20180672 Ver 1_More Info Received_20180613

Goss, Stephanie L�' O6ga
From: Deborah Shirley <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2018 11:39 AM
To: '[e-mail]'
Cc: Goss, Stephanie; Randy King ([e-mail]); Craig Duerr
(Craig. Duerr@ Pu IteGroup.com)
Subject: [External] RE: Pre -Construction Notification Application: Stonecreek (PJD-AID
#SAW -2017-00921)
Attachments: UPDATED PER USACE_PCN _Stonecreek _06-13-18.pdf; StoneCreek Exhibits -sheets 9 and
10.pdf; Neu -Con SOA Stonecreek 051518.pdf
James,
Per your request, we have updated the Overall and impact exhibit for Stonecreek, sheets 5, 8 and 9 of the PCN
application (all updated in bold), and provided an updated Statement of Availability from Resource Environmental
Solutions.
Please note that we had previously offered a 1:1 mitigation ratio to Impact #3 {i.e. W2 (#3-W1)), and have updated that
mitigation to a 2:1 mitigation ratio for the 0.013 acres of permanent wetland impacts.
Please let us know if you need anything additional to complete your review of the PCN application for the Stonecreek
project.
Thank you,
Debbie
Debbie Edwards Shirley
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
919-846-5900 (office)
919-673-8793 (mobile)
ATHINK BEFORE YOU PRINT
From: Deborah Shirley
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2018 3:11 PM
To:'[e-mail]' <[e-mail]>
Subject: Pre -Construction Notification Application: Stonecreek (PJD-AID #SAW -2017-00921)
James:
Please see attached electronic copy of the Pre -Construction Notification Application for the Stonecreek project
that was couriered to your office last week on Wednesday May 16th.
This is a courtesy copy of the scanned, PCN application, please let me know if you will need anything
additional to complete your review of the attached application.
Thank you,
Debbie

Debbie Edwards Shirley
En-Oronmemal Specialist
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
North Quarter Office Park
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104
Raleigh, NC 27615
919-846-5900 (office)
919-673-8793 (mobile)
This electronic communication, including all attachments, is intended only for the named addressee (s) and may contain confidential information. This electronic communication may not
have passed through our standard reviewlquality control process. Design data and recommendations included herein are provided as a matter of convenience and should not be used for
final design. Rely only on final, hardcopy materials bearing the consultants original signature and seal. If you are not the named addressee (s), any use, dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is prohibited. If you have received this electronic communication in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete the original communication
from your system. Thank you.
` THINK BEFORE YOU PRINT

(UPDATED PCN, IMPACT W2 (#3-W1) AND MITIGATION
PLAN PER USACE REQUEST 06-13-18
dot WArfiq c
9
P <
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 13
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
la.
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit L] Section 10 Permit
1b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29 or General Permit (GP) number: N/A
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
® Yes
❑ No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ® Riparian Buffer Authorization
le.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ®No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
® Yes
❑ No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes
®No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Stonecreek
2b.
County:
Wake
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Fuquay-Varina
2d.
Subdivision name:
Stonecreek
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
N/A
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Carl Edwin Falco
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
D.B.; 16896; Pg. 1119
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d.
Street address:
7829 Saint Annes Way
3e.
City, state, zip:
Fuquay-Varina, NC 27526
3f.
Telephone no.:
919-215-9227
3g.
Fax no.:
N/A
3h.
Email address:
N/A
Page 1 of 13
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ® Other, specify: Owner -please send correspondence to Agent and
Applicant
4b.
Name:
Chris Raughley
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
Pulte Home Company, LLC
4d.
Street address:
1225 Crescent Green Drive, Ste. 250
4e.
City, state, zip:
Cary, NC 27518
4f.
Telephone no.:
919-816-1161
4g.
Fax no.:
N/A
4h.
Email address:
Chris. RaughleyAPulteGroup.com
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Deborah Edwards Shirley
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
5c.
