20180572 Ver 1_401 Application_20180418

CAROLINA
ECOSY TEMS9 INC.
Ms. Tasha Alexander
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
201 80572
3040 NC Hwy 42 West; Clayton, NC 27520
P:919-359-1102 — F:919-585-5570
April 23, 2018
RE: Pre -Construction Notification: Clean Water Act Section 404/401 Approvals and Neuse
River Riparian Buffer Authorization, Meadows of Banks Subdivision
Wake County, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Alexander;
Carolina Ecosystems, Inc., on behalf of the Perry Brothers Construction and Stewart -Proctor, has
prepared the attached Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) for the above referenced project for a
Clean Water Act (CWA) Section 404 Nationwide Permit (NWP) 29, its corresponding Section
401 General Certification 4139, and a Neuse River Riparian Buffer Authorization. The site is
located along Banks Road in southern Wake County. The project would help to meet housing
demands for residences in the rapidly growing Triangle region of North Carolina.
The attached PCN form provides information for your use in review of unavoidable impacts to
streams, wetlands, and riparian buffers. Two unnamed tributaries of Mills Branch in the Neuse
River Basin occur on the property. Impacts would include a perpendicular road crossing of
Stream SA, including portions of two of its associated wetlands and riparian buffer. A portion of
stream SB would also be filled, and two areas of its buffer graded to accommodate a stormwater
BMP. No portion of the BMP's treatment footprint would overlap these resources.
Access to the site would be provided via extension of Berkshire Lane on the site's west. A stub
road on the east is required by the county, but no plans to develop future phases exist. Future
home sites will be limited to 7,000 square feet of impervious surface in perpetuity, but overall
imperviousness is not known. Eighteen percent is used in this application as an estimate, but is
likely an overestimate. Wake County will review and approve stormwater plans for the project.
Avoidance and Minimization
A pump around would be utilized to install the culvert and road crossing of Stream SA and
temporarily dewater 165 feet of Stream SA (Attached Sheet C-5 and impact Figure 1). Within
this area, three 80 -foot long, 60 -inch diameter culverts would be installed and impact 82 linear
feet of stream. Each would be installed to 1 -foot below natural stream bed. The stream on the
downstream end of these culverts would be stabilized with rip -rap, compressed into natural bed
elevation, for 41 linear feet.

Meadows of Banks
April 23, 2018
Page 2 of 3
Stormwater collected at the road cul-de-sac would be diverted to Wet Detention device #2 in the
northwestern portion of the site. The original plan included a diversion ditch berm wetland WJ,
but the design was modified to pipe under this feature with no permanent impact to this wetland.
Stormwater would be directed through -an 18 -inch reinforced concrete pipe under the wetland
(Sheet C-5). A temporary wetland impact of 280 square feet would accommodate installation.
During the PJD visit with the USACE, Stream SB was extended approximately 100 feet beyond
what the NCDWR had buffered and resulted in a portion of the stream extending into the
treatment footprint of Wet Detention Device # 1. To preserve soils suitable for septic systems,
maintain the minimum storage volume required by Wake County, and minimize impacts to
surface waters, the device was shifted so that only a portion of its berm would impact Stream SB.
The minimized impact to this feature would now total 24 linear feet (Impact Figure 2).
Two buffer impact areas, totaling 0.28 acre are associated with this property. The impacts would
occur in Zone I and Zone II as part of the perpendicular road crossing over stream SA (0.26 acre,
Impact Figure 1), and grading and revegetating a portion of zone II to install a BMP Berm
adjacent to stream SB (0.02 acre, Impact Figure 2). Level spreaders are proposed on the south
side of stream SA's buffer along the proposed road crossing (Sheet C-3). Each would be located
outside Buffer Zone II and ensure diffuse flow of stormwater along the proposed road through
the buffers.
Sediment and erosion control measures would be implemented according to NC requirements,
and approved by NCDEQ prior to implementation. Jurisdictional areas adjacent to construction
areas would be clearly marked with protection fencing or other similar method to avoid
inadvertent encroachment. Copies of permits and impact areas would be provided to the prime
contractor and all subcontractors working in or near jurisdictional areas. Land clearing would
take place along with installation of erosion control devices. Construction would be
accomplished using typical equipment including excavators, backhoes, and dump trucks.
Additional equipment may be used as required.
A Tier 1 search of the NC Natural Heritage Data Explorer found no records of federally
protected species on or near the project. Their report is attached. The preceding information,
along with the enclosed Pre -Construction Notification form, Vicinity map, USGS map,
Jurisdictional Features map, impact drawings, and erosion sediment control plan sheet C-3 are
being submitted for your review of this project.

R 0 L I N ,
SYSTEMS, INC.
3040 NC Hwy 42 West; Clayton, NC 27520
P:919-359-1102 — F:919-585-5570
April 23, 2018
Ms. Tasha Alexander
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105 `\
Wake Forest, NC 27587
RE: Pre -Construction Notification: Clean Water Act Section 404/401 Approvals and Neuse
River Riparian Buffer Authorization, Meadows of Banks Subdivision
Wake County, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Alexander;
Carolina Ecosystems, Inc., on behalf of the Perry Brothers Construction and Stewart -Proctor, has
prepared the attached Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) for the above referenced project for a
Clean Water Act (CWA) Section 404 Nationwide Permit (NWP) 29, its corresponding Section
401 General Certification 4139, and a Neuse River Riparian Buffer Authorization. The site is
located along Banks Road in southern Wake County. The project would help to meet housing
demands for residences in the rapidly growing Triangle region of North Carolina.
The attached PCN form provides information for your use in review of unavoidable impacts to
streams, wetlands, and riparian buffers. Two unnamed tributaries of Mills Branch in the Neuse
River Basin occur on the property. Impacts would include a perpendicular road crossing of
Stream SA, including portions of two of its associated wetlands and riparian buffer. A portion of
stream SB would also be filled, and two areas of its buffer graded to accommodate a stormwater
BMP. No portion of the BMP's treatment footprint would overlap these resources.
Access to the site would be provided via extension of Berkshire Lane on the site's west. A stub
road on the east is required by the county, but no plans to develop future phases exist. Future
home sites will be limited to 7,000 square feet of impervious surface in perpetuity, but overall
imperviousness is not known. Eighteen percent is used in this application as an estimate, but is
likely an overestimate. Wake County will review and approve stormwater plans for the project.
Avoidance and Minimization
A pump around would be utilized to install the culvert and road crossing of Stream SA and
temporarily dewater 149.5 feet of Stream SA (Attached Sheet C-5 and impact Figure 1). Within
this area, three 80 -foot long, 60 -inch diameter culverts would be installed and impact 82 linear
feet of stream. Each would be installed to 1 -foot below natural stream bed. The stream on the
downstream end of these culverts would be stabilized with rip -rap, compressed into natural bed
elevation, for 41 linear feet.

Meadows of Banks
April 23, 2018
Page 3 of 3
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at your earliest
convenience at [phone] or [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Carolina Ecosystems, Inc.
Chris Hopper
Senior Environmental Scientist
cc: Ms. Karen Higgins, NCDWR, 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
Attachments:
- Pre -Construction Notification Form
- Agent Authorization Form
- NC Natural Heritage Program Search Report NCNHDE-5665
- Figures
o Project Vicinity
o USGS Map
o Features Map
- Meadows of Banks Existing Conditions (Stewart -Proctor, Sheet EX -1)
- Meadows of Banks Impact Maps (Stewart -Proctor, Figures I and 2)
- Meadows of Banks Erosion and Sediment Control Plans (Stewart -Proctor, Sheet C-3)
- Meadows of Banks Roadway Plan and Profile (Stewart -Proctor, Sheet C-5)

Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑X Yes ❑ No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑X Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑X No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑X No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ YesX❑ No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Meadows of Banks Subdivision
2b. County:
Wake
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Raleigh
2d. Subdivision name:
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Perry Brothers Construction
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
Book 017051 / Page 01524
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d. Street address:
2016 Pagan Road
3e. City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27603
3f. Telephone no.:
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑X Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Chris Hopper
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Carolina Ecosystems, Inc.
5c. Street address:
3040 NC Highway 42 West
5d. City, state, zip:
Clayton, NC 27520
5e. Telephone no.:
919-274-5979
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 10698070002
1 b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
ILatitude: 35.6371 Longitude: -78.6969
1 c.
Property size:
26.02 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Mills Branch (27-43-15-7)
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C; NSW
2c.
River basin:
Neuse
3.
Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The property includes maintained fields and mature hardwood forest. The project vicinity is characterized by small agricultural properties interspersed
with residential developments and forestland.
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.48
3c.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 1,560
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
See cover letter. The purpose of this residential development is to provide single family housing for the expanding population of the area.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
See cover letter.
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (includingall prior phases)in the past?
❑X Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments: PJD submitted
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
Preliminary ❑ Final
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Chris Hopper
Agency/Consultant Company: Carolina Ecosystems, Inc.
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
A preliminary jurisdictional determination has been requested, and the site visit occurred on March 28, 2018.
5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
5b.
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. If yes, explain.
No future phases are planned. See cover letter for discussion.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑X Wetlands ❑X Streams — tributaries ❑X Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 P
Fill for road crossing
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Yes
Corps
0.088
W2 T
SW Pipe Installation
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Yes
Corps
0.006
W3
Choose one
Choose one
Yes
W4
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W5
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W6
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
0.094
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 P
Culvert
SA
PER
DWQ
12
82
S2 T
Stabilization
SA
PER
DWQ
12
41
S3 T
Pump -Around
SA
PER
DWQ
12
149.5
S4 P
Fill
SB
INT
DWQ
6
24
S5
Choose one
S6
Choose one
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
296.5
3i. Comments:
82 linear feet of Stream SA and 24 feet of Stream SB are the only permanent impacts for this project. The total stream loss requested for this project is
106 linear feet.
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑X Wetlands ❑X Streams — tributaries ❑X Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 P
Fill for road crossing
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Yes
Corps
0.088
W2 T
SW Pipe Installation
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Yes
Corps
0.006
W3
Choose one
Choose one
Yes
W4
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W6
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
0.094
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g•
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 P
Culvert
SA
PER
DWQ
12
82
S2 T
Stabilization
SA
PER
DWQ
12
41
S3 T
Pump-Around
SA
PER
DWQ
12
165
S4 P
Fill
SB
INT
DWQ
6
24
S5
Choose one
S6
Choose one
-
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
312
3i. Comments:
82 linear feet of Stream SA and 24 feet of Stream SB are the only permanent impacts for this project. The total stream loss requested for this project is
106 linear feet.
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivi ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01
Choose one
Choose
O2
Choose one
Choose
03
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated Flooded Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑X Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number—
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
61 P
Road Crossing
SA
No
7,873
3,237
B2 P
BMP Berm
SB
No
0
1,087
B3
Yes/No
B4
Yes/No
B5
Yes/No
B6
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
7,873
4,324
6i. Comments: Both impacts are listed as Allowable in the Rule's Table of Uses.
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
See attached (Sheet C-3). A pump around would be utilized during installation of the road crossing of Stream SA. A storm water conveyance, required
along the north of Stream SA, has been amended to pipe underneath wetlands and avoid fill and drainage impacts. Level spreaders are proposed at
the southern side of the Stream SA road crossing.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Best management practices and sedimentation and erosion control methods will be used during all construction techniques. No equipment refueling or
maintenance activities will occur adjacent to jurisdictional areas. All temporary impacts to jurisdictional wetlands during construction activities will be
returned to their original configuration and seeded in a timely manner for stabilization.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑x Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Storm water BMPs are being constructed to provide sufficient nutrient removal to negate the need for
❑ Yes ❑X No
diffuse flow provisions. Level Spreaders are provided along each side of the proposed road crossing,
south of Stream SA.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
18
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑X Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
Stormwater wetlands (2) will be constructed on-site. Wake county will be responsible for review and approval of storm water plans.
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
Wake County
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject?
Wake County
❑x Phase II
0 NSW
3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
USMP❑
❑
apply (check all that apply):
Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑X No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
El Session Law 2006-246
❑Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached.
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes
❑X No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes
❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (if so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes
❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes
❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes
❑X No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes
❑X No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The
proposed project is a residential subdivision that, once built, will not support additional development.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Each lot would utilize an individual septic system to treat wastewater.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
habitat?
❑ Yes ❑X No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
impacts?
❑X Yes ❑ No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
USFWS website https:www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylist&vake.html. NC Natural Heritage Data Explorer was performed (attached).
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
hftp://wwww.habitat.noaa.gov/protection/efh/efnmapper.htm1
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
❑ Yes ❑X No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
HPOWEB Map Service http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/. National Register of Historic Place http:/Avww.nps.gov/nr/research/.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ YesX❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
Wake County GIS floodplain mapping, North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program http:/twww.ncfloodmaps.com/
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant isprovided.)
Page 10 of 10

