HomeMy WebLinkAbout20170023 Ver 2_Permit Renewal Request_20180425Environmental Consultants,
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104, Raleigh, NC 27615 • Phone: (919) 846-5900
sandec.com
To: US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Attn: Tasha Alexander
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
From: Bob Zarzecki
Soil & Environmental Consultants, P.A.
April 25, 2018
S&EC Project # 12870
N.C. Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
Attn: Karen Higgins
Archdale Building — 9th Floor
512 North Salisbury Street,
Raleigh, NC 27604
Re: Lewis Property — 4304 Long Branch Trail, Raleigh, Wake County, NC
Permit Renewal Request (SAW -2016-01404 / DWR#17-0023)
On behalf of the owner, Ms. Deborah R. Lewis, we hereby provide notice that the previously
permitted wetland fill impacts authorized under the attached USA CE General Permit Verification
letter SAW -2016-01404 dated 2/21/17 and N.C. DWR Approval DWR#17-0023 dated January 19,
2017 have not yet occurred.
Ms. Lewis understands that the NWT and GC associated with these approvals have expired and
thereby her authorization to fill the wetlands has expired.
As such, Ms. Lewis hereby requests the renewal of these approvals under the current 2017
NWP 18 and GC4139. The information and plans provided in the attached PCN application dated
12-30-2016 have not changed. The total requested wetland impacts remain the same at 0.098
acres.
A copy of this letter and new $240.00 DWR application fee will be hand delivered to DWR.
Please contact me at (919) 846-5900 if you have any questions or require additional information.
Attached: USACE General Permit Verification letter SAW -2016-01404 dated 2121117
N.C. DWR Approval DWR#17-0023 dated January 19, 2017
PCN application dated 12-30-2016
SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS. PA
27509
DATE INVOICE NO.
COMMENT
AMOUNT
NETAMOUNT
04/25/2018 9904252018
DWR #17-0023v2 application Fee jobl2870.W1
240.00
y 'rep,
ii%'..
DATE 04/25/18 VENDOR NC Division of Water Resources
TOTAL
240.00
2750.9
SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS,
8412 FALLS OF NEUSE,;STE. 104
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27615 DATE
OU inirn 0AC cnnn cnv mini one nAC'7 RALEIGH'. NC276OM24b
o ° o °o
o° 0 or 0 o X1'000 2 7 50 901: 2 5 3 7 16 2 11: 2 10 1 2 7 4 1 3130
U.S. ARMYWILPS ONDISTRICT NGNEERS COPY
Action Id. 2016-01404 County: Wake U.S.G.S. Quad: NC -Raleigh East
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Permittee: Deborah R. Lewis
Address: 4304 Long Branch Trail
Raleigh, NC 27604
Telephone Number: 267-496-6947
E-mail: deborahlewis890Email.com
iI II 'I' T
'J
FES 27 2017
Size (acres) 2.7 Nearest Town Raleigh
Nearest Waterway Rtocl y Creek River Basin Neuse --
USGS HUC 0302020_1 Coordinates Latitude: 35.828404
Longitude: -78.546043
Location description: The proiect is located at 4304 Long Branch Trail, Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina.
Description of projects area and activity: This verification authorizes impacts to 0.098 acre of wetlands for residential
improvements._ _Fill will be placed into a portion of the wetlands behind the house.
Applicable Law(s): ® Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344)
❑ Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403)
Authorization: Nationwide Permit 18. Minor Discharges
SEE ATTACHED NWP GENERAL, REGIONAL, AND/OR SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Your work is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the enclosed
Conditions, your application signed and dated 12/30/2016, and the enclosed plans 2 of 2 submitted on 12/30/2016. Any violation
of the attached conditions or deviation from your submitted plans may subject the permittee to a stop work order, a restoration
order, a Class I administrative penalty, and/or appropriate legal action.
This verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below unless the nationwide authorization is modified, suspended
or revoked. If, prior to the expiration date identified below, the nationwide permit authorization is reissued and/or modified, this
verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below, provided it complies with all requirements of the modified
nationwide permit. If the nationwide permit authorization expires or is suspended, revoked, or is modified, such that the activity would
no longer comply with the terms and conditions of the nationwide permit, activities which have commenced (i.e., are under construction)
or are under contract to commence in reliance upon the nationwide permit, will remain authorized provided the activity is completed
within twelve months of the date of the nationwide permit's expiration, modification or revocation, unless discretionary authority has
been exercised on a case-by-case basis to modify, suspend or revoke the authorization.
Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality Certification. You
should contact the NC Division of Water Resources (telephone 919-807-6300) to determine Section 401 requirements.
For activities occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA), prior
to beginning work you must contact the N.C. Division of Coastal Management Morehead City, NC, at (252) 808-2808.
This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal, State
or local approvals/permits.
If there are any questions regarding this verification, any of the conditions of the Permit, or the Corps of Engineers regulatory program,
please contact Tasha Alexander/al 91 -554-4884,!Jxt.45 or tasha.l.alexantYer(a)usace.army.mil.
Corps Regulatory Officials�l Date: 2/21/2017
Expiration Date of Verificati n 3/18/2017
2016-01404
Determination of Jurisdiction:
A. ❑ There are waters, including wetlands, on the above described project area that may be subject to Section 404 of the. Clean
Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). This preliminary
determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part
331). However, you may request an approved JD, which is an appealable action, by contacting the Corps district for further
instruction. Please note, if work is authorized by either a general or nationwide permit, and you wish to request an appeal of an
approved JD, the appeal must be received by the Corps and the appeal process concluded prior to the commencement of any work
in waters of the United States and prior to any work that could alter the hydrology of waters of the United States.
B. ❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC §
1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to
exceed five years from the date of this notification.
C. ® There are waters, including wetlands, within the above described project area that are subject to the permit requirements of
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations,
this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
D. ❑ The jurisdictional areas within the above described project area have been identified under a previous action. Please reference
jurisdictional determination issued Date. Action ID: AID.
Iasis For Determination: See the approwd 'uriNdictional determination form dated 2/2112017.
Remarks: None.
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site
identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security
Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request
a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdiction determinations as indicated in B and C
above).
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdiction determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. if you request to appeal this determination you
must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Jason Steele, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 10M 15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: (404) 562-5137
M order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that i as been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, iAVt be received at the above address by 4/22/2017.
**It is not necessary to submit fnAA fo4to the Divisigq O qe if you do not objectA the determination in this correspondence.**
Corps Regulatory Official:
Date of JD: 2/21/2017
Expiration Date of JD: 2/21/2022
2016-01404
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at
http://corpsmapu.usace.anny.mil/cin_apex/fTp=136:4:0
Copy furnished:
Agent: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Bob Zarzecki
Address: 8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104
Raleigh, NC 27615
Telephone Number: 919-846-5900
E-mail: bzarzeckiAsandec.com
2016-01404
Special Conditions
1. Please be advised that if additional impacts to waters of the U.S., either on this property or on/adjacent to
this property and associated with this project/activity, are proposed at a later date, those impacts will be
combined with the current impacts to waters of the U.S. and will be reviewed cumulatively. Generally,
compensatory mitigation will be required if individual or cumulative (i.e., past and present) losses or
degradation of waters of the U.S. are greater than 150 linear feet of perennial or intermittent stream
channel and/or 0.1 acre of wetland. Additionally, cumulative impacts that result in the loss or degradation
of greater than 300 linear feet of perennial or intermittent* stream channel, and/or 0.5 acre of wetland, will
be processed under an Individual Permit. This verification of the use of the Nationwide Permit Program
for this project does not imply that this office will necessarily approve any future proposal to impact waters
of the U.S. on this property and/or associated with this project/activity.
