20170905 Ver 2_More Information Received_20180705

Action History (UTC -05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
Submit by Anonymous User 7/5/2018 1:49:16 PM (Message Start Event)
Accept by Montalvo, Sheri A 7/9/2018 7:58:28 AM (NON -DOT - Existing Project)
• The task was assigned to Montalvo, Sheri A. The due date is: July 10, 2018 5:00 PM
7/5/2018 1:49 PM

Staff Review
ID#* Version* 2
20170905
Is this project a public transportation project?* r Yes
r No
Reviewer List:* Sue Homewood:eads\slhomewood
Select Reviewing Office:* Winston-Salem Regional Office - [phone]
Submittal Type:*
Application Attachments
Does this project require a request for payment to be sent?
r
Yes
r
No

Project Submittal Dated 7/5/2018
Please note: fields marked with a red asterisk below are required. You will not be able to submit the form until all
mandatory questions are answered.
Project Type: r New Project
r Pre -Application Submittal
F More Information Response
r Other Agency Comments
r For the Record Only (Courtesy Copy)
New Project - Please check the new project type if you are trying to submit a new project that needs an official approval
decision.
Pre -Application Submittal - Please check the pre -application submittal if you just want feedback on your submittal and
do not have the expectation that your submittal will be considered a complete application requiring a formal decision.
More Information Response - Please check this type if you are responding to a request for information from staff and
you have and ID# and version for this response.
Other Agency Comments - Please check this if you are submitting comments on an existing project.
Project Contact Information
Name: charles huffine
Who is subrritting the information?
Email Address: [e-mail]
Project Information
Existing ID #: Existing Version:
20170905 2
20170001 (no dashes)
Project Name: graham i-40 drive in
Is this a public transportation project?
r Yes
r No
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
r Yesr No r Unknown
County (ies)
Alamance
Please upload all files that need to be submited.

Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach docurrent
1---2018-03-28 Graham Drive In Entrance
2.34MB
Move_Revised 1. pdf
2---2018-03-28 Graham Drive In Entrance
4.15MB
Move_Revised 1. pdf
2A---2018-03-28 Graham Drive In Entrance
3.35MB
Move_Revised 1. pdf
2B---2018-03-28 Graham Drive In Entrance
2.77MB
Move_Revised 1. pdf
MEMO OF REVIEW RESPONSES WSRO - SH 6-27-
557.94KB
2018.pdf
Graham Drive - In - 6-1-2018 response to review
121.07KB
comments USACE.pdf
Only pdf or lmfiles are accepted.
Describe the attachments:
Plans and response letters in digital form as requested.
PF By checking the box and signing box below, I certify that:
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the
"Uniform Electronic Transactions Act")
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes
(the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written
signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the online form."
Signature:
Submittal Date:

MEMO OF REVIEW RESPONSES: 6-27-2018
FOR: Mrs. Sue Homewood, WSRO

FROM:
The L.E.A.D.S. Group, Pa
Civil engineering firm for:

Sue:

Thank you for your review and comments. Please find the attached revised plan set and comments
response below each excerpt item from your May 30, 2018 letter (also attached in its entirety). Our
responses appear in all UPPERCASE BOLD text below.
Please feel free to contact our office at 336-227-8724 if you should have any questions or need
additional clarification.

Thank you,
Charles D. “Chad” Huffine, PE NC Reg. No. 24924

ATTACHED AS REQUESTED WITH REVISIONS INCORPORATED INTO THE ATTACHED PLAN SET.

THE REVISED PLAN SET IS ATTACHED, ENLARGED SHEETS ARE PROVIDED AND BUFFER FEATURES
ALONG WITH MAPPED WETLANDS ETC. ARE SHOWN AS REQUESTED.

PLEASE SEE THE REVISED PLAN SET WITH ENLARGED AREAS OVER EACH IMPACT, APPROPRIATE
HATCHING, LABELING OF INDIVIDUAL FEATURES AND TABULATED IMPACT QUANTITIES ARE ALSO
PROVIDED AS REQUESTED. ENLARGED AND DETAILED CROSSING AND IMPACT SHEETS ARE
PROVIDED. CROSSING NUMBER 1, CAN BE FOUND ON SHEET 2A. CROSSING NUMBER 2, CAN BE
FOUND ON SHEET 2B.

