HomeMy WebLinkAbout20090424 Ver 1_401 Application_20090409DR. J.H. CARTER III & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Environmental Consultants 0 9- 0 4 2 4
P.O. Box 891 • Southern Pines, N.C. 28388
(910) 695-1043 9 Fax(910)695-3317
Letter of Transmittal
To: NC Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
WE ARE SENDING YOU
Date: 4-14-09 Job # 0911
Attn: C ndi Karol /Ian McMillan
Re: Industrial Park West substation, Kinston
Attached Reports X Maps
Copy of letter Plans X Data
Prints Photos X Permit application
COPIES DATE # P s DESCRIPTION + U, K
1 4-13-09 22 Permit application for the proposed P
Industrial Park West Substation,
City of Kinston, Lenoir County, NC
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED
For approval
For your use
As requested
For review and comment
REMARKS:
1 ESY
>y
fFL?l !_;A _
!
•
w
_ Approved as noted
•
Approved as submitted ?.? _ t.f
Returned for corrections ;' 1, ??
X For your information r art
rj
,
18
'
1
ay
I've enclosed a courtesy copy permit application for your information The project
includes construction of an electrical substation with an access road that will cross a
ditch. Proposed project impacts are under 0.10 acre and do not require written approval
Additionally, DENR was in contact with the engineer (Booth & Assoc.) last year, who
indicated that the City of Kinston has an approved erosion and sediment control plan and
does not need to submit anything else for approval (see enclosed email from Bryan
Maness of Booth & Assoc.). Call if you have any questions. Thanks,
Jennifer Archambault
COPY TO:
SIGNED:
If enclosures are not noted, please contact us immediately
Endangered Species Surveys • Environmental Assessments 9 Land Management 9 Wetlands Mapping and Permitting
Page 1 of 1
Jennifer Archambault
From: "Bryan Maness" <ManessBD@booth-assoc.com>
To: "Jennifer Archambault" <jrchambault@jhcarterinc.com>
Cc: Jason Thigpen"' <Jason.Thigpen@ci.kinston.nc.us>
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2008 8:44 AM
Subject: Kinston Roadside Ditch [6641]
Jennifer,
Thanks for taking the time to swing by the Kinston site last week. For your records, the section of driveway that
crosses the questioned ditch is 20' wide, 30' long, and will have a 36" RCP with inlet and outlet riprap protection.
The City has already received an erosion and sediment control permit from NCDENR and is not required to
submit anything else for approval. Please let me know if you need any additional information from me for your use
in contacting the CORE. Thanks so much for your help!
Bryan D. Maness, PE
Project Engineer III
Booth & Associates, Inc.
A Part of USA, Inc. - An Employee Owned Company
`I be lt?:vt,
Tel. (919) 851-8770 Ext. 150
Cell (919) 880-9779
Fax (919) 859-5918
mailto:M...anessBD a Booth As_s_oc.com
fv-+_ &- ?sSe? ` VAY-a l I
G y (cs" -b V\ M
__
4/14/2009
DR. J.H. CARTER III & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Environmental Consultants
P.O. Box 891 • Southern Pines, N.C. 28388
(910) 695-1043 • Fax(910)695-3317
13 April 2009
Ms. Emily Jernigan
Washington Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
P.O. Box 1000
Washington, North Carolina 27889-1000
Dear Ms. Jernigan:
Enclosed is a permit application for the Industrial Park West electrical substation in Kinston,
Lenoir County, North Carolina (see enclosed maps). In general, proposed jurisdictional impacts
include the discharge of fill material in a roadside ditch wetland for an access road to the electrical
substation, with a total project impact of approximately 0.012 acre to jurisdictional waters,
including wetlands.
Please review the enclosed permit application and contact me if you need any additional
information. Thank you for your time.
Sincerely,
. 440vv-
Jenn fer M. Archambault
Wildlife Biologist
CC: NC Division of Water Quality - 401 Wetlands Unit
Endangered Species Surveys 9 Environmental Assessments • Land Management • Wetlands Mapping and Permitting
01/27/2009 11:27 252-939-3279
29 December 2008
To Whom It May Concern:
KINSTON PUBLIC SERV.
PAGE 02/03
Dr. J. H.. Carter III & Associates, Inc. is authorized. to prepare and submit the necessary
permits for the proposed Industrial Park West Substation., in Lenoir County, NC. As
proposed in the attached document (WETLAND PERMITTING FOR
PROPOSED INDUSTRIAL PARK, WEST SUBSTATION) dated 24 October 2008.
Additionally, this letter grants permission to federal and state regulatory authorities to
conduct site visits on our property to evaluate wetland boundaries and project impacts.
R?Jason pectfully,
C. Thi en
City of Kinston
0 9- 0 ; 2 4
O?O? \,NA TF9OG
I I > ?
I?.?I o <
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.0 November 2008
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information COURTESY
1. Processing Copy
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps: ®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 12 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ® Yes ? No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ? Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401 For the record only for Corps Permit:
because written approval is not required? Certification:
® Yes ? No ? Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation ? Yes ® No
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program.
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h ? Yes ® No
below.
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? Yes ® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Industrial Park West Substation - Kinston
2b. County: Lenoir
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Kinston
2d. Subdivision name: N/A
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state N/A
project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name on Recorded Deed: City of Kinston, Jason Thigpen-Contact
3b. Deed Book and Page No. not available from Lenoir County GIS
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d. Street address: P.O. Drawer 339 DEuR_
3e. City, state, zip: Kinston, NC 28502
3f. Telephone no.: (252) 939-3320
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address: Jason.Thigpen@ci.kinston.nc.us
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form -Version 1.0 November 2008 Version
Section A. Applicant Information, continued
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ? Agent ? Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: Jennifer M. Archambault
5b. Business name
(if applicable): Dr. J.H. Carter III & Associates, Inc., Environmental Consultants
5c. Street address: 515-F Midland Road
5d. City, state, zip: Southern Pines, NC 28387
5e. Telephone no.: (910) 695-1043
5f. Fax no.: (910) 695-3317
5g. Email address: jrchambault@jhcarterinc.com
Page 2 of 12
PCN Form - November 2008 Version
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1 a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): Not available on Lenoir Co. GIS
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): 35.2701823'N - 77.6664765'W
1c. Property size: 3.07 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Falling Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: WS-IV; NSW
2c. River basin: Neuse
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The parcel is currently an actively cultivated corn field, bordered to the west by railroad tracks and to the south by
Smithfield Way (no known State Route number). General land use in the immediate vicinity includes agriculture and
industrial areas.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
< 0.10 acre. The only wetland onsite is the roadside ditch and only the proposed access road easement was evaluated.
The proposed substatation will be located in the existing corn field.
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
none
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed access road is to allow access to the future Industrial Park West 115 to 15 kV substation.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project includes construction of an electrical substation and access road. Construction of the access road requires
crossing a roadside ditch (deemed possibly jurisdictional by Mr. David Shaeffer-personal communication) and installation
of a 36-inch diameter culvert. The ditch averages 10-12 feet across and the total width of the crossing will be 45-feet.
The maximum impact will be (12'x45') - 540 square feet (or 0.012 acre). Equipment may include bulldozers, graders and
other standard heavy equipment.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / ? Yes ® No ? Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
? Preliminary ? Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known): Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
No JD was made, however, we were advised to apply for the permit without the JD in the interest of time. Examination of
available GIS data (specifically LIDAR) by the Corps indicated that the impacts were likely jurisdictional.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ? Yes ®No
? Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
No previous permit requests have been made. The engineer did visit the site with a representative from DWQ, who
indicated that DWQ was not interested in regulating such a small impact. DWQ suggested contacting the USACE to the
engineer to ensure compliance, though.
