20180765 Ver 1_PUBLIC NOTICE SAW201702281-PN_20180615

LLIMijill"
US Army Corps PUBLIC NOTICE
Of Engineers
Wilmington District
Issue Date: June 15, 2018
Comment Deadline: July 16, 2018
Corps Action ID Number: SAW -2017-02281
The Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers (Corps or USACE) received an application from
Mr. Scott Wearren of High Hampton Resort, LLC / High Hampton Land, LLC, (High Hampton LLCs)
seeking Department of the Army authorization for 200 linear feet (If) of temporary stream impacts (utility
crossings); 3,293 if of permanent stream impacts (golf course redesign, stream crossings for roads, stream
bank stabilization); 0.76 acres (ac) of permanent wetland impacts (golf course redesign, crossings for
roads, and laundry/maintenance facility); and 0.159 ac permanent open water impacts (golf course
redesign and beach relocation/construction), associated with the High Hampton Redevelopment Project in
Cashiers, Jackson County, North Carolina.
Specific plans and location information are described below and shown on the attached maps, figures, and
plans. This Public Notice and all attached plans are also available on the Wilmington District Web Site at
http://www. saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Re ug latoryPermitProrg am.aspx
Applicant:
AGENT (if applicable):
Authority
Mr. Scott Wearren
High Hampton Resort, LLC / High Hampton Land, LLC
3104 Blue Lake Drive, Suite 200
Vestavia Hills, Alabama 35243
Mr. Clement Riddle
C1earWater Environmental Consultants, Inc.
32 Clayton Street
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
The Corps evaluates this application and decides whether to issue, conditionally issue, or deny the
proposed work pursuant to applicable procedures of the following Statutory Authorities:
❑ Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344)
❑ Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403)
❑ Section 103 of the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972 (33 U.S.C. 1413)
Version 7.8.2014 Page 1

Location
Directions to Site: From the intersection of NC Highway 107 and U.S. Highway 64 in Cashiers, go south
on NC Highway 107. After 1.5 miles turn left into the High Hampton resort/development. In general the
project site is within the Cashiers Valley and is bisected by Highway 107, bordered to the north by
Chattooga Ridge with Rocky Mountain and Chimney Top Mountain and to south by a small ridgeline
above Fowler Creek.
Project Area (acres): 684
Nearest Town: Cashiers
Nearest Waterway: Unnamed Tributaries (UTs) Fowler Creek, Fowler Creek, UTs
Horsepasture River, UTs Rochester Creek, Hampton Lake, and Jewel Lake
River Basin: Tugaloo (03060102) and Seneca (03060101)
Latitude and Longitude: 35.09949 N, 83.08381 W
Existing Site Conditions
The High Hampton Redevelopment project site is 684 acres consisting of an existing residential
subdivision, existing resort core with a hotel, 16 -acre lake, pool, tennis, spa, golf course and driving
range, residential rental cottages, and approximately 400 acres of undeveloped land. The site is within the
1,412 acre existing High Hampton Resort and High Hampton residential development. High Hampton
LLCs are part of Daniel Communities, LLC (Daniel Communities). Daniel Communities has been in
business since 1938 and is recognized as a leader in the real estate industry. The proposed project is part
of Daniel Communities' proposed master plan for the overall 1,412 acre existing resort and residential
community.
It is noted that one of the dominant principles of Daniel Communities intense planning process is the
preservation of the natural landscape; it is of the utmost importance in the development of the master plan
and is what makes High Hampton a unique place. High Hampton LLCs' project team includes WGLA
Engineering; Mountain Soils, Inc.; Fazio Design Company; Hart & Howerton Land Planning; Benchmark
Club Management; and C1earWater Environmental Consultants, Inc. (CEC). All have spent many days on
the site and in the office to determine the best uses and preservation priorities for all the habitat
communities and unique resources within the project boundary. An object of the proposed master plan
recognizes the existing development infrastructure and how to complete the resort while using natural
features of the land and minimizes development activity in the most environmentally sensitive portions of
the site.
The 684 -acre project site is mostly comprised of the original High Hampton Inn and Country Club that
was founded in 1922 by Mr. E.L. Mckee. The resort has been owned by the Mckee family until the fall of
2017 when it was purchased by Daniel Communities. Several small parcels have also been recently
acquired and added to the development by Daniel Communities. The historic High Hampton Inn offers
mountain golf, tennis, spa services, hiking, and a 16 -acre private mountain lake for swimming, boating,
and fishing. Approximately 326 acres of the High Hampton property were placed into a conservation
easement, which includes the summits of Chimney Top Mountain and Rocky Mountain.
Version 7.8.2014 Page 2

Daniel Communities acquired the property in the fall of 2017. The natural features of the land along with
the existing golf course, resort core, and residential community were evaluated by Daniel Communities to
determine the type of development plan that would best fit the property.
The project area is situated in the Blue Ridge physiographic province and in the Southern Crystalline
Ridges and Mountains Ecoregion of North Carolina. Blue Ridge province is a mountainous zone that
extends northeast -southwest from southern Pennsylvania to central Alabama. The physiography of
Jackson County consists of high, intermediate, and low mountains; floodplains; and low stream terraces.
Elevations at the site range from approximately 3,600 feet above mean sea level (MSL) within the central
portion of the property along Fowler Creek, to 4,618 feet above MSL at the top of Chimney Top
Mountain in the eastern portion of the property. The project site is surrounded by commercial
development, developed rural residential, public open space, and forested undeveloped lands.
Waters at the project site are part of the Savanah River system and are mostly within the Tugaloo River
watershed (HUC 03060102), with some waters in the northern portion of the project site within the
Seneca River watershed (HUC 03060101). UTs Fowler Creek, Fowler Creek, UTs Horsepasture River,
UTs Rochester Creek, Hampton Lake and Jewel Lake are located at the project site. Both lakes are
impoundments of UTs to Fowler Creek. Streams at the site within the Tugaloo River watershed flow
generally south into Fowler Creek, which exits the project site along the southern project boundary.
Fowler Creek flows into the Chattooga River approximately 3.8 miles downstream of the project area.
Streams within the Seneca River watershed at the site generally flow north and eventually empty into the
Horsepasture River.
The Chattooga River, Horsepasture River, and their tributaries contain some of the most pristine and high-
quality waters in the North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia. As designated by the North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) — Division of Water Resources (DWR), streams at the
site are classified as fresh water secondary recreation -aquatic life class C and special designated trout
waters.
There are wetlands located within the High Hampton Redevelopment project boundary. The majority of
these wetlands have been identified as wetland seeps or headwater wetlands and are abutting associated
stream channels. Two of the wetlands are classified as wetland bogs and are adjacent to streams. The
project boundary contains the following amounts of jurisdictional waters of the U.S. (WoUS).
Summary of Jurisdictional Waters
Aquatic Resource
Amount
Stream
37,625 if
Wetland
27.57 ac
Open Water
16.45 ac
The Corps issued a jurisdictional determination (JD) for 674 acres of the High Hampton Redevelopment
project site in January 2018. A request for JD on 10 additional acres in the project site was submitted to
the Corps in May 2018. This request is pending field verification of the submitted data. Previous USACE
permitted regulatory projects within the High Hampton resort and residential development is summarized
in the following table.
Version 7.8.2014 Page 3

