HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0020354_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20070305O�0� W A iF9OG n7
Mr. Paul S. Messick Jr.
Town of Pittsboro
P.O. Box 759
Pittsboro, NC 27312
Subject
Dear Mr. Messick:
March 5, 2007
Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Town of Pittsboro WWTP
NPDES Permit No. NCO020354
Chatham County
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
On February 23, 2007, Mr. Shannon Langley and Ms. Stephanie Brixey of the Raleigh Regional Office
conducted a compliance evaluation inspection of the Town of Pittsboro's WWTP with the assistance of Mr.
John Poteat, ORC of the facility, and Mr. Bill Davis, operator at the facility. Their help was appreciated as it
facilitated the inspection process.
The following observations were made:
1. The Town of Pittsboro's WWTP is permitted to discharge at a rate of 0.75 MGD and consists of a
mechanical bar screen, 2 circular aeration basins that encompass 2 circular secondary clarifiers, high -
rate sand filters, UV disinfection system, effluent flow meter, cascade post aeration, drum sludge
thickener, and 2 aerobic digesters.
2. The Division's records show that Mr. John Poteat, grade 4 license, is listed as the ORC and Mr. Perry
Dunn is listed as the backup ORC. Mr. Dunn no longer works at the WWTP therefore an ORC
Designation form needs to be submitted to the Division with updates. The form can be found on the
DWQ website at: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/tacu/forms.html.
3. Mac Septic hauls sludge from the WWTP to be disposed of by Synagro. The facility had one side empty
for sludge storage at the time of the inspection.
4. A comparison of the September to November 2006 DMRs indicated no discrepancies.
5. The facility has not submitted its annual compliance report for 2006 to the users or DWQ. It was
discussed that the Town can combine the water and wastewater report into one document.
6. It was noted that the skimmer on Clarifier #2 was not working properly.
7. The DO level of the aeration basin was 5.0 ppm at the time of the inspection. The operator stated that
they are trying to bring the DO down slowly over a period of time.
Nne
Carolina
Narturally
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Raleigh Regional Office Surface Water Protection Phone (919) 7914200 Customer Service
Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 FAX (919) 571-4718 1-877-623-6748
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycledl10% Post Consumer Paper
Town of Pittsboro's WWTP
NPDES Permit No. NCO020354
8. The operator stated that the intensity of the UV system was running at 100% but the meters on the
system do not function properly. There is no backup disinfection system on-site.
9. The influent pump station has audible and visual alarms available but they were not operational at the
time of the inspection. Please describe how the alarms are set up to work.
10. The generator on-site is not automatically activated but must be turned on manually. The generator is
tested weekly but not under load. It is recommended that the generator be tested under load.
11. The facility analyzes the field parameters and Environment One performs all other parameters.
12. The outfall was observed during the inspection and there was no visual impact to the stream noted.
The overall conditions of the Town of Pittsboro's WWTP are compliant with Division standards. If you have
any questions regarding the attached report or any of the findings, please contact Stephanie Brixey at (919) 791-
4200 (or email: stephanie.brixey(a ncmail.net).
Cc: Mr. John Poteat, Town of Pittsboro
Mr. Bill Davis, Town of Pittsboro
Stephanie Brixey - RRO
•Cbnfral Files
Sincerely,
Stephanie Brixey
Environmental Specialist
LQ 0 - 2 q�` E, 1
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Form Approved.
EPA Washington, D C 20460
OMB No. 2040-0057
Water Compliance Inspection Report
Approval expires 8-31-98
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
1 I NI 2 15I 3I M00020354 111 121 07/02/23 117 18i cI 191 GI 20I
lJ U U U 1_
Remarks
21111IIIIIIIII IIII I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I IIIIIII6
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 QA ---------------------------Reserved-----------------
671 1 69 70U 71 I I 72 U 73 I I 174 751 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 80
u LI_I
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include
Entry Time/Date
Permit Effective Date
POTW name and NPDES permit Number)
Pittsboro WWTP
10:00 AM 07/02/23
07/02/01
Exit Time/Date
Permit Expiration Date
Small St Extension
Pittsboro NC 27312
01:00 PM 07/02/23
11/04/30
Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s)
Other Facility Data
John Thomas Poteat/ORC/919-542-2530/
Name, Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number
Perry J Dunn,PO Box 759 Pittsboro NC 27312/ORC/919-542-2444/91954271nOt9Cted
N0
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
Permit E Flow Measurement Operations & Maintenance Records/Reports
Self -Monitoring Program E Sludge Handling Disposal Facility Site Review Effluent/Receiving Waters
Laboratory
Section D: Summary of Find ln /Comments Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspector(s)Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Stephanie Brixey ::Z"� 1 ((�j &N:4 L -j / RRO WQ///
l/
E. Shannon Langley RRO WQ//919-791-4200/
Signature of Mana ent Q A Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
3 S
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous edifiolSs ara-Qbsolete.
