20090360 Ver 1_Application_20090403

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TVANSPORTATION
BEVERLY EAVES PERDUE.
GOVERNOR
APRIL 1, 2009
NCDENR Division of Water Quality
Brian Wrenn
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
EUGENE A.
090p
RE: Linear Transportation Project / SR 1123(Creeksville Church Road / HarnettCounty
State Project # 6C.043097
USACOE NWP#14 / NCDENR WQC 3704
Dear Mr. Wrenn:
Enclosed, please find seven (7) copies of a PCN and related documentation for a Linear
Transportation Project along SR 1123 (Creeksville Church Road) in Harnett County. The project
will be completed in compliance with NCDENR Division of Water Quality General Certification
3704, and, USACE Nationwide Permit #14.
This project is being submitted under the 401 Automated Payment Procedure. The State
Project Number is 6C.043097 and the permit fee is $240.00.
A separate copy of this submission has been forwarded to Ken Averitte of the Fayetteville
Regional Office.
If you should have any questions or comments regarding this notification, please feel free to
contact me.
incerely
Cum I l?u/S
James .Berko, PWS
Divisi n 6 Environmental Officer
P. O. Box 1150, Fayegeville, NC 29302-1150 - Telephone [phone] - Fax [phone]
F.
a
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
BEVERLY EAVES PERDUE
GOVERNOR
March 30, 2009
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
ATTN: Mr. Richard Spencer
NCDOT Coordinator
qN1?
QOFN
'? ?t>r ???9 a
e A. 'V Jr.
SECRETARY ,.
09306®
Subject: Notification for Nationwide Permit 14 (Minor Road Crossing)
NCDENR 401 WQC 3704
Culvert Replacement SR-1123 (Creeksville Ch Rd) Harnett County
State Project Number: 6C.043097
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) has scheduled to clear, grade, drain,
base and pave SR-1123, Harnett County. Total project length is 0.49 miles. The roadway
footprint will be widened from 45 feet to 60 feet and stabilized grass shoulders (6 foot) will be
provided. This project will require the replacement of three (3) wet cross lines as shown below:
Crossing Roadway Station Existing Culvert Proposed Culvert
Permit site 91 Sta. 12 + 00 40 LF 24" RCP 56 LF 42" RCP
Permit site 92 Sta. 15 + 00 44 LF 24" RCP 64 LF 36" RCP
Permit site #3 Sta. 23 + 67.11 1 (40 LF 18" RCP)
1 40 LF 18" CMP 52 LF 36" RCP
New Stream Impacts = 48 linear feet
Wetland Roadway Station Wetland Impacts
Permit site #I Sta. 12 + 00 0.018 acres
New Wetland Impacts = 0.018 acres
Construction of this project will require impacts to the waters of the United States in the Cape
Fear River Basin. All permit sites convey drainage to Jumping Run Creek (Class C) which then
flows into the Little River. The project is located within the 03030004 Hydrologic Unit, sub
basin 03-06-14.
P. O. Box 1150, Fayetteville, NC 28302-1150 - Telephone [phone]- Fax [phone]
SR-1123 is located within southern I larnett County along SRI 121 (Ray Rd.). TIP Project U-
3465 will improve Ray Road to a multi-lane facility from NC 210 to SR 1 120 (Overhills Road).
The anticipated let date for U-3465 is 2011. There is sparse residential development along SR
1 123.
Permit Site #1 is located at Ration 124-00. The current culvert is 40 L,F 24" RCP and NCDOT
proposes to increase the culvert to a 56 LF 42" RCP. The UT to Jumping Run Creek is a
perennial stream with a small swath of wetlands at the entrance of the proposed culvert. The
total wetland impact for Permit Site #1 is 0.018 acres which is necessary to bring SR 1 123 up to
