20060646 Ver 1_Staff Report_20060801

Staff Report
Project Num: 20060646 Version: 1
Name: East Nash Development Site **303d**
County: Nash
Location: UT Stony Creek Nashville
Latitude: +35°58'08"
SW Plan Location:
Owner: Rose, David L.
Contact Person: Rose, David L
Inspection Date: 08/01/2006
Reason for Inspection: Other
On-Site Representative(s):
Primary Inspector: Mike Horan
Secondary Inspector(s):
Question Areas:
Site Visit
Inspection Summary:
Title:
Entry Time: 03:17 PM
Status: Received
Project Type: Industrial /Commercial /Business
Region: Raleigh
Longitude: -77°56'07"
Phone: [phone]
Exit Time:
Inspection Type: Staff Report
Phone: [phone]
Page: 1

Project Num: 20060646 Owner: Rose, David L.
Inspection Date: 08/01/2006 Inspection Type: Staff Report Reason for Visit: Other
Site Visit Yes No NA NE
Do impacts described in the application differ those seen in the field? ^ ~ ~ ^
If yes, please describe differences:
Are the Intermittent/Perennial calls different in the application? ~ ~ ~ Q
If yes, please describe differences, and how mitigation ratios are affected:
Are there additional impacts not described in the application? ~ ~ ~ ^
If yes, please describe and quantify:
Were the impacts in place prior to the application for the 401 Certification? ^ ~ ^ ^
Additional conditions recommended for the Certification:
Recommended project modifications: It is my opinion that the applicant has not minimized or avoided to the be
Is this a modification request to an existing Certification? ~ ~ ^ ~
Are there additional stromwater conditions that should be required due to the following classifications: ~ ~ ^ ^
# 303(d)list, Class WS, NSW, ORW, HQW
Describe: 303(d) listed waters
Is this a subdivision or otherwise part of a larger project? ~ ~ ~ ^
# If yes, what phase is this?
Are there prior impacts from prior phases? ~ ~ ^ ~
If yes, what are the cumulative imacts for this project?
Possible secondary impacts noted: the placement of the building could effect the stabilization of the channel d
Comment: Just because this is a large chain company I do not think we should just let them
Page: 2