Action ID Number
NWP Number Open Water (ac)
Temporary Permanent
Wetland (ac) Stream (lf)
Temporary Permanent Temporary Permanent
2001-30660'*
NWP 27
150
2002-300242
NWP 14
50
2005-319483
NWP 13
160
2008-004164
NWP 16 / 33 / 39 0.2
3
2009-017135*
NWP 18
10
2009-018826
NWP 29
60
Impact Totals 0.2 0
0 0 10
423
Total Loss of Waters of the U.S. (ac)
0
Total Loss of Waters of the
U.S. (if)
113
Required Wetland Mitigation (ac)
0
Required Stream Mitigation0
'Individual property within High Hampton development is a cumulative effect, though not cumulative mitigation
'Stream bank stabilization
'Culvert stream crossing
'Stream bank stabilization
4Jewell Lake dam repairs and dredging
5Stream bank stabilization
6Culvert stream crossing
Twelve mapped soil series are present on the project site. They are the Chestnut-Edneyville complex,
Cleveland -Chestnut -Rock Outcrop complex, Cullasaja-Tuckasegee complex, Edneyville-Chestnut
complex, Nikwasi fine sandy loam, Rock Outcrop -Cleveland complex, Sylva-Whiteside complex,
Tuckasegee-Whiteside complex, Udorthents, Udorthents-Urban Land complex, and Whiteside-
Tuckasegee complex.
During site visits in 2017 and 2018, CEC identified several habitat types at the High Hampton
Redevelopment project site. The following is a summary of each of the habitat types identified on-site.
Acidic cove forest habitat occurs in narrow, steep slopes. It has a dense forest canopy and a dense shrub
layer. The herbaceous layer is sparse. Species observed include tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera),
black birch (Betula lenta), eastern hemlock (Tsuga canadensis), red maple (Acer rubrum), northern red
oak (Quercus rubra), Eastern white pine (Pinus strobus), pepperbush (Clethera alnifolia), Fraser
magnolia (Magnolia fraseri), great rhododendron (Rhododendron maximum), galax (Galax aphylla),
heartleaf (Hexastylis spp.), and autumn clematis (Clematis virginiana).
Mixed hardwood -pine forest habitat has a closed canopy of pine and mixed hardwood trees. Overstory
species observed within this forest include scarlet oak (Quercus coccinea), white pine, shortleaf pine
(Pinus echinata), red maple, tulip poplar, black cherry (Prunus serotina), cucumber magnolia (Magnolia
acuminata), chinkapin oak (Quercus muehlenbergii), shagbark hickory (Carya ovata), and black oak
(Quercus velutina). Shrub and sapling species include bear huckleberry (Gaylussacia ursina), high bush
blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum), sparkleberry (Vaccinium arboreum), mountain laurel (Kalmia
latifolia), great rhododendron, white ash (Fraxinus americana), viburnum (Viburnum sp.), American
holly (Ilex opaca), buffalo nut (Pyrularia pubera), alternate -leaved dogwood (Cornus alternifolia), sugar
maple (Acer saccharum), service berry (Amelanchier arborea), and sweet shrub (Calycanthus floridus).
Version 7.8.2014 Page 4

The herbaceous species observed include Catesby's trillium (Trillium catesbaei), painted trillium
(Trillium undulatum), dew berry (Rubus sp.), raspberry (Rubus sp.), wild strawberry, bellwort (Uvularia
sessilifolia), rattlesnake plantain (Goodyera pubescens), English ivy (Hedera helix), firmoss (Huperzia
sp.), pink lady slipper (Cypripedium acaule), Solomon's seal (Poligonatum biflorum), meadow parsnip
(Zizia trifoliate), clubmoss (Lycopodium clavatum), running cedar (Lycopodium digitatum), cranefly
orchid (Tipularia discolor), Christmas fern (Polystichum acrostichoides), rattlesnake root (Prenanthes
altissima), fairy -wand (Chamaelirium luteum), sedge, rosette grass, bowman's root (Gaillenia trifoliata),
wild violet (Viola spp.), halberd -leaved violet (Viola hastata), sassafras (Sassafras albidum), green and
gold (Chrysogonum virginianum), and goldenrod (Solidago sp.).
Pine -oak heath habitat is a mixed woodland with exposed montane areas and sharp ridges and dry slopes.
It is naturally dominated by pines and has a dense shrub layer. Species observed include white pine,
northern red oak, sourwood (Oxydendrum arboreum), Fraser magnolia, Solomon's seal, alternate -leaved
dogwood, bloodroot (Sanguinaria canadensis), trillium (Trillium spp.), violet, hickory (Carya spp.), witch
hazel, fairy -wand (Chamaelirium luteum), sedge, red maple, scarlet oak, tulip poplar, compass plant
(Sylphium sp.), pink lady slipper (Cypripedium acaule), great rhododendron, black oak, cleavers (Gallium
aparine), bellwort, and mountain mint (Pycnanthemum sp.).
Turf -landscaped maintained habitat was observed in intervals throughout the project area including
mowed paths, power line corridors, a recreational golf course, landscaped parking lot, and
commercial/residential lawns. Species that were observed within this habitat include fescue (Festuca sp.),
crabgrass (Digitaria sp.), common plantain (Plantago major), white clover (Trifolium repens), common
dandelion (Taraxacum officinale), black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia), heartleaf, raspberry, pink lady
slippers, bluegrass (Poa sp.), creeping bentgrass (Agrostis palustris), English ivy, American box wood
(Buxus sempervirens), river birch (Betula nigra), eastern arborvitae (Thuja occidentalis), hosta (Hosta
spp.), Fraser -fir (Abies fraseri), Japanese maple (Acer palmatum), white pine, bald cypress (Taxodium
distichum), goldenrod, yarrow (Achillea millefolium), ragweed (Ambrosia artemesiifolia), mullein
(Verbascum thapsus), Norway spruce (Abies pinagene), sacred bamboo (Nandina domestica), and
flowering dogwood (Cornus florida).
Mountian bog habitat is primarily comprised of an herbaceous layer with some shrubs and is lacking a
canopy. These wetlands appeared to be semi -permanently saturated. Shrub and sapling species observed
within these wetlands include pussy willow (Salix discolor), great rhododendron, possumhaw viburnum
(Viburnum nudum), pinxterbloom azalea (Rhododendron periclymenoides), steeplebush (Spireae
tomentosa), elderberry (Sambucus canadensis), swamp rose (Rosa palustris), Japanese barberry (Berberis
thunbergii), witch hazel (Hamamelis virginiana), and chokeberry (Aronia arbutifolia). The herbaceous
species observed include sphagnum mosses (Sphagnum spp.), Joe Pye weed (Eutrochium fistulosum),
jewelweed (Impatiens capensis), sedge sp. (Carex spp.), woolgrass (Scirpus cyperinus), Japanese siltgrass
(Microstegium vimineum), green bullrush (Juncus effusus), mountain bluets (Houstonia caerulea),
buttercup (Rununculus spp.), sedge (Carex spp.), water hemlock (Cicuta maculata), raspberry (Rubus sp.)
sensitive fern (Onoclea sensibilis), wild strawberry (Fragaria virginia), bushy bluestem (Andropogon
glomeratus), golden ragwort (Packera aurea), pond -lily (Nuphar sp.), yellow dock (Rumex crispus),
rosette grass (Dicanthelium sp.), cottongrass (Eriophorum virginicum.), and yellowroot (Xanthorhiza
simplicissima). Also, a community of the at -risk species, Southern Appalachian purple pitcherplant
(Sarracenia purpurea), was observed in the bog adjacent and connected to Hampton Lake.
Version 7.8.2014 Page 5

