20090577 Ver 1_401 Application_20090509

09-0577
Wetland and Natural Resource
Consultants, Inc.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
Attn: Ms. Lori Beckwith
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
Re: Highland Forest Development
Nationwide Permit 29 Application
Haywood County, North Carolina
Lori / Cyndi:
May 18, 2009
(-t4- 1771
N.C. Uivisio`n o ter Quality
Surface Water Protection Section
Attn: Ms. Cyndi Karoly
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
D
IIAY 1 0 2000
DENR • WATER QUALITY
WETLANDS AND STORWAIATER BRANCH
The purpose of this letter is to request authorization for proposed impacts to Jurisdictional
Waters of the U.S. at Highland Forest in Haywood County, North Carolina. Highland Forest
began under the name Indian Ridge Preserve and was permitted for 142 I.f. of stream impact
on 9/8/05 (Action ID: 200532756-57). Most of those impacts were never installed. In addition
to changing names the project has also been sold to another development group and this group
has acquired more property now totaling +/- 802 acres. Highland Forest now seeks permitting
for an additional 7 l.f. (totaling 149 l.f.) of stream impacts and 0.06 acre of wetland impact
under a Nationwide Permit 29. The jurisdictional areas for this project include tributaries to
Morgan Branch and Browning Branch.
The project requests pipe/fill of 149 linear feet of stream impact and 0.06 acre of wetland fill for
road crossings. These impacts are necessary to access the property. Many of the proposed
roads follow existing logging roads but will require pipe extensions. Two bridges will be used to
avoid additional impacts. One bridge will be used for the new crossing at #21 and the other
will be used to replace an existing crossing at #23. Because of the existing road conditions and
topographic constraints, the requested impacts are necessary for the proposed project.
We look forward to hearing from you. Please feel free to call with questions or for any
additional information.
Best Regards,

Jennifer Robertson
Canton Office
PO Box 882
Canton, NC 28716
828-648-8801
828-648-8802 Fax
• Corps Submittal Cover Sheet
1. Project Name: Highland Forest
2. Name, Mailing Address, Phone Number of Property Owner/Applicant
Company and/or Name: Highland Forest Partners, LLC
Address: 684 St. Andrews Rd. Waynesville, NC 28786
Phone: [phone]
3. Name of Consultant/Agent: Ms. Jennifer Robertson
4. Related/Previous Action ID number(s): 200532756-57
5. Site Address: Indian Ridge Road (off of Lickstone Rd.)
6. Subdivision Name: Highland Forest
7. City: Waynesville
8. County: Haywood
9. Lat: 35.434957-N Long: -82.98111 W
10. Quadrangle Name: Hazelwood
11. Waterway: Browning Branch, Medford Branch,
12. Watershed: French Broad
13. Jurisdictional Features on the Site: (Approximations Only.)
Stream Length: 32,121 linear feet
Wetland Area: 1.57acres
Open Water Area: acres
14. Requested Action:
® Nationwide Permit # 29
? General Permit #
® Jurisdictional Determination Request
? Pre-Application Request
The following information will be completed by Corps office:
AID:
Prepare File Folder Assign number in ORM Begin Date
Authorization: Section 10 Section 404
Project Description / Nature of Activity / Project Purpose:
Site/Waters Name:
Keywords:
WN:t
Wetland and Natural Resource #*
Consultants, Inc. "-
Department of the Army
Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers
Attn: Ken Jolley, Chief Regulatory Division
PO Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
-and-
NC Division of Water Quality
Attn: Cyndi Karoly
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-2260
I, the current landowner of the property identified below, hereby authorize Wetland and Natural
Resource Consultants, Inc. to act on my behalf as my agent during the processing of permits to
impact Wetlands and Waters of the US that are regulated by the Clean Water Act and the
Rivers and Harbors Act.
Federal and State agents are authorized to be on said property when accompanied by Wetland
and Natural Resource Consultants, Inc. staff.
Wetland and Natural Resource Consultants, Inc. is authorized to provide supplemental
information needed for permit processing at the request of the Corps or DWQ.
Property Owner of Record: Address:
Address:
Address:
Phone Number: a28 4744 Q?
111) el-11
Property Location: Las
Owners Signature:
Date: lj? d
Canton Office Newton Office
PO Box 882 wnrinc.com PO Box 224
Canton, NC 28716 Newton, NC 28658
828-648-8801 828465-3035
828-648-8802 Fax [phone] Fax
Pre-Construction Notification PCN Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ? Yes ® No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ? Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
? Yes N No For the record only for Corps Permit:

? Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program. ? Yes ® No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below. ? Yes ® No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? Yes ® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Highland Forest
2b. County: Haywood
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Waynesville
2d. Subdivision name: Highland Forest
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: Highland Forest Partners, LLC
3b. Deed Book and Page No. Deed Book: 718 Deed Page: 1000
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable): Charles Rogers
3d. Street address: 684 St. Andrews Rd.
3e. City, state, zip: Waynesville, NC 28786
3f. Telephone no.: 828-456-7934
3g. Fax no.: 828-452-5860
3h. Email address:
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ? Agent ? Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: Jennifer Robertson
5b. Business name
(if applicable): Wetland and Natural Resource Consultants
5c. Street address: PO Box 882
5d. City, state, zip: Canton, NC 28716
5e. Telephone no.: 828-712-9205
5f. Fax no.: 828-648-8802
5g. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 8613-47-1187
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.434957 Longitude: -82.98111
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size: +/- 802 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Browning Branch
Medford Branch
proposed project: ,
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C; Tr
2c. River basin: French Broad
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Mostly forested with numerous logging roads, and a few pre-existing homes. Surrounded by forested slopes, a gravel
mine, some small farms, and low density residential.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
1.57 acres
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
32,121 linear feet
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
To develop a residential community near Waynesville. .
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
In order to develop the property as proposed there are stream crossings that will be required to access high ground. The
work will be accomplished with typical construction and grading equipment.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past? ® Yes ? No ? Unknown
Comments: Corps determinations were made within the
original Indian Ridge permit area. (Action ID: 200532756-57)
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
? Preliminary Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: WNR
Name (if known): Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
9-8-05 (see attached permit with JD determination)
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
hi ® Yes ? No
? Unknown
t
s project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
NW 3/39 on 9-8-05 (see attached permit)
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
e
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ? Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ? Buffers
? Open waters ? Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number - Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ - non-404, other) (acres)
Temporary T
W1 ®P ? T fill/culvert herbaceous ® Yes
? No ® Corps
® DWQ
0.03
W2 ®P ? T fill/culvert herbaceous ® Yes
? No ® Corps
® DWQ
0.03
W3 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W4 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W5 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W6 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts 0.06
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length
Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ - non-404 width (linear
Temporary (T) (INT)? ,
other) (feet) feet)
S1 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S2 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S3 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S4 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S5 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S6 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 149
3i. Comments: "See Attached Impact Tables
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
3. Stream Impacts
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact
Perennial (PER) Average Impact
number - Type of impact Stream name or intermittent Type of stream length
Permanent (P) or (INT)? jurisdiction width (linear
Temporary (T) (feet) feet)
? ? culvert UT to Medford PER Q Corps

