Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20090424 Ver 1_401 Application_20090409DR. J.H. CARTER III & ASSOCIATES, INC. Environmental Consultants 0 9- 0 4 2 4 P.O. Box 891 • Southern Pines, N.C. 28388 (910) 695-1043 9 Fax(910)695-3317 Letter of Transmittal To: NC Division of Water Quality 401 Wetlands Unit 1650 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 WE ARE SENDING YOU Date: 4-14-09 Job # 0911 Attn: C ndi Karol /Ian McMillan Re: Industrial Park West substation, Kinston Attached Reports X Maps Copy of letter Plans X Data Prints Photos X Permit application COPIES DATE # P s DESCRIPTION + U, K 1 4-13-09 22 Permit application for the proposed P Industrial Park West Substation, City of Kinston, Lenoir County, NC THESE ARE TRANSMITTED For approval For your use As requested For review and comment REMARKS: 1 ESY >y fFL?l !_;A _ ! • w _ Approved as noted • Approved as submitted ?.? _ t.f Returned for corrections ;' 1, ?? X For your information r art rj , 18 ' 1 ay I've enclosed a courtesy copy permit application for your information The project includes construction of an electrical substation with an access road that will cross a ditch. Proposed project impacts are under 0.10 acre and do not require written approval Additionally, DENR was in contact with the engineer (Booth & Assoc.) last year, who indicated that the City of Kinston has an approved erosion and sediment control plan and does not need to submit anything else for approval (see enclosed email from Bryan Maness of Booth & Assoc.). Call if you have any questions. Thanks, Jennifer Archambault COPY TO: SIGNED: If enclosures are not noted, please contact us immediately Endangered Species Surveys • Environmental Assessments 9 Land Management 9 Wetlands Mapping and Permitting Page 1 of 1 Jennifer Archambault From: "Bryan Maness" <ManessBD@booth-assoc.com> To: "Jennifer Archambault" <jrchambault@jhcarterinc.com> Cc: Jason Thigpen"' <Jason.Thigpen@ci.kinston.nc.us> Sent: Monday, June 30, 2008 8:44 AM Subject: Kinston Roadside Ditch [6641] Jennifer, Thanks for taking the time to swing by the Kinston site last week. For your records, the section of driveway that crosses the questioned ditch is 20' wide, 30' long, and will have a 36" RCP with inlet and outlet riprap protection. The City has already received an erosion and sediment control permit from NCDENR and is not required to submit anything else for approval. Please let me know if you need any additional information from me for your use in contacting the CORE. Thanks so much for your help! Bryan D. Maness, PE Project Engineer III Booth & Associates, Inc. A Part of USA, Inc. - An Employee Owned Company `I be lt?:vt, Tel. (919) 851-8770 Ext. 150 Cell (919) 880-9779 Fax (919) 859-5918 mailto:M...anessBD a Booth As_s_oc.com fv-+_ &- ?sSe? ` VAY-a l I G y (cs" -b V\ M __ 4/14/2009 DR. J.H. CARTER III & ASSOCIATES, INC. Environmental Consultants P.O. Box 891 • Southern Pines, N.C. 28388 (910) 695-1043 • Fax(910)695-3317 13 April 2009 Ms. Emily Jernigan Washington Regulatory Field Office US Army Corps of Engineers P.O. Box 1000 Washington, North Carolina 27889-1000 Dear Ms. Jernigan: Enclosed is a permit application for the Industrial Park West electrical substation in Kinston, Lenoir County, North Carolina (see enclosed maps). In general, proposed jurisdictional impacts include the discharge of fill material in a roadside ditch wetland for an access road to the electrical substation, with a total project impact of approximately 0.012 acre to jurisdictional waters, including wetlands. Please review the enclosed permit application and contact me if you need any additional information. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, . 