20180854 Ver 2_Stream Buffer Determination Request_20180709

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Water Resources xr=etar
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DWR Use Only: Projecttl: JK-QaTVV
Date Received:
Buffer Applicability / Stream Origin Determination Request
Property Owner Information
1. Owner Information (corporation/individual who is legally responsible for the property and Its compliance)
la. Name(s) on Recorded Deed Ham Equipment LLC
lb. Responsible Party (for LLC) Bobby Ham
1c. Mailing Address 963 US -Hwy 258, Snow Hill, NC 28580
Id. Telephone Number 252-747-8200 1 1e. Email address
2. Address of Property or Location of Project Site (including county, nearest named town, and highway or road name/ number):
The project site is located in Pitt County, approximately three miles southeast of the Town of Farmville, North Carolina and east of
State Route 1139 (Move Turnage Road) (Figure 1). The site known as the Wingfoot Riparian Buffer Restoration Site (Wingfoot Site) is
located within the Little Contentnea Creek TLW of the Neuse River HUC 03020203. (PIN: 4636538996 / Deed Book: 3303 Page: 247)
3.
Agent / Consultant Information
3a. Agent/ Consultant Name
Kevin Yates(CMS) - Mitigation Provider/ Christian Preziosi(LMG)- Consultant
3b. Company
Clearwater Mitigation Solutions (CMS)
3c. Mailing address
604 Macon Place, Raleigh, NC 27609
3d. Telephone no.
919-624-6901 1 3e. Email address [e-mail]
4. Project/ Site Information
4a. Name of project
Wingfoot Buffer
Mitigation Site
4c. Nearest Named Stream
Little Contentnea Creek
4b. County
I Pitt
4d. River Basin
I Neuse (HUC-03020203)
5. Project Description (attach plan if available) The Wingfoot Site is currently managed for agricultural production (corn, cotton, and
soybean) and lacks existing forested buffer along a majority of the streams and drainage ways dissecting the site. Site drainage and
hydrology have been historically altered with channelized streams and cleared agricultural lands prevalent on historic aerial photos
dating back to the 1940s. CMS proposes restoration and enhancement of woody vegetation along these unnamed tributaries in
response to NC DMS RFP #16-007402, to provide riparian buffer credits in the Neuse 03020203 HUC.
6. Has anyone from DWQvisited the site? No I Staff Name: I Date of Visit:
7. Attach a map of the site Indicating project boundaries on the USGS 1:24,000 Topo and/or NRCS Soil Survey
If you are unable to locate either of these maps, please contact the DWR Washington Reglonal Office for assistance.
DWR Use Only: Is this determination for the purpose of Buffer mitigation? Nutrient offset credit?
8. Please return form to: Anthony Scarbraugh Note: Submittals on Friday after 12:00 pm
943 Washington Square Mall Will be stamped as received on the
Washington, NC 27889 Next business day
State of North Carolina I Envirorunental Quality I Water Resources
Washington Regional Office 1943 Washington Square Mall I Waslangton,North Carolina27889
252 946 6481

Water Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Directar
Email: Anthonv.Scarbrauzh(@ncdenr.eov
Please contact Anthony Scarbraugh at the Washington Regional Office at [phone] if you have any
questions.
State otNorth Caroline I Environmental Quality I Water Resources
Washington Regional office 1 943 Washington Square Mall I Washington, North Carolina 27889
252 946 6481