current safety standards. In order to provide for aquatic life movements, the culvert will be
buried 8 inches below the existing stream invert.
Permit Site 42 is located at Station 15+00 and also conveys a perennial UT to Jumping Run
Creek. The existing 44 LF 24" RCP will be removed and replaced with a 64 LF 36" RCP. The
proposed pipe will be buried 7 inches.
Permit Site #3 is located at Station 23+67.11. This site has twin culverts under the roadway; a
40I,F 18" CMP and a 4011 18" RCP. The ends of the pipes are buried. The pipes will be
removed and replaced with a single line of 52LF 36"' RCP.
RESOURCE STATUS
In general, there will be minor impacts proposed as a result of the replacement of the culvert
along SR-1123 (Creeksville Ch Rd.) in Harnett County. This culvert site has undergone human
manipulation. A Nationwide Permit #14 / NCDENR 401 WQC 3704 is required for the project.
Endangered Species: Plants and animals with Federal classification of Endangered (E) or
Threatened (T) are protected under provisions of Section 7 and Section 9 of the Endangered
Species Act of 1973, as amended. As of January 31, 2008, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
lists four federally protected species for Harnett County.
Federally Protected Species for Harnett County
SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME STATUS
Haliacems leucocephalus Bald Eagle 13GPA
Picoides horealis Red-cockaded woodpecker E
Notropis Mekislocholas Cape Fear shiner E
Lrimuclain cacperuluefolia Rough-leaved loosestrife E
"E" denotes Endangered (a species that is in danger of extinction throughout
all or a siOniticant portion of its range).
T(SiA)- Threatened due to similarity ol'appearance, a species that is threatened
Due to similarity of appearance with other rare species and is listed for its
Protection. These species are not biologically endangered or threatened and
Are not subject to Section 7 consultation.
A biological conclusion of "No Effect" was reached for all species during the November 18,
2008 survey for protected species. Protected species were not identified, nor, was the general
habitat for each species identified.
REGULATORY APPROVALS
Application is hereby made for a Department the Army Nationwide Permit 14/ NCDENR 401
WQC 370=1 as required by the above-described activities.
The National Register was reviewed in addition to conducting a field view of the project for
significant historic features.
The project impacts are minor in nature and should not remove or degrade existing water quality
uses. Pipe sizes proposed are the minimum necessary to create a safe highway while
accommodating the 25-year design storm. There is no record within the NCDOT District 2
Office (Harnett County) that the road experiences flood overtopping. By utilizing the erosion
control measures, downstream water quality standards will be protected. All appropriate BMP"s
will be utilized during construction.
Attached is a Preconstruction Notification Form. plan sheets, marked county road map, quad
location map and photographs.
If you should have any questions, or need additional information please contact James J. Rerko,
PWS at (910) 4_337-0208.
Sincerely
o"
Janie. J. Rerko, PWS
Division 6 Environmental Officer
ATTACHMENTS
Cc: Brain Wren, Division of Water Quality (7 copies)
Ken Avenue, Division of Water Quality (1 copy)
Greg Burns, P.E., Acting Division Engineer
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.0 November 2008
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form A. Applicant Information

