20090134 Ver 1_Application_20090211

014
i
Jr
i

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
BEVERLY EAVES PERDUE
GOVERNOR
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
Post Office Box 1000
Washington, NC 27889-1000
Attention: Mr. William Wescott
NCDOT Coordinator
February 4, 2009
F,g
tip. 1 1 <?^
??,rT. <:. Og
EUGENE A. CONTI, JR.
SECRETARY
090134
Subject: Application for Section 404 Individual Permit, Section 401 Water Quality
Certification, and Tar-Pamlico Buffer Authorization for the extension of SR
1537 (Daniel Street) from SR 1518 (Baker Street) to US 258, Tarboro,
Edgecombe County. State Project No. 8.2291201, Debit $570 from WBS
34983.1.1, TIP No. U-3826.
Dear Sir:
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to extend SR 1537
(Daniel Street) in Tarboro, North Carolina from its current terminus at SR 1518 (Baker Street)
eastward to US 258 near NC 122. This application package consists of the cover letter, ENG
Form 4345, half size plan sheets, permit & buffer drawings, FWS concurrence letter, mitigation
plan, and Hydraulic Design Concurrence meeting (4B, 4C) minutes for U-3826.
1.0 Purpose and Need
The purpose of the project is to reduce traffic in downtown Tarboro and improve the route
between Tarboro and regional highways in eastern Edgecombe County.
2.0 Summary of Impacts
Waters of the U.S.: Construction of the proposed project will necessitate impacts to
jurisdictional waters. There will be a total of 1.48 acres of permanent riparian wetland impacts
and 16 linear feet (0.01 acre) of permanent stream impacts. In addition, there will be 0.23 acre
of temporary impacts to wetlands due to temporary fill. There will also be 10 ft. (0.01 acre) of
temporary stream impact, and 0.73 and 0.36 acre of surface water impacts for a work bridge and
a work pad, respectively.
Tar-Pamlico Riparian Buffers: There will be 14,465 ft2 of impacts to riparian buffers for U-
3826; of this, Zone 1 has 8,663 ft2 and Zone 2 has 5,802 ft2.
MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: [phone] - LOCATION:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FAX: [phone] CAPITAL BLVD
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PLB SUITE 168
1598 MAR SERVICE CENTER WEBSITE: WWW.NCDOT.ORG RALEIGH, NC 27604
RALEIGH NC 27699-1596
•i
'N\
n 3.0 Summary of Mitigation
r
The proposed construction of U-3826 will impact 1.48 acres of jurisdictional riparian wetlands
that..will require mitigation within the Tar-Pamlico River Basin. NCDOT will assume
responsibility for satisfying the federal Clean Water Act compensatory mitigation requirements
for the unavoidable impacts to 1.48 acres of impacts to wetland using on-site mitigation and
assets within the same hydrologic unit.
The 14,465 ft2 of riparian buffer impacts are allowable and do not require mitigation.
4.0 Project Schedule
Curr'ently,`U-3826 has a review date of June 2, 2009, is scheduled to let July 21, 2009 and will
be available for construction shortly thereafter.
5.0 NEPA Document Status
An Environmental Assessment (EA) and Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) were
approved by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) on December 8, 2003 and August
10, 2006 respectively, for U-3826 and circulated to the appropriate agencies. A FHWA Right of
Way Consultation was issued on September 19, 2007.
6.0 Independent Utility
The subject project complies with 23 CFR Part 771.111(0, which lists the Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA) characteristics of independent utility of a project:
1) The project connects logical termini and is of sufficient length to address
environmental matters on a broad scope;
2) The project is usable and a reasonable expenditure, even if no additional
transportation improvements are made in the area;
3) The project does not restrict consideration of alternatives for other reasonably
foreseeable transportation improvements.
7.0 Resource Status
Wetlands and streams within the U-3826 Preferred Alternative corridor were delineated in
February and September 2001 using the field delineation method outlined in the 1987 Corps of
Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual. The North Carolina Division of Water Quality's
(DWQ) Identification Methods for the Origins of Intermittent and Perennial Streams was used to
make stream determinations. The original Jurisdictional Determination (JD) was issued on
September 5, 2001. Jurisdictional features were re-verified with William Wescott of the US
Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) on September 19, 2006. At the Corps' request,
jurisdictional determination forms were not submitted due to the Rapanos Supreme Court case.
Two jurisdictional streams have been identified within the project area of U-3826, the Tar River
and an unnamed tributary (UT) to the Tar River. Descriptions of these streams are in Table 1.