t YQ
�f
INQUIRY #: 5232866.1
YEAR: 2014/�l�-U�'
= 875' IlC' EDR'
r..
I

w7-l'7wTWW
5.1 II

LANDOWNER AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRITION:
Deed Book: 3303 Page: 247 County: Pitt
Parcel ID Number: 4636538996
Street Address: 963 US -258
Snow Hill NC 28580
Property Owner (please print: _ Bobby I lam
Property Owner (please print):
The undersigned, registered property owner(s) of the above property, do hereby authorize
of Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
(Contractor/Agent/Project Manager)' (Name of Contractor/Agent Firm/Agency)'
to take all actions necessary for the evaluation of the property as a potential stream, wetland and/or
riparian buffer mitigation project, Including conducting stream and/or wetland determinations and
delineations, as well as issuance and acceptance of any required permit(s) or certification(s). I
agree to allow regulatory agencies, including the US Army Corps of Engineers, to visit the property
as part of these environmental reviews.
Property Owners(s) Address:
(if different from above)
Properly Owner Telephone Number: 252-531-5958
Property Owner Telephone Number: 252-747-8200
We hereby certify the above information to be true and accurate to the best of our knowledge.
03/27/018
(Property Owner Authorized Signature) (Date)
(Property Owner Authorized Signature) (Date)
'Name of fill delivery staff member (full -deliveries) or DMS project manager (design -bid -build).
'Name of company (full -deliveries) or DMS (design -bid -build).

t
I
Lz�4 L c FRaG LEVEL ROIL c
_ I, I A, c
+I� _ o
f I j�# zifiQ 4LL
1
{'#+4 t t me
3 ° f.3, �, Q >
Q d
i, v c' to c
°
E��P fjl
r
IYHJII Yv••-- �.�yy 11 O if
-
„o..t C C 6
If
SOS ' S! 1 t y
gp�Lp Ci o g
to ' ''d i � � r # •R'� " t� V' �� �` °e Q � � �
kj
00
k ] N N
o 0
Q �
,' d 0) c y
� y11 N w; � m co
ZZ G E a
y -- o
CS .. mcnoU
.QO G,I k @oMZ rn
ru O 4`I _�^- �: Oa �� a_O 000
N m y 7- ._ o
1 Q cE 2 m =v
o
M EN
�Q U U'
'X o
OE 0
°° NJ m++
0S'M y' tee'- -_ _> a C h afn0 V
�
LO z
�J�r 3 m

a
CrossrO las \ l
a
CIL c
Ballards
j
o
�\• t
i�
65
a
ol
LO
en 0
y ik
06
um
owe
cnO
0. 0
\n
a,
d
�
ui
U
ww
LL
\
P?
J
Km Z� rr `�1
O
5Q
je ti F
1
\\\\ \
E
o
C J
N C
° .::...
d 1.
Ern
o
NN
U) O
. ;
Z��
CV V
CL
co
W 9
0 O
oje Turna9e,
00 00
t a
xE
o
a LL
00-
o
ch
0 `m7
U
U
o �o
2
f0 J
_. j
)Z
d®
WD

V m mN N m N (O O
W r n (0 � N N
.O C O W N h N N 00. O N
d A
W 111 I1 oCD
z= v r— a
4ittT v�y��T� �T� vq♦ tis y}iI 4 r7E• D ��
11 r t, r 'IL
' c
�'�i' E Ll1 ImQ
r
yrev-s.� ,e��v �Yi� 45 1 "r '�, 'S S � t� W � ',s• `. L U J U)
y
i k •�''p •• « C��w' Sti �< �'�t4 aet i'Y3 �`„ _ _ w G
�t�., A f fit l• b3 Y �4�'t i'11 C� C y
N
�' a tiu C7
rn
Z
a
wLam, S c
� �5W
�o
W
N
V
ai m
� m
o �
N Q'
S] Q
K W @ 0
LL H a J
LL w
D n z ! O J
W m 0
Z- C a
oaa m
LLKU E M
aF EE p
o N U) N U
`maM m
E C m QOZ
C) -009
07 C C'4
o
C
a
ca
G o a Ol� mU��
O m p_ a C_ N aI
Z o m o O d
,o N
N o m Z m N
LO U
= U o
G1 Z n
IM g 0
�« g