S4 D P ? T
extension
Branch
? INT
D DWQ 5 15
culvert
Medford Branch D PER D Corps
5
10
S5 D P El T extension El INT D DWQ
culvert UT to Browning D PER D Corps
S6 D P ? T extension Branch ? INT D DWQ 5 20
culvert UT to Browning D PER D Corps
S7 D P ? T extension Branch ? INT D DWQ 5 10
? ? fill / culvert Browning Branch 2 PER 2 Corps 5 30
S13 D P ? T ? INT D DWQ
? ?
arch or bridge UT to Medford B PER 0 Corps
5
0
S21 ? P ? T Branch ? INT D DWQ
? ?
arch or bridge UT to Medford
P
$
0
S23 El P El T Branch 1:1
N T D DWQ
culvert UT to Medford D PER D Corps

S24 D P ? T
extension
Branch
? INT
D DWQ 10 14
culvert UT to Medford D PER D Corps

S25 D P ? T
extension
Branch
? INT
D DWQ 10 20

S26 D P El T
no new impact
Medford Branch 2 PER
? NT
D Corps
D DWQ
5
30
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 149

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number - (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ?P?T
02 ?P?T
03 ?P?T
04 ?P?T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If and or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose
number of pond
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, the n complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
? Neuse
? Tar-Pamlico ? Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ? Catawba ? Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number - Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Temporary T impact required?
B1 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
B2 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
B3 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
Stream Impacts (feet)
Flooded I Filled I Excavated I Flooded I Filled I Excavated
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes ? No if yes, permit ID no:
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
All impacts are for road crossings. Most are at existing crossings. Road and lot layouts have been adjusted to avoid impacts.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Two bridges or arched spans will be used. One at a new crossing and another to replace an existing crossing.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? ? Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ? DWQ ? Corps

2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project? ? Mitigation bank

El Payment to in-lieu fee program
? Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ? Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ? warm ? cool ?cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation? ? Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.

Zone 6c.
Reason for impact 6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier 6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 8 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ? Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
? Yes ? No
Comments:
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? less than 6 %
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ? Yes ® No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: less than 20%
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
Plan not required, but here are impervious calculations:
Total development =798 ac Total impervious=42.68 ac Percent imp erious = 5.35%
18' wide roads=14.62 ac. 12' wide roads=6.11 ac. 236 lots @ 3,000 sqft=16.25 ac. 71 condos @ 3,500=5.70 ac
? Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ? DWQ Stormwater Program
? DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? Haywood County
® Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ? NSW
? USMP
apply (check all that apply): ? Water Supply Watershed
? Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ? Yes ® No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
? Coastal counties

4a.
Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ? HQW
? ORW
(check all that apply): ? Session Law 2006-246
? Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ? Yes ® No
S. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ? Yes ? No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ® Yes ? No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ? Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ? Yes ? No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
? Yes
? No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ? Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ? Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a . Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ? Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b . If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a . Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Individual septic systems.
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ? Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ? Yes ® No
impacts?
E:1 Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
? Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
NC Natural Heritage Program website
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ? Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
Office of Habitat Protection website
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ? Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NC State Historic Preservation Office website
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ? Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA website - Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRMette)
6
Jennifer Robertson ?
+ May 18, 2009
Applicant/A
ent's Printed Name Date
g '
Applicant/Agent
s Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Page 11 of 11
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
L
LL
N
O
L
a
_d
H
v
cv
E
L
O

C) U U 0 .2 .2 .2 .2 D U U U U U U U U U U O U O O U
C -
.
E
Q
E
Q
E
Q
C
a)
c
a)
c
a)
c
(D
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
V-
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
U
ca
0-
0
.
CL
.-
c
c
a
- - E E E E E
m
m (D a) E
0 3 3 3 m a) a) m 3 3 3 3 3 ? 3 3 3 ? 3 . 3 0 3 :- @ @
a) a) a) a) a) m a) a) a) m m a) a) m
= a) C r a)
Q c c c c c c c c c c c c c
C c c c
O O O > > > > 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O L O ?- > > O
c c c 7 7 7 7 c c c c c c c c c c c Q c Q 7 5 C
U U U U U U
V
m
C.
0 0 0 LO O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 "T N O
CN M CO
d
L
3
r+
3
LL
t
O)
_

J
'
O L[) Ll7 O O O 0 O O O
O 0 0 0 O
O O
O 'T 0 0
d I M IT ? ? CY) co M M - co ca CD I M Iq co
7
C
LL
V
Lv

CD o 0 Ln O O
N ° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O
to
L
L

U
t
cm
_
d
J LO
O LO Ln O O O O
O O O O
0
0
0 0 0 0
O O
C) O
O O O O
_ ? CM 'IT IT 'IT co co N N co Iq co co O 't N N co
L
L

U

C.

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14- Iq O 0 N O N
M N

E
m
a
s
a)

d
J
_ LO
I't O LO
CO 0
CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
t, CO N N M N N M ? M M M Iq N N M
N
x
d

a

cn N M Ln (D I- 00 0 0 N M Lo (0 f- M O O r N CO v Ln M
++ O O - N N N N N N N
Q fn Co (7) 0 (n w (7) (7) (7) (7) m m 0 5 05 (n 05 N

O
00
O
co
co
>Z
a)
U
N
N
a)
a)
cn
U
m
Q
O
c
cn
2
cn
cu
L
LO
O
O
N
()
U
c
N
a)
CY)
c
c?
L
U
c
N
Q
a)
U)
a) a)
> >
W U U
Q
ao 00
o --
d L? L?=
C c
H cu m
a) (D
V m
CL N
E N O O O
O O C
O
m E
O
CO ?- 00
N N
.?+ C. (n co
V.

