20090392 Ver 1_401 Application_20090409

The
Catena
roup
0 9- 0 3 9 2
410-B Millstone Drive
Hillsborough, NC 27278
[phone]
Mr. Dave Bailey
USACE-SAW-RG
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
NC DWQ, 401/Wetlands Unit (5 copies)
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650
April 9, 2009
fix; i r? r?,.y
PA 111)
'4 pr A
`? G •?j nt1
T?"?DSAR!p""ER QUALI.Ty y
kR 8R„a,?L?,!
ATTENTION: REGULATORY- PCN Application Submittal for Nationwide 12 and
Preliminary Wetland Jurisdictional Determination for Proposed Folkstone
Wells Site in Onslow County, NC
Dear Mr. Bailey:
The Catena Group, Inc. (TCG) has completed a wetland delineation study for a proposed
Onslow Water and Sewer Authority production well site along Old Folkstone Road in Holly
Ridge, Onslow County, NC. TCG, acting as permitting agent for Onslow Water and Sewer
Authority (ONWASA), seeks approval from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for 0.055
acres of unavoidable impacts to waters of the U.S. under Nationwide Permit 12.
The purpose of this project is to construct two new wells drawing water out of the Upper and
Lower Castle Hayne aquifers for an estimated total capacity of 700 gpm in order to bring the
Dixon Water Treatment Plant to full capacity and meet potable water demand. This project is
helping ONWASA to meet the Central Coastal Plain Capacity Use Area requirement of
reducing pumpage of the Black Creek Aquifer. In addition, this project is eligible for
economic stimulus funding (ARRA) as long as all environmental permits are obtained prior
to June 1, 2009. It is our understanding that the USACE has 30 days to review nationwide
permit applications; however, we would be considerably appreciative if this permit
application review could be expedited to meet the short deadline imposed by the federal
stimulus project.
Accompanying this letter is Site Plan Sheet C4 as well as the July 2008 delineation report,
maps, and wetland determination data forms for all surface waters located within and
adjacent to the project study area. We would like to request a preliminary JD in conjunction
with the PCN submittal for all surface waters delineated within the project study area
depicted in Figure 2 of the attached report.
Also enclosed as attachments to the PCN form is the April 7, 2009 US FWS response letter
(PCN Section F5d) and the March 27, 2009 letter sent to SHPO requesting their comments
regarding historic and cultural resources (PCN Section 177b). Please note that we have not
yet received a response from SHPO, yet expect a response shortly as part of the Categorical
Exclusion required by NCDENR as part of the ARRA application. The SHPO letter will be
forwarded to your office upon receipt.
,?
,?
If you have any questions or require additional information to aid in your review of this
application, please feel free to contact me at the number above or via email
[e-mail]). Again, we appreciate any expedited review of this permit
by your office in an effort to meet the ARRA deadline.
Sincerely,
The Catena Group, Inc.
Jennifer Callahan
Enclosures: PCN Form
PCN Attachments
Agent Authorization Letter
Site Plan Sheet C4
April 7, 2009 US FWS letter
March 27, 2009 SHPO request letter & General Well Field Location Map
July 2008 Wetland Delineation Report
CC: Mr. John Wise, GMA
0 9- 0 3 9 2
O?O? W ATF""6
o lqii? --c
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification PCN Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing -----_. __? kip
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the

Corps:
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 12 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ? Yes ® No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ? Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
? Yes ® No For the record only for Corps Permit:

? Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program. ? Yes ® No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h
below. ® Yes ? No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? Yes ® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: ONWASA Dixon Area Folkstone Road Production Wells
2b. County: Onlsow
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Holly Ridge
2d. Subdivision name: n/a
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
n/a °Y'' i. ` i
" ii
3. Owner Information APR ? L
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: Onslow Water and Sewer Authority
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
'M PAtN
3071497 1,AXA4.5
m, LI a4
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d. Street address: c/o Karen Wallace, 228 Georgetown Road
3e. City, state, zip: Jacksonville, NC 28540
3f. Telephone no.: 910-455-0722
3g. Fax no.: 910-455-5607
3h. Email address: [e-mail]
Page I of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ? Agent ? Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: Jennifer Callahan
5b. Business name
(if applicable): The Catena Group, Inc.
5c. Street address: 410-B Millstone Drive
5d. City, state, zip: Hillsborough, NC 27278
5e. Telephone no.: [phone]
5f. Fax no.: [phone]
5g. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1 a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 746-58.5
Latitude: 34.523056 Longitude: -
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): 77.508611
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size: 2.07 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Juniper Swamp
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C; SW
2c. River basin: NE Cape Fear
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Wooded on the site. Surrounding land use rural, wooded, agricultural.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.3 acre
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
n/a
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
To construct two new wells drawing water out of the Upper and Lower Castle hayne aquifers for an estimated total
capacity of 700 gpm in order to bring the Dixon Water Treatment Plant to full capacity and meet potable water demand.
This project is helping ONWASA to meet the Central Coastal Plain Capacity Use Area requirement of reducing pumpage
of the Black Creek Aquifer.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Two water production wells are proposed to be installed in an upland area on the site drawing water out of the Upper and
Lower Castle Hayne aquifers for an estimated total capacity of 700 gpm to bring the Dixon Water Treatment Plant to full
capacity and meet potable water demand. The new well sites are located adjacent to Folkstone Road in the township of
Holly Ridge, NC, and are known as Dixon Well Sites #8 and #9. Water from these wells will be routed through new and
existing raw water transmission lines to the Dixon Water Treatment Plant for treatment and finishing. All work will be
performed on ONWASA-owned property. A 12-foot wide driveway is proposed to cross a wetland to access the wells.
Overhead electric power lines are proposed to parallel the access driveway. See attached plan sheet depicting general
location of the well field and other site details (drawing number C4). General construction eqiupment will be used to
construct the driveway.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past? ? Yes ® No ? Unknown
Comments: JD verification is requested in conjuction with this
permit application
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
f
? Preliminary ? Final
o
determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known): Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
6. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past? ? Yes ® No ? Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ? Yes ® No
[6b. If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ? Streams - tributaries ? Buffers
? Open Waters ? Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number - Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ - non-404, other) (acres)
Temporary T
W1 ? P ®T underground PF04 ® Yes ® Corps 0
01
waterline ? No ® DWQ .
W2 ®P ? T driveway crossing PF04 ® Yes
? No ® Corps
® DWQ 0.02

W3 ® P ? T overhead
powerline
PF04
® Yes
? No
® Corps
®DWQ
0.025
maintenance
W4 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W5 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W6 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts 0.055
2h. Comments: Please see the attached July 2008 Wetland Delineation Report for additional infomration.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number - PER or
-
404, 1
(Corps
0
stream
Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ
-
non-
404
, (linear
Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet)
S1 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S2 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S3 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S4 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S5 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S6 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments:
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number- (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ?P?T
02 ?P?T
03 ?P?T
04 ?P?T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If and or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres)
number of pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes ? No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
? Neuse ? Tar-Pamlico ? Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ? Catawba ? Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number - Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Temporary T impact required?
B1 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
B2 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
B3 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Water production wells are proposed to be installed in an upland area. The wetland on the site bisects the property and
therefore cannot be avoided; however, wetland impacts were minimized by designing the driveway to cross the wetland at a
perpendicular angle in a shorter/smaller section of the wetland. Overhead powerlines were also placed closer to the driveway
through the wetland to further minimize impacts.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
The driveway will be graded to existing ground surface on both sides of the wetland. Three 12" ID HDPE or RCP culverts will
be installed to allow conveyance of water to satisfy wetland hydrology.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? ? Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ? DWQ ? Corps

2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project? ? Mitigation bank

El Payment to in-lieu fee program
? Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:

3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
_____
Quantity
T
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ? Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ? warm ? cool ?cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 7of11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation? ? Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.

Zone 6c.
Reason for impact 6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier 6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 8 of 11
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ? Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
El Yes [:1 No
Comments:
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 5.8%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ? Yes ® No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: less than 10,000 sq. ft. disturbed
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
? Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ® DWQ Stormwater Program
? DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? N/A
? Phase II
3b. Which of the.following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ? NSW
? USMP
apply (check all that apply): ? Water Supply Watershed
? Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ? Yes ? No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
® Coastal counties

4a.
Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ? HQW
? ORW
(check all that apply): ? Session Law 2006-246
? Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ? Yes ® No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ? Yes ? No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ? Yes ? No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ® Yes ? No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ® Yes ? No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
? Yes ® No
Comments: Funding for this project includes ARRA Economic Stimulus funds (1 a).
It requires a Categorical Exclusion (1 b). This ARRA Project / Categorical Exclusion
is in review by Public Water Supply Section (1 c).
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ? Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ? Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ? Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
This project is helping ONWASA to meet the Central Coastal Plain Capacity Use Area requirement of reducing pumpage
of the Black Creek Aquifer.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ? Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ®Yes ? No
impacts?