* The District Commander has the ability to waive the 300 linear foot limit for intermittent streams on a
case-by-case basis. All requests for waiver must be in writing and shall include rationale for the request.
2. A pre -construction inspection of the project site must be performed by the Army Corps of Engineers,
Wilmington District (USACE), prior to beginning work within jurisdictional waters. The applicant must
contact the USAGE to establish a suitable date and time to conduct the pre -construction inspection. The
applicant and construction contractor who will be grading and filling, must be present during the pre -
construction inspection. Also, the exact footprint of the proposed fill must be demarcated for the pre -
construction meeting. Geographic coordinates (latitude and longitude), for the project endpoints
(upstream and downstream locations) must be provided before or on the pre -construction inspection date.
The coordinates must be provided in North American Datum 1983(NAD83), decimal degree format.
3. The applicant must notify the USAGE, in writing, no later than 30 days after completion of work within
jurisdictional waters. The applicant will also provide post -construction photographs of the filled area.
Specific requirements for the photographs will be discussed during the pre -construction meeting
referenced in #2 above. The notification and photographs must be sent to Tasha Alexander, Regulatory
Project Manager, Raleigh Regulatory Field Office, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 3331 Heritage Trade
Drive, Suite 105, Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587.
ROCKY
AL FENCE
R UNE
7! rroject wo.:
4344 LONG BRANCH TRAIL �12g�o '
WAKE CO. , NC �I1En`: �D7P5' soil at Environmental consultants, PA
UEEIDKM K. UVA5
8412 FalkwfNeu.w Rd.,Suite II#! Raleigh, \milt Cnolina 27615
ceL L•dc: .er,4
EXISTING CONDITIONS Plwm:(919)846•SXrO Fax: (919)34G-9467
QF � _.SmdfiC.cun1
BUFFALOE RD,
o
C ONc
a I eRq
NCy
v
51 TE
A
x
VI CIN
IT #SAP
N. T. S.
ROCKY
AL FENCE
R UNE
7! rroject wo.:
4344 LONG BRANCH TRAIL �12g�o '
WAKE CO. , NC �I1En`: �D7P5' soil at Environmental consultants, PA
UEEIDKM K. UVA5
8412 FalkwfNeu.w Rd.,Suite II#! Raleigh, \milt Cnolina 27615
ceL L•dc: .er,4
EXISTING CONDITIONS Plwm:(919)846•SXrO Fax: (919)34G-9467
QF � _.SmdfiC.cun1
SAMPLE
Site
Cowardin
Estimated amount of
Class of aquatic
Latitude
Longitude
aquatic resource in
number
Class
review area
reSonrce
]
35.827719
-78.545706
P -FO -1
.01 Acres
non -section 10 —wetland
2
35.828068
-78.545777
P -FO -1 i
.25 Acres
non -section 10 —wetland
3
35.827767
-78.546296
P -FO -1
.05 Acres
non -section 10 —wetland
4
35.827668
-78.545969
R -3 -SB -4
375 LF
non -section 10 — Stream
5
35.827856
-78.546323
R -3 -SB -5
137 LF
non -section 10 - Stream
Water Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
January 19, 2017 .
Deborah Lewis
4304 Long Branch Trail
Raleigh, NC 27604
ROY COOPER
Govemor
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Director
DWR #17-0023
Wake County
Subject: APPROVAL OF 401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION•WITH ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
Lewis Property.— Long Branch Trail
Dear Ms. Lewis:
You have our approval for the impacts listed below for the purpose described in your
application dated December 30, 2016 and received by the Division of Water Resources
(Division) on December 30, 2016. These impacts are covered by the attached Water Quality
General Certification Number 3890 and the conditions listed below. This certification is
associated with the use of Nationwide Permit Number 18 once it is issued to you by the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers. Please note that you should get any other federal, state or local
permits before proceeding with your project, including those required by (but not limited to)
Sediment and Erosion Control, Non -Discharge, and Water Supply Watershed regulations.
This approval requires you to follow the conditions listed in the enclosed certification and the
following additional conditions:
1. The following impacts are hereby approved provided that all of the other specific and
general conditions of the Certification are met. No other impacts are approved, including
incidental impacts. [15A NCAC 02B .0506(b)(c)]
Type of Impact
Amount Approved
Amount Approved
(units)
(units)
Permanent
Temporary
Wetland
0.098 (acres)
0 (acres)
2. No Waste, Spoil, Solids, or Fill of Any Kind
No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas
beyond the footprint of the impacts depicted in the Pre -Construction Notification. All
Division of Water Resources, Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Operations Section http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/aps
1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Phone: (919) 791-4200
Location: 3800 Barrett Drive, Raleigh, NC 27609 Fax: (919) 788-7159
Long Branch Trail
DWR #17-0023
401 APPROVAL
Page 2 of 3
construction activities, including the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of
sediment and erosion control Best Management Practices, shall be performed so that no
violations of state water quality standards, statutes, or rules.occur. [15A NCAC 02H .0501
and .0502]
3. Protective Fencing
The outside buffer, wetland or water boundary and along the construction corridor within
these boundaries approved under this authorization shall be clearly marked with orange
warning fencing (or similar high visibility material) for the areas that have been approved to
infringe within the buffer, wetland or water prior to any land disturbing activities to ensure
compliance with 15 NCAC 02H.0500. [15A NCAC 02H .0506(b)(2) and (c)(2) and 15A NCAC
02H .0507 (c)]
4. This approval is for the purpose and design described in your application. The plans and
specifications for this project are incorporated by reference as part of the Certification. If
you change your project, you must notify the Division and you may be required to submit a
new application package with the appropriate fee. If the property is sold, the new owner
must be given a copy of this approval letter and General Certification and is responsible for
complying with all conditions. [15A NCAC 02B .0507(d)(2)]
5. This approval and its conditions are final and binding unless contested. [G.S. 143-215.5]
This Certification can be contested as provided in Articles 3 and 4 of General Statute 150B by
filing a written petition for an administrative hearing to the Office of Administrative Hearings
(hereby known as OAH). A petition form may be obtained from the OAH at
http://www.ncoah.com/ or by calling the OAH Clerk's Office at (919) 431-3000 for information.
Within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of this notice, a petition must be filed with the
OAH. A petition is considered filed when the original and one (1) copy along with any
applicable OAH filing fee is received in the OAH during normal office hours (Monday through
Friday between 8:00am and 5:00pm, excluding official state holidays).
The petition may be faxed to the OAH at (919) 431-3100, provided the original and one copy of
the petition along with any applicable OAH filing fee is received by the OAH within five (5)
business days following the faxed transmission.
Mailing address for the OAH:
If sending by First Class Mail If sending via delivery service
via the US Postal Service: (e.g. UPS, FedEx):
Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-6714
Long Branch Trail
DWR #17-0023
401APPROVAL
Page 3 of 3
Office of Administrative Hearings
1711 New Hope Church Road
Raleigh, NC 27609-6285
One (1) copy of the petition must also be served to DENR:
Sam Hayes, General Counsel
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1601
Please send one (1) copy of the petition to DWR:
If sending by First Class Mail If sending via delivery service
via the US Postal Service: (e.g. UPS, FedEx):
Karen Higgins Karen Higgins
NC DENR-DWR — 401 & Buffer NC DEN R-DWR — 401 & Buffer
Permitting Unit Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center. 512 N. Salisbury Street .