V O O O O N N O 0 -0
Q- C C C C c c a
E N N N N
N
m
m N N E
O N N N N O O N N

(D C C U -t

>
>
>
>
U
U
>
> C:
0
:3 -5 75 7 Q Q 7 5 C
U U 01 01
U
U
V
m
a
E Lo 0 0 0 0 0 0 'IT 0 0 0)
N - CM N M
V-
4)
3
7
LL
t
Cf
C

J Lo 0 0 0 0
O
O 0 0
d ?t M M M M
7
r
+
.
U.
V
m
a

LO CD O O
O
U)
CN W)

L
U
t
a?
c
m
J
't
?
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
_
L
L
U

m
a
E

0 0 0 0 0 04
0 d
'

E
d
CL
s
a?
c
d
J
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
w, M M N N N N M
y
x
d
d
L
CL

Cf) v. Lo Cfl r, M M ? LO CO

a)
a) N N N N N

CL

(A 4

? _

?

cn O
_
U) N
_
c) N

U) N
+
Cl) N
-L.
U) N

(D

N
L
W
C
N
V
ii
E
L
Q
C?
G
v
cv

L
O
B
ai
km
a
0
ao
0)
CA
co
co
z
m
U
tD
m
ZOOT-Ddl saiTiunwwoO anaasaad ayl
,P,:) paj
eugOaeO LWON 'AlunOj poOmAeH :uo
Tsaaod puely6lH
:aweN i
peiano - deW :pedwl puellaM
60-TT-S 21NM ,? ,OOL=„T.
I
I
TO88-8?9-8Z8 ?: ?-:-•?
9T/8Z ' 'uoTueD Z88 Xo8 'O'd
?'N =-
s;uellnsuoD aoinosad leanTeN pue pueRaM
,OOTZ ,OObT OOL ,OS£ 0

° ° D
- - y
m d

E
0
0 a
1
c `
c c N
G C
CO J J 9 3 ?
2
0 0 c c
TJ U C X
/?. w c C
/ j
w U d W
?` J I
r i r
4
Q i
N z
O Q < r
U. 7FD
(1) z
O
co C)
Q \\?? ? Y I' I ?I I
r ?? t 1
„
N1
21 b
Va.

7
0

I
,
\ G

r'
A

O
r, V
S (?
75
ZOOT-Ddl sailiunwwoD an,iasaad ayl
:a [o:;ual
euijaeD PON 'AjunoD poomAeH 9TZ8Z ON 'uoTueD Z88 Xo9 '0'd
:vale •. .? ._.} „-
sTuellnsuoD aoanosa-d jeanTeN pue puejjaM z .
Tsaaod pue?y6iH
awe palm ,006 1009 00£ AST 0?
(S jo T) do asop - deW Taedwi puejTaM (\ \?
:deW ! I A A ??:.
J
6O-TT-S 21NM 00£=..T.
Paul
tt
P , abpia9 ao "\\
uedS pay:)ay \\
?J
? -U
? ??Nb2i1N?

H12j ON

ZOOT-Ddl salllunwwoD aAJasaad ayl
a 7?a[a
euilaeD PON 'AlunoD poomAeH :uc
ISWOo puelg5lH
:awe ?
(S Io Z) do asop - deW pedwI pUellaM
60-Ti-S MM .onF=.,T
,006 1009 100£ IOST 0
T088-8?9-8Z8 -- ?•- •?
9TL8Z 'D'N 'uolueD Z88 Xo8 'O'd *= :?.'?a
slue;lnsuoD a:)anosad leanTeN pue puell@M - ?> z

ZOOT-Jdl sailiunwwo0 anaasaad a4l
:a [oj auai T088-8b9-8Z8 •.?''-^•
eugoae0 WON 'Aluno0 poaw(eH 9TLK 'D'N 'uoTueD Z88 X08 '0'd
Tsaaod pue?y6iH sTuelinsuoD aaanosad leanleN pue puelTaM .
awe 006 .009 00£ OST 0
(S jo ?) do aso?a - deW pedwj puellaM ?: ^+
:deW \
6Lkv?
0-TT-S ._._ 2fNM -...._. ._.-__ Lf?j

r

A
V

/h?
H1?AON
ZOOT-Jdl sailiunwwoD anaasaJd ayl
:a [m :]ua
eullOJeD LWON 'AlunoD poomAeH
:uaje
TsaJOd puely6lH
:awe a
(S jo t,) do asola - deW IaedwI puellaM
:deW
60-TT-5 'dNM 00£=..T. as
?
?/ / ??,o
Lnn
D m
O
U
L
Q
?l
Aoo?
?? I 1
/,/ i?
T088-8b9-8Z8 -; ?--.•*
9TZ8Z 'D'N 'UOTUeD Z88 X09 'O'd = `'+y
slueTlnsuoD aaJnosad leJnTeN pue puel}aM - } •:
,006 ,009 ,00£ ,OST 0 \ / ' L
_/ II
? 11
of
I
2
0
z

ZOOT-Ddl :apo:) pa[oi saiTiunwwoD a/uasaad Z
eugoaeD LWON 'AlunoD poomA2H
Isaaod puely6iH
(S do S) do asop - deW :pedwI puelTaM
60-TT-S ._._ bNM
,006 1009 ,00£ IOST 0
T088-8b9-8Z8 •: ?-_,?+
9TLSZ O'N 'uoTueD Z88 X08 '0'd `'=y
sTueTlnsuoD aaanosab le.inTeN pue puelTaM
2
F
Z
•
1
1

