20180847 Ver 1_401 Application_20180618

zo1sosaz
CLearWaLer F�uf�1
��oe��
1 b 20i8,1
C1earWater Environmental Consultants, Inc. D
www.cwenv.com �� 8
June 15, 2018
Mr. David Brown Ms. Karen Higgins
US Army Corps of Engineers NC Division of Water Resources
Asheville Regulatory Field Office 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208 1617 Mail Service Center,
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-2638 Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
RE: White Oak Phase 5 (+/-7.7 acres)
Nationwide Permit 29 Application
Henderson County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Brown and Ms. Higgins,
The attached Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) is being submitted on behalf of JK Land LLC.
represented by Mr. Ken Lotze. The project site is located off Zeb Corn Road and includes a 7.7
acre parcel located in Henderson County, North Carolina. JK Land LLC. is seeking a Nationwide
Permit 29 for the placement of fill and culverts associated with the construction of a residential
subdivision.
While proposed impacts are below the threshold requiring 401 Certification, the applicant is
requesting written approval from DWR for the storm water management component of the
project. This phased project is exempt from the Henderson County NPDES Phase II post
construction control requirement as the subdivision master plan approval pre -dates the Phase II
requirements. However, the proposed high-density development requires written approval from
DWR to comply with the 401 Certification. The applicant is providing documentation of storm
water management under GC4139 specific condition 5(b).
A copy of this package has been sent to Mr. Byron Hamstead of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service for review. Please do not hesitate to contact me at 828-698-9800 if you have any
questions or comments.
Sincerely,
Alea Tuttle, P. W. S
Biologist
Copy Furnished:
US Fish and Wildlife Service — Byron Hamstead
NC Division of Water Resources, Asheville — Andrew Moore
32 Clayton Street
Asheville, NC 28801
828-698-9800 Tel
rW
R. Cement Riddle, P.W.S.
Principal
' ,. a

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
SAW — 201 - BEGIN DATE [Received Date]:
Prepare file folder Assign Action ID Number in ORM FI
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: White Oak Phase V
2. Work Type: Private W1 Institutional El Government F Commercial F
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form 133d and 133e):
The project purpose is to construct a residential development consisting of 33 residential lots
suitable for singe family dwellings and associated infrastructure.
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]:
JK Land, LLC
5. Agent / Consultant [PCN Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]: ClearWater Environmental Consultants
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form 115b):
7. Project Location - Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form Bib]:
35.364619, -82.439509. The site is located off of Zeb Corn Rd in Henderson County
8. Project Location -Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form Bia]: 9670-45-5031
9. Project Location — County [PCN Form A2b): Henderson
30. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c): Hendersonville
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form Val: Clear Creek
12. Watershed / 8 -Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 132c): French Broad
Authorization: Section 10 r_1 Section 404 a Section 10 & 404
Regulatory Action Type:
Standard Permit
✓ Nationwide Permit # 29
Regional General Permit #
Q Jurisdictional Determination Request
Pre -Application Request
Unauthorized Activity
Compliance
E] No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

CLearWater
Department of the Army
Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers
Attn: Scott McLendon, Chief Regulatory Division
PO Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
-and-
NC DWR, Webscape Unit
Attn: Karen Higgins
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
1, the current landowner/managing partner of the property identified below, hereby authorize
ClearWater Environmental Consultants, Inc. (CEC) to act on my behalf as my agent during the
processing of jurisdictional determination requests and permits to impact Wetlands and Water of
the US subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10
of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. CEC is authorized to provide supplemental information as
needed at the request of the USACE or DWR_
Additionally, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, US Army Corps of Engineers
to enter upon the property herein described for the purposes of conducting onsite investigations and
issuing a determination associated with Wetlands and Waters of the US subject to Federal
jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors
Act of IS". LAN
I
Property Owner of Record: J . T� + L A �L D1_ 4 �. _
Property Owner Address: SAO -6-0-19T H VE
IMA1rT1JC- Vs . NQ, _21I0S
Phone Number. _104-2)2_1-552.7 _
Email address: e r to ! fou q M em—LI _CM
Property Location: 7.72 Q AMM �S17E�3 ST.,JI agl0*1LLh
Owner/Managing partner Signature:
Owner/Managing printed name: rr_N N &#d I. Lp V 1-zS
Date: —MAY 2-4, Z f J 1 a
32 Clayton Street
Asheville, NC 28801
Phonc:828-698-9800
\v",%Yxwenv.com

