20090381 Ver 1_More Info Received_20090518

r'PS'N'C'-EN-ER1;Y
A SCANA COMPANY
ID q- D 068
May 15, 2009
Cyndi Karoly
NC DWQ, 401 Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center MAY 1 8 2009
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
DENR - WATER QUALITY
f&-ELANDS AND STORMgATER BRANCH
Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
NOV-2008-PC-0853
T-1 1B Replacement 12" Steel Natural Gas Transmission/Distribution Line
Dear Ms. Karoly:
As requested by your April 17, 2009, letter, enclosed you will find a corrected Pre-
Construction Notice (PCN) for the referenced project, along with related drawings and
maps. You may disregard our earlier submittal, because we have completely revised this
application.
We believe that this application is now complete. If you have any questions, please give
me a call. I also suggest that the permit writer consult with Lauren Witherspoon of
NCDENR, because she has some insight on this project.
I apologize for the problems with our original submittal. Again, please let me know if
there are any additional questions or concerns.
Sincerely,
Bay ell R. Shier, P.E.
Supervisor - Environmental Services
SCANA Corporation
cc. Lauren Witherspoon, NCDENR
DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
3800 Barrett Drive
Raleigh, NC 27609
PSNC Energy 1 800 Gaston Road • Post Office Box 1398 • Gastonia, North Carolina • 28053-1398 • www.psncenergy.com
Letter to NCDENR
May 15, 2009, 2009
Page 2
Rusty Harris, PSNC
Bill Rayner, PSNC
Jerry Littlejohn, PSNC
Scott Swindler, PSNC
Tucker Bullock, PSNC
Hagood Hamilton, SCANA
Tom Effinger, SCANA
coq- 03 8 1
O?O? SAT ?R4G
r
o ?
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification PCN Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the

Corps:
® Section 404 Permit ? Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: NWP 12 or General Permit (GP) number: 3699
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ® Yes ? No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ® Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
? Yes ® No For the record only for Corps Permit:

? Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program. ? Yes ® No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below. ? Yes ® No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? Yes ® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: T-11 B Replacement
2b. County: Durham
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Durham
2d. Subdivision name: N/A
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no: N/A
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: N/A - PSNC has easement from property owners, and is therefore the project owner
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d. Street address:
3e. City, state, zip:
3f. Telephone no.:
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
Page I of 12
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ? Agent ® Other, specify: Pipeline owner
4b. Name: D. Russell Harris, President and COO
4c. Business name
(if applicable): PSNC Energy
4d. Street address: PO Box 1398
4e. City, state, zip: Gastonia, NC 28053
4f. Telephone no.: 704 834-6622
4g. Fax no.: 704 810-3171
4h. Email address: [e-mail]
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: Darrell Shier
5b. Business name
(if applicable): PSNC Energy
5c. Street address: PO Box 1398
5d. City, state, zip: Gastonia, NC 28053
5e. Telephone no.: 803 217 6125
5f. Fax no.: 803 217 7810
5g. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 2 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1 a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 0840-02-65-4640, 0840-02-66-3137, 0840-02-88-0797
Latitude: 35.965497 Longitude: -
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): 78.842981
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size: 8.634, 9.509, 7.359 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Little Lick Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: Class C
2c. River basin: Neuse
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site consists of an existing natural gas and water pipeline corridor, which is mowed periodically. The surrounding
properties are a mix of undeveloped forest and light-density residential.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.19 acres
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
Little Lick Creek crosses the pipeline corridor twice (designated hereafter as S4 and S5), with about 255 linear feet of
stream within the project corridor. Another 73 linear feet of an unnamed, intermittent tributary to Little Lick Creek crosses
the corridor (designated hereafter as S1). Finally, a small turn (about 25 linear feet) of Little Lick Creek bends within, but
does not cross the corridor. There is total of approximately 333 linear feet of streams within the project corrdidor.