Street address:
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Ste. 104
5d.
City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27615
5e.
Telephone no.:
919-846-5900
5f.
Fax no.:
919-846-9467
5g.
Email address:
DShirley(@SandEC.com
Page 2 of 13

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. ' Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
Parcel ID: 0678056672
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): IMPACT4
Latitude: 35.6350 Longitude: -78.7644
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size:
± 78
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
UT to Middle Creek 27-43-15=(4)
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C, NSW .
2c. River basin:
Neuse; Hydrologic Unit Code 03020201
3. Project Description
3a: Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application: Existing conditions consist of wooded land with open agriculture fields. Two stream systems with adjacent
wetlands and riparian buffers flow to the north and there is a drained pond on the northern property boundary. The
general land use in the vicinity of the project is residential.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
Approximately 3.25 acres of wetlands and approximately 1. 71 acresin open waters.
3c. List the total estimated, linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
Approximately 1, 875 linear feet
3d. Explain the purpose of•the proposed project:
The purpose• of the proposed project is to construct a residential development and construct the infrastructure necessary
to access the residential development.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The overall project consists of a single family, residential development comprising of 185 residential lots and the
construction of roadway infrastructure, utilities, single -family lots and stormwater BMP's. Specifically, there are
stream, wetland and riparian buffer impacts associated with utilities, and wetland impacts associated with road-
infrastructure. Equipment typically used for 'construction and earthwork such as backhoes, bulldozers, excavators,
graders, pavers etc. will be utilized for this project.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for lh,is property !
Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?®
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
® Preliminary ❑ Final
Comments: SAW-2017-00951
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company: Soil & Environmental
Name (if known): Steven Ball
Consultants, PA Other:
4d. If yes, list the'dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
USACE- James Lastinger with the, Corps verified jurisdictional areas on May 11, 2017 (PJD AID# SAW-2017-00951);
NCDWR-Rick Trone with the NCDWR field verified the riparian buffers on January 27, 2018 (NBRRO #17-13)
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all-prior- phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
N/A
Page 3 of 13
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
N/A
Page 4 of 13

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ®Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type-ofjurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
wetland
DWQ — non -404, other),
(acres)
Temporary T
if known
W1(#1 -W1)
Utility Crossing-
Permanent, No Perm
Headwatar
®Yes
®Corps
0.015
®P ❑ T
Loss
Forest
El No
ElDWQ
W2 (#3-W1)
SCM Discharge
Headwatar
® Yes:
® Corps
0.013
®P E] T
Forest
E] No
❑ DWQ
W3 (#6-W2)
Road Fill
Headwatar
® Yes
® Corps
0.171
®P ❑ T
.,.
Forest
❑ No ,
❑ DWQ
W4 (#6-W2)
Road Fill -Temporary
Headwatar
® Yes,
® Corps
0.021
❑ P ® T
Construction Access
Forest
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 (#7-W3)
Utility Crossing-
Permanent, No Perm
Headwatar
® Yes,
® Corps
0.016
® P ❑ T
Loss
Forest
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 (#10-W3)
Utility 'Crossing -
Permanent, No Perm
Headwatar
®Yes
®Corps
0.057
®P ❑ T
Loss
Forest
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W7 (#11-W3)
Road Fill
Headwatar
® Yes '
® Corps
0.003
• ®P ❑ T
Forest
El No
❑ DWQ
W8 (#11-W3)
Road Fill -Temporary
Headwatar
® Yes
® Corps
0.001
❑ P ® T
Construction Access
Forest
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts•
0.297
2h. Comments: Total proposed permanent impacts to jurisdictional wetlands = 0.187 acres; total proposed
permanent, no permanent loss impacts to jurisdictional wetlands (i.e. permanent maintenance corridor @ utility
crossings & SCM Discharge) = 0.088; total proposed temporary impacts' to jurisdictional wetlands = 0.022 acres. Temporary
impacts will be brought back to original contours and re -vegetated with wetland seed mix. .
