20050998 Ver 2_401 Application_20051207

HAL OWEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
`. SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS
P.O. Box 400, 266 Old Coats Road
Lillington, NC 27546-0400
Phone [phone] / Fax [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
u E9 -,I,,
5 December, 2005
Mrs. Lillette Granade
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
Post Office Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
Reference: Green Valley South, Section 1
USACE Action ID 200500198
Dear Mrs. Granade,
DS- oqa S
21Rk-L-5LOWE @
DEC 7 2005
DENR - WATER QUAUTI'
1YETIANDS AND STDRA,{pyATER BRANCH
Enclosed please find the revised Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) that has been
prepared for the above referenced property, which is located on the southern side of Country
Club Drive, Cross Creek Township, Cumberland County, North Carolina. The residential
development plan proposes two road crossings that will impact 195 linear feet (.004 acre) of an
intermittent stream and 0.148 acre of wetland (0.152 acre total impacts to waters of the U.S.). It
is our belief that the proposed wetland impacts can be authorized by USACE Nationwide Permit
39 (WQC3402).
I trust that this provides all the information that you require to authorize the proposed impacts.
ti If you have any questions or need additional information, please feel free to contact me at your
convenience.
Sincerely,
}?j(LcDO??- ? rV
Krissina B. Newcomb
Environmental Scientist III
CC: Mr. John Culbreth(owner)
Southeast Development
428 Swan Island Court
Fayetteville, NC 28311
Division of Water Quality
401 /WetlandsUnit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Soil Science Investigations • Wetland Delineations, Permitting, and Consulting
Office Use Only: Form Version March 05
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or"N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 39/ WQC #3402
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here:
II. Applicant Information
DEC 7 `lOG5
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Mr. John Culbreth DFN. R -'WATER QUAL' 7
Mailing Address: Southeast Development WERM08 WF_? ?
428 Swan Island Court
Fayetteville, NC 28311
Telephone Number: 910-303-0366 Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Hal Owen
Company Affiliation: Hal Owen & Associates, Inc.
Mailing Address: PO Box 400
Lillington, NC 27546
Telephone Number: 910-893-8743 Fax Number: 910-893-3594
E-mail Address: halowen(a)earthlink.net
Page 5 of 12
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: _ Green Valley South, Section One
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 0439-30-1975
4. Location
County: Cumberland Nearest Town: Fayetteville
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): NA
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): Site is on southern side of
Country Club Road, approximately 2650 feet west of the intersection of Country Club Road
and Ramsey Street
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.0971 ON 78.8903 °W
6. Property size (acres): 54.2
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Country Club Branch
8. River Basin: Cape Fear
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Site has been cleared for development. General land use in
the vicinity is residential and commercial
Page 6 of 12
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The proposed project is a residential housing development with multi-family units serviced
by a network of roads and public sewer and water. Equipment to be utilized includes
bulldozers, pans, trackhoes, and other typical construction equipment.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: residential development
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
Action ID 200500198; 14 March 2005 USACE Jurisdictional Determination
DWO Project 405-0998; 2 June 2005 PCN submitted; 19 August 2005 PCN withdrawn
V. Future Project Plans
VI.
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No future wetland permits will be needed. All remaining wetlands to be preserved
Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 7 of 12
I . Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Impact "A' is an existing road
crossing of the wetland drain and stream utilizing a culvert and fill. Impact "B" is a proposed
road crossing utilizing the same.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
se arately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year
Floodplain
es/no Distance to
Nearest
Stream
linear feet Area of
Impact
(acres)
A Fill forested wetland no 0 0.080
B Fill forested wetland no 0 0.068

Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.148
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 5.53
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiDly lenath X width. then divide by 43.560_
Stream Impact
Perennial or Average Impact Area of
Number Stream Name Type of Impact
Intermittent? Stream Width Length Impact
indicate on ma Before Impact linear feet) acres
A UT to Country
Club Branch culvert intermittent 1 97 .002
B UT to Country
Club Branch culvert intermittent 1 98 .002

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 195 .004
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding. drainaize. bulkheads. etc.
,Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc.) Area of
Impact
acres

