The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutR5829_Final_PJD_Package_FullSTATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ROY COOPER GOVERNOR May 29, 2018 ATTN: Mr. Tom Steffens U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Washington Regulatory Field Office 2407 West Sth Street Washington, North Carolina 27889 JAMES H. TROGDON, III SECRETARY SUBJECT: Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Package (PJD) for the following Natural Resources Technical Report: TIP R-5829 — Improvements to US 70 from US 70A west of Princeton to the Goldsboro Bypass in Johnston and Wayne Counties, NC. Mr. Steffens: The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to improve US 70 from US 70A west of Princeton, to the Goldsboro Bypass in Johnston and Wayne Counties, NC. Below and attached are a brief description of the project, figures depicting all features, and appropriate forms. Field work was conducted on the following dates: 2017 — October 13, 18-19, 24-27, 31; November 1-3, 6-10; 2018 — May 2-3. Three Oaks Engineering (Three Oaks) staff inembers, led primarily by Nathan Howell and Chris Sheats, conducted the site investigation (Figure 1). One hundred and twelve potential jurisdictional features (26 streams, 52 wetlands, 22 tributaries, and 12 ponds) were identified (Tables 1- 4; Figures 2 and 3). NC Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) Stream Identification forms are included for each potential jurisdictional stream. US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Wetland Determination forms (both wetland and upland forms) are included for each potential jurisdictional wetland. Three exempt stormwater basins were located within the study area and are included within the attached Rapanos Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form (Appendix C). Field data was collected for both NC Stream Assessment Method (NCSAM) forms for degraded streams and NC Wetland Assessment Method (NCWAM) forms for degraded wetlands. Several of the NCWAM forms were completed and included in this package. However, there is currently a technical issue related to the NCWAM and NCSAM Microsoft Excel Rating Calculators and their compatibility with the Three Oaks computer operating system. Therefore, the remaining NCWAM forms and all the NCSAM forms could not be completed at this time. Three Oaks has contacted the NCSAM and NCWAM Assessment Teams and are awaiting a resolution to the issue. Once possible, the remaining forms will be provided to USACE. Mailirag Address: NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS — DNISION 4 Telephone: (252) 640-6530 Customer Service: I -877-368-4968 Wehsite: www.ncdot.gov Location: 5009 WARD BLVD P.O. BOX 3165 WILSON, NC 27895 Table 1. Potential 'urisdictional streams in the stud area. Stream Name Map ID NCDWR Index Best Usage Figure Number Classification Beaverdam Creelc Beaverdam Creelc 27-55 WS-IV; NSW 3-5/7 UT to Moccasin Creek SA 27-53-(0.5 C; NSW 3-1 UT to Moccasin Creek SB 27-53-(0.5 C; NSW 3-1 UT to Moccasin Creek SC 27-53-(0.5 C; NSW 3-1 UT to Little River SD 27-57- 20.2 WS-IV; NSW 3-7 UT to Little River SE 27-57-(20.2) WS-IV; NSW 3-7/8/9 UT to Little River SF 27-57- 20.2 WS-IV; NSW 3-8/9 UT to Little River SG 27-57- 20.2 WS-IV; NSW 3-12 UT to Little River SH 27-57- 20.2 WS-IV; NSW 3-12 UT to Little River SI 27-57-(20.2 WS-IV; NSW 3-12 UT to Little River SJ 27-57- 20.2 WS-IV; NSW 3-12 UT to Little River SK 27-57- 20.2 WS-IV; NSW 3-12 UT to Little River SL 27-57- 20.2 WS-IV; NSW 3-12 UT to Little River SM 27-57-(20.2) WS-IV; NSW 3-13 UT to Little River SN 27-57- 20.2 WS-IV; NSW 3-14 UT to Little River SO 27-57- 20.2 WS-IV; NSW 3-14 UT to Little River SP 27-57- 20.2 WS-IV; NSW 3-15 UT to Little River SQ 27-57-(20.2) WS-IV; NSW 3-15 UT to Little River SR 27-57- 20.2 WS-IV; NSW 3-14 UT to Little River SS 27-57- 20.2 WS-IV; NSW 3-14 UT to Little River ST 27-57- 20.2 WS-IV; NSW 3-14 UT to Little River SU 27-57-(20.2) WS-IV; NSW 3-14 UT to Little River SV 27-57- 20.2 WS-IV; NSW 3-14 UT to Little River SW 27-57- 20.2 WS-IV; NSW 3-14 UT to Little River SX 27-57- 20.2 WS-IV; NSW 3-14 UT to Little River SY 27-57-(20.2) WS-IV; NSW 3-16 Table 2. Characteristics of otential 'urisdictional streams in the stud area Compensatory River Basin Appears on Map ID Length (ft.) Classification NRCS Soil Mitigation Required Buffer Surve ? Beaverdam Creek 918 Perennial Yes Sub'ect Yes SA 538 Perennial Yes Sub'ect Yes SB 320 Intermittent Undetermined Sub'ect Yes SC 218 Perennial Yes Sub�ect Yes SD 623 Perennial Yes Sub�ect Yes SE 410 Perennial Yes Sub'ect Yes SF-I 250 Intermittent Undetermined Sub'ect Yes SF-P 1,002 Perennial Yes Sub'ect Yes SG 204 Perennial Yes Not Sub'ect No SH-I 164 Intermittent Undetermined Not Sub'ect No SH-P 785 Perennial Yes Sub'ect Yes SI 257 Perennial Yes Not Sub'ect No Table 2. Characteristics of otential 'urisdictional streams in the stud area (continued) Compensatory River Basin Appears on Map ID Length (ft.) Classification NRCS Soil Mitigation Required Buffer Surve ? SJ-I 356 Intennittent Undetennined Sub�ect Yes SJ-P 1,034 Perennial Yes Sub�ect Yes SK 247 Intennittent Yes Not Sub�ect No SL-I 108 Intermittent Undetermined Not Sub�ect No SL-P 229 Perennial Yes Not Sub�ect No SM-I 245 Intermittent Undetermined Sub�ect Yes SM-P 902 Perennial Yes Sub�ect Yes SN 344 Perennial Yes Not Sub�ect No SO 1,759 Perennial Yes Sub�ect Yes SP 125 Perennial Yes Sub�ect Yes SQ 72 Perennial Yes Not Sub�ect No SR 406 Perennial Yes Sub�ect Yes SS 254 Perennial Yes Sub�ect Yes ST-I 101 Intermittent Undetermined Sub�ect Yes ST-P 159 Perennial Yes Sub�ect Yes SU 152 Perennial Yes Sub�ect Yes SV 1,218 Perennial Yes Sub�ect Yes SW 211 Perennial Yes Not Sub�ect No SX 87 Perennial Yes Not Sub�ect No SY-I 73 Intermittent Undetermined Not Sub�ect No SY-P 130 Perennial Yes Not Sub�ect No Total 13,901 Table 3. Characteristics of otential 'urisdictional wetlands in the stud area Map NCWAM Classification NCWAM Hydrologic Figure Area (ac.) ID Ratin Classification WA Riverine Swam Forest — Ri arian 3-2 0.45 WB Riverine Swam Farest — Ri arian 3-2 0.18 WC Headwater Forest Low* Ri arian 3-1/2 8.36 WD Riverine Swam Forest — Ri arian 3-1 1.97 WE Headwater Forest Low* Ri arian 3-2 5.91 WF Headwater Forest — Ri arian 3-2 1.55 WG Headwater Forest — Ri arian 3-1 0.02 WH Pine Flat Low* Non-ri arian 3-3 0.64 WI Headwater Forest — Ri arian 3-4 0.36 WJ Headwater Forest Low Ri arian 3-5 1.95 WK Pine Flat — Non-ri arian 3-4 4.36 WL Headwater Forest Low Ri arian 3-5 1.93 WM Headwater Forest — Ri arian 3-4 0.08 WN Basin Wetland — Non-ri arian 3-5 <0.01 WO Headwater Forest Low Ri arian 3-7 3.62 WP Bottomland Hardwood Forest — Ri arian 3-7 1.86 WQ Headwater Forest — Ri arian 3-7/8 2.64 Table 3. Characteristics of otential 'urisdictional wetlands in the stud area (continued) Map NCWAM Classification NCWAM Hydrologic Figure Area (ac.) ID Ratin Classification WR Headwater Forest - Ri arian 3-8/9 0.69 WS Bottomland Hardwood Forest - Ri arian 3-9 0.84 WT Riverine Swam Forest - Ri arian 3-10 0.02 WU Basin Wetland Low Non-ri arian 3-11 0.09 WV Headwater Forest - Ri arian 3-12 0.28 WW Riverine Swam Forest - Ri arian 3-12 0.32 WX Flood lain Pool - Ri arian 3-12 0.04 WY Headwater Forest - Ri arian 3-13 0.45 WZ Headwater Forest Medium* Ri arian 3-15 2.52 WAA Headwater Forest - Ri arian 3-14 1.40 WBB Headwater Forest - Ri arian 3-14 0.01 WCC Headwater Forest - Ri arian 3-14 037 WDD Bottomland Hardwood Forest - Ri arian 3-14 0.54 WEE Bottomland Hardwood Forest - Ri arian 3-14 0.73 WFF Headwater Forest - Ri arian 3-14 0.45 WGG Headwater Forest - Ri arian 3-14 0.18 WHH Headwater Forest - Ri arian 3-14 0.04 WII Basin Wetland - Non-ri arian 3-14 0.15 WJJ Headwater Forest Low* Ri arian 3-14 0.01 WKK Bottomland Hardwood Forest - Ri arian 3-14 0.03 WLL Headwater Forest - Ri arian 3-14 0.98 WMM Headwater Forest Low Ri arian 3-14 0.41 WNN Headwater Forest Low Ri arian 3-14 0.05 WOO Pine Flat - Non-ri arian 3-15 1.66 WPP Pine Flat - Non-ri arian 3-15 039 WQQ Pine Flat - Non-ri arian 3-15 0.01 WRR Pine Flat - Non-ri arian 3-16 0.06 WSS Headwater Forest - Ri arian 3-16 0.08 WTT Headwater Forest - Ri arian 3-16 0.09 WUU Headwater Forest Low Ri arian 3-16 0.02 WVV Headwater Forest Low Ri arian 3-16 0.05 WWW Pine Flat - Non-ri arian 3-17 8.34 WXX Pine Flat - Non-ri arian 3-17 0.05 WYY Headwater Forest - Ri arian 3-18 <0.01 WZZ Headwater Forest - Ri arian 3-14 <0.01 Total 57.23 Note: NCWAM forms were completed for wetlands possessing characteristics conducive to their receiving a lower functional rating score and subsequent mitigation ratio. The functional rating scores for these wetlands are presented above. Some wetlands may contain both low and high-quality characteristics (e.g., when a portion of a wetland has been clearcut, or occurs within a utility easement that receives regular disturbance). In instances where an NCWAM form was completed for a portion of a wetland, an asterisk will be shown beside the NCWAM rating. Note: Some NCWAM forms for this project have not been completed at this time due to technical issues. Once those forms are completed, they will be provided to USACE and this table will be updated. Table 4. Surface waters in the stud area Map ID of Length (1�/Area (ac) Surface Water Jurisdictional Connection in Stud Area Figure TA Yes SB/WC 152 linear feet 3-1 TB Yes WG/PA 248 linear feet 3-1 TC Yes Beaverdam Creek 1,215 linear feet 3-5 TD Yes Beaverdam Creelc 855 linear feet 3-5 TE Yes Beaverdam Creelc 6501inear feet 3-5 TF Yes Beaverdam Creek 6371inear feet 3-4 TG Yes Beaverdam Creelc 175 linear feet 3-4 TH Yes Beaverdam Creek S 101inear feet 3-4 TI Yes Beaverdam Creek 33 linear feet 3-4 TJ Yes WM 116 linear feet 3-4 TK Yes (outside stud area) N/A 141 linear feet 3-4/3-6 TL Yes (outside stud area) N/A 1,2541inear feet 3-7 TM Yes (outside stud area) N/A 1121inear feet 3-7 TN Yes outside stud area N/A 2871inear feet 3-7 TO Yes WP 61 linear feet 3-7 TP Yes WQ/SE 268 linear feet 3-7 TQ Yes SK 247 linear feet 3-12 TR Yes SM 438 linear feet 3-13 TS Yes SV/PH 92 linear feet 3-15 TT Yes (outside stud area) N/A 3721inear feet 3-16 TU Yes WVV/PJ 98 linear feet 3-16 TV Yes outside stud area N/A 573 linear feet 3-18 Holts Pond Yes WA 0.68 acres 3-2 PA Yes WG 0.08 acres 3-1 PB No None 0.29 acres 3-4 PC No None 0.19 acres 3-5 PD No None 0.47 acres 3-7 PE Yes WQ/SE 0.21 acres 3-7 PF Yes SM 0.04 acres 3-13 PG Yes SP 1.96 acres 3-15 PH Yes SV 0.69 acres 3-15 PI No None 0.08 acres 3-15 PJ Yes WSS/WTT/WUU 1.22 acres 3-16 PK No None 0.60 acres 3-18 If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me by phone at (252)-640- 6427 or email at tccoggins@ncdot.gov. This is a request for concurrence with our assessment. We appreciate your assistance on this project. Sincerely, DocuSigned by: c�.a� %��.5 FA1DF1361A89464... Chad Coggins North Carolina Division of Transportation Division of Highways — Division 4 Environmental Officer 509 Ward Blvd. Wilson, NC 27895 Cc: Rob Ridings, NCDWR Eric Alsmeyer, USACE Appendix A Figures Vicinity Map Upgrade US 70 To Interstate Standards From US 70 Goldsboro Bypass To West of SR 2314 (Pondfield Rd) Wayne / Johnston Counties, North Carolina � R-5829 Study Area Streets Streams i � L � County Boundary Date: May 2018 Scale: 0 1,250 2,500 Feet Job No.: ' ' 17-008 Drawn By: Checked By: CMR NDH Figure �,� ,,I -- t ; i � � � ��, � , a. � �� ,`�� —.�--� � ; �� /i' . � _- � � � �^+ �O � �' � - -_ � ' �� J J , � � - -- ( �- - �� (� /', �.3 �,, -_ � ��/� i �_ � � � _ a�'- _ _ so ^` 1 �; :> _, `� � �� '�I `,,f ; 1` , - 1 . �, i � _ - � f } , � . �... . ;I ,�__ � � �; � � _-, �- -_ r � ,� ,�,�, _i / _ � - ____ ` � o�, � \� � i� . / � �0 � � -� � � _ � � � �t �_" _. ,..�J � 1 N � .` �-` �� ' � o F RAI ,l r"��' L Rp `�'' , � i � / - _ v r `% 1 CEj� (� -, , +� , , , � � � \ �,�' I� �.�� -� _�.� S I � 1' -/, , ; . � ` F'- :�z� pR,� , � �I 1, �_ � � 1:_ ;,:-� , �. ;,1 - 1.�-- `�:` _ % '/t � �VIL'�f - _ . . "�� jy ' 1 � . ; _�J . J 12S _ ` �'�t �p1� \ � 1 � TJ ��- ' \C�11�;• - ; ! !i'i, I, i - I �� WM - /r� `' 'v 1 , i �..1" � w� �FkSheet 4 ,s', / t fl•.• � / ,. _i j ` f`� , ` I o '_ f '. , , �✓, l, SC PB :'' � / � � � ' I � �� / ' SC - - - WM ~ ; . . �_"�/ ' ;:-' �. � 1 � �� ( i � 4 �� ;,, sn��t � �: � � �� . ,� , TB - ��, �, �� ., � � �' I p �� L J' /" � �� / /I WD TA • PA TF TH Sh�eet'6 �' • ' ' ./ f 6 � -�� ,��%f'. � +I wc SB � Ti � �'�' f � ' � J / � \_ ��,�__ , � ,--, , WA ,� W I ^ � _ � ;1 \ .� 1 ./ �--- �'". ' `- --.,,` Q Wr E T' TH �..� :_ T� � TK � _- ��- -=�- L �i'•� TL • , ��=� _ . I SA TE � _ � WE Sheet 7 � - -' ?� WB W� TC��` , ~� . � TO SD WP �A� 5 R__n- -.�..;y�� ' � I �J , f Hoits ,; '� Sheet 2 � _ � % o � pond '-� �� WF Sheet 5 `BA �WN , WO - PD � '�� /} �� /l l ,1 -1 . ,�l .,� �u r ..r � I� '�_. ',i � �, `,� ; � _ '�. � - _ , � - J �J � � � ��' � �� /� -_. _ o_ � � G CJ. �- �� Y.� _ �-' � r � ^� �� ,� : �-� 'y-�s� G - •. - �/ ` r��-�_} U�'(F'y : � .`f': ` DA/,pYRp i .- ^,+�� %1s,� � n / :i1 _ \� ..`��,�_ ._ ' i� �� - ; z, � , ,� - S h @ @t 9 , �. . �.� � ' �ia�cm�---- � �., J 1, / .� • � �, � � � < , C Beaverdam�' TN SE �1 l� � fl , �/ � �� `�sr � Creek� . BC _ _ _ / �`-� `�_ �� nc�,� - '`� Ts aoiV R p WH �., � � SF � WS � � ;' I � ` -, �� "' �1;� �� . R� � 4.P . � _ � �,. f '`- / \ � ` ` ' � Sheet 3 _ � ,.� � BB \sF �: 8F WT i .:, �� ;� + ,,. r �, -� � � �`` � - � ��'� sneet s �-- , ` � �� ,� �, wR Sheet,10 ' __ p r 1 � +! ��, � ,``� U�? 'J' , / . - i l + 0�� ` O �� ' � � �_ , � y _ _ � __ ''�<<n^ ` s� -�', ` �� I O �, _r, O, f� �-� , �� I TC/ Jf 1 ��/ �� y �I� r , �, (-` I �- I � ,�\ � '�� \, ��,.�--`-� ' �-a �^ � S h eet 12 � `� � o ,,.� � � J !� + � ` � �Sp-., - i ' SV �I _ , � _ WKK p I H��ton •�. � r SJ �A �-_ � � � �/ , � ' /�e�d �\,� , si Sfieet 14 sv � -�-- p I�; "� � i � J '�_ \ ' WU S� S� '' f , `�� `�.'-_ - ' I � �. '--1 h, . < <,,, • SV .;�1- � -_ � '� � ��'�.- _ /� � Sh'eet 11 SM SM � ;J � . �.-- i� ' SM � � �1 � �- � -� � � � SR WMM �heet 1� �` ,,� �a �f�r�f� Fi�f' - ; � J � u " .� �, _� � \ l � - ;, - � "i . / � �� 'K�n � J �SO WNN � ,,t� Pond Sheet 13 P� �\ � i., ` �� ) - � �� D -- � � Q i . �=' W�gg�PH SV . ; � i � �. `1,�?I _ � � x �.% ' _ TR `SO �`� _ SY WUU - � .� i rn ..`� . , . i �, _�i_=J, J ` -_ -� _ z / rG, - _ �. SP PI .---� � � `� e�= � � _ � - o - _ � , �'� . -�-, WZ �. wss ,n�,,;- t � �� . �; ' �..� � '� � � � ~ ---=--9--- �o � : - s3 -� �,y��1 I wz Sheet 15 wPP TU Sheet 18 � _ --- �'i � . � � '/, x' _ - \ ,I , ; PG � _ �; g _�J o �� ( � � -»o� _ :.� .ti- � - nttr� � �, l -_ 1 -� � �._ 1 \ �L. . � - - . � - -� , ~� f� \. -I : , - TV - - C Hf[ FA,p,y q - �� \ / �: / ,� � Sheet 17 — - --Ka T . � ' •1,, l' WXX � � - _ , � _ J `'�1 _f : �� r � ` ��,. i � 1 ''g' �' ', - � � ^�, _ � C� %� . � , \ � _ ? Q � _ ,{� c .� � ��;.. .� �, � — � , �t'� 1 1 } � r, / �` ;� ��` _< • :.�, y J . ; PK `�_ - n � � -- f fVA?�'� F'� 1� f ' ' _. , - � - - C�. _ _\/� �'' � � , � �� '1 �� - i� �. � _ - - -- - ,l �_ , �p - \ Y . ' �_ � - ' . � , 2 , �� : _..._��-, ;t_ /r ��o ; y ' i5 �C - % I ," I � II °+' -- �9 ' l _ � ` � Q _,--� � �� ' ` , f'�( _ i -'-� � I � , ��iy� �� . / . _( - -- ti �,r _ �..� % ' � „ ~� \�, • -,� � + -,_ t,r � 1 �F �, r ''� `J`l_ ``i � _ � \� C`, �� - �� ! � -n `''� � �j-:�,, Ji � ` !1`-r ( �l� � -J - � J �� c�� 1 s, Z � , �-� , s- `�� f _ e = �_'�- = 1 � �' . � � � /i r - � _ � / � �i� � U I� � . ,�rp / �- , ��_ �` I �� } ' r == y , �-' �.,t.s. ., - � __ _ `- '`� ' - i,ake i �' •'., - / �,� ,, USGS The National Map: National Boundaries Dataset, National Elevation Dataset, Geographic Names Information System, National � � Hydrography Dataset, National Lahd Cover Database, National Str'uctures Dataset, and National Transportation Dataset; U.S. Census Bureau - _ __ � � - - TIGER/Line; HERE Road Data ' Jurisdictional Features Sheet Index Upgrade US 70 To Interstate Standards From US 70 Goldsboro Bypass To West of SR 2314 (Pondfield Rd) Wayne / Johnston Counties, North Carolina Q R-5829 Study Area QSheet Index Potential Perennial Stream Potential Intermittent Stream Potential Tributary of the U.S. Culvert Potential Wetland Potential Pond Date: May 2018 Scale: 0 1,250 2,500 Feet Job No.: ' 17-008 Drawn By: Checked By: CMR NDH Jurisdictional Features Map Upgrade US 70 To Interstate Standards From US 70 Goldsboro Bypass To West of SR 2314 (Pondfield Rd) Wayne / Johnston Counties, North Carolina Q R-5829 Study Area QSheet Index Potential Perennial Stream Potential Intermittent Stream Potential Tributary of the U.S. Culvert Potential Wetland Potential Pond Date: May 2018 Scale: 0 175 350 Feet I � � Job No.: 17-008 Drawn By: Checked By: CMR NDH Figure Sheet 1 of 18 Jurisdictional Features Map Upgrade US 70 To Interstate Standards From US 70 Goldsboro Bypass To West of SR 2314 (Pondfield Rd) Wayne / Johnston Counties, North Carolina Q R-5829 Study Area � Sheet Index Potential Perennial Stream Potential Intermittent Stream Potential Tributary of the U.S. Culvert Potential Wetland Potential Pond Date: May 2018 Scale: 0 175 350 Feet I i I Job No.: 17-008 Drawn By: Checked By: CMR NDH Figure Sheet 2 of 18 Jurisdictional Features Map Upgrade US 70 To Interstate Standards From US 70 Goldsboro Bypass To West of SR 2314 (Pondfield Rd) Wayne / Johnston Counties, North Carolina Q R-5829 Study Area � Sheet Index Potential Perennial Stream Potential Intermittent Stream Potential Tributary of the U.S. Culvert Potential Wetland Potential Pond Date: May 2018 Scale: 0 175 350 Feet I i I Job No.: 17-008 Drawn By: Checked By: CMR NDH Figure Sheet 3 of 18 Jurisdictional Features Map Upgrade US 70 To Interstate Standards From US 70 Goldsboro Bypass To West of SR 2314 (Pondfield Rd) Wayne / Johnston Counties, North Carolina Q R-5829 Study Area � Sheet Index Potential Perennial Stream Potential Intermittent Stream Potential Tributary of the U.S. Culvert Potential Wetland Potential Pond Date: May 2018 Scale: 0 175 350 Feet I i I Job No.: 17-008 Drawn By: Checked By: CMR NDH Figure Sheet 4 of 18 Jurisdictional Features Map Upgrade US 70 To Interstate Standards From US 70 Goldsboro Bypass To West of SR 2314 (Pondfield Rd) Wayne / Johnston Counties, North Carolina Q R-5829 Study Area QSheet Index Potential Perennial Stream Potential Intermittent Stream Potential Tributary of the U.S. Culvert Potential Wetland Potential Pond Date: May 2018 Scale: 0 175 350 Feet I � � Job No.: 17-008 Drawn By: Checked By: CMR NDH Figure Sheet 5 of 18 Jurisdictional Features Map Upgrade US 70 To Interstate Standards From US 70 Goldsboro Bypass To West of SR 2314 (Pondfield Rd) Wayne / Johnston Counties, North Carolina Q R-5829 Study Area QSheet Index Potential Perennial Stream Potential Intermittent Stream Potential Tributary of the U.S. Culvert Potential Wetland Potential Pond Date: May 2018 Scale: 0 175 350 Feet I � � Job No.: 17-008 Drawn By: Checked By: CMR NDH Figure Sheet 6 of 18 Jurisdictional Features Map Upgrade US 70 To Interstate Standards From US 70 Goldsboro Bypass To West of SR 2314 (Pondfield Rd) Wayne / Johnston Counties, North Carolina Q R-5829 Study Area QSheet Index Potential Perennial Stream Potential Intermittent Stream Potential Tributary of the U.S. Culvert Potential Wetland Potential Pond Date: May 2018 Scale: 0 175 350 Feet I � � Job No.: 17-008 Drawn By: Checked By: CMR NDH Figure Sheet 7 of 18 Jurisdictional Features Map Upgrade US 70 To Interstate Standards From US 70 Goldsboro Bypass To West of SR 2314 (Pondfield Rd) Wayne / Johnston Counties, North Carolina Q R-5829 Study Area � Sheet Index Potential Perennial Stream Potential Intermittent Stream Potential Tributary of the U.S. Culvert Potential Wetland Potential Pond Date: May 2018 Scale: 0 175 350 Feet I i I Job No.: 17-008 Drawn By: Checked By: CMR NDH Figure Sheet 8 of 18 Jurisdictional Features Map Upgrade US 70 To Interstate Standards From US 70 Goldsboro Bypass To West of SR 2314 (Pondfield Rd) Wayne / Johnston Counties, North Carolina Q R-5829 Study Area QSheet Index Potential Perennial Stream Potential Intermittent Stream Potential Tributary of the U.S. Culvert Potential Wetland Potential Pond Date: May 2018 Scale: 0 175 350 Feet I � � Job No.: 17-008 Drawn By: Checked By: CMR NDH Figure Sheet 9 of 18 Jurisdictional Features Map Upgrade US 70 To Interstate Standards From US 70 Goldsboro Bypass To West of SR 2314 (Pondfield Rd) Wayne / Johnston Counties, North Carolina Q R-5829 Study Area QSheet Index Potential Perennial Stream Potential Intermittent Stream Potential Tributary of the U.S. Culvert Potential Wetland Potential Pond Date: May 2018 Scale: 0 175 350 Feet I � � Job No.: 17-008 Drawn By: Checked By: CMR NDH Figure Sheet 10 of 18 Jurisdictional Features Map Upgrade US 70 To Interstate Standards From US 70 Goldsboro Bypass To West of SR 2314 (Pondfield Rd) Wayne / Johnston Counties, North Carolina Q R-5829 Study Area � Sheet Index Potential Perennial Stream Potential Intermittent Stream Potential Tributary of the U.S. Culvert Potential Wetland Potential Pond Date: May 2018 Scale: 0 175 350 Feet I i I Job No.: 17-008 Drawn By: Checked By: CMR NDH Figure Sheet 11 of 18 Jurisdictional Features Map Upgrade US 70 To Interstate Standards From US 70 Goldsboro Bypass To West of SR 2314 (Pondfield Rd) Wayne / Johnston Counties, North Carolina Q R-5829 Study Area � Sheet Index Potential Perennial Stream Potential Intermittent Stream Potential Tributary of the U.S. Culvert Potential Wetland Potential Pond Date: May 2018 Scale: 0 175 350 Feet I i I Job No.: 17-008 Drawn By: Checked By: CMR NDH Figure Sheet 12 of 18 Jurisdictional Features Map Upgrade US 70 To Interstate Standards From US 70 Goldsboro Bypass To West of SR 2314 (Pondfield Rd) Wayne / Johnston Counties, North Carolina Q R-5829 Study Area QSheet Index Potential Perennial Stream Potential Intermittent Stream Potential Tributary of the U.S. Culvert Potential Wetland Potential Pond Date: May 2018 Scale: 0 175 350 Feet I � � Job No.: 17-008 Drawn By: Checked By: CMR NDH Figure Sheet 13 of 18 Jurisdictional Features Map Upgrade US 70 To Interstate Standards From US 70 Goldsboro Bypass To West of SR 2314 (Pondfield Rd) Wayne / Johnston Counties, North Carolina Q R-5829 Study Area QSheet Index Potential Perennial Stream Potential Intermittent Stream Potential Tributary of the U.S. Culvert Potential Wetland Potential Pond Date: May 2018 Scale: 0 175 350 Feet I � � Job No.: 17-008 Drawn By: Checked By: CMR NDH Figure Sheet 14 of 18 Jurisdictional Features Map Upgrade US 70 To Interstate Standards From US 70 Goldsboro Bypass To West of SR 2314 (Pondfield Rd) Wayne / Johnston Counties, North Carolina Q R-5829 Study Area QSheet Index Potential Perennial Stream Potential Intermittent Stream Potential Tributary of the U.S. Culvert Potential Wetland Potential Pond Date: May 2018 Scale: 0 175 350 Feet I � � Job No.: 17-008 Drawn By: Checked By: CMR NDH Figure Sheet 15 of 18 Jurisdictional Features Map Upgrade US 70 To Interstate Standards From US 70 Goldsboro Bypass To West of SR 2314 (Pondfield Rd) Wayne / Johnston Counties, North Carolina Q R-5829 Study Area QSheet Index Potential Perennial Stream Potential Intermittent Stream Potential Tributary of the U.S. Culvert Potential Wetland Potential Pond Date: May 2018 Scale: 0 175 350 Feet I � � Job No.: 17-008 Drawn By: Checked By: CMR NDH Figure Sheet 16 of 18 Jurisdictional Features Map Upgrade US 70 To Interstate Standards From US 70 Goldsboro Bypass To West of SR 2314 (Pondfield Rd) Wayne / Johnston Counties, North Carolina Q R-5829 Study Area QSheet Index Potential Perennial Stream Potential Intermittent Stream Potential Tributary of the U.S. Culvert Potential Wetland Potential Pond Date: May 2018 Scale: 0 175 350 Feet I � � Job No.: 17-008 Drawn By: Checked By: CMR NDH Figure Sheet 17 of 18 Jurisdictional Features Map Upgrade US 70 To Interstate Standards From US 70 Goldsboro Bypass To West of SR 2314 (Pondfield Rd) Wayne / Johnston Counties, North Carolina Q R-5829 Study Area QSheet Index Potential Perennial Stream Potential Intermittent Stream Potential Tributary of the U.S. Culvert Potential Wetland Potential Pond Date: May 2018 Scale: 0 175 350 Feet I � � Job No.: 17-008 Drawn By: Checked By: CMR NDH Figure Sheet 18 of 18 Jurisdictional Features Sheet Index Upgrade US 70 To Interstate Standards From US 70 Goldsboro Bypass To West of SR 2314 (Pondfield Rd) Wayne / Johnston Counties, North Carolina Q R-5829 Study Area OSheet Index Potential Perennial Stream Potential Intermittent Stream Potential Tributary of the U.S. Culvert — Streets Potential Wetland Potential Pond �--- �_ _j County Boundary Date: May 2018 Scale: 0 1,250 2,500 Feet Job No.: ' 17-008 Drawn By: Checked By: CMR NDH Figure �. �R,-�.�7z� - ,'.' . � . ' r;. �� • i ��e � . �� . r �' . �' I t . �+ '�' �" . �� *J�. ' a i � �i � � `' ;- .�.�,,� .�4 11�� + ,�, . � lf � �;, k`.�r . � ��y, +t x�� R� ?9� * � .,i� *C.i� � �� fi�y�� ,� r�� S ~ � . �� . 9��.,'r�i;',�. � �"'h . .f•� r`tR��'StI.' �_�^4�:J��=J �.. �.:1 ��: rtt �`'�,p �. � � ' 1,{rr• �� rs� � _ .. ' �'•�-s�� i��•'�, �-_ •p i- 1',� -. w , :i, �, :�b' � V' . r ti' .,'�`. i 4. s _ +,�eql .'•. :' .. �-: (. ;�� . .. 17 ' ( . 1-+l:�� - ,�`�i ��I �� ' i f� T4�_ �+ �r} . `��- �i. � .� . ..�6�Tl�.��_"f�, S� _ � � �".oj,• y 1�.ti�a��: � � J,1 . ',Jy�� -�� : �. • - �. . �. � � � �, � . . � -- _ *4�y� -^,�:�. slt � ,�'�,� .� 't �, y ��1. ,� � � � � � .., r� r �1[" �' � F`, � [S d � �� +y��..r -� �� rY,. � � .Y ,1� �,�;.y�,-.� � �: Y .. „�-�f . r i`. Y•� ,. . ; � •s - - �r��! ,-��t��' •r' � #. p� - , . _ a^� { : .� .', . . , �-�5�~^laf.l �7�'i-t, y y `> 6-'L .` _ � 1 � �� y�,� ' � , . . . . .. . � � l . �y � � � . � . f�� . . ., V � . +„��^�� r,�.�'4 . Y. ��,�, ��q 'S . ? '''.. 1. •�. �b��,y x � y- . . .� � 'i� � .. , J Ya �+�.�'�Ir-Lr .i� Y;i+y; '�' _ �s} .� �__ , t,:' r ,..�_ ,1: = ��,�C,F�� My t� �! .t•�...�7F� �wr -t. .� .0+.4yaS. �'�•.'� 'M � •�wi.�y!� ��t '� ! . :s ' .' � .. � ..- : . . . yF - ' r � Y Suti . h x•' J a � :r� -.Y ib�.,w�' .t ; � -ry-�- �•y . y �k ^ T_ � Y ` ` � - � ,_- gi.� � � � . i �, `-- - � -r--� f - � � =�''1E- i �.a .' r"1 : ,.r'�rt +a��'i L � .`'i ! � r�_.^`'_. -� .� _ - _& , r i� ' . '✓• Y>. . �.�? • ,r R .LLv � Y , _ .,�?�, 'o. : � . �"•' '' � -" ti ; -��1 ,1 �;i' > . _ _�_ - -_ •• - � � _ � � _ .. -. '{ .'CM ,_;�' :�{'� M ' _` � '�' . ' - 1 � . ' `� -. i i 't� ��. . �.vy . �a'�� '-� �..s1F,C t ��, y�.�,y� �� k i ,� a. ` _.. : v- r • . ;ti. _ - - - � � a �S'.' � �?''f'b�.x;r�f J� ' vc. y!�y� 1„iy'. ., � f'� � . l• L+l4W • _ !' -'`�'� ��1�'�� s �� M� � �a �"� , �� +.r i.sis�� y -AF �- {1. _ � ! � " - � a � iE y ; +. ,-� ' ' l.+ i � - � t�, '; � k• .- , A� �i''H• r . ) ., ,,_� � , - _ ': `" �� ' .D�.�I �.' . - . -. - . - . --_ _ - _�,�, � � •r^ ht r� � � '��; ♦ �e � _ * -srlR'`�' , � f �J �•f,��L yrr�+ . . � �-� -, •, , ti . • . � r `= ` � � -� .�- - ' �'�. �►T � ��k �.''� � � �� '�t .- ? - t � �� -�� _ .� � ti... � .. ,p+r .��!` ,r ��: ,r� � - .i,. 'sFl.. >: � . '+ �''�". ..<. �� -�, .��: :3,.L. .S �' ��'�' � �+�. C.A'��At};i r �} �•V': ► �,�y� r .! j��..�t � �, �'r_� 4_ . � - wt� '�• _, -, fT'i �� .� .,,- 1_ . , �'-�. �.J :1 �, ' �� _� ;-.� . ��" . � - f SC. i� ii�,:� �� i� t �' ` ` ��i� �, � �� , t� a � ' Y � .��:� �4��1 i T1�. �¢y / �` 3��.�i lt. � 1 _ �� : :,�� r .�'�};; - `� ��„r* �, : �`� L�� : �� t" '.}, yM,µ,t�„�_�r, � _ �� .�'• `a.' f-• - •.� . �i'`� .� � � , , � �' -�r= � ;a . . ! . .�f , y - -' .. $-. �}� . •� � �,� �. ' 1 � ��'; ' 4, k: , v V.�I l � � ��:. '. �' , � � � �' ; � k 4 1. � , � l 3�►4�i1 ._ . < _ �Y " ��5 � �� :5 ► �;'� . 'H��+� �� K� ". 1 �1 `,^ r� � . . , � � '. il�� !a 4i .. . i r�k.�� y�,,t�� '�-y �� i�,� _ � .' _ � ti .,�L -r ,F�- �7' 'e- -�} s - + � �Y .L��- � -� �T' � �? S, r- r � f�,. _ P �-.�4. � ��.� t'y �` .� :•i �.,'+ri� :.�..'' . `�A�`4 �?+-� }`� 1 �- _ A �. _ i�Y �?`��1�y �i. � ?i �{ •� �^i { •, ~ � trY _ . '' �� > - �z 4 } � ,�; , .. - , { : - } ��; � :� ' � s ' '�'�� 'w�'�r . � � T� y" � .,.{� �.� � �. �� ql a •'` ��, r , �r+ .'> , ,,,�< ,w� . - � , �- � ,Y,,1 v.u�.- - „ A Y � � �C�� : �. " t t � �. F ' � Y` �. � h � � @ , ' `� ' _ - . `� ��r- ,L� 6� � � �'' ._ . . ` . '��. . �� • ��% , � `J.� '1 � '�r. . � i :•.� .. !!; . T� � b _ � . . br ' .' ..Y - � � ..� , s� '�. - Yw lC#". %'��4� _ r, - . 6 �'. � � '+y . !�' Ors. �o , �+. .^�h - � _�� -r' L i �w ��` t 6 ,� �` �b k ?C, ` - = i, "� ' 1 4 . :� +�: . .,�. . . �.` ��7!'�r�'�fa�`��'_.', �ies�,'�o-'i. y`�.�e�, �`' a�'-'��'�� r t y�,. ' , �� s-.� iM �` . � `� ��f�f4J. � '� ' ` "a7'_ . '� `�� Y �$ � ,. �Y � .�, .. �` �. . _ : � . ..�i - 7 ' .3' � �� , s-�� .- �:. � _'W�-� � - � � r ?!% .�c ,' '�� ,�� .•�:"�. 't �rr.��' � .:'.� i1rc-•'r'ri`�: , � - .�..,., '��''� ��_� � A�r � `iV �� - y 'n . r: ")i J '�,F -.` - � �,� i �y, ' �`� t. • � ��. � .`` _� �� ♦ � r, _ �'� � • ,-�i.�y��:.y�" � ,L � '` ' - 2� � `� 4 `•, �� r �` � . . _ �. 4�ti�: � 3`L �'.z .: �:.. T 1 � . . Y { � j�` .+ I • . � e�' - i � �'�'�'�- . - '�`� - } 3 - � - - - �^t� ' r" _ ,� _ �� —_ - — l s� � I "" r �� -+��r•.�,�.� � � � ''�' �• ''��'- T..r � ..�`'_ 4 'Y7� �w M c.y `�.� y �.� .*=•_ . i � •�r � R f �=4 ;;�� . i £�' _ ,� ��.� - ; ��.�`,,,,Y � �,; - - �; �<�-� t..- s,,. = ` :,C, �' . h 1: �' ) .. M , . . ' y'. , .. _- � . .! f } jy'' ti � .1r� .� - -� � r�r r - 4 Y � - Y�-_�_ .. . _�� _._ y��/f: r ��. .`. ' --- 9 � � ' i - 'r.ff � ��.+ � � �:� �� _, � .�.� WFI '' ``_ ��.�. �� ,� �' �� . �� :: �T �` \ ;�' � - �r �°''�sr !> �: . r :._ l _s � s�� t � ,', , .,� � = fl�� +�'� E'��A► �`��lt i , r �O s :t . �� T � ' �� • A � � �'h = � - ��;-d �,` � �� _ . . , ,, „1,,,,: , , � � � ; � � � j� x �., f=�:� ��I�' . 's� >'�� `4�.I�, �, .�� ;� ♦ __ - _ � � Pf�l��''�.�j �ti,� �_ •-- 1 •- � ��, P 'gT7 , � �' .rs�= _ `��1, �� 1 `'_�1'� �` .� � y 1� �_ ,��,�:. '+�, � , , ��'-� Jd' " `� '�'� —� s'''"�� » �, ; - � �_ .�'�, �'�s yg� � S � �,_ � �� ' :� "' r ♦ '3i ='�' �>.' a +'� �'�� _�4� ;j ^�_ �� 0,. k - �. � :� �� y " .. � •y !j . �r� �, �r ,'�' + � �;? ��• � � •`� o- �' '.�:`tt'� ._ �. `�;.—� •.;� � � � ■ Jurisdictional Features Map Upgrade US 70 To Interstate Standards From US 70 Goldsboro Bypass To West of SR 2314 (Pondfield Rd) Wayne / Johnston Counties, North Carolina Q R-5829 Study Area OSheet Index Potential Perennial Stream Potential Intermittent Stream Potential Tributary of the U.S. Culvert — Streets Potential Wetland Potential Pond �--- �_ _j County Boundary Date: May 2018 Scale: 0 175 350 Feet I � � Job No.: 17-008 Drawn By: Checked By: CMR NDH Figure Sheet 3 of 18 r• � i i R�; . ..i � � � � i �� ' �, �� ii � 'yr ��,j' ��t,l�, �� ik ; � � ��J _ � V ��L ,_ _, r _ -��,�� -��, � , -� , �;;►� � u�i `w .'� , _ � �-°= , f° � �.`�� . .� � _�� t �� v�� ``aa � _ _ �� 1: - : �� ' . � C _e L '�. - h � � �� ' °,� t r ^ � ,_ � ,�. _.; ..� �.��". "�-- _,,,�` i�� ,�� z � '�%y � - . ' ��.�` _ ;, . �4 ' �T -. � � } �� 1:'t�1 . � � �R` � 4 _ ��, � .,.v � I .�4� ,,, � 1 `I r �� _ r � �`s�+ y,��4 ,�r �_ . �'' � . .� � �-� ., � b � a . �.ttz �� 1 .�1- � i-. �� .. �� t�� S ^+t. ,. i ��r 'F li r� �� y �� . . ,� 'f-a�r.. , v.,. ,x- 1 . '� � � , �,c�;, ` �y�}��" �. � : �+' `" �''� �� '- lf'.-�;i��'+ J y` r�. .�-._�� `� , 4. �� : � s� wa; �,� , _. � � � n � II , \, 1 .. .. y��;� ' Y�.1 1� nN w R � t �� } _ <," ` � - � �:'. � � 7s. , � s T � �~. • • �� . - . �+�� -. � � „ ,. . � ,. s :; �� ! ;.�' � .=�,.r�� ,a, '� ` .� '`� '` 1'',�. �, '�`'�r ��.�, ."' t: f`� .�r � _ f=,. � � �' .��,- _ • �•� . _ i' '"� , �7' � !� C �`�� 7 i� _ i' �+�: �p{ • ;,• r �� .� � ; � � �± ��. - ..�` :''�.. ;�. ; �w, �,' r,` v " �4�sC� - .y R'��;� •J } Y�i � � • � _,� ,�- � - : �__ = WJ �� '"�r,.� .:; `� .:, , . .,�=� , � ,- - � i� i � �- G r r -- - - - - _ - - - - - � �-�- � fk �. r �/�� _ ! _yq' �4 Y _ 1 - .� � � � v � � �� .j J `y'�qd.�i � �� . — �'3� ,� -`:T}� . I. � � _ - - - e .- ___ _ _ _ • r ,�` � -- ' . �(( _� - C �{J �,_ l��y� 1 . . .. � S� �- . � . !' '_4�+1 % � - J ` 't.. � m" . _ � �-, ' , �` � JJ/� # � �, , -. � ,4 =,. �� -. .• � '�• �r .L �' •►� � t . i "#�� r �.� �� * � � 'J ' , � � ' �! � � ,_ � '� gOON HILL DR � � � 1 �; . � ' � — � -_. -� • � � •. . � � � � � � �, ; . ,� _ . �---� � � T� . � � - - -', � �� . � e ,r`�� ',�` ..' � [¢' �_, . t �.•; �' ''`� - , � a „ - -- �� 1 ' ��y :Y �. J� a , 1 �. y � ,rt}`� � � �' �i T � �-,. - "� ; , �F -�1� �. - ' _, � �-�- '";� � , . � � :;'. .. �. �'�`� `. : _ _ r � �'', 2ti � { 1 � - ��°F.�A F�� -} �' �� / _ � ', ,:��_€ :, } i � • � } � � ; . � a ' •i` �: '+� d 4 :� 'r � , �� ►: �7��_M; � � ��v. � � Ls- :,: � �� . �,�_ :. ,J V � �� r � �,.w ,� _ �� ?�;'� � t � i �'X�t�' � it . �� f 1. , '�, � � , ,•,�, ;. � � � �� a .1 �� ,;��., ';, ' 4 ;;'� �. i ''�.�- �i ,.>d� , •''y � 3�� _ � a..� 1, _ ,�� '� , � • .; ' �( 9y�r � � '. S � 4, _� � . � � � r/ , x:�� ,� � �. � i � � ,1' � �� - . `�'�� ., ,� . �.�� i� � � 1NM, +;.,�� ^ ' d y �� 4 ' If� � � • , �'$r Iy _ �,�! , ��. �` � � i - �`. . .. a:' . .. , r . �;� i , �:#�r •L�� ,� ^` � �r3 r ° a �� .�"~ c� �;�� '�'- -- TG ;'�':� ,TG �t v � t,e � � ,�,. � . r; h%�, '�'`'��r • � - � P� Y�' r'��` � 4' `�/�'� L �. � I • • 3 ��; '' O^ . - �` r i � _'. +�¢ (�,�r�� . •�i i � � s '�,' i ' � _ � � , k> • � ` � n ; 1� ,�;,�'�. ,� ' i � .� � f `�� ` - Y? TK` , � �r � ..S�h: '� ��J �� 'f `f.. � q- .r C .T � 5' � _ - — j� % t � � � ,►f , � � � !A �p�f+. , f _ .' . ' �� -, � �.� � `` � kr i o � - �_ �� I � TH �. �' ,. U, � • . _ - _ - � ��I�� , + _ - - �. � � . r — ' j ,)' nN I .� � �' ... _ O ;'i TH � � z � � � � - - � � A �, ., �.: � TF � .• . _ _ � � _ -_ - -- -. .�e �� ; �.•��.� 'o"� ' '``` $ � + `� , � - i � �� `� � . PC . - . � �,��- ._ • - � US 70 IIWYG � ~'-;-�= _ _ : . , � - ' �-� _ _ � - _ _ _ ,^ �� ;, . _ � — _ � �-�.• _ `- -- -- _ - � ' . . �. �: - - -- _ . - - ra - v6R �N� 3�S !�e TD �.�,. - - � -- . •^. _ _ � --� ♦ - - J � I�JCC�Ir Jurisdictional Features Map Upgrade US 70 To Interstate Standards From US 70 Goldsboro Bypass To West of SR 2314 (Pondfield Rd) Wayne / Johnston Counties, North Carolina Q R-5829 Study Area OSheet Index Potential Perennial Stream Potential Intermittent Stream Potential Tributary of the U.S. CU�V@ft — Streets Potential Wetland Potential Pond f--- �_ _j County Boundary Date: May 2018 Scale: 0 175 350 Feet � , � Job No.: 17-008 Drawn By: Checked By: CMR NDH Figure Sheet 4 of 18 J ? WK t �� f� . � u - � �;�- , , TH �tiTA:IFSTIC DR�, � -� �� I ti � �� _ TH F� c� A "' ' � � _ ��,z � �� , � � J � TG TF � ,d+-v �sr 4� �'� �� - �+:r ��'�+...��" - �� . .��►I� �},., � ► � �-. Q - _ . TG � ` ~--��-' �" '''rs�_`r�F1F� _ _ -` _ _ i F ._ ` _ . • � C `; r � _ _ .- _—_ _ - 1�1�7�� vY��l.� ` . _ __-. •�A ,, � - — ----- -- - -- . _ TD -- _4�._"' " ' -"�� _ ti4'_ - 1� ~ .� �. . _ — -- -- - --�^L,. - - �'�'"` =�- - L- M 'f� � - � _ _ ... - - _ �. � +�. f� _!` i - T- ��=TT`s? �.` �y ' .. � � f �� T � � ' ' 'i. . _ �r.= % �= ir : ��s`, �y " '4Y . �q ��,� .`� � . TN` i �'h ►.4 � � �� „ r � y. _ �' `�-, Ic.'. 4. � � � ��"y, � � - • . - rrr,-t'�' . 1 ' � '�`� �' �' • . � �1� )� r- a J lJ , � sf. _ _ _ --�_ -__ � e-: a:_ � �C JR.�.�r' + F�� v � *�� ' ` � �� -- PC _ _ � _ 'WJ -�'�- ' A` � '� • � .� . _ `�. . � . I �{ _ t L e iL�j�y, � � . �,� ��':. � ��y� � � � s i � �L� �� s �-�� ' r !{Y k °I�. - .. . •�rv - � � � �- T :, � .� , C�. , .,� , - ` } � i � _ `�+ � - _ ► � : . I 7 - ` �'� � ,? �! �� 11 � � �� - 4J' . ,�1 �,\'' I, +�.�`i'' � �'s Y �ti ,*� ' � � �� 1�� .: . �R" � r ' �� * - "'Ld ' �h"�' � � � +"�� - .: C' . , . - �j7 �D,1 ST''-� e- � �y �- '� � �ir� �` � � � �� ; � „w " �1 FJi'Ci , ' � `*, - _ ��.� �> � � ( '� ` } . � I �� Q �� q�'�.: . .<<', �E«, � � � � ,1 _ /� + �. � ' � ., - . L p - ;�t �'�s � �;:"� `� . � � - -- p i - � �`�, . ti�-. ti.; . l� e t. . � ��..r. '� 7 ?�`. t - - 5:.- .. . � iiin I � �I �.. .F' . . . � . ' . -1,i� �„ y.' � } � � � - `� � � ' � - - r •P _ � - � `� � , � � - !� - - � � � -� �� . � . ,� , � � ,'� � ' �SS � T "4 '9v . � � • ,� `� ' � +.c � ( � � � � �_ a. " F r._ '�. � II � � % �.�i . � f . , _ � \ ' � � . . , �„ :a «+o-_ - - 'r. 1 j q►� � `� � ( _ y ! � � 7"'� � ., . � � _ � ', �(e/ � ': T ,y� �� M`,� 1 � v, ♦ ' , . . . ' l ! � 9► � '� �L-' � � �'. � - . �� ,�.. � ,G�� s`. ,� Q ,_ � �- ^ /�°f` `_ '� � - , � � �`` � ' � � �!{� -'{} , �' � c.4 � ti �,.s=z�- ? ,q► � � _ � � � � �•.` i�'��; r � � �y�y w. � 5 � . �1' f� �� ; � �1 � �"� - �Ls'`, � BA ' ' ' �� '1 ;�- C Sj 1 "'°'� � � _ ,►-f�. •+( . i , _ .'��_= P� ��. _ _ � � '! 1 .�WF�' . �4 � ��°v .�. " ��,�r'py' 3R'. - �. + • , .� � '��. ] * � ..tr,. �L 2 ' w r j� . .�`� �� ' _ ..��_ � !I r '`Y � t. �f. '� - � ;.e• /i � f�; . � . 7 � � dr' . • �� . `. � • U�-�. v ? Beaverdam' �.' 3J,� 4 ,� � ` ^ � �• / ' ;�� .� ��`,�� TE - : Creek• � , � � �] ;. � �' _ - �'. }' + � � � r. � • � -.�.. , � � ,�, � � �� - � � � _- � ' � �.,�;_ _ ,f: � . ,�+� , , /"�� .,�� ,.� +� ,. `.y f � `,�;�� +� �• w. �`�'� � <��, �'' � �` i �' ��r' � /'�/' ��4 i,�'`'� _�tJ" ��ir. , �a 5�^� , , - {� � ._ �:��: _ �.._ • 'a� - � � � ��.^ ` '� / 4 �r� � - �' r-�- � WH _ - �� ''•3 � j�1 T 9 � _ ^ .^��r ` �. � �„W � 'i ~ ! � �v ;v . .. �r N. ' . a � i�.: �:i�r�i �� 'ai\ ; � f � � �M� -..�'�� '' . _ e � � r �G ��i ► �j � ,�, � . �' z _ �v ,'�� . IK �,a;� ; � I = � \ � � �t '•i, � , I � ��: ��,,� _ - ,�, M'� ? �' . ' :� �� , �, • � _ '� t`i�f' a �� , � - �� , � � :,. `�. �: �_ :.�� . � � � " a� -� -. `� � _ i /�^ ^* � �/ / � � �' '�*` ' i � �� , ' � �� ! -� � '. � �a . >_ Of,�" , r►� �. � ,� �� `�y M� _ J/�5,� , 1.� � �'� � ��' � � S� � � - � � � �;� y�r� � � � � , �'� , � . ��! �� ; �t -� '� � ;,+��1 ..A f '! ;'. R �? �. / ' ,ri ' � � �!?�, � U�p�.: ��.� � �1 �v ,� • � � '. - � ,�.��. I F. ?r►�, � � � . _„ �,`' i";. °t�. '�-'' � ��` �,�' �yr�A �:�� .��k� �~ �� _�.�; e�� "�4�'� �� I ��j� �. ;� j �, � � -'' •�� '1� �'- '`�, _ -��' � 7� a� (� �. - r� � % -. ,l ., ,��,� � h.� �a . �� n� . J, � - 5 - �;.� �� `� � � ♦ �� , � 1 ,� e � � � . �'�ra�- � � � G �� ;. � �� .�� . �^ �� s'' fiy: � h, �� _ �? �•� �; � �' "af��` � �w> `7 � ,(� + �' ��.. - - Z � � � '.� : .f � �.':'�►G+� � �� . �� ,1J��i ��_ -. �� y : . , � ,�� . . � �i '�, . � �'', , .:'-r`� ' � � � �• � �: � s Jurisdictional Features Map Upgrade US 70 To Interstate Standards From US 70 Goldsboro Bypass To West of SR 2314 (Pondfield Rd) Wayne / Johnston Counties, North Carolina Q R-5829 Study Area OSheet Index Potential Perennial Stream Potential Intermittent Stream Potential Tributary of the U.S. c��ert — Streets Potential Wetland Potential Pond �--- �_ _j County Boundary Date: May 2018 Scale: 0 175 350 Feet i � i Job No.: 17-008 Drawn By: Checked By: CMR NDH Figure Sheet 5 of 18 r �Ys��r. � i C' '� `t - e � r t� ir �` q , u -- 1 �� i '� TK'';R ; � � � -� ? � �. _ .� �� + `V � � �1� f � . . ,,�� l �' �_ j �i� •r M" ��,._f_j �1. ^�2 tYlD/1 T � o�+ � d�„',' . �� : �� ; } � a �� ! � , �t : � c� d ' � � .r 4 ]' j�'�+F�. k �� . � ' ', �� '� r ��H + y � �.�a` -�� ' ' � �� ,,,:' _ �� e.f r. — �Sr. . .. �.r• � r , � . � .. . . �.. \� \ \ � � " ' ti � � � � �� . - _� �I'..`�� , ^a� � �� -j J, . __ S r +- '� �� ~ � �-; , _ �i n -,� .' �' 4� ` - � � u. �. �``- US ``s - � �� . �� ` . �/I�/��'```� '�t�F,� �,, ��.. ��,� - � � � � . - � ,, ,� ��,-�� , �: �-'i' � � �' � �r 1 - 5�y�5,� ' — �' � � � ; � ! ��rrf �f�f �, . L1��„� � � � � „��'� -� �a,� � � .� ♦ `�r ,, J1i�:'�T � `iR',l\^•� �. , �14 `^ �\.' � _ �� ` r�yr { �, T A ` — rv "11� 1�'-� ', ' u�" _ '� y�� ^ .. ,�� ef'.. �' - �, �` �is�`` •'tr+ . -i �,s_ � � �' . � � _ 1 ,t r "� ,�'�"'�r� r — «. � •; t--- �'� � �' : ' �' ��- � _ �� 1 . . � yr . .� . '� f^ � � o sr- 1. ' f �.� `_ -_ �: �� i. • ,� r '� .h '� - '- �� f� } ` .« _� i,y,i,� .�i _.-�_� a,r �� .�� . - ,�t}Y': � 'r . � _�� , °� � - � � �. r � . ua.��,�,. 4 j '.'.7� � � �. -. � �� `�� `, .��c- � .. 4 ♦ � _�t ' � ��y _ �igA�'''+ �� . � . ` ,e �.� �r y' � `�� : � ``�\\ � �A i@ � � �i. � +;3e ti ; ry�:. �}� �\�'• ..�1'� �y / �-� '''' � ` t� �' � ' s- v ' ' � � �� . � `� � f•� � �j r � _ :.�;i� � - E ��'�' :� ,' - _ ,, � . 1 � �ti� �y �l� �' , � ..,. s� : ,, �"' , � � �,., � . .. r��t'`�.�� . ' �" � �� ' � _ �1 .� ;^ . , ,��_ s �� /� ,' y �. .,� `� . � � /!► � !�' r'� ' � . . 1F ' s- � Jurisdictional Features Map Upgrade US 70 To Interstate Standards From US 70 Goldsboro Bypass To West of SR 2314 (Pondfield Rd) Wayne / Johnston Counties, North Carolina Q R-5829 Study Area OSheet Index Potential Perennial Stream Potential Intermittent Stream Potential Tributary of the U.S. Culvert — Streets Potential Wetland Potential Pond �--- �_ _j County Boundary Date: May 2018 Scale: 0 175 350 Feet I � 1 Job No.: 17-008 Drawn By: Checked By: CMR NDH Figure Sheet 6 of 18 '� - :�, � � � �' •�,-�.;.; .�,� � ,'r �� _ .. -� .�� , , .� , �, ` ;.;� `'� - �s ,�,�+f- _ ►� -� r � _ ` �: � �� ^.r �►-� � v �� , ' , `r � T � � ` � " ,� .� , - f � .•. � `�,'�, , ^� �� °' • � . �'t, "� , � � � � � :. �►, _ � _ � � , � ' ��-�� ^. r'�� .''}�O �� .�`" ., � � .l.'�'P i . #�:,.��i� � � _ ty '�'�� y� � . '., �1� '4!►`� � - � `�.�..,, �� T s, - � -��.- r ;� �r q i � �l: -, � • - - ,aJ �f� .i ca . :tJ /�. � y-z� � �� ! � ,`� . � � . ''� 11.�/• ' � �* � � � �� '{� . �, 1 � Y., .T � ! 1 - ,� '-� S ,�i Ar ��ti' i -•�. , �` � � ^ � � q �, "�� ' �'P.. � �1 . � . � s �� r I � � .. . � "�P '�� i . .. . Y - �_ � � -� � �`'„ �'' f . . i ` <. � � �� 'r . �. � F . �' 1� A i ' '.} . . �/ �'\� � � ��h� �1,. 1• .��n - ��,( F i �` � l s . `.l` ` . - / � � � � ..� � . � �� t �I. ^_ � '�� ' ' �J ��. I� � - . :� � 1�' �.. _ - " !1!J ��'��, � , '� ��`� _ ' � . l f . ;lf � �,� ^� , Q �` +`46 '� `F� '� � .S ��Y _ . 4 , �:.'+�" �r. j, � �� ° .� ,� ,�'��{t�tv 4a,. �_ � � i � ,i4 � �e - :y... �� t '��`i�'�° "��'� i�� ', v,`�'' , � ,� ' ,!� �h. � � _ � . c., s�' , ' � � -��e R � ,� r ° r �� y , � T M � �P� 4f {�`� 111. , � f'p�" �ai � /',. ��up�� 1•, \�` ,� •`'�. T� � �� s }� '� �` .�''. C +yy : . �.'}� �.5�� f�+' . n �-,` "iI � ., . -� �'�' �� _� ��. 5�'i 1 �' � _ ' '� ♦, T /�j '- 7 J { ' T '� �, ��` y.`� �� _ � � 1[� �� !',a5 '�1-. .��•,.,' ��..� '� �, - �R.�'- y' �- ��\ �ft'0�1. ��'�+ �.. 4. F f � � i � S; � � � 7- � � . 5 I .e y`�Y i h± r� � r+��r+y � � � ¢�� . �� . � � � � � 'i�• � � ^x� ��' + � ; � II -` '1. a '� �r' y �3� �/y��y.� . R-. i� 41! � �. } �,�j.� � ,.�� •�?i..� tt 4 . ` . Y'. "�. ,��q ..`�? ,'� `��_ .e ,` 4 . �1 ,.�y, . . � � .`. ` \ .�M��. `'� .'� �� q.� t�. • `� ;��'` �j" � ,,,t '� ti�r :.� ��, �'� ,��,�. , G^ _ �` � y- f ` `" l : /� '4�� n + f nt �Clr� _ � . � 4 p: rii niA-�� •' � ��,�~` � _ , � ` M Y L. / �' � �y � . /� ,S J, , �r . �., �� . � ' � s , � �c�` . _ •- � - '--.. �, � .. �. � ` y - �'4 ..A'��..' � �N �J ��..' :� � . ,. .3r . j i .', .��'1 .�1 <�F.s � � - �,,� . �'` " `$, � �-�1 "� � ��, �, �-?� > �. � ,� 4 -� . . ,� , "� • ! �,: , f � � � � �' < �, ;� . i �.� �: t;� t . T� � � J.., . SD ; : , �- , , , �A ,��.-. _ ' �i` r .� � i ,'` SD,' S1 ::c �,��:' : , _ � y�: . ` � `'a'` ; � �T .� ! `+ _ y;� .�� 1' �, #,�. `` � yC � �. /�- ` / . ��TN WO - �� - �. �� - .;�,;. � '� -' - ,. .� _ �� - �a$ � � ., � T , ` � r ' � a i��. �,_.�, � / �1� i . � - ��d • r � .• ;:,", ,��. ::, �/ ,�''�� .r � �� a` � � � - - ' � �� , -` - e� - ,, ( '�• , � � � ` �l`�i � . � �� . � '� - .1 � - .. � � � _ ��, � 'i�',TO �, r �` �. ` a,, .� � .��,�'{ `.- r � ' � . �► � � - n � " '•" ' , '.I��O�,, .� O � � �� L��GSTO� ST " r �` �'.: s 9 : ��s �o,��. -�I ` M , � ' , . f ►, z 4; r. '� _ --� � � . J i "� i �. i.,' �;/- � �it . ,� .� . ,� �'g�rts'y �' .� '% O' ,,E� � � - �_ ., . a � t , �� PD �'f � �; l� k� {�ii. !�� L .:` � • � . r'' . � t Ft' �'t i s' �'i � � . t f 1�--�'=-T*� '� 4 , 1 `�;F . � ,.��: �1 �,�� `� e - � �1.-. .^� Ca - -♦ � �' _ � "s'� - - � , . �6� ,'� A � / �/`,..y � �" �.` '� � ,... v ;� �, 4, �, � �� ,, , ^ � i� : � , r� I �. 'RJ ! ; � - - � � v: � ,4. � � .� e, i+ � ..r .��i � � ,�� c� � , 4 , �� .r .l � i •- � i. �i - � � �- . , . . . . � ' �� Beaverdam Creek ' � � � �. '`' � • 1� ,_ r � � � � � , '� sr ��~ ''� � It7 � t �, cl�: �� ,.� •�. ��'� �'i' ``y^ �.� � ' j, �Rp` y ,��', �.. : � r.�• ' - � � � � � c4. . 3 :r S � - . . `�� - _ � i. , � ,Ij++3.�t �' _ ''� ; u,a� A � , � � ' � �, ' � �Dw �RD i� � ' �� ;• - �'�'��' ��' ` �� Y i�� • ' y� Y��y� � '3 T � _' . , %�� . .j� ',% � ��.i �+ �� .� "�`' �7 I . . � :�' '1 - '�. � �4,ct�' . �" � A � ' �v ►�cnaL s�r_ _� _ _ _ � �.�: - — � • ti _ - � '; , . '�. ` �� ': i �� ` - r.' �• • y =��.F ;^ —".""!r � `��P-'� r p �` � . �' ° � `� s, � i ' � r�k �# `ei --i i., �` , a �' � /� � j' _ ' !:;w i s= `l� � � �� d:{_�� _� �iI'rl a'�, ,�w1+'� :i .+�.� ��c`-. � � � h � �}�� 1�`. ,t_ - �, r � ��_ , � 4 , + -� F� :rjti" r -;r ,, l . . t �' ''� , I 1 _ t� ' k - �: `.� �:# � ;� �o � ��.�,i^� � y �� 1 ` � ��,, ' - � j �r ' a`�C,• �� ' ~ . p ��}� Y, '�� ! '� f `� i � R.- . �� . '� �� iP��t� i" . . . . \ If�: .z. ,r ,, y , _� ,, Lr � �s , ''� fi� .� � s,, .� __ ., .,� �; � n � � ;, '� - f`� � + } �':,xa�,�,v ,�+e,,,� � �1 �.� t � + r •� 1v' t � , � � �J . - Beaverdam�i � `fJ �� - "^• .� �,�. , 'k �",�, ..� .�s _ � . .: .�� \+� �"Creek �` �p � _ � � � . � ` � ' ,�`� f` 's'� � _ ��j�jlyn, `' ��' � ' _ - �C'� � � - � - "� � - _ �'��& �ti � � - � _,_ �� -� - f�` � '4 r.l� PE � � ,�;C�F � F•` � ; E li i � � _�- • � - . _ � �Z: � , V (.• �� J� l. 4 ��, � ' �' "Yi i '�'�' _ �[ � � �`� . . � � ".�� P� -Q�p � `L. � �� ' �, , �` - .,� �'. i 1 � � ! � � _ \ 'o „te �,- . � r . p _ �., '� � ' -t ♦ �� e - 'i � d�1 ♦ . � 1' �� i. ^� � �� - . .. �aP"` 'd.,_ � , ��A �' � � - � � F„' - �' � R �� , - ,� 1 s F *'.,. - , � . _ .7 �� - � r - , ..� � �'' .� . r c. � _ , . . � ! . � .� R��i ; �� c 3 � �iT �j�� 4, - V'. 3 . !��#/ •� , � �1� W� y._. � . , �+� ,. cy,, � qRO e� , -_� r-+ � > •'�i .i: � ,, � -` � i�''' -. � �. _� �l � �J � S.Sl, : - .;*� t t, `� �t � r � �� ' y �4 .> 'd�'.+ - � ��j ,. FI ' G � � � ,� � =• ' r�_ � ��w�;�, � '�,�,; ,�'V - � , �� SE r 1 � T +� 1 _ ' r ,y., , �� l s s� 5 nqr �,i `! `L _ � " 4,'. : 1 • ' � � i:� � r.... �• .� yaA�i p,�L . �L '.. ''� �t' �'.�1 � . � � � ^ \ _ �.�1 'i- � �C �-T'.�\ 1 I � � , ' � • �' � � ' �- . ,i� � .� . �'- _ . . �. ��. . .. ' -I , W P. �-J I �� Jurisdictional Features Map Upgrade US 70 To Interstate Standards From US 70 Goldsboro Bypass To West of SR 2314 (Pondfield Rd) Wayne / Johnston Counties, North Carolina Q R-5829 Study Area OSheet Index Potential Perennial Stream Potential Intermittent Stream Potential Tributary of the U.S. CU�V@ft — Streets Potential Wetland Potential Pond r--- �_ _j County Boundary Date: May 2018 Scale: 0 175 350 Feet I � � Job No.: 17-008 Drawn By: Checked By: CMR NDH Figure Sheet 7 of 18 � ` Beaverdam , �Creek �� ,� `� �� _rt `�,;%� �� ,, �, �� tiv� � �� i'�� .. � ,rL.t�. �� ` t _ �,�1 I �., � �' F �U �� s,sr � ��/n ` � � ' � � x � � ^�3.. ��" .. j �,��I�'`, y.{r��'4� 'r.a�J� ir�� ' S. J� � ,�� . 1� 1: n� .�, I � �;;; , � ' � p ` •� � ��:�� ,' � .�' ;R��, � , � _',� w^ ` `- �. � . ,\; r � x � '�� i�� ! `; L �� 1 !� �. ,��+� -� � � s: .,- � � .�- � r ��ye.y { �� j4 �� } _ • ^3 "1� �� -. . . '1 �� . , � � � • '�s,'� { — `� �: ` ; � � , � • '�,� y - �ek�-' g � ! , , ,� r'S ; � - - \ �1 �i �� r. , �;'f�i.,�"� . . - - _� � : -� .w"�Er `` a , , • ax . �' ' x _ .. , 1� I � � � r—_— `` 'k _ l�- � _ _t7�-.!ii � � � ��'�. � ' _ ��' ,� �� -� "� _ � "� -�• �3 ;' � � � ,� � 4 ,r, � � '.� � � y � . -, { " _ ��; . x� ., ^ e _ �. � . ` '1r_ �`+� � �'. ` ; 1 ��.. �' ,� a , ,. . . _ . � y .. - � �: '� . _ ;: i.. � ,�41 � � :. !A.°� `:w.� � .. ��Sn� ' � Y R- }` �I 5 ;� ` � P�� j � . . �, � . - 1 . �r� � . 1 ��, �. . . 'A't � ' . . .. . -,.� ' 1 �r�.. '�� . _ �>>=' ` _ � : r . , - . � �, _ �� -., � �, � ��'� � � ,, • �,. o,� . � � li��l �� ' � � � �� - � - . ` `S'�j� a � +� � F_'� - �� - :s- � '4 - - � � + � el`Q�� _ � ♦ � � I, ,'�r'-� ?'�'� '� � � �- ' °� ��`l1�� 'jj''jj �� 4�,t� �� ."!' � , �"��'' � �t. � �\ � - .� v� � 1 �— � � BC 4� : � .. ` '�, - � . ' � � �� 1.��., _ 4 , � � a w � � . . �< y��' � ;; � :< � �` �w',�, �'fit ��-, y,� ''�' ,w , �, . �°' � `�a' "�, �° � Y •. y "� j 6' �� p � f `� i � s� ;r •`? ' , fi N� _ � BB:�4 _. k r� ' . • - � '� ��' `� . �„ N` - \ ; � � �; ` � _� � �,'�_.. = t '� . � � y � •t'• �r1J y'�,_, �ti` ,� � �,. . �` + ✓ t �� ;„�; _ , �' ��' � , � _ y� �, � � `!� -it: "t� �. ' _ "- .,� �� , / � - � '� 'i� ��. � . �. n d .. < � :�� y�1 . . / � ' . � , k' �,+ �. ,, _ � � � �,� � ' Ar� �+ �, ` a , �. ,. � 'rd _ k � �f-.�t ' � � � : _ y f ,I , -, �, ' � °�'� : * �- �� _ � � � � � �� r ' � � PE I SF .__ � ;s• ,. � � �y `� \ .., S ..,. � �(c,� ��y. _ \ � � t1 . 1 ``` i TR. �� r ` . - � aw ' °'h. . '!F' - \. . j -� - �. `°,. _ ti-, � - � � �. 'ti:. � � _ r 1- , � � '�, � * , � � �-_ � - �' � i : :� Ni�� ,� �� ` � �� F� � � �4 � , � .,Y� '�r� �� , yt'' F .. ,�, � �S S?� n � z= ` ��, ,-C° �' `~��--'`'- _ ��. _�� •� � � � �-.._ �.� `�,: . - . : �; - . `� . , : �� , i � � �. R' � ,��t , 3, f � Q� •ti�� ti��"'�e -'�'f.' �' / . �, � � �*i�"�'� ^ �� ,�,> l �; � a � so'° �� _ � � � CrT�� _ 1 .� � . �;F``'�I. � - "�-� �� '"ti�� . . - - + . i 4 -• , � � � � � �� . . _ � �� . ; . { �` ;� � - �. .�' � � - �i-y-j .�K. �\. �' T � L[ � a . j� � � �.� . .. { ,c�,�� '' -' ��^�s ,�•�: � - � - �r �1., ,� ��>�,� � µ p- �� ..� �� -..l� � `y�� 1 ��'�� J 1�; `\ `� .'• �'� _. '`w ,�Rb ��. _��r � � � �` �" ` � � � - .;;,, ,� . ' q ., ` ,� ,� " ;,,��1'; _ � '`�� ' �� ' '' . � .�: ,��n e . � 4\� . � n� `� 'r " � - i A' :� �� '� "� ' r' _ ��` �� ` . � �� , - . � ' t��v ��, d� ,Y,�� :a � , � � r- ... y�iS � r� w � �. ' � _ �_�ti . i� Y � .. .'1 i �� S� r ��" `�'M �I a �� \� ' / « .. .r , r ��.; i �,�`�� M � � • � , ��. Jurisdictional Features Map Upgrade US 70 To Interstate Standards From US 70 Goldsboro Bypass To West of SR 2314 (Pondfield Rd) Wayne / Johnston Counties, North Carolina Q R-5829 Study Area OSheet Index Potential Perennial Stream Potential Intermittent Stream Potential Tributary of the U.S. Culvert — Streets Potential Wetland Potential Pond �--- �_ _j County Boundary Date: May 2018 Scale: 0 175 350 Feet I � � Job No.: 17-008 Drawn By: Checked By: CMR NDH Figure Sheet 8 of 18 � �. ��,:,� t I _ _ �x i ' y�, �' Y�u'y'"�� )�r�� , � _ �� .� � � -� .,.: .� � ��;r�.r, r-� K-- i R �� , , . � , �r '� ;� �� '�;,, . � :;t :; � � _ � r�h` i^F y�. `. .�...L �jm+1� 4�� - �+� �� -_ � i, '��i� �`�A '. " �� ' _ " �.• . ��. T }� �,c� i�.t! . , '�.� � � :�� . :��. ' ' � • �. ,�lf +'y. '�`�� a �.'w.'? . �� 1 '� d . ,�v ..i� � . � oi, .�..:�.W� ��' '-�' ��_ r� - '�- .'i:�.. _ , � . ��.•:' , �r Y' , . , . �_ �.i' �„�� . "i' v �1„ . ..�yq . \ ' � r�i- � '''Y i � ` J _� . L.. .. 1�._\�7R {��-. ; w�ti ' ft� iy l!1':�' -.'� ��• ) 6� i. . � �'1 i� . . . , +f�ls . .�~'` " � y Y � � � � T . " � .. - ,..F . �,��y � -a i . . . � i _ � y �, t i }, f . . � �L .. � 'H i+�. .-� yr . ,`� � I. �. � t'! . 3 _ " , � .. ' 1 i ay, � _ '�4 J - i �SI.�f'q-l.. t` � :.� ` �.� a. I� ��++ . iS'_.� �, ��S". i ' � . .; :�� h � F . Z � � � � ,� . r ��11 � _ . .., � �r: �il.,'� �'.'�«� . � .�4. ' --�� F�r �': �.�y, .: � ..� � _ � � - � . .�:'y� �, ��-lrr..n �.� Y . �1 ' � � :� . r, ��s � �r . . . _ . r ��`� '.'1%, . .t� . � -_ `.�..�. � .� _ - Yt�- " � .�Y� . �-tw' - �� . w ;q�rr, .t�:i �4��i; r e �y•�2 1 � � . - � . 1 • � : }+,,. r•'. �L %�� . li, i J� • , . - ,r , . � 1 �C! Y r . . �i t..' r. R'r{. . _ S.' 1 R i s'- � v • ky� � � � ��- � � ' F . � . �. '� :r�. A .ir . f.' _ ' .�,r � f b�µ , i �- . ' � �` -ti l��, .-�� "�p�. a� -. ' - r r ' L;� w. i F� a �rw.e i� . _�. � � fi ; � c _ �}.,' y � J , .� �- -C l�� '�+'y` �'y�-� a�`�. ,'M�it� - . �'. r � - � �Y �e �. `-" �✓ •� r '� r r � ' � �� c ��a..�� :H �,.�i �: � � � } •; , .i �� . �y � q�, -� "o •� 1-,��;.��!4.,r �.rp}L _ � ��r"?�C�';!� �,,� � , ,~ . ._� ��rfi ��''! .-y�' �`3i� .t �`.y` ,. � � �r.��iIA�YiF� ..,•tf, pr�4,� � r i "✓gl,� S. �'"sin Ni _." . . '�'-5_ �,, ��µ } ti +. �� . � , � ^ ��t-- � t'� � r �Yi3i-� `r �� ,� �sL�4 i��+�ap��`�3��'i }. , -r J '"� �, t, - ~ti,,�� '� . ,_�� } .- � ti �r ' ^ r '�t � ��.� ,� ++�'�K, Y :µ��s '�. �� . �`: � S�' 1,5� Q� S � .l r , � � 7 ' .4�. t �'.C�' ,� ., L� � �, V � 1 �" � � `r . .� ,;`. � � ei 3 a t. � � 9r '�' � ,�['r�� ;4� v i ��.y . . 'd : �. Y�t S, : .1 v � . . �/;� ,, y �. _ , h t . {,'C � : � � � J. .C+i`M � �� r ,, .r • k - �''. .F l -i r. .�,.,t;�,,, ,� ' +R� -. . a:�- e r-. ..: ��. _ . �,�� _ , _f .r * ` � - i.. ;�- - �,.'�l d ��,�, _'� � � � c ,'.�- � � �,�' . � ° r�� .'�j'�J�ti1��•4 �.^r.; !'7r i`Y. . "'.r+_. ; ,.�� r = � p,w • i . , y r "}�� 'w " � � ,�' � �( ,� 7yyy'��i ir .dr �,� ...'f, Y� �. .. .`;` }"�, � ��,� t�.'�� ' .,N �rtkt•'7 �._'/ � � _ _.W � 7'`�� .L�'}f;(� �� V7ti��.�' �iy��'i" � $.�'. . _ � �.'�r _/ , ' y� L a �%S� .9� :A �v",g� � , � ' '� lp Y�' . .� ', ..a. _y�l9h r' ¢.;� �. -}J�'. -.d�� .� � _ _ ._t.� - 'yy'�'i r •i -.. t R.f`4��5, + y.!.: �r '! i,� �� o� . f i��` `�(. �7. y t "�rl�,� '-tw, ,.�tp..0 .►�} .r r - . ;� ' � r;, � �� ; � 3 � �"` ��-e �g y�` +.P�'-r�i" + :< ti, �a� �r i � . t: . � . '� , l `7 � �J�, ��' ��.., . ..} - ♦ A�.;� �� _ ' `r '{ �' �i1`► _ F*�� , j�r-r' r ,�r ,�,,�1- . - tr � . - �* - . . _ . .a r=}+ p�A � �' f`'?N..t t t' ��r _ ' .. � ;'i��«� �� _ _� �`_ _ , 3± ' �� . sy <iF � � _ . , . . . ' . +.. Oy ♦ . ,T `� �, J S�!.+I;'' . '•� .. _ ' ' ' a .�� . -. ', , . �� -r •�. V �.r� - r ` 'u' r , , _ � ' , , * � _ �, �. s ��,�p _ • �� ,k� {, '1 ,� - t`i.. .. ,'�'-:� �� .-• �'" � , � � �- s � �� r' {'•�`_. � � �^ _:T� � . . . 1 . , Y�..Y . f' 4 Y r ' . YT� _ . \ _ y �� : - . . � y � V: �� . • . } ' � .. ` Yl.. �� l ,'. i , ' . �. . � . Y 7 �. . � � k , .�r,"r y £ ��t' H -- ,v _ \ ; , ,t �yr , ,y�' yi'�rj` ... t a . � �`�� ' {P /*.'' J�,: s•'A+' �,� �i1;� fit{�' � L f •'_ , r . . ,L. '� l �' � r� :7FE � , l r �! kr � F � 1�Y� �'1 � '� � �:� �� ...� i � ��;�J�� .r� F _ . - ` '�r�. 1 � � a �� r'u �P+� '�� .ii' � �ub" � �' _ , ' ' • . .,,, - �1�� L .. ../- � '+t'� . i� 'q '9 '8 f.ajf� { Y� H��`• �� 7��• �i`� _ ... � ti' r + _ _ ' _ . ' � �, . - � � ;. ,-��j;; � � � ��-' . - � J `, . ' '�F. 4t �r.�h � yJ � � ' . . _ - . . O �_ . . '�s1t, `iM-�''4�{,,t� f � 1 �► v. " _ � �' . 7 t ��y1��,�� ,�p �F �� - - �.r � r 'i - : � �_ � . �� ,� ��f �� y . � ,�# r .��. � �� . - , �_ - —. 's �;,� -'. ♦� �,i,� F: S'� Y y e'� �''�"�" Y� r t � t '� � _t.. • . . � � ' ��` •� Y _ � �' i. 'itiu � 'y � N'��r„ 1 �. . d.'r. ' • - 1 � • - - . � . � �� p � .•, s � - � l�- s f � - � f:r-� I � � �� i 'i f.�-�- - �� ' . _ _ _ ' � v '�I _ �`y) �,;� ;1��(�1�� ' E � �, .�' � . r.I . �r� i � o .� . _, � � f: _ -... ' . `-:. • � � b�- 'i .' . �r , SY�'� •:�' �.;'�y >• 1_aS � �' �-'i' ' %: : r � ,+-t�� _ �r L� � � _ { ��.i. ..` .;Yt•; �.Rlt j' � I e� . . f ..;y�� !�.' • �{-� .�� _� 1�+..i�.i� +.� '.e .rs = C� . �.r. -� - . � . - . ' _ � r' �� _ . 4� , � ,` ..Al^" ��,�_. J�, i.:.bi ,l" � ' �4 � �-X,'Nf .�� 7�`� �b��l F�ir. '`r?- ' t.�� ±'� r' . _ _ _ � - _ . ��:� ��+�' .�'r;��: .�,. �� _ ��f �'r�+•� •��. -�� • �, - - :¢. - '. '_. .c'' y .�!,� Y f' t �v `ay sN„ 8 K, y' r�t.'-l-�� *� ►'.. r - �� # - ;� .! s�� ij � �:' r ; :k ., ,/' . }' .�' � ya � •• ',�;y r t +.r. _ � �}r � , 4 < 8#. - y � � ' � '� YP . '� . .' � rX . S�' t t., �,. a, 4 + 1.. � � ,a' � J r y, i� �, ��t •:1�j� �,� ��,, ` , , , .. . , ' r r . � � p�j!Y � � '� '�; '� _ r �. +M'i , . � �. �,_ Fr � �- �� }l� ti �'� i � .i . . .'�� r :[i• ..r� yf� � �.��,�q;��-4.T.' S.. �' � `•y �i �.v� '� y�.�7� � �. - ,�F � �.�� i.. � �;1/_ �W . P'm ql�. � �• F _ "��.. . . , , �� ^; �. .`i� ` ' �-a� -ti �` '�� t �� f_ ' a .1 - s, �- �:�` .. 'r 1 a,4 ' � , r r --�� , .F .3� � I � � :. ,7R � ��` - . i� .�y �ew"S '• - . '4^ ` '.} � ' '` � ��. � , Yk y . � •2��f,1 �� 'Y '�� 1� �' I yL �° _ .,� , y ` ... �. . . � :-- �S • rre� EY ".� tAT{T•y•.• � � � - ' :'� * h :JI ♦'- .w. ti1... � � r�4 vY . i�'�"'�.T1'f yj. �F: , .� I J :.1 r � ;Fkj 1F ;9 E. � �� `l� �1 • , , , ei� , �-� � . . •!. ` c� i� ,,.. r �,, ��'^��,� ►�, l� _"�j�'4;7' . +�l�'; 'r•a;. � r - � �:: Y .. .�ckr �, � +�l ��►��.�t��.. `��',� =��x _ -�YR,..�� 1� � +p� . �'�'1�T .1 tM. gi' '�i? J - i . �,,. . r�.l� �� `i �; '' l' 4- ' _ � kkkJ i. ' M � �' [ ' � 1,�. . .y - �.'� ; . ��. � f N � ��•7 f.5�: ;-d: � •i . ,es „ .C. - .�M }'� f,;t��y, t +�� .r ;, � � ' 6 f`_ � . �-: ',�� . ' '.1!'�►� �� .�'� �:YTai, 1 �'_. F � fi ` • _ M1 ' � � � � - �..I` L.�V ! 1 . ' l� �'S�?Lw - ,.,'. . � 'j' „ ...� r� ' _ .� i — r y. �•� 'jt,f�" �� J� - � � � - , +. � 'q . � ` .. � � : � 1°' .v.� � -^��'�+ � a. �'� - _� ��►; ��;t � '� _ �i, � �si ,r y- �- . . - U y .. i -_ r I ' �'�2� . � . +. ` ,'MR' 1, , '1». �� .i� � . ��1� _ ��■ �, S �,` r 1�• �.... A�1 �+.'�1 " � ' �i'!• 1 � � _ . . �-'._'�. . . ' �� . . . �► ., ; �,�, ; � -�, SF��, . � ..s, � �:: -, � �, , :� ,..��—. c - °w� +�. , ,, � �'�' � �;. i^ �� ,�. � ; �, �• �4 `�� l. � -\.. _ .. 4 .... _ \ �'- '�� . '� � ' ��' F�� Fi,, :� '"'��.:'*>_' ^�� . �� i , ; , � �� ik� i" r �,. ��S'�ii� , +�� `, - � � � �� f �� ;�'�c ` �' a �:: <`#.' � � �` , '�.�, ` �' �'' * � � ,. a � ��'. ' F�• k �4$ .�� ,'�► , . �. � � . �� ;�� ; , � c � �',� � � .,. . �� - � , ,. . ��:— •l� :��' �: '�`� _�^ �y '- � � � �� ,� , � � � - � e� Ns s��,��,� _ !ti �,�:� ., �, r \i � � � •\ � �� , � � ., � �� / \ �' r �\ 1 �. � �� {. � �r. F� � � �� r ,: � �`1 -' � I` e . � �� '.{ ■�[ �, _ ,el:..�c e�►,. . ��F _ �'~��`'4' "` e°u 3 � ' �� e.\; � _ `,� �j� � - ,�. � ,. ,. �, �� ,, ��r.��.�4 �'� � ;� f'.. ,, ,,� _ /�` , t, � �;!�•;� . � . ��'. � .'t �;,�. - - - �,� � , �� wY '�'� � " � + E! y . 7 �. ,�; �; �, � � `�r, "6it�� , � � J �` 7'' ^�� '`-- � ..T �d ^` �, 5� x'� � �� ' ;. �f • :� . ..S .1 . �. . �.� ��R . � � � � • . ., .�4 a � �` `,Y .� , , :fi �,. � .,�.>> ' � 'i - I� ��g,��t \'a� ; , ti. . �. '�»- �`'k �'�„ , ' • r � .i � ._� '°'"�_ ,;� i � ��. �' f � �> , � e �„ /, �b„ ^ � �. � •� ' � -� y�{ � � '% � �'x ' • � b� f • � �' � f ii �� J - � � � �, I �, � "t.. �� /r �� p i.fi �� '4. � � � � � � � ' J �1 � , - . r�, � �'.y',i' . � , r � 4 �I�` } �•�� « � .. �� . � _ � f� �� s. �� , ;��: � .. i �.; ��: �. y �. �.' , �' :,� 4 z � /'� ^ ^ -. r� �� L - - _ 4�.�Te ��,� � � 1."0 '°'`,� . . ... - � . � � - � t �� `� �� ^ , y . _ ��`i � �'� t ��. `� � � `' ` _ ;�s r . r .�'� '�� . . � �� .-- � �.Fa��... . .�.i ��-'�.,' a.� � , �_, . _ j� 1' r �� ,�� r ,, - ,� �Z i.. :r �. _ ; l ' . � µ � . � j�_ . . � � J; �� . .�a� i.4t � .. E� t ,,? e , . � �+ �'Stk d�, �� F .` Q � '�' -1, - - - *r �- , �r \ � � � `<I'�Oq�`� 't J�� ` '� ,� , �''e �1 . -r'. f/q��. -.��, '�, �:� �,. �.: C1` � ti `�: ' - . ` � - ,�� . , � � �" �� 1L�'�! � � ' � � �� ,�� 'Gs.. ` �� + �� r y��:-. ''`�1�i�'� ` y.�, ;� 'Y� , - � � +.�� _.„ � ��^1)�`'� .-� ��;� ; - - ,,,� � . f ' �j ��'�' •. i.. �' ��;� � � � - �' i � - - iy � �, .�' • �' -� i� �� , ^ _ � . � � � t �wu � �;�-_�. �� M._. "" SG 1 ' �. i _ 9�:�� y - -r _- ' � � � �-: -'WV � ./'ai�SH � �� _1 d Jurisdictional Features Map Upgrade US 70 To Interstate Standards From US 70 Goldsboro Bypass To West of SR 2314 (Pondfield Rd) Wayne / Johnston Counties, North Carolina Q R-5829 Study Area OSheet Index Potential Perennial Stream Potential Intermittent Stream Potential Tributary of the U.S. Culvert — Streets Potential Wetland Potential Pond f--- �_ _j County Boundary Date: May 2018 Scale: 0 175 350 Feet 1 � 1 Job No.: 17-008 Drawn By: Checked By: CMR NDH Figure Sheet 10 of 18 ��I I i � �'� � . :�r' - n'� �.. . � � ; . � '•+l� .L ' ! � . •' � ' . 1 . i ' i �. � �.. !� I; ' � � �'. ��'� � � �» r � ''',,+"s. - :'� . . `a. �. �,� "�� ` �.��,. � , •�'�� i .� � � � _,� ''x. 1�, r�- _ , � � � ; � � ' �• � ' ' '4 :.-�. f�� ' ,�'� �'"F t .� � � �r � . A` � "�a �-a � � . ,� ` t �' " �i� '.1 4 F . c .: � o-�� a; ''f.�l�. .�'- � � � Y � ' � � .v � �,,�� i - _ .�` _ ��r; - '_ •<' : - . � �� :5�,� � � p . . ��.,".� ' _ �� - :` �� _`.,� � , cC,� � ,�� ,� �-.\ �F� • �� L�'�� _ ��'y _ � � :, ,�, ,, , � f. � : �tl� , , ;� r. —. � - ,.Qo ;: ` � ^� /� �``.' r � •_,@ .., ' ; - _ � .` ; ',• � ' 11 �k;GU � � - _ �Gj` �'�. ... � � �� J -�� _�-� , �_ - , hy.- ;..,� - Z ` - =- ��'' _ . ti .r r t �� - � � _ � �9!.. `1ti��'t LkR�;s ,y. 14� �-. � � � �J , �9U,'s`� �?h �/`j r •:�F4� , yi� � ,{� . i ��yJ� 1� ' � R�. �� /� � q .� . �, r � � / , r � v\ J � � � �� , ,`, -� � ` 1 ~ � �.;:a� ,� 4, ' � ,�Yi',f ' � ,i.- . , �'., f' - �`�, ',..{ ,�+ � � � �� , � � .. � • . � �' � � � a ,� I �� ~ � � r� � . � � �,y� ` : �' 4i s p � i � ti a� • � �4a, ,v � �� .�a . ' , "y, �'.��: v 7� � r r t �_ �� ,�t � i ,f E. � � �� 1�m� � 1 ��-�.�_ . - �- � _ - � , _ } Y.� ' i �k'�� .:,� _ � � � f �/ ri� ��' ��,�� .�_ �;� �,, �f: � ., � � �.� � _ . ` -.;�� , :'b � � �� .. ` . / �� . . , . . .i � � r' � �' � . � , �'ii �f � ''+., � - ' _ ."' � ��l�.l� J'�ll � . 4. . � - ' � � �b -------� _ . -- -- - - .` % {.. -- �, , � r -' � ' T�� i �, ,� � � ;,. � , , ,. �. � _ � ,'` , ;'�;�; � /� � �" 1��1 � �; „ � ��. . _ ... _ a . ._ Sheet 12 Sheet 13 a�r.�� i �, r� . , '. �� , � � � � i — -- "� . =' a�y`J- -- �: it; r� a!�'�i y � y � " � .:.l: • F.�� `I:.• ' ' C- " _,� f. ; t. . .�: , �' y. _ �� - _ _ �i-�� N _ � i�� _ x� � -� ' -.- _ -� � ��~� - -� -T; - -r- - - � �.�' �`i_ .,��_ �w i 'r-� � , N - ,,l._[y, i_ Jurisdictional Features Map Upgrade US 70 To Interstate Standards From US 70 Goldsboro Bypass To West of SR 2314 (Pondfield Rd) Wayne / Johnston Counties, North Carolina Q R-5829 Study Area OSheet Index Potential Perennial Stream Potential Intermittent Stream Potential Tributary of the U.S. CUIVefY — Streets Potential Wetland Potential Pond f--- �_ _j County Boundary Date: May 2018 Scale: 0 175 350 Feet I � 1 Job No.: 17-008 Drawn By: Checked By: CMR NDH � �� . ��' � ' � t � ty!. -. � ?� � �� ~�� '� �� 1� ` �`�� •�� r - � �; SKr -` - - �,Lr � _ _ - � y, 4 ��,,'; � , 'c �3�-� ,_, �_ � � �, '�t:�`� �' �+TQ' ,� -. �� s7"� �. � yk,�,�� 4 .�. �` `'a,,� _t ,• : r . �. Q �, � � � r �� -.,� � � �,�� -�. ,! +` ,a a . �.� � � �'"I1 CS, �� . � _ _..�� "� �.�� . T i'S �o�i��,y�l��,=�� : g; ' � �� :i.` � �.� . � ;�,�.- �� ' .i ,a� � , ��i' �., ,� ll - _ � ti,.. F � < < �,.+�' aa - -- . ;� -�� , - -�. � � . ��r F . �l � 1 . `?�, . '/l . _ ', -�j� �- . �+►�a� �Y ~�, � 'SJ - R �; 4 .... ! . ' . , 5 _ 4 �11 I i { 1 ,T '- f ,�� ; r� * - F �,.. ti ^ ,. •.,�. , . � � �,, ' : � �' ' , � ,� � �� . . .!' . '�_ , ,.f . .i �L f��'Ri� �� R+.. f � -�j .L�!"'� . , . _ � r �� I �, �� I I Tj J'• ++i� .'� � �C "t. � . • R �, � { � f . . . , �, ��r,��lil;�� , �� __ S�4L.L . ;1� ,Y,;r' � , ,� � t �'' � � �` �J • .'! ,� �r x. _ . .�°. . � +`$ �� R �� - _._ J�` �� . �c3 - �. . A� . ., �, p�� LB ��'��,. �� , � - � ` � � � ' .� � a.�, > �E ' � ; � ' S. ' y .� �., i ,, : /. � � � � q 4'' a� � �'�^ � / ,r: . ' ' ��' Q' WX :, �jr .� . "'� �F+ -"`., C� � `�� r �`•�' i,�, ""��c . r . S� ,� �� u i e� � � ✓� �. ..: . h�; � �„ ` �� _ �� ;� (�i�; Pt �� + � F � `} 3_�=� -K T �'.: .�°CLnto�z � m� ,�+ , ��N �� ' kt�I;, ' � �" �ti _ - �� t��. � � , , bti . . t'" � � � � � � � - � }� /, �ty�_y � � . SN _y r � ` t ��. � � � �� ,. . . _ _ � T , r ,'� � '` - - �' .�:: f ':�� . . _ � a �� ` '"�l�� e � - �� l Ff `_ � '� �'� �` : `' � - . �, _ �__ �y � ;�' �'� � � � � c �' �., ��'``��-- = � � � ' . � p � � -�. ��' � _ �- �-. ... f y � - 'r .oJ7f.� .r � ��f,� +� � � �r�.t i_ , �'� _-.'