Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20090459 Ver 1_Application_20090423 c v0? y STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MICHAEL F. EASLEY DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS LYNDO TIPPETT GOVERNOR SECRETARY April 20, 2009 Mr. Brian Wrenn Division of Water Quality e(!? 401/Transportation Permitting Unit 1650 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 SUBJECT: Emergency pipe replacement on SR 1444 (Beaten Path Road), Iredell County Dear Mr. Wrenn: The North Carolina Department of Transportation proposes to replace a failed pipe on SR 1444 (Beaten Path Road) in Iredell County. A roadway pipe carrying stormwater flow and drainage from a small wetland area has collapsed and a "sinkhole" formed along the road shoulder; therefore, the project was considered an emergency project and construction commenced immediately. The existing 74 foot, 18" CMP will be replaced with a 74-ft long, 24" RCP, plus, a 4 It x 4 ft dropbox with a 16-foot 24" RCP extending from the dropbox at streambed elevation. The dropbox was included in the pipe replacement/extension to dissipate stormwater flow/energy within the pipe system and also to lessen the slope of the proposed pipe in an effort to prevent further stream destabilization. Due to the potential for sediment loss from the pipe failure and subsequent excavation during pipe construction, an instream sediment basin was used. Upon project completion, the basin will be removed and the channel restructured to "normal" channel dimensions based upon a reference cross-section of the stream channel before construction disturbance. The channel reconstruction will consist of the construction of rock-faced benches and coir fiber matting for stabilization. The "inlet" of the existing 15" RCP, which extends to the small upstream wetland will be replaced with a 15" HDPE and the disturbed area around the pipe inlet will be stabilized with coir fiber matting and seeded with wetland seed mix. The total scope of the work will result in a 20 feet of permanent impacts and -10 feet of temporary impacts to an unnamed tributary to Catawba River (Lake Norman, below elevation 760), which is classified as a WS-IV & B CA watershed by the Division of Water Quality The project is located within the critical watershed area; however, SR 1444 is not a rural or urban arterial; therefore, hazardous spill basins are not required. Enclosed is the hazardous spill basin checklist. No sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places are located in the vicinity of the project nor did there appear to be any eligible structures. There will be no effect on any for historical structures. SR 1444, Beaten Path Road Page 2 April 20, 2009 This office has conducted a GIS and field survey for threatened and endangered species in the vicinity of the project. The Natural Heritage Program records document the nearest dwarf- flowered heartleaf location approximately 13.5 miles southwest of the proposed project in Catawba County. The heartleaf is usually found on dry to moist ravine slopes (usually north facing and of the oak-hickory-pine forest type) and in boggy areas near springheads. The project area is mostly residential with some forested areas. There is no suitable habitat within the proposed project area and no heartleaf species were observed. The Natural Heritage Program records document the bog turtle location approximately 7.5 miles southeast of the proposed project. Bog turtles are typically found in bogs, marshes, and wet pastures. There is no suitable habitat located within the project area. T/SA species are not subject to Section 7 consultation; however, no impact on this species is anticipated. I have enclosed a pre-construction notification for a NW#14, sketches of planned activities, and location maps relative to the project. Project information for the 401 Automated Payment Procedure is as follows: • Work order number: 150461-55120005-12.204911-3126 • TIP #: NA • Project Category: $240.00 Fee If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me at (704) 480-9044. Thank you for your time and consideration to this matter Respectfully yours, M.L. Holder, P.E. Division Engineer Twelfth Division BY: Trish Simon Division 12 Environmental Supervisor Enclosures Cc: Polly Lespinasse, DWQ, Mooresville Regional Office O?O?_ W AZ, qOy T ? r O < Office Use Only: Corps action ID no. DWQ project no. Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008 Pre-Construction Notification PC Form A. Applicant Information 1. Processing 1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: ® Section 404 Permit ? Section 10 Permit 1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: NW 14 (GC 3704) or General Permit (GP) number: 1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ? Yes ®No 1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply): ® 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit ? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ? Riparian Buffer Authorization 1e. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required? Ff he record only for DWQ 401 icati on: Yes ®No For the record only for Corps Permit: ®Yes ? No If. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program. Yes El ® No 1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h below. ? Yes ® No 1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? Yes ® No 2. Project Information 2a. Name of project: SR 1444 (Beaten Path Road) Pipe Replacement 2b. County: Iredell 2c. Nearest municipality / town: Mooresville 2d. Subdivision name: NA 2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no: 12.204911 3. Owner Information 3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: NC DOT Right of Way 3b. Deed Book and Page No. NA 3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if applicable): 3d. Street address: 3e. City, state, zip: 3f. Telephone no.: 3g. Fax no.: 3h. Email address: Page 1 of 11 PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 4. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 4a. Applicant is: ? Agent ? Other, specify: 41b. Name: Mike Holder 4c. 4d. Business name (if applicable): Street address: N.C. Department of Transportation, Division of Highways 1710 East Marion Street 4e. City, state, zip: Shelby, NC 28151 4f. Telephone no.: 704-480-9020 4g. Fax no.: 704-480-5401 4h. Email address: mholder@ncdot.gov 5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable) 5a. Name: Trish Simon 5b. 5c. Business name (if applicable): Street address: N.C. Department of Transportation, Division of Highways 1710 East Marion Street 5d. City, state, zip: Shelby, NC 28151 5e. Telephone no.: 704-480-9044 5f. Fax no.: 704 480-5401 5g. Email address: tsimon@ncdot.gov Page 2 of 11 PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification la. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): NA Latitude: 35.5759237 Longitude: - 1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): 80.9172844 DDDDDD) (-DD DD . ) (DD.DDDD 1c. Property size: <.10 acres 2. Surface Waters 2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to UT to Catawba River (Lake Norman below elevation 760) proposed project: 2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: WS-IV & B CA 2c. River basin: Catawba 3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: 74-foot, 18 " CMP. Land use is mostly residential with mixed forest land. 3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0 3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 20 3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: The purpose of the proposed project is to replace a failed pipe for the safety of the travelling public. 3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: Replacing existing failed 74-foot, 18" pipe, with a 24", 74-foot pipe and a 4 It x 4 ft drop box and 16 feet of 24" pipe set at streambed grade extending from the drop box. The purpose of the drop box is to dissipate energy within the pipe system. 4. Jurisdictional Determinations 4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / project (including all prior phases) in the past? ® Yes ? No ? Unknown Comments: Jursidictional determination made by NCDOT Division 12 DEO - contacted DWQ for jurisdictional verification 4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type ? Preliminary ? Final of determination was made? 4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: DWQ Name (if known): Other: 4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation. 4/9/09- No written documentation 5. Project History 5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for El Yes ? No ®Unknown this project (including all prior phases) in the past? 5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions. Page 3 of 11 PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? ? Yes ® No 6b. If yes, explain. Page 4 of 11 PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version C. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary 1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply): ? Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ? Buffers ? Open Waters ? Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f. 2a . Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction number - Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ - non-404, other) (acres) Temporary T ? Yes ? Corps W1 ? P ? T ? No ? DWQ ? Yes ? Corps W2 ? P ? T ? No ? DWQ ? Yes ? Corps W3 ? P ? T ? No ? DWQ ? Yes ? Corps W4 ? P ? T ? No ? DWQ ? Yes ? Corps W5 ? P ? T ? No ? DWQ ? Yes ? Corps W6 ? P ? T ? No IQ ?D 2g. Total wetland impacts 2h. Comments: 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g. 3a . Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact m length t rea number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 s Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ - non-404, width (linear feet) Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) S1 ®P ? T Dropbox/Pipe i E UT to Catawba River (Lake PER ? ®INT ® Corps ®DWQ 1.5 feet 20 feet on xtens Norman) S2 ? P ® T 'Instream sediment basin ? PER ® INT ® Corps ® DWQ 10 feet ? PER ? Corps S3 ? P ? T ? INT ? DWQ ? PER ? Corps S4 ? P ? T ? INT ? DWQ ? PER ? Corps S5 ? P ? T ? INT ? DWQ ? PER ? Corps S6 ? P ? T ? INT ? DWQ 3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 30 3i. Comments: ' Stream channel in area of instream basin to be reconstructed to reference condition upon completion of n.n,eM Page 5 of 11 PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 4. Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below. 4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e. Open water Name of waterbody impact number - (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres) Permanent (P) or Lem ora T 01 ?P?T 02 ?P?T 03 ?P?T 04 ?P?T 4f. Total open water impacts 4g. Comments: 5. Pond or Lake Construction then complete the chart below. pond or lake construction ro os . 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e. Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland Proposed use or purpose E (acres) number of pond Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded P2 5f. Total 5g. Comments: 5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ? Yes ? No If yes, permit ID no: 5i. Expected pond surface area (acres): 5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): 5k. Method of construction: 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below . If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts below. If an impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form. 6a. ? Neuse ? Tar-Pamlico ? Other: Project is in which protected basin? ? Catawba ? Randleman 6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g. Buffer impact number - Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Tem ora T impact required? ?Yes B1 ?P?T ? No ?Yes B2 ?P?T ? No - ?Yes B3 ?P?T T 7 1 ? No 6h. Total buffer impacts 6i. Comments: Page 6 of 11 PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version Justification and Mitigation ance and Minimization pecifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. ction of stream channel in area of instream basin to maintain channel dimensions. pecifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. F r fiber matting on banks of reconstructed channel. Stabilization using of coir fiber matting and wetland seed mix in upstream wetland area after removal and replacement of pipe. 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? ? Yes ® No 2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ? DWQ ? Corps 2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? ? Mitigation bank ? Payment to in-lieu fee program ? Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: 3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity 3c. Comments: 4. Complete if Making a Payment to in-lieu Fee Program 4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ? Yes 4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet 4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ? warm ? cool ?cold 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres 4h. Comments: 5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan. Page 7 of 11 PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) -required by DWQ 6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires buffer mitigation? ? Yes ® No 6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of mitigation required. Zone 6c. Reason for impact 6d. Total impact (square feet) Multiplier 6e. Required mitigation (square feet) Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba) Zone 2 1.5 6f. Total buffer mitigation required: 6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund). 6h. Comments: Page 8 of 11 PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ? Yes ® No within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? 1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why. ? Yes ? No Comments: NA 2. Stormwater Management Plan 2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 0% 2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ? Yes ® No 2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: Complies with NCDOT's individual NPDES permit NCS000250. (Implementation, management, and inspection of erosion control devices and control of discharge sources (ie. construction equipment). 2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, na rrative description of the plan: NA ? Certified Local Government 2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ? DWQ Stormwater Program ? DWQ 401 Unit 3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? NA ? Phase II ? NSW 3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs El USMP apply (check all that apply): ? Water Supply Watershed ? Other: 3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ? Yes ? No attached? 4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review ? Coastal counties ? HQW 4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ? ORW (check all that apply): ? Session Law 2006-246 ? Other: 4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ? Yes ? No attached? 5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ® Yes ? No 5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ® Yes ? No Page 9 of 11 PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ® Yes ? No use of public (federal/state) land? 1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an t l St ? Yes ®No e or a environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the Nationa (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? 1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval El Yes ? No letter.) Comments: NA 2. Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated d d d St ? Yes ® No an ar s, Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetlan or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0200)? 21b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ® Yes ? No 2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): Pipe failure and sinkhole formation along roadway was considered an emergency project which required immediate repair. The DWQ regional office was contacted on April 8, 2009 and verbal approval for pipe repair was given by DWQ personnel. 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ? Yes ®No additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? 3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description. The project is a minimum criteria project which has low potential for cumulative/indirect impacts and will not result in additional development which could impact water quality. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. No wastewater generated from project. Page 10 of 11 PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ? Yes ® No habitat? 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ? Yes ® No impacts? ? Raleigh 5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. ? Asheville 5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? NC Natural Heritage Program database 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ? Yes ® No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? No salt marshes, oyster reefs, or seagrass beds located in vicinity of project. 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ? Yes ®No status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? The State Historic Preservation office resources and the National Register of Historic Places were reviewed for historic sites in the vicinity of the project; however, the pipe replacement project occurs within a previously impacted area (NCDOT Right of way). 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ? Yes ® No 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA FIRM panal number:3710462700E (ncsparta.net) M,L. Nolde/ N1.L.? ln? ?r -,)o -0 Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Applicant/Agent's Signature Date (Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.) Page 11 of 11 PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version SR 1444 (Beaten Path Road) Iredell County I R Q ? \ I? WS V N? DSO c Emergency pipe replacement n ,moo ° 0 SR 11p0 A N? sq ? »y Q C / { , ? o 0 0.5 1 2 Miles /ll A I N Vicinity Map v ` v? j `.. / 1 V ) Sinkhole/Emergency ' Pipe Replacement ??' it: .1 1 00 Name: LAKE NORMAN NORTH Date: 4/17/2009 Scale: 1 inch equals 1000 feet 4<P?r ?1,?ol v r Location: 035.5759237° N 080.9172844°W Caption: Emergency pipe rplcmnt, SR 1444 (Beaten Path Rd), UT to Catawba River (Lake Norman), WS-IV B CA, Catawba Basin SR 1444, Beaten Path Road Iredell County Sinkhole area ?\ 1 Upstream drainage from wetland area y < ? fJ y1* f ?f Ail Downstream outlet APR-16-2099 03:21P FROM:IREDELL CO. MAINTENR 704-876-1828 . .I 9 0 4 O ; s :n P N y /'wP a? ah n O O t l/ \ n! 1 P ?tl J K 0 O ? U ? QP b y a y J .' K ? Q/ Fw L . Z W 9 L w h ° V 0 n a TO:SHELBY DIVISON P.2 /2 4 ? o a 0 ? y o ? 4 F K U O 2 d T ? qq ? fi r b J 5 P o W 4 i .. ? P ? 0 n t A O N u ? 1 D A Z 7 I b i V 2 Z ZQ P n? V v ^ W Q 4, x c C m' a r.: t nui± pssu wi, r ?F: -5/1 le N M s h n Y e µ N N ? P I 4 9 M 9 r _ a W N 'O _J h N a 0. ' W -NIO 9 ° N p CqT ? v ? J 2 , m V N m P N N ? o H / N S P a z ' 9 ?'d NOSInIO AM3HS:01 m 9 +, r ?P go I N h r_ W P I ? 9 d• 0 0 V I 6 J a u 0 'm r ? P 0 0 elm ?6G MM? M N I -r K ? P 0 N b 9 ? 828T-9L8-t,W UN31NIUW '00 1-1303JI:WOJ3 U2b:60 6002-9T-Jdd V .ry 4 0 tl V N 3 v 4 0 P? J Y x V Y J h? } n 4J ? Y T J 4? J a" J J LL h n a J I W Z 2 U eP rI ? a' J N s "Z, x a 6 4-0 5A? Aiu six E 0 w- ?N J . N r u J J rt 4 u n a 0. 9/t, 'd NOSInIO AMIIHS:01 M iff 828T-9Z8-b0L UN31NIUW '00 -n=0 ]I:W0ad URb:60 6002-9T-add I U' n e F J ?'Z ? O r x e ?n P V) n ? h 'Q 2 V n w U Z w LL W c x t r F n -t d 0 i ? P d ?y J > ry f b d m i m p m a 3 F L d p J ?f u^ r d r u N o ? A h P T ? U (F o o m iF w 9 S'd NOSIf1I0 AM3HS:01 F U .p r f eqc 5X? des eae ?c?c A?m 828T-9L8-b0L UN31NIUW '00 -n303NI:WOJd UZt,:60 6002-9T-ddU S 9/9,C] J r y 0. Pi 7t O e o m ) Z ? ? I1 F V n ? 2 ? k iQ m 2 , _ ? r- h P q n ? N ? n Z a p 0 m v y a F i = 1i T n n 0 2 W ' n ? a tl a r ? 2 m 1 u p J N '11 P 4 m w ?. tl uu e c r ? r a f F p, 3 o w a y 40 o `F u 4 \ ;: Y has AAA v F W 4 r W ??? 3 • ? ? 1 Jd ? / b NOSIAIO A813HS:01 828L-9L8-b02- UN31NIUW '00 -11303JI:WOJd HEb:60 6002-9L-NdC NCDOT HAZARDOUS SPILL BASIN CHECKLIST Division: 12 County: fredell Project ID: River Basin: Catawba Bridge No: Pipe Replacement Route: SR 1444 (Beaten Path Road) Stream: UT to Catawba River (Lake Norman below el. 760) WS-IV & B CA Watershed Water Quality Criteria: Yes No Stream Crossing Blue Line On USGS ? r ORW r W. WS1 ? rv-j WS 11,111 OR W, Crossing Within 0.5mi of W.S. Critical Area R6 ? Roadway Criteria: Route Designation- Arterial Urban Arterial Rural Yes No r rv-, r R Additional Site Information: Is a Hazardous Spill Basin Required? Yes No r r Criteria Based Upon NCDOT "Best Management Practices for the Protection of Surface Waters" (March, 1997). • 11 ,