PLEASE NOTE THAT A WRITTEN DESCRIPTION OF CROSSING SPECIFICS AT EACH LOCATION, INCLUDING
A CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE, JUSTIFICATIONS FOR CROSSINGS WITH TWIN PIPE SYSTEMS, AND
PHOTOGRAPHIC ILLUSTRATION OF EXISTING AND FUTURE CONDITIONS AT EACH CROSSING IS NOW
PROVIDED FOR EXPLANATION AND REVIEW. CROSSINGS ARE DESIGNED FOR FUTURE CONDITIONS
RESULTING FROM POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OF UPSTREAM AREAS IN ACCORDANCE WITH
PROACTIVE DESIGN PRACTICES AND PAST EXPERIENCE WITH LOCAL GOVERNMENT PHILOSOPHY.
DEWATERING PRACTICES, DETAILS AND SEQUENCES FOR EACH CROSSING NOW APPEAR ON EACH
SHEET FOR THE GIVEN CROSSING WITH IMPACTS DESIGNATED AS REQUESTED.

THE ATTACHED PLANS WILL BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY OF GRAHAM UPON COMPLETION OF THE
USACE PERMITTING PROCESS WHICH IS RUNNING CONCURRENT WITH OUR SUBMITTAL TO YOUR
OFFICE. AS SUCH, THE REQUESTED JORDAN LAKE BUFFER AUTHORIZATION FORM IS NOT AVAILABLE
TO PROVIDE AS REQUESTED BUT WILL BE FORTHCOMING UPON COMPLETION OF THE CITY OF
GRAHAM’s REVIEW.
Graham / I-40 Drive In – Responses 6-1-2018
Responses in all caps bold

1) Plan Sheet 2/2 states (and the PCN indicates) that no fill or permanent structures are proposed within the 100-year
floodplain. However, the National Flood Hazard map indicated that Crossing 1 would occur within Flood Zone AE.
Please explain this discrepancy and add the 100-year floodplain line to the plansheet(s). Note that NWP 39 cannot be
used to authorize above grade fills within the mapped FEMA 100-year floodplain (NWP 39 Regional Condition 4.1.4). If
proposed activities related to Crossing 1 occur within the mapped FEMA 100-year floodplain, we recommend that you
request to use NWP 14 for these impacts;
PLEASE NOTE THAT THE TEXT NOTE ON SHEET TWO AS REFERENCED ABOVE HAS
BEEN REVISED TO CORRECTLY REPRESENT THE WORK PROPOSED AT THE
PROPERTY. WHILE THE MAJORITY OF THE PROPERTY IS MAPPED WITHIN THE 100
FLOOD PLAIN, AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE MAJORITY OF THE PROPERTY IS
PROPOSED, NO WORK IS PROPOSED WITHIN THE MAPPED 100 YEAR REGULATORY
FLOOD WAY (both as defined below). THE PLAN NOTE HAS BEEN REVISED TO
ACCURATELY DESCRIBE THESE CONDITIONS. ADDITIONALLY, THE FLOOD PLAIN
LINE AND REGULATORY FLOODWAY LINES HAVE BEEN TAKEN FROM THE FIRM
PANEL AND ADDED TO THE PLAN SHEET AS REQUESTED FOR CLARITY. NOTE THE
BLUE AREA BELOW SHOWING THE 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN AND THE BLUE/WHITE
AREA ILLUSTRATING THE REGULATORY FLOODWAY ALONG BACK CREEK. WE
PROPOSED NO DISTURBANCES WITHIN THE RESERVED REGULATORY FLOODWAY.

PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING:
Flood hazard areas identified on the Flood Insurance Rate Map are identified as a Special Flood Hazard Area
(SFHA). SFHA are defined as the area that will be inundated by the flood event having a 1-percent chance of being
equaled or exceeded in any given year. The 1-percent annual chance flood is also referred to as the base flood or
100-year flood. SFHAs are labeled as Zone A, Zone AO, Zone AH, Zones A1-A30, Zone AE, Zone A99, Zone AR,
Zone AR/AE, Zone AR/AO, Zone AR/A1-A30, Zone AR/A, Zone V, Zone VE, and Zones V1-V30. Moderate flood
hazard areas, labeled Zone B or Zone X (shaded) are also shown on the FIRM, and are the areas between the limits
of the base flood and the 0.2-percent-annual-chance (or 500-year) flood. The areas of minimal flood hazard, which
are the areas outside the SFHA and higher than the elevation of the 0.2-percent-annual-chance flood, are labeled
Zone C or Zone X (unshaded).
A "Regulatory Floodway" means the channel of a river or other watercourse and the adjacent land areas that must
be reserved in order to discharge the base flood without cumulatively increasing the water surface elevation more
than a designated height. Communities must regulate development in these floodways to ensure that there are no
increases in upstream flood elevations. For streams and other watercourses where FEMA has provided Base Flood
Elevations (BFEs), but no floodway has been designated, the community must review floodplain development on a
case-by-case basis to ensure that increases in water surface elevations do not occur, or identify the need to adopt a
floodway if adequate information is available.
GIVEN THESE CONDITIONS AND THE PRESENCE OF THE ESTABLISHED
REGULATORY FLOODWAY, DEVELOPMENT IS PROPOSED AS SHOWN WITHOUT
DISRUPTION OF 2017 FEMA ESTABLISH ZONES. NW 14 WILL BE USED FOR THE
PROPOSED ACTIVITIES RELATED TO CROSSING #1
2) The Typical Culvert Crossing Illustration shown on Plansheet 2/2 is too generic to allow compliance inspections of this
project. Please provide zoomed‐in detail and plan view sheets of each road crossing, clearly showing the following:
ENLARGED PLAN AND PROFILE / CROSS SECTIONS FOR THESE ROAD CROSSINGS
HAVE BEEN ADDED TO THE PLAN SET FOR CLARITY AS REQUESTED. THESE
ENLARGED VIEWS SHOW THE STREAM AND WETLAND BOUNDARIES, HATCHING
AS REQUESTED, PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY IMPACTED AREAS, NOTES
INDICATING THAT RIP RAP IS TO BE IMBEDDED TO AT LEAST FLUSH WITH THE
BOTTOM OF THE EXISTING STREAM CHANNEL, TEMPORARY IMPACT AREAS AS
NEEDED FOR CONSTRUCTION ACCESS/DEWATERING, FOOTPRINTS OF EXISTING
CULVERTS, AND FOOTPRINTS OF THE PROPOSED CULVERTS. TEMPORARY
IMPACTS ARE TABULATED AS REQUESTED.
a. stream and wetland boundaries;
b. different hatching for the footprint of wetland and stream impacts, including impacts due to fill (in wetlands),
impacts due to culverts, impacts due to rip rap pads (clearly showing the rip rap will be imbedded), and temporary
impacts outside of the permanent impact areas needed for construction access/dewatering;
c. footprint of the existing culverts;
d. footprint of the proposed culverts;
3) Please confirm that the existing stream beds at Crossings 1 and 2 are wide enough to fit the proposed twin culvert pipes (42”
and 30”, respectively), so as to fit NWP 14 Regional Condition 3.6.4. Further, how will the crossings fit NWP Regional Condition
3.6.2?
CROSSING #1
AVERAGE CHANNEL WIDTH (EXISTING TOP OF BANK) AT ACTUAL PIPE CROSSING
LOCATION:
9.5’w,13.8’w = AVG.11.6’
PROPOSED TWIN 42” OUTSIDE TO OUTSIDE WIDTH: (2@51”+6”) = 9’

CROSSING #2
AVERAGE CHANNEL WIDTH (EXISTING) AT ACTUAL PIPE CROSSING LOCATION:
24’w,7’w = 15.5’
PROPOSED TWIN 30” OUTSIDE TO OUTSIDE WIDTH: (2@37”+6”) =6.7’

3) Wetland AA at Crossing 1 extends beyond the crossing corridor and should be noted as such on the plan sheet. Also,
the downstream end of Wetland AA does not appear to extend all the way to the end of the fill slope. This correction
should be made on the plansheet and the wetland impacts updated on the PCN;

THE NOTE IS ADDED AS REQUESTED, ADDITIONALLY, THE WETLAND AREA AA AS MAPPED
AND SURVEYED IS SHOWN AS SUCH ON THE PLAN AND IS TABULATED AS REQUESTED.

