20090330 Ver 1_Application_20090326

mow..
3 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
!1
d GOVERNOR

l?
CL
0
CJ
T
l.,
U

LYNDO TIPPETT
SECRETARY
February 27, 2009
41210)
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, NC tf o f r b ZOCo L
ATTN 2 Mr. Monte Matthews ® 9
,o` ST ?R ?ecri
NCDOT Coordinator
Subject: Application for Section 404 Nationwide Permit 33 for
the removal of Bridge No. 338 over the Yadkin River on
SR 1190/1402 in Yadkin and Surry Counties. Division 11,
Federal Aid Project No. BRA-1190(2), TIP No. B-4820,
WBS Element No.38590.1.1
Dear Sir:
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to remove Bridge No.
338 over the Yadkin River on SR 1190/1402. No new structure will be constructed. There
will be 0.001 acre of temporary surface water impacts from the construction of a barge
access. There will be no permanent surface water or wetland impacts.
Please see enclosed copies of the Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) and design plans for
the above-referenced project. An unsigned Categorical Exclusion (CE), which includes a
Section 4(f) Evaluation and an unsigned Memorandum of Agreement (MOA), is attached.
The MOA and CE are currently in the signature process. A signed CE (with signed MOA)
will be distributed upon receipt, and additional copies will be available upon request.
This project is located in a North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) designated
trout county; therefore, comments from the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
(NCWRC) will be required prior to authorization by the Corps of Engineers. By copy of this
letter and attachments, NCDOT hereby requests NCWRC review. NCDOT requests that
NCWRC forward their comments to the Corps of Engineers and the NCDOT within 30
calendar days of receipt of this application. The NCWRC has informed NCDOT that the
Yadkin River is not an NCWRC trout stream and that there are no moratoria for the project.
This project calls for a letting date of June 16, 2009 and a review date of April 28, 2009.
MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: [phone] LOCATION:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FAX: [phone] CAPITAL BLVD
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS SGRE 240
1598 MAIL SERVICE CENTER WEBSITE: WWW.NCDOT.ORG RALEIGH NC 27604
RALEIGH NC 27699-1598
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
A copy of this permit application will be posted on the NCDOT Website at:
http://www.ncdot.orvJdoh/preconstruct/pe/. If you have any questions or need additional
information, please call Bill Barrett at [phone].
Sincerely
?ivGreg Thorpe, Ph.D.
Environmental Management Director. PDEA
w/attachments
Mr. Brian Wrenn, NCDWQ (2 copies)
Ms. Marla Chambers, NCWRC
Ms. Marella Buncick, USFWS
w/o attachments (see permit website for attachments)
Dr. David Chang, P.E.. Hydraulics
Mr. Victor Barbour, P.E., Project Services Unit
Mr. Mark Staley, Roadside Environmental
Mr. Greg Perfetti, P.E., Structure Design
Mr. Michael A. Pettyjohn, P.E. Division 11 Engineer
Mr. Heath Slaughter, Division 11 Environmental Officer
Mr. Jay Bennett, P.E., Roadway Design
Mr. Majed Alghandour, P. E., Programming and TIP
Mr. Art McMillan, P.E., Highway Design
Ms. Pam Williams, PDEA Project Planning Engineer
Mr. Scott McLendon, USACE, Wilmington
T e'
Office Use Only: Form Version March 05
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. 0 Q ff) Q
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not ApplicablE" or"N/A1`)
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
? 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide; Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NW-33
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here:
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Gregory J Thorpe PhD Environmental Management Director
Mailing Address: 1598 Mail Service Center
Telephone Number:_ [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: wabarrett(cl?ncdot gov
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name:
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number: Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
Page 1 of 9
N 6
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Removal of Bridge No 338 on SR 1190/1402 over the Yadkin River
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): B-4820
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN):
4. Location
County: Sum & Yadkin counties Nearest Town: Elkin (Sum Co.) & Jonesville
(Yadkin Co.)
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): I-77 north, west on US-21
(turns into US-21 Business) to SR 1402 (Gwyn Avenue)
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): °N ow
6. Property size (acres):
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Yadkin River, Class C water
8. River Basin: Yadkin -Pee Dee
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at httl)://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/mal)s/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Bridge No. 338 was closed and removed from the functional
road svstem in December 2005 In addition to crossing over the Yadkin River, several town
Page 2 of 9
streets, a nark and railroad tracks are also crossed by the bridge There are also several
buildings that are in proximity to the bridge The general land use is commercial In the area
of Bridge No. 338, there are two (2) historic resources: the Downtown Elkin Historic District
and Bridge No. 338 (Hugh B Chatham Bridge) and one (1) publicly owned recreational
facility: Crater Park which qualify as Section 4(f) resources Measures to mitigate Adverse
Effects to the Downtown Elkin Historic District and Bridge No 338 are documented in a
Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) - attached to the PCE It was determined that the
removal of Bridge No. 338 has No Effect to Crater Park and its functionality
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Removal of Bridge No 338 which spans the Yadkin River, and also spans Main Steet
Yadkin Valley Railroad, Standard Street Monroe Street and Crater Park within the Town of
Elkin and its southern approach is within the Town of Jonesville Bridge No 338 is 1509
feet in legnth consisting of concrete superstructure and substructure and utilizes steel
overhead trusses for spans over the Yadkin River. Standard bridge demolition techniques
will be utilized, including the use of a barge for bent removal A temporary barge access will
be constructed as part of the project
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the project is to remove Bridge
No. 338. constructed in 1931 which in 2005 had a sufficiency rating of 2 out of 100 because
of structural deficiency and operational inadequacy. The bridge was closed to vehicular
traffic in December 2005 because of the overall deterioration of the bridge steel and concrete
componenets. Removal of the bridge improves safety for pedestrians and vehicles due to
falling concrete and removes the potential for debris to fal into the Yadkin River as the
bridge continues to deteriorate
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.N/A
V. Future Project Plans
Page 3 of 9
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
There are no plans for the construction of a bridge at this site Traffic currently utilizes Bridge
No. 21 on U.S. 21 Business that is located approximately 725 feet downstream of Bridge No
338. Bridge No. 21 was built in 1971 to accommodate the increase traffic between Jonesville and
Elkin and is a 4-lane facility with 3-foot sidewalks on both sides
VL Proposed impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with. the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: The proposed impacts are
temporary impacts to Yadkin River from the construction of a temporary barge access (0.0 1
acre) and from potential bridge demolition debris 070 cubic vards) that may enter the water.
There will be no permanent impacts to streams or wetlands
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list irnnarts Arne to tenth ctnirl„rr anri flnnr9;nn
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland

(e forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year
Flood lain
p
(yes/no) Distance to
Nearest
Stream
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
No wetlands

Total Wetland Impact (acres)
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property:0
Page 4 of 9
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage- multiniv 1Pnoth x width th Pr, livi 1e 1,y d7 ';AA
Stream Impact
Number
(indicate on ma)
Stream Name ..
Type of Impact
Perennial or
Intermittent? Average
Stream Width
Before Impact Impact
Length
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
1 Yadkin River temporary Perennial 155 feet 40 0.01
(demo. debris) Yadkin River temporary Perennial N/A N/A 170 yd3

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 40 0.01
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation. dredging- flooding- drainage hnikhearlc Pt!`
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma
) Name of Waterbodv

(if applicable)
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, es
[nary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc.) Area of

Impact
(acres)
N/A

Total Open Water Impact (acres)
6. List the cumulative imnact to all Waterc of the IT C rem,ltina frnm the r.r,,;P?+•
St
res): 0.01
hupact
Wcres): p
a
Oct (acres):
Toaters of the U S(acres) 1
Toct (linear feet): 40
7. Isolated' Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ® No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USAGE.
8. Pond Creation
Page 5 of 9
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related,to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. The temporary barge access is
needed to accommodate barge access for the removal of the bridge bents The temporarv barge
access has been located so that it does not impact an unnamed tributarv (UT) to Yadkin River
and so that it does not impact a public boat launch The NCDOT's "Best Management Practices
for Bridge Demoliton" will be adhered to
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
Page 6 of 9

If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/stnngide.html.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
As the impacts are temporary no mitigation is warranted
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.erir.state.nc.us/wip/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
I . Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ® No ?
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ® No ?
Page 7 of 9
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ® No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ? No ?
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 1.5
Total
c.ouc I cucuus uur w reef perpenmcwar room the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 213.0242 or.0244, or.0260.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level.The MOA outlines proposed action to construct a
sidewalk with curb and gutter alone the southern side of East Market Street (US 268)an
d
proposes stairs from East Market Street down to Main Street
Page 8 of 9
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ndwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
The project is for the removal of Bridge No 338 only. No new structure is to be constructed
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
Biological Conclusions of No Effect are given for Schweinitz's sunflower (Helianthus
schweinitzii) - habitat present but no plants presen (surveyed 10/15/07)and small whorled
pogonia (Isotria medeoloides) - no habitat present No Biological Conclusion is required for the
bog turtle (Glyptemys muhlenbergii)