CAROLINA
3040 NC Hwy 42 West; Clayton, NC 27520
ECOSYSTEMS,INC. P:919-359-1102 — F:919-585-5570
PROPERTY ACCESS AND AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
Property Information
Property Address
and/or Description Meadow of Banks Subdivision
Parcel Identification
Numbers) (PIN) 0688-96-9907
City: Fuguay'Varina State: NC County: Wake Property Size (Acres): 27.9
Property Owner Information
Owner: 0 Authorized Agent*. ❑
Name: Perry Brothers Construction
Title:
Street Address: 2016 Pawn Road
City: Raleigh State:NC Zip Code:27603
*Written proof of authorization from owner required.
Authorization
1, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein, do authorize
representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein
described for the purpose of conducting on-site investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the
U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors
Act of 1899.
Additionally, I hereby grant Carolina Ecosystems, Inc. (CEO staff, their designated contractors and representatives, as
well as other Federal., State or local authorities access to the above referenced property when necessary for the purposes of
conducting on-site environmental consulting services. 1 also grant CET the authority to act as authorized agent on behalf of
the owner of the above listed property for the communication, submission, and/or application to relevant govenunent
entities, including local, state, and federal authorities, for the review, acceptance, concurrence, and/or approval of
environmental information, documents, and/or permit requests concerning the above listed property. These services may
include regulatory determinations of environmental features on my property such as issuing a determination associated
with streams and wetlands. I certify that I ain the legal owner or authorized agent of the legal owner of the above property
and have authority to grant such access. I have made CFI aware of, and supplied all available records related to, previous
environmental investigations on the subject property of which I have knowledge.
Owner/Agent (signature) 9
- Date

�.r+ir.VFp,
z-
-Z7 � K
North Carolina department of Natural and Cultural Resources
Natural Heritage Program
Governor Roy Cower
March 26, 2018
Christopher Hopper
Carolina Ecosystems Inc
3040 NC Hwy 42 W.
Clayton, NC 27520
RE: Meadows of Banks S/D
Dear Christopher Hopper:
Secretary Susi H_ Hamilton
NCNHDE-5665
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide information
about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
A query of the NCNHP database, based on the project area mapped with your request, indicates that there are
no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, or conservation/managed areas
within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there may be no documentation of natural
heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have
been surveyed. The results of this query should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists.
In the event that rare species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may
update our records.
The attached 'Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that have been
documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these records suggests that
these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area if suitable habitat exists and is
included for reference. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed area within a one -mile radius of the
project area, if any, are also included in this report.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation planning, project
review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria for regulatory decisions.
Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published without prior written notification to the
NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP
data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a Dedicated Nature
Preserve (DNP), Registered Heritage Area (RHA), Clean Water Management Trust Fund (CWMTF) easement,
or Federally -listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance, please
contact Rodney A. Butler at rodney.butlerD-ncdcr.aov or 919.707.8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
MAJLING ADDRESS: Telephone: [phone] LOCATIOR
1651 Mad Service Center wuwu.ncr.org 121 West Jorma Street
Ra *h, NC 27659-1651 Rafth, NC 27603

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Meadows of Banks SID
March 26, 2018
NCNHDE-5665
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Dragonfly or
32043
Damselfly
G5
Freshwater
18654
Bivalve
Rare
Freshwater
2952
Bivalve
3 -Medium
Freshwater
8924
Bivalve
Vascular Plant
981
Coryphaeschna ingens Regal Darner 2004 -Pre
Alasmidonta undulata Triangle Floater 2016-11-04
Lampsilis radiata Eastern Lampmussel 2016-11-03
Strophitus undulatus Creeper 2016-11-04
Pseudognaphalium helleriHeller's Rabbit -Tobacco 1948-10-12
Natural Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
H?
5 -Very
--- Significantly
G5
S2?
Low
Rare
C
3 -Medium
Species of Threatened
G4
S3
Concern
E
3 -Medium
--- Threatened
G5
S3
E
3 -Medium
--- Threatened
G5
S3
H
4 -Low
--- Significantly
G4G5T
S3
Rare Peripheral
3T4
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https //ncnhde natu reserve, org/content/help. Data query generated on March 26, 2018; source: NCNHP, Q1 January 2018. Please resubmit your
information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 3

NCNHDE-5665: Meadows of Banks S/D
March 26, 2018
Project Boundary
Buffered Project Boundary
®
NHP Natural Area (NHNA)
®
Managed Area (MAREA)
Page 3 of 3
1:23,327
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 mi
0 0.3 0.6 1.2 km
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmn, Interrrep, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS,
FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Surrey, Esri Japan,
METI, Esn Chirm (Hong Kong), s nsstopo, m OpenStreetMap—tributors, and
ft GIS User Comrcnmiy

Fuquay- ;
r'
(Fuquay-jLinale Cre k
Lat: 35.6371 / Long: -78.6969 Creek
Terrible
Project Location.
Wake County, NC
i
N
CAROLINA
ECOSYSTEMS MMEME== NI i I Q Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 'L USGS Streams
April 2018
arner
r
R� 1
Meadow of Banks S/D
Wake County, NC
Figure 1: Vicinity Map

JIr
z
+�'_ WJ WA SA
WH 411w- I
0
4ik
W
D
.K WC �': WB}
WE
WE SBS }�
r Y y } t 6
a , rIFF
ri
` Y
a
1 r
J� i

VICINITY
WETLANDS
40
TEN-TEN ROAD
= 6,442 S.F., 0.15 AC.
NOYU
= 233 S.F., 0.01 AC.
WETLAND AREA WD #1-5
- 643 S.F., 0.01 AC.
WETLAND AREA WE #1-6
= 460 S.F., 0.01 AC.
WETLAND AREA WF #1-4
= 187 S.F., 0.004 AC.
j
- 4,331 S.F., 0.13 AC.
WETLAND AREA M #1-5
= 2,521 S.F., 0.06 AC.
WETLAND AREA W1 01-5
= 1,162 S.F., 0.03 AC.
= 2,819 S.F.0.06 AC.
WETLAND AREA WV #1-9
1,778 S.F.,, 0.04 AC,
TOTAL WETLAND AREA = 21,714 S.F., 0.50 AC.
BNKSHIRE
STE
CH
VICINITY
WETLANDS
WETLANDAREA WA #1-23
= 6,442 S.F., 0.15 AC.
WETLAND AREA WC #1-4
= 233 S.F., 0.01 AC.
WETLAND AREA WD #1-5
- 643 S.F., 0.01 AC.
WETLAND AREA WE #1-6
= 460 S.F., 0.01 AC.
WETLAND AREA WF #1-4
= 187 S.F., 0.004 AC.
WETLAND AREA WO #1-16
- 4,331 S.F., 0.13 AC.
WETLAND AREA M #1-5
= 2,521 S.F., 0.06 AC.
WETLAND AREA W1 01-5
= 1,162 S.F., 0.03 AC.
WETLAND AREA WJ #1-13
= 2,819 S.F.0.06 AC.
WETLAND AREA WV #1-9
1,778 S.F.,, 0.04 AC,
TOTAL WETLAND AREA = 21,714 S.F., 0.50 AC.
GRAPHIC SCALE
( IN Fir )
1 men - 150 fL
vJ
Y
Z
a Z
m = o
0
LL
0 z
=o
U) U
0 z
o Z
p w F-
X
Q w
w
NE;
EX -1

'
M
`� xE_ 2
RI�RIAN
BUFFER
NOTE• Ah�
ALL UTILITIES TO BE WITHIN
RIGHT OF WAY
1 n -r I—&_...... _
SA — LINEAR FEET OF STREAM UNDER CULVERT
SA — LINEAR FEET OF DISSIPATOR WITH RIP—RAP
SA — LINEAR FEET TEMPORARY FOR PUMP—AROUND
SA — STREAM IMPACT AREA
®INTERIOR BUFFER AREA (ZONE 1)
® EXTERIOR BUFFER AREA (ZONE 2)
E WETLAND IMPACT AREA FOR ROADWAY CROSSING
o v v WETLAND IMPACT AREA FOR ADDTIONAL ROADWAY
® TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT AREA FOR CONSTRUCTION
MEADOWS OF BAPW
1Vm QOIwff NmH CAROLINA
WACT MAP
STEWART-PROCTOR
Design Consultants
319 Choponoke Road
Ralei h, North Carolina 27603
Phone [phone] Fax [phone]
I, r
r
i
�_:�P,ARIAN
BUFFER-------
82
UFFER-__.__-
82 LF 2 BENDS
41 LF 1 BENDS
165 LF
1,511 SF, 0.03 Ac.
7,873 SF
3,237 SF
2,774 SF, 0.06 Ac.
1,080 SF, 0.02 Ac.
280 SF, 0.006 Ac
PREPARED FOR:
GRAPHIC SCALE
PERRY BROTHERS
DEVELOPMENT CO.
2016 PAGAN ROAD
50 0 25' 50'
RALEIGH, NC 27603
DATE : 3-9-18
PROJECT ENGINEER:
( IN FEET )
MIKE L. STEWART
1 inch = 50 ft
PROJECT CADD DESIGNER:
NC DWO MAPS:
JOHN A. TEEL
AREA IMPACT MAP
PROJECT SURVEYOR:
FIGURE#: l
HERB PROCTOR

TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA #2
SB - LINEAR FEET OF IMPACT 24 LF
® EXTERIOR BUFFER AREA (ZONE 2) 1,087 SF
MEADOWS OF BADW
WAZB CDtWff, MEH CAMM
IlRACT MAP #2
5TEWART PROCTOR
SP Design Consultants
319 Chapanoke Road
Role* h, North Carolina 27603
Phone [phone] Fax [phone]
PREPARED FOR:
GRAPHIC SCALE
PERRY BROTHERS
DEVELOPMENT CO.
2016 PAGAN ROAD
50 0 25' 5(
RALEIGH NC 27603
DATE : 3-9-18
PROJECT ENGINEER:
( IN FEET
MIKE L. STEWART
1 inch = 50 ft.
PROJECT CADD DESIGNER:
NC DWO MAPS:
JOHN A TEEL
AREA IMPACT MAP
PROJECT SURVEYOR:
FIGURE# : 2
HERB PROCTOR

50' RIGHT OF WAY
IIS" --8- 24' B -B
L I-2� P -HT.
�
1�.�.. FT.
3:1 SLOPE
CUT
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION
WITH SIDEWALK
NTS
vNL
BOTH Intim`
1/4-/R
zIXIx .BIL
6331(
SHOULDER SECTION
DRIVEWAY TURNOUT GRADES
TEMPORARY MATTING SCHEDULE
'
JUTE
STA, 11+38 RIGHT SIDE BL
TO
BEGIN PERM MAT STA 14+65 BL
STA 14+00 LEFT SIDE BL
TO
INV PIPE B STA. 12+00 L-1
STA. 18+95 RIGHT SIDE BL
TO
INV PIPE A STA. 16+00 BL
STA. 19+22 LEFT SIDE BL
TO
INV PIPE A STA 16+00 BL
STA. 14+41 RIGHT SIDE L-1
TO
INV PIPE B STA. 12+00 L-1
STA 12+22 LEFT SIDE L-2
TO
INV PIPE C STA. 14+45 L-2
STA. 12+22 RIGHT SIDE L-2
TO
INV PIPE C STA. 14+45 L-2
STA. 15+58 RIGHT SIDE L-2
TO
INV PIPE D STA. 15+16 L-2
i�13
TOP 294
MV IN - 291 1
-' INV OUT
PERMANENT DITCH PROTECTION SCHEDULE ENKA MAT
STA, 14+65 RIGHT SIDE BL
TO
INV PIPE A STA. 16+00 BL
NOTES EXLA0 PUAROUND'
1. ALL VAnMPON SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ONLY DRY OR ISOIATED SECTIONS OF CHANNEL.
2. IMPERVIOUS DIKES ARE TO BE USED TO ISOLATE WORK FROM STREAM FLOW WHEN
NECESSARY.
3. CONTRACTOR$RA1J_ ONLY OPERATE THE PUMP WHEN WORKERS ARE PRESENT. THE
PUMP AROUND PUMP SHALL BE TURNED OFF AT THE END OF EACH DAY AND THE IMPERVIOUS
DIKES REMOVED TO ALLOW FLOW THROUGH THE CHARNEL.
4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ONLY DISTURB THE AMOUNT OF CHANNEL THAT CAN BE GRADED
AND STABILIZED WITHIN A SINGLE WORK DAY AND NO MORE THAN 150 FEET. A STABILIZED
CHANNEL SHALL INCLUDE THE FINAL GRADING. INSTALLATION OF THE MATTING, AND
INSTALLATION OF THE TEMPORARY SEEOING.
5. IF THE CONTRACTOR MUST TURN OFF THE PUMP AROUND PUMP OR P UNEXPECTED STORM
EVENTS OCCUR PRIOR TO THE CHANNEL BEING STABILIZED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL
A TEMPORARY LINER OR OTHER MEASURE TO PROTECT THE DISTURBED CHANNEL UNTIL
WORK IS RESUMED.
B. MAINTENANCE OF STREAM FLOW OPERATIONS SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE WORK,
THIS INCLUDES POLYETHYLENE SHEETING. DIVERSION PIPES, PUMPS AND HOSES.
7. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINING AND ACQUIRING THE PROPER SIZED
PUMP, THE PUMP SHALL BE LARGE ENOUGH TO PUMP, THE PUMP SH4LL BE LARGE ENOUGH
TO PUMP IWC GAUMIN AND HAVE A MIN 201 TOTAL DYNAMIC HEAD.
SEQUENCE OL CONSTRUCTION FORTYPKAL
WORK AREA
t. INSTALL UPSTREAM PUMP AND TEMPORARY FLEXIBLE HOSE.
2. MCE UPSTREAM IMPERVMS DIKE AND BEGIN PUMPING OPERATIONS FOR STREAM
DWERSION.
3. PLACE DOWNSTREAM IMPERVIOUS DIKE AND PUMPING APPARATUS. DEWATER ENTRAPPED
AREAL AREA TO BE DEWATERED SHALL BE EQUAL TO ONE DAYS WORK.
4. PERFORM FJICAVATION AND PIPE INSTALLATION.
5. EXCAVATE ANY ACCUMULATED SILT AND DEWATER BEFORE REMOVAL OF IMPERVIOUS DIKES,
PUMPS AND TEMPORARY FLEXIBLE HOSE.I DOWNSTREAM IMPERVIOUS DIKES FIRST).
6. ALL GRADING AND STABILIZATION MUST BE COMPLETED IN ONE DAY WITHIN THE PUMP
AROUND AREAS BETWEEN THE IMPEWICLS DIKES.
S. STABILIZE DISTURBED AREA WITH SEED AND MULCH.
® SKIMMER/RISER BASIN
® WAKE CO. CUSTOM BASIN
-HAT- TEMPORARY MATTING
--E31 - ENKA MAT
Q STORM SEWER PIPE
-�- TEMPORARY DIVERSION DITCH
GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
-g- SILT FENCE
OMITS OF DISTURBANCE
CHECK DAM
SE36 RIP RAP
® SILT FENCE OUTLET
■ SKIMMER
---POROUS BAFFLE
HORSESHOE INLET PROTECTION
-IPF- TREE PROTECTION FENCE
ABC
3:
LEVELI
SPREADER DRAREAGE C ANO
IIFIOYR Q FACTOR FORBAY LENGTH
#1 0.25 AC. 0.5 7.2 0.90 CFS 10 6 SF 10'
#2 0.25 AC. 0.5 7.2 1.01 CFS 10 6 SF 10'
'
I �
'
I I _ _
ANTHONYANT4 USA
N
JOHN B
B -N/F ._
ALLd 8 SARAH
Il BAUYCARDNER
D.B. 15679, PG. 318 D.B. 1479$, - -0. 512
D.B. 16595, PG,
-IM
SIMPSON
D. 12288. PG. 2841
PIN 0688-97-7,729' PIN
/ /
�. 1829( PG
,1739-rCASMTA�
PIN/ -0698-07-1758
1
',. D.B. 1= PG.
I / OOBB-87
(SEE C-8 FOR
D.1115188, P0. 2554 �
PIN D888-98-8820 (�
DETAIL)
--
_
-
TPF
TPF F
TPF
SILT DE
CT -17-2D'
0
OUTLET \
7: a
i�13
TOP 294
MV IN - 291 1
-' INV OUT
-�
PUBLIC
D E.
t
y�
" '•
" 290,9
RIP RAP SEE 0-2 FOR
CLASS B L
'
I �
N/F N/F
MICHAEL k SHEILA MITCHEL B JESSICAN
BENT KRAUSE,..'
I I _ _
ANTHONYANT4 USA
20' PUBO )-'M
B -N/F ._
ALLd 8 SARAH
Il BAUYCARDNER
D.B. 15679, PG. 318 D.B. 1479$, - -0. 512
D.B. 16595, PG,
N�
ARI h LEL
D. 12288. PG. 2841
PIN 0688-97-7,729' PIN
/ /
0888-97-9]29
,1739-rCASMTA�
PIN/ -0698-07-1758
1
',. D.B. 1= PG.
N
RUTH FlSIH
(SEE C-8 FOR
D.1115188, P0. 2554 �
PIN D888-98-8820 (�
DETAIL)
:j AREA RETAINED
::%
_
-
TPF
TPF F
TPF
SILT DE
CT -17-2D'
0
OUTLET \
7: a
i�13
TOP 294
MV IN - 291 1
-' INV OUT
-�
PUBLIC
D E.
t
y�
" '•
" 290,9
RIP RAP SEE 0-2 FOR
CLASS B L
(
20' PUBO
MFFE
(tea V1ILIry
I `0295 87
- -
/
- od (MIN
TIMI _
N` N/F
20' PUBO )-'M
20 PERMANENT
UTILITY ESM'T
CONST. AND
Bal.CB`41 33
-N IENAN..'E ESM'T
f
WET DETENTION
CLASS B
DEVICE /2
N
RUTH FlSIH
(SEE C-8 FOR
D.1115188, P0. 2554 �
PIN D888-98-8820 (�
DETAIL)
:j AREA RETAINED
::%
NT _
BY OWNER = 1.86 AC.
BANKS POIN
INC �
1
34171 PO149 ---
.PIN/ OBBB B]-4353
SILT DE
80' 3.0"
OUTLET \
CB ()t3 W/BAFFLES 0.36 0.36 1.30
565 SF
CF
578 SF 1,296 CF
SILT FENCE
OUTLET (TYR)
133'x67'x4.5'
37'x20'x4.5'
20' 1.75"
10'
20'PERMANRN
.CONST
CB #4 W AFFLES 0.36 0.36 1.30
ESOrT
D
IMAINTENANCE
37'x2O'x4.5'
10'
)IMENSIONS LISTED ARE FOR BOTTOM OF BASINS
(SEE
o
4LL SKIMMER BASINS TO HAVE POROUS BAFFLES.
LEGEND
-__-7,000
N` N/F
----------
EDWAROSSwE
18134, PQ. 1858PIN ......3.:..
/
J I
-
;J::!:::; ::'= ;:iiviiiiii2l_::.
�; i
_
/
Bal.CB`41 33
�-r y
�rJ
DIXI
CLASS B
BEFOREBACQUIRING A BUILDING PERMIT FOR LOTS MARKED WITH AN iF THE BUILDER
MAY NEED TO OBTAIN A FLOOD HAZARp AREA USE PERMIT FROM W KE COUNTY
N
RUTH FlSIH
- -
D.1115188, P0. 2554 �
PIN D888-98-8820 (�
THERE SHALL BE NO FILLING OR THE ERECTION OF PERMANENT STRUCTURES IN THE
AREAS OF W E COUNTY FLOOD HAZARD SOILS OR FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
(FEM4A
:j AREA RETAINED
::%
AGENCY 100 YEAR FLOOD ZONES UNTIL A FLOOD STUDY IS APPROVED BY
WAKE DOl0T) AND/0R F.E.M.A.
BY OWNER = 1.86 AC.
34 705 SF
8,178 SF
35 625 SF 39,780 CF
8,911 SF 10,062
98,523 CF
375'x95'x4.5'
LEGEND
-__-7,000
STORAGE
----------
7.000SF = MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS ALLOWED
- -
FLOOD HAZARD SOILS SHOWN
-
PER DELINEATION FROM SdcEC
�rJ
DIXI
CLASS B
BEFOREBACQUIRING A BUILDING PERMIT FOR LOTS MARKED WITH AN iF THE BUILDER
MAY NEED TO OBTAIN A FLOOD HAZARp AREA USE PERMIT FROM W KE COUNTY
BOUNDARY AREA : 27.87 AC.
SITE AREA: 26.01 AC.
�NVIRONMENTAL SERMC CER BUILDERS ENGINEER, ARCHITECT AND OR SURVEYOR
AS APPROPRIATE) MUST CERTIFY THAT ALL FLOOD HAZARD REQUIR MENTS ARE MET.
o
THERE SHALL BE NO FILLING OR THE ERECTION OF PERMANENT STRUCTURES IN THE
AREAS OF W E COUNTY FLOOD HAZARD SOILS OR FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
(FEM4A
:j AREA RETAINED
::%
AGENCY 100 YEAR FLOOD ZONES UNTIL A FLOOD STUDY IS APPROVED BY
WAKE DOl0T) AND/0R F.E.M.A.
BY OWNER = 1.86 AC.
W
• r� '' } \P
MFFE
-295.67'LOT-14
t
r p/F1l
TIT
I
DtB 15488. PO I %P R
PIN/ OBBB-B9w990 LOT
.\ arfr,. i
CL If)
1
LOT.
HAW
307.3 '
I r
\1 I
4
\ q
Aa14s� _--
SKIMMER/RISER BASIN DRAINAGE DENUDED DID
AND WAKE AREA (Ac.) Ac. (CFS)
SURFpALCI�ER �A�REA SURFACE AREA STORAGE
PROVIDED
STORAGE
BASIN SIZE
WEIR SKIMMERr
IN' RA
�rJ
DIXI
CLASS B
PROVIDED
L x W x D
SIZE
o
N
SB i11°" W/BAFFLES 22.1 4.50 79.8
SB N2 /BAFFLES 5.59 0.95 20.2
34 705 SF
8,178 SF
35 625 SF 39,780 CF
8,911 SF 10,062
98,523 CF
375'x95'x4.5'
80' 3.0"
MFFE
-295.67'LOT-14
t
r p/F1l
TIT
I
DtB 15488. PO I %P R
PIN/ OBBB-B9w990 LOT
.\ arfr,. i
CL If)
1
LOT.
HAW
307.3 '
I r
\1 I
4
\ q
Aa14s� _--
SKIMMER/RISER BASIN DRAINAGE DENUDED DID
AND WAKE AREA (Ac.) Ac. (CFS)
SURFpALCI�ER �A�REA SURFACE AREA STORAGE
PROVIDED
STORAGE
BASIN SIZE
WEIR SKIMMERr
eCOOSUNNTY
DIXI
REQUIRED
PROVIDED
L x W x D
SIZE
o
N
SB i11°" W/BAFFLES 22.1 4.50 79.8
SB N2 /BAFFLES 5.59 0.95 20.2
34 705 SF
8,178 SF
35 625 SF 39,780 CF
8,911 SF 10,062
98,523 CF
375'x95'x4.5'
80' 3.0"
CB ()t3 W/BAFFLES 0.36 0.36 1.30
565 SF
CF
578 SF 1,296 CF
23,241 CF
1,302 CF
133'x67'x4.5'
37'x20'x4.5'
20' 1.75"
10'
CB #4 W AFFLES 0.36 0.36 1.30
565 SF
578 SF 1,296 CF
1,302 CF
37'x2O'x4.5'
10'
)IMENSIONS LISTED ARE FOR BOTTOM OF BASINS
o
4LL SKIMMER BASINS TO HAVE POROUS BAFFLES.
SKIMMER BASINS 1 AND 2 TO BE CONVERTED INTO STORMWATER PONDS
a
'
STORM SEWER - PIPE CHART
DISSIPATOR DESIGN
PIPE SIZE DRAIN Q25
LENGTH SLOPE
INVERT INVERT SIZE
AREA CFS
FEET %
IN OUT LENGTH WIDTH
D50
LINING
AG
FT
FT
THICKNESS
�
PIPE A 24"RCP 9.70 16.9
52 0.58
304.6 304.3 120
6.0
6"
18" CLASS 8
Ci
'
PIPE B 48"RCP 18.5 31.0
W/HEADWALL
56 0.54
303.3 303.0 15.0
7.5
6"
18" CLASS B
SEAL:
PIPE C(3)60"HDPE 215.0 235.3
80 0.75
285.6 285.0 30.0
15.0
6"
18" CLASS B
�N-� R
W/HEADWALL
PIPE D 18"RCP
����
I a
-
f
0.68 2.70
-RCP
64 0.78
292.5 292,0
_ i
PIPE E 18 0.88 3.10
122 0.57
291.8 291.1
- ' SEAL
"
22024
-
OUTLET gAIET� (WIDCLIY
RP RM 9BE
191 tl1s1
RAD BIYILNSJD S
(L O)
4 \� PPE A 24• ELM t69 CLASS B (DSO.B7 ELY x r x Ir 19-18
` - PPE B 3r 678 31.0 CLASS B (D50 -n ELS x 7.5' K 1
j - PPE C (3)BO• 618 283 CLASS B (Dw-r) 3V K 1r x 19-
- I !\ PPE F Is, 202 270 CLASS B (D50=61 IY x 43' [ 1r �
\ , A57 STONE ON DEWOE I lY 1.38 3LB CLASS B (D5 6') r K Y a tr
FABRIC Ma 2 12• 1.41 11.1 CLASS B (D50=67 8' Ls x Ir \` I MO
REN � O 11
-NEUSE RIVER PERMANENT STORMWATER 2MEAN �'
RIPARIAN 50' F \ 1 otl-L78q� DIVERSION BERM cr C -'
TOP OF 50' FROM EaSPRE..
SIDES OF CREEKBOIH FADER UP �NANINB eti DB -1 Sc `O
_AR H/W " �. O
LF
ENT r Y\
noN 294.6r / \ 4MM611lJH-on T O at h
_ Dean -no vs -la ns w
tp _ uEta�wlmwmnual 2�
/! DN �O\ TmLA WD -IDT IXa140! I,
� RDNF IFR A _w? Olt n
SCALE 7Oc
20 CHANNEL \_. I
LEVEL SPREADER PLAN VIEW 1 AND 2
CHANNEL DESIGN D-2 p I
LEVEL SPRREADFR UP 1 057'LyY HIGHWAY METHOD w c
D.A.- 13.55 ACRES O
ROW PATH 025 =39.0 lF$
N/F USE MANNINGS E0. 0
BRENDA GOTTEN p-� 8 = J'
D.B. 10659, PG. 14 0.5' ;1 - -- 3:1 31 - 035
FN/ 0698-0e-59'. .... SIDE SLOPE - 11
CHANNEL SLOPE - 0.6%
ANNEL 3 YM� • • . b - 3 DEPTH = 1.58' M - 3.17 FPS 1
59 DOFF USE CALDBOUND INC. E14KAMAT II LINER 1``1 11
FILTER FABRIC T -IDS 82. 1.58).008 - 0.6 Pg
ENKA 1 - 20 PSF
Appq ( n t
�AppgOppppp�� yy gg i\
WN LENGTH IENGTII = 180' e P
1 GENERAL NOTES
EVEL SPREADER PROFILE VIEW 1 AND 2 ��llJJe
- CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING
UTIUTIES, AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGE
RESULTING FROM HIS ACTIVITIES. CALL UTUTY LOCATOR
Divert flow While trenching SERVICE 46 HOURS PRIOR TO BEGINNING EXCAVATION. $
ALL CONSTRUCTION AND MATERIALS SHALL BE IN
across the stream ACCORDANCE 1WTH THE WAKE COUNTY DESIGN STANDARDS
AND SPECIFICATIONS. $
CONSTRUCTION DRAWING APPROVAL IS REQUIRED BEFORE
CONSTRUCTION ON THIS PROJECT MAY BEGIN.€ g g
_ �1 3�9'
Planning and Design
uF="nauu. •_nor` ��
r.v,wve
STOCKPILE NOTES
STOCKPILE HEIGHT NOT TO EXCEED 35 FT, STOCKPILE SLOPES 2:1 OR
FLATTER.
APPROVED BMP. SHALL BE SHOWN ON A PLAN TO CONTROL ANY POTENTIAL
SEDIMENT LOSS FROM A STOCKPILE.
STOCKPWNG MATERIALS ADJACENT TO A DITCH, DRAINAC-EWAY.
WATERCOURSE, WETLAND, STREAM BUFFER, OR OTHER BODY OF WATER
SHALL BE AVOIDED UNLESS AN ALTERNATIVE LOCATION IS DEMONSTRATED TO
BE UNAVAILABLE.
DIVERSIONS TO APPROVED BMP. SHOULD BE UTIUZED ON UPSLOPE SIDES OF
STOCKPILES
OFF-SITE SPOIL OR BORROW AREAS MUST BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH WAKE
COUNTY UDO AND STATE REGULATIONS. ALL SPOIL AREAS OVER AN ACRE
ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE AN APPROVED SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN.
DEVELOPER CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY WAKE CO. OF ANY OFFSITE
DISPOSAL SOIL PRIOR TO DISPOSAL FILL OF ANY FEMA FLOODWAYS
AND NON -ENCROACHMENT AREAS ARE PROHIBITED EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE
PROMDED BY SUBSECTION
14-19-2 OF THE WAKE COUNTY UNIFIED
DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE(CERTIFICATIONS AND PERMITS REQUIRED).
SEEDING OR COVERING PILES WITH TARPS MULCH IS REWIRED AND WILL
REDUCE EROSION PROBLEMS TARPS SHOULD
KEYED IN AT THE TOP OF
THE SLOPE TO KEEP WATER FROM RUNNING UNN DERNEATH THE PLASTIC.
STAGED SEEDING AND MULCHING SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED ON A CONTINUAL
BASIS WHILE THE STOCKPILE IS IN USE.
ESTABLISH AND MAINTAIN A VEGETATIVE BUFFER AT THE TOE OF THE
SLOPE(WHERE PRACTICAL).
PLASTIC COVERING CAN ALSO BE USED FOR IMMEDIATE PROTECTION FROM
EROSION ON DISTURBED AREAS AND STOCKPILES SHEETING SHOULD BE
KEYED IN AT THE TOP OF THE SLOPE TO KEEP WATER FROM RUNNING
UNDERNEATH THE PLASTIC.
STOCKPILE FOOTPRINTS SHALL BE SETBACK A MIN. OF 25' FROM PROPERTY
UNES
ANY CONCENTRATED FLOW LIKELY TO AFFECT THE STOCKPILE SHALL BE
DIVERTED TO AN APPROVED BMP.
IF STOCKPILE IS TO REMAIN FOR FUTURE USE AFTER THE PROJECT IS
COMPLETE (BUILDERS, ETC.), THE RNNANCIAL RESPONSIBLE PARTY MUST
NOTIFY WAKE COUNTY OF A NEW RESPONSIBLE PARTY FOR THAT STOCKPILE
DISTURBED AREA = 5.60 AC ' r
GRAPHIC SCALE
STORMWATER CONTROL AND MANAGEMENT FOR REVIEW ONLY-
IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION DRAWING
IMPERVIOUS AREA PER LOT TO BE LIMITED TO 7,000 S.F. DEVELOPER SHEET
THIS AMOUNT TO BE TO STRINGENTLY ENFORCED INTO PERPETUITY. PLAN IS SUBJECT TO REVISIONS DURING PERRY BROTHERS DEVELOPMENT CO. ( W FECr)
WAKE COUNTY TOOL V1.4 WAS USED FOR ALL STORMWATER CALCULATIONS. THE CONSTRUCTION APPROVAL PROCESS RALE PAGAN ROAD L 1nc5 - l0o tL C_3
RALEIGH, NC ROAD V
SUBDIVISION #S-22-17
U)
Z z
J
W z CL
0 J
°d
O F
z Z
i O
O
Q (if
W w

h j
W m yam- — cow /� Ir
Y
V, a
WATERLINE 6'X6" TEE" / / •` l 16'X$ REDAICER
W/BLOGKING 1 I
3
ING ,.' - e W/B RCtC'NG I "1 � ..
ci
37� 0 PROPOSE50o_(PUBLC) L L31t218,�R=3
5425 000_
8560
311.024, R-300
4000 / /
( / MFFE0
100 YEAR H/W
EASEMENT
i
•; Im ELEVATION =307.32'
PLAN VIEW FOR L-1
34(
3M
33C
325
320
315
310
305
300
295
1[
d`\ L=187 30, R=5 0 0 0
L 50' R/W
(PUBLIC) L-2
MFFE
_ -295.67' -°
cxarxlc scaiE PVI STA = 11.50 30
PVI ELE=317
PLAN VIEW FOR L-2
V = 317.35
A.D. _ -4.05
K = 58.73
( D7 rm) 330 --.. -.
237 78'VC
1 ImL - 50 K
- -
- -
- PVI
TA 14+
1571
-
320
PVI
LEV 3
2 58
315
325
LOW POINT ELE 30867
K ' 30 31
-
-
LOW POINT STA 11+08.19
315
--
300
310
PVISTA =11 89.16
-
5700V
305
310
- PVt ELEV =- 07.32
300
285
295
K 30.
28D_0
50
_ r!
300
24Z21C
W
a
'
�
m
mn
Z
�
95
EXISTING
GROUND 114
w
W
C
pi
n V'
M
W
w
L
U 0
r Z 04
-- -
LO
12932
31 6.. - -.
Q J
CL.TOP OF
FINIqHFn r,
-
0 o
m
U
w
PPOIN
PVI STA 14+ 1
O � Q
265
rim mU
J
pl°
wm
VI EV 0
-
m,,.
Ll
-
LLI
J
AD=10.52
�W
ZOW
Z
uw.
ry
'Rw
Z
�297.29'VC
o
Fom
-.-.
�
-. ..
ISTINGGROUND
ciw
ren
_-
-
a�
-.
_
V
¢ w,.,
Ute;..
ton—
-. -.. PIPE _
RCI
-
100 YEAR 1
/W
E1EV- 30E
32'
-
{1,
L TO
OF
,00 10+50
11+00
11-50
12+00 12+50
13.00
13+50
14+nn
14+50
15-00
5+21
PROFILE VIEW FOR L-1
340
325
335
- -- - -_-
320
330
m
U U
L�
315
325
310
320
lO
305
315
jZ
300
310
v
Ovpi
295
305
310
290
300
285
295
28D_0
50
10
02
22
'o m...
+_1_1_10
o
R
- -- - -_-
325
m
U U
L�
o�
ry
lO
¢ N O1
jZ
c
v
Ovpi
><
O `0 1`
310
2U
�
2
a
300
W
Im
Z
Z
J
95
EXISTING
GROUND 114
Q
W
C
'o m...
+_1_1_10
o
R
- -- - -_-
325
m
U U
L�
ry
320
$
315
.0 93.3j
310
305
300
Im
Z
J
95
EXISTING
GROUND 114
Q
ILL
0
LOW POINT ELFV 2
G
M
W
w
L
U 0
r Z 04
-- -
LO
12932
31 6.. - -.
Q J
--
-
�
ZZ 0
= g Z
-
PPOIN
PVI STA 14+ 1
O � Q
265
.
J
Q
VI EV 0
-
A
-
LLI
O
AD=10.52
5<
L
uw.
�297.29'VC
o
Fom
�
ciw
ren
_-
-
n
vo
n
ry
_
� w
-
{1,
L TO
OF
4
I
FNISH
D GRADE
_
�
Z�
w �.
w
E
--
WATERT
--.
--
.:
SURI]
VBELOW
:.
(�
10D YEAR H/W
GRADE_..
€0�' HDPEO
EIiY:-193.87'PI -.
--
W/HVDW
eo
g
18
�m
To 11+00
11+50
12+00
12+50
13+00
13+50
14+00
14*50
15+00
15+5n
tfi+nn
t
PROFILE VIEW FOR L-2
330
o
R
325
L�
320
$
315
310
305
300
Z
J
95
Q
ILL
0
M
W
w
L
U 0
r Z 04
290
O
Q J
U)
ZZ 0
= g Z
O � Q
265
O
J
Q
>Q
>
280
LLI
O
@0
5<
L
FOR REVIEW ONLY- DRAWING
DEVELOPER NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET
PERRY BROTHERS DEVELOPMENT CO. PLAN IS SUBJECT TO REVISIONSDURING !�-G
2016 PAGAN ROAD l.i J
RALEIGH, NC 27603 THE CONSTRUCTION APPROVAL PROCESS