Total Open Water Impact (acres)
Page 8 of 12
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): 0.004
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.148
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.152
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 195
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ® No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. Efforts to avoid proposed
impacts include maintaining significant areas of wetlands and streams within the oven space of
the development. The road format has been modified by introducing an L-turnaround to
eliminate the need for a road crossing over a wetland seep. The road crossing at Impact "B" is
required by City of Fayetteville Subdivision and Zoning Ordinances Chapter 27-1 11) (copy
attached], which limits cul-de-sac roads to less than 800 feet long
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
Page 9 of 12
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmaide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
All remaining wetlands and streams on this property (5.378 acre) will be preserved.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/wm/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Page 10 of 12
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ? No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 213 .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
213 .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ? No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 1.5
Total
t-unc i extenas out ju reet perpenmcuiar from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 213.0242 or.0244, or.0260.
Page I 1 of 12
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. Proposed impervious acreage for Green Valley
South, Section One, is 12.5%.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
i
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
City of Fayetteville Sewer
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ® No ?
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ® No ?
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ® No ?
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description: A
second phase of development is planned with single family residential housing There will be no
additional stream or wetland impacts.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 12 of 12
jSEP-09-2004 09:35 AM
gap-09-2004 44:47 AM
i
?I
THOMAS GOODEN
MAL. OWEN % ASSOC INC
9 September 2004
Owner Infa m don:
Mr. Jahn Calbreth (owner)
Boutheut Development
428 Swim Wand Court
paYeftiAe. NC 28311
[phone]
910 223 7788 P.02
930 ova 3294 P,OZ
Property Dmription;
Country Cltib Road, Fayetteville
Cumberland County, North Carolina
1, cR ilt*q g fi
autllvcize the US lum Co . as owner of the Above fdWenwed property,
Y rpe of aCincas to enter the subject propany ibr the purpose of
wetland ddineWon review
I also authorize Mr. Hal Owen of Hal Owen & Associates, inc. * act in my b"F as my
aswd in promsing applieatiens for wetland ccrtificatien andlor pc=iu.
Date
C
?A
1)
m
4.•
O
1MG
Oo5RCP
'IC

„0

W>
S?pac?
1?Jeflgc,d: o.o$o Ate.
TRAP 88
J
_.TP.6p
5-raam
GABLES DRIVE SECTIONAL NI
BASIN do TEMP
TRAP 45-A'-^
wITHBAF?iFS°us

F£s/31
SECAOAW N
nv /T .e7
0

BASIN do TE6dP
TRAP 65-A
WITH POUROus
BAFFLES
i
Goode,-7 & Associates, h
1745 Cypress Lakes Rd
Hope M111s, NC 28348
91 O -223- 7766
rcx. 910-223-7788
Grawing 04476-2
°b' e6p?it?

c
CGUNT;zy CLUB g
Zero Lot Line Deve1o,01,
DETAIL S
Green Valley So u
Section One
City cf Fayetteville
Cross Creek Township
Cumberland County North
CO 111 7C
REWSED AUGUST 2Z, 2X5
green. Valley SOL,*
U SCa 5 ?. 5 Menu+? Tapo?raPh?c .
ye-4+f Lv? 11c Quaolran le I
r
?
,
??
,?
.. •sil ? N ?--? \ ' ? ? t?? '?_?- ?7 l ur, .. .. +1i '???•
.L ? ??
t G1^} i`?
/ ?-+?1, ? ?.?/F
? '{I
N j 4 1 •If• ? ; ?i?t....

238 l+ \
200
FI,

?•. •% o? i, .??/
1
j
1
and.
' "-fi ? y
•
' r
x
lay Pi p
•
l .J ,r

g} 2 .
l mil' ! f, ?, r
• + ?"`.. S
/` ?? ?
??y( ?,. 1,, :
?'? ? f
'F ?- ? `/?
'

drk ?Circle

C• v _ st v

'. :

