20180518 Ver 1_401 Application_20180418

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actionsf"\*0
le
2 0 1 80
SAW — 2017 - 02292 BEGIN DATE [Received Date]:
Prepare file folder ❑ Assign Action ID Number in ORM
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: Asbury Chapel
2. Work Type: Private ❑� Institutional ❑ Government F] Commercial 11
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form 63d and Be]:
The purpose of the project is to redevelop the site for residential homes.
4. Property Owner/ Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]: Owner: Janet Haack. Applicant: TAC Asbury Chapel, LLC. POC: Todd Terwilliger
5. Agent / Consultant [PCN Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]: Gregg Antemann, PWS
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form 135b]: None
7. Project Location - Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form 61b]:
Northeast of the Asbury Chapel Road -Eastfield Road intersection, in Huntersville, NC.
35.383295 N, -80.805908 W
8. Project Location -Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form B1a]: 021 161 13, 02116112, 02101112, 02116101
9. Project Location —County [PCN Form A2b]: Mecklenburg
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Huntersvllle
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form 62a]: Ferrelltown Creek
12. Watershed / 8 -Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 132c]: 03040105
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404 ❑/ Section 10 & 404
Regulatory Action Type:
❑Standard Permit
✓ Nationwide Permit # 29
❑ Regional General Permit #
❑ Jurisdictional Determination Request
F
]Unauthorized
Pre -Application Request
Activity
0 Compliance
❑ No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

CAROLINA WETLAND SERVICES, INC.
550 E. Westinghouse Blvd.
Charlotte, NC 28273
704-527-1177 (office)
704-527-1133 (fax)
To: Mr. David Shaeffer
Charlotte Regulatory Satellite Office
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801
Subject: Asbury Chapel Site
Huntersville, NC
CWS Project No. 2017-0418
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
Date: April 2, 2018
WE ARE SENDING YOU: Pre -Construction Notification NWP#29
ON BEHALF OF: TAC Asbury Chapel, LLC.; POC: Todd Terwilliger
ATTACHMENTS INCLUDED:
NO.
DATE
DESCRIPTION
1
4/2/2018
Attachment A: Pre -Construction Notification Form
2
4/2/2018
Attachment B: Property Owner Deed Information
3
9/6/2017
Attachment C: Agent Authorization Form
4
9/6/2017
Attachment D: Figures 1-8
5
1 9/6/2017
1 Attachment E: Site Plans with Impacts
6
1 9/6/2017
1 Attachment F: PETS Report
7
1 9/6/2017
1 Attachment G: Photo a e (Photographs A -J
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
J For verification and signature ❑ Revisions per field visit ❑ As requested ❑ As submitted
REMARKS: Mr. Shaeffer, we are submitting an PreConstruction Notification NWP#29 for your
verification and signature.
Please do not hesitate to contact Gregg Antemann at 704-408-1683 or [e-mail] should
you have any questions or comments regarding this request.
Sincerely,
ZT__� C, AU�_
Gregg Antemann, PWS
Principal Scientist
Daniel Roberts
Project Scientist

Asbury Chapel Site April 5, 2018
Additional Drawings and Supplemental Information CWSProjectNo.2017-0418
ATTACHMENT A:
Pre -Construction Notification

o%��ja'F�wA rF�goG
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
® Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes ® No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
becausewritten approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit.-
ermit:because
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes ® No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Chapel Grove Subdivision
2b.
County:
Mecklenburg
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Huntersville
2d.
Subdivision name:
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Janet Haack
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d.
Street address:
3e.
City, state, zip:
3f.
Telephone no.:
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
O Agent ® Other, specify: Purchaser/Developer
4b. Name:
Todd Terwilliger
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
The Ardent Companies
4d. Street address:
2100 Powers Ferry Road SE, Suite 350
4e. City, state, zip:
Atlanta, GA 30339
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
[e-mail]
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Gregg Antemann, PWS
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Carolina Wetland Services, Inc.
5c. Street address:
550 E. Westinghouse Blvd.
5d. City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28273
5e. Telephone no.:
04-408-1683
5f. Fax no.:
04-527-1133
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 12
PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
02116113, 02116112, 02101112, 02116101
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
FLatitude. 35.383295° Longitude: -80.805908°
1 c. Property size:
76 ac.
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Ferreltown Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C
2c. River basin:
Yadkin-PeeDee
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The project area consists of mixed forest, deciduous forest, residential areas, and actively maintained utility line rights -of -ways.
Land use in the vicinity consists of residential and forested areas.
ccording to the United States Department of Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA-NRCS) Web Soil
Survey of Lincoln County (Figure 4, attached) and the most recently published NRCS Soil Survey for Mecklenburg County
(Figure 5, attached), current and historic on-site soils consist of Cecil sandy clay loam (2 to 8 percent slopes [CeB2]), Cecil
sandy clay loam (8 to 15 percent slopes [CeD2]), Enon sandy loam (2 to 8 percent slopes [EnB]), Enon sandy loam (8 to 15
percent slopes [EnD]), Monacan loam (0 to 2 percent slopes [MO]), and Wilks loam (15 to 25 percent slopes [WkE]). Of the on-
site soils, only Monacan loam is listed on the Web Soil Survey Hydric Soils List as containing hydric inclusions.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.106
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 1,323
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of this project is to develop the property into a single-family residential subdivision in order to meet the growing
demand in the Huntersville/Charlotte, North Carolina area. Charlotte and its surrounding area is one of the fastest growing
cities in the country. In 2016 Charlotte and Huntersville experienced the 11th highest total new residents in the country and is
averaging two times the North Carolina average growth rate since 2010.
Page 3 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project proposes to construct a single family residential subdivision. All proposed impacts related to this project are
included in this PCN as a single and complete project, though the construction of the proposed subdivision may occur in
phases. Activities affecting waters of the U.S. include three road crossings to allow for ingress and egress into and within the
subdivision. All sewerline crossings will be installed via jack -and -bore method and will not result in additional impacts. Impacts
to on-site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. have been reduced to the maximum extent practicable. One on-site non -jurisdictional
pond will be drained and filled. Dewatering of the pond will be accomplished by siphoning and/or pumping water through silt
sacs. Proper sediment and erosion control measures will be used to minimize disturbances to downstream waters (Attachment
D). All work will be constructed in the dry utilizing Town of Huntersville standard cofferdam methods. Proper sediment and
erosion control measures will be used to minimize disturbances to downstream waters in accordance with Water Quality
General Certification (WQC) #4139 and NWP #29. Typical inspected and regularly maintained mechanized equipment will be
used for construction activities in jurisdictional waters.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project(including all priorphases) in thepast?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known): Daniel Roberts
Other: Carolina Wetland
Services
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
An Approved JD was submitted to, and received by, the USACE Asheville Field Office on October 27, 2017 (SAW -2017-02292).
Site was visited and verbally approved by David Shaeffer on January 19, 2018.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
All existing on-site impacts were permitted in 1985 by non -reporting permit 26.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes 19 No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 12
PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
Wetlands ® Streams – tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f. Area
Wetland impact
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
Type of jurisdiction
of
number
Corps (404,10) or
impact
Permanent (P) or
DWQ (401, other)
(acres)
—Temporary
W1
p
Road Crossing 1-
Bottomland Hardwood
Yes
Corps
0.003
Culvert
W2
P
Road Crossing 2-
Bottomland Hardwood
Yes
Corps
0.001
Culvert
W3
p
Road Crossing 3-
Bottomland Hardwood
Yes
Corps
0.029
Culvert
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
10.033
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial (PER) or
Type of
Average
Impact
number
intermittent (INT)?
jurisdiction
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(feet)
feet)
S1
P
Culvert
Stream A
INT
Corps
4
42
S2
P
Culvert
Stream A
PER
Corps
4
34
S3
P
Culvert
Stream B
PER
Corps
4
72
S4
T
Dewatering
Stream A
IN
Corps
4
20
S5
T
Dewatering
Stream B
PER
Corps
4
20
3h. Total stream and tributary
impacts
188 If
3i. Comments:
Page 5 of 12
PCN Form – Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivii ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Tem porar T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01
_
Choose One
Choose
02
_
Choose One
Choose
03
_
Choose One
Choose
04
-
Choose One I
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose One
P2
Choose One
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number-
Permanent (P) or
Temporar T
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B1
_
Yes/No
B2
_
Yes/No
B3
-
Yes/No
B4
_
Yes/No
B5
-
Yes/No
B6
_
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 6 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.4 January 2009