II _
/' -? ??
I Directions to Indian Ridge Rd, Waynesville, NC 28786
Directions to Indian Ridge Rd, Waynesville, NC YAI400 LOCAL
Maps
28786
Total Time: 46 mins, Total Distance: 35.02 miles
Distance
Page 1 of 1
P 1. Start at 151 PATTON AVE, ASHEVILLE going toward
GROVE ST go 370 ft
2. Turn l on N FRENCH BROAD AVE go 0.2 mi
3. Turn on HAYWOOD ST go 211 ft
4. Turn on MONTFORD AVE go 317 ft
5. Turn 0 to take ramp onto 1-240 W go 0.89 mi
6. Continue on US-19 S go 0.23 mi
7. Take the 1-40 exit onto 1-240 W go 3.16 mi
8. Take exit #1A/CANTON/KNOXVILLE onto 1-40 W go 18.27 mi
9. Take exit #27/CLYDE/WAYNESVILLE/MAGGIE
VALLEY/FRANKLIN/MURPHY/ATLANTA onto US-74 W go 1.37 mi
10. Take exit #107/E JONES COVE onto GREAT SMOKY
MOUNTAINS EXPY go 7.46 mi
11. Take exit #981W WAYNESVILLE go 0.18 mi
12. Turn 0 on HYATT CREEK RD(US-23-BR) go 0.25 mi
13. Turn is to follow US-23-BR go 158 ft
14. Turn on HENDRIX ST go 0.33 mi
15. Turn on ALLENS CREEK RD go 0.74 mi
16. Turn on LICKSTONE RD go 1.37 mi
17. Turn l? on INDIAN RIDGE RD go 0.37 mi
P 18. Arrive at INDIAN RIDGE RD, WAYNESVILLE
Time: 46 mins, Distance: 35.02 miles
When using any driving directions or map, it's a good idea to do a reality check and make sure the road still exists,
watch out for construction, and follow all traffic safety precautions. This is only to be used as an aid in planning.
http://maps.yahoo.com/print?ard=1 &v3=0&.intl=us&&mvt=m&tp=1 &stx=&clat=35.450... 11/12/2008
. Directions to Indian Ridge Rd, Waynesville, NC 28786
Directions to Indian Ridge Rd, Waynesville, NC YA1400 LOCAL
Maps
28786
Total Time: 46 mins, Total Distance: 35.02 miles
Page 1 of 1
YkH?!
5,x,0 Rd
? a `da
"b ?0ain St
N
rr``, }
(C ¢Syyl
i?urelRdge Y?i? S?'a?
?4:1PtlY ?IL'hslis 276
Wayn svllle A?
R
on S t
Hazelwood
y 0,3,b Or Cry
' R s 276
e,
NYA1TC:REEK 74 Wopwi Wk
cowufy chk inn
SAUNCC:K ?,.?
2S km
1.0mi Yahoo!2008,t>ata NAVTEQ2008
When using any driving directions or map, it's a good idea to do a reality check and make sure the road still exists,
watch out for construction, and follow all traffic safety precautions. This is only to be used as an aid in planning.
http://maps.yahoo.com/print?ard=1 &v3=0&.intl=us&&mvt=m&tp= l &stx=&clat=35.450... 11/12/2009
l 7 y
r
l 7 !/ F 1 f
?tlR f r
R B ??M 44 r
a ? r
\
r_-
stir
X a a
t 1 +'?
ff,
'k, 4
M
t' ?-t O Abe
L
/\
' t V ?. y, 1 r - l - ]brN- cq ?"'°irz'sa d "
e
? 1 .
N
R 1
ar.c
PISGAH B IytAT 10 NA L.
,..;n t a.lq ? . ? ?}`• I , I ; ? ; y rL-w ?.} ? ? I `? \ ?, ? t .e ?.
'r ??? - Y _ ?r to r -i _?x+/ ..o c.A. ? 1 ?J 1 r . 5 flrl }r?-ra
o o ?` i y N
M
aids "(- { J t
/ G 1 ( 01 I a
71 /? wa .?F? rS y., I d C ?" ?c
c 1 /
?.i1 P" JV, ? ? _?--? (??-,I FY's ?? itr ??. ? ?? ?- ? ?.•; ?
w, ¢ ! ( I
a 7L,014; c'-'--'r--
? R¢H DInpG., I}
A
n{,;.:
5°W
Copyright (C) 1997, Maptech, Inc.
B tHr , 1Ca?sle ?t f ,«ay?eav e 6 ?` si' ,'y
2
¢2964
III \ ?
1 '
s
? LL? 1
724 r Y
\•? 7304. &oo
aa
1. `
,. tdj-P•1-: ' ?..j a r S-O f? e- i kst ne Fd' F.:o
b e 70
s
i r ? B?,d M T 727
,
i
14
f. .ANNE J L. 590 ,
• HT;r72ftx 13
1E 3 0 -`
Dee Gafp
Copyright (C) 1997, Maptech, Inc.
i? ati .. A fF So-.,, c ? - r t .r a' ?? r ?F( '? i5},. F? yy y?.
i
r r•f 14°x" ,v x e.: J ?. i a t x r *? 'a r r
a<ifcjf,? rf? m .fix W.
.r=
I-l
. 1 5 ,a}" ., 4? r2 "? ? S r s- Y •;t rl"; } ? ,? ^, ,, . s u t ?'.
i %ANA. y,r , . 4 ?f r ,d
77
y r ? + },?4 'WTI ?^y?- -
^e 5 c r
?Zr 1,1Rim, w. Q?• T.:'L5} ' All_
?I
I
? b
t
l , ?r t/ ?5 r '-
i
i
i
kn
cz
U

z
Q) CD
Lo
¦ O
M
I¦I O
M
O
N
N
u°
O
O
O
U-)
L)
O
4
_T
U
N ?
?o
4?