? \w ?s

• l ?
.. \
<: r ' o

?E Smith
{
71
\ -
os
`., •

PIA
j 1 upuvuaus %-upyngm w ryyr ueLorme rarmouto, me uauyo Source uata: inks (-- j950 tt Scale:1 :24,000 Detail: 13-0 Datum: WGS84

of T "
cbg s :. y

SHEET NUMBER 11
CUMBERLAND AND HOKE COUNTIES, NORTH CAROLINA
A ., 78°52'30'

ES,

s

K 1
l
yj i 3 '
.5
`

41111 - M4 I
?`, ,'4 ?l?f +St

ppisf Y, ,

_ SL f

e
Y 'S' l .T
7

?L
? ?J
a
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Country Club Date: 5 August 2004
Applicant/Owner: Mr. John Culbreth County: Cumberland
Investigator: Krissina B. Newcomb State: North Carolina
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ®Yes ?No Community ID: nonwetland
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? ?Yes ®No Transit ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? ?Yes ®No Plot ID: 1
(If needed, explain on reverse.) 1 11
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Carya glabra Tree FACU 9.
2. Liriodendron tulipifera Tree FAC 10.
3. Liquidambar styraciua Tree FAC+ 11.
4. Tilia americana Tree FACU 12.
5. Aralia spinosa S/S FAC 13.
6. Rubus spp. Herb - 14.
7. smilax rotundifolia Vine FAC 15.
8. vitis rotundifolia Vine FAC 16.
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW or FAC(excluding FAC-). 5/7 X 100 = 71%
Remarks: hydrophytic vegetation was not observed.
HYDROLOGY
? Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks)
? Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
? Aerial Photographs
? Other
® No recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
? Inundated
? Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
? Water Marks

Field Observations: ? Drift Lines
? Sediment Deposits
? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) Secondary Indicators: (2 or more required)
? Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) ? Water-Stained Leaves
? Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: >23 (in.) ? FAC Neutral Test
? Other (explain in remarks)
Remarks: Hydric soil indicator was not observed.
Culbreth-CountryClub-wdfs.doc
SOILS
s and Phase): Waaram Urban Land Complex 0-8 /o slope ed T e?
FFTSaxon Unit Name o Drainage Class: well
Field Observations Confirm. Mapp yp
? Yes ® No
omy (Subgro up): Arenic Paleudult s
Profile Description:
Mottle Colors Mottle
Depth Matrix Colors Abundance/Contrast
Horizon (Mansell moist) fMansell Moist)
inches
0-7 A_ I OYR 4/2
l OYR 4/5
7-16 16 - 23 - 2.5Y 5/8
2.5Y 6/4
23+
Hydric Soil Indicators:
? Histosol
? Histic Epipedon
? Sulfidic Odor
? Aquic Moisture Regime
? Reducing Conditions
? Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors
Texture, Concretions,
Structure, etc.
andy Loam
landv Loam
>andy Loam
.name sand
? Concretions
? High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soil
? Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
? Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
? Listed on National Hydric Soils List
? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Hydric soil indicator Ras not observed.
NVETLAND DETERNUNATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ? Yes ® NO Is this Sampling Point within a Wetland?
Wetland Hydrology Present? ? Yes ® No ? Yes ®No
Hydric Soils Present? ? Yes ® No
Remarks: This observation point is located approximately 20 feet above wetland point Al.
Culbreth-CountryClub-wdfs.doc
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Country Club Date: 5 August 2004
Applicant/Owner: Mr. John Culbreth County: Cumberland
Investigator: Krissina B. Newcomb State: North Carolina
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ®Yes E]No Community ID: wetland
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? ?Yes ®No Transit ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? ?Yes ®No Plot ID: 2
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Acer rubrum Tree FAC 9. Boehmeria cylindrica Herb FACW+
2. Liriodendron tulipifera Tree FAC 10. Smilax laurifolia Vine FACW+
3. Magnolia virginiana S/S FACW+ 11. Campsis radicans Vine FAC
4. Acer rubrum S/S FAC 12.
5. Woodwardia areolata Herb OBL 13.
6. Osmunda cinnamomea Herb FACW+ 14.
7. Arundinaria gigantea Herb FACW 15.
8. Cornus amomum Herb FACW+ 16.
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW or FAC(excluding FAC-). 11/11 X 100 = 100%
Remarks: Hydrophytic vegetation was observed.
HYDROLOGY
? Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks)
? Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
? Aerial Photographs
? Other
® No recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
? Inundated
® Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
? Water Marks