1. Processing
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number: 3704
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ® Yes ? No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ? Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
? Yes ® No For the record only for Corps Permit:

? Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program. ? Yes ® No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below. ? Yes ® No
1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? Yes ® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: SR 1123- Creeksville Church Rd
2b. County: Harnett County
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Spring Lake
2d. Subdivision name: NA
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no: 6C.043097
3. Owner Information
3a. Name on Recorded Deed: NA
3b. Deed Book and Page No. NA
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable): NA
3d. Street address: NA
3e. City, state, zip: NA
3f. Telephone no.: NA
13g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
NA
NA
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.0 November 2008 Version
Section A. Applicant Information, continued
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ® Agent ? Other, specify:
4b. Name: Greg Burns, P.E./NCDOT/Div 6/Acting Division Engineer
4c. Business name
(if applicable): NCDOT
4d. Street address: PO Box 1150
4e. City, state, zip: Fayetteville, NC 28302
4f. Telephone no.: [phone]
4g. Fax no.: [phone]
4h. Email address: [e-mail]
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: James J. Rerko, PWS
5b. Business name
(if applicable): NCDOT/Div 6/Division Environmental Officer
5c. Street address: PO Box 1150
5d. City, state, zip: Fayetteville, NC 28302
5e. Telephone no.: [phone]
5f. Fax no.: [phone]
5g. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 2 of 12
PCN Form - November 2008 Version
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): NA
Permit site #1: 35.2229 'N -78.9536 'W
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Permit site #2: 35.2225 'N -78.9548 'W
Permit site #3: 35.2207'N - 78.9568'W
1c. Property size: 3.5 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Jumping Run Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C
2c. River basin: Cape Fear
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Existing 25 foot dirt road with maintenance limits 60 feet in width. Woods, sparse rural homes, some lapidated run-down
Ises
.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
approximately 0.018 acre
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
approximately 180 feet
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
By Statue, NCDOT is required to pave all unpaved secondary roads. To ensure that the roadway meets current safety
standards, the road will be paved to a width of 20 feet, 6 foot grass shoulders will be installed on each side and 3:1 side
slope will be provided within the 60 foot right of way.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Bring SR 1123 up to current safety standards, ie. 20 foot paving with 6 foot stabilized shoulers and 3:1 side slopes within
a 60 foot right of way. The exsiting culverts are deteriorated and need to be replaced. Impacts will be minimized as
much as possible. The culverts will be replaced utilizing a track-hoe excavator. While front end loaders will place fill
material. Eventually a motor grader will finish grade the project prior to paving.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / ? Yes ? No ® Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
®Preliminary ? Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: NCDOT
Name (if known): Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Richard Spencer (COE) and Ken Averitte (DWQ) reviewed 01/13/09
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ? Yes ® No ? Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
Page 3 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.0 November 2008 Version
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ? Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 12
PCN Form - November 2008 Version
PCN Form - Version 1.0 November 2008 Version
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory, continued
4. Open Water Impacts

it tnere are proposea impacts to iaKes, ponas, estuaries, muutanes, sUUnas, Me rwanuc Ucedn, UI airy Uu lei UI.JCI I WaLCI UI
the U.S. then ind ividualist all o en water impacts below.
-4a. 4b. 4c. - - - 4d. 4e. -
Open water Name of
impact number waterbody Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
- Permanent (if
(P) or applicable)
Temporary T
01 ?P?T NA
02 ?P?T
03 ?P?T
04 ?P?T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments: NA
Page 6 of 12
PCN Form - November 2008 Version
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory, continued
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If and or lake construction pro osed, then complete the chart below.
5a.

Pond ID 5b.

Proposed use or 5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres) 5d.
Stream Impacts (feet) 5e.
Upland
(acres)
number purpose of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1 NA
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments: NA
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes ®No if yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres): NA
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): NA
5k. Method of constructioo: NA

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an impacts require mitigation, then ou MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.

Project is in which protected basin?
? Neuse ?Tar-Pamlico ? Other:
? Catawba ? Randleman
6b.
Buffer impact
number -
Permanent (P)
or Temporary 6c.

Reason
for impact 6d.

Stream name 6e.

Buffer
mitigation
required? 6f.

Zone 1 impact (square
feet) 6g.

Zone 2 impact
(square feet)
B1 ? P ? T NA ? Yes ? No
B2 ?P?T ?Yes ?No
B3 ? P ? T ? Yes ? No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments: NA
Page 7 of 12
PCN Form - November 2008 Version
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
-_a_.Specif1ca11ydes.cribe-measures taken to avoid-or-minimize the proposed _impacts __in_designing project.
Remove and replace existing culverts along SR 1123 (Creeksville Ch Rd.) which is necessary to provide the minimum
current safety standards.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
SR 1123 does not currently meet the current safety standards, ie. 20 foot paved roadway with 6 foot stabilized grass
shoulders. NCDOT proposes to improve SR 1123 to the minimum standard.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? ? Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ? DWQ ? Corps
k
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this

project? MIL <2L1 n
? Payment to in-lieu fee program

? Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: NA
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ? Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: 0 linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: 0 warm, cool, cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): 0 square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres
4h. . Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
F.a If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
NA
Page 8 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.0 November 2008 Version
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation, continued
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ
Will the project resultin animpact within -a protected riparian buffer that requires
6a ? Yes _ ____No
_ _
.
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
1 Total buffer mitigation required:
6c. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).

6d. Comments:
Page 9 of 12
PCN Form - November 2008 Version
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ? Yes Z No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? ? Yes ? No
2. Determination if the Project Requires a Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Does the project require a Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit? ? Yes ® No
2b. Is the project subject to General Certification 3704 or 3705? ® Yes ? No
3. Determination of Stormwater Review Jurisdiction
3a. Is this project subject to any of the following state-implemented stormwater ? Coastal counties
management programs (check all that apply)? HQW
? ORW
If so, attach one copy of the approval letter from the DWQ and one copy of the ? Session Law 2006-246
approved stormwater management plan. ? Other:

3b. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? Harnett Co.
3c. Is this local government certified to implement a state stormwater program? © Yes ? No
If so, attach one copy of the approval letter from the local government and one copy
of the approved stormwater management plan (or one copy of the approved
Stormwater management plan stamped as approved).
4. Information Required for DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
4a. What is the overall percent imperviousness according to the most current site plan? 33%
4b. Does this project contain any areas that meet the criteria for "high density" per ? Yes ® No
General Certifications 3704 and 3705?
4c. If the site is over 24% impervious and/or contains high density areas, then provide a brief narrative description of the
stormwater management plan.
The existing roadway is 33% impervious. No additional impervious surface proposed. Existing roadside ditches shall be
stabilized. ESC EMP's shall be utilized during construction in accordance with NCDOT's BMP's for construction and
maintenance activities.
4d. Has a completed BMP Supplement Form with all required items been submitted I El Yes ® No
for each stormwater BMP?
Page 10 of 12
PCN Form -Version 1.0 November 2008 Version
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federallstate/local) funds or the ® Yes ? No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ? Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
? Yes
? No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
DVVQ SurfaGB Watw GF Wetland Stand rds
1300
tl
d R
l
1 5A NGAG 2H
W
yes
,
.
),
e
an
u
es (
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ? Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ? Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
NA
Page 11 of 12
PCN Form -Version 1.0 November 2008 Version
F. Supplementary Information, continued
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ? Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ? Yes ? No
impacts?
El Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. vill
? A
h
e
e
s
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
NC Natural Heritage GIS layer and website, USFWS Endangered Species website prt ??,?rn„ y (proms n d u r v?y
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ? Yes ® No
-6t)-.-VVhat data sources did you use to detennine whetheF yuui site &impact Esserrtt Fish Habitat?
USFWS website- http://www.fws.gov/nc-es/fish/fish.html
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ? Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
National Register of Historic Places website
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ? Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? NC Floodplain Mapping website
Greg Burns, P.E. f ?
e6
1 /22/09?
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name ApplicanVAgent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
Date
is provided.)
Page 12 of 12
PCN Form - November 2008 Version
SR 1123-Creeksville Ch. Rd. Harnett co.

k„

Permit site #1 ^;Is
!,_?_
't ?' • {, `' Permit site #2 ,.;? l rat
Permit site #3
(I ?t,' Lyl f 1?-.J't`• 1??:?1f ]l.i"? - .. ?? ? _ ?'.?+ Z.,, i•" li ? .I??.,'.L?