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Raleigh, NC 27604
This letter completes the review of the Division under section 401 of the Clean Water Act.
Please contact Cherri Smith at 919-791-4251 or cherri.smith@ncdenr.gov if you have any
questions or concerns.
tSicer ly,
Danny Smith
Supervisor, Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Enclosure: GG 3890
cc: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; Raleigh Regulatory Field Office; 3331 Heritage Trade
Drive, Ste. 105; Wake Forest, NC 27,597
Bob Zarzecki; Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA; 8412 Falls of Neuse Rd., Ste.
104; Raleigh, NC 27615
DWR RRO 401 file
DWR 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
Environmental Consultants,
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104, Raleigh, NC 27615 • Phone: (919) 846-5900
sandec.com
Updated December 30, 2016
S&EC Project # 12870
To: US Army Corps of Engineers N.C. Division of Water Resources
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
Attn: Tasha Alexander Attn: Karen Higgins
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105 Archdale Building — 9`" Floor
Wake Forest, NC 27587 512 North Salisbury Street,
Raleigh, NC 27604
From: Bob Zarzecki
Soil & Environmental Consultants, P.A.
Re: Lewis Property — Long Branch Trail — Property Improvements (SAW -2016-01404)
Raleigh, NC
On behalf of the owner, Deborah R. Lewis, please find attached a complete application and supplemental information
requesting written concurrence from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the N.C. Division of Water
Resources (DWR) that the activities proposed below may proceed under Nationwide Permit 18 and General Water
Quality Certification 3890. Please contact me at (919) 846-5900 if you have any questions or require additional
information.
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Name
Lewis Property — Long Branch Trail
Project Tye
Property Improvements / Landscaping
Owner / Applicant
Deborah R. Lewis
County
Wake
Nearest Town
Raleigh
Waterbody Name
Rocky Creek
Index Number
27-28
Class
C; NSW
USGS Cataloging Unit
03020201
IMPACT SUMMARY
Stream Impact (acres):
0
Wetland Impact (acres):
0.098
Open Water Impact (acres):
0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres)
0.098
Total Stream Impact (linear feet):
0
Attachments: PCN Application & Supplemental Information
DWR Permit Application Fee (proposed work is under notification threshold, but 401 letter requested)
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 18 or General Permit (GP) number: N/A
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
® Yes
❑ No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ® Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
Yes
® No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Lewis Property— Long Branch Trail
2b.
County:
Wake
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Raleigh
2d.
Subdivision name:
N/A
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
N/A
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Deborah R. Lewis
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
D.B. 016278 Pg. 01042
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
N/A
3d.
Street address:
4304 LONG BRANCH TRL
3e.
City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27604
3f.
Telephone no.:
(267) 496-6947
3g.
Fax no.:
N/A
3h.
Email address:
deborahlewis89@gmail.com
Page 1 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify: Owner-please send correspondence to Agent and
Applicant
4b.
Name:
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
4d.
Street address:
4e.
City, state, zip:
4f.
Telephone no.:
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Bob Zarzecki
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Soil &Environmental Consultants, PA
5c.
Street address:
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Ste. 104
5d.
City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27615
5e.
Telephone no.:
919-846-5900
5f.
Fax no.:
919-846-9467
5g.
Email address:
bzarzecki@sandec.com
Page 2 of 14
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
Parcel ID: 1735465764
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.828404 Longitude: -78.546043
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size:
± 2.54
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
Rocky Creek 27-28
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C; NSW
2c. River basin:
Neuse River Basin; Hydrologic Unit Code 03020201
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application: The property a single -family residential lot that includes a house, driveway, some outbuildings and a pre-
existing fenced in horse pasture area. The fence has been removed, but the pasture area continues to be maintained as
a lawn. All proposed wetland impacts exist within this maintained lawn area. The surrounding properties are all single -
family residential lots similar to this one.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
Approximately 0.31 acres of wetlands.
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
Approximately 512 linear feet
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
To allow for a more usable backyard/lawn area.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Clean fill dirt and top soil would be brought in to raise the existing elevation of the backyard/lawn area. The area
will be leveled and planted in grass (either using sod or seeded). Dump trucks will bring in the fill dirt and mini-
excavators (e.g. Bobcats, etc.) will be used to level off the area.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
El Preliminary Final
®
Comments: A JD request package was submitted to the
Corps on July 07, 2016 by Bob Zarzecki.
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company: Soil & Environmental
Name (if known): Bob Zarzecki
Consultants, PA Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
USACE- Tasha Alexander with the Corps verified jurisdictional areas on August 09, 2016 (SAW-2016-01404); NCDWR-
Cheng Zhang with the NCDWR conducted a Neuse Buffer determination on March 23, 2016, see attached letter (NOV-
2016-SS-0007).
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
The violation (NOV-2016-SS-0007) has been resolved per the attached June 7, 2016 email from DWR.
Page 3 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ❑ Streams - tributaries ® Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number -
Type of impact
Type of
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
wetland
DWQ - non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
if known
W1 (#1) ®P F-1Bottomland
T
Wetland Fill
® Yes
® Corps
0.098
Hardwood
I ❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
0.098
2h. Comments: All proposed wetland impacts/fills are within the pre-existing pasture/lawn area and are only proposed to raise
the area to make it more usable. No impervious surfaces are proposed.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -Permanent
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
(P) or Temporary (T)
intermittent
DWQ - non -404,
width
(linear
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 (#1)❑P❑T
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
0
3i. Comments:
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individu Ily list all open water im acts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water impact
Name of waterbody
number -
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ❑P❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
Page 4 of 14
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then com fete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose of
(acres)
number
pond
Flo
ode
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
d
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
® Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number—
Reason for impact
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
required?
B1 (#1) ® P ❑ T
Fill
UT to Rocky
El
0
6093.83
Creek
6h. Total buffer impacts
0
6093.83
6i. Comments: Buffer impacts only involve grading with revegetation within Zone 2 of the buffer which is an "EXEMPT' use
under the buffer rules. No trees are proposed to be removed, as this area is already a cleared, maintained, pre-existing horse
pasture area.
Page 5 of 14
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
S&EC completed a wetland delineation and Neuse River Buffer evaluation for the entire property in order to identify
natural resources so that impacts could be avoided & minimized to the maximum extent practicable. Impact 1 is a
proposed grading area. Proposed impacts include 6,093.83 square feet of buffer impact and 0.098 acres of wetland
impact. All proposed impacts exist within the pre-existing horse pasture area, currently being maintained as a grass lawn.
The owner, Ms. Lewis, has provided the following narrative explaining her justification and need for the proposed
improvements.
"Justification for Yard Improvements
When I purchased my home I was unaware that the backyard pasture area remained wet and un -walkable most of the time.
Years ago, this area had been a pasture for horses. However, the degree to which the land stayed wet was not made known
to me. The last owner just let the horses use the area with no regard to the area being wet or muddy. I do not own horses
and would very much like to be able to walk in the pasture area and use it as a grass lawn. I would like to add a minor
amount of fill to my property to make it a useable backyard that is mowed and well groomed.