Henderson Countv. NC Tax Parcel Report Wednesday, February 28, 2018
REID:
Listed to:
Mailing Address:
Mailing City, State, Zip:
Physical Address:
Deed:
Date Recorded:
Revenue Stamps:
County Zoning:
Property Description:
Map Sheet:
Assessed Acreage:
Building Value:
Land Value:
Value To Be Billed:
North Carolina Senate District
Parcel Irt amuntion
1006242
Pin:
JK LAND, LLC
Neighborhood:
636 SAGEMONT AVE
Township:
MATTHEWS, NC 28105
Municipality:
0 ZEB CORN RD
Tax District:
003057/00580
Plat:
2017-05-25 10:55:00.0
Elementary School District:
1371.00000000
Middle School District:
R1
High School District:
WHITE OAK VILLAGE LOFUTURE
BMSLD-6346
9670.00
7.38000000
$0.00
$110,700.00
$110,700.00
48
Soil:
Voting Precinct:
Commissioner District
Agricultural District
North Carolina House District
U.S. House District
Flood Zone:
8670455031
WHITE OAK
Clear Creek
MOUNTAIN HOME FIRE
SLD 6346
CLEAR CREEK
APPLE VALLEY MIDDLE
NORTH HIGH
Heyesville loam, 2 to 7 percent
slopes
Northeast
2
None Found
117
11
Zone X. Not Shaded (Areas
outside of the floodplain)
Henderson County
WARNING: THIS IS NOT A SURVEY.
GeographicInbmetion Systems (GtS)
200 North Grove Street
AN Infomutium or data provided (whether subscribed, purchased or otherwise distributed) Is provided as Is, without any
HendersorMte, NC 28782
warranties, Incl dmp the warranties of menchantabli ty or of farwss for a particular purpose_ Henderson County and its
3t& P: (ata) 6865124
amptoyees make no warranties at guarantees, e8har express or huptied. Use of the Informadon or data subscribed,
F: (828) 6605122
purchased or otherwise distributed, whether In had copy or digital media, stall be at the uaefs own risk

o�pF VJA rF�,GG
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes X❑ No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
© 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes © No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes © No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑ Yes Q No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes © No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes © No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
White Oak Phase 5
2b. County:
Henderson
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Hendersonville
2d. Subdivision name:
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
JK Land, LLC
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
003057/00590
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Ken Lotze
3d. Street address:
636 Sagemont Ave
3e. City, state, zip:
Matthews, NC 28105
3f. Telephone no.:
704-321-5527
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
R. Clement Riddle
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
ClearWater Environmental Consultants Inc.
5c. Street address:
32 Clayton Street
5d. City, state, zip:
Asheville, NC 28801
5e. Telephone no.:
[phone]
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 9670455031
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.364619 Longitude: -82.439509
1c. Property size: 7.7 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project: Clear Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C
2c. River basin: French Broad
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The project site consists partially of mixed hardwoods and pasture. Adjacent land use Is primarily residential and agricultural
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.286
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 406
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The project purpose Is to construct a residential development In Henderson County.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project consists of developing the parcel Into 32 residential lots suitable for single family dwellings and associated Infrastructure.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
ro includi all rior hases in the ost?
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
Comments: pJp request submitted wilt, This PCN (Attachment A)
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
® preliminary ❑ Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the Jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company: Clearwater Env. Consultants
Other.
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps Jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑Yes Q No ❑ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file' instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
Q Yes ❑ No
6b. If yes, explain.
This Is phase 5 of the White Oak residential community, which is In its final phase of development.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ❑X Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 P
Fit
Headwater Wetland
Yes
Corps
0.09
W2 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W3 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
VV4
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
VV5 -
Choose one
Choose ane
Yes/No
-
W6
Choose one
Choose one
YesMo
-
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
2h. Comments:
Impacts will consist of suitable dean All.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3e.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e. 3f.
Type of Average
jurisdiction stream
width
(feet)
39.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
31 P
Fill
Si- UT to Clear Creek
INT
Corps
149.5
S2 -
Choose one
-
-
S3 -
Choose one
-
-
S4 -
Choose one
-
-
S5 -
Choose one
-
-
S6 -
Choose one
-
-
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
149.5
31. Comments:
Impacts will consist of a culvert and suitable clean fill.
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivi ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 -
Choose one
Choose
02 _
Choose one
Choose
03 -
Choose one
Choose
04 _
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water Impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If Pond or lake construction proposed. the complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c.
Pond ID number Proposed use or Wetland Impacts (acres)
purpose of pond
Flooded Filled Excavated
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded Filled Excavated
P1 Choose one
P2 Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, permit ID no:
51. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of constriction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWC)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any Impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other.
6b. 6c.
Buffer Impact Reason for Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Tem
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B1 -
YeslNo
B2
Yes/No
B3 -
Yes/No
B4 -
Yes/No
B5 -
YesM0
86 -
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
61. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
impacts were avoided on 256.5 ft of stream (63% of the total length) and 0.186 acres of wetland (65% of the total area). Impacts were necessary to
allow for the development of residential lots in the vicinity of the jurisdictional waters, however the impacts to streams and wetlands within these lots
are limited to the portion Intended for the construction of dwelling units. The lot design for the development is planned to maximize the number of lots
outside of jurisdictional areas.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Construction equipment will be operated from high ground to avoid Impacts to the remaining jurisdictional features. Appropriate sediment and erosion
control measures will be utilized on site.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
Project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete If Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in4leu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
49. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
S. Complete If Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Pian
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
Yes © No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved In -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
❑ YesX❑ No
1b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
28%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
0 Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. if this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
See attached 'Supplemental Information'
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? Dwo
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is this ro'ect?
Henderson County
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Phase 11
❑ NSW
® USMP
Water Supply Watershed
® Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑Yes © No
4. DWO Stormwater Program Review
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs applyHSession
(check all that apply):
❑Coastal counties
❑HOW
ORW
Law 2006-246
©Other.
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ® No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ❑X No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
❑ ❑ No
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
Yes
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWO Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Oyes ®No
2c. If you answered "yes' to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future Impacts) result in
[]Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes' to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The project location is in an area already developed for residential uses and will not substantially increase the demand for additional development
which could Impact nearby downstream water quality.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The wastewater generated on-sae will be conveyed via sanitary sewer to a nearby wastewater treatment facility on Balfour Rd. This facility was
constructed with a capacity to treat 4.8-MGD. The daily average flow in 2016 was 3.08-MGD (3,140,000-gallon per day) or -64%
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ YesX❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
-
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
North Carolina Natural Heritage Data Explorer, and US Fish and Wildlife List of Endangered Species, Threatened Species, Federal Species of
Concern, and Candidate Species for Buncombe county. CEC consulted the FWS Northern Long Eared Bat Consultation Areas map. (Attachment B)
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes Q No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
South Atlantic Habitat and Ecosystems IMS. Impact will not occur in a marine system.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ YesX❑ No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
The site is approximately 2 miles from the NR site Berkeley Mills Ballpark (#HN1903), and approximately 3 miles from the the NR site Otto King House
(#HN1910) It is the opinion of CEC that the development of this project will not significantly affect these resources.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ❑X No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
CEC consulted FEMA firm panel 370096700J, effective 1012/2008.
AL64 TkTTLE
Afflwiy—;�)
12,
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant Isprovided.)
Page 10 of 10