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
In order to avoid and minimize impacts to jurisdictional waters of the U.S., the Chapel Grove Subdivision site was delineated
prior to developing the site plan, and the proposed site plan was designed to avoid the jurisdictional features to the maximum
xtent practicable. On-site waters of the U.S. were delineated and an Approved Jurisdictional Determination site visit occurred
n January 19, 2018 (SAW -2017-02292).
No Build Alternative
In an attempt to minimize impacts to jurisdictional waters while meeting the goals of the project, a "No Build" alternative was
considered. The property is being purchased for the purpose of providing more residential housing to meet the growth and
emand of an area in Huntersville experiencing significant population growth. A "No Build" option would not meet the project
goals of providing necessary housing to meet the current demand. Therefore, the No Build Alternative was eliminated from
further consideration.
Proposed Impacts to Jurisdictional Waters
Unavoidable permanent impacts to on-site jurisdictional features are limited to 148 linear feet of streams and 0.033 acres of
wetlands. The configuration and density of the project has been design to avoid waters of the U.S. to the greatest extent
practicable while still meeting project needs. The interconnectivity of streets is an essential component of the Town of
Huntersville 2030 Community Plan and is regulated by the Huntersville Zoning Ordinance, Article 5. In accordance with the
Town of Huntersville 2030 Community Plan and Huntersville Zoning Ordinance, Article 5, cul-de-sacs and stub roads are
thoughtfully designed to allow interconnectivity of the proposed development with adjoining properties that minimizes impacts to
waters of the U.S.
Road Crossing 1 Impacts (S1,S2+W1)
The alignment of Chapel Grove Crossing was chosen as it allows the road to cross at a nearly perpendicular angle, impacts less
f the higher value water resources, and allows for a stub road in the northern part of the proposed subdivision. Road Crossing
1 crosses Stream A at the intermittent and perennial breakpoint (S1 and S2). Installation of a 60 -inch corrugated metal pipe
(CMP) culvert will result in permanent impacts to 42 If of intermittent flow and 34 If of perennial flow totaling 76 If of permanent
stream impacts (Impact Drawings). Roadside grading will result in 0.0026 acres of impacts to Wetland AA (W1). Adjusting the
alignment of Chapel Grove Crossing would result in additional impacts to waters of the U.S. and/or would not comply with local
regulations.
Road Crossing 2 Impacts (S3+W2)
Road Crossing 2 is designed to cross Stream B at a near perpendicular angle far enough downstream so that grading does not
affect the confluence of Stream D with Stream B and far enough upstream to minimize impacts to Wetland AA. Installation of a
72 -inch CMP culvert will result in permanent impacts to 72 If of Stream B. Riprap fill in the wingwall apron of the downstream
culvert will result in 0.0014 acres of Wetland AA (W2) impacts.
Road Crossing 3 Impacts (W3)
The proposed Hollow Bend Drive is necessary as it provides extra ingress and egress points to meet Town of Huntersville
ordinances for the proposed subdivision. The alignment of Hollow Bend Drive has been designed to completely avoid impacts t
Wetland CC, Stream B, and Stream C. In order to avoid these water resources, 0.029 acres of Wetland BB will be permanently
impacted (W3).
Page 7 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
The project proposes to impact 148 If of stream and 0.033 ac. of wetlands for the construction of three road crossings. In order
o further minimize and avoid designed impacts, pipes are being placed in upland areas to maintain hydrologic connection of
upslope and downslope waters and to maintain current drainage areas of downgradient headwater streams (Site Plans, sheet
L-6). In order to minimize cumulative impacts to Stream D, proposed BMP 3 will filter and discharge on site stormwater within
he natural existing valley for Stream D. For sewerline installation, jack -and -bore or similar directional boring method will be
used and no additional impacts will occur (Site Plans, Sheet WL -3). In order to limit stream bank erosion, stream banks will be
stabilized using a combination of natural and hard stabilization techniques immediately above and below culverts. All work will
be conducted in the dry in accordance with NC WGC #4139. Temporary impacts resulting from dewatering at each stream
crossing will be no more than 20 linear feet ([S4+S5] See attach dewatering detail). Typical inspected and regularly maintained
mechanized equipment will be used for construction activities in jurisdictional waters. Proper sediment and erosion control
measures will be used to minimize disturbances to downstream waters. Design, installation, operation, and maintenance of all
sediment and erosion control measures shall be equal to or exceed the requirements specified in the North Carolina Sediment
and Erosion Control Manual.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
❑ Yes ® No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
Type: Choose One
Quantity:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose One
Quantity:
Quantity:
Type: Choose One
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose One
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Page 8 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) —required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
Zone 2
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 9 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
This project is associated with a stormwater infrastructure maintenance project and
0 Yes ❑ No
does not require a SMP.
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
28%
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
On-site
stormwater management plan is a part of the Huntersville Water Quality Ordinance
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
Huntersville
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is thisproject?
Huntersville
® Phase II
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
0 NSW
apply (check all that apply):
0 USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
0 HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
0 Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes 0 No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 10 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes
® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes
❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes
® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes
IR No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
O Yes
® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance
with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
This project will utilize off-site treatment at Mallard Creek WWTP.
Page 11 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes Z No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes Z No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
The United States Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS), Raleigh Field Office, North Carolina Distribution Records of
Endangered, Threatened, and Species of Concern list for Mecklenburg County was reviewed. CWS performed a North
Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) Database Search for any federally -protected species potentially occurring
within Mecklenburg County and the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Cornelius and Derita, North Carolina quadrangles
(Attachment 13).
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes Z No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
https://www. habitat. noaa.gov/protection/efh/efhmapper/index. html#
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes Z No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office HPOWEB GIS Service (Attachment 11).
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes Z No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? Flood map number 3710456900J accessed at
https://msc.fema.gov/portal/search?AddressQuery=asbury%20chapel%20road%2C%20Huntersville%2C%20NC#searchre
sultsanchor
4.2.18
Mr. Gregg Antemann
Applicant/Agent's Signature (agent's
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
signature is valid only if an authorization letter
Date
from the applicant is provided.)
Page 12 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

Asbury Chapel Site April 5, 2018
Additional Drawings and Supplemental Information CWSProjectNo.2017-0418
ATTACHMENT B:
Property Owner Deed Information

3/27/2018
Property Detail Print View
Print
r�>
Close
Parcel Information
Parcel ID Account Parent Previous
02116112 INDIVIDUAL
Owners)
Owner Name Mailing Address
City/State
HAACK JANET M 3116 ETHEREAL LN
CHARLOTTE NC 28226
HAACK DONALD E FAMILY TST 3116 ETHEREAL LN
CHARLOTTE NC 28226
HAACK JANET M TRUSTEE 3116 ETHEREAL LN
CHARLOTTE NC 28226
Legal Information
Legal Municipality Date Annexed Special District
Fire District Acreage
NA HUNTERSVILLE 09/19/2016 FIRE SERVICE D
HUNTERSVILLE 3.54
Total Parcel Assessment Exemptions
Building Land Features Total Exemption
Year Approved Review Date Amount
211500 98100 2700 312300
Sales Information
Sale Price Stamps Qualify VI Type
Legal Ref. Grantor
Oct 30 2009 0 LESS $3000 IMP WARRANTY D
25188-724 HAACK,DONALD E
Jan 2 2001 0 LESS $3000 IMP DEED STAMPS
11835-753 HAACK DONALD E &WF J
Land Use
Use Units Type Neighborhood
Assessment
R120 3.54 SMAC C101
98100
Building Information
Bldg Description Type Year Property Location
1 Single-Fam RES 1985 11540 ASBURY CHAPEL RD
HUNTERSVILLE
Bldg Story Units Total Sq Ft Heated SgFt Foundation
Ext. Wall Grade Value
1 2.0 STORY 1 4228 2540 CRAWL SPACE
CEDAR,RDWD - GOOD 02 211500
Bldg Heat Fuel Fire Place AC Fixtures Bedrooms Full Baths 3/4 Baths 1/2 Baths
1 HEAT PUMP ELECTRIC 1- FPS AC -CENTRAL 0 2
3 0 0
Sub Area
Bldg Description
Size
1 UPPER STORY - FINISHED
456
1 BASEMENT - UNFINISHED
896
1 BASE (FIRST FLOOR)
2084
1 PORCH - OPEN - FINISHED
104
1 PORCH - OPEN - FINISHED
112
1 CARPORT - FINISHED
576
Depreciation
Bldg Physical Functional Economic
Special Override
1 AV - 21.00% - 0.00% - 0.00%
- 0.00% - 0.00%
Special Features & Yard Items
Bldg Built Type Quantity
Units Value
1 1990 DECK 1
522.00000 2700
Notes
Tax Year Notes Note Date
Value Changes
Notice Date Tax Year Reason
Changed To Deferred
Feb 8 2011 2011 Countywide Revaluation
312100 0
Jan 17 2003 2003 Countywide Revaluation
254700 0
Mar 30 2000 2000 Remodeled and/or New Addition
239180
Mar 30 2000 2000 Remodeled Improvements and/or New Additi
239180
http://meckcama.co.mecklenburg.nc.us/RELookup/Property/Print?parcelId=02116112 1/1

Asbury Chapel Site April 5, 2018
Additional Drawings and Supplemental Information CWSProjectNo.2017-0418
ATTACHMENT C:
Agent Authorization Form

AGENT CERTIFICATION OF AUTHORIZATION
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner/agent of record of the property/properties identified
herein, do authorize representative of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-site
investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal
jurisdictional under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and
Harbors Act of 1899.
I, I odc� 1,1-f �� �� � , representing AT4 ,`7 C�o, ( LLLIereby
certify that I have authorized Gregg Antemann of Carolina Wetland Services, Inc. to act on my
behalf and take all actions necessary to the processing, issuance, and acceptance of this
request for wetlands determination / permitting and any and all standard and special conditions
attached.
We hereby certify that the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to
the best of our knowledge.
1
Applicant's signature
zo �-
Date
1114� C AU�_�
Agent's signature
10-04-2017
Date
Completion of this form will allow the agent to sign
all future application correspondence.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 468B7C53-4973-4D96-9DD8-DBE0912CAE5F
AGENT CERTIFICATION OF AUTHORIZATION
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner/agent of record of the property/properties identified
herein, do authorize representative of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-site
investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal
jurisdictional under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and
Harbors Act of 1899. Tax Parcel #s 02116113,
Janet Haack 02116112, 02101112, 02116101
I, ,representing hereby
certify that I have authorized Gregg Antemann of Carolina Wetland Services, Inc. to act on my
behalf and take all actions necessary to the processing, issuance, and acceptance of this
request for wetlands determination / permitting and any and all standard and special conditions
attached.
We hereby certify that the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to
the best of our knowledge.
DocuSioneed W. R- - ,+
h.
F7EFD83F97E4418...
Applicant's signature
12/1/2017
Date
Agent's signature
10-04-2017
Date
Completion of this form will allow the agent to sign
all future application correspondence.

