20180725 Ver 1_B4479_CE_20180524

Type I and II Ground Disturbing Categorical Exclusion Action
Classification Form
STIP Project No. B-4479
WBS Element 38384.1.FD2
Federal Project No. BRZ-1700(17)
A. Prolect Description:
The proposed project involves the replacement of Bridge Numbers 222, 226, 228 and 230
carrying SR 1700 (Red Hill Road) over Red Hill Swamp, in Columbus County.
The project is included in the 2016-2025 North Carolina State Transportation Improvement
Program (STIP). The project location is shown in Figure 1 in Appendix A. Photos of the
site are shown in Figures 2 and 3 in Appendix A. Functional design plans are included in
Appendix A as Figures 4— 6.
Right of way acquisition and construction for the project are scheduled to begin in federal
fiscal years 2018 and 2019, respectively, in the draft 2017-2027 STIP.
B. Description of Need and Purpose:
The purpose of the proposed project is to replace four obsolete bridges.
Bridge Nos. 222, 226, 228, and 230 are all structurally deficient and functionally obsolete.
The table below presents information regarding the existing bridges.
Bridge No. 222 226 228 230
Crosses Red Hill Red Hill Red Hill Red Hill
Swamp Swamp Swamp Swamp
Year Built 1947 1949 1949 1949
Clear Roadway Width 24 feet 24 feet 24 feet 24 feet
Length 70 feet 74 feet 74 feet 56 feet
Sufficiency Rating 22.47 24.6 25.36 25.36
Functionally Yes Yes Yes Yes
Obsolete? �Structural (Structural (Structural (Structural
Appraisal=3) Appraisal=4) Appraisal=4) Appraisal=2)
Structurally Yes Yes Yes Yes
Deficient? �Substructure (Substructure (Substructure (Substructure
Condition=3) Condition=3) Condition=3) Condition=2)
Posted Weight Limit 22 tons SV 16 tons SV 18 tons SV 18 tons SV
32 tons TTST 24 tons TTST 25 tons TTST 27 tons TTST

C. Categorical Exclusion Action Classification: (Check one)
0 TYPE I
❑ TYPE II
D. Proposed Improvements
28. Bridge rehabilitation, reconstruction, or replacement or the construction of grade
separation to replace existing at-grade railroad crossings, if the actions meet the
constraints in 23 CFR 771.117(e)(1-6).
E. Special Prolect Information:
A vicinity map showing the location of the four bridges and the detour route is included in
Appendix A as Figure 1. Photographs of the bridges are included in Appendix A as Figures
2 and 3.
NCDOT has sought input from the following agencies as a part of the project development:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, NC Department of Natural Resources, U.S. Fish & Wildlife
Service, N.0 Wildlife Resources Commission, NC Division of Water Quality, and the
Environmental Protection Agency. No special concerns were expressed by any of the
agencies contacted.
Estimated Costs:
The estimated costs, based on 2017 prices, are as follows:
R/W: $ 37,000.00
Const: $3,100,000.00
Utilities: $ 0.00
Total: $3,137,000.00
Estimated Traffic:
Year 2012 450 vehicles per day (vpd)
Year 2035 900 vpd
Accidents: Eleven crashes occurred in the vicinity of the project during a recent three-year
period. None were associated with the geometry of the bridge or its approach roadways.
Design Exceptions: There are no anticipated design exceptions for this project.
Proposed Bridge Length: The proposed bridge lengths for Bridge Nos. 222, 226, and 228
is 90 feet. The proposed bridge length for Bridge No. 230 is 75 feet. The clear roadway
width on each bridge will be 30 feet 10 inches.
Pedestrian and Bicycle Accommodations: SR 1700 is not a designated bicycle route,
nor does it have any pedestrian accommodations.
Offsite Detour: Bridge Nos. 222, 226, 228, and 230 will be replaced on the existing
alignment. Traffic will be detoured offsite (see Figure 1) during the construction period.
NCDOT Guidelines for Evaluation of Offsite Detours for Bridge Replacement Projects
considers multiple project variables beginning with the additional time traveled by the
average road user resulting from the offsite detour. The offsite detour for this project would
include SR 1700, SR 1701, SR 1702, SR 1758, NC 211, and US 701 Business. The
majority of traffic on the road is through traffic. The detour for the average road user would
2

result in 15 minutes additional travel time (nine miles additional travel). Up to a 24-month
construction duration is expected for this project.
Public Involvement: A landowner notification letter and a newsletter were sent to all
property owners affected directly by this project. Property owners were invited to comment.
No comments have been received to date.
Northern long-eared bat (NLEB): The US Fish and Wildlife Service has developed a
programmatic biological opinion (PBO) in conjunction with the Federal Highway
Administration, the US Army Corps of Engineers and NCDOT, for the NLEB in eastern
North Carolina. The PBO covers the entire NCDOT program in Divisions 1-8, including all
NCDOT projects and activities. The programmatic determination for NLEB for the NCDOT
program in Divisions 1-8 is "May Affect, Likely to Adversely Affect." The PBO will provide
incidental take coverage for NLEB and will ensure compliance with Section 7 of the
Endangered Species Act for five years for all NCDOT projects with a federal nexus in
Divisions 1-8, which includes Columbus County.
3

F. Proiect Imaact Criteria Checklists:
Type I& II - Ground Disturbing Actions
FHWA APPROVAL ACTIVITIES THRESHOLD CRITERIA
If any of questions 1-7 are marked "yes" then the CE will require FHWA approval. Yes No
� Does the project require formal consultation with U.S. Fish and Wildlife � �
Service (USFWS) or National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS)?
2 Does the project result in impacts subject to the conditions of the Bald and � �
Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGPA)?
3 Does the project generate substantial controversy or public opposition, for any � �
reason, following appropriate public involvement?
4 Does the project cause disproportionately high and adverse impacts relative to � �
low-income and/or minority populations?
5 Does the project involve a residential or commercial displacement, or a � �
substantial amount of right of way acquisition?
6 Does the project require an Individual Section 4(f) approval? ❑ ❑X
Does the project include adverse effects that cannot be resolved with a
7 Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) under Section 106 of the National Historic � �
Preservation Act (NHPA) or have an adverse effect on a National Historic
Landmark (NHL)?
If any of questions 8 through 31 are marked "yes" then additional information will be required for those
questions in Section G.
Other Considerations Yes No
Does the project result in a finding of "may affect not likely to adversely affect"
8 for listed species, or designated critical habitat under Section 7 of the ❑X ❑
Endangered Species Act (ESA)?
9 Is the project located in anadromous fish spawning waters? ❑ 0
Does the project impact waters classified as Outstanding Resource Water
10 (ORW), High Quality Water (HQW), Water Supply Watershed Critical � �
Areas, 303(d) listed impaired water bodies, buffer rules, or Submerged
Aquatic Vegetation (SAV)?
11 Does the project impact waters of the United States in any of the designated � �
mountain trout streams?
12 Does the project require a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Individual � �
Section 404 Permit?
13 Will the project require an easement from a Federal Energy Regulatory � �
Commission (FERC) licensed facility?
14 Does the project include a Section 106 of the NHPA effects determination � �
other than a no effect, including archaeological remains?

Other Considerations (continued) Yes No
15 Does the project involve hazardous materials and/or landfills? ❑ ❑X
Does the project require work encroaching and adversely affecting a
16 regulatory floodway or work affecting the base floodplain (100-year flood) � �
elevations of a water course or lake, pursuant to Executive Order 11988 and
23 CFR 650 subpart A?
Is the project in a Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) county and � �
17 substantially affects the coastal zone and/or any Area of Environmental
Concern (AEC)?
18 Does the project require a U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) permit? ❑ �
� 9 Does the project involve construction activities in, across, or adjacent to a � �
desi nated Wild and Scenic River present within the pro'ect area?
20 Does the project involve Coastal Barrier Resources Act (CBRA) resources? ❑ ❑X
21 Does the project impact federal lands (e.g. U.S. Forest Service (USFS), � �
USFWS, etc. or Tribal Lands?
22 Does the project involve any changes in access control? ❑ 0
23 Does the project have a permanent adverse effect on local traffic patterns or � �
community cohesiveness?
24 Will maintenance of traffic cause substantial disruption? ❑ ❑X
Is the project inconsistent with the STIP or the Metropolitan Planning
25 Organization's (MPO's) Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) (where ❑ ❑X
applicable)?
Does the project require the acquisition of lands under the protection of
Section 6(f) of the Land and Water Conservation Act, the Federal Aid in Fish
26 Restoration Act, the Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Act, Tennessee Valley � �
Authority (TVA), or other unique areas or special lands that were acquired in
fee or easement with public-use money and have deed restrictions or
covenants on the property?
27 Does the project involve Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) � �
buyout properties under the Hazard Miti ation Grant Pro ram (HMGP ?
28 Does the project include a de minimis or programmatic Section 4(f)? ❑ ❑X
29 Is the project considered a Type I under the NCDOT's Noise Policy? ❑ 0
30 Is there prime or important farmland soil impacted by this project as defined by � �
the Farmland Protection Policy Act (FPPA)?
31 Are there other issues that arose during the project development process that � �
affected the project decision?
G. Additional Documentation as Required from Section F
Response to Question 8:
Wood Stork: There is habitat for the wood stork within the study area. The species was not observed
during field investigations performed on March 17, 2015 (an additional survey will be conducted during
the revised US Fish and Wildlife Service survey window of April 15, 2017 to July 15, 2017). A review of
the NCNHP records on May 20, 2015 indicates no occurrences within one mile of the study area.
Biological Conclusion: May Affect - Not Likely to Adversely Effect
5

Response to Question 12:
Anticipated Permits: The proposed project will affect 4.06 acres of wetlands based on an area of 20
feet outside of the slope stakes. A Nationwide permit (NWP) 23 (33 CFR 330.5(a) 23)) may be
applicable for impacts to "Waters of the United States" resulting from this project. Other permits that
may apply include a NWP 33 for temporary construction activities such as stream dewatering, work
bridges, or temporary causeways may be required during bridge construction. However, it is possible
that an Individual Section 404 Permit could be required. The US Army Corps of Engineers holds the
final discretion as to what permit will be required to authorize project construction. The corresponding
Section 401 Water Quality Certification(s) (WQC) from the NCDWR will also be needed.
Response to Question 16:
Columbus County is a participant in the National Flood Insurance Program, administered by the
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Based on the most current information available
from the NC Floodplain Mapping Program (FMP), these stream crossings are in a designated flood
hazard zone.
The proposed bridge replacements will provide equivalent or greater conveyance than that of the
existing bridges. The Hydraulics Unit will coordinate with the FMP, the delegated state agency
administering FEMA's National Flood Insurance Program, to determine the status of the project with
regard to applicability of NCDOT'S Memorandum of Agreement with FMP, or approval of a Conditional
Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) and subsequent final Letter of Map Revision (LOMR).
This project involves construction activities on or adjacent to a FEMA-regulated stream. Therefore, the
Division shall submit sealed as-built construction plans to the Hydraulics Unit upon completion of
project construction, certifying the drainage structures and roadway embankment located within the
100-year floodplain were built as shown in the construction plans, both horizontally and vertically.

H. Proiect Commitments
Columbus County
Bridge Numbers 222, 226, 228 and 230
Carrying SR 1700 (Red Hill Road) over Red Hill Swamp
Federal-Aid Project BRZ-1700(17)
WBS No. 38384.1.FD2
STIP Project B-4479
Division Six Construction, Resident Engineer's Office
Columbus County Emergency Services will be contacted at [phone] at least one month prior to
road closure to make the necessary temporary reassignments to primary response units.
Columbus County Schools will be contacted at [phone] at least one month prior to road closure
to allow temporary rerouting of school buses.
This project involves construction activities on or adjacent to a FEMA-regulated stream. Therefore, the
Division shall submit sealed as-built construction plans to the Hydraulics Unit upon completion of
project construction, certifying the drainage structures and roadway embankment located within the
100-year floodplain were built as shown in the construction plans, both horizontally and vertically.
Hydraulics Unit
The Hydraulics Unit will coordinate with the Floodplain Mapping Program, the delegated state agency
administering FEMA's National Flood Insurance Program, to determine the status of the project with
regard to applicability of NCDOT'S Memorandum of Agreement with FMP, or approval of a Conditional
Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) and subsequent final Letter of Map Revision (LOMR).
Natural Environment Section
An additional survey for the federally-listed wood stork will be conducted during the revised US Fish
and Wildlife Service survey window of April 15, 2017 to July 15, 2017.