Multiple headwater forest wetland habitat areas were observed within the project site. The main factor
contributing to hydrology in these wetlands were adjacent streams and groundwater seeps. Species observed
within these wetlands include pepperbush (Clethera alnifolia), red maple, great rhododendron, sphagnum
moss, New York fern (Thelypteris noveboracensis), common blue violet (Viola sororia), Joe Pye weed,
autumn clematis, jewelweed, possumhaw viburnum, mountain bluets, and raspberry.
Riparian buffer and fresh water stream habitats include the streambeds, banks, and stream corridor of the
streams at the site. Streams at the project site vary from 1 to 10 feet wide. Permanently rooted aquatic plants
are practically non-existent in the streams at the site. The stream bed substrate is predominantly sand, with
some gravel and cobble and bedrock exposures. Hampton and Jewel lakes have approximately 16.45 acres of
open freshwater habitat. Stream and lake banks can be dominated by dense thickets of rhododendron.
Overstory species observed include tulip poplar, shagbark hickory, white pine, Fraser magnolia, red
maple, red oak, eastern hemlock, sourwood, black birch, and yellow birch (Betula alleghensis). Shrub and
sapling species observed include pinxterbloom azalea, service berry, American holly, buffalo nut, great
rhododendron, witch hazel, pepperbush, alternate -leaved dogwood, and striped maple (Acer
pensylvanicum). Herbaceous species observed include devil's walking stick (Aralia spinosa), rattlesnake
plantain, trillium, yellowroot, Joe Pye weed, mountain mint, buttercup, annual bluegrass (Poa annua),
mountain bluets, raspberry, wild lettuce (Lactuca spp.), pink lady slipper, meadow parsnip, mouse -ear
hawkweed (Hieracium pilosella), dog hobble, sphagnum moss, cucumber root (Medeola virginiana),
bellwort, New York fern, Cateby's trillium, painted trillium, compass plant, striped wintergreen
(Chimaphila maculata, and partridge berry (Mitchella repens).
Terrestrial communities at the project site are comprised of forested lands with some open habitats that
may support a diverse number of wildlife species. Representative mammal, bird, reptile, and amphibian
species commonly occurring in the habitats noted above is listed in the flowing paragraph. Information on
these species that typically use the habitats at the project site was obtained from relevant literature, mainly
the Biodiversity of the Southeastern United States, Upland Terrestrial Communities (Martin et al. 1993).
Mammal species that commonly occur in these habitats include eastern cottontail (Sylvilagus floridanus);
gray squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis); eastern chipmunk (Tamis striatus), southern flying squirrel
(Glaucomys volans), various vole, rat, and mice species; raccoon (Procyon lotor); Virginia opossum
(Didelphis virginiana); white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginiana), and black bear (Ursus americanus).
Bird species that commonly use these habitats include indigo bunting (Passerina cyanea), prairie warbler
(Dendroica discolor), northern cardinal (Cardinalis cardinalis), field sparrow (Spizella pusilla), rufous -
sided towhee (Pipilo erythrophthalmus), red -eyed vireo (Vireo olivaceous), scarlet tanager (Piranga
olivacea), blue jay (Cyanocitta cristata), and Carolina chickadee (Poecile carolinensis). Predatory birds
may include several hawk and owl species and turkey vulture (Cathartes aura). Reptile and amphibian
species that may use the terrestrial community include copperhead (Agkistrodon contortrix), eastern corn
snake (Pantherophis guttatus), eastern box turtle (Terrapene carolina carolina), eastern fence lizard
(Sceloporus undulatus), five -lined skink (Plestiodon fasciatus), spring peeper (Pseudacris crucifer),
timber rattlesnake (Crotalus horridus), and American bull frog (Rana catesbeiana). The dominant species
of salamander in these habitats are dusky salamanders (Desmognathus spp.).
Version 7.8.2014 Page 6

CEC conducted a file review of records maintained by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) and the
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NHP). The desktop literature review involved a review of the
FWS list of protected species in Jackson County and the NHP Element Occurrence Data on which NHP
identifies current and historic occurrences of listed species for a specific locale. The FWS lists 8 species
as occurring in Jackson County that are subject to Endangered Species Act (ESA) Section 7 consultation
(see table below). The NHP database identifies 35 element occurrences (EO) within a 1 -mile radius of the
project site; 1 EO species holds a Federal status and is subject to Section 7 consultation. The NHP
database also identifies 7 EOs within the project area, none of which are subject to Section 7 consultation.
Common Name
Scientific Name
Federal Status
Carolina Northern Flying Squirrel
Glaucomys sabrinus coloratus
E
Indiana Bat
Myotis sodalis
E
Northern Long -Eared Bat (NLEB)
Myotis septentrionalis
T
Appalachian elktoe
Alasmidonta ravenehana
E
Spruce -Fir Moss Spider
Microhexura montivaga
E
Small Whorled Pogonia
Isotria medeoloides
T
Swamp Pink
Helonias bullata
T
Rock Gnome Lichen* *
Gymnoderma lineare
E
"Species with a Federal status subject to Section 7 Consultation and within 1 mile of the project site.
E - Endangered. A taxon "in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range."
T - Threatened. A taxon "likely to become endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant
portion of its range."
CEC consulted the FWS' "Northern Long -Eared Bat Consultation Areas" map for Jackson County. The
proposed project site is not in a Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) identified as having known occurrences of
hibernation or maternity sites.
CEC conducted an office review of topographic maps and aerial photography, as well as, a pedestrian
survey of the project site concurrent with the wetland delineation (August -September 2017) and again on
May 3-4, 2018, to identify potential habitat for several of the above noted listed species. Based on the
results the pedestrian surveys no federally listed threatened or endangered species were observed.
Approximately 50 occurrences of the Southern Appalachian purple pitcher plant were documented in a
wetland by CEC during the May 2018 survey. This vascular plant is listed as a federal species of concern
(FSC) and has been previously documented on-site by the Southern Appalachian Highlands Conservatory
(Highlands Conservatory). Project planning would eliminate potential threats to this species from
construction and site redevelopment activities. The applicant is avoiding direct impacts where this species
occurs and has proposed this wetland to be preserved via a conservation easement with Highlands
Conservatory.
CEC reviewed the National Park Service National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) GIS Public Dataset
and the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) HPOWEB GIS Web Service. This
review indicated indicates five historic properties located within an approximate 1 -mile radius of the High
Version 7.8.2014 Page 7

Hampton Redevelopment project site, High Hampton Inn Historic District (JK0006), Church of the Good
Shepherd (JK0008), George M. Cole House (JK0269), Evan Pell Store (JK0270), and the Mordecai Zachary
House (JK0024). The High Hampton Inn Historic District, consisting of approximately 30 acres, was listed
in the NRHP in 1991 and is centrally located at the project site and includes the area proposed for resort
core redevelopment. The inn is the predominant structure within this area, however, the historic district also
includes several smaller structures including cottages, the Smokehouse, and Noah's Ark (formerly the
Supply Building). The Inn, Smokehouse, Noah's Ark, and some of the cottage structures are being
maintained and/or renovated as part of the final design.
Applicant's Stated Purpose
The project purpose is to redevelop the existing High Hampton resort property and residential
community, this includes the expansion of the current residential community, redesigning and
enlarging the existing golf course, and upgrading the resort core and associated amenities.
Project Description
The applicant proposes redevelopment of the High Hampton property in Jackson County, North Carolina.
The project involves redesigning the current golf course in order to facilitate a Tom Fazio Premier Club.
The Premier Club would be central to establishing a residential community and attracting guests to a
revamped resort core, which would feature several upscale amenities and services.
High Hamptons LLCs noted that this site is uniquely well situated for the re -development and expansion
of a master planned community. The proposed redevelopment property will contain a variety of land uses,
generally consistent with other successful projects in the Cashiers -Highlands area of Western North
Carolina. These uses include additional single family and multi -family residential homes, redesigned golf
course, upland, wetland, and stream buffers under conservation easements, hiking trails, renovated resort
core centered on the existing historic inn, and updated associated amenities and infrastructure.
Master planning and permitting of this large and long-term redevelopment project depends upon having
flexibility to implement sound land planning and engineering design principles which are often
conceptual at the time of permitting. These designs must include enough land for the project to be
economically justified, reasonable site access, construction of utilities and storm water systems, and
appropriate locations of various land use amenities. High Hampton LLCs is anticipating the proposed
redevelopment activities and construction projects to take 10 years to complete. Because of this, the
applicant has requested the length of the permit to be valid for 10 years. An estimated timeline for the site
work is, golf course expansion and reconfiguration 2018-2020; resort core/amenities, uplands
neighborhood (located in northwest portion of the site), and fieldstone neighborhood (west of NC -107)
2019-2021; and remaining residential neighborhoods and associated infrastructure 2021-2028.
The applicant proposes to permanently impact 3,293 if of stream channel, 0.76 acre of wetlands, 0.159
acre of open water and temporarily impact 200 if of streams to achieve the previously stated project
purpose through the redevelopment of a residential golf club resort community. There are twenty-four
permanent stream impacts, ten temporary stream impacts, twenty-eight wetland impacts, and two open
water impacts associated with High Hampton redevelopment project. These impacts are summarized in
the following table.
Version 7.8.2014 Page 8