� � � �= tr y� is:y. w € �;�+-+ ;� . � i � i /; �' I �� y� . � � i / ,� �: _ .r �4. § r , ` r� , i' ' i '��-� _ - - � v\ � M�,Q JIVI - = �•''�' � � -. �WY, a. � r' ,` ; ,- - r,_ � i ` `r��, �. :'� - ' r, � , �; � .� � �� r � � � , I�i . �� \;\ - �� -,� �y�c ��`�, ti `� ��. 1 , .�T .� r-� C. � �C�� - - �� . . i .� �i - '�`' - � -.`'� 3� �, > f ^ ; � .� _ � fr _ � `� � , � �� ,'}�.�� . � . .-� d� - -;� -�.�'r,.ti i�c �t.,r,��.. r-�°�._:_,._� :` �� '' �+.�. � � � - '^ti „r r a:; i^< <v ` '4� , - � � ;F.:'' � '' ; / � � yi. hq;a, � ' I� . '- - - "-: � . �^/ �, _� h �1!1� �I��- , . . '`i�� 1 � _ -- - � �-� ��.� � yi � . � _ � _ :� �`�iP i /' �i4��,y . .a� �� '� �l° ' r�/.-., - �ti � �i t � _ -� - � / '� � / U �� - � �� _ r, _.� � �,�k. - • . � a� , � a ,� �. �- '`�t � ��j�` � . ._ . ,\ �t � . �'i �`� � ;f�� a�s, �,�fi rfN e-- � f.' - �!. �� -�� _ +�- �' a� r * f ` �i � �� , •t , i. �'' ','" �"'� ` ,r '3� rl;�. � KF;177i � �.� _ � _ � r _ ti, y � . �._ - ;-� �s " ,,, a . , � ' `,� k .a`r. �.,_ � D--.. H7(; 2' ~-��l - -. -� - r n, �a s a - �.'t RIl'E`�1��.. � '� _ ''~� � _�� -- '� � ' "`� � : , � � ♦ '� y ' ' _r -, � � ! �_�� ,i ' � . j ,'�J° • � � / �"� rr ;, a� ��,;: w� . f a w, p � �'} .r . � , i. � � ..,'P.r: -� ,� c �. �` -��e'6`-,-r '� � � ''a` `? .. - +� s� � �'�'+►� _ — . _ � �^ � ,/ � � 1' - _ -_ � _ y?-.,��7- - -r __ . r �l . . r �If>> . '�;;9, '� � '�a�` s4'' 't" �`� � �' "�'r _ _ - - � -�_ � q L �a� � . -.�, /� �i 7!� ,� •1�,, �. ., 1��'n�� M 1` � �{ __ �i`_-�`�#-• _ _ �- �`f{ � `�� ' I�f -� � Yc '� i _ � �. � • ``� - � ` � � _ _ _ - - �'�` ^R �ti`"`� .� � �,� ,?��'�' � - � � _ � � �; ' r,. _ - t _ ''�_' r, ��'�_ � ' _ , � � �� _ so: o ,, � . � � _ . . . _ ��` �L; _ �p � �.`��. �'��,� Jf . . _ �`� '-' ♦ - � ' _ ` ti �� }�C i�� / � . ,. � . _ {� 1 : :. . -. �� - `� L ' �'\/ �y .��` f � "'�� /.- `� �' -=- - --� , - ?:;., � '� - _ - - . _� - � ►' '3 - _ � � ;� , � ' �. 'T� � � -- � � b �* �/� � r �.�* �_ _ _ `_ ; � -- ,, - - 7 , � _ �_ � � __ _ _ � . << �, �� , � ,�`:�"�.:'.,,�' _ � �- `` �' ` r�t.� : � � �,�� DRtj� ` � � '�r ��, . Y�" E _ '��a � - �-�� ,' f ��'��.+ . , { ' - � - {%: h ', b� v �� .'��,` - 4. �' � � `'ni -- • �, .� � j t '�r� . i' _ � - ,' � -�._ �., �ti ' , - - --� � �:. __` r"` i ' ' _ � _ .-fi ,- .,� ` I, ��titi �� +.hli.�l .. - a- .. ��ri �� --� � ti 4d � !�. I, IP i . i _ - � .A ti t R , . �� i I �i� i�(�� . , . ,. � �! �. � � �.'q.. _ �_, _ �� i� �I�l��i1� jMf�� `_ r :P� � � - - I� i1i � �� , .i. fHfi�l'�'H. . r �� =�•. ' -� . - ( r � _ i r .:�-. �_ �'� �� ta' !c� ' � �� , ,,: �;' . . ' f+. � , � + � � '��' 3�;r 1C �� _ �''- - � i� � w "�.NC+CGI�/�� Jurisdictional Features Map Upgrade US 70 To Interstate Standards From US 70 Goldsboro Bypass To West of SR 2314 (Pondfield Rd) Wayne / Johnston Counties, North Carolina Q R-5829 Study Area OSheet Index Potential Perennial Stream Potential Intermittent Stream Potential Tributary of the U.S. Culvert — Streets Potential Wetland Potential Pond r--- �_ _j County Boundary Date: May 2018 Scale: 0 175 350 Feet � 1 � Job No.: 17-008 Drawn By: Checked By: CMR NDH Figure Sheet 13 of 18 � � x .o�; ,� •!1 �+� i� � ' , ' .f � � �� +�� t •{ • 1 ' � 3 �t .: � - �. `: � p' ' .y, � , : . �, .. � �� ,. � - �; . ��` , ; �,�,�� ,� -•� , � � ,.� ,� ��' - i i ��QJ�I�� . 7,.•,i' . p !. ` ti�-� _ � r - Y �." .•r.. ' �'r = `- r �ee . l" �� . � li.., . �r x- : _ r� . ... - � �� . • ^ WEE ��¢i ..��_ �'•; i l� S N � � � �, � H� �� SN � �„ r �. � '. . �'^ . . � f� •�� ' � ��, 4� �e WDD� _ - ,_ _,� � �� ` � � ��'°SO - _ � "F. �'1 ` � . �'� ' �AY ` 1�`r,� �" �_ i T� ' Y �p j - - �. - , .Y� !� . �� 5 � � j� ��I t � a,�� 'r � �i! , SM :,�.; � SM ^� •�, SM , .,� i y I , ; �r ^ . - P �� , �e*� i, � -.�Y - /.... ,� v'' _ ii �� I �'r . � - � � �• �' �� WDD � 1� ' �� p��. :� -`� ; � '�~ I � t, �-;� �� . � rR /�'.. �`-� 45'f'T, � !' ,. k�- � t � C � F + � R i� � � r „ ' � �� , ' '� . �� so � :i> ui �/aA` . � T H�H(Li:s �` r. � ,. ��RIVF,,�� -�_ �' • � ` �� A WZ .� , ,,�,, ► ; , � �,�r, WDD WDD �, -,1.= <" `.: i :C ' 7 �� _, �� - .'x` t' � �; � � ti �' '� � � �. � fi ' � t�. � �" � _ � - ,. , y r" �� ,�' �: �F�'� �C:� ^�� ._ �� '` �L '" � � - M � `��+ � .'�.'it,.+ �.�. *X� .�. � :d � � � � � - '' � 7" � � � _ � ''.=1�-.. �,.,}.�' . � � t y z `' � �.,,� � �1,.' _ �1�-. 1'�,,� `I `' '.1�„ � "..t • ��i1�r��Ytj! ~.c:�. _- � �1� , . , r, v ��l �i' ��T',�- " r � �- � # �. �� - ,. . � � � ,. . �; _ �� x.;.�.-� � _ - a.`; ' . ::�r•, _. ' !'!� � 1 �; - WJJ �_ - - `� 4 . . � � ,� , t . � � � - R a.� . < �' _.�, ' gt/V . tiy �� . y� . �' � � � , al � , � ,� r ,�, �� e . �lt�..r: i � � � �= ` � �' x>' ��i � �� _ Barr,r ; � � Su, � -� 1�Rf1r� Y 1, _ ,�i•� e . ..� ��r' :,� � `� SX ,( . . _ � .�. �� - �. i ` , , _ '�v*-. _�� ' � :,.� �� ;* ' r . '� - � ,� � . -�-�, ,; WKK S V, WLL' r ti �'t r ! C' �� r. "u F' s �' � , ��;A �r , � - �� ; --' . '_ � r . �1 y� i " . �� 1 , . t�_-.. .`�i„�� '.�'x `,� _ , L 4, ,.,� �a` .:�� - WFF - .� •� ¢ � p� ''� � S� WGG + �� w i` �. .� b • k `=' - � '� ` � : � ^ ��! _ . � "��i � .A` A � f ln'� . '^ ��'.� . WCC� �' n �I�,y��s` "r^�,�,�, `�., � ► �, a % �' 1�! � ': �\ � � � �� N 'A �+ � . wF .. '� r � 11� �, � �� r � - " yr b * , - 9�. _ .� . � � �� ~� f`� �,' �. . � 'e f _ � � �-. � ,''� ` � �. . r - -- �� ,..— :. �� - _. ' . � — _ � _ _r.. ' � ` _ ,.'4,� -. . . . c :.,-. . � � �.. / . � .. � ' : � � r '� ti,�: % -�l,' �.�� -� _ J� . _ ~ .. .3 �� ' �: � " r W I I �� ,�, � � �. � ~ .� � � i- � 1 !_ . - �•.,ti'...� � T�'T �i �' _ . � v�,�`'� �� ^� 'yC , ,, - a, �t ,s� � � �e 1 � W �jo �r'�' W1Lll ` `�� ' � �� . {� � ��►�\i)o21V'_ti � �� '� � � T ' � �� ' . D . A . . i, '_ � �" � - a . , -. _ , $ `- �� .� F� �. ' ';�. .� , . ;w � .= � r# .� - � � , ° S,� � � f t' � � - .� � � ,� , �� '' t °{ '^ � ��t a '$ - �, , �.- - ,,. ��_ .� ..r'+ ' *,F� 11;. r � y}�� , . .. -� . ,�,' Ttl � r �� .�;. ��,�,� ��Z �,��r ` '� �v � .y. - - � � �'1 .a, �Y �, � W N N L. � t- _ � - �; �, , �� M -= iWNN' . � i ' �� " r ti SV�'_ _- - _ .� L ' ,� ! -� � �.' a� PH� �r _ � . . � .,u� i._ . . - . - . - _� � - . �r, . '�� . - � �� iC � - S � e 7� � 'S � _ �l i �� -- "zi+ .. . .�.� ^� �.'"�� — - . �Y' -� �; �4 ',,� ` & , �,._y v � . ., . � � � :� . '�`. _ _ _:r � ; �._=y - 'Y `- _ z ��'� � j ' � • °� ,� ','`�e�, `.a � � . n � ' ��- { -;� �� r L ,�! ;' * .. � �'_ ,TS -- •- -- Jurisdictional Features Map Upgrade US 70 To Interstate Standards From US 70 Goldsboro Bypass To West of SR 2314 (Pondfield Rd) Wayne / Johnston Counties, North Carolina Q R-5829 Study Area OSheet Index Potential Perennial Stream Potential Intermittent Stream Potential Tributary of the U.S. Culvert — Streets Potential Wetland Potential Pond r--- �_ _j County Boundary Date: May 2018 Scale: 0 175 350 Feet 1 � 1 Job No.: 17-008 Drawn By: Checked By: CMR NDH Figure Sheet 14 of 18 ; ,. � . r . ,> C� �(r��A �` �,' � � �' - ��'' . � � �* � _ , , � ,�. � CG• /' � �. -� _�. 'S' � r, - (g �'►'r � �C ��- ►� � ! �r �� J ,��F ;� !' ��, I`T'+� -^yw f _ � '.. ... l��lr �"x,� 1f�lplZj,S �� s'"� �WAA'�„ ' � r��z�tr��w�p � „ .•'?�� Z��U -. es,- � j � �' r: ��, + . . . , tl ., �+ � , �r: -'� __ ��: ; � � � �� '_ �� ' �� ' �� `� • , 1� . ; ��, : sk� ` x t ' � ~ �� i �i �!�_`` _ , ti '_ � ti � �: � � `� �:, '�_` �� ' `� � `- - � -. �� 4 � � -, u ' � � µ . r �: ��y � ' �4 � s� . Q .� , , ; �,. _: � �''f °�'. 3 . , , , ', � - ,-�� r -� -� � � � � ,� ,.�.� � , � - , � �, �. �, -� �i - ti��4 .+�� ►� � �"..� �` r ., n" �/BB. ! . r ' .i�.Y-�� r� � _� y� „� , . � � -_ - � ' e> T ! � � . � - i� ). 4 �6l '��+ �1. / �..� i1 �� . , '. w j +. � r _ J�`4 � `�' 3�%�� .' �,� ♦ �'��. � � � �t� WNN . ! �i ��" WNN " �'?[�� } x�I _ ,'} _ � � Y � 'F - I �� _�J�� ;i � *��, � � ^,x ''.� � � .�. . SVr- a , , . � . , . , � ;�� . ''�� _.� . , � t�*,,�t = - r-- - .� . --�_ 3� �'.? � �., s _ . :4� - . _ i / , -. _ . \.� .F�r ,� �.'�- �•s - �, ��..r 1 � i �PH �'9� ' , .. ," � - �- . .^ z� �� F �S:' /, �f� •.__`�� 'a��S� - t 3'i�.� I _ I l_� Y��L 1. f�Ye�,*_ �r. .� _�J CO ' � �'SS � j6t ;5' �=- - - !/�� r ' . � i. - r '�- {,�' / � "1(/ ��' - � 0 -_ \ �..',e� �, y :'l N I , i ( .. j � � r r1 . �� . �. � <) � � � °��i� � � d ,� -� , ;�.�. � .a � ,� �/` ` -- y,� � ,� � ..t� � . . i . �:� ` _ / ' . _ .s � � '� ,_ v�? K' : �ti �u f� +z1�`_ ' ^+r � �� „ ' w .„, �,� �rr" �.TS t � - WZ i� h..� �. � � 4 : � � I 1 I �' , kf' �s�- r `t � ` � ' C . �' ` '�c, '�a` �` ` , ' _ p� � X ",,�._ -� rt y �, « '�� T� c,; -�� ,l,� � wz - , ,�.,�� ' �;,`��,^�. �'�,,;��, ' `�.� . . �� .,f ,;,.�`�et . . — �+f• � �� 4'%.rl. r7.5..: �rMw �, � `+�+"ti_ ., ' � , - �.. 4 � '� e i S � . J �� ee . / ^ . - '� '� , y �'� a`s._ -' _ _ ��' _ - � � � ,' . ' .� �. � 4� r• � --�.._ i � y i ' ' � � �r � . . � . 1F . �� -:� .- - . .. - . --`.i�, � ' ,, �; �,� '�' - � � � ; �� '�;,�,�. � . , �, ., fi� � ��„ ./� : � ,. . �, r�, � _ .. �E I . _ '""� . .. ] W +' - - � ' , y� e' � ( . _ .. .. . . � ' �� '• ). -,�-3 -� - -. - . - �` ��@;4 y,� . �, ►. s�"' . �: i, + ` . .: - - �-� �� _ p� - ' 'rt ,� - _ . . - - ''�.. - �� r — �' � �i�� f� .lyq�n_.. �� . � �� "/ �� * - . _ �:, � '. �� + � %.. ` �, -_� � ! 1��!' +- ,~ r rF�� !�� R.�:. _. . + . • ' .�5� �. . �. !� -,� �A � �j . ♦ � s_� - � •� % '' - �-1' . �, '� � � � � � � �� } , �. . }• � . Y � - - �� :� � ,��-�'� r �'` . �`�� f � I � � . �- � w - ��"�-: , , � � r �� : � a - y ,/� , _ � � � r �-,- �C.� /' � ' . � `� :�, � ,�' ' / / � / , � �„ � - . � r � �` � � � '� � '~ � �. ti > � � � � w�,� U �� _t-� '`' .�`= r�- . - � � . ,� � - �� - ` � � � � � ' `� �" "� +`. ; -1 ,+ � .3 � � ` f ^ � ��. ''.� :� - �r - -_ _ -_ _ . . �� P � � ..,�� `�-, , � _ � � _ , '� r ; .a� , �:a . '� � "�' � H-i _ '�l. `� , 1 f � � �, 1 � ...� �i' � .<� � � � -_ Jurisdictional Features Map Upgrade US 70 To Interstate Standards From US 70 Goldsboro Bypass To West of SR 2314 (Pondfield Rd) Wayne / Johnston Counties, North Carolina Q R-5829 Study Area OSheet Index Potential Perennial Stream Potential Intermittent Stream Potential Tributary of the U.S. CU�V@ft — Streets Potential Wetland Potential Pond �--- �_ _j County Boundary Date: May 2018 Scale: 0 175 350 Feet I � 1 Job No.: 17-008 Drawn By: Checked By: CMR NDH Figure Sheet 15 of 18 �� - - : _- -----:,� . . ,�y_ -_ �. � �_ - - �; � - - _ � � — T —^ `. _ _ .� � r . . - -.. 7 �—��. � L .. ,� � - ' � .. _ ��-� k � � � �' � - �,`� '_�� ..� � iy r S �� r — � y ' � � _ :� ti � _ -.�.�.� u., yy�{� - ' � . a, �-c-�- -, � ti _ � _ i -.... _ . . � ; r'�q- _ _ . - -_ 'L _ - _ _ _ - _ _ � - .r! ��j � f� rl�� '- . �. �, :� �: - � ti � - � �� . � �. , '� � �l I � ' _ � ni�� ! _ � . � - . �. � {I -_ _ j•� � 1 �' � _ �;�i ... � ,� . � y } i �"_' _ _ , . �._�',, r - - ,s' a=-- - . - � - -- � __- . _- - i � � -- - if � �j� t „► ' or��:- �i :.1�F ' -_��- T � �� - -+r � "_ • _ � � ;�� i�J '�' •�. ' 4�,f .�;-s: , _ . ,��__.__-__- - ,:� - - _ ` I f +� ', IJ� - r T �� _'__ _ L� , ' 1 ' s,�,,� a .;_ T�. of, , [�'�! �. � �I i � � ` ��:r 1'�'' � �fl�'dl^' } � a � , ; .y�� _ ��_ ��--+----e�� - - . '�9L-.^�.. µ" , q • - ��a �- - � �O G: S f x - ~ T^LIS; � , ''"_ �_ _ _ � , _ - � � -, �".:.::...:,• � �` °� ^ _- - - 1��'x �Wr�`� y'''. , � � , � - ,� Y-- � : � � . -� .a . n--0 !u�� - ,R�rr,��^` �` r`�`Iitel�.' �; �� , � Y wy a t�1:(-r-,'M, i r� a.e�w —�• ..�: �� L _:.�I. �r�-�, ; �:»l� �� l�4�. ,;� , ,�.,_,c�.__� � , �. i - �•� s �� s � � � � �' �° �"t'. �,�� ,{b'.�� - � •� � `�,__ :�Y ,�.� � - �� :..� tenrw � �r .�,� WQQ � asx� ,.�.._��'_ �.�.., �� F ,:.�.. . �-*�. V_ .x. �.., ..vic r k...n1�`$3 � . � WRR:��: '��I�s.�'... �/J - �` ��, �„ ;y ; , °, ,, f�F• _ p .� , .� ;,'�; ,� � � � - °� i ' '�._ ! . '2 fi�� ){ �-...i � ' � � ' �� '•? ,�' ` �k=�3� �i� �`: r, �f;;, r ~� '. ��,��d �:�� 6.. -t _ ' �`. �i h��y �� ,�• .�-� � ��.r .I.r, ,� t . - ��'�_ . � .{ � :.r st Y �' i� _ -� �r y�� 'w ��. � ,� � ��.�:� �-- - � � , � P� � �� •�.► - - � �' I � '' ,� � >�'- �� WVV� � � WTT,, �� ' ' T•�;; � ,� .a , � 1, , � t � � ..� � � � s � . � � � ...,WUU� . � ' � �, _ _ SY' -� � • - _�__ �_ �_ :��,, --=� - � ��F` � at �� . �. :I,�, .. J��-�_.. SheetY1�; ' � �_ � �� ) �� I WWW � � 8 . � �. � fy ...j . ' �� ! rlb...� � ��.O i � ' I�V. � �•; { �- L �` ��l@ _ — _ �kmy ' r - _ q1�,1� �- !�'O �I .��9� �,�_L. . - , �� - �� . _i�� ' ��1 �. r� , �� , r`� n ' a S•' �' Y, k' . t _- �''� � � _';� , � �, � , er►� t 'x- ;; t � Jurisdictional Features Map Upgrade US 70 To Interstate Standards From US 70 Goldsboro Bypass To West of SR 2314 (Pondfield Rd) Wayne / Johnston Counties, North Carolina Q R-5829 Study Area OSheet Index Potential Perennial Stream Potential Intermittent Stream Potential Tributary of the U.S. Culvert — Streets Potential Wetland Potential Pond r--- �_ _j County Boundary Date: May 2018 Scale: 0 175 350 Feet i � i Job No.: 17-008 Drawn By: Checked By: CMR NDH Figure Sheet 16 of 18 W� . : F ,� �r �_ .!• r fr� �� „ �, co r '�'j�l ik.: �"` y4 . �1`� . V. � `� � '�. � :;:,.�-�r u '�rr,�., ..37w�w � �'- — - - —�.-• , _� :. .�r' ___ . �� Ri +L�� 1 , N, � "�#Sl�lJi � �. � � �'�"�" �� .�.,,�,..�. �, � � ... �NY:r37 r+�r_ � � .,r ;�� • �. a., s W R R'�� a,-,r�, '� #�is 1'... �: � � �.� � .« ��.-'�� *�'�_� Y..ii�/il11{tn � .i1�1"F`�"�y �q�� '.._- ��+�.fi�� - ` �_ _.; ;� �M R� r�c. : � �c..3e � .� A , ° ° . x ,r^+ir =� f �. � � �, �� . , s. e. �, � t P ��e � . � . ..;,�„ ��ta-?lv�'r � .•: r.,r:�� a. . u.�sra-� ` - � �-�-;��. ,. : � �� *.�A. �R�"�� a � � :� �A� ��= � 'i� � � � ��.�� t� g��l�q � �;�. t,f��;p ��l��QO+�� - ` �i�}�D ��i+��.4e�b��,� ` �. _ � - "��.� � �� - . `=�Z'+'� ++� � � � • '��*e L�� . � .. _.�� . :.; � ,, .. �._.L.�♦ - . . . '- � � _ _ . . } �' _ - -i 'ry� _ .? *� � � j �5� '�[,�' :� � F � � =�. -; � r, � . � � , ;'� r� ,� � i � - �; �� i � . �' + � . � ��i�'..r.. , � � �►��1��4�1 �'-a;.� �- ��_ A' .. _ � � ,^ �G�i � z� � a �9 �_ � ` �� v �;�.-'�! `� �� `�_z � �``: _ � � }. �� s Q M� � . J� �. � � � �. , ��' ' � �� `'�s +� . , , �:�,_.�� t " ..: �� .l� -` M�r �• f �.., �'2 �? I" - �. , . � �� r� l" � ��.,��, ' - .--�-.°�'_'�.-�-.-?_ �_ WXX i,, � y.... :. ,,,,..� ,�f � t y : .` �. , �,_-_ ,,;� � IM � : ; � �' .f�• . I � � {�` 4� �ra� �,�, ..;5. ,�-;,. ':C `..C: .��I�� +', .��. ��, .� ��/� 1 'J sl� J{j if�F� f� i� �� \ � - i `- ,�`- ',1 ! :s- ��s � ~ �'�" "'i� " 9y� �� a/ r �� w ! i ,��i, �„^,,.�' v.� - : � � � � "�L . ,. � � . r�y' �� i�,�tY�p� h�;}:'? �'��. Ff /'�_ -. � •�y� ��, _�. � x''�{:-��,� ''t:• - �, ,Y�'�' �' �u _ h! � p� %� 1 N�� y�,M� ��'� 1 i �� g � fi 1 �� ! `�", `�' , ��,�,�- d �» �. . ' ,�`/f ;., r - f� 4�. � � � . rYyr ,�w,k Y�..�� ,�'� '� ��'�. �� „� 4 ,� �+��k� 3 -w ..- . � � � i�'�� 6' � t`' ' `� . � l}� � t � �� i7� +�,. kr• , ��. �i`p;� - h �n, � zt,��,�`�� . � , � � ( `�� 'f .i�; i?'t f ',_; � �� f� ,^ �'�y �� ; � �� r;3'` � 'S !� �' •� , tr' �_��- ' S; ,!e �j?�� '�� i',� �j�� S 1 � � Di�' � �R — i{ti+ . /,S r.- .F 'x � � � � � - �4�' ` �� !'� �`` �1- ' " _F / � +' .�.` . y y', I? i' � 1�.` /., .. i�'ti. : �� — �( � � J ��`— ti�; , �� ° . �� .�- Y ( ,� � • ' _ r �, - _ �.. ,'�. I r � ' 1�1yL��:'ytiT ,�r �f.l.�. '� ' V �� 4 � �l�:R�:��r � �F ti t �� , �: � Z� � � . r� � �'�'' ° ,;, ��, , Y��n� a�l: ilJl ��,' L�Y � ��.::a - - — _ � ' .. v , r�� .; , �_�� ' l r��:1' s' . 1 � t; r, .r'i,� —� _-� � �r . '.5�ti :,,�T y r r _. � - �..I ,J�� 1 + � �� / � �,I• S ' _ �� +�. �l� 3 ' JU.h�'1� i r f'; t � � rr.�i ��5��•�� c �;:, � _t' j � , � � � �. _ �- -- . , r� �' `r��. . � �� — : �'R �� Jurisdictional Features Map Upgrade US 70 To Interstate Standards From US 70 Goldsboro Bypass To West of SR 2314 (Pondfield Rd) Wayne / Johnston Counties, North Carolina Q R-5829 Study Area OSheet Index Potential Perennial Stream Potential Intermittent Stream Potential Tributary of the U.S. Culvert — Streets Potential Wetland Potential Pond �--- �_ _j County Boundary Date: May 2018 Scale: 0 175 350 Feet i � i Job No.: 17-008 Drawn By: Checked By: CMR NDH Figure Sheet 17 of 18 �;� � . .�. _ - � � � � � - � _ 1 . y � at >9d p� � ��L\G J�,t !'� : ��' " � +�,4, , � `r ,� ' -�� ,�`,� � �, �,� � _ ��:�� . .� - ��, �'!i�� -'►.� �;� y�if t r �1,� 1��i1 �.j. . � 1 � � ��• �, ��ir � � ,� ��' �o r_� +�� ,� � `�.*g� j + �1� '�``� � � � � �� Y- -{}��'.gp � ' �-. � - i j Ii' l e! � i�� 1• . i � • � t � �` '' I: . ^ . i' �f }I � �'��, � � � � ' � � �� l.t� � .� r M �j' _ ,��_�_ � ��s � ,�' . � � . ��` . � .� _ . � �i n-_ _ " a �`� r - f:.1 _ --■ _ � "� . - . _ __-� ' _ _ - } ��n ��` 3,;'.: '� ` ` __ °N � ��r`� _ ` � j � �� _ * . - ;� l -= y,f� o �V % ii� },� 'i � �. � �: � � � L ,�� ,3 i � �� "7 �� :V, ��-� �. . � f� ��'� �� e n !� i I. � . �«'f ,c � � , i(:()'�,! A( ON:� � �� ^ � "a'� iDR!!'[? -PL10Ej .a �. j , ��. _ , � � t-�� '^' � � � , : � '_. � '�� , + � rL ' , `�;� -�.: ,�� _ , a' , � � � � �'` � .. , � �_�• - , �. �-� j ,4 ; ;, : . �y ',-� .,� � - :�s.,►> L�c � ,� 1� ti � � .. � , `:� _ �� y��,:r, -�i� � - d � I � _ r � ` ��''�- �-� � — - - , � �� ' z .� � y �-� ' � . � ._'j� � h7'i' � a�- � � �. ,_�.► 6r. d � ` .: - ,� 1'i� � 1 - �rJ �"" --� y--� � _ �� t - � .1 , �.• t: y M f +� { - _ 1� �� ^ \ - . l� . �� d''' . �� i ' ° � h .. 1 4 � C �� .�' .� , � � A. Q � i �.:. ! ��_• � E�',� �t� � " f '''� ` � � , � J� �Y,:_ � ��' � , �'Y.} � � A��J � , � . �: � - p � ^$� � ; .� �� I : � " ! � , ��, � �' ��% � �`� l f � I � -,.. �� t �� r � � � � �.. - � t. � � �, � � �,� _ _ � , , i � fi ' �1. � i ��' + �� '. ' � �' � .. �i. . -s, ` ` _ , +2.�.� 1 1 � � � � '� .� � �. - _ c 1 . � 'S'.4• -� -� s M � � � ,. ,� � �, �,��' a�y,` �� ' �;; �,.� ��,,.. _ � � - _ _ y ,.�;�� '! � ��- ;� � � . � , ' y , � � ,. �-� , � r+�7 I� �1.� �., ,, � {/t'y, ._ .�� .... , r;►• � i � �; .y' a /�� O j';'' ,I �'' , ' '� I� � P � _ I � � µ� ::1 �; ` �� , y `,\ . � �� .. , ,1,�,, � ._-�. . t-.� �-. �-3 .�� Y„�� "i. �`� � � �ASKGW� 1'LAC1:� '.�DEBI3IE DRR'�' . .r� �`� � _' � � 1: � �. . — � . y r ` C� ! � � .� , •' _ �?s'�' � � �-�' �. �� t� . � � � � , � ,: � , r� � tir _ '. p �'S )0 � � '�' _. r i'�-�"' >; • �YI�i � - � � � t�7�+. � f �w�� - ` : �' :/ `�'"��'��'!�l`,t*k, ` Y! ,,� IE-'rC^ , "� . ' ` 4 � � � � �� . `��z a► _ : R �'. ,� - - . f � f- � '�.T . , .. i � ��i�B� y :+ �r e� r ,/ ' ` � �:�: � � �., _ '� E� � �� . � �z A . P � _ 'f;,. �,� . '+_. . . � �♦ � �_.. ' .� ' �� I� ,. i. � i �i� 1 � r - r . � ' . � -,~ � �� . \` �� 4Y }_u r. � :�.> . . �;: ,A� .� - � I' s=�r = PK•; �, �. �)"�` ��. _ � , N �- � �_ 1 . �• � - v �, f-� � �; ?it -�' fi � _;� �- �� r- — " � �- j• �; - -'� '�z, .��"�=o�'_�,,•� __. ' -.�" �, �' . '+. � � E , ��, � � ,,,� � - 1, � � �,,►. ,_.� � � ;,�sT ' � r � � w � � 'd WENDY4WAV �E,�ST S�'CND1 «'.A�. � , ti, 1 y r. . ( � ♦ �� * � � ! A , F � ' � i 4�;j '- •M� A� � �' •i � r �� v. � ' .� �,� j� ��. �` �ti,V�� - r` !/ �I � , ��1-• _ r ,, � � a /� �`�, i `� � � :'=r�. � �� . i - - . ` �� •'` �n'f _ - �� - �'r-: � r , � • t� (�:k; � �'' � -�z � - _ --s--�_.� � � '�`�*`- ` �`�'� � �-� _� - = — - - ��'�� t�. � �,' ; p,w r� � _ �-"c..�+c - T ' ��-- . : . _ _ . - . ""' , _ — _ — — - . _ � � -.'_- � _ ` �. � - � - - -- - - - - . _ - - _ —4_- _ ` _�- .�z �_- _ ,^-- - . : y �--�-_ �--.� - - - - � _ - -=. �--.�� _T _ r'-� _. . : T� � _ � _ . _ _ .• � "_�-� __ _ - � _ -- — _ � _- ,, , � � ' _ "�-- _ -_ _ - - � n. --- 1�->- . - � { ;,;.y � � :-- _ ..,� � �� fi+ � � -- -_ - _ ' ,i �� ' � �. _ � ^� . nr= �. , � � 4 � � :'� t � � r�� Q �� , � - ' „� __ ' - - _ _ _ .. - F �. r. ' � w � f( � Y _ 1� � ,� _ _ i. - . �� R� � .r, �. , ��...� � � ' � —, . _ _ _ .a� k.: ,� . ._ �� ,�__ � �. ,� , , , ��,�� = '� .t t, "i�° - +r . r � � r - , �• � �, �p. _ _. ;. f�JCC�IA Jurisdictional Features Map Upgrade US 70 To Interstate Standards From US 70 Goldsboro Bypass To West of SR 2314 (Pondfield Rd) Wayne / Johnston Counties, North Carolina Q R-5829 Study Area OSheet Index Potential Perennial Stream Potential Intermittent Stream Potential Tributary of the U.S. Culvert — Streets Potential Wetland Potential Pond �--- �_ _j County Boundary Date: May 2018 Scale: 0 175 350 Feet I � 1 Job No.: 17-008 Drawn By: Checked By: CMR NDH Figure Sheet 18 of 18 Appendix B Stream and Wetland Data Forms i e��vudam C.rec�(� �%3e�,sd I7-�r4� G��' NC DW Stream ldeotificarion Form Versio¢ 4.11 ��ip? (� /✓�rt ��R �^ ",Pa� Date: j 3/� ol . ProjecVSite: �' J:�Z Latltude:rJ� �D �/^ Evaluator:N•1l,.I�t,n �-iOWfJ.� �.�j� Counh''__.)s,�:n5�o___ Longitude:—�U�.i�� 02 Total Points: 3� Stream Determination (circle aher Sheam is af leasl lnrermlttent Ephemeral intermittent erennial e.g �uatl Name: ��; �"..( p,� �� If? 19 or erennlal rt>_ 30' A Geomo�phology (Subtotal= %� 5) Absen[ Weak Moderate Strong 1° Contm ly ofchannel betl and Uank 0 1� Z � 2 Sinuosity of channel alon9lhalweg � 0 :1 � I 2 � 3� 3. In_channel structure'_ex rifFle�ool, step-pool, ' p—� � � I z I 3 I 7 Recent alluvial deposits e. Headcuts fl Glade cun�ml 10. Natual valley 1 t. Semnd ar greater order che ' artlf¢ial tlitches are not rateQ see B. Hydrology (Subtotal= �2. Presence af 62seBow 13. Iron oxidizing bacteria �4 Leailitter 15. Sedimenl on plants or tlebri i6. Organic tlebris lines or pile= 17. Soilbased evidence of high C. Biology (Subtotal= �B FibroUS foots in streambetl 19 Rooted uplantl plants in stre 20 Macrobenthos (nole diversity 2�. Aquatic MolWsks n Fisn 23 Cra�sh _ _ 24 Amohibians Sketch�. 7e2 r,�Hf� � D. ly� — N o N4'! � � N� 0 i Z 0 �7, 2 0 �.5 1 0 CQ,�i7 � No-0 . Yes= ual 0 1 2 0 1 2 � OS 0 ',G 1 0 5 1 No=O � Vesf` 3 2 � � � , 0 1 2 a i l,2 0 os i 05 � 0 05 j 1 _ — a os — i FACW=075�, OBL j 5 her=0 mel0otls See p 35 of manual RankNe;ght(hl'.�� / BanMull width (ft) 8 Wa[e�tlep[h�in�. - �� Channelsubrt�ale IIt,Sand.6iave obble. 6eNack Velonty-�fast moderat slow ` ❑ainY .� ��eay^Ightly hrbiQ lorbitl / Date: � �� ' 5 �(�^`� Evaluator:��,y�� W�� Total Points: SfreamisaNeasllntertnittenf QUS I(? 19 0� perennial i2 30' �� A.Geomo�phology (Sublolal= �i 1` Continuity of channel betl and bank 2. Sinuosiry oi channel along [halweg 3. Inchannel simcture' ex rifFle-000l. strn bars or i i. secona or greater omer cnannel ' atllfclal tlM1ches are not rsteQ sae diswa B. Hydroloqy (Subrotal= 'a,� 12. Presence ot BaseFlow �3. Imn ozd'¢ing bacteria �4 Leaflitter 15. SedimeM on plants or debris i6. Organic debris lines or piles 17. Soil-based evidence of high water C. eioloqy (subtotai = I 18. Fibrous roots in stream6ed 19. Rootetl upland plants in streambe[ 20 Macmbentl�ns(noletliversiryandabi 21. Aquatic Mollusks 22 Fish 23 CrayFlsh __._____'- __.. 29 Amphibians 25 Algae -..—.. ..—.. 2fi Wellantl plants in streambed 'perennial strezTs mav alw De itlenvifietl � Sketch: ��o ��y�.� � u5��- No Nv.c� - Ye� (�9�P!"o�nr� Ci-CC'� Project/5ite: (,/ ��j �6�/� Latltude: 3� y� r 0 /'�L County: � D�P.S�'o(� .. . Longitude: �� J,r � � � �, StreamDetermination(cirdeone) Other�f', fE�o�� Ephame2l Intermkten-9erenn a.3 QuaoNama: AbseM Weak Moderate Stron 0 1 2 T3 0 J_1 2 3 0 1 ,�2� 3 0 1 2 3 0 �1� 2 3 0 1 3 0 2 3 /� 1 2 3 0 ;" OIS 7 1.5 0 0.5 1 % 7.5 No�01 Yes=3 0 1 2 0 �1 ? 2 I5 1 0 0 0.57 1 0 ' 0.5 '� 1 1 5 No=0 Yes:=,3„% 3 2 1 0 3 2 1 0 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 0 OS 7 15 D 0.5 1 1.5 � '—�-�� __ 1 _' . 15 0� 05 1 75 FACW=0.75; OBL=15 Other=0 iofmanual /T1 9arik Neighl (k�: -/ - � 6anklullwidth�k�.��1 � Watei depth (inl. (� - G � Channelsubstrzle "Ci-.�ey,5il(-Sand_Grav�lob�le. eeawcF — _ Velaciry - la:t, moderate, slo.w ) Claiiry `cleaUslighUyNrbid, lurbid i -� A NC DWQ Stream lden[ificaHon Form Version 4.11 oa�: 5?��c i`i r�o��us��: �.� q L�� n�ae: �5, `1�3 D S>. Evaluatoc Coun Lon itude: r �/��u;i �CWeCI � L'>L h'� �hn5�o��—..__ .9 -�� 'L��"l, TotalPoints: StreamDMermination(circleone Other Sheamisatleasllntermlttent �s�� Ephemeral Intertnittent P renNal e.B QuaoName: �. Rt19or eienmalifa30` rf�� A.Geomor holo Subtotal= �<�- Ahsent Weak Moderate Strong �° Continuity of channel be0 antl bank 0 1 2 � 3 2 Sinuosity of channel along thalwey � 0 �� 2 3 3. Inchannel sVucfure'. ex rifFle-pool, step-pool, p � .-� 3 ripple-pool se uence 4. Particle size of stmam substrete 0 ;� 2 3 5. Active/relict Floodplain p ' 1 2 3 6. Deposdional bars or benches 0 �iJ 2 3 7. Receni allwial deposRs : p. 1 2 3 8. Headcuts p ;]_) 2 3 9. Gratle control 0 �,�5, i 1 1.5 10. Natu21 valley 0 a.5 1 ' iS 11. Second or greater ortler channel N- 0 Yes = 3 ° atlifclal tlitches are not a�ed; see discussions in manual B. H droiog (Subtotal= �/ 12. Presence oi Baseflow 0 1 Z L.� 13. Iron oxidizing bactena p 1 2 3 �4.Leaflitter '1.5 1 0.5 0 15. Sediment on plants or deUris � :'-0 �„� 1 1 5 16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 05 � 1:' 1.5 17. Soil-basetl evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3 j C. Biolo Su6total = � =� � �8 Fibmus roots in streambetl � 3 2 1 0 tQ Rwtetl uplantl plants in streambetl 2 1 0 2o Macrobenthos (note tliversity and zbuntlance) 0 2 3 21. Aquatic Mollusks -� �L Z 3 22 Fish 0 !OS 7 1.5 23 CraNsh 0 1 1.5 24. Amphibians __ __ p !Q§�� 1 1.5 25. Algae 0 05 � 1j 1.5 26 We�land plants in streambetl FAGW = 0 75, 08L = 7 5 Other'�0 ; perennialsir_ smayalsnbe tlenhfietl singothermelnotls Seep.35ofmanual Nales/�`.,��.�! , �'/ �.�n:!�ti,s �.0 �a fJo/'41-i _ __'- ��— l� � r eank Hei6ht Ik� �, i -� --"� - Sketch�. �N ,o J ea�krunw�du�(fll. 5 Wale� depth jin� (J — D U; �' N 0 CM1annel substtate ��v.v,.51� Sand Grave pbUle, N�'c,5 - Ye5 eea�o�H VelocitV - fazt, moEerate. SI� Clarhy %i'lea)slightlylw'hid,lmbid NC DWQ Stream ldeutific�� Date: f��3� � i� Evaluator' 1I I I � ��G r.Gf' -r.�b)sl,l Total Points: ShamisaNeastinfennittent G�,� I(> 19 or perennial if z 30' A.Geomorphology (Subtotal= t 1' Continuity olchannelbetl and bank 2. Sinuosity of channel along [halweg 3. In-channel structure' ex nfFle-pool. ste 7 Racent ellwial � t Second or greater ortler channel ' artlfclal tlRches are no� �stetl; see d,iicu5sions in manual B. Hydroloqy (Subtotal= /;�� 1 �2. Presence oi BaseFlow '13. Iron oxitlizing bacteria 14 LeaNitter / (SublOt21 = roots in stream n Fisn 23 Cra�sh . _ _ _ 24 Amphibians 2S Algae 26 Wetlantl plants in sVeambetl 'perennial sirer.. s may Iso be itlen�ifietl usin9 otbe NO(¢51 �M�l'L, r-�-Gf�I. i �f Sketch: �?�_ � , v F p u�5lr5- N� NRc ; - Ye� SB PmJecf/Ske:P,fjg�� Lrtitude: JJ� /�'fJ County: — I . Longitude: c : -- �cL4.:;4�r _..--�"�,.12D.6�. StreamDetermination arcleone) O[her EphemeaY�� Perennial e.g Quaanlame: �`�� p��,��, Absent Weak Moderate Strong 0 1 2 3 0 — '" 2 3 p 1 2 3 0 � - 2 3 (.0 1 2 3 0 �1 � 2 3 0 7 2 3 0 1 2 3 Ob 1 7.5 ,.01 0,5 1 15 Na�O Ves=3 0 t Q. 3 0 2 3 15 1 0.5 0 0 1 15 0 os i is No=O Yes,`a 0 0 3 3 1.5 15 1.5 I5 _ 0 —'- 9ankHeight(ft�'.�-� oanklull width �kC-� � Watei dePUi (in� �. D —�� Channelsubstrate'C� I_y SIIi,San G�avel,Cobble. xed,�a Veloairy � fa5t, moderale, Slow i L:-= ❑arit� cl� lightly [urhiq Wrbid NC DWQ Stream oa� s�3 Z�l� . � Evaluator: p�l,�� ; ��, ToWI Points: Sfream Is at leasf lnrertnittenf s� ProjecUSite: � .;j`�v�t LatlWde: �� G,�'�'f�� / County: ��..i,',�cn Longitude:� ��•], -_ =----- __�8. L2�= Stream Oetermination (cir.cle.one�.. Other � Ephemeral IntertnRtent��erenni `eg QoaONama: � f�!I('Y.�� o. nyuiuio �auococai= 12. Presenc= of Basefiow 0 1 2 3 13. Iron oxitlizing baeteria p (1 2 3 14. L¢af Iltter i 5 ,l � OS 0 15 SedimeM on planls or debris 0 :� 9..5 1 1 5 raats in 22 Fish _ 23 Cray 24 Amo � and aeuntlanoe Sketch�. / i l �',> �'.J✓ff� U.c�s— Y�� N�c; - Ye; 2 1.5 2 3 1 1.5 1 15 1 LS Rank Heigh� (RI'. �/' J 6ankfull wldlh (R�'.� — /S Wa[eidepth(inl�, 6�3L�� Channelsubstta�e:�'Llav Silt,Sand,6ravel [obble, Bedm<k �— Velociry � fast, modera�e�sfo� � ❑artty ;fleaal_%��ghtlyNrbid. Wrb�tl NC llWQ Stream ldentiffcafio Date: J/Z/7 V � �� Evaluatoc�Uf.l.�ii I�pWQ// + L�G r Total Points: J � Sheamis alleastinteimittent Iia 19 mperennialiia i0' A. Geomorphology (Subtotai=�✓ 1° Continuily of channel bed and bank 2. Sinuosily af channel along thalweg 3.In-channelstmcture: ex rifFle-pool, step-po npple-poolsepuence 4. Particle size of stream substrate 5. Active/relic[ floodplain 6. Deposttional bars or benches 7. Receni alluvial tleposils 8. Heaticuls 9. Gratle control �0. Naturel valley 11. Second or greater order channel ' aM1ifcial tlitches are nol ydted; see dis ionsin �. B. Hydrology (Subtotal= s � 12. Presence of 6aseflow 13. Iron axidizing bacte�ia �4. Leaf litter io. txganic aeons iines or pnes 17. Soil-basetl evitlence oi high waterl C. Biology (Subtotal = I i� 18 Fibmus roots in streambed 19. Rootetl uplantl plants in streambetl 20 Macrobenthos (nole tliversity and ab� 21. Aquatic MOINsks 22 Fish z3 ��,��sh 24 Amphibians 25 Aloae Sketch�. ' C %0� / ' ��1�l�' � � US(r'�- `/2J� N�ZcS— �PS ProjecNSite: Q , rJ�?c� Latitude: '%� !J/ � �� County: T��,� Longitude�_�S �L��/)� _ L StreamDetermination(circleone) Other Ephemeral Intertnittept'Perenni5 e.9 ��eoName: �. f��C24 o i 0 1 0 �1 0 7 0 1 0 !1 0 !,1 � — 2 2 2 2 2 2 i 1 Yes o i 2 0 2 s a 0 `�0 1 0 5 � No=O 2 � 0 See o. d5 of manual 3 3 3 15 15 15 0 0 3 3 15 15 is 15 eankNeigM1t(fll"/ �O` � sa�� w�d�h a�� y, i� watxi den�F �In� �— $` ChannelsubSVata'-fI�-SI 5- d� Cobble. 8etlmd veloci�y - las�, moeerate, �� ❑aiilY�dea tllghc�ywrbid.Wrb�tl �ate: i/ ��0�?' Evaluator:��Yl.r.n ��r,�pF�1 c}�� Total Points: Sh'eamisatleasrin(artnittenr �� if 2 19 oi perenmal i/ 2 30' GIi� A.Geomorpholo y (Subtotal= 1 �' Con�inuity oi channel betl antl bank 2. Sinuosiry of channel along thalweg 3. Imchannel strudure' ex rifile-000l. steo-ooi 5. Active/relict 9. Gretle contml 10. Natural valley 1 t. Secontl ar greate� orde� channel ' artlficYal tlttches are nol �a�etl', see tliscuyyor B. Hydrology (Subtotal= � �2. Presence of BaseFlow 13. Iron oxitlizing bactena 14 Leailitter 15. Sediment on plants or de6ris 16. Organic debris lines or piles � 7. Soil-basetl evidence of hlgh wa r tat C. Bioloqy (Subtotal= 18 Fibrous roots in sUeamtied 19 Rooted uplantl piants m streambed 2� Macrobenthos(noteaiversiryandabw� 21 �quatic Mollusks 22 Fish 23 Creyfish 24 Amphibians __ . _........— __ 25. Algae 26 Wetland plants in streambetl 'perennia6sirez�=_ may al� be identifietl uvi NOt/eS: >ypJ L iip�lJn�' �2�n �^JF�'� . � (-'� •....—�: � Skefch-, � '� . :' ✓ F": ;`'v r?.. J u5C—s — Yes N�?cs— N� �E �Ddl )U'Uin;/rl n�,�;n �D ror.�luU�CL (J`��(. Form Versiou 4.11 Project/5ite: �_rj`6LQ Latitude: 3)Y,!t6353 County LongRude: � - � � _' —S t,�s�� n--- —=�t8. l/3.6�, Stream �etermination �circl Other Ephemeral Intermittent erennial e.fl 4uaCName: rf�.i f'�o� p � 2 3 p 2 3 U t 2 3 ly 1 2 3 ,0� 1 2 3 p % 1 � 2 3 Ob 1 1.; 0 GS 1 'y' No D Yes=3 0 1 z a 0 :�% 2 ' 3 is ,...—.: os o a /os ) � +. 3 2 1 0 (� 2 1 0 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 � OS 1 15 0 r05 1 15 �. 05 —_'__ 1 1.5 —__— _ a __—� 7 � 1.5 FAGW=075�, OBL"=1 ' ther=0 methods SeeO 35ufmanual BankHeiBhtlhl.�-u� / eanklull width �h1.?' �% Wale�tlepch(in� D —.y�� CM1annelS�bsUaYe�-CIaV SIIL�Santl �avel Lo001e, OeJmck velo<itV - tasi. moeerare. s� ❑aJty_:le ;IiRJIIlylurbiE,lurbitl z �� ,�, a- 115 Form Versiou 4.11 Date: �G 3I ' G f 7. Project/SRe: �. j� i� Latitude: � Evaluator.p��.l�.� I�..�i 1/�.,..e �J.,..,� /,.,i. County: SJ��::-�,.� Longitude:, IOWIYomts: SheamDetermination(circleone) O[her I StreamisaNeastlnrertni^enf `� 5 Ephemeral ntermitten Perennial eg.OuadName: �/�',�f I � -�-----... � (hon Date: Evaluator: s�'� Form Versio¢ 411 ProjeeNSite: �. sc62 5� I Latitude: Longihde:_ IOWIYolnts: SheamDetermination(circleone) Other StreamisaNeaslinhrtnittent i/ �nao�.�a.a�m.,r��zeo� �"� Ephemeral Intermittent erenma eg.QuadName: `p,��Ln �ate: �p�5 � ^-'l�' Evaluator.N, NUw�I� � �'S Total Points: Sfreemisatlea5tlnteimlttenl rj( iftf9or0erenniali;a30' � A. Geomorphology �Subtotal=_ �' Cnntinudy ot channel bed and bank 2. Sinuosity of channel along Ihalweg 3.lo-channelstructure: ex. nflle-000l.! size 'artilclald'Rches are notrated;ue tllscu: B. Hydrology (Subtotal= ��- 12. Presence of Baseflow 2i n 23 in streambed Sketch: Sa J ��^� . tl.;!r: - N� Ntic;-Na Form Version 4.11 ProjacNSite: , r�� -� 9 l kr�f� County: �p nm St�eam Oetermination �circl� Ephemeral Intermittent � 0 1 0 1 0 1 i 0 1 0 1 S� Latitude: �. /.//�'36 G � Longitude:_'}� la•�L�% Other j�J w(� o � c( Sbc / � e.g. Quatl Name: C 1 c" No=O` � res=a 0 1 2 � 0 1 2 3 1 0.5 0 0 a5 �: 0 0.5 > > = No=O Ves 31 3 Z � � 3 2 1 � n� � � 2 3 0.5 tlank Height�R�:(� — /2 ea�xr�n w�acn 1e1: 2 D—�/o � Waterdepch �In�', /�� Channelsubstrare<[(v.511L5and Grave7:ohble, Betlmck Velociry-fasLmoderate, ow Clariry tlea slighttyWrbitl,wrbid - srf _z � 1-a. �o: �-� � NC DWQ Stream Identificatiou Rorm Versiou 4.11 _ Date: r) /L/ �� q PmjectlSite: .C>�'7Cl Latitude: s5. rjsl q J� Evaluator: � �G County: Longitude:_ �� a�^� N� <,., �I�,� u a- v�k,y,;�- ---- , TotalPoints: Stream0eterrn,lna4ortici[cleone) O[her �J�.� (TcIrJiUo1'O 5heamisaNeastintermlttenr �j� J EphemeratrirL�ent.Perennial e.gOuatlName: iizl9or erenmali/a30' f- A.Geomor holo Subtotal= "I � Absent Weak Moderate Strong 1' Continuity o! chann=l betl antl bank 0 1 2 ., � —.. . ___ _"__ ' _ 2. Sinuosity uf channel along [halweg 0 d Z 3. 3.In-channelstmcture' ex nffle-pool,step-pool, /�� n le- ool se uence � �% Z 3 4.Particlesizeofstreamsubstate 0 �i 2 3 5. Activelrelictfloodplain 1 2 3 6. DeposRional bars or benches .' 0. 1 2 3 7. Recem alluvial deposds ! p�. 1 2 3 e. Headcuts 0 1 Z 3 I 3. Grade conUol 0 0.5 1 1.5 '�O. Natural valley 0 O S 1 t� Second or greaterortler channel No 0 Yes =3 ' aRifdal tlRches are nol reteQ see tliscu�y onsin manual B. H drolog (Subtotai= �-6 I �i 12. Presence uf 6asefiow p 1 � 2 3 �3. Iron oxidiziny bacteria p % 1 2 3 �4 Leaflitter �5 } OS 0 t5-Sedlmenlonplan[sordebns 0 0.5 ' 7 15 i6. Organic tlebris lines or piles 0 �0.5 j 1 1 5 t7.5oi1-basetlevidenceofhighwatertable7 No=O Yes=3 C. Biolo (Subtofal = , `J 18 Fibmus roots in streambetl 7 1 0 19. Rooted uplantl plant=_ in streambetl 3 2 1 0 � 20 Macrobenthos(notediversiryantlabuntlance) 0 7 2 3 � 21. Aquatic Mollusks /.0 T 1 z 3 22 Fish OS > i�s 23 Crayfish �_p�� 0.5 1 1 5 _ 24 Amphibians 0 O5 7 � 5 25. Algae -..--�- -'-" -� 0 �; 0 5 1 1.5 26 Wetlantl plants in streambetl PACW = 0]$ OBL = 7 5 Other -,D 'perennial hreaTs may also be itlentified using other melhotls. See p 35 of manual Notes. ��:.P1E11i't.Jd� :i r � '..L �G�� F.l e.r�_ � 6A�-�'��ei�'F.f.�, �L c' Lo :ACu�4. -. �'��,-�ar u�_ �an� c�,n /1�.��_.. 6anNHel8htf111:��p� '� � SkE�Clll /l� r ��^f�, j Bankfullwidth(HIl'�� , Watei tleplh �in� � —� �j�— nf/1 Channelsubsvatel�Ciay SillSanE Gravei Cobole. Nlzc. — I�a a�d�o�« — Velo�iry � [ast.moCerate:s�oy.;' ❑anty'' [lea�� sLghtly lurblq W rbitl � � -� r ,,ts�c-s NC DW Stream Identificarion Form Version 4.11 oa<e: lo�z(�?oI�' Projecf/Sit¢: �_ (J��'9 ��aae ?� �I��DD Evaluator. .I"IOW{�I'4LS�UK2S'�Ae-�f County: �,.}g:lf,� Longitude:�.^�r/,��: 0 TOfalPoi�rtS: Stream0etermination(cimieone) IO[her NWC�G� S�' ShaamisaNeasflnteimlttent /�/ Epheme�al Inte�mittent erenma e.g.QuaEName: P� �m[ai = and bank 2. Sinuosity of channel along thalwe� 3. lo-channel stmcmre: ex. rifFle-pool ripple-pool sequence 4. Particle size of stream subst2te 5 Activelrelict flootlplain 6. DeposHional bars or benches 7. Recent alluvial tleposAs B. Headcuts 9. Gratle control �0_ Natural valley 1 t Second or greate� ortler channel ' artifcial tlACM1es are nol rotetl; see tliscu B. Hydrology (Subtotal=�' 12. Presence oi Base9ow tlebris mt in 23. Cra�sh 24. Amphibians 25. Algae 26. Wetland plants in streambetl 'pe�ennial strezTs may also be itlentifietl NOtBS: /P4yJ f�lv �.ri,'id 5 � ��5 �' I��: �'{ } frt4 7ro<o Sketch: �� JN�, 3 UJ�rI- I`�� Cd(�c>- �ie5 u [9 manual. � � 3 j� 2 3 � 2 3 7 2 3 j 2 3 7 3 IS t 1.1 IS 1 /�, Ves - s i z � 2 eankHeight{ftl'�� Bankfull width �k�: % � �4 Water depth �in�: y— �� [ryann=lsuhshate ay,Silt,Sand,Grave obEl=. �edwck Velociry �- iast�, moAerate,Q ClaraV-f4�55vsllghtlycurbld, mrbid � G -�-- NC DW Stream ldeotificarion Form Version 4.11 Date:>f/.L/ `B/nD - Pmjectl5ite' }/ _� �'C� Latitutle: JS, �'�� 1 �� Evaluator:�,ly!l� ��+�[% � �G. county: �,�Q,�� ' LongiWde:� ��g�{ Tot2lPointS: StreamDetermination circleone Other Sneamisaneas(in(ermltten� 2/�, zj E hemerel IntertnHten' erennl e OvanNam ��Id'1Gf0 if t 19 oi erennial i( a 30' � P �u 8 A. Geomor holo Subtolal = �G, i Absent Weak Moderate Strong 1° Con�inuity of channel betl and bank 0 1 2 .3 2. Sinuosity of channel along Ihalweg � 0 A 2 3 3. Inchannel shucture: ex riffle-pool, step-pool, 0 � 2 3 ri le- ool se uence 4. Particle size of sfream substrale p ( � p 3 5. Ac6ve/relict Floodplain p � p g 6. DeposAional bars or benches p � p g 7. Recent alluvial deposHs 0 � 2 3 8. Headcuts 0 2 3 9. Grede control ' 0'.5 1 1.5 �0. Natural valley � 0 OS 1 7.5 11. Semntl or greater ortler channel N= 0 Ves = a ' atllfdal tlHa'�es are iwl 2tetl', see dlsaissions in manual B. H drolo Subtotal = �, i �2. Presence of BaseAow p � p g 13. Iron oxitl¢Ing bac[era 0 1 2 3 14. Leaf lifter �, i p.5 0 � 5. SedlmeM on planis or debris p ,�,5� � � 5 1G. Organic tlebris lines or plles 0 i 0.5�� 1 LS 17. Soil-basetl evidenca of high water table? No = 0 Yes = C. Biolo Subrotal= , �J �6. Fibmus roots in sheambetl / 3�' 2 1 0 19. Rootetl uplantl planls in streambed z � p 20 Macmbenthos (note tliversiry antl abunaance) 0 ;�f 2 3 21. Aquatic Mollusks _ � 0- 1 2 3 22. Pish .0 0.5 1 1 5 23 C�a�sh _.`___'_" __..._. �0 05 1 1.5 24 Amphibians p '�05� 1 1.5 _'--.-__.__ ._._" �- -_'_ 25. Algae ____'_..._�_ 05 7 ---' 1.5 -' 26 Wetland planfs in streambed FAGW �0 75- BL = 1 5 Other = � 'perennial sirea'�s may also be itlenlifietl using olherme�hods. See p 35ofmanual � -'__ _ --'__"_ _" N0�25: /15/ A G _�fV4Pf- l 6(l� ,�r'1 :G 4�eh11� �c"v M��'. :�.qn�P� _ _ -__ .-_ - _.-'.--._....-_._ _-...._...__. ... $I(E1Chl / BankHPighl�ft�'cl",� � 7e� ��juf�.� aa�M�iiwmo�ie�::�`/ �iGS � WBle�depCM1�inf�.�-�� _ - r� Chd11�21 SY�S[fdlPr ��dy. $Ill, $dOd 3VPI. CObb�P. ��K.C.�_ �'.1U BPtlmCk Velocity � fas�, moderateislow fladry. [Ieai,�IlghHV��rbid,lurbid �ate: +j��°f G Evaluator:„\��Hr, �._.W0�,1 � �v Total Points: Sfream is aNeasf Intermittent � ' !f 3 19 orperenmal i( 2 30' A.Geomorphology (5ubtotal=_ �' Continudy of channel betl and ban4 Z Sinuosity otchannel along Ihalweg 3. Inchannel stmcture: ex nffle-pool, npple-poolsequence 4. Particle size of streamsubstrate 5. Active/relict Ooodplaln 6. Deposdional bars or benches 7 Recentalluvialdeposds e. Headcuts 9. G�atle conlml 10. Natural valley 1 t. Second or greater ortler channel ° artlfcial d'Rches are no� a[eQ see tllscus B. Hydrology (Subtolal= i 12. Presence of BaseHow 13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 14 Leaflltter 15. Sedimenl on plants or debris 16 Organic debris lines or piles 17. Soil-basecl evitlence oFhigh water C. Bioio (Subiotal= �! 18 Fibmus roots in streambed 18 Rootetl uplantl planYs in streambe 20. Macrobenthos (note diversiry and ak 21. Aquatic Mollusks 22 Fish 23 Cfayfish 24 Amphibians "___ _._.____ 25 Al�jae 26 Wetland plants in sireambetl 'oerennial slrezss mav alw be itlentifed ske,�n: L�c �;�Nre, 3 UJItS � fJD P�K'. �rCj fion Porm Versiou 4.11 Projecf/5ite:�i.�l�� Latitude: ;(�� C L�� 4� County: ��f�y�,v longitude_—_�.�,_/�0/� StreamDetermi�_ationcircleone� O[her yQ� C�.I.,��,��p Ephemerql'lntermittent erennial e.g 4uaoNeme: 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 No`� I � Yes=3 D 1 2 3 1 2 3 u i os o o �os' i is 0 ' OS 7 15 Nn=n Ves=31 � mel�otls.5eep 35� as Ob 05 0 15 Bank Heighl Ih) �- � � i BanMull widtli Ik�� ,. wate�aepUil'�nl�� J..;.�-'<.i'" Channelsubarat ' ('.e�la�_.Silt.� ravel. Cob�le. Bedmd Velocity - fast.moderate.� Clariry' a�AlighclVWrhld,iurb�d NC DWQ Stream 7 Oate: �0�2��20�7 Evaluatoc �J. N�4V�II ` Total Points: SKeam is al least intemtitten! Projeci/Site: � .�'j�'L�{ counTy: W�, �� y Stream Determination (circle Ephemeral Intermittent e�rt Latitutle: 35 U[�(J �� . Longitude:_�� IQ2�I Other NwC,�idsb�r� e.g. 4uadName: H. Fi tlfolog (Subtotal= '��./ � \ 12. Presence of BaseFlow 0 1 2 �.�. �5. Sediment on roots 72. 23. 24. 25 26. Sketch: �Pe r��r� � �' ✓ «i(TJ' vP� NY�c: �- Ye,' 0 OS 1 1.5 0 os �i �s � No=0 Yes 3 3 2 7 0 3 2 1 0 �¢) 1 2' 3 � 2 3 0.5 1 15 0.5 1 1.5 p �5� t5 0 05 ; ,5 mtirb�. FACW=075; OBL=�S Other�, othe� methods. See p 35 of manual. vet �,......I.,.,.� rn.c0. F.if;rP_ if/Csa�,/'�+c� y r.nK—�.r C BankHeight(fi��.G—/% � BanMull wiEth �k): 20 —/ �D Wate�tlep[hl��l� /— �b CM1annelsubsaare6avSilti Sentl G�Cobble, 6etlmck Velociry-fast. moderatesr..� Clariry ar sl' htl mrbi urbid NC Date: lC Evaluator: ToWI Poii Sbeam is al im Identificarion Form Version 411 �, Project/Site: `� _ � �1'��,5'vkfS-�G�.1�f County: �� ip Stream Oetertnination i010 Su6tolal= �� AhSeM Weak bhannel betl zntl bank � � :hannelalongthalweg 0 1 mMure: ex. rifFle-pool, step-pool, Q /.`, a uence �i�� of st�eem subs[rate 0 � Ioodplaln Q � bars or benches 0 1 aldeposits 0 1 0 1 � 0 0.5 =v 0 0 5 `anlfclal dilches are no[ ratea; see B. Hydrofogy (Subtotal=_ 12. Presenre oi BaseFlow 13 Iron oxidizing bacteria 14. Leaf litter t5. Setliment on plants or tlebri 16. Organlc debns Ilnes ot piles 17. Soil-based evitlence ofhigh C. Biology (Subtotal=_ �8 Fibrous roots in sheambed 55, Sketch: � JCP� r��.f�� Ui�YS� ��fi ti P.c, N� Latitude: rJ%.' Longitutle: _ � Other (VW I e:g. QuatlNarne: Motlerete 2 � 2 2 2 2 2 No i� I Ves = o i � � � z 5 1 OS 0 �0.5 � 0 Ob � 1 n��_n Yes= �4Y 0.5 �K 3 e�,r - /� `%4fiuv� IfCcO�.O/�� L ° � f 0ank Height (k): y— 6 Bankfullwidth�h�: �p)� z0 Warerdepthllnp6 � Channelsubnrate�.0 y�SilpSan,Gravel,CobEie, eedmd Vemnry-fxst. moderate, s� ClarRy�Fe�ir IghtlyNrbid'lurbid NC DWQ Stream Ident�cafion Date: �D�2��0/�"I Evaluator. N��IOwUI � L. �%�25'� Total Points: � SheamisatleasOntermlttent q 2 � !I? 19 orperennial if a 30' L J A. Geomorphology (subtotal= �� a Continuiry of ch=nnel betl antl bank 2. SinmeRy of channel along thalwag 3. Irnchannel stmcture: ex. rifFle-pool, step-pool 9. Gratle control 10. NaNral valley 11. Se�ntl or greater order char aadifclal tldches are no[ rated', see tl B. Hydrology (Subtotal=_ �2. Presence ofBaseFlow �3. Imn oxitlizing bacte�ia 14. Lear litter 15. Setliment on plants or debns 1G. Org2nic debris lines or piles 17. Soil-based evitlence of high e (: Rinlnnv lFuhtntal= 19. Rootetl 26. Wetlantl plants in streambetl 'perennlal sirez".s mxy alw be Itlenlif� Nates: Sketch: i � 'a:� ��Ufn_, � ��/�— ��, r' � ✓ r `l � �•��i �� ProjacHSite: �_r�t�'zG� �atituee:2�y�9�� county: V.�,;��P Longitude:��./��i Stream0ete�mination(circleone) I OtherNW C�u�dypo�o EohemeraLln rm en erennial e.g.QuadName: '�0�� , �00� �� 0� �� .�a�� 3 3 3 0 BankHelgM1t(h): �-% � Bankfuliwidth�k�:J �� Waterdepth�in): p� y� CM1annelsubscrate�Clay, ilt5and,Gnvel obble. Bedmck Velociry-fastmotlerate,slow ofi�. Clariry-cleaqslightlyturbiqmrbid N/A NC DWQ Stream Identification D�: �D�Z�j/201� Evaluator. �V. I�UW��`L�J}OkQ}-1 ToWI Points: Sheamisa(leastintermittent q' r iftl9orperenniali(a30' �1 �� A. Geomorpholo y (Sub� �% �a� ContinuBy of channel beA and bank 2. Sinuosityof channel alongthalweg 3. Irnchannel structure: ex. rifFle-pool, step-pool, ripple-poolsequence 4. Particle size of stream substrete 1t Secontl or greater order char 'artifckl tldches are nol2ted; see d B. Hydrology (Subtotal= � �2. Presence of BaseFlow 13.Iron oxidizing bacteria �4.Leaflitter 15. Sediment on plants or debris 16. Organic tlebris lines or piles 17 Soil-based evidence of high � C. Biology (Suhtotal=� 18 Fibrous roots In streambetl 19. Rcoled upland plants in stre� 20. Macrobenthos {note aiversity a 21. Aquatic MOIWsks z2. Fisn 23 Cra�sh 25. Wetlantl plants in streambed 'perennidl Sbex^s may ZI�A be itlenllfi NO[es: ir ;r,.,-,�i� ri WE - � Sketch: � G �5'�T� J 'v.�(%� f�1� rin.<,- ri� J ��Z Projectl5ite: Q'C�g�7' La[itude: ;r� County: �.ju.�� Langitude:_ :� Stream Oetermination (circle one Other N W� Ephemeral intermitten Perenmal e.g.QuadName: '�O��t�� 0� �� 7� 0 35 1 t 3 I� � � 0 0 BankHeight�k): j �� 9ankfuflwitlth�k�:�� +�� WarerdepcM1�in�: �—�� CM1annel subshate � �ay Silt Sand Grave�Cobble, eetlmck vebciry-fasc, modeate,5lo�l Clariryrcea slighHyNrbiQmrbid NC DWQ Stream ldentification Form Versio¢4.11 Date: �/'_�?nl,% ProjecVSite: fG-5�,� p` Latitude: s i - ._ � �.�e'S� Evaluator. J ,�, �U .. �� C Counry; \i��'f�",.`—_' Longilude��g �� J 92/ .�.c� � Total Poinis: .___ .__.._ ..._ --__ . _ _ . __ snaemisarieaym�arm�rcan� streamoetermi�kioa�circleone) Other NU1 �„I[l%bala liz 19 or erannial iiz 30' ��" , 1'�� Ephemerel ntermittant erennial e.g OuaaNeme: A. Geomor holo SuUtotal = I D- I I AbseM Weak Moderate Strong 1' Continuity ot chennel betl antl bank 0 1 2 3 2. Sinuosily of channel along fhalweg 0 _��_ 2 3 3. Inchannel structure'. ex rifFle-pool,�step-pool, �,,,.ie �,,,,i �e,,,�e.,,.e 0 ( 1 N� 2 3 5. Activelrelict Oootlplain 6. DaposRional bars or benches 7. Recent alluvial deposks B. Headcuts 9. Gratle conlroi t0. Natural valley i t. Second or greater order char ' atllncFal aitches are not reteB, see d B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 12. Presence ot Basefiow 13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 14 Leaflitter 15. Sedimen� on plants or debris i6 Organic tlebris Ilnes or piles 17. Soil-basetl evidence of high � C. Biology (Subtotal = —% 18. Fibrous rooR in streambetl 22 Flsh Sketch'. � r � � a'�' r '%� ��` j ,� � �y'_ `��i Nr�<�� Y'eS =3 0 1 0 1 T 0 os a ; s No=0 3. 2 �3 2 0 1 0 1 � 0.5 0 0.5 0 '0 5 0 05 FACW = melltotls.Seep 35olmanual Q Q � 15 BankHeight(klij(-�i r oa�� w�d�n �hi3-G ware� aevm f�l�. Q. 2" Channelsubstra�e -Oav Silt.SanE avel,Cobble. 9eAmck .I Velociry - fast, moderale. slow /"D�Q ❑ailly/�Iea�JsliRhtlyNrbid,wrbidj,q y0��j NC DW)Q Stream Identiticatlo� Oate: J/J/7o'�' Evaluetor: �U,��,r,y� /-'.i��ll d- �.SG ToWI Poirt[s: 3�,i) Sh'eamis at �easr Intermittent If 2 i9 or pere�nial it 2 30' A, Geomorphology (Subtotal= ��.� 1° Continuity of channel betl and bank 2 Sinuosity of channel along lhalweg 3. In-channel simcture: ex riffle-pool, ste�poc ripple-pcol sequence 4. Partide size of streamsubstrete 5. Active/relict fioodplain 6. Deposdional bars or henches 7. Recent alluvial tleposits 8. Headcuts 9. Gretle confrol � �. �econd or grea[er oraer cnar ' arli(clal tlitcM1es are not re�eQ see d B. Hydrology (5ubtotal=_ 12. Presence of BaseHow �3 Iron oxitlizing bacteria �4 Leaflitter 15. Sediment on plants or tleb�is 18 Fibrous roots in stream6etl 19. Rooletl uplantl plants in strean 20 Macrobenthos (note tliversity an� 2'I Aquatic Mollusks 22 Fish 23 Cra�sh 29 Amphibians � � 25 Aloae siree^s mey also be Sketch: / ,9� �'�,�re 3 u5��- ye: �I {�� J — y'C� in manual �we nmr-}d� Yn �,p5-� r eu rn �ersion 4.11 ProjectlSite: �/-� a`� Latitude: 2� (�y � ?, Coun Lon itude:�- �' W_`"y��-� __ 9--i2,_Il`1��- Stream�etermination(circl Other (JV) �j-::��I�i%�+fa Ephemeal Intermitte i� erennial )e.g QvadName: � Absent Weak Moderate Strong u i 2 0 ] 3 0 1 � 3 0 ! 1 2 3 0 1 2 �3� n �t 2 3 0 0 1 Z 0 1 2 5 ' 0 � '0.5 � 1 15 2 0 ' v 2 3 `0 1 2 3 0 OS 1 15 0 �05 1 1.5 0 OS ' 1 > 1.6 � 05 1 16 FAGW=075�, OBL=15 Othe -0 __ p�35ofmanual �� _ "'/ / �— i --"" "�BankHeiBh�lk1�'J� �-'—�� Bankfullwidth�k�� / Wate� depth (inl�. �� [nannelsubsha�e-Oay511Lsand �avel.cobGle. Bedrock Velociry � fast, moderare,-�sl, o�y,J ❑arity/��511Rhtlyl��hid.lurb�tl NC DWQ Stream Identi£cafion Form Version 4.11 Oate: � p/aG) Z p1 T ProjectlSite: ,�_ ..�� Evaluator: N. �U�''2 �� . S��S' IGu�P Counb: �,Cty TOtal PoiMs: Stream �etermination Streamisafleaslmtertnittenl� G.j- 3/�Q% Ephemeral intermitte� otchannel bxd and bank f channel along thalweg structure: ex. nffle-000l.! 7. Recent alluvial tleposM1s 8. Heaticu�s 9. Grade controi 10. Naturel valley 1 t. Secrond or greater ortler c ' atlifcial tlttches are no[ rateQ s B. Hydrology (Subtotal= �2. Presence of Base9ow on plants ordeb�is <N i3woen Or�y�n :'- W� �4�1�� Latitude: yl, L�//� 90� Longitude:_�g /�Jvl aher N�1�1 (�U�d56o.a eg. Quetl Name: � 2 3 1 �,21 3 � �� 3 � 3 � 2 3 � 2 3 � 3 2 3 0.5 > > , 5 1 1.! vo�=a 0 3 3 0 �,S 1.5 � 22. Fish (,0 u.o i � + 23 Crayfish �.5 � �.5 24. Amphibians Q �,5 � �.5 25. Algae � � 1-5 26. Wetla nd plants in streambed FACW = 075' OBL = 1.5 Other = 0 'perennial strex�s may alw be Itlentified using othe� me[ho0s. See p. 35 of manual ` Notes-L F! o'� G ' � n<l, 7o'nt5 1- 2. lu�Tn/oi I'irs_A ro c�,f i�G ��.L�v� 1 r l�r d� �,� �,.i �r� rnl � "'r.y'uE%� I>:�rFo, � D�:�III -/-�,� 6�e µ� �;ra�� ,.��'��yh+� BankHeightlk�: � �� Sketch: - � �ea��twiwmm�k�:.2-3 fod,�m3r15 �� c�nM�./ ��FC�;G✓+C :=C9cr<.,L i� / / watecdepth pn1:a _ I 6 �dUfms' CM1annelsubshate�_CIav.511t Sand Gr�obble, �,,�� 9Edmck vJ9'i_ � r vemciry - iast motlerate s, o�w r � V9 � N( �� AIV24i � fJC) Clar�ly*clear sllghHymrb�d,mrbid ' � V NC DWQ S[ream ldeutiticafion Form Version 4.11 Date: �� Z�/L�� ProjecGSite; �i. j�-� Latitude: ✓j'.• i'�/� EvaluaWr: , � i Coun Lon itude:_� , y�� wl,� �1,��.A 3 G�G H UJG,{r,a 9.._—.1 Z,i(l� �. TotalPoiMs: StreamDetermination(circlPoneJ� Other��j ( Sneam rs a� leas� mteimittent �/ r°\°)': 1.". �� nz 19 oi erennial u� 30' J U• ?� Ephemerel lntermitten �erennial) eg QuaOName: / A. Geomor holo (Subtotal= %,� Abserrt Weak Moderate Stron9 ia Gontinuity o� channel betl and bank 0 1 2 Z Simroshy of channel along Ihalweg 0 1 � � 2 3 3. In-channel strudure'. ez nffle-pool, step-pool, 0 � Z s ri le- ool se uence 4. Particle size oF stream substrate 0 1 ,Z 3 S.Active/relictAoodplain 0 1 2 �3� 6. Deposdional bars oi benches 0 1 2 3 7 Recentalluvialdeposils p � 2 3 8. Headcuts p .1 2 3 9. Gratle control � 0 5 1 1.5 10Naturalvalley 0 OS 1 -��1.5' it.Secondorgreaterorderchannel No=O �es=3 ' artlFlclal tlkches are nol rated; sae dl�ussions in manual B. H drolog (Subtotal= �D �2. Presence of BaseAow p 1 2 � 13. Imn oxitlizing bacterla p 1 2 3 14 Leaflitter % 1.5 1 05 0 �S. Sediment on planls ordebns p ��O S% 1 1 5 i6 Organic tlebris lines or piles 0 O S 1'� 1 5 �7 Soil-bas=tlevitlenceofhighwate�table7 No=O Yes�� C. Biolo Subtotal= � L � 18 Fibrous roots in streambed / 3__ 2 � � 19 Rooted uplantl planis in s[reambetl � 2 1 0 20 Mac:oben[hos(noletliversityantlab�mtlanceJ Q .t Z 3 2'I. AquaHc MOIWsks 1 2 3 j 22 Fish 0 !OS 1 L5 23 Cra�sh 0 ,' 0.5 1 7 5 ._ 24 Amphibians p � 1 1 5 . _ _...—..__ _ "_' _ _..___— ._ ._ . 25.AIgae ____" �— 05 7 1b 26 WetlanG plants in streambed FACW = 0 75: OBL = 1 5 Other = 0 'perennial sireaTs may also be Itlentifetl usingo�hermelhods See p 35 f —manu�al .. _ Notes _� �l_. �R1Df/_nSr� ��GMe U �l�dlrC �J+>.��A /f*r'a�iu.�_ --_..__._ ..__ ..."_'"—_—"_—"_ __-- — __.._ ._— BankHeight�fl�� $kEICh: �p /I/ l BanktullwidtM1lk� /:i � po<I��, - � Watei depth �in� �J � �� , �r Urannelsubnra��llt,,,{��Gr51�oEble, � s BeEro[F N��[.i— �P� VelodtY-�s�.motleia[e�S wJ � ❑adry� ��ile�IlgM1tly wrbid. wrbid � sP NC DWQ Sheam.ldenkifcafion Form Version 4.11 - �ate: 5/3 I S ProjeeUSke:'� ,S ��L �� Latitude: J) � CC—_ �!�_ Evaluator. `I County: Longltude;_ Q � �q`�' .r.f, lio`vl d.1 3 i�] L ��n_L�-- __ _ —...— � U.��.r.� To}alPoints: StreamDetermination(circleone O[her NV� rj-ol�fSHo�o SheamisaNeasNnteimlttenf %L E hameral IntermRten��mnni I�'�. e. QuadNeme: li>_ 19 oi erennlal U a 30' �� P 9 A. Geomor holo Subtotal= /�� % A6sent Weak Moderate Strong 1° Continuity oi channel bed antl bank _ _ p � p ��—_�3� 2 Sinuos@y of channol alon9 thalweg 0 :1 2 3 3. Inchannel shucture: ex rifFle-pool, slep-pool, ri le- ool se uence 0 ,�� 2 3 4. Particle size of stream substrete 0 1�� 2 3 S.ActivelrelictFloodplain 0 1 2�� 3 6. Depositional Uars or benches U 7 2 3 7. Recent alluvial deposRs 0 �,1.�� 2 3 8. Headwts 0 ' i- 2 3 9. Gratle control ��--� 0�.5 7 1.5 t0. Natural valley p 0.5 1 �T-� 11. Second or greater ortle� channel No = 0 Ves = 3 ' artl(clal tlltches a�e nol reled', see dlscussi�s in manual B. H drolog (Subtotal = ��, i 12 Presence of Basefiow p � y `3�` 13. Iron oxitlizing bac[eria 0 I %2 3 14. Leaflltter [� 7 1 1 O5 0 15. SeOiment on plan�s or debris p .5 1 1 5 16. Organic debris lines or piles p �' 0 5�� 1 1.5 17. Soil-basetl evitlence of high watertable? No= 0 Ves.=3 : C. Bi010 Su6to[al= 18. Fibrous roots in streambed Z � p 19. Rootetl uplantl plants in streambetl ., 3. 2 1 0 20 Macrobenthos(notetliversltyanaabuntlance) 0 :1'`. 2 3 21 Aquatic Mollusks �� p 3 22 Fish 0 (',5� 1 1.5 23 Crayfish 0 �OS:; 1 15 29 Amphibians -........ —. '.0�? 0.5 1 1.5 —_.__._—"._ _—..—� 25. Algae __ :� 05 7 1 5 26 WetlanG plan�s in streambetl FACW = 075; OBL = 1 5 Other_�� 'perennia��l s"treaTs may alw be itlentifietl using olher me�hotls. Se �p. 35 of manual Notes: Ny�.hr';G VpfR�r�uS,'�+. ,fr,� .�`} ��, _ — '---__"__ — _... ...__ -____—'—___'"_'__ ____.._—.__ _ � SY.EiCh' � OankNeight�k�'y-$ /�� VI� J BdnkfullWidth(R�:J�/�.L � I/ I� /l Wam�tlep[h(in��.(J—� _ uX'rj �a, . _ __ Channelsubstrare �CUv SIIt,SanA, Grave Cobble. �q��[�,�. �nr'" eedmck )`� Velo<ity � fasL modera[e,slo Qai iry`d�sllghcly Nrbiq W rbitl sQ NC DWO Stream Date: ]i j/zGl." Project/Site: Q.S�� Latitutle:Ji Evaluator. N• NJW{II � L. S�k��-('H^�p �OO�ty° °V0.yh� Langdude:� TotalPoints: � r Stream0etermination(a� leone) � Other NW C9dc�5bu�o I SbeamisaNeastinterm^tten� Jl, �, Ephemeral Intermittenf Perennial , e.g.4uadName: 5 b�„, �a, �_ '>— � NC DW Stream Identifica6on Form Version 4.11 �ate: I'�/Zh �'l� (` Project/Site'. �_�'j�2`T Latitude: 3h. yy� Evaluator:.l.� _ 1�. ..,1� 1%�o^.� :i..�e; CounTy: �u.yp�, Lon9itude:��'C.. TOtalPointS: "(f'+� ��eam0e[ermination(circleone Other I�W �jp�p�p°�`� Streemisa(leasfintertnittent ;-� Ephemeral Intermitten erennial eg.OuadName: J j FC DWQ Stream Identificafion Form Version 4.11 ❑ate: ID�Z�/ 20!= Project/Site: � �� Latitutle:2Y%�:�^-�9? ,$ � Evaluator: �,,�,�ry� }40�J �. ��i"/ 5� P"ounty:��, 1� Longitude:�'.�'-� /J2 �3 W l � TotalPoints: � StreamDetermination(circleone) OtherNv`% �Iu�c�S�''O SMeamisaHeasllnteimittenr �'�. �/ Ephemeral Intermitten,bPEre e.g.QuadName; 12. Presenre of BaseFlow 13 Iron oxltlizing bactena �4. Leaf litter 15. Sediment on plants o� d=bris 16. Organic tlehris lines or piles �7. Soil-basetl eNdence of high � C.Biology (Subtotal=� t6. Fibrous roo:s in streambed 19. Rooted uplantl planh in strez 20. Macmbenthos (note tliversiry a 21 Aquatic Mollusks 22 FISh 23 Cre�sh 24. Amphibians Sketch: ,_l � � �, j �1.; :"r ` — od o Nc' :_' - ;/,�_. 0 1 U 3 p 2 3 IS i 1 0.5 0 0 os > > 0 � "0.5 � � �'� un=n Ves=3 1 2 3 0 5 1 L. 0.5 1 1. 0 S � � —` QS 1 1 PACW� 75' OBL=1.5 O[her=0 See o. 35 of manual eank Height �k�: l �i Bankfull witlth (k�: (� � I q r waterdepthlin)�, /-6" Channelsubstrace-Clay, -tSanqGrzv obble. Bedmch Veloairy—fast,modera[ -s�2w� Clanry c ear 9�igh[ly m�bitl, mrhitl ' �� NC DW Stream ldeutifcatlon Form Version 4.11 Date:IQI��/ 0/'(� ProJectlSitel ([ _r� 6� :1 Latitude:��.y ��. � Evaluato�. � I � Coun � Lon itude: l�nJ�� ✓1 �-r<:,� e_ L� C �' `V�a�{�Q�-- 9 ' d�', lD��-� 6 TotalPoiMs: StreamOeterminationclrcleone) Other IJW Sheemisalleasflnleimlttenf ��' a�oS�?�� I/a i9oi erennialila 30' -��I Epheme� 'Intermktent erenniel ag. puetlNama: A. Geomor holo Subtotal = � I,� Absent Weak Moderate Strong 1° Conlinuity of channel betl antl bank p � p �j 2. Sinwslty of channel along thalweg 0 A `� 3 3. In-channel stmcture: ex nffle-pool, step-pool, � ri le- ool se uence 0 ;� 2 3 4.Particlesizeo(streamsubsta[e 0 .'�1�- 2 3 5. Active/relict Floodplain 0 1 2 3 6. Deposttional bars or benches p � p g 7. Recent alluvial deposits ;� 0? 1 2 3 8. Headcuts p ' �'> p g 9. Gratle coniml ��_p - 0.5 1 1.5� �O,NaNralvalley p OS 1 5.• 11. Semnd or greater order channel No� 0 Yes = 3 ' artlficial tlRa'ies am nal 2tetl; see tliscuiq�g�s in manual B. H drolo (Subtotal= �.,J �2. Presence of Baseflow 0 � 2 3 13. Iron oxitlizing bacteria ;' 0 1 2 3 14. Leaf li@er �7,5 1 0.5 0 �5, Sedlment on plants or tlebris 0 '-0.5 j 1 1 5 1G. Organic tlebris lines or piles p -"b.5"� 7 t5 � 7. Soil-basetl evidence of high watertable? No = 0 Yes'= 3 C. Biolo Subtotal= 76. Pibmus roots in streambed � 3> p 7 p 19. Rooted uplantl plants In streambetl p � p 20 Macrobenthos(nofetllversltyanaabundance) '�� p 3 2t Aquatic Mollusks . 0' 1 2 3 22. Fish '__ ��.Il: 0.5 1 1.5 23 Cra�sh 0) 0.5 1 1.5 _.....__--_.. .___ ... '�s-�•_ _ __ __ __ 24 Amphibians � 0.5 1 L5 —'_.. _ _- ..—_- __. ...._�__ —_'—__ 25. Algae 0 05 1 7 5 _. .—�.��_' 26 Wetland planfs in slreambed FACW = 075; OBL = 1 5 Other = 0 'perennial sirezTs may alw be iden�ified uvng other methotls. See p 35 of manual ___' _" ____'_"____....._... Notes: ....----_ _- ...__— _._.—.__ —___.. ._ .r.--........__—. __ SkelCh'. i 9ankHeigntlkC/-p( � �� 1-��r� � Oankfullwidth(k��.�-°� J Ware� dePth (inl. �, r � ��ri'%- �`�0 Channeisubstta�e,.CalvSil[sa=d,js.avei.to�ble. n��J — YP� Bedmck "� Velociry � faz�, moderale, sluw /��-n •� ❑aiiry tleai slighclylvrbid,lurbiJ��J/R Date: �O�L9 �701' Evaluator. L, S�ok25- Identificatian Form Version 4.11 I ProjectlSite: Q F jV• Nwy�� I County: . � � ��r�a�ae: 3g .',:"lo � � Longitude:�� Q' TotalPoirtts: r StreamOetermination(circl oe Other Nw ��ol�S�p�rO Streamisa(ieast�nfermittent 2(� �� Ephemeral Intermittent rennial eg.QuatlName: �oi�r �G°n`\ �� I,��,.� ��ts 7� 3 NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 � Date: IO' Iq - ZU �{ Prolectl5ite: iL" � Yj Z� Latitude: �1,�!'C, o'�C.l Evaluator: �� s� Counry:�l�'y�f'L Longitude:_��,1p��,,..� TotalPoints: j- 5Q7-� StreamDetermination�cir e Other NW ��oI6�5boro Streamisatleaslintertnittent L�' � itzi9or aienniali�z30• '✓`lCfr�� Ephemeral Intermittent erennial e.g.OuadName: A.GeOmo holo Subto[al= IO.� -�z• � Ahsent Weak Moderate Stron 1° Continudy or channel bed antl bank 0 1 2 3 2. Sinuosity of channel along Ihalwog 0 1 2 3 3.In-channelstructure: ex. nffle-pool, step-pool, p � 2 3 ri le- ool sequenre 4. Particle size of siream subst2te � T. 2 3 -� �4 ��. 5. Active/relict flootlolain ( 0 1 2 3 9. Grade control 10. NaNrel valley 1 �. Secnntl or gmater order channel 'artlMial ditches are nol ated; see tlisws B. Hydrology (Subtotal=_ 12. Presence of Basetlow 13. Iron oxid'¢ing bacteria 14. Leaflitter �5. Sediment on plan[s or debris �E. Organic tlebris lines or piles �7. Soil-basetl eNtlence of hiah water 23. 0 �5 � i.: �Na=O . Ves=3 0 1 2 � 3 � 1 2 3 5 1 0.5 0 0 �5� 1 1.t 3 2 1 0 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 �..`�.Y;� �, os � �s 0 �. � 1b 0 .� 0.5 1 1.5 =��" �. 0 1 1.5 t". �,��. �FACW=075: BL=15 Olher=0 ' itlentifed us�na olher me[hotls. See o. 35 ot manual. Sketch: � � �G TI�G'�P � L�i i'I / ' ��i,7 fh;C: - /> eank Height (k�:�� Bankfull witlih Ihl� 4�' '� W ater tlepiM1 (in): 0 ' Channel subshat "�%C-la SIS�4dN��avel, Cobble, Betlmck VelociW - fast, motlerace, � Clariry 'tlear � lightly ivrbid, wrbld Date: �D ��j�2�J� � Evaluator. N, I'�oN,�� t�. S}o�QS- Total PoiMs: Sfreamisa(IeasNnta/mittent JS.S If t 19 or0erennial il t 30' A. Geomorpholo y ISubrotal = r4 �5 � �' Continuity of channel bed antl bank 2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 3.In-channel stmcture: ex. nfFle-pool, step-pool, ripple-pool sequence 4. Particle size of stream substrete 5. Active/relict Flootlplain 6. Deposdional bars or benches 7. Recent allwial deposHs ' arti(cial tlRches 3re nol rzteQ see tliwussions in manual B. Hydrology (Subtotal= � � ) 12. Presence of Baseflow _ �� mbetl in s[reamhed 2I. 22. 23. 'perennial s[rez�s may alw be itleniifi Notes: v� �C �� 5� S� * bvll_�L.o.,�`.lQ� Skefch: / s� p %�� 'J�r�L / �J�ib!� Y;'� ��1�[, - '%� c m�i�a�e ��. � i� �-s i- 5. !� V 'ersion 4.11 ProjecUSite: �—�j 82 CI Latltutle: i'J.yrJ� � o County: �� '� Longitude:��.�`�. �0'��li� StreamDete�mination(ciroleone) O[her N� FI° °�S b°�� Ephemeral IntermR[ent erennia e.g OvadName: Y Absent Weak Motlerate S[rong 0 1 2 0 1 2 3 p � 1 2 3 a�l�/$�' o i z 0 1' 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 0.5 1 0 a.5 � Nn-1 VE5=3 i 0 Q °o � � � ■ 0 i� � � 0 0 � � 0 e `; � ;5 �r.., r ACW=075 6BL= h�Other=0 s. See p. 35 of manual qcv.-.�.;��c,(t. �r� j .c��lc... .�.-.� � � Y G_.. ,. `; I'� �.^, F-._ C� C BankHei6htlhl: 3 � �� eankfullwidth�k): �) � �` , Waterdepth(in): I ' �n Channelsubsttah Silt,Sap ,Gravel,Cobble. Bedmck ^ Velociry - fast, modeate, xloW� Clariry dear slightlyturbiqNrbid S-!i�H�n„ F..ns b�.cr `:aw,_r�y ..�,>.I�.e�� ,� (��,;.<Y �e�c� p��S�C/V! d� S�U.L\i_l ,.Y'i.�, �✓.� �.IPN� Q��"��✓� oate: �J�2�20(�� Evaluator:��.�n � Total Points: Streem is a( leas( mrertniM1enf il a 19 orpemnnial it 2 30' A. Geomorphology �Su 1' Continuity otchannel �etl 2. Sinuosity of chennel alonc 3.lo-channelstmcture'ez ri 5. Ac6ve/relict Form Version 4.11 Projecf/5ite: R.c�:� County: \JJtn �� I� F_ Stream �etermination Ephemerel Intertnittei 9. Gratle conlml 10_ Netural velley 11. Second or greaterortler channel ' atllOGal ditches are not 2�etl', see tliv_'ussons in manual B. Hydrology (Subtotal=�� 2. Presence of Basefiow 13. Iron oxitlizing bacteria t4. Leaf litter �5. 5eeimeni on plants or debris 1G Organic debris lines or piles 17 Soil-based evitlence of high watertable7 C. BIDIO (Subtotel= 18 Fibrous rooh in sheambed 19 Rooted uplantl plant=_ in st�eambetl 20 Mac:obenthos(notemversiryantlabunaance) 2� Aquatic Mollusks 22 Fish 23 Creyfish 29 Amphibians ' _". .._._ __' 25 Algae 26 Wetlantl plants in strezmbed 'perennial si�ea+s may al� be itlentified using o�her meinotls Skeich�. j�� ,'.Jr� 3 �7 � ��iif- N� N2c.s- �o SW ��nude:35, `/50 ��3 ._ Longitude; �y� ��OG_ ' L Other ��US �q��.<;'r�i0 e.g UvaOName:�' D 1 2 L� 0 � 2 3 o. � 2 _ '__'3 0 1' 2 3 7 2 3 0 1 2 3 0 . 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 0 OS 1 15 0 OS � 15 Na, 0 i. �es = 3 0 1 a �.i 15 1 0.5 �.-5 OS 65 3 3 0 0 1 1 � 0 0 0 eankHeight�Fll'�-/, � � Banklullwitlth�k�.i^ � � Watei dePtM1 (inl � ;.Y.,/.._. �,� Channel svbitrale'�CIaY Silt, iantl, G�dve��yo0ble eedmck Velo<itV - �az�, mode�ate.� la ClairtyJea�'slightlymr�id, Wrbitl Oate: ��LO l�" Evaluator: N.How¢U * Total Points: Sfream is at least in:ermlttenf � Identificafion Form Version 4.11 ProjecUSite: �, _ :�� L.Siv�CO_5-lGw�y County: ��,�Iy�1 Stream �ete�mination %jy��.y Ephemerel Intermiltei 6. Deposdional bars or benches 7. Recent alluvial deposrts B. Headcut= 9. Giatle control 10. Natural valley 1 t. Second or greate� o�de� channel 'anlfcial dnches are nol roted: see �tliscc` B. Hydrology (Subtotal= i.�. 12. Presence of BaseFlow 13 Iron oxitlizing bacte�ia 14. Leaf litter 15. Sediment on plants or debris 16. Organic tlebris lines or piles 17 Soil-basetl ehdence of high watE R Rinlnnv lCunintal - . 22. Fish 23 Cray 24 Amp 25. Alga 26 Wetl l �mm Ya��+ 7- -!o C�nFl�en�e u;{.l, 5}�eFm SF, < �7 J Latituee: 9 j.i`I� 5i'> Longitude:��a� I��J_�. Other Nw C,�tl�dS�oo�J e.g. Quad Name: 1 (Ji 3 1 2 .^3 � �" � 3 1� 2 3 o i (z' a 0 1 �2� 3 15 ;�� 0-5 0 0 � � 0 Ob 1 i: No=O �es=3 3 2 1 0 3 2 1 0 p 1_�> 2 3 '0 1 2 3 0 0.5 � 1. 0 '0.5 1 1: 0 '0: � 1. 0 os � i FACW—Q-73 o8L=�5 Other=0 methotls. See p. 35 of manual. _ . Sketch: jyv ��w(� j u;r,: - raa NR�:— �D SP� w;11 5�F•4 � ye�eww�� C BankHeibht(ft�:' �� J Bankfullwid�M1(ft�: � " 5' W dter tlep[h (in�: 'L" � � ° Channel subrtrate � a Ilf�� Gravel, Cobble. BeEmck Velociry—f st,moderate� Clarity— lea slighflyNrhitl.