Page 3 of 12
PCN Form -Version 1.0 November 2008 Version
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ? Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
N/A
Page 4 of 12
PCN Form - November 2008 Version
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ? Streams - tributaries ? Buffers
? Open Waters ? Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number - Type of Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or impact (if known) DWQ - non-404, other)
Temporary T
W1 ®P ? T culvert ditch
? Yes ®No ® Corps
? DWQ
0.012 acre
W2 ? P ? T ? Yes ? No ? Corps
? DWQ
W3 ? P ? T ? Yes ? No ? Corps
? DWQ
W4 ? P ? T ? Yes ? No ? Corps
? DWQ
W5 ? P ? T ? Yes ? No ? Corps
? DWQ
W6 ? P ? T ? Yes ? No ? Corps
? DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts 0.012 acre
2h. Comments: The ditch is not shown as a blue line on USGS or soil maps. At the time of the site visit (6-27-08), the ditch
had stagnant, standing water.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f.
Stream impact Type of Stream name Perennial (PER) or Average stream width (feet) Impact
number - impact intermittent (INT)? length
Permanent (P) or (linear feet)
Temporary (T)
S1 ? P ? T ? PER ? INT
S2 ?P?T ?PER ?INT
S3 ? P ? T ? PER ? INT
S4 ?P?T ?PER ?INT
S5 ? P ? T ? PER ? INT
S6 ? P ? T ? PER ? INT
3g. Total stream and tributary impacts N/A
3h. Comments: No stream impacts
Page 5 of 12
PCN Form -Version 1.0 November 2008 Version
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory, continued
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individual) list all o en water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of
impact number waterbody Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
- Permanent (if
(P) or applicable)
Temporary T
01 ?P?T
02 ?P?T
03 ?P?T
04 ?P?T
4f. Total open water impacts N/A
4g. Comments: No open water impacts
Page 6 of 12
PCN Form - November 2008 Version
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory, continued
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If and or lake construction pro osed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or (acres)
number purpose of pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes ? No if yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an impacts require mitigation, then ou MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
® Neuse ? Tar-Pamlico ? Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ? Catawba ? Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number - Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact (square Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) for impact Stream name mitigation feet) (square feet)
or Temporary required?
T
131 ?P?T ?Yes ?No
B2 ?P?T ?Yes ?No
B3 ?P?T ?Yes ?No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments: No buffer or buffer impacts.
Page 7 of 12
PCN Form - November 2008 Version
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
A site with few wetlands was chosen for the project. The only access to the property is from Smithfield Way and the
roadside ditch runs parallel and adjacent to the road for the entire property boundary. Crossing the ditch is unavoidable
in order to access the site.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
The access road will be the minimum width necessary to construct and maintain the substation.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? ? Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ? DWQ ? Corps
.2c.
If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project? ? Mitigation bank
? Payment to in-lieu fee program
? Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) T Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ? Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: warm, cool, cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h.. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 8 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.0 November 2008 Version
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation, continued
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation? ? Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact
(square feet) Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
Total buffer mitigation required:
6c. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6d. Comments:
Page 9 of 12
PCN Form - November 2008 Version
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ? Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? ? Yes ? No
2. Determination if the Project Requires a Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Does the project require a Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit? ? Yes ® No
2b. Is the project subject to General Certification 3704 or 3705? ? Yes ® No
3. Determination of Stormwater Review Jurisdiction
3a. Is this project subject to any of the following state-implemented stormwater ? Coastal counties
management programs (check all that apply)? ? HQW
If so, attach one copy of the approval letter from the DWQ and one copy of the ? ORW
? Session Law 2006-246
approved stormwater management plan. ? Other:
3b. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? Lenoir Co./Kinston
3c. Is this local government certified to implement a state stormwater program? ? Yes ® No
If so, attach one copy of the approval letter from the local government and one copy
of the approved stormwater management plan (or one copy of the approved
Stormwater management plan stamped as approved).