Summary of Proposed Impacts to WoUS
GOLF COURSE
Stream (If)
(all permanent impacts)
Wetland (ac)
(all ermanent im acts)
Open Water (ac)
(all permanent impacts)
Stream Impact 1
62
Wetland Impact 1
0.003
Open Water Impact)
(water intake)
0.009
Stream Impact 2
158
Wetland Impact 2
0.008
Stream Impact 3
110
Wetland Impact 3
0.002
Stream Impact 4
106
Wetland Impact 4
0.022
Stream Impact 6
269
Wetland Impact 5
0.001
Stream Impact 14
200
Wetland Impact 9
0.05
Stream Impact 15
142
Wetland Impact 10
0.002
Stream Impact 16
119
Wetland Impact 11
0.065
Stream Impact 19
153
Wetland Impact 12
0.076
Stream Impact 20
74
Wetland Impact 13
0.029
Stream Impact 22
554
Wetland Impact 14
0.073
Stream Impact 23
146
Wetland Impact 15
0.011
Stream Impact 24
36
Wetland Impact 16
0.004
Wetland Impact 20
0.098
Wetland Impact 21
0.039
Wetland Impact 22
0.004
Wetland Impact 23
0.001
Wetland Impact 24
0.006
Wetland Impact 25
0.014
Wetland Impact 26
0.006
Wetland Impact 27
0.002
Wetland Impact 28
0.012
Total Stream Impacts
2,129
Total Wetland
Impacts
0.528
Total Open Water
Impacts
0.009
ROADS
Stream (If)
(all permanent impacts)
Wetland (ac)
(all ermanent im acts)
Stream Impact 5 46
Wetland Impact 6 0.005
Stream Impact 7 68
Wetland Impact 7 0.001
Stream Impact 8 30
Wetland Impact 8 0.044
Stream Impact 9 11
Wetland Impact 17 0.005
Stream Impact 10 66
Wetland Impact 18 0.006
Stream Impact 11 55
Stream Impact 12 45
Stream Impact 13 72
Stream Impact 17 23
Stream Impact 18 50
Stream Impact 21 98
Total Stream Impacts 564
Total Wetland
Impacts
0.061
Version 7.8.2014 Page 9

The applicant is proposing the redevelopment of an existing golf course of 5,740 yards to a new 18 -hole
Fazio Design Golf Club of approximately 6,748 yards. After avoidance and minimization, the layout of
the golf course will permanently 2,129 1f of streams and 0.528 acres for wetlands. Renovation of the
existing practice area will include a driving range, putting, and chipping greens. There are no stream or
wetland impacts associated with renovating the existing practice facility.
Associated with the golf course, the applicant proposes to impact approximately 400 square feet (0.009
acres) of open water (Lake Hampton) for the purposes of installing a water withdrawal pipe and wet well
to provide irrigation water for the golf course. The withdraw rate will be less than 0.5 feet per second.
Version 7.8.2014 Page 10
UTILITIES
Stream (If)
all temporary impacts
UC Impact 1 20
UC Impact 2 20
UC Impact 3 20
UC Impact 4 20
UC Impact 5 20
UC Impact 6 20
UC Impact 7 20
UC Impact 8 20
UC Impact 9 20
UC Impact 10 20
Total Stream Impacts 200
STREAM BANK STABILIZATION
Stream (If)
(all permanent impacts)
Golf Course Hole 5
300
Golf Course Hole 8
150
Golf Course Hole 18
150
Total Stream Impacts
600
RESORT CORE
Wetland (ac)
all permanent impacts)
Wetland (ac)
all permanent impacts)
Wetland Impact 19
0.171
Open Water Impact 2
(new beach)
0.15
Total Wetland
Impacts
0.171
Total Open Water
Impacts
0.15
IMPACT TOTALS
Stream (If)
Wetland (ac)
Oen Water (ac)
Temporary
200
Temporary
0
Temporary
0
Permanent
Permanent with
Loss of WoUS
3,293
2 693
Permanent
Permanent ith
w
Loss of Wous
0.76
0.76
Permanent
Permanent with
Loss of WoUS
0.159
0
The applicant is proposing the redevelopment of an existing golf course of 5,740 yards to a new 18 -hole
Fazio Design Golf Club of approximately 6,748 yards. After avoidance and minimization, the layout of
the golf course will permanently 2,129 1f of streams and 0.528 acres for wetlands. Renovation of the
existing practice area will include a driving range, putting, and chipping greens. There are no stream or
wetland impacts associated with renovating the existing practice facility.
Associated with the golf course, the applicant proposes to impact approximately 400 square feet (0.009
acres) of open water (Lake Hampton) for the purposes of installing a water withdrawal pipe and wet well
to provide irrigation water for the golf course. The withdraw rate will be less than 0.5 feet per second.
Version 7.8.2014 Page 10

The applicant will use approximately 74,000-90,000 gallons per day, when needed, during the summer
months. Hampton Lake is approximately 16 acres. Based on the size of the lake and irrigation needs, this
lake will provide 45 days of irrigation during a drought.
Anchor QEA calculated the 7Q10 flow for the outlet of Hampton Lake. The total area that drains into the
lake was estimated to be 0.757 square miles. Anchor QEA calculated the mean annual flow to be
approximately 3.028 cubic feet per (cfs) second. Based on this information the 7Q10 for Hampton Lake is
estimated to be 0.475 cfs. The dam at High Hampton will be operated to allow a minimum of 61,400 GPD
(80% of 7Q10) through the lake during drought conditions.
The applicant will conduct limited hand -clearing maintenance activities in three wetland locations located
within the golf course. Hand clearing may be conducted once or twice per year and will limit vegetation
to less than six feet in height for playing golf over these wetland areas. The applicant also proposes a pile
driven elevated cart bridge over the wetlands to allow access from tee to green for golfers and
maintenance vehicles.
The project would include the construction of eleven stream impacts and five wetland impacts associated
with road crossings and related road crossing infrastructure, resulting in 546 If of permanent impacts to
streams and 0.061 acres of permanent impacts to wetlands. Six proposed stream crossings avoided
impacts by utilizing bridges.
There are ten proposed utility crossings for the project that would result in 200 1f of temporary impacts to
stream channels. These utility lines would be installed using the "trench -cut" method and upon
completion, stream beds and banks would be returned to original contours and stabilized with matting and
appropriate seed. Work within the stream utility crossing areas would occur in the dry via a pump around
system/apparatus. Sediment and erosion control devices and best management practices would be utilized
during utility line installation as well.
High Hampton owns their on-site waste water collection system and currently sends waste water to the
Tuckasegee Water and Sewer Authority (TWSA) for 46 residential lots. The remaining existing
residential lots are served by on -lot individual systems.
The future 243 residential lots in the project area will have 75 lots served by on -lot individual sewer
systems permitted one at a time by the developer prior to being sold. The remaining 168 proposed
residential lots will generate 24,864 gallons per day (GPD) that will either be provided with sewer
capacity by the developers' on-site wastewater treatment system (WWTS) currently being designed
(Burgin Engineering) and permitted for 50,000 GPD or by future capacity which TWSA's new
wastewater facility with plans to have on-line within the next 36 months.
The resort core will generate a future sewer need of 19,605 GPD. In addition, future employee housing
will have a demand of 10,000 GPD. The proposed laundry and back of housing will generate
approximately 20,000 GPD of additional sewer usage daily. Therefore, the future development needs
from either the new WWTS and/or new TWSA plant (scheduled completion 202 1) will be 74,469 GPD
not including on -lot sewer systems. The new WWTS and disposal system will be permitted under NC
G. S. 130A-336-. I(e) (6). The permit will be administered by NC Division of Public Health.
Version 7.8.2014 Page 11