Categorical Exclusion Approval
STIP Project No.
WBS Element
Federal Project No.
Prepared By:
5/18/2017
Date
Prepared For:
Reviewed By:
5/18/2017
Date
B-4479
38384.1.FD2
BRZ-1700(17)
—DocuSigned by:
5�-�p�,�,�, C. ��,�,�,�.�,
Stephen C. Greene, P.E., Vice-F
Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc.
—DocuSigned by:
,�bSt,p�, �l.i�,t,V'
Joseph H. Miller, PE, Project P�ar�r�'ri�g ���igYr�eer
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Unit
North Carolina Department of Transportation
by:
'1� p ��„'- � , -
1r
�Rsn�ann�.e
James Mclnnis, Jr., PE, Project Engineer
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Unit
North Carolina Department of Transportation
0 Approved
❑ Certified
5/18/2017
Date
If all of the threshold questions (1 through 7) of
Section F are answered "no," NCDOT approves this
Categorical Exclusion.
If any of the threshold questions (1 through 7) of
Section F are answered "yes," NCDOT certifies this
Categorical Exclusion.
by:
�^r� ��17�;- .
Y
James Mclnnis, Jr., PE, Project ngineer��
North Carolina Department of Transportation
FHWA Approved: For Projects Certified by NCDOT (above), FHWA signature
required.
N/A
Date John F. Sullivan, III, PE, Division Administrator
Federal Highway Administration
:

APPENDIX A

.,
• • • • Detour Route
TIP NO. B-4479
PROJECT
LOCATION MAP
Bridge Nos. 222, 226, 228 and 230
on SR 1700 (Red Hill Road)
over Red Hill Swamp
Columbus County
Not to Scale
FIGURE 1

South view from Bridge No. 230
� South view from Bridge Nos. 228 and 226
og 99�WSg6
' TIP NO. B-4479 `� ��
�� Q�
Columbus Co. � �
Pictures of s o
Existing Conditions ���'!�� 4Wp���p �
Bridge Nos. 222, 226, 228 and 230
on SR 1700 (Red Hill Road)
over Red Hill Swamp
Columbus County
Not to Scale
FIGURE 2

�
4
�:x ;_ _ .� �.
i '� '�� �
'����9��Y1� :.;� ',�' ,
�,�r�a►-��'�.��'�� •
,.. _. „
��� ��
� � .�. , •;1
�
1a�9��'9dfi �'j°���
' J � � {-}�
r �'
i
14 y i�i+l'�i .. , �
I . � '' ' i
, . ._:.:.-�.n'�_.: .
�
South view from Bridge No. 222
�;l . !'i7 ' ,.� T h L ' . � '
r it �� ...�a'�r''���',^� .
� f
.� � 1' y '� ~-R' � r�. � -
+�:��. - ��.x", _ -
•`�_. .. ' _ �i. r •M_
�r-i fi��'
- MxI
i � 1.
- y
�, Y
� ����'"}�� I,�' '�:,���"`. �
• �.r
- �. � T . ���..it _
' '�� ,-,�;���,� . - �
_.
" - .,� � . -
.�: .:;�,_ -_
-� � '�; : �_
�:. � `� =��,=-';:�:`L-
� 9y.
. . � .' �¢ . �_ d �. �� +.
M
i. M. 9� �'i ' l.; � �#'_��
ir � �' ;�-� �• t"- s!,' ,
- ~'�- 'S�- ,r,.:._',^.. r�� -• .�.*'�:� 4"'
c,s' _,l t ,sti ._ '.y. .
s..
� \
Columbus Co.
� i
---� ��- `- -- h�
�? p
Bridge No. 222 approach from South
TIP NO. B-4479
Pictures of
Existing Conditions
og 99�WSg6
0.�R� ��Q�
� .
:
� �
� a
> $
0
�� Q
�r �� 4WwM��O
Bridge Nos. 222, 226, 228 and 230
on SR 1700 (Red Hill Road)
over Red Hill Swamp
Columbus County
Not to Scale FIGURE 3

0
>
i
+
0
C:
rE _
I= E _
- T Sto. l3 f
� N�,-- F
C
u<� - ��
03 03
Zr6,
0
,a oz o2
z� In
�� oi .o,
�� .00.00 � .
24 0� .oi �l 55° 26' 053" E
'v R-3� �02 .OS R = 0,
F :
— Z'FDPg
��
E—E �—� \
E —
SR 1701 GREEN
N ELKINS ROAD
O
-� -
Pl Sto 12+37.46
p = 4l°43'21.3"fRTJ
D = 22° 55' 05.9"
L = 182.05'
T = 95.27'
R = 250.00'
e = 04
RUNOFF = 69
C
� —� —
� R------
POC STA.72+50.00-
POT STA. 13+70.56
COLUMBUS COUNTY
B-44 79
REPLACE IN PLACE
WITH OFFSITE DETOUR
-L-
PI Sta 13+24.27 PI Sta 22+14.08
0= 9° 20' 13.3" (LTJ p= 18` 29' S77" (RTI
D= 2° l7' 30.6" D= 4` 46' 28.7"
L = 407.40' L = 387.45'
T = 204.15' T = 195.43'
R = 2.500.00' R = 1,200.00'
e = 09 e = 04
Runoff= I00' Runoff = l00'
� _
�
� . . � - � . , � ' ' _ � . .
� .. - .. . � -.. /�
�5+00 . ��' . .
' %'
� -L- � -L-
6' 11' � 11' 6' 8' 30'�10" �
9'wrGR I GRADE I
z' , jPOINT z' 4'-5" 11' 1P _ 4'-5"
�{I FDPS li FDPS� �� I ��
0_08� OA2 a.02. -0.08 ��� � GRADE � 1"
A:1 - - 4: ] 3.1 .- .. � ' POINT
t 0.04 I�� y„�
0.04_
VARIABLE � � 3�1 ROADWAY TYPICAL SECTION o0 oa o0 oa oa oa.n. o0 00 00 oa
SLOPE -
-L- STA. 10+00.00 TO 50+50.00 2 yq,-
�-Y- 33' OUT-TO-OUT WIDTH
C�� VARIE$ .�_` VARIES b� , H_� � 11 PRESTRESSED CONC CORED SLAB UNITS
9�W�cR ti� To t5�� ti� To ts� BRIDGE TYPICAL SECTION
pos o.02 I o.02 ooa. , ___ FOR BRIDGE 222 OVER RED HILL SWAMP
4:1 GRADE 4:7 3�� .. ..
VARIABLE '� 1 POINT
s�oPe 3' ROADWAY TYPICAL SECTION
-Y- STA. 10+00.00 TO 13+29.15
SR 1700 RED HILL ROAD
E E E E E
C� _� � — — — —
20+00
E
— � � GRAU-350i
— � F C � ITYPJ
c c — — �
F �
E E - (TVP.�
E E�E
u�: � .,
_ /
RED HILL SWAMP
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
B-4479 4
R�W SHEEf NO.
ROA�WAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER ENGINEER
I\c'�,�ItI�LE 'l PiL:1\"�
�O NOT l"tili I��DN FW Al.qU151T10N
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
1 RAMEYKEMP
- — egeeeeeee
� ASSOCIATES, INC.
T r a s p o r t a t i o E n g i r s
n5808 Faringdon Place, Suite 100 e
Raleigh. North Carolina 27609
Phone:[phone]
50' 25' 0' S0' 100'
E�E
F �e_
F E`
�'PE "' BR 222 � —
�TiNP�, —_ _ � e
i_«._��� — � o
� o
�_, , � o
\F �
— _.. , � .-rT Z, FOPS �"
• � 7'7TTYt'
F N h
p - hQ h
E — � cry W
�E � _ � FOP 4,
—E � S � � �
� i
E F � �
` ` ' - . \ Z �
f Z
BROWN MARSH SWAMP ��
��
A�JT4CIPATEQ �ESIG�J �ATA
DESUGN 5'�AN DAR D5 = 5'U BR EGaf]NAL '�EFt
DESOGIV SPEE[7 = 60 MP�B
a�a� za� z = a�a
a�a� zas� _ �oa
D�B V =
D =
DIPAL =
'E"�S � '
MIN. �ZADIUS = 15Q(}"
MAX. �GRAD E = 4 °/a
K sa� = 1 �6
K crest = 151
SE MAX, = Q.l�4
CLASSIFICATIC]N = �'Uk�AL Ct7LLECTC7�
'�E�R�tAIN = LEVEL
DES�GN EXCEP'fnON = h�C]M E
� BRIDGE APPROACH SLAB
FOR -L- PROFlLE, SEE SHEET N0. 7
FOR -Y- PROfILE, SEE SHEET NO. 8

