Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20150053 Ver 1_Environmental Assessment_20060701Protected Species Survey Improvements to US 64 from Lake Tosaway to Indian Creek Transylvania Count,y�, North Carolina (T[P R-2�09C) (State Project WBS No.34328) Prepared for: Ko & Associates 1011 Schaub Drive, Suite 202 Raleigh, NC 27606 and The North Carolina Department of Transportation Raleigh, North Carolina Prepared by: The Catena Group A10-B Millstone Drive Hillsborough, North Carolina 27278 Tel(919)732-1300 Fax(919)732-1303 July 2006 PROTECTED SPECIES SURVEY Improvements to US 64 from Lake Toxaway to Indian Creek Transylvania County, North Carolina (R-2409C) Introduction The following report is submitted to detail methods and results of a survey for small whorled pogonia (Isotria medeoloides) within the area of proposed improvements to US 64 in Transylvania County, NC (R-2409C). This report is an addendum to the draft Natural Resources Technical Report (NRTR) delivered to Ko and Associates in February 2006. It was stated in the February draft NRTR report that suitable habitat for small whorled pogonia occurs throughout the project area, and thus a biological conclusion of "Unresolved" was given until surveys could be conducted during the flowering period of May to June. The pogonia survey was later conducted by The Catena Group during the flowering period and resulted in discovery of a new colony of small whorled pogonia located within the cut-fill boundaries of one (Alternate 2) of the three proposed improvement alternatives. Project Description The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes improvements to a section of US 64 in Transylvania County; North Carolina (Figure 1). These improvements involve a combination of widening of the existing roadway and construction of roadway on a new alignment. The project extends from a point approximately 0.25 mile west of the US 64/NC281 intersection (just east of the Lake Toxaway outfall) and extends eastward a distance of approximately 1.5 miles, ending just west of Indian Creek. Three alternate alignments are proposed: Alternate 1 entails improvements on the existing alignment; Alternate 2 is proposed as a 30 mile per hour (MPH) alignment involving new road construction on a new alignment; Alternate 3 is proposed as a 40 MPH alignment and also involves new road construction on a new alignment. Protected Species in Transylvania County Plants and animals with federal classifications of Endangered, Threatened, Proposed Endangered, and Proposed Threatened are protected under provisions of Sections 7 and 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. As of February 25, 2003, the USFWS lists nine species of plants and animals as federally protected species for Transylvania County (Table 1). Table 1. Threatened and Endangered Species, Transylvania County Common Name Scientific Name Status Bog turtle Glyptemys muhlenbergii T(S/A)* Carolina northern flying squirrel Glaucomys sabrinus coloratus Endangered Appalachian elktoe Alasmidonta raveneliana Endangered Oyster mussel Epioblasma capsaeformis Endangered** Mountain sweet pitcher plant Sarracenia jonesii Endangered Small whorled pogonia lsotria medealoides Threatened Spreading avens Geum radiatum Endangered Swamp pink Helonias bullata Threatened Rock Gnome Lichen Gymnoderma lineare Endangered *T(S/A) - Threatened due to similarity of appearance (e.g., American alligator)--a species that is threatened due to similarity of appeazance with other rare species and is listed for its protection. These species are not biologically endangered or threatened and are not subject to Section 7 consultation; **Historic record - obscure and incidental record. Based on NC Natural Heritage Program records, no Threatened or Endangered species listed to occur in Transylvania County are documented within 1 mile (1.6 kilometers) of the study area. None of the species listed as occurring within the county, with the exception of small whorled pogonia, are provided suitable habitat within the study area, and therefore were given Biological Conclusions of "No Effect" in the draft NRTR. Species Synopsis Small Whorled Pogonia lsotria medeoloides Status: Threatened Family: Orchidaceae Listed: October 6, 1994 Small whorled pogonia is a perennial herb in the orchid family with long, pubescent roots and a smooth, hollow stem 3.7 to 9.8 inches tall terminating in a whorl of 5 or 6 light green, elliptical leaves that are somewhat pointed and measure up to 3.1 x 1.6 inches. A flower, or occasionally two flowers, is produced at the top of the stem. Small whorled pogonia's nearest relative is the purple five leaf orchid (Isotria verticillata), which is similar looking, but can be distinguished by its purplish stem and by differences in the flower structure. The purple five leaf orchid is much more common and widespread than the small whorled pogonia. When not in flower, young plants of Indian cucumber-root (Medeola virginiana) also resemble small whorled pogonia. However, the hollow stout stem of the small whorled pogonia will separate it from the genus Medeola, which has a solid, more slender stem (USFWS 1992). Small whorled pogonia is often found in colonies. Some individuals within a colony may remain underground in a dormant state for several years, making it difficult to determine population size and viability. Flowering typically occurs in May through June. 2 This orchid typically grows in open, dry, deciduous woods and in areas along streams with acidic soil. The plant can also be found in rich, mesic woods in association with eastern white pine and great rhododendron. Small whorled pogonia prefers areas with a layer of leaf litter and decaying material, but can also be found on dry, rocky, wooded slopes, moist slopes, or slope bases near vernal streams (NCNHP 2004). - . There are 23 populations of small whorled pogonia in the Southeast Region: five populations occur in North Carolina, four in South Carolina, 13 in Georgia, and one in Tennessee. Most southeastern populations number less than 25 plants. South Carolina has one population of over 25 plants, and Georgia has two populations numbering about 100 plants each. In the Southeast, North Carolina has two protected sites, both of which are viable; South Carolina has four protected sites,. two of which are viable; and Georgia has seven protected sites, four of which are viable (USRWS 1992). Small whorled pogonia is extremely rare: it is listed as Endangered in North Carolina and has a State Ranking of S 1, "Critically Imperiled" with fewer than five extant populations in the state. It has a. Global Ranking of "G2" which is defined as; "imperiled globally because of rarity or because of some factor (s) making it�very vulnerable to extinction . throughout its range" (NCNHP 2004). � " The primary threat to small. whorled pogonia is �habitat destruction, while collecting is a threat to a lesser degree (USF.WS 1992). According to Denise Moldenhauer of USEWS, Asheville office,. there is a lack of experience with relocating/transplanting this species, and there no empirical evidence to suggest that transplanting can be accomplished successfully (pers. comm.). . Methods For this evaluation, the project area is an area approximately 50 feet outside of the cut-fill boundaries for each of the proposed alternates, approximately 50:4 acres total. Systematic surveys were conducted within the project during the days of June 14=16; 2006 by two persons � walking transects (perpendicular to slope of terrain) and searching areas of suitable habitat wliile spaced 15-20 feet apart. A back—and=forth pattern was conducted uritil the entire section of suitable habitat was covered. Suitable liabitat was considered to be open, deciduous and coniferous forest, rhododendron thickets; dry roadside cuts, mesic drainages and floodways, and fern gl"ades. Dense stands of mountain laurel (Kalmia litifolia) were found significantly .lacking '. of herbaceous vegetation and were also extremely diffcult to investigate effectively, so. were . excluded from the survey. Nonetheless, nearly the entire project area, riorth and south of US 64 and its maintained shoulders, were surveyed. Results The survey resulted in finding one colony of small whorled pogonia within the project area on. June 16, 2006 (see photographs below). fihe colony is located at the east end of the project� area 3 and notth of US 64, appro�imately 50 feet from the road (Fi�ure 2: coords: 35.12467, - 82.9170>). This location occurs �vithin the cut-till boundary tor Alremate 3. but just outside of Alternates I and 3. hiitially. we located two individual plants approximately 3 feet apart; one individual was in the fruiting stage supporting a maturing capsule, while the other apparendy had not flowered. A subsequent visit to the colony by NCDOT and USF WS personnel resul[ed in the tinding of six additional small whorled poconia stems, all within a distance of 20 feet of the ori�inal two stems and closer to the road. According to Anne Burrows of NCDOT (pers. comm.), only one of these individuals had Flowered. Photographs and stem measurements were taken of the two stems found on June 16; identification of the plants as being small whorled pogonia was confirmed by Denise Moldenhauer and Carolyn Wells of the USFWS (.4sheville office). based on the photographs and tield observa[ion. The colony occurs on a dry, acidic slope (gradual) that is southward facine and receives moderate sun light. The canopy is likely second-growth and dominated by mature white pine (Pi�rus strnhus), but also contains some oaks (Or�erct�s spp.); the understory is open and the herbaceous vegetation provides sparse to moderate covera�e of the ground, although one of the later-found individuals was found beneath dense coverage of blueberry (Vnccrniaim sp.) nearby. The litter layer eontains a mixture of dried pine and deciduous leaves. Biological Conclusion Unresohed During the survey within the project area in June 2006, a colony of small whorled was identified in the eastern portion of the project and north oP US 64. The colony is represented by eight individuals, all located within �0 feet of the existine roadway and within the cut-till boundaries of Alternate 2, as proposed. Although the colony is not expected to occur within Alternates I and 3, it is believed that some plants may be within lees than I U ot� feet their boundaries, and thus could be affected by construction activities or associated land clearine. Specitic construction and 4 clearing limits cannot be determined at this time, and therefore a Section 7 Consultation will be required in order to evaluate the potential impacts to the species. Based on this information, a Biological Conclusion of Unresolved has been given. Also, because some individuals within the population may remain dormant in some years, it is difficult to estimate the exact population size without monitoring for a long period. This species is extremely rare in North Carolina and throughout its range, and because there is no supporting evidence to suggest that the colony could be successfully relocated, it is likely that during review of the project the USFWS will strongly encourage avoidance of the population. References North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP). 2004. Natural Heritage Program List of the Rare Plant Species of North Carolina. M.A. Franklin and J.T. Finnegan, Eds. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program. Raleigh, NC. ' US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1992. Small Whorled Pogonia (Isotria medeoloides) Recovery Plan, First Revision. Newton Corner, Massachusetts. 75 pp. 5 �-��� �e � '� . ���� �'� (� � l.! � �1 , 1, � � � K , ,,. � ��� BM�1 LCL� � � • � J� J"'_i_. � ^ ��iU � � , �. � F%�- j"" 1��.�' �4�9• � .\`e �. ..._ ' s� , �b G-�_�'�, � 1- � . 1/ . . �J�Z. J`•�- ;: . � J _ � � . ,: � � "�' • �`J. ~.y �' � , l,-` � ' � �• 6 � .i � ��.`;. �q•�� r �, ,.,:.� ` ` ` `,v� '� . i• _ �� -.-J �s (• � yr�'s � a = s r • �� >. � ; � c: � 1 ��C, qq i �� i t � �ar � :. :J_ ,ay"- `S7, • . =�\ �ce, �3 A� / 78i �' . ��0p0 �-� z s ` . / � Ai �``£?p�i ,: - �' °s, �� � , , 'v • �L � � ! . i� �\y, < �, � Y : � � o�, � i Lake T � �� � � � � �� l wcs � ` " � d ` �� J , j 9y '� ;+ _�, �... � � ( SS- //! � ��' ,I . MR/,�r� '7 � �� ( �1r�1 ,'! � `i •<� � .� \� / J. �'+�����.�`_- 1.' `/�i� ��$ `�;l �.� `��� �/� �: - .I ... . '� /� ) ��. �. \ 1 \ + J � PROJECTAREA V����, � � � V�/-"{�� {�.. �i JOoO., . . __ � � ?�� � �` . i I/y1. 1 . • . 4 , `>=I--�'"�f ^ � ' \ � ( �' �M '�'�Y:tfti.i} • � �1 '' 2 . , a , . w " _ k: ,,_� �':'� t �.-` .. '� . � , / 1:ake Toxaway'. . °�kO$�oi(j i . 1 ,. B�, .aroS'a• ' Ch! • � • v •�a. . � ��1����. � 1 �.�� . i � . . _ � 1 . . . . . ` i.���' I _� . - ��/�`<-'G % '\�/ � _ _.� �� �� �. �I . �� � : B�1 U 55 -�� ,n `c� �' �p. �� � �' ;�;� \ ��' �1 ;�'ti� ��/ ` � � . � r \ r � �/� �1 (inr���.At.�tcP.ul. ���� ) / l� ' r � - 8 � . i��, J � i ; �`� j'�'i j -fJ i ,� � . � � _ . . {� ���� �o° � � 8' r, �� ��� id t '!� i� i rA �� _� � � - - /�.- ` .. I\ r, _., �i!„ /� I i ..� ; 1\'. : ;- � ��. ;;f ; ,� , �. a -�,�/ � �� � O �� � a$.`' ' J �� _S' - \ � �, � � r �I�� %�� : •; � �': . , �' ,� �� �/ �r ,y;, ` ,� _,' 0 ,� r � � (1 - � �, � �,ir. i o � e �'if+ ,,f ` `,� 1' •-� f'-- � f ��',' �^"`)� _ � ����`� ' ,�'""'`,b � ,�f. . : 1 ./ "'' .. .P � ..,,, � `�" � ;.��J�!�_-� . � � �' r1 r�� .V7���" r 1�`�'�+i .J� I�� ,� C'." ��._.�'; `r �, '.l ��. 1 / f c' �V l� � �; � !j I , �. �`i � / f � � ' + n ���, > . � . The Site Location Map Da�e �lY Z� Fig� Catena Small Whorled Pogonia Survey s�„�, ,�w � Group TIPR-2409C � 013 �� � (US 64 from Toxoway Lake to Indian Creek) ��h Nn. ' T�81`fYIV81NpCW�ty.N011�CAt01n4� 6iQ5