impacts: 3,840.00 2,560.00
Zone 1 Zone 2
Total buffer impacts: 3,840.00 2,560.00
6i. Comments:
A request for DWR to come evaluate this stream area has been made to Stephanie Goss. A site visit has not been
scheduled. Waiting for response from DWR.
Supporting Documentation - i.e. Impact Maps, Plan Sheet, etc.
click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach docurrent
Buffer Imapct Map.pdf 743.57KB
driveway C1.pdf 417.42KB
File must be FDF
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:*
Headwalls will be installed, this road crossing is a shared driveway, and the stream is located where it is
perpendicular to the stream and does not cross any stream forks or meanders. These will all minimize proposed
impacts.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:*
Headwalls will be installed, this road crossing is a shared driveway, and the stream is located where it is
perpendicular to the stream and does not cross any stream forks or meanders. These will all minimize proposed
impacts.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
r Yes r No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
The stream impact is less than 150' in length.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
— Recent changes to the stormwater rules have required updates to this section ."""
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection
Rules?
r Yes r No
1b. All buffer impacts and high ground impacts require diffuse flow or other form of stormwater treatment. If the project is subject to a
state implemented riparian buffer protection program, include a plan that fully documents how diffuse flow will be maintained.
All Stormwater Control Measures (SCM)s must be designed in accordance with the NC Stormwater Design Manual. Associated
supplement forms and other documentation shall be provided.
What type of SCM are you providing?

r Level Spreader
r- Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHWT)
r- Wetland Swale (higher SHWT)
r- Other SCM that removes minimum 30% nitrogen
(check all that apply)
For a list of options to meet the diffuse flow requirements, click here.
Diff us Flow Documentation
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach docurrent
File type crust be FDF
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?
f Yes r No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?*
f Yes
r No
To look up low density requirement click here 15A NCAC 02H.1 003(2).
2c. Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP) reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state -
approved local government stormwater program?*
f Yes
r No
Hnt: projects that have vested rights, exemptions, or grandfathering from state or locally implerrented stormwater programs or projects that satisfy state or locally-inplerrented storrrwater programs
through use of com7unity in -lieu programs should answer no to this question.
3. Stormwater Requirements
3a. Select whether a completed stormwater management plan (SMP) is included for review and approval or if calculations are provided
to document the project will not cause degradation of downstream surface waters.*
r Stormwater Management r Antidegradation
Plan Calculations
3b. Stormwater Management Plan: If submitting a SMP for review and approval, it shall complywith the high-density development
requirements set forth in 15ANCAC 02H .1003. Include all appropriate stormwater control measure supplemental forms and associated
items.
Qick the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach docurrent
FILE TYPE M15T BE FDF
3c. Antidegradation Calculations: If submitting calculations to document the project will not cause degradation of downstream surface
waters, the documentation shall include a detailed analysis of the hydrological impacts from stormwater runoff when considering the
volume and velocity of stormwater runoff from the project built upon area and the size and existing condition of the receiving
waterbody(ies).
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach docurrent
FILE TYPE M15T BE PDF
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?
f Yes r No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or
DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?*
r Yes r No

2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
r Yes r No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional development, which could impact
nearby downstream water quality?*
f Yes r No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
This is the last phase of this subdivisions.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
r Yes f Nor N/A
4b. Describe, in detail, the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the
proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated at a treatment plant, list the capacity available at that plant.
Septic systems are proposed for this project. AWT has completed all licensed soil science evaluation to determine
this is possible.
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?
f Yes r No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
f Yes r No
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
f Yes r No r Unknown
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
f Yes r No
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
r Yes r No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
f Yes r No
Link to the NLEB SLOPES document: http://saw-reg.usace.army.mil/NLEB/1-30-17-signed_NLEB-SLOPES&apps.pdf
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?'
r Yes r No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers,
mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
r Yes r No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
IPac report and Natural Heritage Report
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
f Yes r No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?
EFH Mapper

7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
Link to the State Historic Preservation Office Historic Properties Map (does not include archaeological data: http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural
preservation status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)?*
r Yes
DA i7
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
NPOWEB GIS Services for the NC State Historic Preservation Office.
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach docurrent
Natural Her rept.pdf
FWS Endangered.pdf
Preservation Map.pdf
File must be RDF
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
Link to the FEMA Floodplain Maps: https://msc.fema.gov/portal/search
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?*
r Yes
G No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
FEMA Flood Maps provided my FEMA online data: www.fema.gov
Miscellaneous
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach docurrent
Flood Map.pdf
PCN Miscellaneous Document Submittal.pdf
File crust be FDF or KkV
Signature
rJ By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
754.38KB
4.5MB
633.59KB
2.09MB
28KB
■ I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
■ I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic
Transactions Act');
■ I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic
Transactions Act');
■ I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
■ I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:*
Julie Davidson
Signature
Date Submitted:
7/13/2018

Initial Review
Is this project a public transportation project?*(?
f Yes r No
Change ony ff needed.
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?
r Yes
f No
BIMS # Assigned
20180990
Version#*
Reviewing Office*
Raleigh Regional Office - [phone]
Select Project Reviewer*
Stephanie Goss:eads\szgoss
Is a payment required for this project?*
f No payment required
r Fee received
r Fee needed - send electronic notification
What amout is owed?*
r $240.00
f $570.00

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOT NO.
PLAN NO.
PARCEL ID:
6932
STREET ADDRESS: Ridgemont Subdivision - End of Naxos Way (planned)
36.136
Please print:
Property Owner:
Property Owner:
-78.501
Ridgemont, LLC
The undersigned, registered property owners of the above noted property, do hereby authorize
Julie Davidson
(Contractor / Agent)
of Agri -Waste Technology, Inc.
(Name of consulting firm)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of
this permit or certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
Property Owner's Address (if different than property above):
833-A Wake Forest Business Park Wake Forest NC 27587
Telephone:
919-291-3069
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the
best of our knowledge.
Author' d Signature
Date:
Authorized Signature
Date:

Avvr
Agri -Waste Technology, Inc.
501 N. Salem St. Suite 203
Apex NC 27502
P: 919.859.0669
www.agn aste.com
Project Site
USGS Topographic Map
Ridgemont Subdivision
Steve Gould
Franklin Co., NC N
IMPORTANT NOTES:
1. Stream Crossing is not to
scale.
2. This stream is an un -named
tributary to Middle Creek.
3. This driveway crossing is
proposed to impact – 64
linear feet of stream.
4. This project is located in
Floodzone ID X which
means it is not inside a
100 yr. floodplain.
5. This project is necessary to
gain access to lots 24 and 25.
It is intended to be a shared
driveway for these lots.
6. The planned shared driveway
is designed as a DOT Q25 with
headwalls to minimize impacts.
7. CAD drawing was provided
by Cawthorne, Moss, and Panciera
P.C. Professional Land Surveyors
Drawn By: Julie Davidson
Reviewed By: Jeff Vaughan
Date:
D-
I
]]. J;
,FYI-YIY
' h
Wk ?
a 3,2
02�
•$ l . 0. A
1 �
TA
IT
,,. �•
TOTAL. A..
T"
-7 10
wF 62.5 125 250 375 500
Fv 1 Fee
—This map was created for proposed planning purposes only. It is not intended to be used as a plat or survey map of any type.—