440vv- Jenn fer M. Archambault Wildlife Biologist CC: NC Division of Water Quality - 401 Wetlands Unit Endangered Species Surveys 9 Environmental Assessments • Land Management • Wetlands Mapping and Permitting 01/27/2009 11:27 252-939-3279 29 December 2008 To Whom It May Concern: KINSTON PUBLIC SERV. PAGE 02/03 Dr. J. H.. Carter III & Associates, Inc. is authorized. to prepare and submit the necessary permits for the proposed Industrial Park West Substation., in Lenoir County, NC. As proposed in the attached document (WETLAND PERMITTING FOR PROPOSED INDUSTRIAL PARK, WEST SUBSTATION) dated 24 October 2008. Additionally, this letter grants permission to federal and state regulatory authorities to conduct site visits on our property to evaluate wetland boundaries and project impacts. R?Jason pectfully, C. Thi en City of Kinston 0 9- 0 ; 2 4 O?O? \,NA TF9OG I I > ? I?.?I o < Office Use Only: Corps action ID no. DWQ project no. Form Version 1.0 November 2008 Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form A. Applicant Information COURTESY 1. Processing Copy 1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: ®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit 1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 12 or General Permit (GP) number: 1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ® Yes ? No 1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply): ? 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit ? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ? Riparian Buffer Authorization 1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401 For the record only for Corps Permit: because written approval is not required? Certification: ® Yes ? No ? Yes ® No 1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation ? Yes ® No of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program. 1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h ? Yes ® No below. 1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? Yes ® No 2. Project Information 2a. Name of project: Industrial Park West Substation - Kinston 2b. County: Lenoir 2c. Nearest municipality / town: Kinston 2d. Subdivision name: N/A 2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state N/A project no: 3. Owner Information 3a. Name on Recorded Deed: City of Kinston, Jason Thigpen-Contact 3b. Deed Book and Page No. not available from Lenoir County GIS 3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if applicable): 3d. Street address: P.O. Drawer 339 DEuR_ 3e. City, state, zip: Kinston, NC 28502 3f. Telephone no.: (252) 939-3320 3g. Fax no.: 3h. Email address: Jason.Thigpen@ci.kinston.nc.us Page 1 of 12 PCN Form -Version 1.0 November 2008 Version Section A. Applicant Information, continued 4. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 4a. Applicant is: ? Agent ? Other, specify: 4b. Name: 4c. Business name (if applicable): 4d. Street address: 4e. City, state, zip: 4f. Telephone no.: 4g. Fax no.: 4h. Email address: 5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable) 5a. Name: Jennifer M. Archambault 5b. Business name (if applicable): Dr. J.H. Carter III & Associates, Inc., Environmental Consultants 5c. Street address: 515-F Midland Road 5d. City, state, zip: Southern Pines, NC 28387 5e. Telephone no.: (910) 695-1043 5f. Fax no.: (910) 695-3317 5g. Email address: jrchambault@jhcarterinc.com Page 2 of 12 PCN Form - November 2008 Version B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification 1 a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): Not available on Lenoir Co. GIS 1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): 35.2701823'N - 77.6664765'W 1c. Property size: 3.07 acres 2. Surface Waters 2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Falling Creek proposed project: 2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: WS-IV; NSW 2c. River basin: Neuse 3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: The parcel is currently an actively cultivated corn field, bordered to the west by railroad tracks and to the south by Smithfield Way (no known State Route number). General land use in the immediate vicinity includes agriculture and industrial areas. 3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: < 0.10 acre. The only wetland onsite is the roadside ditch and only the proposed access road easement was evaluated. The proposed substatation will be located in the existing corn field. 3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: none 3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: The purpose of the proposed access road is to allow access to the future Industrial Park West 115 to 15 kV substation. 