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The T-11 & T-11 B high pressure transmission pipelines extend generally north-south from Stem to the southern edge of
the Research Triangle Park. They are a critical part of a larger network of transmission pipelines that supply natural gas
to a 10 county area including Raleigh, Durham, Chapel Hill, and Research Triangle Park. These pipelines were initially
installed in 1960 & 1963 to meet the customer growth and new development in this rapidly growing area. The current
replacement project was necessary to ensure safe and reliable operation of the T-11 B pipeline in the future and to ensure
compliance with applicable USDOT safety regulations
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Prior to construction, erosion and sediment control measures were installed as detailed in the erosion control plan for the
project. The existing natural gas pipeline was excavated using trackhoes and other construction equipment. All used
pipe was hauled away for recycling and the trench was backfilled. All spoils were sidecast away from sterams and
wetlands. A trench was then cut in approximately the same location, again using trackhoes and other construction
equipment. After the new pipeline was welded and placed in the trench, the exc avation was backfilled and compacted.
The area was seeded and mulched to stabilize the area. Periodic inspections are now being performed and corrective
actions taken, as needed, to maintain a stablized site.
Page 3 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
El Yes ® No Unknown
?
Comments: No jurisdictional determination has been
conducted by the Corps or DWQ; however, the Corps has
agreed that the project meets the requirements of NWP-12
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type ? Preliminary ? Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known): Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ® Yes ? No ? Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
A NWP 12 permit was previously requested from the Corp; however, the Corps did not act within 45 days, so the permit
was automatically granted. An NCDENR Erosion Control Permit, Project ID DURHA-2008-016, was granted to this
project.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ? Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ® Buffers
? Open Waters ? Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number - Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ - non-404, other) (acres)
Temporary T
W1 ? P ®T Excavation and fill Bottomland
Hardwood Forest ® Yes
? No ® Corps
® DWQ 0.02
W2 ? P ®T Excavation and fill Bottomland
Hardwood Forest ® Yes
? No ® Corps
® DWQ 0.15
W3 ? P ®T Excavation and fill Bottomland
Hardwood Forest ® Yes
? No ® Corps
® DWQ 0.02
? Yes ? Corps
W4 ? P ? T ? No ? DWQ
? Yes ? Corps
W5 ? P ? T ? No ? DWQ
? Yes ? Corps
W6 ? P ? T ? No ? DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts 0.19
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length
Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ - non-404, width (linear
Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet)
S1 ? P ®T Temporary trenching UT to Little Lick
Creek ® PER
? INT ® Corps
® DWQ 5 73
S2 ? P ? T None ? PER
? INT ? Corps
? DWQ
S3 ®P ? T Relocation Little Lick Creek ® PER
? INT ® Corps
® DWQ 10 69
S4 ? P ®T Temporary trenching Little Lick Creek ® PER
? INT ® Corps
® DWQ 10 182
S5 ? P ? T Temporary trenching ® PER
? INT ? Corps
? DWQ 10 68
S6 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 333
3i. Comments: 3 q aw
At S1, 73 linear feet of stream channel was temporarily disturbed in order to replace the natural gas pipeline. No permanent
fill or rip-rap was left within the stream channel.
Page 5 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
S2 left blank intentionally.
At S3, 69 linear feet of a braided stream channel was filled, due to the approaching threat of the stream bank erosion to the
safety and reliability of the natural gas transmission pipeline.
At S4, 182 linear feet of stream channel was temporarily disturbed in order to replace the natural gas pipline. No permanent
fill or rip-rap was left within the stream channel.
At S5, 68 linear feet of stream channel was temporariliy dsiturbed in order to replace the natural gas pipeline. No permanent
fill or rip-rap was left within the stream channel.
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
- Permanent
(P) or
Temporary T
01 ?P?T
02 ?P?T
03 ?P?T
04 ?P?T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If and or lake construction proposed, then com lete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose of (acres)
number pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes ? No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
Page 6 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
® Neuse ?Tar-Pamlico ? Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ? Catawba ? Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number - Reason for Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) impact Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
or Temporary required?