Page # 1
NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type 1
31 NC0020IL 111 121 07/02/23 117 18UC
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
Skimmer on Clarifier #2 is not working properly.
Generator is tested weekly but not under load.
Influent pump station audible and visual alarms are available but were not operating properly at time of
inspection.
LO 8-- �Vfid
Page # 2
Permit: NCO020354 Owner - Facility: Pittsboro WWTP
Inspection Date: 02/23/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit
Yes
No
NA NE
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new application?
❑
❑
■
❑
Is the facility as described in the permit?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Are there any special conditions for the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection?
■
❑
❑
❑
Comment: There are no special conditions for this permit.
Record Keeping
Yes
No
NA NE
Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is all required information readily available, complete and current?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are all records maintained for 3 years (lab. reg. required 5 years)?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the chain -of -custody complete'
■
❑
❑
❑
Dates, times and location of sampling
■
Name of individual performing the sampling
■
Results of analysis and calibration
■
Dates of analysis
■
Name of person performing analyses
■
Transported COCs
■
Are DMRs complete: do they include all permit parameters?
■
000
Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ?
❑
■
❑
❑
(If the facility is = or > 5 MGD permitted flow) Do they operate 24/7 with a certified operator on each shift?
❑
❑
■
❑
Is the ORC visitation log available and current?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site?
■
❑
❑
❑
Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review?
❑
■
❑
❑
Comment: The 2006 annual compliance report has not been submitted.
Flow Measurement - Effluent
Yes
No
NA
NE
# Is flow meter used for reporting?
■
❑
❑
❑
Page # 3
Permit: NCO020354
Inspection Date: 02/23/2007
Flow Measurement - Effluent
Owner - Facility: Pittsboro WWTP
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Is flow meter calibrated annually?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the flow meter operational?
■
❑
❑
❑
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter?
❑
❑
■
❑
Comment:
❑
■
❑
❑
Operations & Maintenance
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping?
■
❑
❑
❑
Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable Solids,
pH, DO, Sludge ■
❑
❑
❑
Judge, and other that are applicable?
Comment:
Yes
No
NA
NE
Pump Station - Influent
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is the pump wet well free of bypass lines or structures?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the wet well free of excessive grease?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are all pumps present?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are all pumps operable?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are float controls operable?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is SCADA telemetry available and operational?
❑
■
❑
❑
Is audible and visual alarm available and operational?
❑
■
❑
❑
Comment: SCADA telemetry is not available. Audible and visual alarms were not
■
❑
❑
❑
operational at time of inspection.
%I--
\Iw
MA
\IC
Type of bar screen
a.Manual
❑
b.Mechanical
■
Are the bars adequately screening debris?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the screen free of excessive debris?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is disposal of screening in compliance?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the unit in good condition?
■
❑
❑
❑
Comment:
Aeration Basins
Yes
No
NA
NE
O
Mode of operation
Type of aeration system,
Page # 4
Permit: NCO020354
Owner - Facility: Pittsboro WWTP
Inspection Date: 02/23/2007
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Aeration Basins
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is the basin free of dead spots?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are surface aerators and mixers operational?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are the diffusers operational?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the foam the proper color for the treatment process?
■
❑
❑
❑
Does the foam cover less than 25% of the basin's surface?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the DO level acceptable?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Is the DO level acceptable?(1.0 to 3.0 mg/I)
❑
❑
❑
❑
Comment: The DO level noted at time of inspection was 5.0 ppm. The operators are
trying to bring the DO down slowly over a period of time.
Secondary Clarifier
Is the clarifier free of black and odorous wastewater?
Is the site free of excessive buildup of solids in center well of circular clarifier?
Are weirs level?
Is the site free of weir blockage?
Is the site free of evidence of short-circuiting?
