20171250 Ver 2_Application Attachments_20180426 (5)

MINIMUM CRITERIA DETERMINATION CHECKLIST
TIP Proj ect No. P-5704
W.B.S. Project No. 46398.11
Proiect Location:
Stouts Siding Extension project; proposed extension of the existing rail siding track along CSX
Transportation's (CSX) SF-line from east of Indian Trail Road (SR 1008) to west of Wesley
Chapel Stouts Road. The project limits begin west of the existing Indian Trail Road rail-
highway crossing to east of the existing Hayes Road (SR 1378) rail-highway crossing in the
Town of Indian Trail, Union County, North Carolina.
Proiect Description:
The proposed project involves the extension of the existing rail siding track along the CSX SF-
line in Union County. The proposed project is included in the 2016-2025 North Carolina State
Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). It is anticipated that construction will occur
within existing CSX right of way; therefore, no additional right of way will be required.
Construction is scheduled for state fiscal years 2018 and 2019 in the STIP.
The project proposes the following improvements; construction of new siding track extending
approximately 10,000 feet from railroad milepost (MP) SF-313.4 to SF-315.3; rebuilding the
existing siding track from railroad (MP) SF-312.8 to SF-313.4, a distance of approximately
3,200 feet; installation of new interlocking railroad signals and powered turnouts on the main
track at each end of the siding; and drainage improvements that will extend existing culverts to
the north side of the existing main track (see Figure 3).
Train traffic will remain open during construction. Work adjacent to the track will be protected
by current CSX Safety and Roadway Worker Protection rules. A brief closure of Wesley
Chapel-Stouts Road is anticipated, and a roadway detour will be coordinated with NCDOT
Division 10 staff during the design phase of the project.
Puruose and Need:
The purpose of the project is to support and enhance freight operations along the CSX-SF line by
constructing a passing siding in the middle of a 30-mile segment of single track railroad. The
passing siding will efficiently and effectively allow trains traveling in opposite directions to pass,
and for fast, high priority trains to pass slower or lower priority trains traveling in the same
direction.
Tvpe of Document
A State Minimum Criteria Determination Checklist is used as the appropriate documentation. In
accordance with House Bi11795 "An Act to Reform and Amend the State Environmental Policy
Act", "Significant expenditure of public moneys" means expenditures of public funds greater
than ten million dollars for a single project or action or related group of projects or actions.
Contributions of funds and in-kind contributions by a non-State entity shall not be considered an
expenditure of public funds for purposes of calculating whether such an expenditure is
significant. The expenditures of public funds on this project is less than the ten million dollar
threshold to consider it to be significant but the land-disturbing activity is greater than the ten
acres threshold resulting in substantial, permanent changes in the natural cover or topography
will require SEPA documentation.

Anticipated Permit or Consultation Requirements:
Nationwide Permits (NWP) 14 and 23 will likely be applicable. A NWP No. 33 may also apply
for temporary construction activities such as stream dewatering, work bridges, or temporary
causeways that are often used during bridge construction or rehabilitation. The USACE holds the
final discretion as to what permit will be required to authorize project construction. If a Section
404 permit is required, then a Section 401 Water Quality Certification (WQC) from the NCDWR
will be needed.
Special Proiect Information:
Environmental Commitments:
The list of project commitments (green sheets) are located at the end of the checklist.
Estimated Costs:
The total cost for the project included in the 2016-2025 STIP is $11,000,000. Of this total,
$5,500,000 is for construction using State Highway Trust Funds (public funds), and $5,500,000
is for construction using CSX funds (other funds). Contributions of funds and in-kind
contributions by a non-State entity shall not be considered an expenditure of public funds for
purposes of calculating whether such an expenditure is significant. The expenditure of public
funds is less than the ten million dollar threshold to be considered significant.
Estimated Traffic:
`Source: NCDOT Traffic Volume Maps:
https://xfer.services.ncdot.gov/imgdot/DOTTSUMaps/AADT_COLTNTIES_2015/Union/LTnion County_AADT_20
15.pdf
Train Traffic
Train Traffic (20161` I 8 trains
` Source: Stouts Siding Extension CSX SF-Line Noise Assessment Report (August 2016).