/also was unaware that the pasture was a jurisdictional wetland. All of my applications for permits are to avoid fill along the
property line and within 30 feet along Rocky Creek. I have no intention of disturbing the area and 1 intend to avoid any
disruption to the natural flora and fauna. My impact in this area will be minimal and only to allow enjoyment of this natural
setting. I grew up in this neighborhood, Foxcroft, and love it so much I wanted to buy here myself. I plan on living at this
property for decades to come.
I am intending to use the area as yard and make as little of impact on the land as possible. However, to be able to use this
part of the yard I am applying for fill to be allowed only within the allowable parameters and without disturbing the creek or
wetland areas. I am a nature lover and do not intend to harm or impact the land. I want to abide by the restrictions while
being allowed to add fill dirt to the property so that the backyard pasture area can be enjoyed and walked.
Sincerely,
Deborah R. Lewis
4304 Long Branch Trail
Raleigh, NC 27604"
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
As per the project engineer; Standard Erosion Control measures will be incorporated such as silt fencing, inlet
protection of all upstream structures and appropriately sized sediment riser basins will be utilized during
construction.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
❑ Yes ® No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
project?
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
Page 6 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
3.
Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a.
Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b.
Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type:
Quantity:
3c.
Comments:
4.
Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b.
Stream mitigation requested:
4c.
If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d.
Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
4e.
Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
4f.
Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
4g.
Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
4h.
Comments:
5.
Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a.
If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6.
Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a.
Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ❑ No
6b.
If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone
1
Zone
2
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g.
If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h.
Comments:
Page 7 of 14
E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
® Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ®No
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
No new impervious is proposed.
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
The project will not result in any additional impervious surfaces.
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
❑ Certified Local Government
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
❑ Phase II
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): As stated above
DWR issued an NOV, which has since been resolved and does not involve the wetland fill requested in this application.
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
We have reviewed the "Draft Internal Policy, Cumulative impacts and the 401 Water Quality Certification and Isolated
Wetlands Programs" document prepared by the NC Division of Water Quality on April 10, 2004, version 2.1. The draft
states that many private developments are unlikely to cause cumulative impacts, including projects such as urban in -fill,
most residential subdivisions and small commercial developments as well as agricultural and silvicultural operations This
project involves improvements to an existing single-family residential lot subdivision decades ago. We anticipate
that the DWR will advise us if any additional information is needed.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The property uses an existing onsite wastewater septic system. The proposed fill areas are outside the septic field.
Page 9 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
F1 Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat? The NC -Natural Heritage Programs Data Explorer Map was used to search for elemental occurrences of
federally protected species listed within 1 mile of the project boundaries. It was determined based on the search that
there are no elemental occurrences that are listed as federally Threatened/Endangered within 1 mile of the project
boundaries. Please note the interim 4(d) rule identifies the Northern Long-eared Bat as a Threatened species within
Wake County and a triangle polygon on the southern side of the property resides in Wake County.
References: North Carolina Natural Heritage Program Data Explorer Search [December 15, 2016]. Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, Office of Land and Water Stewardship, Raleigh, NC. http://www.ncnhp.org/
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
The NOAA Habitat Conservation/Habitat Protection: National Marine Fish Service; Essential Fish Habitat Mapper website
was referenced. No Essential Fish Habitat was identified near the project.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? The NC
State Historic Preservation Office HPOWEB GIS Service interactive map was referenced on December 15, 2016; no
historic listings or study list entries or determined eligible listings were identified within the property boundaries.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
® Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: Owner and their engineer will work with Wake County to ensure
compliance with floodplain regulations. However, the County will require a 404 permit for the wetland impacts before they will
review the project for compliance with floodplain regulations. The proposed fill is minor and will essentially ony envolve
regrading of areas with no substantial increase in the overall elevations of the floodplain. No fills are proposed in the floodwa .
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? Per project engineer & NC Floodplain Mapping
Program
Soil & Environmental
Digitally signed by Bob Zarzecki
Bob Zarzecki DN: t Bob Zarzecki, o=5&K, PA, c Wetlands
Department, email=bzarzecki@sandedeccom, c=US
Updated
p
Consultatns, PA
Date: 2016.12.3014:32:06-05'00'
December
Bob Zarzecki
30, 2016
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
is provided.)
Date
Page 10 of 14
Environmental Consultants,
841' F.0, of Neuse Road, Suite 104. Raleigh, NC 27615 • Phone (919) 846-5900
smdec.eom
PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION / AGENT AUTHORIZATION
Project Name/Description: 4304 LONG BRANCH TRAIL
Date: 2016
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
Attn: Tasha Alexander
S&EC Project #
Field Office: USACE Raleieh Regulatory Field Office
I, the undersigned, a duty authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein, do
authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) and Soil &
Environmental Consultants, PA (S&EC) staff (as my agent) to enter upon the property herein described
for the purpose of conducting on-site investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters
of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of
the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. This document also authorizes S&EC (as my agent) to act on my
behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of a permit or
certification and any and all associated standard and special conditions. This notification supersedes any
previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for government
officials to enter the property when accompanied by S&EC staff. You should call S&EC to arrange a site
meeting prior to visiting the site.
PARCEL INFORMATION:
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 1735465764
Site Address: 4304 Long Branch Trail. Raleieh, Wake Co.. NC 27604
Lat/1-ong: 35.828587 / -078.548594
Watershed: Rocky Creek Neuse River. 27-28. "C.NSW". 03020201
PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION:
Name: Deborah R. Lewis
Address: 4304 Long Branch Trail, Raleigh, NC 27604-5950
Phone No.: ( ) Fax No.: ( ) Mobile No.: (267) 496-6947
Email: deborahrlewis89@gmail.com
bebo" R. WM S 4 -Al. lip
Property Owner (please print) Date
Owner Signature
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to
Me best of our knowledge.
° li•uuur!6'e4dll5 r.25iiYi6211: 21012?Is 13Elul <
NC WAM WETLAND ASSESSMENT FORM
Accompanies User Manual Version 5
USACE AID#: NCDWR #:
Project Name Lewis Property Date of Evaluation June 20, 2016
Applicant/Owner Name Deborah R. Lewis Wetland Site Name Pasture Wetland Area
Wetland Type Bottomland Hardwood Forest Assessor Name/Organization B. Zarzecki / S&EC
Level III Ecoregion Piedmont Nearest Named Water Body Rocky Creek
River Basin Neuse USGS 8 -Digit Catalogue Unit 03020201
County Wake NCDWR Region Raleigh
;Yes F;No Precipitation within 48 hrs? Latitude/Longitude (deci-degrees) 35.828587/-078.548594
Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area (may not be within the assessment area)
Please circle and/or make note on last page if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference, if
appropriate, in recent past (for instance, approximately within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include, but are not limited
to the following.
• Hydrological modifications (examples: ditches, dams, beaver dams, dikes, berms, ponds, etc.)
• Surface and sub -surface discharges into the wetland (examples: discharges containing obvious pollutants, presence of nearby
septic tanks, underground storage tanks (USTs), hog lagoons, etc.)
• Signs of vegetation stress (examples: vegetation mortality, insect damage, disease, storm damage, salt intrusion, etc.)
• Habitat/plant community alteration (examples: mowing, clear -cutting, exotics, etc.)