? ),

J
?- .'s'7{alMr ;
;r! _? Fark
J
,?Y a•

gyp'
i f
P r,,?1
• 1
Ij,
1 V
0 1,250 2,500 5,000 Feet
1 inch equals 2,000 feet
Permit Site Impacts
Stream Impact = 16 LF
Wetland Impact = 0.018 Ac.
Hattie McNair
doo*
Wetland Impact - '+ J? 40 LF of Existing 24" RCP
0.010 Ac. ° Replace With Proposed
° 56 LF of 42" RCP
Edge of
Pavement Flowline
\ \ / / of Ditch
- RNV VARIES
------
Shoulder I I
Point
Flowline
of Ditch
- - - - - - - -
Wetland Impact =
0.008 Ac.
Plan View of
Hattie McNair
Existing Pipe / Proposed Construction
Harnett County, NC
SR 1123 - Creeksville Church Road - Permit Site #1
03/25/2009
Shoulder
Point
----------------
RNVVARIES -\
I ---- -- Edge of
1 Pavement
I
Scale - 1 " = 60'

QO U
},
CO -0 r
U) 7C) 0)
?.- .-
???F)
o
(3)
r) < CZ C) ?
o

Q) -0 z C/)

IZZ
Z xN

wc
-
c E
o?
-
.
M (D
Occn> co
N

a?
N O O
O «,
O n
1..?
CO O }
o
LL U _0

x
w o U i-
4-J

4

O
- -
- to LJ? (')
- -- z-
C
4
O O ? II
W U v -

/?? r
E
E I l V ??
?U \ J _
(DO
70

?
^,

_

U
7
-
N
- o
0

?
W
o
) ? 0 C/)
Lo CD
m Lo 0 (l)
N i_ a)
L M O s...
O
> N
ti ?U
N O
?
Co ON
NOO

Z U M
c'
J
O
O

r r

U)
(D_

C)
LI) _
??

L-0

4

y "4 . ?'' 'tJ t ?l
SR' 1123- Upstream- Harnett- P# 1 '
P `, a yl a,0., ,3 jp,((, ?}ry. cp?? r3 J Y
+ •Jn ? Y ?,, ^ ? e11?4
SS " ?. r t
Y -1 hf#t L?- iH r tra ..t .x? ~ tiaryMG r..
??' ?i+ ? °. Yy?1 t;rr• '' rl?° - ktl t ?; ?''?: r ?'h: 'tw - f'' C` a
?,._ i. 'r ? 1?.? 1 4 •R` 1?(t ?ya ?t r h s v fC? C ?t"f- ?-: r{- p .'A
t is
yt' -V a '?`Z•VL'? ?.. '4(i? •? Ki. r 'tp' ,+f{ 7¢ [?`'•fy +-5q1 is
(ly?i. , • a "?` ? v ? }? a"IL? - rl. ' , y ? ?. RF? F 4+• . >?rji e ? - ? ?("1 .:.
-sr
r?1/I ? ,x'41 2! r?r
A;n
n ?'4
A 4 .?
?r ?.J`._'?4: der. -. '.?. ??.L ?2.. C. M?'/ .. ?A•?-?????? ..fLF ..
.% J

.-
?:? SR 1123-

Permit Site Impacts
Stream Impact = 20 LF
Wetland Impact = None in R/W
Hattie McNair
Edge of
Pavement
-f[/VV VFIRICJ
\ \ o
44 LF of Existing 24" RCP
Replace With Proposed
64 LF of 36" RCP
Shoulder
Point
- - - - -
Flowline
of Ditch
Wetland Area
Outside of
Maintenance
Limits - Do Not
Disturb

Shoulder
Point

?- -RAN VARIES -
_
- - - - - Edge of
-? Pavement
Steve Adams
Plan View of
Existing Pipe / Proposed
Harnett County,
Construction
NC
SR 1123 - Creeksville Church Road - Permit Site #2
03/25/2009
Flowline
Scale - 1 11 = 60'
O
N Ln .?
Qo
G)r?
C/) 7?
O
?'`
0 (Y)
W W Z CD L
O
cD CD
Z I op C) O C
a) a?
N O N
a. c
U-
J ?
vU
o ry
00
- C
O
0?
O
C ?
O
Z
o
- - - - - - - o
N
O
a
- oU
?LL
? d'cD
cfl (Y)
?o?
z0N
(1) Co
C U II O
U
CY)
C?
N
X >
W
r o
C)? E
oY
N