T
B1 ®P ? T Streambank UT to Little Lick Creek (73 ? Yes 0 (see comment) 0 (see comment)
stabilization LF) ® No

B2 ®P ? T Streambank UT to Little Lick Creek (10 El Yes
0 (see comment)
0 (see comment)
stabilization LF) ® No
Protection ? Yes
B3 ®P ? T of existing Little Lick Creek ® No 4140 2760
structure
B4 ®P ? T Streambank UT to Little Lick Creek (162 ? Yes 0 (see comment) 0 (see comment)
stabilization LF ® No
B5 ®P ? T Streambank UT to Little Lick Creek (68 ? Yes 0 (see comment) 0 (see comment)
stabilization LF) ® No
6h. Total buffer impacts 4140 2760
6i. Comments:
At B1, 73 linear feet of rip-rap was placed on both streambanks of the unnamed tributary to Little Lick Creek. All streambank
stabilization is within the top-of-bank. No rip-rap was placed above the top of bank.
At B2, 10 linear feet of rip-rap was placed on the western streambank of Little Lick Creek. All streambank stabilization is
within the top-of-bank. No rip-rap was placed above the top of bank.
At B3, 69 linear feet of a braided stream channel was filled, due to the approaching threat of the stream bank erosion to the
safety and reliability of the natural gas transmission pipeline. Buffer zone impact was calculated assuming an impact along 69
linear feet of stream, and then assuming that 50 feet of buffer was impacted on either side. Thus, Zone 1 was calculated as
69 feet x 30 feet x 2; Zone 2 was calculated as 69 feet x 20 feet x 2.
At B4, 182 linear feet of rip-rap was place on bother streambanks of Little Lick Creek. All streambank stabilization is within
the top-of-bank. No rip-rap was placed above the top of bank.
At B5, PSNC removed and then replaced 57 linear feet of rip-rap on both stream banks. After pipeline construction was
completed, an additional 11 linear feet of rip-rap was placed on the streambanks, for a total of 68 linear feet of impacts. All
streambank stabilization is within the top-of-bank. No rip-rap was placed above the top of bank.
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
PSNC attempted to find an alternate route for this pipeline, but was unsuccessful. Thus, the pipeline had to follow the route of
the existing pipeline, which required multiple crossings of the same stream, and included one non-perpendicular crossing.
Directional boring of the pipe under the streams was also considered but was not possible, because the existing pipe had to
be removed. Thus, open cutting of the creek was unavoidable. Also, one braided channel of Little Lick Creek threatened to
erode down to the gas pipeline, thus creating a safety hazard to the surrounding community. This erosion could only be
halted by filling of the braided channel.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Appropriate erosion control measures were put in place prior to construction. Work was scheduled during an extremely low
stream flow, thus minimizing the impacts.
Page 7 of 12
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? ? Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ? DWQ ? Corps

2c.
If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? ? Mitigation bank
? Payment to in-lieu fee program
? Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ? Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ? warm ? cool ?cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation? ? Yes ? No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.

Zone 6c.
Reason for impact 6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier 6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
Page 8of12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
6h. Comments:
Page 9 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ® Yes ? No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: This is an "as-built" application. Diffuse flow measures were included ? Yes ® No
during the original construction.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 0%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ? Yes ® No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: This is an "as-built" application. The
project did not increase stormwater flows over the baseline flow.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
? Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ® DWQ Stormwater Program
? DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? City of Durham
? Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ? NSW
? USMP
apply (check all that apply): ? Water Supply Watershed
? Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ? Yes ® No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
? Coastal counties
? HQW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ? ORW
(check all that apply): ? Session Law 2006-246
? Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
? Yes ® No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ® Yes ? No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ® Yes ? No
Page 10 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ? Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ? Yes ? No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
? Yes ? No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ® Yes ? No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ® Yes ? No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): PSNC did obtain
NCDENR and US Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) permits and approvals for the project; however, PSNC did not obtain all
necessary regulatory notifications and approvals required by NCDENR's 401 Water Quality Certification, the Neuse River
Riparian Buffer Rules, and the Construction Stormwater General Permit. The violations are more fully described in a
NCDENR letter dated December 17, 2008. PSNC's responded in a letter dated February 2, 2009.