Avvr
Engineers and Soil Scientists
Agri -Waste Technology, Inc.
501 N. Salem St. Suite 203
Apex NC 27502
P: 919.859.0669
www.agriwaste.com
Project Site Soils Map
Ridgemont Subdivision
Steve Gould
Franklin Co., NC N
IMPORTANT NOTES:
1. Stream Crossing is not to
scale.
2. This stream is an un -named
tributary to Middle Creek.
3. This driveway crossing is
proposed to impact - 64
linear feet of stream.
4. This project is located in
Floodzone ID X which
means it is not inside a
100 yr. floodplain.
5. This project is necessary to
gain access to lots 24 and 25.
It is intended to be a shared
driveway for these lots.
6. The planned shared driveway
is designed as a DOT Q25 with
headwalls to minimize impacts.
7. CAD drawing was provided
by Cawthorne, Moss, and Panciera,
P.C. Professional Land Surveyors
Drawn By: Julie Davidson
By: Jeff Vaughan
Date:Reviewed
----------
- � ,'`'. ���• ,J aim ... -'-.- _ ,5,',�•` ,��,'f '' __ - - - x -
A
r
3 mo
rk , . 4 0 7 ,AC:1
3:s4:ft: f
Y
! ANA 30 A4�/� '•
•,
� I'
J.
Ji' �Y�.� y�'3�SQ:�
- - b 5a -,A
„ r , res�Fta.t s ft: , �• r�' r+1d?t{15r ROF?a
jar•; 5, - T 7_g
� a A
.St
.,4.,916 AC:�1� U �-
-
,il 77:0:
. , r, 4 r°•�13 5 "� ,.Y i 1. - 1- 59
300 q4t:
�`�� � • ±, 11 1 � } f F3' `� 4 � p '�` I 1 � 'V346 ', l'4u� I, 3 p� ,Q�' AC: .
r, 51,207 's.ft:• R jI ;
^`�'
to
1,468 A, `
obaf
w = " ` �r �,74r r i t5 i 4309 ft"
V� - - _ �...� aaf - / �� `�
•,''z �.� `3eo'. i76'14 ,��t – �` — z
sA�N a2 'sq,Yt:, t�'
�, 'r, rr l - - t ` - +�• �r`M1Y }� .�'1�' }" 55•S
• �7'
9q,ft,ip
160
F �A�[it1 5.r '�o ao _ g•
60,
--------- a ' '' Et7 54' PU$i
Legend
Stream Crossing
OParcel
Soil Types (Web Soil Survey) I ;1 ,',`. ' i;` - o as so 180 270 iso
i'r
NC�Cente'rforGeographwc�lnf©�rmation&Analysis
—This map was created for proposed planning purposes only. It is not intended to be used as a plat or survey map of any type."`

Avvr
Engineers and Soil Scientists
Agri -Waste Technology, Inc.
501 N. Salem St. Suite 203
Apex NC 27502
P: 919.859.0669
www.agriwaste.com
Project Site Map
Ridgemont Subdivision
Steve Gould
Franklin Co., NC N
IMPORTANT NOTES:
1. Stream Crossing is not to
scale.
2. This stream is an un -nam
tributary to Middle Creek.
3. This driveway crossing is
proposed to impact — 64
linear feet of stream.
4. This project is located in
Floodzone ID X which
means it is not inside a
100 yr. floodplain.
5. This project is necessary to
gain access to lots 24 and 25.
It is intended to be a shared
driveway for these lots.
6. The planned shared driveway
is designed as a DOT Q25 with
headwalls to minimize impacts.
7. CAD drawing was provided
by Cawthorne, Moss, and Panciera,
P.C. Professional Land Surveyors
DrawnDavidson
Date:Reviewed By: Jeff Vaughan
Ir '; !', ._.... ._. '__-+. '�`,``��''\+•'� r','f r"/_�"_�- = - -_ -74tH. -" _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ - -- ---_ -_- -
-" - -
' ; �,� ! i ,'rte ��• _ r.' .S &T13'Ba--E " _ `' ' `- - _ - - - . _ _ - - _ ,�, ^ - _ _ �'y_lyYy
•w,'�r. '' '' - '`` J' . .F,�'f ;r^j "~r.r. .—�.y`,-� I� J � '� FV1rfL $C�. �t.^-.
r`I iii `4�• _ ._'"'' "�' `�' ,F�! '�-�-r '4i a �''r` Y _-__._,�!'�.-8 '1- _ OLN
_21
,''+ ''l, i;il r•fr. r �'I �'- --__ - ,,,,�-, 1' '`f`'+ ' "' �yyT' YTf, lt'', t11' �'\` `\ r e� '\`\7-L}} r" _�'T_' '
'`'`:tip ',".! •�I•�. _, i•' _ __ `'.hl,'"'`I' r+fr r I'S1;?s, t �w' `� "+ � \ f �0,,�$�?.`$`+L� � _ ,` ea-_ ___
i' �' ;;,', f,'r�= ____ �`` :r=:;'',,, ;; ',t.;t`47, A,.` '` ;ii�fJ.sYl}• a.B9- ���_
T✓,Qr J_2g gq_it
,RY•• '
AC
L ` '�'.;'� ':i,� .1 ' ' .-I l r`__- , t\ ` `' •"" ,, to ;�n, ` i` 4` �' �'� , 51c 1 79A
�i ,�t'apl,h� �K, f•' r ��/I '.' '� - _ __ - ._ '�` ,1\-_ 'rs / 5 .�'�� v��7 ��" � •'rf ,.�'"�•.' ,r,+._ .� _ _
'' ' f,`k;,�; =�r==y - ___ ;`,,�;:�`, - '-3r.�• ,X14 ,fg5.sq;f
•A_�.'-0.7,JS'.�
7�si(f,::``.`�:,',t,', , r r'r�l;'�?'Y r 1Y,�r- :5G-Pu9ta=G� ,>'e'- �;�--__•._..
''i; �. is °''!'i•'!I',r.el' f$B+�f; :�.� a �� il,, .,`,•�+" t'�''` ' 'f !' - _ ,�� �t0 vxc4c't _ -"- �j--
,�ii'a+l.
X`•'`'l•'•
-�,,::�;'C�';L';'1.';r ;:r;' r` ,t t,`•,., „ ',,;;; {jj + `,' 4?.' , 39,627.Sq�
• ., � r , '• \ `, JJ ,r`, ', 51"'•,'�`''p"�, � r`, � . ; �.✓f � •�' pL -1 fir. I(�
• 1,;. �'; ' "L I���'r `� i , I'!' S , ,�;, ,, �':'' '% J e � i � � t � �'� �r•S' � iF � ��-•'` �a�l�_�SPr
' 111E ti j1r1,15t y/�'y� i �i Wit© 91,5•Sq.'t••-
„ ..........
•.";f}; r;r,{, 1 , ',1','`a.`' �',,�, ,''r � 1, "�i`•'�� .'� ��i+'If ',��t1' • /3 ,.
''.i I` �;, ,��� ''4'• �',Y' ,'t � :�•','<<� . ",�' �' gt`L';}7$,'��t:'.'- ';p�u�;, `°` r'S }� •4;,918 .;6,C:C , m� `� - _ 3�
7-7: -
;r': r.'"i ,`„F;',' tib, -! I '. ' ;' :''a i $ r; �'.yy�'• i r , r , �•j�/`-,y .'�i' !
,';:; ' ; CI: ;,�, '�''� I '. .,r' ,.� ` ,',', ; '��'''"�"'' ' ',°' ;i ,'L ; 1 r` I •,, rir " �.• ,,� j, r� .� '� r'-�---__ 59
'!e!';;e�''�'r,i �:5�t�t Its '��, f, l\' - r ,1:��:`�;i ,I,; Ir ,. ;; `I'j „ `r. �,' i',',,' .M• - .� �- --�__ -
.e, 4r
'rtrll EA
I`+'t.f r ,! �,� f ',AG 3 t 00 9 .
A ., ', ;:` .I ;' i ; ;0.,74 1 �.fi89, AC.
URON "5
.-`76, ASC; ( 5
liq
''%if"� y�-�== _--- _.t / yr'��'.;,.'�`'' `yL•` '`,� ``�'���,�'�''" �f i ;1 r4f$git: i�L�{.!I r � r4S� ----� `
'; ',!r".• _ __{ y \1',, t I ,}`, , r''t 'i ;; �,: ;,'t'yt r++�;'jy 5 . f r ! ,d.3?. _ , 'S 4Y `•�`'
•! , / rr �Ij. _ .!"'-_ _ _ � -��'+ - - } ' • 1 ' `L ` 5 '`� �" 't ' � ` �, , V; I '' ,' 1 ,,1' �' . . ��� , t � , l • � '` `. �,.1 M1 1
_ _ - ' i , •err ' r r ` d',`t ', t a r + `,n ;�n ,L "r r i t,5 t 4 x' ()91 `tSq,ft
4,
•�.'>r - --
+�' '/. '/' � .�'�-_. _�_ •�_ - _ � _/, �r'r •�"_ \",.'�;,ti. `ti 1 f ,' +� i
1Q,765
V L`.lt:� `'` , ,may �r �. I'' 1' / J PRA IA4i„ !�
'4 5 q f
t i
i -
b,
ft, 17
'>, , `'. `^\` •,, I I`5 t -. ,599 A
:-,- ''`.�`,``�„��T', t,��,944 $q/i,f�. � \ ,•� � t -t -` � t
0 5W
`=` ��'.�,-__-'-_'_--"_ _ _•ti .' `'t 'i,. �i,`;�"C `y `\ •.1C^♦ '`�',' S - •sy�pZ-.ta. -
l 1' r�` ``; •;-:� \, ---� _ ``i•, - ``,.'t ,^ ti�
- �_a�_p , I L„i; i; I !r�'• '`'`,`{,L:::,• •: _ ,�r}'•,r:�-nom-., `.�,,• f i i
Legend
EE Stream Crossing 'y: ;' ,•�t,- '`� ._.:,, =f, ¢ �.�.
OParcel i� '','r'!;�'r ;!r ;t`.�,`1t'� jr'r 45 90 180 270 360,
•" :; r' rr '� �.�` Feet'�
-This map was created for proposed planning purposes only. It is not intended to be used as a plat or survey map of any type."