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g•
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -Permanent
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
(P) or Temporary (T)
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 (#1-8) ❑ P ® T
Utility Crossing
UT to Middle
Creek
❑ PER
® INT
® Corps
❑ DWQ
6
40
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
40
.3i. Comments: Temporary stream impacts = 40 LF
Page 5 of 13
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individu Ily list all open water im acts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water impact
Name of waterbody
number—
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ❑P❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments: Pond will be drained preceding road construction
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose of
(acres)
number
pond
Flo
ode
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
d
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
Page 6 of 13

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer.impacts
below. If any impacts require, mitigation, then youMUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
® Neuse . ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number —
Reason for impact
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
required?:
B1 (#1) ®P ElUT
T'
Utility Crossing ,
to,Middle
Creek;;
,❑ `Yes
®�No
2448
1721
B2 (#2) ® P ❑ T
Utility -Perpendicular
UT to Middle
Creek:
'Yes'
❑ `No,
1311
2338
B3 (#3) ® P ❑ T
SCM Discharge
UT to Middle,
Creek:
❑PYes'
®!No
631
421
B4 (#4) ® P E]T
SCM Grading
UT. to Middle
;❑'Yes
0
1918.
Creek
® .No
B5 (#5).® P ❑ T
SCM Discharge
UT to Middle `
Creek®;No
,❑;Yes '
475
648
B6 (#8) ® P El
Utility Crossing
UT to Middle'�❑'Yes
;Creek
�'®�No,' i
2149
1286
B7 (#9) ®P ❑ T
SCM Discharge
UT, to Middle
Creek
',Yes !
IENo
669
425
6h. Total bu'ffe'r impacts
7683
8757
6i. Comments:'

D.- Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
S&EC completed a wetland delineation and Neuse River Buffer evaluation for the entire property in order to identify
natural resources so that impacts could be avoided & minimized to the maximum extent practicable. Overall Avoidance &
Minimization during site plan design: Earlier iterations of the site plan included 205 lots, which would have produced more
impervious area and stormwater, indirectly impacting more of the natural resources. Rillcrest Grove Way originally
connected to the west intersecting with Raddercrest, this was removed which avoided permanent stream, wetland and
riparian buffer impacts. This change, in road infrastructure also resulted in the proposed cul-de-sac at the end of Falco
Field Lane. Retaining walls were 'added between lots 112 and 113, resulting in an avoidance of permanent wetland
impacts. Cataldo Way was moved south to minimize wetland impacts at Impact 11 and to avoid impacts to the existing
pond near lots 26 & 27. The pump station was relocated from the Raddercrest cul-de-sac to the Falco Field cul -de -'sac to
avoid stream and buffer impacts associated with the pump station and access road.' The number of stormwater ponds
was reduced from 5 to 4 which resulted minimization of riparian buffer impact for SCM discharges. Retaining walls were
added to lots 126, 127,140, 171, 180, 181 to reduce riparian buffer and wetland impacts. And where possible sewer
crossings are proposed as aerial to avoid stream impacts. Impact 1 is a proposed force main and sanitary sewer
crossing. Proposed impacts include temporary stream impacts, along with permanent, no permanent loss wetland impacts
and associated riparian buffers. This 40' wide easement is necessary to accommodate both the force main and the'
sanitary�sewer. The permanent, no permanent loss impacts are for the permanent'rhaintenance corridor and the change
of wetland function, compensatory mitigation has been proposed at� 1:1 for the wetland impacts. Impacts have been
minimized by crossing the stream and wetland area at a near perpendicular angle. "Impact 2 is a proposed parallel force
main and sanitary sewer impact. Proposed impacts include parallel riparian buffer' impacts, compensatory mitigation has
been proposed for Zone 1 impacts. This impact is necessary because of the limited land between the buffered stream
(stream B) and the existing wetland (wetland W2) and the necessary placements of the pump station, the force main and
sanitary sewer and SCM #2. Impacts 3 & 5 are proposed SCM discharges from SCM's 1 & 2. Proposed impacts