Supplemental Information
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
This project requires written approval from DWQ. The project is part of a phased development approved
prior to July 1, 2007, which is when the NC session law 2006-246 began requiring Phase II post -
construction stormwater management under local authority. Therefore, the project is "grandfathered"
or exempted from approval the local authority
However, White Oak Phase 5 development is a high-density project (as defined in 15A NCAC 02H
.1003(2)(a) in accordance with15A NCAC 02H .1017). Therefore, the applicant proposes to comply with
the requirements in accordance with 15A NCAC 02H .0506(b)(5) by providing the following as specified
in GC4139:
b. "Provide calculations to document that the project will not cause degradation of downstream surface
waters. Documentation shall include a detailed analysis of the hydrological impacts from stormwater
runoff when considering the volume and velocity of stormwater runoff from the project built upon area
and the size and existing condition of the receiving stream(s)."
The applicant has supplied documentation of the above hydrological analysis with the understanding
that GC4139 is contingent upon DWQ review and approval of this document.

Storm Water Hydrological Analysis
In order to ensure no degradation to downstream stream channels from the project, Odom Engineering
determined the pre -development flow velocity using the Chezy-Manning equation with a resulting
velocity of 7.77 feet per second. This was compared the exit velocity of the most downstream pipe (Pipe
1) as determined using Stormwater Studio software with an exit velocity of 5.46 feet per second.

ODOM Report
Sto-eater Studio 2017 v 2.0.0.53
Pr jest Name: WHITE OAK PHASE 5
05-01.2018
Lim
No.
Inlet
1D
Drain
Am
(ad)
Rurtolf
Coni
1C1
1
Ftlat
thVhrl
Incr
D
left)
Uphirstl
(aft)
Grata
Am
Is")
Orab
Lon
til
Orale
WWIh
IRI
GuIM
Spend
IRI
Inlet
Spread
til
Lino
ID
Um
Length
Ift1
Invert
Up
IRI
Invert
Dn
IRI
Lina
Slope
(1111116)
Lim
SW
Ilol
Flow
Rata
(Cfs)
Capad.
Full
left)
Val
Ave
Htfsl
Val
Dn
true)
WI
Up
Iftfsl
DnStrra
Lim No.
HGL
Dn
Iftl
He
Up
til
HGL
Junet
(ft)
1
J8-1
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
....
....
....
....
....
....
PIPE -1
83.38
2129.50
2126.00
0.008
48
68.63
11124
5.59
5.46
5.72
Oulfall
2130.00
2130.14
2130.24
2
AB -2
0.07
0.68
9.13.
0.42
0.42
-
„..
0.60..
.0.50
PV --2
98.13
212720
2128.60
0.0082
42
88.8.1
79.47
7.13
7.14
7.13
1
2130.59
2131.04
2131.20
3
AB -3
0.06
0.52
9.13
0.38
0.38
....
....
....
0.47
0.47
PIPE -3
133.57
212SAO
2127.30
0.0157
42
6822
126.15
8.13
7.09
9.16
2
2131.51
2131.93
2131.93
4
AB4
18.30
OA1
9.04
67.84
67.84.
....
„.
....
9.88
9.56
PIPE -4
35.09:.
2100.00
2129.50
0.0111
42
67.84
115.27
8.16
725
9.11
3
2132.77
2132.53
2132.97
Notes: IOF Fie - HENDER6tNVILLE.idr, Rehm Period = 251m. Toed Do MMted to Melt captured hours. Pipe travel time suppressed. tvvv<r Fur: KWE "K FHaeea

Channel Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. Thursday, May 3 2018
18012 - WHITE OAK PHASE 5 - PRE -DISTURBANCE
Triangular
Highlighted
Side Slopes (z:1)
= 8.00, 8.00
Depth (ft)
= 1.36
Total Depth (ft)
= 12.00
Q (cfs)
= 115.00
Area (sqft)
= 14.80
Invert Elev (ft)
= 2115.00
Velocity (ft/s)
= 7.77
Slope (%)
= 5.18
Wetted Perim (ft)
= 21.93
N -Value
= 0.033
Crit Depth, Yc (ft)
= 1.67
Top Width (ft)
= 21.76
Calculations
EGL (ft)
= 2.30
Compute by:
Known Q
Known Q (cfs)
= 115.00
Elev (ft) Section
2129.00
2127.00
2125.00
2123.00
2121.00
2119.00
2117.00
2115.00
2113.00
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240
Reach (ft)
Depth (ft)
14.00
12.00
10.00
MI
4.00
2.00
1ft
_1) nn

White Oak (+/- 7.7 AC)
r
,SrFpl1 Ief';,1
a
-
ff0;l, Ir
cal l L o cx
u
3
adz
�t•�
Ero�jectftu�ndary
n
0
�0
�
e�
Nix Rd
a
��
d
tours
r`
-
a
dap R
4
~�lgnla,,
T
fJ
4' qtly Frah Square��
p
�anl�toir
co
a, by..„.
Old SU
n"e1
8�
S
D� u CVrptln� a
addefl t)r
hillRd
� 1 PI
�
ko
I Li 641
oe�sti,��R
Signal Hill Rd
Sugarloaf Rd
4�i
Blue 10
y"Vo
a
N
e
�:1tsrl
Rd
,� Ridilr, a
�a 13..;i E
F,:zlj
v
y;
Legend
o
c
Oaha
0
0.25 0.5
1
=
ti
1 Project Boundary
L ..
i Miles
Drawn by; BWY 3.1.18; CEC Project# 961,
CwarWater
Site Vicinity
Henderson County,
North Carolina
32 Clayton Street
Figure 1
Asheville, North Carolina 28801

White Oak Phase 5 (+/- 7.7 AC)
4 �
' r '
,• , �- \ '.r `� 'fir �
1AftI'
It
Legend
Project Boundary
D n by: KAY -2-12.18; CEC P
Henderson County,
North Carolina
N
N.10 +
v IL
4
0 500 1,000 2,000
Feel
Of M am N _ ..
CLearWater USGS Topographic Map
Hendersonville Quad
32 Clayton Strcet
Asheville, North Carolina 28801 Figure 2

White Oak Phase 5 (+/- 7.7 AC)
• •':, ^, � ,. fir• , "'�► �'" �.� �ti t► '3 :`;j
41�40
•, n�•;/
m�
000 ,a
400
t ♦ 1 �
• 777
" s /
rs
k : R•r �
} •± � :` �'`... Irl � i�i. �
t
fir
�, =isle ��: '��-'� — -i—` T ` _ _ �,..',-,.T�F'r. ��"'�: �• � j
I Vt
it S y T k
�.�.[A' r
,
'l 7
Y
t n
Legend
0 50 100 200
— - , Project Boundary ff�. �t� 13�. ;i,{ Feet
L_ r ; �'` 'NC•�Map-'NGGenter
Y � ---- `� Vie. �� 96�.. � •C"��w't. Board; �� :��'' - � i , � •- �` ..}'�+
w
Henderson County, a CLom&er Aerial Photograph
North Carolina NCCGIA 2015
32 Clayton Street Figure 3
Asheville, North Carolina 28801 g

White Oak Phase 5 (+/- 7.7 AC)
I
HYC
i
I
{ I1 HYB r
1
i
Legend � _-
-v4 Project Boundary
L —
SODS "^
HyB Hayesville Loam, 2-7% slopes
0 50 100 200
,_.
HyC Hayesville Loam, 7-15% slopes "' Feet
— for G'
Drawn b23.1a; C 961 L` Board P
NGOneMa NC Center
Henderson County, CLearWater USDA Soils Map
North Carolina Figure 4
32 Clayton Street
Asheville, North Carolina 28901

White Oak Phase 5 (+/- 7.7 AC)
�** I
L— j Project Boundary e
Wetland , fr
....... Intermittent Stream
Perennial Stream
Proposed Wetland Impact (0.09 AC)
Proposed Stream Impact (149.5 LF)
--- Culvert I
Proposed Road N
Proposed Water Line
Proposed Stormwater Drainage
Proposed contours
Existing Sewer Line
Esri, HERE, Garmin, ® OpenStreetMap contributors, NC OneMap, NC Center
Drawn by: AKT 6.6.18; CEC Project# 961 for Geographic Information and Analysis. NC 911 Board
Henderson County, CLearWater Impact Map
North Carolina Figure 5
32 Clayton Street
Asheville, North Carolina 28901

White Oak Phase 5 (+/- 7.7 AC)
�Li [J -
t �
H'rV, DOURS`©Ni COUNTY` AREA,©F`MINIM�AL FL00D MA7ARD T
!` `. } • .. •'- } h �. � moi,. ,
x
Legend
"
r— — t ' Project Boundary a} - N
Flood Hazard Zones
Zone Type
t
1% Annual Chance Flood Hazard �, r
�CP
r .�
Regulatory Floodway
t
'P
0, w '
�`A 4 Special Floodway N �� r \ '
Area of Undetermined Flood Hazard Zone AE00 %?08)
— 00
' 0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard
V.
Future Conditions 1% Annual Chance Flood Hazard 0 250 500 1,000
FL-OODiNAY
Area with Reduced Risk Due to Levee Zoric- AE Feet
m� 40� ap, NCC to m
Drawn by; AKTJ
5.23.18; ro ect# 961 /
Henderson County, C�earater FEMA Floodplain Map
North Carolina 32 Clayton Street FIRM panel 370096700)
Asheville, North Carolina 28801 Figure 6

CONCRETE HEADWALL OyE� GIDE
PROP
46" 0 HDPE
INV. 2126.00
EX15_ T_ 5`AM BED
STORM PIPE CROSS .5ECTIOV
N. T.S.

Attachment A: Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request

urisdictional Determination Request
E
US Army Corps
of Engineers
Wd—glon District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http•//www saw usace army mil/Missions/RepulatolyPetmitPro,pram/Contact/CountyLocator.asl)x,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number. [phone]
Fax Number. [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number. [phone]
Fax Number. [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number. [phone]
Fax Number. [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number. 910-2514633
Fax Number. (910) 2514025
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D - PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1

A.
B.
jurisdictional Determination Request
PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: 0 Zeb Corn Road
City, State:
County:
Hendersonville, NC 28791
Henderson
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN):
9670-45-5031
REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: R. Clement Riddle
Mailing Address: 32 Clayton Street
Asheville, NC 28801
Telephone Number: [phone]
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Select one:
RI am the current property owner.
W1I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant'
Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name: JK Land, LLC
Mailing Address: 636 Sagemont Ave
Matthews, NC 28105
Telephone Number: 704-321-5527
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION 3A
By signing below, l authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
See Attached
Print Name
Capacity: ❑ Owner ❑ Authorized Agents
Date
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
�1gned to avoid all aquatic resources.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
HA Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑ Other:
3 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, sldp to Part E.
If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
3 Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide an apvroved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
❑ I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
DMap of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
✓a Size of Property or Review Area 7.7 acres.
❑ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
P/
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude:
Longitude: -82.439509
35.364619
F7A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than l 1x17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
• Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
✓� Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. htta.//www saw usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-
Program/Jurisdiction/ _
Version: May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
a Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDs, please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Detennination Forme
a Vicinity Map
zAerial Photograph
z USGS Topographic Map
RV Soil Survey Map
zOther Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
Landscape Photos (if taken)
NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
ElOther Assessment Forms
7 www.saw.usace.arTny.mil/PortaW59/docs/regulatory/reedocs/JD/RGL 08-02 App A Prelim JD Form fillable.pdf
I Please see http://www.saw.usace.army.miUMissions/Regulatory-Pennit- roeram/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction isto be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

White Oak Phase 5 (+/- 7.7 AC)
Jurisdictional wetlands and waters identified on this map have been located within sub -meter accuracy utilizing a Trimble mapping
grade Global Positioning System (GPS) and the subsequent differential correction of that data. GPS points may demonstrate
uncorrectable errors due to topography, vegetative cover, and/or multipath signal error.
Note: The illustrated wetland and stream locations are approximate. These areas have been flagged in the field; however, they have
not been surveyed. Although ClearWater Environmental Consultants, Inc. (CEC) is confident in our assessment, the US Army Corps
of Engineers (Corps) is the only agency that can make final decisions regarding jurisdictional wetland and waters of the US
delineations. Therefore, all preliminary determinations are subject to change until written verification is obtained. CEC strongly
recommends that written verification be obtained from the Corps prior to closing on the property, beginning any site work, or making
any legal reliance on this determination.
This map was prepared by CEC using the best information available to CEC at the time of production. This map is for informational
purposes only and should not be used to determine precise boundaries, roadways, property boundary lines, nor legal descriptions.
This map shall not be construed to be an official survey of any data depicted.
Source Data: Field collected data 2/27/2018; Associated Land Surveyors (Cameron Baker, PLS) provided by Odom Engineering.
e
Legend
L. _ Project Boundary
Potential Wetland
•••.••••. Potential Intermittent Stream
Potential Perennial Stream
-- Culvert
Contours
* Data Form
Henderson County,
North Carolina
Potentially Jud dictional Water
Wetland (AQ
Stream
(LF)
W1
0.150
S1
406
W2
0.137
Total
0.286
Total
406
N
0 50 100 200
Esn, HERE, Garmin, © OpenStreetMap cont iii Feel
for deographic Information and Analysis, NC 911 rd,,
CLearWaEer Jurisdictional Determination
Delineated 2/27/2018
32 Clayton Street
Asheville, North Carolina 28801