Avvr
Engineers and Soil Scientists
i 1 i 1 1 1 L 11 1 V
Agri -Waste Technology, Inc.
501 N. Salem St. Suite 203
Apex NC 27502
P: 919.859.0669
www.agriwaste.com
Tar Pamlico Buffer Impact Map
Ridgemont Subdivision
Steve Gould
Franklin Co., NC N
IMPORTANT NOTES:
Buffer Impact (sq.ft.)
Zone 1: 3,840 sq.ft
Zone 2: 2,560 sq.ft.
Total - 6,400 sq.ft.
This map is not to exact
scale and design.
Drawn By: Julie Davidson
By: Jeff Vaughan
Date:Reviewed
7 '
%
4L k L 1 ti l
ti 4�7
k %
k
46 116 N
, % k kk
r Y s ti,,ti 4 % k k ti ik 5
tit � k L% k
— r— ti k a ykti1 R.�
,r f s +� ti +� k 1 ' ti ,� S 1. w
k % M lk N %
� 1
RJR
r" ��+krf'
■ t x�`1 k L t 5 4 kti
%
Olk
45
N 5 N L k y L 1k IL* k I 5k kk 111
* ti AQ6 �' 4 k L k L ti L L k r► h L I• 1'
if* ` 1
1%� �~ ti t 1 � k k L � Y i I k 1
■
o�
L 1 1 k I Y I L k 1 t,
1
y w * k L Ik L� L L }M 7Y l+
' 5 A ' ,, L l k �1 LL IL 4 L 1 k SI {
• � � %
5 1 t 1 Il
i�% L ti y kk ti� �k 1 L I 11
'k L k k '� PL I k i y} 1 f k 1t I1
5 4 L
4 �
` ti til tihi L1 4 liar
>V k ti ti t111 k ti l Y 6 L l L Y 7 I I kill
FL ; 1 l I IL iti1
11 L 1 1 ti 1 I M �1 L Y ti L L I k 4
y L L% 1111
I S L k 11 L 1 L 1 1 1 I l 11 L L L
` A l k s I t 4 L Y L L i M #k1L LItiL 4
Legend
--Stream Impact (Driveway) Extent 64'
—Perennial Stream (Non USGS)
• Buffer Zone 1-30'
Buffer Zone -2 20'
L
i 1 i 1 1 1 L 11 1 V
Y
f
I E
1 1 �� 1`+l ■ 1 7
1 1
11
FI M1 1 r1111
l 1
i I I r 1 a I
1{
r # r
t r + r r Driveway Design:
r 1 L 1 The drainage area for this crossing is 55 acres.
Since it's a shared driveway, DOT standard for
I , Q25 instead of Q10 is used. It will need to be a
3 { I 4 } 48" pipe with headwalls. Assuming 40' from
a headwall to headwall, which is 20' of road and
t I 10' either side to the face of the headwall.
That will leave a shoulder of about 8' on either
1 side of the driveway. The HW depth for the
' ■ crossing is 7.2'. The inverts of the pipe are 308
i I t I 4 and 307.6 with the pipe at 1 %. The road CL
+ L above the pipe should be 318 to account for the
HK
S
Lry�' If a dissipator is installed at the downstream end
k T 4 of the pipe, it will be 24' long, 8' wide, with 36" of
20" Class B rip rap for 117 cfs at 11 fps. The total
impacts are 40' of pipe plus the 24' of dissipator,
or 64 LF of stream impacts. {■
�J / j i f
t f r { } f W t
I r f f f 0
loft
r r F 1.
f r r 1 I I 1
i i 1 1 k I�i f I
1 I LL ■ 1 l M J +
F
i j� 1 }
f r J A I I I I F
� � f
+ or
4F r
7 + + r + s
r r' r i f f F r
1' r� r r' *r x
! * f F `� • rF f j f
+ ++ r 4 r+ r+ r f r 4 f r 3
rP + l+ r* r l i i ir r{ r F
I# r 1 f a i 0 f r f F t
r. LY 11i Lr r rr+� r+ S {
1 15 30 60 90 120 i
—This map was created for proposed planning purposes only. It is not intended to be used as a plat or survey map of any type.***