/ z
r 3
° a 1
� \ Cre¢k.>
Ca
In
LU
Co
0
k 0 m
m
o
r
j m
3 m
m
0
zu.F)
KJZ
O
O
U
0 Q
O
a
Ca 2 LL'mf
1
m
W Y _
Ca Z
z
a
°
J/ U
1rr
0
0
0
n
w
U
Co
I
IN
0
ti
0
0
m
un M qt
0 IL
LL
0' o
LL O r
cn d
N
0
0
0
N
It
O
c Co
fltb N ENN
0 02 C'=0
Il; • d min (0 U) N U
a ym_ C M
CU 0
CZ m
aNi CL o c) -cog
d' I _o noo ddn & Em' f0w `46
n N J ) C L O
' C ���a3 Ngo ANO ��= 3k
�T � � Co
V
C c �oo� �o 0 0o rn'X _ 0) CSU
I
\ -c o00 oo9��mm-o cca dad >0 Oa J
o o y E o a� > 7
IN NNCN(C(pp T
aKNNy NN 00C TACO 0°JZ N
T N6CCN� Fny�V C— yea U
l oE��wnn O1'�0o �eo� mE
mmn8mScacEvmn�m`°mF2'-,
> z �a 0x9 Orn
L'oUCo O'm U)
_50..... mm(if 1ccIQn
0 Ca
i

�
�o
�
N
M 1
H
K
fn C
C O
�
10
d O
N O
N
m
Z
m' C7O
_
I~L
C
V
O
y
N
O
Q 10
y o
o
E
g
U
o
N
r
LL
K E
5
7~ d OC
>
W
a0 r
p R
(r
W
a
E
m m
U
w d
N
l0
d
.�.•
y y
U)
ii C
co
m
m'
a
3
,f
o
0 ®
ma
J
ui
u
I
n
�
U
/
F
O
yl
j'
II
Dmo
�I
m t
M
z -
m E
o
a
o U
i
!
E-Ic
CMZ m
0.0�
/
m
a
Tco9
CU -C o
1
'aa
E m m
w0 :_. oO t
C
m Ed
R a U� c9
2g
\ .
/
i
7
O
m
O L c
O
a
0� C
C N m
71t1
o
Z V
O Il
7
I
cc
C)
(L
v
z
/
N
W O O
J

n%_ uwtl acream i i
Date: 3 -,� I v?
Evaluator: LAAO) C__ 04_
Stream Is at least intemlittent LI / , a
if>_ 19 oroarnnnialif29n• L+
Yorm Version 4.11
Proiect/Site: F{aw,
County: T it
Stream Determination (circ
Latitude: 3 5. 5 (off (0 4 y
Longitude:-}+; 53y709
Other is
e.g. quad Name:
H. ueornor nolo Subtotal =J
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
Absent
0
Weak
1
Moderate
2
Strong
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
(1-0 1
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
d
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
1
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
QD
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
1
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
0.5
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
es =
-•....�-,-..���� ��� ���..o. � oo eaaim.a m manaar
B. Hvriminnv lRuhtntAl0 52.G t
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
(1-0 1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 0.5
3
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 0,5
1
15
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2 1
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
CA
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
CV
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; BL = I.D
Other= 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods, See P. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: t� gL�uaCulora ') r:�l�v 31"
FLaobvl At
,(
✓--
_ w_wsD1r�.....

NC DWU Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 31.2;& 1(.g
Project/Site: HOW--,
Latitude: 35. SC +S(D
Evaluator: Wes Fim tot.
County: F ty�-
Longitude: -'}+. 5322`19
Total Points: P^
Stream Determination (cir
Other
Stream is at least intermittent O J
3B
it i 19 orrennial if a:30-
Eph eral Inter 'ttent toreial
e.g. Quad Name:
A.Geomor holo Subtotal= !+ O
Absent
Weak
Moderate
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed C3
Strong
1s Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
14. Leaf litter
1.5
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
0
2
0
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. rifle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
16. Organic debris lines or piles
2
0.5
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
Z3)
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
OBL = 1. Other = 0
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
2
Notes: r.+• t'_
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
-aNhcial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 9. (D )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed C3
13. Iran oxidizing bacteria
1
0
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1T_
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
CD
No = 0
3
Z3)
G. blolotty (Subtotal = 14 •J 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed C3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenlhos (note diversity and abundance) 0
1
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish 0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish 0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians 0
0.5
CD
1
25. Algae 0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.7k
OBL = 1. Other = 0
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: r.+• t'_
Sketch:
SF`L

