The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20150996 Ver 1_Other_20180420 Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions {! Α ЋЉЊ BEGIN DATE \[Received Date\]: 5 2113 Prepare file folder Assign Action ID Number in ORM 1.Project Name \[PCN Fm A2a\]: ProvidenceVillage 2.Work Type: Private Institutional Government Commercial 3.Project Description / Purpose \[PCN Form B3d and B3e\]: Thepurposeoftheprojectistodevelopthepropertyformulti-familyhousing. 4.Property Owner / Applicant \[PCN Form A3 or A4\]: PulteHomeCompanyLLC;POC:Mr.JeremyHuntsman 5.Agent / Consultant Νt/b CƚƩƒ !Ў Α ƚƩ hwa /ƚƓƭǒƌƷğƓƷ L5 bǒƒĬĻƩΞʹ CWS;POC:AliisaHarjuniemi,PWS 6.Related Action ID Number(s) \[PCN Form B5b\]: SAW-2015-02113 7.Project Location - Coordinates\[PCN Form B1b\]: LocatedsoutheastoftheInterstate485andProvidenceRoadinCharlotte,NorthCarolina DecimalDegreesCoordinates:35.054297,-80.765763 8.Project Location - Tax Parcel ID \[PCN Form B1a\]: 23113138 9.tƩƚƆĻĭƷ \[ƚĭğƷźƚƓ Α /ƚǒƓƷǤ \[PCN Form A2b\]: Mecklenburg 10.tƩƚƆĻĭƷ \[ƚĭğƷźƚƓ Α bĻğƩĻƭƷ aǒƓźĭźƦğƌźƷǤ ƚƩ ƚǞƓ \[PCN Form A2c\]: Charlotte 11.tƩƚƆĻĭƷ LƓŅƚƩƒğƷźƚƓ Α bĻğƩĻƭƷ ğƷĻƩĬƚķǤ \[PCN Form B2a\]: SixMileCreek Catawba03050103 Authorization: Section 10 Section 404 Section 10 & 404 Regulatory Action Type: Standard Permit Pre-Application Request Nationwide Permit # Unauthorized 29&18 Regional General Permit # Compliance Jurisdictional Determination Request Revised20150602 Office Use Only: Corps action ID no. DWQ project no. Form Version 1.4 January 2009 Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form A. Applicant Information 1. Processing 1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: Section 404 Permit Section 10 Permit 1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29 and 18 or General Permit (GP) number: 1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? Yes No 1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply): 401 Water Quality Certification – Regular Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit 401 Water Quality Certification – Express Riparian Buffer Authorization For the record only for Corps Permit: 1e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ because written approval is not required? 401 Certification: Yes No Yes No 1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu Yes No fee program. 1g. Is the project located in any of NC’s twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h Yes No below. 1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? Yes No 2. Project Information Providence Village 2a. Name of project: Mecklenburg 2b. County: Charlotte 2c. Nearest municipality / town: ProvidenceVillage 2d. Subdivision name: 2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no: 3. Owner Information 3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: Pulte Home Company, LLC 32372-358 3b. Deed Book and Page No. 3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if Mr.JeremyHuntsman,DirectorofLandDevelopment,PulteHomeCompanyLLC applicable): 11121CarmelCommonsBlvd,Suite450 3d. Street address: Charlotte,NC28226 3e. City, state, zip: 7044147073 3f. Telephone no.: N/A 3g. Fax no.: Jeremy.Huntsman@pultegroup.com 3h. Email address: Page 1 of 13 PCN Form – Version 1.4 January 2009 4. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 4a. Applicant is: Agent Other, specify: 4b. Name: 4c. Business name (if applicable): 4d. Street address: 4e. City, state, zip: 4f. Telephone no.: 4g. Fax no.: 4h. Email address: 5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable) AliisaHarjuniemi,PWS 5a. Name: 5b. Business name CarolinaWetlandServices,Inc. (if applicable): 550E.WestinghouseBlvd. 5c. Street address: Charlotte,NC28273 5d. City, state, zip: 9802591222 5e. Telephone no.: N/A 5f. Fax no.: aliisa@cwsinc.net 5g. Email address: Page 2 of 13 PCN Form – Version 1.4 January 2009 B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification After-the-Fact permit parcel: 23113138 1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.054297º Longitude: -80.765763º 1c. Property size: After-the-Fact permit parcel: 13.8 acre 2. Surface Waters UTSixMileCreek 2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project: ClassC 2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: Catawba(HUC03050103) 2c. River basin: 3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: Providence Village (formerly known as Star City Tract) is located southeast of the Interstate 485 and Providence Road in Charlotte, North Carolina (Figure 1, Attachment A). The project area currently consists of an active construction site for multi-family residential development. Surrounding land uses consist of forested areas, commercial properties, and single- and multi-family residences. The United States Geological Survey (USGS) Topographic Map (Figure 1) and the United States Department of Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA-NRCS) Soil Survey (Figure 2) are included in Attachment A. The USDA-NRCS soil survey does not depict any jurisdictional features within the project limits. The USGS topographic map depicts a stream in the eastern portion of the property that was classified as a wetland during the wetland delineation in 2013 (previous JD information – Attachment I). Approximately 0.15 acre of the 0.16 acre on-site wetland has since been impacted during site development. 3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.16 acre of jurisdictional wetland area 3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property 0 3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: The purpose of this project is to develop the property into a multi-family residential development. This project will provide residential housing for Charlotte, North Carolina to meet the growing demand for housing due to population growth. Page 3 of 13 PCN Form – Version 1.4 January 2009 3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: Project History The General Permit Verification for NWP 29 was issued on November 13, 2015 (SAW 2015-02113). The Nationwide Permit and associated Water Quality Certification expired on March 18, 2017. Therefore, the permittee had until March 18, 2018 to complete the proposed impacts. Copies of the expired General Permit Verification and Water Quality Certification for this project are included as Attachments C and D, respectively. The permittee changed from Crescent Communities to Pulte Home Company, LLC in December 2017, when Pulte purchased the portion of the property where the Wetland AA (the only on-site wetland) was located (Mecklenburg Tax Parcel ID. 23113138). As the permittee changed since the original permit application in 2015, the permit transfer letter was forwarded to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) on April 4, 2018. This After-the-Fact Permit application includes the 13.8-acre portion of the project owned by Pulte Home Company, LLC (Mecklenburg Tax Parcel ID. 23113138). A change in the approved plan design was made in early 2017; however, due to a clerical oversight, the revised plan was not forwarded to the USACE. The plan change did not affect the quantity of the impacts. The new design moved the stormwater control measure to the northeastern portion of the property from the southeastern portion of the property. The plan was approved by City of Charlotte and exceeds the requirements for stormwater water quality treatment. The most current site plan is enclosed as an Attachment E. Current Project Status and Completed Activities On April 4, 2018, Carolina Wetland Services, Inc. (CWS) scientists Aliisa Harjuniemi, Professional Wetland Scientist (PWS), and Megan Shelton, Staff Scientist I, visited the Providence Village site to review the completed project activities and determine if the project is in compliance with the Nationwide Permit Authorizations. The authorized wetland impacts totaled 0.16 acre of permanent impacts to Wetland AA. Figure 3 depicts the original site plan permitted in 2015 (Attachment A). Based on the April 4, 2018 site visit, the project has impacted a total 0.15 acre of jurisdictional wetland area (Figure 4, Attachment A). Therefore, the completed impacts are slightly less than the authorized impact area and are within the same footprint as the authorized impacts. The contractor, J. O. Flowe Grading Company, started grading operations on January 22, 2018, and the excavation and fill of the wetlands was completed by February 26, 2018 (Attachment F). Photographs 1-3 (Attachment G) are representative of current site conditions. Typical heavy equipment were used in grading operations (bulldozers, excavators, dump trucks, graders, etc.). Fork lifts and man lifts will be used for loading materials and access. As the impacts to wetlands exceeded the mitigation threshold, compensatory mitigation was required in 2015. In compliance with the required conditions of the permit, the required mitigation fee for the entire proposed wetland impacts was paid to the Division of Mitigation Services after receiving the original permit verification (SAW-2015-02113). The receipt for the mitigation payment is enclosed as Attachment H. CWS forwarded documentation of the completed activities within the Waters of the U.S. to the USACE on April 9, 2018. On April 10, 2018 Mr. David Schaeffer from the USACE requested an After-the-Fact permit for the project to be in compliance with Nationwide Permit General and Regional Conditions. After-the-Fact Permit Grading and fill associated with the residential areas, roads, and site fill slopes resulted in 0.07 acre of permanent wetland impact (W1; Figure 4). The fill slopes for the stormwater treatment measure permanently impacted 0.08 acre of the wetland (W2; Figure 4). Since the stormwater treatment measure fill slopes were placed on the jurisdictional wetland area, the project is not in compliance with NWP 29 Regional Conditions. The stormwater treatment measure had been designed appropriately for the project purpose and has been approved by the City of Charlotte. The outfall of the stormwater treatment measure is outside the wetlands. It is our opinion that relocating this stormwater pond would negatively impact the waters due to increased sediment deposition, and relocation or redesign of the stormwater feature is not feasible within the approved plan design. Therefore, our client requests that the stormwater control measure be left in its current position and to be permitted After-the-Fact as a minor discharge under Nationwide Permit No. 18. No additional impacts to jurisdictional waters are planned for this phase of the project. As the Water Quality Certification corresponding to the Nationwide Permit Nos. 29 and 18 is the same for both of these Nationwide Permits, the project is in compliance with the Water Quality Certification conditions. A copy of this permit will be provided to North Carolina Division of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) as the project’s layout has changed. Page 4 of 13 PCN Form – Version 1.4 January 2009 4. Jurisdictional Determinations 4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by Yes No Unknown the Corps or State been requested or obtained for this Comments: Wetlands delineated on August 29, 2013 property / project (including all prior phases) in the 4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, Preliminary Final what type of determination was made? 4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: Name (if known): Carolina Wetland Services, Inc. 4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation. Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination was issued by the USACE on November 13, 2015 (Attachment I). 5. Project History 5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or Yes No Unknown obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in ? 5b. If yes, explain in detail according to “help file” instructions. The General Permit Verification for NWP 29 was issued on November 13, 2015 (SAW 2015-02113). The Nationwide Permit and associated Water Quality Certification expired on March 18, 2017. Therefore, the permittee had until March 18, 2018 to complete the proposed impacts. Copies of the expired General Permit Verification and Water Quality Certification for this project are included as Attachments C and D, respectively. The contractor, J. O. Flowe Grading Company, started grading operations on January 22, 2018, and the excavation and fill of the wetlands was completed by February 26, 2018 (Attachment F). 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? Yes No 6b. If yes, explain. This project has several phases. Previous phases west of the current project area have been previously developed (no impacts to WoUS associated with previous phases). As this is prime area for development, negotiations on developing the parcel east from the project area are ongoing. All potential future impacts will be cumulative to the current phase and will be mitigated accordingly. Page 5 of 13 PCN Form – Version 1.4 January 2009 C. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary 1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply): Wetlands Streams – tributaries Buffers Open Waters Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. 2a.2b.2c.2d.2e.2f. Area Wetlandimpact Type of impact Type of wetland ForestedType of jurisdiction of numberCorps (404,10) or impact Permanent (P) orDWQ (401, other) (acres) Temporary(T) Fill(NWP29)HeadwaterForestYesCorps0.07 W1 P Fill(NWP18)HeadwaterForestYesCorps0.08 W2 P W3 W4 W5 W6 0.15 2g.Total Wetland Impacts: 2h. Comments: The already occurred wetland impacts total 0.15 ac. W1 will permitted under NWP29 W2 will be permitted under NWP18 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted. 3g. 3a.3b.3c.3d.3e.3f. Impact Average Type of impact Stream name StreamimpactPerennial (PER) or Type of length numberintermittent (INT)? jurisdiction stream (linear Permanent (P) orwidth feet) Temporary(T) (feet) S1 S2 S3 S4 3h.Total stream and tributary impacts 3i. Comments: Page 6 of 13 PCN Form – Version 1.4 January 2009 4. Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below. 4a.4b.4c.4d.4e. Openwater Name of waterbody impactnumber (ifapplicableType of impact WaterbodyArea of impact (acres) type Permanent (P) or Temporary(T) ChooseOneChoose O1 ChooseOneChoose O2 ChooseOneChoose O3 ChooseOneChoose O4 4f.Total open water impacts 4g. Comments: 5. Pond or Lake Construction If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below. 5a.5b.5c.5d.5e. Proposed use or numberWetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Pond ID Upland purpose of pond (acres) Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated ChooseOne P1 ChooseOne P2 5f.Total: 5g. Comments: 5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? Yes No If yes, permit ID no: 5i. Expected pond surface area (acres): 5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): 5k. Method of construction: 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form. 6a.Project is in which protected basin? Neuse Tar-Pamlico Catawba Randleman Other: 6b.6c.6d.6e.6f.6g. BufferImpact Reason for impact StreamnameBufferZone1Zone2 number–mitigationimpactimpact Permanent (P) orrequired?(square(square Temporary(T)feet)feet) Yes/No B1 Yes/No B2 Yes/No B3 Yes/No B4 Yes/No B5 Yes/No B6 6h.Total Buffer Impacts: 6i. Comments: Page 7 of 13 PCN Form – Version 1.4 January 2009 D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. To avoid and minimize the impacts to the jurisdictional waters of the U.S., the Providence Village site was delineated prior to finalizing the site plan. 1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. Proper sediment and erosion control measures will be used to minimize disturbances to downstream waters. Construction activities and impacts to on-site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. will comply with all conditions of Nationwide Permit Nos 29 and 18 and Water Quality Certificate No. 4139. 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for Yes No impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? 2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): DWQ Corps Mitigation bank 2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this Payment to in-lieu fee program project? Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: Quantity: Type:ChooseOne 3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Quantity: Type:ChooseOne Quantity: Type:ChooseOne 3c. Comments: 4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program 4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. Yes 4b. Stream mitigation requested: ChooseOne 4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres 4h. Comments: Compensatory mitigation was required in 2015. In compliance with the required conditions of the permit, the required mitigation fee for the entire proposed wetland impacts was paid to the Division of Mitigation Services after receiving the original permit verification (SAW-2015-02113). The receipt for the mitigation payment is enclosed as Attachment H. Page 8 of 13 PCN Form – Version 1.4 January 2009 5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan. 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) – required by DWQ 6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires Yes No buffer mitigation? 6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of mitigation required. 6c.6d.6e. Reason for impact Total impact MultiplierRequiredmitigation Zone (squarefeet) (square feet) 3 (2 for Catawba) Zone 1 1.5 Zone 2 6f.Total buffer mitigation required: 6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund). 6h. Comments: Page 9 of 13 PCN Form – Version 1.4 January 2009 E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified Yes No within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? 1b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why. Yes No No buffer authorization was required as the site contained no jurisdictional streams. 2. Stormwater Management Plan 2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? >24 % 2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? Yes No 2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: 2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan: The stormwater will be directed to the stormwater treatment measure located in the northeastern portion of the project area. The City of Charlotte has approved the Stormwater Management Plan (Proof of Approval, Attachment J). CityofCharlotte 2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? 3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a. In which local government’s jurisdiction is this project? Phase II NSW 3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs USMP apply (check all that apply): Water Supply Watershed Other: 3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been Yes No attached? 4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review Coastal counties HQW 4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ORW (check all that apply): Session Law 2006-246 Other: 4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been Yes No attached? 5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? Yes No 5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? Yes No Page 10 of 13 PCN Form – Version 1.4 January 2009 F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) 1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the Yes No use of public (federal/state) land? 1b. If you answered “yes” to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State Yes No (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? 1c. If you answered “yes” to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval Yes No letter.) Comments: 2. Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, Yes No or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? 2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes No 2c. If you answered “yes” to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): A change in the approved plan design was made in early 2017; however, due to a clerical oversight, the revised plan was not forwarded to the USACE. The plan change did not affect the quantity of the impacts. The new design moved the stormwater control measure to the northeastern portion of the property from the southeastern portion of the property. Since the stormwater treatment measure fill slopes were placed on the jurisdictional wetland area, the project is not in compliance with NWP 29 Regional Conditions. The stormwater treatment measure had been designed appropriately for the project purpose and has been approved by the City of Charlotte. The outfall of the stormwater treatment measure is outside the wetlands. It is our opinion that relocating this stormwater pond would negatively impact the waters due to increased sediment deposition, and relocation or redesign of the stormwater feature is not feasible within the approved plan design. The fill slopes for the stormwater treatment measure impacted less than tenth of an acre of the wetland area. Therefore, our client requests that the stormwater control measure be left in its current position and to be permitted After-the-Fact under Nationwide Permit No. 18. 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in Yes No additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? 3b. If you answered “yes” to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered “no,” provide a short narrative description. As this area is prime area for development, additional unquantified impacts to off sites waters may occur with future development. The potential future development will be designed in accordance with the most recent stormwater management, sediment and erosion control guidelines. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) Page 11 of 13 PCN Form – Version 1.4 January 2009 4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. Sewer lines will be connected to existing off-site sewer lines. On-site sewage will be treated off site at a Charlotte treatment plant. Page 12 of 13 PCN Form – Version 1.4 January 2009 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or Yes No habitat? 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act Yes No impacts? 5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. 5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? USFWS, Endangered Species, Threatened Species, Federal Species of Concern, and Candidate Species, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina: https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylist/gaston.html North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) Data Explorer: https://www.ncnhp.org/ 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? Yes No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? NOAA Fisheries: http://www.habitat.noaa.gov/protection/efh/habitatmapper.html 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation Yes No status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/ 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? Yes No 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: . 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA FIRM No. 3710356500J 4.18.18 Ms.AliisaHarjuniemi Applicant/Agent's Signature (Agent's Date signature is valid only if an authorization letter Applicant/Agent's Printed Name from the applicant is provided.) Page 13 of 13 PCN Form – Version 1.4 January 2009 I Legend Project Limits (13.8 ac.) 2,0001,00002,000Feet REFERENCE: USGS 7.5 MINUTE TOPOGRAPHIC MAP, DATED 2017 SCALE:SCALE:DATE: FIGURE NO. 4/18/2018 1 inch = 2,000 feet USGS Topographic Map CWS PROJECT NO:CWS PROJECT NO:DRAWN BY: 1 AVH 2018-0101 Providence Village of COORDINATES:COORDINATES: Charlotte, North Carolina CHECKED BY: Mecklenburg County 35.054297,-80.765763CAG 4 C:\\Users\\AliisaHarjuniemi\\Desktop\\2018 Current Projects\\Star City\\ArcGIS\\Figure1_USGS.mxd I Providence Road Legend Soil Unit - Description DaB - Davidson sandy clay loam, 2-8% slopes DaD - Davidson sandy clay loam, 8-15% slopes Project Limits (13.8 ac.) DaE - Davidson sandy clay loam, 15-25% slopes MeB - Mecklenburg fine sandy loam, 2-8% slopes 1,00050001,000Feet REFERENCE: USDA-NRCS HISTORIC SOIL SURVEY OF MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NC, SHEETS 12 AND 13, DATED 1976. SCALE:SCALE:DATE: FIGURE NO. USDA-NRCS Historic Soil Survey 4/18/2018 1 inch = 1,000 feet of Mecklenburg County 2 CWS PROJECT NO:CWS PROJECT NO:DRAWN BY: AVH 2018-0101 Providence Village of COORDINATES:COORDINATES: CHECKED BY: Charlotte, North Carolina 4 35.054297,-80.765763CAG Mecklenburg County C:\\Users\\AliisaHarjuniemi\\Desktop\\2018 Current Projects\\Star City\\ArcGIS\\Figure2_Historic Soils.mxd I NWP 18: Minor Discharge W2 - Wetland Fil - 0.08 ac. 1 Å 2 3 NWP 29: Residential Development W1 - Wetland Fill - 0.07 ac. Legend Project Limits (13.8 ac.) SAW 2015-02113: Originally Proposed Impacts: 0.16 ac. NWP 18: Wetland Imapct - Permitted under NWP 29 in 2015 NWP 29: Wetland Imapct Actual Impacts: 0.15 ac. - After-the-Fact permit under NWPs 18 and 29 in 2018 Wetland (Not Impacted) Mitigation fee for these impacts paid to DMS (DMS# 23965) Parcel Owned by Pulte (ATF Permit) Owned by Others (No Impacts) Photo Location and Direction ! Í 2001000200Feet REFERENCE: GIS LAYER(S) PROVIDED BY MECKLENBURG COUNTY GIS DEPARTMENT, DATED 2016. SITE PLAN PROVIDED BY LANDDESIGN, DATED 2018. SCALE:SCALE:DATE: FIGURE NO. 4/20/2018 1 inch = 200 feet After-the-Fact Impacts CWS PROJECT NO:CWS PROJECT NO:DRAWN BY: 4 AVH 2018-0101 Providence Village of COORDINATES:COORDINATES: Charlotte, North Carolina CHECKED BY: Mecklenburg County 35.054297,-80.765763CAG 4 C:\\Users\\AliisaHarjuniemi\\Desktop\\2018 Current Projects\\Star City\\ArcGIS\\Figure4_AFT Impacts.mxd 23113138 WetlandFill (NWP18) -0.08ac. Wetland WetlandFill (notimpacted) (NWP29) -0.07ac. PROVIDENCE VILLAGE TOWNHOMES CITY OF CHARLOTTE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NC REVISIONS: 1016235 06/30/2017 0' 15'15'30'60' DATE:DESIGNED BY:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:Q.C. BY:SCALE:PROJECT #:SHEET #: 02%,)-).!29 0,!..%$ MULTI-&!-),9 35"$)6)3)/. APPROVAL CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG PLANNING DEPARTMENT By Brent Wilkinson 12/22/17 FINAL APPROVAL ENGINEERING By Brendan M. Smith at 9:07 am, Dec 21, 2017 PCO / DETENTION / DRAINAGE PLAN EROSIONCONTROL URBAN FORESTRY TREE ORDINANCE CDOT NOTE: SCHEDULE PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING AT LEAST 48 HRS. PRIOR TO ANY LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY USING THE ONLINE FORM FOUND AT http://charlottenc.gov/ld