20090544 Ver 1_401 Application_20090509

? t
Q9-0544
Silver Landing
Transportation .,P-
Center
Charlotte, North Carolina
Joint Application Form and Supporting Documentation, for
NATIONWIDE PERMITS THAT REQUIRE NOTIFICATION
TO CORPS OF ENGINEERS AND NCDENR
Prepared For
Ms. Lorin Stiefel
DavidLand LLC
6707 C Fairview Road
Charlotte, NC 28210
Prepared By:
Leonard S. Rindner, PWS
Environmental Planning Consultant
3714 Spokeshave Lane
Matthews, NC 28105
[phone]
MAY 1 q 201'9
DENR - WATER QUALfTY
4'7=ANDS AND sror?r?WATER 81;t'NCtr
May 11, 2009
I
Corps Submittal Cover Sheet
1
2
3
Please provide the following info:
Project Name SILVERLANDING (BYRUM-STEELE CREEK)
Name of Property Owner/Applicant: Davidiand, LLC, 6707-C, Fairview Rd, Charlotte, NC 28210-3354
Name of Consultant/Agent: Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC
*Agent authorization needs to be attached.
4. Related/Previous Action ID number(s):
5. Site Address: Corner of Byrum Road and Steele Creek Road (Hwy 160) p
6. Subdivision Name:
7. City:
12. Watershed: HUC:03050103
10. Quadrangle Name:
11. Waterway:
8. County: Mecklenburg
9. Lat: 035.1888718° N Long: 080.9581287° W (Decimal Degrees Please)
13. Requested Action:
? Nationwide Permit # 39
General Permit #
? Jurisdictional Determination Request
_ Pre-Application Request
The following information will be completed by Corps office:
AID:
Prepare File Folder Assign number in ORM
Authorization: Section 10
Project Description/ Nature of Activity/ Project Purpose:
CHARLOTTE WEST
Section 404
Begin Date
Site/Waters Name:
Keywords:
09-0544
?0F W A TF, O
O G
P
01
r
1 4 >
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
A IF n-
1. Processing
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the

Corps:
® Section 404 Permit ? Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 39 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ® Yes ? No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ? Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
? Yes ® No For the record only for Corps Permit:

? Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program. ® Yes ? No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below. ? Yes ® No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? Yes ® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Silverlanding
2b. County: Mecklenburg
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Charlotte
2d. Subdivision name: Silverlanding
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no: N/A
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: DavidLand, LLC
3b. Deed Book and Page No. 13481-203 ; 06854-118
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable): Mr. Marc Silverman
3d. Street address: 6707 Fairview Road #C
3e. City, state, zip: Charlotte, NC 28105
3f. Telephone no.: 704 362 0400
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ? Agent ® Other, specify: Owner
4b. Name: Ms. Lorin Stiefel
4c. Business name
(if applicable): DavidLand, LLC
4d. Street address: 6707 Fairview Road #C
4e. City, state, zip: Charlotte, NC 28210-3354
4f. Telephone no.: 704 362 0400
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address: [e-mail]
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: Leonard S. Rindner
5b. Business name
(if applicable): Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC
5c. Street address: 3714 Spokeshave Lane
5d. City, state, zip: Matthews, NC 28105
5e. Telephone no.: 704 904 2277
5f. Fax no.: 704 847 0185
5g. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 2 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 14104107
Latitude: 35.1889 Longitude: - 80.9538
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): (DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size: +/- 33 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to UT of Coffey Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C
2c. River basin: Catawba
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Disturbed former nursery; forested/disturbed; highway and airport related development
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
Less than 1/2 acre overall
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
+/- 2005 linear feet
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Industrial/Commercial Transportation Subdivision
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Mass grading required to serve trucks and delivery; industrial land uses associated with Charlotte Douglas Airport - earth
moving equipment will be used to prepare lots and roads
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
®Yes ®No ? Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments: meeting with Steve Chapin 9/11/07
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
®Preliminary ? Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC
Name (if known): Leonard S. Rindner Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
jurisidictional determination field verified 9/11/07 by Steve Chapin of the USACE
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ? Yes ® No ? Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ? Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ? Buffers
? Open Waters ? Pond Construction
Page 4 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number - Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ - non-404, other) (acres)
Temporary (T
W1 ®P ? T Fill PEM1C - drained
pond bed ? Yes
® No ® Corps
® DWQ 0.28
W2 ®P ? T Fill PSS1A ? Yes
® No ® Corps
® DWQ 0.014
? Yes ? Corps
W3 ? P ? T Fill ? No ? DWQ
? Yes ? Corps
W4 ? P ? T Fill ? No ? DWQ
? Yes ? Corps
W5 ? P ? T Fill ? No ? DWQ
? Yes ? Corps
W6 ? P ? T ? No ? DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts 0.294
2h. Comments: 0.28 acres of wetland impacts are in a recently drained pond bed
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact length
number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream (linear feet)
Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ - non-404, width
Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet)

S1 ® PMT
Fill
Same ? PER
® INT ® Corps
® DWQ
3' 113 If
Unimp/breach
Score 22
149 If
R Corps ' Imp. Stream
S2 ® P ? T Fill Same ® INT ® DWQ 4 (then goes
underground)
Score 26
287 If
(Re-emerges
? PER ® Corps
'
' Unimportant -
S3 ®P ? T Fill Same ® INT ® DWQ 2
-4 becomes
ephemeral)
Score 18 to
22
173 If
? PER ® Corps
'
' (re-emerges
S4 ®P ? T Fill Same
® INT
®DWQ 2
-4 unimportant
intermittent)
Score 18-22
151 If
S5 ®P ? T Fill Same ? PER ® Corps 4'-5- (important
® INT ® DWQ intermittent)
Score 29.5
S6 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
Page 5 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 873 If
3i. Comments: 573 linear feet unimportant intermittent stream (18 to 22 per NCDENR Guidelines); 300 linear feet of important
intermittent stream estimated - mitigation proposed; no impacts proposed to perennial streams.
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
- Permanent
(P) or
Temporary T 4b.
Name of
waterbody
(if applicable) 4c.

Type of impact 4d.

Waterbody type 4e.

Area of impact (acres)
01 ?P?T
02 ?P?T
03 ?P?T
04 ?P?T
4L Total open water impacts
4g. Comments: Existing pond indicated on USGS maps has been drained.
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.

Pond ID 5b.

Proposed use or 5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres) 5d.
Stream Impacts (feet) 5e.
Upland
(acres)
number purpose of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
_5L Total
5g. Comments: N/A
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes ? No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
Page 6 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. ? Neuse ? Tar-Pamlico ? Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ? Catawba ? Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number-
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
or Temporary impact required?
(T)
?Yes
61 ?P?T ? No
?Yes
B2 ?P?T ? No
? Yes
B3 ? P ? T ? No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
This project is designed to take advantage of the transportation system enabling the region to be served. Reducing the size of
the buildings, or modifying accessibility, compromising engineering requirements and safe access does not meet current
design standards and can severely jeopardize the success of the project in this highly competitive industry. Therefore it would
not be feasible as a project. In conclusion, due to the site planning constraints of a development of this type, large contiguous
areas must be graded for building pads, parking, and access roads. To balance the environmental consequences of these
unavoidable impacts to surface waters and wetlands the developer has proposed minimization measures and has proposed a
compensatory mitigation plan. The proect avoids impacts to perennial streams - 30 point or more according to NCDENR
gyidelines.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
As depicted on the site plan, the remaining perennial streams will be adequately barricaded and or marked to minimize the
potential of inadvertant stream impacts. Site is subject to an approved Sedimentation and Erosion Control Plan.

2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ® Yes ? No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ? DWQ ® Corps
? Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
®Payment to in-lieu fee program
project?
? Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
Page 7 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ? Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: 300 linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ® warm ? cool ?cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0.50 acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that
requires buffer mitigation? ? Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.

Zone 6c.
Reason for impact 6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier 6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 8 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ? Yes ? No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
? Yes ? No
Comments:
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? approximately 70 %
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ® Yes ® No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
The stormwater management facility will be designed to meet the City of Charlotte Po st Construction Controls Ordinance
for quantity and quality controls
® Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ? DWQ Stormwater Program
? DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? City of Charlotte
Z Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ? NSW
? USMP
apply (check all that apply): ? Water Supply Watershed
? Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ? Yes ® No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
? Coastal counties
? HQW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ? ORW
(check all that apply): ? Session Law 2006-246
? Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
? Yes ? No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ? Yes ? No
5b . Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ? Yes ? No
Page 9 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ? Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ? Yes ? No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
El Yes
? No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ? Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ? Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ? Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
Project is in with existing roads, land uses and infrastructure.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Municipal sanitary sewer
Page 10 of 12
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ® Yes ? No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ? Yes ® No
impacts?
? Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
h
ill
? A
ev
s
e
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
Site was evaluated during the wetland delineation process for the presence of Schweinitz's Sunflower. The site is heavily
forested and thick in early to mid-forest succession. Invasive grass, vine, and shrub species dominated the lower
vegetative strata. Ecotonal edges along roads and clearings were inspected to determine if Schweinitz's sunflower was
present.
Project site is not in a watershed that has been identified as habitat for the Carolina heelsplitter.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ? Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
ttp://www.nmfs. noaa.gov/habitat/habitatprotection/efh/G IS_inven. htm
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ? Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
According to the latest published version of the National Register of Historic Places for the presence or absence of
registered properties, or properties listed as being eligible for inclusion therein, this site is not registered property or
property listed as being eligible for inclusion in the Register. Site is a former agricultural and nursery site which has been
heavily disturbed.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ? Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain dete in tion? 60enburg County GIS

Leonard S. Rindner - 5-11-09
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
Ag, is signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.
Page 11 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