Date:
Evaluator: V -)e5
Stream is at least intermittent
Identification
•5
Version 4.11
ProjectiSite: l�Gu'h
County: ,P,+i-
Stream Determination b
Latitude: a�j, Sips tR� j
Longitude: "114-, 532`J
Other -Z3
e.g. Quad Ndame:
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 16 •5
1° Continuity of channel bed and bank
Absent
0
I Weak
1
Moderate
2
Strong
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
3
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
p
1
0 0.5
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
CO
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
3
8. Headcuts
0
2
3
9. Grade control
0
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
es = 3
B.Hvdroloov (Subtotal= 10•_c,�t,,,,o„�a,
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
(LO 1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 0.5
1
1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles
0 0.5
1
1.
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes =
1.5
ate.-rnunVMnir0101 is ■ar.�
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1
®
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks 1
2
3
22. Fish 0 0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish 0IV
1
1.5
24. Amphibians 0 ro.5
1
1.5
25. Algae 0 0.5
1
1.5
28. Welland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75;
BL = 1. Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: %V- lkow i%tcocPLP'%"
�--- `-_-
�3
$lIL wtlbw ALcsoPlr}vj
CstoEZOFa4+;1

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 7J.'7.1�'l
tO
Project/Site:
Latitude:
Evaluator: Web ���
County:
Longitude: -14} 53(o3
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent %,�� Q
Stream Determination (circ) )
Other I
it 2! 19 orperennial if 30'
Eph eral Inter ttent r i
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geornor holo Subtotal= I k -V
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1e Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
16. Organic debris lines or piles
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
17. Soll-based evidence of high water table?
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool s uence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1M
1
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or babcbeR
21Co
0.5
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
CU
1 1
2
3
8. Headcuts
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
1 0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
Sketch:
nEfie
n� ray
SFU
FtEL.p
anmciai ditches are not rateo; see mscussions in manual
B. Hvdroloov (Subtotal= to. S )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
14. Leaf litter
1
1
2 3
0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or dehri-
0 0.5
1 1.
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 0.5
1
17. Soll-based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
QYes =_V
C. Bioi0av (Subtotal = 1l , 5 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
CV
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.7f OBL = 1.5
Cher = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
nEfie
n� ray
SFU
FtEL.p
rEk
o.r

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version d_11
Date: 31231%$
Project/Site:-Qq,ty�
Latitude:35.5(v(Q22J4
Evaluator: ujm �y .,�a�r-
County:
Longitude:53.110
Total Points:
Stream /s at least IntermittentE
��
Stream Deter Ieetio circle one)
Other
if219 or erannial if 2:30-
P h era( nter tte Pere ial
e. g. Quad Name:
-, r
A. ueomor holo Subtotal =
18 Continuity of channel bed and bank
Absent
0
Weak
1
Moderate
2
Strong
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
®
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
25. Algae
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
Uj1
ACW = 0.75
2
3
B. Headcuts
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
W
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
GIN11bFOI WMIOs Cie 1Nl 1mtlu; see discussions In manual
B. Hvdroloqv (Subtotal= 9.0 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 1
2 3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or i2wL
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 0.5
0 0.5
1
1
17. Soil -based evidence of high water able?
No = 0
Yes =
C. Blologv (Subtotal= r 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3 2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
CD
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0 U
1.5
24. Amphibians
0 COW
1.6
25. Algae
0
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
ACW = 0.75
OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: M
Sketch:
�ihUd
n^9
��1.0