Field Observations: ? Drift Lines
? Sediment Deposits
® Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) Secondary Indicators. (2 or more required)
? Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 11 (in.) ? Water-Stained Leaves
? Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: 3 (in.) ? FAC Neutral Test
? Other (explain in remarks)
Remarks: Wetland hydrology indicators were observed.
Culbreth-CountryClub-wdfs.doc
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Blaney loamy sand 8-15% slopes Drainage Class: well
Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Arenic Hapludults ? Yes ® No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) Nlottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
Munsell :.foist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-7 l OYR 2/1 Sand Loam
7-30 N 2.5 Loam, mucky
Hydric Soil Indicators:
? Histosol ? Concretions
? Histic Epipedon ? High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soil
? Sulfidic Odor ? Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
? Aquic Moisture Regime ? Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
? Reducing Conditions ? Listed on National Hydric Soils List
® Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Hydric soil indicator observed.
WETLAND DETERN NATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ® Yes El No
Wetland Hydrology Present? ® Yes ? No Is this Sampling Point within a Wetland?
Hydric Soils Present? ® Yes ? No ® Yes ? No
Remarks: This observation point is located approximately 20 feet downslope of A0.
Culbreth-CountryClub-wdfs.doc
SUBDIVISION AND ZONING
ORDINANCES
CHAPTER 27 AND 32
FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
REVISED JULY, 1999
Sec. 27-1
Sec. 27.2
are equal to or exceed that standards of the municipality, as shown
in its subdivision regulations. Provided, however, that the plats of
these 4 exempted classes shall have the planning agency's stamp of
"No Approval Required" before filing with the Register of Deeds
Office.
(N) Super block.::; Super block shall mean a large developable piece of land
surrounded by a street, provided it is divided by a minimum ten (10) foot
multipurpose easement or a public right-of-way, with a minimum five (5) foot
wide concrete walk every one thousand eight hundred (1,800) feet. Cul-de-
sacs are allowed within the super block provided they are no longer than
eight hundred (800) feet in length.
(m) Zero lot line developments. A development including but not limited to
patio homes, townhouses, and businesses consisting of one (1) or more
structure(s) comprising at least two (2) single-family residences or
businesses whether attached or detached intended for separate
ownership, and developed in accordance with section 27-100). The zero
lot line provision may only be used in situations where additional vacant
lot(s) are created.
(n) Unit ownership (condominium) development. A projed of two (2) or more
residential units in one (1) or more multi-unit buildings with common areas
and facilities designed and constructed for unit ownership as permitted by
the North Carolina Unit Ownership Ad when approved under the
requirements for unit ownership developments set forth in this chapter.
(o) Urban services area. The urban services area for the City shall be as
shown on the Urban Services Area Map for the City, as approved by the
City Council, the original of which shall be maintained in the office of the
City Clerk, and copies kept in the office of the Inspection Superintendent
and the Planning staff. Attached to and included as part of the Urban
Services Area Map shall be the development standards based upon density
for the Urban Services Area as approved by the City Council.
(Ord. of 9-10-56, § 1; Orel. No. 1969-12, §§ 1, 2, 9-22-69; Ord. No. 1972-3, § 3, 3-13-
72; Ord. No. 1974-12, 12-9-74; Ord. No. 1982-13, § 2(1), 5-10-82; Ord. No. 1994-3, § 1,
3-21-94; Ord. No. 1998-8, § 1, 7-1-96; Ord. No. 1996-20, § 1,2,10-7-96, Ord. No. 1999-
3, § 2, 3-15-99)
Sec. 27-2. Review and approval of plats and group developments.
No real property within the city shall be subdivided as defined in section 27-1 and
offered for sale or a plot recorded until a preliminary sketch and a final plot of the
proposed subdivision have been reviewed and approved as set forth in the procedure
FAYETTEVILLE CITY CODE CHAPTER 27 SUBDIVISIONS
e:\&%fthptr27 (07/99)