Accidents: N/A
Design Exception:
There are no anticipated design exceptions for this project.
Pedestrian and Bicycle Accommodations:
N/A
Alternatives Considered:
No Build — The no build alternative does not meet the purpose and need of the project.
Construct Siding on the South Side of the Existing Railroad — Due to the existence of
a siding on the north side of the railroad, and conflicting industry services located on the
south side of the railroad, this alternative was determined not feasible.

Construct Siding on the North Side of the Existing Railroad (Recommended) - Due
to the conflicts associated with constructing the siding on the south side of the railroad
(as described above), an alternative to construct the siding on the north side of the
railroad was developed and selected as the preferred alternative.
Public Involvement:
A landowner notification letter was sent to all property owners whose property, or a portion of
their property, was included within the project study area boundary. Property owners were asked
to provide comments. Questions received from the residential and business communities
involved connectivity across the railroad corridor, safety, and construction timing.
An informal public workshop meeting was held on June 13, 2016. There were seven citizens in
attendance. The majority supported the proposed improvements.

PART A: MINIMUM CRITERIA
1. Will the proposed project involve land disturbing activity of more than ten acres
that will result in substantial, permanent changes in the natural cover or
topography of those lands?
2. Will the proposed project require the expenditure of more than ten million
dollars in public fixnds?
3. Is the proposed project listed as a type and class of activity which would qualify
as a Non-Major Action under the Minimum Criteria rules?
If "yes", under which category?
(Note: If either Category #8 or #15 is used, complete Part D of this checklist.)
YES NO
❑ �
❑ �
� �
Category #8
If "yes" is selected far either Question 1 ar 2 and "no" is selected far Question 3, then the project does not
qualify as a Non-Major Action. A state environmental impact statement (SEIS) or state environmental
assessment (SEA) will be required.
PART B: MINIMUM CRITERIA EXCEPTIONS
YES NO
4. Does the proposed activity have a significant adverse effect on wetlands;
surface waters such as rivers, streams, and estuaries; parklands; prime or unique ❑ �
agricultural lands; or areas of recognized scenic, recreational, archaeological, or
historical value?
10
Will the proposed activity endanger the existence of a species on the
Department of Interior's threatened and endangered species list?
Would the proposed activity cause significant changes in land use
concentrations that would be expected to create adverse air quality impacts?
Would the proposed activity cause significant changes in land use
concentrations that would be expected to create adverse water quality or
groundwater impacts?
Is the proposed activity expected to have a significant adverse effect on long-
term recreational benefits?
Is the proposed activity expected to have a significant adverse effect on
shellfish, finfish, wildlife, or their natural habitats?
Will the proposed activity have secondary impacts or cumulative impacts that
may result in a significant adverse impact to human health or the environment?
11. Is the proposed activity of such an unusual nature or does the proposed activity
has such widespread implications, that an uncommon concern for its
environmental effects has been expressed to the NCDOT?
❑ �
❑ �
❑ �
❑ �
❑ �
❑ �
■ //
Note: If any of Questions 4 through 11 in part B are answered "YES", the proposed project does not
qualify as a Non-Major Action. A SEIS or SEA will be required.
4

PART C: COMPLIANCE WITH STATE AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS
Ecolo . ica�l Impacts
12
13
Is a federally protected threatened or endangered species, or its habitat, likely to
be impacted by the proposed action?
Does the action require the placement of fill in waters of the United
States?
14. Does the project require the placement of a significant amount of fill in high
quality or relatively rare wetland ecosystems, such as mountain bogs or pine
savannahs?
15
16
Does the project require stream relocation or channel changes?
Is the proposed action located in an Area of Environmental Concern, as defined
in the Coastal Area Management Act?
Cultural Resources
17
18
Will the project have an "effecY' on a property or site listed on the National
Register of Historic Places?
Will the proposed action require acquisition of additional right of way from
publicly owned parkland or recreational areas?
YES NO
� ❑
� ❑
❑ �
❑ �
❑ �
❑ �
❑ �
Questions in PART C are designed to assist the Engineer in determining whether a permit or consultation
with a state or federal resource agency may be required. If any question in PART C is answered "YES",
refer to the Environmental Guidance section of this document and contact the appropriate individual for
assistance.
Question 12:
Suitable habitat for the Carolina heelsplitter (Lasmigona decorata) is present in the project study area. A
review of the July 2016 NCNHP database on January 26, 2017 indicates no known occurrences within 1.0
mile of the study area. Habitat evaluations were conducted by Three Oaks personnel on February 2, 2017
within all the streams crossed by the project alignment. The Carolina heelsplitter was not found during
the surveys and is not expected to occur within the surveyed portions of South Fork Crooked Creek, or
the easternmost UT, nor is it expected to occur in close proximity downstream of the respective project
crossings, as South Fark Crooked Creek is impounded by a golf course and the UT flows through a
highly-urbanized area. Based on these conditions and the survey results, impacts are not expected to
occur to this species. Strict adherence to erosion control standards should minimize the potential for
any adverse impacts to occur to the aquatic fauna in these streams. The biological conclusion is No
Effect.
Suitable habitat for Michaux's sumac (Rhus michauxii) is present in the study area along the railroad
siding, roadsides, and utility right of ways. A review of the July 2016 NCNHP database on August 25,
2016 indicates no known occurrences within 1.0 mile of the study area. Surveys were conducted on
September 19, 2016 in which no plants were observed during the survey. The biological conclusion is No
Effect.

Suitable habitat for Schweinitz's sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii) is present in the study area along the
railroad siding, roadsides, utility right of ways, and field/forest edges. A review of the July 2016 NCNHP
database on August 25, 2016 indicates no known occurrences within 1.0 mile of the study area. Surveys
were conducted on September 19, 2016 in which no plants were observed during the survey. The
biological conclusion is No Effect.
Question 13: Four jurisdictional streams and five jurisdictional wetlands were identified within the
project study area (Figure 2). Project construction will result in approximately 297 feet of total stream
impacts and 0.46 acres of wetland impacts. Nationwide Permits (NWP) 14 and 23 will likely be
applicable. A NWP No. 33 may also apply for temporary construction activities such as stream
dewatering, work bridges, or temporary causeways that are often used during bridge construction or
rehabilitation. The USACE holds the final discretion as to what pernut will be required to authorize
project construction. If a Section 404 pernut is required, then a Section 401 Water Quality Certification
(WQC) from the NCDWR will be needed.

PART D: (To be completed when elther category #8 or #15 af the rules is used.)
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
P�roject length: 2.5 miles
Right of �Vay width: 2UU feet (existing}
Total Acres of Disturbed Ground Surface: 13.27 acres
'Total Acres of �Vetland Impacts: 0.46 acres
Total Linear Feet of Stream Impacts: 297 feet
24. Proj ect Purgose; The purpose af the pro� ect is to support an+d enhanc� fr�ight
o rations along the CSX-SF Xine by constructing a paassing siding in t�e r�iddle
�
of a 30�mile segme�t of single track railroad. The passing sidxng will eff c�ently
and effectively allow trains tr�veling in apposite directions to pass, and for fast,
high priority tra,ins ta pass slow�� or lowex pr�.orit� trains trav�ling in �tl�e sa.n�e
direction.
•
Rev�ewe �
3/21/2017
Date
�
Date
� �c� ��l �
Date
�� .�
� `l _ ! i
. , ,�.
,�
Arthur Petteway, �'E
Senior Rail Proj ect Devel
Rail Division
Engineer
J es Bridges, PE, CPM a
ail Proj eet Development Manager
Rail Division
�1
ur � �.c�c
J cquel' e Y. Obedi te, PE
ansultant P�oj ect Manager
Thre� Oaks Engineering
7
.
�a�qABl�d�g��y
�aa�� � ��,��: `',.
�,� �,�, ,�� � ���;, �
� 3
,� �C ��� '�.
,`.` ��.�,.. .,,� �/' �,�
; �. .•o��S��g .`�, ;
= .•q�' �`� -. � =.
� �, �
� �
,. + � �
� : ��A : �
_
R
�.. ` �
� -� ; �� Ia44 ; � ;
.
��• •� '
�—,-, ..
� . . .
. ..� . �.
.
� 1�•,�.!���I��+.�f• `�,,
,! // ,, �v., �� `.
., ; �yF Y. o�,,�,`
`��/111l1���,,

PROJECT COMMITMENTS:
Union County
Stouts Siding Extension Project
CSX SF-line from west of the existing
Indian Trail Road (SR 1008) rail-highway crossing to
east of the existing Hayes Road (SR 1378) rail-highway crossing
W.B.S. No. 46398.1.1
T.I.P. No. P-5704
NCDOT Division 10 Construction, Resident Engineer's Office — Detour from Rail Crossing
Closure
• In order to have time to adequately reroute school buses, Union County Schools will be
contacted at [phone] at least one month prior to road closure.
• Union County Emergency Services will be contacted at [phone] at least one
month prior to road closure to make the necessary temporary reassignments to primary
response units.
NCDOT Hydraulic Unit — FEMA Coordination
The Hydraulics Unit will coordinate with the NC Floodplain Mapping Program (FMP), to
determine the status of the project with regard to applicability of NCDOT'S Memorandum of
Agreement, or approval of a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) and subsequent
final Letter of Map Revision (LOMR).
NCDOT Rail Division Construction-FEMA
This project involves construction activities on or adjacent to a FEMA-regulated stream.
Therefore, the Rail Division shall submit sealed as-built construction plans to the Hydraulics
Unit upon completion of project construction, certifying that the drainage structures and
railroad embankment that are located within the 100-year floodplain were built as shown in
the construction plans, both horizontally and vertically. The preliminary "Limited Detailed
Flood Study" and "Detailed Flood Study" indicate that the existing culverts overtop during
the 100 year event.
State Minimum Criteria Page 1 of 1
Green Sheet
March 2017

,`�
�Z
N �� �
4 �� :
Q ...�
?o
V� L �i
� `7
pM'h`i yU/l�j 9 -
,� y, -�
... e ��.� -� �:
c: �� c,
4
os 9�
O
O ��,
Indi - �'� � . �-
Trall ,d - - -
f;
� V.� (f C^ \� 0 .
y4 !.
��i c�.
� Pry Un:onvillb�lndian Trail RU yy
iy
r \• J i,�s or . .
\ a
2-D \�� � a _ . 4�
2 � \ � �t�.` r `QJe,yn�Di- _ , .,.,�i::_�. �;�.��/na .-
\
a
J j� �a � T
0 G�
��y ��d.�
F ��y/tr `�holo9y �' �'i�85 p p o��� . ..
�. Edn:. Ry 4p Q p� � U`
in.:- •i'��y aehba r�eak a66 � � �_,
P.;i4. yPl�.� .�.-�N�'� iu .. dg �.
'.\ � ��
t ' "�� C' �� O
� .a ,� . aq �
"�o J ` Gcepk(i .
G �t L
/' /., � - 'l `O
� ��� `�
. n
��\�` . Gr�.
g ``�+,
Proposed Project s S��ckbndg�0 �,�� Y;
^�
so Q
�� ���n�
o ,�
�� UNION UNTY o°�c c �,
� ^� r .��
�- ay � -
o� �
�p \�� `�-���
RO' lr \l tl'li �'-.
C�
�
: Y Ma�
. .. .. C Pel[r .
� �
-� ' �
�\� � ;\
; INDIAN TRA7L
/
\
j � rvv _CQ��I
i c N�f�l;
/ r �a
���
` Proposed Project � �;? e
��
a
Monrc�
R9nl
0 0,5 1 2 3 AifE)a;tt
Miles �
i-
d
Stouts
�� ��� °'�i.
� ��
b
�e
'G
,. ,S,o
,. ,
F,.
0 1,000 2,000 4,000
Feet
oF NQpTH Cq VICINITY MAP County: UNION
P� '�gy STOUTS SIDING EXTENSION
y '� NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT CSX SF-LINE Div: 10 STIP# P-5704 Figure
, ; OF TRANSPORTATION FROM WEST OF INDIAN TRAIL ROAD (SR 1008) w
; aQ RAIL DIVISION TO EAST OF HAYES ROAD (SR 1378) WBS: 46398.1.1 �'
9J�F4'TQFTRpH°'Q�� UNION COUNTY Date: JANUARY 2017
STIP PROJECT P-5704

. _
N �-� ��� n, �
;s
Qa �
:r, �"' `,_ o , Legend
, ;�: � �F Q. "i
� '� ��� � ��a 5; ' � Project Study Area Union County Parcels (2014)
d _ �� r
� � � �od� �'>� ,�=� T� Railroad 24k Hydrography
, `s; 7',f
� � °s� 74 '' �" h ■ NCDOT Bridge Locations � Major Waterbodies
--.n. � O� -,
� � � �� ��� � Schools Wetlands
� Qa � e� %�. � 'i Floodplains
� e �� Q Libraries
\;�. .-� Q._... .�G9
C � �\ � ■ - .1, � Qm �:`�\ `�r
;� r \�, '( � c y e J a ��
y � �/ S , �
� z �
� . ! �As oci�les �� v, .
7 ■ � �
a � � 1r�����a� �
� ���� a � �
5 ,,a` U��o��v�11e ��d . � Alexls Dr �
�� o ��i
r\ ; ���� � � _`e0� (!�p. O`
� . 1 �� ,.. , c,c��e\\� ���F � �
�� �� i
`cA , � �a r,� � �
UFN � � � �
s� Cj . 'f�.G Q\ti\� , � � . �/R;! a�
7 �
,�� O ,� v `
a B O � s� �
.. R�n9ef��� � o��� 36� m\�.� .�C, -�`� v�.
- ` d (,'ii� ¢Y' ,�c �gc � . L oi . 2
. Gt '�� < � � G �O
S,^ - - _ � � . �y� � G�e ��� � c> �
a((^� �� � �� o�� G`oo ���y J �
O, �j �� �
... � r'. So` . � . � � S�o
.� . - . . . .. °,F6 .
cn � , � . �._.y`, v9R '
. . � \���.. O
^ �
. .. . ,- .' SyG ��
. _ _ i " � ' : . . � � � S�O :�r �, .
Q. � = r d�
�
o ` � l �� ��` .�� �o,
U`\ � a r f � �o� . 5'^ �
��� s. ,,, . �
e �.
, ��.,�� � ay_ ��
� �� � .
�� C�� ry
� d �u `O 74
0
'I � � ��, � - � d
� �.�� � °�� J�.° � . Ar�hie �� �� � �e�R�s�JAe R
�e`� ttq
Q �, Q� �Q- - /��y ,
1 �v .� � �� _,}��.
�, ; ` ; � �
e � / e adhe"yCn �b �/ �Or �N�a � . ' � .
e -r` C, �Q ��,;
v� - ' "o, � , �
�v � ��f � ` . 6 j
` e_ ? . u . � f t. i
n "� � � � � ' �i
Q l ,
3 � / � G;� �
�i o1ck��� 'o� .
j N . f � �'�,a � ��,
� L �� � �
F
i' _ ,r R� �" :. "��F` �
��° �o� f . —. •
��5` ��„��{,e� , ` � �
� J ��z.
vr
- Q Mustan
'Fenwlrk Dr -� 9 Dr � ` �
. . O � ; � �1 Es Rd
i . - df� � ,c-� N�y �
�
� �
� c� � � � �� � �� r `� ����
i ,r ,^�' � °� G` "``�
� ��. ,`�' ,�� '` ' �� -.��
��
' �° c,o��e�� ��, ,,�'�� ��� �
i� � � � � �` ��� �� � � �°% �
� s
1 � r� ,Q _ �h, *'
�
a��' q c � "�rF R�j
��
. �i.� � � _ y�, �z.�e:_
0 1,000 2,000 4,000 �o„y P�`kD` � � �� � �`r-o
c r
\�`~ ' S; �'`s. �►
Feet �'-�. � � � �;�'�� �� z� �'c
o . %,
� ���� �
OF NQpTFI �Q ENVIRONMENTAL FEATURES MAP County: UNION
y� 96�q STOUTS SIDING EXTENSION
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT CSX SF-LINE Div: 10 STIP# P-5704 Figure
, ; OF TRANSPORTATION FROM WEST OF INDIAN TRAIL ROAD (SR 1008) �
; aQ RAIL DIVISION TO EAST OF HAYES ROAD (SR 1378) WBS: 46398.1.1
9J�F4'TQFTRpH°'Q�� UNION COUNTY Date: JANUARY 2017
STIP PROJECT P-5704

,; ti
n �•�� t �
;, �.
.-'.} a y ,�
F' '. Y � .. ,: . . F �'r :
'�`�r �+�� - ' � �
�r � � � � �. �
``3'�+� �'_ ���_
. h � ���.. _ '•�
. k.r� , � �.�.(` 1r .
. -. � r w `� � - yQ . ` �1 `_
±^�1�' � � � ti 1 ! `��' . 1.1.
. � .� ,�. r �� A r�. � .
:. � a� �,.�,�„ r ,�';�.
` i � '�
'� : �'+�, _ �uTf ' -
,w'1-? �, ���+� .,� ,�
t -
T�4,t.�{�� «t"�.� +,._*+.fr�, �
,*� i.
'.� � ± 1'�^.�' .
�� �° ' � '�
� � ; , r
� �-��-I�- i�� � � �-r
� -i �� ��- ��` �-; ��� ; � i��,- i�
�.�s � � �
�- -- ' - -' �': t—�. �, � ^,y � ` ' � r f
' ._ �i.. . _�.` . ` � .
_��
�J �
'o ' Coral Ridge Ln
� - — — _. I
��t Y ` r
't ' i O 7, ,,
1.
1 ,3 I_
�
_ '� � ��'�� '- ..
Bridgeway Dr `
�`��y
' -. � I
n
�►e�► -, � . -
:�
� .,
., c
48" RCP
.. ' $� 5�i�� a�'.C�q H 1irM'"�4,'�J. ' ? ` . .1L�/�7i jC '-���\�� ' - ' ,�
3 `��+ " I
� �. _ _ � . . ,.. _ _ . _ ' _ __ '_ .. ._ .
'-.'� �'_� .'��.1. '� _ ]i '� � .�_ ' r '. � - . � �-�� � �. . -_ ➢ � . - _ _ , ` - .. ��!` - __--- . ' ' -
`----------------------------------------------'-•-'------� - '"ti��r.�Jr� -------------------'----------�-. ---------------- ------------------------------------------ - -._ . --------•---• ----•---'--- '_- ---^--�--- ------- '- . ------'-----'--.�: -- --. _.. _. __ _.---------'----------- ~
----------_-�------------------�__�,�.�_-_- —�----------- - - ---- - --- — - - ---- -- ---- - - - -- - ,
- ----- ----- - _-_- _-_ - - ---------- __ _ _.. .._��
�� � � � � � � � � �
�' 4
�tk s a.
�' � l ' "Y•- '
f • � * � � ',�� �
3� �
.� �,� �, �-� � _ , �
, � � �.
�����.�,< < �:.
_ . � .� : y� , � �; `.
, ��
�= -�'L�k` - -.�; - �
`� , � .� � - -
, � _ �.,: �. -fi _
-t- �, `� �
_$�'�'� �� _, �
�,�'; `µ � ; _ y -. _ . � � a _, �
-1 ' � �{. �- �.� . _ � ~ . , _ `-�-.yy _ Y,�� +'� ; r'
''� - - ':�; ,��5�^ -`�'r,� ;��
' �-.
� �� ;��`' - :`
., � , . ,
��{�� i ���. �r � i`^It�\ ��� t r �M
"y'_v,� -y ,. .�__� ��,`�„�����,��:� ..�� ''.
Z �
'��+ �' �:�R. ��. `\�.�,� �` f i
-. � �- "� . ',� ,, . �.. �
.�
� . -r�, :. . _ -
� -,
Legend
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT Proposed Railroad �� Existing Railroad � Parcel Boundary (2016) -
OF TRANSPORTATION Proposed Turnout ------- Existing Culvert/Pipe Jurisdictional Streams
RAIL DIVISION
------- Proposed Slopestakes CSX Right of Way �� Jurisdictional Wetlands
Note - Orange Call-Out Box Denotes Culvert Extension
Hydrography (NHD)
FEMA Floodplain
FEMA Floodway
1 2 3 4 5
Sheet 3 of 5
- � � � � : Y . J "
r
, _ � " � I'�� �{,
,,
'•' � ,. . , k�'''�r��
l�yL,f
�.;_T,4
0 100 200 400
Feet
FIGURE 3
RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS
STIP PROJECT P-5704
STOUTS SIDING EXTENSION
WBS #: 46398.1.1
DIV. 10
UNION COUNTY
JANUARY 2017

V
J�
�
� � Li � . ' -f � .. - . . . - - . . '�
�l�. 'ti
� T . .
r,.
�. �T _ ..�•.
r '� , �"
� } �:
. i, - �
�R
�u, c
2.5'W x 3.5'H Triple Barrel Rock Culvert
w/ 3.7'W x 4'H (Outer)
�' and 4.7'W x 4'H (Center) 15" RCP � 15" CMP
_� � �
� Conc. Extension �
�'" I _� _�z - � �
r- - ----.
�,. `� : ' - ` ; . - . �� •.. . ��.. .;:.' ''-�; �4 --.-_--
�
r-
- '' --- `
----�------ -------�--------- _---__------------_--- ----- ------__ __�-------------------------------�-------- -r�:,� - - _.�_ ---�-----------`_.------- ------------------'-------------------------------------------- ------'--
_ � ` �
.,
� -'-- -�' '---- - - - - ----- - -------- - -- - - --�---- --- ------- - - ------ - --- - --- --
-- --- ---------------- -r---;- -:-------- . .a___�_ _._ a - , _-- - - --.. _ . _- _ - •-- - - - '
,� ,-�- ------------------------------------ \ �
___�_.
Country Ln
• ��,.
� �..
,'�
, ,�
` :��'2,�:. _ �
_ . , �, .
Proposed No. 15
Right Hand Turnout
*.�� �. •�
,� . y,• � � �x . . . .
c,�; . ,��5,. �,. ,�.�� , s a c
��-•7i�'�!� •:es����� r�, ' _�� > r �� � -.
t � '
i �} � i� . ' �,� . .
4 • 1 �.`'�}��, � •.
_ L � � �: 1� � ; � -
. '1,1-. � ' �'
, _ �' 4 -^ , ., ' �*+y,� - �i�7' ti , . .
. _ �r .}.�.
_ ^' �+ : �:.i:
��{ t`
� �. :{,��z. '�
_ 7 . /
��'4, ;'.
Legend
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT Proposed Railroad �� Existing Railroad � Parcel Boundary (2016) -
OF TRANSPORTATION Proposed Turnout ------- Existing Culvert/Pipe Jurisdictional Streams
RAIL DIVISION
------- Proposed Slopestakes CSX Right of Way �� Jurisdictional Wetlands
Note - Orange Call-Out Box Denotes Culvert Extension
24" RCP
Hydrography (NHD)
FEMA Floodplain 1 2 3 4 5
FEMA Floodway Sheet 5 of 5
- 18" RCP
15" CMP
0 100 200 400
Feet
FIGURE 3
RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS
STIP PROJECT P-5704
STOUTS SIDING EXTENSION
WBS #: 46398.1.1
DIV. 10
UNION COUNTY
JANUARY 2017
N