Z •Z310
Applicant/Agerit's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 9 of 9
D. Special Proiect Information:
The estimated costs, based on 2008 prices, are as follows:
Alternative 1
Bridge Removal $1,410,000
Roadway/Miscellaneous Const. 241,000
Miscellaneous & Mobilization 190,000
Engineering and Contingencies 284,000
Total Construction Cost $2,125,000
Temporary Construction Easements 108,000
Utilities 92,000
Total $2,325,000
Bridge Demolition: Bridge No. 338 includes a superstructure composed of reinforced
concrete and steel truss. The substructure is composed of concrete piers including one
mass concrete pier (in-water) which.may result in cumulative temporary fill of
approximately 150 cubic yards.
Alternatives Discussion:
Do-nothing -- The do-nothing alternative is not consistent with the proposed action's
purpose and need since it does not do anything to prevent the continual deterioration of
the bridge and prevent debris from falling on the pedestrians, vehicular traffic, Yakin
Valley Railroad and into the Yadkin River. The do-nothing alternative, while avoiding
impacts to the eligible resources, is not considered to be an environmentally sensitive and
a prudent solution.
An option of limiting the bridge to pedestrian traffic was reviewed, however it will
require extensive repairs to make the bridge structurally sound and eliminate hazards to
vehicles and pedestrians from falling concrete. This option would require ownership of
the bridge be transferred to one of the two municipalities, which they have declined due
to the cost. The extensive repair cost, continual maintenance cost and the liability are
major concerns for the State and municipalities
Rehabilitation - The existing bridge is both structurally and geometrically deficient and
the general condition of the bridge is rated poor. The sufficiency rating in 2005 was only
2 out of a possible 100 when it was closed to vehicular traffic. Rehabilitation of the
existing bridge is not feasible because of the very poor condition of the concrete
superstructure and steel truss. The bridge is a fracture critical structure due to the truss
and is subject to collapse in the event of vehicular impact. Due to the overall deterioration
of the bridge members, hazards to vehicles and pedestrians posed by falling debris, the
fact that the truss spans are fracture critical and unprotected from vehicular impacts, a
prudent course of action would be to remove the bridge. The rehabilitation alternative,
while avoiding impacts to the eligible resources, is not considered to be a feasible and
prudent solution.
Bridge Removal (preferred) - The proposed action is to remove Bridge No. 338 which
was removed from the functional road system in 2005. Vehicular access has been
removed for over three years and the community has already adjusted and is functioning
with out this facility. The traffic that once traveled on Bridge No. 338 now travels across
Bridge No. 21 on US 21 Business (Bridge Street) approximately 715 feet downstream.
Bridge No. 21, built in 1971, has the capacity to accommodate the increased traffic
between Jonesville and Elkin. Bridge No. 21 is a four lane facility (two lanes in each
direction) with three-foot sidewalks on both sides. '
NCDOT's Division 11 Office concurs with the removal of Bridge No. 338 and the
proposed mitigation measures.
Other Agency Comments:
The N.C. Division of Water Quality had no special concerns for this project
Comment: The Town of Elkin had the opportunity to review the proposed stairs and
landscape plan and in a letter dated April 14, 2008 (attached) requested the following:
1. The existing gabion (in the northeast quadrant) is unsightly and will not complement
the proposed work plan. We would like to see additional work in this area with possibly
a more permanent structure that shows the continuity of the proposed stairs and supports.
2. There is an active skateboarding community in Elkin. The railings and banisters, as
proposed, present a "welcoming" venue for skateboarders to potential deface, scar, and
turn into an unsightly area. We request consideration in the final design of the
railings/banisters to discourage or complicate this activity from occurring.
3. Due to the historic nature of the bridge and the surrounding historic district, we would
like to see as much of the existing bridge concrete railing to be utilized in the proposed
plan as is possible.
4. As a reminder of the existing bridge, we would like to see a plaque at the top and
bottom of the stairs briefly describing its history and years in operation.
5. The Town of Elkin would like to sit down with NC DOT staff to review the final
project plan prior to it going out to bid. As the responsible party following the
completion of the project, we would like to feel comfortable with the plan we will be
maintaining in the future. Furthermore, it would be helpful if NC DOT staff, at this
meeting, could present a proposed schedule along with proposed costs to the Town for
the maintenance of this area for our future budgetary considerations.
6. We understand trees will need to be removed in and around Crater Park for the
demolition project and request for NCDOT to replace these trees following the
completion of the project.
Response: NCDOT, FHWA, the State Historic Preservation Office (HPO) and the
Town of Elkin will coordinate efforts to mitigate the effects that will be generated by the
removal of the historic Bridge No. 338. These measures of mitigation are included in the
MOA and Final Section 4(f) evaluation which include the following:
1. Photorecordation: Prior to the initiation of construction, NCDOT will record the
existing condition of Bridge No. 338 and its surroundings within the Downtown Elkin
Historic District in accordance with the Historic Structures and Landscape Recordation
Plan attached in the MOA.
11. Construction of a Stairway, Terrace, and Landscaping: A stairway, terrace, and
landscaping will be constructed between East Market Street and Main Street after the
removal of Bridge No. 338. The final design will be agreed upon by NCDOT, SHPO, and
the Town of Elkin. The stairway will incorporate the following elements:
1. NCDOT will retain ownership of the right-of-way in the location of the stairway.
2. The Town of Elkin will be responsible for all future maintenance of the stairway,
terrace, landscaping, and lighting.
3. The historic cobblestones located west of the existing bridge between Main Street and
East Market Street will be preserved in place.
4. The existing gabion walls will be covered with a finish that matches that of the
proposed terrace wall.
5. The Town of Elkin will purchase lampposts, as well as a bench, for the terrace that
match those existing in Downtown Elkin. NCDOT will install the lampposts and
bench during construction of the stairway. NCDOT will reimburse the Town of Elkin
for actual costs.
6. NCDOT will design and produce an interpretive panel presenting the historical and
architectural significance of Bridge No. 338 and its relationship to the Downtown
Elkin Historic District.
(i) More specifically, NCDOT will research and design the interpretive panel,
provide funding for fabrication of the panel, and install the panel on the terrace.
The Town of Elkin will be responsible for maintaining the panel once it is in
place.
(ii) Prior to fabrication of the interpretive panel, NCDOT shall afford the SHPO and
the Town of Elkin an opportunity to review and comment on the panel. If no
comments are received within thirty (30) days of confirmed receipt, NCDOT may
assume that the reviewing parties do not object to the proposed design. Should
any of these parties have questions about or comments on such plans and
specifications, NCDOT shall consult with that parry and, if necessary, with all
consulting parties to address questions and comments.
(iii)The interpretive panel will be installed within three (3) years of the execution of
the let date of TIP No. B-4820.
7. Construction of the stairway, terrace, and landscaping will be completed within two
(2) years of the execution of the let date for TIP Project B-4820.
3. Should changes to the stairway, terrace, and landscaping design, as shown in Figures
4A and 4B, become necessary, NCDOT will submit changes to SHPO and the Town
of Elkin for their review and comment.
III. Access to Crater Park facilities will be maintained during construction by use of a
temporary access road from Standard Street. The area will be returned to the current
condition upon completion of the bridge removal.
IV. Landscaped trees within the park boundary that are removed for the demolition of
the bridge will be replaced.
Comment: The Town of Jonesville requested that a pedestrian bridge be constructed to
link the greenways of both Towns.
Response: There are currently no sidewalks or greenways down to the Bridge No. 338 in
Jonesville. The existing Bridge No. 21 on US 21 Business provides sidewalks on both
sides of the bridge for pedestrian access to both Towns. US 21 Business is a curb and
gutter facility and could accommodate any future sidewalks leading to Bridge No. 21. A
pedestrian bridge is not considered part of this project.
Public Involvemeut:
A letter was sent by the Location & Surveys Unit to all property owners affected directly
by this project. Property owners were invited to comment.
A newsletter was sent to all those in the project study area in December 2007 and the
Tribune (local newspaper) have featured several articles about the bridge removal.
Three comments have been received to date including concerns of historic nature and
delays on US 21 Business caused by the railroad switching yard.
Responses to the. citizens concerns were sent identifying the condition of the bridge and
that the State Historic, Preservation Office is working with NCDOT to address the
adverse effect that will be caused by the removal of the historic structure. NCDOT has
developed plans to extensively landscape the area over which the bridge passed while
preserving the historic cobbled street and pedestrian access.
Shifting the traffic to US 21 Business introduced delays due to an at-grade railroad
crossing and a railroad switching yard just east of the crossing. Before and since the
closing of the Bridge No. 338, NCDOT has worked closely with the towns and the
Yadkin Valley Railroad to move the railroad-switching yard to a location east of Elkin.
The funding has been approved and construction on the switching yard relocation should
be completed by 2009. Moving the switching yard will minimize traffic delays at the
crossing. Several alternative locations for a new bridge have been investigated for a
future project to cross the Yadkin River and provide improved access when warranted
between Elkin and Jonesville.
Based on no additional communication requested, a Citizen's Informational Workshop
was determined unnecessary.
E. Threshold Criteria
The following evaluation of threshold criteria must be completed for Type II actions
ECOLOGICAL YES NO
(1) Will the project have a substantial impact on any
unique or important natural resource? X
(2) Does the project involve habitat where federally
listed endangered or threatened species may occur? X
(3) Will the project affect anadromous fish? ?
X
(4) If the project involves wetlands, is the amount of
permanent and/or temporary wetland taking less than
one-tenth (1/10) of an acre and have all practicable measures

to avoid and minimize wetland takings been evaluated?
X ?
(5) Will the project require the use of U. S. Forest Service lands? ?
X
(6) Will the quality of adjacent water resources be adversely
impacted by proposed construction activities? X
(7) Does the project involve waters classified as Outstanding Water ?
Resources (OWR) and/or High Quality Waters (HQW)? X
(8) Will the project require fill in waters of the United States
in any of the designated mountain trout counties? X
(9) Does the project involve any known underground storage
tanks (UST's) or hazardous materials sites? I
8

YES NO
PERMITS AND COORDINATION
(10) If the project is located within a CAMA county, will the
project significantly affect the coastal zone and/or any
71
"Area of Environmental Concern" (AEC)? X
(11) Does the project involve Coastal Barrier Resources Act

resources? ?
X
(12) Will a U. S. Coast Guard permit be required? ?
X
(13) Will the project result in the modification of any existing

regulatory floodway? ?
g
(14) Will the project require any stream relocations or channel

changes? ?
X

SOCIAL, ECONOMIC. AND CULTURAL RESOURCES YES NO

(15) Will the project induce substantial impacts to planned

growth or land use for the area? ?
g
(16) Will the project require the relocation of any family or

business? ?
X
(17) Will the project have a disproportionately high and adverse
human health and environmental effect on any minority or

low-income population? ?
X
(18) If the project involves the acquisition of right of way, is the

amount of right of way acquisition considered minor? ?
X
(19) Will the project involve any changes in access control? ?
X

(20) Will the project substantially alter the usefulness

and/or land use of adjacent property? ?
X
(21) Will the project have an adverse effect on permanent

local traffic patterns or community cohesiveness? ?
X
(22) Is the project included in an approved thoroughfare plan
and/or Transportation Improvement Program (and is,

therefore, in conformance with the Clean Air Act of 1990)? ?
X
(23) Is the project anticipated to cause an increase in traffic

volumes? ?
X
9

(24) Will traffic be maintained during construction using existing ?
roads, staged construction, or on-site detours? X
(25) If the project is a bridge replacement project, will the bridge
be replaced at its existing location (along the existing facility)
and will all construction proposed in association with the ?
bridge replacement project be contained on the existing facility? N/A
(26) Is there substantial controversy on social, economic, or
environmental grounds concerning the project? ? X
(27) Is the project consistent with all Federal, State, and local laws

relating to the environmental aspects of the project? ?
X
(28) Will the project have an "effect" on structures/properties
eligible for or listed on the National Register of Historic Places? 7X
(29) Will the project affect any archaeological remains which are

important to history or pre-history? ?
g
(30) Will the project require the use of Section 4(f) resources
(public parks, recreation lands, wildlife and waterfowl refuges,
historic sites, or historic bridges, as defined in Section 4(f)
of the U. S. Department of Transportation Act of 1966)? ?X
(31) Will the project result in any conversion of assisted public
recreation sites or facilities to non-recreation uses, as defined
by Section 6(f) of the Land and Water Conservation Act

of 1965, as amended? ?
X
(32) Will the project involve construction in, across, or adjacent
to a river designated as a component of or proposed for
inclusion in the National System of Wild and Scenic Rivers? ? X
Additional Documentation Required for Unfavorable Responses in Part E
Response to Question 2: Suitable habitat for Schweinitz's sunflower is present in the project
study area along roadside shoulders. Surveys were conducted by NCDOT biologists throughout
areas of suitable habitat on October 15, 2007. No individuals of Schweinitz's sunflower were
observed. Potential habitat was observed to be overgrown with kudzu. A review of NCNHP
records, updated September 28, 2007, indicates no known occurrences within 1.0 mile of the
study area. The biological conclusion is "No Effect."
Response to Question 8: Per the NCWRC letter dated February 11, 2008, the Yadkin River is
not a NCWRC trout stream and there are no moratoria for the project.
Response to Question 9: The Geographical Information System (GIS) was consulted to identify
known sites of concern in the project study area. NCDOT Geotechnical Engineering Unit
conducted a field reconnaissance along SR 1190/1402 on January 15, 2008. Seven (7) possible
10
UST facilities, one auto repair shop, and the railroad yard were identified within the project
study area (Figure 5). All sites are anticipated to present low geoenvironmental impacts to the
project. NCDOT's Geotechnical Engineering Unit will provide soil and groundwater
assessments on each of the sites within the project construction limits (Sites 1 thru 4) prior to
construction authorization.
Response to Question 28: The Historic Preservation Office (HPO) reviewed the subject project
and determined that surveys were required (see letter dated November 29, 2007). The area of
potential effects was surveyed in January 2008. All structures within the area of potential effects
were photographed, and later reviewed by NCDOT architectural historians and staff at the HPO.
The Elkin Historic District and Bridge No. 338 were identified as listed on the National Register
of Historic Places. In the attached concurrence form dated January 28, 2008, it was agreed that
the project will have an "Adverse Effect". The attached Memorandum of Agreement identifies
the proposed mitigation agreed upon between NCDOT, HPO, and the Town of Elkin.
Response to Question 30: Within the project area, there are two historic resources (Downtown
Elkin Historic District and Bridge No. 338) and one publicly owned recreational facility (Crater
Park) that qualify as Section 4(I) resources. The Section 4(f) resources could not be avoided by
the proposed bridge removal. Bridge No. 338 is included in Downtown Elkin Historic District
and Crater Park is located on both sides of the bridge near the Yadkin River. The Historic
District will be impacted since Bridge No. 338 will be removed from the district. During the
Section 106 coordination with the Historic Preservation Office, the removal of Bridge No. 338
was determined to have an "adverse effect" (see attached concurrence form) on the Historic
District and Bridge No. 338. The Town of Elkin considers the removal of the bridge as "no
effect" to Crater Park and its functionality (see attached letter dated April 14, 2008). The Final
Section 4(1) Evaluation document is attached.
G. CE Approval
TIP Project No. B-4820
W.B.S. No. 38590.1.1
Federal Project No. BRZ-1190(2)
Proiect Description:
The proposed project will remove the structurally deficient Bridge No. 338 in
Surry/Yadkin Counties over the Yadkin River on SR 1190 which was closed in
December 2005 (Figure 1). Upon removal of the bridge, a sidewalk with curb and
gutter will be constructed along the southern side of East Market Street (US 268) in
Elkin, as the street crosses SR 1190 (Gwyn Avenue). Curb cuts will be constructed in
this sidewalk at the southeastern and southwestern corners of the intersection of US 268
and SR 1190, in accordance with ADA and AASHTO standards. A barrier will be
placed at the southern end in Jonesville to prevent vehicles and pedestrians from
traversing onto the Yadkin River bank from the roadway. A temporary roadway from
Standard Street will provide access to Crater Park during the demolition of Bridge No.
338. Mitigation measures proposed for the adverse effect to the Elkin Historic District
and the removal of the historic bridge include a proposed stairway, terrace and
landscaping design (Figures 4A and 413) between East Market Street and Main Street as
agreed upon in the Memorandum of Agreement (attached).
Categorical Exclusion Action Classification:
TYPE II(A)
X TYPE II(B)
Approved:
Date Bridge Project Development Engineer
Project Development & Environmental Analysis Branch
Date Project Engineer
Project Development & Environmental Analysis Branch
Date Project Planning Engineer
Project Development & Environmental Analysis Branch
For Type II(B) projects only:
Date
Federal Highway
12
PROJECT. COMMITMENTS:
Surry/Yadkin Counties
Bridge No. 338 (Hugh B. Chatham Bridge) on SR 1190/1402
Over the Yadkin River
Federal-Aid Project No. BRZ-1190(2)
WBS No. 38590.1.1
T.I.P. No. B-4820
All Design Groups/PDEA/Division Resident Construction Engineer -
The measures developed to mitigate adverse effects to the Downtown Elkin Historic
District due to the removal of a contributing resource, Bridge No. 338, include:
1. Photorecordation: Prior to the initiation of construction, NCDOT will record the
existing condition of Bridge No. 338 and its surroundings within the Downtown
Elkin Historic District in accordance with the Historic Structures and Landscape
Recordation Plan attached in the MOA.
II. Construction of a Stairway, Terrace, and Landscaping: A stairway, terrace, and
landscaping will be constructed between East Market Street and Main Street after
the removal of Bridge No. 338. The final design will be agreed upon by NCDOT,
SHPO, and the Town of Elkin. The stairway will incorporate the following
elements:
1. NCDOT will retain ownership of the right-of-way in the location of the stairway.
2. The Town of Elkin will be responsible for all future maintenance of the stairway,
terrace, landscaping, and lighting.
3. The historic cobblestones located west of the existing bridge between Main
Street and East Market Street will be preserved in place.
4. The existing gabion walls will be covered with a finish that matches that of the
proposed terrace wall.
5. The Town of Elkin will purchase lampposts, as well as a bench, for the terrace
that match those existing in Downtown Elkin. NCDOT will install the lampposts
and bench during construction of the stairway. NCDOT will reimburse the Town
of Elkin for actual costs.
6. NCDOT will design and produce an interpretive panel presenting the historical
and architectural significance of Bridge No. 338 and its relationship to the
Downtown Elkin Historic District.
(i) More specifically, NCDOT will research and design the interpretive panel,
provide funding for fabrication of the panel, and install the panel on the terrace.
The Town of Elkin will be responsible for maintaining the panel once it is in
place.
(ii) Prior to fabrication of the interpretive panel, NCDOT shall afford the
SHPO and the Town of Elkin an opportunity to review and comment on the
panel. If no comments are received within thirty (30) days of confirmed receipt,
NCDOT may assume that the reviewing parties do not object to the proposed
design. Should any of these parties have questions about or comments on such
Programmatic Categorical Exclusion Page 1 of 2
Green Sheet
February 2009
plans and specifications, NCDOT shall consult with that party and, if necessary,
with all consulting parties to address questions and comments.
(iii) The interpretive panel will be installed within three (3) years of the
execution of the let date of TIP No. B-4820.
7. Construction of the stairway, terrace, and landscaping will be completed within
two (2) years of the execution of the let date for TIP Project B-4820.
8. Should changes to the stairway, terrace, and landscaping design, as shown in
Figures 4A and 413, become necessary, NCDOT will submit changes to SHPO
and the Town of Elkin for their review and comment.
III. Unanticipated Discovery: In accordance with 36 CFR 800.11(a), if NCDOT
identifies additional cultural resource(s) during construction and determines them
to be eligible for the NRHP, all work will be halted within the limits of the NRHP-
eligible resource(s) and the FHWA and SHPO contacted. If after consultation with
the Signatory and Concurring Party(ies) additional mitigation is determined
necessary, the NCDOT, in consultation with the Signatory and Concurring
Party(ies), will develop and implement appropriate protection/mitigation measures
for the resource(s). Inadvertent or accidental discovery of human remains will be
handled in accordance with North Carolina General Statutes 65 and 70.
Roadway Design/ Division Resident Construction Engineer
Access to Crater Park facilities will be maintained during construction by use of a
temporary access road from Standard Street. The temporary access road will be returned
to its original condition upon completion of the bridge removal.
Roadside Environmental Unit
Landscaped trees within the park boundary that are removed for the demolition of the
bridge will be replaced.
Roadway Design/ Roadside Environment Unit/Program Development Branch
A municipal agreement will be prepared clarifying that the land will remain NCDOT's
and that the proposed stairs; terrace and landscaping will be maintained by the Town of
Elkin. The Town of Elkin will purchase the lighting and benches as denoted on the
proposed plan for continuity with their existing lighting and benches in Downtown Elkin
and will be reimbursed by NCDOT for the actual costs.
GeoEnvironmental Section
Soil and groundwater assessments will be prepared on each of the sites within the project
construction limits (Sites 1 thru 4) prior to right of way acquisition.
Programmatic Categorical Exclusion Page 2 of 2
Green Sheet
February 2009
Surry/Yadkin Counties
Bridge No. 338 (Hugh B. Chatham Bridge) on SR 1190/1402
Over the Yadkin River
Federal-Aid Project No. BRZ-1190(2)
WBS No. 38590.1.1
T.I.P. No. B-4820
FINAL SECTION 4(F) EVALUATION
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
AND
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
APPROVED:
DATE Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
Environmental Management Director
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch. NCDOT
DATE John F. Sullivan, III, P.E.
Division Administrator
Federal Highway Administration
DRAFT SECTION 4M EVALUATION
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) in coordination with the Federal
Highway Administration (FHWA) proposes to remove Bridge No 338 (Hugh B. Chatham
Bridge). Bridge No. 338 is located within a historic district and a recreation facility. The
historic district is on the National Register of Historic Places and the recreation facility is a
publicly owned park both of which require an evaluation in accordance with Section 4(f) of the
US Department of Transportation Act of 1966 and the federal regulations 23 CRF 771.135.
The intent of the Section 4(f) legislation is to preserve the natural beauty of the countryside; the
general provisions state that "the Secretary (of the US Department of Transportation) shall not
approve any ... project ... which requires the use of any publicly owned land from a public park,
recreation area, or wildlife and waterfowl refuge of national, State, or local significance as
determined by the Federal, State, or local officials having jurisdiction thereof, or any land from .
an historic site of national, State, or local significance as so determined by such officials unless
(1) there is no feasible and prudent alternative to the use of such land, and (2) such program
includes all possible planning to minimize harm..."
1.1. PURPOSE AND NEED
The purpose of this project is to remove Bridge No. 338 on SR 1190/SR 1402 (Gwyn Avenue)
over the Yadkin River in Surry/Yadkin Counties, North Carolina (Figure 1). Bridge No. 338,
constructed in 1931, also spans over Main Street, Yadkin Valley Railroad, Standard Street,
Monroe Street, and Crater Park within the Town of Elkin and its southern approach is within the
Town of Jonesville. Bridge No. 338 is 1509 feet in length consisting of concrete superstructure
and substructure and utilizes steel overhead trusses for spans over the Yadkin River. In addition
to crossing over, several town streets, several railroad tracks, a park, and the river, there are
several buildings that are in proximity to the bridge.
The bridge was closed to vehicular traffic in December 2005 because of the overall deterioration
of the bridge steel and concrete components. All traffic between the Towns of Elkin and
n- 04u rtnai aecnon 4(t) Hvaluation
Jonesville use US 21 Business (Bridge Street) approximately 725 feet downstream or US 21/1-77
approximately 1.5 miles upstream to cross the Yadkin River. In 2005 Bridge No. 338 had a
sufficiency rating of 2 out of a possible 100 and because of the structural deficiency and
operational inadequacy of the existing bridge the removal of the bridge was deemed eligible for
FHWA's Highway Bridge Program.
Removal of the bridge improves safety for pedestrians and vehicles due to falling concrete and
removes the potential for debris to fall into the Yadkin River as the bridge continues to
deteriorate. The proposed removal of Bridge No. 338 will impact Section 4(f) resources
associated with Crater Park. Bridge No. 338, and the Downtown Elkin Historic District.
1.2. PROPOSED ACTION
The proposed project includes the removal of Bridge No. 338, proposes a sidewalk with curb
and gutter along the southern side of East Market Street (US 268) as the street crosses SR 1190
(Gwyn Avenue) and proposes stairs from East Market Street down to Main Street. Curb cuts are
proposed in the sidewalk at the southeastern and southwestern comers of the intersection of
East Market Street and Gwyn Avenue, in accordance with ADA and AASHTO standards. A
barrier is proposed at the northern end of SR 1402 in Jonesville to prevent vehicles and
pedestrians from traversing onto the Yadkin River bank.
No relocations of business or residence and no right-of-way are proposed. Temporary
construction easement will vary on both sides of the existing bridge for the bridge removal.
Monroe Street will be closed to the public during demolition. A temporary roadway is proposed
from Standard Street to the existing canoe launch access road to provide access to Crater Park.
The temporary access road will be removed and the ground returned to its original condition
upon completion of the project.
15-4820 htnal Section 4(0 Evaluation
1.3. DESCRIPTION OF SECTION 4(F) RESOURCES
Within the project area, there are two historic resources and one publicly owned recreational
facility that qualify as Section 4(f) resources. As shown on Figure 2 these resources include:
• Downtown Elkin Historic District
• Bridge No. 338
• Crater Park
The Section 4(f) resources could not be avoided by the proposed bridge removal. Bridge
No. 338 is included in Downtown Elkin Historic District and Crater Park is located on both sides
of the bridge near the.river. The Historic District will be impacted since Bridge No. 338 will be
removed from the district. During the Section 106 coordination with the Historic Preservation
Office, the removal of Bridge No. 338 was determined to have an "adverse effect" (see attached
concurrence form) on the Historic District and Bridge No. 338. The Town of Elkin considers
the removal of the bridge as no effect to Crater Park and its functionality (see attached letter
dated April 14, 2008).
Downtown Elkin Historic District
The Downtown Elkin Historic District was listed in the National Register under Criterion A in
the area of commerce and Criterion C in the area of architecture. Bounded by Market Street, the
Hugh G. Chatham Bridge (Bridge No. 338), Standard Street. and Front Street. The district
contains seventy-two buildings and two structures, with a majority of the buildings dating from
1890-1950. Pivotal to the development and growth of downtown Elkin, the arrival of the Yadkin
Valley Railroad in 1890 brought increased opportunity for trade and better access to markets.
The district constitutes the historic core of Elkin's commercial center and is significant in the
area of commerce for being the place where commerce thrived in the town. As well, the district .
is significant in the area of architecture as a collection of commercial buildings representative of
styles popular from the late nineteenth century through the mid-twentieth century.
B-4820 Final Section 4(f) Evaluation
Hugh G. Chatham Bridge (Bridge No. 338)
Spanning the Yadkin River between Elkin, Surry_County and Jonesville, Yadkin County, this
1509 foot long, concrete and steel truss bridge was erected in 1931 as State Project No. 7960.
Bridge No. 338, a contributing resource to the historic district, was named in honor of Hugh
Gwyn Chatham, president of Chatham Manufacturing Company, who died in 1929. The bridge
consists of concrete pier under-supports, a two-lane road flanked by arcaded concrete guardrails,
and two camelback trusses. A sidewalk runs along the west side of the bridge. At each end, the
concrete guardrails curve outward at each entrance to the span. Two sets of concrete steps lead
from the bridge down to the north and south sides of East Main Street in Elkin.
Crater Park
Crater Park, located along the north bank of the Yadkin River and on both side of Bridge
No. 338, is owned and operated as a municipal park by the Town of Elkin. Crater Park consists
of approximately 6.5 acres of landscaped open space, a versatile soft ball and soccer field, and a
canoe launch facility to the Yadkin River.
1.4 AVOIDANCE ALTERNATIVES
Three alternatives that avoid impacting the historic district or the public park were evaluated
below.
a. Do-Nothing
The do-nothing alternative is not consistent with the proposed action's purpose and need
since it does nothing to prevent the continual deterioration of the bridge and prevent
debris from falling on the pedestrians, vehicular traffic, Yakin Valley Railroad and into
the Yadkin River. The do-nothing alternative, while avoiding impacts to the eligible
resources, is not considered to be an environmentally sensitive and prudent solution.
B-4820 Final Section 4(f) Evaluation 4
b. Rehabilitation
The existing bridge is both structurally and geometrically deficient and the general
condition of the bridge is rated poor. The sufficiency rating in 2005 was only 2 out of a
possible 100 when it was closed to vehicular traffic. Rehabilitation of the existing bridge
is not feasible because of the very poor condition of the concrete superstructure and steel
truss. The bridge is a fracture critical structure due to the truss and is subject to collapse
in the event of vehicular impact. Due to the overall deterioration of the bridge members,
hazards to vehicles and pedestrians posed by falling debris, the fact that the truss spans
are fracture critical and unprotected from vehicular impacts, a prudent course of action
would be to remove the bridge. The rehabilitation alternative, while avoiding impacts to
the eligible resources, is not considered to be a feasible and prudent solution.
C. Retain for Pedestrian Use
An option of limiting the bridge to pedestrian traffic was reviewed, however it will
require extensive repairs to make the bridge structurally sound and eliminate hazards to
vehicles and pedestrians from falling concrete. This option would require ownership of
the bridge be transferred to one of the two municipalities, which they have declined due
to the cost. The extensive repair cost, continual maintenance cost and the liability are
major concerns for the State and municipalities.
1.5. IMPACT ON THE SECTION 4(F) PROPERTIES
The removal of Bridge No. 338 impacts the historic resources because the bridge is within the
Downtown Elkin Historic District and the bridge is eligible for the National Register of Historic
Places.
The proposed bridge removal will not affect the functionality of the Crater Park.
B-4820 Final Section 4(0 Evaluation

No relocations of business or residence and no right-of-way are proposed. Temporary
construction easement will vary on both sides of the existing bridge for the removal of the
bridge.
1.6 MEASURES TO MINIMIZE HARM
The following measures have been developed through coordination between the NCDOT,
FHWA, the State Historic Preservation Office (HPO), and the Town of Elkin to mitigate adverse
affects created by the removal of Bridge No. 338, a National Register eligible resource, from the
Downtown Elkin Historic District and the publicly owned and operated Crater Park.
A. Measures to mitigate adverse effects to the Downtown Elkin Historic District and Bridge
No. 338 are documented in the attached Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) include:
I. Photorecordation: Prior to the initiation of construction, NCDOT will record the existing
condition of Bridge No. 338 and its surroundings within the Downtown Elkin Historic
District in accordance with the Historic Structures and Landscape Recordation Plan
attached in the MOA.
II. Construction of a Stairway, Terrace, and Landscaping: A stairway, terrace, and
landscaping will be constructed between East Market Street and Main Street after the
removal of Bridge No. 338. The final design will be agreed upon by NCDOT, SHPO, and
the Town of Elkin. The stairway will incorporate the following elements:
1. NCDOT will retain ownership of the right-of-way in the location of the stairway.
2. The Town of Elkin will be responsible for all future maintenance of the stairway,
terrace, landscaping, and lighting.
3. The historic cobblestones located west of the existing bridge between Main Street and
East Market Street will be preserved in place.
4. The existing gabion walls will be covered with a finish that matches that of the
proposed terrace wall.
5. The Town of Elkin will purchase lampposts, as well as a bench, for the terrace that
match those existing in Downtown Elkin. NCDOT will install the lampposts and
bench during construction of the stairway. NCDOT will reimburse the Town of Elkin
for actual costs.
is-1462u hinal 6ecnon 4(t) Evaluation
6
6. NCDOT will design and produce an interpretive panel presenting the historical and
architectural significance of Bridge No. 338 and its relationship to the Downtown
Elkin Historic District.
(i) More specifically, NCDOT will research and design the interpretive panel,
provide funding for fabrication of the panel, and install the panel on the terrace.
The Town of Elkin will be responsible for maintaining the panel once it is in
place.
(ii) Prior to fabrication of the interpretive panel, NCDOT shall afford the SHPO and
the Town of Elkin an opportunity to review and comment on the panel. If no
comments are received within thirty (30) days of confirmed receipt, NCDOT may
assume that the reviewing parties do not object to the proposed design. Should
any of these parties have questions about or comments on such plans and
specifications, NCDOT shall consult with that party and, if necessary; with all
consulting parties to address questions and comments.
(iii)The interpretive panel will be installed within three (3) years of the execution of
. the let date of TIP No. B-4820.
7. Construction of the stairway, terrace, and landscaping will be completed within two
(2) years of the execution of the let date for TIP Project B-4820.
8. Should changes to the stairway, terrace, and landscaping design, as shown in Figures
4A and 4B, become necessary, NCDOT will submit changes to SHPO and the Town
of Elkin for their review and comment.
III. Unanticipated Discovery: In accordance with 36 CFR 800.11(a), if NCDOT identifies
additional cultural resource(s) during construction and determine them to be eligible for
the NRHP, all work will be halted within the limits of the NRHP-eligible resource(s) and
the FHWA and SHPO contacted. If after consultation with the Signatory and Concurring
Party(ies) additional mitigation is determined necessary, the NCDOT, in consultation
with the Signatory and Concurring Party(ies), will develop and implement appropriate
protection/mitigation measures for the resource(s). Inadvertent or accidental discovery of
human remains will be handled in accordance with North Carolina General Statutes 65
and 70.
B-4820 Final Section 4(f) Evaluation
B. Access to Crater Park facilities will be maintained during construction by use of a temporary
access road from Standard Street. The area will be returned to the current condition upon
completion of the bridge removal.
C. Landscaped trees within the park boundary that are removed for the demolition of the bridge
will be replaced.
D. Handicap Accessibility: Two sets of concrete steps that lead from the bridge down to the
north and south sides of East Main Street in Elkin will be removed with the bridge. A
handicap accessible ramp was considered to provide access between the East Market Street
and Main Street; however there is not enough space to ramp down from East Market Street to
Main Street in accordance with ADA standards without taking additional right-of-way within
the historic district and the removal of the original cobble stones west of the bridge between
the streets. Handicap accessibility is provided by the existing sidewalks along the north side
of East Market Street to the intersection with Main Street as shown on Figure 2. A sidewalk
with handicap accessibility is proposed along East Market Street on the south side to connect
the existing sidewalks on either side of the bridge entrance.
1.7 COORDINATION
The proposed project was coordinated with the Town of Elkin, FHWA, and HPO. A survey of
historic architectural resources was conducted in the area of potential effect of the project, in
accordance with Section 106 of the Historic Preservation Act.
The Section 106 determination of effect coordination with the State Historic Preservation Officer
(SHPO) indicated that the project will have an "adverse effect" on the Historic District and
Bridge No. 338. A concurrence form documenting the SHPO's concurrence of the effect on the
National Register properties is included in the Appendix of this document.
Avoidance alternatives were considered for the project and were determined not to be feasible
for the project because they did not meet the purpose and need for the project or were not
considered prudent based on the deteriorated condition of Bridge No. 338. Measures to
minimize harm to the Historic district were coordinated with the SHPO and the Town of Elkin
B-4820 Final Section 4(f) Evaluation - 8
and included in the design decisions to provide the stairs and terrace from East Market Street to
Main Street
A letter from the town's officials supporting the proposed action is included. The Town of Elkin
accepts the proposed action and mitigation measures as proposed. In accordance with
Section 106 of the National Preservation Act, since the project has an adverse effect on the
Downtown Elkin Historic District and Bridge No. 338, NCDOT has entered into a Memorandum
of Agreement with the HPO and FHWA, the Town of Elkin, and the Advisory Council on
Historic Preservation (ACHP). The FHWA and SHPO have accepted the MCA included in the
Appendix of this document.
The proposed action includes all possible planning to minimize harm to Crater Park, the Historic
District and Bridge No. 338 resulting from such use.
B-4820 Final Section 4(f) Evaluation
Eue?
1112
A-, ?{ { 1138. \
u ?
nu ?, ? X13
/gyp" ?.`• ?, P?, - \
Y Y FY fi{V f t .? ?? \
a,v
t y
? IY't3 i t ? 'y y+{
a y
rv I I ?
??9an 0 - I ' ? h ? rv ,: r I
servov . +. H95
: ? is _ ave q{U 1 1
V qr ? bA.- 51 ? '? 1 y
Z m \ ®,'. \
r a ? { ?? It sr j?..V 3i \ '. ate ^-'r "x
O i- 5 'F ? C `#? 4 ry J'(r'r? '-s E l ?? i t ?Y yT .
v { BURRY F 3,'t ?; ELK1T1'f
r I1S0: ,z Jfi, s c s..a e a?,li -r ? reyF T ? X?
cn AAMA 000NTY 'L } ly
J ?;, + s ? a 14 :?
, 4r
i,LTM e by ni L , '.t fi I r \
fi
? 4 + t Irr?e '
g?1,'?' yy-eus
, H1B ? _v h4 ? l y 1'1a ?g (ins Y N ? r _ - xr '"
hi .y a i
4
14
soy ,<o2 END PROD
.1so, 3;'3+E7 18?d1 11 Ck K0-)£
Y
?rMJONESUIL?
-.O
a'k?nK \
1389 CO U N 1 I VW,3
m(..??''t?-??A, ° e+•
ARLI TON ,`
1388 yk's' ?" nsd139 4 ,'
$,•3MF
1388 1' ? _
"4l?Y . 3v
i . eonnW °iy? NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
¢y\ TRANSPORTATION
F J..y, a DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT S'
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH
SURRY-YADKIN COUNTIES
BRIDGE No. 338 ON SR 1190-1402
OVER THE YADKIN RIVER
B-4820
Figure ]
B4820 Figure 3-A
West side of steel truss bridge section
Looking south across bridge at E. Market Street and SR 1190 intersection
B-4820 Figure 3-B
Looking west as Bridge No. 338 crosses over Main Street.
Looking at east side of bridge as it crosses over Yadkin Valley Railroad.
B4820 Figure 3-C
Looking at East Side of Bridge
Looking at South end of Bridge No. 338 in Jonesville
y ? 1
ti m WTI
r
. t?r11?` sm Y .?'-gr
g F? eY"
1I al
%e yy. l
??isP F 3,
g.
t'
L
{ ,
'534q` ? rit'?4:
` t M1 r 3 Y 11 4 .yq
f . ll t' ? u s
rv'
i
r
l
N#' ' y
A
m :2 ilk
d v m w
Q
w
LL
0
N
co
R
6
lip,
?'r'
?- • ?-hktt't. ?y?` ,1f y<.,a xa iyr?',5.?:'°-Y?"ri- ? ??',.???i4 °?"?, 6 ``?r?f t „
??Yjq 2 $? ta'?,-r5 i ms`s
?st'tP l? rtJS ?? 4`a+.° ?'; vt` ..Cn u*¢?ak/
f ?J' ?d'TV K 3 ?'Jt. ?\
S?1 IW - iR?J t ?? a., r?nYC?,sW k• ??F-ix`f et i5„{? ?? Uy
Iil'yy?A ? 1S i xa r?x?s,g ?;? ty s'r y?
y vrv$ ? &„ ,, s '?'ta ? a y e
y:.'C??{r'°?C it5'A"„NI"'c`gcsn''1}FSY { V
gnwlnmm
z,y,F7$8+.'?-rb "Ffa"t Fssrr x Y
.+ Y4, +v i jr
X?k
`- F ?rtv W, t 1
S? t y.
qy J y?ef{k?Q f"? £r ?L ??J{?Q?`i? F? tl `C 4?5"}??p'C?1 ?r R?F?'+""iy?^?.=?M.y?'?? ?`5
Rt"Ts`'rk?'"
n
'T t5
Z' Z;
_ n u `
m
C
W
C3
W
O
N
co
tr
m

IIwF CS y? 4J r:+ {"?'#? '§??r??'•?? ! 4! ?J 4F3 I ? R'
?i't!?• "?i?:??-T'?,M ` . bfyk ?:. *?? ,r.?,•z 4, p p ,s:.., ? z ?`' j
t?
n
?Aty k1S
? Fib } ' ?
7 ?: a l r k ' ,tcvj ?? d
M&Rmn
w F)
'o 0
?.
# ? ?t M N
(? « 1 a "?6ti ? < t
. d,til 4` m k
dci`'. I ? ? W h
r• ` t 'O ?? ? RA f
i
?.^ N G
ri SaG 1 tnd ?" --MIN
mp 3 ? r ' shy 1! ? ? a
{Pr^?a"R,W ..Y '. , wry ?., nll K ""?: +?:?"'1 ?i l•? m o ?,
J? ? ? ? `u" ? q f a , d m o
Y Lh ?C 7 ,?,. ' `O I .?I d C Y m
TY ?v N ? p'O to in
i .!y` ? M U ' LZ
I?rF d 11 K o cq
CN4 ?3€ 9v rt ?? ? 1: , d ,
fi ?? m ? l ? ?? m w: ra
o: ?[3 4 ! nk,? P+ F
??'1r nd S YID l x?>! • ..!
m
s
O N
? w
N (n
w?
y
C
J C
H
C
? O
U
O >.
C Fa
0,
? C
d
J a°
N
W
LL
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT
AMONG THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION,
THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,
AND
NORTH CAROLINA STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER
FOR
THE REMOVAL OF BRIDGE NO. 338 OVER THE YADKIN RIVER
ON SR 1190/1402 (GWYN AVENUE) IN ELKIN
YADKIN AND SURRY COUNTIES, NORTH CAROLINA
TIP PROJECT No. B-4820
FEDERAL AID PROJECT No. BRZ -1190(2)
WHEREAS, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) has determined that the
replacement of Bridge No. 338 on SR 1190/1402 (Gwyn Avenue) over the Yadkin River
in Yadkin and Sorry Counties, North Carolina (the Undertaking) will have an effect upon
the Downtown Elkin Historic District, a district listed in the National Register of Historic
Places (NRHP), of which Bridge No. 338 is a contributing resource; and
WHEREAS, the FHWA has consulted with the North Carolina State Historic
Preservation Officer (SHPO) pursuant to 36 CFR Part 800, regulations implementing
Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (16 U.S.C. 470f); and
WHEREAS, FHWA has notified the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation
(Council) of the adverse effect and it has declined to comment or participate in the
consultation; and
WHEREAS, the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) has
participated in the consultation and has been invited by FHWA and the North Carolina
SHPO to be a signatory to this Memorandum of Agreement (MOA); and
WHEREAS, the City of Elkin has participated in the consultation and has been invited to
concur with this MOA,
NOW, THEREFORE, FHWA, NCDOT, and the North Carolina SHPO agree that the
Undertaking shall be implemented in accordance with the following stipulations in order
to take into account the effects of the Undertaking on the historic properties.
STIPULATIONS
The FHWA and NCDOT will ensure that the following measures are carried out:
1. Photorecordation
Prior to the initiation of construction, NCDOT will record the existing condition of
Bridge No. 338 and its surroundings within the Downtown Elkin Historic District in
accordance with the attached Historic Structures and Landscape Recordation Plan
(Appendix A). Copies of the documentation will be deposited in the files of the State
Historic Preservation Office, NCDOT Historic Architecture Section, and the Elkin
Public Library.
II. Construction of a Stairway, Terrace, and Landscaping
A stairway, terrace, and landscaping will be constructed between East Market Street
and Main Street after the removal of Bridge No. 338. The final design will be agreed
upon by NCDOT. SHPO, and the Town of Elkin. The stairway will incorporate the
following elements:
1. NCDOT will retain ownership of the right-of-way in the location of the
stairway.
2. The Town of Elkin will be responsible for all future maintenance of the
stairway, terrace, landscaping, and lighting.
3. The historic cobblestones located west of the existing bridge between Main
Street and East Market Street will be preserved in place.
4. The existing gabion walls will be covered with a finish that matches that of
the proposed terrace wall.
5. The Town of Elkin will purchase lampposts, as well as a bench, for the
terrace that match those existing in Downtown Elkin. NCDOT will install the
lampposts and bench during construction of the stairway. NCDOT will
reimburse the Town of Elkin for actual costs.
6. NCDOT will design and produce an interpretive panel presenting the
historical and architectural significance of Bridge No. 338 and its relationship
to the Downtown Elkin Historic District.
More specifically, NCDOT will research and design the interpretive
panel, provide funding for fabrication of the panel, and install the panel
on the terrace. The Town of Elkin will be responsible for maintaining
the panel once it is in place.
ii. Prior to fabrication of the interpretive panel, NCDOT shall afford the
SHPO and the Town of Elkin an opportunity to review and comment on
the panel. If no comments are received within thirty (30) days of
confirmed receipt. NCDOT may assume that the reviewing parties do
not object to the proposed design. Should any of these parties have
questions about or comments on such plans and specifications, NCDOT
shall consult with that party and, if necessary, with all consulting
parties to address questions and comments.
iii. The interpretive panel will be installed within three (3) years of the
execution of the let date of TIP No. B-4820.
7. Construction of the stairway, terrace, and landscaping will be completed
within two (2) years of the execution of the let date for TIP Project B-4820.
Should changes to the stairway, terrace, and landscaping design, as shown in
Appendix B, become necessary, NCDOT will submit changes to SHPO and the
Town of Elkin for their review and comment.
III. Unanticipated Discovery
In accordance with 36 CFR 800.11(a), if NCDOT identifies additional cultural
resource(s) during construction and determine them to be eligible for the NRHP, all
work will be halted within the limits of the NRHP-eligible resource(s) and the
FHWA and SHPO contacted. If after consultation with the Signatory and
Concurring Party(ies) additional mitigation is determined necessary, the NCDOT, in
consultation with the Signatory and Concurring Party(ies), will develop and
implement appropriate protection/ I miti Ration measures for the resource(s).
Inadvertent or accidental discovery of human remains will be handled in accordance
with North Carolina General Statutes 65 and 70.
IV. Dispute Resolution
Should any of the Signatory or Concurring Party(ies) object within (30) days to any
plans or documentation provided for review pursuant to this Agreement. the FHWA
shall consult with the objecting party(ies) to resolve the objection. If the FHWA or
objecting party(ies) determines that the objection cannot be resolved, the FHWA
will forward all documentation relevant to the dispute to the Council. Within thirty
(30) days after receipt of all pertinent documentation, the Council will either:
1. Provide the FHWA with recommendations, which the FHWA will take
into account in reaching a final decision regarding the dispute, or
2. Notify the FHWA that it will comment pursuant to 36 CFR Section
800.7(c) and proceed to comment. Any Council comment provided in
response to such a request will be taken into account by the FHWA in
accordance with 36 CFR Section 800.7 (c) (4) with reference to the
subject of the dispute.
Any recommendation or comment provided by the Council will be understood to
pertain only to the subject of the dispute; FHWA and NCDOT's responsibility to
carry out all of the actions under this agreement that are not the subject of the
dispute will remain unchanged.
V. Amendments
Should any of the Signatory or Concurring Party(ies) to this MOA believe that its
terms cannot be carried out or that an amendment to the terms must be made, that
party(ies) shall immediately consult with the other party(ies) to develop amendments
in accordance with 36 CFR 800.6(c)(7). If an amendment cannot be agreed upon,
the dispute resolution process set forth in Stipulation IV will be followed.
VI. Termination
Any of the Signatory or Concurring Party(ies) may terminate the MOA by providing
notice to the other party(ies), provided that the party(ies) will consult during the
period prior to termination to seek agreement on amendments or other actions that
would avoid termination. Termination of this MCA will require compliance with 36
CFR 800. This MOA may be terminated by the execution of a subsequent MOA
that explicitly terminates or supersedes its terms.
VII. Duration
Unless terminated pursuant to Stipulation VI above, this MOA will be in effect until
FHWA, in consultation with the other Signatory and Concurring Party(ies),
determines that all of its terms have satisfactorily been fulfilled or if NCDOT is
unable or decides not to construct the Undertaking.
Execution of this Memorandum of Agreement by FHWA, NCDOT, and the North
Carolina SHPO, and implementation of its terms, evidence that FHWA has afforded the
Council an opportunity to comment on the Undertaking, and that FHWA has taken into
account the effects of the Undertaking on the historic properties.
AGREE:
Federal Highway Administration
John F. Sullivan, III, P.E.
Division Administrator
State Historic Preservation Officer:
Date
Jeffery J. Crow Date
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Officer
North Carolina Department of Transportation:
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
Date
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT
AMONG THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION,
THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,
AND
NORTH CAROLINA STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER
FOR
THE REMOVAL OF BRIDGE NO. 338 OVER THE YADKIN RIVER
ON SR 1190/1402 (GWYN AVENUE) IN ELKIN
YADKIN AND SURRY COUNTIES, NORTH CAROLINA
TIP PROJECT No. B-4820
FEDERAL AID PROJECT No. BRZ -1190(2)
Execution of this Memorandum of Agreement by FHWA, NCDOT, and the North
Carolina SHPO, and implementation of its terms, evidence that FH VA has afforded the
Council an opportunity to comment on the Undertaking and that FHWA has taken into
account the effects of the Undertaking on the historic properties.
CONCUR:
Lestine Hutchens
Mayor
Town of Elkin
Date
APPENDIX A
Historic Structures and Landscape Recordation Plan
For the Removal of Bridge No. 338 on SR 1190/1402 (Gwyn Avenue)
TIP No. B-4820
Federal Aid Project No. BRZ - 1190(2)
Yadkin and Surry Counties. North Carolina
Photographic Requirements
Photographic recordation of Bridge No. 338 and the Downtown Elkin Historic District
Elevations and oblique views of Bridge No. 338 and representative structural and ornamental
details.
• Overall and selected photographic views of the project area showing the relationship between
Bridge No. 338 and the Downtown Elkin Historic District.
Photographic Format
• Color digital images (all views). Images are to be shot on a SLR digital camera with a
minimum resolution of 6 megabyte pixels, at a high quality (preferably RAW) setting, to be
saved in TIE format as the archival masters.
All processing to be done to archival standards.
The accompanying printed inventory of the images - including subject, location, date, and
photographer information for each image - is to be completed according to Division of
Archives and History standards.
Copies and Curation
• One (1) set of all above mentioned photographic documentation will be deposited with the
North Carolina Division of Archives and History/Historic Preservation Office to be made a
permanent part of the statewide survey and iconographic collection.
• One (1) contact sheet shall be deposited in the files of the Historic Architecture Section of
NCDOT.
• One (1) contact sheet shall be deposited in the files of the Elkin Public Library.
APPENDIX B
Elevation and Plan View
Proposed Stairway, Terrace, and Landscaping
For the Removal of Bridge No. 338 on SR 1190/1402 (Gwyn Avenue)
TIP No. B-4820
Federal Aid Project No. BRZ - 1190(2)
Yadkin and Surry Counties, North Carolina
Dated 1/26/2009

mnv "°
-v z?? 1 T??`lCr ? I
W N 1 1 T?,? ax t i
w ti
a
Fi
1. -
r ? J
,
l
W1--?"?
Wil

CCG^.?
g
? \
S
A

r? Q
_
5'?._.._
!' .

I 1
U
?

Federal Aid # BRZ1190(2) 77P # B-4820 County: Surry/Yadkin
CONCURRENCE FORM FOR ASSESSMENT OF EFFECTS
Project Description: Remove Bridge No. 338 on SR 1190/SR 1402 over Yadkin River in Elkin
On 28 January 2008 representatives of
® North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
® Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)
® North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (HPO)
? Other
Reviewed the subject project and agreed
? There are no effects on the National Register-listed property/properties located within
the project's area of potential effect and listed on the reverse.
? There are no effects on the National Register-eligible property/properties located within
the project's area of potential effect and listed on the reverse.
There is an effect on the National Register-listed property/properties located within the
project's area of potential effect. The property/properties and the effect(s) are listed on
the reverse.
? There is an effect on the National Register-eligible property/properties located within the
project's area of potential effect. The property/properties and effect(s) are listed on the
reverse.
Signed:
29 )mo" 2oog'

/- Z9-DA
YHWA, for the Division Administrator, or other Federal Agency . Date
Representative, HPO
KW - 11A
State Historic Preservation Officer .
Date
00, 09
Date

Federal Aid # BRZ-1190(2) 77P # B4820 County: SurryNadkin
Properties within the area of potential effect for which there is no effect. Indicate if property is
National Register-listed (NR) or determined eligible (DE).
Properties within the area of potential effect for which there is an effect. Indicate property status
(NR or DE) and describe the effect.
BP-10&6 No 3313 &4%2) - ADveP66 t""Ee-T
?Lw.? iivjoP t( 1?5?fL?Ut CND) - ADYf"S .E'PFT--T
Reason(s) why the effect is not adverse (if applicable).
Initialed: NCDOT FHWA
i
HPO ft
d'•
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Peter B. Sandbeck, Administrator
Michael F. Emley, Governor Of6« of Archives erd Ffi,mry
I.iabeth C. Ev=., See,etary Division of Hismccrl Re,oorcea
Jeffiey J. Crow, Deputy secretary
David Brook, Director
November 29, 2007
MEMORANDUM
TO: William T. Goodwin
Bridge Project Development Unit
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch, NCDOT
FROM: Peter Sandbeck UJi ake SQ..,dllr??
RE: Bridge #338 on SR 14`20& SR 1190 over Yadkin River, Elkin/Jonesville, B-4820,
Surry & Yadkin Counties, ER07-2211
Thank you for your letter of October 8, 2007, concerning the proposed undertaking referenced above.
The bridge in question is likely to be historic and the area surrounding it may contain a historic district
We recommend that a Department of Transportation architectural historian identify and evaluate any
structures over fifty years of age within the project area, and report the findings to us.
There are no known archaeological sites within the pr oposed project area Based on our knowledge of the area,
it is unlikely that any archaeological resources that may be eligible for inclusion in the National Register of
Historic Places will be affected by the project We, therefore, recommend that no archaeological investigation
be conducted in connection with this project
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919/733-4763. In all future
communication concerning this project, please cite the above referenced tracking number.
cc: Mary Pope Furr, NCDOT
Matt Wilkerson, NCDOT
Locadov: 1019 Eat Jove, street, Rdeigh NC 27601 Ma044 Add.: 4617 More Srr i , Cmoe; R,k* NC 27699.4617 T
ekphove/Par. [phone]/507-6399
Ca
U.S.Deportment North Carolina Division
of Transportation
Federal Highway
Administration December 12, 2008
Mr. Don Klima, Director
Office of Federal Agency Programs (OFAP)
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation
The Old Post Office Building
1100 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. 4 809
Washington, D.C. 20004
Dear Mr. Klima:
310 New Bern Avenue, Suite 410
Raleigh, North Carolina 27601
In Reply Refer To:
HDA-NC
This letter serves as notification of an Adverse Effect Determination pursuant to 36 CFR
800.6(a)(1) on the Downtown Elkin Historic District, a property listed in the National Register
of Historic Places, in Elkin, North Carolina (Yadkin and Surry Counties). The project is
described as "Removal of Bridge No. 338 (Hugh Chatham Bridge) Over the Yadkin River on
SR 1190/1402 (Gwyn Avenue)" (TIP 4 B-4820).
This project is subject to compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation
Act of 1966 (NHPA), as amended, and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP)
regulations for compliance (36 CFR 800). The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) is
the federal agency official for this project. This notification does not offer a formal invitation
to the Council for your participation in the consultation process because none of the
circumstances specified in 36 CFR 800.6(a)(1)(1)(A-C) exist for this project.
The effect on the Downtown Elkin Historic District is adverse due to the removal of Bridge
No. 338, which is a contributing resource within the District. The North Carolina State
Historic Preservation Officer has concurred in the determination of effects.
The following information is attached with this letter:
9 A description of the undertaking
? A description of the steps to identify historic properties
? Location maps
i Photos of historic properties
9 A description of the affected historic properties
? Concurrence form for Assessment of Effects
? A description of proposed mitigation measures
? Public comment
MOVING THEao`
AMERICAN
ECONOMY

Should you have any questions, please contact Donnie Brew at 919.747.7017 or
donnie.brew(c,fhwa dot.eov. Should you wish to reply electronically, please send your
correspondence to NorthCarolina.FHWA(a.fhwa.dot. eov.
Sincerely,
9'a ?4'??
For John F. Sullivan, III, P.E.
Division Administrator
Attachments
cc: Mary Pope Furr, NCDOT-HEU
Pam Williams, NCDOT-Bridge
Town of Elkin
TOWN MANAGER
Lloyd Wm. Payne, Jr.
TOWN ATTORNEY
Raymond A. Parker
MAYOR
Lestine H. Hutchens
COMMISSIONERS
J. L. Lowe, Jr.
Gambill Aldridge
Gill Ripley
Harold Lee Wagoner
Joe Walker
April 14, 2008
Ms. Pamela Williams
Project Development Engineer
Bridge Unit
North Carolina Department of Transportation
1551 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1551
Re: B-4820 Elkin Bridge Removal
Dear Ms. Williams:
On behalf of the Elkin Town Board of Commissioners, I would like to express my
appreciation for your visit to Elkin on Thursday, April I Oh to discuss the removal of the
Hugh Chatham Bridge. The Board has reviewed the proposed plan and accepts the proposed
stairs and landscape as mitigation for the adverse effect to the historic district of removing
the bridge, and we furthermore agree to the maintenance of the enhancement once complete.
The Board understands the land will still belong to the NC Department of Transportation and
a subsequent Memorandum of Agreement will be composed furthering clarifying the
relationship of both parties to this effect. The Town of Elkin will purchase the lighting as
denoted on the proposed plan for continuity with our existing lighting in Downtown Elkin
and will be reimbursed by NC DOT for the actual costs. In addition, the Town has spent a
great deal of money on our benches in the downtown area and would like to utilize the same
type and style of benches as is currently present. This could be accomplished in much the
same manner as the lighting through a Town purchase and NC DOT reimbursement.
Crater Park, located at the river, is owned and operated as a municipal park by the Town of
Elkin. The Town of Elkin considers the removal of the bridge no effect to the Park and its
functionality. We accept the proposed temporary roadway during the demolition of the
bridge as mitigation that is proposed from Standard Street to the canoe launch access road.
In reviewing the plan, several items were noted by the Town Board and staff. thus a response
is requested on the following items:
PO Box 857 • Elkin, NC 28621 • [phone] • FAX [phone] • TDD [phone]
www.elkinnc.org
I . The existing gabon is unsightly and will not complement the proposed work plan.
We would like to see additional work in this area with possibly a more permanent
structure that shows the continuity of the proposed stairs and supports.
2. There is an active skateboarding community in Elkin. The railings and banisters, as
proposed, present a "welcoming" venue for skateboarders to potential deface, scar,
and turn into an unsightly area. We request consideration in the final design of the
railings/banisters to discourage or complicate this activity from occurring.
3. Due to the historic nature of the bridge and the surrounding historic district. we would
like to see as much of the existing bridge concrete railing to be utilized in the
proposed plan as is possible.
4. As a reminder of the existing bridge, we would like to see a plaque at the top and
bottom of the stairs briefly describing its history and years in operation.
5. The Town of Elkin would like to sit down with NC DOT staff to review the final
project plan prior to it going out to bid. As the responsible party following the
completion of the project, we would like to feel comfortable with the plan we will be
maintaining in the future. Furthermore, it would be helpful if NC DOT staff, at this
meeting, could present a proposed schedule along with proposed costs to the Town
for the maintenance of this area for our future budgetary considerations.
6. We understand trees will need to be removed in and around Crater Park for the
demolition project and request for NC DOT to replace these trees following the
completion of the project.
Again, the Town of Elkin is appreciative to NC DOT for our inclusion in this project.
We feel the project is a wonderful approach to beautify our downtown area and look
forward to working with your office on this development.
Feel free to contact me if i can be of further assistance to you.
Sincerely,
Lestine Hutchens
Mayor
Town of Elkin
Cc: Elkin Board of Commissioners
Lloyd Wm. Payne, Jr., Town Manager
Teresa Howell, Main Street Manager

TOWN OF
JONESVILLE
136 West Main Street Jonesville, NC 26642
Phone[phone] Fax[phone]
Pamela R. Williams
Bridge Project Planning Engineer
Department of Transportation
1551 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, 27699-1551
Dear Ms. Williams,
A
Piedmont
Triad
® community
I would like to ask that DOT consider as part of the demolition of the Hugh Chatham
Bridge that a pedestrian bridge be constructed to link the greenways of both Towns. We
understand that a new bridge is being studied and we are years from any replacement.
This bridge served as a vital link between the Two Towns and we need something to
replace the current pedestrian link. I feel that DOT should give priority to our
communities for local enhancement funds as part of this demolition. This is in reference
to TIP No. B-4820. Thank you for any consideration we can receive concerning this
matter.
,Si?nceArer
`? r(
Ron Niland
Town Manager
Jonesville
CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION ACTION CLASSIFICATION FORM
A.
TIP Project No.
W.B.S. No.
Federal Project No.
Project Description:
B-4820
38590.1.1
BRZ-1 190(2)
The proposed project will remove the structurally deficient Bridge No. 338 in
Surry/Yadkin Counties over the Yadkin River on SR 1190 which was closed in
December 2005 (Figure 1). Upon removal of the bridge, a sidewalk with curb and gutter
will be constructed along the southern side of East Market Street (US 268) in Elkin, as
the street crosses SR 1190 (Gwyn Avenue). Curb cuts will be constructed in this
sidewalk at the southeastern and southwestern comers of the intersection of US 268 and
SR 1190, in accordance with ADA and AASHTO standards. A barrier will be placed at
the southern end in Jonesville to prevent vehicles and pedestrians from traversing onto
the Yadkin Riverbank from the roadway. A temporary roadway from Standard Street
will provide access to Crater Park during the demolition of Bridge No. 338. Mitigation
measures proposed for the adverse effect to the Elkin Historic District and the removal of
the historic bridge include a proposed stairway, terrace and landscaping design (Figures
4A and 4B) between East Market Street and Main Street as agreed upon in the
Memorandum of Agreement (attached).
B. Purpose and Need:
The purpose of this project is to remove Bridge No. 338 on SR 1190/SR 1402 (Gwyn
Avenue) over the Yadkin River in Surry/Yadkin Counties, North Carolina. Bridge
No. 338, constructed in 1931, also spans over Main Street, Yadkin Valley Railroad,
Standard Street, Monroe Street, and Crater Park within the Town of Elkin and its
southern approach is within the Town of Jonesville (Figure 2). Bridge No. 338 is 1509
feet in length consisting of concrete superstructure and substructure and utilizes steel
overhead trusses for spans over the Yadkin River. In addition to crossing over several
town streets, several railroad tracks, a park, and the river, there are several buildings that
are in proximity to the bridge.
In 2005, NCDOT Bridge Management Unit records indicated that Bridge No. 338 had a
sufficiency rating of 2 out of 100 according to Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)
standards and because of the structural deficiency and operational inadequacy; the
removal of the bridge was deemed eligible for FHWA's Highway Bridge Program. The
bridge was closed to vehicular traffic in December 2005 because of the overall
deterioration of the bridge steel and concrete components. All traffic between the Towns
of Elkin and Jonesville use US 21 Business (Bridge Street) approximately 725 feet
downstream or US 21/1-77 approximately 1.5 miles upstream to cross the Yadkin River.
Removal of the bridge improves safety for pedestrians and vehicles due to falling
concrete and removes the potential for debris to fall into the Yadkin River as the bridge
continues to deteriorate. The proposed removal of Bridge No. 338 will affect Section 4(f)
resources that include Crater Park, Bridge No. 338, and the Downtown Elkin Historic
District
C. Proposed Improvements:
Circle one or more of the following Type II improvements that apply to the project:
Modernization of a highway by resurfacing, restoration, rehabilitation,
reconstruction, adding shoulders, or adding auxiliary lanes (e.g., parking,
weaving, coming, climbing).
a. Restoring, Resurfacing, Rehabilitating, and Reconstructing.pavement (3R
and 4R improvements)
b. Widening roadway and shoulders without adding through lanes
c. Modernizing gore treatments
d. Constructing lane improvements (merge, auxiliary, and turn lanes)
e. Adding shoulder drains
f Replacing and rehabilitating culverts, inlets, and drainage pipes, including
safety treatments
g. Providing driveway pipes
h. Performing minor bridge widening (less than one through lane)
i. Slide Stabilization
j. Structural BMP's for water quality improvement
Highway safety or traffic operations improvement projects including the
installation of ramp metering control devices and lighting.
a. Installing ramp metering devices
b. Installing lights
c. Adding or upgrading guardrail
d. Installing safety barriers including Jersey type barriers and pier protection
C. Installing or replacing impact attenuators
f. Upgrading medians including adding or upgrading median barriers
g. Improving intersections including relocation and/or realignment
h. Making minor roadway realignment
i. Channelizing traffic
j. Performing clear zone safety improvements including removing hazards
and flattening slopes
k. Implementing traffic aid systems, signals, and motorist aid
1. Installing bridge safety hardware including bridge rail retrofit
O3 Bridge rehabilitation, reconstruction, or replacement or the construction of grade
separation to replace existing at-grade railroad crossings.
a. Rehabilitating, reconstructing, or replacing bridge approach slabs
b. Rehabilitating or replacing bridge decks
c. Rehabilitating bridges including painting (no red lead paint), scour repair,
fender systems, and minor structural improvements
d. Replacing a bridge (structure and/or fill)
4. Transportation corridor fringe parking facilities.
Construction of new truck weigh stations or rest areas.
Approvals for disposal of excess right-of-way or for joint or limited use of right-
of-way, where the proposed use does not have significant adverse impacts.
7. Approvals for changes in access control.
8. Construction of new bus storage and maintenance facilities in areas used
predominantly for industrial or transportation purposes where such construction is
not inconsistent with existing zoning and located on or near a street with adequate
capacity to handle anticipated bus and support vehicle traffic.
9. Rehabilitation or reconstruction of existing rail and bus buildings and ancillary
facilities where only minor amounts of additional land are required and there is
not a substantial increase in the number of users.
10. Construction of bus transfer facilities (an open area consisting of passenger
shelters, boarding areas, kiosks and related street improvements) when located in
a commercial area or other high activity center in which there is adequate street
capacity for projected bus traffic.
11. Construction of rail storage and maintenance facilities in areas used
predominantly for industrial or transportation purposes where such construction is
not inconsistent with existing zoning and where there is no significant noise
impact on the surrounding community.
12. Acquisition of land for hardship or protective purposes, advance land acquisition
loans under section 3(b) of the UMT Act. Hardship and protective buying will be
permitted only for a particular parcel or a limited number of parcels. These types
of land acquisition qualify for a CE only where the acquisition will not limit the
evaluation of alternatives, including shifts in alignment for planned construction
projects, which may be required in the NEPA process. No project development
on such land may proceed until the NEPA process has been completed.
13. Acquisition and construction of wetland, stream and endangered species
mitigation sites.
14. Remedial activities involving the removal, treatment or monitoring of soil or
groundwater contamination pursuant to state or federal remediation guidelines.
------ - ----
15-AUK-2008 11:99 -
<asQOa¢o?,?\?n??\5-4820_rtlY-l-sh.dgn ? ,

?C010tTRAGT C202127 1?'ll' PROJECT: , ',
o 0
_q A H a
O
n v
? OOgo ? n
u _ R q f7
? O q
? O O O
_ g
N
O O O
O N N
j2 ? ? 0 ? o N
o n n n n 11
O A N O? ?
C O N ? V _.
? :R :R iR ? g a
X x .
Fy? Z Z
r
Z z,
O
g ? y9
j Ip A
A Q`Y1 L?
O N
N
O
n ?
N N
O lCmli ?rNn
N
w 1
N ? „yG pq? b y
S !`1 fa O '
S? ¢?3
e ?
, p p 16 b 1?
P
4
z
T
0
t, ;
e ?g •PPPO
;
m
Q r ?
9.vn
to g

mN
um

Tn
V \ (gyp
1 lJ

i
•
Ip
m
? l
1
•
\
/

V ?
I N

Ii a
? \ V

o
i
s
ti
o Q
a.Y
O
C
I
v
0
m
n

? y .
- a ?
y
O
a a

I

F - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
i
i
i
i
i
B-2009 06:48
i
03.
$31 ECK,
10
All
174 tri
Va-
66 4
i
i
i
ZD :7
rrl
s 56.0
20
i
0' ?ca
g 1'4
0+ 0
TO CO
00.00 E
I?
r---------------
I I I -- -- I
I I
I _ I
I , ' I
I I
I I
I
I
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I
I I
I I
CHUNE
I I
SEE
I I
I I
I II
I
I I
I I
I
I I
I I
I
I I
py -1
I I
I
I I
I I
OF FLOW
I
0. SL\T 9. w
I I
P-1 '4
I I
00
e, rn
r4 `lP
--s R
-0 tb
ILI
ft, 01
I
I
I I
I I
I
I I
I I
I I
I
I I
I
I I
I I
I
I I
----- -- -------
09, 0
I I
I I
I I
I
I I
I
I I
I
I I
I
I
I I
I I
I
I
I I
rs Lt, /' J/p
14
I
I
I
I I
I I
I I.
I I
I I
I
I I
I I
I
I I
I;z
I I
I i