i
CODY WAY
U
J
U
o g UGHANS WAY
j
SITE
C� t E/VS K'AY PEARCE WAV
POPLAR CREEKpR
VICINITY MAP
NO SCALE
71
3 M
- 3:0
n _
-L
NJ
Q
'd m
A Q
M
1-40
IS
IT F
rn
E:
II Fr,
ELEVATION
X2 i FT -
H2
N7
,, R TD 4;HAWr
F6I OAR OiZE
F LAIC
NOTES;
U
M
Ww
< EL
LU CL
F-
LU LU
3 _
< 4 H
1 �
■ r
V') 1 LLi
�
� J
L LU EA
E
U -
!i
355
350
345
340
335
330
325
320
315
310
305
300
295
T THIS FI FtA&T EAICMLL MAI Of t1SEb F13A THE PbLLtAYE %,E
A
Structure Inlet
From To Area
21TA IDAR S t 005, 01 , K9.21, 83B.27. 036.33.
Height of
Watershed
UM. -39, 035,51, S39,57., 5N,63 AND OM,@& -
FT_
F INATALL PR%PI ENEIMULLS WITH YI AN13 PAY
MIN _IKA X.
FM f ACtDADANCE WITH SPECT F1t.TtON LTJ ON Me.
[3-
MX N. Imo,
MIN, JMM,
USE 4000 PSI CONC#IETr=.
BM
' PROVIQE ALL FIEINFUF103 Kh STEEL II PEETS AST X15
-
F#I GRADE M A413 WELDED WIRE FABRIC, {41NFURWING
0 (FT.
TO ASTW Al M WITH 2" WIN. CLE, MCE _
H2
PLACE LIFT' HOLES OR PINS IM ACCORDANCE WIT14
W6
OW OTANDMl) 1ON- 704,
1-2612-00
' PIPE TO BE GFftTEO INTO HEAUWALL AT JGB SITE BT
=
00f+ITR,�tTOPI
-
ALL ELEMENTS MEtW TO MEET ASTM C913,
45
W9LOW WIFIE FAURIG MAY OF; IIYUTUD FOR REWW
1 -25J2.00
AS LONE] Aa THE �E AREA �F STEEL I� PRQM7[�E[].
s
04INFEIk ALL OWNSAS 1 R ON HAVE A I'�, IkM Of 1
As.
L AEFEIIT C T
1.50
IFOH &M SIZE
a4
1,2512,00
NOTE= THE MINI MM BAR SIZE SHALL BE JOS EMS
1.6Of2.61D
OPT10x
SIDE
TO INCR*EASE THUS FAA SLZIE AS NEEDIER .
U
M
Ww
< EL
LU CL
F-
LU LU
3 _
< 4 H
1 �
■ r
V') 1 LLi
�
� J
L LU EA
E
U -
!i
355
350
345
340
335
330
325
320
315
310
305
300
295
A
Structure Inlet
From To Area
EN DWALL DIMENSIONS
Height of
Watershed
tc
Time of
Conc.
FT_
MINILKJM
MIN _IKA X.
MrN_ FW-
MIDI, fKI
MX N. Imo,
MIN, JMM,
PIPE aIA.
BM
SIZE
11111 (FT.
H21�FT.)
0 (FT.
W1
412
1.0
W6
0 S'P
1-2612-00
2-DO13-79
1-2611-76
3.0Df3. 75
5-6016-130
1.25
45
M 8'F
1 -25J2.00
3-0013-75
1-2612-00
3.513111`11 .7-5
$-15016-75
1.50
45
a4
1,2512,00
3.01114.26
1.6Of2.61D
9,6013,7E
B,601111'6,76
2,0
.05
84
1,15002.60
4.DO14,76
1.7612.50
4,00F4,26
7.6019,26
2,6
#3
$ aY
2,50)2.50
4.11016.-00
2. 1111f3.40
'1,511+5. &D
10.00111.90
310
495
M ad'
3.0003,0+0
5. DO 16.00
2.F513.50
5.25 T'5, 75
1111.501111'11.75
3,5
.05
ip
8.-0QJ6.?6
x.21513.50
6.0016.719
i2.0011111•113,26
.4,0
NU
ip s'p
9,5014,5+0
6.5017.00
3.2513.50
5,5056,75
13.00)19.0
.4.19
96
0 $'F
'410015.00
G r5018 r SO
3.2514.00
7.0010.25
Ia . Nil S. 75
6.0
46
a A'F
-4_NIS .00
7-0019-50
3-2514.00
7.25f9.25
13-15115.75
5,5
45
a 8'
11,15010,IDO
7,5010.50
3-2014-00
7,24fO,25
14,00115,75
6,0
45
@ a-
416015. 00
7.-51118.60
.2514.00
7,7BfN,26
14,75110,76
U
M
Ww
< EL
LU CL
F-
LU LU
3 _
< 4 H
1 �
■ r
V') 1 LLi
�
� J
L LU EA
E
U -
!i
355
350
345
340
335
330
325
320
315
310
305
300
295
Storm Drainage Calculations
A
Structure Inlet
From To Area
Length of
Watershed
Height of
Watershed
tc
Time of
Conc.
--Cr --Cr O
cl' cl' O
COO M
N O
V�
O
� CO W
O CR 1l
1� u'> O
O N
u'> O u7
1� O of
S rCT Or -
Cross Pipe Depth
Stone Pad Pad Pad
Size Thickness Zone Width Length
l�� rT 1 �r
HW
Depth
Elevation
PVI VK 1+06.00
W
I� W O
O N 10
cli U-
CV
N O
M M
(cfs)
PVI ELEV. 312.80
(ft/ft)
y
(in) (in) (ft) (ft)
m
M M
M M
LOW PT. STA. 0+76.46
M C'M
M M
10
838 80
116.9
116.9
LEV. 317.51
LOW PT.- 5 05
15(.00 VC
43.1 48 11.4 40.00 308.00
/
-0+50 0+00
0+50
1+00
1+50
2+00
2+50
oho
OLL
o
307.60
A 29.70
1.8
1 7.20
314.80 317.35 1 2.55
O
ON
+,
O
U
O
Cl?
�0
M
+ co
+
00
M
O �c-
�
Q W
Q
W
H J
af6
o
H
J
Co W
co
W
LU
�c
W W
9 X
�0
ami
CL
CL
ami
ami
ami
ami
LD-
0 0
0
0
0
d
0
0
U
0
U
U
U
U
U
o
N
0
In
46. 3LF 48" RCP
1.00%
0
0
0 0
0
c')
OC"7 U�O
Cl)
� �
OM
0
L0t` M
C"') CO
OM
N
*k
+ M M
c 0 *k o
M c 0
Horizontal Scale
= 1 : 50
i=
> > Cj
E
Vertical Scale =
1 : 5
Storm Drainage Calculations
A
Structure Inlet
From To Area
Length of
Watershed
Height of
Watershed
tc
Time of
Conc.
--Cr --Cr O
cl' cl' O
COO M
N O
V�
O
� CO W
O CR 1l
1� u'> O
O N
u'> O u7
1� O of
S rCT Or -
Cross Pipe Depth
Stone Pad Pad Pad
Size Thickness Zone Width Length
l�� rT 1 �r
HW
Depth
Elevation
N N O
U
W
I� W O
O N 10
cli U-
CV
N O
M M
(cfs)
(cfs)
(ft/ft)
y
(in) (in) (ft) (ft)
m
M M
M M
M M
M C'M
M M
10
838 80
116.9
116.9
838-80
43.1 48 11.4 40.00 308.00
-0+50 0+00
0+50
1+00
1+50
2+00
2+50
Storm Drainage Calculations
A
Structure Inlet
From To Area
Length of
Watershed
Height of
Watershed
tc
Time of
Conc.
Storm
Intensity
25
C Q
For Inlet Flow
Area (Q=CIA)
Q
Total
Flow
Slope
Calc.
n= Pipe Pipe Vfull Pipe Invert In Inv. Out CB Top
Size Size Length Elev. Elev. Elev.
Dissipator Pad
NCDOT
Cross Pipe Depth
Stone Pad Pad Pad
Size Thickness Zone Width Length
HWID
HW
Depth
Elevation
HW Shoulder Buffer
(ac)
(ft)
(ft)
(min)
(in/hr)
(cfs)
(cfs)
(ft/ft)
(in) (in) (ftlsec) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft)
(in) (in) (ft) (ft)
m
(ft)
(ft) (EL) (EL) (ft)
FES #1 55.00
2,577
150
10
7.09
116.9
116.9
0.0100
43.1 48 11.4 40.00 308.00
�U
FES #2
CZ
S-
LL
OLL
o
307.60
20 36 8 24
1.8
1 7.20
314.80 317.35 1 2.55
355
350
345
340
335
330
325
320
315
310
305
300
295
3+00 3+50
GRAPHIC SCALE
50 0 25 50 100
HORIZONTAL
1 inch = 50 ft.
5 0 2.5 5 10
VERTICAL
1 inch = 5 ft.
U
0
_ N =N
Qi
Ddb Z
�. •
\
N
U
JCZ
00
U
O
W���
N
O
>
m
Q
C
m
m
x
m
m
m
W
(DLL
> O
�U
CZ
S-
LL
OLL
o
z
(D
a
+,
M
U
N
U
U
U
JCZ
O
�--� Ca
U
O
W���
O
>
m
Q
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
W
(DLL
> O
Q
CZ
S-
LL
OLL
o
0
(D
a
U
W
O
af6
o
y
LU
�c
ami
ami
ami
ami
ami
ami
ami
LD-
0 0
0
0
0
d
0
0
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
o
N
0
In
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
U
JCZ
O
�--� Ca
O
W���
O
>
/ /Y Z
EE
CZ
^,
O L
W
(DLL
> O
Q
CZ
S-
LL
OLL
o
(D

