Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0020354_Compliance Report_20070620R NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY PRETREATMENT COMPLIANCE INSPECTION (PCI) REPORT BACKGROUND INFORMATION [Complete Prior To PCI• Review Program Info Database Sheet(s)l 1. Control Authority (POTW) Name: Town of Pittsboro 2. Control Authority Representative(s): Bill Davis 3. Title(s): Operator/Pretreatment Coordinator 4. Last Inspection Date: 09/20/2005 Inspection Type (Choose One): ® PCI ❑ Audit 5. Has Program Completed All Requirements from the Previous Inspection or Program Info Sheet(s)? ® YES ❑ NO 6. Is POTW under an Order That Includes Pretreatment Conditions? ❑ YES ® NO Order Type, Number, Parameters: PCS CODING Trans.Code Main Program Permit Number NJ INICIO1012101315141 Are Milestone Dates Being Met? ❑ YES ❑ NO MM/DD/YY J 06 1 20 1 07 (DTTA) Inspec.Type Inspector Fac. Type LU MrPTI La -1 1NSP (FACC) 7. Current Number Of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs)? 1 SIUS 8. Current Number Of Categorical Industrial Users CIUs ? 1 CNS 9. Number of SIUs Not Inspected By POTW in the Last Calendar Year? 1 19. Which Industries have been in SNC for Limits or Reporting during SNC for Limits: none 10. Number of SIUs Not Sampled By POTW in the Last Calendar Year? 0 Public Notice?(May refer to PAR if Excessive SIUs in SNC) Not Published: 11. Enter the Higher Number of 9 or 10 1 NOIN 12. Number of SIUs With No IUP, or With an Expired IUP 0 NOCM 13. Number of SIUs in SNC for Either Reporting or Limits Violations During Either of the Last 217 0 Semi -Annual Periods Total Number of SILTS in SNC PSNC 14. Number of SIUs in SNC For Reporting During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods 0 MSNC 15. Number of SIUs In SNC For Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods 0 SNPS 16. Number of SIUs In SNC For Both Reporting and Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2 0 Semi-annual Periods POTW INTERVIEW 17. Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any NPDES Limits Violations? ® YES ❑ NO If Yes, What are the Parameters and How are these Problems Being Addressed? fecal, ammonia, BOD 18. Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any Problems Related to an Industrial ® YES ❑ NO Discharge (Interference, Pass -Through, Blockage, Citizens' Complaints, Increased Piedmont Biofuels sent a slug to the Sludge Production, Etc.)? WWTP. The Town has stopped the If Yes, How are these Problems Being Addressed? industry's discharge for now. 19. Which Industries have been in SNC for Limits or Reporting during SNC for Limits: none either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods? Not Been Published for SNC for Reporting: none Public Notice?(May refer to PAR if Excessive SIUs in SNC) Not Published: none 20. Which Industries are on Compliance Schedules or Orders? For all SIUs on an Order, Has a Signed Copy of the Order been sent to the Division? none 21. Are Any Permits Or Civil Penalties Currently Under Adjudication? If Yes, Which ❑YES ® NO Ones? LTMP FILE REVIEW: 22. Is LTMP/STMP Monitoring Being Conducted at Appropriate Locations and Frequencies? ® YES ❑ NO 23. Are Correct Detection Levels being used for all LTMP Monitoring? ® YES ❑ NO 24. Is the LTMP Data Maintained in a Table or Equivalent? ® YES ❑ NO Is the Table Adequate? ® YES ❑ NO 25. Is the LTMP effluent data reported on the Discharge Monitoring Report? ® YES ❑ NO DWQ Inspector, please verify yourself 26. IfNO to 23 - 26, list violations 27. Should any Pollutants of Concern be Eliminated from or Added to the LTMP? ❑ YES ® NO If yes, which ones? Eliminated: Added: NC DWQ Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form Updated 10/27/2006 Page 1 28. PRETREATMENT PROGRAM ELEMENTS REVIEW - Please review POTW files, verify POTW has copy of Program Element with supporting documents and cony of PERCS Approval T.atte.r anri liatac — +o.,+. 