It
2

J( Table 1. Jurisdictional Streams
Permit Site Stream Name Sub-basin Stream Index
Number
Best Usage Classification
4 Tar River 03-03-03 28-(74) WS IV; NSW
4 UT to Tar River 03-03-03 28-(74) WS IV,NSW
8.0 Impacts to Jurisdictional Resources
Impacts to jurisdictional wetlands and surface waters for U-3826 are summarized below in
Tables 2 & 3 respectively.
Table 2. Wetland imnnetc
Permit Site Station Permanent ac. Tem ora ac.
1 34+50/36+50 0.75 0.00
2 40+15/41+00 0.04 0.00
3 44+00/46+00 0.22 0.00
4 57+10/59+65 0.69 0.23
Table 3_ Snrfnre Wafer rmno nf?
Permit Site Name Permanent
ft. Temporary
ft. Permanent
ac. Temporary
ac.
4 Tar River 0 0 0 1.09
4 UT to Tar River 16 10 0.01 0.00
8.1 Impacts to Waters of the U.S.
Permanent Imnacts• Proposed permanent impacts include fill, excavation, and mechanized
clearing in wetlands. These impacts are to 1.48 acres of riparian wetlands. There are 16 linear
feet (0.01) of stream impacts from the pipe installation at the UT to the Tar River.
Temporary Impacts: Proposed temporary impacts to riparian wetlands are 0.23 acre of
temporary fill and temporary stream impacts of 10 ft. (0.01 acre). Proposed temporary impacts
also include 0.73 acre (stream) for a work bridge over the Tar River and 0.36 acre (riparian
wetlands) for a work pad.
Hand Clearing: There will be 0.85 acre of hand clearing in riparian wetlands.
Utility Impacts: There will be no impacts due to utilities for U-3826.
8.2 Impacts to Tar-Pamlico River Basin Riparian Buffers
This project is located in the Tar-Pamlico River Basin (HUC 03020103); therefore, the
regulations pertaining to the Tar-Pamlico River Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 213.0233) apply.
There will be 14,465 ft2 of impacts to riparian buffers. This includes 8,663 ft2 in Zone 1 and
5,802 ftZ due to the bridge crossing at Site 1. According to the buffer rules, bridges are
Allowable. Uses designated as Allowable may proceed within the riparian buffer if there are no
3
i
y
practical alternatives to the requested use pursuant to Item (8) of this Rule. All practicable ti
measures to minimize impacts within buffer zones were followed.
9.0 Protected Species
The United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) list two federally protected species for
Edgecombe County as of the January 31, 2008 listing (Table 4).
Table 4_ Federally Protected Snecies in F.duecomhe Cnnntv
Common Name Scientific Name
I
Federal
Habitat
Biological
Status Present Conclusion
Picoides borealis Red-cockaded wood ecker E No No Effect
Elli do steinstansana Tar Rivers in ussel T Yes MANLTAA
NCDOT biologists determined that there was no suitable habitat for the red-cockaded
woodpecker (RCW). Therefore, the biological conclusion is "No Effect".
Surveys were conducted at the project site in the Summer 2002 and in August 2006 for the Tar
River spinymussel (TSM). Suitable habitat and other freshwater mussels were found, but no
TSMs were collected. However, TSMs have been found upstream and downstream of the
project site. Due to this fact and how difficult the TSMs are to find, NCDOT concludes that U-
3826 may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect the TSM. NCDOT, in conjunction with the
USFWS, will complete a biological evaluation (BE) for this project concerning the TSM. The
BE will be finalized in March 2009 after the preconstruction survey for the TSM. Concurrence
will be sought by NCDOT after the survey. Construction will not start until concurrence is
reached.
10.0 Cultural Resources
10.1 Archaeology
An archaeological survey and evaluation were conducted along Alternative D (Preferred
Alternative) and concluded on May 20, 2005 to identify any previously unrecorded
archaeological resources in the project area and to determine if the resources retained the
quality, quantity, and integrity of archeological remains that would qualify a site as eligible for
the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). Four archeological sites and two isolated finds
were identified during the survey. NCDOT archeologists determined that these sites were not
eligible for the NRHP. The State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) has concurred with this
finding. This letter is located in the FONSI.
10.2 Historic Architecture
The only structure that is eligible for the NRHP within the Preferred Alternative is the
Atlantic Coast Rail Line Railroad Bridge. The SHPO has concurred. with this finding. The
SHPO also concurred that there was an effect on this property by the Proposed Alternative.
The Alternative was shifted slightly south of the Bridge and the SHPO signed a concurrence
4
letter on July 16, 2002 stating that there was no effect on the Atlantic Coast Rail Line
Railroad Bridge. This letter is located in the EA.
11.0 FEMA Compliance
The project has been coordinated with appropriate state and local officials and the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to assure compliance with FEMA, state, and local
floodway regulations.
12.0 Mitigation Options
The NCDOT is committed to incorporating all reasonable and practicable design features to
avoid and minimize jurisdictional impacts, and to provide full compensatory mitigation of all
remaining, unavoidable jurisdictional impacts. Avoidance measures were taken during the
planning and NEPA compliance stages; minimization measures were incorporated as part of the
project design.
12.1 Avoidance and Minimization
All jurisdictional features were delineated, field verified and surveyed within the corridor for U-
3826. Using these surveyed features, preliminary designs were adjusted to avoid and/or
minimize impacts to jurisdictional areas. NCDOT employs many strategies to avoid and
minimize impacts to jurisdictional areas in all of its designs. Many of these strategies have been
incorporated into BMP documents that have been reviewed and approved by the resource
agencies and which will be followed throughout construction. All wetland areas not affected by
the project will be protected from unnecessary encroachment. Individual avoidance and
minimization items are as follows:
• The project was designed to avoid or minimize disturbance to aquatic life movements.
• NCDOT will minimize long-term water quality impacts using the most t B
Management Practices for Protection of Surface Waters, as identified in the
Highway Program (FHPM) and North Carolina Administrative Code, Chapter 4.
• Crossings of jurisdictional areas were angled to cross as perpendicular as
•
c
minimize impacts.
The use of a Hazardous Spill Basin.
The use of 3:1 fill slopes in jurisdictional areas where practicable.
The use of hand clearing in wetlands where practicable.
Construction of a longer bridge over the Tar River (this lessened
acre).
recen est
Federal Aid
possible to
wetland impacts by 0.27
To avoid and/or minimize impacts to anadromous fish, the "Stream Crossing Guidelines for
Anadromous Fish Passage" will be followed including an in-stream construction
moratorium from February 15 to September 30 for the Tar River and associated inundated
wetlands. .
NCDOT proposes to use sheet piles on smaller wetlands to sever the connection to the Tar
River in order to avoid impacts to anadromous fish.
5
12.2 Compensation
The NCDOT has avoided and minimized impacts to jurisdictional resources to the greatest extent
possible as described above. The unavoidable impacts to jurisdictional wetlands and streams will be
offset by compensatory mitigation provided by on-site mitigation and with assets from the NCDOT
Onsite Mitigation Debit Ledger. NCDOT will assume responsibility for satisfying the federal Clean
Water Act compensatory mitigation requirements for the unavoidable impacts to 1.48 acres of
wetlands and 16 linear feet of stream resulting from the construction of U-3826.
NCDOT proposes to restore 0.94 acre of riparian wetland for this project (see the wetland drawings
for details). The remaining 0.54 acre of wetland will be offset with assets from the Mildred Wood
Mitigation Site.
The Mildred Wood Mitigation Site was constructed as onsite mitigation for T.I.P. R-21 I I/R-2112A
US 64 relocation in Edgecombe and Martin Counties. The 418-acre site is located in Edgecombe
County southeast of Tarboro and may be accessed from US 64 on its southern boundary. The site
has completed its monitoring period and met prescribed hydrologic and vegetative success criteria.
The Site was originally debited for R-2111, R-2112A, and R-509GB and has since been debited for
R-211213, U-2218, U-2720, B-2980, B-4021, and B-4020. To offset the 0.54 acre of unavoidable
impacts to riparian wetlands associated with T.I.P. U-3826, the Mildred Wood Mitigation Site will
be debited 0.54 acre of riparian wetland restoration. These debits are reflected in the debit ledger
below.
Table 5. NCDOT Onsite Mitigation Debit Ledger (Acres)
As Built
Site name Site TIP HUC River Basin Division County Mitigation Type Amount
Riparian Wetland
Mildred R-2111/ Restoration
Woods R-2112A 3020103 Tar-Pamlico 4 Ed ecombe 395
Available Debit Debit Debit Debit Debit Debit Debit Debit Debit
R-509GB,
R-2111, &
R-2112A R-2112B Alterations U-2218 U-2720 B-2980 B4021 B-4020 U-3826
99.75 217 23 23.5 21.5 6 3 0.25 0.46 0.54
13.0 Indirect and Cumulative Effects
An Indirect' and Cumulative Effects Assessment (ICE) was completed in August 2005. The
report concluded that near-zero growth rate, lack of adequate water and sewer services, and the
floodplain would help deter project-induced growth. Any project related growth would be
within the city limits of Tarboro. U-3826 will not likely induce any significant amount of
growth in this area.
6
L 14.0 Regulatory Approvals
Section 404
Application is hereby made for a USACE Individual 404 Permit as required for the above-
described activities.
Section 401
Application is hereby made for a Section 401 Water Quality Certification from the N. C.
Division of Water Quality.
Tar-Pamlico Riparian Buffer Authorization
NCDOT is requesting a Tar-Pamlico Riparian Buffer Authorization from the NCDWQ.
A copy of this permit application will be posted on the DOT website at:
http://www.ncdot.org/doh/preconstruct/pe/neu/permit.html.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Chris Underwood at
[e-mail] or [phone].
Sincerely
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
Environmental Management Director, PDEA Branch
cc:
W/attachment
Mr. Brian Wrenn, NCDWQ (5 Copies)
Ms. Kathy Matthews, USEPA
W/o attachment (see website for attachments)
Dr. David Chang, P.E., Hydraulics
Mr. Greg Perfetti, P.E., Structure Design
Mr. Victor Barbour, P.E., Project Services Unit
Mr. Mark Staley, Roadside Environmental
Mr. Richard E. Greene, PE, Div. 4 Engineer
Mr. Chad Coggins, Div. 4 Environmental Officer
Mr. Scott McLendon, USACE, Wilmington
Mr. Gary Jordan, USFWS
Mr. Travis Wilson, NCWRC
Mr. Ron Sechler, NMFS
Ms. Anne Deaton, NCDMF
Mr. Jay Bennett, P.E., Roadway Design
Mr. Majed Alghandour, P. E., Programming and TIP
Mr. Art McMillan, P.E., Highway Design
Mr. Bryan Yamamoto, PE, PDEA
Mr. Drew Joyner, PE, Human Environment Unit Head
Mr. Clarence W. Coleman, P.E., FHWA
Ms. LeiLani Paugh, NEU
Mr. Randy Griffin, NEU
APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT
CFR
OMB APPROVAL NO. 0710-003
Expires December 31 2004
Fvblic reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 10 hours per response, although the majority of applications should
require 5 hours or less. This includes the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed,
and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of
information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Service Directorate of Information
Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302; and to the Office of Management and Budget,
Paperwork Reduction Project (0710-0003), Washington, DC 20503. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no
person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number.
Please DO NOT RETURN your form to either of those addresses. Completed applications must be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction
over the location of the proposed activity.
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
Authority: Rivers and Harbors Act, Section 10, 33 USC 403: Clean Water Act, Section 404, 33 USC 1344; Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries
Act, 33 USC 1413, Section 103. Principal Purpose: Information provided on this form will be used in evaluating the application for a permit. Routine
Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local government agencies. Submission of
requested information is voluntary, however, if information is not provided the permit application cannot be evaluated nor can a permit be issued.
One set of original drawings or good reproducible copies which show the location and character of the proposed activity must be attached to this
application (see sample drawings and instructions) and be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of the proposed
activity. An application that is not completed in full will be returned_
1. APPLICATION NO. I 2. FIELD OFFICE CODE 3. DATE RECEIVED 4. DATE APPLICATION COMPLETED
BELOW
8. AUTHORIZED
5. APPLICANTS NAME
North Carolina. Department of Transportation
Project Development & Environmental Analysis
6. APPLICANTS ADDRESS
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1548
7. APPLICANTS PHONE NOS. W/AREA
a. Residence
b. Business 919-733-3141
NAME AND TITLE (an agent is not required)
AUUKtJJ
qu. AOtN I5 VHUNE NOS. W/AREA CODE
a. Residence
b. Business
I hereby authorize, to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to furnish, upon
request, supplemental information in support of this permit application.
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE . DATE
NAME, LOCATION, AND DESCRIPTION OR PROJECT OR ACTIVITY
12. PROJECT NAME OR TITLE (see instruct.)
U-3826
NAMt Uh WA I tKtlUUY, IF KNOWN (if applicable)
Tar River
15. LOCATION OF PROJECT
Edcecombe NC
COUNTY STATE
14. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS (if applicable)
10. V I nCK -WI. I I VIN UnJ%-Klr I IUNJ, It KNOWN (see inso,etions) Section, Township, Range, LaeLOn, and/or Accessors's Parcel N."er, for eitample.
17. DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE
Please see attached vicinity map and cover letter.
ENG FORM 4345, Jul 97 EDITION OF FES 94 1S OBSOLETE (Proponent: CECW-OR)
X18. Nature of Activity (Description of project, include all features)
Extension of SR 1537 (Daniel Street) from SR 1518 (Baker Street) to US 258. This will be new location. There Will be a 1450'
Wridge with two bents in the water. There will also be 0.94 acre of wetland restoration.
lu. rto)ect rurpuse(Descriie the reason or Purpose of the proleet. see instwebers)
County. reduce traffic in downtown Tarboro and improve the route between Tarboro and regional highways in eastern Edgecombe
USE BLOCKS 20-22 IF DREDGED AND/OR FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE DISCHARGED
20. Reason(s) for Discharge
Construction of roadway and bridge.
21. Type(s) of Material Being Discharged and the Amount of Each Type in Cubic Yards
earthen fill
22. Surface Area in Acres of Wetlands or Other Waters Filled (see instructions)
1.36 permanent acres of wetland, 0.23 temporary acre of wetland, 0.01 permanent acre of surface water, and 0.01
temporary acre of surface water.
23. Is Any Portion of the Work Already Complete? Yes _ No X IF YES, DESCRIBE THE COMPLETED WORK
24. Addresses of Adjoining Property Owners, Lessees, Etc., Whose Property Adjoins the Waterbody (If more than can be entered here, please attach a supplemental list).
Please see sheet 2 of 21 in the permit drawing package.
25. List of Other Certifications or Approvals/Denials Received from other Federal, State, or Local Agencies for Work Described in This Application.
AGENCY TYPE APPROVAL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER DATE APPLIED DATE APPROVED DATE DENIED
Would include but is not restricted to zoning, building and flood plain permits
26. Application is hereby made for a permit or permits to authorize the work described in this application. I certify that the information in this application is
complete and accurate. I /futrther certify that I possess the authority to undertake the work described herein or am acting as the duly authorized agent
of the applicant. Aok
6-V E-3-al
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE SIGNATURE OF AGENT DATE
The application must be signed by the person who desires to undertake the proposed activity (applicant) or it may be signed by a duly authorized
agent if the statement in block 11 has been filled out and signed.
18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides that: Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States knowingly
and willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up any trick, scheme, or disguises a material fact or makes any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or
representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or entry, shall
be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both.
ENG FORM 4345. Jul 97 EDITION 0 F FEB 9415 OBSOLETE (Proponent: CECW-OR)
Daniel Street Extension Wetland Restoration Plan
TIP U-3826
Edgecombe County
Federal Aid Project No. STP-1537(2)
WBS 34983.1.1
January 22, 2009
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) will perform on-site
mitigation for riverine wetland impacts associated with Transportation Improvement
Program (TIP) U-3826. NCDOT will restore approximately 0.864 acres of bottomland
hardwood forest to be used as onsite riverine wetland mitigation for impacts associated
with the roadway project.
EXISTING CONDITIONS
The proposed roadway project is located northeast of the Town of Tarboro in Edgecombe
County. The project begins at the intersection of SR 1518 and Daniel Street west of the
Tar River and continues to the intersection of Hwy 258 and NC 122 east of the Tar River.
The Environmental Assessment for TIP U-3826, dated December 2003, provides further
details concerning existing roadway and project study area conditions.
The proposed project extends across the Tar River and its floodplain. The floodplain on
the west side of the Tar River consists mainly of riverine swamp forest dominated by
canopy species of bald cypress (Taxodium distichum), water tupelo (Nyssa aquatica), and
swamp chestnut oak (Quercus michauxii). The floodplain on the east side of the Tar
River consists mainly of bottomland hardwood forest with a mix of water oak (Quercus
nigra), willow oak (Quercus phellos), river birch (Betula nigra), water tupelo, swamp
chestnut oak, bald cypress and red maple (Ater rubrum). An abandoned railroad
causeway extends across the Tar River along the length of the roadway project. On the
east side of the Tar River, the railroad causeway runs parallel to the proposed roadway
project along the north side.
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
The proposed riverine wetland mitigation will consist of restoring 0.864 acres of
bottomland hardwood forest. A section of the abandoned railroad causeway and
connecting road, from Station 52+35 to Station 57+50, will be graded to wetland
elevation. Target elevations will be based on elevations taken in the wetland areas
adjacent to the proposed restoration areas. All excavated areas shall be ripped and disked
if necessary prior to planting of the site.
The restoration site will be planted following the successful completion of the site
grading. The site will be planted at a density of 680 trees/acre on 8 foot centers with at
least four of the following species as available: swamp chestnut oak, water oak, willow
oak, river birch water tupelo and bald cypress.
The Natural Environment Unit shall be contacted to provide construction assistance, as
needed, to ensure that the wetland mitigation area is constructed appropriately.
MONITORING:
Upon successful completion of construction, the following monitoring strategy is
proposed for the mitigation site. NCDOT will document monitoring activities on the site
in an annual report distributed to the regulatory agencies.
No specific hydrological monitoring is proposed for this restoration site. The target
elevation will be based on the adjacent wetland and verified during construction.
Constructing the site at the adjacent wetland elevation will ensure the hydrology in the
restored area is similar to the hydrology in the reference area.
Reforestation monitoring will be conducted by visual observation and photo points for
survival and density of vegetation. Success criteria for reforestation is based on survival
of 320 stems per acre after three years. NCDOT shall monitor the site for a minimum of
three years or until the site is deemed successful. Monitoring will be initiated upon
completion of the site planting.