� 'fj11r54
FK009 hee
VANCE
_
Farm 99-
a
GV04.82 Moss Famity
House 9957
■
�,-
FK0324 Clifton Conyers
}
House (AppFox imate site)
x
'*x9
b
GVO489 John PeaMJr.
House 1 SE-8
�
r
p Stir}
L]
+
FK044-4 S.andling Home
2095
■ $ ti
i
r Lv
r Ch
O
GV04S0 J. E. Jenkins
* House
fi
�.
� NC0005 Raleigh Cieston
RailCaridor 2007
010,#
4 FRANKLIN
+T,
w
n
GV0506 Morton-H 6 `-"
Q6
House
~` -
-- - -
FK0346 Ransom Harris
•
Way House
FK0470 Wilda House
�s
F] r
-4 �*
f
Tp l I P�
' B��rr,wuoa f#a
a Ur
a
56
m
X
i
�
y
96
Q, FKO'Fx 3 Frgnxlintffrt
s FKD Aldridg�H.
pt W 90
t,,,;ta. � 2119 X005
Vann Hous 0
'ie Ma gun C
FK4542 C.L 9e; FKD483 M Gee H Ouse
:Fn,
McGh rH us�!_00�'FK0294 Franklinton
A'. AM Oo Church 91 .9990 --
FK 2irsiistflt
F
+1 .57 S�fling Mill i a,
q HisrtaricDstr�ict 2005:'
FK 9FK07-jrSt�'1
9�l�in.�'Cn
Pr ian �illF95 Granvflk- County, State of North
CarolinaiDOT, Esri, HERE, Garmin,
INCREMENT P, NGA, USUS

