HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0020354_Compliance Report_20070620R
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PRETREATMENT COMPLIANCE INSPECTION (PCI) REPORT
BACKGROUND INFORMATION [Complete Prior To PCI• Review Program Info Database Sheet(s)l
1. Control Authority (POTW) Name: Town of Pittsboro
2. Control Authority Representative(s): Bill Davis
3. Title(s): Operator/Pretreatment Coordinator
4. Last Inspection Date: 09/20/2005 Inspection Type (Choose One): ® PCI ❑ Audit
5. Has Program Completed All Requirements from the Previous Inspection or Program Info Sheet(s)? ® YES ❑ NO
6. Is POTW under an Order That Includes Pretreatment Conditions? ❑ YES ® NO
Order Type, Number, Parameters:
PCS CODING
Trans.Code Main Program Permit Number
NJ INICIO1012101315141
Are Milestone Dates Being Met? ❑ YES ❑ NO
MM/DD/YY
J 06 1 20 1 07
(DTTA)
Inspec.Type Inspector Fac. Type
LU
MrPTI
La -1
1NSP (FACC)
7. Current Number Of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs)?
1
SIUS
8. Current Number Of Categorical Industrial Users CIUs ?
1
CNS
9. Number of SIUs Not Inspected By POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
1
19. Which Industries have been in SNC for Limits or Reporting during SNC for Limits: none
10. Number of SIUs Not Sampled By POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
0
Public Notice?(May refer to PAR if Excessive SIUs in SNC) Not Published:
11. Enter the Higher Number of 9 or 10
1
NOIN
12. Number of SIUs With No IUP, or With an Expired IUP
0
NOCM
13. Number of SIUs in SNC for Either Reporting or Limits Violations During Either of the Last 217
0
Semi -Annual Periods Total Number of SILTS in SNC
PSNC
14. Number of SIUs in SNC For Reporting During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
0
MSNC
15. Number of SIUs In SNC For Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
0
SNPS
16. Number of SIUs In SNC For Both Reporting and Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
0
Semi-annual Periods
POTW INTERVIEW
17. Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any NPDES Limits Violations? ® YES ❑ NO
If Yes, What are the Parameters and How are these Problems Being Addressed? fecal, ammonia, BOD
18. Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any Problems Related to an Industrial
® YES ❑ NO
Discharge (Interference, Pass -Through, Blockage, Citizens' Complaints, Increased
Piedmont Biofuels sent a slug to the
Sludge Production, Etc.)?
WWTP. The Town has stopped the
If Yes, How are these Problems Being Addressed?
industry's discharge for now.
19. Which Industries have been in SNC for Limits or Reporting during SNC for Limits: none
either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods? Not Been Published for SNC for
Reporting: none
Public Notice?(May refer to PAR if Excessive SIUs in SNC) Not Published:
none
20. Which Industries are on Compliance Schedules or Orders? For all SIUs on an
Order, Has a Signed Copy of the Order been sent to the Division?
none
21. Are Any Permits Or Civil Penalties Currently Under Adjudication? If Yes, Which
❑YES ® NO
Ones?
LTMP FILE REVIEW:
22. Is LTMP/STMP Monitoring Being Conducted at Appropriate Locations and Frequencies? ® YES ❑ NO
23. Are Correct Detection Levels being used for all LTMP Monitoring? ® YES ❑ NO
24. Is the LTMP Data Maintained in a Table or Equivalent? ® YES ❑ NO Is the Table Adequate? ® YES ❑ NO
25. Is the LTMP effluent data reported on the Discharge Monitoring Report? ® YES ❑ NO DWQ Inspector, please verify yourself
26. IfNO to 23 - 26, list violations
27. Should any Pollutants of Concern be Eliminated from or Added to the LTMP? ❑ YES ® NO
If yes, which ones? Eliminated: Added:
NC DWQ Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form Updated 10/27/2006 Page 1
28. PRETREATMENT PROGRAM ELEMENTS REVIEW - Please review POTW files, verify POTW has copy of Program Element with
supporting documents and cony of PERCS Approval T.atte.r anri liatac — +o.,+. 41, n_ _ W T_.0_ -
Program Element
Last Submittal
Date In file?
WILU r1V law 1111V.
Last Approval
Date In file
Date Next Due,
If Applicable
Headworks Analysis (HWA)
08/05/2002
® Yes ❑ No
12/12/2003
® Yes ❑ No
08/01/2008
Industrial Waste Survey (IWS)
09/29/2003
® Yes ❑ No
06/17/2004
® Yes❑ No
09/30/2008
Sewer Use Ordinance (SUO)
05/02/2005
__9
® Yes ❑ No
05/12/2005
® Yes ❑ No
06/01/2007
Enforcement Response Plan (ERP)
10/01/1998
Yes ❑ No
10/13/1998
® Yes ❑ No
Long Term Monitoring Plan (LTMP)
03/01/2002
® Yes ❑ No
03/04/2002 1
® Yes ❑ No
Categorical Standard Applied I.E. 40 CFR, Etc. Or N/A
INDUSTRIAL USER PERMIT (IUP) FILF, RFVIF.W Q IT TP PTT F u FVTPIXTQ nD t UTT p T3 VN rTT 11T , ,-r,
29.
- — - - - - - a • iLL 1\1i
User Name 1. HydroTube 2.
v Iu ry t11VL 1 I 11U.N
3
30.
IUP Number
0001
31.
Does File Contain Current Permit?
