20180777 Ver 1_401 Application_20180618

DWR
Division of water Resources
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
January 31, 2018 Ver 2.3
Please note: fields marked with a red asterisk below are required. You will not be able to submit the form until all mandatory questions are answered.
Also, if at any point you wish to print a copy of the E -PCN, all you need to do is right -click on the document and you can print a copy of the form.
Below is a link to the online help file.
https://edocs.deq.nc.govMaterResources/0/edocl6247041PCN%20Help%20File%202018-1-30.pdf
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:*
Guilford
Is this project a public transportation project?*
f Yes f• No
This is any publicly funded by nunicipal,state or federal funds road, rail, airport transportation project.
1a. Type (s) of approval sought from the Corps:*
V Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
F Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?*
IJ Nationwide Permit (NWP)
r Regional General Permit (RGP)
r Standard (IP)
This form may be Corps to initiate the standard/individual permit process. Please contact your Corps representative for submittal of standard permits.
All required items that are not provided in the E -PCN and be added to the miscellaneous upload located at the bottom of this form.
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: 29 - Residential Developments
NWP Number Other:
List all IWV nurrbers you are applying for not on the drop down list.
1c. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:*
check all that apply
IJ 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular r 401 Water Quality Certification - Express
F Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit r Riparian Buffer Authorization
r Individual Permit
*
1d. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
O Yes O No
For the record only for Corps Permit: O Yes O No

1e. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program
f Yes C No
1f. Is the project located in anyof NC's twentycoastal counties?*
r Yes C No
1h. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?*
f Yes f• No
Link to trout information: http://vmw.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-ProgranVAgency-Coordination/Trout.aspx
B. Applicant Information
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Michael Brame
1b. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
(xxx)xxx-xxxx
[phone]
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
V Owner r Applicant (other than owner) r Agent/Consultant
(Check all that apply)
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Canter Properties, LLC
2b. Deed book and page no.:
008027-02680
2c. Responsible party:
(for Corporations)
Kenneth Canter
2d. Address
Street Address
2100 Fairfax Road
Address Line 2
city
Greensboro
Fbstal / Zip Code
27407
2e. Telephone Number:
(xxx)xxx-xxxx
[phone]
2f. Fax Number:
(xxx)xxx-xxxx
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
...........
State/ Province/ legion
NC
Country
us
C. Project Information and Prior Project History

1. Project Information
1a. Name of project:*
Single Family Residence
1b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
1c. Nearest municipality / town:*
Greensboro
1d. Driving directions*
If it is a new project and can not easily be found in a GPS crapping system Please provide directions.
3313 Gaston Road, Greensboro, NC 27407
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
(tax PIN or parcel ID)
7832732824
2b. Property size:
(in acres)
2.15
2c. Project Address
Street Address
3313 Gaston Road
Address Line 2
City
State/ Province/ Pagion
Greensboro
NC
Pbstal / Zip ( :)de
Country
27407
us
2d. Site coordinates in decimal degrees
Please collect site coordinates in decimal degrees. Use between 4-6 digits (unless you are using a survey -grade GPS device) after the decimal place as
appropriate, based on how the location was determined. (For example, most mobile phones with GPS provide locational precision in decimal degrees to
map coordinates to 5 or 6 digits after the decimal place.)
Latitude:* Longitude:*
36.010272 -79.888557
ex: 34.208504 -77.796371
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Reddicks Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
WS -Iv
Surface Water Lookup
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Cape Fear
River Basin Lookup

4. Project Description
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
The site is being developed with a single family residence and associated driveway. Surrounding properties
include a golf course, wooded land and single family residences.
4b. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for
DWR)
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
USGS (Use).pdf
File type mist be pdf
883.23KB
4c. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site.
(for DWR)
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
Soils (Use).pdf 3.01 MB
File type must be pdf
4d. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0
4e. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
(intermittent and perennial)
125
4f. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
The purpose of the proposed project is to develop the site with a single family residence.
4g. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
The overall project consists of development of the site with a single family residence and associated driveway. The
driveway has been constructed across a stream on the site in order to access the construction site of the
residence. To facilitate development of the site and construction of the proposed stream crossing, clearing and
grading the site is necessary. Graders, haulers, excavators and other heavy equipment will be used during site
construction. A water supply well will be drilled on the site to provide water to the residence. Sanitary sewer
services will be used at the site. The site will tie into existing sewer lines located on the east side of the stream and
there will be no additional impacts to jurisdictional features associated with the sewer line connection.
4h. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
1311-14 FINAL PLAT RECOMB-EXHIBIT 2-20-18 Stream Exhibit06-01-
— — — — — 198.31 KB
18—Rev—CPT-06-05-18.pdf
File type rrust be pdf
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas? *
r Yes f No r Unknown
Comments:
The stream is high -banked. Wetlands are not present. The lower reach of
the stream was dry at the time of our site visit. The stream is intermittent
based on our observations.
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
r Preliminary r Approved r Unknown r N/A
Corps AID Number:
Bcample: SAWt-2017-99999
The USACE has not verified the site to the best of my knowledge.
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Michael Brame

Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
Pilot Environmental, Inc.
5d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
The site has not been verified by the USACE or the NCDWR.
5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload
Crick the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
File type must be FDF
6. Project History
6a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
f Yes C No f Unknown
7. Future Project Plans
7a. Is this a phased project?*
f Yes C No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the
proposed project or related activity? This includes other separate and distant crossing for linear projects that require Department of the
Army authorization but don't require pre -construction notification.
I am not aware of other permits that are associated with the development of
the site.
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
F Wetlands V Streams -tributaries r Buffers
r- Open Waters r Pond Construction
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites
impacted.
3a. Reason for impact*3b.lmpact 3c. Type of impact*3d. Stream name* 3e. Stream 3f. Type of 3g. Stream 3h. Impact s fe
type* Type* Jurisdiction* width* length*
S1 Road Crossing P Culvert Unnamed Intermittent Both 3 34 1
Nbp label (e.g. Road Crossing Permanent (F' or Perennial (FES or Average (linear feet) 0
1) Temporary (T) intermittent (INT) (feet) 9
** All Perennial or Intermittent streams must be verified by DWR or delegated local government.
3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
3i. Total permanent stream impacts:
34
3i. Total temporarystream impacts:
0
3i. Total stream and tributary impacts:
34
3j. Comments:

In order to access the a single family residence (under construction), a driveway has been constructed. The
driveway crosses a stream and a 36 inch flared end section concrete culvert impacted 34 linear feet of intermittent
stream channel.
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:*
The culvert was installed in an area where the stream was relatively straight. The road crossing was installed as
near to perpendicular to the stream as practical. Additionally, the road crossing was designed in an area where it
was not necessary to remove mature trees such as those located up and down -gradient of the culvert.
The residence will utilize municipal sanitary sewer services and has been designed to avoid additional impacts to
jurisdictional features associated with sewer line connection. The sanitary sewer services will connect to existing
sewer lines located between the residence and the stream to avoid additional impacts.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:*
The culvert has been installed on the site. The culvert was installed in the dry and there is no evidence that
sediment was discharged during the installation. A flared end culvert was used to avoid impacts associated with rip
rap.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
f Yes r No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
Based on the amount of impacts, mitigation is not proposed.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
**' Recent changes to the stormwater rules have required updates to this section .***
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection
Rules?
r Yes f No
1b. All buffer impacts and high ground impacts require diffuse flow or other form of stormwater treatment. If the project is subject to a
state implemented riparian buffer protection program, include a plan that fully documents how diffuse flow will be maintained.
All Stormwater Control Measures (SCM)s must be designed in accordance with the NC Stormwater Design Manual. Associated
supplement forms and other documentation shall be provided.
What type of SCM are you providing?
F Level Spreader
rJ Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHWT)
F Wetland Swale (higher SHWT)
F Other SCM that removes minimum 30% nitrogen
(check all that apply)
For a list of options to meet the diffuse flow requirements, click here.
Diff us Flow Documentation
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach docun ent
File type rrust be FDF
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250? *

f Yes r No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?*
r Yes
f No
To look up low density requirement click here 15A NCAC 02H.1003(2).
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land? *
r Yes r No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or
DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0200)? *
f Yes r No
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
r Yes r No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
A violation has not been issued. The stream that was impacted is a weakly defined intermittent stream, especially
in the area of impact. Portions of the stream have rooted vegetation growing in them and very weak stream
characteristics. The client installed the culvert in order to access the buildable portion of his property. Because a
stream shows up on the USGS and other maps observed by the permitting department, they required that a
stream determination be performed. Pilot was contracted to delineate streams and wetlands on the site. During our
site visit, a culvert was observed that impacted a weakly defined intermittent stream. This is the reason that the
landowner is applying for an after the fact permit.
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional development, which could impact
nearby downstream water quality?*
f Yes r No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
One single family residence is being constructed on the lot. Neither the residence or associated sewer lines will
impact jurisdictional areas. Other future impacts are not anticipated.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
f Yes r Nor N/A
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?
f Yes r No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
f Yes r No
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?*

f Yes r No
5f. Will you cut anytrees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
f Yes r No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
f Yes r No
Link to the NLEB SLOPES document: http://saw-reg.usace.army.mil/NLEB/1-30-17-signed_NLEB-SLOPES&apps.pdf
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
f Yes r No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers,
mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
f Yes r No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
Pilot consulted the USFWS List of Protected Species for Guilford County. The USFWS identifies the following
protected species in Guilford County: small whorled pogonia (T). Based on our observations, suitable habitat for
small whorled pogonia is not located on the site.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
f Yes r No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
The stream is intermittent and was dry with the exception of a stagnant pool at the time of our site visit. The stream
does not provide suitable habitat for fish species.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
Link to the State Historic Preservation Office Historic Properties Map (does not include archaeological data: http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoveb/
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural
preservation status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)?*
r Yes f No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
The site is located within the Pilot Life - Sedgefield Historic District. The land use in this district is for residential
purposes. The land use is not changing. This will fit the general land use of the district.
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
alck the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
NCSHPO HPO Map.pdf 202.46KB
File must be FDF
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
Link to the FEMA Floodplain Maps: https:Hmsc.fema.gov/portal/search
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?*
f Yes r No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
FEMA FIRM 3710783200J
Miscellaneous
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.

Qick the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach docurrent
FEMA FIRM.pdf
123.52KB
Agent Authorization. pdf
23.37KB
GIS Information.pdf
135.96KB
DP-1.pdf
103.26KB
NCDWR Stream Form.pdf
300.34KB
File mist be FDF or IME
Signature
V By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
■ I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
■ I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic
Transactions Act');
■ I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic
Transactions Act');
■ I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
■ I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:*
Michael T. Brame
Signature
Mow/ 7- , ►'are
Date Submitted:
6/5/2018
Initial Review
..................................................................................................................................................................................
Is this project a public transportation project?*(?)
O Yes r No
Change only 9 needed.
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
r Yes
f No
BIMS # Assigned*
20180777
Version#*
1
Reviewing Office*
Winston-Salem Regional Office - [phone]
Select Project Reviewer*
Sue Homewood:eads\slhomewood
Is a payment required for this project?*
f No payment required
r Fee received
r Fee needed - send electronic notification
What amout is owed?*
r $240.00
C $570.00

EX. 36" RCP
EX. GRAVEL
DRIVEWAY
INV. IN: 802.85
INV. OUT: 802.47
EX. FES
EX. FES
SITE INFORMATION:
OWNER: CANTER PROPERTIES, LLC

2100 FAIRFAX RD.
GREENSBORO, NC 27407
NUMBER OF LOTS: 1
SITE AREA: 2.146 AC±
PARCEL ID: 0225756
PIN: 7832732824
DEED REFERENCE: DB. 8027 PG. 2690
ZONING: RS-20
SUBJECT PROPERTY IS NOT SUBJECT TO A 100 YEAR
RETURN FREQUENCY FLOOD HAZARD, AND SUCH FLOOD
CONDITION IS SHOWN ON THE FEDERAL FLOOD INSURANCE
RATE MAP NO. #3710783200J, REV. 6/18/2007.
SITE IS LOCATED IN THE LOWER RANDLEMAN LAKE WATERSHED.
(DEEP RIVER WS IV)
PIPE X-SECTION
SCALE: 1" = 40' HOR., 1" = 4' VERT.F:\Projects\1311-14\RECORD\1311-14_FINAL PLAT_RECOMB-EXHIBIT_2-20-18_Stream Exhibit_06-01-18.dwg, Stream Exhibit, 6/5/2018 2:28:23 PM, 1:1
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X

Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?Yes No X

Remarks:

HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)

Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:

Remarks:

Project/Site: 3313 Gaston Road City/County: Greensboro/Guilford Sampling Date: June 5, 2018
Applicant/Owner: Kenneth Canter State: NC Sampling Point: DP-1
Investigator(s): Pilot Section, Township, Range: NA
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.) Flood plain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Gentle Slope
Slope (%): 2-3 Lat: 36.010279 Long: -79.888498 Datum: WGS 84
Soil Map Unit Name: EnD – Enon fine sandy loam NWI Classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.Sampling Point DP-1
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30’ )
Absolute
% Cover
Dominant
Species?
Indicator
Status
1. Liquidambar styraciflua 20 Y FAC
2. Acer rubrum 20 Y FAC
3. Liriodendron tulipifera 10 Y FAC
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
50 = Total Cover
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15’ )
1. Liquidambar styraciflua 10 Y FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
10 = Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5’ )
1. Polystichum acrostichoides 5 Y FAC
2. Toxicodendron radicans 15 Y FAC
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
20 = Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30’ )
1. Smilax rotundifolia 5 Y FAC
2. Vitis rotundifolia 5 Y FAC
3.
4.
5.
6.
10 = Total Cover

Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 8 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 8 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B)

Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species X 2 =
FAC species X 3 =
FACU species X 4 =
UPL species X 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is > 50%
3 - Prevalence Test is ≤ 3.0
1
4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:

Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm)
or more in diameter at breast height (DBH),
regardless of height.

Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.

Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.

Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.

Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)

SOIL Sampling Point: DP-1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type
1 Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 4/4 100 Loam
4-18 7.5YR 4/6 100 Loam

1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Suface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)(MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3)(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Red Parent Material (TF2)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136)
3Indicators of Hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present, unless
disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (s4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Stripped Matrix (S6)

Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):

Hydric Soil Present?Yes No X

Remarks:

LEGEND
Site Boundary
FEMA FIRM
3313 Gaston Road
Approximate 2.15 Acre Tract
Greensboro, Guilford County, NC
Pilot Project 3784
Drawing 4
FEMA FIRM Panel
3710783200J
Effective 6.18.2007
Not to Scale

NCSHPO HPO Website
3313 Gaston Road
Approximate 2.15 Acre Tract
Greensboro, Guilford County, NC
Pilot Project 3784
Drawing 6
NCSHPO HPO Website
Not to Scale
SITE
Published Soil Map
3313 Gaston Road
Approximate 2.15 Acre Tract
Greensboro, Guilford County, NC
Pilot Project 3784
Drawing 2A
USDA Soil Survey
of Guilford County, NC
Published 1977, Sheet 32
Not to Scale
LEGEND
Site Boundary
SITE
USGS Topographic Map
3313 Gaston Road
Approximate 2.15 Acre Tract
Greensboro, Guilford County, NC
Pilot Project 3784
Drawing 1
USGS Topographic Map
Greensboro, Guilford, High Point & 
Pleasant Garden, NC Quadrangles
Scale:  1” = 2,000’
LEGEND
Site Boundary