AhITICIRATED DESIGhI [�ATA
DESVGN STAN DA�t DS = SlJ BR EG9�NAL TIE�t
DES�GN SPEED = 6Q MPIi
ADT 20'92 = 45�
ADT 2035 = 900
aHV =
d =
aUAL =
�f�fST -
MON. RAD�US = 150(}'
MAX. GFtA[] E = 4 %
K sag = 136
K crest = 151
�E M,AX. _ (7.i�4
CLASSVFICAl1QN = R'URAL CaLLECTQR
'�E'�RAYN = LEVEL
DESVGN EXCEPTIDN = NaN E
COLUMBUS COUNTY
B-44 79
REPLACE IN PLACE
WITH OFFSITE DETOUR
—L—
PI Sto 22+I4.08 PI Sto 25+26.28
�= l8' 29' 577" �RTJ p= 7` 38' 21.4" (RTl
D= 4° 46' 28.7" D= 3° /0' S9.2„
L = 387.45' L = 240.00'
T = 195.43' T = 120.18'
R = I,200.00' R = 1.800.00'
e = .04 e = .04
Runoff = l00' Runoff = l00'
'^w: ..� �- .. � < . _ n-. � :' ^T r�. ' H-: 'k;� � � r _ ' .-.n .. � .. . , � ' , :: � , ^ - .. .. - .
y . : �� - ,, . . - . . . ' ' . ��\ � .. _` � �. � Y : . � . � -
� � � . F .~P ~ 4 r ~ • . . �
R k F F p T41 n. h � �� .}- h
h ._ f. " k h},� 1� "� k
. . � �� h. �� h M�. k 4 k� � r ,F r` F- r h k- f�.- .� � -
�
..� . '. _ 4� .Nry� �T y.N h-4 . _...
N w
� i. I:� �WI�L WHITE -. . - '. .. F F� " ..- ; � � h . � µ_ M . 4 r � R hg . . .
.
� ��,�a =;, ��� k ' � RED HILL SWAMP 30+00 '"_- � " � M k � T _ � � � _ - . .
25+00 ,- _ � `
� , • ' - " ,
- - �� "
.. . ' .. _ , ` " F. .� ' .. ..
E__—E E SR 1700 RED HILL ROAD
DE�— F E E E E
—1 _ � — —� �
= F �� TYPE-III� BR 226 ^ F� ' GRAU-350
� ,_T �-.ITYP�
r
m m 2' FDPS
mi
N � �
m� 2' fDPS — � � — �
m —� �
—{ D F - F
P N —E
A E
+ E��
O
O
O
O O
�
O
U
U
�
II
J
O
�
N
�
�
�
J
F F +
E E
DO NOT �ISTURB TRCE
(Y� _ _ � C � F
E E E
35+00
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
5 B-4479 5
R�W SHEEf NO.
ROA�WAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER ENGINEER
I\c'�,�ItI�LE 'l PiL:1\"�
�O NOT l"tili I��DN FW Al.qU151T10N
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
1 RAMEYKEMP
- — egeeeeeee
� ASSOCIATES, INC.
T r a s p o r t a t i o n E n g i n e r s
n5808 Faringdon Place, Suite 100 e
Raleigh. North Carolina 27609
Phone:[phone]
50' 25' 0' S0' 100'
:- � _
E E E E E E E E E E
_ _ — F F
T,: 1 BR 228 T----------------_
2' FDP�
N l4° 47' 13.0" W
_e-�-�T1TVPE-III _.... �.�.S�TTTTr-e� TYPU-3�0 � _ _ � � � C � .
_(TYP) __ _— 1 F C
F F
F
E E E E E E E E E E
..�_ = � � _ - . . .. . _ .. ' .. . ,. , , . W�c�;.4 r - �. �`�(� I• Y�
�
' �.
- ' . - - � . � FAEJ PRDPEP.TIE�:iLC -
' BROWN MARSH SWAMP " �
�B �Ofl6 PG 322 _ } � ��K �� � '�
, . .. JOroE'_ � � . , � .. . � - _ . � � P-B 71 PG '47.. . 4� 4 M � . F 4 .. k .' 4 } �.-� �
.-,a. - +Kr F _ . , , � . . � . : ' . . , . " ^ w . . w� ;r � �- I
. . . . k. � k`�r ._ . , ` . � ' _ ' � , . .. y_ k* } F k h �F k K k � r.'� I.
_ : . . .. r . � ,. . � ^ . F. . ' w F- }: ..
�r tt- � r. K ` '. w. . . ^.h. -� f, k
' " ' F- .k �T i•- rt � r, m k �' . ' I" , '` ,i � ^ ' w" � M � � � L. �' R �� � 4� k 4 �` ,y.� H= � �
_ P ,w k . ' L - � - ' }. 4, ♦ � k � _ . . h :: �,. L4h .
- � K 4
.r. t, . rt' � �" -. � F. � Lh" k%"- . - _ . � _ k rn �- F " ,+ �.` k f :_ ` k � M k k " F i^ } � k , 1 1
� h.•. . h. .. ' . � . � . � . - t- . ' - A� � K , �'. 4 Y I-_ ` r' ` k- ` t .
' _ _ . . ' . . , _ - .. - . . . � . . . _ . . . . . . _ . . ` - . - " ' - . . _. . � m�. .
� -L-
`6'�.` 11' � 11' ��6'�� 8'
9'wiGR � GRADE
2' I iPpINT 2'
FDPS I;' FDPS �
o.oa o.oz o_.oz l0.08
Q:l 4: ) 3'�
VARIABLE :.:'-. .: �' 3.1
SLOPE .,_,. .
ROADWAY TYPICAL SECTION
—L— STA. 10+00.00 TO 50+50.00
� —L—
30' � 70"
4'-5" 11' I 11' 4'-5"
1' I� �� 1'
1" GRADE � 1"
I,' POINT I
o.oz o.oz_
00 00 00 00 00 00 0 00 00 00 00
� 2 3/4„
33' OUT—TO—OUT WIDTH
11 PRESTRESSED CONC CORED SLAB UNITS
BRIDGE TYPICAL SECTION
FOR BRIDGE 226 OVER RED HILL SWAMP
� —L—
30' � 10"
4,_5„JI` 11, I �1, � L4,_5„
1, I � ` 1,
1" � GRADE 1��
��POINT '{�
0.0_2 I� OA2
oa. o 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
� 2 3/4" MIN
33' OUT—TO—OUT WIDTH
11 PRESTRESSED CONC. CORED SLAB UNITS
BRIDGE TYPICAL SECTION
FOR BRIDGE 228 OVER RED HILL SWAMP
� BRIDGE APPROACH SLAB
FOR -L- PROFILE, 5EE SHEET NO. 7
�
�
Q
0
t
�
M �
�w
�7 w
_
J V%
I w
w �
Z
_
U
�

Z
0
>
s .
0
0
0
0
} E E
� F
M � — _ — —
� � j 2' FDPS
VI W �
J �
� w 2' FDPS
w w
Z N F
= E E
U
Q
�
��, � � _
90+00 ' � �. r
� 4
4.
E E
E E E
�
v
+
N
v
�
r . �
I
J n
E — �
-E
COLUMBUS COUNTY
B-44 79
REPLACE IN PLACE
WITH OFFSITE DETOUR
—L —
Pl Sto 43+30.80 Pl Sto 49+57.43
p= l° 09' 39.2" 2TJ p= 0` 33' 49.2" �LTI
D= 0' 30' 00.0" D= 0° 30' 00.0"
L = 232/8' L = 112.73'
T = 116.09' T = 5637'
R = I1,459.16' R = 11,459.16'
e = NC e = NC
45+00
RED HILL SWAMP
SR 1700 RED HILL ROAD
E E E
_ _ _ F
GRAU-350
�TYP)
�a 1-ri� T' i
_ — _ _ — _ _ — F
E E E
� � -' . I.._ �.
, IC86 P 32[ - - . .. _ . . �, _ _ h M . . ` , ., A ' ..
�8 iIPG A7 . , .. . . ' . � _ . � - . �s °>.- � µ-� _ .� 4 .- � . M ^.
..F r k� k r k'h
. _ . . . . � . . . . � _ . k .� �` � F- h- � i.
' . . _ - - _ -. . _ . ' f' � TF M 'R . �c
. . : - � . 4 . ' !. _ �" i.. 4' r�. k �m }
' r L- T �' F x R �, 2 � M k k. 4 ; , , �}-' � T F , .. . .
_ h` m h_ � � P` � i
. _ `_ 4�` }. k _ . , . . . . .. . . .
4 � _ �
µ t- l F. ,: . . � ,l ' - F� ..
� —L—
6' 11' � 11' 6' 8' _�
9'w/GR I GRADE
2' � IPOINT 2'
� �FDPS FDPS �
0_08�� OA2 OA2. 0.08, ---
4:1 4:1 3'� : � _
VARIABLE '�:-`'--.-. ` 3.1
SLOPE ��-.,.�
ROADWAY TYPICAL SECTION
—L— STA. 10+00.00 TO 50+50.00
k,.�;t�; J+_fJNlf•I�.. 'IJiiI�I�'�
dr� �can rc �oe
. , � � P.B 56� PG 6i
� � . ' � ' ' : . . _ . .
- . �
n" k, � T x'� K� � �. _
,- � h- r. h` rt-
.; h � �- k u e L w N 4..
—E E E E-
F � �
— BR 230 �- �
T: — I
�1,: .._ TYPE��II�������������
fn'Pl _ _ — —
F
—E E E E-
k. � . •.
BROWN MARSH SWAMP
� —L—
` 30' � 10° _
4'-5"� 11' I 11' 4'-5"
�' � � � � �;
�� GRADE I 1,•
POINT
,0_02 I�/ 0_02,
00 00 oa o0 00 00 00 0o ao 00 00
� 2 3�4" MIN
33' OUT—TO—OUT WIDTH
11 PRESTRESSED CONC. CORED SLAB UNITS
BRIDGE TYPICAL SECTION
FOR BRIDGE 230 OVER RED HILL SWAMP
�GFLt L4MP$ELL BE4�
�� 08,938 PG�iqg -
� .P8 19 FG.53 ��
E E
��9�
E�F
� � — — — — — F
—E E E E—
END PR
—L— 50+
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
B-4479 6
R�W SHEEf NO.
ROA�WAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER ENGINEER
I\c'�,�ItI�LE 'l PiL:1\"�
�O NOT l"tili I��DN FW Al.qU151T10N
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
1 RAMEYKEMP
- — egeeeeeee
� ASSOCIATES, INC.
T r a s p o r t a t i o E n g i r s
n5808 Faringdon Place, Suite 100 e
Raleigh. North Carolina 27609
Phone:[phone]
ww.rameykemp.com
NC License No. C-0910
50' 25' 0' S0' 100'
ANiICIPATEm mESIGN mATA
DE50G�J STAMLA'�DS = S�IBREGOQNALTiER
DESOGM SPEED = fiq MPFi
AD�2(1'�2 = 45�
ADT 2Q35 = 9a0
DFI V =
D =
DUAL =
�$ � -
MON. �tAQAUS = '�5�0'
MAXs G�ZADE = 4 °/a
K sag = '� 36
K crest = �51
SE MAX. _ �.a4
CLASS9FICATIQN = �tU�AL CQLLEC�OR
TE'�tRA�IJ = LEVEL
DESVGM EXCEP'�9{7N = NON E
� BRIDGE APPROACH SLAB
FOR -L- PROFILE, SEE SHEET NO. 7