The proposed on-site WWTS has an associated treatment drip irrigation system. The location of the
proposed drip irrigation sites include the primary system and designated repair area. Additional acreage
was added to the system as a safety factor. This safety factor, which includes two and a half times (2.5x)
the required space, or a total of eleven and one-quarter acres (11.25 ac) will comprise the system. The
additional acreage will act as a site buffer and will provide protection for the entire system. Additionally,
the areas reserved for subsurface disposal are distributed throughout sections of the development to allow
optimum percolation and evapotranspiration of the treated wastewater effluent as well as to not
hydraulically overload one section of the property. There are no direct stream or wetland impacts
associated with the construction and operation of the on-site WWTS and drip irrigation areas.
Stream bank stabilization is proposed at golf holes 5, 8, and 18. The purpose stabilization activities is to
stop existing erosion and prevent further sedimentation into Fowler Creek, UTs Fowler Creek, and
Hampton Lake. Stream bank stabilization activities within the golf course boundary will total
approximately 600 1f, with bank treatments occurring on the left and right banks of the channel.
The High Hampton Inn would be expanded to accommodate additional guests, and amenities associated
with the resort would be renovated as well. Emphasis on preserving the historic integrity of the High
Hampton Inn would also be prioritized, and any structural additions would be designed to appropriately
match the site's established aesthetic. Proposed inn expansion would increase potential available room
occupancy from 115 rooms to 170 rooms on-site. Impacts to jurisdictional features would not occur from
the expansion of the current inn.
The applicant also proposes the development of a laundry and maintenance facility associated with the inn
and resort amenities. This area is referred to as the "back of house." Approximately 0. 171 acre of
permanent wetland impacts would be associated with back of house construction.
Additional roads, cart paths, and walking trails would be incorporated within the resort core's current
infrastructure. An event lawn, swimming pool, yoga pavilion, restaurant, and playground area would also
be included within the redeveloped resort core area. Impacts to jurisdictional features would not occur
from the inclusion of these amenities.
The current beach area would also be relocated to meet greater occupancy demand. The beach would be
constructed/relocated along the western edge of Hampton Lake, with access to the resort core, and the
beach would be expanded from 3,375 square feet, to approximately 6,750 square feet (approximately 270
linear feet in length and 25 linear feet wide into the lake). Sand would be added above the natural pool
elevation and into the lake for about 25 feet resulting in 0.15 acres of permanent impacts to open waters.
Native shrubs and mature trees would also be planted along the old beach area. The existing trail network
along the eastern portion of the lake would be preserved as well.
The applicant proposes to rebuild and extend a dock currently located at Lake Highland. The proposed
dock would be rebuilt in a manner that would not cause impacts to open water (driven or jetted piles).
Floating boat storage would be constructed similarly and would increase boat stowing capacity from 885
square feet to 1,000 square feet within Hampton Lake.
Version 7.8.2014 Page 12

Avoidance and Minimization
The applicant provided the following information in support of efforts to avoid and/or minimize impacts
to the aquatic environment. Pre -project site planning was conducted to delineate and field verify
jurisdictional WoUS within the proposed project area. These features were used to select a viable
alternative to avoid and minimize impacts to aquatic resources.
In preparing the master plan, the applicant considered a variety of constraints, including impacts to
wetlands and other WoUS. The applicant has avoided and minimized impacts to wetlands to the greatest
extent practicable and feasible while still accomplishing the overall project purpose. It has been
determined that large mountain properties in Western North Carolina contain similar streams, springs, and
seeps as those found on the project site.
During design of the proposed master plan, the applicant considered development alternatives, which
included impacts to more streams than the proposed plan depicts. Prior to the submittal of this application,
the applicant conducted meetings with regulatory agency personal including the USACE, DWR, and NC
Wildlife Resources Commission (WRC). Many of these changes were in response to consultant and
agency input. Specifically, other development plans required more impacts to streams and wetlands from
golf course routing. Additional avoidance and minimization efforts were completed by avoiding road
crossing impacts by utilizing six bridges. All streams associated with cart path crossings will be avoided
through the utilization of bridges. In addition to the restoration and stream enhancement proposals, the
proposed master plan will preserve streams at a preservation ratio of 7.5:1 and wetlands at a ratio of 30:1,
thereby demonstrating that the applicant has designed the proposed project to avoid jurisdictional impacts
to the greatest extent practicable. Because the site is covered in long linear stream segments, it would be
impossible to avoid all streams while continuing to maintain a rational project design and the flexibility
needed to construct a large-scale master planned golf course and residential community with a lengthy
build out period.
The project as proposed avoids approximately 34,572 linear feet of stream (90%) and 26.81 acres (97%)
of wetlands. A summary of the avoidance and minimization is as follows.
Aquatic
Resources
On -Site Totals
Proposed Impacts
Percent Avoided
and Minimized
Stream
35,572 If
3,4931f
90%
Open Water
16.29 ac
0.159 ac
99%
Wetland
26.81 ac
0.76 ac
97%
Compensatory Mitigation
The proposed project does involve temporary and permanent impacts to jurisdictional WoUS. The
temporary impacts to streams for utility crossing, permanent impacts to streams for stream bank
stabilization activities, and permanent impacts to open waters will not result in functional losses to the
aquatic environment within these jurisdictional resources and will not result in a permanent loss of
jurisdictional WoUS.
Version 7.8.2014 Page 13

Upon completion and implementation of all practical avoidance and minimization efforts, 2,693 if of
stream channel, 0.76 acre of wetlands, and 0.159 acre of open water impacts associated with the High
Hampton Redevelopment project are unavoidable. A conceptual mitigation plan was provided by the
applicant in the permit application and the proposed mitigation measures are described below.
The applicant proposes to mitigate for 2,693 if of proposed stream impacts, as well as 113 if of
cumulative stream impacts from previous projects at the site, at a 1:1 ratio through NC Division of
Mitigation Services (DMS). By letter dated May 21, 2018, DMS has indicated they are willing to accept
payment for impacts associated with this project. In addition to the noted stream mitigation through DMS,
the applicant proposes to mitigate stream impacts at a 7.5:1 ratio through preservation of 23,355 if of on-
site stream channels with approximately 31 acres of designated 30 -foot upland buffers on each side of the
stream.
The applicant proposes to mitigate wetland impacts at a 30:1 ratio through preservation of 21.645 acres of
wetlands, including high quality mountain bogs. The streams, wetlands, and upland buffer within the
mitigated areas are all proposed to be preserved using a conservation easement held by the Highlands
Conservancy. A final draft of the conservation easement will be sent to the Corps for review and
approval.
In summary, High Hampton LLCs proposes to mitigate for 2,8061f of unavoidable stream impacts and
0.76 acres of wetland impact. Compensatory mitigation will be in the form of preservation and payment
into the DMS. The following table summarizes the proposed stream and wetland mitigation.
Method
Type
Amount
Ratio
DMS
Restoration
2,8061f
1:1
On -Site Streams
Preservation
23,355 if
7.5:1
On -Site Wetlands
Preservation
21.645 ac
30:1
Essential Fish Habitat
Pursuant to the Magnuson -Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, this Public Notice
initiates the Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) consultation requirements. The Corps' initial determination is
that the proposed project would not affect EFH or associated fisheries managed by the South Atlantic or
Mid Atlantic Fishery Management Councils or the National Marine Fisheries Service.
Cultural Resources
Pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, Appendix C of 33 CFR Part
325, and the 2005 Revised Interim Guidance for Implementing Appendix C, the District Engineer
consulted district files and records and the latest published version of the National Register of Historic
Places and initially determines that:
❑ Should historic properties, or properties eligible for inclusion in the National Register, be present
within the Corps' permit area; the proposed activity requiring the DA permit (the undertaking) is a
type of activity that will have no potential to cause an effect to an historic properties.
Version 7.8.2014 Page 14

❑ No historic properties, nor properties eligible for inclusion in the National Register, are present
within the Corps' permit area; therefore, there will be no historic properties affected. The Corps
subsequently requests concurrence from the SHPO (or THPO).
❑ Properties ineligible for inclusion in the National Register are present within the Corps' permit
area; there will be no historic properties affected by the proposed work. The Corps subsequently
requests concurrence from the SHPO (or THPO).
❑ Historic properties, or properties eligible for inclusion in the National Register, are present within
the Corps' permit area; however, the undertaking will have no adverse effect on these historic
properties. The Corps subsequently requests concurrence from the SHPO (or THPO).
❑ Historic properties, or properties eligible for inclusion in the National Register, are present within
the Corps' permit area; moreover, the undertaking may have an adverse effect on these historic
properties. The Corps subsequently initiates consultation with the SHPO (or THPO).
❑ The proposed work takes place in an area known to have the potential for the presence of
prehistoric and historic cultural resources; however, the area has not been formally surveyed for
the presence of cultural resources. No sites eligible for inclusion in the National Register of
Historic Places are known to be present in the vicinity of the proposed work. Additional work may
be necessary to identify and assess any historic or prehistoric resources that may be present.
SHPO and applicable tribal historic preservation offices (THPO) will be notified via Public Notice about the
project and will be given the opportunity to comment on the project and its potential effects on cultural
resources. The District Engineer's final effect determination will be based upon submitted comments to
this public notices from SHPO and/or THPO; and further coordination with the SHPO and/or THPO, as
appropriate and required; and with full consideration given to the proposed undertaking's potential direct
and indirect effects on historic properties within the Corps' permit area.
Endangered Species
Pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973, the Corps reviewed the project area, examined all
information provided by the applicant and consulted the latest North Carolina Natural Heritage Database.
Based on available information:
❑ The Corps determines that the proposed project would not affect federally listed endangered or
threatened species or their formally designated critical habitat.
❑ The Corps determines that the proposed project may affect, but not likely to adversely affect
federally listed endangered or threatened species or their formally designated critical habitat. The
Corps initiates consultation under Section 7 of the ESA and will not make a permit decision until
the consultation process is complete.
Version 7.8.2014 Page 15

❑ The Corps is not aware of the presence of species listed as threatened or endangered or their
critical habitat formally designated pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA) within
the project area. The Corps will make a final determination on the effects of the proposed project
upon additional review of the project and completion of any necessary biological assessment
and/or consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and/or National Marine Fisheries
Service.
The FWS will be notified via Public Notice about the project and will be given the opportunity to comment
on the project and its potential effects on threatened and endangered species. The District Engineer's final
effect determination will be based upon submitted comments to this public notices from FWS; and further
coordination with the FWS, as appropriate and required; and with full consideration given to the proposed
undertaking's potential direct and indirect effects on federally threatened or endangered listed species
and/or their formally designated critical habitat within the Corps' permit area.
Wild and Scenic Rivers
Pursuant to the Wild and Scenic Act of 1968, the Corps will review the proposed project activities for
potential impacts to designated Wild and Scenic Rivers. The project area is not located in a component of
the National Wild and Scenic River system or in a river officially designated by Congress as a "study
river" for possible inclusion in the system.
The Chattooga River located 3.8 miles downstream and to the southwest, via Fowler Creek, of the project
area is a designated Wild and Scenic River. The U.S. Forest Service (USFS) is the federal agency which
has the direct management responsibilities of the Wild and Scenic River portion of this river.
The USFS will be notified via Public Notice about the project and will be given the opportunity to comment
on the project and its potential effects on designated Wild and Scenic Rivers. The District Engineer's final
effect determination will be based upon submitted comments to this public notices from USFS; and
further coordination with the USFS, as appropriate and required; and with full consideration given to the
proposed undertaking's potential direct and indirect effects on Wild and Scenic River portion of the
Chattooga River within the Corps' permit area.
Other Required Authorizations
The Corps forwards this notice and all applicable application materials to the appropriate State agencies
for review.
North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR): The Corps will generally not make a final
permit decision until the NCDWR issues, denies, or waives the state Certification as required by Section
401 of the Clean Water Act (PL 92-500). The receipt of the application and this public notice, combined
with the appropriate application fee, at the NCDWR Central Office in Raleigh constitutes initial receipt of
an application for a 401 Certification. A waiver will be deemed to occur if the NCDWR fails to act on this
request for certification within sixty days of receipt of a complete application. Additional information
regarding the 401 Certification may be reviewed at the NCDWR Central Office, 401 and Buffer
Version 7.8.2014 Page 16

Permitting Unit, 512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-2260. All persons desiring to
make comments regarding the application for a 401 Certification should do so, in writing, by July 16,
2018 to:
NCDWR Central Office
Attention: Ms. Karen Higgins, 401 and Buffer Permitting Unit
(USPS mailing address): 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Or,
(physical address): 512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
North Carolina Division of Coastal Management (NCDCM):
❑ The application did not include a certification that the proposed work complies with and would be
conducted in a manner that is consistent with the approved North Carolina Coastal Zone
Management Program. Pursuant to 33 CFR 325.2(b)(2) the Corps cannot issue a Department of
Army (DA) permit for the proposed work until the applicant submits such a certification to the
Corps and the NCDCM, and the NCDCM notifies the Corps that it concurs with the applicant's
consistency certification. As the application did not include the consistency certification, the Corps
will request, upon receipt„ concurrence or objection from the NCDCM.
❑ Based upon all available information, the Corps determines that this application for a Department of
Army (DA) permit does not involve an activity which would affect the coastal zone, which is
defined by the Coastal Zone Management (CZM) Act (16 U.S.C.
§ 1453).
Evaluation
The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable impacts including
cumulative impacts of the proposed activity on the public interest. That decision will reflect the national
concern for both protection and utilization of important resources. The benefit which reasonably may be
expected to accrue from the proposal must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. All
factors which may be relevant to the proposal will be considered including the cumulative effects thereof,
among those are conservation, economics, aesthetics, general environmental concerns, wetlands, historic
properties, fish and wildlife values, flood hazards, flood plain values (in accordance with Executive Order
11988), land use, navigation, shoreline erosion and accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation,
water quality, energy needs, safety, food and fiber production, mineral needs, considerations of property
ownership, and, in general, the needs and welfare of the people. For activities involving the discharge of
dredged or fill materials in waters of the United States, the evaluation of the impact of the activity on the
public interest will include application of the Environmental Protection Agency's 404(b)(1) guidelines.
Version 7.8.2014 Page 17

Commenting Information
The Corps of Engineers is soliciting comments from the public; Federal, State and local agencies and
officials, including any consolidated State Viewpoint or written position of the Governor; Indian Tribes
and other interested parties in order to consider and evaluate the impacts of this proposed activity. Any
comments received will be considered by the Corps of Engineers to determine whether to issue, modify,
condition or deny a permit for this proposal. To make this decision, comments are used to assess impacts
on endangered species, historic properties, water quality, general environmental effects and the other
public interest factors listed above. Comments are used in the preparation of an Environmental
Assessment (EA) and/or an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) pursuant to the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Comments are also used to determine the need for a public hearing
and to determine the overall public interest of the proposed activity.
Any person may request, in writing, within the comment period specified in this notice, that a public
hearing be held to consider the application. Requests for public hearings shall state, with particularity, the
reasons for holding a public hearing. Requests for a public hearing shall be granted, unless the District
Engineer determines that the issues raised are insubstantial or there is otherwise no valid interest to be
served by a hearing.
The Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District will receive written comments pertinent to the proposed
work, as outlined above, until 5 PM, July 16, 2018. Comments should be submitted to:
Mr. David Brown
USACE Wilmington District
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina, 28801-5006
Version 7.8.2014 Page 18

eh�!
ellttr
0o e
i � r
J
a ,
Legen14�
d j 0 025 0.5 1
� �P�olaa eo��mn 107 Milas
Jack,— Comity, Cl ear v YaLer SSite Vicvuty
North Carolina 32 Cla — s Figure 1
Asheville, - Caroli x2801

