Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20180459 Ver 1_More Info Received_20180406 Johnson, Alan From:Heath Caldwell <heath.caldwell@wetlands-epg.com> Sent:Friday, April 06, 2018 10:35 AM To:Johnson, Alan Cc:Len Rindner Subject:Re: \[External\] Fwd: southstone CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless verified. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to Report Spam. Yes, correct- at that Impact Area 1. Will get those impacts for you. Thanks- On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 9:05 AM, Johnson, Alan <alan.johnson@ncdenr.gov> wrote: So the actual loss of stream is 157, even though the pipe is 96 ft. part of the old channel is lost due to the location of the new pipe. So the riprap extending from the new pipe is on upland. Need the buffer impacts temporary/permanent (total) And amount within 50 ft (if any) From: Heath Caldwell \[mailto:heath.caldwell@wetlands-epg.com\] Sent: Friday, April 06, 2018 8:28 AM To: Johnson, Alan <alan.johnson@ncdenr.gov> Cc: Len Rindner <len.rindner@wetlands-epg.com> Subject: Re: \[External\] Fwd: southstone CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless verified. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to Report Spam. Hey Alan- Working on these comments here. Just wanted to clarify, on the rip rap at Impact Area 1, that rip rap isn't being installed within the existing channel. That rip rap is being placed at the outfall of the proposed culvert at a location of an approximate 20LF channel that will tie-in to the existing stream. That is why we didn't count the rip rap here. At Impact Area 2, it is being installed within the existing channel so we included there. Make sense? 1 On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 2:23 PM, Johnson, Alan <alan.johnson@ncdenr.gov> wrote: Just wanted to be clear on the impact length because the table pulled out the riprap on one crossing and on the other it didn’t. No they don’t have to bore all the way, but because they are submitting the 401, the impact should be included. Meet the condition of the buffer rule. I would bore outside of 50 ft from top of bank. From: Len Rindner \[mailto:len.rindner@wetlands-epg.com\] Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2018 2:02 PM To: Johnson, Alan <alan.johnson@ncdenr.gov>; Heath Caldwell <heath.caldwell@wetlands-epg.com> Subject: \[External\] Fwd: southstone CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless verified. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to Report Spam. Alan With the new regional conditions the USACE is calling rip rap that is installed at grade (not piled up) as a permanent impact but not a loss that requires mitigation - the engineers design the length of these rip rap aprons based on engineering and local criteria. We certainly can have them provide the calcs and the standards. I included Heath on your boring concern because he met with you regarding this ... can we discuss with him too. Do they need to bore all the way? Len ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Johnson, Alan <alan.johnson@ncdenr.gov> Date: Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 1:35 PM 2 Subject: southstone To: "Len Rindner (len.rindner@wetlands-epg.com)" <len.rindner@wetlands-epg.com> A tad confusing: on stream A, you combine the riprap and pipe for a total of 157 ft of impact (states 96 ft of culvert, so that means 60 ft of riprap???) sound like a lot. On stream C you split the impact out. 32 ft of riprap 61 ft of culvert Are they jack and boring through/under the entire buffer? IF not, the impact should be called out in the buffer impact table. Clarifying permanent and temporary impact. Thanks Alan D Johnson – Senior Environmental Specialist NC Dept. of Environment & Natural Resources (NCDENR) Division of Water Resources - Water Quality Regional Operations 610 East Center Ave., Suite 301, Mooresville, NC 28115 Phone: (704) 235-2200 Fax: (704) 663-6040 E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties unless the content is exempt by statute or other regulation. 3 -- Len Rindner Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group www.wetlands-epg.com (704) 904-2277 -- Heath Caldwell Wetlands & Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC www.wetlands-epg.com 704.999.5279 -- Heath Caldwell Wetlands & Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC www.wetlands-epg.com 704.999.5279 4