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ? Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The T-11 B project only replaced an existing natural gas pipeline. The area surrounding this pipe is already serviced with
natural gas, therefore, no additional development is expected because of this pipeline replacement.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
Page 11 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ? Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ? Yes ® No
impacts?
?
Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. ? Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
A list of state and federal rate species for Durham County was obtained from the North Carolina Natural Heritage
Program. There were three federally protected species found in Durham County. A field survey was conducted by Fish
and Wildlife Services (Whittier, NC). They found no suitable habitat for any of these species and saw no specimens
during a field survey.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ? Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
Corps guidance documents for Essential Fish Habitat
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ? Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
The project involved the replacement of an existing natural gas pipeline. The only area that was disturbed was within the
footprint of the previous pipeline installation. Therefore, no cultural resources were expected in the area.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ® Yes ? No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: Only temporary impacts will take place. No fill will be placed within
the FEMA floodplain
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA Map

c

Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Page 12 of 12
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
i _ 1
i 4' x4' x3' N
i Sediment Pit o ~
t ( i i 0
~ 0
i, ~ I Water Bar ~ ~
~ , -212
~ ~ i 340
P~ ~ ~ ~ EA ITT DR FASA~IT R f
I ~ i ~
i I ~
4"- 2 E- 7 I i ~ '
f 340 i 340 , ~ ~
~ , i d
~ ~ ~ i i !
I ~ i -v ~ ~
~ i ~ Stream Impacts S3 ~ , _
' ~ ~ " t S4, ® 360
' < ~ i- ' ` Buffer Impacts B3 8c B4
i ' ~ ~ I i
' {per detail sheet) ~
i i t H SE OE
i S OR
• i ~ ® 0 - I s ~
~ 3~0 ~ i ~
~ ~ 1 ~
i i .Q ~
~ I i r
I ® 1 ~ ~ ,
o~
~ i Water Bar
- •o o~ ~
~ l .360 i
4' x4' x3' ~ o
/
~ ! r Im act B2 Stream Crossin S2, Buffe / g p Sediment Pit _ N
-1 [ 1 ' No Im acts to Stream, Ri -Ra Placed an
[ / p i~ p , 3~0 [ 10 Linear Feet of Stream Bank on West Side
a i - - - ' "Stream Impact S1, Buffer Impact B1 380
f Stream. No Ri Ra Placed Above To of Bank. _ P P P I [ 4 - - o Permanent Impacts in Stream. Rip-Rap Placed
i ~ on 73 Linear Feet of Stream Bank on Both Sides
i ~ i
/ .Stream. ~1o Rip-.Rap Placed Above Top-of-Bank
i ~ 1
[ \ Wetlands (W1)
' 1 1 Unkno n" e [ 9
' S006 [ 1
L~ i 4 - 1 ~ / ~ m 4'x4'x3' ~
r, ~ Sediment Pit ~
[ 17 I ~ :om C?
- Fa _ I [ ~ 45 ~
o Water Bar e /
[ DU-12 -8 8A ~ I I
i " v~.~,~r; I ~o B
i ~ o
j o r i i
SS 2C2 ~ ~ ~ Construction
i ~ ~1 ~ En ~ o Entrance /Exit
SS 3 1 l
~ ~ r 1
' SS 20 ' _ D ~-1 - 2 38 & ~ i 4®
/ oc we
-1 2
3 60 `t.
~ 1
~ General Notes
1340 Controctor Muet Refer to EdcSC Plan I)etoil Sheet for Erosion
y ~ 4'x4'x3' 4 X 4 X 3 Control Measure.
Sediment F d l m e n t P l t All Laydown Areas wltnln Limits of Diaturbance (included w/
ESC Plan).
~G i D All Erosion Control M®asur®s In place prior to any Fleeting
S Water Bar and/or Excovation. ~ t e r Bar / Se®, also, enclo Construction Detail Sheeta for Eacsc
Measures and Speci~catlons.
~ ~ Cutiex Matting Required Along Entire Rout®.
340 340 360
Ofeet 400feet / Ofeet 100feet 200feet 30 12"
1 ~ a~
f i~AY 1 ~ 2009
m m m m m ~ 1
! WETLANDS ANO STORMdUATER BRANClI
~ ~
T-11 B Replacement
,
- ~ ~ ! t ' US 70 to Gibson Road
Legend
800a Gaston Rd., Gastonia, NC 28056 D u r h a m C o o n ty ~ C
Cos Carrying [Gtis] ~ Leak Survey.Area - Stream.Centerline -Stream ~ / Transmission Elbow.Existing cut Location aBc Det Fitting,Distribution Annototion ~ Tick Mark,Location CTg Transmiseion Segments [Cis] ~ Transmission Pipe Change,Existing Location PIPE TO BE INSTALLED Author: Jeff Smith
Fitting,Distribution Cap Land Baae [Gzs] Line/Loop.End Location Transmission Valve.Critical N Location
Fitting,0istribution Tee/Reducing Tee -Contour Line. Route 10 Line/Laop.Start Location Transmission Valve.Exisiing Plug Location Fitting~Disiribution Reducer~Expander -Contour LIne.Route 2 Pipe Segment.Existing Route Abc Def Transmission Valve.Annototion 2" Polyethelene PE-2406 SDR 11 Checked By, Jerry Littlejohn
Flfting~Distribution Tranaition ®Contour Line.Route 20 Pipe Segment.Removed Route iR Transmission Station.Existing Transmission Regulation Locotio Approved By: Darrell Shier
Main.Distributlan Plastic Raule Contour Line,Route 5 ADO Det Pipe Segment Annotatlon,Exlsting Annotation Abo Def Transmission Station,Annotation Mnin.Distributlon Steel Route R4oC~ Contour Line Annotation.Annotation CTO Cas ODjeoEs [Gtis] Transmission Casing.Existing Route 4" Polyethelene PE-2406 SDR 11.5 Date, 05~15~2009
Abc Def Main Annotation.Disfribution Lake.Area D Transmission ReducecExisting Location Abc Del Transmission CasingAnnototion NanCae Carrgting [CQs] Lot Line.Back Side Lot Route Tronsmission Tee.Existing Reducing Location Q Transmission Monitoring Point.Location 8" Polyethelene PE-2406 SDR 13.5 PrO~eCt NUITIber
e?m~ Erosion ControLCheck Dom -Lot Line. Right of Woy Route i_~ Transmission Tee.Existmg Straight Location Abc Def Transmission Monitoring Point.Annotation Page 1 of 3 Cit No. Ke No,
®-a-® Erosion Control,Sediment Fence Aba Def Road AnnotationAnnotation Transmission Tee.Remaved Reducing Location -Transmission Monitoring Point.Leader Line Erosion ControLStorm Water Flow Direction ahc Def SR Road AnnotationSR Annotation Transmission Elbow.Existing 90 Location 12" Steel 0.250"WT X-52 (FBE-2040) 4,781 Feet 120 29
Grid Sheet No. 00"04""
CP Number BF-22 2
i

~ 340
Water Bar
t
~ ~ r' 4' x4' x3'
Sediment Pit
i 320
; / 4'x4'x3'
~ ~ i Sediment Pit
340 i ~
i =~1-- -
~ ~
i ~ ~ 320 Water Bar
i I i ~ ~
it
4'x4'x3' _ ~
3~0 ~ ~ Sediment Pit ~ ~'r
o~ 1 ! - I -
1~/ ~Q
i ~r ~P ' lc - -
1 i' I ' ~ _
340 ~ _
/ / _ ,
I ~ ~ / ~o . i Water Bar
1 ~ y r'
i I ~ ~ I 1 '
~ i ,Q
® ~
- i f ~ r ,
~ I 1 1 i ~ ,
~ - 1 i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
? i > >
I 4x4 x3 J ~ 4' x 3' - '
~ ? Sediment Pit / I ~ rn' I gent Pit ~ ~ , !
I i~ / ~ ? i ~ , j t v
/ [ ~ i ~ I ~
/ A'~
/ ? , ~o
T - - - 360 , Water Bar N ~
i , ~ ~ I
9~
~ F 360 f~H,~l
~d' ~ ,
I i
~ ~ Water Bar ' ~
4' x4' x 3' , ~
i ~ Sediment Pit i ~
I~ ~ i
1 ~ y 1 ~ - - ~
~ ~J I;
i ~
I I i
- ~ \
i 9 9 9 ~
4x4 x3 ~ I
~ ~ Sediment Pit i O I ~ ~
i ~ s
,fir 320 ; ~ (l
Water Ba ~ JVater Bar ~ I
i
' 1 " Doubl n
~ f,.~ ~ Wetlands RS0062 ~ ~ C~ Wetlands (W3 I ® General Notes
3775E-~0 ~ I ~ Con~iractor Must Refer to EdcSC Plan Datoil Shsst for Erosion Conti rol Measure.
_
9 9 f 4x4 x3 All l.aydown Areas within Lirnite of Disturbance (included w/
Water Bar N o . Bar E~CS v Plan). j All Erosion Control Maaaur®s in place prior to any Bloating
Sediment Pit ~ 340 ~ ~ I and,~or Excavation.
Constructio n S t r U C t l a n ~ ' See, oleo, encloaed Canatruction Detail Sheets for ESC
- Entrance E a n a e / EX I t Msa cures and Specifications.
320 Curlax Notting Required Along Entire Rout®.
~ ~ 360 I
5 i ~ ~ _ o
t,
Ofeet 100feet 200feet 300feet 400feet l ~ R`
t Water Bar Bar
i U-, i cn I
m m m km m ~
ti~ ~ . ~ / l P I
~ F, [ ~ Q , 1 T-11 B Replacement
t
~ t ` ~I US 70 to Gibson Road
i ° t, 0 Durham County,
Legend w 800a Gaston Rd., Gastonia, NC 28056
- Lot Line.Ri ht of Wo Route i i Transmission Elbow.Existing 45 Location ~ 1~ ~ PIPE TO BE INSTALLED Author: Jeff Smith
Cae Carrying [Cis] Erosion Control.Storm Water Elow Direction g Y abc Dei Road Annotation,Annotation ~ / Transmission Elbow,Existing cut Location ~ ~ I 2" Polyethelene PE-2408 SDR 11 Checked By~~ Jerry Littlejohn
Abe Def Pitting,Dietributian Annotation ~ Leader~Arrow Head ~ ~ Abc Det SR Road Annotation.SR Annotatlon Closure.Bxisting Location ~ I Fitting.Distribution 90 Elbow - LeadecLeader Line - - Stream.Centerline -Stream ~ Tap,Existinq Tapping tee Location /
Fittin .Distribution Ca ~ Leak Survey.Area N 9 p Unnamed Span.Route Abc Def Tap.Annotatlan / Approved By: Darrell Shier 4" Polyethelene PE-2406 SDR 11.5
I_I Fitting.Distribution Tee/Reducing Tee ~ Tick Mark.Laaation ~ ~h CTO Tranemieston Segments [Ctis] Transmission Pipe Change.Existing Loaatlon Line Laop,End Location ® Transmission Station,Abandoned Double Run Farm Tap Location Q Fitting.Distribution Reducer/Exponder Land.Hase [Gtis] Date: 05/ 15/2009
Fittin .Distribution Transition Contour Line,Route 10 / ' W e t ~ n d 5 9 Llne/Loop.Start Location Ahc Def Transmission Station.Annotation ~ 'n.Distribution Plastic Route -Contour LIne.Rouie 2 ~ ~ Mai pipe Segment.Existing Route Transmission Caeing.Existing Route Wetlands (W2) i Project Number 8" Polyethelene PE-2406 SDR 13.5 Page 2 of 3
Main.Distribution Steel Routs Contour Line.Rouie 20 1 f / - Caniour Line.Raute 5 Pipe Segment.Removed Route Transmission Casing.Removed Route 1/ No, Ke No, ~~t
Main.Disiributlon Retired Steel Route PI e Se ment.Abandonetl Route ~ Abc Oef Main Annotatlon.Dlstribution ~eON Contour LI'ne Annototion.Annotatlon P 9 12" Steel 0.250"WT X-52 {f8E-2040) 4,781 Feet 12a 2s 0050438 Grld Sheet No.