Aft,
*pl^a
i-
W
V1
M
CT
4
t6
U
.L'
U

L O
LL .?
O
N
\ O
O
67
O
N
M
r

O
CO
O
Cl)
Cl)
O
y
r-1
Q
A
r.,

a
ro
0
0
U
ro
Z?
? 0.
L N
? N
i M
Y O
? O
? N
a\
Soils Legend
- BkB2 - EdE - PvvE - TrE
- BkC2 EdF RNF - TrF
- BoD2 - EvD RfF - TuD
-BrC -EvE -RgF ?TVE
- BsC - EwF - RmF - Ud
- BsD - ExD - RoA - UfA
- BsE Fn E2 - ScB - Ur
- BuD HaB2 - SdC - W
- ChE - HaC2 SdD - WaD
- ChF --- HaD2 - SeE - WaE
- CtD - HeC - SfC - VVaF
- CtE - HeD - SmF VVeC
- CxA HmA - SoE - WeD
- DAM - HvvB - SoF ® WeE
- DeA - acE - SsE - Vbh B2
DhA - OcF - SuA - ft C2
- DsB - OwD - TaC AhD2
DsC - CwE TcD - VGhE2
- DuC ® F'g TcE - 'AhF2
- EdC - PwC - TeC2 V\bC
_ EdD - PwD - TeD2 - V\/oD
http://maps.haywoodnc.net/gisweb/Legend.htm 11/12/2008
NC DENR - DIVISON OF WATER QUALITY
.0304 FRENCH BROAD RIVER BASIN
2B .0300
Class
Name of Stream Description Class Date Index No.
Shiny Creek From source to Allen Creek WS-I;Tr,HQW 09/01/04 5-16-7-3
Coldspring Branch From source to Shiny Creek WS-I;Tr,HQW 09/01/04 5-16-7-3-1
Deep Gap Creek From source to Allen Creek WS-I;Tr,HQW 09/01/04 5-16-7-5
Old Bald Creek From source to Allen Creek WS-I;Tr,HQW 09/01/04 5-16-7-6
Steestachee Branch From source to Allen Creek WS-I;Tr,HQW 09/01/04 5-16-7-7
Bearpen Branch From source to Allen Creek WS-I;Tr,HQW 09/01/04 5-16-7-8
Allen Creek From dam at Waynesville C;Tr 08/03/92 5-16-7-(8.5)
Water Supply Reservoir to
Richland Creek
Rocky Branch From source to dam at Old C;Tr,HQW 09/01/04 5-16-7-9-(1)
Waynesville Reservoir
Rocky Branch From dam at Old Waynesville C;Tr 09/01/04 5-16-7-9-(2)
Reservoir to Allen Creek
Cove Field Branch From source to Allen Creek C;Tr 07/01/73 5-16-7-10
Browning Branch From source to Richland C;Tr 07/01/73 5-16-8
Creek
Medford Branch From source to Browning C;Tr 09/01/04 5-16-8-1
Branch
Camp Branch From source to Browning C;Tr 07/01/73 5-16-8-2
Branch
Plott Creek From source to Richland C;Tr 07/01/73 5-16-9
Creek
Eaglenest Creek From source to Richland C;Tr 07/01/73 5-16-10
Creek
Farmer Branch From source to Richland B 04/01/58 5-16-11
Creek
Richland Creek From Boyd Avenue in B 04/01/58 5-16-(11.5)
Waynesville to Lake
Junaluska Dam
Shingle Cove Branch From source to Richland B 04/01/58 5-16-12
Creek
Shelton Branch From source to Richland B 04/01/58 5-16-13
Creek
Raccoon Creek From source to Richland B 04/01/58 5-16-14
Creek
Ratcliffe Cove Branch From source to Raccoon B 04/01/58 5-16-14-1
Branch
Factory Branch From source to Lake B 04/01/58 5-16-15
Junaluska Richland Creek
McElroy Branch From source to Factory B 04/01/58 5-16-15-1
Branch
Mauney Cove Branch From source to Factory B 04/01/58 5-16-15-2
Branch
Richland Creek From Lake Junaluska Dam to C 09/01/74 5-16-(16)
Pigeon River
Rogers Cove Branch From source to Richland C 09/01/74 5-16-17
Creek
Page 5 of 63 2008-10-25 06:20:02
O
u m
u
«mm
Y N C O N
F ? O N
O- C y ? U
W m -O to
0
LU U 0 E
u O U L LL
O c N Lo Lai 0,7 O om°?
O 0
CC*C :E cc GO)
C U
C 7 Z O
NV??
col
u m
Q o m
CL. w c
vU C4 mWM?$
1A L-
w ?EE?
v
o o v
T C3
LL, w oa
C C W
O J U IL
7
Qp R o «
o2E?L
TV L U?pp
O
O
3y ?
O U ?L O LL o
? w
o z o
O C m ? x ?
m u E
m x v -° m
`D
w m m m o
i
r
y
/ LM
/
O
/
X q,
.?Q
- I
.?
OC
Q' VI
L?L ¢
W V
C ?
G
Z ?
°' W z¢ = o y
1+J
W a-
d F"'
d
? i?
z =
? Q 0.?,
? La a
O
O wo
u
g
Z
O ,
o o w
pro O z
d ? <
dw
w

W N

a x
m F T
Delineation Performed by: Wetland and Natural Resource Consultants
P.O. Box 882, Canton, NC 28716
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Wetland Data Form - Routine Wetland Determination
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project / Site: Highland Forest Date: 11/5/08
Applicant / Owner: Trey Ropers County: Haywood
Investigator: WNR - Joel McSwain State: NC
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes ® No ? Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes[] No TransectID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes ? No ® Plot ID:
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Indicator Stratum Dominant Plant Species Indicator Stratum
1. Carex spp. FAC-OBL herb 9.
2. Juncus spp. FACW-OBL herb 10.
3. Impatiens capensis FACW herb 11.
4. Polygonum sagittatum OBL herb 12.
5. Boehmeria cylindrica FACW herb 13.
6. 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). 90%
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
? Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks)
? Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
? Aerial Photographs
? Other
? No Recorded Data Available
Field Observations:
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Primary Indicators:
® Inundated
® Saturated in Upper 12"
? Water Marks
? Drift Lines
? Sediment Deposits
? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: 00-44 (in.) Secondary Indicators:
Depth to Free Water in Pit: =004 ® Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
(In.) ® Water-Stained Leaves
? Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: 00-44 (in.) ® FAC-Neutral Test
? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Headwater seeps, mostly from ground water, and usually saturated to the surface.
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Drainage Class:
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? Yes ? No El
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-8 A 10YR 4/2 / sandy clay and cobble