LEONARD S. RINDNEX PLLC
Environmental Planning Consultant 3714 Spokeshave Lane
Professional Wetland Scientist Matthews, NC 28105
Land Planning Tele: [phone]
May 11, 2009
Ms. Lorin Silverman Stiefel
M. David Properties
6707-C Fairview Road
Charlotte, NC 28210
Re: Wetlands Evaluation - Silverlanding, near Charlotte Douglas Airport,
Charlotte, NC
Dear Lorin:
In order to interface with the United States- Army Corps of Engineers and the North
Carolina Department of Natural Resources I will need your authorization. Please sign the
following statement:
This letter authorizes Leonard S. Rindner, PWS as our firm's agent in matters related
to Waters of the U.S. and Waters of North Carolina for the referenced project site. This
includes interfacing with the United States Army Corps of Engineers and the North
Carolina Department of Natural Resources
-??w
f~" ` '-=?
Name i Date
Please contact me if you have any questions or require additional explanation. Thank
Leonard S. Rindner, PWS
Environmental Planning Consultant
Profession Wetland Scientist
[e-mail]
F?cos?stem
PROGRAM
May 11, 2009
M. David Properties
6707-C Fairview Road
Charlotte, NC 28210
Expiration of Acceptance: February 11, 2010
Project: Silverlanding
County: Mecklenburg
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is willing to accept
payment for impacts associated with the above referenced project. Please note that this decision does not assure that the payment will
be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact these
agencies to determine if payment to the NCEEP will be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local
government permits regulations or authorizations associated with the proposed activity including SL 2008-152: An Act to Promote
Compensatory Mitigation by Private Mitigation Banks.
This acceptance is valid for nine months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not received a copy of the
issued 404 Permit/401 Certification/CAMA permit within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's
responsibility to send copies of the permits to NCEEP. Once NCEEP receives a copy of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based
on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the In
Lieu Fee to be paid to NCEEP by an applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed at www.nceep.net.
Based on the information supplied by you the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation are summarized in the following
table.
River
Basin CU
Location Stream (feet) Wetlands (acres) Buffer I
(Sq. Ft.) Buffer 11
(Sq. Ft.)
Cold Cool Warm Ri arian Non-Riparian Coastal Marsh
Impacts Catawba 03050103 0 0 300 0.50 0 0 0 0
Credits 03050103 Expanded
Service Area 0 0 600 1.0 0 0 0 0
Upon receipt of payment, EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. If the regulatory agencies require
mitigation credits greater than indicated above, and the applicant wants NCEEP to be responsible for the additional mitigation, the
applicant will need to submit a mitigation request to NCEEP for approval prior to permit issuance. The mitigation will be performed
in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the N. C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources
and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998 and consistent with the Guidance for Expanded Service Area
for Mitigating Impacts within the Lower Catawba River Basin adopted by the PACG-TC on September 12, 2006.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Valerie Mitchener at [phone] or Kelly Williams at
[phone].
Sincerely,
Will m . Gilmore, PE
Director
cc: Cyndi Karoly, NCDWQ Wetlands/401 Unit
Steve Chapin, USACE-Asheville
Alan Johnson, NCDWQ-Mooresville
Len Rindner,agent
File
RP?SL?OVY,K?... ... Prot" 0" Jta&

Asp
NCDENR
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 / 919-715-0476 / www.nceep.net
Y'.\Projects'JBC\IBC-08030, Siiver Landing Phase 2, InterCon\Land\Constructlon Drawing s\Cu rrent drawings\WETLANDS EXHIBIT.dwg, 5/11 /2009 10:50:33 AM, m;
7L
Cn _
o ES-~; BLVD
W
g,?RUM Ito
PHASE 1
(UNDER CONSTRUCTION) PHASE L
w
W
VICINITY MAP
N.T.S.
PROM= M. IBC-8030 SILVER LANDING PRO?JEGT 11 THE JOHN R. McADAMS
COMPANY, INC.
m"Am IBC08030-VM SM?CREEK ROAD
CHARLOTM, NORTH C,AROLiNA v f m
8701 C04M ROAD. IMI M
0 cAROiDi? 2=6
DAM 05-11-2009 VIC= MAP (7CRAMBM. 04) 527-0800
uuppyrnk�,) aat, mapiecn, inc.
° 0.9666° 0.9833° 0.9000 °
Z
pi
i
-:7
..
-�'i '^ f` .. -.,_.a �y �.- .4 � 'A} tot'' � .�. ali • l 'f .. J'.r'
Y w
11
jrJ � � rk r s � ��' � t r--.-. r � I ..• 1 ' .. t' aft
r -
•• 'j � t
r , ." I 4 .'
( `,la r
I
_ �"` r _ _W. , 1, f �+ fl +� t ��
f � fir• s h _"' — k" � � �, r �. .,,,�� � �, t�-_.,.J . . _
r.r ,' ,5, •`` ,._._ �1"'s .-�-_ t, 6k C y• -_.r �
.} t�..: � ,�'`rf � _ � r` �r"y..- �`�`•"—"`: rf E � .s... j,. � , r+ r t -' M C r
n"+, \ I ; _ ,--.// �� `ti ti_,•+' ss 'I "f � i' 1 r� � ��� r� r 'M��•I'I
u i � J � • � ti...
Y,r
t'�"-,i� (��} �,�, :�tt �'y� r�5+ ,� '�y 4 � At ,tE$,�,",,�'•
Z
�f. � � r
�tJ
v. J 4 ," i r _ a I` ,. } fir' ' .'nN '
f rf I' �" t $ t F -
qtr 1 'r
ii
-.^+ti.= 5 > -' _• ; t fat rr t4 1 '.,y >., ' * �,r I,ti �r
ti —ti-
le
z
-ZD
W
,✓ �.^,t . lid r
y. ppi ;tu- _ w"..`,. _I'{ 1 -
m
��j
ARR
It
` _ _ " }� ; �-- _ ,
,
+��_� •/+v y y
I %"f
�t,,,�
- _
,,r•
,,II ��f/((}� ,!}y'j
.Yf f: _
� 'I�
" PJJf,,, ////
ST
i S 1 r+� �y5 +jif � + l� + � ,� �r•.. � ,a'��ijlj �. it } , 1''
'
• iii
PHASE 1
-
PHASE 2r'
•� i
rr 1A
,J d a.eF #'• r r Ir',f
i k J.122, ste
�.9 �, 4* t4 •H9 �'"'144� R/�'�., � 6 �Ir _ s^
(''
.. v.. v- -Jr' .."� t
C
OD
��. � _., 1 qtr �,,.•�„^-r ,r.. _ .. r�:�;'�.:k'^� i/ �,-.}"-�; n Sid =_,� ''
f
ke
i''4•''i`'F' _ *, �,� `: "'. �, "Tt "'-r.-, r. y �"i•• �4
y r
_ y y
65 h � 1_ 1v I
L4
M ' ,
•"z
7° 'VV A� a 1, e
✓f'
0.9666"
833° 0.9000°
V� 177
Name: CHARLOTTE WEST Location: 035.1887506° N 080.9581494° W SILVERLANDING
Date: 5/11/2009
Scale: 1 inch equals 1000 feet APPROXIMATE PROJECT
BOUNDARY
uuppyrnk�,) aat, mapiecn, inc.