Asbury Chapel Site April 5, 2018
Additional Drawings and Supplemental Information CWSProjectNo.2017-0418
ATTACHMENT D:
Figures 1 - 8

i
a �
V Y
0
o`
o
a w
� u
Eaal6erd
Ro
s�!
A
JOplor �"rRa
4
c
i
r
a
n°
is
a
0
c
t b4ti 6r
3 Hue Ar,,_'. Rn
a
t
'o
v
K
v8e
X94 �
Rtanc*Aur Dr Farryle0(o b w
c
U e
_ dcGs � 5,u,a� Ar4ar Cr ecM �rr��
4 �
i
w '
a
tf eaves Cr e��
rnr �e
1A�4a Vn0 a�4n
eP
D` {
S
O �
p+0 Ra i RP 4 D
toi �e C �'� Hee ? nes y p,AOn K
rr0, nd
4 �C ¢ gpyr Q, a Jcan armas Or
Sh,—g 0,
3
ppm pi c
iii: Pma� 'rc''
41f °R° Legend
aE °'
P d
Ile
Hc�4,MKM r�Avc
F pn>� Project Limits (75 ac.)
4 µ\an A 9rpYe Ra [+ _
flr2,000 1,000 0 2,000 Feet
REFERENCE. BACKGROUND VICINITY MAP PROVIDED BY ESRI, DATED 2017 t
SCALE: DATE:
1 inch = 2,000 feet 8/29/2017 Vicinity Map FIGURE NO.
CWS PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY:
2017-0418 JDR Asbury Chapel Road Site
C:\Google Drive\2017\2017 Consulting\2017 Projects\2017-0418 Asbury Chapel\ArcGIS\Figurel_Vicinity.mxd

C.\Google Drive\2017\2017 Consulting\2017 Projects\2017-0418 Asbury Chapel\ArcGIS\Figure2_USGS.mxd

C:\Google Drive\2017\2017 Consulting\2017 Projects\2017-0418 Asbury ChapelhArcGIS\Figure3_Aenal.mxd

CAGoogle Drive\2017\2017 Consulting\2017 Projects\2017-0418 Asbury Chapel\ArcGIS\Figure4_Current Soil. mxd

WkD `
WkD ��' � O W
WkE � •
WkE WkD
W WkD cc)WkD
'.
kD �`WkE FnB
WkE
Asbury Chapel Road
EnB
P
C 2`�, EnD
Cie
ID W w
CeB2 �,".�.—�` MeB
�
EnD
EnB 1 r6 w
B
CeB2In
WE
r0.;D
2442, .�
H !�
n
_r. KE- 4 ! O
N lrB C
CeQ End �© M e8
IrA End
MeB CeBZ:
V ,,.
CeD2 M e B �
Cel 24 4 2
M e8,; HeB
IYI 0
to tn EnB Legend
� � Q
Project Limits (75 ac.)
if
Soil Unit Name and Description
Hydric
Coverage (%)
CeB2
Cecil sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded
No
47
CeD2
Cecil sandy clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately eroded
No
0.1
EnB
Enon sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
No
38.9
EnD
Enon sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
No
41.8
MO
Monacan loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded
Yes
5.1
WkE
Wilkes loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes
No
9.3
Total Coverage:
100%
IYI 0
to tn EnB Legend
� � Q
Project Limits (75 ac.)
if
REFERENCE: HISTORIC USDA-NRCS SOIL SURVEY OF
"A
11000 500 0 1,000 Feet
-.--
MECKLENBURG COUNTY, SHEETS 2
AND, , DATED 1975
ep
_
SCALE:1 inch = 1,000 feet
DATE: 8/29/2017
USDA-NRCS HistoricSoil Survey
FIGURE NO.
of Mecklenburg County
CWS PROJECT NO:
2017-0418
DRAWN BY.
JDR
Asbury Chapel Road Site
5
APPLICANT NO:
CHECKED BY:
CAROLINA
Huntersville, North Carolina
GCA
WETLAND SERVICES
CWS Project No. 2017-0418
C:\Google Drive\2017\2017 Consulling\2017 Projects\2017-0418 Asbury Cha pel\ArcG IS\Figu re5_ Historic Soil.mxd

C:\Google Drive\2017\2017 Consulting\2017 Projecls\2017-0418 Asbury Chapel\ArcGIS\Figure6_NWl.mxd

Figure 8
Accessed: September 5, 2017
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office
HPOWEB GIS Service
z
t
r'
< ,00
a
Z'i qi^
f•
ryaoc c}i ar1 4,
Approximate Project Location L,
P
zani!v C!.'�!Qt
ep
4�
'yam �r
Leo a�.a ns1�f•tf e�bi
HT1 £tIpM DC2 F1Mnut6n I
ya` aseh„!o�.r .as. tl�v
'4
to
v � u
r;'G41 Af,
k4C`
e
6
O
r! �a
A
ej
� c
tin
ILIA n uo 4�
aoratae �be�.r
4
y 3
e
5mts nr
vu due Rn
?hr}�nat
Carolina Wetland Services, Inc. 2017-0418 Asbury Chapel Site

Asbury Chapel Site April 5, 2018
Additional Drawings and Supplemental Information CWSProjectNo.2017-0418
ATTACHMENT E:
Site Plans with Impacts

LOCATION MAP
SCALE: NOT TO SCALE
Landworks LOCATION MAP V�IAAAR. 26, 2018
PROJECT NO:
N Design Group, P.A. CHAPEL GROVE SUBDIVISION 17061
° sNEET 1621 tittle Avenue, Suite 111 TOWN OF HUNTERSVILLE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NC WL -COVER
o Charlotte, NC 28211 SCALE:
a
104-841-1604 fax; 704-841-1604 TAC ASBURY CHAPEL, LLC NOT TO SCALE

OLMST
UI I I E\XISTING1�0 AD
SUBDIVISION
,cop _7.�.FAv
/
-
o DRIVE
707 EXISTING OPEN SPACE
, J
OLMSTEAD NEIGHBORHOOD
ASSOCIATION, INC.
® , © EXISTING SANITARY
I --I SEWER EASEMENT /
j ASBURY
\ - UNITED
�_Jj METHODIST
WETLAND "AA" CHURCH
ACOA
J' Fz I ;�� ERENNIAL J
O 1, STREAM "E" r
EX. POND "A" /
PERENNIAL STREAM "A"
INTERMITTENT STREAM "A" I
PERENNIAL
STREAM "B" /
POND
WET AND "CC" } ��
nU / OPER1./
-r i PR
,s
G �
� f)
WETLAND "BB" I (C- XISTING GRAVEL
�- ROADS / TRAILS
_ INTERMITTENT NTERMITTENT
O STREAM "C" STREAM "D" I.A I GREATER —�
VISION
EXISTING BUFFER � �� UNITED
I
o
of ir CEMETERY SHOWN PER / METHODIST /
m l j l �j' p 0 MECK CNTY. I CHURCH �� Y
c (n a GIS, TYP.
N �i
a Q Q \ r
o =
ov
E v ° J O " T?
I x\01
�j \
0' 250' 500' 1000'
SCALE: 1" = 500'
O
n DATElandworks EXISTING CONDITIONS
MAR. 26, 201$
Design Group, P.A. CHAPEL GROVE SUBDIVISION PROJECT 11.:17
061
SHEET #
Charlotte,,NC
1611Litee,Suite Ill TOWN OF HUNTERSVILLE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NC WL -1
NC 28 28111 SCALE:
704-841-1604 fax: [phone] TAC ASBURY CHAPEL, LLC
i 1 " = 500'

U I 1 EXISTING OLMSTVISION AD
SUBDIVISION
o � ',J"r4 kk t-PRpMENADE ;Ib„
° I i 1 DRIVE �''//
p EXISTING OPEN SPACE
i
Chapel Grove Crossing �� OLMSTEAD NEIGHBORHOOD
ASSOCIATION, INC.
c
V
INTERMITTENT PROPOSED SANITARY
STREAM "E"° SEWER EXTENSION
" j
I al,
PROPOSE I 1
SAND FILTER #1 ASBURY PROPOSED SAN.
UNITED SEWER CROSSING —
PROPOSE METHODIST (BORE -NO
SAND FILTER #2 i' , a CHURCH IMPACT)
1 o WETLAND "AA" Q
±0.16 AC.i'
Z PROPOSED O�
ROAD \ \ ��O r-
`� W W CROSSING \ ;2
J Q IMPACT #1
cy-
v POND
PERENNIAL STREAM "A"
0 _
\�� I
INTERMITTENT STREAM " A"
� V
EX. MAN-MADE POND MENIT�•
±0.28 ACRES I I
WETLAND "CC" / rn �` ° ^ ' \
±0.01 ACRES ROPSAND
� SAND
•. \ � j ` � FILTER #4
gOVNDPRY I � X. 50' WIDE GAS LINE
Lh PRO,gCT
\ ` , RIGHT-OF-WAY
ROAD PROPOSED 1 ❑ 1 PROPOSED ROAD
CROSSING WETLAND "BB" NTERMITTENT CROSSING IMPACT #2
IMPACT #3 ±0.03 ACRES o STREAM "D" PROPOSED SAND
' FILTER #3
0 \ I GREATER
VISION -BUFFERS SHOWN PER
Ir X�I r UNITED MECK. CNTY. GIS, TYP.
m W 1 INTERMITTENT , ERENNIAL METHODIST 0 1
v Q CL o CHURCH
(A
a -STREAM "C" STREAM
=
V I I P,
° _ r
STREAM IMPACT SUMMARY >;
E ROAD CROSSING #1 - INTERMITTENT STREAM "A" 42 LF
E ROAD CROSSING #1 - PERENNIAL STREAM "A" 34 LF Hollow Bend Drive
ROAD CROSSING #2 - PERENNIAL STREAM 'B" 72 LF r \��Q
F \PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT TOTAL: 148 LF
L If
GWETLAND IMPACT SUMMARY ' N
U ROAD CROSSING #1 - WETLAND AA 113 SF 0.0026 AC. \
T ROAD CROSSING #2 - WETLAND AA 61 SF 0.0014 AC.
= ROAD CROSSING #3 - WETLAND BB 1,285 SF 0.029 AC. \ \ 0' 250' 500' 1000'
J
= PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT TOTAL: 1,459 SF 0.0335 AC. /- SCALE: 1" = 500'
n
landworks SITE PLAN FOR STREAM IMPACTS DATE: MAR. 26, 2018
PROJECT NO:
N Design Group, P.A. CHAPEL GROVE SUBDIVISION 17061
° 1621 Little Avenue, Suite 111 TOWN OF HUNTERSVILLE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NC SHEET# WL -2
Charlotte, NC 28211 scnLE:
y 104-841-1604 fax: [phone] TAC ASBURY CHAPEL, LLC 1" = 500'
i

PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER EXTENSION
(40' MIN. FROM TOP OF BANK
NO IMPACT TO STREAM)
\1
landworks
OFF-SITE SEWER - EXISTING & PROPOSED
up
\ I
EXISTING SANITARY
CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
SEWER EASEMENT
I I
CHAPEL GROVE SUBDIVISION
1 //I
EXISTING SANITARY SEWER
I
1621 Little Avenue, Suite III
1
l
1
SHEET# WL -3
o
EXISTING OPEN SPACE
OLMSTEAD NEIGHBORHOOD
ASSOCIATION, INC.
SCALE:
704-841-1604 fax: [phone]
TAC ASBURY CHAPEL, LLC
EXISTING SANITARY
\ \1 I\\
SEWER MANHOLE
1
ASBURY
UNITED
METHODIST
CHURCH
PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER EXTENSION
(40' MIN. FROM TOP OF BANK
NO IMPACT TO STREAM)
\1
EXISTING OLMSTEAD
SUBDIVISION
PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER
CROSSING (BORE - NO IMPACT)
UPPERS SHOWN PER
MECK. CNTY. GIS, TYP.
\\\\O
N_�
\ 1 ` 1111111
wA
1
.'PROPOSED
i /— �,►- — J/ / SAND \ v�
FILTER #4 I01
I' N
50' 100' 200'
SCALE: 1" = 100'
Q
landworks
OFF-SITE SEWER - EXISTING & PROPOSED
up
ACQUIRED SANITARY SEWER
AND TEMPORARY
CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
Design Group, P.A.
EXISTING OLMSTEAD
SUBDIVISION
PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER
CROSSING (BORE - NO IMPACT)
UPPERS SHOWN PER
MECK. CNTY. GIS, TYP.
\\\\O
N_�
\ 1 ` 1111111
wA
1
.'PROPOSED
i /— �,►- — J/ / SAND \ v�
FILTER #4 I01
I' N
50' 100' 200'
SCALE: 1" = 100'
Q
landworks
OFF-SITE SEWER - EXISTING & PROPOSED
up
MAR. 26, 2018
Design Group, P.A.
CHAPEL GROVE SUBDIVISION
PROJECT NO:
1061
1621 Little Avenue, Suite III
TOWN OF HUNTERSVILLE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NC
SHEET# WL -3
o
Charlotte, NC 28271
SCALE:
704-841-1604 fax: [phone]
TAC ASBURY CHAPEL, LLC
1" = 100'
a

LEGEND i
IMPACTED I I I I
WETLANDS I
EX. WETLANDS I
TO REMAIN
PROPOSEDIMPACTTO
WETLAND'AA" FOR ROAD
CROSSING #1: ±0.0026 ACRES J
� I i
STREAM BANK STABILIZATION
RIP RAP ARMOR TYP. RIP RAP
TO BE PLACED ON THE
r
CHANNEL BANKS±12 ABOVE
THE ORDINARY HIGH WATER I W 1
MARK; NOT WITHIN THE /
STREAM
I
PROPOSED IMPA T TO
INTERMITTENT STREAM
"A" FOR ROAD CROSSING
#1: 42 LF
HEADWALLS,
BOTH SIDES, TYP.
o
k gP
O
l�Ge.• epN�
-Oe
OF
EXISTING
INTERMITTENT /
STREAM "A" — / -762-
-
i JFF�Gs
J 3�eGG��y.G OF6PN�
—
:;,
S2
1
--IL-:/EXISTING
` PERENNIAL
m2:oA N� STREAM "A"
/
PROPOSED IMPACT TO
PERENNIAL STREAM "A" FOR
O ROAD CROSSING #1: 34 LF
ym �0 \
0
z _� \
N
°q
Lj -FA
N
SEE SHEETS WL -7, WL -10, & WL -11 / \ s� 0' 10' 20' 40'
FOR CULVERT #1 PROFILE, / /j68 �� 2
ELEVATION AND DETAILS ! 2� \
� SCALE: 1"= 20'
°
STREAM IMPACT FOR STREAM CROSSING #1 DATMAR.26, 2018
Landworks
PROJECT NO:
NDesign Group, P.A. CHAPEL GROVE SUBDIVISION 17061
°
° 1621 Little Avenue, Suite 111 SHEET a
Charlotte, NC 28211 TOWN OF HUNTERSVILLE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NC WL -4
104-841-1604 fax: [phone] TAC ASBURY CHAPEL, LLC SCALE:
L 1"=20'

LEGEND p 6 m
IMPACTED
WETLANDS
EX. WETLANDS _
TO REMAIN 4 Nps
011
�Q 24U pQ
W2 X47 �p C
co4u
' I % I N410
/
PROPOSED IMPACT TO
WETLAND "AA" FOR ROAD
CROSSING #1:±0.0014 ACRES
ctigo
1 I 00 A�O
S3
STREAM BANK STABILIZATION I /
RIP RAP ARMOR TYP. RIP RAP I / / PROPOSED IMPACT TO
TO BE PLACED ON THE I / / / I ` PERENNIAL STREAM "B"
CHANNEL BANKS ±12" ABOVE /
THE ORDINARY HIGH WATER / / / I FOR ROAD CROSSING #2:
MARK; NOT WITHIN THE / _ ` 72 LF
STREAM _ / / PROPOSED
STORM
DRAINAGE
Q0,4C, // �. TO WATER
�♦ / /°S // \`� / QUALITY
e i 2 V `��/ BASIN
1 �
HEADWALLS,
NBOTH SIDES, TYP. / O
N
EXISTING ^� / 7 ti° ° Q�
E PERENNIAL
STREAM"B'EXISTING
�� •�^�° \ SQL /
INTERMITTENT �TF4
STREAM "D" �9S
m /ape °��/
N
m SEE SHEETS WL-8, WL-10, WL-11\ 0' 10' 20' 40'
U FOR CULVERT #2 PROFILE,
ELEVATION AND DETAILS /
SCALE: 1" = 20'
Q GATE:
Landworks STREAM IMPACT FOR STREAM CROSSING #2 MAR. 26, 2018
c' PROJECT NO:
NDesign Group, P.A. CHAPEL GROVE SUBDIVISION 1061
1621 Little Avenue, Suite 111 TOWN OF HUNTERSVILLE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NC SHEET# WL-5
b Charlotte, NC 28211 SCALE:
a
04
104-841-1604 fax:[phone] TAC ASBURY CHAPEL, LLC 1" = 20'

LEGEND \\
IMPACTED \
WETLANDS
EX. WETLANDS \
TO REMAIN \ \
i 'o \ \ e�\
10
00. \
os\GA \\
A \\ \
\\\\\\\
STREAM IMPACT FOR STREAM CROSSING #3
oATI:
10
\
\
SEE SHEETS WL -9 & WL -10
`1
Oil
\ \
INTERMITTENT STREAM "C"
POINT OF BEGINNING
(NO IMPACT)
TOWN OF HUNTERSVILLE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NC
SHEET# WL -6
b
RIP RAP APRON
HEADWALLS, BOT
SIDES, TYP.
�'9
RIP RAP /
APRON
(NO IMPACT)
�\ co I
e�
�rr�
�--
A
\
)POSED STORM DRAINAGE
TO WATER QUALITY BASIN
PROP l
CU\ERTDl
Z� PROJECT BOUNDARY \
REQD. 20' PERIMETER BUFFER `
NCDOT STANDARD
HEADWALLS, BOTH
\ SIDES, TYP. - NO IMPACT
0' 15' 30' 60'
SCALE: 1" = 30'
Q
Landworks
STREAM IMPACT FOR STREAM CROSSING #3
oATI:
0
26, 2016
SEE SHEETS WL -9 & WL -10
FOR CULVERT #3 PROFILE,
CHAPEL GROVE SUBDIVISION
ELEVATION AND DETAIL
1621 Little Avenue, Suite Ill
�--
A
\
)POSED STORM DRAINAGE
TO WATER QUALITY BASIN
PROP l
CU\ERTDl
Z� PROJECT BOUNDARY \
REQD. 20' PERIMETER BUFFER `
NCDOT STANDARD
HEADWALLS, BOTH
\ SIDES, TYP. - NO IMPACT
0' 15' 30' 60'
SCALE: 1" = 30'
Q
Landworks
STREAM IMPACT FOR STREAM CROSSING #3
oATI:
0
26, 2016
PROJECT NO:17061
Design Group, P.A.
CHAPEL GROVE SUBDIVISION
1621 Little Avenue, Suite Ill
TOWN OF HUNTERSVILLE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NC
SHEET# WL -6
b
Charlotte, NC 28211
SCALE:
N
104-841-1604 fax: [phone]
TAC ASBURY CHAPEL, LLC
1" = 30'

a
PROPOSE
HANDRAILS,
GRADE
BOTH SIDES,
TOP OF W
ffiTYP.
ELEV: = 76
X,
SLOPE, TYP.
70
PROPOSE
SANITARY
TOP OF WALL
LEV: = 769.60
STREAM B
STABILIZA
RAP ARMO
D WINGWALL
RAP TO BE LACED
(BEYOND)
ON THE CH NNEL
TOP OF BANK
BANKS ±1 2�ABOVE
THE ORDIN RY HIGH
WATER MA
WITHIN TH STREAM
60
EXISTING G
C/L INTERMITTENT
STREAM A
RADE AT C/L
PERENNIAL STREAM 'A'
MIN. BURY IN
PER NCDENR
ERMIT READ.
76 LF CULVEAT IMPACT
50
MEASURED AT STREAM C/L
PROFILE - ROAD
CULVERT CROSSING #1
SCALE H: 1"=30'V: 1 "=5'
TOP OF HEADWALL
60" CMP
�i
c
.N
N
O
P
1 Ftz�
STREAM BANK STABILIZATION
X
RIP RAP APRON, BOTH SIDES
_w
HEADWALL INVERT OF 60" PIPE 12"
�?
FOOTING BELOW FIN. GRADE (MIN.)
a�
r
U
ROAD CULVERT #1 ELEVATION AT HEADWALL
a
SCALE: NOT TO SCALE
a
Landworks
CULVERT PROFILES & ELEVATIONS
DAT
0
MAR. 26, 2018
PRQIECT NO: 17061
Design Group, P.A.
CHAPEL GROVE SUBDIVISION
762tLittle Avenue, Suite 111
TOWN OF HUNTERSVILLE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NC
SHEET# WL-7
b
Charlotte, NC 28211
scnLE: AS SHOWN
a
104-841-1604 fax: [phone]
TAC ASBURY CHAPEL, LLC

o�
PROPOSE[
GRADE
TOP OF WA
ELEV: = 76i
PROPOSES
SANITARY!
STREAM BANK
STABILIZATION RIP
RAP ARMOR, TYP. RIP
RAP TO BE PLACED 58' LF 72" CMP
ON THE CHANNEL @ C/L OF PIPE
BANKS t12" ABOVE
THE ORDINARY HIGH
WATER MARK; NOT
WITHIN THE STREAM
75
PROFILE - ROAD CULVERT CROSSING #2
SCALE H: 1"=30'V: 1 "=5'
TOP OF
72" CMP
HEADWA__
FOOTING
ROAD CULVERT #2 ELEVATION AT HEADWALL
1NDRAILS,
TH SIDES,
TYP.
—2:1 MAX
.OPE, TYP.
'OF WALL
✓: = 767.72
✓INGWALL
(BEYOND)
' OF BANK
EXISTING GRADE AT C/L
PERENNIAL STREAM 'B'
—1' MIN. BURY IN
PIPE PER NCDENR
401 PERMIT READ.
ABILIZATION
BOTH SIDES
-... 72" PIPE 12"
BELOW FIN. GRADE (MIN.)
SCALE: NOT TO SCALE
landworks CULVERT PROFILES & ELEVATIONS DATE:MAR. 26, 2018
Design Group, P.A. CHAPEL GROVE SUBDIVISION PROJECT NO: 17061
7621 Little Avenue, Suite I'll TOWN OF HUNTERSVILLE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NC 3NEETp WL8
0Charlotte, NC 28271
TAC ASBURY CHAPEL, LLC SCALE:
C14
704-841-1604 fax: [phone] AS SHOWN
a041
H
0
B(
77
L
U
Ann
770
53
S
TO
ELE
EWER
SLOPEDI
TOI
76
760
STREAM BANK
STABILIZATION RIP
RAP ARMOR, TYP. RIP
RAP TO BE PLACED 58' LF 72" CMP
ON THE CHANNEL @ C/L OF PIPE
BANKS t12" ABOVE
THE ORDINARY HIGH
WATER MARK; NOT
WITHIN THE STREAM
75
PROFILE - ROAD CULVERT CROSSING #2
SCALE H: 1"=30'V: 1 "=5'
TOP OF
72" CMP
HEADWA__
FOOTING
ROAD CULVERT #2 ELEVATION AT HEADWALL
1NDRAILS,
TH SIDES,
TYP.
—2:1 MAX
.OPE, TYP.
'OF WALL
✓: = 767.72
✓INGWALL
(BEYOND)
' OF BANK
EXISTING GRADE AT C/L
PERENNIAL STREAM 'B'
—1' MIN. BURY IN
PIPE PER NCDENR
401 PERMIT READ.
ABILIZATION
BOTH SIDES
-... 72" PIPE 12"
BELOW FIN. GRADE (MIN.)
SCALE: NOT TO SCALE
landworks CULVERT PROFILES & ELEVATIONS DATE:MAR. 26, 2018
Design Group, P.A. CHAPEL GROVE SUBDIVISION PROJECT NO: 17061
7621 Little Avenue, Suite I'll TOWN OF HUNTERSVILLE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NC 3NEETp WL8
0Charlotte, NC 28271
TAC ASBURY CHAPEL, LLC SCALE:
C14
704-841-1604 fax: [phone] AS SHOWN

om
TOP OF WALL—
ELEV. =±786.00
—TOP OF WALL
ELEV. = ±786.00
SLOPED WINGWALL LOPED WINGWALL
(BEYOND) (BEYOND)
PROPOSED STORM DRAT
PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER
TOP OF
EXISTING GRAD[
AT WETLAND BB
-,±58 LF' 42" RCP
— @ C/L OF PIPE
±58 LF CULVERT
NO STREAM IMPACT
PROFILE — ROAD CULVERT CROSSING #3
SCALE H: 1"=30'V: 1 "=5'
IUr
42"
HEA
FOOTING
ROAD CULVERT #3 ELEVATION AT HEADWALL
7
MIN. BURY IN PIPE
PER NCDENR 401
PERMIT READ.
I I
-EXISTING GRADE
P RAP APRON 770
RAP APRON
_... .. 42" PIPE 12"
BELOW FIN. GRADE (MIN.)
O SCALE: NOT TO SCALE
a
Q
Landworks
CULVERT PROFILES & ELEVATIONS
DATE:
MAR. 26, 2018
PROJECT NO:
17061
N
Design Group, P.A.
CHAPEL GROVE SUBDIVISION
°
7621 Little Avenue, Suite 111
TOWN OF HUNTERSVILLE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NC
SHEET# WL_9
o
Charlotte, NC 28211
SCALE:
704-841-1604 fax: [phone]
TAC ASBURY CHAPEL, LLC
AS SHOWN
a

CONCRETE
rU)
HEADWALL w - Q w
>>
>= NQ
CONCRETE `J W
�a w
WINGWALL = a w
EXISTING STREAM
STREAM BA7STABILIZATIO BOTTOM ELEVATION
RIP RAP ARRAP
TO BE PLAC_
CHANNEL BANKS ±12" ABOVE
THE ORDINARY HIGH WATER
MARK; NOT WITHIN THE IPE INVERT
STREAM
CONCRETE —, y 12" EARTH FILL
FOOTING
IN PIPE BOTTOM (TYP.)
ENLARGED CULVERT & HEADWALL DETAIL @ ROAD CROSSING 1 & 2
SCALE: NOT TO SCALE
r�
CONCRETE a w
HEADWALL > >
wZ
N Q
ww
CL LU
iii
CL N
w�
w��
I
CONCRETE
3 WINGWALL
XISTING WETLAND
o RIP RAP APRON AT EN
OF PIPE ON FILTER
E FABRIC
M
IPE INVERT
m
X
wCONCRETE —� 12" EARTH FILL
U FOOTING IN PIPE BOTTOM (TYP.)
co ENLARGED CULVERT & HEADWALL DETAIL @ ROAD CROSSING 3
L
SCALE: NOT TO SCALE
J
d
Landworks CULVERT PROFILES & ELEVATIONS DATE: MAR. 26, 2018
PROJECT NO:
Design Group, P.A. CHAPEL GROVE SUBDIVISION 17061
0
1621 Little Avenue, Suite 111 TOWN OF HUNTERSVILLE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NC SREETk WL -10
Charlotte, NC 28211
.LL 104-841-1604 fax: [phone] TAC ASBURY CHAPEL, LLC SCALE: AS SHOWN

EXISTING TO
OF BANK
PROPOSED CHANNEL SLOPE
MATCH EXISTING UPSTREAM
AND DOWNSTREAM STREAM
BANK AND STREAMBED
CONTOURS AT FACE OF '
STONE I
CUT EXISTING SLOPE—�
BACK TO 1:1 SLOPE MIN. I
EXISTING CHANNEL -4 /
SLOPE I !
ORDINARY HIGH I
WATER MARK I
to
CHANNEL BOTTOM
ELEVATION
Wi JJ
i J
WOODY
PLANTINGS,
SEE GENERAL
NOTES
—STAPLE FABRIC AT
TOP OF SLOPE TO
PREVENT SHIFTING
IRAFI FW500 GEOTEXTILE
FABRIC OR EQUIVALENT
N. 34" CLASS II RIP RAP
GENERALNOTES
1. BEGINNING AT A POINT 16" ABOVE CHANNEL BOTTOM ELEVATION, CUT BANK BACK AT A 1:1 MINIMUM SLOPE TO JUST
ABOVE THE TOP OF CULVERT
2. ORIENT THE GEOTEXTILE PARALLEL TO THE DIRECTION OF WATER FLOW
3. SUCCESSIVE SHEETS OF GEOTEXTILE MUST BE OVERLAPPED ACCORDING TO THE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS
4. GEOTEXTILE FABRIC SHALL BE SECURED IN PLACE WITH THE USE OF WOODEN STAKES OR STAPLES ACCORDING TO
THE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS AT THE TOP OF THE SLOPE
5. RIPRAP WILL BE PLACED ON THE CHANNEL BANKS AT A DEPTH OF 12". FINAL RIPRAP LAYER SHOULD BE FLUSH WITH
THE REST OF THE CHANNEL SLOPE
6. BEGIN RIPRAP PLACEMENT AT THE TOE AND PROCEED UP THE SLOPE DIRECTLY ONTO THE GEOTEXTILE
7. BACKFILL ALL VOIDS IN THE RIPRAP WITH SMALLER STONE TO ENSURE THE GEOTEXTILE IS FULLY COVERED
8. AFTER PLACEMENT OF THE RIPRAP, AVOID ANY GRADING ABOVE THE GEOTEXTILE THAT RESULTS IN MOVEMENT OF
THE RIPRAP
9. WOODY PLANTINGS SHALL BE DORMANT CUTTINGS OF SILKY DOGWOOD, SILKY WILLOW AND / OR ROOTED STOCK OF
HAZEL ALDER. PLANTINGS SPACED 2 FT. O.C.
10. ALL BANK STABILIZATION SHALL BE PLACED ABOVE HIGH WATER MARK
11. ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK TO BE ESTABLISHED BY A WETLANDS CONSULTANT
STREAM BANK STABILIZATION - RIPRAP ARMOR
SCALE: NOT TO SCALE
Landworks CULVERT PROFILES & ELEVATIONS DATE: MAR. 26, 2018
Design Group, P.A. CHAPEL GROVE SUBDIVISION PROJECT NO: 17061
1621 Little Avenue, Suite 111 SHEET u
Charlotte, NC 28211 TOWN OF HUNTERSVILLE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NC WL -11
SCALE:
104-841-1604 fax: [phone] TAC ASBURY CHAPEL, LLC AS SHOWN

720
715
710
705
700
ml GENERAL NOTES
m 1. PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER TO BE BORED BENEATH EXISTING STREAM CHANNEL
720
715
710
705
700
OFF-SITE SANITARY SEWER BORE - NO IMPACT
SCALE: NOT TO SCALE
DATE:
Lan wor s CULVERT PROFILES & ELEVATIONS MAR. 26, 2018
Design Group, P.A. CHAPEL GROVE SUBDIVISION PROJECT NO: 17061
1621 little Avenue, Suite 111 SHEET«
Charlotte, NC 28211 TOWN OF HUNTERSVILLE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NC WL -12
TAC ASBURY CHAPEL, LLC SCALE:
L 1 104-841-1604 fax: [phone] AS SHOWN

U I ` EXISTING OLMSTEAD j
SUBDIVISION
r, ~1
C -ii I U0 o Q I 14?1.PROMENADE
DRIVE \
Ali
Z� �I
o o I STING OPEN SPACE
OLMSITEAD NEIGHBORHOOD I
ASSOCIATION, INC. `
o
0 0 .n� 1
PROPOSED— ° ® C�j c
BMP #1
PROPOSE 4 � ( ASBURY I PROPOSED SAN. 1
BMP #2
J / UNITED SEWER CROSSING -
METHODIST (BORE -NO
CHURCH IMPACT)
o WETLAND "AA" �p
p PROPOSED p�
WWI I ROAD �eOG
CROSSING \\ `2 NTERMITTENT —
co Q IMPACT #1 �9
\ -per STREAM "E"
EX.
PERENNIAL STREAM "A" POND "A"
INTERMITTENT STREAM "A" / I
INTERMITTENT STREAM
\Q
EX. MAN-MADE_
POND
±0.28 ACRES
VL I �' A \\
)
WETLAND "CC"
WETLAND"_ -PROPOSED
>\ BMP #4
a \
F1 pFtO�ECT ;�� I X. 50' WIDE GAS LINE
IRIGHT-OF-WAY
1
PROPOSED ROPOSED PROPOSED ROAD
ROAD �� BMP #3 CROSSING IMPACT #2
� CROSSING
IMPACT#3 \ )ham GREATER
` VISION -�
O 1J rJn� UNITED �> I
INTERMITTENT ERENNIAL /� METHODIST
X Of
Z — STREAM "C" STREAM "B" " CHURCH00
0)a
m Q Q
y /t
P U
U U \ f)
WATER QUALITY NOTES: \Q
1. WATER QUALITY BMP'S SHALL BE INSTALLED
m IN ACCORDANCE WITH TOWN OF
X HUNTERSVILLE POST CONSTRUCTION
CONTROLS ORDINANCE (PCCO) AND THE
v MECKLENBURG COUNTY BMP DESIGN \ N
MANUAL
= 2. BMP DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE \ \ \ \ \ 0' 250' 500' 1000'
p APPROVED BY THE MECKLENBURG COUNTY
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
� \ SCALE: 1" = 500'
landworks WATER QUALITY MASTER PLAN DATE: MAR. 26, 2018
PROJECT NO:
N Design Group, P.A. CHAPEL GROVE SUBDIVISION 1061
1621 Little Avenue, Suite 111 TOWN OF HUNTERSVILLE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NC SHEET# WL -13
o Charlotte, NC 28271 SCALE:
a
104-841-1604 tax: 704-841-1604 TAC ASBURY CHAPEL, LLC 1" = 500'

NOTES:
1. WORK IN CREEK SHALL BE PLANNED TO MINIMIZE THE NUMBER OF DAYS OF
DISTURBANCE.
2. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO OBSERVE THE LOCAL WEATHER FORECASTS AND NOT BEGIN
WORK IN THE CREEK UNLESS AT LEAST THREE DAYS WITHOUT RAIN IS ANTICIPATED.
3. ALL DISTURBED CREEK BED AND BANKS ARE TO BE STABILIZED PRIOR TO THE END
OF EACH WORK DAY.
4. FOR LARGER CREEKS, CONSTRUCTION SHOULD OCCUR ON ONE SIDE
OF THE CREEK AT A TIME. THE FIRST SIDE SHOULD BE STABILIZED
BEFORE BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE.
5. A TEMPORARY PIPE OR PUMP MAY BE INSTALLED TO CONTROL
CREEK FLOW DURING CUNSTRUCTION.
CONSTRUCT THREE ROCK CHECK DAMS (STD. 513.1) AT 100 -FOOT
SPACING DOWN STREAM FROM THE CONSTRUCTION ZONE IF
CONDITIONS AND PROPERTY RIGHTS ALLOW. -�
CONSTRU
TOP BANK
INSTALL DIKE OR COFFERDAM IMMEDIATELY
UPSTREAM OF THE CONSTRUCTION ZONE
IF CREEK HAS BASE FLOW
�T
Tativnof. CONSTRUCTION WITHIN CREEK BANK
"l4 mw e DRAWING (FOR USE WITH ROAD CROSSINGS,
NORTH CAROLINA UTILITY CROSSINGS & CULVERT CONSTRUCTION)
NOT TO SCALE
10/14/09
STD. NO.
523.1

Asbury Chapel Site April 5, 2018
Additional Drawings and Supplemental Information CWSProjectNo.2017-0418
ATTACHMENT F:
PETS Report

CAROLINA WETLAND SERVICES, INC.
550 E. Westinghouse Blvd.
Charlotte, NC 28273
704-527-1177 (office)
704-527-1133 (fax)
September 7, 2017
Todd Terwilliger
The Ardent Companies
2100 Powers Ferry Road SE, Suite 350
Atlanta, GA 30339
Subject: Protected Species Habitat Assessment Report
Chapel Grove Subdivision
Huntersville, North Carolina
CWS Project No. 2017-0418
Dear Mr. Terwilliger
The Ardent Companies has contracted Carolina Wetland Services, Inc. (CWS) to provide a
protected species habitat assessment for the Chapel Grove Subdivision site. The Chapel Grove
Subdivision site (Mecklenburg County Tax Parcel Nos. 02116113, 02116112, 02101112,
02116101) is approximately 76 acres in extent and is located northeast of the Asbury Chapel
Road and Eastfield Road intersection in Huntersville, North Carolina (Figure 1).
Methods
In -office Desktop Review
To determine which protected species are listed as occurring or potentially occurring within the
project vicinity and prior to conducting the on-site field investigation, CWS consulted the United
States Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS) Endangered and Threatened Species and Species
of Concern by County for North Carolina online database for Mecklenburg County'. In addition,
CWS performed a data review using the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP)
Data Explorer on March 29, 2018 to determine if any record occurrences of federally -listed,
candidate endangered, threatened species, or critical habitat are located within the project
limits.
Typical habitat requirements for listed species was discerned from multiple USFWS3 and
NCNHP' online resources including, but not limited to, specific USFWS species profiles,
recovery plans, NCNHP's Guide to Federally Listed Endangered and Threatened Species of
North Carolina, and List of the Rare Plant Species of North Carolina. United States Department
of Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA-NRCS) Web Soil Survey of
United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Raleigh Field Office, Accessed March 16, 2018. Endangered and Threatened Species
and Species of Concern by County for North Carolina. https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylisUmecklenburg.html
z North Carolina Natural Heritage Data Explorer. Accessed March 16, 2018. https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/.
a U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2006. Optimal Survey Windows for North Carolina's Federally Threatened and Endangered Plant
Species. http://www.fws.gov/nces/es/plant_survey.html. Accessed March 16, 2018.
Buchanan, M.F. and J.T. Finnegan. 2010. Natural Heritage Program List of the Rare Plant Species of North Carolina. NC Natural
Heritage Program, Raleigh, NC. Accessed from https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylist/nc_Counties.html
NORTH CAROLINA - SOUTH CAROLINA
WWW.CWS-INC.NET
Page 1 of 7

Chapel Grove Subdivision
Protected Species Assessment Report
September 7, 2017
CWS Project No. 2018-0092
Mecklenburg County-' and aerial imagery were also reviewed for potential habitat communities
of listed species within the project vicinity (Figures 2 and 3).
Field Suniey
CWS scientists Daniel Roberts, Project Scientist, and Ryan Gibbons, Staff Scientist I, conducted
a pedestrian habitat assessment of the project area on August 24, 2017. Potential habitats for
potentially occurring federally -protected species that were identified during the desktop review
were assessed in the field for the quality of physical and/or biological features essential to the
conservation of the applicable species. Additionally, during the pedestrian habitat assessment,
areas were reviewed for applicable federally protected species. Identification references for
natural communities include the National Land Cover Database (2011)6.
Prior to the field work, CWS scientists visited a known population of Helianthus schweinitzii on
August 23, 2017 to determine the condition of its stem, leaves, and flowers. Based on the site
visit, the aboveground plant parts are identifiable and some of the flowers were already present.
Results
Based on the NCNHP data explorer review, there are no current records of federally -protected
species within the project limits, however there are records of Schweinitz's sunflower
(Helianthus schweinitzif) within a mile of the project limits (Attachment A). The USFWS lists six
federally protected species for Mecklenburg County (Table 1). An official species list has not
been obtained from the USFWS Asheville Field Office.
Table 1. Unofficial List of Federally -Protected Species Potentially Occurring within the
The Oaks at Oakhurst Site, Mecklenburg County, NC.
Major Group
Scientific Name
Common Name
Federal Status*
Record Status
Plant
Helianthus
Schweinitz's
E
Current
schweinitzii
sunflower
Plant
Echinacea
Smooth coneflower
E
Current
laevigata
Plant
Rhus michauxii
Michaux's sumac
E
Current
Animal
Lasmigona
Carolina heelsplitter
E
Current
decorata
Animal
Myotis
Northern -long-eared
T
Current
septentrionalis
bat
Animal
Haliaeetus
Bald eagle
BGPA
Current
leucocephalus
E - Endangered, T - Threatened, BGPA - Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act
Three terrestrial community types were identified within the project area during the field survey.
These community types consist of open maintained gas line right-of-way, maintained cleared
areas, and forested areas (Figure 3). Of the identified on-site community types, open
maintained gas line right-of-way, and forested areas are considered potential habitat for
United States Department of Agriculture, 2017. Web Soil Survey of Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. Accessed 12/16/18.
Source: https://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov/app/HomePage.htm
e MLRC. National Land Cover Database, 2011. https://www.mrlc.gov/nlcdll_leg.php
Page 2 of 7

Chapel Grove Subdivision September 7, 2017
Protected Species Assessment Report CWS Project No. 2018-0092
federally threatened or endangered species that could potentially occur within the project limits.
A brief description of each species habitat requirements and determination of effect findings are
listed below by species.
Schweinitz's sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzil)
Habitat Description:
Schweinitz's sunflower is a perennial herb with yellow rays and yellow centers. They
can reach heights of five feet. Populations are limited to the piedmont of North and
South Carolina. It has been listed as an Endangered species under the ESA since 1991.
The typical habitat for this plant includes roadsides, old pastures, transmission line
right-of-ways, open areas, either natural or human -maintained habitats, or edges of
upland woods. Major characteristics of soils associated with suitable Schweinitz's
sunflower habitat include thin soils, soils on upland interstream flats or gentle slopes,
soils that are clay like in both composition and texture (and often with substantial rock
fragments), soils that have a high shrinkage swell capacity, and those which vary over
the course of the year from very wet to very dry.
Biological Analysis:
Potential on site habitat for this species is limited to the open maintained gas line
right-of-way (Figure 3, Photographs 1-6). The desktop review and field survey
assessment determined that this area does not have the proper soils, slopes, and
occasional disturbances to support Schweinitz's sunflower. The on-site transmission line
right-of-way appears to be intensively maintained, limited the potential for establishment
of sunflower populations. Additionally, herbaceous vegetation in the right-of-way was
dominated by aggressive colonizing species such as blackberry (Rubus argutus) and
dogfennel (Eupatorium capillifolium), which would outcompete Schweinitz's sunflower.
This survey was conducted during the optimal survey window of late August to October,
and no individuals of Schweinitz's sunflower or other Helianthus species were observed
during the field assessment on August 24, 2017. Even though known population records
of the species occur within one mile of the project area in the NHP database, no
supportive habitat was present and no individuals were observed, leading CWS to
conclude that the project will not affect Schweinitz's sunflower.
Smooth coneflower (Echinacea laevigata)
Habitat Description:
Smooth coneflower is a tall, perennial herbaceous plant found in areas with abundant
sunlight where competition in the herbaceous layer is minimal. It has been federally
listed as Endangered under the ESA since 1992.$ Typical habitat for this plant includes
meadows, open woodlands, the ecotonal regions between meadows and woodlands,
cedar barrens, dry limestone bluffs, clear cuts, and roadside and utility rights-of-way. In
North Carolina, the species normally grows in magnesium- and calcium- rich soils
associated with gabbro and diabase parent material, and typically occurs in Iredell,
United States Fish and Wildlife Services. 1991. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Helianthus schweinitzii
(Schweinitz's sunflower) Determined to be Endangered. http://ecos.fws.gov/docs/federal_register/frl852.pdf.
8 United States Fish and Wildlife Services. 1992. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Echinacea laevigata (Smooth
Coneflower) Determined to be Endangered. http://ecos.fws.gov/docs/federal_register/fr2l40.pdf.
Page 3 of 7

Chapel Grove Subdivision
Protected Species Assessment Report
September 7, 2017
CWS Project No. 2018-0092
Misenheimer, and Picture soil series. It grows best where there is abundant sunlight, little
competition in the herbaceous layer, and periodic disturbances (e.g., regular fire regime,
well-timed mowing, careful clearing) that prevents encroachment of shade -producing
woody shrubs and trees. On sites where woody succession is held in check, it is
characterized by a number of species with prairie affinities.
Biological Analysis:
A NCNHP data record review revealed that there are no current occurrences for this
species within the project limits, or within a one -mile radius of the project (Attachment A).
Though disturbed open areas conducive to early -succession species are present in the
project area, these areas consist of saprolite and residuum weathered soils, absent of
magnesium and calcium and are therefore not suitable for smooth coneflower.9 Due to
the lack of habitat and known occurrences, CWS concludes that this project will not
affect smooth coneflower.
Michaux's sumac (Rhus michauxii)
Habitat Description:
Michaux's sumac is a rhizomatous shrub. It is densely hairy with compound leaves
exhibiting evenly -serrated leaflets. Flowers are small, greenish to white, in terminal
clusters. Fruits are red drupes produced from August to October. It has been listed as
an Endangered species under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) since 1989.10 It is
found on the coastal plains of Virginia to Florida, with most populations occurring in
North Carolina. It prefers sandy or rocky open woods with basic soils, as well as,
highway right-of-ways, roadsides, or edges of artificially -maintained clearings.
Biological Analysis:
A NCNHP data record review revealed that there are no current occurrences for this
species within the project limits, or within a one -mile radius of the project (Attachment A).
Though disturbed open areas conducive to early -succession species are present in the
project area, these areas consist of acidic Cecil and Enon soils that are not suitable for
Michaux's sumac (Figure 2). Additionally the Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
states in its Michaux's sumac profile page that the species is considered historic in
Mecklenburg County11. Due to the lack of habitat and known occurrences, CWS
concludes that this project will not affect Michaux's sumac.
Carolina heelsplitter (Lasmigona decorata)
Habitat Description:
The Carolina heelsplitter was historically known from several locations within the
Catawba and Pee Dee River systems in North Carolina and the Pee Dee and Savannah
River systems, and possibly the Saluda River system in South Carolina. In North
Carolina, the species is now known only from a handful of streams in the Pee Dee and
9 United States Department of Agriculture, 2017. Web Soil Survey of Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. Accessed 12/16/18.
Source: https://websoilsurvey.nrrs.usda.gov/app/HomePage.htm
10 United States Fish and Wildlife Services. 1989. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Determination of Endangered
Status for Rhus michauxii (Michaux's sumac). http://ecos.fws.gov/docs/federal_register/frl601.pdf.
11 Suiter, Dale. Fish and Wildlife Biologist. Raleigh Ecological Services Field, USFWS. Michaux's Sumac Species Profile page. Last
updated August 24, 2017. Accessed March 16, 2018 https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/es_michauxs_sumac.htmi
Page 4 of 7

Chapel Grove Subdivision September 7, 2017
Protected Species Assessment Report CWS Project No. 2018-0092
Catawba River systems. The species exists in very low abundances, usually within 6 feet
of shorelines, throughout its known range. The general habitat requirements for the
Carolina heelsplitter are shaded areas in large rivers to small streams, often burrowed
into clay banks between the root systems of trees, or in runs along steep banks with
moderate current. Recently, the Carolina heelsplitter has been found is in sections of
streams containing bedrock with perpendicular crevices filled with sand and gravel, and
with wide riparian buffers. 12
Biological Analysis:
A pedestrian foot survey conducted on August 24, 2017 revealed perennial and
intermittent streams within the project limits. The on-site streams are highly unstable
with silty bottoms, high sedimentation, and high turbidity, which is not conducive to
heelsplitter habitat. No heelsplitters were observed on-site during the site visit on August
24, 2017. Due to the lack of habitat, and the fact that these streams are located within
the Yadkin Pee -Dee River basin, but they are not within the Goose Creek of Duck Creek
Watersheds leads, CWS to conclude that this project will not affect the Carolina
heelsplitter.
Northern Iona -eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis)
The northern long-eared bat (NLEB) is one of the species of bats most impacted by the
white -nose syndrome disease. Summer habitat (roosting habitat) of the NLEB includes forests
and woodlots containing live trees and/or dead snags greater than three inches diameter at
breast height with cavities or crevices. Winter habitat (hibernacula) of the NLEB includes caves,
mines, rocky areas, or structures that mimic similar conditions such as culverts greater than
48 -inch in diameter.13 The NLEB was listed as Threatened (T) on April 2, 2015.
The forested areas within the property are potential habitats for the NLEB. A Standard Local
Operating Procedure for Endangered Species Act Compliance (SLOPES) was established for
NLEB between the USFWS Asheville and Raleigh Ecological Offices and the United States
Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Wilmington District, on January 31, 2017.14 This SLOPES
defines how the USACE will make determinations of effect to the NLEB on projects in which the
USACE is the lead federal agency. Alternative Local Procedure 1 (ALP 1) applies for the
Chapel Grove Subdivision site as the action area is within range of the NLEB,75 the action area
is located outside of a red 12 -digit HUC as defined by the Asheville Ecological Services Field
Office, 16 and consultation by the USACE is not required on other listed species or critical habitat.
The final 4(d) rule exempts incidental take of NLEB associated with activities that occur greater
than 0.25 miles from a known hibernaculum site and greater than 150 feet from a known,
occupied maternity roost from June 1 -July 31. In accordance with ALP 1 and the final 4(d) rule
(effective as of February 16, 2016), any incidental take that may result from associated activities
is exempt under the 4(d) rule. Therefore, this project is exempt under the 4(d) rule.
NCDOT TE Animal Habitat Descriptions. 2015.
https:Hcbnnect. ncdot.gov/resources/Environmental/Compliance%20Guides%20and°/a2OProcedures/TE%2OAnimal%2OHabitat%
20Descriptions%2OM ar_6_2015. pdf
13 United States Fish and Wildlife Service. 2016. 4(d) Rule for the Northern Long -Eared Bat; Final rule.
https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2016-01-14/pdf/2016-00617.pdf
14 USACE http://saw-reg.usace.army.mil/NLEB/1-30-17-signed_NLEB-SLOPES&apps.pdf
5 The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) 2016. https://www.fws.gov/midwest/endangered/mammals/nleb/pdfMMSZone.pdf
e The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) 2016. Northern Long -Eared Bat.
Page 5 of 7

Chapel Grove Subdivision September 7, 2017
Protected Species Assessment Report CWS Project No. 2018-0092
Bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus)
The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act," enacted in 1940, prohibits anyone, without a
permit issued, from "taking" bald eagles, including their parts, nests, or eggs. Habitat for the
bald eagle includes cliffs and forested areas typically within 1.0 mile of estuaries, large lakes,
reservoirs, rivers, seacoast, and as they become more abundant, stands of undisturbed forest.
A desktop -GIS assessment of the project study area, as well as the area within a 1 mile radius
of the project limits, was performed on August 31, 2017 using 2017 color aerials. No water
bodies large enough or sufficiently open to be considered potential feeding sources were
identified (Figures 1-3). Additionally, a review of the NCNHP database on August 31, 2017
revealed no known occurrences of this species within 1.0 mile of the project study area. A
pedestrian survey was conducted on August 15, 2017, and no bald eagles or bald eagle nests
were observed. Due to the lack of habitat and known occurrences, CWS concludes that this
project will not affect this species.
Summary
Based on the literature search and the results of the on-site assessment for suitable habitat of
federally -protected endangered, and threatened species, suitable habitat was not observed
within the project limits for Schweinitz's sunflower, smooth coneflower, Michaux's sumac, bald
eagle, or Carolina heelsplitter. CWS has concluded that activities within the project area will not
directly or indirectly jeopardize the continued existence of Schweinitz's sunflower, the smooth
coneflower, Michaux's sumac, bald eagle,and Carolina heelsplitter. Additionally, based on the
project area location, no tree removal activities will occur within a 150 -foot radius of a known,
occupied NLEB maternity roost from June 1 -July 31 and no trees will be removed within 0.25
miles of a known hibernaculum at any time of year. Therefore, any incidental take on NLEB that
may result from associated activities is exempt under the 4(d) rule and notifications will follow
the SLOPES agreement"'. Biological determinations requirements for federally protected
species are summarized in Table 2 (below).
Table 2. Bioloqical Determination Requirements Summary Table for Federally Protected Species
E - Endangered, T - Threatened, BGPA - Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act
- Required in accoradnce with SLOPES, ALP 2 agreement.
https://www.fws.gov/midwest/MidwestBird/eaglepermits/bagepa.html
8 http://www.fws.gov/asheville/htmis/project_review/NLEB_in_WNC.html
Page 6 of 7
Federal
Effect on Listed
Biological
Scientific Name
Common Name
Status*
Species
Determination
Required
Helianthus schweinitzii
Schweinitz's sunflower
E
Will Not Affect
No
Echinacea laevigata
Smooth coneflower
E
Will Not Affect
No
Rhus michauxii
Michaux's sumac
E
Will Not Affect
No
Lasmigona decorata
Carolina heelsplitter
E
Will Not Affect
No
Myotis septentrionalis
Northern -long-eared bat
T
Exempt/Excepted
Yes**
Haliaeetus
Bald eagle
BGPA
Will Not Affect
No
leucocephalus
E - Endangered, T - Threatened, BGPA - Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act
- Required in accoradnce with SLOPES, ALP 2 agreement.
https://www.fws.gov/midwest/MidwestBird/eaglepermits/bagepa.html
8 http://www.fws.gov/asheville/htmis/project_review/NLEB_in_WNC.html
Page 6 of 7

Chapel Grove Subdivision
Protected Species Assessment Report
September 7, 2017
CWS Project No. 2018-0092
A biological assessment was not conducted for this project. All biological determinations of
effect represent the best professional opinion of CWS and are not official determinations of
effect. It is the responsibility of the lead federal agency to render an official determination of
effect. Should the lead federal agency agree with CWS's initial findings of no effect, then no
USFWS consultation is required to comply with Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act.
Should the lead federal agency's determination of effect differ from the findings of CWS, formal
or informal consultation with USFWS may be required.
Thank you for the opportunity to provide these services on this important project. Please do not
hesitate to contact Daniel Roberts at 704-527-1177 ext. 707 or [e-mail] should you
have any questions or comments regarding this report.
Sincerely,
Daniel Roberts Christine A. Geist, PWS, CE
Project Scientist Principal Scientist
Attachments: Figure 1: Vicinity Map
Figure 2: USGS Site Location
Figure 3: Aerial Imagery
Attachment A: NCNHP Data Review Report
Attachment B: Representative Photographs (1-7)
Page 7 of 7

W% ,held A"
GsvylB Ar;rvn:
�+rmnT IrM
R4pond i:e7. '
rRn
Mn1�rVn#,
Ro
b �rY Ur
s. Hus
*C Ginnr> 17d
11
r
4
A
V
C
t
e
e0
4°
o'
F�
{o
\„r°
r�
E
P7 aryl=ae Cr
den O`
pmbe�
....__Robert HOMI Rd .~..
O
x
foo
t IF e
Sh
Legend
xrte Rd
� 14ed4° M o*
MxPte pve Oe�M
f� Project Limits (75 ac.)
k,
P ' Rd
2,000 1,000 0 2,000 Feet
REFERENCE: BACKGROUND VICINITY MAP PROVIDED BY ESRI, DATED 2017.
- q
SCALE. DATE:
1 inch = 2,000 feet 8/29/2017 Vicinity Map FIGURE NO.
CWS PROJECT NO. DRAWN BY.
2017-0418 JDR Chapel Grove Subdivision 01
APPLICANT NO: CHECKED BY: CAROLINA Huntersville, North Carolina
GCA WETLAND SERVICES CWS Project No. 2017-0418
G:\My Dhve\2017 Consulting\2017 Projects\2017-0418 Asbury ChapelVarcGIS\Figure1_Vdnity.mxd
4°
\„r°
r�
P7 aryl=ae Cr
8
Farr. roof E O
oc
\.c 6}4
* fP
U
ec`
'� 90 °o
0 S.
i O`
T eeM
Arbor Lt
c
n
Focr \.n
P
a C`
\nyc
LSexv er Cree'^
N �n
y
f O�x CO j
114
6
a U
{
`9%Mood
c �
Cn o 16
� �
o
n
pc
y,
O,
rCo
'k.4 _ ..
b
r
soon V\
ShwnU (5>*
....__Robert HOMI Rd .~..
O
x
foo
t IF e
Sh
Legend
xrte Rd
� 14ed4° M o*
MxPte pve Oe�M
f� Project Limits (75 ac.)
k,
P ' Rd
2,000 1,000 0 2,000 Feet
REFERENCE: BACKGROUND VICINITY MAP PROVIDED BY ESRI, DATED 2017.
- q
SCALE. DATE:
1 inch = 2,000 feet 8/29/2017 Vicinity Map FIGURE NO.
CWS PROJECT NO. DRAWN BY.
2017-0418 JDR Chapel Grove Subdivision 01
APPLICANT NO: CHECKED BY: CAROLINA Huntersville, North Carolina
GCA WETLAND SERVICES CWS Project No. 2017-0418
G:\My Dhve\2017 Consulting\2017 Projects\2017-0418 Asbury ChapelVarcGIS\Figure1_Vdnity.mxd

G\My Drive\2017 Consulling\2017 Projects\2017-0418 Asbury Chapel\ArcGIS\Figure2_USGS.mxd

GWy Dnve12017 Consulting\2017 Projects\2017-0418 Asbury ChapeNArcGIS\Figure3_Aerial.mxd