Hydric Soil Indicators:
? Histosol ? Concretions
? Histic Epipedon ? High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
? Sulfidic Odor ? Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
? Aquic Moisture Regime ? Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
? Reducing Conditions ? Listed on National Hydric Soils List
® Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Mostly gravel or cobble at the surface
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ? Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ? Within a Wetland? Yes ® No ?
Hydric Soils Present? Yes ® No ?
Remarks: This wetland data form represents multiple wetland seeps found either at the
headwaters of channels, or beginning spring seeps abutting channels.
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION L• BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD): 5/18/09
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
State:NC County/parish/borough: Haywood City: Waynesville
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 35.434957° N, Long. -82.98111 ° W.
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Medford Branch
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) into which the aquatic resource flows: Pigeon River
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): 06010106 - Pigeon
® Check if map/diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is/are available upon request.
? Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc...) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
? Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
® Field Determination. Date(s): 11/5/08
SECTION II: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are no "navigable waters of the U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [Required]
? Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
? Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are "waters of the U.S." within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required]
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply):
? TNWs, including territorial seas
? Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
® Relatively permanent waters2 (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
? Non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
® Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
? Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
? Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
? Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
? Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non-wetland waters: 3,334 linear feet: 8 width (ft) and/or acres.
Wetlands: 0.035 acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: Established by OHWM.
Elevation of established OHWM (if known):
2. Non-regulated waters/wetlands (check if applicable):3
Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain:
' Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year-round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e.g., typically 3 months).
' Supporting documentation is presented in Section III.F.
SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section III.A.1 and Section IH.D.1. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections III.A.1 and 2
and Section III.D.1.; otherwise, see Section III.B below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW:
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
2. Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is
'`adjacent":
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non-navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year-round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year-round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section IILD.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody4 is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section III.B.1 for
the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section III.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III.C below.
1. Characteristics of non-TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: Pick List
Drainage area: Pick List
Average annual rainfall: inches
Average annual snowfall: inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
? Tributary flows directly into TNW.
? Tributary flows through Pick List tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are Pick List river miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List river miles from RPW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
Identify flow route to TNW5:
Tributary stream order, if known:
' Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the and
West.
' Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.
(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apply):
Tributary is: ? Natural
? Artificial (man-made). Explain:
? Manipulated (man-altered). Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: feet
Average depth: feet
Average side slopes: Pick List.
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
? Silts ? Sands ? Concrete
? Cobbles ? Gravel ? Muck
? Bedrock ? Vegetation. Type/% cover:
? Other. Explain:
Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain:
Presence of run/riffle/pool complexes. Explain:
Tributary geometry: Pick List
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): %
(c) Elow:
Tributary provides for: Pick List
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year: Pick List
Describe flow regime:
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is: Pick List. Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Pick List. Explain findings:
? Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
? Bed and banks
? OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply):
? clear, natural line impressed on the bank ?
? changes in the character of soil ?
? shelving ?
? vegetation matted down, bent, or absent ?
? leaf litter disturbed or washed away ?
? sediment deposition ?
? water staining ?
? other (list):
El Discontinuous OHWM.7 Explain:
the presence of litter and debris
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
the presence of wrack line
sediment sorting
scour
multiple observed or predicted flow events
abrupt change in plant community
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determine lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply):
? High Tide Line indicated by: ? Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
? oil or scum line along shore objects ? survey to available datum;
? fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore) ? physical markings;
? physical markings/characteristics ? vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types.
? tidal gauges
? other (list):
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
`A natural or man-made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
'Ibid.
(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
? Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width):
? Wetland fringe. Characteristics:
? Habitat for:
? Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
? Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
? Other environmentally-sensitive species. Explain findings:
? Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non-TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size: acres
Wetland type. Explain:
Wetland quality. Explain:
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non-TNW:
Flow is: Pick List. Explain:
Surface flow is: Pick List
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Pick List. Explain findings:
? Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non-TNW:
? Directly abutting
? Not directly abutting
? Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain:
? Ecological connection. Explain:
? Separated by berm/barrier. Explain:
(d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are Pick List river miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is from: Pick List.
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the Pick List floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
? Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width):
? Vegetation type/percent cover. Explain:
? Habitat for:
? Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
? Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
? Other environmentally-sensitive species. Explain findings:
? Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis: Pick List
Approximately ( ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.
For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres)
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed:
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
1. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III.1):
2. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non-RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III.D:
3. Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section 111.1):
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERSIWETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
1. TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
? TNWs: linear feet width (ft), Or, acres.
? Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
2. RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year-round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial: significant flow and definite bed and bank were observed in the field.
? Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally:
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
® Tributary waters: 3,334 linear feet 8 width (ft).
? Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Non-RPWss that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
? Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section IILC.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
? Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
? Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
4. Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
Z Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year-round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW: Wetlands observed in the field were topographically and hydrologically contiguous with
the streams that were down flow.
? Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section 111.13 and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW:
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: 0.035 acres.
Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
? Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section IILC.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
Impoundments of jurisdictional waters.9
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
? Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
? Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1-6), or
? Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA-STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):"
? which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
? from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
? Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
? Other factors. Explain:
'See Footnote # 3.
9 To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III.D.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos.
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
? Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
? Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
? Wetlands: acres.
F. NON-JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
? If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
? Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
? Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain:
? Other: (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
? Non-wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft).
? Lakes/ponds: acres.
? Other non-wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
? Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non-jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
Non-wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft).
Lakes/ponds: acres.
Other non-wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
? Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
® Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
? Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
? Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
? Corps navigable waters' study:
? U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
? USGS NHD data.
? USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:Hazelwood.
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Haywood County GIS Soils.
? National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
® FEMA/FIRM maps:Firmette.
? I00-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date):
or ? Other (Name & Date):
Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:200532756-57 (9/8/05).
? Applicable/supporting case law:
? Applicable/supporting scientific literature:
? Other information (please specify):
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD): 5/18/09
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
State:NC County/parish/borough: Haywood City: Waynesville
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 35.434957° N, Long. -82.98111 ° W.
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Medford Branch
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) Into which the aquatic resource flows: Pigeon River
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): 06010106 - Pigeon
® Check if map/diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is/are available upon request.
? Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc...) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
? Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
® Field Determination. Date(s): 11/5/08
SECTION II: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are no "navigable waters of the U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [Required]
? Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
? Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are "waters of the U.S." within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required]
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply):
? TNWs, including territorial seas
? Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
® Relatively permanent waters (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
? Non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
® Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
? Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
? Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
? Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
? Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non-wetland waters: 8,650 linear feet: 8 width (ft) and/or acres.
Wetlands: 1.14 acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: Established by OHWM.
Elevation of established OHWM (if known):
2. Non-regulated waters/wetlands (check if applicable) :3
? Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain:
Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
Z For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year-round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e.g., typically 3 months).
3 Supporting documentation is presented in Section III.F.
SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section III.A.1 and Section III.D.1. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections III.A.1 and 2
and Section III.D.1.; otherwise, see Section III.B below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW:
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
2. Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent":
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non-navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year-round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year-round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section IH.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section III.D.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody4 is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section HI.B.1 for
the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section III.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III.C below.
1. Characteristics of non-TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: Pick List
Drainage area: Pick List
Average annual rainfall: inches
Average annual snowfall: inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
? Tributary flows directly into TNW.
? Tributary flows through Pick List tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are Pick List river miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List river miles from RPW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
Identify flow route to TNW5:
Tributary stream order, if known:
' Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the and
West.
5 Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.
(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apples
Tributary is: ? Natural
? Artificial (man-made). Explain:
? Manipulated (man-altered). Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: feet
Average depth: feet
Average side slopes: Pick List.
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
? Silts ? Sands ? Concrete
? Cobbles ? Gravel ? Muck
? Bedrock ? Vegetation. Type/% cover:
? Other. Explain:
Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain:
Presence of run/riffle/pool complexes. Explain:
Tributary geometry: Pick List
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): %
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for: Pick List
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year: Pick List
Describe flow regime:
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is: Pick List. Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Pick List. Explain findings:
? Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
? Bed and banks
? OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply):
? clear, natural line impressed on the bank ?
? changes in the character of soil ?
? shelving ?
? vegetation matted down, bent, or absent ?
? leaf litter disturbed or washed away ?
? sediment deposition ?
? water staining ?
? other (list):
? Discontinuous OHWM.7 Explain:
the presence of litter and debris
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
the presence of wrack line
sediment sorting
scour
multiple observed or predicted flow events
abrupt change in plant community
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determine lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply):
? High Tide Line indicated by: ? Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
? oil or scum line along shore objects ? survey to available datum;
? fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore) ? physical markings;
? physical markings/characteristics ? vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types.
? tidal gauges
? other (list):
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
'A natural or man-made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
'Ibid.
(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
? Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width):
? Wetland fringe. Characteristics:
? Habitat for:
? Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
? Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
? Other environmentally-sensitive species. Explain findings:
? Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non-TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size: acres
Wetland type. Explain:
Wetland quality. Explain:
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non-TNW:
Flow is: Pick List. Explain:
Surface flow is: Pick List
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Pick List. Explain findings:
? Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non-TNW:
? Directly abutting
? Not directly abutting
? Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain:
? Ecological connection. Explain:
? Separated by berm/barrier. Explain:
(d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are Pick List river miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is from: Pick List.
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the Pick List floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
? Riparian butler. Characteristics (type, average width):
? Vegetation type/percent cover. Explain:
? Habitat for:
? Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
? Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
? Other environmentally-sensitive species. Explain findings:
? Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis: Pick List
Approximately ( ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.
For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres)
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed:
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
1. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III.D:
2. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non-RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III.D:
3. Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section I11.1):
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
1. TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
? TNWs: linear feet width (ft), Or, acres.
? Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
2. RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year-round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial: significant flow and definite bed and bank were observed in the field.
? Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally:
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Z Tributary waters: 8,650 linear feet 8 width (ft).
? Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
3. Non-RPWss that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
? Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
? Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
? Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identity type(s) of waters:
4. Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
® Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year-round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW: Wetlands observed in the field were topographically and hydrologically contiguous with
the streams that were down flow.
? Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section 111.13 and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW:
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: 1.14 acres.
5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
? Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
6. Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
? Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
7. Impoundments of jurisdictional waters.
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
? Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
? Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1-6), or
? Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA-STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):ro
? which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
? from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
? which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
? Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
? Other factors. Explain:
'See Footnote # 3.
To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III.D.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos.
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
? Tributary waters: linear feet width (11).
? Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
? Wetlands: acres.
F. NON-JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
? If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
? Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
? Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
? Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain:
? Other: (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
? Non-wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft).
? Lakes/ponds: acres.
? Other non-wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
? Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non-jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
? Non-wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft).
? Lakes/ponds: acres.
? Other non-wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
? Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
® Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
? Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
? Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
? Corps navigable waters' study:
? U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
? USGS NHD data.
? USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:Hazelwood.
® USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Haywood County GIS Soils.
? National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
? State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
® FEMA/FIRM maps:Firmette.
? 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date):
or ? Other (Name & Date):
® Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response Ietter:200532756-57 (9/8/05).
? Applicable/supporting case law:
? Applicable/supporting scientific literature:
? Other information (please specify):
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD): 5/18/09
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
State:NC County/parish/borough: Haywood City: Waynesville
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 35.434957° N, Long. -82.98111 ° W.
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Medford Branch
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) Into which the aquatic resource flows: Pigeon River
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): 06010106 - Pigeon
® Check if map/diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is/are available upon request.
? Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc...) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
? Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
® Field Determination. Date(s): 11/5/08
SECTION II: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are no "navigable waters of the U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [Required]
? Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
? Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are "waters of the U.S." within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required]
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply): t
? TNWs, including territorial seas
? Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
® Relatively permanent watersz (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
? Non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
® Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
? Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
? Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
? Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
? Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non-wetland waters: 1,357 linear feet: 8 width (ft) and/or acres.
Wetlands: 0.17 acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: Established by OHWM.
Elevation of established OHWM (if known):
2. Non-regulated waters/wetlands (check if applicable):3
? Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain:
Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year-round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e.g., typically 3 months).
' Supporting documentation is presented in Section III.F.
SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section III.A.1 and Section III.D.1. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections HI.A.1 and 2
and Section III.D.1.; otherwise, see Section HIM below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW:
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
2. Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent":
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non-navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year-round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year-round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section III.D.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody4 is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section III.B.1 for
the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section III.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III.C below.
1. Characteristics of non-TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: Pick List
Drainage area: Pick List
Average annual rainfall: inches
Average annual snowfall: inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
? Tributary flows directly into TNW.
? Tributary flows through Pick List tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are Pick List river miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List river miles from RPW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
Identify flow route to TNW5:
Tributary stream order, if known:
' Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the and
West.
' Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.
(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that annlv):
Tributary is: ? Natural
? Artificial (man-made). Explain:
? Manipulated (man-altered). Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: feet
Average depth: feet
Average side slopes: Pick List.
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
? Silts ? Sands ? Concrete
? Cobbles ? Gravel ? Muck
? Bedrock ? Vegetation. Type/% cover:
? Other. Explain:
Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain:
Presence of run/riffle/pool complexes. Explain:
Tributary geometry: Pick List
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): %
(c) EI2W:
Tributary provides for: Pick List
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year: Pick List
Describe flow regime:
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is: Pick List. Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Pick List. Explain findings:
? Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
? Bed and banks
? OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply):
? clear, natural line impressed on the bank ?
? changes in the character of soil ?
? shelving ?
? vegetation matted down, bent, or absent ?
? leaf litter disturbed or washed away ?
? sediment deposition ?
? water staining ?
? other (list):
? Discontinuous OHWM.7 Explain:
the presence of litter and debris
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
the presence of wrack line
sediment sorting
scour
multiple observed or predicted flow events
abrupt change in plant community
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determine lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply):
? High Tide Line indicated by: ? Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
? oil or scum line along shore objects ? survey to available datum;
? fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore) ? physical markings;
? physical markings/characteristics ? vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types.
? tidal gauges
? other (list):
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
6A natural or man-made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
'Ibid.
(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
? Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width):
? Wetland fringe. Characteristics:
? Habitat for:
? Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
? Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
? Other environmentally-sensitive species. Explain findings:
? Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non-TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size: acres
Wetland type. Explain:
Wetland quality. Explain:
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non-TNW:
Flow is: Pick List. Explain:
Surface flow is: Pick List
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Pick List. Explain findings:
? Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non-TNW:
? Directly abutting
? Not directly abutting
? Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain:
? Ecological connection. Explain:
? Separated by berm/barrier. Explain:
(d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are Pick List river miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is from: Pick List.
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the Pick List floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
? Riparian butter. Characteristics (type, average width):
? Vegetation type/percent cover. Explain:
? Habitat for:
? Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
? Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
? Other environmentally-sensitive species. Explain findings:
? Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis: Pick List
Approximately ( ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.
For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres)
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed:
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the now
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
1. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNR's. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III.D:
2. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non-RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III.D:
3. Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section III.D:
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
1. TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
? TNWs: linear feet width (ft), Or, acres.
? Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
2. RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year-round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial: significant flow and definite bed and bank were observed in the field.
? Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally:
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
® Tributary waters: 1,357 linear feet S width (ft).
? Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Non-RPWss that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
? Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
? Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
? Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
® Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year-round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section IILD.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW: Wetlands observed in the field were topographically and hydrologically contiguous with
the streams that were down flow.
? Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section 111.13 and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW:
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: 0.17 acres.
Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
? Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section IILC.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
? Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section IILC.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
Impoundments of jurisdictional waters.9
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
? Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
? Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1-6), or
? Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA-STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):"
? which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
? from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
? which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
? Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
? Other factors. Explain:
'See Footnote # 3.
9 To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III.D.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos.
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
? Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
? Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
? Wetlands: acres.
NON-JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
? If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
? Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
? Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain:
? Other: (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
? Non-wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft).
Lakes/ponds: acres.
Other non-wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
? Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non-jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
? Non-wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft).
Lakes/ponds: acres.
? Other non-wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
? Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
® Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
? Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
? Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
? Corps navigable waters' study:
? U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
? USGS NHD data.
? USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:Hazelwood.
® USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. C i tation: Haywood County GIS Soils.
? National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
? State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
® FEMA/FIRM maps:Firmette.
? I00-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date):
or ? Other (Name & Date):
® Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response Ietter:200532756-57 (9/8/05).
? Applicable/supporting case law:
? Applicable/supporting scientific literature:
? Other information (please specify):
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action ID. 200532756-57 County: Haywood USGS Quad: Waynesville
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Property Owner / Authorized Agent: Mr. Glen Percy
Address: Indian Ridge Preserve, LLC
711 N. Dixie Highway, Suite 200
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
Telephone No.: 561-722-9527
Size and location of property (water body, road name/number, town, etc.): The pro8ect site is located off
Lickstone Road in Waynesville, Haywood County, North Carolina.
Description of projects area and activity: This permit authorizes stream impacts on Medford Branch,
Browning Branch, and their unnamed tributaries associated with the construction of three new
road crossings, impacts totaling 114 linear feet; four culvert extensions, new impacts totaling 28
linear feet; two fords converted to cunverted crossings, totaling 60 linear feet; and the replacement
and upsizing of three existing crossings with no new impacts. All impacts are associated with road
construction to provide vehicular access to a residential subdivision.
Applicable Law: ® Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344)
? Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403)
Authorization: Regional General Permit Number:
Nationwide Permit Number: 03 and 39
Your work is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the
attached Nationwide and Special conditions, the attached September 6, 2005 North Carolina Wildlife Resources
Commission conditions, and your submitted plans. Any violation of the attached conditions or deviation from your
submitted plans may subject the permittee to a stop work order, a restoration order and/or appropriate legal action.
This verification is valid until the NWP is modified, reissued, or revoked. All of the existing NWPs are
scheduled to be modified, reissued, or revoked prior to March 18, 2007. It is incumbent upon you to remain
informed of changes to the NWPs. We will issue a public notice when the NWPs are reissued. Furthermore, if you
commence or are under contract to commence this activity before the date that the relevant nationwide permit is
modified or revoked, you will have twelve (12) months from the date of the modification or revocation of the NWP
to complete the activity under the present terms and conditions of this nationwide permit. If prior to the expiration
date identified below, the nationwide permit authorization is reissued and/or modified, this verification will remain
valid until the expiration date identified below, provided it complies with all new and/or modified terms and
conditions. The District Engineer may, at any time, exercise his discretionary authority to modify, suspend, or
revoke a case specific activity's authorization under and NWP.
Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality
Certification. You should contact the NC Division of Water Quality (telephone [phone]) to determine
Section 401 requirements.
For activities occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area
Management Act (LAMA), prior to beginning work you must contact the N.C. Division of Coastal Management
This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other
required Federal, State or local approvals/permits.

