Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20180349 Ver 1_USACE Correspondence_20180330Homewood, Sue From: Bailey, David E CIV USARMY CESAW (US) <David.E.Bailey2@usace.army.mil> Sent: Friday, March 30, 2018 2:48 PM To: Brad Luckey; rwelborn@twinlakescomm.org Cc: Michael Brame; Homewood, Sue Subject: [External] Request for additional information; RE: Twin Lakes PCN, Alamance County; SAW -2018-00284 Attachments: 2003 Aerial.pdf, 2008 Aerial.pdf, Pages from SAW-2004-203752460384.pdf CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless verified. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to Report Spam.<mailto:report.spam@nc.gov> All, Thank you for your PCN and attached information, dated and received 3/6/2016, for the above referenced project. I have reviewed the information and need clarification before proceeding with verifying the use of Nationwide Permit 14 (http://saw- reg.usace.army.mil/NWP2017/2017NWPI4.pdf). Please submit the requested information below (via e - mail is fine) within 30 days of receipt of this Notification, otherwise we may deny verification of the use of the Nationwide Permit or consider your application withdrawn and close the file: 1) Although section D.Ia of the PCN does provide some information as to why the proposed road was not designed within (at least a portion of) the existing driveway stream crossing footprint, the reasoning given does not justify why the proposed crossing couldn't be designed to incorporate at least a portion of the existing stream crossing footprint. It appears that the access road alignment could be re -designed to use the existing stream crossing footprint and still fit the project purpose listed in section B.3d of the PCN. Please update the PCN and plans to incorporate the existing stream crossing footprint to further minimize impacts to waters of the US (per NWP General Conditions 23(a) and (b). Or, provide additional justification for the current design, addressing the practicability of using the existing crossing to further minimize impacts to waters of the US. Please note that the future park area shown on the Overall Site Plan does not appear to be essential to the project purpose; 2) The proposed wetland crossing would bisect a relatively small wetland area, and the Corps is concerned about secondary and cumulative impacts to this resource. Please provide the acreages of each wetland unit that would remain if this design was authorized. How would hydrology be maintained in each wetland unit? If these wetland areas cannot be reasonably expected to maintain their functional quality following construction of this design, you must provide additional compensatory mitigation for this loss of wetland function; 3) As discussed previously, a search in our database has revealed no previous permits on the Twin Lakes property. However, the Corps field verified a wetland/stream delineation (performed by S&ME) on the property on 2/19/2004 (Action ID: SAW -2004- 20375; see attached). Based on the information in this file, as well as an aerial photo search, the existing driveway stream crossing was constructed between 2004 and 2008, and apparently without obtaining written verification from the Corps. Per this information, it appears that this road crossing resulted in approximately 60 linear feet of stream impacts and 0.09 acre of wetland impacts. Please note that the Corps will consider these impacts cumulative when evaluating Nationwide Permit and compensatory mitigation thresholds. Please let me know if you have any questions. -Dave Bailey David E. Bailey, PWS Regulatory Project Manager US Army Corps of Engineers CE -SAW -RG -R 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105 Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587 Phone: (919) 554-4884, Ext. 30. Fax: (919) 562-0421 Email: David.E.Bailey2@usace.arxny.mil We would appreciate your feedback on how we are performing our duties. Our automated Customer Service Survey is located at: http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/f?p=136:4:0 Thank you for taking the time to visit this site and complete the survey. -----Original Message ----- From: Brad Luckey [mailto:bluckey@pilotenviro.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 6, 2018 1:01 PM To: Bailey, David E CIV USARMY CESAW (US) <David.E.Bailey2@usace.army.mil>; Homewood, Sue <sue.homewood@ncdenr.gov> Cc: Michael Brame <mbrame@pilotenviro.com> Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Twin Lakes PCN, Alamance County - Electronic Copy David and Sue, Please find attached electronic copy of the Twin Lakes PCN. Hard copies and appropriate fees will be mailed today to both agencies. Please note that I believe we currently have 2-3 mitigation SOAs for the remainder of the Cripple Creek wetland credits. Other private banks in Haw, 02 HUC do not have credits available. So, in the likely event private credits are not available for this project, I went ahead and requested full amount of credits from DMS. If they are available, then it will be a mix and match from Cripple Creek and DMS. Just wanted to bring to your attention since we currently have at least two PCNs in right now with this type of split mitigation proposals. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, Bradley S. Luckey, PWS 336.708.4997 (c) 336.310.4527 (o) PO Box 128 Kernersville, NC 27285 www.pilotenviro.com <http://www.pilotenviro.com/> bluckey@pilotenviro.com <mailto:bluckey@pilotenviro.com> i 5z 2ligl04- CVCL�a.t�e�-- a-- ►-"\ e cx J j -o IJ—ck '`-Q� c( � `�1J C . l �m A s `(i cA. Cites t-1-11 N� �Jb 5VI-e-cam im C—�cc VI ural zeds d \ a: 770.3 t \ \ �. 08.6 a r.•Fl \ \ \ w etland. A 32t.0 \\ trearrt: T4� 4.76 f � EXISTING rw PSD f - -TER TES I X. D \ 1N .3 w F 2 , r• 1 = 613,45 \ IN TE PON6"�pV \ / F3 �Q 612.39 .24 0 Legend Flagged JD Boundary of Pond Bottom —••—••- Stream from Topo Survey o local property boundary 0 125 250 50Peet � IA d Nk 9 A Scale: 1" = 250 Feet Twin Lakes Project - Localized JD Drawn By: S. McMillanSam: LISGS NAPP Aerial -1998 Checked By: M. H. O'Brien Alamance County, North Carolina Date: December -03 ENGINEERING TESTING � S&MEPfOlect#1588-03-026 Wirwccutr�rca rn. Location of Existing Crossing r 4 JAWY 2018-00284 r 0 r -r• .r m f 70 h r 17 r . 2013-00847 0 125 250 500 r Feet ILLNCCGIA Aerial 2008 SAW -2018-00284 1Ar 1 Twin Lakes Maintenance Facility rpsCgling Burlington, Alamance County 1 l 1 s 41 .: 14, !• , Location of Existing Crossing gorr lot f 2018-00284 �#rt 401•, I, .14f �^ IF 400.0 f *MaE�•�4 i� r a„ tel„ •i. � •� � . �� C`� � •.w { 3 Ad .. Ij y .� s• 20'13-00847 0 125 250 500r ti Feet Ncccia Aerial 2003 SAW -2018-00284 I Ar Twin Lakes Maintenance Facility Burlington, Alamance County I