include permanent loss wetland impacts and riparian buffer impacts. The riparian buffers areas will be regraded and
revegetated post -construction but will -remain within an easement. The permanent, no permanent loss impacts are for the
permanent easement and the change of wetland function, compensatory mitigation has been proposed at 1:1 for the
wetland impacts. These impacts are necessary to discharge treated stormwater from the Stormwater Control Measures
(SCM). Impact 4 is proposed SCM grading, Zone 2 only. This area will be revegetated post -construction. Impact 6 is
proposed, road fill for a. road/cul-de-sac. Proposed impacts include temporary and permanent wetland impacts. A retaining
wall has been added to minimize wetland impacts. This impact is necessary because it provides a safe turn -around for
municipal service equipment and emergency equipment potentially using Falco Field Lane. The cul-de-sac serves multiple
purposes by providing access drive for the pump station and the Stormwater Control Measure. And finally, it is necessary
as a turn -out for Rillcrest Grove Way and the length between the cul-de-sac and Rillcrest Grove Way is at a minimum
length. Impact 7 is a proposed sanitary sewer crossing. Proposed impacts include permanent, no permanent loss
wetland impacts. This impact is necessary to provide sanitary sewer to the eastern side of the development. Impacts
have been minimized by crossing at a near perpendicular angle and at a narrow section of the wetland area. The
permanent, no permanent loss impacts are for the permanent maintenance corridor and the change of wetland function,
compensatory mitigation has been proposed at 1:1 for the wetland impacts. Impact 8 is_a proposed aerial utility crossing
to an intermittent steam. Impacts include Zone 1 & 2 riparian buffer impacts. This utility crossing has been minimized by
avoiding stream impacts. Impact 9 is a proposed SCM discharge from SCM #4. Proposed impacts include riparian buffer
impacts. The riparian buffers areas will be regraded and revegetated post -construction but will remain within an
easement. These impacts are necessary to discharge treated stormwater. Impact 10 is a proposed sanitary sewer
crossing. Proposed impacts include permanent, no permanent loss wetland impacts. The permanent, no permanent loss
impacts are for the permanent maintenance corridor and the change of wetland function, compensatory mitigation has.
been proposed at 1:1 for the wetland impacts. This impact is necessary to provide sanitary sewer to the southeastern side
of the development. Impact 11 is proposed road fill foran infrastructure road. Proposed impacts include temporary and
permanent wetland impacts. As discussed above within the Overall Avoidance & Minimization, this road was shifted as
far south as possible, therefore minimizing wetland Impacts in this location. All °temporary stream impacts will be brought
back to pre -construction elevations and stream banks will be stabilized. All temporary wetland impacts will be brought
back to pre -construction contours revegetated with a wetland seed mix.
Furthermore, the applicant is aware of the regional conditions associated with the Nationwide Permits 29. With respect to
residential developments (NWP 29 -Regional Conditions section 4.0) there are no impact associated with stormwater
facilities or single-family recreation facilities for this project, there are no proposed discharges to floodplain or floodways,
the stream classification for this project is' C (i.e. not High Quality Waters, Coastal Wetlands or wetland adjacent to these
waters) and no riprap is being proposed within streams.
Page 8of13
- PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts -through construction techniques.
Contractor will follow the following construction sequence:
Contractor shall install erosion & sedimentation control measures including, but not limited to, construction
entrances, silt/tree protection fence, diversions/check dams, and sediment basins/traps in accordancewith
requirements set forth in the Wake County,Land Disturbing Permit.
Contractor:shall notify the Town of Fuquay Varina Public Works 48 -hours in. advance of start of work during a
period of time with no rain in the forecast.
Prior to start of work, contractor shall have all materials and equipment on=site, For utility crossings with
casings, the carrier pipe shall be installed within the casing pipe prior to any open cut activities.
Contractor shall install a temporary coffer dam ori the upstream side of the proposed crossing to pump water
around the open cut area to the downstream side. Contractor may also install a temporary diversion channel lined
with plastic to allow the stream to bypass the open cut area. . __1'
Contractor shall place the culvert or utility casing with carrier pipe at elevations shown on the approved plans
and backfill in accordance with Town of Fuquay Varina specifications.
Contractor shall restore channel and stabilize any disturbance, within 24 -hours of start of work.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Maters of the U.S. or. Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require. Compensatory Mitigation for
® Yes ❑ No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
® DWQ ® Corps
® Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for.this
ElPayment to -in -lieu fee program
project?
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if.Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: EBX-Neuse sponsored Neu -Con Wetland & Stream Umbrella Mitigation Bank (wetlands)
Type:
Quantity:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Riparian Wetland
0.46
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
0 linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
0 square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
4h. Comments: See attached letter from NCDMS
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 9 of 13

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
® Yes
❑ No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
Parallel utility
1,311
3:1
3,933
Zone 2
1.5:1
0
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
3.933
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to
private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
Payment into a private mitigation bank, please see attached SOA letter
6h. Comments: EBX will utilize either: EBX-Neuse 1, LLC Neuse Riparian Buffer Umbrella Mitigation Bank or EBX Upper
Neuse Riparian Buffer Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Page 10 of 13

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required.by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified -
LK Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: The SMP will be reviewed by the Town of Fuquay Varina and has been
® Yes ❑ No
designed in accordance with the NCDEQ and the Towns guidelines. The
stormwater management plan (SMP) and SCM's provide nitrogen treatment
throughout the site.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
35.81
2b. 'Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
Per the project engineer. Four wet detention basins have been proposed and designed to treat the requirements for 85% TSS
removal, drawdown of the first inch of rainfall between 2-5 days and reduction of the peak flow for the 1" 24 hour, storm
event. In addition, 100 year event has been analyzed to ensure safe passage through the site. The SMP will be 'reviewed by
the Town of Fuguay Varina and has been designed in accordance with the NCDEQ and the Towns guidelines.
® Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified -Local Government Stormwater Review,
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Town of Fuquay-Varina
Phase II
® NSW
3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP .
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
El Yes ® No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
Z. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No .
5b.'Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 1 f of 13
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
We have reviewed the `Draft Internal Policy, Cumulative impacts and the 401 Water Quality Certification and Isolated
Wetlands Programs" document prepared by the NC Division of Water Quality on April 10, 2004, version 2.1. The draft
states that many private developments are unlikely to cause cumulative impacts, including projects such as urban in -fill,
most residential subdivisions and small commercial developments as well as agricultural and silvicultural operations. The
Stonecreek project is a residential development. Additionally, the project is located within Fuquay-Varina jurisdiction,
therefore the adjacent properties that have potential for development will have the following regulations to protect
downstream waters: 1) the Neuse River Basin Riparian Buffer Protection regulations, these regulations require
limited development within the riparian buffer area in addition to "diffuse flow" requirements at a minimum and could
require Best Management Practices that control nitrogen if diffuse flow cannot be achieved; and finally 2) the Phase
11 NPDES Stormwater Permit Program, this program includes permitting requirements for Municipal Separate Storm
Sewer Systems (MS4s) in addition to post -construction stormwater management requirements. We anticipate that
the DWR will advise us if any additional information is needed.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
A public Sewer Pump Station will be constructed on site to connect the site to the Town of Fuquay-Varina's municipal
sewage collection and treatment system.
Page 12 of 13
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes. ®No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat? The NC-Natural Heritage Programs Data Explorer Map was;used to search for elemental occurrences of
federally protected species listed within and within 1 mile of the project boundaries. It was determined based on the
search that there are no elemental occurrences that are listed as federally Threatened/Endangered within or within 1 mile
of the project boundaries.
References: North Carolina Natural Heritage Program. 2018. Geographic Information System (GIS) data. NCDNCR,
Raleigh, NC. Available at htto.11www.ncnh:1orp/. (Accessed: May 15, 2018).
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
I
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ®No
6b. What data sources did, you use to determine, whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
The NOAA Habitat Conservation/Habitat Protection: National Marine Fish Service; Essential Fish Habitat Mapper website
was referenced. No Essential Fish Habitat was identified near the project.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National.Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you ,use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? The NC
State Historic Preservation Office HPOWE6 GIS Service interactive map was referenced on May 15, 2018, no historic
listings or study list entries or determined eligible listings were identified within the property boundaries. Additionally, no
structures exist within the property boundaries.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
TE]Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:'
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? NC Floodplain Mapping Program
Deborah E. Shirley
Digitally signed by Deborah E. Shirley
Deborah E. Shirle ADN: cn=Deborah EShirley, o, ou,
y oae!zo;8io6;,;;Z;Z4-04oU5
May 96,
2018
Applicant/Agent's Signature
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Date
Page 13 of 13

/ \ I cwl-i. 10
Ell!
wl 1.1
L�J, C0
Qu11 SOM
SCALE 1"=250'
2gO' 5
0 0'
SITE DATA:
TOTAL SITE AREA 77.46 ACRES
TOTAL WETLANDS: 3.25 ACRES (141,365 SF)
TOTAL OPEN WATER (PONDS): 1.71 ACRES 74,810 SF
TOTAL STREAMS:
TOTAL PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS: 27.74 -/-(35.81%)
WETLAND & STREAM IMPACT LEGEND:
PERMANENT WETLANDS -GREEN
PERMANENT WETLANDS (NO LOSS -ORANGE
TEMPORARY WETLANDS -PURPLE
TEMPORARY STREAM -BLUE
i CD 61 BUFFER IMPACT -ZONE 1
71 --- BUFFER IMPACT - ZONE 2 U, rip
U,
gal O�
UG
U.1
zig
"I (AQ
mwc
�390.
1 5a F.71 MU 0 7N- ;21

/ -AN PACT I� 1
I SCM DISCHARGE
' - ' - _ - ' ♦ 1 _ 1 _' / 1 1 ZONE 1 BUFFER IMPACT 3 I
SCM DISCHARGE 5109E
.J( 0315E
'., ♦
/
_.-._ - W _ 1`1 PROPOSED /
S
[moi ♦ ♦ _. A PUMP STATMDN
4, ZONE 1 BUFFER W �/ ` \ I / \ i - \
Si
d
0,.�7r�.e1L�3Y� SCM DISCHARGE
\ 4]5 S.. \ ♦
x F
\
d W ` .U' IW W W W iO�M+H.� �� / �! � � •� •ZONE 2 BUFFER 1 � s M
� \ W r W iY�aYtiM�-�t-. ^l^.^b _ _._ _ . �' - i � IMPACT 3 -.-\ I ♦�
�I' W \\MM//22LL W J ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACT t ♦ 9CM pSCHARGE 1 `
�
C \
I W S y W W u 20' PUBLIC W / SCM GRADNG _ _ 02i SF
181 ING
�� Wll y `k W Y W UTILITY% - \
I _y�W W> V IW .y EA9EMENi \\\ \ T' '•T I LI 2OUTELmUCRO83ING T
_ p/.•�y.1
W WV' N WWW (FDTURE) • _/ r ^ JI,IVIJtE L - V ♦ ZONE IMPACTS \ 23389E
♦
¢¢
_
LA
1 WETLgNpW 1 1 ZONE 2 BUFFER / �� SCM DISCHARGE \ \ =
♦\♦\ \I
�1 \ I V% -- \, ZONEIBUFFER' 1 I
IMPACT 2 UTILm W /
i CROSSING'
I _ - ZONE, BUFFER I
IMPACT 1 UTILm
♦♦
I _ �_�♦ ��\I 1235 SFr, I 1 C�
•�
/^ LL/�
_ ♦ _ /� _9SF BUFFER IMPACT 1 UTILITY CROSSING
1/
/ ` / / ` / - - a -^\ LL `�. W PERMAN W NO LOSS WETLAND IMPACT 1 UTILITY CROSSING
i ♦`♦\ ♦
_ _ / ♦
/ 1 I 157 SF _
\ \ ♦ /
Z\ I UTILITY \ TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT 1 UTILITY CROSSING
lam` _ ♦ ��\♦\\♦ ' EA9EMENil2C SF ....... - _
♦ PERMANENT NO LOSS WETLAND IMPACT 1 UTWTY CROSSING
O
NI.
G
- ♦ 1 ♦\ J
1 1
\\\ ♦1 ♦ 11 \\ \ (` '
Lu €( f
\ \ ( 1 ZONE 1 BUFFER IMPACT 1 UTILITY CROSSING
M \ \�\ II 1 1 1212 SF r
♦ ♦ /
♦ / /
11 \ r ^ It 11 1\ \\
WETi.
Lu
\ ♦ 1 _ \ \ \ ` \ ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACT, UTRm CROSSING /
1 BOB S F \ / ^
I I, / \ 1
F
1 \ \ I l \ 1 ; \ \
i 1 n
I
\\�\ \) \
Z
SCALE P•=50• J 1j ,�1—, I I�-
�� \
r/
Os¢
Jr
\
0 50• 100' , 1 ( '\ I \I ♦/ ♦
STREAM;IB
II \
i
WETLAND i STREAM IMPACT LEGEND: r . I ♦ ` I I I \ \ ` 1 V \
® PERMANENT WETLANDS -GREEN w I
.®.'. PERMANENT WETLANDS (NO LOBS) -ORANGE \ 1 IY I ZONE t BUFFER
O
3'.
® TEMPORARY WETLANDS-PURPLE ZONE2BUFFER \
W
\
_ TEMPORARY STREAM -BLUEwi
O p^p
® BUFFER IMPACT -ZONE 1 / \♦I 1 I \ \�` �SW WWW,y/y /\
//
\ e,
1
® BUFFER IMPACT. ZONE2 1 I/ \ \ \♦ , 1\ ` �^'yI
\�
I I � ♦ � 1 ` 1� �WWw \ �

fires
EBX-Neuse I, LLC Stream and Wetland Banks
Statement of Availability June 13, 2018
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
James Lastinger
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Center, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Re Project: Stonecreek
This document confirms that Pulte Home Company, LLC (Applicant) for the Stonecreek (Project) has
expressed an interest to utilize 0.46 Riparian Wetland Mitigation Credits from the EBX-Neuse
sponsored Neu -Con Wetland & Stream Umbrella Mitigation Bank, specifically 0.46 wetland credits from
the Arrington Bridge III Site, all in the Neuse HUC 03020201. As the official Bank Sponsor, EBX-Neuse
I, LLC, attests to the fact that mitigation is available for reservation at this time.
These mitigation credits are not considered secured, and consequently are eligible to be used for alternate
purposes by the Bank Sponsor, until payment in full is received from the Applicant resulting in the
issuance of a Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate by the bank acknowledging that the Applicant has
fully secured credits from the bank and the Banker has accepted full responsibility for the mitigation
obligation requiring the credits/units.
The Banker will issue the Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate within three (3) days of receipt of the
purchase price. Banker shall provide to Applicant a copy of the Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate and
a documented copy of the debit of credits from the Bank Official Credit Ledger(s), indicating the permit
number and the resource type secured by the applicant. A copy of the Mitigation Credit Transfer
Certificate, with an updated Official Credit Ledger will also be sent to regulatory agencies showing the
proper documentation.
If any questions need to be answered, please contact me at 919-209-1075.
Best Regards,
Caitlan B. Parker
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605