Mecklenburg County, NC POLARIS
http://poIariS.mecklenburgcountync.gov/serv Iet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrima...
SILVERLANDING
APPROXIMATE PROJECT
BOUNDARY
of 1 5/11/2009 4:31 PM
Mecklenburg County, NC POLARIS
http: //po l ari s.meckl enburgco untync . gov/serv l et/com.esr i .esri map.Esri ma...
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
POLARIS
Property Ownership Land Records Information System
Date Printed: Mon May 11 2009 16:23:09 GMT-0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
SILVERLANDING
14163123 7
14112131 1
14112112 r ±
14112138 f?
?y r/` 14720267
? ?- 14/20102 J-
14120101,
14112132 ?
14112111
I
14112133
74120183 14128167
_14112145 14128786
14112120
t 14112146 14126185 --
14112118
14112118
14128104 14184183
14112121 - 141 2126 --
J ' 1411212b
J 14184704
14112123
J
J 14112108
141127 ??.
M1)26168 104102
( 14126184 14704107
? r
PHASE 1 14104148 Y
14104122
- 74104181
-? PHASE 2
W26t68 141281$3
14128182
14126181 ,
1'14128150 14128749
i41R81T7it4 79 ,14126 51 114"726185, %
14104123
1 14128115 14128178 ,14126152 14121781
+
14128174 i "-178 %4126-3 ti
4 1
to 12818$ ^°" \'
1128154
4 ?t4t28tS7 14128155' 14128148
11A126t80
I+ _261 1511 M M
141261885
t41126W } 141289S6* 141261",1,
14126159 • • . 14126147 5,
14121111
14128180 ^14128138 14126140 14121112
+ 14128137 14128130 74126747 14126143 14126145 74721128
14128142 14126144
1Afi26735 _
114t26136 KKLECABlrr7+a WUNT'i!*0150 14128108 M1 2410q ° J 14721182 14121118
141 133 14126107 14128105 t
01 214121103 0.
This map is prepared for the inventory of real property within Mecklenburg County and is compiled from recorded deeds, plats, tax maps, surveys,
planimetric maps, and other public records and data. Users of this map are hereby notified that the aformentioned public primary information sources
should be consulted for verification. Mecklenburg County and its mapping contractors assume no legal responsibility for the information contained herein.
SILVERLANDING
APPROXIMATE PROJECT
BOUNDARY
1 of 1 5/11/2009 4:25 PM
Y:\ProjectSUBCUBC-08030, Silver Landing Phase 2, InterCcn\Land\Construction Drawings\Current drawingsAIVE-FLANDS EXI IIBIT.dwg, 5111!2009 3:22 05 PM, ma,
.. , -_ J. .- , t. `._? . _ ? ?\\ 4•!: -__ ? ;, r ^,,yi;! rig ?'
(ll?k.,
t \?\ \\4 L?('.j '{!l/ lJ,.- ?i !'"_\ ,l l `i ?\I ll\? ?111`?`, ti:',!.acF'^ " "r ??iq .?:;:i:: •'.::
11v'\t.t-11 tt/tlJ! !. ,- 7,1 4 v IJIv4?vv4 ,;, „ tr I
1'1.r44i14t 4r4t\.t{(I / t 4 `\ tt\Il/i???'3:''?;.,:?"" ?
1 I ! \'4\\ ? .1.4 \ 1\\ \\? : i 4 tli \\ t 4 t ! 14 t 4 \?,,? ,?; ;;: , Per ? t,? .:
A '\ _J I I 1 41 4A V r!.=?'-- 'nab+' ;rrrr,
/ I' V ? v ? v t ? /' 4 / 1 1 _ ="sa'6 rnngr r,rlrn((,
?J } f 1 V4 ?\ 111 v V! / / i J / 1 1 t_r?S• 3 rv++r ry({( ,r
-1 Will,
to I
lx?
z Z,
JJ 1 I I / { l ! 1 ., ? may) ? a.,t_ , rtr r r , i•°--
4 v 1?? 1 t?l Jl Vl1r'
•V 1 1 / 1AVvA11II'It
- \ !fl •/l 11/l J''??rl•r 1 (??!/ uri{r? i'i 1 ` %.•^..?.?,,` ? ur
l 4" r ;, ?r' ?% rh r
\I ! ?/ JIIIJ1J1111V1 1 r//•'udl {iW4b ri t r f'/!ao,`,1t
1 /! 1 !f 1441x/ r`r m bo?+r hull o i 'r ?,?,,_ ` ??2y?t'?
If II J 1
I ! / ( I / ..' 71 t i' l \\ I f l y +xron,,,u',r n { i 1 it l ??? r :: ``:. r?t\
! ! ! l,! I { i/ / 1 JJ/J /1 r dr+; r..• ?_%':ii'S f ?`r": ?, ?`)"rx.?:'
! 11111f f?''J1414/!//11 l!/// rii ?d `'?n(I'7 ?'{?`^rr,,irir:4 ii!4' ?i'ij trt t'"
I It
7/ 11/1!111(! J!t!4l11(/JII/ 1`i '!ir"?y{ur1 ??? ^+lifr?f:" y''f+j{j
1 ! I fl' M4 h4ft1,?+ifr,
yf1.JJi/l1ll n;r r ri"{4rrtir{i}/ r t rirM1.r r, q^ (a1"
- _- ----?%?/ ?%/JJ)lr/%ltJJJ, "44?iv i'P?^,
n
21
V" \
r
JJ 44 _ I
rr 1 l A, l ?- ? v -
1 / F,/' \1 441\7\ `4114 `\1
,1\\1, rt ill I,!tlif r r _
n r
It 1
'?,?7" 4it t 44\\ /1.^ /7 111 1 r J / /l!1 / J // 1/?.J I ? ? .' _
c ''? / I// IJ/ JI J L- r t v ?1 i{t`1t a+ W r rr%""or:` `? : ^". ,..?/?./"r' y+r ` t Y,?• `1\a.. '.. ) ! /`r ! I . 1! 1 !/ /I 4w \ /f!" I4\\\
\l .. ^'// /1/J / f rel n1 f,?,, ,rd ? * -' Nr "' " ,rt 1 \ \`?\\-, - J { 4\\\\
\ -•'? i /// / /! rrNIA and 7r?,? \?,"`__/ e`I ?4r iri"'. ri?:: rjr`i" ? l: '"/ / J \,
\`.\ V1? - Ji / f/ / J }u rr ny'r t???M`t` ?, /? r' ?'i?n'1j '_-'. ?'(??fi `i.^il ? i i' `I \'.`.? \ \ / \ ? ! V
\\ \ .-? - -' ? //? /?/ {( r i "}j+ r ?`? "1''4i3rr a'r•." r i r r +. t r "' i i \?\ ` \\ ) / ? \ \ \ C .. - f '
1 r r?r,a+ti vial i14 y :;. r hriN, rrrr iirlrr art ` ... 1 1
It)4 Ilt 1441 \4111 iI/ir•i/ /"" iii{i?ur4+w?l,t rr "?i i'?? ,T•.c rrl a?ittti?i'';i?"r"1 ,o 'r i r
{ i.,??
1) I 4 f I !/////1 ,ICtrr r ?._`-?:^;' (4p {4 t ,,A, i
x11// \\\? ?\%lli\Nk\\ 4, !f. ff"/ /_
// Ii /lull loll \' J) r- r'rdnP°,d?ri,?`.`'`= s ti(a rrr,hr?'G rrrr { 1?`J:`9 =_ \\ w\\llf JJ I.,-' r J / 1 /.I?
1 / 11 \????„r, P`w`t, ?°L 5'!?`'ii S°(rrrr ,rrrlr; rr." _c? \ \ \\ \ 11! IIIJ? If ! I /
/ I (II ?)!I JI!! 11 s\`?' rrrr 4t to tu::.. '>s?c%e5"' +n up((r n rlri _ --_ \ \ \`\ jJ
J I J I !f / i }iyrn{I!rrlr:s ?$ro!; "`uVi°'4 r'i? jr'i+ \` it
111 1 rlry,r eyu'rt ?. ?"c .., n r, r ' __ ,\`• \ \1\/\ \ ,II ? ?/
\, '\r II1
/ \ / !1 11 .? /
` _.\. ?1?J 1\ J?` t !1 /y #'J J
r1,=}°t, \
\.. ?. }- ..:.1 ?ii ear+rr ..1-ae" e - '+n ily?rl 1 .rat yzoF 1 \I / _ ( 1 fi ! `?; =
?\C/!///r ?•?'^.' 1, r?4i'r":`; _= "1r s" + `,?`4Sxi _?? l \ I ..\. 4\ 11 r tfi?/.fl ?_1 ?-
uv fr1 1A, 1111.-1 !? /' l,Irr
gyp. ;tom ?? / p. .:.. -s ] t? . IV't1 Al 1v t I1 j!
i. I(lr! Jtl ?- si-:' yn S% ?'. _ ,{ , / f 1?1 Ate/ I ICI A ry_e? l \ J Ifl lv?
L
fill' \ -- . 7 r ? 1 (D TJ 1111. t I'1 yJ' i / ! /
t - / y i,? V Ix'r -_ l 1 / m Z I I I ,?11 1/ J!/ ( i r t 4 A?4
'? ( ?A I t v rA Il ? v A e
d' Q v t 4 ` I,
o 011- 1'n44\t \ _J` , i(t4^ m\ ii r \ I r \ 1x11
I r/,5,1 1 I 11 I , / 411tA14[-
r¢/Ill?lrl7?\?/'? fj`?` \?:An'i\'? 1A ?, +it y ! j r1 fiU)?1 1?11J \J J 4t
f rl ?? `+ z 1 ?) v fie. __/ t i w? *t? 1 1\
r
l1/%/Il t\ 1 r te/ r, t r?'?:: ?t i _ t ? 4 J/ _.%J?7 f 4 f / fl J 1 t i .i 4 4
/ ? 11 117J\... .w" r t1\"\\`?. I/ ? ?FsF- V t 1 1! rN,
rtVv?1lJftt1Jill ?jJ1 vt\vV y? Y. f\ 111/%%?? `=v t t 411\tllt 1 1 t I 1 1vtll'111
1/ /I l !1I ?? \ \ V t4 V A) t1 // 1A - t A 7, V A \4 f..? / 11 f 11 J 1
-,J??? 1 A\ 5 \ 4\A VVI(1JIIl r ?w 1 I A11 /I II !
t\4ttl v V 4tIJ Val ldi V11 l [ S \ t 7 ! ll fll
v?rP4t4 1! Irl I/JIr! 1 ! 1 f \ 1 4 ? r , ! r ul,ly
i 1! 1 1 1! t t
t?l f f Y ?... _ J it to 14,.1 4 Iil i/ 1 \ %i
911 4 /a- iif v
R t4 1\ f 1 1 I ! i I A'
j / rYl l-{!O ?v 4 \?IttiV14V@AVAV /J<?-a
i [r f t? yV4 1 1 1j14?V111 ?! ?/ A\A, 1! i 4 1 1 1 1 !1 tAty \
Ir i 1 \ \ \ \ _?? . / A 1J I 1 111 \11\?tz` \\\\ 141 1 J 1 J I 1 1 1
/?/1 \\ \ \ \ \ 4 i / = i /`t 7/ t V 144 1 \?\;.?\ \\\•``_?/ - \\nI. .1}It 1 1 J 1 1 t , I ! 1 r!i
)r/ \{? l\ \\ '? \ 1 1 4 / / r ; 7 // / 1 t \\1 \\\\."4 4 1 i_ d\\.l? tf // J ! S J tJ
\ V vV\ Vv \t 1j / / ?'- `'E /F( 1 A\l\ 1? !1?/? A•4AO 1 / t JJ?i {I!
r r; let '; v ,A 4 V A A , 1 t,, 1 1 1 'i-B` ., -- J 1 / s ti'' A 111v11 t .+l.l , ? . 1l4> i._- 4 / / J \,,,v} t t tl : ! elv?
1J ll •,._ .,li, 1 ? I I ? .../J ..-J /? L 1//1'i ?1 AA' / l ??cn ..\\
jIf(\ \ t '/ / /. 1 ', ` 1 \ 1 1111 I! t '? //- 1 N , // 1/r! / \\`\ i 1`11 I 1
( rA? V7//// rl tlAIi A!I J \ " %/J, - / f /r/lJ (l//1 /( 1 v•? V i I Off'
i .r Av 1 /. % // / V v vJ 1 V t 1 V { ?. (( \ // / _ 1 .I i tl lIl ?A / \A.dl 1 { ) / / \
( fit(, tf I 4-
1?\1 f: if
, /\{1111 - \\fll"/'i1 1AAIl 1 1 14/'i/?J 1'
-?1 1Av .AAA .?A•?V?. ? ?_? 141d1V1 ., ?Il.A__?-. I?.?..///! .__ Id1. 1.1b1 1 ?. J1 _?AA! -. .'r 1,11 {.. Iri.?. i .-_PRO7ECr NO.
IBC-8030 SILVER LANDING PROJECT THE JOHN R. McADAMS
IBC08030-PO MELE CREEK ROB COMPANY, INC.
ENGINEERS/PLANNERS/SURVEYORS
0 SCALE: CHARLOTPE, NORTH CAROLINA
9701 CARMF.f. ROAD, SUITE 205
CHAR {p DATE: 05-11-2009 EXISTING CONDITIONS OVERALL (704)4527_0 OORTR (',AROf7NA 2R22R
Y.\Projedsl113C\IBC-08030, Silver Landing Phase 2, InterCon\Land\Construction Drawings\Current drawingsllNETLANDS EXHIBIT.dwg, 5/11/2009 3:1833 PM, ma,
a
n
x az]
Vl ^?