High Hampton (+/- 684 AC)
14
- LMT 1667*
3486
Rocky Mtn
.� ,1117' •pC
1 � 7
i � 7
UPnEA \ � �I
shiel
`• �
I� I
`-� )�- ; 1 G GARY/ /
CFrmr,Lytop
r v MM»6
Mt
I� ,': 'Z1 .crs
Efi
l I
Legend '�
»J` J
� Fowle O'eek ` 1� 14�
- f
'� 1 ��,�
918
� 0 1,000 2,000 4.000
_ Feet
Jad,son C' -M
North Carolina
(R^ater Top,pz,pl-,l I\lz,p
- Ca,,Ifi _. Qnad
z claym0 Figure 2
Asheville, NoM Caroli x HS01

CROSSROAD
BRIDGE #1 (ROAD)
BRIDGE #2 (ROAD)
v
STREAM IMPACT #23
146 LF (GOLF) WETLAND
IMPACT #25
IMP,ff
0.014 AC.
(GOLF)
O.D06 A 24
VI C.
(GOLF)
STREAM
WETLAND
IMPACT #22 IMPACT #26
554 LF 0.006 AC.
(GOLF) (GOLF)
WETLAND WETLAND 0 10*
IMPACT #23 '00
0.001 AC. IMPACT #27
(GOLF) 0.002 AC. (GOLF)
WETLAND IMPACT #28 ♦softftr
STREAM IMPACT #24 0.012 AC. (GOLF)
36 LF (GOLF) *%
INSET "B" Pip
(SEE FIGURE 5.1) OP,
SCALE I" = 100'
PROBACK OF H GOLF HO #1
AINTEONPANSCEED (SEE FIGURE 5 (SEE FIGURE 5.1)
5.05 0
SEE�INSET "B"
STREAM IMPACT #18
50 LF (ROAD)
WETLAND IMPACT #19
WASTEWATER DRIP IRRIGA11ON 0.171 AQ (OTHER)
TIONS T
LOCA VP.) IAETLAND IMPACT . j116' -PA 'T�
YP
a
WETLAND 17 0.006 AC. (ROAD)
0.005 AC (ROAD)
UC#6
BRIDGE 06 UC 09
UC f7 UC #10
STREAM IMPACT #17 tIDGE #5
23 LF (ROAD)AN, WETLAND 11 A I
mas0.029 AC. (GOLF.,♦
s.
300 LF OF
PROJECT
J) LIZA
BOUNDARY■ Tee t BANK STABI a
N I -- I IV I
PROPERTY
WETLAND IMPACT
#14WETLAND
BOUNDARY ■ 0.073 AC. (GOLF) IMPACT 09
•
-D- 0.050 AC. (GOLF) •
STREAM IMPACT #14
Ai 200
v WETLAND IMPACT
WETLAND IMPACT # 0.065
AC. (GOLF)
ielv�0.004 =-xvwneeeeeeeeVAMS TLAN76D IMPCT
0.0AC.A(GOLF)
■ STREAM IMPACT 016 WETLAND IMPACT #10
119 LF 0.002 Ac. STREA(GOLF)
■ M IMPACT J#115
WETLAND IMPACT #15 142 LF (GOLF)
■
0.011 AC, (GOLF)
■
L—ee"ame
REAM
I T ACT 3
7\17
72 VLF (ROAD)
OPEN WATERS
JURISDICTIONAL IMPACTS
STREAM ROAD CULVERTS
16.45 AC.
5.09 LEGEND—BRIDGE
564 LF me PROPERTY BOUNDARY
F4 (ROAD) 4
V LIC #5
150 LF OF STREAM
STREAM GOLF COURSE SUBTOTAL
2.129 IF
2.693 LF PROJECT BOUNDARY
BANK STABILIZATION
STREAM UTILITY LINE (TEMPORARY) 200 LF WETLAND—NO DISTURBANCE
STREAM BANK STABILIZATION 1100 LF LINEAR
WETLAND —ROADS 0.061 AC. (2,657 S.F.) WATER
WETLAND — Off COURSE 0.528 AC. (22.9913 S.F.)OPEN AIM
WETLAND — DEVELOPMENT 0.171 AC. (7.437 S.F.)
SUBTOTAL 0.760 AC. (33,093 S.F.) STREAM
MEN WATERS — GOLF COURSE
(WATER INTAKE)
0.009 AC. (400 S.F.) -------- CULVERT
PROPOSED IMPACT
— DEVELOPMENT
(BEACH AREA)
0.15 AC (6,750 SF)
HAND CLEAR NO IMPACT
AVOIDANCE
STREAM
BRIDGE — ROAD
34,572 LF PRESERVATION AREA
6 FA
WETLANDS
OPEN WATERS
MITIGATION
26.8124 AC. I STREAM BUFFER
16.282 AQ
PROPOSED GOLF COURSE
2018 STREAM IMPACTS
PRIOR STREAM IMPACTS
2.693 LF PROPOSED UTILITY CROSSING
REQUIRING MITIGATION
TOTAL STREAM (LINEAR FEET)
113 LF WASTEWATER DRIP IRRIGATION
LOCATIONS
NCDMS
LPRESERVATION
PRESERVATION OF UPLAND BUFFERS
2,806 LF
21.654 AQ PROPOSED STREAMBANK
APPROXIMATELY 31 AC. STABILIZATON
WGLA
WGLA ENGINEERING, PLLC
724 5th AVENUE WEST
HENDERSONVILLE, NC 28739
[phone]
WGLA.COM
NC LICENSE P-1342
High Hampton
Cashiers Township
Jackson County
North Carolina
CAI?
P1160
n
FEVP"S
DAM DESCIa11 -
4/2/18 8-1.1-
5/15/18 R - Mon
Know what's below.
Call before you dig.
PROJECT NUMBER 17133
DATE: 4/18
DRAWN BY: KHC
CHECKED BY: TWT
Stream and
Wetland Impact Map
Figure 5.0
SCALE: I "=500'

ND
IMPACT .0AC.
(GOLF)
STREAM
IMPACT #22
554 LF
(GOLF)
WETLAND
IMPACT #23
0.001 AC. ew
(GOLF)
STREAM IMPACT #2
36 LF (GOLF)
INSET "B"
(SEE FIGURE 5.1)
SCALE 1' — 1O3'
TLAND
ACT #2
06 AC.
)LF)
NO
T #27
AC. (GOLF)
IMPACT #28
(GOLF)
2989
'MPACTMAZ
HIGH HAMPTON P DIETAL SHEEM
CASHIERSTOWNSHI 5.01
JACKSON COUNTY J.b#: 5118:12M
NORTH CAROLINA Date: 170
Scale: I"=5719

CAWY
Psi
t1GINEERING, PLLC IMPACT MAP
7246th v—. r. AVENUE HIGH HAMPTON DETAIL SHEET
YGLA HENDERSONVILLE, NO 28739 CASHIERS TOWNSHIP 5.02
(828) 687-717, JACKSON COUNTY l,b*: 18118
,ngineeringwGLA.COMNORTH CAROLINA Date: 5/17/18
NO LICENSE P-1342 Scale: I"=500'

------- L--\,— WETLAND
INSET "A1
A 1� IMPACT #3 it
ONSERVATION 0.002 AC.
EASEMENT (SEE FIGYRE15. ) (GOLF)
14E(Pzll��'
158.45f AC. SCALE I =too'
111, Will

STREAM IMPACT #18
50 LF (ROAD)
WASTEWATER DRIP IRRIGATION
LOCATIONS (TYP.)
WETLAND IMPACT #17
0.005 AC. (ROAD)
LJC
UC #7
STREAM IMPACT #17
23 LF (ROAD)
u n
PROJECT
BOUNDARY
PROPERTY
BOUNDARY
2989
on
G-r.GINEERING.PLLC IMPACT MAP
7246th AVENUE HIGH HAMPTON DETAILSHEEr
WGLA HENDERSONVILLE, NO 28739 CASHIERS TOWNSHIP 5.05
(828) 687-7M JACKSON COUNTY Job#: 18118
Engineering
W-COM NORTH CAROLINA Date: 5/17/18
NO LICENSE P-1342 Scale: I"=500'

