Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20080868 Ver 2_N&O EPA put a hold on mining expansion_20090326EPA puts a hold on minim exnifncinn Damage feared to N.C. wetlands BY WADE RAWLINS STAFF WRITER are less environmentally damag ing ... alternatives for mining the project site that would avoid im- pacts to important wetland and stream resources," Stanley Mei- burg, acting regional administra- tor, said in a letter to the corps. The waters of the Pamlico estuary provide nursery habitat for many commercial and recre- ational fish found along the coast. The EPA regional office's deci- sion comes in defiance of pres- sure from four members of North Carolina's congressional delegation to settle the issue quickly. The next step will un- fold in Washington, where higher-level EPA and corps offi- cials will decide whether to re- quire changes in the mining plan to minimize damage to wetlands and streams in Beaufort County. PCS Phosphate, part of an international company based in Canada, has worked the mine near Aurora since 1995 to pro- duce phosphate for fertilizer and animal feed supplements, and for use in food additives such as phosphoric acid, a flavor enhan- Federal environmental regula- tors have decided to challenge a plan by PCS Phosphate to expand mining near the Pamlico River in Eastern North Carolina, saying the expansion would cause unacceptable environmen- tal harm. In a rarely used move, the regional director of the U.S. Fnvironmental Protection Agency in Atlanta has notified 'he U.S. Army Corps of Engi- wers' Wilmington office that he mining permit the corps flans to issue is unacceptable nd should be put on hold. The plan to allow the company mine about 11,000 acres adia- ent to its current open-pit mine ver 35 years entails the largest ermitted destruction of -reams and wetlands in North arolina. "We continue to believe there cer in Coca-Cola and jellies. It i the largest employer in Beaufort County, with 1,100 full-time workers. The application to expand mining is handled by the Corps of Engineers, with state and fed- eral agencies such as the EPA of- fering iriput. The EPA has veto authority, though it's rarely used. Company disappointed Ross Smith, manager of envi- ronmental affairs for PCS, said the company was unaware the letter had been issued. "Certainly, PCS is disappoint- ed in EPA's response," Smith said. "We believe the Corps of Engineers has ... made appropri- ate decisions. We're hopeful the corps will resolve any issues and proceed with issuance of the permit." Penny Schmitt, a spokes- woman at the Corps of Engi- neers, said she expected the EPA headquarters office to agree to the regional office's request to get involved in the review. "We just want to let the pro- s cess go forward," Schmitt said. Environmental advocates e cheered the push by the EPA for more changes to the mining plan. "We certainly fully support EPA's efforts to address the ad- verse impacts that will result if PCS is allowed to move for- ward," said Derb Carter, direc- tor of the Southern Environmen- tal Law Center's Carolinas of- fice. "Much of this will be irre- versible and have long-term consequences to the Pamlico River, Beaufort County and that part.of the state." The company first applied to expand its mine in 2000. It sought to mine through wet- lands, salt marsh and head- waters of a number of creeks - a plan state regulators said violat- ed state law, causing the issue to be tied up in court until 2006. Since then, the company has offered a different plan, and the permitting process has moved forward. wade.rawlins@)newsobserver.com or 919-829-4528 newsobserver.com Tu NEWMBSERVER newsobserver.com Page 1 of 2 Published: Mar 26, 2009 02:00 AM Modified: Mar 26, 2009 08:33 AM EPA puts a hold on mining expansion Damage feared to N.C. wetlands BY WADE RAWLINS, Staff Writer Comment on this story Federal environmental regulators have decided to challenge a plan by PCS Phosphate to expand mining near the Pamlico River in Eastern North Carolina, saying the expansion would cause unacceptable environmental harm. In a rarely used move, the regional director of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in Atlanta has notified the U.S. Army Corps.of Engineers' Wilmington office that the mining permit the corps plans to issue is unacceptable and should be put on hold. The plan to allow the company to mine about 11,000 acres adjacent to its current open-pit mine over 35 years entails the largest permitted destruction of streams and wetlands in North Carolina. "We continue to believe there are less environmentally damaging ... alternatives for mining the project site that would avoid impacts to important wetland and stream resources," Stanley Meiburg, acting regional administrator, said in a letter to the corps. The waters of the Pamlico estuary provide nursery habitat for many commercial and recreational fish found along the coast. The EPA regional office's decision comes in defiance of pressure from four members of North Carolina's congressional delegation to settle the issue quickly. The next step will unfold in Washington, where higher-level EPA and corps officials will decide whether to require changes in the mining plan to minimize damage to wetlands and streams in Beaufort County. PCS Phosphate, part of an international company based in Canada, has worked the mine near Aurora since 1995 to produce phosphate for fertilizer and animal feed supplements, and for use in food additives such as phosphoric acid, a flavor enhancer in Coca-Cola and jellies. It is the largest employer in Beaufort County, with 1,100 full-time workers. The application to expand mining is handled by the Corps of Engineers, with state and federal agencies such as the EPA offering input. The EPA has veto authority, though it's rarely used. Company disappointed Ross Smith, manager of environmental affairs for PCS, said the company was unaware the letter had been issued. "Certainly, PCS is disappointed in EPA's response," Smith said. "We believe the Corps of Engineers has ... made appropriate decisions. We're hopeful the corps will resolve any issues and proceed with issuance of the permit." Penny Schmitt, a spokeswoman at the Corps of Engineers, said she expected the EPA headquarters office to agree to the regional office's request to get involved in the review. http://www.newsobserver.com/news/v-print/story/1458425.html 3/26/2009 newsobserver.com Page 2 of 2 "We just want to let the process go forward," Schmitt said. Environmental advocates cheered the push by the EPA for more changes to the mining plan. "We certainly fully support EPA's efforts to address the adverse impacts that will result if PCS is allowed to move forward," said Derb Carter, director of the Southern Environmental Law Center's Carolinas office. "Much of this will be irreversible and have long-term consequences to the Pamlico River, Beaufort County and that part of the state." The company first applied to expand its mine in 2000. It sought to mine through wetlands, salt marsh and headwaters of a number of creeks -- a plan state regulators said violated state law, causing the issue to be tied up in court until 2006. Since then, the company has offered a different plan, and the permitting process has moved forward. wade.rawlins@newsobserver.com or919-829-4528 Comics, crosswords and coupons... only in The N&O print edition. Subscribe Now! © Copyright 2009, The News & Observer Publishing Company A subsidiary of The McClatchy Company http://www.newsobserver.com/news/v-print/story/1458425.html 3/26/2009