[urbld , s� �, NC DWQ Stream Ideufificafion Form Version 4.11 Date: �? 9;^I�G PmjecVSite;�-/g"Z�j ��eit�ae:3h'y`//6�3 Evaluator: � �I �I Coun Lon itude:, �. r.n oWP,U 3 1`SL h�jp.��' 9_._�`l.o_�11.36=, Total Points: --- - Nyj (.c 'SG ro Stream �s aueasuntertnittem r�`J Stream Oetepainatioi�rcle one) Other o� c � r>_ 19 or erennlal irz 30' .�� Ephemeral'IntermRtent erennial e g Ouae Name: A. Geomor holo (Subtotal =✓, ' Absent Weak Moderate Strong �' Gontinuity of channel betl anG bank 0 1 _ Z _ 2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 �J z 3__ 3. In-channel stmcture: ez riiFle�ool, stepyool, ,� ri le- ool se uence � 2 3 4. Particle size of stream subst2te 0 J 2 3 S.Ac6ve/reliclFlootlplain �';p 1 2 3 5. Deposifional bars or benches !y0 > 1 � 3_ 7. Recent alluvial deposils 0 1 2 3 e. Headwts 0 1 Z 3 9. Grade control 0 0 5 1 1.5 10 Na[ur�lvalley 0 OS � > >�5 � 1. Sewntl or greater order channel No = 0 �es = a a atllGclal tlttches are rrol2tetl; see tljs[cus�ns in manual B. H drolo (Subrotal = 7 � � _ �2 Presence of Basefiow 0 1 C� - 3 �3 Iron oxidlzing bac[eria 1 � 3 �4 LeaFlitter 7.5 1 OS 0 t5. Sedlmenl an planis or de6ris 0 � 0-5 � 1 1 5 tFi. Organic tlebris Iines or piles 0 0 5) i >�5 17. Soil-basetl evidence of hi9h watertable? No = 0 - Yes = 3 C. Biolo (Subtotal = �e. Fibrous roots in streambed �.3 , 2 � � _ 19. Rootetl uplantl plants in streambed , 3 2 � � _ 20 Macrobenthos (note tliversity antl abuntlance) 0 Q Z 3 21_ Aquatic Mollusks �,0 1 2 3 22 Fish 0 'O5� 1 1.5 23 Crayfish ;,0 -� OS � ��5 _ 24 Amphibians 0 05 1 15 _. __'_. _____'_ __ _ _'___ __ 25 Alyae 0 05 1 _� 26 Wetland plants in sireambed FACW = 0 75; OBL - 7 5 Other = 0_ 'pemnnial HreaTs may alw be itlentifie0 using olher methods. See p. 35 of manual �p�Notes' ! < / u �— '�te�r '�...1; ,e, ir' 1:,; �..1''S�oUrur�S ��.�.�; �� rb,,/a? ��: .! ; (t, �Jr� , _ . .. . — —._.—_—__.— _�— _ —.._. Sketch� / � sa��kr�e�qni(RPJ-�i , ' i�a� }-� r✓� r� � aanMuu wmm IR�.,j -5 � � Watei Jepth (in� Q � /� i A �/T� _��,� [hannel suhsVat¢:-�CIay�S^ilt, and Grave Cohble. n Bedwck N I��ij — N� Veloory - fasL moderate, sfow ❑ainy �ea��ligM14V�urbidwrbitl ' s y- P NC DWQ Stream ldentificatioo Form Versiou 4.11 Date: 5/y�2ol� Pmject/Site:��-54z Latitude:.�i5,�� 9 D Evaluator � Coun Lon ItuCe:� �.� �I C oJ�-G�,;, l�� c.0 d- �sc. ty v�a �; `._._ _. s Total Points: --.. .-. .y_ ..... . ._--_ _ ..,�—g streamisariansrmre�.�,men� n/ t SVeamDetermination�circl e O[her I�W (rpld°S�ofi� /ia 19or erennlali/i30' <"" J Ephemersl IntermHtant erennidlj a.g QuadNeme: A. Geomor holo Subtotal= �,5 Absent Weak Motlerate Strong �' Continuily of channel bed antl bank p � p 2. Sinoosily oi chao�el along thalweg 0 _.� � 2 3 3. In-channel stmcture: ex nffle-pool, step-pool, ;.---- � Z 3 ri le-pool se uence � 4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 :" 1'� 2 3 S. Active/relict Flootlplain 0 ?> 2 3 6.Depositionalbarsorbenchas ; p�-- � p 3 7. Recent alluvial tleposils ;"p' � y 3 � 8. Headculs i"0„�' 1 2 3 9. Grade control '0 0'.5 1 1.5 �0. Naturel valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 �` 1�.Secondorgreaterortle�channel Norb^ Ves=3 ' artlflclal tlRches are nol releQ see dlscusslons in manual B. H drolo (Submtal= �2. Presence of Basefiow p � Z � � 13. Iron oxidlzing bacteria p �1 2 3 14. Leaf litter �,5 , 7 0.5 0 15. Sediment on planis or debris ,'� 0� 0.5 1 1 5 16. Organic debris lines or piles / 0.5 1 ib 17. Soil-basetl evitlence of high ter table7 No = 0 Yes� 3 C. Biolo Subtolel= �8 Fibmus roots in streambed /3 2 1 0 19. Rooted upiantl plants in s[reambed % 3 2 1 0 20 Macrobenlhos(nofetliversiryaneabuntlanw) 0 -,y 2 3 2t Aquatic MOINsks i 0� 1 2 3 22. Fish 0 ( Q_$i 1 1 S 23 Cra�sh 0 0. 1 1.5 ---__-- _ _'_._ 24 Amphibians � 05 1 15 —_._._._ ._.._— __ '__..._—_' ' 25 Algae ___ 0 05 � 1 1 5 26 Wetlantlplantsinstreambetl FACW=075, OBL 15 �� her=0 'pe�ennialslrez�smayalso eidentifiedusngothermelnotls.Seep.35ofmanual � 7Notes: Y �, !'<,c., In �Y '< /�n � 'r i .l ' � lac e' � ' �1y r 'nJ 1��m � 1�2�5;5_r[Cuy.*S�11;1�L1,'c�,larii5�✓r_N.[S� larnu�nS �L��,�,� . nl2YZ��1 1 i SkZiCh. BankHelyht(R�'.2-% � J�e� �'�hf� � na��r�nwia�i��rq.o—� n Wa[ei dep[h pn��. � — � � UC�y� � %JiJ Channelsubs[raF�ClavS�45an�_�avellobble. NR( � — a-]?� aea,a�o ,1 Velaciry � fas1. mode�a�e, slow I`�4� °L. ❑aiiiy alea sIlRh�lyWrbid,wrb�tl i �;bu,�tiry TK 0/� SZ ( �roin u�Fd�Sl;ne i�,�+'a NC DWQ Stream ldentificafion Form Versiou 4.11 y'1 �n �� .0��. Date: �/ �� o � c� Projectl6ite: �J . C Y' :' G, letitutle: ?i i y��i ��o� Evaluator:��(i�,��,n � County: "� �� .��p�� Longitude�� G o�,�.� � t =�t— —" ''' — —9 _� B'19`1 Tot2lPolnts: J� l ��j Str�. ermination(circleone) Other � Sheam is a( least inteiminent �� if? 19or eranmali1230' �� E hemeJ tertniHent Pemnnlal ag OuaaName: I �� ri�P:�,i', A. Geomor holo Subrotal=��" � AbseM Weak Moderate 5.qq �' Coniinuity o� channel betl and bank 0 1 2 2 Sinuosity o(channel along Ihalweg 0 �Z 2 _ __ 3� 3. In-channel stmcture'. ex rifflepool, step-pool, � �_/1 z 3 ri le- ool se uence (! 4. Parlide size of stream substrale � 1 2 3 5 Ac[ive/relict Floodplain p, 1 2 3 6. DeposRional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 7.Recentalluvialdeposds ; ,p,� 1 2 3 8. Heaticuts 0 1 2 3 9. Grede coniml � 0 0.5 1 1.5 10. Naturel valley 0 1 1 5 1 t. Second or greaterortler channel No(= 0 �es = a 'artlfcial tldches are not rateQ see di sions in manual B. H drolog Subtotal=� 12. Presence oF BaseFlow p 1 2 3 t3_ Iron oxldlzing bacterla p � t 2 3 �4Leaflitter 15 1 OS 0 15. Sedimenl on plants or tlebris � 0 0.5 1 7 5 15. Organic tlebris lines or piles 0' 0.5 1 15 17. Soil-basetl eNdenc=- of high water table? No = 0 �es = a C. Biolo (Su6total= 18 Fibrous roots in streambed 3 � 1 0 19. Roofetl uplantl piants in streambetl 2 1 0 � 2t] Macrobentho=_(notediversiryandaountlance) � 0 1 � 3 21 Aquatic MOIWsks 1 2 3 22 Fish 0 LO,S. ) 1 1.5 23 Crayfish _ __ _ _ _ _ __ _ p � 1 1.5 __ 24 AmPhlbians _ __ . � �� 1 __ _ � 25 Algae 0 05 �� I.5 26 Wetland plants in sfieambed � FACW = 0 75, OBL = 7 5 Othe = 0 'perennlal siretTs may alsu be Itlen�ifietl using o�her melhotls See p�i5 of manual , � _ ._. .__-_ Notes Tnn;bci�:4 — rG�,_�e'` :C1, v�e ln �' _..'—_ _'_— __ -__ _..—_.. ._..._—' ._._ _— - . _.__ .. __. eank HeIgM1� (fl6 �- °/ rJkEiCh1 panklullwidth�hl�� r Wateitlepthl�inl0�� CM1annelsubsbatq�0ay Sill ian , ravel robble. a�e�oa velocitV' fast. moderate. slow � ❑anry�¢eiar slightlymrbiqwrbid _-- I Date: � I�o � � l o�'E- Evaluator: ��t/�n lOalU/ ? �n�d Total Points: ' sheamiseNeasYlntermittent ,� �Cj ii? 19 or oerennial if a?0' A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= T 1' Continuity of �hannel bed and bank 2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 3. In-channel structure: ez. riffleyool, step-I size 8. Heaticuts 9. Grede contml t0. Naturalvalley 1t Secontl or greater ' artificlal d'Rches are no� channel :'$P'. � �i �N�F!'i � � / 7�,5 fP�GE� ,5 IOC��e? GYS�r?tirn �ok ��l �5 �i ra C.r rc,, l�i a r.} I'?c'J'�. ersion 4.11 Projecusite: (Z- Cj <6'LC` Latitude: rJ� y(�� [� a County: Way�e, Lon9itutle:��l�, �� f{�' I �ermination(ciroleone) I Other ero Intermittent Perennial eg.QuadName:��,� ��i� seirt Weak Moderate Stro a 1 2 L:. 0 1 2 3 '� � 2 3 p 2 3 p 2 3 � 2 3 � 2 3 Q � ? 3 OS i V 0 � 5 > >-' ni�_nl Yes=3 NC DWQ Stream ldentificat oate: ��2D1`� Evaluator: NAr� �I��PU � L�� n. � ., Total Points: SM1eamisaNeasNnteimlttenr �v J Il2f9mperennialtl?30' Q A_Geomorpholoqy (subtotal= s i° Continuity of channel betl and bank 2. Sinuoshy of channel along [halwey 3. Ir+channel structure' ex nffle-pool, step-� npple-poolsequence 4. Particle size of stream substrete 5. Active/relict fioodplain 6. DeposAional bars or benches i�i. �econa or greater ortler chai a atlifclal tlitches are not 2tetl: see � B. Hydrology (subtotal = 12. Presence otBasefiow t3. Iron oxidving bacteria �4. �eaf litter 15. Sedimen� on planls or tleb�is is roocs m screamoea tl uplantl piants in stream benthos (note tliversity and c MOINsks .h bians iG plants in straambed slrexTs may aJw be itlentifi ��1u2 Iln� J,,nno�( u'i �'i<#;e�%� %�+��r1 Ir;nEz��at� Elemc�7{niy `:�_�"f;7/. �ersion 4.11 ProjecUSlte: ) j�- � Latitude: 3�/ �- QJ 1 Countyr� Longitude:_ 7 �G,,s}an -- --�2._i=..�`l1`� �ream�termination(circleone) Other Ephertreal)ntertnittenc Perennial a.g 4va0Name: � �,,,,/_� See @ 1 2 3 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 i5 1 1.5 I.5 1 1.5 Yes=3 , 0.5 � 3 E 0 2 1 1 1 — — = 1 5 Olher = 0 0 3 3 15 1.5 1.5 7b �� Bank Height (k��.�' � Sketch: �oo�S �,n �1tice'> -Fa /,� D!Pe]' /�� 'oeJ eznamiw�amceL�'-5� `iH�Dut�,pn� ��1 / Uj� � � .r I Watertlep[h{in�.�_��' � [ �G� ,tr jyf (e i,.jGTY(� , �%�P�EI�� CM1annelsubsVat I S'I S ravel,Cobble. � ' / �� ,S ��'S9nqn�, 6earocu "/ Velocity - tast, modera[e, slow pv0/�� ❑arrty de sGRht�yW�biQWrbiOSllrpe�s, W�SL�Nb b�i�ERMINAI`�CiN aATA FORM — A#lantic ae�d Gulf C4astal Pl�in Region P�o��r�ate: R-5829 US 70 Improvements city�county: Johnston Saanpling oate: 5/3/2018 ApplicanUOwner: NCDOT State; n1C Sampling Point: �NE-13 Wet ir�vesti9ator{s): Nathan Howell & Lizzy Stokes-Cawley Sectian, Towr�sn�p, �tanye: Princeton Landform (�aillslope, terrace, etc.): Headwater Forest Local relief (concave, cornex, nane}: CO►IVeX SI❑pe j%}: 5 Subregion {�RR or M�taA): LRR-P �at: 35.472194 �fl�g; -78.182885 �Dakum: NAD 83 s�i� Map vnit r�ame: Toisnot loam, 0-2% slopes n�Wi c��ssif�catio�: None Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the si�e typical far this time o# yesr? Yes � A�o �{If no, explair� in Remarks.} Are Vegetation� Soil I v I or Hydrerlogy �✓ , significantly disturhed? N� Are "Norrnal Circumstances° present7 Yes �✓ No � /�ae Vegetation ✓� Scail ✓� or Mydrology�✓ naturally proble�atoc? NO [If needed, explain any answer� in Remarks.J SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Aitach site rnap showing sampling point locatior�s, trarosects, impork��t features, etc. Hydrophytic V�getation Present? Hydric Sail Present? Wetland Hydrology Pres�nt? Yes �✓ No 0 Yes �/ hio � Yes � Ma �� Is the Sampled Area within a IMetiand? Xes ✓� No � NCWAM: Headwater Forest. Wetlands WC and WQ possess similar edaphic, hydrologic, and floristic properties and are included under this form. HYDR{)LC?GY Wetland Hydrolagy dndicators: Secondarv Indicatars (minimurra of twa reauired� I'rimanr Indicatars [minimum of one is reauir�d; ch�ck all that appiv) QSur�ace Soil Cracks (6�6} Q✓ 5urface Water (A1) QAq�uatic Faurra (B13j QSparse3y Vegeta#ed Canca�e Surface (BS) �Higi� WaY�r Table (A2} �IWarl C3eposits (�15} {LRFi IJ} �✓ Drainage Patterns (B10) QSakuratior� {A3� �Fiydrogert� Sulfide Odor {C1 } �Mnss Trim Lenes (896} �Water Marks (B'I ) QOxidized Rhrizospheres along LiWing Roots {C3} �Dry-Seasan Water Tab}e (C2} �Sediment C?eposits (B2} �Presence of Reduced Iron (C�1J �Cra�sh Burrows (C8} �Drift Deposits (B3} �k�ecer�t kron �ieduct�on in Tilled Svils (CB) �5atueation Vosible on Aerial Irnagery {�9} �Algal hAaf or Crust (B4) �Thin IlAuck Su�rf�ce (C7) �Geamorphic Position ([32) �fron i7epr�sits (B5} �Other (Explain in Ftemarks) �hallow Aquika�rd (C73) � Inu�datian V6sible on Aerial Umagery (B7� �FfIC-G�Yeutra! Test (Da� � Wat�er-Sta��ned Leaves (B9) � Sphagnum unoss (�8} (LRR T, U) Fielc� f3bservations: i Sueface Water �'resent? Yes �✓ No D[7epth (inches): �� Water Table Present? Yes � No ,Q []epth (ir�ches}: (C� SUrF8C2 Saturatipn Present? Yes � No � Depth {inc�resj: (C� SUffaC2 Wetland F�ydroMogy Preser�t? Yes �✓ No � 6ndudes �a illa frin e �esc�ibe F�ecorded �aka {stream gauge, monitonng well, aerial photos, previouas inspectians}, oi availab6e: Remarks: US Army Cor,ps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Caastal Plain F�egian —'Uersevn �.0 R-5829 US 70 Improvements VEGETATION (Fi�e Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius j �iq Cover Soecies? Status �. Nyssa biflora 30 Yes OBL 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 30 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: � 5 20% of total cover: 6 Saolin4 Stratum (Plot size: � 5' radius � �. Nvssa biflora 30 Yes OBL z.Acer rubrum 30 Yes FAC 3. 4. 5. 6. �� = Total Co�er 50% of total cover: 3� 20% of total cover: � 2 Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' radiUs � �. Vaccinium fuscatum 30 Yes FACW z. Itea virqinica 15 Yes FACW 3.Cyrilla racemiflora 15 Yes FACW 4. Magnolia virginiana 15 Yes FACW 5. 6. 75 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 37.5 20% of total cover: 15 Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' radius ) �.Osmundastrum cinnamomeum 20 Yes FAC z.Osmunda regalis 20 Yes FACW 3. Lorinseria (Woodwardia) areolata 15 Yes OBL 4.Carex sp. 10 N/A NI 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 55 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 27•5 20% of totel cover: � � Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot siza: 3�' radius ) �. Smilax laurifolia 30 z. 3. 4. �� Hydrophytic 30 = Total Cover Vegetation 50% of total cover: � 5 20% of total cover: 6 Present? Yes FACW Sampling Point: WE-13 Wet uominance iest vunrKsneet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC Total Number of Dominant 5pecies Across All Strata: Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL. FACW. or FAC Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiplv hv: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = nynropnyuc vegetanon inaica[ors: 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation �/ 2 - �ominance Test is �50% 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0' � Prohlematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) ' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 6e present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata: Tree — Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft(6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at hreast height (DBH). Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft(6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shru6 — Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft {1 to 6 m) in height. Herh — All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft(1 m) in height. Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height. on s Yes� No� US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 R-5829 US 70 Improvements SOIL Sampling Point: Profile Description: {Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the ahsence of indicators.] Depth Matrix Redox Features {inches) Color fmoistl % Color {moistl % Tvpe Loc` Texture Remarks 0-2" 10YR 2/2 100 L 2-8" 10YR 2/1 100 L 8-14+ 10YR 6/1 90 10YR 4/6 10 C M SL WE-13 Wet 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked 5and Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicahle to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.J Indicators for Prohlematic Hydric Soils3: � Histosol {A1) Polyvalue Below Surface {S8) (LRR S, T, llj 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O) Histic Epipedon (A2) Thin Dark Surtace (S9) [LRR S, T, U} 2 cm Muck (A10) [LRR S} Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) {LRR Oj Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 950A,Bj Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, Tj Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) Organic Bodies (A6) {LRR P, T, ll) Redox Dark Surtace (F6) (MLRA 953B] 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, ll) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) �ed Parent Material (TF2) Muck Presence (A8) (LRR Uj Redox Depressions (F8) ery Shallow Dark Surtace (TF12) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) Marl (F90) [LRR ll) �Other (Explain in Remarks) ✓ �epleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Ochric (F11) {MLRA 151 j Thick Dark Surtace (Al2j Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) �Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (M LRA 150A� Umbric Surtace (F13) (LRR P, T, ll} wetland hydrology must be present, Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) {LRR O, Sj Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 159] unless disturbed or problematic. Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Reduced Vertic (F18j (MLRA 150A, 150Bj Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) [MLRA 149A} Stripped Matrix (S6) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) {MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D] Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, llj Restrictive Layer {if ohservedj: Type: Depth (inchesj: Hydric Soil Present? Yes� No� Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 W�SL�Nb b�i�ERMINAI`�CiN aATA FORM — A#lantic ae�d Gulf C4astal Pl�in Region P�o��r�ate: R-5829 US 70 Improvements city�county: Johnston Saanpling oate: 5/3/2018 ApplicanUOwner: NCDOT State; n1C Sampling Point: �NE-13 Upl ir�vesti9ator{s): Nathan Howell & Lizzy Stokes-Cawley Sectian, Towr�sn�p, �tanye: Princeton Landform (�aillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, cornex, nane}: CO►IVeX SI❑pe [°/a}: 10 Subregion {�RR or M�taA): LRR-P �a#: 35.472497 �fl�g; -78.182780 �Dakum: NAD 83 s�i� Map vnit r�ame: Toisnot loam, 0-2% slopes n�Wi c��ssif�catio�: None Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the si�e typical far this time o# yesr? Yes � A�o �{If no, explair� in Remarks.} Are Vegetation� Soil I v I or Hydrerlogy �✓ , significantly disturhed? N� Are "Norrnal Circumstances° present7 Yes �✓ No � /�ae Vegetation ✓� Scail ✓� or Mydrology�✓ naturally proble�atoc? NO [If needed, explain any answer� in Remarks.J SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Aitach site rnap showing sampling point locatior�s, trarosects, impork��t features, etc. Hydrophytic V�getation Present? Hydric Sail Present? Wetland Hydrology Pres�nt? Yes � No ✓0 Yes � hio � Yes Ma �� Is the Sampled Area within a IMetiand? Xes � No � Wetlands WC and WQ possess upland plots with similar edaphic, hydrologic, and floristic properties; thus, they are included under this form. HYDR{)LC?GY Wetland Hydrolagy dndicators: Secondarv Indicatars (minimurra of twa reauired� I'rimanr Indicatars [minimum of one is reauir�d; ch�ck all that appiv) QSur�ace Soil Cracks (6�6} QSurface Water (A1) QAq�uatic Faurra (B13j QSparse3y Vegeta#ed Canca�e Surface (BS) �Higi� WaY�r Table (A2} �IWarl C3eposits (�15} {LRFi IJ} �Drainage Patterns (B10) QSakuratior� {A3� �Fiydrogert� Sulfide Odor {C1 } �Mnss Trim Lenes (896} �Water Marks (B'I ) QOxidized Rhrizospheres along LiWing Roots {C3} �Dry-Seasan Water Tab}e (C2} �Sediment C?eposits (B2} �Presence of Reduced Iron (C�1J �Cra�sh Burrows (C8} �Drift Deposits (B3} �k�ecer�t kron �ieduct�on in Tilled Svils (CB) �5atueation Vosible on Aerial Irnagery {�9} �Algal hAaf or Crust (B4) �Thin IlAuck Su�rf�ce (C7) �Geamorphic Position ([32) �fron i7epr�sits (B5} �Other (Explain in Ftemarks) �hallow Aquika�rd (C73) � Inu�datian V6sible on Aerial Umagery (B7� �FfIC-G�Yeutra! Test (Da� 'Wat�er-Sta��ned Leaves (B9) Sphagnum unoss (�8} (LRR T, U) Field f3bservations: i Sueface Water �'resent? Yes � No D✓ [7epth (inches): � Water Table Present? Yes � IVo ,Q C]epth (ir�ches}: 0 Saturatipn Present? Yes � No � Depth {inc�resj: 0 Wetland F�ydroMogy Preser�t? Yes ,Q No �✓ 6ndudes �a illa frin e �esc�ibe F�ecorded �aka {stream gauge, monitonng well, aerial photos, previouas inspectians}, oi availab6e: Remarks: US Army Cor,ps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Caastal Plain F�egian —'Uersevn �.0 R-5829 US 70 Improvements VEGETATION (Fi�e Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius j �. Pinus taeda 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. % Cover Soecies? Status 75 Yes FAC 75 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 37•5 20% of total cover: 15 Saolin4 Stratum (Plot size: � 5' radius � �. Acer rubrum 30 Yes FAC z.Oxydendrum arboreum 30 Yes FACU 3. 4. 5. 6. �� = Total Co�er 50% of total cover: 3� 20% of total cover: � 2 Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' radiUs � �. Vaccinium sp. 30 N/A NI 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. � = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: � Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' radius ) �.Cvaripedium acaule 20 Yes FACU z.Tipu►aria discolor 10 Yes FACU 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 50% of total cover: 15 Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot siza: 3�' radius ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 50% of total cover: 0 holoqical adaptations 30 = Total Cover 20% of totel cover: 6 Sampling Point: WE-13 Upl uominance iest vunrKsneet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC Total Number of Dominant 5pecies Across All Strata: Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL. FACW. or FAC Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiplv hv: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation �/ 2 - �ominance Test is �50% 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0' � Prohlematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) ' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 6e present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft(6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at hreast height (DBH). Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft(6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shru6 - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft {1 to 6 m) in height. Herh - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft(1 m) in height. Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic 0 = Total Cover Vegetation � 20% of total cover: � Present? Yes� No� US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0 SOIL ne R-5829 US 70 Improvements or confirm the ahsence of indic WE-13 Upl Sampling Point: Depth Matrix Redox Features {inches) Color fmoistl % Color {moistl % Tvpe Loc` Texture Remarks 0-3 10YR 4/3 100 SL 3-12+ 10YR 5/6 100 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked 5and Grains Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicahle to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.J � Histosol {A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Organic Bodies (A6) {LRR P, T, ll) 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, ll) Muck Presence (A8) (LRR Uj 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) �epleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surtace (Al2j Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (M LRA 150A� Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) {LRR O, Sj Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, llj Restrictive Layer {if ohservedj: Type: Depth (inchesj: Remarks: SL 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Indicators for Prohlematic Hydric Soils3: Polyvalue Below Surface {S8) (LRR S, T, llj 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O) �Thin Dark Surtace (S9) [LRR S, T, U} 2 cm Muck (A90) [LRR S} Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) {LRR Oj Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 950A,Bj ILoamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, Tj IDepleted Matrix (F3) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) Redox Dark Surtace (F6) (MLRA 953B] Depleted Dark Surface (F7) �ed Parent Material (TF2) Redox Depressions (F8) ery Shallow Dark Surtace (TF12) Marl (F90) [LRR ll) �Other (Explain in Remarks) Depleted Ochric (F11) {MLRA 151 j Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) �Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Umbric Surtace (F13) (LRR P, T, ll} wetland hydrology must be present, Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 159] unless disturbed or problematic. Reduced Vertic (F18j (MLRA 150A, 150Bj Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) [MLRA 149A} Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) {MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D] Hydric Soil Present? Yes� No� US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 W�SL�Nb b�i�ERMINAI`�CiN aATA FORM — A#lantic ae�d Gulf C4astal Pl�in Region P�o��r�ate: R-5829 US 70 Improvements city�county: Johnston ApplicanUOwner: NCDOT State; NC ir�vesti9ator{s): Nathan Howell & Lizzy Stokes-Cawley Sectian, Towr�sn�p, �tanye: Princeton Landform (�aills4ope, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, cornex, nane}: CO►IVeX Subregion {�RR or M�taA): LRR-P �at: 35.472736 �fl�g; -78.170391 Saanpling oate: 5/3/2018 Sampling Point: W�-1 Wet SI❑pe j%}: 10 �Dakum: NAD 83 s�i� Map vnit r�ame: Grantham silt loam, 0-2% slopes n�Wi c��ssif�catio�: None Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the si�e typical far this time o# yesr? Yes � A�o �{If no, explair� in Remarks.} Are Vegetation� Soil I v I or Hydrerlogy �✓ , significantly disturhed? N� Are "Norrnal Circumstances° present7 Yes �✓ No � /�ae Vegetation ✓� Scail ✓� or Mydrology�✓ naturally proble�atoc? NO [If needed, explain any answer� in Remarks.J SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Aitach site rnap showing sampling point locatior�s, trarosects, impork��t features, etc. Hydrophytic V�getation Present? Hydric Sail Present? Wetland Hydrology Pres�nt? Yes �✓ No 0 Yes �/ hio � Yes � Ma �� Is the Sampled Area within a IMetiand? Xes ✓� No � NCWAM: Headwater Forest (Disturbed). Wetlands WL, WMM, and WNN all possess similar landscape positions and edpahic, hydrologic, and floristic properties. They all possess disturbed soils and vegetation. HYDR{)LC?GY Wetland Hydrolagy dndicators: Secondarv Indicatars (minimurra of twa reauired� I'rimanr Indicatars [minimum of one is reauir�d; ch�ck all that appiv) QSur�ace Soil Cracks (6�6} QSurface Water (A1) QAq�uatic Faurra (B13j QSparse3y Vegeta#ed Canca�e Surface (BS) �Higi� WaY�r Table (A2} �IWarl C3eposits (�15} {LRFi IJ} �Drainage Patterns (B10) QSakuratior� {A3� �Fiydrogert� Sulfide Odor {C1 } �Mnss Trim Lenes (896} �Water Marks (B'I ) QOxidized Rhrizospheres along LiWing Roots {C3} �Dry-Seasan Water Tab}e (C2} �Sediment C?eposits (B2} �Presence of Reduced Iron (C�1J �Cra�sh Burrows (C8} �Drift Deposits (B3} �k�ecer�t kron �ieduct�on in Tilled Svils (CB) �5atueation Vosible on Aerial Irnagery {�9} �Algal hAaf or Crust (B4) �Thin IlAuck Su�rf�ce (C7) �Geamorphic Position ([32) �fron i7epr�sits (B5} �Other (Explain in Ftemarks) �hallow Aquika�rd (C73) � Inu�datian V6sible on Aerial Umagery (B7� �FfIC-G�Yeutra! Test (Da� 'Wat�er-Sta��ned Leaves (B9) Sphagnum unoss (�8} (LRR T, U) Field f3bservations: i Sueface Water �'resent? Yes � No D✓ [7epth (inches): � Water Table Present? Yes � IVo ,Q C]epth (ir�ches}: 0 Saturatipn Present? Yes � No � Depth {inc�resj: 8 Wetland F�ydroMogy Preser�t? Yes �✓ No � 6ndudes �a illa frin e �esc�ibe F�ecorded �aka {stream gauge, monitonng well, aerial photos, previouas inspectians}, oi availab6e: Remarks: US Army Cor,ps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Caastal Plain F�egian —'Uersevn �.0 R-5829 US 70 Improvements VEGETATION (Fi�e Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: W�-� Wet A6solute Dominant inaicator uominance iest vunrKsneet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius j % Cover Soecies? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 2. Total Number of Dominant 3� 5pecies Across All Strata: 4. Percent of Dominant Species �� That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 6. 50% of total cover: 0 Saolin4 Stratum (Plot size: � 5' radius � 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 50% of total cover: � Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' radiUs � �. Sambucus canadensis 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1 �A� 1 �� 100 ��B� 0 = Total Cover Prevalence Index worksheet: 20% of total cover: � Total % Cover of: Multiplv hv: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) p_ = Total Co�er 20% of total cover: � 20 N/A NI 2� = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 10 20% of total cover: 4 Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' radius ) �.Juncus effusus 45 Yes FACW z.Carex sp. 20 N/A NI 3.Eleocharis sp. 10 N/A NI 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 50% of total cover: 37.5 Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot siza: 3�' radius ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 50% of total cover: 0 holoqical adaptations 75 = Total Cover 20% of totel cover: 15 Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation �/ 2 - �ominance Test is �50% 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0' � Prohlematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) ' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 6e present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft(6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at hreast height (DBH). Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft(6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shru6 - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft {1 to 6 m) in height. Herh - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft(1 m) in height. Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic 0 = Total Cover Vegetation 20% of total cover: � Present? Yes� No� US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0 SOIL ne R-5829 US 70 Improvements or confirm the ahsence of indic Sampling Point: Depth Matrix Redox Features {inches) Color fmoistl % Color {moistl % Tvpe Loc` Texture Remarks 0-12 10YR 5/1 80 7.5YR 4/6 2p C M/PL L 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked 5and Grains Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicahle to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.J � Histosol {A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Organic Bodies (A6) {LRR P, T, ll) 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, ll) Muck Presence (A8) (LRR Uj 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) �epleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surtace (Al2j Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (M LRA 150A� Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) {LRR O, Sj Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, llj Restrictive Layer {if ohservedj: Type: Depth (inchesj: Remarks: WJ-1 Wet 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Indicators for Prohlematic Hydric Soils3: Polyvalue Below Surface {S8) (LRR S, T, llj 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O) �Thin Dark Surtace (S9) [LRR S, T, U} 2 cm Muck (A90) [LRR S} Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) {LRR Oj Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 950A,Bj ILoamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, Tj IDepleted Matrix (F3) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) Redox Dark Surtace (F6) (MLRA 953B] Depleted Dark Surface (F7) �ed Parent Material (TF2) Redox Depressions (F8) ery Shallow Dark Surtace (TF12) Marl (F90) [LRR ll) �Other (Explain in Remarks) Depleted Ochric (F11) {MLRA 151 j Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) �Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Umbric Surtace (F13) (LRR P, T, ll} wetland hydrology must be present, Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 159] unless disturbed or problematic. Reduced Vertic (F18j (MLRA 150A, 150Bj Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) [MLRA 149A} Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) {MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D] Hydric Soil Present? Yes� No� US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 W�SL�Nb b�i�ERMINAI`�CiN aATA FORM — A#lantic ae�d Gulf C4astal Pl�in Region P�o��r�ate: R-5829 US 70 Improvements city�county: Johnston ApplicanUOwner: NCDOT State; NC ir�vesti9ator{s): Nathan Howell & Lizzy Stokes-Cawley Sectian, Towr�sn�p, �tanye: Princeton Landform (�aills4ope, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, cornex, nane}: CO►IVeX Subregion {�RR or M�taA): LRR-P �at: 35.472058 �fl�g; -78.169707 Saanpling oate: 5/3/2018 Sampling Point: W�-1 Upl SI❑pe j%}: 10 �Dakum: NAD 83 s�i� Map vnit r�ame: Grantham silt loam, 0-2% slopes n�Wi c��ssif�catio�: None Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the si�e typical far this time o# yesr? Yes � A�o �{If no, explair� in Remarks.} Are Vegetation� Soil I v I or Hydrerlogy �✓ , significantly disturhed? N� Are "Norrnal Circumstances° present7 Yes �✓ No � /�ae Vegetation ✓� Scail ✓� or Mydrology�✓ naturally proble�atoc? NO [If needed, explain any answer� in Remarks.J SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Aitach site rnap showing sampling point locatior�s, trarosects, impork��t features, etc. Hydrophytic V�getation Present? Hydric Sail Present? Wetland Hydrology Pres�nt? Yes � No ✓0 Yes � hio � Yes Ma �� Is the Sampled Area within a IMetiand? Xes � No � Wetlands WL, WMM, and WNN all possess upland plots with similar edpahic, hydrologic, and floristic properties; thus, they are included under this form. HYDR{)LC?GY Wetland Hydrolagy dndicators: Secondarv Indicatars (minimurra of twa reauired� I'rimanr Indicatars [minimum of one is reauir�d; ch�ck all that appiv) QSur�ace Soil Cracks (6�6} QSurface Water (A1) QAq�uatic Faurra (B13j QSparse3y Vegeta#ed Canca�e Surface (BS) �Higi� WaY�r Table (A2} �IWarl C3eposits (�15} {LRFi IJ} �Drainage Patterns (B10) QSakuratior� {A3� �Fiydrogert� Sulfide Odor {C1 } �Mnss Trim Lenes (896} �Water Marks (B'I ) QOxidized Rhrizospheres along LiWing Roots {C3} �Dry-Seasan Water Tab}e (C2} �Sediment C?eposits (B2} �Presence of Reduced Iron (C�1J �Cra�sh Burrows (C8} �Drift Deposits (B3} �k�ecer�t kron �ieduct�on in Tilled Svils (CB) �5atueation Vosible on Aerial Irnagery {�9} �Algal hAaf or Crust (B4) �Thin IlAuck Su�rf�ce (C7) �Geamorphic Position ([32) �fron i7epr�sits (B5} �Other (Explain in Ftemarks) �hallow Aquika�rd (C73) � Inu�datian V6sible on Aerial Umagery (B7� �FfIC-G�Yeutra! Test (Da� 'Wat�er-Sta��ned Leaves (B9) Sphagnum unoss (�8} (LRR T, U) Field f3bservations: i Sueface Water �'resent? Yes � No D✓ [7epth (inches): � Water Table Present? Yes � IVo ,Q C]epth (ir�ches}: 0 Saturatipn Present? Yes � No � Depth {inc�resj: 0 Wetland F�ydroMogy Preser�t? Yes ,Q No �✓ 6ndudes �a illa frin e �esc�ibe F�ecorded �aka {stream gauge, monitonng well, aerial photos, previouas inspectians}, oi availab6e: Remarks: US Army Cor,ps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Caastal Plain F�egian —'Uersevn �.0 R-5829 US 70 Improvements VEGETATION (Fi�e Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius j �. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 50% of total cover: 0 Saolin4 Stratum (Plot size: � 5' radius � 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 50% of total cover: � Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' radiUs � 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Sampling Point: WJ-1 Upl Hosoiute uominant inaicator uominance iest vunrKsneet: % Cover Soecies? Status Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC Total Number of Dominant 5pecies Across All Strata: Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL. FACW. or FAC 1 �A� 2 �� 50 ��B� 0 = Total Cover Prevalence Index worksheet: 20% of total cover: � Total % Cover of: Multiplv hv: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = p_ = Total Co�er Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: _ 20% of total cover: � 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - �ominance Test is �50% 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0' � Prohlematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) � = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: � Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' radius ) �.Andropoqon virainicus 45 Yes FAC z. Eupatorium capillifolium 20 Yes FACU 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 50% of total cover: 32.5 Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot siza: 3�' radius ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 50% of total cover: 0 holoqical adaptations 65 = Total Cover 20% of totel cover: 13 ' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 6e present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft(6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at hreast height (DBH). Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft(6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shru6 - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft {1 to 6 m) in height. Herh - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft(1 m) in height. Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic 0 = Total Cover Vegetation � 20% of total cover: � Present? Yes� No� US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0 SOIL ne R-5829 US 70 Improvements or confirm the ahsence of indic WJ-1 Upl Sampling Point: Depth Matrix Redox Features {inches) Color fmoistl % Color {moistl % Tvpe Loc` Texture Remarks 0-6 10YR 4/3 100 L 6-12 10YR 5/4 100 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked 5and Grains Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicahle to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.J � Histosol {A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Organic Bodies (A6) {LRR P, T, ll) 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, ll) Muck Presence (A8) (LRR Uj 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) �epleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surtace (Al2j Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (M LRA 150A� Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) {LRR O, Sj Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, llj Restrictive Layer {if ohservedj: Type: Depth (inchesj: Remarks: SL 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Indicators for Prohlematic Hydric Soils3: Polyvalue Below Surface {S8) (LRR S, T, llj 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O) �Thin Dark Surtace (S9) [LRR S, T, U} 2 cm Muck (A90) [LRR S} Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) {LRR Oj Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 950A,Bj ILoamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, Tj IDepleted Matrix (F3) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) Redox Dark Surtace (F6) (MLRA 953B] Depleted Dark Surface (F7) �ed Parent Material (TF2) Redox Depressions (F8) ery Shallow Dark Surtace (TF12) Marl (F90) [LRR ll) �Other (Explain in Remarks) Depleted Ochric (F11) {MLRA 151 j Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) �Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Umbric Surtace (F13) (LRR P, T, ll} wetland hydrology must be present, Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 159] unless disturbed or problematic. Reduced Vertic (F18j (MLRA 150A, 150Bj Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) [MLRA 149A} Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) {MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D] Hydric Soil Present? Yes� No� US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 W�SL�Nb b�i�ERMINAI`�CiN aATA FORM — A#lantic ae�d Gulf C4astal Pl�in Region P�o��r�ate: R-5829 US 70 Improvements city�county: Johnston ApplicanUOwner: NCDOT State; NC ir�vesti9ator{s): Nathan Howell & Lizzy Stokes-Cawley Sectian, Towr�sn�p, �tanye: Princeton Landform (�aillslope, terrace, etc.): Basin Local relief (concave, cornex, naneJ: COIICaVe Subregion {�RR or M�RA): LRR-P �a#: 35.469931 �fl�g; -78.162251 Saanpling oate: 5/3/2018 Sampling Point: �NN-4 Wet SI❑pe j%}: 0 �Dakum: NAD 83 s�i� Map vnit r�ame: Rains-Urban land complex, 0-2% slopes n�Wi c��ssif�catio�: None Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the si�e typical far this time o# yesr? Yes � A�o �{If no, explair� in Remarks.} Are Vegetation� Soil I v I or Hydrerlogy �✓ , significantly disturhed? Yes qre "Norrnal Circumstances° present7 Yes �✓ No � /�ae Vegetation ✓� Scail ✓� or Mydrology�✓ naturally proble�atoc? NO [If needed, explain any answer� in Remarks.J SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Aitach site rnap showing sampling point locatior�s, trarosects, impork��t features, etc. Hydrophytic V�getation Present? Hydric Sail Present? Wetland Hydrology Pres�nt? Yes �✓ No 0 Yes �/ hio � Yes � Ma �� Is the Sampled Area within a IMetiand? Xes ✓� No � NCWAM: Basin Wetland. Wetlands WU and WII possess similar landscape positions and edaphic, floristic, and hydrologic properties. Therefore, they are included under this form. HYDR{)LC?GY Wetland Hydrolagy dndicators: Secondarv Indicatars (minimurra of twa reauired� I'rimanr Indicatars [minimum of one is reauir�d; ch�ck all that appiv) QSur�ace Soil Cracks (6�6} Q✓ 5urface Water (A1) QAq�uatic Faurra (B13j QSparse3y Vegeta#ed Canca�e Surface (BS) �Higi� WaY�r Table (A2} �IWarl C3eposits (�15} {LRFi IJ} �Drainage Patterns (B10) QSakuratior� {A3� �Fiydrogert� Sulfide Odor {C1 } �Mnss Trim Lenes (896} �Water Marks (B'I ) QOxidized Rhrizospheres along LiWing Roots {C3} �Dry-Seasan Water Tab}e (C2} �Sediment C?eposits (B2} �Presence of Reduced Iron (C�1J �Cra�sh Burrows (C8} �Drift Deposits (B3} �k�ecer�t kron �ieduct�on in Tilled Svils (CB) �5atueation Vosible on Aerial Irnagery {�9} �Algal hAaf or Crust (B4) �Thin IlAuck Su�rf�ce (C7) �Geamorphic Position ([32) �fron i7epr�sits (B5} �Other (Explain in Ftemarks) �hallow Aquika�rd (C73) � Inu�datian V6sible on Aerial Umagery (B7� �FfIC-G�Yeutra! Test (Da� � Wat�er-Sta��ned Leaves (B9) Sphagnum unoss (�8} (LRR T, U) Fielc� f3bservations: i Sueface Water �'resent? Yes �✓ No D[7epth (inches): � Water Table Present? Yes � No ,Q []epth (ir�ches}: SUrf8C2 Saturatipn Present? Yes � No � Depth {inciresj� SUt'f8C2 Wetland F�ydroMogy Preser�t? Yes �✓ No � 6ndudes �a illa frin e �esc�ibe F�ecorded �aka {stream gauge, monitonng well, aerial photos, previouas inspectians}, oi availab6e: Remarks: US Army Cor,ps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Caastal Plain F�egian —'Uersevn �.0 R-5829 US 70 Improvements VEGETATION (Fi�e Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: WN-4 Wet A6solute Dominant inaicator uominance iest vunrKsneet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius j % Cover Soecies? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 2. Total Number of Dominant 3� 5pecies Across All Strata: 4. Percent of Dominant Species �� That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 6. 0 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: � Saolin4 Stratum (Plot size: � 5' radius � �. Salix niara 30 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Yes OBL g� = Total Co�er 50% of total cover: � 5 20% of total cover: 6 Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' radiUs � �. Salix nigra 15 2. _ 3. 4. 5. 6. Yes OBL 15 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 7.5 20% of total cover: 3 Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' radius ) �.Juncus effusus 30 Yes FACW z.Carex spp. N/A NI 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 50% of total cover: 15 Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot siza: 3�' radius ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 50% of total cover: 0 holoqical adaptations 30 = Total Cover 20% of totel cover: 6 Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiplv hv: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation �/ 2 - �ominance Test is �50% 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0' � Prohlematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) ' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 6e present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft(6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at hreast height (DBH). Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft(6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shru6 - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft {1 to 6 m) in height. Herh - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft(1 m) in height. Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic 0 = Total Cover Vegetation 20% of total cover: � Present? Yes� No� US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0 SOIL ne R-5829 US 70 Improvements or confirm the ahsence of indic Sampling Point: Depth Matrix Redox Features {inches) Color fmoistl % Color {moistl % Tvpe Loc` Texture Remarks 0-12 10YR 4/1 70 10YR 8/1 10 D M L 7.5YR 4/6 2p C M 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked 5and Grains Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicahle to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.J � Histosol {A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Organic Bodies (A6) {LRR P, T, ll) 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, ll) Muck Presence (A8) (LRR Uj 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) �epleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surtace (Al2j Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (M LRA 150A� Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) {LRR O, Sj Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, llj Restrictive Layer {if ohservedj: Type: Depth (inchesj: Remarks: WN-4 Wet 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Indicators for Prohlematic Hydric Soils3: Polyvalue Below Surface {S8) (LRR S, T, llj 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O) �Thin Dark Surtace (S9) [LRR S, T, U} 2 cm Muck (A90) [LRR S} Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) {LRR Oj Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 950A,Bj ILoamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, Tj IDepleted Matrix (F3) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) Redox Dark Surtace (F6) (MLRA 953B] Depleted Dark Surface (F7) �ed Parent Material (TF2) Redox Depressions (F8) ery Shallow Dark Surtace (TF12) Marl (F90) [LRR ll) �Other (Explain in Remarks) Depleted Ochric (F11) {MLRA 151 j Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) �Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Umbric Surtace (F13) (LRR P, T, ll} wetland hydrology must be present, Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 159] unless disturbed or problematic. Reduced Vertic (F18j (MLRA 150A, 150Bj Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) [MLRA 149A} Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) {MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D] Hydric Soil Present? Yes� No� US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 W�SL�Nb b�i�ERMINAI`�CiN aATA FORM — A#lantic ae�d Gulf C4astal Pl�in Region P�o��r�ate: R-5829 US 70 Improvements city�county: Johnston ApplicanUOwner: NCDOT State; NC ir�vesti9ator{s): Nathan Howell & Lizzy Stokes-Cawley Sectian, Towr�sn�p, �tanye: Princeton Landform (�aills4ope, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, cornex, naneJ: CO►IVeX Subregion {�RR or M�RA): LRR-P �a#: 35.469931 �fl�g; -78.162251 Saanpling oate: 5/3/2018 Sampling Point: �NN-4 Upl SI❑pe j%}: 10 �Dakum: NAD 83 s�i� Map vnit r�ame: Rains-Urban land complex, 0-2% slopes n�Wi c��ssif�catio�: None Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the si�e typical far this time o# yesr? Yes � A�o �{If no, explair� in Remarks.} Are Vegetation� Soil I v I or Hydrerlogy �✓ , significantly disturhed? Yes qre "Norrnal Circumstances° present7 Yes �✓ No � /�ae Vegetation ✓� Scail ✓� or Mydrology�✓ naturally proble�atoc? NO [If needed, explain any answer� in Remarks.J SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Aitach site rnap showing sampling point locatior�s, trarosects, impork��t features, etc. Hydrophytic V�getation Present? Hydric Sail Present? Wetland Hydrology Pres�nt? Yes � No ✓0 Yes � hio � Yes Ma �� Is the Sampled Area within a IMetiand? Xes � No � Wetlands WU and WII possess upland plots with similar landscape positions and edaphic, floristic, and hydrologic properties. Therefore, they are included under this form. HYDR{)LC?GY Wetland Hydrolagy dndicators: Secondarv Indicatars (minimurra of twa reauired� I'rimanr Indicatars [minimum of one is reauir�d; ch�ck all that appiv) QSur�ace Soil Cracks (6�6} QSurface Water (A1) QAq�uatic Faurra (B13j QSparse3y Vegeta#ed Canca�e Surface (BS) �Higi� WaY�r Table (A2} �IWarl C3eposits (�15} {LRFi IJ} �Drainage Patterns (B10) QSakuratior� {A3� �Fiydrogert� Sulfide Odor {C1 } �Mnss Trim Lenes (896} �Water Marks (B'I ) QOxidized Rhrizospheres along LiWing Roots {C3} �Dry-Seasan Water Tab}e (C2} �Sediment C?eposits (B2} �Presence of Reduced Iron (C�1J �Cra�sh Burrows (C8} �Drift Deposits (B3} �k�ecer�t kron �ieduct�on in Tilled Svils (CB) �5atueation Vosible on Aerial Irnagery {�9} �Algal hAaf or Crust (B4) �Thin IlAuck Su�rf�ce (C7) �Geamorphic Position ([32) �fron i7epr�sits (B5} �Other (Explain in Ftemarks) �hallow Aquika�rd (C73) � Inu�datian V6sible on Aerial Umagery (B7� �FfIC-G�Yeutra! Test (Da� 'Wat�er-Sta��ned Leaves (B9) Sphagnum unoss (�8} (LRR T, U) Field f3bservations: i Sueface Water �'resent? Yes � No D✓ [7epth (inches): � Water Table Present? Yes � IVo ,Q C]epth (ir�ches}: 0 Saturatipn Present? Yes � No � Depth {inc�resj: 0 Wetland F�ydroMogy Preser�t? Yes ,Q No �✓ 6ndudes �a illa frin e �esc�ibe F�ecorded �aka {stream gauge, monitonng well, aerial photos, previouas inspectians}, oi availab6e: Remarks: US Army Cor,ps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Caastal Plain F�egian —'Uersevn �.0 R-5829 US 70 Improvements VEGETATION (Fi�e Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: WN-4 Upl A6solute Dominant inaicator uominance iest vunrKsneet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius j % Cover Soecies? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 2. Total Number of Dominant 3� 5pecies Across All Strata: 4. Percent of Dominant Species �� That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 6. 50% of total cover: 0 Saolin4 Stratum (Plot size: � 5' radius � 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 50% of total cover: � Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' radiUs � 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. O �A� 0 �� (A1B) 0 = Total Cover Prevalence Index worksheet: 20% of total cover: � Total % Cover of: Multiplv hv: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = p_ = Total Co�er Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: _ 20% of total cover: � 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - �ominance Test is �50% 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0' � Prohlematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) � = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: � Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' radius ) �.Eremochloa sp. 100 N/A NI 2. 3. 4. _ 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 50% of total cover: 50 Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot siza: 3�' radius ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 50% of total cover: 0 , list morphological adaptations 100 = Total Cover 20% of totel cover: 20 ' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 6e present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft(6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at hreast height (DBH). Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft(6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shru6 - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft {1 to 6 m) in height. Herh - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft(1 m) in height. Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic 0 = Total Cover Vegetation � 20% of total cover: � Present? Yes� No� �� Upland plot located in adjacent church lawn US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0 SOIL ne R-5829 US 70 Improvements or confirm the ahsence of indic WN-4 Upl Sampling Point: Depth Matrix Redox Features {inches) Color fmoistl % Color {moistl % Tvpe Loc` Texture Remarks 0-12 10YR 6/3 100 SL 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked 5and Grains Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicahle to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.J � Histosol {A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Organic Bodies (A6) {LRR P, T, ll) 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, ll) Muck Presence (A8) (LRR Uj 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) �epleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surtace (Al2j Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (M LRA 150A� Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) {LRR O, Sj Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, llj Restrictive Layer {if ohservedj: Type: Depth (inchesj: Remarks: 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Indicators for Prohlematic Hydric Soils3: Polyvalue Below Surface {S8) (LRR S, T, llj 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O) �Thin Dark Surtace (S9) [LRR S, T, U} 2 cm Muck (A90) [LRR S} Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) {LRR Oj Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 950A,Bj ILoamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, Tj IDepleted Matrix (F3) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) Redox Dark Surtace (F6) (MLRA 953B] Depleted Dark Surface (F7) �ed Parent Material (TF2) Redox Depressions (F8) ery Shallow Dark Surtace (TF12) Marl (F90) [LRR ll) �Other (Explain in Remarks) Depleted Ochric (F11) {MLRA 151 j Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) �Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Umbric Surtace (F13) (LRR P, T, ll} wetland hydrology must be present, Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 159] unless disturbed or problematic. Reduced Vertic (F18j (MLRA 150A, 150Bj Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) [MLRA 149A} Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) {MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D] Hydric Soil Present? Yes� No� US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 W�SL�Nb b�i�ERMINAI`�CiN aATA FORM — A#lantic and Gulf C4astal Pl�in Region P�o��r�ate: R-5829 US 70 Upgrades city�county: �ohnston ApplicanUOwner: NCDOT State; NC ir�vesti9ator{s): Nathan Howell & Lizzy Stokes-Cawley Sectian, Towr�sn�p, �tanye: Princeton Landform (�aills4ope, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, cornex, nane}: CO►IVeX Subregion {�RR or M�taA): LRR-P �a#: 35.467542 �fl�g; -78.148316 Saanpling oate: 5/3/2018 Sampling Point: �NO-1 Wet SI❑pe j%}: 5 �Dakum: NAD 83 s�i� Map vnit r�ame: Toisnot loam, 0-2% slopes n�Wi c��ssif�catio�: None Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the si�e typical far this time o# yesr? Yes � A�o �{If no, explair� in Remarks.} Are Vegetation� Soil I v I or Hydrerlogy �✓ , significantly disturhed? N� Are "Norrnal Circumstances° present7 Yes �✓ No � /�ae Vegetation ✓� Scail ✓� or Mydrology�✓ naturally proble�atoc? NO [If needed, explain any answer� in Remarks.J SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Aitach site rnap showing sampling point locatior�s, trarosects, impork��t features, etc. Hydrophytic V�getation Present? Hydric Sail Present? Wetland Hydrology Pres�nt? Yes �✓ No 0 Yes �/ hio � Yes � Ma �� Is the Sampled Area within a IMetiand? Xes ✓� No � NCWAM: Headwater Forest (Disturbed). This wetland formed due to the installation of a berm/dam at the lower end of the valley. This was installed as part of a stormwater feature. HYDR{)LC?GY Wetland Hydrolagy dndicators: Secondarv Indicatars (minimurra of twa reauired� I'rimanr Indicatars [minimum of one is reauir�d; ch�ck all that appiv) QSur�ace Soil Cracks (6�6} Q✓ 5urface Water (A1) QAq�uatic Faurra (B13j QSparse3y Vegeta#ed Canca�e Surface (BS) �Higi� WaY�r Table (A2} �IWarl C3eposits (�15} {LRFi IJ} �Drainage Patterns (B10) QSakuratior� {A3� �Fiydrogert� Sulfide Odor {C1 } �Mnss Trim Lenes (896} �Water Marks (B'I ) QOxidized Rhrizospheres along LiWing Roots {C3} �Dry-Seasan Water Tab}e (C2} �Sediment C?eposits (B2} �Presence of Reduced Iron (C�1J �Cra�sh Burrows (C8} �Drift Deposits (B3} �k�ecer�t kron �ieduct�on in Tilled Svils (CB) �5atueation Vosible on Aerial Irnagery {�9} �Algal hAaf or Crust (B4) �Thin IlAuck Su�rf�ce (C7) �Geamorphic Position ([32) �fron i7epr�sits (B5} �Other (Explain in Ftemarks) �hallow Aquika�rd (C73) � Inu�datian V6sible on Aerial Umagery (B7� �FfIC-G�Yeutra! Test (Da� 'Wat�er-Sta��ned Leaves (B9) Sphagnum unoss (�8} (LRR T, U) Field f3bservations: i Sueface Water �'resent? Yes �✓ No D[7epth (inches): � Water Table Present? Yes � No ,Q []epth (ir�ches}: (C� SUrF8C2 Saturatipn Present? Yes � No � Depth {inc�resj: (C� SUffaC2 Wetland F�ydroMogy Preser�t? Yes �✓ No � 6ndudes �a illa frin e �esc�ibe F�ecorded �aka {stream gauge, monitonng well, aerial photos, previouas inspectians}, oi availab6e: Remarks: US Army Cor,ps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Caastal Plain F�egian —'Uersevn �.0 W�SL�Nb b�i�ERMINAI`�CiN aAT,!# FORM — A#lantic ae�d Gulf Ccsastal Pl�in Region P�o��r�ate: R-5829 US 70 Improvements city�county: �Nayne Saanpling oate: 10/13/2017 ApplicanUOwner: NCDOT State; n1C Sampling Point: WW-9a Wet ir�vesti9ator{s): Nathan Howell & Lizzy Stokes-Cawley Sectian, Township, �tanye: Rosewood Landform (�aillslope, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, cornex, nane}: COIICaVe SI❑pe [%}: 0 Subregion {�RR or M�RA): LRR-P �a#: 35.453372 �fl�g; -78.128447 �Dakum: NAD 83 s�i� Map vnit r�ame: Bibb sandy loam ��,16 ��if�bo,�; None Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the si�e typical far this time o# yesr? Yes � A�o �{If no, explair� in Remarks.} Are Vegetation� Soil I v I or Hydrerlogy �✓ , significantly disturhed? N� Are "Norrnal Circumstances° present7 Yes �✓ No � /�ae Vegetation ✓� Scail ✓� or Mydrology�✓ naturally proble�atoc? NO [If needed, explain any answer� in Remarks.J SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Aitach site rnap showing sampling point locatior�s, trarosects, impork��t features, etc. Hydrophytic V�getation Present? Hydric Sail Present? Wetland Hydrology Pres�nt? Yes �✓ No 0 Yes �/ hio � Yes � Ma �� Is the Sampled Area within a IMetiand? Xes ✓� No � NCWAM: Riverine Swamp Forest. Wetlands WA, WB, WD, WT, WKK, and WLL all possess similar landscape positions and edaphic, hydrologic, and floristic properties. Therefore, they are included under this wetland form. HYDR{)LC?GY Wetland Hydrolagy dndicators: Secondarv Indicatars (minimurra of twa reauired� I'rimanr Indicatars [minimum of one is reauir�d; ch�ck all that appiv) QSur�ace Soil Cracks (6�6} Q✓ 5urface Water (A1) QAq�uatic Faurra (B13j QSparse3y Vegeta#ed Canca�e Surface (BS) �Higi� WaY�r Table (A2} �IWarl C3eposits (�15} {LRFi IJ} �✓ Drainage Patterns (B10) QSakuratior� {A3� �Fiydrogert� Sulfide Odor {C1 } �Mnss Trim Lenes (896} �Water Marks (B'I ) QOxidized Rhrizospheres along LiWing Roots {C3} �Dry-Seasan Water Tab}e (C2} �Sediment C?eposits (B2} �Presence of Reduced Iron (C�1J �Cra�sh Burrows (C8} �Drift Deposits (B3} �k�ecer�t kron �ieduct�on in Tilled Svils (CB) �5atueation Vosible on Aerial Irnagery {�9} �Algal hAaf or Crust (B4) �Thin IlAuck Su�rf�ce (C7) �Geamorphic Position ([32) �fron i7epr�sits (B5} �Other (Explain in Ftemarks) �hallow Aquika�rd (C73) � Inu�datian V6sible on Aerial Umagery (B7� �FfIC-G�Yeutra! Test (Da� � Wat�er-Sta��ned Leaves (B9) Sphagnum unoss (�8} (LRR T, U) Fielc� f3bservations: i Sueface Water �'resent? Yes �✓ No D[7epth (inches): �� Water Table Present? Yes � No ,Q []epth (ir�ches}: (C� SUrF8C2 Saturatipn Present? Yes � No � Depth {inc�resj: (C� SUffaC2 Wetland F�ydroMogy Preser�t? Yes �✓ No � 6ndudes �a illa frin e �esc�ibe F�ecorded �aka {stream gauge, monitonng well, aerial photos, previouas inspectians}, oi availab6e: Remarks: US Army Cor,ps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Caastal Plain F�egian —'Uersevn �.0 R-5829 US 70 Improvements VEGETATION (Fi�e Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius j �.Acer rubrum 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. % Cover Soecies? Status 40 Yes FAC 40 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20 20% of total cover: 8 Saolin4 Stratum (Plot size: 3�' radius � �. Maanolia virainiana 40 Yes FACW z.Acer rubrum 20 Yes FAC 3. 4. 5. 6. �� = Total Co�er 50% of total cover: 3� 20% of total cover: � 2 Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' radiUs � �. Ligustrum sinense 40 z.Acer rubrum 20 3. 4. 5. 6. Yes FAC Yes FAC 60 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 30 20% of total cover: � 2 Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' radiuS ) �.Saururus cernuus 15 Yes OBL z. Lorinseria (Woodwardia) areolata 15 Yes OBL 3. Boehmeria cylindrica 10 Yes FACW 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 50% of total cover: 20 Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot siza: 3�' radius ) �. Smilax laurifolia z. 3. 4. �� Hydrophytic 40 = Total Cover Vegetation 50% of total cover: 20 20% of total cover: $ Present? 40 = Total Cover 20% of totel cover: $ 40 Yes FACW Sampling Point: WW-9A Wet uominance iest vunrKsneet: Number of Dominant Species 9 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: _ Total Number of Dominant 5pecies Across All Strata: Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL. FACW. or FAC 100 Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiplv hv: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = nynropnyuc vegetanon inaica[ors: 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation �/ 2 - �ominance Test is �50% 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0' � Prohlematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) ' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 6e present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata: Tree — Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft(6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at hreast height (DBH). Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft(6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shru6 — Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft {1 to 6 m) in height. Herh — All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft(1 m) in height. Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height. on s Yes� No� US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 SOIL R-5829 US 70 Improvements e Description: fDescribe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the ahsence of indic Sampling Point: Depth Matrix Redox Features {inches) Color fmoistl % Color {moistl % Tvpe Loc` Texture Remarks 0-8" 10YR 2/1 100 L 8-12"+ 10YR 4/2 85 10YR 5/6 15 C M L WW-9A Wet 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked 5and Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicahle to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.J Indicators for Prohlematic Hydric Soils3: � Histosol {A1) Polyvalue Below Surface {S8) (LRR S, T, llj 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O) Histic Epipedon (A2) Thin Dark Surtace (S9) [LRR S, T, U} 2 cm Muck (A10) [LRR S} Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) {LRR Oj Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 950A,Bj Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, Tj Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) Organic Bodies (A6) {LRR P, T, ll) Redox Dark Surtace (F6) (MLRA 953B] 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, ll) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) �ed Parent Material (TF2) Muck Presence (A8) (LRR Uj Redox Depressions (F8) ery Shallow Dark Surtace (TF12) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) Marl (F90) [LRR ll) �Other (Explain in Remarks) ✓ �epleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Ochric (F11) {MLRA 151 j Thick Dark Surtace (Al2j Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) �Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (M LRA 150A� Umbric Surtace (F13) (LRR P, T, ll} wetland hydrology must be present, Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) {LRR O, Sj Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 159] unless disturbed or problematic. Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Reduced Vertic (F18j (MLRA 150A, 150Bj Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) [MLRA 149A} Stripped Matrix (S6) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) {MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D] Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, llj Restrictive Layer {if ohservedj: Type: Depth (inchesj: Remarks: Hydric Soil Present? Yes� No� US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 W�SL�Nb b�i�ERMINAI`�CiN aAT,!# FORM — A#lantic ae�d Gulf Ccsastal Pl�in Region P�o��r�ate: R-5829 US 70 Improvements city�county: �Nayne Saanpling oate: 10/13/2017 ApplicanUOwner: NCDOT State; n1C Sampling Point: WW-9a Upl ir�vesti9ator{s): Nathan Howell & Lizzy Stokes-Cawley Sectian, Township, �tanye: Rosewood Landform (�aillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, cornex, naneJ: CO►IVeX SI❑pe [°/a}: 10 Subregion {�RR or M�RA): LRR-P �a#: 35.453508 �fl�g; -78.128853 �Dakum: NAD 83 S�i� Map vnit r�ame: Craven sandy loam, 6-10% slopes, eroded (Gritney) n�Wi c��ssif�catio�: None Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the si�e typical far this tirne o# year? Yes � I�lo �{If no, explair� in Remarks.} Are Vegetation� Soil I v I or Hydrerlogy �✓ , significantly disturhed? N� Are "Norrnal Circumstances° present7 Yes �✓ No � /�ae Vegetation ✓� Scail ✓� or Mydrology�✓ naturally proble�atoc? NO [If needed, explain any answer� in Remarks.J SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Aitach site rnap showing sampling point locatior�s, trarosects, impork��t features, etc. Hydrophytic V�getation Present? Hydric Sail Present? Wetland Hydrology Pres�nt? Yes � No ✓0 Yes � hio � Yes Ma �� Is the Sampled Area within a IMetiand? Xes � No � Wetlands WA, WB, WD, WT, WKK, and WLL all possess upland plots with similar landscape positions and edaphic, hydrologic, and floristic properties. Therefore, they are included under this form. HYDR{)LC?GY Wetland Hydrolagy dndicators: Secondarv Indicatars (minimurra of twa reauired� I'rimanr Indicatars [minimum of one is reauir�d; ch�ck all that appiv) QSur�ace Soil Cracks (6�6} QSurface Water (A1) QAq�uatic Faurra (B13j QSparse3y Vegeta#ed Canca�e Surface (BS) �Higi� WaY�r Table (A2} �IWarl C3eposits (�15} {LRFi IJ} �Drainage Patterns (B10) QSakuratior� {A3� �Fiydrogert� Sulfide Odor {C1 } �Mnss Trim Lenes (896} �Water Marks (B'I ) QOxidized Rhrizospheres along LiWing Roots {C3} �Dry-Seasan Water Tab}e (C2} �Sediment C?eposits (B2} �Presence of Reduced Iron (C�1J �Cra�sh Burrows (C8} �Drift Deposits (B3} �k�ecer�t kron �ieduct�on in Tilled Svils (CB) �5atueation Vosible on Aerial Irnagery {�9} �Algal hAaf or Crust (B4) �Thin IlAuck Su�rf�ce (C7) �Geamorphic Position ([32) �fron i7epr�sits (B5} �Other (Explain in Ftemarks) �hallow Aquika�rd (C73) � Inu�datian V6sible on Aerial Umagery (B7� �FfIC-G�Yeutra! Test (Da� 'Wat�er-Sta��ned Leaves (B9) Sphagnum unoss (�8} (LRR T, U) Field f3bservations: i Sueface Water �'resent? Yes � No D✓ [7epth (inches): � Water Table Present? Yes � IVo ,Q C]epth (ir�ches}: 0 Saturatipn Present? Yes � No � Depth {inc�resj: 0 Wetland F�ydroMogy Preser�t? Yes ,Q No �✓ 6ndudes �a illa frin e �esc�ibe F�ecorded �aka {stream gauge, monitonng well, aerial photos, previouas inspectians}, oi availab6e: Remarks: US Army Cor,ps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Caastal Plain F�egian —'Uersevn �.0 R-5829 US 70 Improvements VEGETATION (Fi�e Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius j �. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 50% of total cover: 0 Saolin4 Stratum (Plot size: � 5' radius � 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 50% of total cover: � Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' radiUs � 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Sampling Point: WW-9A Upl Hosoiute uominant inaicator uominance iest vunrKsneet: % Cover Soecies? Status Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC Total Number of Dominant 5pecies Across All Strata: Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL. FACW. or FAC 0 = Total Cover Prevalence Index worksheet: 20% of total cover: � Total % Cover of: Multiplv hv: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = p_ = Total Co�er Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: _ 20% of total cover: � 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - �ominance Test is �50% 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0' � Prohlematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) � = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: � Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' radius ) �.Andropoqon virainicus 15 Yes FAC z. Dactylis glomerata 15 Yes FACU 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 50% of total cover: 15 Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot siza: 3�' radius ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 50% of total cover: 0 , list morphological adaptations 30 = Total Cover 20% of totel cover: 6 ' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 6e present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft(6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at hreast height (DBH). Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft(6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shru6 - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft {1 to 6 m) in height. Herh - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft(1 m) in height. Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic 0 = Total Cover Vegetation � 20% of total cover: � Present? Yes� No� US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0 SOIL ne R-5829 US 70 Improvements or confirm the ahsence of indic WW-9A Upl Sampling Point: Depth Matrix Redox Features {inches) Color fmoistl % Color {moistl % Tvpe Loc` Texture Remarks 0-8" 10YR 6/3 100 SL 8-12"+ 10YR 5/4 100 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked 5and Grains Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicahle to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.J � Histosol {A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Organic Bodies (A6) {LRR P, T, ll) 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, ll) Muck Presence (A8) (LRR Uj 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) �epleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surtace (Al2j Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (M LRA 150A� Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) {LRR O, Sj Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, llj Restrictive Layer {if ohservedj: Type: Depth (inchesj: Remarks: SL 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Indicators for Prohlematic Hydric Soils3: Polyvalue Below Surface {S8) (LRR S, T, llj 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O) �Thin Dark Surtace (S9) [LRR S, T, U} 2 cm Muck (A90) [LRR S} Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) {LRR Oj Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 950A,Bj ILoamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, Tj IDepleted Matrix (F3) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) Redox Dark Surtace (F6) (MLRA 953B] Depleted Dark Surface (F7) �ed Parent Material (TF2) Redox Depressions (F8) ery Shallow Dark Surtace (TF12) Marl (F90) [LRR ll) �Other (Explain in Remarks) Depleted Ochric (F11) {MLRA 151 j Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) �Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Umbric Surtace (F13) (LRR P, T, ll} wetland hydrology must be present, Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 159] unless disturbed or problematic. Reduced Vertic (F18j (MLRA 150A, 150Bj Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) [MLRA 149A} Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) {MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D] Hydric Soil Present? Yes� No� US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 W�SL�Nb b�i�ERMINAI`�CiN aAT,!# FORM — A#lantic ae�d Gulf Ccsastal Pl�in Region P�o��r�ate: R-5829 US 70 Improvements city�county: �Nayne Saanpling oate: 5/3/2018 ApplicanUOwner: NCDOT State; n1C Sampling Point: �NY-6 Wet ir�vesti9ator{s): Nathan Howell & Lizzy Stokes-Cawley Sectian, Township, �tanye: Rosewood Landform (�aillslope, terrace, etc.): Headwater Forest Local relief (concave, cornex, nane}: CO►IVeX SI❑pe j%}: 5 Subregion {�RR or M�RA): LRR-P �at: 35.446424 �fl�g; -78.114479 �Dakum: NAD 83 s�i� Map vnit r�ame: Bibb sandy loam ��,16 ��if�bo,�; None Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the si�e typical far this time o# yesr? Yes � A�o �{If no, explair� in Remarks.} Are Vegetation� Soil I v I or Hydrerlogy �✓ , significantly disturhed? N� Are "Norrnal Circumstances° present7 Yes �✓ No � /�ae Vegetation ✓� Scail ✓� or Mydrology�✓ naturally proble�atoc? NO [If needed, explain any answer� in Remarks.J SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Aitach site rnap showing sampling point locatior�s, trarosects, impork��t features, etc. Hydrophytic V�getation Present? Hydric Sail Present? Wetland Hydrology Pres�nt? Yes �✓ No 0 Yes �/ hio � Yes � Ma �� Is the Sampled Area within a IMetiand? Xes ✓� No � NCWAM: Headwater Forest. Wetlands WAA, WBB, WCC, and WZ are all NWI wetlands (PF01A) that possess similar landscape positions and edaphic, hydrologic, and floristic properties. Therefore, they are included under this form. HYDR{)LC?GY Wetland Hydrolagy dndicators: Secondarv Indicatars (minimurra of twa reauired� I'rimanr Indicatars [minimum of one is reauir�d; ch�ck all that appiv) QSur�ace Soil Cracks (6�6} QSurface Water (A1) QAq�uatic Faurra (B13j QSparse3y Vegeta#ed Canca�e Surface (BS) �Higi� WaY�r Table (A2} �IWarl C3eposits (�15} {LRFi IJ} �✓ Drainage Patterns (B10) QSakuratior� {A3� �Fiydrogert� Sulfide Odor {C1 } �Mnss Trim Lenes (896} �Water Marks (B'I ) QOxidized Rhrizospheres along LiWing Roots {C3} �Dry-Seasan Water Tab}e (C2} �Sediment C?eposits (B2} �Presence of Reduced Iron (C�1J �Cra�sh Burrows (C8} �Drift Deposits (B3} �k�ecer�t kron �ieduct�on in Tilled Svils (CB) �5atueation Vosible on Aerial Irnagery {�9} �Algal hAaf or Crust (B4) �Thin IlAuck Su�rf�ce (C7) �Geamorphic Position ([32) �fron i7epr�sits (B5} �Other (Explain in Ftemarks) �hallow Aquika�rd (C73) � Inu�datian V6sible on Aerial Umagery (B7� �FfIC-G�Yeutra! Test (Da� � Wat�er-Sta��ned Leaves (B9) Sphagnum unoss (�8} (LRR T, U) Fielc� f3bservations: i Sueface Water �'resent? Yes � No D✓ [7epth (inches): � Water Table Present? Yes � IVo ,Q C]epth (ir�ches}: 0 Saturatipn Present? Yes � No � Depth {inc�resj: 8° Wetland F�ydroMogy Preser�t? Yes �✓ No � 6ndudes �a illa frin e �esc�ibe F�ecorded �aka {stream gauge, monitonng well, aerial photos, previouas inspectians}, oi availab6e: Remarks: US Army Cor,ps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Caastal Plain F�egian —'Uersevn �.0 W�SL�Nb b�i�ERMINAI`�CiN aAT,!# FORM — A#lantic ae�d Gulf Ccsastal Pl�in Region P�o��r�ate: R-5829 US 70 Improvements city�county: �Nayne Saanpling oate: 5/3/2018 ApplicanUOwner: NCDOT State; n1C Sampling Point: �NY-6 Upl ir�vesti9ator{s): Nathan Howell & Lizzy Stokes-Cawley Sectian, Township, �tanye: Rosewood Landform (�aillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, cornex, nane}: CO►IVeX SI❑pe [°/a}: 10 Subregion {�RR or M�RA): LRR-P �a#: 35.446424 �fl�g; -78.114479 �Dakum: NAD 83 s�i� Map vnit r�ame: Bibb sandy loam ��,16 ��if�bo,�; None Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the si�e typical far this time o# yesr? Yes � A�o �{If no, explair� in Remarks.} Are Vegetation� Soil I v I or Hydrerlogy �✓ , significantly disturhed? N� Are "Norrnal Circumstances° present7 Yes �✓ No � /�ae Vegetation ✓� Scail ✓� or Mydrology�✓ naturally proble�atoc? NO [If needed, explain any answer� in Remarks.J SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Aitach site rnap showing sampling point locatior�s, trarosects, impork��t features, etc. Hydrophytic V�getation Present? Hydric Sail Present? Wetland Hydrology Pres�nt? Yes � No ✓0 Yes � hio � Yes Ma �� Is the Sampled Area within a IMetiand? Xes � No � Wetlands WAA, WBB, WCC, and WZ all possess upland plots with similar landscape positions and edaphic, hydrologic, and floristic properties. Therefore, they are included under this form. HYDR{)LC?GY Wetland Hydrolagy dndicators: Secondarv Indicatars (minimurra of twa reauired� I'rimanr Indicatars [minimum of one is reauir�d; ch�ck all that appiv) QSur�ace Soil Cracks (6�6} QSurface Water (A1) QAq�uatic Faurra (B13j QSparse3y Vegeta#ed Canca�e Surface (BS) �Higi� WaY�r Table (A2} �IWarl C3eposits (�15} {LRFi IJ} �Drainage Patterns (B10) QSakuratior� {A3� �Fiydrogert� Sulfide Odor {C1 } �Mnss Trim Lenes (896} �Water Marks (B'I ) QOxidized Rhrizospheres along LiWing Roots {C3} �Dry-Seasan Water Tab}e (C2} �Sediment C?eposits (B2} �Presence of Reduced Iron (C�1J �Cra�sh Burrows (C8} �Drift Deposits (B3} �k�ecer�t kron �ieduct�on in Tilled Svils (CB) �5atueation Vosible on Aerial Irnagery {�9} �Algal hAaf or Crust (B4) �Thin IlAuck Su�rf�ce (C7) �Geamorphic Position ([32) �fron i7epr�sits (B5} �Other (Explain in Ftemarks) �hallow Aquika�rd (C73) � Inu�datian V6sible on Aerial Umagery (B7� �FfIC-G�Yeutra! Test (Da� 'Wat�er-Sta��ned Leaves (B9) Sphagnum unoss (�8} (LRR T, U) Field f3bservations: i Sueface Water �'resent? Yes � No D✓ [7epth (inches): � Water Table Present? Yes � IVo ,Q C]epth (ir�ches}: 0 Saturatipn Present? Yes � No � Depth {inc�resj: 0 Wetland F�ydroMogy Preser�t? Yes ,Q No �✓ 6ndudes �a illa frin e �esc�ibe F�ecorded �aka {stream gauge, monitonng well, aerial photos, previouas inspectians}, oi availab6e: Remarks: US Army Cor,ps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Caastal Plain F�egian —'Uersevn �.0 R-5829 US 70 Improvements VEGETATION (Fi�e Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius j �iq Cover Soecies? Status �. Liriodendron tulipifera 60 Yes FACU z. Morus rubra 40 Yes FACU 3. 4. 5. 6. 100 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 50 20% of total cover: 20 Saolin4 Stratum (Plot size: � 5' radius � �.Oxvdendrum arboreum 30 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 50% of total cover: 15 Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' radiUs � �.Acer rubrum z. Liqustrum sinense 3. 4. 5. 6. Yes FACU g� = Total Co�er 20% of total cover: 6 40 Yes FAC 30 Yes FAC 7� = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 35 20% of total cover: 14 Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' radius ) �.Tipularia discolor 15 Yes FACU z. Mitchella repens 15 Yes FACU 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 50% of total cover: 15 Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot siza: 3�' radius ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 50% of total cover: 0 , list morphological adaptations 30 = Total Cover 20% of totel cover: 6 Sampling Point: WY-6 Upl uominance iest vunrKsneet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC Total Number of Dominant 5pecies Across All Strata: Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL. FACW. or FAC 2 (A� 8 �� Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiplv hv: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - �ominance Test is �50% 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0' � Prohlematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) ' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 6e present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft(6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at hreast height (DBH). Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft(6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shru6 - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft {1 to 6 m) in height. Herh - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft(1 m) in height. Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic 0 = Total Cover Vegetation � 20% of total cover: � Present? Yes� No� US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0 SOIL ne R-5829 US 70 Improvements or confirm the ahsence of indic WY-6 Upl Sampling Point: Depth Matrix Redox Features {inches) Color fmoistl % Color {moistl % Tvpe Loc` Texture Remarks 0-6 10YR 3/1 50 10YR 8/1 SL 50% coated 6-12 10YR 5/3 100 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked 5and Grains Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicahle to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.J � Histosol {A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Organic Bodies (A6) {LRR P, T, ll) 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, ll) Muck Presence (A8) (LRR Uj 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) �epleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surtace (Al2j Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (M LRA 150A� Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) {LRR O, Sj Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, llj Restrictive Layer {if ohservedj: Type: Depth (inchesj: Remarks: SL 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Indicators for Prohlematic Hydric Soils3: Polyvalue Below Surface {S8) (LRR S, T, llj 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O) �Thin Dark Surtace (S9) [LRR S, T, U} 2 cm Muck (A90) [LRR S} Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) {LRR Oj Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 950A,Bj ILoamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, Tj IDepleted Matrix (F3) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) Redox Dark Surtace (F6) (MLRA 953B] Depleted Dark Surface (F7) �ed Parent Material (TF2) Redox Depressions (F8) ery Shallow Dark Surtace (TF12) Marl (F90) [LRR ll) �Other (Explain in Remarks) Depleted Ochric (F11) {MLRA 151 j Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) �Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Umbric Surtace (F13) (LRR P, T, ll} wetland hydrology must be present, Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 159] unless disturbed or problematic. Reduced Vertic (F18j (MLRA 150A, 150Bj Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) [MLRA 149A} Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) {MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D] Hydric Soil Present? Yes� No� US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 W�SL�Nb b�i�ERMINAI`�CiN aAT,!# FORM — A#lantic ae�d Gulf Ccsastal Pl�in Region P�o��r�ate: R-5829 US 70 Improvements city�county: �Nayne Saanpling oate: 10/13/2017 ApplicanUOwner: NCDOT State; n1C Sampling Point: �NDD-3 Wet ir�vesti9ator{s): Nathan Howell & Lizzy Stokes-Cawley Sectian, Township, �tanye: Rosewood Landform (�aillslope, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, cornex, nane}: CO►IVeX SI❑pe j%}: 5 Subregion {�RR or M�taA): LRR-P �a#: 35.448695 �fl�g; -78.111727 �Dakum: NAD 83 S�il Map �lnit I�ame: Torhunta loam �� i�r�bo,�; PF01 A Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the si�e typical far this time o# yesr? Yes � A�o �{If no, explair� in Remarks.} Are Vegetation� Soil I v I or Hydrerlogy �✓ , significantly disturhed? N� Are "Norrnal Circumstances° present7 Yes �✓ No � /�ae Vegetation ✓� Scail ✓� or Mydrology�✓ naturally proble�atoc? NO [If needed, explain any answer� in Remarks.J SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Aitach site rnap showing sampling point locatior�s, trarosects, impork��t features, etc. Hydrophytic V�getation Present? Hydric Sail Present? Wetland Hydrology Pres�nt? Yes �✓ No 0 Yes �/ hio � Yes � Ma �� Is the Sampled Area within a IMetiand? Xes ✓� No � NCWAM: Bottomland Hardwood Forest. Wetlands WP, WS, WX, and WEE all possess similar landscape positions and edaphic, hydrologic, and floristic properties. Thus, they are included under this form. HYDR{)LC?GY Wetland Hydrolagy dndicators: Secondarv Indicatars (minimurra of twa reauired� I'rimanr Indicatars [minimum of one is reauir�d; ch�ck all that appiv) QSur�ace Soil Cracks (6�6} QSurface Water (A1) QAq�uatic Faurra (B13j QSparse3y Vegeta#ed Canca�e Surface (BS) �Higi� WaY�r Table (A2} �IWarl C3eposits (�15} {LRFi IJ} �✓ Drainage Patterns (B10) QSakuratior� {A3� �Fiydrogert� Sulfide Odor {C1 } �Mnss Trim Lenes (896} �Water Marks (B'I ) QOxidized Rhrizospheres along LiWing Roots {C3} �Dry-Seasan Water Tab}e (C2} �Sediment C?eposits (B2} �Presence of Reduced Iron (C�1J �Cra�sh Burrows (C8} �Drift Deposits (B3} �k�ecer�t kron �ieduct�on in Tilled Svils (CB) �5atueation Vosible on Aerial Irnagery {�9} �Algal hAaf or Crust (B4) �Thin IlAuck Su�rf�ce (C7) �Geamorphic Position ([32) �fron i7epr�sits (B5} �Other (Explain in Ftemarks) �hallow Aquika�rd (C73) � Inu�datian V6sible on Aerial Umagery (B7� �FfIC-G�Yeutra! Test (Da� 'Wat�er-Sta��ned Leaves (B9) Sphagnum unoss (�8} (LRR T, U) Field f3bservations: i Sueface Water �'resent? Yes � No D✓ [7epth (inches): � Water Table Present? Yes � IVo ,Q C]epth (ir�ches}: 0 Saturatipn Present? Yes � No � Depth {inc�resj: 8° Wetland F�ydroMogy Preser�t? Yes �✓ No � 6ndudes �a illa frin e �esc�ibe F�ecorded �aka {stream gauge, monitonng well, aerial photos, previouas inspectians}, oi availab6e: Remarks: US Army Cor,ps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Caastal Plain F�egian —'Uersevn �.0 W�SL�Nb b�i�ERMINAI`�CiN aAT,!# FORM — A#lantic ae�d Gulf Ccsastal Pl�in Region P�o��r�ate: R-5829 US 70 Improvements city�county: �Nayne Saanpling oate: 10/13/2017 ApplicanUOwner: NCDOT State; n1C Sampling Point: �NDD-3 Upl ir�vesti9ator{s): Nathan Howell & Lizzy Stokes-Cawley Sectian, Township, �tanye: Rosewood Landform (�aillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, cornex, nane}: CO►IVeX SI❑pe [°/a}: 10 Subregion {�RR or M�RA): LRR-P �a#: 35.448695 �fl�g; -78.111727 �Dakum: NAD 83 s�i� Map vnit r�ame: Bibb sandy loam ��,16 ��if�bo,�; None Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the si�e typical far this time o# yesr? Yes � A�o �{If no, explair� in Remarks.} Are Vegetation� Soil I v I or Hydrerlogy �✓ , significantly disturhed? N� Are "Norrnal Circumstances° present7 Yes �✓ No � /�ae Vegetation ✓� Scail ✓� or Mydrology�✓ naturally proble�atoc? NO [If needed, explain any answer� in Remarks.J SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Aitach site rnap showing sampling point locatior�s, trarosects, impork��t features, etc. Hydrophytic V�getation Present? Hydric Sail Present? Wetland Hydrology Pres�nt? Yes � No ✓0 Yes � hio � Yes Ma �� Is the Sampled Area within a IMetiand? Xes � No � Wetlands WP, WS, WX, and WEE all possess upland plots with similar landscape positions and edaphic, hydrologic, and floristic properties. Thus, they are included under this form. HYDR{)LC?GY Wetland Hydrolagy dndicators: Secondarv Indicatars (minimurra of twa reauired� I'rimanr Indicatars [minimum of one is reauir�d; ch�ck all that appiv) QSur�ace Soil Cracks (6�6} QSurface Water (A1) QAq�uatic Faurra (B13j QSparse3y Vegeta#ed Canca�e Surface (BS) �Higi� WaY�r Table (A2} �IWarl C3eposits (�15} {LRFi IJ} �Drainage Patterns (B10) QSakuratior� {A3� �Fiydrogert� Sulfide Odor {C1 } �Mnss Trim Lenes (896} �Water Marks (B'I ) QOxidized Rhrizospheres along LiWing Roots {C3} �Dry-Seasan Water Tab}e (C2} �Sediment C?eposits (B2} �Presence of Reduced Iron (C�1J �Cra�sh Burrows (C8} �Drift Deposits (B3} �k�ecer�t kron �ieduct�on in Tilled Svils (CB) �5atueation Vosible on Aerial Irnagery {�9} �Algal hAaf or Crust (B4) �Thin IlAuck Su�rf�ce (C7) �Geamorphic Position ([32) �fron i7epr�sits (B5} �Other (Explain in Ftemarks) �hallow Aquika�rd (C73) � Inu�datian V6sible on Aerial Umagery (B7� �FfIC-G�Yeutra! Test (Da� 'Wat�er-Sta��ned Leaves (B9) Sphagnum unoss (�8} (LRR T, U) Field f3bservations: i Sueface Water �'resent? Yes � No D✓ [7epth (inches): � Water Table Present? Yes � IVo ,Q C]epth (ir�ches}: 0 Saturatipn Present? Yes � No � Depth {inc�resj: 0 Wetland F�ydroMogy Preser�t? Yes ,Q No �✓ 6ndudes �a illa frin e �esc�ibe F�ecorded �aka {stream gauge, monitonng well, aerial photos, previouas inspectians}, oi availab6e: Remarks: US Army Cor,ps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Caastal Plain F�egian —'Uersevn �.0 R-5829 US 70 Improvements VEGETATION (Fi�e Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius j �iq Cover Soecies? Status �. Liquidambar styraciflua 40 Yes FAC z. Liriodendron tulipifera 40 Yes FACU 3. 4. 5. 6. 80 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 40 20% of total cover: 16 Saolin4 Stratum (Plot size: � 5' radius � �. Quercus alba 20 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Yes FACU 2� = Total Co�er 50% of total cover: � � 20% of total cover: 4 Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' radiUs � �. Ligustrum sinense 50 2. _ 3. 4. 5. 6. Yes FAC 50 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 25 20% of total cover: 10 Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' radius ) �.Tipularia discolor 20 Yes FACU 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 50% of total cover: � � Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot siza: 3�' radius ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 50% of total cover: 0 holoqical adaptations 20 = Total Cover 20% of totel cover: 4 Sampling Point: WDD-3 Upl uominance iest vunrKsneet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC Total Number of Dominant 5pecies Across All Strata: Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL. FACW. or FAC Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiplv hv: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - �ominance Test is �50% 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0' � Prohlematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) ' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 6e present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft(6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at hreast height (DBH). Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft(6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shru6 - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft {1 to 6 m) in height. Herh - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft(1 m) in height. Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic 0 = Total Cover Vegetation � 20% of total cover: � Present? Yes� No� US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0 SOIL ne R-5829 US 70 Improvements or confirm the ahsence of indic WDD-3 Upl Sampling Point: Depth Matrix Redox Features {inches) Color fmoistl % Color {moistl % Tvpe Loc` Texture Remarks 0-4 10YR 5/3 100 L 4-12 10YR 5/4 100 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked 5and Grains Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicahle to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.J � Histosol {A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Organic Bodies (A6) {LRR P, T, ll) 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, ll) Muck Presence (A8) (LRR Uj 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) �epleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surtace (Al2j Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (M LRA 150A� Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) {LRR O, Sj Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, llj Restrictive Layer {if ohservedj: Type: Depth (inchesj: Remarks: SL 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Indicators for Prohlematic Hydric Soils3: Polyvalue Below Surface {S8) (LRR S, T, llj 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O) �Thin Dark Surtace (S9) [LRR S, T, U} 2 cm Muck (A90) [LRR S} Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) {LRR Oj Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 950A,Bj ILoamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, Tj IDepleted Matrix (F3) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) Redox Dark Surtace (F6) (MLRA 953B] Depleted Dark Surface (F7) �ed Parent Material (TF2) Redox Depressions (F8) ery Shallow Dark Surtace (TF12) Marl (F90) [LRR ll) �Other (Explain in Remarks) Depleted Ochric (F11) {MLRA 151 j Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) �Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Umbric Surtace (F13) (LRR P, T, ll} wetland hydrology must be present, Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 159] unless disturbed or problematic. Reduced Vertic (F18j (MLRA 150A, 150Bj Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) [MLRA 149A} Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) {MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D] Hydric Soil Present? Yes� No� US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 W�SL�Nb b�i�ERMINAI`�CiN aAT,!# FORM — A#lantic ae�d Gulf Ccsastal Pl�in Region P�o��r�ate: R-5829 US 70 Improvements city�county: �Nayne Saanpling oate: 10/13/2017 ApplicanUOwner: NCDOT State; n1C Sampling Point: �NGG-4 Wet ir�vesti9ator{s): Nathan Howell & Lizzy Stokes-Cawley Sectian, Township, �tanye: Rosewood Landform (�aillslope, terrace, etc.): Headwater Forest Local relief (concave, cornex, nane}: CO►IVeX SI❑pe j%}: 5 Subregion {�RR or M�taA): LRR-P �at: 35.447898 �fl�g; -78.105973 �Dakum: NAD 83 S�il Map �lnit I�ame: Torhunta loam ��,16 ��if�bo,�; None Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the si�e typical far this time o# yesr? Yes � A�o �{If no, explair� in Remarks.} Are Vegetation� Soil I v I or Hydrerlogy �✓ , significantly disturhed? N� Are "Norrnal Circumstances° present7 Yes �✓ No � /�ae Vegetation ✓� Scail ✓� or Mydrology�✓ naturally proble�atoc? NO [If needed, explain any answer� in Remarks.J SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Aitach site rnap showing sampling point locatior�s, trarosects, impork��t features, etc. Hydrophytic V�getation Present? Hydric Sail Present? Wetland Hydrology Pres�nt? Yes �✓ No 0 Yes �/ hio � Yes � Ma �� Is the Sampled Area within a IMetiand? Xes ✓� No � Wetlands WFF, WHH, WYY, WZZ, WG, WI, WM, WR, and WV all possess upland plots with similar landscape positions and edaphic, floristic, and hydrologic properties. Therefore, they are included under this form. HYDR{)LC?GY Wetland Hydrolagy dndicators: Secondarv Indicatars (minimurra of twa reauired� I'rimanr Indicatars [minimum of one is reauir�d; ch�ck all that appiv) QSur�ace Soil Cracks (6�6} QSurface Water (A1) QAq�uatic Faurra (B13j QSparse3y Vegeta#ed Canca�e Surface (BS) �Higi� WaY�r Table (A2} �IWarl C3eposits (�15} {LRFi IJ} �✓ Drainage Patterns (B10) QSakuratior� {A3� �Fiydrogert� Sulfide Odor {C1 } �Mnss Trim Lenes (896} �Water Marks (B'I ) QOxidized Rhrizospheres along LiWing Roots {C3} �Dry-Seasan Water Tab}e (C2} �Sediment C?eposits (B2} �Presence of Reduced Iron (C�1J �Cra�sh Burrows (C8} �Drift Deposits (B3} �k�ecer�t kron �ieduct�on in Tilled Svils (CB) �5atueation Vosible on Aerial Irnagery {�9} �Algal hAaf or Crust (B4) �Thin IlAuck Su�rf�ce (C7) �Geamorphic Position ([32) �fron i7epr�sits (B5} �Other (Explain in Ftemarks) �hallow Aquika�rd (C73) � Inu�datian V6sible on Aerial Umagery (B7� �FfIC-G�Yeutra! Test (Da� 'Wat�er-Sta��ned Leaves (B9) � Sphagnum unoss (�8} (LRR T, U) Field f3bservations: i Sueface Water �'resent? Yes � No D✓ [7epth (inches): 0�� Water Table Present? Yes � IVo ,Q C]epth (ir�ches}: 4° Saturatipn Present? Yes � No � Depth {inc�resj: (C� SUffaC2 Wetland F�ydroMogy Preser�t? Yes �✓ No � 6ndudes �a illa frin e �esc�ibe F�ecorded �aka {stream gauge, monitonng well, aerial photos, previouas inspectians}, oi availab6e: Remarks: US Army Cor,ps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Caastal Plain F�egian —'Uersevn �.0 R-5829 US 70 Improvements VEGETATION (Fi�e Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30�X10� � �.Acer rubrum 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. % Cover Soecies? Status 40 Yes FAC 40 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20 20% of total cover: 8 Saolin4 Stratum (Plot size: 3��X� �� ) �. Liauidambar stvraciflua 15 Yes FAC z.Acer rubrum 15 Yes FAC 3. Quercus nigra � YPS FAC; 4.Magnolia virginiana 1;, YPC Fnr�ni 5. 6. 50% of total cover: 3� Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30'x10' � �. Magnolia virginiana z. Vaccinium fuscatum 3. 4. 5. 6. �� = Total Co�er 20% of total cover: � 2 15 Yes FACW 15 Yes FACW 30 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 16 20% of total cover: 6 Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30�X� �� ) �.Osmundastrum cinnamomeum 30 Yes FACW z.Arundinaria tecta 30 Yes FACW 3. Lorinseria (Woodwardia) areolata 10 No OBL 4.Sphagnum sp. 10 N/A NI 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 50% of total cover: 35 Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot siza: 3��X� �� ) �. Smilax laurifolia z. Smilax rotundifolia 3. 4. �� Hydrophytic 2� = Total Cover Vegetation 50% of total cover: � � 20% of total cover: 4 Present? 70 = Total Cover 20% of totel cover: 13 10 Yes FACW 10 Yes FAC Sampling Point: WGG-4 W2t uominance iest vunrKsneet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC Total Number of Dominant 5pecies Across All Strata: Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL. FACW. or FAC Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiplv hv: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = nynropnyuc vegetanon inaica[ors: 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation �/ 2 - �ominance Test is �50% 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0' � Prohlematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) ' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 6e present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata: Tree — Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft(6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at hreast height (DBH). Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft(6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shru6 — Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft {1 to 6 m) in height. Herh — All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft(1 m) in height. Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height. rtemarKs: �ir onservea, us[ morpnoiogicai aaaptauons Plot size is indicative of wetland shape. Yes� No� US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 SOIL R-5829 US 70 Improvements e Description: fDescribe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the ahsence of indic Sampling Point: Depth Matrix Redox Features {inches) Color fmoistl % Color {moistl % Tvpe Loc` Texture Remarks 0-13" 10YR 2/1 100 L 13-19+ 10YR 5/1 90 10YR 4/6 10 C M SL WGG-4 Wet 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked 5and Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicahle to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.J Indicators for Prohlematic Hydric Soils3: � Histosol {A1) Polyvalue Below Surface {S8) (LRR S, T, llj 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O) Histic Epipedon (A2) Thin Dark Surtace (S9) [LRR S, T, U} 2 cm Muck (A10) [LRR S} Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) {LRR Oj Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 950A,Bj Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, Tj Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) Organic Bodies (A6) {LRR P, T, ll) Redox Dark Surtace (F6) (MLRA 953B] 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, ll) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) �ed Parent Material (TF2) Muck Presence (A8) (LRR Uj Redox Depressions (F8) ery Shallow Dark Surtace (TF12) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) Marl (F90) [LRR ll) �Other (Explain in Remarks) �epleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Ochric (F11) {MLRA 151 j ✓ Thick Dark Surtace (Al2j Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) �Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (M LRA 150A� Umbric Surtace (F13) (LRR P, T, ll} wetland hydrology must be present, Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) {LRR O, Sj Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 159] unless disturbed or problematic. Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Reduced Vertic (F18j (MLRA 150A, 150Bj Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) [MLRA 149A} Stripped Matrix (S6) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) {MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D] Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, llj Restrictive Layer {if ohservedj: Type: Depth (inchesj: Remarks: Hydric Soil Present? Yes� No� US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 W�SL�Nb b�i�ERMINAI`�CiN aAT,!# FORM — A#lantic ae�d Gulf Ccsastal Pl�in Region P�o��r�ate: R-5829 US 70 Improvements city�county: �Nayne saanpling oate: 10/13/2017 ApplicanUOwner: NCDOT State; n1C Sampling Point: �NGG-4 Upl ir�vesti9ator{s): Nathan Howell & Lizzy Stokes-Cawley Sectian, Township, �tanye: Rosewood Landform (�aillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, cornex, nane}: CO►IVeX SI❑pe j%}: 5 Subregion {�RR or M�taA): LRR-P �a#: 35.447898 �fl�g; -78.105973 �Dakum: NAD 83 S�il Map �lnit I�ame: Torhunta loam ��,16 ��if�bo,�; None Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the si�e typical far this time o# yesr? Yes � A�o �{If no, explair� in Remarks.} Are Vegetation� Soil I v I or Hydrerlogy �✓ , significantly disturhed? N� Are "Norrnal Circumstances° present7 Yes �✓ No � /�ae Vegetation ✓� Scail ✓� or Mydrology�✓ naturally proble�atoc? NO [If needed, explain any answer� in Remarks.J SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Aitach site rnap showing sampling point locatior�s, trarosects, impork��t features, etc. Hydrophytic V�getation Present? Hydric Sail Present? Wetland Hydrology Pres�nt? Yes � No ✓0 Yes � hio � Yes Ma �� Is the Sampled Area within a IMetiand? Xes � No � Wetlands WFF, WHH, WYY, WZZ, WG, WI, WM, WR, and WV all possess upland plots with similar landscape positions and edaphic, floristic, and hydrologic properties. Therefore, they are included under this form. HYDR{)LC?GY Wetland Hydrolagy dndicators: Secondarv Indicatars (minimurra of twa reauired� I'rimanr Indicatars [minimum of one is reauir�d; ch�ck all that appiv) QSur�ace Soil Cracks (6�6} QSurface Water (A1) QAq�uatic Faurra (B13j QSparse3y Vegeta#ed Canca�e Surface (BS) �Higi� WaY�r Table (A2} �IWarl C3eposits (�15} {LRFi IJ} �Drainage Patterns (B10) QSakuratior� {A3� �Fiydrogert� Sulfide Odor {C1 } �Mnss Trim Lenes (896} �Water Marks (B'I ) QOxidized Rhrizospheres along LiWing Roots {C3} �Dry-Seasan Water Tab}e (C2} �Sediment C?eposits (B2} �Presence of Reduced Iron (C�1J �Cra�sh Burrows (C8} �Drift Deposits (B3} �k�ecer�t kron �ieduct�on in Tilled Svils (CB) �5atueation Vosible on Aerial Irnagery {�9} �Algal hAaf or Crust (B4) �Thin IlAuck Su�rf�ce (C7) �Geamorphic Position ([32) �fron i7epr�sits (B5} �Other (Explain in Ftemarks) �hallow Aquika�rd (C73) � Inu�datian V6sible on Aerial Umagery (B7� �FfIC-G�Yeutra! Test (Da� 'Wat�er-Sta��ned Leaves (B9) Sphagnum unoss (�8} (LRR T, U) Field f3bservations: i Sueface Water �'resent? Yes � No D✓ [7epth (inches): 0�� Water Table Present? Yes � IVo ,Q C]epth (ir�ches}: 0° Saturatipn Present? Yes � No � Depth {inc�resj: 0° Wetland F�ydroMogy Preser�t? Yes ,Q No �✓ 6ndudes �a illa frin e �esc�ibe F�ecorded �aka {stream gauge, monitonng well, aerial photos, previouas inspectians}, oi availab6e: Remarks: US Army Cor,ps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Caastal Plain F�egian —'Uersevn �.0 R-5829 US 70 Improvements VEGETATION (Fi�e Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius j �iq Cover Soecies? Status �. Pinus taeda 60 Yes FAC z. Quercus alba 30 Yes FACU 3. 4. 5. 6. 90 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 45 20% of total cover: �$ Saolin4 Stratum (Plot size: � 5' raidus � �.Oxvdendrum arboreum 30 Yes FACU z. Ilex opaca 20 Yes FAC 3. 4. 5. 6. 50% of total cover: 25 Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' radiUs � �. Vaccinium sp. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 5� = Total Co�er 20% of total cover: 10 10 N/A NI � = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: � Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' radius ) �.Hexastvlis arifolia 20 Yes FAC z. Mitchella repens 20 Yes FACU 3. Pteridium aquilinum 20 Yes FACU 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 50% of total cover: 30 Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot siza: 3�' radius ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 50% of total cover: 0 , us[ morpnoiogicai aaaptauons Plot size is indicative of wetland shape. 60 = Total Cover 20% of totel cover: 12 Sampling Point: WGG-4 Upl uominance iest vunrKsneet: Number of Dominant Species 3 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant 5pecies Across All Strata: Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL. FACW. or FAC 7 43% Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiplv hv: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = nynropnyuc vegetanon inaica[ors: 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - �ominance Test is �50% 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0' � Prohlematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) ' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 6e present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft(6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at hreast height (DBH). Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft(6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shru6 - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft {1 to 6 m) in height. Herh - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft(1 m) in height. Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic 0 = Total Cover Vegetation � 20% of total cover: � Present? Yes� No� US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0 SOIL ne R-5829 US 70 Improvements or confirm the ahsence of indic WGG-4 Upl Sampling Point: Depth Matrix Redox Features {inches) Color fmoistl % Color {moistl % Tvpe Loc` Texture Remarks 0-7 10YR 2/1 50 10YR8/1 50 SL 50% masked 7-12 10YR 6/3 100 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked 5and Grains Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicahle to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.J � Histosol {A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Organic Bodies (A6) {LRR P, T, ll) 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, ll) Muck Presence (A8) (LRR Uj 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) �epleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surtace (Al2j Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (M LRA 150A� Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) {LRR O, Sj Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, llj Restrictive Layer {if ohservedj: Type: Depth (inchesj: Remarks: SL 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Indicators for Prohlematic Hydric Soils3: Polyvalue Below Surface {S8) (LRR S, T, llj 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O) �Thin Dark Surtace (S9) [LRR S, T, U} 2 cm Muck (A90) [LRR S} Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) {LRR Oj Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 950A,Bj ILoamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, Tj IDepleted Matrix (F3) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) Redox Dark Surtace (F6) (MLRA 953B] Depleted Dark Surface (F7) �ed Parent Material (TF2) Redox Depressions (F8) ery Shallow Dark Surtace (TF12) Marl (F90) [LRR ll) �Other (Explain in Remarks) Depleted Ochric (F11) {MLRA 151 j Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) �Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Umbric Surtace (F13) (LRR P, T, ll} wetland hydrology must be present, Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 159] unless disturbed or problematic. Reduced Vertic (F18j (MLRA 150A, 150Bj Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) [MLRA 149A} Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) {MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D] Hydric Soil Present? Yes� No� US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 W�SL�Nb b�i�ERMINAI`�CiN aAT,!# FORM — A#lantic ae�d Gulf Ccsastal Pl�in Region P�o��r�ate: R-5829 US 70 Improvements city�county: �Nayne Saanpling oate: 5/3/2018 ApplicanUOwner: NCDOT State; n1C Sampling Point: W��-1 Upl ir�vesti9ator{s): Nathan Howell & Lizzy Stokes-Cawley Sectian, Township, �tanye: Rosewood Landform (�aillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, cornex, naneJ: CO►IVeX SI❑pe j%}: 5 Subregion {�RR or M�RA): LRR-P �a#: 35.450697 �fl�g; -78.103642 �Dakum: NAD 83 s�i� Map vnit r�ame: Bibb sandy loam ��,16 ��if�bo,�; None Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the si�e typical far this time o# yesr? Yes � A�o �{If no, explair� in Remarks.} Are Vegetation� Soil I v I or Hydrerlogy �✓ , significantly disturhed? N� Are "Norrnal Circumstances° present7 Yes �✓ No � /�ae Vegetation ✓� Scail ✓� or Mydrology�✓ naturally proble�atoc? NO [If needed, explain any answer� in Remarks.J SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Aitach site rnap showing sampling point locatior�s, trarosects, impork��t features, etc. Hydrophytic V�getation Present? Hydric Sail Present? Wetland Hydrology Pres�nt? Yes � No ✓0 Yes � hio � Yes Ma �� Is the Sampled Area within a IMetiand? Xes � No � Due to the similarity of their soils, vegetation, and hydrology, the upland plot for wetland WO is covered under this form. HYDR{)LC?GY Wetland Hydrolagy dndicators: Secondarv Indicatars (minimurra of twa reauired� I'rimanr Indicatars [minimum of one is reauir�d; ch�ck all that appiv) QSur�ace Soil Cracks (6�6} QSurface Water (A1) QAq�uatic Faurra (B13j QSparse3y Vegeta#ed Canca�e Surface (BS) �Higi� WaY�r Table (A2} �IWarl C3eposits (�15} {LRFi IJ} �Drainage Patterns (B10) QSakuratior� {A3� �Fiydrogert� Sulfide Odor {C1 } �Mnss Trim Lenes (896} �Water Marks (B'I ) QOxidized Rhrizospheres along LiWing Roots {C3} �Dry-Seasan Water Tab}e (C2} �Sediment C?eposits (B2} �Presence of Reduced Iron (C�1J �Cra�sh Burrows (C8} �Drift Deposits (B3} �k�ecer�t kron �ieduct�on in Tilled Svils (CB) �5atueation Vosible on Aerial Irnagery {�9} �Algal hAaf or Crust (B4) �Thin IlAuck Su�rf�ce (C7) �Geamorphic Position ([32) �fron i7epr�sits (B5} �Other (Explain in Ftemarks) �hallow Aquika�rd (C73) � Inu�datian V6sible on Aerial Umagery (B7� �FfIC-G�Yeutra! Test (Da� 'Wat�er-Sta��ned Leaves (B9) Sphagnum unoss (�8} (LRR T, U) Field f3bservations: i Sueface Water �'resent? Yes � No D✓ [7epth (inches): � Water Table Present? Yes � IVo ,Q C]epth (ir�ches}: 0 Saturatipn Present? Yes � No � Depth {inc�resj: 0 Wetland F�ydroMogy Preser�t? Yes ,Q No �✓ 6ndudes �a illa frin e �esc�ibe F�ecorded �aka {stream gauge, monitonng well, aerial photos, previouas inspectians}, oi availab6e: Remarks: US Army Cor,ps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Caastal Plain F�egian —'Uersevn �.0 W�SL�Nb b�i�ERMINAI`�CiN aAT,!# FORM — A#lantic ae�d Gulf Ccsastal Pl�in Region P�o��r�ate: R-5829 US 70 Improvements city�county: �Nayne Saanpling oate: 5/3/2018 ApplicanUOwner: NCDOT State; n1C Sampling Point: W��-1 Wet ir�vesti9ator{s): Nathan Howell & Lizzy Stokes-Cawley Sectian, Township, �tanye: Rosewood Landform (�aillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, cornex, naneJ: CO►IVeX SI❑pe j%}: 5 Subregion {�RR or M�RA): LRR-P �a#: 35.450697 �fl�g; -78.103642 �Dakum: NAD 83 s�i� Map vnit r�ame: Bibb sandy loam ��,16 ��if�bo,�; None Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the si�e typical far this time o# yesr? Yes � A�o �{If no, explair� in Remarks.} Are Vegetation� Soil I v I or Hydrerlogy �✓ , significantly disturhed? N� Are "Norrnal Circumstances° present7 Yes �✓ No � /�ae Vegetation ✓� Scail ✓� or Mydrology�✓ naturally proble�atoc? NO [If needed, explain any answer� in Remarks.J SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Aitach site rnap showing sampling point locatior�s, trarosects, impork��t features, etc. Hydrophytic V�getation Present? Hydric Sail Present? Wetland Hydrology Pres�nt? Yes �✓ No 0 Yes �/ hio � Yes � Ma �� NCWAM: Headwater Forest (Disturbed) HYDR{)LC?GY Is the Sampled Area within a IMetiand? Xes ✓� No � Wetland Hydrolagy dndicators: Secondarv Indicatars (minimurra of twa reauired� I'rimanr Indicatars [minimum of one is reauir�d; ch�ck all that appiv) QSur�ace Soil Cracks (6�6} Q✓ 5urface Water (A1) Q✓ Aq�uatic Faurra (B13j QSparse3y Vegeta#ed Canca�e Surface (BS) �Higi� WaY�r Table (A2} �IWarl C3eposits (�15} {LRFi IJ} �✓ Drainage Patterns (B10) QSakuratior� {A3� �Fiydrogert� Sulfide Odor {C1 } �Mnss Trim Lenes (896} �Water Marks (B'I ) QOxidized Rhrizospheres along LiWing Roots {C3} �Dry-Seasan Water Tab}e (C2} �Sediment C?eposits (B2} �Presence of Reduced Iron (C�1J �Cra�sh Burrows (C8} �Drift Deposits (B3} �k�ecer�t kron �ieduct�on in Tilled Svils (CB) �5atueation Vosible on Aerial Irnagery {�9} �Algal hAaf or Crust (B4) �Thin IlAuck Su�rf�ce (C7) �Geamorphic Position ([32) �fron i7epr�sits (B5} �Other (Explain in Ftemarks) �hallow Aquika�rd (C73) � Inu�datian V6sible on Aerial Umagery (B7� �FfIC-G�Yeutra! Test (Da� 'Wat�er-Sta��ned Leaves (B9) Sphagnum unoss (�8} (LRR T, U) Field f3bservations: i Sueface Water �'resent? Yes �✓ No D[7epth (inches): � Water Table Present? Yes � No ,Q []epth (ir�ches}: (C� SUrF8C2 Saturatipn Present? Yes � No � Depth {inc�resj: (C� SUffaC2 Wetland F�ydroMogy Preser�t? Yes �✓ No � 6ndudes �a illa frin e �esc�ibe F�ecorded �aka {stream gauge, monitonng well, aerial photos, previouas inspectians}, oi availab6e: Remarks: Wetland is fed by a perennial seep. US Army Cor,ps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Caastal Plain F�egian —'Uersevn �.0 R-5829 US 70 Improvements VEGETATION (Fi�e Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30�X8� � 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 50% of total cover: 0 Saolin4 Stratum (Plot size: 3��X8� ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 50% of total cover: � Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 3��X8� ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Sampling Point: WJJ-1 Wet Hosoiute uominant inaicator uominance iest vunrKsneet: % Cover Soecies? Status Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: � Total Number of Dominant 5pecies Across All Strata: Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL. FACW. or FAC 0 0 = Total Cover Prevalence Index worksheet: 20% of total cover: � Total % Cover of: Multiplv hv: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = p_ = Total Co�er Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: _ 20% of total cover: � 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - �ominance Test is �50% 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0' � Prohlematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) � = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: � Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30�X8� ) �.Eleocharis sp. 20 N/A NI z.Ludwigia sp. 20 N/A NI 3.Juncus sp. 20 N/A NI 4. _ 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 50% of total cover: � Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot siza: 3��X8� ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 50% of total cover: 0 , us[ morpnoiogicai aaaptauons � = Total Cover 20% of totel cover: 0 ' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 6e present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft(6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at hreast height (DBH). Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft(6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shru6 - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft {1 to 6 m) in height. Herh - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft(1 m) in height. Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic 0 = Total Cover Vegetation � 20% of total cover: � Present? Yes� No� Plot size is indicative of wetland shape. no plants identifiable to species level. Genera are indicative of permanently saturated conditions. US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0 R-5829 US 70 Improvements SOIL Sampling Point: Profile Description: {Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the ahsence of indicators.] Depth Matrix Redox Features {inches) Color fmoistl % Color {moistl % Tvpe Loc` Texture Remarks 0-2 10YR 3/2 100 L 2-4 10YR 6/2 90 10YR 2/1 10 L Organic streaking 4-12 10YR 4/1 60 10YR 2/1 30 S 7.5YR 4/6 10 C M S WJJ-1 Wet 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked 5and Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicahle to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.J Indicators for Prohlematic Hydric Soils3: � Histosol {A1) Polyvalue Below Surface {S8) (LRR S, T, llj 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O) Histic Epipedon (A2) Thin Dark Surtace (S9) [LRR S, T, U} 2 cm Muck (A10) [LRR S} Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) {LRR Oj Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 950A,Bj Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, Tj Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) Organic Bodies (A6) {LRR P, T, ll) Redox Dark Surtace (F6) (MLRA 953B] 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, ll) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) �ed Parent Material (TF2) Muck Presence (A8) (LRR Uj Redox Depressions (F8) ery Shallow Dark Surtace (TF12) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) Marl (F90) [LRR ll) �Other (Explain in Remarks) �epleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Ochric (F11) {MLRA 151 j Thick Dark Surtace (Al2j Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) �Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (M LRA 150A� Umbric Surtace (F13) (LRR P, T, ll} wetland hydrology must be present, Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) {LRR O, Sj Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 159] unless disturbed or problematic. Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Reduced Vertic (F18j (MLRA 150A, 150Bj Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) [MLRA 149A} Stripped Matrix (S6) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) {MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D] Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, llj Restrictive Layer {if ohservedj: Type: Depth (inchesj: Hydric Soil Present? Yes� No� Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 W�SL�Nb b�i�ERMINAI`�CiN aAT,!# FORM — A#lantic ae�d Gulf Ccsastal Pl�in Region P�o��r�ate: R-5829 US 70 Improvements city�county: �Nayne Saanpling oate: 5/3/2018 ApplicanUOwner: NCDOT State; n1C Sampling Point: �NPP-1 Wet ir�vesti9ator{s): Nathan Howell & Lizzy Stokes-Cawley Sectian, Township, �tanye: Rosewood Landform (�aills4ope, terrace, etc.): Interstream Divide Local relief (concave, cornex, nane}: COIICaVe SI❑pe [%}: 0 Subregion {�RR ar M�RA): LRR-P �at: 35.441605 �fl�g; -78.101081 �Dakurn: NAD 83 s�i� Map vnit r�ame: Rains sandy loam, 0-2% slopes n�Wi c��ssif�catio�: None Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the si�e typical far this time o# yesr? Yes � A�o �{If no, explair� in Remarks.} Are Vegetation� Soil I v I or Hydrerlogy �✓ , significantly disturhed? N� Are "Norrnal Circumstances° present7 Yes �✓ No � /�ae Vegetation ✓� Scail ✓� or Mydrology�✓ naturally proble�atoc? NO [If needed, explain any answer� in Remarks.J SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Aitach site rnap showing sampling point locatior�s, trarosects, impork��t features, etc. Hydrophytic V�getation Present? Hydric Sail Present? Wetland Hydrology Pres�nt? Yes �✓ No 0 Yes �/ hio � Yes � Ma �� Is the Sampled Area within a IMetiand? Xes ✓� No � NCWAM: Pine Flat. Wetlands WF, WH, WK, WOO, WQQ, WRR, WW, and WXX all possess similar landscape, edaphic, floristic, and hydrologic characteristics. Therefore, they are covered under this wetland form. HYDR{)LC?GY Wetland Hydrolagy dndicators: Secondarv Indicatars (minimurra of twa reauired� I'rimanr Indicatars [minimum of one is reauir�d; ch�ck all that appiv) QSur�ace Soil Cracks (6�6} QSurface Water (A1) QAq�uatic Faurra (B13j QSparse3y Vegeta#ed Canca�e Surface (BS) �Higi� WaY�r Table (A2} �IWarl C3eposits (�15} {LRFi IJ} �Drainage Patterns (B10) QSakuratior� {A3� �Fiydrogert� Sulfide Odor {C1 } �Mnss Trim Lenes (896} �Water Marks (B'I ) QOxidized Rhrizospheres along LiWing Roots {C3} �Dry-Seasan Water Tab}e (C2} �Sediment C?eposits (B2} �Presence of Reduced Iron (C�1J �Cra�sh Burrows (C8} �Drift Deposits (B3} �k�ecer�t kron �ieduct�on in Tilled Svils (CB) �5atueation Vosible on Aerial Irnagery {�9} �Algal hAaf or Crust (B4) �Thin IlAuck Su�rf�ce (C7) �Geamorphic Position ([32) �fron i7epr�sits (B5} �Other (Explain in Ftemarks) �hallow Aquika�rd (C73) � Inu�datian V6sible on Aerial Umagery (B7� �FfIC-G�Yeutra! Test (Da� � Wat�er-Sta��ned Leaves (B9) Sphagnum unoss (�8} (LRR T, U) Fielc� f3bservations: i Sueface Water �'resent? Yes � h�o D✓ [7epth (inches): N011e Water Table Present? Yes � IVo ,Q C]epth (ir�ches}: 1° Saturatipn Present? Yes � No � Depth {inc�resj: (C� SUffaC2 Wetland F�ydroMogy Preser�t? Yes �✓ No � 6ndudes �a illa frin e �esc�ibe F�ecorded �aka {stream gauge, monitonng well, aerial photos, previouas inspectians}, oi availab6e: Remarks: US Army Cor,ps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Caastal Plain F�egian —'Uersevn �.0 R-5829 US 70 Improvements VEGETATION (Fi�e Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius j �iq Cover Soecies? Status �. Pinus taeda 40 Yes FAC z. Liquidambar styraciflua 20 Yes FAC 3. 4. 5. 6. Saolin4 Stratum (Plot size 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 60 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 30 20% of total cover: � 2 15' radius � p_ = Total Co�er 50% of total cover: � 20% of total cover: � Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' raidUs � �. Cyrilla racemiflora 30 z. Maqnolia virqiniana 20 3. 4. 5. 6. Yes FACW Yes FACW 50 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 25 20% of total cover: 10 Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' ralduS ) Sampling Point: WPP-1 W2t uominance iest vunrKsneet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC Total Number of Dominant 5pecies Across All Strata: Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL. FACW. or FAC Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiplv hv: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = nynropnyuc vegetanon inaica[ors: 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation �/ 2 - �ominance Test is �50% 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0' � Prohlematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) ' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 6e present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata: Tree — Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft(6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at hreast height (DBH). �.Arundinaria tecta 10 Yes FACW Sapling— Woody plants, excluding woodyvines, z.Osmundastrum cinnamomeum 10 Yes FACW approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. 3. 4. _ 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 50% of total cover: � � Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot siza: 3�' radius ) �. Smilax laurifolia z. 3. 4. �� Hydrophytic 40 = Total Cover Vegetation 50% of total cover: 20 20% of total cover: $ Present? 20 = Total Cover 20% of totel cover: 4 40 Yes FACW Shru6 — Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft {1 to 6 m) in height. Herh — All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft(1 m) in height. Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height. on s Yes� No� US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 R-5829 US 70 Improvements SOIL Sampling Point: Profile Description: {Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the ahsence of indicators.] Depth Matrix Redox Features {inches) Color fmoistl % Color {moistl % Tvpe Loc` Texture Remarks 0-8" 10YR 4/1 60 10YR 6/1 25 D M L 10YR 4/6 15 C M g-12+ 10YR 7/1 70 10 YR 5/6 30 C M CL WPP-1 Wet 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked 5and Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicahle to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.J Indicators for Prohlematic Hydric Soils3: � Histosol {A1) Polyvalue Below Surface {S8) (LRR S, T, llj 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O) Histic Epipedon (A2) Thin Dark Surtace (S9) [LRR S, T, U} 2 cm Muck (A10) [LRR S} Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) {LRR Oj Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 950A,Bj Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, Tj Stratified Layers (A5) ✓ Depleted Matrix (F3) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) Organic Bodies (A6) {LRR P, T, ll) Redox Dark Surtace (F6) (MLRA 953B] 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, ll) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) �ed Parent Material (TF2) Muck Presence (A8) (LRR Uj Redox Depressions (F8) ery Shallow Dark Surtace (TF12) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) Marl (F90) [LRR ll) �Other (Explain in Remarks) �epleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Ochric (F11) {MLRA 151 j Thick Dark Surtace (Al2j Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) �Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (M LRA 150A� Umbric Surtace (F13) (LRR P, T, ll} wetland hydrology must be present, Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) {LRR O, Sj Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 159] unless disturbed or problematic. Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Reduced Vertic (F18j (MLRA 150A, 150Bj Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) [MLRA 149A} Stripped Matrix (S6) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) {MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D] Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, llj Restrictive Layer {if ohservedj: Type: Depth (inchesj: Hydric Soil Present? Yes� No� Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 W�SL�Nb b�i�ERMINAI`�CiN aAT,!# FORM — A#lantic ae�d Gulf Ccsastal Pl�in Region P�o��r�ate: R-5829 US 70 Improvements city�county: �Nayne Saanpling oate: 5/3/2018 ApplicanUOwner: NCDOT State; n1C Sampling Point: �NPP-1 Upl ir�vesti9ator{s): Nathan Howell & Lizzy Stokes-Cawley Sectian, Township, �tanye: Rosewood Landform (�aills4ope, terrace, etc.): Interstream Divide Local relief (concave, cornex, naneJ: CO►IVeX SI❑pe j%}: 5 Subregion {�RR ar M�RA): LRR-P �at: 35.441610 �fl�g; -78.102351 �Dakurn: NAD 83 s�i� Map vnit r�ame: Rains sandy loam, 0-2% slopes n�Wi c��ssif�catio�: None Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the si�e typical far this time o# yesr? Yes � A�o �{If no, explair� in Remarks.} Are Vegetation� Soil I v I or Hydrerlogy �✓ , significantly disturhed? N� Are "Norrnal Circumstances° present7 Yes �✓ No � /�ae Vegetation ✓� Scail ✓� or Mydrology�✓ naturally proble�atoc? NO [If needed, explain any answer� in Remarks.J SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Aitach site rnap showing sampling point locatior�s, trarosects, impork��t features, etc. Hydrophytic V�getation Present? Hydric Sail Present? Wetland Hydrology Pres�nt? Yes � No ✓0 Yes � hio � Yes Ma �� Is the Sampled Area within a IMetiand? Xes � No � Wetlands WF, WH, WK, WOO, WQQ, WRR, WWW, and WXX all have upland plots that possess similar landscape positions and edaphic, floristic, and hydrologic characteristics. Therefore, they are included under this form. HYDR{)LC?GY Wetland Hydrolagy dndicators: Secondarv Indicatars (minimurra of twa reauired� I'rimanr Indicatars [minimum of one is reauir�d; ch�ck all that appiv) QSur�ace Soil Cracks (6�6} QSurface Water (A1) QAq�uatic Faurra (B13j QSparse3y Vegeta#ed Canca�e Surface (BS) �Higi� WaY�r Table (A2} �IWarl C3eposits (�15} {LRFi IJ} �Drainage Patterns (B10) QSakuratior� {A3� �Fiydrogert� Sulfide Odor {C1 } �Mnss Trim Lenes (896} �Water Marks (B'I ) QOxidized Rhrizospheres along LiWing Roots {C3} �Dry-Seasan Water Tab}e (C2} �Sediment C?eposits (B2} �Presence of Reduced Iron (C�1J �Cra�sh Burrows (C8} �Drift Deposits (B3} �k�ecer�t kron �ieduct�on in Tilled Svils (CB) �5atueation Vosible on Aerial Irnagery {�9} �Algal hAaf or Crust (B4) �Thin IlAuck Su�rf�ce (C7) �Geamorphic Position ([32) �fron i7epr�sits (B5} �Other (Explain in Ftemarks) �hallow Aquika�rd (C73) � Inu�datian V6sible on Aerial Umagery (B7� �FfIC-G�Yeutra! Test (Da� 'Wat�er-Sta��ned Leaves (B9) Sphagnum unoss (�8} (LRR T, U) Field f3bservations: i Sueface Water �'resent? Yes � No D✓ [7epth (inches): � Water Table Present? Yes � IVo ,Q C]epth (ir�ches}: 0 Saturatipn Present? Yes � No � Depth {inc�resj: 0 Wetland F�ydroMogy Preser�t? Yes ,Q No �✓ 6ndudes �a illa frin e �esc�ibe F�ecorded �aka {stream gauge, monitonng well, aerial photos, previouas inspectians}, oi availab6e: Remarks: US Army Cor,ps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Caastal Plain F�egian —'Uersevn �.0 R-5829 US 70 Improvements VEGETATION (Fi�e Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius j �. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 50% of total cover: 0 Saolin4 Stratum (Plot size: � 5' radius � 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 50% of total cover: � Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' raidUs � 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Sampling Point: WPP-1 Upl Hosoiute uominant inaicator uominance iest vunrKsneet: % Cover Soecies? Status Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC Total Number of Dominant 5pecies Across All Strata: Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL. FACW. or FAC 0 = Total Cover Prevalence Index worksheet: 20% of total cover: � Total % Cover of: Multiplv hv: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = p_ = Total Co�er Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: _ 20% of total cover: � 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - �ominance Test is �50% 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0' � Prohlematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) � = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: � Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' ralduS ) �.Andropoqon virainicus 20 Yes FAC z. Eupatorium capillifolium 10 Yes FACU 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 50% of total cover: 15 Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot siza: 3�' radius ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 50% of total cover: 0 , list morphological adaptations 30 = Total Cover 20% of totel cover: 6 ' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 6e present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft(6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at hreast height (DBH). Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft(6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shru6 - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft {1 to 6 m) in height. Herh - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft(1 m) in height. Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic 0 = Total Cover Vegetation � 20% of total cover: � Present? Yes� No� US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0 R-5829 US 70 Improvements SOIL Sampling Point: WPP-1 Upl e Description: fDescribe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the ahsence of indic Depth Matrix Redox Features {inches) Color fmoistl % Color {moistl % Tvpe Loc` Texture Remarks 0-4" 10YR 5/3 100 L 4-10 10YR 5/3 90 10YR 4/6 10 C M L 10-14+ 10YR 6/6 100 CL 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked 5and Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicahle to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.J Indicators for Prohlematic Hydric Soils3: � Histosol {A1) Polyvalue Below Surface {S8) (LRR S, T, llj 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O) Histic Epipedon (A2) Thin Dark Surtace (S9) [LRR S, T, U} 2 cm Muck (A10) [LRR S} Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) {LRR Oj Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 950A,Bj Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, Tj Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) Organic Bodies (A6) {LRR P, T, ll) Redox Dark Surtace (F6) (MLRA 953B] 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, ll) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) �ed Parent Material (TF2) Muck Presence (A8) (LRR Uj Redox Depressions (F8) ery Shallow Dark Surtace (TF12) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) Marl (F90) [LRR ll) �Other (Explain in Remarks) �epleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Ochric (F11) {MLRA 151 j Thick Dark Surtace (Al2j Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) �Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (M LRA 150A� Umbric Surtace (F13) (LRR P, T, ll} wetland hydrology must be present, Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) {LRR O, Sj Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 159] unless disturbed or problematic. Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Reduced Vertic (F18j (MLRA 150A, 150Bj Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) [MLRA 149A} Stripped Matrix (S6) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) {MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D] Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, llj Restrictive Layer {if ohservedj: Type: Depth (inchesj: Remarks: Hydric Soil Present? Yes� No� US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 W�SL�Nb b�i�ERMINAI`�CiN aAT,!# FORM — A#lantic ae�d Gulf Ccsastal Pl�in Region P�o��r�ate: R-5829 US 70 Improvements city�county: �Nayne Saanpling oate: 5/3/2018 ApplicanUOwner: NCDOT State; n1C Sampling Point: �NTT-1 Wet ir�vesti9ator{s): Nathan Howell & Lizzy Stokes-Cawley Sectian, Township, �tanye: Rosewood Landform (�aills4ope, terrace, etc.): Headwater Forest Local relief (concave, cornex, naneJ: CO►IVeX SI❑pe [°/a}: 10 Subregion {�RR ar M�RA): LRR-P �at: 35.442184 �fl�g; -78.092348 �Dakurn: NAD 83 s�i� Map vnit r�ame: Norfolk sandy loam, 6-10% slopes n�Wi c��ssif�catio�: None Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the si�e typical far this time o# yesr? Yes � A�o �{If no, explair� in Remarks.} Are Vegetation� Soil I v I or Hydrerlogy �✓ , significantly disturhed? N� Are "Norrnal Circumstances° present7 Yes �✓ No � /�ae Vegetation ✓� Scail ✓� or Mydrology�✓ naturally proble�atoc? NO [If needed, explain any answer� in Remarks.J SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Aitach site rnap showing sampling point locatior�s, trarosects, impork��t features, etc. Hydrophytic V�getation Present? Hydric Sail Present? Wetland Hydrology Pres�nt? Yes �✓ No 0 Yes �/ hio � Yes � Ma �� Is the Sampled Area within a IMetiand? Xes ✓� No � NCWAM: Headwater Forest. Wetlands WSS, WUU, and WVV all possess similar landscape positions and edaphic, hydrologic, and floristic properties. Therefore, they are included under this form. HYDR{)LC?GY Wetland Hydrolagy dndicators: Secondarv Indicatars (minimurra of twa reauired� I'rimanr Indicatars [minimum of one is reauir�d; ch�ck all that appiv) QSur�ace Soil Cracks (6�6} QSurface Water (A1) QAq�uatic Faurra (B13j QSparse3y Vegeta#ed Canca�e Surface (BS) �Higi� WaY�r Table (A2} �IWarl C3eposits (�15} {LRFi IJ} �✓ Drainage Patterns (B10) QSakuratior� {A3� �Fiydrogert� Sulfide Odor {C1 } �Mnss Trim Lenes (896} �Water Marks (B'I ) QOxidized Rhrizospheres along LiWing Roots {C3} �Dry-Seasan Water Tab}e (C2} �Sediment C?eposits (B2} �Presence of Reduced Iron (C�1J �Cra�sh Burrows (C8} �Drift Deposits (B3} �k�ecer�t kron �ieduct�on in Tilled Svils (CB) �5atueation Vosible on Aerial Irnagery {�9} �Algal hAaf or Crust (B4) �Thin IlAuck Su�rf�ce (C7) �Geamorphic Position ([32) �fron i7epr�sits (B5} �Other (Explain in Ftemarks) �hallow Aquika�rd (C73) � Inu�datian V6sible on Aerial Umagery (B7� �FfIC-G�Yeutra! Test (Da� � Wat�er-Sta��ned Leaves (B9) Sphagnum unoss (�8} (LRR T, U) Fielc� f3bservations: i Sueface Water �'resent? Yes � No D✓ [7epth (inches): � Water Table Present? Yes � IVo ,Q C]epth (ir�ches}: 0 Saturatipn Present? Yes � No � Depth {inc�resj: 8 Wetland F�ydroMogy Preser�t? Yes �✓ No � 6ndudes �a illa frin e �esc�ibe F�ecorded �aka {stream gauge, monitonng well, aerial photos, previouas inspectians}, oi availab6e: Remarks: US Army Cor,ps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Caastal Plain F�egian —'Uersevn �.0 R-5829 (US 70 Improvements) VEGETATION (Fi�e Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius j �.Acer rubrum 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 50% of total cover: 20 Saolin4 Stratum (Plot size: � 5' radius � 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 50% of total cover: � Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' radiUs � 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. % Cover Soecies? Status 40 Yes FAC Sampling Point: WTT-1 Wet uominance iest vunrKsneet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC Total Number of Dominant 5pecies Across All Strata: Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL. FACW. or FAC 4� = Total Cover Prevalence Index worksheet: 20% of total cover: 8 Total % Cover of: Multiplv hv: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = p_ = Total Co�er Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: _ 20% of total cover: � 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation �/ 2 - �ominance Test is �50% 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0' � Prohlematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) � = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: � Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' radius ) ' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 6e present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft(6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at hreast height (DBH). �.Saururus cernuus 30 Yes OBL Sapling- Woody plants, excluding woodyvines, z. Boehmeria cylindrica 10 YeS FACW approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. 3. 4. _ 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 50% of total cover: 20 Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot siza: 3�' radius ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 50% of total cover: 0 , list morphological adaptations 40 = Total Cover 20% of totel cover: $ Shru6 - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft {1 to 6 m) in height. Herh - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft(1 m) in height. Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic 0 = Total Cover Vegetation 20% of total cover: � Present? Yes� No� US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0 SOIL ne R-5829 (US 70 Improvements) or confirm the ahsence of indic Sampling Point: Depth Matrix Redox Features {inches) Color fmoistl % Color {moistl % Tvpe Loc` Texture Remarks 0-12 10YR 4/1 70 7.5YR 4/6 30 C M, PL L 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked 5and Grains Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicahle to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.J � Histosol {A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Organic Bodies (A6) {LRR P, T, ll) 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, ll) Muck Presence (A8) (LRR Uj 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) �epleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surtace (Al2j Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (M LRA 150A� Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) {LRR O, Sj Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, llj Restrictive Layer {if ohservedj: Type: Depth (inchesj: Remarks: WTT-1 Wet 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Indicators for Prohlematic Hydric Soils3: Polyvalue Below Surface {S8) (LRR S, T, llj 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O) �Thin Dark Surtace (S9) [LRR S, T, U} 2 cm Muck (A90) [LRR S} Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) {LRR Oj Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 950A,Bj ILoamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, Tj IDepleted Matrix (F3) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) Redox Dark Surtace (F6) (MLRA 953B] Depleted Dark Surface (F7) �ed Parent Material (TF2) Redox Depressions (F8) ery Shallow Dark Surtace (TF12) Marl (F90) [LRR ll) �Other (Explain in Remarks) Depleted Ochric (F11) {MLRA 151 j Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) �Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Umbric Surtace (F13) (LRR P, T, ll} wetland hydrology must be present, Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 159] unless disturbed or problematic. Reduced Vertic (F18j (MLRA 150A, 150Bj Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) [MLRA 149A} Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) {MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D] Hydric Soil Present? Yes� No� US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 W�SL�Nb b�i�ERMINAI`�CiN aAT,!# FORM — A#lantic ae�d Gulf Ccsastal Pl�in Region P�o��r�ate: R-5829 US 70 Upgrades city�county: �Nayne Saanpling oate: 5/3/2018 ApplicanUOwner: NCDOT State; n1C Sampling Point: �NTT-1 Upl ir�vesti9ator{s): Nathan Howell & Lizzy Stokes-Cawley Sectian, Township, �tanye: Rosewood Landform (�aills4ope, terrace, etc.): Headwater Forest Local relief (concave, cornex, naneJ: CO►IVeX SI❑pe [°/a}: 10 Subregion {�RR ar M�RA): LRR-P �at: 35.442184 �fl�g; -78.092348 �Dakurn: NAD 83 s�i� Map vnit r�ame: Norfolk sandy loam, 6-10% slopes n�Wi c��ssif�catio�: None Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the si�e typical far this time o# yesr? Yes � A�o �{If no, explair� in Remarks.} Are Vegetation� Soil I v I or Hydrerlogy �✓ , significantly disturhed? N� Are "Norrnal Circumstances° present7 Yes �✓ No � /�ae Vegetation ✓� Scail ✓� or Mydrology�✓ naturally proble�atoc? NO [If needed, explain any answer� in Remarks.J SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Aitach site rnap showing sampling point locatior�s, trarosects, impork��t features, etc. Hydrophytic V�getation Present? Hydric Sail Present? Wetland Hydrology Pres�nt? Yes �✓ No 0 Yes � hio � Yes Ma �� Is the Sampled Area within a IMetiand? Xes � No � Wetlands WSS, WUU, and WVV all possess upland plots with similar landscape positions and edaphic, hydrologic, and floristic properties. Therefore, they are included under this form. HYDR{)LC?GY Wetland Hydrolagy dndicators: Secondarv Indicatars (minimurra of twa reauired� I'rimanr Indicatars [minimum of one is reauir�d; ch�ck all that appiv) QSur�ace Soil Cracks (6�6} QSurface Water (A1) QAq�uatic Faurra (B13j QSparse3y Vegeta#ed Canca�e Surface (BS) �Higi� WaY�r Table (A2} �IWarl C3eposits (�15} {LRFi IJ} �Drainage Patterns (B10) QSakuratior� {A3� �Fiydrogert� Sulfide Odor {C1 } �Mnss Trim Lenes (896} �Water Marks (B'I ) QOxidized Rhrizospheres along LiWing Roots {C3} �Dry-Seasan Water Tab}e (C2} �Sediment C?eposits (B2} �Presence of Reduced Iron (C�1J �Cra�sh Burrows (C8} �Drift Deposits (B3} �k�ecer�t kron �ieduct�on in Tilled Svils (CB) �5atueation Vosible on Aerial Irnagery {�9} �Algal hAaf or Crust (B4) �Thin IlAuck Su�rf�ce (C7) �Geamorphic Position ([32) �fron i7epr�sits (B5} �Other (Explain in Ftemarks) �hallow Aquika�rd (C73) � Inu�datian V6sible on Aerial Umagery (B7� �FfIC-G�Yeutra! Test (Da� 'Wat�er-Sta��ned Leaves (B9) Sphagnum unoss (�8} (LRR T, U) Field f3bservations: i Sueface Water �'resent? Yes � No D✓ [7epth (inches): � Water Table Present? Yes � IVo ,Q C]epth (ir�ches}: 0 Saturatipn Present? Yes � No � Depth {inc�resj: 0 Wetland F�ydroMogy Preser�t? Yes ,Q No �✓ 6ndudes �a illa frin e �esc�ibe F�ecorded �aka {stream gauge, monitonng well, aerial photos, previouas inspectians}, oi availab6e: Remarks: US Army Cor,ps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Caastal Plain F�egian —'Uersevn �.0 R-5829 (US 70 Improvements) VEGETATION (Fi�e Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: WTT-1 Upl A6solute Dominant inaicator uominance iest vunrKsneet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius � % Cover Soecies? Status Number of Dominant Species �. Acer rubrum 40 Y@S FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC z. Total Number of Dominant 3� 5pecies Across All Strata: 4. Percent of Dominant Species �� That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 6. 50% of total cover: 20 Saolin4 Stratum (Plot size: � 5' radius � 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 4� = Total Cover Prevalence Index worksheet: 20% of total cover: 8 Total % Cover of: Multiplv hv: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) p_ = Total Co�er 50% of total cover: � 20% of total cover: � Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' radiUs � �. Ligustrum sinense 20 2. _ 3. 4. 5. 6. Yes FAC 2� = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 10 20% of total cover: 4 Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' radius ) �.Microsteaium vimineum 40 Yes FAC 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 50% of total cover: 20 Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot siza: 3�' radius ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 50% of total cover: 0 , list morphological adaptations 40 = Total Cover 20% of totel cover: $ Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation �/ 2 - �ominance Test is �50% 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0' � Prohlematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) ' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 6e present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft(6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at hreast height (DBH). Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft(6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shru6 - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft {1 to 6 m) in height. Herh - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft(1 m) in height. Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic 0 = Total Cover Vegetation 20% of total cover: � Present? Yes� No� US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0 SOIL ne R-5829 (US 70 Improvements) or confirm the ahsence of indic WTT-1 Upl Sampling Point: Depth Matrix Redox Features {inches) Color fmoistl % Color {moistl % Tvpe Loc` Texture Remarks 0-4 10YR 5/3 100 L 4-12 10YR 6/4 100 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked 5and Grains Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicahle to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.J � Histosol {A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Organic Bodies (A6) {LRR P, T, ll) 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, ll) Muck Presence (A8) (LRR Uj 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) �epleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surtace (Al2j Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (M LRA 150A� Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) {LRR O, Sj Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, llj Restrictive Layer {if ohservedj: Type: Depth (inchesj: Remarks: SL 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Indicators for Prohlematic Hydric Soils3: Polyvalue Below Surface {S8) (LRR S, T, llj 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O) �Thin Dark Surtace (S9) [LRR S, T, U} 2 cm Muck (A90) [LRR S} Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) {LRR Oj Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 950A,Bj ILoamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, Tj IDepleted Matrix (F3) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) Redox Dark Surtace (F6) (MLRA 953B] Depleted Dark Surface (F7) �ed Parent Material (TF2) Redox Depressions (F8) ery Shallow Dark Surtace (TF12) Marl (F90) [LRR ll) �Other (Explain in Remarks) Depleted Ochric (F11) {MLRA 151 j Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) �Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Umbric Surtace (F13) (LRR P, T, ll} wetland hydrology must be present, Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 159] unless disturbed or problematic. Reduced Vertic (F18j (MLRA 150A, 150Bj Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) [MLRA 149A} Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) {MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D] Hydric Soil Present? Yes� No� US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 NC WAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0 USACE AID # NCDWR# Project Name R-5829 (US 70 Improvements) ApplicanUOwner Name NCDOT Wetland Type Level III Ecoregion River Basin County ❑ Yes � No Headwater Forest Southeastern Plains Neuse Johnston Precipitation within 48 hrs? Date of Evaluation Wetland Site Name Assessor Name/Organization Nearest Named Water Body USGS 8-Digit Catalogue Unit NCDWR Region ude/Lonqitude (deci-deqrees) 5/2/2018 WC (Utility Easement) Nathan Howell & Lizzy Moccasin Creek 03020201 35.473660, -78.183840 Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area (may not be within the assessment area) Please circle and/or make note on the last page if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference, if appropriate, in recent past (for instance, within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include, but are not limited to the following. • Hydrological modifications (examples: ditches, dams, beaver dams, dikes, berms, ponds, etc.) • Surface and sub-surface discharges into the wetland (examples: discharges containing obvious pollutants, presence of nearby septic tanks, underground storage tanks (USTs), hog lagoons, etc.) • Signs of vegetation stress (examples: vegetation mortality, insect damage, disease, storm damage, salt intrusion, etc.) • HabitaUplant community alteration (examples: mowing, clear-cutting, exotics, etc.) Is the assessment area intensively managed? � Yes ❑ No Regulatory Considerations - Were regulatory considerations evaluated? �Yes ❑No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area. ❑ Anadromous fish ❑ Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species � NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect ❑ Abuts a Primary Nursery Area (PNA) ❑ Publicly owned property ❑ N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) (including buffer) ❑ Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HQW, ORW, or Trout ❑ Designated NCNHP reference community � Abuts a 303(d)-listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d)-listed stream What type of natural stream is associated with the wetland, if any? (check all that apply) � Blackwater ❑ Brownwater ❑ Tidal (if tidal, check one of the following boxes) ❑ Lunar ❑ Wind ❑ Both Is the assessment area on a coastal island? ❑ Yes � No Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver? ❑ Yes � No Does the assessment area experience overbank floodinq during normal rainfall conditions? ❑ Yes � No 1. Ground Surface ConditionNegetation Condition — assessment area condition metric Check a box in each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface (GS) in the assessment area and vegetation structure (VS) in the assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable (see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable, then rate the assessment area based on evidence an effect. GS VS ❑A ❑A Not severely altered �B �B Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area (ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks, excessive sedimentation, fire-plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure alteration examples: mechanical disturbance, herbicides, salt intrusion [where appropriate], exotic species, grazing, less diversity [if appropriate], hydrologic alteration) 2. Surface and Sub-Surface Storage Capacity and Duration — assessment area condition metric Check a box in each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration (Surf) and sub-surface storage capacity and duration (Sub). Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. A ditch <_ 1 foot deep is considered to affect surface water only, while a ditch > 1 foot deep is expected to affect both surface and sub-surface water. Consider tidal flooding regime, if applicable. Surf Sub ❑A �A Water storage capacity and duration are not altered. �B ❑B Water storage capacity or duration are altered, but not substantially (typically, not sufficient to change vegetation). ❑C ❑C Water storage capacity or duration are substantially altered (typically, alteration sufficient to result in vegetation change) (examples: draining, flooding, soil compaction, filling, excessive sedimentation, underground utility lines). 3. Water Storage/Surface Relief — assessment area/wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes) Check a box in each column. Select the appropriate storage for the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT). AA WT 3a. ❑A ❑A Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water > 1 deep ❑B ❑B Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 6 inches to 1 foot deep ❑C ❑C Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep �D �D Depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep 3b. ❑A Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet ❑B Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is between 1 and 2 feet ❑C Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is less than 1 foot 4. Soil Texture/Structure — assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes) Check a box from each of the three soil property groups below. Dig soil profile in the dominant assessment area landscape feature. Make soil observations within the top 12 inches. Use most recent National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils guidance for regional indicators. 4a. ❑A Sandy soil �B Loamy or clayey soils exhibiting redoximorphic features (concentrations, depletions, or rhizospheres) ❑C Loamy or clayey soils not exhibiting redoximorphic features ❑D Loamy or clayey gleyed soil ❑E Histosol or histic epipedon 4b. �A Soil ribbon < 1 inch ❑B Soil ribbon >_ 1 inch 4c. �A No peat or muck presence ❑B A peat or muck presence 5. Discharge into Wetland — opportunity metric Check a box in each column. Consider surface pollutants or discharges (Surf) and sub-surface pollutants or discharges (Sub). Examples of sub-surface discharges include presence of nearby septic tank, underground storage tank (UST), etc. Surf Sub �A �A Little or no evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the assessment area ❑B ❑B Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the wetland and stressing, but not overwhelming the treatment capacity of the assessment area ❑C ❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges (pathogen, particulate, or soluble) entering the assessment area and potentially overwhelming the treatment capacity of the wetland (water discoloration, dead vegetation, excessive sedimentation, odor) 6. Land Use — opportunity metric (skip for non-riparian wetlands) Check all that apply (at least one box in each column). Evaluation involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. Consider sources draining to assessment area within entire upstream watershed (WS), within 5 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (5M), and within 2 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (2M). WS 5M 2M ❑A ❑A ❑A > 10% impervious surfaces ❑B ❑B ❑B Confined animal operations (or other local, concentrated source of pollutants ❑C ❑C ❑C >_ 20% coverage of pasture ❑D ❑D ❑D z 20% coverage of agricultural land (regularly plowed land) ❑E ❑E ❑E >_ 20% coverage of maintained grass/herb �F �F �F >_ 20% coverage of clear-cut land ❑G ❑G ❑G Little or no opportunity to improve water quality. Lack of opportunity may result from little or no disturbance in the watershed or hydrologic alterations that prevent drainage and/or overbank flow from affecting the assessment area. 7. Wetland Acting as Vegetated Buffer — assessment arealwetland complex condition metric (skip for non-riparian wetlands) 7a. Is assessment area within 50 feet of a tributary or other open water? ❑Yes �No If Yes, continue to 7b. If No, skip to Metric 8. Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the water body. Make buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland. Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed. 7b. How much of the first 50 feet from the bank is wetland? (Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the .water body. Make buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland. Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.) ❑A z 50 feet ❑B From 30 to < 50 feet ❑C From 15 to < 30 feet ❑D From 5 to < 15 feet ❑E < 5 feet or buffer bypassed by ditches 7c. Tributary width. If the tributary is anastomosed, combine widths of channels/braids for a total width. ❑s 15-feet wide ❑> 15-feet wide ❑ Other open water (no tributary present) 7d. Do roots of assessment area vegetation extend into the bank of the tributary/open water? ❑Yes ❑No 7e. Is stream or other open water sheltered or exposed? ❑Sheltered — adjacent open water with width < 2500 feet and no regular boat traffic. ❑Exposed — adjacent open water with width >_ 2500 feet or regular boat traffic. 8. Wetland Width at the Assessment Area — wetland type/wetland complex condition metric (evaluate WT for all marshes and Estuarine Woody Wetland only; evaluate WC for Bottomland Hardwood Forest, Headwater Forest, and Riverine Swamp Forest only) Check a box in each column for riverine wetlands only. Select the average width for the wetland type at the assessment area (WT) and the wetland complex at the assessment area (WC). See User Manual for WT and WC boundaries. WT WC ❑A ❑A >_ 100 feet �B �B From 80 to < 100 feet ❑C ❑C From 50 to < 80 feet ❑D ❑D From 40 to < 50 feet ❑E ❑E From 30 to < 40 feet ❑F ❑F From 15 to < 30 feet ❑G ❑G From 5 to < 15 feet ❑ H ❑ H < 5 feet 9. Inundation Duration — assessment area condition metric (skip for non-riparian wetlands) Answer for assessment area dominant landform. ❑A Evidence of short-duration inundation (< 7 consecutive days) �B Evidence of saturation, without evidence of inundation ❑C Evidence of long-duration inundation or very long-duration inundation (7 to 30 consecutive days or more) 10. Indicators of Deposition — assessment area condition metric (skip for non-riparian wetlands and all marshes) Consider recent deposition only (no plant growth since deposition). �A Sediment deposition is not excessive, but at approximately natural levels. ❑B Sediment deposition is excessive, but not overwhelming the wetland. ❑C Sediment deposition is excessive and is overwhelming the wetland. 11. Wetland Size — wetland type/wetland complex condition metric Check a box in each column. Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates three aspects of the wetland area: the size of the wetland type (WT), the size of the wetland complex (WC), and the size of the forested wetland (FW) (if applicable, see User Manual). See the User Manual for boundaries of these evaluation areas. If assessment area is clear-cut, select "K" for the FW column. WT WC FW (if applicable) ❑A ❑A ❑A >_ 500 acres ❑B ❑B ❑B From 100 to < 500 acres ❑C ❑C ❑C From 50 to < 100 acres ❑D ❑D ❑D From 25 to < 50 acres ❑E ❑E ❑E From 10 to < 25 acres ❑F ❑F ❑F From 5 to < 10 acres ❑G ❑G ❑G From 1 to < 5 acres ❑H ❑H ❑H From 0.5 to < 1 acre �I ❑I �I From 0.1 to < 0.5 acre ❑J ❑J ❑J From 0.01 to < 0.1 acre ❑K ❑K ❑K < 0.01 acre or assessment area is clear-cut 12. Wetland Intactness — wetland type condition metric (evaluate for Pocosins only) ❑A Pocosin is the full extent (>_ 90%) of its natural landscape size. ❑B Pocosin type is < 90% of the full extent of its natural landscape size. 13. Connectivity to Other Natural Areas — landscape condition metric 13a. Check appropriate box(es) (a box may be checked in each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates whether the wetland is well connected (Well) and/or loosely connected (Loosely) to the landscape patch, the contiguous naturally vegetated area and open water (if appropriate). Boundaries are formed by four-lane roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors the width of a four-lane road or wider, urban landscapes, maintained fields (pasture and agriculture), or open water > 300 feet wide. Well Loosely ❑A ❑A >_ 500 acres ❑B �B From 100 to < 500 acres ❑C ❑C From 50 to < 100 acres �D ❑D From 10 to < 50 acres ❑E ❑E < 10 acres ❑F ❑F Wetland type has a poor or no connection to other natural habitats 13b. Evaluate for marshes only. ❑Yes ❑No Wetland type has a surface hydrology connection to open waters/stream or tidal wetlands. 14. Edge Effect — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes and Estuarine Woody Wetland) May involve a GIS effort with field adjustment. Estimate distance from wetland type boundary to artificial edges. Artificial edges include non-forested areas >_ 40 feet wide such as fields, development, roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors, and clear-cuts. Consider the eight main points of the compass. Artificial edge occurs within 150 feet in how many directions? If the assessment area is clear cut, select option "C." ❑A 0 ❑B 1 to 4 �C 5to8 15. Vegetative Composition — assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes and Pine Flat) ❑A Vegetation is close to reference condition in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of appropriate species, with exotic plants absent or sparse within the assessment area. �B Vegetation is different from reference condition in species diversity or proportions, but still largely composed of native species characteristic of the wetland type. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clearcutting or clearing. It also includes communities with exotics present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata. ❑C Vegetation severely altered from reference in composition, or expected species are unnaturally absent (planted stands of non- characteristic species or at least one stratum inappropriately composed of a single species), or exotic species are dominant in at least one stratum. 16. Vegetative Diversity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for Non-tidal Freshwater Marsh only) ❑A Vegetation diversity is high and is composed primarily of native species (< 10°/a cover of exotics). ❑B Vegetation diversity is low or has > 10% to 50% cover of exotics. ❑C Vegetation is dominated by exotic species (> 50 % cover of exotics). 17. Vegetative Structure — assessment area/wetland type condition metric 17a. Is vegetation present? �Yes ❑No If Yes, continue to 17b. If No, skip to Metric 18. 17b. Evaluate percent coverage of assessment area vegetation for all marshes only. Skip to 17c for non-marsh wetlands. ❑A >_ 25% coverage of vegetation ❑B < 25% coverage of vegetation 17c. Check a box in each column for each stratum. Evaluate this portion of the metric for non-marsh wetlands. Consider structure in airspace above the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT) separately. AA WT T o❑A ❑A Canopy closed, or nearly closed, with natural gaps associated with natural processes m❑B ❑B Canopy present, but opened more than natural gaps U�C �C Canopy sparse or absent � ❑A ❑A � ❑B ❑B � �C �C � ❑A ❑A � ❑B ❑B � �C �C � ❑A ❑A _ �B �B ❑C ❑C Dense mid-story/sapling layer Moderate density mid-story/sapling layer Mid-story/sapling layer sparse or absent Dense shrub layer Moderate density shrub layer Shrub layer sparse or absent Dense herb layer Moderate density herb layer Herb layer sparse or absent 18. Snags — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes) ❑A Large snags (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches DBH, or large relative to species present and landscape stability). �B Not A 19. Diameter Class Distribution — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes) ❑A Majority of canopy trees have stems > 6 inches in diameter at breast height (DBH); many large trees (> 12 inches DBH) are present. ❑B Majority of canopy trees have stems between 6 and 12 inches DBH, few are > 12 inch DBH. �C Majority of canopy trees are < 6 inches DBH or no trees. 20. Large Woody Debris — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes) Include both natural debris and man-placed natural debris. ❑A Large logs (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches in diameter, or large relative to species present and landscape stability). �B Not A 21. Vegetation/Open Water Dispersion — wetland type/open water condition metric (evaluate for Non-Tidal Freshwater Marsh only) Select the figure that best describes the amount of interspersion between vegetation and open water in the growing season. Patterned areas indicate vegetated areas, while solid white areas indicate open water. ❑A ❑B ❑C ❑D er[�"�'�.,. ,� '.; s. � '�. � t, 4 i x r�"� � �"'�*' `'� �ad. �'�j"�,r�i � i��f�,��`'��}��"' ygi„ d4+� :�°#,�+'��y'1 � �r+ � f� ;�. s i �" e ru p. � ��+�� .�� R�'..� {�� t1� t's!, �v,-. �� e� r � � 6.- : F � Yi'�$ : �� . .�a�� 5 `� I J 'Y `'�`�. a 22. Hydrologic Connectivity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for riparian wetlands and Sa1tlBrackish Marsh only) Examples of activities that may severely alter hydrologic connectivity include intensive ditching, fill, sedimentation, channelization, diversion, man-made berms, beaver dams, and stream incision. Documentation required if evaluated as B, C, or D. �A Overbank and overland flow are not severely altered in the assessment area. ❑B Overbank flow is severely altered in the assessment area. ❑C Overland flow is severely altered in the assessment area. ❑D Both overbank and overland flow are severely altered in the assessment area. Notes NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0 Wetland Site Name WC (Utility Easement) Date of Assessment 5/2/2018 Nathan Howell & Lizzy Wetland Type Headwater Forest Assessor Name/Organization Stokes-Cawley Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N) NO Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) YES Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N) YES Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N) NO Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N) NO Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N) NO Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N) NO Sub-function Rating Summary Function Sub-function Metrics Rating Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention Condition LOW Sub-surFace Storage and Retention Condition HIGH Water Quality Pathogen Change Condition HIGH Condition/Opportunity HIGH Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NO Particulate Change Condition LOW Condition/Opportunity NA Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NA Soluble Change Condition MEDIUM Condition/Opportunity MEDIUM Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NO Physical Change Condition LOW Condition/Opportunity LOW Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NO Pollution Change Condition NA Condition/Opportunity NA Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NA Habitat Physical Structure Condition LOW Landscape Patch Structure Condition LOW Vegetation Composition Condition MEDIUM Function Rating Summary Function Metrics Rating Hydrology Condition MEDIUM Water Quality Condition LOW Condition/Opportunity MEDIUM Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NO Habitat Condition LOW Overall Wetland Rating �ow NC WAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0 USACE AID # NCDWR# Project Name R-5829 (US 70 Improvements) ApplicanUOwner Name NCDOT Wetland Type Level III Ecoregion River Basin County ❑ Yes � No Headwater Forest Southeastern Plains Neuse Johnston Precipitation within 48 hrs? Date of Evaluation Wetland Site Name Assessor Name/Organization Nearest Named Water Body USGS 8-Digit Catalogue Unit NCDWR Region ude/Lonqitude (deci-deqrees) 5/3/2018 WE (Utility Easement) Nathan Howell & Lizzy Moccasin Creek 03020201 35.472585, -78.181891 Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area (may not be within the assessment area) Please circle and/or make note on the last page if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference, if appropriate, in recent past (for instance, within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include, but are not limited to the following. • Hydrological modifications (examples: ditches, dams, beaver dams, dikes, berms, ponds, etc.) • Surface and sub-surface discharges into the wetland (examples: discharges containing obvious pollutants, presence of nearby septic tanks, underground storage tanks (USTs), hog lagoons, etc.) • Signs of vegetation stress (examples: vegetation mortality, insect damage, disease, storm damage, salt intrusion, etc.) • HabitaUplant community alteration (examples: mowing, clear-cutting, exotics, etc.) Is the assessment area intensively managed? � Yes ❑ No Regulatory Considerations - Were regulatory considerations evaluated? �Yes ❑No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area. ❑ Anadromous fish ❑ Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species � NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect ❑ Abuts a Primary Nursery Area (PNA) ❑ Publicly owned property ❑ N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) (including buffer) ❑ Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HQW, ORW, or Trout ❑ Designated NCNHP reference community ❑ Abuts a 303(d)-listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d)-listed stream What type of natural stream is associated with the wetland, if any? (check all that apply) ❑ Blackwater ❑ Brownwater ❑ Tidal (if tidal, check one of the following boxes) ❑ Lunar ❑ Wind ❑ Both Is the assessment area on a coastal island? ❑ Yes � No Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver? ❑ Yes � No Does the assessment area experience overbank floodinq during normal rainfall conditions? ❑ Yes � No 1. Ground Surface ConditionNegetation Condition — assessment area condition metric Check a box in each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface (GS) in the assessment area and vegetation structure (VS) in the assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable (see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable, then rate the assessment area based on evidence an effect. GS VS ❑A ❑A Not severely altered �B �B Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area (ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks, excessive sedimentation, fire-plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure alteration examples: mechanical disturbance, herbicides, salt intrusion [where appropriate], exotic species, grazing, less diversity [if appropriate], hydrologic alteration) 2. Surface and Sub-Surface Storage Capacity and Duration — assessment area condition metric Check a box in each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration (Surf) and sub-surface storage capacity and duration (Sub). Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. A ditch <_ 1 foot deep is considered to affect surface water only, while a ditch > 1 foot deep is expected to affect both surface and sub-surface water. Consider tidal flooding regime, if applicable. Surf Sub ❑A ❑A Water storage capacity and duration are not altered. �B �B Water storage capacity or duration are altered, but not substantially (typically, not sufficient to change vegetation). ❑C ❑C Water storage capacity or duration are substantially altered (typically, alteration sufficient to result in vegetation change) (examples: draining, flooding, soil compaction, filling, excessive sedimentation, underground utility lines). 3. Water Storage/Surface Relief — assessment area/wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes) Check a box in each column. Select the appropriate storage for the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT). AA WT 3a. ❑A ❑A Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water > 1 deep ❑B ❑B Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 6 inches to 1 foot deep �C �C Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep ❑D ❑D Depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep 3b. ❑A Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet ❑B Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is between 1 and 2 feet �C Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is less than 1 foot 4. Soil Texture/Structure — assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes) Check a box from each of the three soil property groups below. Dig soil profile in the dominant assessment area landscape feature. Make soil observations within the top 12 inches. Use most recent National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils guidance for regional indicators. 4a. ❑A Sandy soil �B Loamy or clayey soils exhibiting redoximorphic features (concentrations, depletions, or rhizospheres) ❑C Loamy or clayey soils not exhibiting redoximorphic features ❑D Loamy or clayey gleyed soil ❑E Histosol or histic epipedon 4b. �A Soil ribbon < 1 inch ❑B Soil ribbon >_ 1 inch 4c. �A No peat or muck presence ❑B A peat or muck presence 5. Discharge into Wetland — opportunity metric Check a box in each column. Consider surface pollutants or discharges (Surf) and sub-surface pollutants or discharges (Sub). Examples of sub-surface discharges include presence of nearby septic tank, underground storage tank (UST), etc. Surf Sub �A �A Little or no evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the assessment area ❑B ❑B Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the wetland and stressing, but not overwhelming the treatment capacity of the assessment area ❑C ❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges (pathogen, particulate, or soluble) entering the assessment area and potentially overwhelming the treatment capacity of the wetland (water discoloration, dead vegetation, excessive sedimentation, odor) 6. Land Use — opportunity metric (skip for non-riparian wetlands) Check all that apply (at least one box in each column). Evaluation involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. Consider sources draining to assessment area within entire upstream watershed (WS), within 5 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (5M), and within 2 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (2M). WS 5M 2M ❑A ❑A ❑A > 10% impervious surfaces ❑B ❑B ❑B Confined animal operations (or other local, concentrated source of pollutants ❑C ❑C ❑C >_ 20% coverage of pasture ❑D ❑D ❑D z 20% coverage of agricultural land (regularly plowed land) ❑E ❑E ❑E >_ 20% coverage of maintained grass/herb �F �F �F >_ 20% coverage of clear-cut land ❑G ❑G ❑G Little or no opportunity to improve water quality. Lack of opportunity may result from little or no disturbance in the watershed or hydrologic alterations that prevent drainage and/or overbank flow from affecting the assessment area. 7. Wetland Acting as Vegetated Buffer — assessment arealwetland complex condition metric (skip for non-riparian wetlands) 7a. Is assessment area within 50 feet of a tributary or other open water? ❑Yes �No If Yes, continue to 7b. If No, skip to Metric 8. Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the water body. Make buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland. Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed. 7b. How much of the first 50 feet from the bank is wetland? (Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the .water body. Make buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland. Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.) ❑A z 50 feet ❑B From 30 to < 50 feet ❑C From 15 to < 30 feet ❑D From 5 to < 15 feet ❑E < 5 feet or buffer bypassed by ditches 7c. Tributary width. If the tributary is anastomosed, combine widths of channels/braids for a total width. ❑s 15-feet wide ❑> 15-feet wide ❑ Other open water (no tributary present) 7d. Do roots of assessment area vegetation extend into the bank of the tributary/open water? ❑Yes ❑No 7e. Is stream or other open water sheltered or exposed? ❑Sheltered — adjacent open water with width < 2500 feet and no regular boat traffic. ❑Exposed — adjacent open water with width >_ 2500 feet or regular boat traffic. 8. Wetland Width at the Assessment Area — wetland type/wetland complex condition metric (evaluate WT for all marshes and Estuarine Woody Wetland only; evaluate WC for Bottomland Hardwood Forest, Headwater Forest, and Riverine Swamp Forest only) Check a box in each column for riverine wetlands only. Select the average width for the wetland type at the assessment area (WT) and the wetland complex at the assessment area (WC). See User Manual for WT and WC boundaries. WT WC ❑A ❑A >_ 100 feet �B �B From 80 to < 100 feet ❑C ❑C From 50 to < 80 feet ❑D ❑D From 40 to < 50 feet ❑E ❑E From 30 to < 40 feet ❑F ❑F From 15 to < 30 feet ❑G ❑G From 5 to < 15 feet ❑ H ❑ H < 5 feet 9. Inundation Duration — assessment area condition metric (skip for non-riparian wetlands) Answer for assessment area dominant landform. �A Evidence of short-duration inundation (< 7 consecutive days) ❑B Evidence of saturation, without evidence of inundation ❑C Evidence of long-duration inundation or very long-duration inundation (7 to 30 consecutive days or more) 10. Indicators of Deposition — assessment area condition metric (skip for non-riparian wetlands and all marshes) Consider recent deposition only (no plant growth since deposition). �A Sediment deposition is not excessive, but at approximately natural levels. ❑B Sediment deposition is excessive, but not overwhelming the wetland. ❑C Sediment deposition is excessive and is overwhelming the wetland. 11. Wetland Size — wetland type/wetland complex condition metric Check a box in each column. Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates three aspects of the wetland area: the size of the wetland type (WT), the size of the wetland complex (WC), and the size of the forested wetland (FW) (if applicable, see User Manual). See the User Manual for boundaries of these evaluation areas. If assessment area is clear-cut, select "K" for the FW column. WT WC FW (if applicable) ❑A ❑A ❑A >_ 500 acres ❑B ❑B ❑B From 100 to < 500 acres ❑C ❑C ❑C From 50 to < 100 acres ❑D ❑D ❑D From 25 to < 50 acres ❑E ❑E ❑E From 10 to < 25 acres ❑F ❑F ❑F From 5 to < 10 acres ❑G ❑G ❑G From 1 to < 5 acres �H ❑H �H From 0.5 to < 1 acre ❑I ❑I ❑I From 0.1 to < 0.5 acre ❑J ❑J ❑J From 0.01 to < 0.1 acre ❑K ❑K ❑K < 0.01 acre or assessment area is clear-cut 12. Wetland Intactness — wetland type condition metric (evaluate for Pocosins only) ❑A Pocosin is the full extent (>_ 90%) of its natural landscape size. ❑B Pocosin type is < 90% of the full extent of its natural landscape size. 13. Connectivity to Other Natural Areas — landscape condition metric 13a. Check appropriate box(es) (a box may be checked in each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates whether the wetland is well connected (Well) and/or loosely connected (Loosely) to the landscape patch, the contiguous naturally vegetated area and open water (if appropriate). Boundaries are formed by four-lane roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors the width of a four-lane road or wider, urban landscapes, maintained fields (pasture and agriculture), or open water > 300 feet wide. Well Loosely ❑A �A >_ 500 acres �B ❑B From 100 to < 500 acres ❑C ❑C From 50 to < 100 acres ❑D ❑D From 10 to < 50 acres ❑E ❑E < 10 acres ❑F ❑F Wetland type has a poor or no connection to other natural habitats 13b. Evaluate for marshes only. ❑Yes ❑No Wetland type has a surface hydrology connection to open waters/stream or tidal wetlands. 14. Edge Effect — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes and Estuarine Woody Wetland) May involve a GIS effort with field adjustment. Estimate distance from wetland type boundary to artificial edges. Artificial edges include non-forested areas >_ 40 feet wide such as fields, development, roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors, and clear-cuts. Consider the eight main points of the compass. Artificial edge occurs within 150 feet in how many directions? If the assessment area is clear cut, select option "C." ❑A 0 ❑B 1 to 4 �C 5to8 15. Vegetative Composition — assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes and Pine Flat) ❑A Vegetation is close to reference condition in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of appropriate species, with exotic plants absent or sparse within the assessment area. �B Vegetation is different from reference condition in species diversity or proportions, but still largely composed of native species characteristic of the wetland type. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clearcutting or clearing. It also includes communities with exotics present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata. ❑C Vegetation severely altered from reference in composition, or expected species are unnaturally absent (planted stands of non- characteristic species or at least one stratum inappropriately composed of a single species), or exotic species are dominant in at least one stratum. 16. Vegetative Diversity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for Non-tidal Freshwater Marsh only) ❑A Vegetation diversity is high and is composed primarily of native species (< 10°/a cover of exotics). ❑B Vegetation diversity is low or has > 10% to 50% cover of exotics. ❑C Vegetation is dominated by exotic species (> 50 % cover of exotics). 17. Vegetative Structure — assessment area/wetland type condition metric 17a. Is vegetation present? �Yes ❑No If Yes, continue to 17b. If No, skip to Metric 18. 17b. Evaluate percent coverage of assessment area vegetation for all marshes only. Skip to 17c for non-marsh wetlands. ❑A >_ 25% coverage of vegetation ❑B < 25% coverage of vegetation 17c. Check a box in each column for each stratum. Evaluate this portion of the metric for non-marsh wetlands. Consider structure in airspace above the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT) separately. AA WT T o❑A ❑A Canopy closed, or nearly closed, with natural gaps associated with natural processes m❑B ❑B Canopy present, but opened more than natural gaps U�C �C Canopy sparse or absent � ❑A ❑A � ❑B ❑B � �C �C � ❑A ❑A � ❑B ❑B � �C �C � ❑A ❑A _ �B �B ❑C ❑C Dense mid-story/sapling layer Moderate density mid-story/sapling layer Mid-story/sapling layer sparse or absent Dense shrub layer Moderate density shrub layer Shrub layer sparse or absent Dense herb layer Moderate density herb layer Herb layer sparse or absent 18. Snags — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes) ❑A Large snags (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches DBH, or large relative to species present and landscape stability). �B Not A 19. Diameter Class Distribution — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes) ❑A Majority of canopy trees have stems > 6 inches in diameter at breast height (DBH); many large trees (> 12 inches DBH) are present. ❑B Majority of canopy trees have stems between 6 and 12 inches DBH, few are > 12 inch DBH. �C Majority of canopy trees are < 6 inches DBH or no trees. 20. Large Woody Debris — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes) Include both natural debris and man-placed natural debris. ❑A Large logs (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches in diameter, or large relative to species present and landscape stability). �B Not A 21. Vegetation/Open Water Dispersion — wetland type/open water condition metric (evaluate for Non-Tidal Freshwater Marsh only) Select the figure that best describes the amount of interspersion between vegetation and open water in the growing season. Patterned areas indicate vegetated areas, while solid white areas indicate open water. ❑A ❑B ❑C ❑D er[�"�'�.,. ,� '.; s. � '�. � t, 4 i x r�"� � �"'�*' `'� �ad. �'�j"�,r�i � i��f�,��`'��}��"' ygi„ d4+� :�°#,�+'��y'1 � �r+ � f� ;�. s i �" e ru p. � ��+�� .�� R�'..� {�� t1� t's!, �v,-. �� e� r � � 6.- : F � Yi'�$ : �� . .�a�� 5 `� I J 'Y `'�`�. a 22. Hydrologic Connectivity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for riparian wetlands and Sa1tlBrackish Marsh only) Examples of activities that may severely alter hydrologic connectivity include intensive ditching, fill, sedimentation, channelization, diversion, man-made berms, beaver dams, and stream incision. Documentation required if evaluated as B, C, or D. �A Overbank and overland flow are not severely altered in the assessment area. ❑B Overbank flow is severely altered in the assessment area. ❑C Overland flow is severely altered in the assessment area. ❑D Both overbank and overland flow are severely altered in the assessment area. Notes NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0 Wetland Site Name WE (Utility Easement) Date of Assessment 5/3/2018 Nathan Howell & Lizzy Wetland Type Headwater Forest Assessor Name/Organization Stokes-Cawley Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N) NO Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) YES Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N) YES Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N) NO Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N) NO Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N) NO Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N) NO Sub-function Rating Summary Function Sub-function Metrics Rating Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention Condition LOW Sub-surFace Storage and Retention Condition HIGH Water Quality Pathogen Change Condition HIGH Condition/Opportunity HIGH Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NO Particulate Change Condition LOW Condition/Opportunity NA Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NA Soluble Change Condition MEDIUM Condition/Opportunity MEDIUM Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NO Physical Change Condition LOW Condition/Opportunity LOW Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NO Pollution Change Condition NA Condition/Opportunity NA Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NA Habitat Physical Structure Condition LOW Landscape Patch Structure Condition LOW Vegetation Composition Condition MEDIUM Function Rating Summary Function Metrics Rating Hydrology Condition MEDIUM Water Quality Condition LOW Condition/Opportunity MEDIUM Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NO Habitat Condition LOW Overall Wetland Rating �ow NC WAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0 USACE AID # NCDWR# Project Name R-5829 (US 70 Improvements) ApplicanUOwner Name NCDOT Wetland Type Level III Ecoregion River Basin County ❑ Yes � No Pine Flat Southeastern Plains Neuse Johnston Precipitation within 48 hrs? Date of Evaluation Wetland Site Name Assessor Name/Organization Nearest Named Water Body USGS 8-Digit Catalogue Unit NCDWR Region ude/Lonqitude (deci-deqrees) 5/3/2018 WH (Utility Easement) Nathan Howell & Lizzy Moccasin Creek 03020201 -78.171333 Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area (may not be within the assessment area) Please circle and/or make note on the last page if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference, if appropriate, in recent past (for instance, within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include, but are not limited to the following. • Hydrological modifications (examples: ditches, dams, beaver dams, dikes, berms, ponds, etc.) • Surface and sub-surface discharges into the wetland (examples: discharges containing obvious pollutants, presence of nearby septic tanks, underground storage tanks (USTs), hog lagoons, etc.) • Signs of vegetation stress (examples: vegetation mortality, insect damage, disease, storm damage, salt intrusion, etc.) • HabitaUplant community alteration (examples: mowing, clear-cutting, exotics, etc.) Is the assessment area intensively managed? � Yes ❑ No Regulatory Considerations - Were regulatory considerations evaluated? �Yes ❑No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area. ❑ Anadromous fish ❑ Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species � NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect ❑ Abuts a Primary Nursery Area (PNA) ❑ Publicly owned property ❑ N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) (including buffer) ❑ Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HQW, ORW, or Trout ❑ Designated NCNHP reference community ❑ Abuts a 303(d)-listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d)-listed stream What type of natural stream is associated with the wetland, if any? (check all that apply) ❑ Blackwater ❑ Brownwater ❑ Tidal (if tidal, check one of the following boxes) ❑ Lunar ❑ Wind ❑ Both Is the assessment area on a coastal island? ❑ Yes � No Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver? ❑ Yes � No Does the assessment area experience overbank floodinq during normal rainfall conditions? ❑ Yes � No 1. Ground Surface ConditionNegetation Condition — assessment area condition metric Check a box in each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface (GS) in the assessment area and vegetation structure (VS) in the assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable (see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable, then rate the assessment area based on evidence an effect. GS VS ❑A ❑A Not severely altered �B �B Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area (ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks, excessive sedimentation, fire-plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure alteration examples: mechanical disturbance, herbicides, salt intrusion [where appropriate], exotic species, grazing, less diversity [if appropriate], hydrologic alteration) 2. Surface and Sub-Surface Storage Capacity and Duration — assessment area condition metric Check a box in each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration (Surf) and sub-surface storage capacity and duration (Sub). Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. A ditch <_ 1 foot deep is considered to affect surface water only, while a ditch > 1 foot deep is expected to affect both surface and sub-surface water. Consider tidal flooding regime, if applicable. Surf Sub ❑A ❑A Water storage capacity and duration are not altered. �B �B Water storage capacity or duration are altered, but not substantially (typically, not sufficient to change vegetation). ❑C ❑C Water storage capacity or duration are substantially altered (typically, alteration sufficient to result in vegetation change) (examples: draining, flooding, soil compaction, filling, excessive sedimentation, underground utility lines). 3. Water Storage/Surface Relief — assessment area/wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes) Check a box in each column. Select the appropriate storage for the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT). AA WT 3a. ❑A ❑A Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water > 1 deep ❑B ❑B Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 6 inches to 1 foot deep ❑C ❑C Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep �D �D Depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep 3b. ❑A Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet ❑B Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is between 1 and 2 feet �C Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is less than 1 foot 4. Soil Texture/Structure — assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes) Check a box from each of the three soil property groups below. Dig soil profile in the dominant assessment area landscape feature. Make soil observations within the top 12 inches. Use most recent National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils guidance for regional indicators. 4a. ❑A Sandy soil �B Loamy or clayey soils exhibiting redoximorphic features (concentrations, depletions, or rhizospheres) ❑C Loamy or clayey soils not exhibiting redoximorphic features ❑D Loamy or clayey gleyed soil ❑E Histosol or histic epipedon 4b. �A Soil ribbon < 1 inch ❑B Soil ribbon >_ 1 inch 4c. �A No peat or muck presence ❑B A peat or muck presence 5. Discharge into Wetland — opportunity metric Check a box in each column. Consider surface pollutants or discharges (Surf) and sub-surface pollutants or discharges (Sub). Examples of sub-surface discharges include presence of nearby septic tank, underground storage tank (UST), etc. Surf Sub �A �A Little or no evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the assessment area ❑B ❑B Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the wetland and stressing, but not overwhelming the treatment capacity of the assessment area ❑C ❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges (pathogen, particulate, or soluble) entering the assessment area and potentially overwhelming the treatment capacity of the wetland (water discoloration, dead vegetation, excessive sedimentation, odor) 6. Land Use — opportunity metric (skip for non-riparian wetlands) Check all that apply (at least one box in each column). Evaluation involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. Consider sources draining to assessment area within entire upstream watershed (WS), within 5 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (5M), and within 2 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (2M). WS 5M 2M ❑A ❑A ❑A > 10% impervious surfaces ❑B ❑B ❑B Confined animal operations (or other local, concentrated source of pollutants ❑C ❑C ❑C >_ 20% coverage of pasture ❑D ❑D ❑D z 20% coverage of agricultural land (regularly plowed land) ❑E ❑E ❑E >_ 20% coverage of maintained grass/herb ❑F ❑F ❑F >_ 20% coverage of clear-cut land ❑G ❑G ❑G Little or no opportunity to improve water quality. Lack of opportunity may result from little or no disturbance in the watershed or hydrologic alterations that prevent drainage and/or overbank flow from affecting the assessment area. 7. Wetland Acting as Vegetated Buffer — assessment arealwetland complex condition metric (skip for non-riparian wetlands) 7a. Is assessment area within 50 feet of a tributary or other open water? ❑Yes ❑No If Yes, continue to 7b. If No, skip to Metric 8. Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the water body. Make buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland. Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed. 7b. How much of the first 50 feet from the bank is wetland? (Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the .water body. Make buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland. Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.) ❑A z 50 feet ❑B From 30 to < 50 feet ❑C From 15 to < 30 feet ❑D From 5 to < 15 feet ❑E < 5 feet or buffer bypassed by ditches 7c. Tributary width. If the tributary is anastomosed, combine widths of channels/braids for a total width. ❑s 15-feet wide ❑> 15-feet wide ❑ Other open water (no tributary present) 7d. Do roots of assessment area vegetation extend into the bank of the tributary/open water? ❑Yes ❑No 7e. Is stream or other open water sheltered or exposed? ❑Sheltered — adjacent open water with width < 2500 feet and no regular boat traffic. ❑Exposed — adjacent open water with width >_ 2500 feet or regular boat traffic. 8. Wetland Width at the Assessment Area — wetland type/wetland complex condition metric (evaluate WT for all marshes and Estuarine Woody Wetland only; evaluate WC for Bottomland Hardwood Forest, Headwater Forest, and Riverine Swamp Forest only) Check a box in each column for riverine wetlands only. Select the average width for the wetland type at the assessment area (WT) and the wetland complex at the assessment area (WC). See User Manual for WT and WC boundaries. WT WC ❑A ❑A >_ 100 feet �B �B From 80 to < 100 feet ❑C ❑C From 50 to < 80 feet ❑D ❑D From 40 to < 50 feet ❑E ❑E From 30 to < 40 feet ❑F ❑F From 15 to < 30 feet ❑G ❑G From 5 to < 15 feet ❑ H ❑ H < 5 feet 9. Inundation Duration — assessment area condition metric (skip for non-riparian wetlands) Answer for assessment area dominant landform. ❑A Evidence of short-duration inundation (< 7 consecutive days) ❑B Evidence of saturation, without evidence of inundation ❑C Evidence of long-duration inundation or very long-duration inundation (7 to 30 consecutive days or more) 10. Indicators of Deposition — assessment area condition metric (skip for non-riparian wetlands and all marshes) Consider recent deposition only (no plant growth since deposition). ❑A Sediment deposition is not excessive, but at approximately natural levels. ❑B Sediment deposition is excessive, but not overwhelming the wetland. ❑C Sediment deposition is excessive and is overwhelming the wetland. 11. Wetland Size — wetland type/wetland complex condition metric Check a box in each column. Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates three aspects of the wetland area: the size of the wetland type (WT), the size of the wetland complex (WC), and the size of the forested wetland (FW) (if applicable, see User Manual). See the User Manual for boundaries of these evaluation areas. If assessment area is clear-cut, select "K" for the FW column. WT WC FW (if applicable) ❑A ❑A ❑A >_ 500 acres ❑B ❑B ❑B From 100 to < 500 acres ❑C ❑C ❑C From 50 to < 100 acres ❑D ❑D ❑D From 25 to < 50 acres ❑E ❑E ❑E From 10 to < 25 acres ❑F ❑F ❑F From 5 to < 10 acres ❑G ❑G ❑G From 1 to < 5 acres ❑H ❑H ❑H From 0.5 to < 1 acre �I ❑I �I From 0.1 to < 0.5 acre ❑J ❑J ❑J From 0.01 to < 0.1 acre ❑K ❑K ❑K < 0.01 acre or assessment area is clear-cut 12. Wetland Intactness — wetland type condition metric (evaluate for Pocosins only) ❑A Pocosin is the full extent (>_ 90%) of its natural landscape size. ❑B Pocosin type is < 90% of the full extent of its natural landscape size. 13. Connectivity to Other Natural Areas — landscape condition metric 13a. Check appropriate box(es) (a box may be checked in each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates whether the wetland is well connected (Well) and/or loosely connected (Loosely) to the landscape patch, the contiguous naturally vegetated area and open water (if appropriate). Boundaries are formed by four-lane roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors the width of a four-lane road or wider, urban landscapes, maintained fields (pasture and agriculture), or open water > 300 feet wide. Well Loosely ❑A ❑A >_ 500 acres ❑B ❑B From 100 to < 500 acres ❑C ❑C From 50 to < 100 acres �D �D From 10 to < 50 acres ❑E ❑E < 10 acres ❑F ❑F Wetland type has a poor or no connection to other natural habitats 13b. Evaluate for marshes only. ❑Yes ❑No Wetland type has a surface hydrology connection to open waters/stream or tidal wetlands. 14. Edge Effect — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes and Estuarine Woody Wetland) May involve a GIS effort with field adjustment. Estimate distance from wetland type boundary to artificial edges. Artificial edges include non-forested areas >_ 40 feet wide such as fields, development, roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors, and clear-cuts. Consider the eight main points of the compass. Artificial edge occurs within 150 feet in how many directions? If the assessment area is clear cut, select option "C." ❑A 0 ❑B 1 to 4 �C 5to8 15. Vegetative Composition — assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes and Pine Flat) ❑A Vegetation is close to reference condition in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of appropriate species, with exotic plants absent or sparse within the assessment area. ❑B Vegetation is different from reference condition in species diversity or proportions, but still largely composed of native species characteristic of the wetland type. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clearcutting or clearing. It also includes communities with exotics present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata. ❑C Vegetation severely altered from reference in composition, or expected species are unnaturally absent (planted stands of non- characteristic species or at least one stratum inappropriately composed of a single species), or exotic species are dominant in at least one stratum. 16. Vegetative Diversity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for Non-tidal Freshwater Marsh only) ❑A Vegetation diversity is high and is composed primarily of native species (< 10°/a cover of exotics). ❑B Vegetation diversity is low or has > 10% to 50% cover of exotics. ❑C Vegetation is dominated by exotic species (> 50 % cover of exotics). 17. Vegetative Structure — assessment area/wetland type condition metric 17a. Is vegetation present? �Yes ❑No If Yes, continue to 17b. If No, skip to Metric 18. 17b. Evaluate percent coverage of assessment area vegetation for all marshes only. Skip to 17c for non-marsh wetlands. ❑A >_ 25% coverage of vegetation ❑B < 25% coverage of vegetation 17c. Check a box in each column for each stratum. Evaluate this portion of the metric for non-marsh wetlands. Consider structure in airspace above the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT) separately. AA WT T o❑A ❑A Canopy closed, or nearly closed, with natural gaps associated with natural processes m❑B ❑B Canopy present, but opened more than natural gaps U�C �C Canopy sparse or absent � ❑A ❑A � ❑B ❑B � �C �C � ❑A ❑A � ❑B ❑B � �C �C � �A �A _ ❑B ❑B ❑C ❑C Dense mid-story/sapling layer Moderate density mid-story/sapling layer Mid-story/sapling layer sparse or absent Dense shrub layer Moderate density shrub layer Shrub layer sparse or absent Dense herb layer Moderate density herb layer Herb layer sparse or absent 18. Snags — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes) ❑A Large snags (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches DBH, or large relative to species present and landscape stability). �B Not A 19. Diameter Class Distribution — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes) ❑A Majority of canopy trees have stems > 6 inches in diameter at breast height (DBH); many large trees (> 12 inches DBH) are present. ❑B Majority of canopy trees have stems between 6 and 12 inches DBH, few are > 12 inch DBH. �C Majority of canopy trees are < 6 inches DBH or no trees. 20. Large Woody Debris — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes) Include both natural debris and man-placed natural debris. ❑A Large logs (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches in diameter, or large relative to species present and landscape stability). �B Not A 21. Vegetation/Open Water Dispersion — wetland type/open water condition metric (evaluate for Non-Tidal Freshwater Marsh only) Select the figure that best describes the amount of interspersion between vegetation and open water in the growing season. Patterned areas indicate vegetated areas, while solid white areas indicate open water. ❑A ❑B ❑C ❑D er[�"�'�.,. ,� '.; s. � '�. � t, 4 i x r�"� � �"'�*' `'� �ad. �'�j"�,r�i � i��f�,��`'��}��"' ygi„ d4+� :�°#,�+'��y'1 � �r+ � f� ;�. s i �" e ru p. � ��+�� .�� R�'..� {�� t1� t's!, �v,-. �� e� r � � 6.- : F � Yi'�$ : �� . .�a�� 5 `� I J 'Y `'�`�. a 22. Hydrologic Connectivity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for riparian wetlands and Sa1tlBrackish Marsh only) Examples of activities that may severely alter hydrologic connectivity include intensive ditching, fill, sedimentation, channelization, diversion, man-made berms, beaver dams, and stream incision. Documentation required if evaluated as B, C, or D. ❑A Overbank and overland flow are not severely altered in the assessment area. ❑B Overbank flow is severely altered in the assessment area. ❑C Overland flow is severely altered in the assessment area. ❑D Both overbank and overland flow are severely altered in the assessment area. Notes NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0 Wetland Site Name WH (Utility Easement) Date of Assessment 5/3/2018 Nathan Howell & Lizzy Wetland Type Pine Flat Assessor Name/Organization Stokes-Cawley Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N) NO Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) YES Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N) YES Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N) Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N) NO Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N) NO Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N) NO Sub-function Rating Summary Function Sub-function Metrics Rating Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention Condition MEDIUM Sub-surFace Storage and Retention Condition MEDIUM Water Quality Pathogen Change Condition NA Condition/Opportunity NA Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NA Particulate Change Condition NA Condition/Opportunity NA Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NA Soluble Change Condition NA Condition/Opportunity NA Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NA Physical Change Condition NA Condition/Opportunity NA Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NA Pollution Change Condition LOW Condition/Opportunity LOW Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NO Habitat Physical Structure Condition LOW Landscape Patch Structure Condition LOW Vegetation Composition Condition NA Function Rating Summary Function Metrics Rating Hydrology Condition MEDIUM Water Quality Condition LOW Condition/Opportunity LOW Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NO Habitat Condition LOW Overall Wetland Rating �ow NC WAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0 USACE AID # NCDWR# Project Name R-5829 (US 70 Improvements) ApplicanUOwner Name NCDOT Wetland Type Level III Ecoregion River Basin County ❑ Yes � No Headwater Forest Southeastern Plains Neuse Johnston Precipitation within 48 hrs? Date of Evaluation Wetland Site Name Assessor Name/Organization Nearest Named Water Body USGS 8-Digit Catalogue Unit NCDWR Region ude/Lonqitude (deci-deqrees) 5/2/2018 WJ Nathan Howell & Lizzy Moccasin Creek 03020201 35.472645, -78.170138 Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area (may not be within the assessment area) Please circle and/or make note on the last page if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference, if appropriate, in recent past (for instance, within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include, but are not limited to the following. • Hydrological modifications (examples: ditches, dams, beaver dams, dikes, berms, ponds, etc.) • Surface and sub-surface discharges into the wetland (examples: discharges containing obvious pollutants, presence of nearby septic tanks, underground storage tanks (USTs), hog lagoons, etc.) • Signs of vegetation stress (examples: vegetation mortality, insect damage, disease, storm damage, salt intrusion, etc.) • HabitaUplant community alteration (examples: mowing, clear-cutting, exotics, etc.) Is the assessment area intensively managed? � Yes ❑ No Regulatory Considerations - Were regulatory considerations evaluated? �Yes ❑No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area. ❑ Anadromous fish ❑ Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species � NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect ❑ Abuts a Primary Nursery Area (PNA) ❑ Publicly owned property ❑ N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) (including buffer) ❑ Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HQW, ORW, or Trout ❑ Designated NCNHP reference community ❑ Abuts a 303(d)-listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d)-listed stream What type of natural stream is associated with the wetland, if any? (check all that apply) ❑ Blackwater ❑ Brownwater ❑ Tidal (if tidal, check one of the following boxes) ❑ Lunar ❑ Wind ❑ Both Is the assessment area on a coastal island? ❑ Yes � No Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver? ❑ Yes � No Does the assessment area experience overbank floodinq during normal rainfall conditions? ❑ Yes � No 1. Ground Surface ConditionNegetation Condition — assessment area condition metric Check a box in each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface (GS) in the assessment area and vegetation structure (VS) in the assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable (see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable, then rate the assessment area based on evidence an effect. GS VS ❑A ❑A Not severely altered �B �B Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area (ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks, excessive sedimentation, fire-plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure alteration examples: mechanical disturbance, herbicides, salt intrusion [where appropriate], exotic species, grazing, less diversity [if appropriate], hydrologic alteration) 2. Surface and Sub-Surface Storage Capacity and Duration — assessment area condition metric Check a box in each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration (Surf) and sub-surface storage capacity and duration (Sub). Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. A ditch <_ 1 foot deep is considered to affect surface water only, while a ditch > 1 foot deep is expected to affect both surface and sub-surface water. Consider tidal flooding regime, if applicable. Surf Sub ❑A �A Water storage capacity and duration are not altered. �B ❑B Water storage capacity or duration are altered, but not substantially (typically, not sufficient to change vegetation). ❑C ❑C Water storage capacity or duration are substantially altered (typically, alteration sufficient to result in vegetation change) (examples: draining, flooding, soil compaction, filling, excessive sedimentation, underground utility lines). 3. Water Storage/Surface Relief — assessment area/wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes) Check a box in each column. Select the appropriate storage for the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT). AA WT 3a. ❑A ❑A Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water > 1 deep ❑B ❑B Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 6 inches to 1 foot deep ❑C ❑C Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep �D �D Depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep 3b. ❑A Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet ❑B Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is between 1 and 2 feet ❑C Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is less than 1 foot 4. Soil Texture/Structure — assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes) Check a box from each of the three soil property groups below. Dig soil profile in the dominant assessment area landscape feature. Make soil observations within the top 12 inches. Use most recent National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils guidance for regional indicators. 4a. ❑A Sandy soil �B Loamy or clayey soils exhibiting redoximorphic features (concentrations, depletions, or rhizospheres) ❑C Loamy or clayey soils not exhibiting redoximorphic features ❑D Loamy or clayey gleyed soil ❑E Histosol or histic epipedon 4b. �A Soil ribbon < 1 inch ❑B Soil ribbon >_ 1 inch 4c. �A No peat or muck presence ❑B A peat or muck presence 5. Discharge into Wetland — opportunity metric Check a box in each column. Consider surface pollutants or discharges (Surf) and sub-surface pollutants or discharges (Sub). Examples of sub-surface discharges include presence of nearby septic tank, underground storage tank (UST), etc. Surf Sub �A �A Little or no evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the assessment area ❑B ❑B Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the wetland and stressing, but not overwhelming the treatment capacity of the assessment area ❑C ❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges (pathogen, particulate, or soluble) entering the assessment area and potentially overwhelming the treatment capacity of the wetland (water discoloration, dead vegetation, excessive sedimentation, odor) 6. Land Use — opportunity metric (skip for non-riparian wetlands) Check all that apply (at least one box in each column). Evaluation involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. Consider sources draining to assessment area within entire upstream watershed (WS), within 5 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (5M), and within 2 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (2M). WS 5M 2M ❑A ❑A ❑A > 10% impervious surfaces ❑B ❑B ❑B Confined animal operations (or other local, concentrated source of pollutants ❑C ❑C ❑C >_ 20% coverage of pasture ❑D ❑D ❑D z 20% coverage of agricultural land (regularly plowed land) �E �E �E >_ 20% coverage of maintained grass/herb ❑F ❑F ❑F >_ 20% coverage of clear-cut land ❑G ❑G ❑G Little or no opportunity to improve water quality. Lack of opportunity may result from little or no disturbance in the watershed or hydrologic alterations that prevent drainage and/or overbank flow from affecting the assessment area. 7. Wetland Acting as Vegetated Buffer — assessment arealwetland complex condition metric (skip for non-riparian wetlands) 7a. Is assessment area within 50 feet of a tributary or other open water? ❑Yes �No If Yes, continue to 7b. If No, skip to Metric 8. Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the water body. Make buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland. Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed. 7b. How much of the first 50 feet from the bank is wetland? (Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the .water body. Make buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland. Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.) ❑A z 50 feet ❑B From 30 to < 50 feet ❑C From 15 to < 30 feet ❑D From 5 to < 15 feet ❑E < 5 feet or buffer bypassed by ditches 7c. Tributary width. If the tributary is anastomosed, combine widths of channels/braids for a total width. ❑s 15-feet wide ❑> 15-feet wide ❑ Other open water (no tributary present) 7d. Do roots of assessment area vegetation extend into the bank of the tributary/open water? ❑Yes ❑No 7e. Is stream or other open water sheltered or exposed? ❑Sheltered — adjacent open water with width < 2500 feet and no regular boat traffic. ❑Exposed — adjacent open water with width >_ 2500 feet or regular boat traffic. 8. Wetland Width at the Assessment Area — wetland type/wetland complex condition metric (evaluate WT for all marshes and Estuarine Woody Wetland only; evaluate WC for Bottomland Hardwood Forest, Headwater Forest, and Riverine Swamp Forest only) Check a box in each column for riverine wetlands only. Select the average width for the wetland type at the assessment area (WT) and the wetland complex at the assessment area (WC). See User Manual for WT and WC boundaries. WT WC ❑A ❑A >_ 100 feet �B �B From 80 to < 100 feet ❑C ❑C From 50 to < 80 feet ❑D ❑D From 40 to < 50 feet ❑E ❑E From 30 to < 40 feet ❑F ❑F From 15 to < 30 feet ❑G ❑G From 5 to < 15 feet ❑ H ❑ H < 5 feet 9. Inundation Duration — assessment area condition metric (skip for non-riparian wetlands) Answer for assessment area dominant landform. ❑A Evidence of short-duration inundation (< 7 consecutive days) �B Evidence of saturation, without evidence of inundation ❑C Evidence of long-duration inundation or very long-duration inundation (7 to 30 consecutive days or more) 10. Indicators of Deposition — assessment area condition metric (skip for non-riparian wetlands and all marshes) Consider recent deposition only (no plant growth since deposition). �A Sediment deposition is not excessive, but at approximately natural levels. ❑B Sediment deposition is excessive, but not overwhelming the wetland. ❑C Sediment deposition is excessive and is overwhelming the wetland. 11. Wetland Size — wetland type/wetland complex condition metric Check a box in each column. Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates three aspects of the wetland area: the size of the wetland type (WT), the size of the wetland complex (WC), and the size of the forested wetland (FW) (if applicable, see User Manual). See the User Manual for boundaries of these evaluation areas. If assessment area is clear-cut, select "K" for the FW column. WT WC FW (if applicable) ❑A ❑A ❑A >_ 500 acres ❑B ❑B ❑B From 100 to < 500 acres ❑C ❑C ❑C From 50 to < 100 acres ❑D ❑D ❑D From 25 to < 50 acres ❑E ❑E ❑E From 10 to < 25 acres ❑F ❑F ❑F From 5 to < 10 acres �G ❑G �G From 1 to < 5 acres ❑H ❑H ❑H From 0.5 to < 1 acre ❑I ❑I ❑I From 0.1 to < 0.5 acre ❑J ❑J ❑J From 0.01 to < 0.1 acre ❑K ❑K ❑K < 0.01 acre or assessment area is clear-cut 12. Wetland Intactness — wetland type condition metric (evaluate for Pocosins only) ❑A Pocosin is the full extent (>_ 90%) of its natural landscape size. ❑B Pocosin type is < 90% of the full extent of its natural landscape size. 13. Connectivity to Other Natural Areas — landscape condition metric 13a. Check appropriate box(es) (a box may be checked in each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates whether the wetland is well connected (Well) and/or loosely connected (Loosely) to the landscape patch, the contiguous naturally vegetated area and open water (if appropriate). Boundaries are formed by four-lane roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors the width of a four-lane road or wider, urban landscapes, maintained fields (pasture and agriculture), or open water > 300 feet wide. Well Loosely ❑A ❑A >_ 500 acres ❑B ❑B From 100 to < 500 acres ❑C ❑C From 50 to < 100 acres ❑D ❑D From 10 to < 50 acres ❑E ❑E < 10 acres �F �F Wetland type has a poor or no connection to other natural habitats 13b. Evaluate for marshes only. ❑Yes ❑No Wetland type has a surface hydrology connection to open waters/stream or tidal wetlands. 14. Edge Effect — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes and Estuarine Woody Wetland) May involve a GIS effort with field adjustment. Estimate distance from wetland type boundary to artificial edges. Artificial edges include non-forested areas >_ 40 feet wide such as fields, development, roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors, and clear-cuts. Consider the eight main points of the compass. Artificial edge occurs within 150 feet in how many directions? If the assessment area is clear cut, select option "C." ❑A 0 ❑B 1 to 4 �C 5to8 15. Vegetative Composition — assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes and Pine Flat) ❑A Vegetation is close to reference condition in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of appropriate species, with exotic plants absent or sparse within the assessment area. �B Vegetation is different from reference condition in species diversity or proportions, but still largely composed of native species characteristic of the wetland type. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clearcutting or clearing. It also includes communities with exotics present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata. ❑C Vegetation severely altered from reference in composition, or expected species are unnaturally absent (planted stands of non- characteristic species or at least one stratum inappropriately composed of a single species), or exotic species are dominant in at least one stratum. 16. Vegetative Diversity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for Non-tidal Freshwater Marsh only) ❑A Vegetation diversity is high and is composed primarily of native species (< 10°/a cover of exotics). ❑B Vegetation diversity is low or has > 10% to 50% cover of exotics. ❑C Vegetation is dominated by exotic species (> 50 % cover of exotics). 17. Vegetative Structure — assessment area/wetland type condition metric 17a. Is vegetation present? �Yes ❑No If Yes, continue to 17b. If No, skip to Metric 18. 17b. Evaluate percent coverage of assessment area vegetation for all marshes only. Skip to 17c for non-marsh wetlands. ❑A >_ 25% coverage of vegetation ❑B < 25% coverage of vegetation 17c. Check a box in each column for each stratum. Evaluate this portion of the metric for non-marsh wetlands. Consider structure in airspace above the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT) separately. AA WT T o❑A ❑A Canopy closed, or nearly closed, with natural gaps associated with natural processes m❑B ❑B Canopy present, but opened more than natural gaps U�C �C Canopy sparse or absent � ❑A ❑A � ❑B ❑B � �C �C � ❑A ❑A � ❑B ❑B � �C �C � �A �A _ ❑B ❑B ❑C ❑C Dense mid-story/sapling layer Moderate density mid-story/sapling layer Mid-story/sapling layer sparse or absent Dense shrub layer Moderate density shrub layer Shrub layer sparse or absent Dense herb layer Moderate density herb layer Herb layer sparse or absent 18. Snags — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes) ❑A Large snags (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches DBH, or large relative to species present and landscape stability). �B Not A 19. Diameter Class Distribution — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes) ❑A Majority of canopy trees have stems > 6 inches in diameter at breast height (DBH); many large trees (> 12 inches DBH) are present. ❑B Majority of canopy trees have stems between 6 and 12 inches DBH, few are > 12 inch DBH. �C Majority of canopy trees are < 6 inches DBH or no trees. 20. Large Woody Debris — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes) Include both natural debris and man-placed natural debris. ❑A Large logs (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches in diameter, or large relative to species present and landscape stability). �B Not A 21. Vegetation/Open Water Dispersion — wetland type/open water condition metric (evaluate for Non-Tidal Freshwater Marsh only) Select the figure that best describes the amount of interspersion between vegetation and open water in the growing season. Patterned areas indicate vegetated areas, while solid white areas indicate open water. ❑A ❑B ❑C ❑D er[�"�'�.,. ,� '.; s. � '�. � t, 4 i x r�"� � �"'�*' `'� �ad. �'�j"�,r�i � i��f�,��`'��}��"' ygi„ d4+� :�°#,�+'��y'1 � �r+ � f� ;�. s i �" e ru p. � ��+�� .�� R�'..� {�� t1� t's!, �v,-. �� e� r � � 6.- : F � Yi'�$ : �� . .�a�� 5 `� I J 'Y `'�`�. a 22. Hydrologic Connectivity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for riparian wetlands and Sa1tlBrackish Marsh only) Examples of activities that may severely alter hydrologic connectivity include intensive ditching, fill, sedimentation, channelization, diversion, man-made berms, beaver dams, and stream incision. Documentation required if evaluated as B, C, or D. ❑A Overbank and overland flow are not severely altered in the assessment area. ❑B Overbank flow is severely altered in the assessment area. �C Overland flow is severely altered in the assessment area. ❑D Both overbank and overland flow are severely altered in the assessment area. Notes NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0 Wetland Site Name WJ Date of Assessment 5/2/2018 Nathan Howell & Lizzy Wetland Type Headwater Forest Assessor Name/Organization Stokes-Cawley Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N) NO Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) YES Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N) YES Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N) NO Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N) NO Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N) NO Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N) NO Sub-function Rating Summary Function Sub-function Metrics Rating Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention Condition LOW Sub-surFace Storage and Retention Condition HIGH Water Quality Pathogen Change Condition MEDIUM Condition/Opportunity MEDIUM Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NO Particulate Change Condition LOW Condition/Opportunity NA Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NA Soluble Change Condition LOW Condition/Opportunity LOW Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NO Physical Change Condition LOW Condition/Opportunity LOW Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NO Pollution Change Condition NA Condition/Opportunity NA Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NA Habitat Physical Structure Condition LOW Landscape Patch Structure Condition LOW Vegetation Composition Condition MEDIUM Function Rating Summary Function Metrics Rating Hydrology Condition MEDIUM Water Quality Condition LOW Condition/Opportunity LOW Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NO Habitat Condition LOW Overall Wetland Rating �ow NC WAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0 USACE AID # NCDWR# Project Name R-5829 (US 70 Improvements) ApplicanUOwner Name NCDOT Wetland Type Level III Ecoregion River Basin County ❑ Yes � No Headwater Forest Southeastern Plains Neuse Johnston Precipitation within 48 hrs? Date of Evaluation Wetland Site Name Assessor Name/Organization Nearest Named Water Body USGS 8-Digit Catalogue Unit NCDWR Region ude/Lonqitude (deci-deqrees) 5/2/2018 WL Nathan Howell & Lizzy Moccasin Creek 03020201 35.470716, -78.166197 Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area (may not be within the assessment area) Please circle and/or make note on the last page if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference, if appropriate, in recent past (for instance, within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include, but are not limited to the following. • Hydrological modifications (examples: ditches, dams, beaver dams, dikes, berms, ponds, etc.) • Surface and sub-surface discharges into the wetland (examples: discharges containing obvious pollutants, presence of nearby septic tanks, underground storage tanks (USTs), hog lagoons, etc.) • Signs of vegetation stress (examples: vegetation mortality, insect damage, disease, storm damage, salt intrusion, etc.) • HabitaUplant community alteration (examples: mowing, clear-cutting, exotics, etc.) Is the assessment area intensively managed? � Yes ❑ No Regulatory Considerations - Were regulatory considerations evaluated? �Yes ❑No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area. ❑ Anadromous fish ❑ Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species � NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect ❑ Abuts a Primary Nursery Area (PNA) ❑ Publicly owned property ❑ N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) (including buffer) ❑ Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HQW, ORW, or Trout ❑ Designated NCNHP reference community ❑ Abuts a 303(d)-listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d)-listed stream What type of natural stream is associated with the wetland, if any? (check all that apply) ❑ Blackwater ❑ Brownwater ❑ Tidal (if tidal, check one of the following boxes) ❑ Lunar ❑ Wind ❑ Both Is the assessment area on a coastal island? ❑ Yes � No Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver? ❑ Yes � No Does the assessment area experience overbank floodinq during normal rainfall conditions? ❑ Yes � No 1. Ground Surface ConditionNegetation Condition — assessment area condition metric Check a box in each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface (GS) in the assessment area and vegetation structure (VS) in the assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable (see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable, then rate the assessment area based on evidence an effect. GS VS ❑A ❑A Not severely altered �B �B Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area (ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks, excessive sedimentation, fire-plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure alteration examples: mechanical disturbance, herbicides, salt intrusion [where appropriate], exotic species, grazing, less diversity [if appropriate], hydrologic alteration) 2. Surface and Sub-Surface Storage Capacity and Duration — assessment area condition metric Check a box in each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration (Surf) and sub-surface storage capacity and duration (Sub). Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. A ditch <_ 1 foot deep is considered to affect surface water only, while a ditch > 1 foot deep is expected to affect both surface and sub-surface water. Consider tidal flooding regime, if applicable. Surf Sub ❑A �A Water storage capacity and duration are not altered. �B ❑B Water storage capacity or duration are altered, but not substantially (typically, not sufficient to change vegetation). ❑C ❑C Water storage capacity or duration are substantially altered (typically, alteration sufficient to result in vegetation change) (examples: draining, flooding, soil compaction, filling, excessive sedimentation, underground utility lines). 3. Water Storage/Surface Relief — assessment area/wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes) Check a box in each column. Select the appropriate storage for the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT). AA WT 3a. ❑A ❑A Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water > 1 deep ❑B ❑B Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 6 inches to 1 foot deep ❑C ❑C Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep �D �D Depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep 3b. ❑A Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet ❑B Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is between 1 and 2 feet ❑C Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is less than 1 foot 4. Soil Texture/Structure — assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes) Check a box from each of the three soil property groups below. Dig soil profile in the dominant assessment area landscape feature. Make soil observations within the top 12 inches. Use most recent National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils guidance for regional indicators. 4a. ❑A Sandy soil �B Loamy or clayey soils exhibiting redoximorphic features (concentrations, depletions, or rhizospheres) ❑C Loamy or clayey soils not exhibiting redoximorphic features ❑D Loamy or clayey gleyed soil ❑E Histosol or histic epipedon 4b. �A Soil ribbon < 1 inch ❑B Soil ribbon >_ 1 inch 4c. �A No peat or muck presence ❑B A peat or muck presence 5. Discharge into Wetland — opportunity metric Check a box in each column. Consider surface pollutants or discharges (Surf) and sub-surface pollutants or discharges (Sub). Examples of sub-surface discharges include presence of nearby septic tank, underground storage tank (UST), etc. Surf Sub �A �A Little or no evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the assessment area ❑B ❑B Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the wetland and stressing, but not overwhelming the treatment capacity of the assessment area ❑C ❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges (pathogen, particulate, or soluble) entering the assessment area and potentially overwhelming the treatment capacity of the wetland (water discoloration, dead vegetation, excessive sedimentation, odor) 6. Land Use — opportunity metric (skip for non-riparian wetlands) Check all that apply (at least one box in each column). Evaluation involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. Consider sources draining to assessment area within entire upstream watershed (WS), within 5 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (5M), and within 2 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (2M). WS 5M 2M ❑A ❑A ❑A > 10% impervious surfaces ❑B ❑B ❑B Confined animal operations (or other local, concentrated source of pollutants ❑C ❑C ❑C >_ 20% coverage of pasture ❑D ❑D ❑D z 20% coverage of agricultural land (regularly plowed land) �E �E �E >_ 20% coverage of maintained grass/herb ❑F ❑F ❑F >_ 20% coverage of clear-cut land ❑G ❑G ❑G Little or no opportunity to improve water quality. Lack of opportunity may result from little or no disturbance in the watershed or hydrologic alterations that prevent drainage and/or overbank flow from affecting the assessment area. 7. Wetland Acting as Vegetated Buffer — assessment arealwetland complex condition metric (skip for non-riparian wetlands) 7a. Is assessment area within 50 feet of a tributary or other open water? ❑Yes �No If Yes, continue to 7b. If No, skip to Metric 8. Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the water body. Make buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland. Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed. 7b. How much of the first 50 feet from the bank is wetland? (Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the .water body. Make buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland. Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.) ❑A z 50 feet ❑B From 30 to < 50 feet ❑C From 15 to < 30 feet ❑D From 5 to < 15 feet ❑E < 5 feet or buffer bypassed by ditches 7c. Tributary width. If the tributary is anastomosed, combine widths of channels/braids for a total width. ❑s 15-feet wide ❑> 15-feet wide ❑ Other open water (no tributary present) 7d. Do roots of assessment area vegetation extend into the bank of the tributary/open water? ❑Yes ❑No 7e. Is stream or other open water sheltered or exposed? ❑Sheltered — adjacent open water with width < 2500 feet and no regular boat traffic. ❑Exposed — adjacent open water with width >_ 2500 feet or regular boat traffic. 8. Wetland Width at the Assessment Area — wetland type/wetland complex condition metric (evaluate WT for all marshes and Estuarine Woody Wetland only; evaluate WC for Bottomland Hardwood Forest, Headwater Forest, and Riverine Swamp Forest only) Check a box in each column for riverine wetlands only. Select the average width for the wetland type at the assessment area (WT) and the wetland complex at the assessment area (WC). See User Manual for WT and WC boundaries. WT WC ❑A ❑A >_ 100 feet �B �B From 80 to < 100 feet ❑C ❑C From 50 to < 80 feet ❑D ❑D From 40 to < 50 feet ❑E ❑E From 30 to < 40 feet ❑F ❑F From 15 to < 30 feet ❑G ❑G From 5 to < 15 feet ❑ H ❑ H < 5 feet 9. Inundation Duration — assessment area condition metric (skip for non-riparian wetlands) Answer for assessment area dominant landform. ❑A Evidence of short-duration inundation (< 7 consecutive days) �B Evidence of saturation, without evidence of inundation ❑C Evidence of long-duration inundation or very long-duration inundation (7 to 30 consecutive days or more) 10. Indicators of Deposition — assessment area condition metric (skip for non-riparian wetlands and all marshes) Consider recent deposition only (no plant growth since deposition). �A Sediment deposition is not excessive, but at approximately natural levels. ❑B Sediment deposition is excessive, but not overwhelming the wetland. ❑C Sediment deposition is excessive and is overwhelming the wetland. 11. Wetland Size — wetland type/wetland complex condition metric Check a box in each column. Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates three aspects of the wetland area: the size of the wetland type (WT), the size of the wetland complex (WC), and the size of the forested wetland (FW) (if applicable, see User Manual). See the User Manual for boundaries of these evaluation areas. If assessment area is clear-cut, select "K" for the FW column. WT WC FW (if applicable) ❑A ❑A ❑A >_ 500 acres ❑B ❑B ❑B From 100 to < 500 acres ❑C ❑C ❑C From 50 to < 100 acres ❑D ❑D ❑D From 25 to < 50 acres ❑E ❑E ❑E From 10 to < 25 acres ❑F ❑F ❑F From 5 to < 10 acres �G ❑G �G From 1 to < 5 acres ❑H ❑H ❑H From 0.5 to < 1 acre ❑I ❑I ❑I From 0.1 to < 0.5 acre ❑J ❑J ❑J From 0.01 to < 0.1 acre ❑K ❑K ❑K < 0.01 acre or assessment area is clear-cut 12. Wetland Intactness — wetland type condition metric (evaluate for Pocosins only) ❑A Pocosin is the full extent (>_ 90%) of its natural landscape size. ❑B Pocosin type is < 90% of the full extent of its natural landscape size. 13. Connectivity to Other Natural Areas — landscape condition metric 13a. Check appropriate box(es) (a box may be checked in each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates whether the wetland is well connected (Well) and/or loosely connected (Loosely) to the landscape patch, the contiguous naturally vegetated area and open water (if appropriate). Boundaries are formed by four-lane roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors the width of a four-lane road or wider, urban landscapes, maintained fields (pasture and agriculture), or open water > 300 feet wide. Well Loosely ❑A ❑A >_ 500 acres ❑B ❑B From 100 to < 500 acres ❑C ❑C From 50 to < 100 acres ❑D ❑D From 10 to < 50 acres ❑E ❑E < 10 acres �F �F Wetland type has a poor or no connection to other natural habitats 13b. Evaluate for marshes only. ❑Yes ❑No Wetland type has a surface hydrology connection to open waters/stream or tidal wetlands. 14. Edge Effect — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes and Estuarine Woody Wetland) May involve a GIS effort with field adjustment. Estimate distance from wetland type boundary to artificial edges. Artificial edges include non-forested areas >_ 40 feet wide such as fields, development, roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors, and clear-cuts. Consider the eight main points of the compass. Artificial edge occurs within 150 feet in how many directions? If the assessment area is clear cut, select option "C." ❑A 0 ❑B 1 to 4 �C 5to8 15. Vegetative Composition — assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes and Pine Flat) ❑A Vegetation is close to reference condition in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of appropriate species, with exotic plants absent or sparse within the assessment area. �B Vegetation is different from reference condition in species diversity or proportions, but still largely composed of native species characteristic of the wetland type. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clearcutting or clearing. It also includes communities with exotics present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata. ❑C Vegetation severely altered from reference in composition, or expected species are unnaturally absent (planted stands of non- characteristic species or at least one stratum inappropriately composed of a single species), or exotic species are dominant in at least one stratum. 16. Vegetative Diversity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for Non-tidal Freshwater Marsh only) ❑A Vegetation diversity is high and is composed primarily of native species (< 10°/a cover of exotics). ❑B Vegetation diversity is low or has > 10% to 50% cover of exotics. ❑C Vegetation is dominated by exotic species (> 50 % cover of exotics). 17. Vegetative Structure — assessment area/wetland type condition metric 17a. Is vegetation present? �Yes ❑No If Yes, continue to 17b. If No, skip to Metric 18. 17b. Evaluate percent coverage of assessment area vegetation for all marshes only. Skip to 17c for non-marsh wetlands. ❑A >_ 25% coverage of vegetation ❑B < 25% coverage of vegetation 17c. Check a box in each column for each stratum. Evaluate this portion of the metric for non-marsh wetlands. Consider structure in airspace above the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT) separately. AA WT T o❑A ❑A Canopy closed, or nearly closed, with natural gaps associated with natural processes m❑B ❑B Canopy present, but opened more than natural gaps U�C �C Canopy sparse or absent � ❑A ❑A � ❑B ❑B � �C �C � ❑A ❑A � ❑B ❑B � �C �C � �A �A _ ❑B ❑B ❑C ❑C Dense mid-story/sapling layer Moderate density mid-story/sapling layer Mid-story/sapling layer sparse or absent Dense shrub layer Moderate density shrub layer Shrub layer sparse or absent Dense herb layer Moderate density herb layer Herb layer sparse or absent 18. Snags — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes) ❑A Large snags (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches DBH, or large relative to species present and landscape stability). �B Not A 19. Diameter Class Distribution — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes) ❑A Majority of canopy trees have stems > 6 inches in diameter at breast height (DBH); many large trees (> 12 inches DBH) are present. ❑B Majority of canopy trees have stems between 6 and 12 inches DBH, few are > 12 inch DBH. �C Majority of canopy trees are < 6 inches DBH or no trees. 20. Large Woody Debris — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes) Include both natural debris and man-placed natural debris. ❑A Large logs (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches in diameter, or large relative to species present and landscape stability). �B Not A 21. Vegetation/Open Water Dispersion — wetland type/open water condition metric (evaluate for Non-Tidal Freshwater Marsh only) Select the figure that best describes the amount of interspersion between vegetation and open water in the growing season. Patterned areas indicate vegetated areas, while solid white areas indicate open water. ❑A ❑B ❑C ❑D er[�"�'�.,. ,� '.; s. � '�. � t, 4 i x r�"� � �"'�*' `'� �ad. �'�j"�,r�i � i��f�,��`'��}��"' ygi„ d4+� :�°#,�+'��y'1 � �r+ � f� ;�. s i �" e ru p. � ��+�� .�� R�'..� {�� t1� t's!, �v,-. �� e� r � � 6.- : F � Yi'�$ : �� . .�a�� 5 `� I J 'Y `'�`�. a 22. Hydrologic Connectivity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for riparian wetlands and Sa1tlBrackish Marsh only) Examples of activities that may severely alter hydrologic connectivity include intensive ditching, fill, sedimentation, channelization, diversion, man-made berms, beaver dams, and stream incision. Documentation required if evaluated as B, C, or D. ❑A Overbank and overland flow are not severely altered in the assessment area. ❑B Overbank flow is severely altered in the assessment area. �C Overland flow is severely altered in the assessment area. ❑D Both overbank and overland flow are severely altered in the assessment area. Notes NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0 Wetland Site Name WL Date of Assessment 5/2/2018 Nathan Howell & Lizzy Wetland Type Headwater Forest Assessor Name/Organization Stokes-Cawley Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N) NO Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) YES Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N) YES Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N) NO Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N) NO Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N) NO Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N) NO Sub-function Rating Summary Function Sub-function Metrics Rating Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention Condition LOW Sub-surFace Storage and Retention Condition HIGH Water Quality Pathogen Change Condition MEDIUM Condition/Opportunity MEDIUM Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NO Particulate Change Condition LOW Condition/Opportunity NA Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NA Soluble Change Condition LOW Condition/Opportunity LOW Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NO Physical Change Condition LOW Condition/Opportunity LOW Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NO Pollution Change Condition NA Condition/Opportunity NA Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NA Habitat Physical Structure Condition LOW Landscape Patch Structure Condition LOW Vegetation Composition Condition MEDIUM Function Rating Summary Function Metrics Rating Hydrology Condition MEDIUM Water Quality Condition LOW Condition/Opportunity LOW Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NO Habitat Condition LOW Overall Wetland Rating �ow NC WAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0 USACE AID # NCDWR# Project Name R-5829 (US 70 Improvements) ApplicanUOwner Name NCDOT Wetland Type Level III Ecoregion River Basin County ❑ Yes � No Headwater Forest Southeastern Plains Neuse Johnston Precipitation within 48 hrs? Date of Evaluation Wetland Site Name Assessor Name/Organization Nearest Named Water Body USGS 8-Digit Catalogue Unit NCDWR Region ude/Lonqitude (deci-deqrees) 5/2/2018 WO Nathan Howell & Lizzy Little River 03020201 -78.148611 Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area (may not be within the assessment area) Please circle and/or make note on the last page if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference, if appropriate, in recent past (for instance, within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include, but are not limited to the following. • Hydrological modifications (examples: ditches, dams, beaver dams, dikes, berms, ponds, etc.) • Surface and sub-surface discharges into the wetland (examples: discharges containing obvious pollutants, presence of nearby septic tanks, underground storage tanks (USTs), hog lagoons, etc.) • Signs of vegetation stress (examples: vegetation mortality, insect damage, disease, storm damage, salt intrusion, etc.) • HabitaUplant community alteration (examples: mowing, clear-cutting, exotics, etc.) Is the assessment area intensively managed? � Yes ❑ No Regulatory Considerations - Were regulatory considerations evaluated? �Yes ❑No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area. ❑ Anadromous fish ❑ Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species � NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect ❑ Abuts a Primary Nursery Area (PNA) ❑ Publicly owned property ❑ N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) (including buffer) ❑ Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HQW, ORW, or Trout ❑ Designated NCNHP reference community ❑ Abuts a 303(d)-listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d)-listed stream What type of natural stream is associated with the wetland, if any? (check all that apply) ❑ Blackwater ❑ Brownwater ❑ Tidal (if tidal, check one of the following boxes) ❑ Lunar ❑ Wind ❑ Both Is the assessment area on a coastal island? ❑ Yes � No Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver? ❑ Yes � No Does the assessment area experience overbank floodinq during normal rainfall conditions? ❑ Yes � No 1. Ground Surface ConditionNegetation Condition — assessment area condition metric Check a box in each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface (GS) in the assessment area and vegetation structure (VS) in the assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable (see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable, then rate the assessment area based on evidence an effect. GS VS ❑A ❑A Not severely altered �B �B Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area (ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks, excessive sedimentation, fire-plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure alteration examples: mechanical disturbance, herbicides, salt intrusion [where appropriate], exotic species, grazing, less diversity [if appropriate], hydrologic alteration) 2. Surface and Sub-Surface Storage Capacity and Duration — assessment area condition metric Check a box in each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration (Surf) and sub-surface storage capacity and duration (Sub). Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. A ditch <_ 1 foot deep is considered to affect surface water only, while a ditch > 1 foot deep is expected to affect both surface and sub-surface water. Consider tidal flooding regime, if applicable. Surf Sub ❑A ❑A Water storage capacity and duration are not altered. ❑B �B Water storage capacity or duration are altered, but not substantially (typically, not sufficient to change vegetation). �C ❑C Water storage capacity or duration are substantially altered (typically, alteration sufficient to result in vegetation change) (examples: draining, flooding, soil compaction, filling, excessive sedimentation, underground utility lines). 3. Water Storage/Surface Relief — assessment area/wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes) Check a box in each column. Select the appropriate storage for the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT). AA WT 3a. ❑A ❑A Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water > 1 deep ❑B ❑B Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 6 inches to 1 foot deep �C �C Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep ❑D ❑D Depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep 3b. ❑A Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet ❑B Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is between 1 and 2 feet ❑C Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is less than 1 foot 4. Soil Texture/Structure — assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes) Check a box from each of the three soil property groups below. Dig soil profile in the dominant assessment area landscape feature. Make soil observations within the top 12 inches. Use most recent National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils guidance for regional indicators. 4a. ❑A Sandy soil �B Loamy or clayey soils exhibiting redoximorphic features (concentrations, depletions, or rhizospheres) ❑C Loamy or clayey soils not exhibiting redoximorphic features ❑D Loamy or clayey gleyed soil ❑E Histosol or histic epipedon 4b. �A Soil ribbon < 1 inch ❑B Soil ribbon >_ 1 inch 4c. �A No peat or muck presence ❑B A peat or muck presence 5. Discharge into Wetland — opportunity metric Check a box in each column. Consider surface pollutants or discharges (Surf) and sub-surface pollutants or discharges (Sub). Examples of sub-surface discharges include presence of nearby septic tank, underground storage tank (UST), etc. Surf Sub �A �A Little or no evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the assessment area ❑B ❑B Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the wetland and stressing, but not overwhelming the treatment capacity of the assessment area ❑C ❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges (pathogen, particulate, or soluble) entering the assessment area and potentially overwhelming the treatment capacity of the wetland (water discoloration, dead vegetation, excessive sedimentation, odor) 6. Land Use — opportunity metric (skip for non-riparian wetlands) Check all that apply (at least one box in each column). Evaluation involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. Consider sources draining to assessment area within entire upstream watershed (WS), within 5 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (5M), and within 2 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (2M). WS 5M 2M �A �A �A > 10% impervious surfaces ❑B ❑B ❑B Confined animal operations (or other local, concentrated source of pollutants ❑C ❑C ❑C >_ 20% coverage of pasture ❑D ❑D ❑D z 20% coverage of agricultural land (regularly plowed land) ❑E ❑E ❑E >_ 20% coverage of maintained grass/herb �F �F �F >_ 20% coverage of clear-cut land ❑G ❑G ❑G Little or no opportunity to improve water quality. Lack of opportunity may result from little or no disturbance in the watershed or hydrologic alterations that prevent drainage and/or overbank flow from affecting the assessment area. 7. Wetland Acting as Vegetated Buffer — assessment arealwetland complex condition metric (skip for non-riparian wetlands) 7a. Is assessment area within 50 feet of a tributary or other open water? ❑Yes �No If Yes, continue to 7b. If No, skip to Metric 8. Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the water body. Make buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland. Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed. 7b. How much of the first 50 feet from the bank is wetland? (Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the .water body. Make buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland. Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.) ❑A z 50 feet ❑B From 30 to < 50 feet ❑C From 15 to < 30 feet ❑D From 5 to < 15 feet ❑E < 5 feet or buffer bypassed by ditches 7c. Tributary width. If the tributary is anastomosed, combine widths of channels/braids for a total width. ❑s 15-feet wide ❑> 15-feet wide ❑ Other open water (no tributary present) 7d. Do roots of assessment area vegetation extend into the bank of the tributary/open water? ❑Yes ❑No 7e. Is stream or other open water sheltered or exposed? ❑Sheltered — adjacent open water with width < 2500 feet and no regular boat traffic. ❑Exposed — adjacent open water with width >_ 2500 feet or regular boat traffic. 8. Wetland Width at the Assessment Area — wetland type/wetland complex condition metric (evaluate WT for all marshes and Estuarine Woody Wetland only; evaluate WC for Bottomland Hardwood Forest, Headwater Forest, and Riverine Swamp Forest only) Check a box in each column for riverine wetlands only. Select the average width for the wetland type at the assessment area (WT) and the wetland complex at the assessment area (WC). See User Manual for WT and WC boundaries. WT WC �A �A >_ 100 feet ❑B ❑B From 80 to < 100 feet ❑C ❑C From 50 to < 80 feet ❑D ❑D From 40 to < 50 feet ❑E ❑E From 30 to < 40 feet ❑F ❑F From 15 to < 30 feet ❑G ❑G From 5 to < 15 feet ❑ H ❑ H < 5 feet 9. Inundation Duration — assessment area condition metric (skip for non-riparian wetlands) Answer for assessment area dominant landform. �A Evidence of short-duration inundation (< 7 consecutive days) ❑B Evidence of saturation, without evidence of inundation ❑C Evidence of long-duration inundation or very long-duration inundation (7 to 30 consecutive days or more) 10. Indicators of Deposition — assessment area condition metric (skip for non-riparian wetlands and all marshes) Consider recent deposition only (no plant growth since deposition). �A Sediment deposition is not excessive, but at approximately natural levels. ❑B Sediment deposition is excessive, but not overwhelming the wetland. ❑C Sediment deposition is excessive and is overwhelming the wetland. 11. Wetland Size — wetland type/wetland complex condition metric Check a box in each column. Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates three aspects of the wetland area: the size of the wetland type (WT), the size of the wetland complex (WC), and the size of the forested wetland (FW) (if applicable, see User Manual). See the User Manual for boundaries of these evaluation areas. If assessment area is clear-cut, select "K" for the FW column. WT WC FW (if applicable) ❑A ❑A ❑A >_ 500 acres ❑B ❑B ❑B From 100 to < 500 acres ❑C ❑C ❑C From 50 to < 100 acres ❑D ❑D ❑D From 25 to < 50 acres ❑E ❑E ❑E From 10 to < 25 acres ❑F ❑F ❑F From 5 to < 10 acres �G ❑G �G From 1 to < 5 acres ❑H ❑H ❑H From 0.5 to < 1 acre ❑I ❑I ❑I From 0.1 to < 0.5 acre ❑J ❑J ❑J From 0.01 to < 0.1 acre ❑K ❑K ❑K < 0.01 acre or assessment area is clear-cut 12. Wetland Intactness — wetland type condition metric (evaluate for Pocosins only) ❑A Pocosin is the full extent (>_ 90%) of its natural landscape size. ❑B Pocosin type is < 90% of the full extent of its natural landscape size. 13. Connectivity to Other Natural Areas — landscape condition metric 13a. Check appropriate box(es) (a box may be checked in each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates whether the wetland is well connected (Well) and/or loosely connected (Loosely) to the landscape patch, the contiguous naturally vegetated area and open water (if appropriate). Boundaries are formed by four-lane roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors the width of a four-lane road or wider, urban landscapes, maintained fields (pasture and agriculture), or open water > 300 feet wide. Well Loosely ❑A �A >_ 500 acres ❑B ❑B From 100 to < 500 acres ❑C ❑C From 50 to < 100 acres �D ❑D From 10 to < 50 acres ❑E ❑E < 10 acres ❑F ❑F Wetland type has a poor or no connection to other natural habitats 13b. Evaluate for marshes only. ❑Yes ❑No Wetland type has a surface hydrology connection to open waters/stream or tidal wetlands. 14. Edge Effect — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes and Estuarine Woody Wetland) May involve a GIS effort with field adjustment. Estimate distance from wetland type boundary to artificial edges. Artificial edges include non-forested areas >_ 40 feet wide such as fields, development, roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors, and clear-cuts. Consider the eight main points of the compass. Artificial edge occurs within 150 feet in how many directions? If the assessment area is clear cut, select option "C." ❑A 0 ❑B 1 to 4 �C 5to8 15. Vegetative Composition — assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes and Pine Flat) ❑A Vegetation is close to reference condition in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of appropriate species, with exotic plants absent or sparse within the assessment area. �B Vegetation is different from reference condition in species diversity or proportions, but still largely composed of native species characteristic of the wetland type. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clearcutting or clearing. It also includes communities with exotics present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata. ❑C Vegetation severely altered from reference in composition, or expected species are unnaturally absent (planted stands of non- characteristic species or at least one stratum inappropriately composed of a single species), or exotic species are dominant in at least one stratum. 16. Vegetative Diversity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for Non-tidal Freshwater Marsh only) ❑A Vegetation diversity is high and is composed primarily of native species (< 10°/a cover of exotics). ❑B Vegetation diversity is low or has > 10% to 50% cover of exotics. ❑C Vegetation is dominated by exotic species (> 50 % cover of exotics). 17. Vegetative Structure — assessment area/wetland type condition metric 17a. Is vegetation present? �Yes ❑No If Yes, continue to 17b. If No, skip to Metric 18. 17b. Evaluate percent coverage of assessment area vegetation for all marshes only. Skip to 17c for non-marsh wetlands. ❑A >_ 25% coverage of vegetation ❑B < 25% coverage of vegetation 17c. Check a box in each column for each stratum. Evaluate this portion of the metric for non-marsh wetlands. Consider structure in airspace above the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT) separately. AA WT T o❑A ❑A Canopy closed, or nearly closed, with natural gaps associated with natural processes m❑B ❑B Canopy present, but opened more than natural gaps U�C �C Canopy sparse or absent � ❑A ❑A � ❑B ❑B � �C �C � ❑A ❑A � �B �B � ❑C ❑C � �A �A _ ❑B ❑B ❑C ❑C Dense mid-story/sapling layer Moderate density mid-story/sapling layer Mid-story/sapling layer sparse or absent Dense shrub layer Moderate density shrub layer Shrub layer sparse or absent Dense herb layer Moderate density herb layer Herb layer sparse or absent 18. Snags — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes) ❑A Large snags (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches DBH, or large relative to species present and landscape stability). �B Not A 19. Diameter Class Distribution — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes) ❑A Majority of canopy trees have stems > 6 inches in diameter at breast height (DBH); many large trees (> 12 inches DBH) are present. ❑B Majority of canopy trees have stems between 6 and 12 inches DBH, few are > 12 inch DBH. �C Majority of canopy trees are < 6 inches DBH or no trees. 20. Large Woody Debris — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes) Include both natural debris and man-placed natural debris. ❑A Large logs (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches in diameter, or large relative to species present and landscape stability). �B Not A 21. Vegetation/Open Water Dispersion — wetland type/open water condition metric (evaluate for Non-Tidal Freshwater Marsh only) Select the figure that best describes the amount of interspersion between vegetation and open water in the growing season. Patterned areas indicate vegetated areas, while solid white areas indicate open water. ❑A ❑B ❑C ❑D er[�"�'�.,. ,� '.; s. � '�. � t, 4 i x r�"� � �"'�*' `'� �ad. �'�j"�,r�i � i��f�,��`'��}��"' ygi„ d4+� :�°#,�+'��y'1 � �r+ � f� ;�. s i �" e ru p. � ��+�� .�� R�'..� {�� t1� t's!, �v,-. �� e� r � � 6.- : F � Yi'�$ : �� . .�a�� 5 `� I J 'Y `'�`�. a 22. Hydrologic Connectivity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for riparian wetlands and Sa1tlBrackish Marsh only) Examples of activities that may severely alter hydrologic connectivity include intensive ditching, fill, sedimentation, channelization, diversion, man-made berms, beaver dams, and stream incision. Documentation required if evaluated as B, C, or D. ❑A Overbank and overland flow are not severely altered in the assessment area. ❑B Overbank flow is severely altered in the assessment area. �C Overland flow is severely altered in the assessment area. ❑D Both overbank and overland flow are severely altered in the assessment area. Notes Wetland WO was created from the installation of a stromwater basin at the bottom of a drainageway. It is holding more water than would naturally occur in this scenario, due to a manmade dam about 3' tall. NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0 Wetland Site Name WO Date of Assessment 5/2/2018 Nathan Howell & Lizzy Wetland Type Headwater Forest Assessor Name/Organization Stokes-Cawley Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N) YES Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) YES Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N) YES Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N) NO Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N) NO Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N) NO Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N) NO Sub-function Rating Summary Function Sub-function Metrics Rating Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention Condition LOW Sub-surFace Storage and Retention Condition HIGH Water Quality Pathogen Change Condition MEDIUM Condition/Opportunity MEDIUM Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NO Particulate Change Condition MEDIUM Condition/Opportunity NA Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NA Soluble Change Condition LOW Condition/Opportunity LOW Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NO Physical Change Condition LOW Condition/Opportunity LOW Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NO Pollution Change Condition NA Condition/Opportunity NA Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NA Habitat Physical Structure Condition LOW Landscape Patch Structure Condition LOW Vegetation Composition Condition MEDIUM Function Rating Summary Function Metrics Rating Hydrology Condition MEDIUM Water Quality Condition LOW Condition/Opportunity LOW Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NO Habitat Condition LOW Overall Wetland Rating �ow NC WAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0 USACE AID # NCDWR# Project Name R-5829 (US 70 Improvements) ApplicanUOwner Name NCDOT Wetland Type Level III Ecoregion River Basin County ❑ Yes � No Basin Wetland Southeastern Plains Neuse on within 48 hrs? Date of Evaluation Wetland Site Name Assessor Name/Organization Nearest Named Water Body USGS 8-Digit Catalogue Unit NCDWR Region ude/Lonqitude (deci-deqrees) 5/2/2018 WU Nathan Howell & Lizzy Little River 03020201 Washington 35.451806,-78.133523 Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area (may not be within the assessment area) Please circle and/or make note on the last page if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference, if appropriate, in recent past (for instance, within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include, but are not limited to the following. • Hydrological modifications (examples: ditches, dams, beaver dams, dikes, berms, ponds, etc.) • Surface and sub-surface discharges into the wetland (examples: discharges containing obvious pollutants, presence of nearby septic tanks, underground storage tanks (USTs), hog lagoons, etc.) • Signs of vegetation stress (examples: vegetation mortality, insect damage, disease, storm damage, salt intrusion, etc.) • HabitaUplant community alteration (examples: mowing, clear-cutting, exotics, etc.) Is the assessment area intensively managed? � Yes ❑ No Regulatory Considerations - Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ❑Yes ❑No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area. ❑ Anadromous fish ❑ Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species � NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect ❑ Abuts a Primary Nursery Area (PNA) ❑ Publicly owned property ❑ N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) (including buffer) ❑ Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HQW, ORW, or Trout ❑ Designated NCNHP reference community ❑ Abuts a 303(d)-listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d)-listed stream What type of natural stream is associated with the wetland, if any? (check all that apply) ❑ Blackwater ❑ Brownwater ❑ Tidal (if tidal, check one of the following boxes) ❑ Lunar ❑ Wind ❑ Both Is the assessment area on a coastal island? ❑ Yes � No Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver? ❑ Yes � No Does the assessment area experience overbank floodinq during normal rainfall conditions? ❑ Yes � No 1. Ground Surface ConditionNegetation Condition — assessment area condition metric Check a box in each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface (GS) in the assessment area and vegetation structure (VS) in the assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable (see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable, then rate the assessment area based on evidence an effect. GS VS ❑A ❑A Not severely altered �B �B Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area (ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks, excessive sedimentation, fire-plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure alteration examples: mechanical disturbance, herbicides, salt intrusion [where appropriate], exotic species, grazing, less diversity [if appropriate], hydrologic alteration) 2. Surface and Sub-Surface Storage Capacity and Duration — assessment area condition metric Check a box in each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration (Surf) and sub-surface storage capacity and duration (Sub). Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. A ditch <_ 1 foot deep is considered to affect surface water only, while a ditch > 1 foot deep is expected to affect both surface and sub-surface water. Consider tidal flooding regime, if applicable. Surf Sub ❑A ❑A Water storage capacity and duration are not altered. ❑B ❑B Water storage capacity or duration are altered, but not substantially (typically, not sufficient to change vegetation). �C �C Water storage capacity or duration are substantially altered (typically, alteration sufficient to result in vegetation change) (examples: draining, flooding, soil compaction, filling, excessive sedimentation, underground utility lines). 3. Water Storage/Surface Relief — assessment area/wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes) Check a box in each column. Select the appropriate storage for the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT). AA WT 3a. ❑A ❑A Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water > 1 deep ❑B ❑B Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 6 inches to 1 foot deep �C �C Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep ❑D ❑D Depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep 3b. ❑A Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet ❑B Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is between 1 and 2 feet ❑C Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is less than 1 foot 4. Soil Texture/Structure — assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes) Check a box from each of the three soil property groups below. Dig soil profile in the dominant assessment area landscape feature. Make soil observations within the top 12 inches. Use most recent National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils guidance for regional indicators. 4a. ❑A Sandy soil �B Loamy or clayey soils exhibiting redoximorphic features (concentrations, depletions, or rhizospheres) ❑C Loamy or clayey soils not exhibiting redoximorphic features ❑D Loamy or clayey gleyed soil ❑E Histosol or histic epipedon 4b. �A Soil ribbon < 1 inch ❑B Soil ribbon >_ 1 inch 4c. �A No peat or muck presence ❑B A peat or muck presence 5. Discharge into Wetland — opportunity metric Check a box in each column. Consider surface pollutants or discharges (Surf) and sub-surface pollutants or discharges (Sub). Examples of sub-surface discharges include presence of nearby septic tank, underground storage tank (UST), etc. Surf Sub ❑A �A Little or no evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the assessment area ❑B ❑B Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the wetland and stressing, but not overwhelming the treatment capacity of the assessment area �C ❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges (pathogen, particulate, or soluble) entering the assessment area and potentially overwhelming the treatment capacity of the wetland (water discoloration, dead vegetation, excessive sedimentation, odor) 6. Land Use — opportunity metric (skip for non-riparian wetlands) Check all that apply (at least one box in each column). Evaluation involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. Consider sources draining to assessment area within entire upstream watershed (WS), within 5 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (5M), and within 2 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (2M). WS 5M 2M ❑A ❑A ❑A > 10% impervious surfaces ❑B ❑B ❑B Confined animal operations (or other local, concentrated source of pollutants ❑C ❑C ❑C >_ 20% coverage of pasture ❑D ❑D ❑D z 20% coverage of agricultural land (regularly plowed land) ❑E ❑E ❑E >_ 20% coverage of maintained grass/herb ❑F ❑F ❑F >_ 20% coverage of clear-cut land ❑G ❑G ❑G Little or no opportunity to improve water quality. Lack of opportunity may result from little or no disturbance in the watershed or hydrologic alterations that prevent drainage and/or overbank flow from affecting the assessment area. 7. Wetland Acting as Vegetated Buffer — assessment arealwetland complex condition metric (skip for non-riparian wetlands) 7a. Is assessment area within 50 feet of a tributary or other open water? ❑Yes �No If Yes, continue to 7b. If No, skip to Metric 8. Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the water body. Make buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland. Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed. 7b. How much of the first 50 feet from the bank is wetland? (Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the .water body. Make buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland. Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.) ❑A z 50 feet ❑B From 30 to < 50 feet ❑C From 15 to < 30 feet ❑D From 5 to < 15 feet ❑E < 5 feet or buffer bypassed by ditches 7c. Tributary width. If the tributary is anastomosed, combine widths of channels/braids for a total width. ❑s 15-feet wide ❑> 15-feet wide ❑ Other open water (no tributary present) 7d. Do roots of assessment area vegetation extend into the bank of the tributary/open water? ❑Yes ❑No 7e. Is stream or other open water sheltered or exposed? ❑Sheltered — adjacent open water with width < 2500 feet and no regular boat traffic. ❑Exposed — adjacent open water with width >_ 2500 feet or regular boat traffic. 8. Wetland Width at the Assessment Area — wetland type/wetland complex condition metric (evaluate WT for all marshes and Estuarine Woody Wetland only; evaluate WC for Bottomland Hardwood Forest, Headwater Forest, and Riverine Swamp Forest only) Check a box in each column for riverine wetlands only. Select the average width for the wetland type at the assessment area (WT) and the wetland complex at the assessment area (WC). See User Manual for WT and WC boundaries. WT WC ❑A ❑A >_ 100 feet ❑B ❑B From 80 to < 100 feet ❑C ❑C From 50 to < 80 feet �D ❑D From 40 to < 50 feet ❑E ❑E From 30 to < 40 feet ❑F ❑F From 15 to < 30 feet ❑G ❑G From 5 to < 15 feet ❑ H ❑ H < 5 feet 9. Inundation Duration — assessment area condition metric (skip for non-riparian wetlands) Answer for assessment area dominant landform. ❑A Evidence of short-duration inundation (< 7 consecutive days) ❑B Evidence of saturation, without evidence of inundation ❑C Evidence of long-duration inundation or very long-duration inundation (7 to 30 consecutive days or more) 10. Indicators of Deposition — assessment area condition metric (skip for non-riparian wetlands and all marshes) Consider recent deposition only (no plant growth since deposition). ❑A Sediment deposition is not excessive, but at approximately natural levels. ❑B Sediment deposition is excessive, but not overwhelming the wetland. ❑C Sediment deposition is excessive and is overwhelming the wetland. 11. Wetland Size — wetland type/wetland complex condition metric Check a box in each column. Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates three aspects of the wetland area: the size of the wetland type (WT), the size of the wetland complex (WC), and the size of the forested wetland (FW) (if applicable, see User Manual). See the User Manual for boundaries of these evaluation areas. If assessment area is clear-cut, select "K" for the FW column. WT WC FW (if applicable) ❑A ❑A ❑A >_ 500 acres ❑B ❑B ❑B From 100 to < 500 acres ❑C ❑C ❑C From 50 to < 100 acres ❑D ❑D ❑D From 25 to < 50 acres ❑E ❑E ❑E From 10 to < 25 acres ❑F ❑F ❑F From 5 to < 10 acres ❑G ❑G ❑G From 1 to < 5 acres ❑H ❑H ❑H From 0.5 to < 1 acre ❑I ❑I ❑I From 0.1 to < 0.5 acre �J ❑J ❑J From 0.01 to < 0.1 acre ❑K ❑K ❑K < 0.01 acre or assessment area is clear-cut 12. Wetland Intactness — wetland type condition metric (evaluate for Pocosins only) ❑A Pocosin is the full extent (>_ 90%) of its natural landscape size. ❑B Pocosin type is < 90% of the full extent of its natural landscape size. 13. Connectivity to Other Natural Areas — landscape condition metric 13a. Check appropriate box(es) (a box may be checked in each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates whether the wetland is well connected (Well) and/or loosely connected (Loosely) to the landscape patch, the contiguous naturally vegetated area and open water (if appropriate). Boundaries are formed by four-lane roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors the width of a four-lane road or wider, urban landscapes, maintained fields (pasture and agriculture), or open water > 300 feet wide. Well Loosely ❑A ❑A >_ 500 acres ❑B ❑B From 100 to < 500 acres ❑C ❑C From 50 to < 100 acres ❑D ❑D From 10 to < 50 acres ❑E ❑E < 10 acres �F �F Wetland type has a poor or no connection to other natural habitats 13b. Evaluate for marshes only. ❑Yes ❑No Wetland type has a surface hydrology connection to open waters/stream or tidal wetlands. 14. Edge Effect — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes and Estuarine Woody Wetland) May involve a GIS effort with field adjustment. Estimate distance from wetland type boundary to artificial edges. Artificial edges include non-forested areas >_ 40 feet wide such as fields, development, roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors, and clear-cuts. Consider the eight main points of the compass. Artificial edge occurs within 150 feet in how many directions? If the assessment area is clear cut, select option "C." ❑A 0 ❑B 1 to 4 �C 5to8 15. Vegetative Composition — assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes and Pine Flat) ❑A Vegetation is close to reference condition in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of appropriate species, with exotic plants absent or sparse within the assessment area. ❑B Vegetation is different from reference condition in species diversity or proportions, but still largely composed of native species characteristic of the wetland type. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clearcutting or clearing. It also includes communities with exotics present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata. �C Vegetation severely altered from reference in composition, or expected species are unnaturally absent (planted stands of non- characteristic species or at least one stratum inappropriately composed of a single species), or exotic species are dominant in at least one stratum. 16. Vegetative Diversity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for Non-tidal Freshwater Marsh only) ❑A Vegetation diversity is high and is composed primarily of native species (< 10°/a cover of exotics). ❑B Vegetation diversity is low or has > 10% to 50% cover of exotics. ❑C Vegetation is dominated by exotic species (> 50 % cover of exotics). 17. Vegetative Structure — assessment area/wetland type condition metric 17a. Is vegetation present? �Yes ❑No If Yes, continue to 17b. If No, skip to Metric 18. 17b. Evaluate percent coverage of assessment area vegetation for all marshes only. Skip to 17c for non-marsh wetlands. ❑A >_ 25% coverage of vegetation ❑B < 25% coverage of vegetation 17c. Check a box in each column for each stratum. Evaluate this portion of the metric for non-marsh wetlands. Consider structure in airspace above the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT) separately. AA WT T o❑A ❑A Canopy closed, or nearly closed, with natural gaps associated with natural processes m❑B ❑B Canopy present, but opened more than natural gaps U�C �C Canopy sparse or absent � ❑A ❑A � ❑B ❑B � �C �C � ❑A ❑A � �B �B � ❑C ❑C � ❑A ❑A _ ❑B ❑B �C �C Dense mid-story/sapling layer Moderate density mid-story/sapling layer Mid-story/sapling layer sparse or absent Dense shrub layer Moderate density shrub layer Shrub layer sparse or absent Dense herb layer Moderate density herb layer Herb layer sparse or absent 18. Snags — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes) ❑A Large snags (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches DBH, or large relative to species present and landscape stability). �B Not A 19. Diameter Class Distribution — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes) ❑A Majority of canopy trees have stems > 6 inches in diameter at breast height (DBH); many large trees (> 12 inches DBH) are present. ❑B Majority of canopy trees have stems between 6 and 12 inches DBH, few are > 12 inch DBH. �C Majority of canopy trees are < 6 inches DBH or no trees. 20. Large Woody Debris — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes) Include both natural debris and man-placed natural debris. ❑A Large logs (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches in diameter, or large relative to species present and landscape stability). �B Not A 21. Vegetation/Open Water Dispersion — wetland type/open water condition metric (evaluate for Non-Tidal Freshwater Marsh only) Select the figure that best describes the amount of interspersion between vegetation and open water in the growing season. Patterned areas indicate vegetated areas, while solid white areas indicate open water. ❑A ❑B ❑C ❑D er[�"�'�.,. ,� '.; s. � '�. � t, 4 i x r�"� � �"'�*' `'� �ad. �'�j"�,r�i � i��f�,��`'��}��"' ygi„ d4+� :�°#,�+'��y'1 � �r+ � f� ;�. s i �" e ru p. � ��+�� .�� R�'..� {�� t1� t's!, �v,-. �� e� r � � 6.- : F � Yi'�$ : �� . .�a�� 5 `� I J 'Y `'�`�. a 22. Hydrologic Connectivity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for riparian wetlands and Sa1tlBrackish Marsh only) Examples of activities that may severely alter hydrologic connectivity include intensive ditching, fill, sedimentation, channelization, diversion, man-made berms, beaver dams, and stream incision. Documentation required if evaluated as B, C, or D. ❑A Overbank and overland flow are not severely altered in the assessment area. ❑B Overbank flow is severely altered in the assessment area. ❑C Overland flow is severely altered in the assessment area. ❑D Both overbank and overland flow are severely altered in the assessment area. Notes This wetland seems to be acting as a stormwater catchment area and is receiving a fair amount of sediment from adjacent farm fields and gravel lots. NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0 Wetland Site Name WU Date of Assessment 5/2/2018 Nathan Howell & Lizzy Wetland Type Basin Wetland Assessor Name/Organization Stokes-Cawley Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N) YES Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) YES Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N) YES Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N) NO Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N) NO Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N) NO Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N) NO Sub-function Rating Summary Function Sub-function Metrics Rating Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention Condition NA Sub-surface Storage and Retention Condition NA Water Quality Pathogen Change Condition NA Condition/Opportunity NA Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NA Particulate Change Condition NA Condition/Opportunity NA Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NA Soluble Change Condition NA Condition/Opportunity NA Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NA Physical Change Condition NA Condition/Opportunity NA Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NA Pollution Change Condition LOW Condition/Opportunity LOW Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NO Habitat Physical Structure Condition LOW Landscape Patch Structure Condition LOW Vegetation Composition Condition LOW Function Rating Summary Function Metrics Rating Hydrology Condition LOW Water Quality Condition LOW Condition/Opportunity LOW Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NO Habitat Condition LOW Overall Wetland Rating �ow NC WAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0 USACE AID # NCDWR# Project Name R-5829 (US 70 Improvements) ApplicanUOwner Name NCDOT Wetland Type Level III Ecoregion River Basin County ❑ Yes � No Headwater Forest Southeastern Plains Neuse on within 48 hrs? Date of Evaluation Wetland Site Name Assessor Name/Organization Nearest Named Water Body USGS 8-Digit Catalogue Unit NCDWR Region ude/Lonqitude (deci-deqrees) 5/2/2018 WZ-Clearcut Portion Nathan Howell & Lizzy Little River 03020201 Washinqto -78.110635 Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area (may not be within the assessment area) Please circle and/or make note on the last page if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference, if appropriate, in recent past (for instance, within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include, but are not limited to the following. • Hydrological modifications (examples: ditches, dams, beaver dams, dikes, berms, ponds, etc.) • Surface and sub-surface discharges into the wetland (examples: discharges containing obvious pollutants, presence of nearby septic tanks, underground storage tanks (USTs), hog lagoons, etc.) • Signs of vegetation stress (examples: vegetation mortality, insect damage, disease, storm damage, salt intrusion, etc.) • HabitaUplant community alteration (examples: mowing, clear-cutting, exotics, etc.) Is the assessment area intensively managed? � Yes ❑ No Regulatory Considerations - Were regulatory considerations evaluated? �Yes ❑No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area. ❑ Anadromous fish ❑ Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species � NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect ❑ Abuts a Primary Nursery Area (PNA) ❑ Publicly owned property ❑ N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) (including buffer) ❑ Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HQW, ORW, or Trout ❑ Designated NCNHP reference community ❑ Abuts a 303(d)-listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d)-listed stream What type of natural stream is associated with the wetland, if any? (check all that apply) ❑ Blackwater ❑ Brownwater ❑ Tidal (if tidal, check one of the following boxes) ❑ Lunar ❑ Wind ❑ Both Is the assessment area on a coastal island? ❑ Yes � No Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver? ❑ Yes � No Does the assessment area experience overbank floodinq during normal rainfall conditions? ❑ Yes � No 1. Ground Surface ConditionNegetation Condition — assessment area condition metric Check a box in each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface (GS) in the assessment area and vegetation structure (VS) in the assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable (see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable, then rate the assessment area based on evidence an effect. GS VS ❑A ❑A Not severely altered �B �B Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area (ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks, excessive sedimentation, fire-plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure alteration examples: mechanical disturbance, herbicides, salt intrusion [where appropriate], exotic species, grazing, less diversity [if appropriate], hydrologic alteration) 2. Surface and Sub-Surface Storage Capacity and Duration — assessment area condition metric Check a box in each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration (Surf) and sub-surface storage capacity and duration (Sub). Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. A ditch <_ 1 foot deep is considered to affect surface water only, while a ditch > 1 foot deep is expected to affect both surface and sub-surface water. Consider tidal flooding regime, if applicable. Surf Sub ❑A ❑A Water storage capacity and duration are not altered. ❑B �B Water storage capacity or duration are altered, but not substantially (typically, not sufficient to change vegetation). �C ❑C Water storage capacity or duration are substantially altered (typically, alteration sufficient to result in vegetation change) (examples: draining, flooding, soil compaction, filling, excessive sedimentation, underground utility lines). 3. Water Storage/Surface Relief — assessment area/wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes) Check a box in each column. Select the appropriate storage for the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT). AA WT 3a. ❑A ❑A Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water > 1 deep ❑B ❑B Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 6 inches to 1 foot deep ❑C ❑C Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep �D �D Depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep 3b. ❑A Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet ❑B Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is between 1 and 2 feet ❑C Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is less than 1 foot 4. Soil Texture/Structure — assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes) Check a box from each of the three soil property groups below. Dig soil profile in the dominant assessment area landscape feature. Make soil observations within the top 12 inches. Use most recent National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils guidance for regional indicators. 4a. ❑A Sandy soil �B Loamy or clayey soils exhibiting redoximorphic features (concentrations, depletions, or rhizospheres) ❑C Loamy or clayey soils not exhibiting redoximorphic features ❑D Loamy or clayey gleyed soil ❑E Histosol or histic epipedon 4b. �A Soil ribbon < 1 inch ❑B Soil ribbon >_ 1 inch 4c. �A No peat or muck presence ❑B A peat or muck presence 5. Discharge into Wetland — opportunity metric Check a box in each column. Consider surface pollutants or discharges (Surf) and sub-surface pollutants or discharges (Sub). Examples of sub-surface discharges include presence of nearby septic tank, underground storage tank (UST), etc. Surf Sub �A �A Little or no evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the assessment area ❑B ❑B Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the wetland and stressing, but not overwhelming the treatment capacity of the assessment area ❑C ❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges (pathogen, particulate, or soluble) entering the assessment area and potentially overwhelming the treatment capacity of the wetland (water discoloration, dead vegetation, excessive sedimentation, odor) 6. Land Use — opportunity metric (skip for non-riparian wetlands) Check all that apply (at least one box in each column). Evaluation involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. Consider sources draining to assessment area within entire upstream watershed (WS), within 5 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (5M), and within 2 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (2M). WS 5M 2M ❑A ❑A ❑A > 10% impervious surfaces ❑B ❑B ❑B Confined animal operations (or other local, concentrated source of pollutants ❑C ❑C ❑C >_ 20% coverage of pasture �D �D �D z 20% coverage of agricultural land (regularly plowed land) ❑E ❑E ❑E >_ 20% coverage of maintained grass/herb �F �F �F >_ 20% coverage of clear-cut land ❑G ❑G ❑G Little or no opportunity to improve water quality. Lack of opportunity may result from little or no disturbance in the watershed or hydrologic alterations that prevent drainage and/or overbank flow from affecting the assessment area. 7. Wetland Acting as Vegetated Buffer — assessment arealwetland complex condition metric (skip for non-riparian wetlands) 7a. Is assessment area within 50 feet of a tributary or other open water? ❑Yes �No If Yes, continue to 7b. If No, skip to Metric 8. Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the water body. Make buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland. Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed. 7b. How much of the first 50 feet from the bank is wetland? (Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the .water body. Make buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland. Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.) ❑A z 50 feet ❑B From 30 to < 50 feet ❑C From 15 to < 30 feet ❑D From 5 to < 15 feet ❑E < 5 feet or buffer bypassed by ditches 7c. Tributary width. If the tributary is anastomosed, combine widths of channels/braids for a total width. ❑s 15-feet wide ❑> 15-feet wide ❑ Other open water (no tributary present) 7d. Do roots of assessment area vegetation extend into the bank of the tributary/open water? ❑Yes ❑No 7e. Is stream or other open water sheltered or exposed? ❑Sheltered — adjacent open water with width < 2500 feet and no regular boat traffic. ❑Exposed — adjacent open water with width >_ 2500 feet or regular boat traffic. 8. Wetland Width at the Assessment Area — wetland type/wetland complex condition metric (evaluate WT for all marshes and Estuarine Woody Wetland only; evaluate WC for Bottomland Hardwood Forest, Headwater Forest, and Riverine Swamp Forest only) Check a box in each column for riverine wetlands only. Select the average width for the wetland type at the assessment area (WT) and the wetland complex at the assessment area (WC). See User Manual for WT and WC boundaries. WT WC ❑A ❑A >_ 100 feet ❑B �B From 80 to < 100 feet ❑C ❑C From 50 to < 80 feet ❑D ❑D From 40 to < 50 feet ❑E ❑E From 30 to < 40 feet ❑F ❑F From 15 to < 30 feet ❑G ❑G From 5 to < 15 feet ❑ H ❑ H < 5 feet 9. Inundation Duration — assessment area condition metric (skip for non-riparian wetlands) Answer for assessment area dominant landform. �A Evidence of short-duration inundation (< 7 consecutive days) ❑B Evidence of saturation, without evidence of inundation ❑C Evidence of long-duration inundation or very long-duration inundation (7 to 30 consecutive days or more) 10. Indicators of Deposition — assessment area condition metric (skip for non-riparian wetlands and all marshes) Consider recent deposition only (no plant growth since deposition). �A Sediment deposition is not excessive, but at approximately natural levels. ❑B Sediment deposition is excessive, but not overwhelming the wetland. ❑C Sediment deposition is excessive and is overwhelming the wetland. 11. Wetland Size — wetland type/wetland complex condition metric Check a box in each column. Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates three aspects of the wetland area: the size of the wetland type (WT), the size of the wetland complex (WC), and the size of the forested wetland (FW) (if applicable, see User Manual). See the User Manual for boundaries of these evaluation areas. If assessment area is clear-cut, select "K" for the FW column. WT WC FW (if applicable) ❑A ❑A ❑A >_ 500 acres ❑B ❑B ❑B From 100 to < 500 acres ❑C ❑C ❑C From 50 to < 100 acres ❑D ❑D ❑D From 25 to < 50 acres ❑E ❑E ❑E From 10 to < 25 acres ❑F ❑F ❑F From 5 to < 10 acres �G ❑G �G From 1 to < 5 acres ❑H ❑H ❑H From 0.5 to < 1 acre ❑I ❑I ❑I From 0.1 to < 0.5 acre ❑J ❑J ❑J From 0.01 to < 0.1 acre ❑K ❑K ❑K < 0.01 acre or assessment area is clear-cut 12. Wetland Intactness — wetland type condition metric (evaluate for Pocosins only) ❑A Pocosin is the full extent (>_ 90%) of its natural landscape size. ❑B Pocosin type is < 90% of the full extent of its natural landscape size. 13. Connectivity to Other Natural Areas — landscape condition metric 13a. Check appropriate box(es) (a box may be checked in each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates whether the wetland is well connected (Well) and/or loosely connected (Loosely) to the landscape patch, the contiguous naturally vegetated area and open water (if appropriate). Boundaries are formed by four-lane roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors the width of a four-lane road or wider, urban landscapes, maintained fields (pasture and agriculture), or open water > 300 feet wide. Well Loosely ❑A ❑A >_ 500 acres ❑B ❑B From 100 to < 500 acres ❑C ❑C From 50 to < 100 acres �D �D From 10 to < 50 acres ❑E ❑E < 10 acres ❑F ❑F Wetland type has a poor or no connection to other natural habitats 13b. Evaluate for marshes only. ❑Yes ❑No Wetland type has a surface hydrology connection to open waters/stream or tidal wetlands. 14. Edge Effect — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes and Estuarine Woody Wetland) May involve a GIS effort with field adjustment. Estimate distance from wetland type boundary to artificial edges. Artificial edges include non-forested areas >_ 40 feet wide such as fields, development, roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors, and clear-cuts. Consider the eight main points of the compass. Artificial edge occurs within 150 feet in how many directions? If the assessment area is clear cut, select option "C." ❑A 0 ❑B 1 to 4 �C 5to8 15. Vegetative Composition — assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes and Pine Flat) ❑A Vegetation is close to reference condition in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of appropriate species, with exotic plants absent or sparse within the assessment area. �B Vegetation is different from reference condition in species diversity or proportions, but still largely composed of native species characteristic of the wetland type. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clearcutting or clearing. It also includes communities with exotics present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata. ❑C Vegetation severely altered from reference in composition, or expected species are unnaturally absent (planted stands of non- characteristic species or at least one stratum inappropriately composed of a single species), or exotic species are dominant in at least one stratum. 16. Vegetative Diversity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for Non-tidal Freshwater Marsh only) ❑A Vegetation diversity is high and is composed primarily of native species (< 10°/a cover of exotics). ❑B Vegetation diversity is low or has > 10% to 50% cover of exotics. ❑C Vegetation is dominated by exotic species (> 50 % cover of exotics). 17. Vegetative Structure — assessment area/wetland type condition metric 17a. Is vegetation present? �Yes ❑No If Yes, continue to 17b. If No, skip to Metric 18. 17b. Evaluate percent coverage of assessment area vegetation for all marshes only. Skip to 17c for non-marsh wetlands. ❑A >_ 25% coverage of vegetation ❑B < 25% coverage of vegetation 17c. Check a box in each column for each stratum. Evaluate this portion of the metric for non-marsh wetlands. Consider structure in airspace above the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT) separately. AA WT T o❑A ❑A Canopy closed, or nearly closed, with natural gaps associated with natural processes m❑B ❑B Canopy present, but opened more than natural gaps U�C �C Canopy sparse or absent � ❑A ❑A � ❑B ❑B � �C �C � ❑A ❑A � �B �B � ❑C ❑C � �A �A _ ❑B ❑B ❑C ❑C Dense mid-story/sapling layer Moderate density mid-story/sapling layer Mid-story/sapling layer sparse or absent Dense shrub layer Moderate density shrub layer Shrub layer sparse or absent Dense herb layer Moderate density herb layer Herb layer sparse or absent 18. Snags — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes) ❑A Large snags (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches DBH, or large relative to species present and landscape stability). �B Not A 19. Diameter Class Distribution — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes) ❑A Majority of canopy trees have stems > 6 inches in diameter at breast height (DBH); many large trees (> 12 inches DBH) are present. ❑B Majority of canopy trees have stems between 6 and 12 inches DBH, few are > 12 inch DBH. �C Majority of canopy trees are < 6 inches DBH or no trees. 20. Large Woody Debris — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes) Include both natural debris and man-placed natural debris. �A Large logs (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches in diameter, or large relative to species present and landscape stability). ❑B Not A 21. Vegetation/Open Water Dispersion — wetland type/open water condition metric (evaluate for Non-Tidal Freshwater Marsh only) Select the figure that best describes the amount of interspersion between vegetation and open water in the growing season. Patterned areas indicate vegetated areas, while solid white areas indicate open water. ❑A ❑B ❑C ❑D er[�"�'�.,. ,� '.; s. � '�. � t, 4 i x r�"� � �"'�*' `'� �ad. �'�j"�,r�i � i��f�,��`'��}��"' ygi„ d4+� :�°#,�+'��y'1 � �r+ � f� ;�. s i �" e ru p. � ��+�� .�� R�'..� {�� t1� t's!, �v,-. �� e� r � � 6.- : F � Yi'�$ : �� . .�a�� 5 `� I J 'Y `'�`�. a 22. Hydrologic Connectivity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for riparian wetlands and Sa1tlBrackish Marsh only) Examples of activities that may severely alter hydrologic connectivity include intensive ditching, fill, sedimentation, channelization, diversion, man-made berms, beaver dams, and stream incision. Documentation required if evaluated as B, C, or D. �A Overbank and overland flow are not severely altered in the assessment area. ❑B Overbank flow is severely altered in the assessment area. ❑C Overland flow is severely altered in the assessment area. ❑D Both overbank and overland flow are severely altered in the assessment area. Notes NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0 Wetland Site Name WZ-Clearcut Portion Date of Assessment 5/2/2018 Nathan Howell & Lizzy Wetland Type Headwater Forest Assessor Name/Organization Stokes-Cawley Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N) NO Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) YES Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N) YES Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N) NO Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N) NO Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N) NO Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N) NO Sub-function Rating Summary Function Sub-function Metrics Rating Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention Condition LOW Sub-surFace Storage and Retention Condition HIGH Water Quality Pathogen Change Condition HIGH Condition/Opportunity HIGH Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NO Particulate Change Condition HIGH Condition/Opportunity NA Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NA Soluble Change Condition MEDIUM Condition/Opportunity HIGH Opportunity Presence (Y/N) YES Physical Change Condition LOW Condition/Opportunity LOW Opportunity Presence (Y/N) YES Pollution Change Condition NA Condition/Opportunity NA Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NA Habitat Physical Structure Condition LOW Landscape Patch Structure Condition LOW Vegetation Composition Condition MEDIUM Function Rating Summary Function Metrics Rating Hydrology Condition MEDIUM Water Quality Condition HIGH Condition/Opportunity HIGH Opportunity Presence (Y/N) YES Habitat Condition LOW Overall Wetland Rating MEDIUM NC WAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0 USACE AID # NCDWR# Project Name R-5829 (US 70 Improvements) ApplicanUOwner Name NCDOT Wetland Type Level III Ecoregion River Basin County ❑ Yes � No Headwater Forest Southeastern Plains Neuse on within 48 hrs? Date of Evaluation Wetland Site Name Assessor Name/Organization Nearest Named Water Body USGS 8-Digit Catalogue Unit NCDWR Region ude/Lonqitude (deci-deqrees) 5/2/2018 WJJ Nathan Howell & Lizzy Little River 03020201 Washington 35.450697, -78.103642 Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area (may not be within the assessment area) Please circle and/or make note on the last page if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference, if appropriate, in recent past (for instance, within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include, but are not limited to the following. • Hydrological modifications (examples: ditches, dams, beaver dams, dikes, berms, ponds, etc.) • Surface and sub-surface discharges into the wetland (examples: discharges containing obvious pollutants, presence of nearby septic tanks, underground storage tanks (USTs), hog lagoons, etc.) • Signs of vegetation stress (examples: vegetation mortality, insect damage, disease, storm damage, salt intrusion, etc.) • HabitaUplant community alteration (examples: mowing, clear-cutting, exotics, etc.) Is the assessment area intensively managed? � Yes ❑ No Regulatory Considerations - Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ❑Yes ❑No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area. ❑ Anadromous fish ❑ Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species � NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect ❑ Abuts a Primary Nursery Area (PNA) ❑ Publicly owned property ❑ N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) (including buffer) ❑ Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HQW, ORW, or Trout ❑ Designated NCNHP reference community ❑ Abuts a 303(d)-listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d)-listed stream What type of natural stream is associated with the wetland, if any? (check all that apply) � Blackwater ❑ Brownwater ❑ Tidal (if tidal, check one of the following boxes) ❑ Lunar ❑ Wind ❑ Both Is the assessment area on a coastal island? ❑ Yes � No Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver? ❑ Yes � No Does the assessment area experience overbank floodinq during normal rainfall conditions? ❑ Yes � No 1. Ground Surface ConditionNegetation Condition — assessment area condition metric Check a box in each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface (GS) in the assessment area and vegetation structure (VS) in the assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable (see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable, then rate the assessment area based on evidence an effect. GS VS ❑A ❑A Not severely altered �B �B Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area (ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks, excessive sedimentation, fire-plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure alteration examples: mechanical disturbance, herbicides, salt intrusion [where appropriate], exotic species, grazing, less diversity [if appropriate], hydrologic alteration) 2. Surface and Sub-Surface Storage Capacity and Duration — assessment area condition metric Check a box in each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration (Surf) and sub-surface storage capacity and duration (Sub). Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. A ditch <_ 1 foot deep is considered to affect surface water only, while a ditch > 1 foot deep is expected to affect both surface and sub-surface water. Consider tidal flooding regime, if applicable. Surf Sub ❑A �A Water storage capacity and duration are not altered. �B ❑B Water storage capacity or duration are altered, but not substantially (typically, not sufficient to change vegetation). ❑C ❑C Water storage capacity or duration are substantially altered (typically, alteration sufficient to result in vegetation change) (examples: draining, flooding, soil compaction, filling, excessive sedimentation, underground utility lines). 3. Water Storage/Surface Relief — assessment area/wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes) Check a box in each column. Select the appropriate storage for the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT). AA WT 3a. ❑A ❑A Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water > 1 deep ❑B ❑B Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 6 inches to 1 foot deep ❑C ❑C Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep �D �D Depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep 3b. ❑A Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet ❑B Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is between 1 and 2 feet ❑C Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is less than 1 foot 4. Soil Texture/Structure — assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes) Check a box from each of the three soil property groups below. Dig soil profile in the dominant assessment area landscape feature. Make soil observations within the top 12 inches. Use most recent National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils guidance for regional indicators. 4a. ❑A Sandy soil �B Loamy or clayey soils exhibiting redoximorphic features (concentrations, depletions, or rhizospheres) ❑C Loamy or clayey soils not exhibiting redoximorphic features ❑D Loamy or clayey gleyed soil ❑E Histosol or histic epipedon 4b. �A Soil ribbon < 1 inch ❑B Soil ribbon >_ 1 inch 4c. �A No peat or muck presence ❑B A peat or muck presence 5. Discharge into Wetland — opportunity metric Check a box in each column. Consider surface pollutants or discharges (Surf) and sub-surface pollutants or discharges (Sub). Examples of sub-surface discharges include presence of nearby septic tank, underground storage tank (UST), etc. Surf Sub ❑A �A Little or no evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the assessment area �B ❑B Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the wetland and stressing, but not overwhelming the treatment capacity of the assessment area ❑C ❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges (pathogen, particulate, or soluble) entering the assessment area and potentially overwhelming the treatment capacity of the wetland (water discoloration, dead vegetation, excessive sedimentation, odor) 6. Land Use — opportunity metric (skip for non-riparian wetlands) Check all that apply (at least one box in each column). Evaluation involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. Consider sources draining to assessment area within entire upstream watershed (WS), within 5 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (5M), and within 2 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (2M). WS 5M 2M ❑A ❑A ❑A > 10% impervious surfaces ❑B ❑B ❑B Confined animal operations (or other local, concentrated source of pollutants ❑C ❑C ❑C >_ 20% coverage of pasture ❑D ❑D ❑D z 20% coverage of agricultural land (regularly plowed land) �E �E �E >_ 20% coverage of maintained grass/herb ❑F ❑F ❑F >_ 20% coverage of clear-cut land ❑G ❑G ❑G Little or no opportunity to improve water quality. Lack of opportunity may result from little or no disturbance in the watershed or hydrologic alterations that prevent drainage and/or overbank flow from affecting the assessment area. 7. Wetland Acting as Vegetated Buffer — assessment arealwetland complex condition metric (skip for non-riparian wetlands) 7a. Is assessment area within 50 feet of a tributary or other open water? �Yes ❑No If Yes, continue to 7b. If No, skip to Metric 8. Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the water body. Make buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland. Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed. 7b. How much of the first 50 feet from the bank is wetland? (Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the .water body. Make buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland. Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.) ❑A z 50 feet ❑B From 30 to < 50 feet ❑C From 15 to < 30 feet ❑D From 5 to < 15 feet �E < 5 feet or buffer bypassed by ditches 7c. Tributary width. If the tributary is anastomosed, combine widths of channels/braids for a total width. �s 15-feet wide ❑> 15-feet wide ❑ Other open water (no tributary present) 7d. Do roots of assessment area vegetation extend into the bank of the tributary/open water? �Yes ❑No 7e. Is stream or other open water sheltered or exposed? �Sheltered — adjacent open water with width < 2500 feet and no regular boat traffic. ❑Exposed — adjacent open water with width >_ 2500 feet or regular boat traffic. 8. Wetland Width at the Assessment Area — wetland type/wetland complex condition metric (evaluate WT for all marshes and Estuarine Woody Wetland only; evaluate WC for Bottomland Hardwood Forest, Headwater Forest, and Riverine Swamp Forest only) Check a box in each column for riverine wetlands only. Select the average width for the wetland type at the assessment area (WT) and the wetland complex at the assessment area (WC). See User Manual for WT and WC boundaries. WT WC ❑A ❑A >_ 100 feet ❑B ❑B From 80 to < 100 feet ❑C ❑C From 50 to < 80 feet ❑D ❑D From 40 to < 50 feet ❑E ❑E From 30 to < 40 feet ❑F ❑F From 15 to < 30 feet ❑G �G From 5 to < 15 feet ❑ H ❑ H < 5 feet 9. Inundation Duration — assessment area condition metric (skip for non-riparian wetlands) Answer for assessment area dominant landform. ❑A Evidence of short-duration inundation (< 7 consecutive days) ❑B Evidence of saturation, without evidence of inundation �C Evidence of long-duration inundation or very long-duration inundation (7 to 30 consecutive days or more) 10. Indicators of Deposition — assessment area condition metric (skip for non-riparian wetlands and all marshes) Consider recent deposition only (no plant growth since deposition). ❑A Sediment deposition is not excessive, but at approximately natural levels. �B Sediment deposition is excessive, but not overwhelming the wetland. ❑C Sediment deposition is excessive and is overwhelming the wetland. 11. Wetland Size — wetland type/wetland complex condition metric Check a box in each column. Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates three aspects of the wetland area: the size of the wetland type (WT), the size of the wetland complex (WC), and the size of the forested wetland (FW) (if applicable, see User Manual). See the User Manual for boundaries of these evaluation areas. If assessment area is clear-cut, select "K" for the FW column. WT WC FW (if applicable) ❑A ❑A ❑A >_ 500 acres ❑B ❑B ❑B From 100 to < 500 acres ❑C ❑C ❑C From 50 to < 100 acres ❑D ❑D ❑D From 25 to < 50 acres ❑E ❑E ❑E From 10 to < 25 acres ❑F ❑F ❑F From 5 to < 10 acres ❑G ❑G ❑G From 1 to < 5 acres ❑H ❑H ❑H From 0.5 to < 1 acre ❑I ❑I ❑I From 0.1 to < 0.5 acre �J ❑J �J From 0.01 to < 0.1 acre ❑K ❑K ❑K < 0.01 acre or assessment area is clear-cut 12. Wetland Intactness — wetland type condition metric (evaluate for Pocosins only) ❑A Pocosin is the full extent (>_ 90%) of its natural landscape size. ❑B Pocosin type is < 90% of the full extent of its natural landscape size. 13. Connectivity to Other Natural Areas — landscape condition metric 13a. Check appropriate box(es) (a box may be checked in each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates whether the wetland is well connected (Well) and/or loosely connected (Loosely) to the landscape patch, the contiguous naturally vegetated area and open water (if appropriate). Boundaries are formed by four-lane roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors the width of a four-lane road or wider, urban landscapes, maintained fields (pasture and agriculture), or open water > 300 feet wide. Well Loosely ❑A ❑A >_ 500 acres ❑B ❑B From 100 to < 500 acres ❑C ❑C From 50 to < 100 acres ❑D ❑D From 10 to < 50 acres ❑E ❑E < 10 acres �F �F Wetland type has a poor or no connection to other natural habitats 13b. Evaluate for marshes only. ❑Yes ❑No Wetland type has a surface hydrology connection to open waters/stream or tidal wetlands. 