4. Information Required for DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
4a. What is the overall percent imperviousness according to the most current site plan? N/A
4b. Does this project contain any areas that meet the criteria for "high density" per
General Certifications 3704 and 3705? El Yes ® No
4c. If the site is over 24% impervious and/or contains high density areas, then provide a brief narrative description of the
stormwater management plan.
N/A - Project only involves construction of an electrical substation on a small out-parcel next to a large cornfield.
4d. Has a completed BMP Supplement Form with all required items been submitted
for each stormwater BMP? ? Yes No
Page 10 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.0 November 2008 Version
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ® Yes ? No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ? Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ? Yes ? No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ? Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ? Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
ddi
i ? Yes ® No
a
t
onal development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact anal
sis in accordance with th
y
e
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The construction of an electrical substation and attending access road is not anticipated to have cumulative impacts to
downstream water quality.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Sewage will not be generated at this site.
Page 11 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.0 November 2008 Version
F. Supplementary Information, continued
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ? Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ? Yes ® No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. ?
Raleigh
? Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
NC Natural Heritage Program data and site investigation.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ? Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
There is no designated EFH located in Lenoir County.
http://ocean.floridamarine.org/efh-coral/ims/viewer.htm;
http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/habitat/habitatprotection/efh/GIS-mapper.htm
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ? Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
The site is located in an agricultural field that has been in long term cultivation.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ? Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: N/A
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? www.ncfloodmaps.com
Jennifer M. Archambault
? - ! (, 4-13-2009
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Ap icant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's sin ture is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant Date
is provided.)
Page 12 of 12
PCN Form - November 2008 Version
V983
Ib
�:: 3 . � ��` / `� !' Q o„rogl`aDn aD y � orgards P coal' 13 _- -� _ � � rs ry,•..
"
I 7 7
� qr
7� n
a r
o 1 ,
W
soul ,
1MI4
\ ..,M
♦W 1 s o � \
Wax1
_...� OT' E RD eed�1 a Br � ' ' Ir Sur•, i G. . • -. 'a
olxoa'rWr-
;� 'b..' - ,aRESGR�. d xa• tidy: ! �a 7xoyEt X70 1 I a° Flootonen we r
r r
oV
-
_ _. _ _: - __. _ .. Y .0 - 3 � � � pl•I ao ' '�Ivocf 8
C.. 1 motJe / q
alaa� J b. ArnPDDd a -.....•_. _y rar o a°� an
Svaap tr M` D n E'ey. p0 ... j• Iwfnty 8 258
-
�
I <°" oos , da - ao .caul aD ,. (' ` � ` ♦ efxxi . \� T�
e �4
/
vAaxslo I f'a O � "Iwisq� � - 8' � / � 7 �' ,Brevnlo�n. i I` .i'_.I._ I' , � •i7>'.i
f I 3 IFNOMR CA nal �' 3 9Nr � coo oea -
_
� /Ji ereo 3 hq rm •, ° `
xaaal.x^ rale Yi9 : � _'' muom. JqL s Pulley � SM'� to
P° a dew - x° • .N x aD orrn 'I "rte i D�01,P aaraxgyp. ao c�oJi S �� irw`mn C7irtogr MxBe EUND s C :NI i �.' eL
no
�� .I n, r SP ♦ m �-_ - ___ _ _. _._{n R•Obn•I -._ V'}. .��Rf. L� /�� ,
SPAS ; ,L �.. \l W r d � �. $. �•rdlwn � `aT° C 4�'rg�� ( -. � �Ro 1, Iy� / ) �
NElm M
rr L
\ Ct Looe Mose/e w.FY�e _
-'IAfia• '� �"'"� B fiery ® Nuar 3y
no
I
A� gq I lauxc aD � Ln� Ao �/l_r ' f,•�t I,� "\ _ i /wr. ,, r i
U pq c rs GSI - L ea ma.-Pv�__ L-S I .�� RL / o 11 ours
R I �h0a+•'s a °��Mx aD - Pn Svwo aq � � I' / � � � ' M' �' � � ,Sa9 _
i
i r i
C m � •
C PM flp r - -7
' r Jone� I Pocosin
i
r
and Ca I
ICCm NFa�m_ � WlC.5.5. ro•f1 ! \
a •r ° _
CrxA � _ 70. 258 _ Geur Awu
8 •
t
a
-
f w �^ R "110
/ •Ea LaEEa - — Do
,LIFTS OF A!I(
THE _ _SE rs"°"
TATE PAR
1_ 55
MAI
�N usr �--�,^ - ,t r o •xrlrk�nx..y -g / l _ U 258 _ L mx
I`\J c{a s be a ,nn J•e bbfe ti) au no
55 KeNya
e, ca _
-(� E ord
58 P IMa Io -
R�
yNry E
ixDs aD � - ._ - it - Eoawt
.._. WAIMeM—� pO ei�p -• / ,' 1 � i"r - 0 QDE �� °rM -
', 'CYo..ro+d. aaeEa aY 4"{ ,m .r � '� ,�� - \foa aD •^ 's •df. -fes @ g
7 ( )i m 33� \ +urA,fs• aD �' l ,_ G` of
RD to
i �on� + I / R f7gU114 55
/1)j)j �r� f• Gewoyd. �
o Z _DEILErS CxaPE j Mlllpo q • II1a0W PD a1'- / r"� I
lawrm to 3> .i_ Eua� aRfa uolwDEa aoW.y
3 , uanex - 0'^��/ � ao �•. 5 � ' i10.,. _ Wo� a ,...j � / ¢0\1• Qo
d F Elketo y ar - i $ ofd
dlfl � PD�a tl - e°�� 5° � p •'� ' � �� / Inr
t
Tulp
uft-d I� L I ap ',�YwDDD Awl r
7
vro&Yr no �°EO RDd roWn affn sr qca f--ao a _ li x `Y/✓• GCOi _
'oL� .r � � _903 Y •� �� W �� I '� _ � ��^ � jD � • � � � r �/F
�r,uy 111 CJ )xofn: I •of
BEULAVIL E ` 77"35'EO"
a on Page 78 KILOMETERS 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 17 5833'
MILES 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
N 000 OOE' E N E8£ E9Z' E N 999 99l' £ N 000 05Z' E
. is / y ? `, __ } .? i • ?' c
o
c
r K F}
-1 f fi _
. #°
X .? j ..a v o
fl
O C Lc)
IE 0-0
0
Z a
00
' .
?
s -
•
r ??
?
` ??
• ?
? 00
00
/?
I; id
i•
r
,1 .Y^ T1
?/ N'. •; Q .'?`
=.
I y= .-i NN?' •t ?
1 ? ?J
_ C
lV •0
-
1 pl n Lo
' •?? f p 0 U U
11
x1 pC
?` ..?? r. ?, ?•
_ ? 1
+ 111 1 1;
'
1 •
?
`
Y,- r Y 1
r
1
1
11 ,1,.,,,
? ?
j3 C
r
. .tom
V/r A L.. .?
_' E? r t +` CJ I
? 1 f I
r 1 rWl _? / +
,{'-• -f-r-1; - J U
_ ,
co
co
l
C
)
1 y
:i ?
../ 117,
..
. /
..... - i ...
?• 11'/
`I
....
.
........
..._
... ..
•
?
..?? /
, .........
p
1' I.
? }
? co
cep :!• ?? ?-?
' , ??
? c0
i
1{ I -
r
w °O
v
Y v
c?
N
Q -It C
O
Y LL 7
N -000
OOE' £ N o£EE £SZ' E N 0999
99l E N 0000 09Z £ zOcn
}
Z
D
O
O
ra
O
Z
w
J
L i 33 000 095
(S! Jaays Swof)
ti
W
m
D
Z
H
w
LU
S
rn
Q
Z
J
O
a
O
S
H
O
Z
H
Z
D
O
O
r1.,
O
z
w
J
a
a
z ?
5
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f
' ?°?N ms ?Ii ail I i
' Nw?B? I I; it ? _ F
! was?<°° Ili ;ji ?o
' °O0
f 5 81'04'09' E I \'I,! c= om
s 8roz'09• E ji I f 2
w,
o.
?E
I
x,6
NIP ($u ?IF?•i
N 8054'00'W c'ya''T? 9
6D.D0'
I o°
2.J95 RNF`I? tp6?,;?•ct. W
6 01J6J4.6
I? R _------ O
z
3 - °
,I ?o
Z S. t O -
O _ o Rz
F ° U TT F
w i u ? w O O O? O
b $ ? o ? N ? ? ? ?? 8 m
I
I I ?
I
I
+H-Hi}Fi+{}µ{
ST CAROLINA a o
00
N
0
R
o
it
U
Q
4Z
J
CL
J
O
O
U
O
N
O
w
w
V
z
Q
0
U N
a
U II
o a a
0
o ? a
°ao
I w
U K
? a F
¢ F N
U ?.
Ut ?
II W
¢ Q
3
Q O
a
o a
0
m
}
a
0
a
T?z
z'
Z b°s -
z<4? ? o?
Fwg o iw - i LL F -
W? ° w -
z -z
T
e T Zwrc i'^a Z - °W - ET,
i
S i
p a mO ° a z <
< `.° o Y
-°° : °o IoW i F?w Fo =''2 - o of ff
n:o
~ s r rc ?' g a a° '? o
- wb! m61 °'a ?V? do ` i rc- o -
8 .i $ i?o ww ° z? ffi wF4 ° F
z
< ap & wa w ?°
WcQ z ° o o u
H3 z- Z- z
aW Jwa &-' m ?< W g o _Q ffi x K
°a z o ? o o <
u Q N
W, Z- 'W¢¢ J rc o w ww j< ?p z w d
ZZ? w0 wK ?O wZd =Jm ??Ff
~ w < ?'yj F Ur w0 ¢e? 0
[?i K 2 2 Z° W z p•OO w0 ? Op < €w F p Q -? 3 0 J ` O
T ° ; 4 ° 3 ZN ?maq <? wo<` r OO Ry < a_ ?? aj w¢ T?r u w rw OF
81.3 ?-
? OF? ?4? .?oo ?¢ O Q? aZw w< wt m?m<o
gPo° F ~ z' « o° w 'n ;o uro i,
? SAw w
H u°
a m mw?°¢i WFi a `- <? _ ?w rc i? ? J 4 ¢ zm O pem i2
wX J
p z.
3? - '?' wOyS M±za95 woz um i. -i? wI` FSi o
_'z w $ ?w 7 T a i°z- zj ?waw mN ` ?° ° ° oN '-^¢ m o- .- '" I & oo vii r S, Q. x 5H
X %Ff a N ?Fff a<??? i<uam? F w8`a Fo b
r ` W g\? Qo < =a - W 1, ? o' €=a < z w °o TO J oz o, z o
> w i 1 15' iN €w fr s N o& _ zw°?+<wN i oWa ?K $o?a?
«nn_ -??a ?o°arc rc _ 11 < o ji€<u
NitntlN?aNn Nounelaisra mE
P r,
'fr
y 7y? ?
1i !f 1 a ,
?j
'
`
v?W 1? ???ryt
i
Y. ...
•
1 i
ILY
.., ,
f
NV
yy
I
7 ?
' ? ,? a fir 3 '. '?". t, ?`-??
}!
The proposed access road will be located off of Smithfield Way (above) and will cross a wetland
ditch (below). The ditch contained stagnant, standing water at the time of the site visit on 27 June
2008, and is located between the Smithfield Way right-of-way and a large corn field, Kinston, Lenoir
County, North Carolina.
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Suedes
1.
4u, Dominant Plant Sondes
Stratum
e.
U
a
S
2jW 11S tA w-'+ 14
,
?
„
3. N "IrS Sk.'IfVI.?tJC 1 u?- shy \PjA- 11
4. SG1.11 1 S1'i? a 6 L- 12.
5 LkjAnC 'r- iwv-? 0 bL1_ 13.
8r?-1
T. ?ld? Q 14.
7. 15.
16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
(excluding FAC-). l
OO
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Desaibe In Remarks):
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
-. No Recorded Data Avg"
Field Observations:
Depth of Surface Water.
Depth to Free Water in Pit: fin.)
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.)
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology Indicators:
Prirtrqry Indicators.
Saturated In Upper 12 Inches
Water Marks
Drill Lines
Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns In Wetlands
Secondary Ind cdors (2 or more mMrsd):
Oxkb@d Root CIwvwb In Upper
- Wate alined Leaves 1Y
Local SON Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain In Remarks)
SOILS
Unit
Name
(Series and Phase).OY hU?rl IXh
taxonomy (Subgroup):
Drainage Gass: 2
Field Ob wntions
CoMirrm Mapped Type? Yes No
039W Horizon Matrix Color Motile colors Mottle Text, Corxxetions,
(Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Mmijanos/Can cast , etc-
L4_
Hydric Soil Indicators:
H
Histic istosol Concretions
Su dic t? _ High Organic content in Surfa ce Layer Sandy Solis
_ Aquic Moisture Regime --Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Rqu?ng Co a Regime - Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors - Listed National Hydric
_, Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: VJ(M Ql? fi .?L A coy-c,
*107 St q4 4T&hkY-' lit ?a? C6t0y_ Q-k-#'-
i" A"41,
WETLAND DETERMINATION
M^d"oP?rYtlc Vegetatlon PeM? No (Cirde) (Cirde)
Hydric Sow t ?Pent? No
No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:
0,? Yi pis i au-,
?ln? s i s 0?+? eS.1oU ?l?d
des
?y;
Approved by HQUSACE 3002
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
W Date: -
Appiicant/Owner. r- Iti OF- tA County: I .r
Investigator: State: r"
Do Normal Circumstances Exist on the site? No Community ID :
Is the site sigh km* disturbed (Atypical Situation)? No Transact ID:
Is the area a potential Problem kw? No Plot ID:
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Soedess Straturn 1
1 Dominant Rant Soedes !
91
^^
h T'T 10.
3.
4. 12
5. 13.
8. _ 14.
7. 15.
8. 18.
PSroe dir of Dominant Spades that are 013L. FACW or FAC 0
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
_. Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks):
Stream. Lake, or Tkie Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
- No Recorded Data AvWWft
Field Observations:
Depth of Surface Water. (in.)
Depth to Free Water in Pit: _(in.)
Depth to Saturated Shc: (in.)
Remarks: M Nko"l
Wetland hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
Ir ufulated
Saturated In Upper 12 Inches
Water Marks
Drift tares
Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns In Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more m wired):
Oxkbed Root Channels in Upper 12•
Waler,Stalned Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Nleutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
SOILS
I,(ep"Name
(Series and Phase): T(5 OhW-tA .
?? ,•,.? Drainage Class:
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Fleur observartons
Codfrn Mapped Type? Yes No
peplh Hortzon • Matrix Color
fMunsell Molst1 Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Corxretlons,
IMtrnsell Mdstl
ecc, A
Hydric Soil Indicators:
-. Histosol
SuNidlc Ip n
Oor - Concretions
_ High Organic Content in Surfs ce Layer Sandy Solis
-
- Aqulc Moisture Regime - Organic Streaking In Sandy Solis
- Listed on Local Hydric Solis List
- Reducing Conditions
- Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors - Listed on National Hydric Solis List
- Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Welland t c Vegetation Present? Yes (Cards) (Circle)
SoNs?P ent???? Yes
Hydric
Yes qb? Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes
by