Is the assessment area intensively managed? F;Yes r-, No
Regulatory Considerations Were regulatory considerations evaluated? E ;Yes ;No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
F Anadromous fish
F Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species
F NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect
F Abuts a Primary Nursery Area (PNA)
F Publicly owned property
F N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) (including buffer)
F Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HOW, ORW, or Trout
F Designated NCNHP reference community
F Abuts a 303(d) -listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d) -listed stream
What type of natural stream is associated with the wetland, if any? (check all that apply)
Blackwater
Brownwater
F Tidal (if tidal, check one of the following boxes) r-, Lunar r-, Wind r-, Both
Is the assessment area on a coastal island? ;Yes , No
Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver? ;Yes F,No
Does the assessment area experience overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions? Yes F, No
Ground Surface Condition/Vegetation Condition — assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface (GS) in the assessment area and vegetation structure
(VS) in the assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable (see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable,
then rate the assessment area based on evidence of an effect.
GS VS
A A Not severely altered
B; B Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area (ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks, excessive
sedimentation, fire -plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure
alteration examples: mechanical disturbance, herbicides, salt intrusion [where appropriate], exotic species, grazing,
less diversity [if appropriate], hydrologic alteration)
Surface and Sub -Surface Storage Capacity and Duration — assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration (Surf) and sub -surface storage capacity and
duration (Sub). Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. A ditch <- 1 foot deep is considered to affect surface water only,
while a ditch > 1 foot deep is expected to affect both surface and sub -surface water. Consider tidal flooding regime, if applicable.
Surf Sub
A A Water storage capacity and duration are not altered.
B; B Water storage capacity or duration are altered, but not substantially (typically, not sufficient to change vegetation).
E ; C [—C Water storage capacity or duration are substantially altered (typically, alteration sufficient to result in vegetation
change) (examples: draining, flooding, soil compaction, filling, excessive sedimentation, underground utility lines).
Water Storage/Surface Relief — assessment area/wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Check a box in each column for each group below. Select the appropriate storage for the assessment area (AA) and the wetland
type (WT).
AA WT
3a. A A Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water > 1 foot deep
B B Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 6 inches to 1 foot deep
C C Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
D; D Depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
3b. A Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet
B Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is between 1 and 2 feet
C Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is less than 1 foot
4. Soil Texture/Structure - assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Check a box from each of the three soil property groups below. Dig soil profile in the dominant assessment area landscape
feature. Make soil observations within the 12 inches. Use most recent National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils guidance for
regional indicators.
4a. A Sandy soil
B Loamy or clayey soils exhibiting redoximorphic features (concentrations, depletions, or rhizospheres)
C Loamy or clayey soils not exhibiting redoximorphic features
D Loamy or clayey gleyed soil
E Histosol or histic epipedon
4b.;A Soil ribbon < 1 inch
B Soil ribbon >_ 1 inch
4c. A No peat or muck presence
B A peat or muck presence
5. Discharge into Wetland - opportunity metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface pollutants or discharges (Surf) and sub -surface pollutants or discharges (Sub).
Examples of sub -surface discharges include presence of nearby septic tank, underground storage tank (UST), etc.
Surf Sub
,A FA Little or no evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the assessment area
B; B Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the wetland and stressing, but not overwhelming the
treatment capacity of the assessment area
C; C Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges (pathogen, particulate, or soluble) entering the assessment area and
potentially overwhelming the treatment capacity of the wetland (water discoloration, dead vegetation, excessive
sedimentation, odor)
6. Land Use - opportunity metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands)
Check all that apply (at least one box in each column). Evaluation involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. Consider sources
draining to assessment area within entire upstream watershed (WS), within 5 miles and within the watershed draining to the
assessment area (5M), and within 2 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (2M). Effective riparian buffers
are considered to be 50 feet wide in the Coastal Plain and Piedmont ecoregions and 30 feet wide in the Blue Ridge Mountains ecoregion.
WS 5M 2M
F1 A r A r A >- 10% impervious surfaces
C B r B r B Confined animal operations (or other local, concentrated source of pollutants)
C C r C r C >_ 20% coverage of pasture
C D r D r D > 20% coverage of agricultural land (regularly plowed land)
F_1 E r E r E >- 20% coverage of maintained grass/herb
E_ F r F r F >- 20% coverage of clear-cut land
C G r G r G Little or no opportunity to improve water quality. Lack of opportunity may result from little or no disturbance in
the watershed or hydrologic alterations that prevent dainage and/or overbank flow from affectio the
assessment area.
7. Wetland Acting as Vegetated Buffer- assessment area/wetland complex condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands)
7a. Is assessment area within 50 feet of a tributary or other open water?
;Yes [.,No If Yes, continue to 7b. If No, skip to Metric 8.
7b. How much of the first 50 feet from the bank is weltand? (Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the water body. Make
buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland. Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.)
A >- 50 feet
B From 30 to < 50 feet
C From 15 to < 30 feet
D From 5 to < 15 feet
E < 5 feet or buffer bypassed by ditches
7c. Tributary width. If the tributary is anastomosed, combine widths of channels/braids for a total width.
<- 15 -feet wide r; > 15 -feet wide r; Other open water (no tributary present)
7d. Do roots of assessment area vegetation extend into the bank of the tributary/open water?
Yes r; No
7e. Is tributary or other open water sheltered or exposed?
Sheltered - adjacent open water with width < 2500 feet and no regular boat traffic.
Exposed - adjacent open water with width >_ 2500 feet or regular boat traffic.
8. Wetland Width at the Assessment Area - wetland type/wetland complex condition metric (evaluate WT for all marshes
and Estuarine Woody Wetland only; evaluate WC for Bottomland Hardwood Forest, Headwater Forest, and Riverine Swamp
Forest only)
Check a box in each column. Select the average width for the wetland type at the assessment area (WT) and the wetland complex at the
assessment area (WC). See User Manual for WT and WC boundaries.
WT WC
A; A >- 100 feet
B; B From 80 to < 100 feet
+; C; C From 50 to < 80 feet
D; D From 40 to < 50 feet
E; E From 30 to < 40 feet
F; F From 15 to < 30 feet
G; G From 5 to < 15 feet
H; H < 5 feet
9. Inundation Duration — assessment area condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands)
Answer for assessment area dominant landform.
A Evidence of short -duration inundation (< 7 consecutive days)
B Evidence of saturation, without evidence of inundation
C Evidence of long -duration inundation or very long -duration inundation (7 to 30 consecutive days or more)
10. Indicators of Deposition — assessment area condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands and all marshes)
Consider recent deposition only (no plant growth since deposition).
;A Sediment deposition is not excessive, but at approximately natural levels.
B Sediment deposition is excessive, but not overwhelming the wetland.
K; C Sediment deposition is excessive and is overwhelming the wetland.
11. Wetland Size — wetland type/wetland complex condition metric
Check a box in each column. Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates three aspects of the wetland area: the
size of the wetland type (WT), the size of the wetland complex (WC), and the size of the forested wetland (FW) (if applicable, see User
Manual). See the User Manual for boundaries of these evaluation areas. If assessment area is clear-cut, select "K" for the FW column.
WT WC FW (if applicable)
CA CA CA >_ 500 acres
CB CB CB From 100 to < 500 acres
CC CC CC From 50 to < 100 acres
D D D From 25 to < 50 acres
E E E From 10 to < 25 acres
F F F From 5 to < 10 acres
CG CG CG From 1 to < 5 acres
C H C H C H From 0.5 to < 1 acre
C I C I C I From 0.1 to < 0.5 acre
E;J E;J CJ From 0.01 to < 0.1 acre
CK CK .�" K < 0.01 acre or assessment area is clear-cut
12. Wetland Intactness — wetland type condition metric (evaluate for Pocosins only)
EA Pocosin is the full extent (>_ 90%) of its natural landscape size.
LIB Pocosin is < 90% of the full extent of its natural landscape size.
13. Connectivity to Other Natural Areas — landscape condition metric
13a. Check appropriate box(es) (a box may be checked in each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This
evaluates whether the wetland is well connected (Well) and/or loosely connected (Loosely) to the landscape patch, the contiguous
metric naturally vegetated area and open water (if appropriate). Boundaries are formed by four -lane roads, regularly maintained utility
line corridors the width of a four -lane road or wider, urban landscapes, fields (pasture open and agriculture), or water > 300 feet wide.
Well Loosely
[:A CA >_ 500 acres
B CB From 100 to < 500 acres
C E C From 50 to < 100 acres
D CD From 10 to < 50 acres
E CE < 10 acres
F C F Wetland type has a poor or no connection to other natural habitats
13b. Evaluate for marshes only.
Yes [:No Wetland type has a surface hydrology connection to open waters/stream or tidal wetlands.
14. Edge Effect — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes and Estuarine Woody Wetland)
May involve a GIS effort with field adjustment. Estimate distance from wetland type boundary to artificial edges. Artificial edges include
non -forested areas >_ 40 feet wide such as fields, development, roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors and clear -cuts. Consider
the eight main points of the compass. Artificial edge occurs within 150 feet in how many directiions? If the assessment area is clear-cut,
select option "C."
CA 0
CB 1 to
EC 5to8
15. Vegetative Composition — assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes and Pine Flat)
CA Vegetation is close to reference condition in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of appropriate
species, with exotic plants absent or sparse within the assessment area.
CB Vegetation is different from reference condition in species diversity or proportions, but still largely composed of native species
characteristic of the wetland type. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clearcutting or
clearing. It also includes communities with exotics present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata.
E;C Vegetation severely altered from reference in composition, or expected species are unnaturally absent (planted stands of non -
characteristic species or at least one stratum inappropriately composed of a single species), or exotic species are dominant in
at least one stratum.
16. Vegetative Diversity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for Non -tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
[:A Vegetation diversity is high and is composed primarily of native species (<10% cover of exotics).
B Vegetation diversity is low or has > 10% to 50% cover of exotics.
C Vegetation is dominated by exotic species (>50% cover of exotics).
17. Vegetative Structure — assessment area/wetland type condition metric
17a. Is vegetation present?
Yes C No If Yes, continue to 17b. If No, skip to Metric 18.
17b. Evaluate percent coverage of assessment area vegetation for all marshes only. Skip to 17c for non -marsh wetlands.
CA
> 25%
coverage of vegetation
C B
< 25% coverage of vegetation
17c. Check a box in each
column for each stratum. Evaluate this portion of the metric for non -marsh wetlands. Consider structure
in airspace
above the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT) separately.
AA
WT
oFA
E;A
Canopy closed, or nearly closed, with natural gaps associated with natural processes
C:
F�B
F�B
Canopy present, but opened more than natural gaps
v
E;C
CC
Canopy sparse or absent
o
A
F,A
Dense mid-story/sapling layer
cn
UB
E;B
Moderate density mid-story/sapling layer
C
[]C
Mid-story/sapling layer sparse or absent
A
F,A
Dense shrub layer
L
F,B
E;B
Moderate density shrub layer
0
E;C
L]C
Shrub layer sparse or absent
E;A
F,A
Dense herb layer
�5
F,B
E;B
Moderate density herb layer
_
F� C
F� C
Herb layer sparse or absent
18. Snags — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
CA Large snags (more than one) are visible (> 12 -inches DBH, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
E;B Not
19. Diameter Class Distribution — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
L]A Majority of canopy trees have stems > 6 inches in diameter at breast height (DBH); many large trees (> 12 inches DBH) are
present.
B Majority of canopy trees have stems between 6 and 12 inches DBH, few are > 12 -inch DBH.
L]C Majority of canopy trees are < 6 inches DBH or no trees.
20. Large Woody Debris — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Include both natural debris and man -placed natural debris.
L:A Large logs (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches in diameter, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
E;B Not
21. Vegetation/Open Water Dispersion — wetland type/open water condition metric (evaluate for Non -Tidal Freshwater
Marsh only)
Select the figure that best describes the amount of interspersion between vegetation and open water in the growing season. Patterned
areas indicate vegetated areas, while solid white areas indicate open water.
;A CB CC CD
22. Hydrologic Connectivity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for riparian wetlands and Salt/Brackish Marsh only)
Examples of activities that may severely alter hydrologic connectivity include intensive ditching, fill, sedimentation, channelization,
diversion, man-made berms, beaver dams, and stream incision. Documentation required if evaluated as B, C, or D.
E;A Overbank and overland flow are not severely altered in the assessment area.
B Overbank flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
C Overland flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
CD Both overbank and overland flow are severely altered in the assessment area.
Notes
Assessment area wetland and proposed impact/fill area consists of a pre-existing horse pasture currently being maintained as a grass lawn
Wetland Site Name
Wetland Type
NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
Pasture Wetland Area
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Date
Assessor Name/Organization
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N)
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N)
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N)
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N)
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N)
Sub -function Rating Summary
June 20, 2016
B. Zarzecki / S&EC
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
NO
NO
Function
Sub -function
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology
Surface Storage and Retention
Condition
LOW
HIGH
Sub -Surface Storage and Retention
Condition
LOW
Water Quality
Pathogen Change
Condition
HIGH
Condition
LOW
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
YES
Particulate Change
Condition
LOW
Condition/Opportunity
LOW
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
YES
Soluble Change
Condition
MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
YES
Physical Change
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
YES
Pollution Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NA
Habitat
Physical Structure
Condition
MEDIUM
Landscape Patch Structure
Condition
LOW
Vegetation Composition
Condition
LOW
Function Rating Summary
Function
Metrics/Notes
Rating
Hydrology
Condition
LOW
Water Quality
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
YES
Habitat
Condition
LOW
Overall Wetland Rating LOW
Bob Zarzecki
From: Smith, Danny <danny.smith@ncdenr.gov>
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2016 10:40 AM
To: Bob Zarzecki
Cc: Zhang, Cheng; Doug (LLewis1007@aol.com); Deborah Lewis (deborahrlewis89
@gmail.com)
Subject: RE: Lewis Property - 4304 Long Branch Trail - NOV response
Bob and Deborah,
Thank you for meeting with Cheng Zhang and me on June 6th at 4304 Long Branch Trail. The site visit confirmed that the
Notice Violation (NOV-2016-SS-0007) dated April 8, 2016 has been satisfactorily addressed. By copy of this email this
matter is resolved and is closed. No further action is required.
If you have any questions or need assistance please do not hesitate to call me.
Thank you.
Danny
Danny Smith, Supervisor
Raleigh Regional Office
Water Quality Regional Operations
Division of Water Resources
(919) 791-4252
From: Bob Zarzecki [mailto:bzarzecki@sandec.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 3:21 PM
To: Smith, Danny
Cc: Zhang, Cheng; Doug (LLewis1007@aol.com); Deborah Lewis (deborahrlewis89@gmail.com)
Subject: RE: Lewis Property - 4304 Long Branch Trail - NOV response
Danny:
9:30 am sounds good.