14. Edge Effect — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes and Estuarine Woody Wetland) May involve a GIS effort with field adjustment. Estimate distance from wetland type boundary to artificial edges. Artificial edges include non-forested areas >_ 40 feet wide such as fields, development, roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors, and clear-cuts. Consider the eight main points of the compass. Artificial edge occurs within 150 feet in how many directions? If the assessment area is clear cut, select option "C." ❑A 0 ❑B 1 to 4 �C 5to8 15. Vegetative Composition — assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes and Pine Flat) ❑A Vegetation is close to reference condition in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of appropriate species, with exotic plants absent or sparse within the assessment area. �B Vegetation is different from reference condition in species diversity or proportions, but still largely composed of native species characteristic of the wetland type. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clearcutting or clearing. It also includes communities with exotics present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata. ❑C Vegetation severely altered from reference in composition, or expected species are unnaturally absent (planted stands of non- characteristic species or at least one stratum inappropriately composed of a single species), or exotic species are dominant in at least one stratum. 16. Vegetative Diversity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for Non-tidal Freshwater Marsh only) ❑A Vegetation diversity is high and is composed primarily of native species (< 10°/a cover of exotics). ❑B Vegetation diversity is low or has > 10% to 50% cover of exotics. ❑C Vegetation is dominated by exotic species (> 50 % cover of exotics). 17. Vegetative Structure — assessment area/wetland type condition metric 17a. Is vegetation present? �Yes ❑No If Yes, continue to 17b. If No, skip to Metric 18. 17b. Evaluate percent coverage of assessment area vegetation for all marshes only. Skip to 17c for non-marsh wetlands. ❑A >_ 25% coverage of vegetation ❑B < 25% coverage of vegetation 17c. Check a box in each column for each stratum. Evaluate this portion of the metric for non-marsh wetlands. Consider structure in airspace above the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT) separately. AA WT T o❑A ❑A Canopy closed, or nearly closed, with natural gaps associated with natural processes m❑B ❑B Canopy present, but opened more than natural gaps U�C �C Canopy sparse or absent � ❑A ❑A � ❑B ❑B � �C �C � ❑A ❑A � ❑B ❑B � �C �C � ❑A ❑A _ �B �B ❑C ❑C Dense mid-story/sapling layer Moderate density mid-story/sapling layer Mid-story/sapling layer sparse or absent Dense shrub layer Moderate density shrub layer Shrub layer sparse or absent Dense herb layer Moderate density herb layer Herb layer sparse or absent 18. Snags — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes) ❑A Large snags (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches DBH, or large relative to species present and landscape stability). �B Not A 19. Diameter Class Distribution — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes) ❑A Majority of canopy trees have stems > 6 inches in diameter at breast height (DBH); many large trees (> 12 inches DBH) are present. ❑B Majority of canopy trees have stems between 6 and 12 inches DBH, few are > 12 inch DBH. �C Majority of canopy trees are < 6 inches DBH or no trees. 20. Large Woody Debris — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes) Include both natural debris and man-placed natural debris. ❑A Large logs (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches in diameter, or large relative to species present and landscape stability). �B Not A 21. Vegetation/Open Water Dispersion — wetland type/open water condition metric (evaluate for Non-Tidal Freshwater Marsh only) Select the figure that best describes the amount of interspersion between vegetation and open water in the growing season. Patterned areas indicate vegetated areas, while solid white areas indicate open water. ❑A ❑B ❑C ❑D er[�"�'�.,. ,� '.; s. � '�. � t, 4 i x r�"� � �"'�*' `'� �ad. �'�j"�,r�i � i��f�,��`'��}��"' ygi„ d4+� :�°#,�+'��y'1 � �r+ � f� ;�. s i �" e ru p. � ��+�� .�� R�'..� {�� t1� t's!, �v,-. �� e� r � � 6.- : F � Yi'�$ : �� . .�a�� 5 `� I J 'Y `'�`�. a 22. Hydrologic Connectivity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for riparian wetlands and Sa1tlBrackish Marsh only) Examples of activities that may severely alter hydrologic connectivity include intensive ditching, fill, sedimentation, channelization, diversion, man-made berms, beaver dams, and stream incision. Documentation required if evaluated as B, C, or D. �A Overbank and overland flow are not severely altered in the assessment area. ❑B Overbank flow is severely altered in the assessment area. ❑C Overland flow is severely altered in the assessment area. ❑D Both overbank and overland flow are severely altered in the assessment area. Notes NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0 Wetland Site Name WJJ Date of Assessment 5/2/2018 Nathan Howell & Lizzy Wetland Type Headwater Forest Assessor Name/Organization Stokes-Cawley Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N) NO Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) YES Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N) YES Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N) YES Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N) NO Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N) NO Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N) NO Sub-function Rating Summary Function Sub-function Metrics Rating Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention Condition LOW Sub-surFace Storage and Retention Condition HIGH Water Quality Pathogen Change Condition LOW Condition/Opportunity LOW Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NO Particulate Change Condition LOW Condition/Opportunity NA Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NA Soluble Change Condition MEDIUM Condition/Opportunity MEDIUM Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NO Physical Change Condition MEDIUM Condition/Opportunity HIGH Opportunity Presence (Y/N) YES Pollution Change Condition NA Condition/Opportunity NA Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NA Habitat Physical Structure Condition LOW Landscape Patch Structure Condition LOW Vegetation Composition Condition MEDIUM Function Rating Summary Function Metrics Rating Hydrology Condition MEDIUM Water Quality Condition LOW Condition/Opportunity MEDIUM Opportunity Presence (Y/N) YES Habitat Condition LOW Overall Wetland Rating �ow NC WAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0 USACE AID # NCDWR# Project Name R-5829 (US 70 Improvements) ApplicanUOwner Name NCDOT Wetland Type Level III Ecoregion River Basin County ❑ Yes � No Headwater Forest Southeastern Plains Neuse on within 48 hrs? Date of Evaluation Wetland Site Name Assessor Name/Organization Nearest Named Water Body USGS 8-Digit Catalogue Unit NCDWR Region ude/Lonqitude (deci-deqrees) 5/2/2018 WMM Nathan Howell & Lizzy Little River 03020201 Washinqto -78.102220 Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area (may not be within the assessment area) Please circle and/or make note on the last page if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference, if appropriate, in recent past (for instance, within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include, but are not limited to the following. • Hydrological modifications (examples: ditches, dams, beaver dams, dikes, berms, ponds, etc.) • Surface and sub-surface discharges into the wetland (examples: discharges containing obvious pollutants, presence of nearby septic tanks, underground storage tanks (USTs), hog lagoons, etc.) • Signs of vegetation stress (examples: vegetation mortality, insect damage, disease, storm damage, salt intrusion, etc.) • HabitaUplant community alteration (examples: mowing, clear-cutting, exotics, etc.) Is the assessment area intensively managed? � Yes ❑ No Regulatory Considerations - Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ❑Yes ❑No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area. ❑ Anadromous fish ❑ Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species � NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect ❑ Abuts a Primary Nursery Area (PNA) ❑ Publicly owned property ❑ N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) (including buffer) ❑ Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HQW, ORW, or Trout ❑ Designated NCNHP reference community ❑ Abuts a 303(d)-listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d)-listed stream What type of natural stream is associated with the wetland, if any? (check all that apply) ❑ Blackwater ❑ Brownwater ❑ Tidal (if tidal, check one of the following boxes) ❑ Lunar ❑ Wind ❑ Both Is the assessment area on a coastal island? ❑ Yes � No Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver? ❑ Yes � No Does the assessment area experience overbank floodinq during normal rainfall conditions? ❑ Yes � No 1. Ground Surface ConditionNegetation Condition — assessment area condition metric Check a box in each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface (GS) in the assessment area and vegetation structure (VS) in the assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable (see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable, then rate the assessment area based on evidence an effect. GS VS ❑A ❑A Not severely altered �B �B Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area (ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks, excessive sedimentation, fire-plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure alteration examples: mechanical disturbance, herbicides, salt intrusion [where appropriate], exotic species, grazing, less diversity [if appropriate], hydrologic alteration) 2. Surface and Sub-Surface Storage Capacity and Duration — assessment area condition metric Check a box in each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration (Surf) and sub-surface storage capacity and duration (Sub). Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. A ditch <_ 1 foot deep is considered to affect surface water only, while a ditch > 1 foot deep is expected to affect both surface and sub-surface water. Consider tidal flooding regime, if applicable. Surf Sub ❑A �A Water storage capacity and duration are not altered. �B ❑B Water storage capacity or duration are altered, but not substantially (typically, not sufficient to change vegetation). ❑C ❑C Water storage capacity or duration are substantially altered (typically, alteration sufficient to result in vegetation change) (examples: draining, flooding, soil compaction, filling, excessive sedimentation, underground utility lines). 3. Water Storage/Surface Relief — assessment area/wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes) Check a box in each column. Select the appropriate storage for the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT). AA WT 3a. ❑A ❑A Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water > 1 deep ❑B ❑B Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 6 inches to 1 foot deep ❑C ❑C Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep �D �D Depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep 3b. ❑A Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet ❑B Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is between 1 and 2 feet ❑C Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is less than 1 foot 4. Soil Texture/Structure — assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes) Check a box from each of the three soil property groups below. Dig soil profile in the dominant assessment area landscape feature. Make soil observations within the top 12 inches. Use most recent National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils guidance for regional indicators. 4a. ❑A Sandy soil �B Loamy or clayey soils exhibiting redoximorphic features (concentrations, depletions, or rhizospheres) ❑C Loamy or clayey soils not exhibiting redoximorphic features ❑D Loamy or clayey gleyed soil ❑E Histosol or histic epipedon 4b. �A Soil ribbon < 1 inch ❑B Soil ribbon >_ 1 inch 4c. �A No peat or muck presence ❑B A peat or muck presence 5. Discharge into Wetland — opportunity metric Check a box in each column. Consider surface pollutants or discharges (Surf) and sub-surface pollutants or discharges (Sub). Examples of sub-surface discharges include presence of nearby septic tank, underground storage tank (UST), etc. Surf Sub �A �A Little or no evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the assessment area ❑B ❑B Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the wetland and stressing, but not overwhelming the treatment capacity of the assessment area ❑C ❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges (pathogen, particulate, or soluble) entering the assessment area and potentially overwhelming the treatment capacity of the wetland (water discoloration, dead vegetation, excessive sedimentation, odor) 6. Land Use — opportunity metric (skip for non-riparian wetlands) Check all that apply (at least one box in each column). Evaluation involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. Consider sources draining to assessment area within entire upstream watershed (WS), within 5 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (5M), and within 2 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (2M). WS 5M 2M ❑A ❑A ❑A > 10% impervious surfaces ❑B ❑B ❑B Confined animal operations (or other local, concentrated source of pollutants ❑C ❑C ❑C >_ 20% coverage of pasture ❑D ❑D ❑D z 20% coverage of agricultural land (regularly plowed land) �E �E �E >_ 20% coverage of maintained grass/herb ❑F ❑F ❑F >_ 20% coverage of clear-cut land ❑G ❑G ❑G Little or no opportunity to improve water quality. Lack of opportunity may result from little or no disturbance in the watershed or hydrologic alterations that prevent drainage and/or overbank flow from affecting the assessment area. 7. Wetland Acting as Vegetated Buffer — assessment arealwetland complex condition metric (skip for non-riparian wetlands) 7a. Is assessment area within 50 feet of a tributary or other open water? ❑Yes �No If Yes, continue to 7b. If No, skip to Metric 8. Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the water body. Make buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland. Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed. 7b. How much of the first 50 feet from the bank is wetland? (Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the .water body. Make buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland. Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.) ❑A z 50 feet ❑B From 30 to < 50 feet ❑C From 15 to < 30 feet ❑D From 5 to < 15 feet ❑E < 5 feet or buffer bypassed by ditches 7c. Tributary width. If the tributary is anastomosed, combine widths of channels/braids for a total width. ❑s 15-feet wide ❑> 15-feet wide ❑ Other open water (no tributary present) 7d. Do roots of assessment area vegetation extend into the bank of the tributary/open water? ❑Yes ❑No 7e. Is stream or other open water sheltered or exposed? ❑Sheltered — adjacent open water with width < 2500 feet and no regular boat traffic. ❑Exposed — adjacent open water with width >_ 2500 feet or regular boat traffic. 8. Wetland Width at the Assessment Area — wetland type/wetland complex condition metric (evaluate WT for all marshes and Estuarine Woody Wetland only; evaluate WC for Bottomland Hardwood Forest, Headwater Forest, and Riverine Swamp Forest only) Check a box in each column for riverine wetlands only. Select the average width for the wetland type at the assessment area (WT) and the wetland complex at the assessment area (WC). See User Manual for WT and WC boundaries. WT WC ❑A ❑A >_ 100 feet ❑B ❑B From 80 to < 100 feet ❑C �C From 50 to < 80 feet ❑D ❑D From 40 to < 50 feet ❑E ❑E From 30 to < 40 feet ❑F ❑F From 15 to < 30 feet ❑G ❑G From 5 to < 15 feet ❑ H ❑ H < 5 feet 9. Inundation Duration — assessment area condition metric (skip for non-riparian wetlands) Answer for assessment area dominant landform. ❑A Evidence of short-duration inundation (< 7 consecutive days) �B Evidence of saturation, without evidence of inundation ❑C Evidence of long-duration inundation or very long-duration inundation (7 to 30 consecutive days or more) 10. Indicators of Deposition — assessment area condition metric (skip for non-riparian wetlands and all marshes) Consider recent deposition only (no plant growth since deposition). �A Sediment deposition is not excessive, but at approximately natural levels. ❑B Sediment deposition is excessive, but not overwhelming the wetland. ❑C Sediment deposition is excessive and is overwhelming the wetland. 11. Wetland Size — wetland type/wetland complex condition metric Check a box in each column. Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates three aspects of the wetland area: the size of the wetland type (WT), the size of the wetland complex (WC), and the size of the forested wetland (FW) (if applicable, see User Manual). See the User Manual for boundaries of these evaluation areas. If assessment area is clear-cut, select "K" for the FW column. WT WC FW (if applicable) ❑A ❑A ❑A >_ 500 acres ❑B ❑B ❑B From 100 to < 500 acres ❑C ❑C ❑C From 50 to < 100 acres ❑D ❑D ❑D From 25 to < 50 acres ❑E ❑E ❑E From 10 to < 25 acres ❑F ❑F ❑F From 5 to < 10 acres ❑G ❑G ❑G From 1 to < 5 acres ❑H ❑H ❑H From 0.5 to < 1 acre �I ❑I �I From 0.1 to < 0.5 acre ❑J ❑J ❑J From 0.01 to < 0.1 acre ❑K ❑K ❑K < 0.01 acre or assessment area is clear-cut 12. Wetland Intactness — wetland type condition metric (evaluate for Pocosins only) ❑A Pocosin is the full extent (>_ 90%) of its natural landscape size. ❑B Pocosin type is < 90% of the full extent of its natural landscape size. 13. Connectivity to Other Natural Areas — landscape condition metric 13a. Check appropriate box(es) (a box may be checked in each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates whether the wetland is well connected (Well) and/or loosely connected (Loosely) to the landscape patch, the contiguous naturally vegetated area and open water (if appropriate). Boundaries are formed by four-lane roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors the width of a four-lane road or wider, urban landscapes, maintained fields (pasture and agriculture), or open water > 300 feet wide. Well Loosely �A �A >_ 500 acres ❑B ❑B From 100 to < 500 acres ❑C ❑C From 50 to < 100 acres ❑D ❑D From 10 to < 50 acres ❑E ❑E < 10 acres ❑F ❑F Wetland type has a poor or no connection to other natural habitats 13b. Evaluate for marshes only. ❑Yes ❑No Wetland type has a surface hydrology connection to open waters/stream or tidal wetlands. 14. Edge Effect — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes and Estuarine Woody Wetland) May involve a GIS effort with field adjustment. Estimate distance from wetland type boundary to artificial edges. Artificial edges include non-forested areas >_ 40 feet wide such as fields, development, roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors, and clear-cuts. Consider the eight main points of the compass. Artificial edge occurs within 150 feet in how many directions? If the assessment area is clear cut, select option "C." ❑A 0 ❑B 1 to 4 �C 5to8 15. Vegetative Composition — assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes and Pine Flat) ❑A Vegetation is close to reference condition in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of appropriate species, with exotic plants absent or sparse within the assessment area. ❑B Vegetation is different from reference condition in species diversity or proportions, but still largely composed of native species characteristic of the wetland type. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clearcutting or clearing. It also includes communities with exotics present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata. �C Vegetation severely altered from reference in composition, or expected species are unnaturally absent (planted stands of non- characteristic species or at least one stratum inappropriately composed of a single species), or exotic species are dominant in at least one stratum. 16. Vegetative Diversity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for Non-tidal Freshwater Marsh only) ❑A Vegetation diversity is high and is composed primarily of native species (< 10°/a cover of exotics). ❑B Vegetation diversity is low or has > 10% to 50% cover of exotics. ❑C Vegetation is dominated by exotic species (> 50 % cover of exotics). 17. Vegetative Structure — assessment area/wetland type condition metric 17a. Is vegetation present? �Yes ❑No If Yes, continue to 17b. If No, skip to Metric 18. 17b. Evaluate percent coverage of assessment area vegetation for all marshes only. Skip to 17c for non-marsh wetlands. ❑A >_ 25% coverage of vegetation ❑B < 25% coverage of vegetation 17c. Check a box in each column for each stratum. Evaluate this portion of the metric for non-marsh wetlands. Consider structure in airspace above the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT) separately. AA WT T o❑A ❑A Canopy closed, or nearly closed, with natural gaps associated with natural processes m❑B ❑B Canopy present, but opened more than natural gaps U�C �C Canopy sparse or absent � ❑A ❑A � ❑B ❑B � �C �C � ❑A ❑A � ❑B ❑B � �C �C � �A �A _ ❑B ❑B ❑C ❑C Dense mid-story/sapling layer Moderate density mid-story/sapling layer Mid-story/sapling layer sparse or absent Dense shrub layer Moderate density shrub layer Shrub layer sparse or absent Dense herb layer Moderate density herb layer Herb layer sparse or absent 18. Snags — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes) ❑A Large snags (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches DBH, or large relative to species present and landscape stability). �B Not A 19. Diameter Class Distribution — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes) ❑A Majority of canopy trees have stems > 6 inches in diameter at breast height (DBH); many large trees (> 12 inches DBH) are present. ❑B Majority of canopy trees have stems between 6 and 12 inches DBH, few are > 12 inch DBH. �C Majority of canopy trees are < 6 inches DBH or no trees. 20. Large Woody Debris — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes) Include both natural debris and man-placed natural debris. ❑A Large logs (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches in diameter, or large relative to species present and landscape stability). �B Not A 21. Vegetation/Open Water Dispersion — wetland type/open water condition metric (evaluate for Non-Tidal Freshwater Marsh only) Select the figure that best describes the amount of interspersion between vegetation and open water in the growing season. Patterned areas indicate vegetated areas, while solid white areas indicate open water. ❑A ❑B ❑C ❑D er[�"�'�.,. ,� '.; s. � '�. � t, 4 i x r�"� � �"'�*' `'� �ad. �'�j"�,r�i � i��f�,��`'��}��"' ygi„ d4+� :�°#,�+'��y'1 � �r+ � f� ;�. s i �" e ru p. � ��+�� .�� R�'..� {�� t1� t's!, �v,-. �� e� r � � 6.- : F � Yi'�$ : �� . .�a�� 5 `� I J 'Y `'�`�. a 22. Hydrologic Connectivity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for riparian wetlands and Sa1tlBrackish Marsh only) Examples of activities that may severely alter hydrologic connectivity include intensive ditching, fill, sedimentation, channelization, diversion, man-made berms, beaver dams, and stream incision. Documentation required if evaluated as B, C, or D. �A Overbank and overland flow are not severely altered in the assessment area. ❑B Overbank flow is severely altered in the assessment area. ❑C Overland flow is severely altered in the assessment area. ❑D Both overbank and overland flow are severely altered in the assessment area. Notes NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0 Wetland Site Name WMM Date of Assessment 5/2/2018 Nathan Howell & Lizzy Wetland Type Headwater Forest Assessor Name/Organization Stokes-Cawley Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N) NO Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) YES Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N) YES Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N) NO Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N) NO Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N) NO Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N) NO Sub-function Rating Summary Function Sub-function Metrics Rating Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention Condition LOW Sub-surFace Storage and Retention Condition HIGH Water Quality Pathogen Change Condition HIGH Condition/Opportunity HIGH Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NO Particulate Change Condition LOW Condition/Opportunity NA Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NA Soluble Change Condition MEDIUM Condition/Opportunity MEDIUM Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NO Physical Change Condition LOW Condition/Opportunity LOW Opportunity Presence (Y/N) YES Pollution Change Condition NA Condition/Opportunity NA Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NA Habitat Physical Structure Condition LOW Landscape Patch Structure Condition LOW Vegetation Composition Condition LOW Function Rating Summary Function Metrics Rating Hydrology Condition MEDIUM Water Quality Condition LOW Condition/Opportunity MEDIUM Opportunity Presence (Y/N) YES Habitat Condition LOW Overall Wetland Rating �ow Appendix C Agent Authorization Form JD Request Form PJD Form Rapanos Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form urisdictional Determination ReQuest US Army Corps of Engineers Wilmingtan District This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by assigned counties can be found on-line at: http://www.saw.usace.army.miUMissions/Re u�rvPermitProgram/Contact/CountvLocator.aspx, by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager. ASHEVILLE & CHARI.OTTE REGULATORY FIELD OFFICES US Army Corps of Engineers 151 Patton Avenue, Room 208 Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006 General Number: (828) 271-7980 Fax Number: (828) 281-8120 RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE US Army Corps of Engineers 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105 Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587 General Number: (919) 554-4884 Fax Number: (919) 562-0421 INSTRUCTIONS: WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE US Army Corps of Engineers 2407 West Fifth Street Washington, North Carolina 27889 GeneralNumber: (910)251-4610 Fax Number: (252) 975-1399 WILMINGTON REGULATORY F`IELD OFFICE US Army Corps of Engineers 69 Darlington Avenue Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 Genera] Number: 910-251-4633 Fax Number: (910) 251-4025 All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G. NOTE TO CONSLTLTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H. NOTE ON PART D— PROPERTY OWNER AiJTHORIZATION: Please be aware that all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to proceed with the detennination, which may include inspection of the property when necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) ar the owner(s) authorized agent to be considered a complete request. NOTE ON PART D- NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols. NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work. Version: May 2017 Page 1 Jurisdictional Determination Request A. PARCEL INFORMATION street address: Multiple Parcels ciry, state: Princeton, NC county: Johnston & Wayne Parcel IndexNumber(s) (PIN): MUItIple PIN'S B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION Name: Chad Coqqins Mailing Address: 509 Ward B�Vd. Wilson, NC 27895 Telephone Number: 252-640-6427 Electronic Mail Address: tCCOggInS q�nCCiOt.gOV Select one: � I am the current property owner. aI am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant' � Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase � Other, please explain. C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATIONZ Name: Multiple Property Owners Mailing Address: Telephone Number: Electronic Mail Address: � Must provide completed Agent Authorization Forn�/Letter. 2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, Counry GIS/Parcel/Tax Record). Version: May 2017 Page 2 Jurisdictional Determination Request D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION3°4 By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on- site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property. Chad Coggins Print Name Capacity: ❑ Owner ❑✓ Authorized Agents 5/25/2018 Date IDocuSigned by: �C,�t,oi.�, r,4�lln,S E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable) � I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be designed to avoid all aquatic resources. � I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority. ❑✓ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting process. � I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application and the JD is to be used in the permitting process. � I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of the tide. A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization. I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel. � I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land. � Other: For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E. If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a continuation sheet. 5 Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s). Version: May 2017 Page 3 F. ❑✓ �❑ n G. n Jurisdictional Determination Request JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One) I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminarX JD for the property identified herein. A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property. PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is "preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do not expire. I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein. An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identiiies the limits of waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years (subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter OS- 02). I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information to inform my decision. ALL REQUESTS Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the review area. ❑ Size of Property or Review Area 1,934 acres. ❑ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site. Version: May 2017 Page 4 Jurisdictional Determination Request H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS aProject Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude: 35.454300 Longitude: -78.134353 � A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area. Delineation maps must be no larger than l 1x17 and should contain the following: (Corps signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been reviewed and approved).6 ■ North Arrow ■ Graphical Scale ■ Boundary of Review Area ■ Date ■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary assessment reach. For A�roved Jurisdictional Determinations: Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404 wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features. Jurisdictional non-wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries, impoundments) should be labeled as Non-Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary, open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear length of each of these features as appropriate. Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non- jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non-Jurisdictional. Please include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e. "Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage or linear length of these features as appropriate. For Preliminarv Jurisdictional Determinations: Wetland and non-wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404, Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non-wetland Waters of the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and linear length of these features as appropriate. � Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region (at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type) � Please refer to tl�e guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. http://www.saw.usace.armv.mil/Missions/Regulatorv-Permit- Pro,gram/Juri sdiction/ Version: May 2017 Page 5 ✓0 Jurisdictional Determination Request Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the Aquatic Resource Table AJDS, please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Deternunation FormB � Vicinity Map � Aerial Photograph � USGS Topographic Map � Soil Survey Map � Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps) u ✓❑ Landscape Photos (if taken) NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets � NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms � Other Assessment Forms � www.saw.usace.armv.mil/Portals/59/docs/re�ulator,��docs/JD/RGL 08-02 A�p_A_Prelim JD_Form fillable.pdf 8 Please see http://www.saw.usace.armv.mil/Missions/Re ug latorv-1'ermit-Program/Jurisdiction/ Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federal jurisdiction underthe regulatory authorities referenced above. Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website and on the Headquarters USAGE website. Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued. Version: May 2017 Page 6 Appendix 2- PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM BACKGROUND INFORMATION A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: O5I25�2O� H B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Chad Coggins C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: (USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES) State: NC county�par�sn�borougn: Johnston/Wayne �� Princeton Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): �at.: 35.454300 �ong.: -78.134353 Universal Transverse Mercator: � 7 Name of nearest waterbody: Moccasin Creek/Little River E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY): ❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date: ❑ Field Determination. Date(s): TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY JURISDICTION. Site Latitude Longitude Estimated amount Type of aquatic Geographic authority number (decimal (decimal of aquatic resource resource (i.e., wetland to which the aquatic degrees) degrees) in review area vs. non-wetland resource "may be" (acreage and linear waters) subject (i.e., Section feet, if applicable) 404 or Section 10/404) See Attached List A uatic resources in the review area which "ma be" sub'ect to re ulator 'urisdiction Estimated amount of Type of Geographic Site Number Latitude Longitude aquatic resource in aquatic authority to which review area (lf & ac) resource the aquatic resource "ma be" sub'ect Beaverdam 35.466305 -78.157471 918 linear feet Non-wetland Section 404 Creek SA 35.473082 -78.185891 538 linear feet Non-wetland Section 404 SB 35.474073 -78.180653 320 linear feet Non-wetland Section 404 SC 35.477717 -78.183234 218 linear feet Non-wetland Section 404 SD 35.468427 -78.144900 623 linear feet Non-wetland Section 404 SE 35.463534 -78.143832 4101inear feet Non-wetland Section 404 SF-I 35.461696 -78.143755 2501inear feet Non-wetland Section 404 SF-P 35.462890 -78.143341 1,0021inear feet Non-wetland Section 404 SG 35.453681 -78.128971 2041inear feet Non-wetland Section 404 SH-I 35.451977 -78.127267 164 linear feet Non-wetland Section 404 SH-P 35.453009 -78.128223 785 linear feet Non-wetland Section 404 SI 35.451919 -78.128220 257 linear feet Non-wetland Section 404 SJ-I 35.448414 -78.120199 3561inear feet Non-wetland Section 404 SJ-P 35.449703 -78.118311 1,0341inear feet Non-wetland Section 404 SK 35.449834 -78.119728 247 linear feet Non-wetland Section 404 SL-I 35.449315 -78.117057 108 linear feet Non-wetland Section 404 SL-P 35.449623 -78.117438 229 linear feet Non-wetland Section 404 SM-I 35.446336 -78.115925 245 linear feet Non-wetland Section 404 SM-P 35.446524 -78.114087 902 linear feet Non-wetland Section 404 SN 35.448359 -78.113898 3441inear feet Non-wetland Section 404 SO 35.445398 -78.112207 1,7591inear feet Non-wetland Section 404 SP 35.442554 -78.1 ll205 125 linear feet Non-wetland Section 404 SQ 35.442643 -78.111258 721inear feet Non-wetland Section 404 SR 35.447231 -78.108770 406 linear feet Non-wetland Section 404 SS 35.447799 -78.107763 254 linear feet Non-wetland Section 404 ST-I 35.448232 -78.107461 101 linear feet Non-wetland Section 404 ST-P 35.448033 -78.107818 159 linear feet Non-wetland Section 404 SU 35.449604 -78.106707 152 linear feet Non-wetland Section 404 SV 35.445167 -78.102053 1,218 linear feet Non-wetland Section 404 SW 35.450703 -78.103081 2ll linear feet Non-wetland Section 404 SX 35.449543 -78.102575 871inear feet Non-wetland Section 404 SY-I 35.441693 -78.091367 73 linear feet Non-wetland Section 404 SY-P 35.441940 -78.091208 1301inear feet Non-wetland Section 404 WA 35.473172 -78.187242 0.45 acre Wetland Section 404 WB 35.473481 -78.186200 0.18 acre Wetland Section 404 WC 35.473996 -78.182300 8.36 acres Wetland Section 404 WD 35.477775 -78.182605 1.97 acres Wetland Section 404 WE 35.471926 -78.180176 5.91 acres Wetland Section 404 WF 35.470831 -78.176806 1.55 acres Wetland Section 404 WG 35.476246 -78.177286 0.02 acre Wetland Section 404 WH 35.466571 -78.171317 0.64 acre Wetland Section 404 A uatic resources in the review area which "ma be" sub'ect to re ulator 'urisdiction (continued) Estimated amount of Type of Geographic Site Number Latitude Longitude aquatic resource in aquatic authority to which review area (lf & ac) resource the aquatic resource "ma be" sub'ect WI 35.477398 -78.171530 0.36 acre Wetland Section 404 WJ 35.472736 -78.170391 1.95 acres Wetland Section 404 WK 35.474901 -78.168072 436 acres Wetland Section 404 WL 35.470705 -78.166302 1.93 acres Wetland Section 404 WM 35.479799 -78.160874 0.08 acre Wetland Section 404 WN 35.469931 -78.162251 <0.01 acre Wetland Section 404 WO 35.467542 -78.148316 3.62 acres Wetland Section 404 WP 35.468151 -78.144612 1.86 acres Wetland Section 404 WQ 35.463669 -78.144016 2.64 acres Wetland Section 404 WR 35.460722 -78.143673 0.69 acre Wetland Section 404 WS 35.463559 -78.141761 0.84 acre Wetland Section 404 WT 35.459637 -78.137771 0.02 acre Wetland Section 404 WU 35.451844 -78.133527 0.09 acre Wetland Section 404 WV 35.452441 -78.128503 0.28 acre Wetland Section 404 WW 35.453372 -78.128447 0.32 acre Wetland Section 404 WX 35.450350 -78.117288 0.04 acre Wetland Section 404 WY 35.446424 -78.114479 0.45 acre Wetland Section 404 WZ 35.443512 -78.110828 2.52 acres Wetland Section 404 WAA 35.445114 -78.112166 1.40 acres Wetland Section 404 WBB 35.445699 -78.112106 0.01 acre Wetland Section 404 WCC 35.446257 -78.111836 0.37 acre Wetland Section 404 WDD 35.448695 -78.111727 0.54 acre Wetland Section 404 WEE 35.449062 -78.112764 0.73 acre Wetland Section 404 WFF 35.447212 -78.107113 0.45 acre Wetland Section 404 WGG 35.448181 -78.106957 0.18 acre Wetland Section 404 WHH 35.449350 -78.106542 0.04 acre Wetland Section 404 WII 35.447124 -78.105421 0.15 acre Wetland Section 404 WJJ 35.450697 -78.103642 0.01 acre Wetland Section 404 WKK 35.450475 -78.102744 0.03 acre Wetland Section 404 WLL 35.448757 -78.102983 0.98 acre Wetland Section 404 WMM 35.445991 -78.102337 0.41 acre Wetland Section 404 WNN 35.444960 -78.102005 0.05 acre Wetland Section 404 WOO 35.440972 -78.102421 1.66 acres Wetland Section 404 WPP 35.441605 -78.101081 0.39 acre Wetland Section 404 WQQ 35.440414 -78.100027 0.01 acre Wetland Section 404 WRR 35.439965 -78.096838 0.06 acre Wetland Section 404 WSS 35.442524 -78.092476 0.08 acre Wetland Section 404 WTT 35.442184 -78.092348 0.09 acre Wetland Section 404 WUU 35.442011 -78.091218 0.02 acre Wetland Section 404 WVV 35.442148 -78.090836 0.05 acre Wetland Section 404 WWW 35.439241 -78.089124 8.34 acres Wetland Section 404 WXX 35.437931 -78.084570 0.05 acre Wetland Section 404 WYY 35.475970 -78.157102 <0.01 acre Wetland Section 404 A uatic resources in the review area which "ma be" sub'ect to re ulator 'urisdiction (continued) Estimated amount of Type of Geographic Site Number Latitude Longitude aquatic resource in aquatic authority to which review area (lf & ac) resource the aquatic resource "ma be" sub'ect WZZ 35.447924 -78.108476 <0.01 acre Wetland Section 404 TA 35.473618 -78.180268 152 linear feet Non-wetland Section 404 TB 35.476990 -78.177780 248 linear feet Non-wetland Section 404 TC 35.472997 -78.168739 1,215 linear feet Non-wetland Section 404 TD 35.473033 -78.165908 855 linear feet Non-wetland Section 404 TE 35.470104 -78.166288 650 linear feet Non-wetland Section 404 TF 35.474497 -78.167581 637 linear feet Non-wetland Section 404 TG 35.474368 -78.167763 175 linear feet Non-wetland Section 404 TH 35.474391 -78.166621 S 101inear feet Non-wetland Section 404 TI 35.475447 -78.167474 33 linear feet Non-wetland Section 404 TJ 35.479855 -78.160955 116 linear feet Non-wetland Section 404 TK 35.476102 -78.158499 141 linear feet Non-wetland Section 404 TL 35.469923 -78.152391 1,2541inear feet Non-wetland Section 404 TM 35.470189 -78.150481 112 linear feet Non-wetland Section 404 TN 35.468019 -78.149994 287 linear feet Non-wetland Section 404 TO 35.467992 -78.145415 61 linear feet Non-wetland Section 404 TP 35.464258 -78.144429 268 linear feet Non-wetland Section 404 TQ 35.450240 -78.120468 247 linear feet Non-wetland Section 404 TR 35.446422 -78.116753 438 linear feet Non-wetland Section 404 TS 35.444010 -78.100924 92 linear feet Non-wetland Section 404 TT 35.442754 -78.097979 372 linear feet Non-wetland Section 404 TU 35.442056 -78.090785 98 linear feet Non-wetland Section 404 TV 35.439093 -78.080585 573 linear feet Non-wetland Section 404 Holts Pond 35.472268 -78.187807 0.68 acre Non-wetland Section 404 PA 35.476415 -78.177409 0.08 acre Non-wetland Section 404 PB 35.479017 -78.169964 0.29 acre Non-wetland Section 404 PC 35.473697 -78.160306 0.19 acre Non-wetland Section 404 PD 35.467572 -78.145971 0.47 acre Non-wetland Section 404 PE 35.464849 -78.144988 0.21 acre Non-wetland Section 404 PF 35.446566 -78.11 5682 0.04 acre Non-wetland Section 404 PG 35.441376 -78.111219 1.96 acres Non-wetland Section 404 PH 35.444405 -78.101639 0.69 acre Non-wetland Section 404 PI 35.442463 -78.091090 0.08 acre Non-wetland Section 404 PJ 35.441015 -78.101397 1.22 acres Non-wetland Section 404 PK 35.435711 -78.081347 0.60 acre Non-wetland Section 404 1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate. 2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds that there "may be"waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information: SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply) Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources below where indicated for all checked items: �■ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor: Map: 0 Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor. � Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report. � Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale: ❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps: � Corps navigable waters' study: ❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: � USGS NHD data. � USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps. ❑■ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 1:24,000 Princeton/NW Goldsboro � Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: 1994 Johnston� 1974 Wayne � National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: � State/local wetland inventory map(s): � FEMA/FIRM maps: ❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: .(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929) � Photographs: ❑ Aerial (Name & Date): or � Other (Name & Date): � Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter: � Other information (please specify): IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarilv been verified bv the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional determinations. Signature and date of Regulatory staff member completing PJD DocuSigned by: �`^""'� �"��'S 5/29/2018 Signature and date of person requesting PJD (REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature is impracticable)' � Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing an action. APPROVED JURI5DICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM U.S. Army Corps of Engineers This fonn should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section N of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook. SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD): B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: State: NC County/parish/borough: Johnston and Wayne City: Princeton Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 35.454300° N, Long. -78.134353° W. Universal Transverse Mercator: 17 Name of nearest waterbody: Little River/Moccasin Creek Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TN W) lnto which the aquatic resource flows: Little River Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): 03020201 � Check if map/diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is/are available upon request. ❑ Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc...) are associated with this action and are recorded on a different JD form. D. REVIEW PERFORMED P'OR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY): ❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date: ❑ Field Deternunation. Date(s): SECTION II: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION. There Appear to be no "navigable waters of the U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the review area. [Reqa�ired] ❑ Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide. ❑ Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate ar foreign commerce. Explain: . B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION. There are and are not "waters of the U.S." within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required] 1. Waters of the U.S. a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply): 1 ❑ TNWs, including territorial seas ❑ Wetlands adjacent to TN Ws ❑ Relatively permanent waters'- (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into 1'NWs ❑ Non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs ❑ Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs ❑ Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs ❑ Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TN Ws ❑ Impoundments of jurisdictional waters ❑ Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area: Non-wetland waters: linear feet: width (ft) and/or acres. Wetlands: acres. c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: 1987 Delineation Manual Elevation of established OIIWM (if lrnown): . 2. Non-regulated waters/wetlands (check if applicable):3 � Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional. Explain: Three sediment/stormwater basins (BA, BB, BC) and two swine CAFO lagoons (LA aod LB) were identified within the study area. ' Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section IIi below. Z For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary tUat is not a"I'N W and that typically flows year-round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally" (e.g., typically 3 months). ' Supporting documentation is presented in Section III.F. SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete Section III.A1 and Section III.D.1. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections III.A.1 and 2 and Section III.D1.; otherwise, see Section III.B below. 1. TNW Identify TNW: Summarize rationale supporting deternunation: 2. Wetland adjacent to TNW Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent": B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANI�: This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established ander Rapanos have been met. The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non-navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year-round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3 months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year-round (perennial) flow, skip to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow, sldp to Section III.D.4. A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law. If the waterbody4 is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluatio� must consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section III.B.1 for the tributary, 5ection III.B.2 for any onsiYe wetlands, and Section III.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, boYh onsiYe and offsite. The determination whether a significant nex�s exists is determined in Section III.0 below. 1. Characteristics of non-TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW (i) General Area Conditions: Watershed size: square miles Drainage area: square miles Average annual rainfall: inclies Average annual snowfall: inches (ii) Physical Characteristics: (a) Relationship with TNW: ❑ Tributary flows directly into TNW. ❑ Tributary flows through 10 (or more) tributaries before entering TNW. Project waters are 30 (or more) river iniles from TN W. Project waters are 1(or less) river miles from RPW. Project waters are 30 (or more) aerial (straight) miles from TNW. Project waters are 1(or less) aerial (straight) miles from RPW. Project waters cross or seive as state boundaries. Explain: . Identify flow route to TNW': Tributary stream order, if known: a Note that the Insriuctional Guidebook contains additional infonnation regazding swales, ditches, wasl�es, and erosional feahues generally and in the arid West. ' Flow route can Ue described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, wliich flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW. (b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that a�plv): Tributary is: ❑ Natural ❑ Artificial (man-made). Explain: ❑ Manipulated (man-altered). Explain: Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate): Average width: feet Average depth: fzet Average side slopes: Vertical (1:1 or less). Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply): ❑ Silts ❑ Sands ❑ Concrete ❑ Cobbles ❑ Gravel ❑ Muck ❑ Bedrock ❑ Vegetation. Type/% cover: ❑ Other. Explain: . Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain: Presence of run/riffle/pool complexes. Explain: . Tributary geometry: Relatively straight Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): % (c) Flow: Tributary provides for: Intermittent but not seasonal flow Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year: 20 (or greater) Describe flow regime: . Other information on duration and volume: . Surface flow is: Discrete and con�ined. Characteristics: Subsurface flow: Unlmown. Explain findings: ❑ Dye (or other) test performed: . Tributary has (check all that apply): ❑ Bed and banks ❑ OHWM� (check all indicators that apply): ❑ clear, natural line impressed on the bank ❑ ❑ changes in the character of soil ❑ ❑ shelving ❑ ❑ vegetation matted down, bent, or absent ❑ ❑ leaf litter disturbed or washed away ❑ ❑ sediment deposition ❑ ❑ water staining ❑ ❑ other (list): ❑ Discontinuous OHWM.� Explain: . the presence of litter and debris destruction of terrestrial vegetation the presence of wrack line sediment sorting scour multiple observed or predicted flow events abrupt change in plant community If factors other than the OHWM were used to detennine lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply): ❑ High Tide Line indicated by: ❑ Mean High Water Mark indicated by: ❑ oil or scum line along shore objects ❑ survey to available datum; ❑ fine shell or debris deposits (fareshore) ❑ physical markings; ❑ physical markings/characteristics ❑ vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types. ❑ tidal gauges ❑ other (list): (iii) Chemical Characteristics: Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water qualiry; general watershed characteristics, etc.). Explain: . Identify specific pollutants, if known: . �A natural or man-made discontinuity in the OHWNf does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where the OIIWM has been removed by developinent or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break. 'lbid. (iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply): ❑ Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width): . ❑ Wetland fringe. Characteristics: . ❑ Habitat for: ❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings: . ❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings: . ❑ Other environmentally-sensitive species. Explain findings: ❑ Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings: . 2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non-TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW (i) Physical Characteristics: (a) General Wetland Characteristics: Properties: Wetland size: acres Wetland type. Explain: . Wetland quality. Explain: . Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain: (b) General Flow Relationship with Non-TN W: Flow is: Intermittent flow. Explain: Surface flow is: Discrete and contined Characteristics: . Subsurface flow: Unknown. Explain findings: ❑ Dye (or other) test performed: . (c) Wetland Adjacency Deternunation with Non-TN W: ❑ Directly abutting ❑ Not directly abutting ❑ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain: ❑ Ecological connection. Explain: . ❑ Separated by berm/Uarrier. Explain: . (d) Proxinvty�Relatronshrpl to TNW Project wetlands are 30 (or more) river miles from TN W. Project waters are 30 (or more) aerial (straight) miles from TNW. Flow is from: Wetland to/from navigable waters. Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the 500-year or greater floodplain. (ii) Chemical Characteristics: Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed characteristics; etc.). Explain: . Identify specific pollutants, if known: . (iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply): ❑ Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width): . ❑ Vegetation type/percent cover. Explain: . ❑ Habitat for: ❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings: . ❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings: . ❑ Other environmentally-sensitive species. Explain findings: ❑ Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings: . 3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any) All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis: 30 (or more) Approximately ( ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis. For each wetland, specify the following: Directly abuts? (Y/N� Size (in acres) Directiv abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres� Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed: . C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW. Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not Gmited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or outside of a tloodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus. Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapunos Guidance and discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example: • Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW? • Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW? • Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that support downstream foodwebs? • Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or biological integrity of the T'NW? Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to oceur should be documented below: 1. Significant nexus �ndings for non-RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III.D: . 2. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non-RPW flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III.D: . 3. Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III.D: . D. DETERMiNATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY): 1. TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area: ❑ TNWs: linear feet width (ft), Or, acres. ❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres. 2. RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs. ❑ Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year-round are jui�sdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that tributary is perennial: . � Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows seasonally: . Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply): ❑ Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft). ❑ Other non-wetland waters: acres. Identify type(s) of waters: . 3. Non-RPWsa that flow direcdy or indirectly into TNWs. ❑ Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TN W, and it has a significant nexus with a T'NW is jurisdictionaL Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C. Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply): ❑ Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft). ❑ Other non-wetland waters: acres. Identify type(s) of waters: . 4. Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs. ❑ Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands. ❑ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year-round. Provide data and rationale indicating that tributary is perennial in Sectiou III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is direcdy abutting an RPW: . ❑ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is seasonal in Section IILB and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly abutting an RPW: . Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres. 5. Wetlands adjacent to but oot directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs. ❑ Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a T'NW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section IILC. Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres. 6. Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly iuto TNWs. ❑ Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a T'NW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section IILC. Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres. 7. Impoundments of jurisdictional waters y As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional. ❑ Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or ❑ Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1-6), or ❑ Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below). E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA-STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE, DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):lo ❑ which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes. ❑ from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign corrunerce. ❑ which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce. ❑ Interstate isolated waters. Explain: . ❑ Other factors. Explain: . Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determinatiou: $See Footnote # 3. 9 To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III.D.6 of the Instructional Guidebook. 10 Prior to asserHng or dectining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos. Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply): ❑ Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft). ❑ Other non-wetland waters: acres. Identify type(s) of waters: . ❑ Wetlands: acres. F. NON-JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY): ❑ If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements. � Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (ar foreign) commerce. ❑ Priar to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solelv on the "Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR). � Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain:Three sediment basins (BA, BB, BC) and two swine CAFO lagoons (LA and LB) with no significant nexus were ide�tified within the study area. ❑ Other: (explain, if not covered above): . Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR factors (i.e., presence of inigratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional judgment (check all that apply): ❑ Non-wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft). ❑ Lakes/ponds: acres. ❑ Other non-wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource: . ❑ Wetlands: acres. Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply): ❑ Non-wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft). ❑ Lakes/ponds: acres. � Other non-wetland waters: 1.64 acres. List type of aquatic resource: Sediment/stormwater basins and swine CAFO lagoons. ❑ Wetlands: acres. SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES. A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked and requested, appropriately reference sources below): � Maps, plans, plots ar plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant: . � Data sheets prepared/submitted by ar on behalf of the applicant/consultant. ❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report. ❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. ❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps: . ❑ Corps navigable waters' study: . ❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: . ❑ USGS NHD data. ❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps. � U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:1:24,000 Princeton and Northwest Goldsbaro. � USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: 1974 Wayne County and 1994 Johnston County Soil Survey. ❑ National wetlands inventory inap(s). Cite name: . ❑ State/Local wetland inventory inap(s): . ❑ FEMA/FIRM maps: . ❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929) ❑ Photographs: ❑ Aerial (Name & Date): . or ❑ Other (Name & Date): . ❑ Previous deternvnation(s). File no. and date of response letter: . ❑ Applicable/supporting case law: . ❑ Applicable/supporting scientific literature: . ❑ Other information (please specify): . B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD: