19960634 Ver 1_Complete File_19960126

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
&14
NCDENR
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
January 26, 1999
Mr. Leonard Rindner, PWS
3714 Spokeshave Lane
Matthews, NC 28105
Subject:
Wetlands Mitigation
Innes Street Market
Rowan County, NC
DWQ# 960634
Dear Mr. Rindner:
This Office is in receipt of the Status Report dated January 15, 1999, for the mitigation
wetlands at the subject facility. Staff from the Wetlands Unit reviewed the plans and found that
the progress to date is acceptable.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Mr. Todd St. John at (919)
733-1786 ext. 260.
c e ,
J ?etlands R. Dorney
Unit Supervi, or
cc: Mr. Todd St. John, Wetlands Unit
Mooresville Regional Office
4401 Reedy Creek Road, Raleigh, NC 27607 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer. 50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper
. 4
LEONARD S. RINDNER. PWS
Environmental Planning Consultant 3714 Spokeshave Lane
Landscape Architecture Matthews, NC 28105
Land Planning [phone]
January 15, 1999
Mr. Steve Chapin
US Army Corps of Engineers - Reg. Field Office
151 Patton Avenue - Room 143
Asheville, NC 28801 - 5006
Mr. John R. Dorney - Department of Water Quality -
Environmental Science Laboratories
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, NC 27607
Re: Innes Street Market Wetland Mitigation Status Report
Dear Sirs:

On behalf of my client, the Crosland Group, I am providing you with the following
information concerning the status of the wetland mitigation site for your review.
General Visual Observations and Comments
The created wetlands appear to be evolving into easily recognizable wetland
habitat.
2. Great blue herons, terns, and plovers were noted feeding in the marsh areas.
Amphibians, and aquatic insects were observed.
3. Fish were spotted in the lower wet pond of Cell 92
4. A (breeding) family of killdeer were noted in Cell #2. The wetlands seem to b?
large enough to attract migrating birds and birds that rely on open wetland
habitats. Protection may be offered by the surrounding slopes.
5. The water is remarkably clear when the leaving Cell#2
6. It appears that there is a strong probability of a successful mitigation project that
has an excellent chance in meeting and/or exceeding the requirements.
top
`
AN 2 0a
WArc?NDS aan,.
Mr. Steve Chapin, Mr. John Domey
Innes Street Market, Page 2
January 15, 1999,
Meeting Goals
Minimization
- Installation of wet detention ponds completed
- Construction of approximate 400'X 15' retaining wall to minimize impacts to
high quality headwater forest wetlands completed.
- Utilization of existing wetland soils in areas to be impacted in mitigation sites.
- Strict adherence to an approved sedimentation control plan and other best
management practices.
Mitigation
Creation of 4.00 acres of seasonally flooded and temporarily flooded headwater
and extended stormwater wetlands. The proposed plans indicated that approximately
70% of the area will be vegetated wetlands and approximately 30% of the area will be
strategically located open water areas. These open waters do not include the wet pond at
the head of Cell #I or the wet pond also known as Cell #3.
Current Conditions
Wetland Mitigation Cell #1
Cell Al is approximately 1.75 acres and accepts water from a wet detention pond
and from off-site overland drainage. To respond to actual site conditions and grading
issues, the layout of Cell #1 was modified earlier this year to consist of two tiers. Recent
adjustments to the mitigation site included grading adjustments and establishing more
hydrological connections between the tiers. The hydrological connection between the
tiers has been made by simple rip-rap and filter stone weirs.
A recent adjustment was made to the hydrology to lower the level of standing
water on the upper tier and to raise the level of water and increase the duration of
saturation on the lower tier. This modification has allowed for the formation of higher
zones or islands that will be the planting areas for scrub/shrub and bottomland hardwoods
on the upper tier and affords hydrological conditions that are more conducive to wetland
creation on the lower tier. A large island area will be planted with bottomland hardwoods
and scrub/shrub vegetation in the lower tier as indicated.
Mr. Steve Chapin, Mr. John Dorney
Innes Street Market, Page 3
January 15, 1999
As depicted on the attached Data Form #1, it is apparent that the creation and
natural formation of jurisdictional wetlands is succeeding in Cell 91. We believe that
approximately ± 1.70 acres of jurisdictional wetlands will have been created in Cell #l.
Approximately ± 0.05 acres is open water.
Wetland Mitigation Cell #2
Cell 92 accepts ("polished") water from Cell 91, and storm drainage from the
shopping center. A small open water feature is located at the discharge points into Cell
92. Recent adjustments to the mitigation site included grading and hydrological
modifications. Adjustments to the rip-rap and stone weir are in the process of being made
to increase the duration of flooding to establish more marsh-like/aquatic wetland habitat
as required in the design of an extended detention wetlands. While wetland habitat is
being successfully being created in Cell 42 (see Data Form 41) based on observations of
natural succession, it appears that an emergent and scrub/shrub wetland habitat is
developing. It is expected that this adjustment will increase the duration of flooding to
allow the permanent pool to develop as a marsh with a depth of 0 - 18" with an almost
equal distribution of area (35% and 35%) between 0"-9" and (9" to 18"). As depicted on
the attached Data Form 91, it is apparent that the creation and natural formation of
jurisdictional wetlands is succeeding in Cell #2. Approximately 1.30 acres of
jurisdictional wetlands and 1.20 acres of related open water will have been created in
Cell #2.
Overall existing conditions appear to indicate that approximately 3 acres of
created wetlands (70%) and adjacent 1.25 acres of open water (30%) will be created in
this wetland complex.
Vegetation
The objective of the Mitigation Planting Plan is to enhance the created wetland
and/or riparian habitats throughout the various areas used as mitigation on the project
site. Planting will include a diversity of saturation tolerant tree species. The planting plan
will also encourage a diverse canopy and mid-story vegetation. The primary criteria upon
which plant selection is based is the duration of soil saturation.
Forested mitigation sites will be planted at an initial density of approximately 500
trees woody stems per acre by utilizing a combination of bare root seedlings, live stakes,
and/or larger vegetation. Scrub/shrub mitigation sites will be planted at an initial density
of approximately 1000 woody stems per acre by utilizing a combination of bare root, live
stakes, seedlings and/or larger vegetation. Herbaceous species are expected to naturally
succeed.
Mr. Steve Chapin, Mr. John Dorney
Innes Street Market, Page 4
January 15, 1999,
Dr. Jim Matthews (Habitat Assessment Restoration Program) and I believe based
on a recent site visit that the herbaceous vegetation that is volunteering may be
sufficiently diverse to eventually meet the requirements. The vegetation is probably
partially the result of utilizing the hydric soil. The vegetation that is volunteering includes
duck potato, soft rush, seedbox, spikerush, tear-thumb, and several varieties of sedges,
bulrush, (unfortunately) cattails, and others. The cattails are being removed to the extent
feasible.
Schedule
Vegetation will be selected from the following general lists. Planting of scrub/shrub and
bottomland hardwood vegetation is expected to occur this winter. Live stakes such as
silky willow; silky dogwood, and others are expected to be utilized where feasible due to
availability.
Scrub/Shrub Zone
Alnus spp. Betula nigra Cephalanthus occidentalis
Cornus amomum Ilex decidua Lindera benzoin
Sambucus canadensis Viburnum dentatum Salix sp. as approved
* Salix nigra is volunteering naturally
Bottomland Hardwood - Forested Zone
Diospyros virginiana Frax. pennsylvanica Nyssa sylvatica
Quercus species Taxodium distichum Plat. occidentalis
* Liquidambar styraciflua, Acer rubrum, Platanus occidentalis, are volunteering naturally
Tree Planting Zones
Planting zones are based on progressive toleration of saturated soil conditions.
A/B - Transitional Species, and species which tolerate minimum
duration of soil saturation
C/D - Saturation - Tolerant tree species
Forested Zone - Tree Planting Schedule
* No more than 20% of the trees required to be installed shall be of one species to create diversity. Trees
shall be located in a naturalistic pattern. The minimum size shall be 1 yr. bare root seedlings The size
specified below is recommended to increase survivability. Additional or alternate selections may be
necessary based on availability, site specific data, and cost factors. All of the listed species shall be utilized
unless approved otherwise.
Mr. Steve Chapin, Mr. John Dorney
Inns Street Market, Page 5, January 15, 1999
Zone Scientific Name Size and Condition Spacing
AB Diospyros virginiana min. 1 year bare root seedling 9' On Center
Persimmon
C/D Fraz. pennsylvanica min. 1 year bare root seedling 9' On Center
Green Ash
C/D Nyssa sylvatica min. 1 year bare root seedling 9' On Center
Blackgum
C/D Quercus lyrata min. 1 year bare root seedling 9' On Center
Overcup Oak
AB Quercus michauxii min. 1 year bare root seedling 9' On Center
Swamp Chestnut Oak
AB Quercus phellos min. 1 year bare root seedling 9' On Center
Willow Oak
AB Quercus shumardii min. 1 year bare root seedling 9' On Center
Shumard's Oak
CID Tazodium distichum min. 1 year bare root seedling 9' On Center
Baldcypress
S
rub/Sh
dule
b Pl
Z
S
h
ti
c
ru
an
ng
one
c
e
Botanical Name Common Name Size Notes
Ceph, occidentalis Button Bush 14" - 18" Plants 6'-7' O/C
Alnus serrulata Tag Alder 14" - 18" Plants 6'-7' O/C
Betula nigra River Birch 14" - 18" Plants 6'-7' O/C
Lindera benzoin Spicebush 1411- 18" Plants 61-7' O/C
Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood 14" - 18" Plants 6'-7' O/C
Sambucus canadensis Elderberry 14" - 18" Plants 6-7' O/C
Others that are approved
** No more than 20% of the scrub/shrub materials required to be installed shall be of one species to create
diversity and shall be located in a pattern and directed by the planner . The minimum size shall be 1 vr.
bare root seedlings. The size specified below is recommended to increase survivability. Additional or
alternate selections may be necessary based on availability, site specific data, and cost factors. At least six
varieties shall be utilized.
Mr. Steve Chapin, Mr. John Dorney
Innes Street Market, Page 6
January 15, 1999
Fertilization - Herbaceous and Wood Plant Species
1) Use Osmacote fertilizer or approved equal. For spring planting, use 18-6-12, eight to nine month release.
For winter and fall planting, use 18-5-11, twelve to fourteen month release.
2) If planting is under water, use Agriform 20-10-5 two year release 10 gram planting tablets.
3) Fertilize at time of planting
Recommended Quantities of Fertilizer for various Herbaceous Plant Materials IGarbisch
Dormant propagule 15 grams Osmacote or 1 ea. 20-10-5 lOg Agriform tablet
growing bareroot 15 grams Osmacote or 1 ea. 20-10-5 1Og Agriform tablet
container/fiber pot 30 grams Osmacote or 3 ea. 20-10-5 1Og Agiiform tablet
plug (seedling) 15 grams Osmacote or 1 ea. 20-10-5 lOg Agriform tablet
plug (collection) 30 grams Osmacote or 3 ea. 20-10-5 1Og Agriform tablet
Recommended Quantities of Fertilizer for various Woody Species (Garbisch
1 quart container 30 grams Osmacote or 20-10-5 lOg Agrifotm/Manufacturer rate
1 gallon container 90 grams Osmacote or 20-10-5 1Og Agriform/Manufacturer rate
* 30 additional grams for each additional gallon
plug (seedling) 15 grams Osmacote or 1 ea. 20-10-5 1Og Agriform tablet
The side slopes surrounding the mitigation sites will be stabilized to prevent erosion. The
following mixture could be used.
Seeding Mixture
Dates Types Rate
Feb. 1 - Apr. 15 Sericea lespedeza Appalow
(best 2/15 -3/21) (scarified) 501bs/acre
Weeping Lovegrass 3 lbs /acre
Kobe Annual lespedeza 10 lbs /acre
Late winter is the best time to plant lespedezas.
June 1 - Sept. 1 Temporary Crop
Jap. Millet or Sorghum 35 lbs /acre
(to be followed by permanent mixture)
Aug. 25 - Oct. 25 Sericea lespedeza Appalow (low growing)
(best 8/25 - 9/15) (unscarified) 701bs /acre
or
Sericea lespedeza (tall growing)