I met with Doug and Deborah on yesterday morning. Attached are photos taken by Doug on February
29th and photos taken in the same approximate location by me yesterday May 26, 2016. 1 thought
they would be helpful, as they do a pretty good job showing the area has been returned to pre-
existing conditions. The large, pile covered with tarps to the left where the old bard was, is the fill dirt
that Doug had moved out of the buffer. He had it moved onto the concrete slab where the old bard
was and covered in tarps to prevent runoff.
Hope you have a great Memorial Day weekend. See you at Deborah's on the 6th
Bob Zarzecki
Wetlands Department Manager
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
From: Smith, Danny [mailto:danny.smith@ncdenr.gov]
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 1:52 PM
To: Bob Zarzecki
WaterResources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
PAT MCCRORY
Governor
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
Secretary
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Director
April 8, 2016
CERTIFIED MAIL # 7014 3490000188213188
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Deborah Lewis
4304 Long Branch Trail
Raleigh, NC 27604
Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION/ INTENT TO ENFORCE
NOV-2016-SS-0007
Neuse River Riparian Buffer Violations
Stream Standard Violations
Wake County
To Whom It May Concern,
On March 23, 2016, Cheng Zhang from the Raleigh Regional Office (RRO) of the Division of Water
Resources (DWR) conducted a site visit in response to a citizen complaint at the above referenced site.
This site is located in Wake County, North Carolina. The stream impacted is an un -named tributary to
Rocky Creek which is classified as Class C, Nutrient Sensitive Waters (NSW) in the Neuse River Basin.
Accordingly, the following observations and violations were noted during the DWR inspection:
Item I. Neuse River Basin Riparian Buffer — Veaetation
Title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code 02B .0233 (4) of the Neuse River Riparian Buffer Rules
requires that Zones 1 and 2 of the riparian buffer remain in vegetation that is undisturbed except for those
uses provided for in Item (6) of this Rule. (Attachment 1, Photographs 1 &2).
• The subject stream is depicted on the Soil Survey of Wake County and USGS Topographic
Map, and was determined on March 23, 2016 to be subject to the Neuse River Riparian
Buffer rules (see enclosed Buffer Determination Letter);
• DWR staff observed that at the time of the site visit, the contractor hired by the property
owner was attempting to pipe and fill a segment of the un -named tributary. Heavy equipment
was used in zones 1 and 2, causing excessive soil disturbance. Earthen fill transported from
off site was placed in the riparian buffer.
Division of Water Resources, Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Operations Section http://portal.ncdem.org/web/wq/aps
1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Phone: (919) 791-4200
Location: 3800 Barrett Drive, Raleigh, NC 27609 Fax: (919) 788-7159
Item II. Stream Standards -Removal of Use
Title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code 02B .0211 (2) requires that "The waters shall be suitable
for aquatic life propagation and maintenance of biological integrity, wildlife, secondary recreation, and
agriculture; sources of water pollution which preclude any of these uses on either a short-term or long-
term basis shall be considered to be violating a water quality standard." (Attachment 1, Photograph 3)
• DWR staff observed approximately 70 linear feet of the unnamed tributary to Rocky
Creek (Feature A), had been impacted. The stream bank had been excavated along
approximately 70 linear feet of stream.
Requested Response:
You are requested to immediately address the below items in writing within 30 days of receipt of
this letter.
1. Stream Restoration Plan Stream Restoration Plan (Excavation) — Explain how you plan to
restore and stabilize the excavated stream bank
2. Riparian Buffer Restoration Disturbed area in the riparian buffer must be restored and
permanently stabilized. Please submit a Riparian Buffer Restoration Plan to include proposed
plant materials, seeding rates and times of planting, to this office for review and approval.
3. Earthen fill Earthen fill placed in zone one buffer must be removed.
4. Schedule Please indicate in your response a detailed schedule with dates explaining when the
restoration will be accomplished.
Please submit required materials to:
Cheng Zhang
Division of Water Resources
3800 Barrett Drive
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
This office requires that the violations, as detailed above, be abated immediately and properly
resolved. Environmental damage and violations of North Carolina Administrative Codes have been
documented for the subject site as stated above. Your efforts to undertake activities to bring the
subject site back into compliance is not an admission, rather it is an action that must be taken in order
to begin to resolve ongoing environmental issues.
These violations and any future violations are subject to a civil penalty assessment of up to
$25,000.00 per day for each violation. Should you have any questions regarding these matters, please
contact Hpkx-Beek at (919) 791-4200.
Get¢ -ns
Sincere ,
Danny Smith
Water Quality Regional Operations
Raleigh Regional Office
Encl: Buffer Determination Letter
Encl: Attachment 1: Photographic Documentation
cc: DWR RRO file copy
Water -Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
April 8, 2016
Deborah Lewis
4304 Long Branch Trail
Raleigh, NV 27604
PAT MCCRORY
Governor
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
Secretary
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Director
Subject: Surface Water Determination Letter
NBRRO#16-083
Wake County
Determination Type:
Buffer Call
Isolated or EIP Call
® Neuse (15A NCAC 2B .0233)
Start@
❑ Tar -Pamlico (15A NCAC 213.0259)
❑ Ephemeral/Intermittent/Perennial Determination
❑ Jordan (15A NCAC 213 .0267)
❑ Isolated Wetland Determination
Project Name: 4304 Long Branch Trail, Raleigh
Location/Directions: The projected area is at 4304 Long Branch Trail in Wake County
Subject Stream: UT to Rocky Creek
Determination Date: 03/23/2016 Staff: Cheng Zhang
Stream
E/I/P*
Not Subject to
Buffers
Subject to
Buffers
Start@
Stop@
Soil
Survey
USGS
To o
A
I
X
throw hoot
X
X
'P/I/P = Ephemeral/intermittent/Perennial
Explanation: The feature(s) listed above has or have been located on the Soil Survey of Wake County, North
Carolina or the most recent copy of the USGS Topographic map at a 1:24,000 scale. Each feature that is checked
"Not Subject" has been determined not to be a stream or is not present on the property. Features that are checked
"Subject" have been located on the property and possess characteristics that qualify it to be a stream. There may be
other streams located on your property that do not show up on the maps referenced above but, still may be
considered jurisdictional according to the US Army Corps of Engineers and/or to the Division of Water Resources
(DWR).
This on-site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or affected parties that
dispute a determination made by the DWR or Delegated Local Authority may request a determination by the
Director. An appeal request must be made within sixty (60) days of date of this letter or from the date the affected
party (including downstream and/or adjacent owners) is notified of this letter. A request for a determination by the
Director shall be referred to the Director in writing If sending via US Postal Service c/o Karen Higgins DWR — 401 &
Buffer Permitting Unit 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617. If sending via delivery service (UPS, FedEx,
etc.) Karen Higgins DWR — 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit, 512 N. Salisbury Street Raleigh, NC 2 76 04
This determination is final and binding unless, as detailed above, you ask for a hearing or appeal within sixty (60)
days.
Division of Water Resources, Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Operations Section http://deq.ne.gov/about/divisions/water-resources
1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Phone: (919) 791-4200
Location: 3800 Barrett Drive, Raleigh, NC 27609 Fax: (919) 788.7159
4304 Lorig Branch Trail, Raleigh
Wake County
03/23/2016
Page 2 of 2
The owner/future owners should notify the Division of Water Resources (including any other Local, State, and
Federal Agencies) of this decision concerning any future correspondences regarding the subject property (stated
above). This project may require a Section 404/401 Permit for the proposed activity. Any inquiries should be
directed to the Division of Water Resources (Central Office) at (919)-807-6300, and the US Army Corp of Engineers
(Raleigh Regulatory Field Office) at (919)-554-4884.