41, n_ _ W T_.0_ - Program Element Last Submittal Date In file? WILU r1V law 1111V. Last Approval Date In file Date Next Due, If Applicable Headworks Analysis (HWA) 08/05/2002 ® Yes ❑ No 12/12/2003 ® Yes ❑ No 08/01/2008 Industrial Waste Survey (IWS) 09/29/2003 ® Yes ❑ No 06/17/2004 ® Yes❑ No 09/30/2008 Sewer Use Ordinance (SUO) 05/02/2005 __9 ® Yes ❑ No 05/12/2005 ® Yes ❑ No 06/01/2007 Enforcement Response Plan (ERP) 10/01/1998 Yes ❑ No 10/13/1998 ® Yes ❑ No Long Term Monitoring Plan (LTMP) 03/01/2002 ® Yes ❑ No 03/04/2002 1 ® Yes ❑ No Categorical Standard Applied I.E. 40 CFR, Etc. Or N/A INDUSTRIAL USER PERMIT (IUP) FILF, RFVIF.W Q IT TP PTT F u FVTPIXTQ nD t UTT p T3 VN rTT 11T , ,-r, 29. - — - - - - - a • iLL 1\1i User Name 1. HydroTube 2. v Iu ry t11VL 1 I 11U.N 3 30. IUP Number 0001 31. Does File Contain Current Permit? ® Yes [I No E:1Yes E] No ElYes ElNo 32. Permit Expiration Date 07/31/2007 JE 33. Categorical Standard Applied I.E. 40 CFR, Etc. Or N/A 433 34. Does File Contain Permit Application Completed Within One Year ® Yes ❑ No ❑Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No Prior to Permit Issue Date? 11 11 35. Does File Contain an Inspection Completed Within Last Calendar ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No Year?1 36. a. Does the File Contain a Slug Control Plan? a. ❑Yes NNo Yes ❑No a. ❑Yes ❑No b. If No, is One Needed? (See Inspection Form from POTW) b. 0 e NNo Yes ❑No 11 Lb. b. ❑Yes ❑No 37. For 40 CFR 413 and 433 TTO Certification, Does File Contain a ®Yes❑No❑N/A ❑Yes❑No❑N/A ❑Yes❑No❑N/A Toxic Organic Management Plan TOMP ? 11 11 38. a. Does File Contain Original Permit Review Letter from the a. ®Yes ❑No a. ❑Yes []No a. ❑Yes ❑No Division? b. All Issues Resolved? b ®Yes❑No❑N/A b.❑Yes❑No❑N/A b ❑Yes❑No❑N/A 39. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes [:1No Complete its Sampling as Required b IUP? 11 40. Does File Contain POTW Sampling Chain-Of-CustodyForms? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No El Yes ElNo 41. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the SILT Complete ❑Yes❑NoNN/A ❑Yes❑No❑N/A ❑Yes❑No❑N/A its Sampling as Required b IUP? 42. Does Sampling Indicate Flow or Production? ®Yes❑No❑N/A ❑Yes❑No❑N/A ❑Yes❑No❑N/A 43. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No All Non -Compliance from Both POTW and SILT Sampling? 44. a. Was the POTW Notified by SIU (Within 24 Hours) of All Self- a.❑Yes❑No®N/A a.❑Yes❑No❑N/A a.❑Yes❑No❑N/A Monitoring Violations? b. Did Industry Resample Within 30 Days? b. []Yes ❑No b.❑Yes ❑No b. ❑Yes ❑No c. Did POTW resample within 30 days of becoming aware of SIU limit violations in the POTW's sampling of the SIU? c.❑Yes❑No®N/A c.❑Yes❑No❑N/A c.❑Yes❑No❑N/A 45. Was the SILT Promptly Notified of Any Violations (Per ERP)? ❑Yes❑NoNN/A ❑Yes❑NoON/A _OYes_ON_ o[ N/A 46. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was the SIU in SNC? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No 47. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was Enforcement ❑Yes❑NoNN/A ❑Yes❑No❑N/A ❑Yes❑No❑N/A Taken as Specified in the POTW's ERP? 48. Does the File Contain Penalty Assessment Notices? ❑YesONoNN/A ❑Yes❑No❑N/A ❑Yes❑No❑N/A 49. Does The File Contain Proof Of Penalty Collection? ❑Yes❑NoNN/A ❑Yes❑No❑N/A ❑Yes❑No❑N/A 50. a. Does the File Contain Any Current Enforcement Orders? b. Is SIU in Com liance Order? I �a.❑ge'gd§d� N/A a.❑Yes❑No❑N/A a.❑Yes❑No❑N/A »b with ❑Yes❑NoNN/A b.❑Yes❑No❑N/A b.❑Yes❑No❑N/A 51. Did the POTW Representative Have Difficulty in Obtaining Any of.,� ; � Yes 0 Noy " ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑Yes ❑ No F ' This Requested Information For You? NC DWQ Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form Updated 10/27/2006 Page 2 T FILE REVIEW COMMENTS: #35 An inspection was not conducted in 2006. #36 Mr. Davis was not sure if there was a slug plan. A plan could not be found during the inspection. #51 Mr. Davis has been trying to organize the pretreatment files. INDUSTRY INSPECTION PCS CODING: Trans.Code Main Program Permit Number NJ I I I 1 1 I I I 1 1 1. Industry Inspected: 2. Industry Address: 3. Type of Industry/Product: 4. Industry Contact: MM/DD/YY Inspec.Type Inspector Fac. Type 1 I I I 1 I l 1 sJ L 2 I. (DTIA) (TYPI) (INSP) (FACC) Title: 5. Does the POTW Use the Division Model Inspection Form or Equivalent? [:]YES ❑ NO 6. Did the POTW Contact Conduct the Following Parts of the Industrial Inspection Thoroughly? Comments: A. Initial Interview ❑ YES ❑ NO B. Plant Tour ❑ YES ❑ NO C. Pretreatment Tour ❑ YES ❑ NO D. Sampling Review ❑ YES ❑ NO E. Exit Interview ❑ YES ❑ NO Industrial Inspection Comments: OVERALL SUMMARY AND COMMENTS: Comments: HydroTube has closed the facility in Pittsboro Requirements: SUO revisions were due 06/01/2007. Please submit the revised SUO ASAP. Pittsboro needs to submit a letter to the Division to drop HydroTube as a SIU. Recommendations: It is recommended that you update your ERP after the SUO revisions are completed NOD: ❑ YES ® NO NOV: ❑ YES ® NO QNCR: ❑ YES ® NO POTW Ratine• Satisfactory X Marginal UnSatisfactory. PCI COMPLETED BY:Stephanie Brixey DATE: 06/20/2007 NC DWQ Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form Updated 10/27/2006 Page 3