(unscarified)
Wheat 50 lbs /acre
Kobe lespedeza 10 lb/acre
Mr. Steve Chapin, Mr. John Dorney
Inns Street Market, Page 7
January 15, 1999
Nurse Plants
Between May 1, and August 15, add 10 lbs/acre German millet or 15 lb/acre Sudangrass. Prior to May 1 or
August 15, add 40 lb/acre rye (grain).
Vegetation Monitoring
Two to four sample plots will be identified for Mitigation Cell #I and Mitigation
Cell 92. Each sample plot will represent approximately a 50' by 50' area. A permanent
sample plot location will then be identified for that cell. Establishment of an observation
plot of at least 30' radius to record the number and species of each surviving woody stem
and the percent aerial cover of the three most dominant species. Within the 30' radius
area a 10' radius area will be established to record the three dominant herbaceous species.
Mitigation areas will be monitored bi-annually during March/April and
August/September to measure survival rate, species diversity, growth.
Identify upland species and invasive species to be removed such as honeysuckle,
blackberry, rose, poison ivy, kudzu, ligustrum, etc.
At least 320 woody stems per acre in bottomland hardwood areas are surviving. If
this criteria is not met, the area is not considered to be successful and maintenance will
need to be performed on the area in order to provide the required quantiy. A five year
monitoring period will be conducted for forested plant communities.
A minimum 75% cover after five years is required for herbaceous plant cover.
Hvdrologicnl Success Criteria
Saturation or inundation for at least 12.5% of the growing season at lower landscape
positions during average climatic conditions is the target hydrological characteristic.
Upper landscape areas may exhibit inundation and/or saturation between 5% and 12.5%
of the growing season. If wetland parameters are marginal, consultation with USACE
personnel will be conducted to determine the jurisdictional extent in transitional areas.
The data collected during the monitoring period will be utilized to evaluate the success of
the mitigation areas. The success criteria will be as follows:
Soil saturation within 12 inches of the surface for a minimum of approximately
12 consecutive days during the early part of the growing season.
Mr. Steve Chapin, Mr. John Dorney
Innes Street Market, Page 8
January 15, 1999
Observed evidence of inundation or saturation within the root zone for 5% to
12.5% of the growing season.
Establish at least one hydrology indicator per the 1987 USACE Wetland
Delineation Manual in the sample plot or match adjacent riparian habitat surroundings.
Establishment of at least one hydric soil characteristic or match adjacent riparian
habitat surroundings.
These Vegetative, Soil, and Hydrological Characteristics must be met to determine
success of the wetland mitigation. If the mitigation is determined to be unsuccessful the
following one or more of the following contingency plans will be implemented.
1) Selected re-installation of vegetation, thinning, maintenance, and/or acceptance
2) Extended monitoring periods
3) Hydrological modifications or manipulation and/or
4) Off-site mitigation sites and/or.
5) Acceptable alternative form of mitigation.
Report Submittal
An "as-built" plan drawing of the area, including initial species compositions by the
community type, and sample plot locations will be provided after completion of planting.
A review of the actual design, densities, and quantities will also be included and will be
provided within 90 days of completion of planting. Submitted reports will document the
sample plot locations, along with photographs which illustrate site conditions.
Monitoring Reports will include:
1) species and quantity of each surviving woody stem
2) Estimated percent aerial cover of the three dominant species
3) Representative photographs
4) Depth of water table during early part of the growing season
5) Hydric soil observations and other hydrological characteristics.
Field data will be recorded on a monitoring data form and submitted along with
representative photographs in a annual monitoring report. This will be submitted to the
USACE and the NCDWQ. After the fifth year of monitoring, a summary report and
as-builts will be furnished for review and discussion regarding compliance of the project
with conditions of the permit and to determine the need for future monitoring or
modifications.
Mr. Steve Chapin, Mr. John Dorney
Inns Street Market, Page 9
January 15, 1999
Conclusion
Inns Street Market is a well planned and successful commercial development in
Salsibury. The mitigation for the unavoidable impacts to jurisdictional waters of the U.S.
appears to be progressing successfully with the development of wetland hydrology,
hydric soil, and hydrophytic vegetation. This winter the establishment of scrub/shrub and
bottomland hardwoods will begin now that the hydrology, soil, has been further
established. The wetlands mitigation sites have been designed for both long term water
quality protection and establishment of viable wetland habitat.
As an anecdote, during a recent site visit to observe the progress of the mitigation site, I
was asked by a truck driver behind the Food Lion what I was doing. I unconsciously, but
fortunately answered using some professional jargon and expressed that I was evaluating
the progress of the mitigation site. He seemed puzzled by the word, mitigation, and he
said - "look's like a swamp to me!".
Let me know if you have any questions, require further explanation, or would like to
meet at the site.
Sincerely,

D6onard S. Rindner, PWS
Environmental Planning Consultant
NC Landscape Architect 9578
i
1
fi:. a... Nbw AWdb
Ibrtnen cr.r R'bab
m• / R+D.Ii+ Wnera
333 Wwbv- Rbb•
$a1'r K C 28146-1530
11 (711 ) 033.0325
n ?
Z
1
? a
t
? a
1
North;
AC G 6M Ra.y, I
NA08J
Per Solar C>ets.aflar l1
i
1
I1
I
1
1
11
1
1
f
DISCHARGE TO CELL#2
I
PROPOSED BOTTOMLAND
„
°ea I VICINITY MAP NO SCALE I
,ar
1
1
ay/?'..ws+4 SA[1SBU1rr runnanrr
c-ly ROWAN COUNTY
RarM C..&.
r.. mw 070 Perc.l 94, 104, 117
PA, ft-b- 5669-55-1840 Scar. See Droving
.4- by a,vaw.ra
HARDWOODS
i7.w Bo.e Poy.
NO B R ?9 1997 N06£NBER ?9 1997
ow.
0£CEN6£R 04 1997
'1!0'""'b"' 97-459
EXISTING AQUATIC/EMERGENT WETLAND AREAS 7AA-
1N/s A/AP WAS Ivor DRARN 1o GS ?7-.3o snwoaaos
AS PROCRI&D F04 ROMAMY PURP05£1
•
PROPOSED SCRUB/SHRUB AREAS
,..
r
•lw _a.c
q., d, 64 Sfo,obys eI pd.. G Awy
S SQ160J-cT -
SIGNER MQtWAN oe£r RISOLN L- I
7tw1 •>
.acn ? C?
P c N } ?`?a? ?# ` a
O Y•.n ^ W
44 Z7 wv b
.nnx 6`• • 44.//3 wv c
,.a. A\ 7,ya.o2
' 9 •+? w a ?8 744.06 wv u
.av.
.aaa .au, .rw 10 746.74 hE f
p? 101 7 )
46.76 he,
q s
sa
C
.,aua
AREAS ARE APPROXIMATE-FIELD ADAPTATION WILL
na BE REQUIRED
»
i
Y
r PROPOSED SCRUB/SHRUB AREAS
l1
F PROPOSED BOTTOMLAND HARDWOODS
DISCHARGE FROM WET POND I /
VEGETATION PLAN - CELL #l {
:•wo`qd`,?kHg.?.,F1rr.+?a+ti?e:h.wrr'Air.,. .i+•ier:'??1?4';?.'Uw,. 4>::,u '?'?• .?+,}y":•-iyi.'+Yµ'`?Y :?~??,?.••x:.
\AIL
\ ' • ` '? \ ` ,fir' 'r 0. NI ?/} ,
0
en >
54 1 t. 1-1
1 03 1 \??
DG \ 1 \
D I I C i O\ y
D n iY
t O - Z m r- Xo
/\ \
m p r
SCI / FUT?RE D \
r _ /L ---?(- -
oii?
-2-24
\1 M m i
r 1 / zv
z
r e / 1 m =`
X
0 _ X v
'o I f •' Z
vrn r Uzj
-C I n
X
rn ;o
3: 0
a m I ?: D
m D C -?
m c czn
- - m z
:U C / i
i r m y Y.
- l- .: \
._.•. ? 1 1 I I t
j/ G7 r ? 'O ?• ? x•? ? s O - -
z D n \ ?. 2a
C/) y ` ` • J?' y2 a ?\\ ;
Z v \ e d--? -d \ d ?j
r D N 1 / rn
D O a I =
z 1 C v z
II i m
O o It
p cCn r m 1 O
r m
r m o ?? I Z D >< o ?
v
n m m j cn z o a
s? i ;t i I\ , G? ?1
N Z
q ell
D
1 ' 1
Z r I'` •? 1 1 mq?Qo? rr• v
m 1 i I ?
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site:bintos ? Date: 12
Applicant/Owner: County:
Investigator: _L-t^ g j^0(,, State:
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? es No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? "y-es <V TransectlD:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes (5) Plot ID:

(if needed, explain on reverse.) _
C..,.P,- c. t_ _# 1-
VFOc rATION
Derninant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1.L4V4e)C _4 .0py- s &II y)fekfA. ?
I?-?c 1 14 0.06t,
A 10?
/
??
3•i?_y«..,je, rA' 11.
41 V\CAJr. 12-
5-- . ?6 V rr ,(.? ..lC 13.
6. 14.
7._ 15.
S. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL
FACW or FAC 6
.
(excluding FAC-). e
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
-Stream, Lake, or ride Gauge Primary Indd*i ators:
-Aerial Photographs ?nundated
_ Other
-No Recorded Data Available _
?9aturated in Upper 12 Inches
Water Marks
Drift Lines
?Sediment Deposits
Said Observations: _.-tir-ainage Patterns in Wetlands

Depth of Surface Water: Z fin.) Secondag-tiridicators (2 or more required):
% Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
to
Depth to Free Water in Pin. d- z (in.) _ Water-Stained Leaves
_ Local Soil Survey Data
!i )I
Depth to Saturated Soil: d r fin.) _ FAC-Neutral Test
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
s •--? 6x 101at.- A w ?- t?v f a,.?c 40rdwCZt
r'd ,5'hvu? are, * Z -

W71, 1995 -196 -
S

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
0 987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Ce! 14 Z
Project/Site: vNr-e
Applicant/Owner: rza 41
Investigator: Date:
County:
State: AU o

Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site?
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)?
Is the area a potential Problem Area?
(If needed, explain on reverse.) ? No
Yes <115)
Yes 1D Community ID:
Transect ID:
Plot ID:
C-,le,4 1 :9 7,-
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Scecfes Stratum Indicator
Str'at'um A-112-
Z.. 0 YY? _tZ_ ./)?C
4 Dominant Plant Soec:es Stratum Indicator
S. 44
10. •
12.
5.? ? 14CG ?_ ??i 13.
6. 14.
7. / A,wf j 0. 4016 -L--- 15.
8. V1GZ _ - 4

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or PAC
(excluding PAC.).
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
-Stream, Lake, or ride Gauge Primary Indicators:
_ Aerial Photographs , -Kundated
other _ 6mrated in Upper i 2 Inches
-No Recorded Data Available Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
LS4dtment Deposits
Field observations: Fainaga Patterns in Wedands

Depth of Surface Water. Z (n.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches

1 t _ Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Fir. d
(in.1 _ Local Soil Survey Data

Depth to Saturated Sail: fin.) FAC-Neutral Test
-Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:

WTI, 1995 -196-
SOILS - S CtrC. ?j {?h I Ilii' r C"- (( - ?-- 2-
Map Unit Nam
(Series and Phase): ?? I Yh t `4e- -ft We `(Aa ktL Drainage Class: Q?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Feld Observations
Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Oescnwfon-
Depth
(Inches) Hart_' 'Z_o_n Matrix Color Matte Colors marde
[Munsell Moist? (Munsell Moistl Abundance/Contrast
? ?_ to jLSZ IoY ?
Yrr- y
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Texture, Concretions,

Histasol Cone: etians
Histc Epipedon _ H(qh Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
SulSdie Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ AGuic Moisture Regime _ Lasted on Local Hydric Soils List
_ R acing Conditions _ Lasted on National Hydric Soils List
.aeoGayed or Low-Chrema Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
e k aw
WETLAND DETERMINATION
F phytic Vegetation Present? a No (Circle) (Circle)
nd Hydrology Present? No
Soils Present? es No Is Lois Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes No
ks: '
-197. wM' 1995

r'•
MITIGATION CELL #1
tea "?"

[.
*JL *raw,
:r-
tic?Y?..;.?.? a c;-?? ?wr
t ..' . ,?

/ ? '? J f •? ( /fir F
•N -
MITIGATION CELL #1
1w,
Y
a f
t

MITIGATION CELL #2
Y? •^•r A

A

4
K`? ? f s v ? ?1!?If
MITIGATION CELL #2
7 ^.
M'. ? '1y ??? t r
j Y

J1

PRESERVED WETLANDS BELOW CELL#2