?-
O
X C
W 4-
6?
N
?U?
?o-
Q
N O N
d O
N

O
O

L

0 0-
Q I
U
L
j LU
0
0
Ol (Y)
O _r II
U U .
O (D
0-
a. U a?
= U
?
cn >

O
?
Q
Lo O

n
U
?
cM)
O N
O
?
M
V
1! r
SRI 123- Upstream- Permit #2
+ iit ?O ° y S?.f} ys
??g?yyL 4 w i
. {•t ?' r1 }. 1" e . Y r ,yLrY. ''J'r rs'fl," r = f,rr .
" ?4 Y eY?s{,? ` 'r.y7 a• !`fy ?+ A?? t + Ill' 1'x'6 + ?` F u ?1?^ Y 1'?, . _
1
ti?
f rS fi 'ic•+ .,?i i _' 'f t k r 1 "'/ + i r Y
1 .? /I -? [? ? lTI "W.-fir ?L}/?? r.•k y+. ?.. ? •.' ',# f?lC,? .ms's !, ?*y4` • •y , r,,.yl « 9? ???? I
?2 M?.lY Aq?•.., ?`: 7 ? ?, ? ? ?k ,? I{ f,hl ? ? V y '• ?L e ? }1' 1?#'v fLf??'
• . s rf ,.' !r. ? 'M1A.`+ ila rP?? M',p"? ' f }' ?? p.,' as r' ?4p 4 ?.;? ? 'M j. ?br. ?yY *t., -!`'s' 1 ?
vr *•'Ir y,:a s „r!- eel} I r ?' : 1 w f •1..
L .f 1'.C s ?r,?"y??v+ ? ? ?.,r '?+y?-' m - ?-'?' "• ? ? ofI +4k `. ? s ?i,?
?'? '? r ?r?/}FS:r ?^?y'4?'^` ? ??, '?'? '? ?i?•,. ?LC ? ,1 ?h- r ^4 ?7 af?,ndr+ I ?,1 1 ? 1 f?1i`'i ..` ? 4...
Al ?,i ?'Ra!?:?a ? ? rrt p4 ?• .. ?e<I, ? ? ? ' y aMP s?'T 7 ?" ?a,
5 '.:U A 2 A*?* ,A4.^''
?I? ?/?p1L 1 5+'.ny t ,_ ? ; .:1 S' > 'Iw. IL?'•: r i "rh L?.
" l 4y3tf /I°? .ri. •"1+? F'?r4 S '?I4 y ?,N ?L.??? NiC .• ,1. '- ? 1 ,.,y ,?"? r { v?
f?, ? _, ? , ! kY.? ? ? .:{ysL 'F?? yq?-`a" fir. ?1?'3- ''+ •/rN?1 ?'Y?- ? ? + ?>?y r• ? ' ?}-w,?,?
RS6. '? E- ?"T+„?,h ??r - N R1"• 1'`Kt ia:...??' 'ate' %'1? ;r?• t -. ?1 N
' f N ?? es' o D. i 3 rl?f :"1 ?1
zmw,
r, ? •?' i1 ?°'4 ?'E? V?r w -+? \\1 ?' 1 ,'ice ?'? • ' d'
4r y, ? r ? ,? ? ?, : ?i6 tip, • 4 - ? -? . ' ? ` "? .'
M ??A. ,? ?! ,`- ? i Y'?? 't `?, ? T'Y ) Vy? .?4R,??i??1 _?`-,?°•.; i.l.???r ' F ? ? .. r?i
a• Y - ?•? 4 Y'+ ? l;a+" $ ? ! ' ? ?? r ". Y?7r?' ?? ? t ?r T+'??"rki?:: A ,r?. ? ?? -e s Y
..,
?? a {FC1 5 t?n1 +t`?`?? ?} G. :. ;, r .. + •.'?? rS.?y. `1.'? L?,,??ji ?tC:t .=i cyl"? fAC
r,,.,- ,73.-1u,?• ZTtsp?? r? '??>r.?? tr w'?t c? ` r' ?f ,,, -,d,',f.? :nf ?.?'.Y'?': f ,i
?•. r" r.'?• fir, t 4 ri r'`r4, 'Ylt sk.? f ! f Q? } ?'?r 4? •,._ .T t