® Yes [I No
E:1Yes E] No
ElYes ElNo
32.
Permit Expiration Date
07/31/2007 JE
33.
Categorical Standard Applied I.E. 40 CFR, Etc. Or N/A
433
34.
Does File Contain Permit Application Completed Within One Year
® Yes ❑ No
❑Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Prior to Permit Issue Date?
11
11
35.
Does File Contain an Inspection Completed Within Last Calendar
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Year?1
36.
a. Does the File Contain a Slug Control Plan?
a. ❑Yes NNo Yes ❑No
a. ❑Yes ❑No
b. If No, is One Needed? (See Inspection Form from POTW)
b. 0 e NNo Yes ❑No 11
Lb.
b. ❑Yes ❑No
37.
For 40 CFR 413 and 433 TTO Certification, Does File Contain a
®Yes❑No❑N/A ❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
Toxic Organic Management Plan TOMP ?
11 11
38.
a. Does File Contain Original Permit Review Letter from the
a. ®Yes ❑No a. ❑Yes []No
a. ❑Yes ❑No
Division?
b. All Issues Resolved?
b ®Yes❑No❑N/A b.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
b ❑Yes❑No❑N/A
39.
During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes [:1No
Complete its Sampling as Required b IUP?
11
40.
Does File Contain POTW Sampling Chain-Of-CustodyForms?
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No El Yes ElNo
41.
During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the SILT Complete
❑Yes❑NoNN/A ❑Yes❑No❑N/A ❑Yes❑No❑N/A
its Sampling as Required b IUP?
42.
Does Sampling Indicate Flow or Production?
®Yes❑No❑N/A ❑Yes❑No❑N/A ❑Yes❑No❑N/A
43.
During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No
All Non -Compliance from Both POTW and SILT Sampling?
44.
a. Was the POTW Notified by SIU (Within 24 Hours) of All Self-
a.❑Yes❑No®N/A a.❑Yes❑No❑N/A a.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
Monitoring Violations?
b. Did Industry Resample Within 30 Days?
b. []Yes ❑No b.❑Yes ❑No b. ❑Yes ❑No
c. Did POTW resample within 30 days of becoming aware of SIU
limit violations in the POTW's sampling of the SIU?
c.❑Yes❑No®N/A c.❑Yes❑No❑N/A c.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
45.
Was the SILT Promptly Notified of Any Violations (Per ERP)?
❑Yes❑NoNN/A ❑Yes❑NoON/A _OYes_ON_ o[ N/A
46.
During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was the SIU in SNC?
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No
47.
During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was Enforcement
❑Yes❑NoNN/A ❑Yes❑No❑N/A ❑Yes❑No❑N/A
Taken as Specified in the POTW's ERP?
48.
Does the File Contain Penalty Assessment Notices?
❑YesONoNN/A ❑Yes❑No❑N/A ❑Yes❑No❑N/A
49.
Does The File Contain Proof Of Penalty Collection?
❑Yes❑NoNN/A ❑Yes❑No❑N/A ❑Yes❑No❑N/A
50.
a. Does the File Contain Any Current Enforcement Orders?
b. Is SIU in Com liance Order?
I �a.❑ge'gd§d� N/A a.❑Yes❑No❑N/A a.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
»b
with
❑Yes❑NoNN/A b.❑Yes❑No❑N/A b.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
51.
Did the POTW Representative Have Difficulty in Obtaining Any of.,�
; � Yes 0 Noy "
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑Yes ❑ No
F '
This Requested Information For You?
NC DWQ Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form Updated 10/27/2006 Page 2
T
FILE REVIEW COMMENTS:
#35 An inspection was not conducted in 2006.
#36 Mr. Davis was not sure if there was a slug plan. A plan could not be found during the inspection.
#51 Mr. Davis has been trying to organize the pretreatment files.
INDUSTRY INSPECTION PCS CODING:
Trans.Code Main Program Permit Number
NJ I I I 1 1 I I I 1 1
1. Industry Inspected:
2. Industry Address:
3. Type of Industry/Product:
4. Industry Contact:
MM/DD/YY Inspec.Type Inspector Fac. Type
1 I I I 1 I l 1 sJ L 2 I.
(DTIA) (TYPI) (INSP) (FACC)
Title:
5. Does the POTW Use the Division Model Inspection Form or Equivalent? [:]YES ❑ NO
6. Did the POTW Contact Conduct the Following Parts of the Industrial Inspection Thoroughly?
Comments:
A. Initial Interview
❑ YES ❑ NO
B. Plant Tour
❑ YES ❑ NO
C. Pretreatment Tour
❑ YES ❑ NO
D. Sampling Review
❑ YES ❑ NO
E. Exit Interview
❑ YES ❑ NO
Industrial Inspection Comments:
OVERALL SUMMARY AND COMMENTS:
Comments: HydroTube has closed the facility in Pittsboro
Requirements: SUO revisions were due 06/01/2007. Please submit the revised SUO ASAP. Pittsboro needs to submit a letter to the Division to
drop HydroTube as a SIU.
Recommendations: It is recommended that you update your ERP after the SUO revisions are completed
NOD: ❑ YES ® NO
NOV: ❑ YES ® NO
QNCR: ❑ YES ® NO
POTW Ratine•
Satisfactory X Marginal UnSatisfactory.
PCI COMPLETED BY:Stephanie Brixey DATE: 06/20/2007
NC DWQ Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form Updated 10/27/2006 Page 3