ALL OF THIS WETLAND AREA IS BEING IMPACTED AND IS REPORTED. THE 8” PIPE
SHOWN AS WETLAND FEEDING IS PLACED ACCORDING TO FIELD COMMENTS FROM
THE LAST VISIT AS REQUIRED TO SUPPLY WETLANDS OFF SITE AND DOWNSTREAM
OF THIS AREA WITH RUNOFF EVEN AFTER WETLAND AREA AA IS REMOVED.

4) Impacts to Wetland D include only a portion of the total wetland area, with the remaining wetland proposed to total 615
square feet. Since this remaining wetland is very small, and it’s location between two roads would eliminate any
remaining wetland function, this remaining wetland area should be considered a loss of wetlands. This loss should be
shown on the plan sheet and accounted for on the PCN. Note that, if this additional loss of wetlands causes the total
wetland impact amount to reach 0.1 acre, and if no compensatory mitigation is proposed, you will need to include a
justification based on Wetland D’s low aquatic function (see attached NCWAM form for Wetland D);
WETLAND AREA AFFECTED EXPANDED AS REQUESTED AND SHOWN ON THE PLAN AND
UPDATE TABLE OF IMPACTS, WETLAND D HAS A LOW AQUATIC FUNCTION ACCORDING TO
THE NCWAM ATTACHED AND NO COMPENSATORY MITIGATION IS PROPOSED.
5) Impacts to Wetland B appear to be proposed at the downstream end of Crossing 2, although they are not accounted for
on the Plans or the PCN.
IMPACTS OF A TEMPORARY NATURE HAVE BEEN ILLUSTRATED AND TABULATED AS
REQUESTED ON SHEET ONE OF THE SITE PLAN SET. THESE IMPACTS WILL BE SHOWN ON
THE PCN.

