Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20060200 Ver 2_Meeting Notes_20180710Date * 7/10/2018 Site Type DMS stream and wetland Prepared By* Mac H. Sponsor/Provider DMS-Arcadis Project Name* Five Mile Branch NCDMS ID # USACE ID # DWR 20060200 Version* 2 ID#* HUC 02 Basin Yadkin County* Iredell Coordinates Degrees North Degrees West Attendees DMS- Melonie, Paul, Matthew, Tim COE- Todd, Kim EPA -Todd Bob Lepsic- formerly of Arcadis, now with SEPI Notes and Sketch, etc Closeout site visit - Started on R1 walking up through wetlands and downstream, entered around photo point 10 as on CO report. Wetlands- veg looked pretty good, definite pattern of more trees, taller, in areas outside of old ditches. Old ditches lines showed better soil characteristics, more chroma 3 as compared to the more forested areas. Most soil cores showed some indicators and redox development. R1 walking downstream from PP 10 near a structure noted all the areas brought out by DMS regarding bank erosion. They typically noted erosion only on stream left bank. there was some erosion on right bank but not excessive. I estimated a little more on R1 than DMS. Maybe another 100-150 If. Walked in stream to below Swan Road Bridge, for another 1500 feet or so. Then climbed up onto floodplain to look at soils for the wetlands near gauges 24-26 and 28. Did not see alot of difference in soils as per the gauges. Did not look up Fifth Creek, although did see a large erosional area as depicted on the site map. Fifth Creek below confluence with R1 or Beaver Creek did not show as much erosional areas. The main discussion was whether the stream channel deserved a E2 ratio of 2:1. Most of the erosional areas were on Beaver Creek, R1 or Fifth Creek above the confluence. IRT decided after some deliberation that R1 should be a E2 reach at 2.5-1, which resulted on approximately 500 stream credit loss. Action Items