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 6/6/2018
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: See Agent Authorization
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington District
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Henderson City: Hendersonville
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 35.364619 Long.: -82.439509
Universal Transverse Mercator: NAD83
Name of nearest waterbody: Clear Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
BE Field Determination. Date(s): 2/27/2018
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
In review area
(acreage and linear
feet, If applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non -wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 101404)
W1
135.3633
-82.4408
0.15 AC
Wetland
Section 404
W2135
. 3632
-82.4409
0.137 AC
Wetland
Section 404
S1
135.3638
-82.4404
406 LF
Non -Wetland
Section 404

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre-
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
0 Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: Vicinity, USGS Topographic, Aerial, USDA Soil and Stream/Wetland Delineation Maps
0 Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
❑■ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 1:24K Hendersonville Quad
0 Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Web Soil Survey
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: .(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
0 Photographs: n Aerial (Name & Date): NCCGIA 2015
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later iurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member
completing PJD
Signature and date of
person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
' Districts may establish timeframes For requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: White Oak Phase V City/County: Henderson County Sampling Date: 2/27/2018
Applicant/Owner: JK Land, LLC State: NC Sampling Point: W1
Investigator(s): AK, BY Section, Township, Range: Clear Creek
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): streambank, base of hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (°k): 2%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR N Let: 35.3633 Long: -02.4408 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Hayesviile Loam NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain In Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soti or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are 'Normal Circumstances' present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Weiland Hydrology Present?
Remarks:
f►IYDR0L0GY
Yes x No Is the Sampled Area
Yes x No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Yes x No
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reauiredl
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reouired• check
all that aooly)
—Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Water (A1) _True
Aquatic Plants (814)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
_Surface
x High Water Table (A2) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
x Drainage Patterns (B10)
x Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
x Moss Trim Lines (816)
Marks (B1) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—Water
Deposits (B2) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Titled Soils (C6)
x Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Sediment
Drift Deposits (B3) —Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (Cg)
_
Algal Mat or Crust (84) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_
Deposits (B5)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Iron
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_
x Water -Stained Leaves (Bg)
_ Microtopographic Relief (134)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
FAC -Neutral Test (DS)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes x No
Depth (inches): 1
Saturation Present? Yes x No
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous Inspections), If available:
Remarks:
Hydrology emanating from hillslope seeps, at base of hillslope, and from a terrace near sanitary sewer mahcte.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover Species?
Status
1. Betula More
40 Yes
FACW
2. Acer rubrum
10 Yes
FAC
3.
FAC species
12
4.
36
FACU species
5.
x4=
80
6.
0
x 5 =
7.
Column Totals:
87
(A)
50 =Total Cover
Prevalence Index = B/A =
50% of total cover:
25 200% of total cover:
10
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
)
1. AMus serrulata
10 Yes
OBL
2. Ligustrum sinense
10 Yes
FACU
3. Ekwagnus angustifoss
5 Yes
FACU
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
25 =Total Cover
50% of total cover.
13 20% of total cover.
5
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1. Huperzia kwddula
5 Yes
FACW
2. PblysLthum acrosNcbofdes
5 Yes
FACU
3. Vida sp.
2 No
FAC
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12 =Total Cover
50% of total cover.
6 20% of total cover.
3
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover.
20% of total cover.
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet)
Vegetation Is moderately disturbed. Sparse herb layer. Surveyed during dormant season.
Sampling Point: W1
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across AN Strata:
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
4 (A)
7 (B)
57.1% (A/B)
Total % Cover of.
Multiply by:
OBL species
10
x 1 =
10
FACW species
45
x2=
90
FAC species
12
x 3 =
36
FACU species
20
x4=
80
UPL species
0
x 5 =
0
Column Totals:
87
(A)
216 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
2.48
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
X 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 In. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less then 3.28 R tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

ef%H Sampling Point W1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture
Remarks
0-3 5Y 411 90
10YR 416 10 C PL Loamy/Clayey
Prominent redox concentrations
3-5 5Y 512 85
10YR 3/6 15 C PL Loamy/Clayey
Prominent redox concentrations
5-12 5Y 511 90
7.5YR 416 10 C PL Loamy/Clayey
Prominent redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL --Pore Lining. M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sotlsj:
Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147,148) —2
cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147,148) —Coast
Prairie Redox (A16)
_
Histic (A3)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147,148)
_Black
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (Fig)
Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136,147)
_
2 cm Muck (Al 0) (LRR N)
Dark Surface (F6) —Red
Parent Material (F21)
Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
—Redox
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127,147,146)
_Depleted
Dark Surface (Al 2)
? Redox Depressions (178) _Very
Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Thick
Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N. —Other
(Explain In Remarks)
—Sandy
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_
Redox (S5)
Umbdc Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136) Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Sandy
Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (Fig) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_Stripped
—Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147,148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (Inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: White Oak Phase V City/County: Henderson County SamplM Date: 2/27/2018
Applicant/Owner. JK Land, LLC Stale: NC Sampling Point: U1
Investigator(s): AK, BY Section, Township, Range: Clear Creek
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): hillside Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope (%): 1%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR N Let: 35.3633 Long: -82.4408 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Hayesvilie Loam NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation X , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No x Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No x within a Wetiand? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No x
Remarks:
Data point taken on hillside north of W1. Edge between mowed field and forested stream/wetland area.
41Yt1RAi nPY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reouiredi
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required'
check aB that aooiv)
_Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Water (Al)
_True Aquatic Plants (12114)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
_Surface
High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
_
(A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (816)
—Saturation
Marks (B1)
_Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Water
Deposits (B2)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Solis (C6)
—Crayfish Burrows (C8)
—Sediment
Drift Deposits (83)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible an Aerial imagery (C9)
_
Mat or Crust (84)
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Algal
Deposits (B5)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Iron
Inundation Visible an Aerial Imagery (B7)
—Shallow Aquitard (133)
_
-Stained Leaves (B9)
_Microtopographic Relief (D4)
—Water
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
FAC -Neutral Test (135)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Date (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