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 3 1%j
1 t p
Project/Site: "Cti
Latitude: ,2S.,563q,((,
Evaluator: Web P'-tGc.r
County: P" { f
Longitude: ,532 lU
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent ?
��
Stream (circle one)
Other 1`�'
if 2: 19 orperennial ilz 30• L�
Eph al nter tte t Pere ial
?Te
e.g. Quad Nemo:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= Ca OD
0 1
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1' Continuity of channel bed and bank
2
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ri le• ool se uence
ZAbsent
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
No = 0
2
3
5. Activeirelict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
CFACW = 0.
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
o = 0
Yes = 3
- anmciai ancnes are not ratea; see alscussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 12 t C)
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
©
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or de
0 0.5
3
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes= 3
1
C. Bioloav (Subtotal = )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenlhos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
CFACW = 0.
OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
Notes: * n cH�
Sketch: N��
xy`
F►6L�

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 12-77
Project/Site: i"lIZAn
Latitude: aS,CJ(Otj381
Evaluator: [✓ �� -
County:Pj �-
Longitude:-_�-4,537,53
Total Points: 30
Stream is at least intermittent s5
Stream Determination (cit
Other 5f= �-
if 2 19 orperennial if i 30-
Eph eral Interpqttent er is)
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology ( (Subtotal= l 54"'1
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
0.5
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
d
ripple -pool sequence
0
©
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
C 1
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
1
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
es = 3
w
Sketch:
�EUP
arndmai dauros are nut rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal =
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
C 1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0
No = 0
1
es = 3
C. Biolo 1v (Subtotal = N.!5 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
CO.5i
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
= 0.75;
DBL = 1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
w
Sketch:
�EUP
SFlea)
�(E

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date:
Absent
0
Project/Site: �.Q[{,Oy�
Latitude: 95.54t{aCs
Evaluator: uj✓
County:
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least fntormittent Lf 0 d
'
Stream Determination cvcl
'ttent
Other S(:
if z 19 or efennial if 2:30*
E h oral Inter re i I
P
e.g. quadNeme:
A. ueomor nolo (Subtotal= U 11-J
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
Absent
0
Weak
1
Moderate
2
Strong
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
16. Organic debris lines or piles
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Activelrelict floodplain
0
1
2
1.5
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1 5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes= 3
Sketch:��
artifiaal ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloov (Subtotal = / O - O 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1 2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1 2 3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1 0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
MP
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0 es = 3
C.60onv ISuototal= t3-0 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; BL = 1.5
Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:��
ttJ
5FB

APPENDIX C.
SITE PHOTOGRAPHS—EXISTING CONDITIONS
Response to Request for Proposal # 16-007402

APPENDIX B. SITE PHOTOS - EXISTING CONDITIONS
(1)Stream channel Al along northwestern boundary with NC DMS Fox Run Buffer site on left side of bank.
(2)View of existing conservation easement marking immediately northwest of Wingfoot buffer site.
Response to Request for Proposal # 16-007402
Appendix C. Site Photos — Existing Conditions

APPENDIX B. SITE PHOTOS— EXISTING CONDITIONS
(3) Reach Al channel segment to be stabilized (right bank) along northern project boundary.
(4) View of upper stream segment of Reach Bl.
Response to Request for Proposal # 16-007402
Appendix C. Site Photos — Existing Conditions

APPENDIX B. SITE PHOTOS— EXISTING CONDITIONS
(5) View Reach B1 looking upstream (riparian buffer restoration proposed for left side and riparian
enhancement proposed for right side).
(6) Downstream segment of Reach Bl (buffer restoration proposed for right side and buffer
preservation proposed for left side).
Response to Request for Proposal # 16-007402
Appendix C. Site Photos — Existing Conditions

/ `
�rr1
� r
kr;Q�j