Lake.Area Abc Dei Pi e Se ment Annotation.Existin Annotatlon / P 9 g r Noncas Carrying [Gda] L_ CTG cos OOpecta [Cva] CP Number BF-22 2
Erosion ControLSediment Fencs Lot LIne,Back Side Lot Route 34,~

/ ? I I i
i
i

i
~ ~ 1

3~0 s I
~ i
6.._ ~ 5E 89 I
i I ~
I
4 - T - i ~
49 8104 T 1 U 9.16 i
, " o e
GIBS01~ RD 4 ~ o
~ - -
1 ~ r
i , i~ ~ NR i
z i 1 _ ~ i ~ ,
' I ~ I~ I ,
D-0034 - i ~ D2_ , 039A ~ " - - _
r~ I - ~ ' me o
. ~ .1 i ~ , 602- 2
~ ~ ~ r i ~ ~,_,_._a}~ ~ ' N rds m
T ~ HAW ~ K CT , OR /4 I ~
~ ! ~ a 36( 3' D l u I~ 1 -g 360 os4 8 ~ ~ ~ 320 6, R ~kW ~
~w rW
~ ~ 9 1/4 _ 340 ~ 11 e - .1 Construction ~
- i ~ -
i , I i ~ ~ ~ ~ a' o kW ii Entrance /Exit ~~20 4 , - 1 - 0 , ,
' i I I ' I ~ i 4 1 2
[ ~ I ' ~ W ~i 7
I I i ~ ~ i ~ i ~ ~ ~ -
I ,
~ F R ES i A~ R 3~0 i r
~I - - , i 1 I
~ ~ 0 3~ - / , ~ D 0 3 05 37 E \ , ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 3~ 37- 6 - o
~ ~ i I
0, % ~ F, ~ I
~ ~3 % ~ try ~ I ~ I ~ ~ ~ i i Q ~ li 1 ~ I ~ ~ i ~ I i ~
0 ~ ~ .
~ ~ - - , I ~ o ~
• ~ ; cC I i - I
i o i W ~r I , t
t x \ . o ~ _ ~ i _ Water Bar ~!I
~K r I c 8 1 - ~ 0 ~ - ,
/ i N , J' P i I
1? ,i ~ , ~ 320 ~ ~ . 4' x 4' x 3'
i
i I ~ ` ~ I ~ - Sediment Pit
i 360
~ ~ ,
- o Stream Im act S5. Na Permanent -manent Impacts
o p ' ' ~ ~ in Stream. Ri -Ra Placed on 68 LinE n 68 Linear Feet of
~ ~ L P P
` ° Stream Bank an Both Sides of S1 0, o ~ des of Stream.
~ - l No Ri Ra Placed Above To -~~-of , ~ ~ P p Top-~--of-Bank.
~ ~ ~ ,1
-
~ _ ' 4'x4'x3' / ~
~ - ~ ~ Sediment Pit General Notes
~ ~ Contra ,tor Must Refer to ESC Plan Detail Sheet for Erasion
340 ~ We Water Bar cantral M®asure.
1 All Loydown Areas within Limits of Disturbance (included w/
t
i All Erosion Control Measures in place prior to any 9lasting and/or Excavation.
S®®, oleo, enclosed Construction Detail Sh®ets for E6cSC Measures and Specifications.