00 ? 00
r ? 0
-Q ? ? rrr _c r_ va _
tj Dtnr ' ytJs
n ? i ? ?1 ?l ? ?t
D
I I l co ( Q to t
N n'O Os i ?t O ? :.?. •? •ti
O C] ??lz? ///r? _ ? ii er : 'w z\ r rr
\ ?\ \ t 1 \ i r/i rir = '"\`tl tt1 4i J / r > {d' - ! ! ? r t : j
??L? ? t ? ri/r//?-\i\\?u1\\lill?y '1N11117rr1? ?Jmrr,rl? ?? r??\fi..i k- `\ 1 ? .•?,.,•\'\ ?,- / / "? _?
?' ?0. ? ? ?? ? ? ?i ? i l? t! u11 // !r lrtJlll l! i'r r? •A?- ? ? \ ? ?? l l / ?. --
^? ?? \ `1 ? ? i\ j•?i%- '? \11 \\\\\\\ y!/ ///1!!1l1?Jrr Jli? 11Iz1jJ/!/ ii._ ? ?? ???:????';\ ?. `?_,_-.-; l? ? a- ._
{ \ \ „ \\ ,/i/r?it1lill \\\\\
?VN\< i1? {'?t41t !1/!I llrJ? /?!!1 ? r l \`?.. -.?
i r \ _\\11111{111 i Vt 11 1' r /,.. / -,_ \ ? ti
\\iil .? / /..?,7` ?? ` \ \? \ ; ` _ ? r- y ?\
1 -h I l `??r\??? JJJ ?...,?\\\V1t11 \\ ?JIIIIV111V\111111\i\
t 111 - _?i 111411\\\ 1 JJ if !(l/ll/I -ZZ \
1 t t" -' ?- - \\\ \\\\\\\ l; IIli IIi /j//j ir
_ \ \ \ l it i 11111!/ r / /\ ? \ \ arc 1: \
AvvV ???2?1/ll/ 11111 l1 11 11 r
I i rrir ?i\\ y`???!%Jr'lilt fflfrfllrr?lltr J \_ `'\` ? ?? ?Y't /
1/! / J ! r{ y
\V A? i ??? I I 1 It/it I
j t\? / / _??`\11\\1\\\?t? ??\ 7f 1l ! 11f/ I I I
f1
' / / I 1 r ll\1\\???., ?/i I 1111 /', _ ?? \
/ 1 ? ti_? / z? ,=/ ?ltlllll?}?111111rr/? /lr 1 - ¢r. A
?K i r /`? -?.,-??? ??5??.. ?I 1111111 I / / ? /#" 1-'-?' .. ?
? ? ?'? r / r ?-- _?-???????????=??111tth11?111f / r//r/IJ•t.. --,' _? ? ""?.-,
?-
'.? ?-v -N?`?-! _...?_-
r / r r -_rr^,? ..,`?\\? `\??y= J J Jr1lr111 t i 14 l \ ` \ \.._...? `\-
? f ? /' ??.,. ...._,.. A--. ,. -?? r.•-?-// /Jrr 11 I 1 I1 `•.? tA? A \T ?- ?
I iI 11 i - '? \ \
1 y r r ! r -?? ? ?,i?... `, it r fI 1 1 ! ?,\ ? ? ~` ?.
??'"^ ??Z ??? i ??? ??? ?v 1i A 11 / /.r?_.? _ 1 ?I'?Ir'rr r /ra????Z? ? -
_ ?`tt ? \
z (f)
t
lk-
~. ? ?.,? -;. ?!,\\\i\\\i \ 1t\111 } 1 J r1 1 ia` `z t i' _
>`?y \ \i.i i \ ii i\ \ iii` \ \ \ i\ \ ?? y ' -
'``?`??` ..`,? \y?i \\iii \ii \i ??.\??\i \,.-,.? "?? jS`? _ '\ `cyst \ \ ? ?\
\ ? ??\ it tr iii\L\\` ??t?ti?\)111 i \._\' \\ \
??t..??_`\
\ ti?? i \ i ` ) ? 1 / ! 1 1 ? i ? 1 V ?? t I I t`'?` _?---' -??,V •_?_? ;t?? 1 I ?? ? V ? \ VA ?
t7
-,ice?iiii111 lit
\ ??,_\ \ \, i/JI ?1 J /1 / 1 I ( 1 1 `"? ii??_.._?.?''-- i --? -.?"i.\,x??;'l?\ ,1y\ \ - \ \
`? ., v A 1. l ,V 1.11 /Jrr J f 1 J 1 r' ?S_ ti?? _. ?? ?,. AAA, ?1a ? V ? ? ? - \, A A
P"°'gcT " IBC-8030 SILVER LANDING PROJECT J1 THE JOHN R. McADAMS
nLENaHe' IBC08030-PO STEELS CREEK ROAD COMPANY, INC.
t:J SCALE: CHARLOTE, NORTH CAROLINA ENGINEERS/PLANNERS/SURVEYORS
8701 CARMEL ROAD, SUITE 205
(q DAT&: 05-11-2009 PHASE 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS ('704) 52 -ONORTH CAROLINA 28228
Y:\Projects\IBUBC-08030, Silver Landing Phase 2, InterConlLand\Constructlon Drawings\Current drawings\WETLANDS EXHIBIT.dwg, 5111/2009 3:24:36 PM, ma,
6701 CARMEL ROAD, SUITE 205
DATE: 05-11-2009 PHASE 2 SITE PLANS (70??27-OBOO CAROLINA 28226
PROJECT N0. IBC-8030 SILVER LANDING PROJECT THE JOHN R. McADAMS
a "A" IBC08030-PO MELE CREEK ROAD COMPANY, INC.
G SCALE: CHARLO rE, NORTH CAROLINA ENGINEERS/PLANNERS/SURVEYORS
a
Y) Projects\ILIBC-08030, Silver Landing Phase 2, InterCon'IandlConstruction DrawingsiCurrent drawingsMETLANDS EXHIBIT.dwg, 511/2009 3:16:50 PM, ma,
PRO]ECT N0. IBC-80.30 SILVER LANDING PROJECT THE JOHN R. McADAMS
0 A P1L%NA?,e` IBC08030-PO STEELS CREEK ROAD COMPANY, INC.
9 SCALE. CHARLOTM, NOIGH CAROLrnA ENGINEERS/PLANNERS/SURVEYORS
0701 CARMEL ROAD, SUITE 205
DAY' Es 05-11-2009 PHASE 1 SITE PLAN (7 CHARE, NORTH
4)1627-0000 C,ARQLINA 28228
Y:1Projects'IlMIDC-08030, Silver Landing Phase 2, InterCon\Land\Construction Drawings\Current drawings\WETLANDS EXHIBIT.dwg, 5/11/2009 3:23.19 PM, ma,
.-.-{. fj'/' / /ti' t ` \ \ ,t ?•' -gam'....-\.???0/?+thl??i, ?'
is f
Is Is
` ( ? i //J11j/ ?/))\tli ? ,??.`.•?.`?"rear rrrr
1\\? \\++11111 'f_jf/177
,,r\1 ,(\!\1\ \\ ?•I\\r 1(/!I ??i ??f /ltt.\ tt`t?? 11t ?Nrr r r r7?_ 1
I still 1114 1,,
( / J 1, ( 111 / r? htAl I( rr +
! l / /( 1 i I 1 / J / J tngrttrrrgtir+nyi,14 rti
/ 11 \ 1 11 1 . ,trn'I+Iglt't,++rhl r,+tt t l l l , ..
J I ? / , /?, / I// J It?rn??hll??,?+i+t?tiltt,"•,+II? ?, ?`?.?.,',,;+rr/
11 r -4 V/I I Jf/ rrn t+t'tl -r. t114r
rru;+ 1.9 11-
mill
aryl t+, t aq , , ,r? rrr
' art ,,,,_ r r +n
rjj
i,''?i''r nix
1I ?"? /, l I/? ? tt t ? 1 , /I A ,'
1 1/ ill I' f„?,, t o u+ a s `.? ,'?.. •./.
111 Ill?t\11'11, J" it //(?if//r
',i iiiit'vv', ?t`t+ttt°\'t1at ??`1~-` ?•, ry%'f ? ? ?
(( j1 t l(/ D / (! / ,r?Iir'rr II't„ty{ t a```' S%ii +frh'
'
/ t 11 Il Itl?? 1 ( /1(/ ?'?I i' ?y'
IN i J I J I\ t I r a,tnd,'At ler
r ,) / ? I ( C I! ? ` 'iI„n I'uN+t,•' ..? -- -"-a??:;;:"`• rr,9r,
i r 1 1!111 `1 fj t ?y
?j !??Ilf 111/tlf ( Irrririrl,rl?t?t? _ „ c
I
/_ ? l i ?/7J? ?„1-.. '` \\\ ?' - ?•` ,??? '?i?'/? .,sue - -
Mti F
.1
Nis
r 1, er
rhi
,` i I1 i
r ,
l i t jtjtl+? i l l
I 'N
tr
ar
rr?
rr
rr?
,r
it ,, ,, I ,
I I,+a(
nw u,
to Ni'
`f
t
r t+i 111
I--,
?\1111i?' _'/J1 A ?. .?? ? At?l ?t `, ?? `-? ??.? 1. „?j t'//•
It'll
to I I,
41,
/? A"?i / ?? ?? / ( tT1 r Fp rn \ fty 1/
m rte" ?'(( / -1 / 'uP
7f ( - / / > it
\ \ I _' / (t
r
i r` (A
IT I
_...IIn
11,-,
.rxl ?, rl

,

\
'? ?
l t \?
t \
,
I I
1
+1} t? / t
? 3 .• r I ( f
} l
t E?( U

\
? I 1 t 1
1 t
L
irity?t 1 \ ? I'
I , / !

j, t \ t,
i

tt 4'\ ` ?? f l f
r
,

p'y
k3 N5 N

i ?\`` ''? \ t\t ttlt 1i
r
l
I \ 1 } .1
? ll
? ?tl
',,? 1
/ (?
/ J/ l 1 IV?
/ / 11 III t
11 ? , -?V tj?l t !
Cn Vn
\ 11\
? t
I'
t!
r,
t
4i\\;1114/jtit
, tl V11t1ttt%1\1t1
-,i ll
I 19lCtlt t1t
-r ! /// t\l\\lt
1 t (fit' l?\\
f 1 \ \\t ?
t
6°!1 tg I ill. J `?- 1
°
r ? ? ? f` +t ?+,11tt
I?t1t i1 /it t ll j\\, t\t
\ \t\ \'t /?JI r r c It
\ I
NRaec'r No. IBC-8030
® SILVER LANDING PROJECT J1 THE JOHN R. McADAMS
ISCO8030-PO STEELE CREEK ROAD L COMPANY, INC.
tZI SCALRr CHAF2I,0M, NORTH CAROLINA ENGINEERS/PLANNERS/SURVEYORS
8701 CARMEL ROAD, SUITE 205
PATH: 05-11-2009 PHASE 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS (70627-O OORTR CAROLINA 28226