If there are any questions regarding this verification, any of the conditions of the Permit, or the Corps of
Engineers regulatory program, please contact Rebekah I.. Newton at 828-271-7980.
Corps Regulatory Official Rebekah L. Newton Date: September 8, 2005
Expiration Date of Verification: March 18, 2007

-3-
Determination of Jurisdiction:
? Based on preliminary information, there appear to be waters of the US including wetlands within the above
described project area. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory
Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331).
? There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area subject to the permit
requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless
there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not
to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
There are waters of the US and/or wetlands within the above described project area subject to the permit
requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the
law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years
from the date of this notification.
? The jurisdictional areas within the above described project area have been identified tinder a previous action.
Please: reference jurisdictional determination issued-. Action ID
Basis of Jurisdictional Determination: Wetlands: n/a.
Waters: Medford Branch, Brownine Branch, and their unnamed tributaries now to Camp Branch, which is
a tributary to Richland Creek. Richland Creek flows to the Pigeon River which is a tributary to the French
Broad River. The French Broad River is a navigable in fact water.
Corps Regulatory Official: Rebekah L.. Newton
Date September 8, 2005
Enclosures
SURVEY PLATS, FIELD SKETCH, WETLAND DELINEATION FORMS, PROJECT PLANS, ETC.,
MUST BE A`17ACHED TO THE FILE COPY OF THIS FORM, IF REQUIRED OR AVAILABLE.
Copy Furnished:
Jennifer Robertson
WNR
Post Office Box 882
Canton, North Carolina 28716