3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The project includes construction of an electrical substation and access road. Construction of the access road requires crossing a roadside ditch (deemed possibly jurisdictional by Mr. David Shaeffer-personal communication) and installation of a 36-inch diameter culvert. The ditch averages 10-12 feet across and the total width of the crossing will be 45-feet. The maximum impact will be (12'x45') - 540 square feet (or 0.012 acre). Equipment may include bulldozers, graders and other standard heavy equipment. 4. Jurisdictional Determinations 4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / ? Yes ® No ? Unknown project (including all prior phases) in the past? 4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type ? Preliminary ? Final of determination was made? 4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: Name (if known): Other: 4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation. No JD was made, however, we were advised to apply for the permit without the JD in the interest of time. Examination of available GIS data (specifically LIDAR) by the Corps indicated that the impacts were likely jurisdictional. 5. Project History 5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ? Yes ®No ? Unknown this project (including all prior phases) in the past? 5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions. No previous permit requests have been made. The engineer did visit the site with a representative from DWQ, who indicated that DWQ was not interested in regulating such a small impact. DWQ suggested contacting the USACE to the engineer to ensure compliance, though. Page 3 of 12 PCN Form -Version 1.0 November 2008 Version B. Project Information and Prior Project History 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? ? Yes ® No 6b. If yes, explain. N/A Page 4 of 12 PCN Form - November 2008 Version C. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary 1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply): ® Wetlands ? Streams - tributaries ? Buffers ? Open Waters ? Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. 2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f. Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction number - Type of Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact (acres) Permanent (P) or impact (if known) DWQ - non-404, other) Temporary T W1 ®P ? T culvert ditch ? Yes ®No ® Corps ? DWQ 0.012 acre W2 ? P ? T ? Yes ? No ? Corps ? DWQ W3 ? P ? T ? Yes ? No ? Corps ? DWQ W4 ? P ? T ? Yes ? No ? Corps ? DWQ W5 ? P ? T ? Yes ? No ? Corps ? DWQ W6 ? P ? T ? Yes ? No ? Corps ? DWQ 2g. Total wetland impacts 0.012 acre 2h. Comments: The ditch is not shown as a blue line on USGS or soil maps. At the time of the site visit (6-27-08), the ditch had stagnant, standing water. 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted. 3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. Stream impact Type of Stream name Perennial (PER) or Average stream width (feet) Impact number - impact intermittent (INT)? length Permanent (P) or (linear feet) Temporary (T) S1 ? P ? T ? PER ? INT S2 ?P?T ?PER ?INT S3 ? P ? T ? PER ? INT S4 ?P?T ?PER ?INT S5 ? P ? T ? PER ? INT S6 ? P ? T ? PER ? INT 3g. Total stream and tributary impacts N/A 3h. Comments: No stream impacts Page 5 of 12 PCN Form -Version 1.0 November 2008 Version C. Proposed Impacts Inventory, continued 4. Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then individual) list all o en water impacts below. 4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e. Open water Name of impact number waterbody Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres) - Permanent (if (P) or applicable) Temporary T 01 ?P?T 02 ?P?T 03 ?P?T 04 ?P?T 4f. Total open water impacts N/A 4g. Comments: No open water impacts Page 6 of 12 PCN Form - November 2008 Version C. Proposed Impacts Inventory, continued 5. Pond or Lake Construction If and or lake construction pro osed, then complete the chart below. 5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e. Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland Pond ID Proposed use or (acres) number purpose of pond Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded P1 P2 5f. Total 5g. Comments: 5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ? Yes ? No if yes, permit ID no: 5i. Expected pond surface area (acres): 5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): 5k. Method of construction: 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts below. If an impacts require mitigation, then ou MUST fill out Section D of this form. 6a. ® Neuse ? Tar-Pamlico ? Other: Project is in which protected basin? ? Catawba ? Randleman 6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g. Buffer impact number - Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact (square Zone 2 impact Permanent (P) for impact Stream name mitigation feet) (square feet) or Temporary required? T 131 ?P?T ?Yes ?No B2 ?P?T ?Yes ?No B3 ?P?T ?Yes ?No 6h. Total buffer impacts 6i. Comments: No buffer or buffer impacts. Page 7 of 12 PCN Form - November 2008 Version D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. A site with few wetlands was chosen for the project. The only access to the property is from Smithfield Way and the roadside ditch runs parallel and adjacent to the road for the entire property boundary. Crossing the ditch is unavoidable in order to access the site. 1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. The access road will be the minimum width necessary to construct and maintain the substation. 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? ? Yes ® No 2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ? DWQ ? Corps .2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? ? Mitigation bank ? Payment to in-lieu fee program ? Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: 3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) T Quantity 3c. Comments: 4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program 4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ? Yes 4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet 4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: warm, cool, cold 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres 4h.. Comments: 5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan. Page 8 of 12 PCN Form - Version 1.0 November 2008 Version D. Impact Justification and Mitigation, continued 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ 6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires buffer mitigation? ? Yes ® No 6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of mitigation required. Zone Reason for impact Total impact (square feet) Multiplier Required mitigation (square feet) Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba) Zone 2 1.5 Total buffer mitigation required: 6c. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund). 6d. Comments: Page 9 of 12 PCN Form - November 2008 Version E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ? Yes ® No within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? 1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? ? Yes ? No 2. Determination if the Project Requires a Stormwater Management Plan 2a. Does the project require a Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit? ? Yes ® No 2b. Is the project subject to General Certification 3704 or 3705? ? Yes ® No 3. Determination of Stormwater Review Jurisdiction 3a. Is this project subject to any of the following state-implemented stormwater ? Coastal counties management programs (check all that apply)? ? HQW If so, attach one copy of the approval letter from the DWQ and one copy of the ? ORW ? Session Law 2006-246 approved stormwater management plan. ? Other: 3b. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? Lenoir Co./Kinston 3c. Is this local government certified to implement a state stormwater program? ? Yes ® No If so, attach one copy of the approval letter from the local government and one copy of the approved stormwater management plan (or one copy of the approved Stormwater management plan stamped as approved). 4. Information Required for DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 4a. What is the overall percent imperviousness according to the most current site plan? N/A 4b. Does this project contain any areas that meet the criteria for "high density" per General Certifications 3704 and 3705? El Yes ® No 4c. If the site is over 24% impervious and/or contains high density areas, then provide a brief narrative description of the stormwater management plan. N/A - Project only involves construction of an electrical substation on a small out-parcel next to a large cornfield. 4d. Has a completed BMP Supplement Form with all required items been submitted for each stormwater BMP? ? Yes No Page 10 of 12 PCN Form - Version 1.0 November 2008 Version F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) 1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ® Yes ? No use of public (federal/state) land? 1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ? Yes ® No (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? 1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.) ? Yes ? No Comments: 2. Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ? Yes ® No or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? 2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ? Yes ® No 2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ddi i ? Yes ® No a t onal development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? 3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact anal sis in accordance with th y e most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description. The construction of an electrical substation and attending access road is not anticipated to have cumulative impacts to downstream water quality. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. Sewage will not be generated at this site. Page 11 of 12 PCN Form - Version 1.0 November 2008 Version F. Supplementary Information, continued 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ? Yes ® No habitat? 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ? Yes ® No impacts? 5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. ? Raleigh ? Asheville 5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? NC Natural Heritage Program data and site investigation. 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ? Yes ® No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? There is no designated EFH located in Lenoir County. http://ocean.floridamarine.org/efh-coral/ims/viewer.htm; http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/habitat/habitatprotection/efh/GIS-mapper.htm 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ? Yes ® No status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? The site is located in an agricultural field that has been in long term cultivation. 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ? Yes ® No 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: N/A 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? www.ncfloodmaps.com Jennifer M. Archambault ? - ! (, 4-13-2009 Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Ap icant/Agent's Signature (Agent's sin ture is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant Date is provided.) Page 12 of 12 PCN Form - November 2008 Version V983 Ib �:: 3 . � ��` / `� !' Q o„rogl`aDn aD y � orgards P coal' 13 _- -� _ � � rs ry,•.. " I 7 7 � qr 7� n a r o 1 , W soul , 1MI4 \ ..,M ♦W 1 s o � \ Wax1 _...� OT' E RD eed�1 a Br � ' ' Ir Sur•, i G. . • -. 'a olxoa'rWr- ;� 'b..' - ,aRESGR�. d xa• tidy: ! �a 7xoyEt X70 1 I a° Flootonen we r r r oV - _ _. _ _: - __. _ .. Y .0 - 3 � � � pl•I ao ' '�Ivocf 8 C.. 1 motJe / q alaa� J b. ArnPDDd a -.....•_. _y rar o a°� an Svaap tr M` D n E'ey. p0 ... j• Iwfnty 8 258 - � I <°" oos , da - ao .caul aD ,. (' ` � ` ♦ efxxi . \� T� e �4 / vAaxslo I f'a O � "Iwisq� � - 8' � / � 7 �' ,Brevnlo�n. i I` .i'_.I._ I' , � •i7>'.i f I 3 IFNOMR CA nal �' 3 9Nr � coo oea - _ � /Ji ereo 3 hq rm •, ° ` xaaal.x^ rale Yi9 : � _'' muom. JqL s Pulley � SM'� to P° a dew - x° • .N x aD orrn 'I "rte i D�01,P aaraxgyp. ao c�oJi S �� irw`mn C7irtogr MxBe EUND s C :NI i �.' eL no �� .I n, r SP ♦ m �-_ - ___ _ _. _._{n R•Obn•I -._ V'}. .��Rf. L� /�� , SPAS ; ,L �.. \l W r d � �. $. �•rdlwn � `aT° C 4�'rg�� ( -. � �Ro 1, Iy� / ) � NElm M rr L \ Ct Looe Mose/e w.FY�e _ -'IAfia• '� �"'"� B fiery ® Nuar 3y no I A� gq I lauxc aD � Ln� Ao �/l_r ' f,•�t I,� "\ _ i /wr. ,, r i U pq c rs GSI - L ea ma.-Pv�__ L-S I .�� RL / o 11 ours R I �h0a+•'s a °��Mx aD - Pn Svwo aq � � I' / � � � ' M' �' � � ,Sa9 _ i i r i C m � • C PM flp r - -7 ' r Jone� I Pocosin i r and Ca I ICCm NFa�m_ � WlC.5.5. ro•f1 ! \ a •r ° _ CrxA � _ 70. 258 _ Geur Awu 8 • t a - f w �^ R "110 / •Ea LaEEa - — Do ,LIFTS OF A!I( THE _ _SE rs"°" TATE PAR 1_ 55 MAI �N usr �--�,^ - ,t r o •xrlrk�nx..y -g / l _ U 258 _ L mx I`\J c{a s be a ,nn J•e bbfe ti) au no 55 KeNya e, ca _ -(� E ord 58 P IMa Io - R� yNry E ixDs aD � - ._ - it - Eoawt .._. WAIMeM—� pO ei�p -• / ,' 1 � i"r - 0 QDE �� °rM - ', 'CYo..ro+d. aaeEa aY 4"{ ,m .r � '� ,�� - \foa aD •^ 's •df. -fes @ g 7 ( )i m 33� \ +urA,fs• aD �' l ,_ G` of RD to i �on� + I / R f7gU114 55 /1)j)j �r� f• Gewoyd. � o Z _DEILErS CxaPE j Mlllpo q • II1a0W PD a1'- / r"� I lawrm to 3> .i_ Eua� aRfa uolwDEa aoW.y 3 , uanex - 0'^��/ � ao �•. 5 � ' i10.,. _ Wo� a ,...j � / ¢0\1• Qo d F Elketo y ar - i $ ofd dlfl � PD�a tl - e°�� 5° � p •'� ' � �� / Inr t Tulp uft-d I� L I ap ',�YwDDD Awl r 7 vro&Yr no �°EO RDd roWn affn sr qca f--ao a _ li x `Y/✓• GCOi _ 'oL� .r � � _903 Y •� �� W �� I '� _ � ��^ � jD � • � � � r �/F �r,uy 111 CJ )xofn: I •of BEULAVIL E ` 77"35'EO" a on Page 78 KILOMETERS 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 17 5833' MILES 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 N 000 OOE' E N E8£ E9Z' E N 999 99l' £ N 000 05Z' E . is / y ? `, __ } .? i • ?' c o c r K F} -1 f fi _ . #° X .? j ..a v o fl O C Lc) IE 0-0 0 Z a 00 ' . ? s - • r ?? ? ` ?? • ? ? 00 00 /? I; id i• r ,1 .Y^ T1 ?/ N'. •; Q .'?` =. I y= .-i NN?' •t ? 1 ? ?J _ C lV •0 - 1 pl n Lo ' •?? f p 0 U U 11 x1 pC ?` ..?? r. ?, ?• _ ? 1 + 111 1 1; ' 1 • ? ` Y,- r Y 1 r 1 1 11 ,1,.,,, ? ? j3 C r . .tom V/r A L.. .? _' E? r t +` CJ I ? 1 f I r 1 rWl _? / + ,{'-• -f-r-1; - J U _ , co co l C ) 1 y :i ? ../ 117, .. . / ..... - i ... ?• 11'/ `I .... . ........ ..._ ... .. • ? ..?? / , ......... p 1' I. ? } ? co cep :!• ?? ?-? ' , ?? ? c0 i 1{ I - r w °O v Y v c? N Q -It C O Y LL 7 N -000 OOE' £ N o£EE £SZ' E N 0999 99l E N 0000 09Z £ zOcn } Z D O O ra O Z w J L i 33 000 095 (S! Jaays Swof) ti W m D Z H w LU S rn Q Z J O a O S H O Z H Z D O O r1., O z w J a a z ? 5 I I I I I I I I f ' ?°?N ms ?Ii ail I i ' Nw?B? I I; it ? _ F ! was?<°° Ili ;ji ?o ' °O0 f 5 81'04'09' E I \'I,! c= om s 8roz'09• E ji I f 2 w, o. ?E I x,6 NIP ($u ?IF?•i N 8054'00'W c'ya''T? 9 6D.D0' I o° 2.J95 RNF`I? tp6?,;?•ct. W 6 01J6J4.6 I? R _------ O z 3 - ° ,I ?o Z S. t O - O _ o Rz F ° U TT F w i u ? w O O O? O b $ ? o ? N ? ? ? ?? 8 m I I I ? I I +H-Hi}Fi+{}µ{ ST CAROLINA a o 00 N 0 R o it U Q 4Z J CL J O O U O N O w w V z Q 0 U N a U II o a a 0 o ? a °ao I w U K ? a F ¢ F N U ?. Ut ? II W ¢ Q 3 Q O a o a 0 m } a 0 a T?z z' Z b°s - z<4? ? o? Fwg o iw - i LL F - W? ° w - z -z T e T Zwrc i'^a Z - °W - ET, i S i p a mO ° a z < < `.° o Y -°° : °o IoW i F?w Fo =''2 - o of ff n:o ~ s r rc ?' g a a° '? o - wb! m61 °'a ?V? do ` i rc- o - 8 .i $ i?o ww ° z? ffi wF4 ° F z < ap & wa w ?° WcQ z ° o o u H3 z- Z- z aW Jwa &-' m ?< W g o _Q ffi x K °a z o ? o o < u Q N W, Z- 'W¢¢ J rc o w ww j< ?p z w d ZZ? w0 wK ?O wZd =Jm ??Ff ~ w < ?'yj F Ur w0 ¢e? 0 [?i K 2 2 Z° W z p•OO w0 ? Op < €w F p Q -? 3 0 J ` O T ° ; 4 ° 3 ZN ?maq <? wo<` r OO Ry < a_ ?? aj w¢ T?r u w rw OF 81.3 ?- ? OF? ?4? .?oo ?¢ O Q? aZw w< wt m?m<o gPo° F ~ z' « o° w 'n ;o uro i, ? SAw w H u° a m mw?°¢i WFi a `- <? _ ?w rc i? ? J 4 ¢ zm O pem i2 wX J p z. 3? - '?' wOyS M±za95 woz um i. -i? wI` FSi o _'z w $ ?w 7 T a i°z- zj ?waw mN ` ?° ° ° oN '-^¢ m o- .- '" I & oo vii r S, Q. x 5H X %Ff a N ?Fff a<??? i<uam? F w8`a Fo b r ` W g\? Qo < =a - W 1, ? o' €=a < z w °o TO J oz o, z o > w i 1 15' iN €w fr s N o& _ zw°?+<wN i oWa ?K $o?a? «nn_ -??a ?o°arc rc _ 11 < o ji€<u NitntlN?aNn Nounelaisra mE P r, 'fr y 7y? ? 1i !f 1 a , ?j ' ` v?W 1? ???ryt i Y. ... • 1 i ILY .., , f NV yy I 7 ? ' ? ,? a fir 3 '. '?". t, ?`-?? }! The proposed access road will be located off of Smithfield Way (above) and will cross a wetland ditch (below). The ditch contained stagnant, standing water at the time of the site visit on 27 June 2008, and is located between the Smithfield Way right-of-way and a large corn field, Kinston, Lenoir County, North Carolina. DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) VEGETATION Dominant Plant Suedes 1. 4u, Dominant Plant Sondes Stratum e. U a S 2jW 11S tA w-'+ 14 , ? „ 3. N "IrS Sk.'IfVI.?tJC 1 u?- shy \PjA- 11 4. SG1.11 1 S1'i? a 6 L- 12. 5 LkjAnC 'r- iwv-? 0 bL1_ 13. 8r?-1 T. ?ld? Q 14. 7. 15. 16. Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-). l OO Remarks: HYDROLOGY _ Recorded Data (Desaibe In Remarks): Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Aerial Photographs Other -. No Recorded Data Avg" Field Observations: Depth of Surface Water. Depth to Free Water in Pit: fin.) Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) Remarks: Wetland hydrology Indicators: Prirtrqry Indicators. Saturated In Upper 12 Inches Water Marks Drill Lines Sediment Deposits Drainage Patterns In Wetlands Secondary Ind cdors (2 or more mMrsd): Oxkb@d Root CIwvwb In Upper - Wate alined Leaves 1Y Local SON Survey Data FAC-Neutral Test Other (Explain In Remarks) SOILS Unit Name (Series and Phase).OY hU?rl IXh taxonomy (Subgroup): Drainage Gass: 2 Field Ob wntions CoMirrm Mapped Type? Yes No 039W Horizon Matrix Color Motile colors Mottle Text, Corxxetions, (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Mmijanos/Can cast , etc- L4_ Hydric Soil Indicators: H Histic istosol Concretions Su dic t? _ High Organic content in Surfa ce Layer Sandy Solis _ Aquic Moisture Regime --Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils Rqu?ng Co a Regime - Listed on Local Hydric Soils List Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors - Listed National Hydric _, Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: VJ(M Ql? fi .?L A coy-c, *107 St q4 4T&hkY-' lit ?a? C6t0y_ Q-k-#'- i" A"41, WETLAND DETERMINATION M^d"oP?rYtlc Vegetatlon PeM? No (Cirde) (Cirde) Hydric Sow t ?Pent? No No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks: 0,? Yi pis i au-, ?ln? s i s 0?+? eS.1oU ?l?d des ?y; Approved by HQUSACE 3002 DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) W Date: - Appiicant/Owner. r- Iti OF- tA County: I .r Investigator: State: r" Do Normal Circumstances Exist on the site? No Community ID : Is the site sigh km* disturbed (Atypical Situation)? No Transact ID: Is the area a potential Problem kw? No Plot ID: (If needed, explain on reverse.) VEGETATION Dominant Plant Soedess Straturn 1 1 Dominant Rant Soedes ! 91 ^^ h T'T 10. 3. 4. 12 5. 13. 8. _ 14. 7. 15. 8. 18. PSroe dir of Dominant Spades that are 013L. FACW or FAC 0 Remarks: HYDROLOGY _. Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Stream. Lake, or Tkie Gauge Aerial Photographs Other - No Recorded Data AvWWft Field Observations: Depth of Surface Water. (in.) Depth to Free Water in Pit: _(in.) Depth to Saturated Shc: (in.) Remarks: M Nko"l Wetland hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators: Ir ufulated Saturated In Upper 12 Inches Water Marks Drift tares Sediment Deposits Drainage Patterns In Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more m wired): Oxkbed Root Channels in Upper 12• Waler,Stalned Leaves Local Soil Survey Data FAC-Nleutral Test Other (Explain in Remarks) SOILS I,(ep"Name (Series and Phase): T(5 OhW-tA . ?? ,•,.? Drainage Class: Taxonomy (Subgroup): Fleur observartons Codfrn Mapped Type? Yes No peplh Hortzon • Matrix Color fMunsell Molst1 Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Corxretlons, IMtrnsell Mdstl ecc, A Hydric Soil Indicators: -. Histosol SuNidlc Ip n Oor - Concretions _ High Organic Content in Surfs ce Layer Sandy Solis - - Aqulc Moisture Regime - Organic Streaking In Sandy Solis - Listed on Local Hydric Solis List - Reducing Conditions - Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors - Listed on National Hydric Solis List - Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Welland t c Vegetation Present? Yes (Cards) (Circle) SoNs?P ent???? Yes Hydric Yes qb? Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes by