20051986 Ver 3_401 Application_20090512

N•w E? BURDETTE LAND CONSULTING, INC.
10212 Creedmoor Road - Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
Telephone [phone] - Fax [phone]
S
nS- Ia8Lo v3
May 12, 2009
Ms. Cyndi Karoly
401 Oversight/Express Permitting Unit
NC Division of Water Quality
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
RE: Individual Permit Modification Application
Legend Oaks Subdivision Phase III
Chapel Hill, Chatham County, North Carolina
BLC Project #: 7145
DWQ Project #: 20051986, Ver 2
Dear Ms. Karoly:
A
IF9@20WROO
MAY 12 2009
WETLANDS AND STORMWATER BRANCH
Attached is a PCN application for a modification to an individual 401 Water Quality
Certification issued on March 31, 2009 for Phase III of Legend Oaks Subdivision. The proposed
subdivision is located north of Lystra Road and east of US Highway 151501 south of Chapel Hill
in Chatham County.
NCDOT's most recent review of the project's roadway plans prompted a change in the culvert
design resulting in a total of 12 additional linear feet of stream channel impact. Also, temporary
stream impacts that were inadvertently omitted from the original application have been added to
the project. These temporary impacts, totaling 38 linear feet, are necessary for the riprap
structures used to keep the crossing areas dry during construction. Filter fabric will be placed
below the riprap to ensure it can be removed to restore the stream channel once construction is
complete. We discussed these project changes with Mr. Ian McMillan of your office earlier
today. Mr. McMillan agreed that a supplying a revised PCN application and only the
attachments that have changed from the previous application clearly identifying the proposed
changes to the project would be necessary to re-process the 401 WQC.
Five copies of the revised application and legal and letter-sized attachments are provided. Two
copies of full-sized plans and CD with copies of these plans are also provided. A check in the
amount of $570 is also included for the permit processing fee.
Ms. Karoly
BLC Project #: 7145
May 12, 2009
Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Burdette Land Consulting, Inc.
6Lcto
Jennifer . Burdette
Environmental Specialist
Attachments
c: Brantley Powell - HBP Properties, LLC
Trenton Stewart - Arcadia Consulting Engineers, PLLC
0$-iagLO v3
of w:ar?q
Office Use Only:
?? $ Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing -'
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: PCN (revised 5/11/09) provided for Individual Permit information purposes.
or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? Yes ? No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
0 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ? Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
? Yes No For the record only for Corps Permit:

? Yes No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program. 0 Yes ? No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below. ? Yes No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? Yes No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Legend Oaks Subdivision Phase III
2b. County: Chatham
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Chapel Hill
2d. Subdivision name: Legend Oaks "14Y
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no: .,
NA Wk44S1AAoSWATER , "d 12?4
3. Owner Information ?ttRBR4NC{
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: HBP Properties, LLC
3b. Deed Book and Page No. DB 1335 PG 0584, DB 0704 PG 0043, DB 1343 PG 0488, DB 1343 0486
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable): H. Brantley Powell
3d. Street address: P O Box 5365
3e. City, state, zip: Cary, NC 27512
3f. Telephone no.: [phone]
3g. Fax no.: [phone]
3h. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: Agent ? Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: Jennifer A. Burdette
5b. Business name
(if applicable): Burdette Land Consulting, Inc.
5c. Street address: 10212 Creedmoor Road
5d. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27615
5e. Telephone no.: [phone]
5f. Fax no.: [phone]
5g. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 2 of 12
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1 a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 9776-81-6330, 9776-91-1855, 9786-01-2381, & 9786-00-
2777
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.8421795 Longitude: - 79.0720692
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size: 108 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Cub Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: WS-IV; NSW
2c. River basin: Cape Fear
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site is currently forested with the existing Legend Oaks and Lystra Estates residential subdivisions to the west and
south, respectively. Adjacent properties to the north and east are also forested. Please refer to the Vicinity Map provided
as Figure 1 and the USGS Location Map provided as Figure 2 in the original application. A soil survey map for the site is
provided as Figure 3 in the original application. Figure 4 provides a key for the adjacent property owner names and
addressed that were also attached to the original application.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
>1 acre
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
6,000
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the project is to expand the existing Legend Oaks Subdivision using the subject property to create
approximately 57 additional single family building lots.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project consists of extending Legend Oaks Drive to the east across the subject property crossing Cub Creek and an
unnamed tributary to Cub Creek (UT1). The project also includes a connector road to the north, which must cross
another unnamed tributary to Cub Creek (UT2) to access high ground, and four short connector and cul-de-sac roads.
The site plan has three points at which the roadway stubs to the property line for future connectivity. Each of these stubs
have been planned as cul-de-sacs and also placed on high ground and aligned to avoid future impacts to stream
channels. Figures 5, 6, and 7A-D, Insets A-D, and Cross-sections S1-S3 were attached to the original application and
show the overall site and details of each impact. Figure 6 was a key map for the larger scale maps of the project on a
letter-sized sheet for the USACE. This figure has not changed from the original application and remains valid. Revised
Figures 5, 7A-D, Insets 1-4, and Cross-sections S1-S3 are attached to this permit modification application.
Page 3 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Project Information and Prior Project History
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments: Jurisdictional determinations were completed by Yes ? No ? Unknown
the USACE for the property currently occupied by Legend
Oaks Phase I and II. A field verification of the jurisdictional
wetlands and stream determinations for Phase III were
completed on February 10,2009.
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type Preliminary 0 Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: Burdette Land Consulting,
Name (if known): Todd Tugwell - Phase I and II (Final) Inc. (BLC) - Phase III
Monte Matthews - Phase III (Preliminary) Other: S&EC, PA - Phase I and II
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
BLC delineated the surface waters and wetlands on the property planned for Phase III on June 8, 2007. Wetland data
forms, USACE Stream Quality Worksheets, and a NCDWQ Stream Identification Form to support the delineation and
determinations were attached to the original application. Monte Matthews of the USACE and Martin Richmond of
NCDWQ field verified the delineation and determinations of Phase III and changed the intermittent determination of UT1
to perennial. Written documentation of this meeting has not been received.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ¦ Yes ? No ? Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
Two permits were previously issued for Legend Oaks Phase I and II. One permit (Action ID # 200520721) was issued for
a temporary road crossing on March 18, 2005 to evaluate the site. A Nationwide Permit 39 was then issued for
construction of the roads and driveways for the first two phases of the subdivision on November 22, 2005 (Action ID #
200620111). This permit was later modified to include additional intermittent stream channel impacts in 2006 under the
same Action ID number. This permit modification included the following permanent impacts: 149 LF of perennial stream,
202 LF of intermittent stream, and 0.006 acre of wetlands. A 401 WQC was issued for these impacts on February 17,
2006 (DWQ Project #05-1986).
A 401 WQC was issued for Legend Oaks Phase III on March 31, 2009. However, comments from NCDOT regarding the
design of the culverts across Cub Creek require a slightly larger impact. Temporary stream channel impacts from riprap
structures used to keep the proposed crossings dry during construction were inadvertently omitted from the previous
application. This PCN application details the revised impact quantities. Mr. Monte Matthews was provided this updated
information via email and has indicated that he is ready to issue the Individual Permit with these revised impact quantities.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? Yes ? No
6b. If yes, explain.
This is the final phase of the Legend Oaks subdivision. No additional permits are anticipated.
Page 4 of 12
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
0 Wetlands 0 Streams - tributaries ? Buffers
? Open Waters ? Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number - Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ - non-404, other) (acres)
Temporary T
W1 M P? T fill seep Yes
? No Corps
? DWQ 0.006
W2 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W3 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W4 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W5 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W6 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts 0.006
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number - or
(PER)
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ - non-404, width (linear
Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet)
S1 M P M T culvert/riprap Cub Creek PER
?INT M Corps
?DWQ 25 149 - P
21-T
S2 E P E T culvert/riprap UT1 to Cub Ck N PER
? Corps 4 125 - P
INT ? DWQ 11 -T
S3 M P M T culvert/riprap UT2 to Cub Ck 0 PER
? INT 0 Corps 4 102 - P
? DWQ 6-T
S4 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S5 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S6 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
376 - P
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 38 - T
Total 414
3i. Comments: The impact lengths have been modified to reflect the additional linear footage required by the NCDOT
approved culvert designs and temporary impacts discussed under the Project History section.
Page 5 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individual) list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number - (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ?P?T
02 ?P?T
03 ? PEI T
04 ?P?T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If and or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres)
number of pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes ? No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWO)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
? Neuse ?Tar-Pamlico ? Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ? Catawba ? Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number - Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Temporary T impact required
131 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
B2 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
B3 ? PEI T ? Yes
? No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
Page 6 of 12
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The applicant requested a delineation of surface waters and wetlands prior to preliminary plan development to avoid
impacts to jurisdictional areas to the maximum extent practicable. Specifically, the project engineer, Trenton Stewart, PE,
adjusted the road alignment to avoid impacting wetlands and an unnamed tributary to UT1. Due to the dissected
topography of the site, three stream crossings are unavoidable to access areas of high ground on the property. Please
refer to the letter attached to a previous application by Trenton Stewart, PE explaining why using a bridge to cross Cub
Creek is not feasible.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
All proposed road crossings have been designed perpendicular to the stream channel with 5-foot-high headwalls to
reduce the impact to the channel. Road grades were also adjusted to further reduce the linear footage of stream channel
impacted by approximately 49 linear feet. Mr. Stewart's letter also contains additional justification of the road and culvert
design and other efforts taken to minimize stream channel impacts such as using a rip rap stilling basin rather than
standard velocity reduction design and implementation of a special construction sequence to minimize exposed areas.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for Yes ? No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): DWQ Corps
? Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this Payment to in-lieu fee program
project?
Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: 364 linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: warm ? cool ?cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments: The applicant proposes to pay 2:1 mitigation for impacts to perennial stream channels with more than minimal
aquatic function. Of the 752 linear feet of stream channel mitigation required, 376 would be satisfied through payment to NC
Ecosystem Enhancement Program. The remaining 376 linear feet of mitigation required would be satisfied through on-site
preservation.
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Page 7 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
In addition to the riparian buffers required by Chatham's previous buffer rules, to which this project is subject, the
applicant proposes to preserve 861 linear feet of stream channel with a 50-foot wide riparian buffer, 102 linear feet with a
100 foot buffer on one side of the channel, and 857 linear feet with an additional 50 foot wide buffer for a total of 1820
linear feet to be placed in conservation areas providing a preservation ratio of 4.8 to 1. It is important to note that the
proposed conservation areas are located within open space and not within individual lots with lot 13 being the only
exception. The developer proposes to preserve the conservation areas in perpetuity using the USACE's standard
preservation language provided for restrictive covenants. The revised map of the conservation areas for mitigation was
provided to the USACE. A map of the conservation areas and the restrictive covenants would be recorded by December
31, 2010.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ? Yes ? No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 8 of 12
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ? Yes No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
? Yes ? No
Comments:
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 11.7%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ? Yes No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: The attached estimated inventory of
impervious surface area has been prepared by the project engineer showing a total percent imperious surface area upon
build out to be approximately 11.7%.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
? Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ? DWQ Stormwater Program
? DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? Chatham County
? Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ? NSW
? USMP
apply (check all that apply): ? Water Supply Watershed
? Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ? Yes ? No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
? Coastal counties

4a.
Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ? HQW
? ORW
(check all that apply): ? Session Law 2006-246
? Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ? Yes ? No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ? Yes ? No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ? Yes ? No
Page 9 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
F. Supplementary Information
t. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ? Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ? Yes ? No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ? Yes ? No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ? Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ? Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ? Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The proposed infrastructure serves only the proposed residential development. Therefore, the project is not anticipated
to result in additional development.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Individual septic systems approved by Chatham County Health Department will be used to dispose of wastewater
generated from the proposed project.
Page 10 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ? Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ® Yes ? No
impacts?
®
Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
? Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
BLC checked the NC Natural Heritage Program Workroom Database for records of element occurences on or near the
site. We also understand from a telephone conversation with Monte Matthews that the USFWS responded by letter to the
public notice that the project would not impact Endangered Species or Critical Habitat.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ? Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
http://ocean.floridamarine.org/efh_coral/ims/viewer.htm
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ? Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
Ms.Renee Gledhill-Earley of the NC Department of Cultural Resources State Historic Preservation Office responded to
the public notice of the project that their office is not aware of historic resources which would be affected by the project.
See the letter attached to orginial application. One cemetery (Riggsbee) is present on the property and will be preserved
with proper access at the corner of Legend Oaks Drive and Street E. Chatham County GIS shows the Durham-Edwards
cemetery located on site. The project engineer and members of the Chatham County Historical Association have not
been able to locate this cemetery. Two sections of rock wall on lot 23 were located by the project surveyors. Mr. Paul
Webb of TRC was retained to determine if the walls could be associated with the cemetery. Mr. Webb concluded in the
report attached to a previous application that the walls were retaining walls and are not associated with the cemetery. Mr.
Webb did not observe evidence of the Durham-Edwards cemetery during his field investigation, but stated that it is
possible that it is located on the site. Should the cemetery be found, it will be preserved with proper access as required
by NC State Statutes.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ? Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? Sketch Design provided to Chatham County
Jennifer A. Burdette 5/12/09

Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Appli ent ss ignature Date
(Agent's si nature is vali nl i u orization letter from the applicant
Page 11 of 12
I I is provided.)
Page 12 of 12

err`' ;=\, ?

CY)
C
Lc/
x
?.l
-XI

0
ti
M?
W
? A C7
? w
z
U
??A A a
_Q J a x
CC wzxw z°
CUO
1 I\ (\? W U rn
zo
_,? \y A z
"Co ,111 \

O
°a
w
J
U C
Mo
nU_. T o
0
U
H
W
Z?
?w
b?
0
o?
p
J:l
N F
O
L
to ;
\ : , / /ice
7/7
\ \ \ \
s ,
i ?
/ N? LI 50? R)1
...............
I
?+ r r !• / i/ ? j
1
l?l l
/
,.
EA"
CRE,5'K}- -
/
165UR?g FROM-
TOP OF/ BANX
17
-??- P
_. _ I ((Ip
\ .::.:- ? ? ?-•?•-? rte' '
v I?jAPA ? 1 1 ,. RT -E
.,; y ? Y
/ / '? .,,.-, ? f / /??- ///6?/ , `?/`+,?? ?'^ . ? ? ? ?"°"'i,? ? i/ j} jig / , f'- ?F'+t? , t -? ,
---- ----------
IX'
44
?/ , `% ? I I /'//,1.0/4/'`` ? ? 7,??.- 5% •; ?' //?- 61 \ ? ? \p , ? '' \.
GRAPHIC SCALE SURFACE WATER & WETLAND IMPACT MAP N
V = 200' LEGEND OAKS SUBDIVISION PHASE III
200' 0 200'
HPB PROPERTIES, LLC
CHAPEL HILL, CHATHAM COUNTY, NC
....N.' DATE: 03/10/09 SCALE: 1" = 200'
w EBURDETTE LAND CONSULTING, INC. DRAWN BY: TMB ci11c'D BY: JAB
10212 Creedmoor Road - Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
Telephone [phone]-Fax [phone] PROJECT #: 7145 FIGURE #: 7A
S

TR,FAM-A-\ \\ \ \
I
I
i/ CUB CRE?K? i5?7? l 1111 I' I I I I

?A5UR FROG
TOP F BANK

7L
?
\ ? ?•-?'\ \ \ \ III .::? ? ! / / l ? l ? I °f / n
I ? ?? ? ?
[ I I I ?p
yd ? \ ?\ \ \ _ ?vJI I ' I` 'f.. / ? / / l / l / I .? ? 'i, I ? Itt ? \
I
?Y
(E
5 ,.
11
AL :'A?f

, -'
j/
I

/ ?../.f/-_ ?'?•°% ?P RSD ( I\ / ?? \ `/? ?'` J(4??? Y I iR
_ w a
--------------
r

\ I 'P/)
GRAPHIC SCALE
= 200' SURFACE WATER & WETLAND IMPACT MAP N

200 o zoo' LEGEND OAKS SUBDIVISION PHASE III
HPB PROPERTIES, LLC
CHAPEL HILL, CHATHAM COUNTY, NC
N'
' DATE: 03/10/09 SCALE: I"=200t
? BURDETTE LAND CONSULTING, INC.
w E DRAWN BY: TMB cxx'D BY: JAB
10212 Creedmoor Road - Raleigh
North Carolina 27615
,
S Telephone [phone]-Fax [phone] PROJECT #: 7145 FIGURE #: 7B
U10//
?//I I II III II II / / ?? v\????II
_?1111_14 Lk
'
-----
I
l f - . F / /
/ an¦ a + '
t
77 / I I \ y ?? ` j , lf,, \ $ !1 1 r
i
x c <
L
Re, t IN
M
GRAPHIC SCALE SURFACE WATER & WETLAND IMPACT MAP N
1" = soo'
zoo' o soo' LEGEND OAKS SUBDIVISION PHASE III
HPB PROPERTIES, LLC _7?
CHAPEL HILL, CHATHAM COUNTY, NC
...?N.... DATE: 03/10/09 SCALE: 1" = 200'
?w E'3 BU"ETTE LAND CONSULTING, INC. DRAWN BY: TMB c>11c'DBY: JAB
10212 Creedmoor Road - Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
. Telephone [phone]-Fax [phone] PROJECT #: 7145 FIGURE #: 7C
S
I I`:rI ',I

/

. . . . . . . . . . . . J
. . . . . . . . . .
/ `??\ I ..... l .. .......... /
PAS C
?.-
Y-pp
/ sb ?•? ?°` ' ;.' ` /I STREAM- /
-(CUB EEK)_
l i 67`R AM fllNL?-A
-4,, 4(C B CtREEK)
/ 1 9 LIB PERM/?N
?-
/ q 690 FT STREAMiANNEL-A ; ?••? / / _ ,° _ 05
_ -
/(1LC7$ CREEK)
/ 1 LF/fEMPORARY S?Xso" v'
848'SQFT
/ ROAi) "bESIdWANb 1 OAPf INFO A;10N PROVID B-1L :' .
ARC;ADI 6ONSUL I G EyCIN RS APL C //" :' - - - - -
55
GRAPHIC SCALE SURFACE WATER & WETLAND IMPACT MAP N
50' 1" = 0 50' 50' LEGEND OAKS SUBDIVISION PHASE III
HPB PROPERTIES, LLC
CHAPEL HILL, CHATHAM COUNTY, NC
...?N..?' DATE: 03/10/09 SCALE: I"= 50'
:'W a BURDETTE LAND CONSULTING INC. DRAWN BY: TMB Cxx'D BY: JAB
10212 Creedmoor Road - Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
.... Telephone [phone]-Fax [phone] PROJECT #: 7145 INSET: A
S
/ /c)
I \
/ J
0
_j ' '
N I
,_>--- - Lo _ P 67 15.r5 ,\ Pico I IIMP T # 2/ r
'72 .1 i v J I ST AMC ANNE B
S D VE / I ,,1- N
)125 F PERMANE? ,=f
4s34,509 SQFy ,,.. \
00 //66
65+50
r
X00
68
,. z., 68° \
69+
00
\ I I I I I /
--ST AMCkANN R, i
LF TE_MPQRAF$Y _-
I I I _
44 aQ-FT-\
46
I A QESIP N;AN IM?A f IN O?MATION PROVIDEfJ'BB? J II II
I ADIIA CQNSU !TIN?G G ERS,,PCLC - - -7 \ I
4 480 SF
?104 ACS
GRAPHIC SCALE SURFACE WATER & WETLAND IMPACT MAP N
1.. = 50' LEGEND OAKS SUBDIVISION PHASE III
50' 0 50'
HPB PROPERTIES, LLC
CHAPEL HILL, CHATHAM COUNTY, NC
...?N?..' DATE: 03/10/09 SCALE: V = 50'
W E ?i BU"ETTE LAND CONSULTING, INC. DRAWN BY: TMB CHK'D BY: JAB
10212 Creedmoor Road - Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
Telephone [phone]-Fax [phone] PROJECT #: 7145 INSET: B
S
RQAI DESIGN AND IMPACT-INFORMATION PROVIDE BY
I \I I 1 Aft AD1A_CQNSLTtNG ENGINEERS; PLLC y
ZA /
tkx
(UT 2
IMPT# c"5
I
I I I I SrREA?l1 C A -C 2.
l I I 16 LF THMP?RA
A
51,6)99 SF? ) 32 ?QF1 ?
1 X19 AC/
/ AMP T
102 E NIM
1 •SQ
\. . . . . . REAM'--A
OPE? l / ?. . ... ' . , ?C1JBtiREEK)
SPA6E ' l?
?.6 't'ft'
" ?Op
k6 Pb
?`vv 'x
GRAPHIC SCALE SURFACE WATER & WETLAND IMPACT MAP N
V = 50' LEGEND OAKS SUBDIVISION PHASE III
50' 0 50'
HPB PROPERTIES, LLC _-L
CHAPEL HILL, CHATHAM COUNTY, NC
,...N...' DATE: 03/10/09 SCALE: 1" = 50'
w E BURDETTE LAND CONSULTING, INC. DRAWN BY: TMB Cxx'D BY: JAB
10212 Creedmoor Road - Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
Telephone [phone]-Fax [phone] PROJECT #: 7145 INSET: C
S
\ A t V A \Q A \ ?' AJ)QuN
\ \ t \ LD I \ \ h?
\ I
I I I I i u
I
Z -l C)
00,
` w
!s-
\ ` ? ? I 1 t\\\ I `?, ? \ I? I `.1x I >? I ? w
i
\ W CO IN,
c 6' ? ? I I '?\ I y?3 I
CA 0
00
79 1
L13 00
\ 2 0
a) 0
/ \ \ \ ..\ \ \ \ \ :z tq
(n % \ \ \ \ \
\ O Z \ % \ ?" \ \ \
O _ Q \ \ `"\ \
/ U d' ?
\ \ ? \ O it W / `. W
0
\
A z ?.
C) LL c
'1 0 5-20 0
-LO
W F'QL)F ` U I?
W -j 00
\\\\\ ''? \\ `\ 11 \\? V N 00 \\ +t J M
O W
\ \ \ LL W U) o
t \ M
\ \\\ `fie\\ \\ \U \ 0
r'
r
Q
\(D O
v v v«? ,t \ \ v } o
\ \ / \ \ \ \ 0
\ 1
480.DDVC /I.
PM EL-393= ,
Y K-20.15 ?Y
------
1
mau". iro n
-- Or
- - ------ --- o
----------- -_- --- cs ?.
__.nn n --- /__--? /-? -------
y0 ?r /
Z-
----------- - ------
\a ?
----------------- -------
-------------
C14 N
------------------
Q L)
,
\l r, /
r, OD
+ +
400 ?i ?i r ,
...395... _ ?. ?r ...
RO D DE IGN ND IMPACT
INFORMATION ROVI ED
----------BY - CA IA C NSUL ING
EN INEE S, _P LC
- - ------
n uI
----- ------375 ____ ...-_----------
SCA E: H R. 1" 100'
oo o
- ----- ----3?e -- - -- -- --- --- -- - --_- - V ?": 'I' - 0'-
__..-----------
-------------------------------- -. ____.._.....-_-- -_-
+00 47+50 48+oo 48+50 49+00 49+50 50+00 50+50 51+00 51+50 52+00 52+50 53+00 53+50 54+00 54+50
GRAPHIC SCALE SURFACE WATER & WETLAND IMPACT MAP N
1" =100' LEGEND OAKS SUBDIVISION PHASE III
100' 0 100'
HPB PROPERTIES, LLC
CHAPEL HILL, CHATHAM COUNTY, NC
....N..., DATE: 03/10/09 SCALE: AS SHOWN
:'W E BURDETTE LAND CONSULTING, INC. DRAWN BY: TMB cHc'D BY: JAB
10212 Creedmoor Road - Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
Telephone [phone]-Fax [phone] PROJECT #: 7145 CROSSECTION:
S
IMPACT # S 1

I ? X
1
/

r ?

1

z v ??/ • v

\ \ U Q ? 1 \ ,? %f
r
\

\ ^ LL 1?

?J(n
WW

\
\
\? N Q? \ \`
?
Lf)
Co
- -
c
\
\
\
\
\\ \ t
o

% It

1 I
'n
'"
W
?' ?k
F
3k
j ; W 0 w

/
;
a
C]
O
A
U 0
P. L40
I
I I1
1 I z1 I
II , ?D
I PI \
\
?
3? ?
1
V 1 A
\ ?- U
HW z

, u
Z

\ r ---_-- -
` ?0?
_
r
y
W

C) u
l0 z
co _ _ A I
z
' - - \ I ,- ILL I I
10
?.
06
?00
- / O Urn
1 0
1 O cc `` \ \ I \ V z?
w
_6
M00
.- \ \ .\ \ \ \ \ a
- - ?? \ \ \ \
O
- \ W U
eZ fn•
r 1 r? v
g Z' - ?,?? ? _ -
SE St I 1 `? ? / ? ? ' ?
\ ? \ \\ / - -? p -
w --
\ 1\> 1 \ t \ 1x /? a
v 1 I Ln / -
\\\ 111 \ \ ? Lo w j eo
1 \ (-Q \ I / O W N o
\ E\ W\ \ 1 \ / ` / / C
\ V A O Z
\ Y CL Q
v v 1 O \ t (o \ ? / - - (DO-
-fn
_ \ \ \ \_ ___I li "" % WQ Q
\ \ 1 J \ \ I \ ? \? \ 3 ? .II / / / /
I \ / / LL_ /
---- ----- --------- --------°------------------ 435 --------- _°------ ----------------------- ----- ------- ------------------- --------------------
---------------------------------------- -----430 ------------- _-__-___-_--__,_------
*-- - ----- -- __.?_4P5. _-----_ ---------- ----- ___-'-_ - .. -------° _------ ------- ----- - ...-----
11 ..
404ONC
---- ------ 1
EL.403.01
100. X.13.47
` ? ??1. c FM SUr +00.00 $
? WI EL 400.50
---- ----------- ?--_-' ---------_-------4i6 -------- -------_. -------- -------________--- d-----
` 370.OpC
` ?. FM F1.3E5.00
-------------------- - -?ao
EX cufm LIK OF RM.
5'
--------------------
--- --"---°-- --- '----- -- ?-?-- _`? -- ---485: ? ---" ------ - - -- -- ?
i
?i/ 1.517E /
-------------- __ - - -- --------- -°--L--- -----480-. ----_----- _. ---
ii' r
---°- ----- ------- -----..- _--...-. -)_ 0 ? r
t ?
-_°-____ _________
----390 ?z- - ---------
---------------------- --° --? ----- --a-1 f
----- -------
---- C3AD- ES -API IMPA - T'--388- --------- 1*----- -------------
I ------ ------ -- ------ --- ---- -- --
FOR ATIO PR VIDE +
Y AR ADIA CONSULTING -- -- - - - ----------------- - ------375 ---- --_ ,-?,-?---b? -------------------------- -----------
NGIN ERS, PLLC
-°-- ---- ------------- ----------- ------ --370 --------- -------- -?- lJ-------
E R . 1 "- 01
--------__---------_---- --._------- -------- -----365---------- -------- --? 0,
---------- ------
------ ------ --------- --------
----------- --- -- - _------ ------ 360 - --_-- ____'--- ---- -- -- - ....-------- ---------------------
63+50 64+00 64+50 65+00 65+50 66+00 66+50 67+00 - 67+50 68+00 68+50 69+00 69+50 70+00 70+50 71+
GRAPHIC SCALE SURFACE WATER & WETLAND IMPACT MAP N
100' 1"= 0 100' 100' LEGEND OAKS SUBDIVISION PHASE III
HPB PROPERTIES, LLC
CHAPEL HILL, CHATHAM COUNTY, NC
DATE: 03/10/09 SCALE: AS SHOWN
W E ?' BU"ETTE LAND CONSULTING, INC. DRAWN BY: TMs CHK'D BY: JAB
10212 Creedmoor Road - Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
Telephone [phone]-Fax [phone] PROJECT #: 7145 CROSSECTION:
S IMPACT #S2
II
o
F.

M

m
W a

II Profile View of STREET A

440

C.7 W
435 2.99% --- ----- -------- -- -
480.
r PM ST 4+50.00

n
Z PM EL

K-2 394.50

1.52

430
-------------------
-?,,?_-----°

9
- J
------
----------
------
----

----------

----------

----------

----------

--------- -

---
L?
425 -------------- ---?--- --------
-25' -------- -------- ercErR? --- ---------
\ \
420 ----------»_=--- ?.-- --- - ?-- - -----
----
---- -----
----- -- -
----------
---- ---
------
- ----------- -----------

415 -- ---- ---------- ---------- ----- --

410 -

z

405
---------------------
------------
-------- ------------ -----

ROAD DESI N AN IMPAC ---- -- --
400 --- -------- --
INFORMATI ---
N PR VIDED 7i 7 -----
--- - - ------- -------- -------- -------- ----
BY ARCADI CONS LTING
ENGINEER , PLLC
395 ------------------ ---- --- ------ - --- ?{
SCAL : OR. "=100'
M ? E RT 1"=10'
390 _
°i
0)
H
K)
II
? 5

385 --------- ??.._------ - ---------- ---------- ------ ---
0+ 50 1+00 1+ 50 2+ 00 2+ 50 3+ 00 3+ 50 4+ 00 4+ 50 5+ 00 5+ 50 6+ 00 6+ 50
GRAPHIC SCALE SURFACE WATER & WETLAND IMPACT MAP N
1" = 100'
' LEGEND OAKS SUBDIVISION PHASE III
100
0 100'
HPB PROPERTIES, LLC
CHAPEL HILL, CHATHAM COUNTY, NC
DATE: 03/10/09 SCALE: AS SHOWN

W E BURDETTE LAND CONSULTING, INC. DRAWN BY: TMB CHK'D BY: JAB
10212 Creedmoor Road
R
l
i
h
N
h C
li
-
a
e
g
,
ort
aro
na 27615
Telephone [phone]-Fax [phone]
S
PROJECT #: 7145
CROSSECTION:
IMPACT # S3

,fl-__ _ \ }

Q00')

- \ \
----_---
- ___? d \ \ 0

? \ \ \\ O
\ --` ? \ _

_ ?'\\ \ \ C
\\\\flY \ \ \ \ O W \
_ LL W

?/ \\\ \
\ ? V
\
\ ? z
111

\ \ s \ \ 00 c0z
z Z,
9/ 0
U) 0

\ \ \ O
\ \ O ?' \ \
Z LL
z \ U < O \
?M, w M -_-_ \
\ '\ '1?\N \
X Cs.

I

/
?
-
?-qolan1Sa
ce
_ -
?/fi
/ ?#• //§i=? / / it
V) U - _ _
i
, r / 1 / ?I

L n n
i
,
A
/
.

J rit f / /

r \ ? 1 \ It

\ \-4 O

II
'I
II
II
'3a
c5 / ?\ I Ug
/
OI
A-1
O?
?I
{
is I
In,
/
/
/
JO
r
0)
CD
?C?? l tc
V 1'
d
i \
\ Y:
Y
yi \
f I
O O N ,
0, r
ik
o ? W U ?k
A ? A U a. F?
U
z
w
aU
a
g0aU
w
? 00 U
w P-
P-
? w ?1
0
? a
w? w
dW
?a U
Z
H
C
u
z
a
V)
N O
p rn
U Q,
zw
?I
? r
r
rn
a
o?
Q?
W O
q
AW N ?,
A/ O
F?
•LLJ
e z rn
1
i? 11 W
J
j to o
s ?1 UM
rl ?
/
/
\ / 3
\
c
to
G
M