SHEET INDEX
I - EX15TING CONDITION5 PLAN
2 - OVERALL 51TE PLAN
MINIMUM BUILDING 5ETBACK5
Per City of Graham Zoning Ordinance 5ectlon 10.245
City of Graham Zoning: I-1 Light Industrial
Front setback - 50'
Side Setback - 20'
Rear setback - 20'
PARCEL DATA
Alamance County Tax Information:
Parcels Included in this Project:
Parcel I :
GPIN: 8894742981
Parcel ID: 152970
Old Tax Map No.: 13-13-2
Property Address: Kronber95 Court, Haw River, NC
Plat Reference: PB 78 PG 7 1
Deed Reference: DB 427 PG 139
City of Graham Zoning: I-1 Light Industrial
Q �
Existing Impervious Surface Area: O 5f. (none)
51TE DATA:
O
Proposed Use:
Total Property Area:
Existing Building Area
Vacant
Drive In Movie Theater O
34.88 Acres f (Per PB 78, PG 71)
0 5f.
U
Mapped
Wetland Area Table:
NAME OF WETLAND Area(sf.)
A
888
5
18,303
C
879
D
2,268
AA
1,101
DD
3,335
00
C\J I
7 �
IC I
Property of
Grace Rich
F. 13. 33, Pg. 18
2
Recombination Plat
Prepared for
S eedCo Inc
O
,�,,b��,
o� 9'S coC1�
51te 50115 Classification:
Uncla551fled. Cla551fication of near surface 50115 shall be made per
Owner's geotechnical engineering recommendatlon5 based on the
evaluation of exposed 5ubgrade 50115.
Burnt Shops, Inc.
\
D. D. 427, Pg. 1 39
(2) �
a
EIP 14.25 Acres ± NIP \
'
Remainingr
p z in Parcel ID: 152970
P.B. GG, P�j. 270 NIP IIS
0 II V
w
.� I
Cp c II \
Z/
Line Table
Line Bearing Distance
L1 N 73°36'03" W 63.95'
L2 N 20°49' 17" W 149.79'
Curve Table
Curve Chord Bearing Chord Radius Length
C1 S 57'47'14" E 397.58' 610.84' 404.96'
C2 N 80'57'11 " W 444.29' 1445.24' 446.05'
11�
Property of
Melville Plastics, Inc.
P. D. 44, P�1. 186
I"EIP
0
SURVEYOR'S LEGEND
Existing Iron Pipe (EIP)
New Iron Pipe (NIP)
Property Line
Adjoiner's Property Line
Right of Way line
Calculated Point (CP)
PK Nail (Found)
PK Nail (Set)
Right of Way Monument
Overhead Utility Lines
Utility Pole (with Guy Wire)
Light Pole
Sanitary Sewer Manhole
GRAHAM DRIVE IN
PIN:8894742981
PRJ: 1-16-1035
T
�9
00
Kronber
9s Court
Truby pr
o I �
U
SITE I m
E
E_
I
Ert ,So
Interstate 40
NTS Vicinity Map
Lot One
Property of
Melville Plastics, Inc.
F. D. 57, Pg. 137
X
I S 76' '1
II /� �i ie
FACT,5-
k488» E / 1 EIP
CP
^� I /PROP SED 412
Blue Beacon International, Inc. �' GJetla Area 3
D.B. 112 1, Pg. 27 1, D.B. 112 1, Pg. 277 N o I to _ ��` \ Jiz� /
D.B. 1 12 1, Pg. 283, P.B. 59, Pg. 64 0 / IIS I Typic ocationofds�
ra4oa\ w%
Q W O / I IIII l feat es / `\\\
_ \ I � \�.�V1 J7�
/ n r S 77` 6'25
5oai IMPACTS
36g D /h , O PROPOSED �•
/ p o 88' q h� 5 4. X503 r/- Wetlands Area "AA"
I "EIP Control Corner E/p \�\ fBan� h /' x . cy5„ I / TFk �S \ / O
Northing: 845052.43 17 Us. Ft. \\ �. NIP / � / 3 e al Pi 1 117 SM o2 It N
-. Exst. pram %' h If. l'e /r l / — �;
Fastin 1896602.9687 Us. Ft. \\ -
\\ ERMANENT
NAD83(201 I)\\ `\\\\ \ / %/ ly( / ,./
I PACTS PPOPO ED j / do /
Exst. CB \ \ �1 I \ / h / Wetlands rea 'B' / / y \ o
Grate Elev.: 550.9' Z — » \ \2 h 8,303 5. Ft. ± 2 \ \ II
Inv: 546.19'
\ S \ Yt (tem m acts x �� \ �\ \ 3/4 EIP \
Exst. 55MH E We / nv: v: , 14. T PF \ \
Top: 537.22' East. CB �/ II III A� Ea ) 516.26' 1' 440sf.)
Grate1.07' 131
lev�
Inv. In: 530.27' 55 1 I I J �r�
-
Inv.Out: 530.22' Inv:
5525.486 3 \d\S\ A
Exst. C —��p
Gratel8.N
55145E\xsr:4=t�9In6q9' 0, SEF T 4/ %E'I—P
of al
S�I
II
I
II
o
\ c 769• 0,5
t. Bx
GEr1.04,
Inv: 2' > Inv: \ 520\ 97' 24, III -
o�
EIP
/521\ \ \ \ \ — e� / � I EIP
95
X25 89
'�\ 5002497
\f
8
1
I� 523 4WilcoHess LLC
500
s=o5053_°=2�—
ID.
B. 1522, Pg. 194 I
P.B. 53, P 73 -522
-521 II
\
/// \ SS O
5Z° 5os @
— / ) \ / %/ rn
I
CIQ�IjIIIl11 � —\ 5g'—./ / \�506/
/ I \ \ \� — —5ie� = = / /� I / / / \ -507—
IMPACTS Q / / // I I\\ -5171,
PROPOSED
Wetlands Area"A"
e88Sa.Ft./ 5_i35 1 /
ca
w IIII
III 11111 / / \ \ \ \ \ \
II III II 1 � / — // / / / / �• \\ �— \� \\ \\ !-- / \ \ \\ \ \ l I