Avvr
Engineers and Soil Scientists
Agri -Waste Technology, Inc.
501 N. Salem St. Suite 203
Apex NC 27502
P: 919.859.0669
www.agriwaste.com
FEMA Flood Hazard
Ridgemont Subdivision
Steve Gould
Franklin Co., NC N
+1
Drawn By: Julie Davidson
Reviewed By: Jeff Vaughan
D.
r r r r F! F+ l # f i i t f a dd r I l i rr t�
-
! Ir :G Y 4 4 L �!T; I 1 I J , f % r F! i+ Y f•'. wr . -
f I-
r
! ryryi. �P J /
Ir! Flr `"Yr f �r • �� • k i ,rr .1
I�,l rr ' l it fit- f:rr Frj
--------- ,•:..-ys i - J ; 111 4 e- 1 I f l J {r
---�`"'� 4 %5 , 5 TI L L 1; f d A I A i} 1 I 1 4 4 t L S 1 !
li♦';�)/ f`f'_►} ff~` - -nt ti•4 L L4L+1 ir1IL1rL ILI y4 a1I 1
4Yf { ! t t �. f ~ ' /� f y '+ - + -.. _ ; • LLa� a}14L 4 1,4 I 1 N 1 e { J ti ` 1�1��31� J a;,, S,
! # _ k l l t*+ r , I 4 iJ,d+A #�• {
F f , � i / r /1 � ' /~} r " r - � dr a a ✓ .r y � �' ti •~ k k`4 ` 1 � L1y11 ' ,� 1 ,1 •. r* • 1
Tr/ff.r }r W'rfPi rfs+ rY `- r. ✓iti 4y� a4 hv,a �+h hS1 L r 111{�i l,a+Y 14��1,y
Il+t/ff rFr� `' ♦.} �! f r+ +S`a •• •h *• [/,y,'VI'L45 lJ } 11 lr T#L F11 a 4♦ }
li+f F fi• F r F} "£+ +r'�'X x . s r. s Y� r 1 1 I 14 k • a* a
#rl rr! +fir . r' yr' y 4 af}\i .L all I !YI 4%. L xya.dRAIFI •%�jn
!1'fl�f, ,_y+r ��r�---- �1ti.�` `xilasxa5ry4• dr.d9e 5 w ; ham• a �r"`°E�Ykx' •�
f I r r rte` w k y\ •} 1 % y�yY
Ita
iil I/ 1 F Y p M �~ r £ rvr - ; W i s i;•, 4 S S 5 4 a�;; Y 1♦ f'+1 q yy
ff rl jPF I r r 1 rF}fes ' l� f l}✓ {_- y z k a'.YSt h}lL L L I F .....
A
l '" ; t, L, L; t t a~ 'rTl t i}
J f111rt f! +fi fr•#'Yt/r` " a ��_ ,"; tai• ,a I}l•ar*�AS hL ,w ht 7 rr ! "Jf
S i# f 1 !� r r,f i t t✓ r i r 1 ,y • t 4 e4 .L i # !! f F 2i'=Vy
h k � ri f r } rte:
f s111 f + r fJT ��«sL+', ` ,l•` r 1+ I F r F f "f f *.
rr,i .[�
b l x, 4; 1p1�
' * } a% ;1 ; 4 v 5� J`� 1 ; / i f
rl0rl ft Lf 41Pf Fffr+rr{� l#'i►A IIifY `* h {4; �, I. y4 ,J.1E; A. ,4L !l4f 1 II l4fI a ff
�lsJrll+ �'. L \, 1L ' i 4t kk ! 1 r J 1 I.r
IiIfIlll il� rr.I�f,1 rr r/rF '0 fr+��a+ ..R• 3 4 L RL yLhkLv y.1 ky 94150,}11111 L1 I } i T f 1 yl it
F�YhI I P P , 1 1!}yi ! i I ' f s� r 1 l y A• 1 y5 y S Y h, 4{ 5 I i' IL f % ! 1 A 1 521 f 1
11 1P
III J1fP !frF! r % ' * ,L 1S 5 L 1 1 11, r J,+Fd
a Y k y Y 1 L i 1 1 I 71 1 ! r frr� 1 I I +rr•-l++
lA4 r r IP r 1$ 1P�P 1 Al I 1 f f f r `-
�fT111! L J r ! r l rJ it I f J/ }y� .{��{y'j1. tS rk 1V L h L LY 5 Yl' ,`I ', r• J I� T r, L L 1 , 1 f 1 I f
IJJ rf t! r14� 11 L11 ff 11 5f f fiF F ff ` y't 5 4 L' ' 14 L Liv
IPP11LJ11 Y#r; 1.l rl fl ill rl#I [ F•f ff P�{lraw' L14�5 r•.•4S RSly11{y5ytihl iIY'1 r�rfrfr r -i f 551�Ir /1I
II I r r ,l f I f I 1 P 1/ r t 1 t L 5 7 S 'I 11 i /�/ ` y �
Y P I P r I L 1 f {% SyL f h ' S A S S S ; Y L S SL,S iL 1 L k I II 5. �1 LI, ti l i f r l !{ " y 4, i j f # Y 1 A 1 1 7 1{
I]I F4f f 1 11 I fll J I it I r l Y! I 4 I Ir r 7.f y i 4 L y y 4 7� , 1 5 S 4 5 I1 }{ r l l l' L 5 f I p} " % I Y,j r L k1'r�wrl
r P t l d l f! r 4 111 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 Y L L L L h i L L L 4 1 L L k 5 L l 4 1 44 11 1 1 tir ! i r / A
IJLJII YJ LI1 Jlr.111 P41 Sr,111I L 1 It a L L ya1115 �14L1F4 11 Ff1,}4 �Ir JI
IPf rll if ril rr lP+JiTIJ r,L1�11 5. 1 , 1 4 a i SL4 t hljk lLsl; I{14fi� J e1 Fr �N�"
411 rl 11 J+1 r+ rr14hLS I i L Y t L r i 4 4 AL y1 t L4 LII 1 k 1 r +1 r rrFi `+. } •tiJ�
t Y L l L 4 L, 1 1 �Y if i11r! l4LkY k■4 i 4 ./ ► 1 Yh 51 Ii4S, Ik%1 I1S1 rJ1yry� "//'Lyy�[lr 111f1+1J4 L}Y 1L14 a,,4 5 S,,LLy15ji1Y, 4kLaLr1 +T5AR iF�+1 fr++rr+ r
111 11 ,S Y 11 11 1 L 4 '1 y 1 i• lir' , 1 k 4 I 1 i k 1, 1 1 Al Lh Lt 'S, J P f r 1% R F (y,��+ ' r r�r
a+T a s "" ■ 1 Y , I{ i, 1 l 7 Y '1 1 J v f' '4E• r S Y'
OD
L {, r TT f
4 Y 1 � �1 h 1 h I Y L 5 L o h I L 1 r i f f # I may,
Ie 11 i S1 y L S 17 4 J l 1� • f F r r 1 r{
1 1} } A l k 1 , 1 4 I 1 '� ,` K �\/�f ; . f I I k i Y, 1 1 1 1 1, �� LyL S {L 14 S 1 yd. + lr el le r Y f l i r� f x r I T�
I _11 , 1, 4 1 , I 4'1 5 5 i IAL ; .1 a. P L 1 I 11 1 J L 1 L L k L 4 1, r/ 4 1 1. 1 -1 i} a J, T, 1 I 1 i! ++ Fi f r JF {
I A 1 1 1 1 1 4 I. 5 L a 5 L L k 4 • +. 1 a ' .. L I, 1 I I I l I L 1 1 , J i 1 1 1'1 55l { '� ''lfl L I r L I + f l l l r } J t r l
r lk ItL ,•h' 1. I.I s \ i' k J 1 1 1 1 1 ; 1 I Ir 11 Lf A1+ ," LL �
I4 y x I F I f 1 1 1 {xl k r 1 1 f l r 1 r , •r
! l i+ ;, 1♦ 4 5 a• k • k ` w y r; • • ya •t. .. / I 1 \ 4 1 1 1 1 Y! 1 Y i 1 , ! 1 Y I T !{ Sf 1 I wv 1' I. i ] I L I I , rr r 1 f
11 X15 a4 aayL -f�" +.+f- A' ay J 11MI I1 Pi 11 r1i1 ,Pr{1ytl ��f T��'r4, ,*• L L 1hli Jr rl Ji l r! f! f
JI LL Sl lSL4 ,5T S,h'•4Y\4�;%;tea f I11K11I 1115111f,ir
L 0 A{A5111 ,1 [r4; L I Tl�
1 , 5, 5 A r h :. ;' \4 Y r 1 4 Y 4 r I ✓ r� !s , '��vvaa I
i '�l v '� a 4 • "aa• � Y � 14 IS 1F �L 1! I. L i iv4 � 1 L L
'� 1 4 4 14 4•
0 }. a a R t" }* • • f h L 1, 1 I L
L; L 4 k .,I ;, L a k♦ ` y y v ' a l f l 1 I.' 1 1 r J!L Y r S I 1#• F 4 'EA k k 7 1 1 L I L
1 4 i a ;•a•na • *} •} ry' .� r* 1'11111 , ! 1 I f 4
Y-+- r
�, X • a • . w ; .,; . ,' • ' �\ a a ; • 1 1 1. PiJ 4 e1 #J 1!1 P1 A 1�.y, k L.-� , L L 1
ahl L • ' , • , y a .} �ti�} •' 4�.`+1 4 x*y 4 1 \ • ;i � 1 i111J
•.♦k L a 4+\ ~; ' s a ; ; 1 ':: 4i Ir l 5 I1 I'
�I{ a` �• jtiJ�l• % .. 4yy �'1 • ti t M ac F tii. 1 LL' { 1, 1 l 1 1 F r 1 !rf ! f
IA{y a. \ a FFF ` �\ , ;t ' y *v+<w, ;; L 5 k ! rrrLLL y C I I 1' 1 s 4 5 1* 1 I k f, 1 I r 7 1'
•• ; '4;: M1 Li a• ; 4 5. 4 a j 1 I I I h I L, , 1 1 1 1 i t rL 1 i t F /
• a Y`` y;, ;' � ` h ,.. �' S y h a`s a f r f eIF
a 1% `• ry } . \k;a A h \a 1 l 11 L
w• y A 4 y\ L h •' f 1 r A 1 1 4, 4 Ilk 11 I f � 1�4, i / f r j 1 f I 1
a , t o 1 1 4 s r t r r r >tl. ]
Legend k4 Lay . a 4 1 +'' 1 4• . •Y Y 1 h L. 'L 5 1 Y 4 L 1 `1 1+ 1 t 1 r •l ,C`:<r.N r E e r F . 1
r l y A,•41r •a "� / 1, 11y,Qp�r ,11L ;rti,i tl 1 ...% i JF to�F { 1 f r f r, f F
- Stream Impact (Driveway) Extent 64'y a a • + * 1 t , 'tet.; I + 1 + S
4 l vY V S L L L 1 '1 , 1 1
-Perennial Stream (Non USGS) t + a ; ' 1 k
I L 1 1 1 { 1 1 L L �I►! r �Y �` F � F S f I
C> Parcel k 5 a k A • `ati xaaaat••}' I Y iLv 11l 1YL1ii i P r f! I r'* '�Iy ! f) 1 1 �'
a v ;a. \;•1 4, L L Y#1 1•I► 1, 4•• 4 a' r F r f (� / f i r
Floodplain-www.fema.gov ; a a a• •` 1 11 a r i d
r+ t5 y• y; k,~a,*"l`� • t ',� 1 Lt;t114L7 LIP, 4 R i j ! 11r 1 1 r � f rF F
X (Not inside 100 yr. floodplain) 4 y a , • 1 , 1 , L, r r ! r
L , k , a 4 ' A . • • L L7 1 .1 1i 5 1 ! r ! �y� 25 50 100 A 150 200 !
_ 5 • h A,45~; *a;11. Fee #i
*• • •' y t 1 L
-This map was created for proposed planning purposes only. It is not intended to be used as a plat or survey map of any type.-