If you have questions reg this termination, please feel free to contact Cheng Zhang at (919) 791-4259.
S' cere ,
Danny Smith
Supervisor, Water Quality Regional Operations Center
cc: RRO DWR File Copy
4�f
F
�'1
■iJL
♦ \♦
%J
l l
i
■ L
111
♦ \♦
%J
l l
�, j I I
` l
` N\);
11
��i� 1 ► �
1
� � 1\I I
i
■ L
111
%J
l l
1
1 �
i ; 1
1�Al' \N.
1
1
1
`1♦� I I 11
p
0
Of
`�. w
J
(n:
Project NumbeWA
Project Manager:
BZ
Scale:
1=250'
Date:
4/1/16
Map Title:
Evaluation Areas
♦N,ti
♦ice i iii♦♦ ♦ �''r /% � .--�.
Figure 1 - USGS Map
Lewis Property -Long Branch Road
Wake County, NC
Source: USGS Raleigh
West Quadrangle
�` � � �i �i sir � i � ��♦� ♦
0 250 500 N
I l l l l i i i l
Feet
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PAI
E412 iy1h0N\ Ru. S...• kw. \C1%13•M : (919] 946.9w• F-(9191 �uY
-Lk,.. .
4
n
Project Number: Map Title: N
12870.W1 Figure 2 - Soil Survey Map 0 200 400
Project Manager: I i i i I i i i I
BZ Lewis Property -Long Branch Road Feet
Scale: Wake County, NC
1" = 200'•
SSoil & Eiivirosimental Consultants, Pr1
Date: Wake Countyource: xyl,Ial ul l.ueH.vJ, tiui 111yH:�.•,ti['$N.15•Pwn. j919]N 6•S9U0•Fez [H19]YW 9i6
6/20/16 Soil Survev Sheet 40"`"�°
Detailed Delineation of Waters of the US
Suitable for Preliminary Planning Only
S&EC reserves the right to modify this map based on more fieldwork,
and any other additional information. Approximations were mapped
IP using
topographic maps, an photos and ground frothing. If the site is going
to be disturbed, S&EC's demfl d delineation should be approved and
Long B ranch Tra i I pe mitted by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers as required. If the user of
this— desires an accurate map of the regulated features flagged by
S&EC, they should retain a NC Registered Professional ]and Surveyor to
locate S&EC's Nagging.
4 4
t A
02 i
4 , 01
LL
14
16
34 TT CH "
ss w 4 l b
00 26 TT CH 32
} 0 35 TT CH
' Legend
M 37 TT CH Parcel Boundary
CD 27 TT CH
Rock Creek Perennial Stream
f y � Intermittent Stream
Pl�
07Jurisdictional Wetland
38 TT CH
►� 4 N • n M p, N n4 r f' G ' gr phi Int' rm 0 50' Neuse River Buffer
B' rd
Project Number: Map Title: N
12870.W1 Figure 3 - Sketch Map 0 75 150
Project Manager: I I I II I I I I I I I 11
BZ Lewis Property -Long Branch Road Feet
Scale: Wake County, NC
1"=80' •
Source:Wake County GIS Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Date: 9442 I..N of N-
6/21/16
we6/21/16 NC One Map
PIN: 1735465764
PIN Ext: 000
Real Estate ID: 0004846
Map Name: 1735 10
Owner: LEWIS, DEBORAH R
Mail Address 1: 4304 LONG BRANCH TRL
Mail Address 2: RALEIGH NC 27604-5950
Mail Address 3:
Deed Book: 016278
Deed Page: 01042
Deed Date: 01/28/2016
Deed Acres: 2.54
Building Value: $240,286
Land Value: $88,000
Total Value: $328,286
Billing Class: Individual
Description: L061 FOXCROFT SE2
Heat Area: 3916
Site Address: 4304 LONG BRANCH TRL
City:
Township: St. Matthew's
Year Built: 1965
Sale Price: $350,000
Sale Date: 01/28/2016
Use Type: SINGLFAM
Design Style: Split Level
Land Class: RES 10 AC
Old Parcel Number: 439-00000-0114
0 55 110 220 ft
1 inch = 100 feet
Disclaimer
tMaps makes every effort to produce and publish
the most current and accurate information possible.
However, the maps are produced for information purposes,
and are NOT surveys. No warranties, expressed or implied,
are provided for the data therein, its use,or its interpretation.
f
I GlvG R'
V I C I IN I T Y M A P N. T. S.
SITE DATA INCLUDING ROADS, Ex15TiNG
CONTOUR5.FEATURE5. HYDRAULIC AND OTMER
5TRUCTURE5, AND PROPERTY 60UNDAKY
PROVIDED BY B. L. SCOTT LAND 5URVEYING O
RALEIGH. NC ON 9.13- I G.
54EC PERFORMED A DETAILED DELINEATION AN
WA5 CONFIRMED BY TA511A ALEXANDER U5ACI
ON AUGUST 9, 20 [ G.
PRE-EX15TI
WOOD FEF
ZONE I
UNNAMEE
TRI BUTAF
ROCKY CI
4304 LONG 13R.ANCh TRAIL
WAKECO., NC ILU,' 30KAIIK. LEW15
EXI5TI NG CNDITION5
12870
L FENCE
UNE
aleV`Soil & COtlsultAtr* PA
O
11412 Falls of Neuse Rd., Su ire 104 Raleigh, Norlh Cnmli na 27615
met N�" Phone! (919) M6.5900 • Fax: [919} M6-9467
�F 2 w•tiYK•.SandEC.wm
51LT FENCE 1
MAXIMUM EXTENT
OF FILL PLACEMENT
ZONE I
UNNAMED
TRIUUTAKY TC
ROCKY CREEK
x
w
Ac
Ac
Lu
F
D
n
43
ROCKY
C� -.�yjFCOMC.: ACCE 5
TERRAC
CaNC.
STORAGE TERRACE
a j
6 I F ILL AREA
6093.53 5F, 04
05 4
06
07
IMPACT W I
0.098 AC 08
JE 2 (20') ' 09
0.27v ANNUAL 10'
CHANCE OF FLOOD 13
' 12
13
14
51TE DATA iNCLUDiNG ROADS, E 15TING
CONTOUR5,MATUKE5, HYDRAULIC AND OTHER
5TRUCTURE5, AND PROPERTY BOUNDARY
PROVIDED BY B. L. 5COTT LAND 5URVEYING OF
RALEIGH, NC ON 9-13- 1 G-
2. 54EC PERFORMED A DETAILED DELINEATION AND
WA5 CONFIRMED BY TA5HA ALEXANDER 05ACE
ON AUGU5T 9, 2016.
4304 LONG BRANCH TRAIL
WAKE CO., N C
Client:
K. LEW15
FKOF05FD YARD IMFKCVffMFNTS
12870
6Z
Cale:
1 ":50'
heel No.:
2 Of 2
02
IMPACT 5UMMARY
IMPACT
AREA
TYPE
131
6093.83 51'
EXEMPT FILL
GRADING AND
REVEGETATING
W,
0.098 AC
WETLAND FILL
" & Euviroumentd Cance, PA
11412 Falls of Neuse Rd., Su ire 104 Raleigh, Norlh Carolina 27615
Phone! (919) M6.5900 • Fax: (919) M6-9467
."..SandEC.wm