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
U-3826, WBS No. 34983.1.1
EDGECOMBE COUNTY
Hydraulics Project Manager: Andrew Nottingham, PE
Date 05/30/08
ROADWAY DESCRIPTION
The project involves the extension of SR 1537 (Daniel Street Extension) from SR 1518
to US 258/ NC 122. The roadway width is 36 feet with 2-12 foot travel lanes and 6 foot
shoulders for bikes and pedestrians. The overall length of the project is 1.70 miles. The
proposed improvements will include grading, paving, drainage, guardrail, and structures.
ENVIRONMENTAL DESCRIPTION
The project is located in the Tar-Pamlico River Basin. There is 1 major stream crossing
on this project. It is located at the Tar River which is classified as WS IV, CA, NSW
water. This area is endangered Tar Spinymussel habitat. The Tar River is in the vicinity
of the project's identified as an anadromous fish spawning area.
Approximately 16 feet of existing stream will be impacted due to the project.
Approximately 1.48 acres of wetlands will be impacted.
Approximately 0.94 acre of wetlands will be restored.
BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AND MAJOR STRUCTURES
Best Management Practices (BMPs) and measures used on the project are an attempt to
reduce the stormwater impacts to the receiving streams due to erosion and runoff.
Grassed swales and preformed scour holes were used where practicable to treat
stormwater runoff prior to entering the streams. Bridge deck drainage will not be
allowed to directly discharge into the water. Bridge deck drainage will be directed to
hazardous spill basins on each end of the bridge. There is one major stream crossing
consisting of a new bridge at the Tar River. There is also a 18" RCP replacing a 15" RCP
at an Unnamed Tributary to the Tar River.
GRASSED SWALES
-L- STA 22+00 TO STA 34+00 (RT)
-L- STA 22+00 TO STA 26+00 (LT)
-L- STA 37+00 TO STA 40+00 (RT)
-L- STA 41+70 TO STA 43+50 (RT)
-L- STA 62+00 TO STA 63+00 (RT)
-L- STA 62+00 TO STA 63+50 (LT)
-L- STA 70+00 TO STA 70+50 (RT)
r.
HAZARDOUS SPILL BASINS
-L- STA 40+00 TO STA 41+50 (RT)
-L- STA 58+50 TO STA 60+00 (RT)
BRIDGES
-L- from STA 41+95 to STA 57+35 (total length= 1540', 14 spans @ 110') New bridge
over the Tar River and wetlands. A temporary work bridge and a temporary work pad
will be used in the construction of the bridge. .
FINAL MINUTES OF INTERAGENCY 4C MEETING
MEETING FOR PROJECT U-3826, EDGECOMBE COUNTY
HELD ON 6/18/2008
Team Members: Andrew Nottingham
William Wescott
Gary Jordan
Travis Wilson
Rob Ridings
Kathy Matthews
Ron Lucas for Donnie Brew
Jimmy Goodnight
Chris Rivenbark
Brian Yamamoto
Wendi Johnson
Kevin Bowen
Omar Azizi
Mark Staley for David Harris
NCDOT-Hydraulics (Present)
USACE (Present, teleconference)
USFWS (present)
NCWRC (present)
NCDWQ (Present)
EPA (Present)
FHWA (Present)
NCDOT-Roadway (Present)
NCDOT-NEU (Present)
NCDOT-PDEA (absent)
NCDOT-Division 4 (Present)
NCDOT-Construction (Present)
NCDOT-Structures (Present)
NCDOT-REU (Present)
Participants:
Tim Coggins
Melanie Nguyen
Chris Underwood
LeiLani Paugh
Steve Kendall
Jason Mays
Lance Fontaine
NCDOT-Structures
NCDOT-Hydraulics
NCDOT-NEU
NCDOT-NEU
NCDOT-Roadway
NCDOT-NEU
NCDOT-NEU
DOT began the meeting at 2:30 P.M. with an overview of the project.
Hydraulics reviewed the Stormwater Management Plan included with the permit
package. There were no comments.
The team then proceeded to review the permit drawings.
Site 1 on plan sheet 5 was reviewed. There were no comments.
Site 2 and 3 on plan sheet 6 were then reviewed. It was noted that the drive right of
station 38+50- L- was to provide access to parcel 4 as well as provide access to maintain
the hazardous spill basin right of station 40+00 -L-.
Site 4 on plan sheet 6 and 7 was then reviewed. The existing gravel access road on parcel
5 will have to be maintained during and after construction. A portion of the unnamed
tributary to the Tar River will be impacted due to the access road having to be realigned
to avoid a proposed bridge pier. Approximately 0.94 acres of wetland restoration is
proposed at site 4 by removing a portion of the old railroad fill north of the project as
shown on the drawings.
The next two permit drawing sheets showing the location of the temporary work bridge
and work pad needed to construct the bridge were then reviewed. USFWS noted that
they had originally planned on doing a formal section 7 consultation but now intend on
doing an informal section 7 consultation.
The buffer permit drawings were reviewed and there were no additional comments.
The meeting was adjourned at approximately 3:00 p.m.
After the meeting was adjourned the USFWS and EPA noted that the gravel access road
to parcel 5 appeared to be elevated above the wetland and wetland restoration area. They
asked if it could be lowered to the wetland elevation. It was noted that NCDOT designed
the grade of the access road to match the existing access road grade through the wetland
area which is slightly above the existing wetland elevation. NCDOT will investigate if
the access road can be lowered any but noted that it will have to be elevated slightly to
maintain the stability of the road.
FINAL MINUTES OF INTERAGENCY 411 MEETING
PROJECT U-3826, EDGECOMBE COUNTY
Hydraulics Unit Conference Room
August 23, 2006
9:00 am to 11:00 am
Team Members:
Andrew Nottingham
William Wescott
Gary Jordan
Travis Wilson
Rob Ridings
Chris Militscher
Kathy Matthews
Clarence Coleman
Jimmy Goodnight
Omar Azizi
Brian Yamamoto
Chris Underwood
Eddie Bunn for Wendi O. Johnson
Ron Hancock
Sarah McBride
Participants:
Brian Wrenn
Dewayne Sykes
Tim Coggins
Amy Billings
Mark Staley
Elizabeth Lusk
Wade Kirby
Logan Williams
Chris Rivenbark
Jason Mays
Worth Calfee
Veronica Barnes
Elizabeth Workman-Maurer
NCDOT, Hydraulics (Present)
USACE (Present)
USFWS (Present)
WRC (Present)
DWQ (Present)
EPA (Present)
EPA (Present)
FHWA (Absent)
NCDOT, Roadway (Present)
NCDOT, Structures (Present)
NCDOT, PDEA (Present)
NCDOT, NEU (Present)
Division 4 (Present)
NCDOT, Construction (Present)
SHPO (Absent)
DWQ
NCDOT, Roadway
NCDOT, Structures
NCDOT, Hydraulics
NCDOT, Roadside Enviro.
NCDOT,NEU
NCDOT,PDEA
NCDOT,NEU
NCDOT,NEU
NCDOT_NEU
NCDOT,NEU
NCDOT,NEU
RK&K
Andrew started the meeting stating that the 4A meeting for this project was held on
December 14. 2004. Since that time, there have been a lot of changes in personnel
working on this project. Some of the issues that have been discussed in the past include
the following:
• Tar spinymussel Section 7 Consultation
• In-water Moratorium on Anadromous Fish (Inland Primary Nursery Areas)
• Critical Watershed Area (use of Hazardous Spill Basins)
• High Quality Wetlands
• Historical Railroad Bridge
• Tar River Buffer Rules
• Abandoned Railroad bed
• Town of Tarboro's desire to put in a multi-use trail, picnic area, and canoe launch in
the area (abandoned RR RNV)
• Tar River is in a detailed Flood Study
Considering all this information, Andrew then proceeded to go through the project sheet
by sheet.
Sheet 4
Andrew described this area of the project as being relatively flat. There will be ditches
running along both sides of the proposed roadway. The drainage area that these ditches
will pick up is mostly from the new roadway. There were no comments.
Sheet 5
The ditches continue running alongside the north and south sides of the project. The
northern ditch outlets into an existing wetland at approximately STA 26+00. The
southern ditch outlets into an existing wetland at approximately STA 34+00. DWQ
would prefer the ditches to widen before reaching the wetlands. Andrew responded that
these ditches could be widened before entering the wetlands and that check dams could
be used. These methods would help slow and disperse the flow before reaching the
wetlands.
Andrew moved on to the bridge over wetland D3. EPA questioned if there were any
pipes under the abandoned railroad right of way. There are no existing pipes under the
railroad. There is no connectivity between the wetlands on either side of the railroad for
the entire length of the project. Andrew questioned the benefit of the bridge at this
location. The wetland being spanned is at the very edge of wetland D3 with the railroad
embankment being on the other side. As it stands now, the bridge has a total length of
166 LF. Only the high quality portion of this wetland is being spanned. Currently the
wetland impact is 0.350 Acres. Bridging this area versus filling this area is only saving
0.383 Ac. of wetland impact. Initially this area was shown using 2:1 side slopes in the
draft FONSI. The final FONSI uses 3:1 side slopes.
Elizabeth Lusk (PDEA-NEU) wanted to know if the fill slopes of the proposed roadway
were up against the fill slopes of the railroad. They are.
Gary Jordan (USFWS) asked if we could get wetland enhancement by putting cross pipes
under the railroad embankment. Andrew replied that any size pipe would be relatively
small in relation to the flows going through this area. This would result in some large
scour holes. Gary then asked how large a pipe would it take to make this idea beneficial.
Andrew replied that any size pipe would not be advisable, and basically you would have
to open up the whole area. If one looks at the map of the area, you can see how the river
bends to the east and it would tend to migrate in that direction. Removing fill on the west
side of the river would short cut the flow to the river. Gary (USFWS) commented that
the wetland to the north of the railroad embankment is just a small remnant wetland.
Andrew then showed some slides of wetland D3 to the group.
Sheet 6
Andrew discussed the ditches on either side of the proposed roadway. The ditch to the
south will be directed toward a hazardous spill basin at approximately STA 42+00. The
ditch to the north will be directed back to wetland D3 as shown on sheet 5. DWQ
preferred this ditch (north of the railroad) to go to the right and be directed via a cross
pipe to the same hazardous spill basin at STA 42+00 -L- (RT). Andrew said this would
not be a problem. EPA questioned the hazardous spill basin being inside the floodway.
Per DWQ, this is not a problem.
Andrew went on to discuss the 990' long bridge over the Tar River. This bridge would
have a drainage system on it directing the flow to the ends of the bridge and into the
hazardous spill basins. Due to the floodway being updated; this bridge is now
approximately 250' longer than the original bridge proposed in the draft FONSI. Several
photos of the area were shown in a slideshow. Various water levels were shown at
various times of the year.
Gary Jordan (USFWS) discussed the endangered Tar spinymussel. He explained that the
Tar spinymussel should not delay the project, and it is unrelated to the moratorium for the
anadromous fish. A mussel survey was conducted in August 2006. No Tar spinymussels
were found during this survey.
The Biological Assesment (BA) is being prepared by NEU. In the past, the Tar
spinymussels have been located close to the project, but they are hard to find. They were
originally discovered up and downstream of the project. In order to prepare the BA, a
footprint of the bridge will be needed. The footprint should show both permanent and
temporary impacts. It takes 135 days to complete the Biological Opinion (BO). (April
21, 2009 is the current Let Date for this project.)
Travis Wilson (NCWRC) then discussed the anadromous fish moratorium that covers
areas of inundation connected to the Tar River. He stated that at a previous meeting with
the DOT, the DOT asked about using sheet piling to isolate the wetlands in order to do
construction. Due to the unique nature of this project with the railroad fill acting as a
barrier on one side of the wetland, Travis was able to consider this option under 3
conditions:
1. It is installed when the conditions are dry, and it is not effected by a moratorium.
2. There are no additional clearing limits due to installing the sheet piling.
If there is inundation inside the sheet piling, then BMPs (Best Management Practices)
are used for dewatering.
If these conditions are met, then sheet piling would be ok to use, and work may be done
inside the sheet piling.
Gary Jordan (USFWS) needs information on the work bridges and causeways in the BA.
Work bridges are preferred. Causeways would be difficult to maintain with the water
level being unpredictable. Andrew commented that the work bridge would likely span
the river and probably be higher than elevation 21+/- based on the water levels seen in
March and July of 2006. The new bridge is approximately 40'-45' higher than the bed
elevation of the Tar River.
Gary Jordan asked if the contractor could change the work bridge and causeway
information shown on the permit drawings. Ron Hancock answered that the contractor
can change the permit information to have less wetland impacts, but not more wetland
impacts.
Andrew moved on to discuss Tributary A. Stream A as shown on sheet 6 and sheet 7 is
jurisdictional, but is not considered for mitigation or buffer protection. During normal
conditions, Stream A does not appear to adequately support herring movement.
Therefore, Stream A, in its current state, is not a connectivity source. Elizabeth Lusk
(PDEA-NEU) commented that the JD (jurisdictional determination) for this project was
last done in September 2001 and it would have to be redone.
It was noted that wetland D3 does not appear to have connectivity with the Tar River
during its normal or low water conditions. Under normal or low water conditions, the D3
wetland may be separated from the river and, therefore, may not be subject to the
moratorium.
Sheet 7
Andrew moved on to discuss sheet 7. The drainage system on the bridge will drain to the
east side to a proposed hazardous spill basin (HSB).
DWQ questioned where the outlet of the HSB on the east side of the bridge was located.
Andrew noted that the HSB would outlet on the north side of the bridge to Tributary A
and then outlet to the Tar River via the Tributary.
The other HSB on the west side of the bridge outlets into D8. DWQ would prefer a
preformed scour hole (PSH) at that location. DWQ would also like to see some
calculations for grassed swales on the next set of plans. DWQ would prefer to see 3:1
slopes for the ditches rather than 2:1. Eddie Bunn (Division 4) would also prefer 3:1
slopes. Andrew told DWQ that the bridge deck drainage would be piped to a HSB and
dispersed to the wetland area.
The bridge over wetland D 10 was then discussed. EPA questioned the benefit of using
equalizer pipes at this location. Andrew commented that from a hydraulics point of view,
if we did anything, we would remove all of the embankment.
Gary Jordan (USFWS) would like to see the embankment removed for enhancement.
Gary also suggested that if the City of Tarboro continues the trail in this area, maybe a
small footbridge would be adequate in this area of removed fill. Dewayne Sykes
(NCDOT-Roadway) commented that the railroad right of way is believed to have been
reverted back to the property owners in the area. Gary Jordan wanted to know how much
credit we could get for enhancement, and he would like this investigated further.
NCDOT will investigate this option. There was some discussion of mitigation and
enhancement. FHWA may have some funding under the TEA 21 program.
USACE asked if wetland D10 and E7 could be connected. Andrew noted that this would
not be a problem. There is approximately a one foot difference in elevation between the
two wetlands.
Andrew proposed the removal of the western bridge and extending the eastern bridge to
connect with the Tar River bridge. According to Chris Militscher (EPA), the first high
quality wetland was bridged due to two issues. The first issue was the high quality
wetland (bluff area) and the second issue was the difficulty in stabilization of the fill near
the wetland. Dewayne Sykes believed the cost of the fill would be less than the cost of a
bridge at this location. Chris reinforced that the quality of the system was also an
important consideration in the decision to bridge this area. The agencies would need to
visit these areas and weigh the benefit versus impact prior to making a decision or
revisiting Concurrence Point No. 2A. There have been a lot of personnel changes during
this project. Chris Militscher and Gary Jordan are the only two members of the team who
have worked on this project since CP 2A. Several people in the meeting believed that
shifting the first bridge to lengthen the bridge over the Tar River may be more beneficial
to the project overall. It was agreed that ifNCDOT wants to pursue this option then the
group would look at the project again in the field before reaching any decision. NCDOT
will evaluate the cost and mitigation benefits associated with this option including the
option of removing the old railroad fill at this location.
Sheet 8
Andrew discussed sheet 8. There were no comments.
Sheet 9
Andrew discussed sheet 9. There were no comments.
Sheet 10
Andrew discussed sheet 10. There were no comments.
The meeting adjourned at 11:00 a.m.
MINUTES OF INTERAGENCY 4B FIELD REVIEW MEETING
PROJECT U-3826, EDGECOMBE COUNTY
October 16,2006
9:30 AM to 1:00 PM
A field review of the project site was held on October 16, 2006 with the following people
in attendance:
Andrew Nottingham NCDOT, Hydraulics
William Wescott USACE
Gary Jordan USFWS
Travis Wilson WRC
Rob Ridings DWQ
Chris Militscher EPA
Kathy Matthews EPA
Leilani Paugh NCDOT, NEU
Amy Billings NCDOT, Hydraulics
Elizabeth Workman-Maurer RK&K
Joanna Harrington RK&K
Andrew stated that the purpose of this meeting was to review the wetlands and bridge
locations and decide if the alternative discussed in the 4B meeting held on August 23,
2006 was acceptable. Specifically, looking at the alternative of eliminating the proposed
bridge over wetland D3 (from STA 34+50 (+/-) to STA 36+45 (+/-) -L-) west of the Tar
River and connecting the bridge over the Tar River with the bridge over wetland D10
(from STA 51+70 (+/-) to STA 58+00 (+/-) -L) east of the Tar River. This alternative
would span more of wetland D10 reducing the overall wetland impacts for the project by
approximately 0.27 acres. It was noted that the cost for this alternative was
approximately the same as the presently proposed design.
Since the 4B Meeting was held on August 23, 2006, RK&K, USACE and DWQ have
reverified the wetlands and streams on September 19, 2006. Liz Workman provided
copies of a reverified wetlands map and a jurisdictional update sheet to the group. Liz
discussed the changes that were made as a result of the reverification.
At this point, Gary Jordan (USFWS) asked if DOT had investigated mitigation involving
the removal of the old railroad fill in the vicinity of wetland D10. After some discussion,
DOT noted that they had not come to a final decision on this issue. It was noted that
DOT would continue to investigate the possibility of wetland mitigation at this site.
The group proceeded to look at wetland D10 and E7 on the east side of the Tar River.
Both sides of the railroad right of way were viewed so the group could get an idea of the
wetland on the north side of the railroad. This is the area where possible mitigation
might occur by removing the old railroad fill and connecting the wetlands on each side.
It was noted that due to the reverification, wetlands D10 and E7 boundaries have changed
slightly since the final FONSI. This resulted in a slight reduction of the wetland impacts
at these sites. Andrew noted that DOT would connect wetland sites D10 and E7 by
grading out a small area next to the fill slope between the wetlands. There is
approximately a one-foot difference in elevation between the two wetlands where they
are separated by the roadway fill.
The group also looked at Stream W. Several small wetlands have been added.
surrounding Stream `A' (DI 1). Stream `A' is intermittent and no mitigation is required.
Some discussion occurred about whether or not the existing dirt road that crosses Stream
`A' would be left in place if this area were bridged. It was determined that the road could
be taken out if this area were bridged.
The group then proceeded to the west side of the Tar River to review wetland D3.
The group looked at wetland D3, and after some discussion, the group agreed to lengthen
the bridge over the Tar River to connect with the bridge over wetland D10, and eliminate
the bridge over wetland D3. As noted above, this would save approximately 0.27 acre of
wetlands. It was agreed that the existing road fill and the existing pipe at wetland D 10
and Stream `A' would be removed. It was also agreed that DOT would continue to
investigate mitigation involving removing the old railroad fill in the vicinity of wetland
D10.
The meeting adjourned at 1:00 p.m.

"• ' i
a):
I
I l
_'.'; .-tom -?a. •s

u? J tit\
1 ? sa

s i L .3?

. ]a : 13.]w ? 1] f1 'f1y11 911 1: I".
? ? Y.]J{ 1 ]1 I f f1 ? J
1 1;,4 ?' - - - ii J?I{ 'Do ? ?i h13! '11?if?1!]333i ill Ifi w
tl 1i If rf t. it f:l ?' !la i.1 l1 -f 1
.'1? ? Ir :. ;•?? - *.1 ita?l 13?1?`+ ufi a °
• 1?! ? .:I if ja Jlil i I Iii i
1 i n31 ] r
]Y Y ?I 1 1 J 11311 3I a Ali )!r Y]l ? i
i]fry1?flf? I .???91J? ]lily f!ipifll fi ijL11+ _
r ]fJ ]f ? I J ffnf Jft fgJf aif Jl 9l
!i]lililf3!ii 3?fla #!i!jI iifliii 7 i I ?a
#tlu?i1 aJ 3? i J ?j i ?{l i Il •? _ 1?1??;? ]-.:
' ] fa ?u#? a 37faFf 71 I ?. ? i pf rf } I • ,.
!,i} iIL ?iJ'iiJ? ]i I] II l? J M >?l I?' .
!;?3#+9a 1#1 34 l 3ji?ayyf? a ? LP a „#? ?? ' !k ?.
i 3L'.vrei?'
s•. . 5y. i?a ti
l I IV'F? 11'J? iy ]yyi? f {L
J! I
f
1 ,E ry. :: yi, 3 q
3. 1 31 i#i« I ? # ?+f?ll.lik
al ' i • ? Fr
J
i' P ?' 1iN J a+it#7i.']tt fi3 i 5 y fna 'e i'-
i?@ ..:.. yi'J33-s fl-f'af m•f, --
axv
1 I i w'Auiryi3
.] 1 •- if i .I.
„?y1 ?'3 ? I ? I. Id}
-iii;` ?j ? ?• .. { •I .
a
1 _
I 3
r.
-17
_ ?' ita j1 j') air a
^ r?
NCDOT
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
EDGECOMBE COUNTY
PROJECT: 34983.1.1 (U-3826)
SR 1537 (DANIEL ST. EXT.)
FROM SR 1518 (LOOP RD.)
TO US258 / NC122
BUFFER PERMIT
r OF 05/14/0

PROPERTY OWNERS
NAMES AND ADDRESSES
BUFFER PERMIT
PARCEL NO. NAMES ADDRESSES
4 GEORGE F. YORK
6 GEORGE H. JOHNSON, JR.
5 ANNE BOONE SHELTON URQUHART
P. O. Box 459
Conetoe, NC
27819
P. O. Box 2946
Greeneville, NC
27836
P. O. Box 366
Speed, NC
27881
NCDOT
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
EDGECOMBE COUNTY
PROJECT: 349831.1 (U-3826)
SR 1537 (DANIEL ST. EXT.)
FROM SR 1518 (LOOP RD.)
TO US 258/NC 122
SHEET OF 0511411
?? "'a of S
F N
Z w„
L W
Q
N
W 111
LL
U
Q
=
J
m
IL
Z19
w
N
Q

O o
r
w
m
Q
0 wr
z
o
F O
? N
Z
O o
N
J ?
N
v °
O o

J
w
Q m o
V N
W N N
? O N
O N

y/ Q N0
N Z b
H ON -
w

Q J
wr
a ?<

- a
w
W w o
a
x
LL
LL
m
? ?
M
W D y

00

U
O
C

O
r * v
N LL Q
W
N
h r W

U n m
7
K
r

Z J
w Q
~ F
to
0
H
`o
?I
w
N
I

I ?c
4
% 5
.- I 1} 1

J 'w'i
`
IFf -: y

I

,._
I],
?
?1?11
a
?]
- - V
?
.,
gj.
i
]ll i
ia
11111]? f{ai xf3 i 1 ! i t % ? ?
-a?+
? rl ??
?
II
?
??ji!]i ?j ? } i i3 ! • 1 I

r3 SY'If 'TS'Ha?j,R1 r ti

,
331 3r3:j t t-]" .?,? 1 __ ` I ?,,
#1'?1vai 3fiY ' .
?•

- 1,j? 333' i? t .I n
i
'•
j..

r
9
I11
X?c°k! ?i I
?v3ro 1 ??? 1

I ? ' 1 U
i
? ?
I
? •?] a e)j
.
,.y
F
l
Y `y 13 I]] I'+ ] ' I y ' +]i
wa i3 I
!
-nnn Ai x
?SIJl.?'...1
ISd? of
Ii
i? s
?? }5 1 ] a + iti
114 si>'- ]?
? (
If 1 \ i 5
4 a

\ 1 ?
1
I

? '?`? 1 T rtr,

a• 11
}u fir'
i
>3:
3' ' 4 I I

? Ila
f
I ?f
i N>I

..'
.
I
r Lau -
? Y
-
-
L
I
.I Id

Z
Yj1
0 3 ?Ji n
¢:

r?4 lr
V

t
-
?
I
W7
?„y
"

? !
1
.
] Y I i
[ ?c

NCDOT
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
EDGECOMBE COUNTY
PROJECT: 349811.1 (U-3826)
SR 1537 (DANIEL ST. EXT.)
FROM SR 1518 (LOOP RD.)
TO US258/NC122
WETLAND/SURFACE WATER PERMIT
SHEET 9k%ffF FM'00iL A 05111101
uif e? I

PROPERTY OWNERS
NAMES AND ADDRESSES
WETLAND/SURFACE WATER PERMIT
PARCEL NO. NAMES ADDRESSES
4 GEORGE R YORK
6 GEORGE H. JOHNSON, IR.
5 ANNE BOONE SHELTON URQUHART
P. O. Box 459
Conetoe, NC
27819.
P. O. Box 2946
Greeneville, NC
27836
P. O. Box 366
Speed, NC
27881
NCDOT
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
EDGECOMBE COUNTY
PROJECT: 34983.1.1 (U-3826)
SR 1537 (DANIEL ST. EXT.)
FROM SR 1518 (LOOP RD.)
TO US 258/NC 122
SHEET _ OE 0511410
stio.. -7 .:r .2 1

= o
O

F
c N `?
r T m
t- n

E 6
m
i 3
L) y L a
r ?.
F
x
L
O
O
Z O m
i
U
O
f U
c N
¢ C ? m?
3

O
U
Z

x
v

LLJ U

n
W U
¢ ¢
¢ r

m II m
O o
n O

3

?
W II
N

W ? O
O ¢¢
m a
Z
O Y Y
F m¢
¢ 00

O Y >
y
W ¢ ¢
n O O
a a

? w w

^
W W Lu

O O O
Z Z Z

e?m
? a N Z
a
N ?
Z

(/J C C U 2

w
E ~
¢
a U

? m a N a
? m n E? ? m
w
w U E a

U N
I¢i E >i m ? o p

?
E o

m _
Y
C
a N

°

0
?

N m
E E
0

o
a
?
N
F
U N
? ? c
a mv_=vim N IO °
U

N
O
?
? U O ?
W m a
a O
N a 3
U ° ° °
O H ?
c
2 U

J ¢
a N

H
? v
c
? ?
c
a
2 u
a
? W

W
?? N
a
a ?
c
E - ! ? q I.l
N m
N
F ILL ?

> O
p
C
N
a a
c ? C
N_ N U
'°
!? y
O
fp 0
m
E
u, 0 0 0
3
a

Z
O
U
J
J J
J
? J
J
v n IL W ? W

AFT ¢
Q
N
Q

` N
rnN ?
¢ ?
¢ O
U O
¢
o o W o

?

m
° o m
i
u
o
o m
e ? m
E al v In

a
O
m l`L
Ip
+
Ill
O
O

y
m +
? +
? i
I?n

J
fA Z ? N M C
?
O
¢ v O V I

m
w
? n

PLAN VIEW
SITE q
NCDOT
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
EDGECOMBE COUNTY
PROJECT: 31983.1.1 (U-3826)
SR 1537 (DANIEL ST. EXTJ
FROM SR 1518 (LOOP RD.)
TO US 258/ NC 122
5/15/0
w-Onm. r.......-. al
ob.." 4 of
rdy_buf f er_tsh.dgn
CONTRACT.- TIP PROJECT: U-3826

0 0

T

m o

= 5
O
Z° H y

O o o

D
y
0 0
0 0

b
I
? N
O N
O ?kf
(

< _
O <
N
N n
aR i
u
II II II II II II ? x
v o? o
N u, ? b
c ? g g y
? ; X a2 aE o o a
v

h

y 'A
O
n?
a

n ? y
y
c,
!
y
d y
y x
a

b N
q
? 'y7
r N T ,
Q pl °` II
Fh
?f
ti
11 ?

ti EEEti??iii
i
r4 z
<
Q
O
m°,
m
b
m 47
A m
y °

N yyy
OR1
G
m • °
m v
J
V W
y ? y?
b ?G?
g
•

ti R
4
z
z O n
v
_ »

I r
S
m
H I?
??
mm

a

Y ?
y

M
y
y
b?
's, ArAr
M hh?
?y
?n
x
H
H
N y
y
y
K
bb
p
8
s?
C4
z?
?z
U1

a

u
"
N J a
a
C ?
W
Go

V
V O,
N N a

?
m
' ? r ah
$m 9 gp®

m n
T
t Q
g "

GT-
r?
z z
F®
=1
q?
z
n entel\tl.aanga\buffer \buffe._ pab06.dgn B/V/99
MATCHUNE )SHEET 5) STA - 37+50
IT I?j

/ y
?_ll _
q 9,
L
I

n u u u ofn I Y+ ? r
?
-,
\ 48?
4 ? "? I? f
I I $ I
\ ? m
\ ` I I Jl I
I a?
\ 9 I I I ??? aee
, \ E I °m? Rk
I/ \ ? I I IRE
\ E I I ?

\
\WLB- / - \
it `E I \ \ I
I .. I
r na

A E?
g p
p
y
y

o
v ?8 ff s

0
w
' ? / ? \
A \WL ' B'
y D
D

I i .
is y u q^?
3 D s q?1
I c d
.a I a n
• ? } ri
y
I
E ?"g
C b°^
? g

? ??F=
E
3
F b
a' Y ? $ gR
b e
pf °
?O

rn

N
? 4
I
ut

g; a} s
e p
i
I

$
BE
-€O $
n
n
O r
/
14
I
? I
I{
? ?
l I I?
as f I

h f l? ? ?. w?0 \
I \ \
/

} ? I I

Z9
?o I I
OaR
'8? o ? I 1/
I?
f ? I
I Qxs
s +

40400

0
W
f
m I -m 0
f CA
J 45*00
DNN \ \
aRm \ \ I
momN \\
y?' \1
I+$Lr \`
Z1l
m
50400
r
I
4'
I / m m
t

0 0

m

I? om

CONTRACT:
y
O
D
r
Nn
ti
u
x
O
N N
0 0 .
x

P
U 111..
...
N ry
y
C
G
m o

n

29
N
('
N
0 0

D
H

g g
b
O N
0 N
o
o
y
G -+ O <
N u
i

a -?
o? o•
o N r.+ b
f o y
o
? eE o2 ? o 0 1?

o
pn M
a
N ? of K
O ? O ?y
V !Y
y
M?
¢$m
f? 10
XZ O
O
Z
M io
m
k
b
?a
a
h? ? C
a
?k
ti
4 1CIA y
o' [f y x
N
a N a
u n
n ..
o°
P V
N
b
m y
=x?
6 g
b o ?
? VJ Q
y
a.
J• a '°ay
x
x
?y

?n
°x
rn
y
?y
m?
k
b °
7
;r
?z
a ,4
s>
z
N
tsh.dgn
TIP PROJECT.•
r-
U-3826

cb n
T?
0
s?
1
F
s
r?--l

a
C y
I
W
r
?? 7
b
a

M
t>t
saa of
aaa
>w?
a,
0
3/

I`

IC

(SHEET d) SM 37+50

m
3
/
25,00
I K-

L

I

I

1 ?
I
I? K

K-

30fw

I?

z z
y [Y
N r
as
an ?
?i r
b ?
o

g
s®4
ssa oF- ;
808 I s
r>i Y
i
8Sa ?°?

CO

L K-

i
en ml\d, a.mge\.etl and\pehO6.dgn 8/17/99
I*
: lA

y
tltltl O L
1
a??OD?
II ? ' w
I

II II
II IO ? JJ
V?'
N

7
\
I I
I
I F

\
\ \ ? I are
?
? I IR. a+
a
e L

\ E 1 1
\wLe- K 1 \ \ I

i
a ?
_81M A
?\ lB
\ J\ `

oo
E
ITS m
bHu

??I
I o
D?N

?^4
.fig
T ?
y l
L I'M

'S I
a ? s I e
s"a
4
$ F. xg . i D
2 5 v m .
5 0 ?? LR,
q9
- 1
71O
A
y
I
\ \a al. Q.t?--1
\ a ] Qy--?
?\ I
pal
MATCHLINE (SHEET n STA. 51+40
y
T
rn
.Z
=t`
oe I1ll. a ,1i

C
m

N
T
O

1
0

Il a ?S
$
+ f O ao,oo 0
} I
0 N
f
I i' }
l ie
1
I
N

>-SAD 83_-

. H3g t?
} s 3! I I
1 /
r

:- 27q

c Si A

} z
' I
I I
c n
?

°m
8 } € g
1 m
?°
rn 6
o a .?

w z
} /

} a

f 45100 ..?/

/r
en to I\ dr av.r.gb\- tland\ p sn06.dgn
v

u
e Z O

a??op? I

I? I
? ? I
I
I
:
ig
I \ E j
o..
\ r I
S
I?,?
Lr2
M
I

\ E I I
\ \ I I
_ I
\WLB- - I \ \

A
g pp
o ?e I
s s
T
e
s
3

Q?
\ If' f
\ y
a a
o ? n
} n s?
.? f5 \
n
E pt
a 4?A
b

i
Fi
e>c I O
??g
g N

3
? I
8 ? s o
i
8 5 a
s ` ?4
? gR r
g ?$
o I
?( ? e9 ( ?v uin

}fig
°o
40+0 0
1\
_ I
m
N
I? wa\
1? 1
/
1 /
1I I
N
m
W
\ 1

/

m
?a
r
\ I ?0^30
/y
J /
m m
)) m m
O \\ y T m
\ 1 I'? ? m 8
oT
m
MATCHUNE (SHEET 7( STA. 51+10 m
i
6

I
'n-r ental\d-w,qs\.e eland\pshe6.dgn 9/17/99
MATCHUNE
TF-
/

a-+?oDv
n ii ° u ocn

1L ? 1

gl i
I
In Q
o
sp.
COF
} 1pap a} o
i r
F.
4 ? O,I

1-0
aoao
`
I Ira } ? ? ? I "?

f
II

\ I
? III =
\ E 41
_ V
I'
RW
\ wl8 - +
wO E e
x P
I t2 ?
5 ?? gg >: $3
O W? ? iO
RRR $°
R -W
g °? sn \
- -
oe '
e
$ a a P
m .? s m B; Y
a
y o do
e so

9>>
9
F 2
it :4

M
} SSg€
1
I
S 5 s
g o S'" c`? oma
x
J o
¢(? e I

J / I
IT
I } f\
I f \
f? \ i
\w?g\
? 1 N o
R /
NAB ?
}
?
I I I
_
.g> } I I Om
N Xz
} $ I 1 Wm
W
m
CA)
rn
A

\
'AN
f m

L_--

IF \\ m
m

I/
is
0O
11 \
O Ga ??
MATCHl1NE (SHEET 7( STA. 51+40
/4,? 50100 /r
F 41,1
k

MATCHUNE (SHEET 6( STA. 51+I0

T
a
s
8

ii
E >! E
s's
ttl`
9

6
9
s -
r
S

M
a

sly -
1 /
?
N
/ 'Tx• }y]y Ba a?
kF
O
h
K- K
E
Ig6
R

a

y ??J? ? I r I r

I` I
I f
/

/
./ r
e
g
r fa
? r F I

?
r
/
o h
a,
6 1
r 4 u I• /

/ GT,
Ib h
161 I/
/

/ ? 1 a
/ I
/
/
/ k\
/ MATCHUNE (SHEET 8( STA. 65+50

L
lid
111,
1 ,x
1
I , (^
I
II
II
I
I I t
II
II
II
II
I
II
I
I ,
I
I?
f I 1?? m
?i 'i
m " I mo
o t0
v I I
f( m
1? } e j Zoa
w o
} m
I F Q
m
ee zv ? /
1 0
i } I a kF vO 'i 55+00
}
}} I d N5a K-
} I o;
I I
a we K- // ?
14
w as. Z . /g
a?
yM
00\\
f I I EK-
x \
I. ? ,Ike P CA
} k `\ 5oro0 IF m
M- M
f I
el'?
? o
1 1 /
k /
N
(
O I \ \ c
N / \
m

few I

f_ :
o
Ikf

} a S N
* I m
} e m

}

O I

I 2
N m
Vm? m

2w
gwZ ZF' g.
i/ \1 $Iv RJ y 1 v Z'6 w
B
B
P

n $
{{{Illfff 00

m o T

??o u

a ?2

a
r

p
g
l
:EV

m
0
?

RX

K

m

I w w I -
O $?
O
Z fl m
2

IICVl90N5
MEVISIa
MATCHUNE (SHEET 6) STA. 51+40
0
8
t
s
T
8
+
9

+
mm
A?

a
r
sl ?
a
J.?
I
0
o
ro
I /
O.?R d IF I
/ N
m o

? 1 n
._ I
a
f c I I ??
2 m N I i p ro
p ni Zm ?m
\ M m iy io
t/. yZ am n M
\ : P I p o czisa ?i z-+ m?
\ w '" cm z N ° m m
\ V I O CO C9
"'o
4 I a? ° a op
m'^ a+l n mz am
°M tiU Z
\ . I 0 a1 Z
I p ? m
al z O a
\ 4E I
\ ? m
? ? i'.? ? ? 55KY7

?-Ir ODD
II 4 ^ VV1I ? lO
?V?ylq
1)
IN
II
II
]II
I
I
I
I
I
I
1?I
a ga K-
?
/ ?
8
N ?tirODT
?
?
KS ? r(PCC p}'n Va?'UV
A? / p
? `1W
p
i /
5
5 p

I\ // g?? a?Ir ODT
0
N
(

I f
?

I y?
I
f 1
1 :

3
/ 0 jm? $ 1
/ ,? ? ff g
// ' ? I f aE
II z®
/ I
_ I 1 4} I
kQ.
I?
/ MATCHUNE (SHEET 8) STA. 65+50
Is K-
K-
K-
K- +g +?
n 4
I
sill K
ag8,
a ? o
I \

1 ?

??
R2
\
? V
yak

? 6
?a
K
? \

e ?
°
?O y

a?roD
a E
" \ ?
?? ? uu ^ n?ln
o
Y ?,4y. N

60foo I\ T y
?
?tirOD?
` u u ^ n iln
_ m

p
\
1
16 ?
vl .TyI
1
1 /
/ o
1
N 1 /

•' 1
? I/
ti 1`
H I
o m
3 N
t I m
m
N
w MM
"'
I Hm
TO.? rn
?N

I xwz z

ale

O y?

Z
m C O

u

R' \ 0
0
°
T N
65 *° A? aA
0

C?
l
m
?pZe
y O

I

OO 41 ? ?
} 9J ?nA mr m eO
O MP
z gm

C
am
R x
ar 2T
y y
0
VFVI S
Plymol
MATCHUNE (SHEEP 6)STA. 51+40

0 ?
I
/ N N
I
? ? IA
m o
a
V
yNy
O
t? Q
j O Il IIE`-
x
-r v}
RU T
?r
} s un
88 o
68 °) gg
Fm i?l
ii •? -
gL ?6
88 ?7
}} )
?H R ? o I
s 9 I o
b g 4 L o S 5m ??
u ? ? ~ y ?? ? q
D
r - _
F
x ?
} CCgz
y 3d
L ? l
D
O °Or
? o
? 5 4 Q
S c
} ?s
0
T
L
}
?I e
b e? °mD
s
J.?
m

1

/
/ / I I
/
?4I II
ly ? I
A? \\ I
MATCHUNE (SHEET 8( STA. 65+50
I c m c mo
rT b 92 rp
r+n am yo _m
a 1 NN ZUI
C
Z nZD _ yy
V I N I°?1 ? p T
T
? I viz" rd _ Inz r3
Cy 9 ao
m'??Iatm rV1 r pA
m Y mA D
FT mK <
w a9 r ? :
o m? a
n A z
FO
55
W
I V ?? Z?r ODD
uu°n IV1
N ? 4V?yu
I 1$e. V (?V+ lT
? oo Q?! V aU?
r
y ?'?` / ? ??IrOD?
N Y
g L' u u ° uaI I vl
RR? / S$m $?a?w'.I
?/ uullu IVI
.??/ Syr ODL
P °? II II 11 II 1 LII
V O
ism
60 ti
rn ?yrODL
uull 11 l?
y1V
/ o=
// q^ tiO^v'
11? m 7
I 11 /
1 /
53
0
3 N
m
a
m
= mm
Nm Nm
A x sz eNZ $ >yyZZ
A °'IN PO 9^50 1MY
\ v C Z m m
TO ° SN
Q tz .r
'^ y1 bl ° m
?? ?,°m bA 8- :m °
99
?S NNm po g? z =€
A`
c
a
Z fl m
2
W
m
0
0
W
A
O
A
A
N
A
W
A
a
A
N
A
P
A
V
A
OD
A
`O
N
O
th
N i 1
A
8m
z r4
?v ?z
K
9,
Su z
H
i
4ay_pn.ayo
42
W A (n V.
O O O O
O
t
O
O

N
W
A
N
O.
V

O
N
O
N
N
N
N
co
of IGI 1001 1o
W N
dl
A
O o o O ? I O ?2j K TICt, 0 0
i
S
SU ?
I- a
S
zu
?
tsh.dgn
CT:
0 0

A
Q N
U N
U
p
/
T Ca
r
T ? 0 V

O 5
Z ?
A H
N
c
o
+
?
J
h
o o
?
• ?og
H ? N N
O O (/?
< ~ ? ? lNT W
0 C A N N Y b
a l
h

H ?J

n?

C n bb
?
e .
p n N
h ?
ny

C p, n

rn

i 0
0
o ?

ti
cs
A

y

??

e
N y? K ? b
f? 4 e ? $
O ? a
5 y a Q

x
4 >
r
r

CCC
? e
e
m ~
v
m
p I
6
z
a
4
.4N t?
M4
y
` x
?b
i Cf
h
?n
?x
H
yy
y
to
b?
A
em
?z
33?Y?
ik
a
z
N
TIP PROJECT:
U-3826
2 a
? n
o Q
?a

C) r-4
ClA
H/
L-1
a

m a tl

N ? a

C a
?
I

, w
0
U
V U
?' 0,
a

2 •- a?
m ?
S

O T
O T
a 0
° ?
c °-
3
T
a
0
x
O
T
^ q
M
7 9
m
3
A 07 O) x N
1 ??„-tea'
o m_ a 3
N N ? T
N O N° a ?
I 3
° m
I o

J
g O
S <
p
? O ]
m
o-
9
G7
b
O

0 F F Op Pv
o m o ? =c?
a
0
m m .0 0
O v o T
O n O
n n o =a o
c o a ?
c o
o _
y N
N N ?
C C m
m m
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I
I
N
. ,y

3 ? o a 3 ? ? o n ? f: Q! p?n• ?' a Sm`• 'o 'o o' ? ° o o' ?o
u e 0 ? c n c oa m uZ ? 3- °?
V ` C d
3 r.
] ]
o o n• FL '• C o 3° o
a a a o ° c
v 3m o' 3
C a T
O O n
w m
o n °c
y m =
.o ?O O 9 F
J l.? LI lug
T f T ???III?i[[[OOO T w T C T 9 9 V W T
O O TO ? 0 S t} O O O O ? jC
o? 'o a S m n S S S$ m m
3? n n a; ? a a a a n a?
3 0 o o 0 o a- m
g°° ?, a? T S v o v ?
a a• a a E 9 °
a - ° O T n y
n 9
c
o a-
II
1111
? ??? Ir I? I I
I I
S O O O O T a3•
4441,, m O O ° -°O 1 ?
m
0 0 0 0 0= O
a° =o =o =m o= o m
o n v m; o 0
o? a s o? o
c o o T
o T o
= o s
O. O
0
0 go i
i
90
p
r =
O
O C °
's
q
3 0 0 0? 3? o 0 0? E. ?? ? A? A o
T 9 T 'O ? 'm ? nT 9 T O' 0 n N=
°a ^ o. °a n. o° 3 i o a
a o. n. a am w"
] ] o, G1 S. .. ? F
a a s ? a.o ?? o a
o 0 2 ?" 'a sc
Q
o
m _
3 o 0 ?T s
S m m
3
.07
I II ? a
?m?ml I I ?g?€
S O O O T a. T O
maa vsoa;
o m 3 o y r;$ m $ m
m a° f a m a 0 °• T
m n u o o ?. 3?
T 9 o m a S T o
Q m T O_ O
m m G ? O °
a o
m
d = x
N °
m .
N N T 0 T T x; Ol Ol
o' o' 4 a o 9$ z c a
a o y n a 0, °c° p G1
N NQ O o m Y d < c y
a o $. x 1 o
° Pr
x R1
o o°a c C
e
O D ?
O N\
]a `l
° ° n1
`m m
a
°
I I
I 1 v
I
J b' C' C C C C N an w m m O 'n O O < G
o m a o 0 3 a m a 3 m a m a i a N
:3: >> C~ 0 0 oT S ° a O O °0_e oa m °_ ma o_ °a 7 p o
o a x F ?' O o m m N a p' ?^ o N O 1 O ° O e n e
F O
n m g o E N a ?- OC Ni. N Z m c e
0 o N m s] m O T fn Q N n; P O O 47 = T
° a C 0 a o a o, ? a° = a
ld1 2 S ° o• . n
m m a e O d C O O_ C O n m a
o m ] q o m
G = C F w ^ n
-• o m H
Z i° C n m C
° in m o m
• O •
3 7
I I ? I I
I
I I if
8 O o• d d R n O+ ® ® O ®®© Q
I I
O -560n
A I ? n I i I
I 4 I I i
i
O O O O
In
o m
m o 0 o A
G1 ° a. 0 0 0
o
0
o m
r + C
m
h
C
in
I
I
I
I
I 6 ® Q
I
I
I
0
Z
m
z
O
Z
D
r
-o
Z
2
m
N
O
r
N
C
L1 ~
O
m ?
r,?

yI m
m n dG _
O p ? Z
1z
`m n
W N m z
41 ^ ?
0 o 00 z
?a zQ
D O
tai Z z
+ + O
m ? -1
I
II

n
¦
M CA
rn M
Z
--10
m z
J
Z
0
J
5 1
C
V o m
tv
N m ?
m N
Z ? r
N m
m ?^
Z
N
O z
m O
D M
N Z
+ w
O ?
O

l 1
DD
r r
m
Zn
1O
rnZ
N
Z
0
J
r
FF)
-
z
0
m
m
mm
z
m
O
m
m
m
r
O
m
m
m
m
mm
C
2
r
m
y
m
rn
2
E
O
1
mm
a
f
mm
N C N
!J
DT motiv -19 m>V r>9 >T
< a m m< m < a m< a D ti a ti a
O m 9 m O m o
O
< O
O
= T >= MT MT
Z 9
m D T
> 9
aL• 2•
M- > m
DD a ?< .-> 0D< >D >D
<v tim> my m<> <9 <v
my a
-10• - v Dma
a mT
as
>o o•
?m
o oa
m° a-
..>
> 0 ° a
?o
o D
M • x zoo ox ox
m• m mm m- m•
P
T
Y
9A S
?
-1 tiN Dati yyfJ a+
_
y w c>i D > m ->1
mD zm2> Z am> m> m
0 m
o m
T O
>m >>
9 o v
Tx O 9
TS O>
mm
> iimD T 0
ar ti ar , •ti?y D
m xrD ? m
m N m m y
O ( m o m ti O
O O
10 m O 10 r o r
m z a a z .0 m OX w z w o
?a my0 >0 n.0 ma ?0
-
y m m a
9 O
y m my 9 y T m
mm -tom Om omm mm mm
a T 9 m m a 9<
N m
pm w+ y m
w
a
° a
m e
O a
w
O
m
T
Y
m m P m m 2
m T
z T C
< O y r s r < n < m
DD xmm a
m Dam om
Dm
DD
• c swD w5 M. - 0
W z o m
> m T 0 -0
In
N 9 y
T N
x m c
z a
O
/
Xmm
a m>
am as m
m o
a
-1 0 m >
wo Y. ° w
T
m z. a 00
° N xy m m
w c v o<
m o< m o m T <
N mD- m m mm
m T• m T ti v
-1 '-I m w m
O S T =m
m
ow
m m m
O a w m T
a ow m m "1
m
Z
D Z

D
m
f C C- m
N 2
ti
Cl)

X
P (
l)
S > m - =
=. V)
a o > o
9 D9
>
m M O
z ?
m LL
r z ° m O><
m o r m<>
=Dma
m y m = > T
v < a m° zzoo
m j n m mm
x r m Dr v
m 0
> z O > M<>=
w < z
i S m
T 0 m >
x m m m
m=
r > z
m
m y?r
v
>
W

D
.~
ra r
m
D
m c mmz
m z
m ° m mo m
S
ti m m
gvti
m
g 9
m m m
m =m D
m m

D z
z
< 0
z 000
D
M. c
> V a
9 tiaw
D xmm
a'
m
m °
a?-1
° <

m O
mm
z aom

m aim
O ti N
m m S w
a. .
°
>
> H w
o.
r

x
ti
N
D
z
O
y
m
N JO
o= 11
G C
ZD
n
O m
Zm
N ?
2 to
m mm
z D
O
A N
C 9
rn
Z?
n V
0e,
8
s?
F
r
a
z
w

Kd
n
D
r
C
m
O
n m
Z L
O
bb
N H
D' O
+ +
V N
N
O O
N N
O ?
V A
+ +
N N
O V
G• O•
O O•
4
F)
r
C
m a
Om
z L
Z
0
U
i m
N ?
o ?
+ r
N N
m
O z
N Z
o z
N p
+
VI
N
F(::)
v
RD
v
N
I
I
0

4 c
-v
D

m

m ?

Z
Z
O
W
a
W
J W
m
N
p 9
N D
+ F
N T
p
N z
a
+
°o W
v
O•
N
S
7
m
W
S
O
CL
O
C
CL
co
7
to
m
4mm 1 N
aD ?
c
N
I N
co
co
T m
?oN
N
fF)
I
r
20
I

n
M
? N
M
Zn
Q
m z
N
Z
O
N
i-
N
O
V
N
O
N
p
.O
N
I
nz
OO
z Igi
N ..
C
Om
z
Oo
yA m
N z
? Z
m Q
2.
O m
C
y< m
2 O
m m
Z p
zi
m z
z

N

m -i
0 N
:4
0
o

Ul
+

J
n
r-

N

0

rt
y
p m
m
-Z-1
z
N
D
W

SO
+

N

N
M
?-I
ul
N 5
Z Z
O 0
Z
Z
0

O
70
Z

1 D
r ?
0 N
=1
Ir m
Z ?
-v 0
>1
m
'" n

r- -n

0
+ N N
O D (1
-?
O
N m
m O
z -°
D
C -f r%) r
N
a
+
N v
m
Z c
in
0 n
im
Z
Z
O
J
C 1 N 1 N 0 N -+ D
m D A N co T
x D D
s
W W -I D m _ rn T
,.y 1 2 co N m z
z M A ED W N W
W z N (n (D
D N O m m m
m °? O m
O O
Y Go m m
C M

r
m
C
r
m
8
K
0
i
cyp.dyn
?L
7C Z1
C.
n
co I
n
?m
? DD
v vv
mr 7o
c C?v NN
'i
mno
t <
r
=vcNi,c°n
r
II II II II II II II
z m
Cv
Z awW?acnw
0 0 °
m 3
°°

(7 00

v
O s
Z r
m
v m

I
r
y
v D
m
N A_
Z +
-I p
D
th
I V
71 +
w
w
r
Ln
W
V
O
g
y
m
m
z
0
z

5 I m
5' DM

y ?

? i Z
? 9m
p
L +v

C oc)
Nm

Z '
m

- TAR RNER
D

CA

q

O

N
i
m cl
s
O
2 F

+W

5
2
2 ca
LhC)
Y
m
9
S
a

N
m
CA
0
ov
v
0
D
>m
m
z
-I
X
m
50-
M-q
0
N

IL
Sy
o?
F?
0
&P
R
gi
e of
m I N "o?c
$ A Z6 N
?Ell OIiN
??a ? a j m D S? o?
c?j) p J
X+ u
^t3. V } M p g?
i a 'mow m o o?' IE

i
g ml
a
6 ??D
ga
!a

6
a4

L
T+ 8

\
fa

\
\\ 8
L u
}
\

L0
uL
0, m
r
O y
rLµ1
G

\ P V '. \ Y
m?
\ gao \
\ ?VN
\ JJ
? JY
J
J \
\ Y
\
Q?s
i
nA
\
II
II

1 v

Ott"
\
\11
Rig
!q C; lb
' d
Rg?
100?83 _
r
20+00
} o
1 %
\
? AW
MATCHLINE (SHEET 5) STA. 23+50

6
/

sss`
eaa
IN
SYY
99899
fff
939

0
p- 8

y
R
?
B °x;

? xt
y
C ?
22
ANY'
N? 4
/ NE
L.?
,Io

?
a N
a
X
i

g rh 4
O N?pp
?
u O
1

g?
\
\
\ ? N
\ w
u
\ a All
\ p:;
?ea6
$l
1? \\\ ill
4
_ -elM- \ o
21
\
\y
iI \
11I\`
?i
li 1
ii
i,
i
appa a
°C z E
'
0
f Al -
/

j

QjM

Z i 3

I ;
Iyi.
I it
iyy
I ypp
I 41 ?f
{
I i1
{{
`.I f
{
I fj{
1
} {
f f
if
/ I
/ I IF

/ I

m
% 25+07

I ?
I
\ I IE I
a 1 I

/ IIF
I
I I
I
I
m I
1 I IF

1 I
I

1 1? I
1 I
1
I I
I K-
1 I

1 I
\ I
\ I
\ I
\ 30+00
\ K- I

\ I ?

Y? _ ?
I B7M.
63
I
I
I
I

{
1 $
ff
y
f
a ^'
SQ i
1 1J

i

I? 35+00 /

?
I
/
I L - _
?
\ m

/
- - -BlM
T

S
9

-WLB - - - ` /
b??oDv
nnnino I
gss
3W?aa I/
u
Q
I
I I
---\ q8 I '`? I? II I
\
\
\
\WLB- -' Ic \\
I \
s9t ?
'r
a _
a
c :'s
8
?I
Sm9
.^9
s?
$ ? a
} 8
a
y

?, , ,wee
---/ K- \
\ IF: t \
\\ \ 8jM

y
n
i E pFF

7 o?s
s

E ?
1
gR=
\

F I
s 8

o
?
?
?: ? s ee I ?

38
a g ?
4 8 ?R
?. B I
I.0'Ylrt ?
DO
rn
N N N N ICI ?
I' ? o t o sg?
j ICI a
i35EF?e I y Fil

{ +pppp
8
{ L?
e
i1 y
I
{ I ,!
N r
?
,

{ ?
{ 8 N
© a ?

I Ira I p
+
I' 1 ?.wLe\
N

s {
1
? ?

P } rC
/
/

r
? I I
:I I
a
C
as ? { ? I I
I 1 a?
a
0

a
m
L- ? I 0?e
45+00 %.
ViB

mss \
'?•'v i ,
o
Gn a,n \ \
ma ?I
mom
\\

Saul \\

yp#
3 ES y\\
C

/
40+00

l/

50"07
a
/ M Eq
g I /
{ RSSA / u m ?
0 T
pRyRy/ A 0
{ ?P0 r ? a
} O m 3?
A
Z

MATCHUNE (SHEET 6) STA. 51+40
i
I
x x a
s
}
_€
dm
?+ a I E
O is ,? g
i g ? > y
? tltl g
s;
} SI
K-
A
Bull
BFF?i O
y da /

/
L ?

° I

} /
? I
r

0
i
9
o"
i
i
L
}

4m
S? N
R=

0
+u
/
e
J

(SHEET B( STA. 65+50
gR$
R88A
pips
iSotal
ASSg
60+00 K-
55+00 \

N
1
RNA

\
\
\
\
\
a?roDp) \
M1 R M1 tl tlN
O
?pp ?£sQs$
/ ?CY3
/ '1g
aye
J 50

/
/

/

\
V
o4l:k,
OqA
t?&(n
a `Ir ODT
II n?q II a V1
V
a?roDa
tl tl tl tl tlin
?N \ VV
v
a?roD?
tltltltltl?
?pp ?a?Nh4
Iq?m
?yrOD?
uu°utl?
VVpy?Bl
NNfv
1tiN
N
(

?K-
m
I = mm
ym wm
mmz
( p 4G O Z
\ \IL Om u?
T
MW
m
65+00 f o 9 ? 8 m p
€CD
I
O ? v
0,
$ F?
x
K '
egg
\e ???FO
\ AYS
A
c

MATCHUNE I
vl ,
SM65+50
I1
1 I _
1
.Ih ? .
1\
1
1\
II
sg ay
ga I-?;
Tr vl °2
6y g i s
_9

PT
?f
SS
as

N
m
ay?
- a
00
Ps lm
6
S
j>
i
r
algal
8a8, OS
II
II
II
\TI
A
II,
T I?
r
II
VIA
r
wl
?II+I•II I I?
MATCHUNE (SHEEP 9) STA. 76+00
` ? IC
M?
V A
X221
SF
RAAJO
Agr?
5
W-
75+00
VI N
m S
m m
8tr.
O O az
M F
az
0 0 ?r
m T to
m m
m m
i \ e a
i 1 N
u
a ?
v
yi q I

ap

yi

I .

i1
I
I1.
1
i

/ Qr
gym
70400

m
?1? z a I
!Ef
a P
i I

P
^
O
1
F
b
I a1
?p
a tz
1 h

b?
1
a
4

asa?
\
BRgO ?
yzce3 ?

r
as
SS 5 E
88 i
}}
iT
cc
at;
9999
i f
88 3
}}
n
2 a

lag a

1
v
v,
3

O az

p
O ar
z 4

?
y a
F? }
/ ?awoD
rrr?.
.to a
1C ;Ij, r
°
a?
?aaaaa
rrrrr
'SG
i}1i4}
888888
oo??oo'
aaaaaa
rrrrrr
ffiy688t8y8y
yid} ?
l
s a ? a
8 n
a ? n
7 4
4 ?
x
r ?
i n
D
N
T b 6s
Y,.
8 G p
Y9}
rar
Base
s
8888 ° ? 3 n
aaaa ?
s,
YCYS
agas v
;3y} ?s8
°a
L
i?
g2
4
s_'r
Dn
?P
o?
Sa l
eq1 o
X2,
Gs^

888
nP
Il
RRd3t ? / /

/
I/

11

I/

/I
S

5`
9?p°y
A 2
v°
bps
i
Y

W
?s ? l
t2
?I

r/

w?

?I

W
?
r ?
zs
I

I
i 5' z
I
I
I ? .
WS
a3
L4
II s ?
III t
I

rn it
Zj
v-9
DO
mD
70.p
0`C
n14
-? .
CN
00
N
P

R
N
a? o?
°o
NL: a?
O O
O
\ aN Z
E?i^ n
°o
o u
N
L?
w
90#00
it
tE
8851
e.
aa4 O
5

-ILV

s
>e
68
o?
Gg;F O
o^
R
N??

NfE
Z m m
O ni
i l N b
am

`
M f

pa
=
n A W 'o^ :fip
S
? T
p T
p
, O a b
l
7
?
BK 0
O ? y y

?
O
O
4z 1
m
o0
10000

G1
0
0
W
A
O
A
to
DO1
p
In O N
M
+M
W
w
YFY$$RRR
e?ess
I?s?si?MWA; -
iMHA5'
?q??gy?0? ? y0y
TT **^^TT a -
VN?V\VN??
m o m
- -
---- ---------
----- -- --------- -
-- ------ ---------
------ ---------
q
; ? r
oi?e????? C Z RNA
tilt
??N ~MN ~NN ?° 5 $ a
8
z
A
k
d

t N "°?oMi•O<{:<3826_rdy-pll.dgn
. g
gPitt ?
?b1???nx???m
n
r
I

`0 N
-- ---- ---- ---- -- - -- -- -- - -

-- -- - --- -- --- ---- --
--
-
---

--
-- -
---
--
---
---

--

-- -

- --

-- --

-- -

- -

--
- --- -- --- ---- -- - -

- - - - - - - --- ---- -- - -- - -----

10
V
O P

°
n n
II
10 V
J 0
0 14

'o 7C<mm
A? cn
° II
II m
o II m
n
?
P?N In
II II O?
+
,o .p
- til V
N P p (1? OD
N
N V
+ a
2
A
A
m
f
.t H
r
II co
Lh 7 C< ?? II

I A
I
II
my p N c

W
r II
° II
`
N N
m V
A
N a
A O
I - W
+
10
W + O
GDO
CJN N

W N I = 2 =
`
N r ^1
i
10 OD
A T O i O

2 W
0 A
0 N
0 P
0

?aI
9
S
" ??' '-
1
?. ?
i.