PCN Miscellaneous Document Submittal:
Stormwater Management Plan Requirements
Conversation with the engineer that worked on developing this subdivision (Ridgemont Subdivision)
revealed that a Stormwater Management Plan was not required for this development. Therefore one is
not included in this PCN. That engineer is:
[e-mail]
Michael A. Moss, PLS
Cawthorne, Moss & Panciera, PC
333 S. White St.
Wake Forest, NC 27587
919-556-3148
919-554-1370(fax)

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
Natural Heritage Program
Governor Roy Cooper
June 18, 2018
Julie Davidson
Agriwaste Technology, Inc.
501 N. Salem St.
Apex, NC 27502
RE: Road Crossing
Dear Julie Davidson:
Secretary Susi H. Hamilton
NCNHDE-6280
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide information
about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database, indicates that there are
no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or conservation/managed areas
within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there may be no documentation of natural
heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have
been surveyed. The results of this query should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists.
In the event that rare species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may
update our records.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that have been
documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these records suggests that
these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area if suitable habitat exists. Tables of
natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile radius of the project area, if any, are also
included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one -mile radius of the project
area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for guidance. Contact
information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation planning, project
review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria for regulatory decisions.
Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published without prior written notification to the
NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP
data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a Dedicated Nature
Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Clean Water Management Trust Fund easement, or Federally -listed
species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance, please
contact Rodney A. Butler at rod ney.butler&Dncdcr.gov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
MAILING ADDRESS: Tele hone: [919', 7D7-8107 LOCA.TICN
16`1 MaiI Ser,rice Center �n�rr&ncnh2.org 121 VVest hones S-reat
Ralaigh, NC 27899-1881 Ralaigh, NC 27603

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Road Crossing
June 18, 2018
NCNHDE-6280
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic
EO ID
Scientific Name
Common Name
Last
Element
Group
Status
Rank
Rank
Observation
Occurrence
Significantly
G3
S2?
Date
Rank
Dragonfly or
31277
Macromia margarita
Mountain River Cruiser
1980-08-06
E
Damselfly
Low
Rare
Dragonfly or
33749
Somatochlora georgiana
Coppery Emerald
2004 -Pre
H?
Damselfly
---
G3
S2
3 -Medium
---
Natural
295
Granitic Flatrock (Annual
---
2010
NR
Community
S3
Herb Subtype)
Rare Peripheral
Natural
30421
Granitic Flatrock
---
2010
NR
Community
(Perennial Herb Subtype)
Natural
30422
Granitic Flatrock Border
---
2010
NR
Community
G3
Woodland
Vascular Plant
9479
Matelea decipiens
Glade Milkvine
1985-05-11
E
Vascular Plant
8588
Parthenium auriculatum
Glade Wild Quinine
1987-10-23
E
Vascular Plant 7111 Portulaca smallii Small's Portulaca 1985-09-06 A
Natural Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Site Name Representational Rating
County Line Flatrocks R3 (High)
No Managed Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Accuracy
Federal
State
Global
State
Status
Status
Rank
Rank
3 -Medium
Species of
Significantly
G3
S2?
Concern
Rare
5 -Very
---
Significantly
G3G4
S2?
Low
Rare
3 -Medium
---
---
G3
S2
3 -Medium
---
---
G3
S2
3 -Medium
---
---
G3?
S2
3 -Medium
---
Significantly
G5
S3
Rare Peripheral
4 -Low
---
Significantly
G3G4
S3
Rare
Throughout
3 -Medium
---
Threatened
G3
S2
Collective Rating
C4 (Moderate)
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/content/help. Data query generated on June 18, 2018; source: NCNHP, Q2 April 2018. Please resubmit your
information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 3

NCNHDE-6280: Road Crossing
e-°
n� o
�A
c
/
/
/ 55
l d J
5038 Son LaYr'e
O '
- l 4Me Rd
o I
�r
I
O SIorL,
Cf M/�te^e Dr m
Cat hh/I Dr po
/
/
�t,ILn
/
/
/
N
W+E
S
June 18, 2018
Project Boundary
Buffered Project Boundary
NHP Natural Area (NHNA)
Page 3 of 3
_ COd1S Way -
U 0
Creek
i
LM
ucHlar Creek Dr
4abr Ct
1:23,658
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 mi
0 0.325 0.65 1.3 km
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS,
FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan,
METI, Esri China (Hong Kong),—sstopo, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and
the GIS User Community