5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. ®
Raleigh
? Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
Searched NC NHP database and contacted US FWS. One federally protected species, /Lysimachia asperulifolia/ (rough-
leaf loosestrife) [E], is listed as an element occurrence within two miles of the property. In a letter dated April 7, 2009
(attached), US FWS stated that the project is not likely to adversely affect any federally-listed endangered or threatened
species, their formally designated critical habitat, or species currently proposed for listing under the Endangered Species
Act.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ? Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
There are no streams designated as Essential Fish Habitat on or adjacent to the property.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ? Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
A letter was sent to the SHPO office requesting their opinion about the project (attached). To date, they have not yet
issued a response. The response letter will be forwarded to your office upon receipt.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ? Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: N/A
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? Surveyor, Charles F. Riggs & Associates, Inc.
did the
,
determination using Community Panel Number 370340 3720424800J November 3, 2005.
Jennifer Callahan
J Apr. 9, 2009
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Ap Ii nt/Agent's Signature Date
(Age
'ature is va ' my if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.
Page 11 of 11
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Member Govts.
Onslow County
Holly Ridge
Jacksonville
North Topsail Beach
Richlands
Swansboro
Mr. Dave Bailey
USACE-SAW-RG
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
()NWAS
%of Onslow Water & Sewer Authority
----A
Email: fsanderso_onwasa.com
Website: wwni.onwasa.com
RE: Agent Authorization Letter
Folkstone Wells Project, Onslow County, NC
Dear Mr. Bailey:
Office of the
Director for Operations
Francis A. Sanders, Jr., P.E.
Onslow Water and Sewer Authority (ONWASA) is applying for US Army Corps of
Engineers Nationwide Permit #12 for wetland impacts associated with the proposed Folkstone
Wells project. ONWASA authorizes The Catena Group, Inc. (TCG) to act as their agent for
this project.
The project property (PIN 746-58.5) is located near the intersection of Old Folkstone Road
and Highway 17 in Onslow County, NC. Two new water production wells drawing water out
of the Upper and Lower Castle Hayne aquifers are proposed to be installed in an upland area.
The estimated total capacity (700 gpm) will bring the Dixon Water Treatment Plant to fiill
capacity and meet potable water demand. A wetland on the site bisects the property and
impacts cannot be avoided. A 12-foot wide driveway is proposed to cross a wetland to access
the wells and overhead electric power lines are proposed to parallel the driveway. Pennanent
impacts total 0.045 acre and temporary impacts total 0.01 acre, for a total wetland impact of
0.055 acre. Avoidance and minimization measures as well as all other site details are
included in the attached PCN form.
By signing below, ONWASA authorizes TCG to apply for the Folkstone Wells project
permit. If you have any questions, please contact me by telephone at [phone] or
e-mail at fsanders ki),onwasa.com
Sincerely, r
Francis A. Sanders Jr. P.E-...
ONWASA
Director of Operations
228 Georgetown Road. • P.O. Box 1415 • Jacksonville, NC 28540 • Tel [phone] • Fax [phone]
z
r 3 W y? W WJ
W Z
p r ° OC G W ° 3 O D J N W? .}q? lx f/{ b ?[
m W = W J H a
W
> y? n G H to W Z W O Z
(L w
?? Y W^ & v v 3 < o od i 3Q 0Q
7 <W N Fd°N I I I I 0 O W z=
N _&_= i = J Q° ern
I.- a °n n m°°?ji$ I I X_ Z O W O y J ? 5
rn c'''° °?7?^ I I I, I ° ° z! O O Q W <W V§ a
-j 0 It r?x ?"'saa I z z a 3 ;? & z r = W
_ ?3s53 =?m$? I I m Q o z Ss °° N
o°WO? I i I I 8 a x 1y Wd" °
O OC40: lOI air- = a ° F ? 8 a
w

Q

LL- w
OW Q

Z
OW?

Q J O
JW? I

W
Q
Off)
z
aQ

I I
I
I

O
N
I C(- d
V
LLJ W

(J) X
I W Z ? ?- n-
I I J Q ?Q ao
I Uzi LLJ JV)
Ow
Q O

I
cp WO
>
O JQ
J n- W
J
(/) I?
I
I
?
I 0 V,J
(n
z v .? cn Z O
?
I U-)

r
/
i
i
I ? ool
W
W
O
O <
n N
W o
z LLj
; N, U
Q
pO2
:3
?W3
W >
°-z
:3
a
}zp
3 3 3 3 3 3 3 w W w W W w W 3
L
d
^ ^ L
M t
M
^ t
r° t
ao t
?O t
n t
d t
M t
O f

N t

m
Z N C4 11)
d
1A
1n
O
1n
W m i7 O 0 4b F, r, .t .
J
m Q
w
m M
O M
O/ M
n r
O N
tp N
t0 ?t
0 r
^
N a
O N
?p :n
0
p Pp
01 r)
N r
?
Q
~ n
z n
z n
z d
z n
w M
z d
z
z LO
V1 ?t
w 00
w 00
V1 0O
w M
o N
m

w
z
_
J
p
?
U'
,0
LO
0
O/
1,
:
ip
N
LO
OD
i0
O
00
Of
C0
n
il1
00
O
M
»
?
04
-
iM
n
?
N
CO
M
z
J z
J o
M a
d of
M
d (C
d ai
d of
n (Q
? of
M to
lA to
d a
tO lri
d (6, Pi
N

3
d
O
W
N
10
d
M
m
n
00
01 O ?_ N M d ln
d J J J J J J J J J J J J .J .J J J
z LL)
Sao ?? oz-
,g l 5j VL
a ?
o ?
° /
J
Z
w- /
p Y
acr
c /
LLJ
LLJ
Cl-
io
:mss::: Z Q C?
I?
?s
LLJ C(-:z
, w W J Q
CO 0
zaz LL-
0 LLI
Vo o
0-00
(O I ' III / / \ \ N W \
i
LLJ
00
LLJ 1 i / ?w
-j CD L) V)
L) 0
,,, Id II ?\ \ J, - _ _ _
Cl-
li II I I ?) 6j \ \ r ?? w z
cy,
0 0-
I
I i III \ ? ___-?
I / _
r
I / o \ r
I I I
I I // i
I
N 09
I
? /? III ?; I
) Owl / ? \I I 1 N
ff I LZN C°

N

I w w

LLJ 4A_ c0
III, ,
It
i (.? . ?
III t 9J?

,b9.69

?RR
$
N}
=
;
1
0
Z
S
fJ
/1 p
VKvF co
2
m '<

rr

II ?? .M1
j'?
Z^? ? OC
aa
U?
?1
f$?? 'i Y
L
0, M
x

(n
° L J
>
° N i. rn W
4, _
44 W
R N?j R -11
?
6 N CY
R °?-?o R ?S 3o R
?x Sim R 0
Z

??
Q
LLJ
t
N W
U)

C

J
?
i s
#
i Y

=JCiZ?rt?E ,?', t
C :
f m
sC F ..?

x172
.
3
!._ ? c9
i C!
s ?
Y 1 T? ?' ki'
1:
J " .8 t.
S}

O W W U
L >
L.

('
Z
g
ma

Q
-i
7a
? y'
?O
W
?S
-i (A ..
O I-

U
Z m
W I

? q
?y
Q
W 0D
= F=
ZS 41
F- O
Z Q O
Q CO 2
? to
R Z ?
<
R ro

0 g
W Z
C
L
c s
o?
5
yW U
U ° N
.3 N
U
ID
1 ?
? Q u 7?7?
?8?'?y
j
?

??V11
> s
py Z
H
Y Li'
R
i'
V °
` o F F
3 j?
01 ti„
1 S n
t ?? <

ox W,<= W O N JUN
? u y G A
a
ggg g
i ?5?? ? t6? I ? G a x
Ssa:?: o s ? ffa
I

U I I I
I

?

N
drj w
Z> I U p-

f
N o
w I
I
J w
n X
°
a.

w
I
J as
I
Z
4 I

I ?
2
w G MQ 4
°

JO
I =
wo U)w1
QQ J•
O

I >
° p
LL,
Owl I
I ZO ?N Z_I O
XaO 1
I \
0 3 u,
I
z ?
?c

s
Coco
I
p
a I
?II d 6L'£6
,

y_ , y ? DWI ?
s
o?
;ou
ws

g;? l LZSi /?
ego ,L£L9Z M.,BL.L \ i 5g
,9L'S?l I
o /
W ;Y / s
-a a? / o
? j?f{ TJ
? ?1p6I moo. °\ \ .. r (Y w?a co
001
X° /` / www =?a \ IIn m ma / _ =z o)
1 1 II ?\ ¢FN °
cg O wo?U co
I ?I
111 y IIII.// / \\ N In I 1 e
I ,- 1 I Ill / ? /\ J °°r 1, o
I IIII /qg \? // \\ ~ Lo ?
3
LD J 1 11 / \\. / / /? U p = r _
J \ Z L)
Lo
U.1 CY-I w
\ ?1 3 ---\\VVmc? / ?g
I U 1 III ??
= Ii II I I I 6 \ \? r- y9 w z
\\ dY
I ? 1 X11 ? i 0?6 \ ? \`/_yl ?(Y I
V) I 1 II1 // o Z9
N I '1 I I ?gi / / 09 C)f 1 IIII / :1 / / ?//
`'' 111 II I I
a r j1i 111 °? I N 85 £ LZ
I III
.IZN ° l?
L
I / i IIIII I I 00'00£ 3..8L,L
>
- 9?
°w a .,,9'69

V)
\ ?C. .. W
w
• sQ?i • n ?? b ?
{ a" °
z
0
w
N

?
Jp
Awj,i {{ pfy

@E
t;e €kill 8'i i
EJ C 5
b.

?Z
L ?
J
) N
? W
?Q
i N
°
Z
?a
iw
3
JZ
:ff
2a ?s ?

W
6?y ?
?I
"T °F United States Department of the Interior
Q ,
W y
c
9 FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE.
Raleigh Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
RR w '$ Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
April 7, 2009
Public Water Supply/SRF
1634 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1634
This letter is to inform you that a list of all federally-protected endangered and threatened species
with known occurrences in' orth Carolina is now available on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service's (Service) web page at http://www.fws.gov/raleigh, Therefore, if you have projects that
occur within the Raleigh Field Office's area of responsibility (see attached county list), you no
longer need to contact the Raleigh Field Office for a list of federally-protected species.
Our web page contains a complete and frequently updated list of all endangered and threatened
species protected by the provisions of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.)(Act), and a list of federal species of concern' that are known to occur in
each county in North. Carolina.
Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non-federal
representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action federally authorized,
funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any
federally-listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may be
prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining whether additional consultation with the
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally-protected species list, information on the
species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or
evaluation and can be found on our web page at http://www.fws.gov/raleigh. Please check. the
web site often. for updated information or changes.
If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally-listed species known to be
present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to
adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine
t 't'he term "federal species of concern" refers to those species which the Service believes might be in need of
concentrated conservation actions. Federal species of concern receive no legal protection and their designation does
not necessarily imply that the species will eventually be proposed for listing as a federally endangered or threatened
species. However. we recommend that all practicable measures be taken to avoid or minimize adverse impacts to
federal species of concern..
the species" presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural
Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual. field. surveys.
If you determine that the proposed action. may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a federally-protected species, you should notify this office with your
determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects
of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects,
before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed
action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally
listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless an
Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete record
of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified personnel
conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles.
With regard to the above-referenced projects, we offer the following remarks. Our comments are
submitted pursuant to, and in accordance with, provisions of the Endangered Species Act.
Based on the information provided and other information available, it appears that the proposed
actions are not likely to adversely affect any federally-Iisted endangered or threatened species,
their formally designated critical habitat, or species currently proposed for listing under the Act
at these sites. We believe that the requirements of section 7(a)(2) of 'the Act have been satisfied
for these projects. Please remember that obligations under section 7 consultation must be
reconsidered if: (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action that may affect
listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered, (2) these actions are
subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this review, or, (3) a new species
is listed or critical habitat determined that may be affected by the identified action.
We hope you find our web page useful and informative and that following the process described
above will reduce the time required, and eliminate the need, for general correspondence for
species' lists. If you have any questions or comments, please contact this office at (919) 856-
4520.
Pete 1.
Field
2
List of Counties in the Service's Raleigh Field Office Area of Responsibility
Alamance
Beaufort
Berne
lBladen.
Brunswick
Camden
Carteret
Caswell
Chatham
Chowan
Columbus
Craven
Cumberland
Currituck
Dare
Duplin
Durham
Edgecombe
Franklin
Gates
Granville
Greene
Guilford
Halifax
Harnett
Hertford
Hoke
Hyde
Johnston
Jones
Lee
Lenoir
Martin
Montgomery
Moore
Nash.
New Hanover
Northampton
Onslow
Orange
Pamlico
Pasquotank
Fender
Perquimans
Person
Pitt
Randolph
Richmond
Robeson
Rockingham
Sampson
Scotland
Tyrrell
Vance
Waite
Warren
Washington
Wayne
Wilson

Member Govts.
Onslow County
Holly Ridge
Jacksonville
North Topsail Beach
Richlands
Swansboro
March 27, 2009
0 WAS
nslow Water & Sewer Authority
O
Email: [e-mail]
Website: i1,A"v.enrrasa.com
Office of the
Director for Operations
Francis A. Sanders, Jr., P.E.
Ms. Renee Gledhill-Earley
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources, Historic Preservation Office
MSC 4617
Raleigh, NC 27699-4617
Dear Ms. Renee Gledhill-Earley:
The Onslow Water and Sewer Authority has requested categorical exclusion from the substantive
environmental review requirements (CE) under 15A NCAC 1 C .0408 "minimum criteria" rules,
for the project listed below. Before granting the request, the NC Public Water Supply Section,
Division of Environmental Health (PWS) requires that your agency comment on the advisability
of issuing a CE. Specific project information is laid out below.
Project Information
Project #: 59618
Applicant: Onslow Water and Sewer Authority, NC
County: Onslow
Applicant Contact Information
Frank Sanders
Director of Operations
Onslow Water & Sewer Authority
PO Box 1415
Jacksonville, ITC 28540
Tel: [phone]
Fax:[phone]
iiiailto:fsanders@oli-.,vasa.com
Project Engineer Contact Information
John J. Wise, PE
101-E Woodwinds Industrial Court
Cary, NC 27511
[phone]
[phone] fax
[e-mail]
Project Description: Construction of 2 new wells drawing water out of the Upper and Lower Castle
Hayne aquifers for an estimated total capacity of 700 gpzn to bring the Dixon Water Treatment Plant to
full capacity and meet potable water demand. The new well sites are located adjacent to Folkstone
Road in the township of Holly Ridge, NC, and are known as Dixon Well Sites #8 and 49. Water
228 Georgetown Road. • P.O. Box 1415 • Jacksonville, NC 28540 • Tel [phone] • Fax [phone]
from these wells will be routed through new and existing raw water transmission lines to the
Dixon Water Treatment Plant for treatment and finishing. All work will be performed on
ONWASA owned property. The general location of the well field is shown in attached map.
Agency Cross Cutting Authority
North Carolina Cultural Resources Archeological and Historic Preservation
Act of 1974, Pub. L.86-523, as amended
National Historic Preservation Act of 1996,
PL 89-665, as amended
United States Army Corps of Engineers Protection of Wetlands, Executive Order
11990 and Floodplain Management,
Executive Order 11988
United States Fish & Wildlife Service Endangered Species Act, Pub. L. 93-205,
as amended
Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, Pub.
L. 85-624, as amended
Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, Pub. L. 90-
542, as amended
After your review, please provide continents to PWS, preferably by email at
vincent.tomaino2ncinail.net . You may also write to Vincent Tomaino at the addresses below.
If you require additional information, please inquire directly to the applicant contact, at the
address above.
Parcel Mail (e.g., FedEx) Address Regular Mail Address
Public Water Supply/SRF Public Water Supply/SRF
2728 Capital Boulevard 1634 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27604 Raleigh, NC 27699-1634
To enable the project to move forward, please issue your comment letter or email even if you
have no continents. You may reply by email to viiicent.toinaiiroQticmail.net with a copy to
fsanders a,onwasa.com
Sincerely,

Francis A. Sanders, P.]
Director of Operations
Enclosures: Color-coded Project Maps
cc: Vincent Tomaino, PE, PWS
228 Georgetown Road. - P.O. Box 1415 - Jacksonville, NC 28540 - Tel [phone] - Fax [phone]
? ? e = _N^sse?rt=gg
Mill
!, it d h-2h6Z8-C09-0 NSSI
a o ?Sr?
x, rr ins tgMrf N v
-xa,a,.o,q m I a w? j o
k" rpi •
w t b L7
Zoo
G7 r v. ? u
_ ? ? ? 3 ee L O ? N ?
oa4? I }J#I fI{}'} ? ._.-, Y y .: .? ?.% tlti f'` 8 0
r r - ) , f11 IEfE
,1}I.e eb? Its -?-- ?•°3? o
^°i? •i?Jr??e I ?t?1? t eat l~ ? ? _ t?Z`? c
{ { r , i X11# `r±f} d
Imo..,...,---G i +, - }1i?i?1f+311'{t}}
,I a 'fit 11 }}## , 111
s
? 'ft'?}J}f##J }1#I,Y# 1 11- ?....` t S ''?_..-:• 1I 1I ? (??"1 ??y
,r st t.#?i#J}r?'} I! }} rt?'{.i,{? I - ? ? f ? ? t t, ? o ?+µ?N
' {t si .(tit#{?'i} i##J '?^^``, z z(-
}{{
It ji
lit ALL-
e ? s
#;}
1
4 hit
s' 1 I# ? 4k{ #
F 1 f...) .
pill pi
tf i1#1#?. 4},? J6
J t J i { } 1 k \, ` !s ??..
t t ! } i%' J i }'}1 } i ' ;. J } { 14"7
l$ 3,} bye r ??
1 ? ? p
, r
ttt ' ,. ? 4
:01 t;' i I \ '.' sl#
0
? z
xs?
K
pTl
i?
>Gy<
od u?K
ado e?
yy 2Q
K a:
L
41irr ? H
U
t7
a Na
=jH
?>z
m$
L
Nyp
K
f0?
?O
4

Folkstone Wells
Wetland and Stream Delineations
Onslow County, North Carolina
Prepared for:
Groundwater Management Associates, Inc.
101 Woodwinds Industrial Ct., Suite E
Cary, NC 27511
Prepared by:
The
Catena
Group
n s?Et
Chris Sheats
The Catena Group, Inc.
410-B Millstone Drive
Hillsborough, NC 27278
Tel [phone] Fax [phone]
July 2008
The
Caiena
Folkstone Wells
Wetland and Stream Delineations
Onslow County, North Carolina
July 2008
1.0 Purpose
Onslow County is considering the installation of municipal groundwater wells (Folkstone
Wells) near the intersection of Folkstone Road and Highway 17 in Onslow County, NC.
The Catena Group (TCG) was contracted by Groundwater Management Associates, Inc.
to conduct stream and wetland (surface waters) delineations within the project study area.
The objective of this report is to determine the locations and extent of surface waters
subject to protection under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act.
2.0 Project Description
The project study area, a 300 ft X 300 ft (2.07 acres) surveyed parcel, is located on
Folkstone Road (SR 1518) approximately 300 feet east of the intersection of Highway 17
(34°31'23" N, 77a 30'31" W) (Figure 1, Appendix I).
3.0 Methodologies
TCG was provided maps depicting the project study area. Additional mapping resources
used in this investigation include the most recent United States Geologic Survey (USGS)
7.5-minute topographic quadrangle map, and the United States Department of Agriculture
(USDA) Web Soil Survey.
TCG conducted the field investigations on July 23 under partly cloudy weather
conditions. All drainage features and potential wetland areas were evaluated to
determine if they met the criteria for jurisdictional status.
Jurisdictional delineations were performed using the three-parameter approach as
prescribed in the 1987 US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Wetlands Delineation
Manual (Environmental Laboratory 1987). Supplemental technical literature describing
the parameters of hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and hydrological indicators were
also utilized. USACE wetland routine determination forms were completed for each
wetland system (Appendix II).
Wetland boundaries were marked with pink and black striped flagging. All flags were
surveyed using a hand-held GPS unit with sub-meter accuracy.
4.0 Qualification of Investigators
The representative of TCG conducting this investigation was Chris Sheats. Mr. Sheats is
a project manager for TCG with five years of experience conducting natural resource
investigations. His experience includes wetland and stream mitigation, jurisdictional
Folkstone Wells July 2008
TCG Job #2131
The
Caleno
wetland and stream delineations, environmental permitting, threatened and endangered
species surveys, natural systems assessments, stream classifications, and graphics
mapping.
5.0 Results
5.1 Jurisdictional Streams
No jurisdictional streams were observed within the project study area.
5.2 Jurisdictional Wetlands
One jurisdictional wetland was observed within the project study area (Appendix II).
Wetland I (W 1) is a headwater wetland approximately 0.3 acre. The wetland continues
off the property to the southeast (Figure 2).
The soil in Wetland 1 meets field indicator F3 as noted in the Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils in the United States (USDA, NRCS 2003), which states:
F3. Depleted Matrix. A layer that has a depleted matrix with 60 percent
or more chroma of 2 or less and has a minimum thickness of either:
a.) 2 inches entirely within the uppers 6 inches of the soil surface
OR
b.) 6 inches starting with 10 inches of the soil surface
6.0. Summary
No jurisdictional streams were observed within the project study area. One wetland,
approximately 0.3 acre, was observed and delineated. It is the opinion of TCG that this
feature is regulated by the USACE under Sections-404 of the Clean Water Act. This
report is provided for preliminary planning purposes only. It is recommended that if this
wetland is impacted through site development, then Onslow County request a
jurisdictional feature verification from the regulatory agencies prior to, or in conjunction
with, requesting federal and state permits. Any concurrence with the results of this
investigation will be made at that time.
Folkstone Wells July 2008
TCG Job #2131
The
Coteno
REFERENCES
Environmental Laboratory. 1987. "Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual,"
Technical Report Y-87-1. US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station.
Vicksburg, MS.
Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS), United States Department of
Agriculture (USDA). Web Soil Survey. Available online at
http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov/. [Accessed July 18, 2008].
USDA, NRCS, 2003 Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States, Version 5.01.
G.W Hurt, P. M. Whited, and R. F. Pringle (eds.) USDA, NRCS in cooperation
with the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils; Fort Worth, TX.
Folkstone Wells July 2008
TCG Job #2131
GI

Figures
Folkstone Wells July 2008
TCG Job #2131
The
Catena
Group
Folkstone Wells Site
Jurisdictional Wetland Delineations
Onslow County, North Carolina
USGS 7.5-Minute Topographic Quadrangle Map
Date Figure
July 20. 2008
Scale:
As Shown
Project No.
2131
A
Survey contours indicate
<1% slope in this directions

""r,
Project Study Area
Folkstone Wells Site
Jurisdictional Wetland Delineations
Onslow County, North Carolina
USGS 7.5•Minute Topographic Ouadrangle Map
Date: Figure
July 20. 2008
Scale:
As Shown
Project No.
2131
IL-
The
Caseno
Appendix II
ACOE Routine Wetland Determination Forms
Folkstone Wells July 2008
TCG Job #2131
,

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project i site: ??81Sc?,? ?e??5

Z3 os
111
Date:
Applicant ! Owner. County: O -SN - -f
Investigator. C?.f ?e r.•'. s state: r-? e-

'
' N
No
'
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes Community ID
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No Transact ID: W k-
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No Plot I0: x,,11- 4
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Domin?Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Soecles SUvAim Indicator

3, CAX CJ0, 0.16- S.I. 'F Gr-1 11.
4. olia t"?t??? ?M? Subs tVJ i` 12.
5. n..La•? Shrub AC 13.
6. i•? ?• i ;..? ?, hs cb AGE 14.
7. iv.vctr, - 15.

Percent of Dominant Species that are O81_, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). -? 'SO 4
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks):
Stream, Lake, or ride Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
No Recorded Data Available
Field Observations:
Depth of Surface Water: (in.)
Depth to Free Water In Pit: (in.)
Depth to Saturated Soil: :;2p VL (in.)
Remarks:
V?? ?r'?`? ??S ?Lf ? i h GL .
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Primary indicators:
_ inundated
-Saturated in Upper 12"
Water Marks
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
_ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators:
_ Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)

SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Drainage Class:
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? Yes, No
Profile Descriat'Hw:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
finches) _ Horizon (Mum-ell N-oM (Mur" I Moist) Abundanceigontrast _ Stricture, xtc.

CA- It
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol
i _ Concretions
Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulf:dic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime __ Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydr+ophytic Vegetation Present? Yes
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
Hydric Soils Present? Yes
No Is the Sampling Point
No Within a Wetiand? Yes_ No ?
No
Remarks:
• DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project I Site: S Date: ? Z3 DSc
Applicant / Owner: County: _ w loJ _
Investigator. C L+ctis s State: ?-
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID:. d
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No ? Transact ID: tiJ t
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No -? Plot ID: W 1- r0
(explain on reverse If needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Domineol F%nt Species Stratum Indicator

1.?lir.• s Da?44t' ?s r?
L"tY ? 144V
9. VS?11141, e??r.c.,n,8w
i'?c i6 P?S? }
2. &- • w+w? S.?oc 'PAkL j 10. Ac •;?-?:.. ?..iti•-. c,:s?-
? kx6 04W
3. fic'; 'J.'. .,.,. ' 5';%Vz PAcW 11. r
?
HA
S.
?•NCyS J•?
,s u
s. ?, • a V? :. l+Gt vAf.U14 14.45PL+,sk..- -oSS ?...b N t
7. a1 .. v a.& a rl. ??W? 15.
8. 1 4 o is ' 1s.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). P, '
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Stream, Lake, or ride Gauge
i Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
Other _ Inundated
? Saturated in Upper 12"
_ No Recorded Data Available Water Marks
Drift Limes
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits
? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) Secondary Indicators:

Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
? Water-Stained Leaves
e?
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
?• O
SOILS

Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Drainage Class:
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? Yes_ No
Profile DOWADUM.•
Depth R#SWX Colors Mottle Co
lors Motile Textwe, Concretions,

iMunseii Moist) (M unsell
llnchn)

Struetw s. etc.
Moist) Abundance/Conbi*
6- rL 118s 1-11 u c.?C Ana r.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon i High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor v Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
_ Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:

! O© *b EX'+1^ i s 4 dfi• ? ? O r 5.,,? ?c..?-• S
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Within a Wetland? Yes ? No-
Hydric Soils Pressnt? Yes No
Remarks: q4e-6t 6 .5 ?cc r c s