Is scum'removal adequate?
Is the site free of excessive floating sludge?
Is the drive unit operational?
Is the return rate acceptable (low turbulence)?
Is the overflow clear of excessive solids/pin floc?
Is the sludge blanket level acceptable? (Approximately'/4 of the sidewall depth)
Comment: The sludge blanket was 1.5' in a 12' clarifier.
Filtration (High Rate Tertiary)
Type of operation:
Is the filter media present?
Is the filter surface free of clogging?
Is the filter free of growth?
Is the air scour operational?
Is the scouring acceptable?
Js the clear well free of excessive solids and filter media?
Page # 5
Permit: NCO020354 Owner - Facility: Pittsboro WWTP
Inspection Date: 02/23/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Filtration (High Rate Tertiary) Yes No NA NE
Comment:
Disinfection - UV Yes No NA NE
Are extra UV bulbs available on site? 0000
Are UV bulbs clean?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is UV intensity adequate?
0000
Is transmittance at or above designed level?
❑
❑
❑
■
Is there a backup system on site?
❑
■
❑
❑
Is effluent clear and free of solids?
■
❑
❑
❑
Comment: The operators said that the intensity of the UV system is running at 100%
but the meters do not work. There is no backup system onsite.
Standby Power
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is automatically activated standby power available?
❑
■
❑
❑
Is the generator tested by interrupting primary power source?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the generator tested under load?
❑
■
❑
❑
Was generator tested & operational during the inspection?
■
❑
❑
❑
Do the generator(s) have adequate capacity to operate the entire wastewater site?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is there an emergency agreement with a fuel vendor for extended run on back-up power?
❑
■
❑
❑
Is the generator fuel level monitored?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Comment: The generator is not tested under load and there is no agreement with a
fuel vendor.
Laboratory
Yes
No
NA
NE
Are field parameters performed by certified personnel or laboratory?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are all other parameters(excluding field parameters) performed by a certified lab?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Is the facility using a contract lab?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at 1.0 to 4.4 degrees Celsius)?
■
❑
❑
❑
Incubator (Fecal Coliform) set to 44.5 degrees Celsius+/- 0.2 degrees?
❑
❑
■
❑
Incubator (BOD) set to 20.0 degrees Celsius +/- 1.0 degrees?
❑
❑
■
❑
Comment: The facility uses Environmental One as a contract lab.
Aerobic Digester
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is the capacity adequate? LO g — �� ��
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the mixing adequate?
■
Cl
❑
Cl
Page # 6
0
Permit: NCO020354
Owner - Facility: Pittsboro WWTP
No
NA
NE
Inspection Date: 02/23/2007
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
❑
❑
❑
Aerobic Digester
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is the site free of excessive foaming in the tank?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Is the odor acceptable?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Is tankage available for properly waste sludge?
00011
❑
■
❑
Comment:
Solids Handling Equipment
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is the equipment operational?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the chemical feed equipment operational?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is storage adequate?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the site free of high level of solids in filtrate from filter presses or vacuum filters?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the site free of sludge buildup on belts and/or rollers of filter press?
❑
❑
■
❑
Is the site free of excessive moisture in belt filter press sludge cake?
❑
❑
■
❑
The facility has an approved sludge management plan?
■
❑
❑
❑
Comment:
Influent Sampling
Yes
No
NA
NE
# Is composite sampling flow proportional?
❑
■
❑
❑
Is sample collected above side streams?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is proper volume collected?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the tubing clean?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at 1.0 to 4.4 degrees Celsius)?
❑
❑
❑
■
Is sampling performed according to the permit?
■
❑
❑
❑
Comment: Sampling is timed.
Effluent Sampling
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is composite sampling flow proportional?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is sample collected below all treatment units?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is proper volume collected?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the tubing clean?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at 1.0 to 4.4 degrees Celsius)?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type representative)?
■
❑
❑
❑
Comment:
Effluent Pipe
Yes
No
NA
NE
Page # 7
Permit: NCO020354 Owner - Facility: Pittsboro WWTP
Inspection Date: 02/23/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Effluent Pipe Yes No NA NE
Is right of way to the outfall properly maintained? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are the receiving water free of foam other than trace amounts and other debris? ■ ❑ Cl ❑
If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating properly?
Comment:
LO O - T114
0000
Page # 8
C