6/18/2018 IPaC: Resources
IPaC U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
IPaC resource list
This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical habitat (collectively referred to as
trust resources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS) jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near
the project area referenced below. The list may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but that
could potentially be directly or indirectly affected by activities in the project area. However, determining the likelihood and
extent of effects a project may have on trust resources typically requires gathering additional site-specific (e.g.,
vegetation/species surveys) and project -specific (e.g., magnitude and timing of proposed activities) information. �
Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the USFWS office(s) with jurisdiction
in the defined project area. Please read the introduction to each section that follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds,
USFWS Facilities, and NWI Wetlands) for additional information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that section.
Project information
NAME
Ridgemont
LOCATION
Franklin County, North Carolina
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/project/NCUX5FLEEVEDLAFMKBUNN5WKZQ/resources 1/9

6/18/2018
DESCRIPTION
shared driveway stream crossing
Local office
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
[phone]
[phone]
MAILING ADDRESS
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
PHYSICAL ADDRESS
551 Pylon Drive, Suite F
Raleigh, NC 27606-1487'
IPaC: Resources
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/project/NCUX5FLEEVEDLAFMKBUNN5WKZQ/resources 2/9

6/18/2018 INC: Resources
—q*
_ -W
Endangered species
This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis of project level impacts.
The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each species. Additional areas of
influence (AOI) for species are also considered. An AOI includes areas outside of the species range if the species could be
indirectly affected by activities in that area (e.g., placing a dam upstream of a fish population, even if that fish does not occur
at the dam site, may indirectly impact the species by reducing or eliminating water flow downstream). Because species can
move, and site conditions can change, the species on this list are not guaranteed to be found on or near the project area. To
fully determine any potential effects to species, additional site-specific and project -specific information is often required.
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary information whether any
species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of such proposed action" for any project that is
conducted, permitted, funded, or licensed by any Federal agency. A letter from the local office and a species list which fulfills
this requirement can only be obtained by requesting an official species list from either the Regulatory Review section in IPaC
(see directions below) or from the local field office directly.
For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC website and request an official
species list by doing the following: A A — %, ..
1. Log in to IPaC.
2. Go to your My Projects list.
3. Click PROJECT HOME for this project
4. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST.
Listed speciesi and their critical habitats are managed by the Ecological Services Program of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) and the fisheries division of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Fisheries).
Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown on this list. Please contact NOAA
Fisheries for species under their jurisdiction.
1. Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC also shows species that are
candidates, or proposed, for listing. See the listing status page for more information.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/project/NCUX5FLEEVEDLAFMKBUNN5WKZQ/resources 3/9

6/18/2018
INC: Resources
2. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce.
The following species are potentially affected by activities in this location:
Clams
,,:,►,III
Dwarf Wedgemussel Alasmidonta heterodon
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecptspecies/784
Yellow Lance Elliptio lanceolate
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecptspecies/4511
Flowering Plants
NAME
Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecptspecies/5217
STATUS
Endangered
Threatened
STATUS
Endangered
Critical habitats
w
Potential effects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with the endangered species themselves.
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS AT THIS LOCATION.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/project/NCUX5FLEEVEDLAFMKBU N N5WKZQ/resources
4/9

Nie.
Migratory birds
IPaC: Resources
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Acts and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Acts.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to migratory birds, eagles, and their
habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described
below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Birds of Conservation Concern http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/managed-species/
birds-of-conservation-concern.php
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/project-assessment-tools-
and-guidance/ OF \ TV Ab
conservation-measures.php
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds
http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/pdf/management/nationwidestandardconservationmeasures.pdf
THERE ARE NO MIGRATORY BIRDS OF CONSERVATION CONCERN EXPECTED TO OCCUR AT THIS LOCATION.
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all birds at any location year round.
Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding
in the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure. To see
when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures
and/or permits may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or bird species present on
your project site. _: -AN—Now-
What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location?
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/project/NCUX5FLEEVEDLAFMKBUNN5WKZQ/resources 5/9

6/18/2018
IPaC: Resources
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) and other species that may warrant special
attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based
on a growing collection of survey., banding, and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as
occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention because they are a
BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or
development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area. It is not representative of all birds that
may occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the E -bird Explore Data Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN).
This data is derived from a growing collection of survey,, banding, and citizen science datasets .
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes available. To learn more about how the
probability of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me
about these graphs" link. r
,
NIP
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my project area.7A
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering, migrating or year-round), you may refer to the
following resources: The Cornell Lab of Ornithology All About Birds Bird Guide, or (if you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of interest there),
the Cornell Lab of Ornithology Neotropical Birds guide. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if
that bird does occur in your project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds elsewhere" is
indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern throughout their range anywhere within the USA
(including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements
(for eagles) or (for non -eagles) potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities (e.g. offshore
energy development or longline fishing).
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/project/NCUX5FLEEVEDLAFMKBUNN5WKZQ/resources 6/9

6/18/2018
INC: Resources
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to
the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can
implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and groups of bird species within your
project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa
besides birds that may be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird model results files underlying the portal
maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the
Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the year, including migration. Models relying
on survey data may not include this information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study. and the
nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating the Eagle Act should such impacts
occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of priority concern. To learn more about how
your list is generated, and see options for identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC use to
generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of
birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look carefully
at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort
is the key component. If the survey effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In contrast, a low
survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is
simply a starting point for identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might be there, and if they
might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in
knowing when to implement conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities, should presence be
confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or
minimize impacts to migratory birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/project/NCUX5FLEEVEDLAFMKBUNN5WKZQ/resources 7/9

6/18/2018 INC: Resources
Facilities
Wildlife refuges and fish hatcheries
REFUGE AND FISH HATCHERY INFORMATION IS NOT AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME
Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory
1-144
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section 404 of the Clean Water
or other State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program
THERE ARE NO KNOWN WETLANDS AT THIS LOCATION.
Data limitations
of the local U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers District
Act,
The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level information on the location, type and
size of these resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of high altitude imagery. Wetlands are identified based on vegetation, visible
hydrology and geography. A margin of error is inherent in the use of imagery; thus, detailed on -the -ground inspection of any particular site may
result in revision of the wetland boundaries or classification established through image analysis.
The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image analysts, the amount and quality of the
collateral data and the amount of ground truth verification work conducted. Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the source
imagery used and any mapping problems. 40"--N NW4011
Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or field work. There may be occasional differences in
polygon boundaries or classifications between the information depicted on the map and the actual conditions on site.
Data exclusions
Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of aerial imagery as the primary data
source used to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or submerged aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/project/NCUX5FLEEVEDLAFMKBUNN5WKZQ/resources 8/9

6/18/2018
INC: Resources
zones of estuaries and nearshore coastal waters. Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also been excluded
from the inventory. These habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial imagery.
Data precautions
Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe wetlands in a different manner than that
used in this inventory. There is no attempt, in either the design or products of this inventory, to define the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of
any Federal, state, or local government or to establish the geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies. Persons
intending to engage in activities involving modifications within or adjacent to wetland areas should seek the advice of appropriate federal, state,
or local agencies concerning specified agency regulatory programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may affect such activities.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/project/NCUX5FLEEVEDLAFMKBUNN5WKZQ/resources 9/9