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
R Yes QX No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
Yes ❑ No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
USFWS website https:www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylist/wake.html. NC Natural Heritage Data Explorer was performed (attached).
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes QX No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
http://wwww.habitat.noaa.gov/protectionlefh/afnmapper.htm1
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
Yes QX No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
HPOWEB Map Service http,//gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/. National Register of Historic Place hftp://www.nps.gov/nr/research/.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ YesX-1 No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
Wake County GIS floodplain mapping, North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program http://www.ncfloodmaps.com/
CKrm 4Acper, 0-6 -T—
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
-a
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant isprovided.)
Page 10 of 10

f LQT-1-6---
_
10
i'— WETLAN
,—'
° AREA
\
+ + + 1
+ i + + ++
+ 1
i +� +
IIP Rh
t t +
+ j�
'0 E
RIRARIAN�
• -�
BUFFEf�"---�� �
woo \ iz 2r
-----
— �r�
` L R RIA —/
��—
BUF R
NOTE:ALL � ��
T/ rBE WITHIN
�
_ �—��
RIGHTTOF�WAYES //� / \
/� —�'
S1— LINEAR FEET OF STREAM UNDER CULVERT
82 LF 2 BENDS
St — LINEAR FEET OF DISSIPATOR WITH RIP—RAP
41 LF 1 BENDS
S1 — LINEAR FEET TEMPORARY FOR PUMP—AROUND
149.5 LF
S1 — STREAM IMPACT AREA
1,511 SF, 0.03 Ac.
® INTERIOR BUFFER AREA (ZONE 1)
7,873 SF
® EXTERIOR BUFFER AREA (ZONE 2)
3,237 SF
0 WETLAND IMPACT AREA FOR ROADWAY CROSSING
2,774 SF, 0.06 Ac.
7y v WETLAND IMPACT AREA FOR ADDTIONAL ROADWAY
1,080 SF 0.02 Ac.
MEADOWS OF BANDS
PREPARED FOR.
PERRY BROTHERS
GRAPHIC SCALE
WAKE CMWTy N011Ug CARpUNA
DEVELOPMENT CO.
2016 PAGAN ROAD
50' 0 25' 50'
RALEIGH NC 27603
�p �^r� �� D
11Y1CAV 1 1rlt1C
DATE : 3-9-18
PROJECT ENGINEER:
( IN FEET )
S1'EWART PROCTOR
MIKE L. STEWART
1 inch = 50 ft.
PROJECT CADD DESIGNER:
NC DWQ MAPS:
SP Design Consultants
JOHN A. TEEL
AREA IMPACT MAP
319 Choponoke Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
PROJECT SURVEYOR:
FIGURE # :1
Phone [phone] Fax [phone]
HERB PROCTOR