uei eTAT1e1A1 fC.,— Qf­f+ l _ I Icn cciontific names of niants
Sampling Point: U1
Remarks: (include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Vegetation is moderately disturbed. Sparse canopy. Surveyed during dormant season.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Betula nigra
10 Yes
FACW
Number of Dominant Species
2
That Are OBL. FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4
Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50.0% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
10 =Total Cover
Total % Cover of Multiply by:
50% of total cover.
5 20% of total cover.
2
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Saolino/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
)
FACW species 10 x2= 20
1. Rhus glatua
10 Yes
UPL
FAC species 50 x3= 150
2
FACU species 40 x4= 160
3
UPL species 10 x5= 50
4
Column Totals: 110 (A) 380 (B)
5
Prevalence Index = B!A = 3.45
Hydrophytic Vegetation indicators:
6
7
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophylic Vegetation
8
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
g
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.01
10 =Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover.
5 20% of total cover.
2
data M Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Pankum vlrgatum
40 Yes
FAC
'indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2. Andropogon virglokus
30 Yes
FACU
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Phytolacca emerkens 10 No FAC
4. Tdk#um repens
10 No
FACU
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6.
7•
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
8
(1 m) tall.
9.
10.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 R tail.
11
g0 =Total Cover
Woody Vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
45 20% of total cover.
18
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover.
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Vegetation is moderately disturbed. Sparse canopy. Surveyed during dormant season.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: U1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-2
2.5Y 512
100
Loamy/Clayey
2-12
2.5Y 514
100
Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL --Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils:
(Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_Histosol
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147,148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (Al 6)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147,148)
_
Sulfide (A4)
_Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Hydrogen
Stratified Layers (A5)
—Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136,147)
—2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_Red Parent Material (F21)
Below Dark Surface (All)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127,147,148)
—Depleted
Dark Surface (Al2)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Thick
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_
Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (M LRA 122,136)
3Indicators of hydrophyUc vegetation and
—Sandy
Matrix (S6)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_Stripped
—Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127,147, 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictivo Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (I):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data sheet Is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

:V. 44 l7rarm Voreinn d 11 L
1\�.. L �� \[ Vas �.uua ♦uwa.............. � __
Date: �� .-'
__ _____ _ __
Project/Site: W h 1 QaK
Latitude: -35 , 3 6,3 41 a
Evaluator: -'[
County:
Longitude: fj? , 44wo
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent (e, S
Stream Deter a o cle one)
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
3
Ephemeraltermittent rennial
0
it i 19 or perennial if? 30'
2
3
:1
A. Geomorphology Subtotal =
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -P001 Sequence
0
(D2
1
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
1
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
W 1' ,
3
9. Grade control
0
��
Sketch: C�1 ��h�r
VOL � �
N
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
I
No=O=
Yes = 3
anitidal ditches are not rated; see 019CU5510ns in manual
- 1 I_ _J__1_._.. ♦n..La_a_I - --- .
O. Il UI VIV ♦7uu%V%w -
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1 2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
1 2 3
14. Leaf litter
0.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 1
16. Organic debris lines or piles
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0 0.5 1 1
No = 0 Yes = 3
V. OIVIV 'auuaVaill -
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants In streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (nom diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0
1
2
3
22. Fish 0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish 0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae 0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
44
'perennial streams may also be Identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: Qt .- R bo V� ti
6
u- ahoye,
W 1' ,
o
Gtd to I S C.t--
��
Sketch: C�1 ��h�r
VOL � �
N
Scall t.eti+ 'baI'/,burro',-Ct
sec hon w, Fe- Oeto(.e_
S fru, K -e a( S t1 -e asi L,
r4)