BYRUM - STEELE CREEK (SILVERLANDING) `
ydahr• 1r $
JURISDICTIONAL WATERS OF THE U.S.
(STREAM DESCRIPTIONS)N
SAC •'?y ? I
1-21-09 (UPDATED 03-02-09)
APPROXIMATE MAP - WATERS OF THE U.S
• x ..I
*FOR SURVEY AND STUDY PURPOSES ONLY ar x °:"'v
SUBJECT TO U.S.A-C.E. VERIFICATION
vu.
17
I
i
Y1-11&Z1(a-b)-12:
APPROXIMATE WETLAND
BOUNDARY IN DRAINED
POND BED - SUBJECT TO
ADJUSTMENTS DURING THE
? l',
GROWING SEASON
X1- 3: RPW (UNIMP. INT. STREAM}
S
soft F- THROUGH DAM BREACH
n , BAC1- 4: WETLAND ;: •Fi ??
FC1- 10: RPW (IMP. INT. STREAM) '•
C1- 5: LINEAR WETLAND NICK POINT, CONTINUOUS
'4 s # BED/ BANKS. BED SORTED
D1- 6: WETLAND RC1-4: RPW (EPHEMERAL TO UNIMP. INT. STREAM) 1
STREAM HAS DISCONTINUOUS OHWL AND IS
UNDERGROUND AT POINTS
BK1- 3:
LINEAR
WETLAND E_ UC1-16: RPW (UNIMP. INT. STREAM)
STREAM RE-EMERGES AT A NICK
POINT
AF1- 30: RPW
(PERENNIAL STREAM) - NON-JURISDICTIONAL SWALE r
CONTINUES OFFSITE NO BED OR BANKS
E1- 2: WETLAND POCKET
-lot ZC1-12: RPW (UNIMP. INT. STREAM)
STREAM RE-EMERGES FROM A NICK POINT
i
F1-4: WETLAND POCKET f
XC1- 31: RPW (IMP. INT. TO PER. STREAM) - CONTINUES OFFSITE it
• STREAM BECOMES PERENNIAL
I
i
nx 1 F - x Ir!
AF1(a - q) (PERENNIAL STREAM) -CONTINUES OFFSITE is
Au
._ Mfr F4
LEONARD S. RINDNER, PWS
Environmental Planning Consultant 3714 Spokeshave Lane
Professional Wetland Scientist Matthews, NC 28105
Land Planning Tele: [phone]
Fax [phone]
May 11, 2009
Mr. Steve Chapin
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers - Reg. Field Office
151 Patton Avenue - Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801 - 5006
Re: Silverlandine (Byrum-Steele Creek), Charlotte, Mecklenbure County , NC

Dear Mr. Chapin:
On behalf of my client, I am requesting written confirmation of the wetla nd/stream determination and
delineation for the subject property.
Project Name: Silverlanding
Acreage: +/-40 Acres
City/County: Mecklenburg County
Long/Lat: 035.18887180 N 080.9581287° W
Developer: Davidland, LLC
6707-C Fairview Rd
Charlotte, NC 28210-3354
Contact: Leonard S. Rindner, PWS
General Wetland Classification and Description
The site is located at the corner Byrum Road and Steele Creek Road (Hwy 160) and is located in the Upper
Catawba River Basin. The site contains wetlands and relatively permanent waters. The current land-use is
former abandoned agricultural and woodland. The wetland areas can be classified as Palustrine Broad
Leaved, Scrub Shrub and Emergent (PFOIA, PFO1C, PSS1A, PEMIC).
As a reminder, we me at the site on September 11, 2007.
Please contact me if you have any questions or require additional explanation. Thank you for your
consideration,,.
Sincerely,
s
eonard S. Rindner, PWS
Professional Wetland Scientist
L/'

Corps Submittal Cover Sheet
Please provide the following info:
1. Project Name SILVERLANDING (BYRUM-STEELE CREEK)
2. Naive of Property Owner/Applicant: Davidland, LLC, 6707-C, Fairview Rd, Charlotte, NC 28210-3354
3. Name of Consultant/Agent: Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC
*Agent authorization needs to be attached.
4. Related/Previous Action ID number(s):
5. Site Address: Corner of Byrum Road and Steele Creek Road (Hwy 160) p
6. Subdivision Name:
7. City:
8. County: Mecklenburg
9. Lat: 035.1888718° N Long: 080.9581287° W
10. Quadrangle Name: CHARLOTTE WEST
11. Waterway:
12. Watershed: HUC:03050103
13. Requested Action:
? Nationwide Permit # 39
General Permit #
? Jurisdictional Determination Request
_ Pre-Application Request
The following information will be completed by Corps office:
AID:
Prepare File Folder Assign number in ORM
Authorization: Section 10
Project Description/ Nature of Activity/ Project Purpose:
Section 404
ecimal Degrees Please )
Begin Date
Site/Waters Name:
Keywords:
- _-0.9 6 66 °W?--_--- - j1_1 P1 33 °W .9 0 00 °W

Z r
1i,

,
4` ii
I i

Z

_r .
4-

I k* I v''i L r I' 1

fi ? ? +I b E
,t „1 5
r---_ !L
,r ; , , i :s yip '1?1i ? ? yii f
'?
?? "+ ?; ri,;,? r
-T
f
•
?
a
?i.f"",?°';Jy'.• ;Woe
_, --
Y
••

f •? try
? -- ? iii r ! ! R II
?
'` t
_
TM?

1 5
;'l r
1 '-^/ /"` ? I ? ,? ' ! 1"! ? ? t ?? ?'?`"7? 'Ii14 •.-: .. -_ 5ti ? i r? I s'`?'aa
(D
! ..- •
4 1
a (0

'
a
.. ?., 43 4 J r ^
,
r/fear
! ,
A
to
I
t
' „""..?,.
i%`j'1`f
1f
.' I 1'
• ''
44 --
i
p
?
?
i
". Mlc,?

i 1
,
a+.
„

- t
f t
?? 9 ? ? ?L+ . ?1: •a-.+r..."..•^?a ? ., . ?_•.dy._+ ,'??..?? .... ,.,?` r r y'i r ? f 4y f,
q? ?ti "l: t F. w4.e? ?,yh.?; f .. f M j`" i'?..,I •,- Z

_
r
? f-"/ Y.e. ..,? ? R } ?. .. •?{ -°i. .+? ?.I ?k f.? i ?. ^?? ,,°'.'!'k4q„r?.,.W SS .)?
Ilk A
1
e K b

-_
?.,e.e?? %
'a
'F 1f
`? '?
°`
?
F.
6? yf,?
4 ? L,?
i i .• I ?...- I
I
7.. ?
• J

.,
"*? vw t
}
y
f
4
s yk
1 nW l' w M1a `? ?+ ?
7°W
_ P 4
'
i
0.96 66° 0.98 33° 8.90 00° -
Name: CHARLOTTE WEST Location: 035.1888718° N 080.9581287° W SILVERLANDING (BYRUM-STEELE
Date: 5/11/2009 CREEK)
Scale: 1 inch equals 1000 feet HUC: 03050101
APPROXIMATE SITE LOCATION
Copyright (C) 1997, Maptech, Inc.
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION 1: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD): 05-11-09
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
ASHEVILLE REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
Applicant:
Davidland, LLC
6707-C Fairview Rd
Charlotte, NC 28210-3354
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Silverlanding (Byrum-Steele Creek)
State:NC County/parish/borough: Mecklenburg City:
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 035.1888718° N, Long. 080.9581287° W.
Universal Transverse Mercator: 17
Name of nearest waterbody: Coffey Creek (east of Steele Creek Road) & Beaverdam Creek (west of Steele Creek Road)
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) Into which the aquatic resource flows: Sugar Creek (east of Steele Creek Road) &
Catabwa River - Lake Wylie (west side of Steele Creek)
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): 03050103
® Check if map/diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is/are available upon request.
? Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc...) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
? Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
® Field Determination. Date(s): 03-02-09
SECTION 11: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Pick List "navigable waters of the U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [Required]
? Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
? Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are "waters of the U.S." within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required]
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply):
? TNWs, including territorial seas
? Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
® Relatively permanent waters' (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
? Non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
® Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
® Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
? Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
? Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
? Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
1 Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section 111 below.
For purposes ofthis form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year-round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e.g., typically 3 months).
Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non-wetland waters: 13501inear feet: 4width (ft) and/or acres.
Wetlands: 0.317 acres.
Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: 1987 Delineation Manual
Elevation of established OHWM (if known):
Non-regulated waters/wetlands (check if applicable):;
? Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain:
' Supporting documentation is presented in Section 11 I.F.
SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section III.A.1 and Section IILD.1. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections IILA.1 and 2
and Section III.D.I.; otherwise, see Section III.B below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW:
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
2. Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent":
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanoshave been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non-navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year-round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year-round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section III.D.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody4 is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section II1.B.1 for
the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section III.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III.C below.
1. Characteristics of non-TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: square miles = 1370
Drainage area: 85 acres
Average annual rainfall: 44 inches
Average annual snowfall: 4 inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
? Tributary flows directly into TNW.
® Tributary flows through 2 tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are Pick List river miles from TNW.
Project waters are 2-5 river miles from RPW.
Project waters are 2-5 aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are I (or less) aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
Identify flow route to TNWS: West side of Steele Creek Road - unnamed RPW to Beaverdam Creek to Catawba River;
East side of Steele Creek Road - unnamed RPW to Coffey Creek to Sugar Creek.
Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the and
West.
s Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.
Tributary stream order, if known: 1 st.
(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apply):
Tributary is: ® Natural
? Artificial (man-made). Explain:
? Manipulated (man-altered). Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: 4 feet
Average depth: 3 feet
Average side slopes: 2:1.
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
® Silts ® Sands ? Concrete
® Cobbles ® Gravel ? Muck
® Bedrock ? Vegetation. Type/% cover:
? Other. Explain:
Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain: Tributary is stabile.
Presence of run/riffle/pool complexes. Explain: Some riffles exist in stream AF.
Tributary geometry: Meandering
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): 1 %
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for: Seasonal flow
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year: 6-10
Describe flow regime:
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is: Discrete and confined. Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Unknown. Explain findings:
? Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
® Bed and banks
® OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply):
® clear, natural line impressed on the bank ?
® changes in the character of soil
? shelving ?
® vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
? leaf litter disturbed or washed away
® sediment deposition
? water staining ?
? other (list):
? Discontinuous OHWM.7 Explain:
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determ
High Tide Line indicated by:
? oil or scum line along shore objects
? fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore)
? physical markings/characteristics
? tidal gauges
? other (list):
the presence of litter and debris
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
the presence of wrack line
sediment sorting
scour
multiple observed or predicted flow events
abrupt change in plant community
me lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply)
Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
? survey to available datum;
? physical markings;
? vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types.
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain: Water color is clear.
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
'A natural or man-made discontinuity in the OH W M does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OH WM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OH WM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
'Ibid.
(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
® Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width): All the streams have an intact and wide (100'+) forested buffer.
® Wetland fringe. Characteristics: Some wetland seeps exist along the streams.
? Habitat for:
? Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
? Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
? Other environmentally-sensitive species. Explain findings:
® Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings: A few small fish were observed in stream AF, otherwise amphibians
were observed.
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non-TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size:0.314acres
Wetland type. Explain:Drained pond wetland and wetland seeps adjacent to streams.
Wetland quality. Explain:
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non-TNW:
Flow is: Intermittent flow. Explain:
Surface flow is: Discrete and confined
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Unknown. Explain findings:
? Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non-TNW:
® Directly abutting
? Not directly abutting
? Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain
? Ecological connection. Explain:
? Separated by berm/barrier. Explain:
(d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are 2-5 river miles from TNW.
Project waters are 2-5 aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is from: Wetland to navigable waters.
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the Pick List floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain: Water color is clear.
Identify specific pollutants, if known: None known.
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
® Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width):The riparian buffer is intact and wide (100'+).
® Vegetation type/percent cover. Explain: 100%.
® Habitat for:
? Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
? Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
? Other environmentally-sensitive species. Explain findings:
® Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings:Amphibians were observed as well as crayfish.
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis: 9
Approximately ( 0.317 ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.
For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres)
Y/Z: (Y) 0.28
BAC: (Y) 0.005
C: (Y) 0.001
D: (N) 0.02
E: (Y) 0.004
F: (N) 0.002
BK:(Y) 0.001
A: (Y) 0.002
B: (Y) 0.002
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed: The drained pond wetland originates
from a groundwater seep that contributes water to the streams downslope. Wetland A/B is a headwater wetland. All other wetlands
are seeps that contribute water to the streams, except for wetlands D & F, which are small ponded wetlands adjacent to the stream.
All of the wetlands provide habitat for wildlife use and support wetland and facultative vegetation.
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
1. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section 111.1):
2. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non-RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section 111.13:
3. Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section 111.1): Wetlands D and F are separated from the RPW by a sandy berm. A groundwater connection is likely between
wetland F and the adjacent RPW. A groundwater and overland flow connection is likely between wetland D and the adjacent RPW.
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
TN Ws and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
? TNWs: linear feet width (ft), Or, acres.
? Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year-round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial: See attached NCDENR worksheets.
® Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally: See attached NCDENR worksheets.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
® Tributary waters: 1350 linear feet width (ft).
? Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Non-RPWss that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
? Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
? Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
? Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
® Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year-round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW: The wetlands physically drain into the adjacent RPW.
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III.B and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW: The wetlands physically drain into the adjacent RPW.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: 0.295acres.
Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: 0.022acres.
Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
7. Impoundments of jurisdictional waters.'
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
? Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1-6), or
? Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA-STATES WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):"
"See Footnote # 3.
To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III.D.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
? which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
? from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
? which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
? Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
? Other factors. Explain:
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
? Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
? Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
? Wetlands: acres.
F. NON-JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
? If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
? Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
? Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
? Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain:
? Other: (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non-jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
? Non-wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft).
? Lakes/ponds: acres.
? Other non-wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
? Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non-jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
? Non-wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft).
? Lakes/ponds: acres.
? Other non-wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
? Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
? Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
? Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
? Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
? Corps navigable waters' study:
? U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
? USGS NHD data.
? USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:Charlotte West 1:24,000.
® USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL: http://websoiIsurvey.nres.usda.gov.
? National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
? State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
? FEMA/FIRM maps:
? 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos.
® Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date): Mecklenburg County GIS 2007.
or ? Other (Name & Date):
? Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
? Applicable/supporting case law:
? Applicable/supporting scientific literature:
? Other information (please specify):
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:

BYRUM - STEELE CREEK (SILVER LANDING)
I
I.

?yyy ?
}?

JURISDICTIONAL WATERS OF THE U.S. Y' ' '" r f
I
g
\•??
? CI
?
1-21-09 (UPDATED 03-02-09)
h
APPROXIMATE MAP - WATERS OF THE U.S w , . "? •v

*FOR SURVEY AND STUDY PURPOSES ONLY ~ -
'

SUBJECT TO U.S.A.C.E. VERIFICATION Y x#
y{
g IKt
1
j 1
XLYM

J y n _

ti J

e R ', A an'"i II
n
7
8
i ?

I

Y1-11&Z1 (a-b)-12: i
p APPROXIMATE WETLAND
. _.

o v4> BOUNDARY IN DRAINED

r
}
POND BED - SUBJECT TO /
ADJUSTMENTS DURING THE -??
GROWING SEASON

ryfv ,Dry

}
AM
X1- 3: RPW UNIMR INT. STRE
DAM BREACH

BAC1- 4: WETLAND rr N

< ;G FC1-10: RPW (IMP. INT. STREAM)
C1- 5: LINEAR WETLAND +

D1- 6: WETLAND RC1- 4: RPW (EPHEMERAL TO
UNIMP. INT. STREAM) j
BK1-3: U

E- LINEAR I
9 ' f
WETLAND - UCl -16: RPW (UNIMP. INT. STREAM) '

AFl - 30: RPW I
(PERENNIAL STREAM) -
CONTINUES OFFSITE NON-JURISDICTIONAL SWALE

.. E1- 2: WETLAND POCKET f
Ise I
r hn?y,J? I'_
ZC1-12: RPW
(UNIMP. INT. STREAM)
4 F1-4: WETLAND POCKET
MIq, q q ,
XC1.31: RPW (IMP. ..
>.. INT. TO PER. STREAM) -
CONTINUES OFFSITE
?p NOTE: AREAS IMPACTED/DISTURBED
' Y " -• n$ BY GEOTECHNICAL STUDY:
WETLAND C1- 5
AF1(a - q) (PERENNIAL STREAM) -CONTINUES OFFSITE WETLAND D1 - 6
o RPW ZC @ FLAGS 11- 12
-- e.
`r a
Il M
SO
N
? N
Ol
f? f0
Q-
2
Ui3
L Q
r0
Om
z Y
TW
« W
c
00
0w
LMLU
O W
C W
00
T
i I
t?
U
is oD
a
zQ
N
7
ow
NO
Z>
3w
co
O Q.
CO 0
00
c
O
Z
m
v
w Z
U O
co
7O c
Q )O
N +.
i2
?c
ZU
:.a
?1?
c
E _
U?
s0
0
ZY
w
c Ir
'o U
0w
J
Tw
.w
C
m ?
Y
vg
dD
6
a
m o

m
C
O
N N d
°
° ?9
v W N
N=o
-E°

O N
V ?
'

Z m

' m

C ?
C

N .
O
w o m N 0 5 °, E

Z 7 m c
j C=
O V N
U m
U O m E
lo O -a O

O m) E
° m m C
Z? (n
U
O OJ m p N
•L .L '•
mE co m Z Z Z p .. U E N
Q W> cc ,q Q C O 3?
G
?/ n 3 °
N m
o m O Z
vl
m O
° >. d
f0 C N N C
p N Q N
'o
LL
O 3: cmi

° a
3 d w
3 E U m
rn?
o
m y a y

LL. m
v"
wQ °
0
yQN ;
oo ?ro
QC o
a E? and
m0 E
z
Z
m tm m
L g
~
d
o
N
d
m 0 m ° m
°
E
CL a
c

C
m
=
w
?
?
°?

o
?'
>

w
3

t
o a a
Q m e
O
E
J
m
m y
N
L?NC N
'r

n>
C N
Z? of
E
E
>
w _
c
i
m
w
o.? °
N C

N N m . f N
N m E .2'o 0
o "

N m (n

M Cf) 2

7 c Q

N 2 (a

N o
d
a m V
C
w
d N
' c
0 °
o? >> w °
r °? Z
c ?
m E
C
c 10
O -v
!5? °
a m
N>
d
- Z

m a
o a a) m
m E m E
O> Co E r°n?i0 Hw c°nco H o o
m (n
_
p
p.

C
?-

go c
m
U
'a
m m

=

??

R

>

cn

0

O
Q
2°
a
(y ,
t N °
N m
p? @
@
m
Mj u
y
t_
7 r (7 U) z U D C5 ii ap Iii O
0
W
g 41" W ,
4 4 a '?

t +
p yt

r
/
V
LU
CL
$
F-
J
a --=
Q s

U)
0
m
d
4_1
0
4 0
m C N
1!
CL '?
0 3
LL S^ Q g?11
8 U
°
a ?
a ?,
w v
> >
- p

?7 m

t
/L1 N

o
U/ 7
C

c?j ?
>N
c
U/ Oa
'rOj
U
V
d
m
C
d
>
? 2 CL
Wj, m !n co O
v o o
j y m V - C

a -
o
?°n c m m o
U U
0 (9 C
a
aof
cn
WO
(0 in V) 0 co w

G
o a
?
® x 4

x

?C

r

r

>

+

I?I 4 at 111 q

N M
So
N N
In y
m
d
a?
Z
o ?
N p
a
N
'
o CL
CO O
U
m
c
0
Z
W
U
w Z
w
2 ya
0
y C
O
d ?
w
o w
m 0
Z U
r,
Jl
Soil Map-Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Map Unit Legend
BYRUM - STEELE CREEK ROAD
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina (NC119)
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
CeB2 Cecil sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 61.0 62.0%
percent slopes, eroded
CeD2 Cecil sandy clay loam, 8 to 15 28.3 28.8%
percent slopes, eroded
MO Monacan loam 4.3 4.4%
PaE Pacolet sandy loam, 15 to 25 4.8 4.9%
percent slopes
Totals for Area of Interest (AOI) 98.4 100.0%
Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 2.0 7/15/2007
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Byrum - Steele Creek Date: 10-11-07
Applicant/Owner: Davidland, LLC, 6707-C, Fairview Rd, Charlotte, NC 28210-3354 County: Mecklenburg
Investigator: Todd Warren and Nick Nelson State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances Exist on the site? ? Yes No Community ID : Wetland:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No ? Transect ID: Y/z
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No ? Plot ID:
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
i Juncus effusus Herb FACW+ g
2.Leersla oryzoides Herb OBL 10
3. 11.
4. 12-
5. 13.
& 14.
7. 15.
g. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
(excluding FAC-). 100°
Remarks:
The wetland contains only herbaceous material at this time.
HYDROLOGY
? Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland hydrology Indicators:
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
? Aerial Photographs Inundated
Other Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_ No Recorded Data Available Water Marks
Drift Lines

Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: ? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: 0-3 (in.) ? Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12"
Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 0 (in.) Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: 0 (in.) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase). PaE, Pacolet sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes Drainage Class: Well Drained
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? /Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture. Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell_Mgist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-5 A 10YR 4/1 10YR 6/8 30% SANDY LOAM
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol v( Concretions
_
_ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surfa ce Layer Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_
Aquic Moisture Regime _ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
_ Reducing Conditions _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors - Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Soil boring collapsed due to Inundated conditions.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ?Yes
Wetland Hydrology Present? ? Yes
Hydric Soils Present? ?Yes
Remarks:
No (Circle) (Circle)
No
No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? /Yes No
Approved by HOUSACE 3192
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Byrum - Steele Creek Date: 10-11-07
Applicant/Owner: Davidland, LLC, 6707-C, Fairview Rd, Charlotte, NC 28210-3354 County: Mecklenburg
Investigator: Todd Warren and Nick Nelson State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances Exist on the site? ? Yes No Community ID : Wetlands:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No ? Transect ID: C,D,E,F (SIMILAR)
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No ? Plot ID:
11
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Nyssa sylvatica TREE FAC 9
2.Acerrubrum Tree FAC Ip,
3. Fraxinus pennsylvanica Tree FACW 11.
4 Ligustrum spp. Shrub NI 12.
5 Sambucus nigra (canadensis) Shrub FACW- 13.
g. Microstegium vimineum Herb FAC+ 14
7 Lycopus virginicus Herb OBL '15.
F3 Phyllostachys spp. Herb/Shrub NI 16,
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
(excluding FAC-). 100%
Remarks:
L_
11
HYDROLOGY
? Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland hydrology Indicators:
Stream. Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
? Aerial Photographs Inundated
Other 1 Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_ No Recorded Data Available Water Marks
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: ? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: NONE (in.) ? Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12"
Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: NONE (in.) Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: 10 (in.) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): PaE, Pacolet sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes Drainage Class: Well Drained
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Fine, kaolinitic, thermic Typic Kanhapludults Confirm Mapped Type? /Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture. Concretion s,
inches Horizon (Munsell_Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-6 A 10YR 6/1 10YR 6/8 30% SANDY LOAM
6-12 B 10YR 6/4 10YR 6/8 10% SANDY CLAY LOAM
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
_
_ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surfa ce Layer Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Aquic Moisture Regime _ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
_ Reducing Conditions _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
_ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? q/Yes No (Circle) I (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Present? ?/ Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? iYes No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? /Yes No
Remarks:
HOUSACE 3!92
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form
Date: 3-2-09
Evaluator: Tcdd Warrer;Nick Ne1sc)r
Total Points: 22.00
Stream is at least intermittent
if z 19 or perennial if z 30
Project: Silverlanding (Byrum-Steele Creek) Latitude: 035.1888718° N
Site:
County: Mecklenburg
Lonq.: 080.9581287° W
Quad: CHARLOTTE
WEST
Feature label: X
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 11.50 Absent = 0 Weak = 1 Moderate = 2 Strong _ 3
1 a. Continuous bed and bank 2
2. Sinuosity
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 1
5. Active/relic floodplain 1
6. Depositional bars or benches 1
7. Braided channel 0
8. Recent alluvial deposits 1
9a Natural levees 1
10. Headcuts 1
Absent 0 Wink =IDS Moderate = 1 Strong 1.5
11. Grade controls 1
12. Natural valley or draina ewa 1.5
No zi 67 Yes 3
13. Second or greater order channel on existing USGS or
NRCS map or other documented evidence. 0
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 6.00 Absent = 0 Weak = 1 Moderate = 2 Strong = 3
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 2
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or Water in
channel -- dry or growing season 1
5 : .4 iva = 0:v Strong=10
16. Leaflitter 0.5
limA v!?ek=f0,5 Moderate =1 ;
.
St _-:1
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 5
No = 0, Yeses .3
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present?
1.5
C. Biology Subtotal = 4.50 ASBrt= 3 k=2 Moderate = 1 Strong = 0
20b. Fibrous roots in channel 1
21 b. Rooted plants in channel 1
Absent = 0 Weak =`0 5 Moderate = I Strong = 1.
22. Crayfish 1
24. Fish 0
25. Amphibians 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fun us. 0
13 1 4terarte = Strong 3
_
23. Bivalves 0
27. Filamentous algae; periph ton 0
tt ;r3 _. 11.66 . . ,` SA =_2:0 {)ther = D'
29b. Wetland plants in streambed 0
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form
Date: 3-2-09
Evaluator:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
if ? 19 or perennial if > 30
26.00
Project: Silverianding (Byrum-Steele Creek) Latitude: 035.1888718° N
Lonq.: 080.9581287° W
Site:
County: Mecklenburg
Quad: CHARLOTTE
WEST
Feature label: FC
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 15.50 Absent = 0 Weak = 1 Moderate = 2 Strong = 3
1a. Continuous bed and bank 3
2. Sinuosity 2
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 2
5. Active/relic floodplain 1
6. Depositional bars or benches 1
7. Braided channel 0
8. Recent alluvial deposits 1
9a Natural levees 1
10. Headcuts 2
Absent = 0 Weak = 0.5 Moderate = 1- Strong 1.5
11. Grade controls 1
12. Natural valley or draina ewa 1.5
l
i
ti
USGS
h No = 0 Yes = 3
or
on ex
ng
anne
s
13. Second or greater order c
NRCS map or other documented evidence. 0

B. Hydrology subtotal = 6.00 Absent = 0 Weak =1 Moderate = 2 Strong = 3
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 2
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or Water in
channel -- dry or growing season 1
Absent = 1.5 Weak =`1 Moderate 0.5 `Strong ='0
16. Leaflitter 0.5
Absent = 0 Weak = 0.5 Moderate =1 Strong =1.
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0.5
No = 0'`- Yes = 1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? 1.5
C. Biology Subtotal = 4.50 Absent= 3 Weak = 2 Moderate = 1 Strong = 0
20b. Fibrous roots in channel 1
21 b. Rooted plants in channel 1
Absent = 0 Weak = `0.5 Moderate = 1 ' Stron =1
22. Crayfish 1
24. Fish 0
25. Amphibians 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus . 0
Absent = 0 Weak ='1 Moderate = 2 Strong = 3
23. Bivalves 0
27. Filamentous algae-, periph ton 0
FAC = 0.5 FACW = 0.75 OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0 Other = 0
29b. Wetland plants in streambed 0
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form
Date: 3-2-09
Evaluator: Todd Warren/Nick Nelson
Total Points: 18.00
Stream is at least intermittent
if z 19 or perennial if z 30
Project: Silverlanding (Byrum-Steele Creek) Latitude: 035.1888718° N
Site:
Long.'. 080.9581287° W
County: Mecklenburg
Quad: CHARLOTTE
WEST
Feature label: RC
A. Geomorphology ] Subtotal= 8.50 Absent = 0 Weak = 1 Moderate = 2 Strong = 3
1a. Continuous bed and bank 1
2. Sinuosity 1
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0
5. Active/relic floodplain 1
6. Depositional bars or benches 0
7. Braided channel 1
8. Recent alluvial deposits 1
9a Natural levees 0
10. Headcuts 1
Absent =V Weak = 0.5 Moderate =1 Strong = 1.5
11. Grade controls 1
12. Natural valley or drains ewa 1.5
NO 0 Yes = 3
13. Second or greater order channel on existing USGS or
NRCS map or other documented evidence. 0
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 5.00 Absent = 0 Weak = 1 Moderate = 2 Strong =3
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 1
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or Water in
channel -- dry or growing season 1
'Absent ,= 1.5 . Weak = 1' Moderatb - 0.5 Strong = 0"
16. Leaflitter 0.5
'=; sox!t = 0 ;,Wool ak = 0.5 Modet-ats- 1, Strong 1.5
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 5
No - 0 ? Yes'" -5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? 1.5
"vow
C. Biology Subtotal = 4.50 Absent = 3 Weak = 2 Moderate = 1 Strong = 0
20b. Fibrous roots in channel 1
21b. Rooted plants in channel 1
Absent = 0 ' Weak = 0.5 Moderate = 1 Strong =1.5
22. Crayfish 1
24. Fish 0
25. Amphibians 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fun us. 0
Absent , 0 : . Weak = 1 Moderate = Z Stron =3
23. Bivalves 0
27. Filamentous algae; periph ton 0
MC = D.5 FAtW = 0.75 ' OSL:?` 1.5 , SAV = 2:$ 1- Lather = 0
29b. Wetland plants in streambed 0
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form
Date: 3-2-09
Evaluator: Tr•dd. Warre11 Nick Na18oIl
Project: Silverlanding (Byrum-Steele Creek) Latitude: 035.1888718° N
Site:
Long.: 080.9581287° W
Total Points: 22.00
Stream is at least intermittent
if z 19 or perennial if z 30
County: Mecklenburg
Quad: CHARLOTTE
WEST
Feature label: UC, ZC
A. Geomorphology ___] Subtotal= 11.50 Absent = 0 Weak= 1 Moderate = 2 Strong = 3
1a. Continuous bed and bank 2
2. Sinuosity
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting
5. Active/relic floodplain 1
6. Depositional bars or benches 1
7. Braided channel 0
8. Recent alluvial deposits 1
9a Natural levees 1
10. Headcuts 1
Absent= 0 Weak = 0.5 'Moderate = 1 Stron .
11. Grade controls 1
12. Natural valley or draina ewa 1.5
h
l
i
i
USGS No =0 Yes = 3
ng
or
anne
on ex
st
13. Second or greater order c
NRCS map or other documented evidence. 0
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 6.00 Absent _ Q Weak = 1 Moderate = 2 Strong = 3
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 2
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or Water in
channel -- dry or growing season 1
sG ?;? .z« eak -.- Moderate? 101 Strom - 0
16. Leaflitter 0.5
}si??t = 0 Al "k ' 0.5 Moderate = 1 ` Strong- 1.
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0.5
,yr111Q= ? 'Mies ="7:5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present?
1.5
C. Biology Subtotal = 4.50 Absent = 3 Weak = 2 Moderate = 1 Strong = 0
20b. Fibrous roots in channel 1
21 b. Rooted plants in channel 1
Absent =V Weak = 0.5 Moderate = 1 Strong 1.5
22. Crayfish 1
24. Fish 0
25. Amphibians 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fun us. 0
::'1ri .. :• ll?ea ._ ` ..Moderate ,,'2 ti . = 3
23. Bivalves 0
27. Filamentous algae; periph ton 0
fAG = `O:S FACW = :T5; OBL =1.5 - "SAV = 2.0 ' . Other = 0
29b. Wetland plants in streambed 0
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification corm
Date: 3-2-09
Evaluator: Todd Warren/Nick Nelson
Total Points: 29.50
Stream is at least intermittent
if ? 19 or perennial if ? 30
Project: Silverlanding (Byrum-Steele Creek) Latitude: 035.1888718° N
Site:
County: Mecklenburg
Long.: 080.9581287° W
Quad: CHARLOTTE
WEST
Feature label: XC