Curlex Matting Required Along Entire Rout®.
~ 320
i ~
100feet 200feet 300feet 400feet ~ / ~ Ofeet 4'X4'X 4' x 4' x 3' -
340 i ~ Sedimen~ Sediment Pit
i
m m m m m ~ ~
f
/ I
32 i i Water Bar
I ~ i ~ I ~ ~ o T-11 B Replacement
~ ] 9 9 9 ~ ' ~ ,
4x4 x3 , ~ - ~ ~ ~ U S 7 D to Gibson R o a d ~ ,
Sediment Pit Legend f, '
_ Cna Gmrybng [his) Erasion Gontrol,Storm Water Flow Direction AboDef SR Road AnnotationSR Annotation I Transmission ElbmxExieting 80 Loaation ~ 1 u Durham Count NC • ~ ~ 800a Gaston Rd., Gastonia, NC 28056 Y'
Aba Daf Fitting.Distribution Annotation ~ 1.eadecArrow Head StreamCenierfine -Stream ~ / Transmission Elbmr.Existing cut Location { t -i ~ PIPE TO BE INSTALLED author; Jeff Smith
I_ Ftting,Dlstributon BO Elbow -Leader. Leatler Line -Unnamed Span.Route I_ Transmission Elbow.Abantloned 90 location ~ ~ t; FlttingAlstributlon Cap ~ Leak SurveyArea CTO Trmnam6.as¢on Segments [Ctis] ~ Closure.Exie[inq Location ' ~ I - ~ Ch~;cked By, Jerry Littlejohn
Ijl fit{ing.Disttibution Insulating Flange ~ fick Mork.location Line~Loop.End Location 4 Tap,Existing Reinforcing Tee Location j e / I_[ Fltting,Distrlbutlon Tee~Reducing Tee Land Bose [Cts] ® Line~Loop.Start Location I~I Transmieaion Flange.Ezisting Looatlon i 2" Polyethelene PE-2406 SDR 11
D fitiing.Distributlon Reducer/Expander - Gentour Line.Route 10 ~ Pipe SegmentExisting Route I Weld In InsulatocExisting Location I ApFroved By: Darrell Shier I - 4" Polyethelene PE-2406 SDR 11.5
fitting.0lstributlon Transition Contour Line.Route 2 ~ Pipe Segment.Removed Route ~ Tranamission Pipe Change.Existing Location 340 MaIn,DleMbutlon Plastic Route ®Geotour Line.Route 20 ~ Pipe 5egment.Abantloned Route Transmission Volve.Critlcal N Looatlon Date: 05/ 15/2009
Maio.Distribufion Steel Route -Contour Line.Route 5 Abe Oef Pipe Segment Annolatian.Existing Annotation Tranamission Valve.Existing Ball Location e Main.Dlstributlon Retired Plastic Route Amy Contour Line AnnototionAnnotation CTG Cae 06jeote [Cis] AbcOeP Transmission Valve.Annototion ~ ~ Wate I Ba r 8" Polyethelene PE-2406 SDR 13.5 PI'Of2Ct NU111b2C Page 3 of 3
Abc Def Maln Annotatlon.Olstnbution LokeArea D Tranamission Reducer.Existing Location ® Transmission Station.Existing Double Run Regulator Location ~
NonCas Carry¢reg [Cis) Lot L'me.8ack Side Lot Routa Transmission Tee.Existing Reducing Location 1'i Transmisslan Station.Removed Regulaiing Station Location m? Erosion ConfraLCheok Dam -Lot Line,Right of Way Route [ I Transmission Tes,Abandoned Straight Locad'on Abo Det Tranamission Station.Annotatlon , ~ 12" Steel 0.250"WT X-52 (FBE-204D) t}~]$~ Fee{ Cit No, Ke No. '20 2s 0050438
Erosion ControLSedlment Eence Abe De( Raed Annotation.Annotation I P Transmission Elbow.Existing 45 Loeatian ~ Grid Sheet No, - CP Number BF-22 2