• � • .real
6 �
v�
WGLA
Engineering

WGLA
Engineering

tFfy
C = n
724 5th AVENUE HIGH HAMPTON DETAILSHEET
HENDERSONVILLE, NC 28739 CASHIERS TOWNSHIP 5.08
[phone] JACKSON COUNTY Job#: 18118
WGLA.COM NORTH CAROLINA Date: 5/17/18
NC LICENSE P-1342 Scale: I"=500'

WETLAND — ROADS 0.061 AC. (2,657 S.F.)
WETLAND — GOLF COURSE 0-528 AC. (22,999 S.F.)
WETLAND — DEVELOPMENT 0.171 AC. (7,437 S.F.)
SUBTOTAL 0.760 AC. (33,093 S.F.)
OPEN WATERS — GOLF COURSE 0.009 AC. (400 S.F.)
(WATER INTAKE)
— DEVELOPMENT 015 AC (6,750 SF)
(BEACH AREA)
AVOIDANCE
STREAM 34,572 LF
BRIDGE — ROAD 6 EA.
WETLANDS 26.8124 AC.
OPEN WATERS 16.282 AC.
MITIGATION
20�8 STREAM IMPACTS 2,693 LF
PRIOR STREAM EAM IMPACTS
REQUIRING MITIGATION 113 LF
TOTAL STREAM (LINEAR FEET)
NCDMS 2,806 LF
PRESERVATION 2�.654 AC.
PRESERVATION OF UPLAND BUFFERS APPROXIMATELY 31 AC.
pw
4t�iI
� z
C6�okiq wn
WGIA ENGINEERING, 1UU1; IMPACT MAP
7246th AVENUE HIGH HAMPTON DETAILSHEET
WGLA HENDERSONVILLE, NO 28739 CASHIERS TOWNSHIP 5.09
[phone] JACKSON COUNTY Job#: 18118
Engineering -COM NORTH CAROLINA Date: 5/17/18
NO UC`SE P-1342 Scale: I"=500'

LEGEND
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
PROJECT BOUNDARY
LINEAR WETLAND
OPEN WATER
STREAM
-------- CULVERT
PROPOSED IMPACT
JIM HAND CLEAR NO IMPACT
PRESERVATION AREA
STREAM BUFFER
PROPOSED GOLF COURSE
PROPOSED UTILITY CROSSING
LOCATIONS
PROPOSED STREAMBANK
STABILIZATOIJ
4CF��i
2989
Corrinion
WGLA ENGINEERING, PULC IMPACT MAP
7246th AVENUE HIGH HAMPTON DETAILSHEET
HENDERSONVILLE, NO 28739 CASHIERS TOWNSHIP 010
77 JACKSON (828) 687-71 N COUNTY Job # 18118
WGLA.COM NORTH CAROLINA De Date: 5/17/18
SO
NO LICENSE P-1342 Scale: 1

LEGEND
EXISTING CONTOURS
//%!/%171111)�v/ „//! I 1 j I I II /// PROPOSED CONTOURS mse A� .
I /// /�/,, `; ! I / PROPOSED FAIRWAY
,/ 0�,,,
IMPACT AREAS x NCL--Ea-�w
,IIIIII III 1 / / //// /I STREAMS
.% rii%rte i� ,/ / , I // 1 I I
STREAM IMPACT #23 ,IIII I � $ III IIII\ 1! II /11111 WETLANDS
146 LF (GOLF) - I', VIII II I ! 1!111 I I I High Hamton
WETLAND III I11I�11 Ill / 11/ l ce.nlao Taxnenlp
IMPACT #25/////III / 1 ( I // / /��I \\\ j,d mcoumy
IMPACT 0.014 AC.
#
I I I {
\ /� C J / wm r�.
a�
o.oas Ac. (GOLF) Q\�.'
WETLAND
—
/ii%/r/�/
_!IMPACT #26
0.006 AC.
^uw i- // % (GOLF) \\`\=
STREAM
� _� WETLAND �\� \
f , \�
—�—� n /: �\ IMPACT #Z� _ _ _fi�lmini
IMPACT554#LF .I� ,I 0.002 AC. (GOLF) �\\\ vN—SSE �r
(GOLF) / (///` WETLAND IMPACT #28 �\�
` WETLAND /?F0.012 AC. (GOLF)
IMPACT #23 1 �-
0.0AC.
! m (GOLF)
STREAM IMPACT #24
l / 36 LF (GOLF) .f/I j
rot
/a
Got ft. #1

LEGEND
EXISTING CONTOURS
PROPOSED CONTOURS
PROPOSED FAIRWAY
IMPACT AREAS
JJ `J
High Hampton
I \\� ni.nni.nnnnnm STREAMS
a WETLANDS
To-y
STREAM � , \ \
�
0A. Ess/p. k:.
q�mina l;
�-',,�ry
j �i"N��'}
-)A 1),
IMPACT #6 _ __ / 1) /1/llll
269 LF :7-7- l�ll
- / 'WETLAND IMPACT #8 (GOLF) 1 1/ /ice%l%7////11111..
0.022 AG. (GOLF) -. ! I `�.i/t////l///%flllll�
WETLANDNom►
IMPACT #5 111 1 \\\\�
0.001 AC. '\\\\ \`1\\\\�:
(GOLF) / I _' I \\ 1\\ \
WETLAND
/ IMPACT #3
0.002 AC.
/ (GOLF)'
CMH.M.,,
Figure 5.2
ec.�: yew

VSE©ND IMPAC❑I #19
0.171 ACCN DEVELOPMENT)
CASHIERS UNITED
METHODIST CHURCH
7571- 66- 19®
1596/ 420
PURCHASING AND
STORAGE BUILDING
I
PROPOSED LAUNDRY & 'I
NIA INTENANCE BUILDING1
;
'Ll VAETLANDIMPACT #18 1,
D 0111b6 ACgROAD)
EXISTS BUILDING
�\ TO BE RENOVATED
ID �
PROPOSED CONTOURS ENci�Earap, Pric
MARTHA O DAVENPORT srn ays©uswss,
TRUSTEE PROPOSED FAIRVWY EN asoNvi ®czwse
of iso �'
1♦ 7571- 67- 4401
'`,_�♦♦ 1070/ 52 IMPACT AREAS Nc�mrsao
1 ♦♦ STREAMS
1 ♦♦
1
♦ WETLANDS
♦ ♦♦ High Hampton
1 ; ♦♦ 0 WETLAND IMPACT
1 _ cashiers Township
`.=��� ♦ /�/ ♦♦ ,molroCoag
No'h%,Ie
le ♦ ♦
HIGH HAMPTON
LAND, LLC
7581-28-1690
2191/1498
E{`cE8 Y{EEI
F'lt f:L2J1191
lif'!7Eii_3T
Yk�Rf kkf

LEGEND
EXISTING CONTOURS
WATER INTAKE PROPOSED CONTOURS wauenexaaxc, nuc
NEW BEACH AREA _
IMPACT #1 IMPACT 6,750 OF naro�o�w�iu,
' _ r PROPOSED FAIRWAY
400 SF (GOLF) (DEVELOPMENT) 0 Wau a�NO
�f 0 IMPACT AREAS roar reernsaz..
EXISTING BOAT
HOUSE & DOCK TO �I�n�I�n�n�Ilm STREAMS
BE REN OVATED�
WETLANDS
High Hampton
_ _ .........'. WETLAND IMPACT
WATER INTAKE caxhlea thip
IMPACT #I 400 SF - .lecxsox Co -y
(GOLF)o _ - Norm caaona
EXISTING BEACH AREA . n
�TO BE RESTORED TO
+
V NATURAL LAKE EDGE
� � `!p#dlEq�minlir�i`
i l
--,;;, O ;:;;°\ � ��_ _� � °Z� tea•
b O
Back of House
Golf Ma Mance
Stream & Wetland
Impact Map
Figure 5.5
ecxu=: rwav