A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 17.50 Absent = 0 Weak = 1 Moderate = 2 Strong = 3
1a. Continuous bed and bank 3
2. Sinuosity 2
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 2
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 2
5. Active/relic floodplain 1
6. Depositional bars or benches 1
7. Braided channel 0
8. Recent alluvial deposits 1
9a Natural levees 1
10. Headcuts 2
Absent = 0 Weak = 0.5 Moderate = 1 ` Strong 1.5
11. Grade controls 1
12. Natural valley or draina ewa 1.5
No = 0 Yes = 3
13. Second or greater order channel on existing USGS or
NRCS map or other documented evidence. 0
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 7.50 Absent= 0 Weak =1 Moderate = 2 Strong = 3
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 2
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or Water in
channel -- dry or growing season 2
Absent =1.5 Weak = 1 Moderate = 0.5 Strong 0
16. Leaflitter 1
Absent = 0 Weak = 0.5 Moderate = 1 ` Strong = 1.
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0.5
No=O Yes=1..5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? I : L- 1.5
C. Biology Subtotal = 4.50 Absent = 3 Weak = 2 Moderate=1 Strong = 0
20b. Fibrous roots in channel 1
21b. Rooted plants in channel 1
Absent ='0 Weak = 0.5 Moderate =1 Strong `=1.5
22. Crayfish
1
24. Fish 0
25. Amphibians 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0
Absent = 0 Weak = 1 Moderate = 2 Strong =3
23. Bivalves 0
27. Filamentous algae; periph ton 0
FAG ='0.5 'FACW = 0.75 ` OBL =1.5 SAV = 2.0 Other = 0
29b. Wetland plants in streambed 0
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form
Date: 3-2-09
Evaluator: Todd Warren/Nick Nelson
Total Points: 34.50
Stream is at least intermittent
if z 19 or perennial if ? 30
Project: Silverlanding (Byrum-Steele Creek) Latitude: 035.1888718° N
Site:
County: Mecklenburg
Lon .. 080.9581287° W
Quad: CHARLOTTE
WEST
Feature label: AF

A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 21.00 Absent = 0 Weak =1 Moderate = 2 Strong = 3
1a. Continuous bed and bank 3
2. Sinuosity 2
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 2
5. Active/relic floodplain 1
6. Depositional bars or benches 2
7. Braided channel 0
8. Recent alluvial deposits 1
9a Natural levees 2
10. Headcuts 2
Absent = 0 Weak- 0.5 Moderate =1 Strong =1.5
11. Grade controls 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainagewa 1.5
No = 0= Yes = 3
13. Second or greater order channel on existing USGS or
NRCS map or other documented evidence. 0
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 8.50 Absent = 0 Weak =1 Moderate = 2 Strong = 3
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 2
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or Water in
channel -- dry or growing season 3
Absent =1.5 Weak =1 Moderate = 0.5 Strong = 0
16. Leaflitter 1
Absent = 0 Weak = 0.5 Moderate =1 Strong =1.5
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0.5
No = 0 Yes =1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present?
1.5

C. Biology Subtotal = 5.00 Absent = 3 Weak = 2 Moderate = 1 Strong = 0
20b. Fibrous roots in channel 1
21b. Rooted plants in channel 1
Absent= 0 Weak = 0.5 Moderate = 1 Strong =1.5
22. Crayfish 1
24. Fish 0.5
25. Amphibians 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0
Absent = 0 Weak =1 Moderate = 2 Strong 3
23. Bivalves 0
27. Filamentous algae; periph ton 0
FAC = 0.5 FACW = 0.75 OBL =1 5 SAV = 2.0 Other= O
29b. Wetland plants in streambed 0
APPROXIMATE MAP - WATERS OF THE U.S
*FOR SURVEY AND STUDY PURPOSES ONLY
SUBJECTTO U.S.A.C.E. VERIFICATION
SILVERLANDING
JURISDICTIONAL WATERS OF THE U.S.
1-31-08 (UPDATE 12-18-08)
00(l)
SO
N -
M N
OI
? 10
a
m
C_
O
m
U
L
0
Z a
C O
OZ
Ug
21
,w
.0
C J
N.
U?
d
CL
m
2
0
co
N
7
O (n
NO
a?
N
?L >
U?
oa
Cl) O
-00
mU
m
c
O
.m
z
0
O
U )
7
O o O CC
m?
L
? C
ZQ ZU

m
ec
m
0
t
0
O
Z is
L Z
?O
?g
ED w
aW
c>
O J
m
6 N
CL

O °
co O)

_C
O

ul a) D. m

m
a)
? L

O O
E,
O a)
m °

Z m .
-
° m

C
J
ur c 0
a) 'C
o
?w L (n N !? O C? E
N
n> n J
O C
O U $ aoi a
m

E ` o
Vl
0
H °m
mEm Zi
mZ U
Z 0: o

z$ w
:3
Eu)
Q ?> C O N Q C N L'k m'
C
C 3
O
T N N
a)
O N
N Q N
C
O

O -
3 L U
a
'N 2 a) m

30 L c,g O

o nv a v
m
E?
u,
-
w cmi `m 0
v nN 3
E o Jao
c c
n ma?
d Ea
z Na
O g
L E w
w L a? o ma °' m

a
nLpw
C m
J °
m om
2 w nYE
N
1
Q O
E
°'T.N.. m
Z? y
Ql- N
O 0 C
-
O.? ° m
O C O
m° E T
O O a) Of a)
. f0 y0
m
d m
E O Of (D C
o v m o

?°m?
- m
mZcn
J
? N
v O
Q
m
m
.
r 6-0 c ns
i
'0 O: N
rna m CO
_(D
° 0 c C
o v
>> 4)
m -
nmJL
C Z n
c?a
'? v O1 m
O a? cna? oa?m
m

O> `o E O
O
co 3 0 L L
i- :E O 7
co co m
O 2°
O
0
? rn m
o a?? c _ m
? ? ? ? m d ? m o 0
i
^?.. ? ?'i LL 2' W W C N m al ? ? 4: N d
N a N
N N
0 O
W aT F
C)
W
J
oo_
o u m
v w m
C: mu 4° o
dr aS = o T F Q o q
T, c
w O p N O m N N O N m al 'O _
'pXR+I a ro I? m m U U ? C7 ..? ? .? ? a a cn cn cn ii
c71
00 2
8 0
N N
M N
m
a
T
a)
Z
J
oN
N O
T Cl)
N
Z >
(n ?
0 a
-0
a
m
c
m
z
ar
U
ur Z
2 a,
J ?
c
N 0
a! N
m y
7 N
C
Z U
?l
-I
t
Soil Map-Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
SILVERLANDING
Map Unit Legend
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina (NC119)
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
CeB2 Cecil sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 27.2 77.5%
percent slopes, eroded
CeD2 Cecil sandy clay loam, 8 to 15 1.2 3.5%
percent slopes, eroded
PaE Pacolet sandy loam, 15 to 25 6.6 18.9%
percent slopes
Totals for Area of Interest (AOI) 35.1 100.0%
(Natural Reseraces Web Soil Survey 2.0
Cuuservatien Service National Cooperative Soil Survey
1/31/2008
Page 3 of 3

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Byrum -Steele Creek Date: 10-11-07
Applicant/Owner: Davidland, LLC, 6707-C, Fairview Rd, Charlotte, NC 28210-3354 County: Mecklenburg
Investigator: Todd Warren and Nick Nelson State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances Exist on the site? ? Yes No Community ID : Wetlands:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No ? Transect ID: A & B (SIMILAR)
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No ? Plot ID:
(if needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
i Nyssa syivatica TREE FAC 9
2. Acer rubrum Tree FAC 10
3. Fraxinus pennsylvanica Tree FACW i L
4 Ligustrum spp. Shrub NI 12
5 Sambucus nigra (canadensis) Shrub FACW- 13
6 Microstegium vimineum Herb FAC+ 14.
7 Lycopus virginicus Herb OBL 15.
8. 1(3.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OSL, FACW or FAC
(excluding FAC-). 100°
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
? Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland hydrology Indicators:
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
? Aerial Photographs Inundated
Other ? Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_ No Recorded Data Available Water Marks
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: ? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: NONE (in.) ? Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12"
Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 12 (in.) Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: 8 (in.) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
i tt s
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): PaE, Pacolet sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes Drainage Class: Well Drained
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup):Fine, kaolinitic, thermic Typic xanhapludults Confirm Mapped Type? /'Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretion s,
inches Horizon (Munsell_Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-6 A 10YR 6/1 10YR 6/8 30% SANDY LOAM
6-12 B 10YR 6/4 10YR 6/8 10% SANDY CLAY LOAM
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surfa ce Layer Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Aquic Moisture Regime _ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
_ Reducing Conditions _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
_,_, Gieyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophyfc Vegetation Present? /Yes No (Circle) (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Present? t( Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? V( Yes No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? (Yes No
Remarks:
Anor-_
it
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Byrum - Steele Creek Date: 10-11-07
Applicant/Owner: Davidlond, LLC, 6707-C, Fairview Rd, Charlotte, NC 28210-3354 County: Mecklenburg
Investigator: Todd Warren and Nick Nelson State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances Exist on the site? ? Yes No Community ID : upland
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No ? Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No ? Plot ID:
(if needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1 Acer rubrum Tree FAC d.
2 Nyssa sylvatica Tree FAC 10.
3.Ligustrum spp. Shrub NI 11.
q Microstegium vimineum Herb FAC+ 12,
5. 13.
6. '14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
(excluding FAC-). 100%
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
? Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland hydrology Indicators:
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
? Aerial Photographs Inundated
Other Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_ No Recorded Data Available Water Marks
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: NONE (in.) Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12°
Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: NONE (in.) Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: NONE (in.) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:

SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): PaE, Pacolet sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes Drainage Class: Well Drained
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Fine, kaolinitic, thermic Typic Kanhapludults Confirm Mapped Type? ?Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture. Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell_Moist) (Munsell_Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure. etc.
0-5 A 7.5YR 5/4 SANDY LOAM
5-10 B1 2.5YR 4/6 SANDY CLAY LOAM
10-15 B2 2.5YR 4/4 LOAMY CLAY
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosoi _ Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer Sandy Soils
_ Suifidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Aquic Moisture Regime _ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
_ Reducing Conditions _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
_ Gieyed or Low-Chroma Colors - Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
IL-
I
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ?Yes No (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ?
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No ?
Remarks:
(Circle)
Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes No /
HOUSACE 3!92