Attachment B: Threatened and Endangered Species Data

r�
North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
Natural Heritage Program
Governor Roy Cooper Secretary Susi H Hamilton
May 23, 2018
Alea Tuttle
Clearwater Environmental Consultants
32 Clayton Street
Asheville, NC 28801
RE: White Oak Phase V; 961
Dear Alea Tuttle:
NCNHDE-6106
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide information
about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database, indicates that there are
no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or conservation/managed areas
within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there may be no documentation of natural
heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have
been surveyed. The results of this query should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists.
In the event that rare species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may
update our records.
The attached 'Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that have been
documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these records suggests that
these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area if suitable habitat exists. Tables of
natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile radius of the project area, if any, are also
included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one -mile radius of the project
area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for guidance. Contact
information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
httos:Nwww fws aov/officeslDirectory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation planning, project
review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria for regulatory decisions.
Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published without prior written notification to the
NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP
data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a Dedicated Nature
Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Clean Water Management Trust Fund easement, or Federally -listed
species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance, please
contact Rodney A. Butler at rodney.b tl r ncdcr aov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
MAILING ADDRESS. Telephone [phone] LOCATION -
1651 Mail Service Center vvnv ncnhp org 121 West Jones Street
Raleigh, NC 276K-1651 Raleigh, NC 27603

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
White Oak Phase V
Project No. 961
May 23, 2018
NCNHDE-6106
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic
EO ID
Scientific Name
Common Name
Last
Element
Group
Rank
5 -Very
— Significantly
Observation
Occurrence
Low
Rare
Date
Rank
Dragonfly or
33444
Calopteryx amata
Superb Jewelwing
2004 -Pre
H?
Damselfly
Rare
5 -Very
— Game Animal
Freshwater
29693
Strophitus undulatus
Creeper
2010-08-25
E
Bivalve
— Significantly
G4
S3
Rare
Freshwater Fish
5893
Erimystax insignis
Blotched Chub
2014-04-10
E
Mammal
32983
Spilogale putorius
Eastern Spotted Skunk
1982 -Pre
H
Mayfly
34624
Tsalia berneri
a mayfly
2001-03-13
E
Vascular Plant
25168
Dendrolycopodium
Prickly Ground -pine
1949 -Pre
H
dendroideum
Vascular Plant
17819
Sarracenia jonesii
Mountain Sweet Pitcher
1987 -Pre
X
Plant
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
No Managed Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Accuracy
Federal State
Global
State
Status Status
Rank
Rank
5 -Very
— Significantly
G4
S1S2
Low
Rare
3 -Medium
— Threatened
G5
S3
3 -Medium
— Significantly
G4
S2
Rare
5 -Very
— Game Animal
G4
S2
Low
3 -Medium
— Significantly
G4
S3
Rare
5 -Very
-- Significantly
G5
S2
Low
Rare Peripheral
4 -Low
Endangered Endangered
G4T2
S1
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at httns lincnhde natureserve oralconient/heio. Data query generated on May 23, 2018: source: NCNHP, 02 April 2018. Please resubmit your
information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 3

NCNHDE-6106: White Oak Phase V
\\ Oak HIM
U -No/
N
WE
i
May 23, 2018
M Project Boundary
_ Buffered Project Boundary
Page 3 of 3
1:21,555
0 0.175 0.]5 D7 ml
0 0.275 0.55 1.1 km
Sewer. En, WERE, Gump. Inl.mae. --I v Cery, GESCO. USGS
FAO.NPS, NRCAN. GfBaw, IGN. Raea,W NL, OM— 6urv.y. En Japan.
6E71. Ean Ch— Ia&q Kn.pl. av4aahmo. O Op.n5U. M.p cemlihalaa. ane
aro GIs U... Cemlwnr.

Henderson County, NC Tax Parcel Report Wednesday, February 28, 2018
REID:
Listed to:
Melling Address:
Mailing City, State, Zip:
Physical Address:
Deed:
Date Recorded:
Revenue Stamps:
County Zoning:
Property Description:
Map Sheet:
Assessed Acreage:
Building Value:
Land Value:
Value To Be Billed:
North Carolina Senate District
Pareel Information
1006242
JK LAND, LLC
636 SAGEMONT AVE
MATTHEWS, NC 28105
0 ZEB CORN RD
003057/00590
2017-05-25 10:55:00.0
1371.00000000
R1
WHITE OAK VILLAGE LOFUTURE
BMSLD-6346
9670.00
7.38000000
$0.00
$110,700.00
$110,700.00
48
Pin:
Neighborhood:
Township:
Municipality:
Tax District:
Plat:
Elementary School District:
Middle School District:
High School District:
Soil:
Voting Precinct:
Commissioner District
Agricultural District
North Carolina House District
U.S. House District
Flood Zone:
9670455031
WHITE OAK
Clear Creek
MOUNTAIN HOME FIRE
SLD 6346
CLEAR CREEK
APPLE VALLEY MIDDLE
NORTH HIGH
Hayesville loam, 2 to 7 percent
slopes
Northeast
2
None Found
117
11
Zone X, Not Shaded (Areas
outside of the floodplain)
Henderson County WARNING: THIS IS NOT A SURVEY.
Geographic Information Systems (GIS)
200 North Grove Street All Information or data provided (whether suburb". purchased or otherwise distributed) is provided as Is. wil houd any,
Hendersonville, NC 28792 warranties, including the warranties of merchantability or of fitness for a particular purpose. Henderson County W Its
P: [phone] employees make no wamnties or guarantees, ether *)Tress or Implied. Use of the Information or data subscribed,
F: [phone] purchased or otherwise distributed, whether in hard ropy or digital media, shall be at the user's own risk.