c r.,r?? <i3r;,'''• ,4Y ti s°. $,\ '? ,. R i 1 A x:. aj , w? .. ?' ,,?5 i 7 ?y;.
r?L?? ,r K Y 7Y,L?, „? r • ?F 3?*..,i,,,. a "YL„• xt ., .. ? ? ?,TT.,iL`••
rr?1??/•,_^??'/? ICJ ??. !" ')?"?'j?f .??•'i •?.. N ` ?a* ?.Y. ? ; ?1?' -J .•??.yY?41r 'r'/?i,L ?+$itt 'rC ? ????? k ?•
+?rI J' f e 1, ?/ ?`_? J("I' •y ? S ,A ? 1 r ? I A.7F?.. ? <I y '.i.?5i r ! ? •?(? ' ?y? *. R" .w
t?
'f;.?
. Y ;? r .??' >> ? '"?-v +a'Y ' n? t'^ ;«? N? /?" ',? ?+??+k._ d? .• ? ti 1 Ire'
'I.. lr? I r ,}'•,,C,??pl? ?C Jff,? 'DIY r ?.,,. }.'r
17?°?q r o ?1
t S .rr _, i ',LF Y <• A •G? 5.
` ,` •..' .' '? ??r#t i*l?`?i ??`?., ? ,r ?y s '?`? y ?. ?'c-.ia. dl ? ? ? ?. "s. ?r, "i'?!-.:: 'j6Rr?. ? kw ? '? r•_.
1 4..rT?K ?k
=,+?! ? • ?+`??1' A?'.r.."f t 'tir r .- ti +W ?.{r h ?IW..- ??3 ?.aa'` e?? ._r"Y' /'a 4 ,. h ? y.? r?'.
? 7` t` "+?? `??s .?? ;.: 4-- i ?.• ?- .i A2` ?. .3 'tS `;,_? ? ? 1 1? 1 ?j+'? i?••4',• ?i
41+q t1 < 5., 4 q r '3z?ti ?C ti «
r .VC ??,r` y S 11- y' .S- 1e i1 tM t; f y 4 x' `s"; yr S!F 1•
n{ * Y . ? +r1. a > f •. 1 :'. y . 'mr, t-L. ,a .:'? -t - s ^h. ati .
''? I "? aq ?'•d?t 5- f, Cl?+ e`/.r !? r ' .v .
?,-•, .yw }?i?.}W y.. ..5 ,4.;? `fn S +tu41"i, 'S
u . "" r' ? "a.°? 'T .*Y'wy.. 3"yA r'L{, i. '. eY'6- _ ?•+. ? e„4...Y'? "bra' 9yTZ ° - ?? K q ?•
.?- j•yr.?1'? 1 t ? ?,.? `fix L I ? Kr r*'c . rp?l,.! 9 ? r r _ .. `'??? r, ' C•.+?in'SI? ? ?J i' r . ? ?
I; <.?- s k, r ut• xLs .m L• "? w 6i ?.C'' w?'7? I r? W4rrJ r i11 ?/ C 4.' ? '4 r"o
_` a` '3 ?° ? F.. g i4.,1 , ? t ;'F • "W ;,_ t " r .y r r.'.^? 1 rr ,?jJ-.?? ?g,?
?aaf V ISt b:yn>hl+k Nft ` li ?l. `°?? j vy :W ti
??'".??t?. ? ,'?-a. i''`.{? ?/ J'•t ??? i ? r ?'? ` ' '*?e i' ? - ?'?'k? ?, P .T 'd?.d?• w +ky l j, - \ Ac :?{N ? ?t .}.) ?? ' 4 .ddF
.. = c ?A 4,• ;?,f i i .? S >• ` -Ar ' y' J . 'r ?`.' ''? Y 2. •4 Q r 1 '' \"if ?
•' rV? f•..?+r -t"?IS?e rtl?7 ?y~ ? "? T.?.. 7••?s,?~'t. >A.' ? +K? y ?."?`??;r, ?? Ire .?;'•?rs,c ?+Ic? -mss
!Ai" ? ??.?`}_' ?+1.+.y.?a:'• 7? .•? ? ?'.. x?- i, : aV °-? • tr.r•. ? "„ ? v" ??,er - j4 ra ?e ?? 0 ?"?. v r? w ?? :?rC?` jY -sr
- a - '?^'?li r ?i' < r rs +?+•?• • !L' r?A?i11 y 's. „tilt, n ro .-1?
'wiry ?? .? ?77w t??t y,.???^'wR?v 1••5y? I.r..."• ` _ .?t}'!' % y,?_.,, .•' r _ f-
'? . ? t .-? ? ? '',6?- f1- .tom - .?" ?C" T • J `. .
.?"L ? ??nr.,, '?-?,r? ^? `?'- -1?',? l a ?•^i .{??• yR ,':'sir 'j 1 ? 'h_ A 4 f•'-r ?i. '
r? ?-. '?•?=?1."vc n.. ?*,qy 3'_; r+It-.?.T? -'. ?i: t?yly `'¢L ?'L?+'!+ ?.?\ sry?+.;?'?jD' ?-• s?? ?,
• y'. 't oa `,.?. '? ` _'y>,• «I s. ,.C}t'i?.iJ fib' \. .F1' C `.?^my?;?
. ,,.r a. ~l ~ ?S• ? ?! ..w;.y. w .. r r ,I!'. :f •^ s? 1i;y L ? ? ./fit' ^7aTa
^f` 1
nO.1 l.fl/] N-1 ?...r.. i.... ...x. A.......?.1 lF rl ..l
Hattie McNair
Permit Site Impacts
Stream Impact = 12 LF
Wetland Impact = None in R/W
Adams I ?-
Steve I i Joe L. Mcneill
Edge of
Pavement
-RNV VARIES
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Shoulder
Point
Flowline
of Ditch
40 LF of Existing 18'' CMP
& 40 LF of Existing 18" RCP
Replace With Proposed
52 LF of 36" RCP I
Steve Adams
r
----------------
60' RNV -
N
Cn
0
0
Sta. 23+67.11
Beg. 60' RAN
Lorease M. King
Plan View of
Existing Pipe /Proposed Construction
Harnett County, NC
Flowline
of Ditch
Shoulder
Point
Edge of
Pavement
SR 1123 - Creeksville Church Road - Permit Site #3
03/25/2008
Scale - 1 " = 60'
O C.1 O
cTn W CD
N O
C?
?o N
ow
Q ?? ^ ro
G'-
O Ul -M
CD X
-O O <
O _, 0
w o
?n W _N?
?^ <, cn - O oo ??? O cD
?J ! co
v
CD (D
?J LL 0 53,
3.
(D
`V 1 ,
1 ??. ?o I ? N
II p ?- o
CD 0 e-F- p --.1, N gip. o ?.
--h ^Q) < cn p cn Bch -, C31 00:3
cD (D
NJ =(Q
(P cn C)
1 ri- O CD N
O -m
:3 X
U G) z
N ,
?O JO
co C:
3 Q
rt < cD = z
(D 00
O
CCD O Q)
? Cl) Cl) .. ? 0 Cp
t_F O CCD C? X X c
O (D 70
0 O :3 :3 FD.o
CQ cQ Q cn
o 0') Q
W CD 0 n -O_
U) ? o-0-
07-.o ?m
rn
?'?
?1?.''
.y A
i::'Y.
y? ?? .??,
. ? '$'??
;`
`?

y
N ?? w/??/?" ?Y ate'/?
^
`p6
??? M
..7' r ?"f? i
y
{?^' Jam.
? y??
L?
p
ti a;
?•
??? 1'
?.
? .!
.
? s ,.e, ` . J'!'
,7?.r? . ?.

?•?'???