20200065 Ver 1_Correspondence_20180614

Carpenter,Kristi
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Follow Up Flag:
Flag Status:
AI-Sharawneh, Ahmad A
Thursday, June 14, 2018 3:33 PM
[e-mail]
Key, Bryan C; Sutton, Laura E; Norton, Apri) R; Lee,
Craig J
RE: [External] RE: R-4707 Guilford County
Follow up
Flagged
Thank you David, I included Craig lee with hydro so he can see your email.
Ahmad AI-Sharawneh
Project Manager
Project Management Unit
Divisions 11-14
North Carolina Department of Transportation
919 707 6010 office
919 250 4224 fax
[e-mail]
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1548
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public
Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
-----Original Message-----
From: Bailey, David E CIV USARMY CESAW (US)
[mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2018 3:18 PM
To: AI-Sharawneh, Ahmad A <[e-mail]>
Cc: Key, Bryan C<[e-mail]>; Sutton, Laura E<[e-mail]>; Norton,
April R <[e-mail]>
Subject: [External] RE: R-4707 Guilford County
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless verified. Send all
suspicious email as an attachment to Report Spam.<mailto:[e-mail]>
Hello Ahmad, and thank you for your email. Although the extension portion of the
culvert would be included as new impacts requiring authorization, the portion of the
new culvert within the existing culvert footprint would not be considered in the overall

stream impact calculations. As you said, however, the permit application and plans
would need to note that the existing culvert will be replaced, and shown on project
plans.
Note, however, that the Corps would anticipate that the replacement culvert would be
designed using modern environmental concerns. As such, culvert inverts would typically
be buried 1' below existing stream bed, with a 1 foot sill on the main stream flow box. If
stream channel size warrants multiple culvert boxes, then the culvert should be
designed to maintain low/normal flow in one box, and the additional boxes should be
designed as high flow boxes with 2 foot sills, with floodplain benches designed on either
end.
If you have any questions as planning proceeds please let me know.
-Dave Bailey
David E. Bailey, PWS
Regulatory Project Manager
US Army Corps of Engineers
CE-SAW-RG-R
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Phone: [phone], Ext. 30.
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
We would appreciate your feedback on how we are performing our duties. Our
automated Customer Service Survey is located at:
http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/f?p=136:4:0
Thank you for taking the time to visit this site and complete the survey.
-----Original Message-----
From: AI-Sharawneh, Ahmad A [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2018 11:25 AM
To: Bailey, David E CIV USARMY CESAW (US) <[e-mail]>
Cc: Key, Bryan C<[e-mail]>; Sutton, Laura E<[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] R-4707 Guilford County
Hey David,
To follow up on our discussion, site #1 under US 29 was going to be retained and
extended about 438 feet, although the sufficiently rating is fine, we are thinking to
replace it with the same size and in the same foot print and of course lengthen by 438
feet. It is my understanding as long we document this during permitting we should be
fine. Will you please reply to this email and let me know if my understanding of correct.
Thanks
Ahmad AI-Sharawneh
Project Manager
Project Management Unit
Divisions 11-14

North Carolina Department of Transportation
919 707 6010 office
919 250 4224 fax
[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1548
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public
Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law
and may be disclosed to third parties.