111111 111 III11 _--- ,53` / / / \ \ \ \\\ \ / / I 0
11 I — — — _ _�—� �\ \ \ \ \ \
llllllll111� 53 // // I I _ 1 \
V'
_� _
Rip
��5 Lo
Exst. cB / �lI/ll/ll/ l/ 111 1 \ hti a P�
Grate Elev.: 55258' /II III JJI \ \. h� — —
Inv: 547.9 // 1 I c / — 4 \ \\ \ \ u)
�'' III III II `. \ \ � / //J//,---_� \;___ \ \ l_
Grate Elev.: 552.63' \ , IIII Ill 1 �(\ \ \ \ �I — \ � \ \ \Sa \ �/ / / / / / / / \\\�\ \ \ \\\ \ \ \ \ 1 / (V/ P J
Inv: 547.83'
S 41`31 08 W
NO IMPACTS /
l JJ/ \ ,�\ \ \ \ \ \ \ _ s2s \ sza \ \ \ / / \ \ ` \ \ \\\\\\\ s, \ \ \\ WPROPO Area BB"0Q'�/GJv\
I°EIP \---- \ 235.69'
Corny \ \ \_ — — — \\ \ \ \\ —526- _� \ \ ` 50' SETA \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\\ 's24� __ \\ \ \ e�7 ± 3,335 sa. Ft. ±/ C . J�
Northing: 8443 I � \ _ — — \ \ \ \ \ \ \ _ _ \ —527-
&_
s27- \ \ / \ \ \� \��?s 26. \ \\ \ \ / / v,
Fastin 18964 s46,4s'Sgg\F \ \ \ \ — —s28- \ _ \ \ i4RPDX.�LOG�4TI0f� OF \s2s_ mss \ \ \\ \\ \ \ g`'
9 s\ �2 �s4 \ . ,� \ — — — —529 \/ M nu ent \ — — — — — J — — — XST1NG H1GHW Y ss
NAD83(201 1) ��\ \ \s4p� c �\ — \� — — — — = — — — _ 7 9. io 7 \ BILLBeA o \ \ / )\ \��75.80' �G
53583.60'
APPROX. LOCATION OF - - - — — - = _ s3z s3s- _ = — _ _ — _ \ �� ` — "
EXISTING HIGHWAY = _ _ _ — \ N 89 42 —W 139.03' Total I EIP
BILLBOARD—
Interstate 40
(Asphalt)
Notes:
I . All construction methods and materials shall conform to the City of Graham Standard
Specifications f- Details and the NC Plumbing Code.
2. Boundary, existing feature, and topographic information Including located wetland areas a5 flagged in
the field provided by a survey prepared by Doswell Surveyors, Inc. 5urllncgton, North Carolina.
3. Existing Conditions are shown based on field surveys and best available record. Any discrepancies
shall be reported to the engineer immediately.
4. Sanitary sewer service 15 being reclue5ted via a tie to existing City of Graham Sanitary
Sewer Main.
5. Water service 15 being requested via a tie to existing City of Graham Water Main.
G. Exact size and location of all applicable utilities and easements to be field verified prior
to construction.
7. Contact the project engineer immediately with any conflicts recJardincJ the design or construction of
the project. All field a6Ju5tment5 shall be verified by the project engineer prior to construction.
8. Construction and location of sidewalk, slopes, landings, approaches, ramps, and accessible routes
shall be in accordance with the AN51 2009 handicap code or latest Acce551billty Code revision.
9. Contractor shall contact project engineer to observe formwork for site curb, concrete sidewalks, and
other items as well as string lines or other controls prior to the placement of concrete, setting base
course stone, or the placement of asphalt.
10. Compaction of fill materials, approval of residual 51,Ibcyade, soil proof rolls, stone placement, and/or
other materials testing functions shall be in accordance with the project geotechnical engineer's
guidance, specifications, recommendations, and testing standards.
Plan Prepared for:
1-40 Drive -In
P.O. Box 872
Graham, NC 27253
Contact: 33G-229-4225
SOS W Flt
BOSWELL SURVEYORS, INC.
505 East Davis street 336.227.8723 (phone) NOT APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION
Burlington, NC 27215 336.222.9917(fax)
s surveyorLicensellNo. C 0664 01
2 0 0 1 4 0 0 1
�R t'EY O'N Firm License No. C-664 G
CALL BEf=ORE YOU DIG! ITS THE LAW Graphic Scale
ULOCO North Carolina One Call Center
1-800-632-4949 5cale: 111 = 1001
SHEET
X2
4-07-2017
DATE
111 = 100'
SCALE
B5B
DRAWN IN THE U5A 6y
REVISIONS I
Multiple revisions
4-24-2018
7)
O 7)
7) 11)
�1 (— CT 1
s7)
N
ILy
—27-204
Q� SEAL
(9�
24924 c�
D.N.�`�
X.
C-1939
0
Z V
0
z
i;
WE
a
`w V
� V
W n �rn I
�NN�NN Yk
u, U N (� u
U,z�
Q
F�vz 5-
o
�
r n
v
U
.�
�
V J
�
0
r'
Ca
W
�
Iw
Cz
a