20180372 Ver 1_401 Application_20180318

11
THE
WOOTEN
COMPANY
301 West 14"Street
Greenville, NC 27834
252.757.1096
Fax [phone]
March 12, 2018
Ms. Karen Higgins
201 80372
NC Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Quality — 401 Oversight and Express Permitting Unit
512 North Salisbury Street
Archdale Building -9`b Floor
Raleigh, NC 27604
RE: 401 Oversight/PCN Submittal
Kingsboro Industrial Park Utility Extension
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
TWC Project No. 2488-GX
Ms. Higgins:
On behalf of Edgecombe County WSD 1, we are sending you the following documents
for your review and approval of the above -referenced project. The project will extend
new water and sewer utilities in and around the Kingsboro Industrial Park including a
new sewer pump station. Proposed improvements are typically located within existing,
previously disturbed rights-of-way. Encroachments into Zone 1 and 2 buffers will take
place in several locations as identified in the plans and the application herein. The
following files are included with this application:
➢ Five (5) copies of the PCN Form with associated appendices;
➢ One (1) check for $240.00 for the review fee;
➢ Two (2) copies of the full-size (24"06") project drawings;
➢ Three (3) copies of the half-size (11"x17") project drawings;
I trust the above information is sufficient for your review; however, if you should have
any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Approval of the application is requested at your earliest convenience.
Best Regards,
THE WOOTEN COMPANY
William A. Larsen, PE
Enclosures: As noted above
cc: Leonard Wiggins, Edgecombe County WSD 1 (w/o enclosures)
TWC File

Pre- Construction Notification (PCN) Form
New Utilities Extension and Sewer Pump Station
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
March 2018
Prepared By:
T T
THE WOOTEN COMPANY
301 West 14th Street, Greenville, NC 27834
Firm License: F-0115
TWC Project No. 2488-GX

G Y�'3 ` i � '•' Yk �'» �, �,�'; f: '` r _;t �� -.4 "E F3jrla� ♦, _
* ��L k3z '.y t=r �.•.r y. 7} �J�'3 �s 5.�,,5`�E�vp �. '� rv�S scj:«'�a. �"'°�"Yr �, !
1 } �: i � �� 'lrk! yA. r' �'. t��R' � c•2�vt�,{ € i v w..4 k PrP, a '�s'� lc * F�'s #
I i oo
f. � � yi t;t T._: u� _ f �� ,�M r y��N'�y,�y�{�•$l � "fd... � � �tk x r
itY• .� kc ,f 4 �r5_}t�t. k rt^fir
i y : _ ' `- 0 : t5 yL {�. 31�y`''�s fC�,t,� 4 a�• y ,y� jk
r
10
Y
y1
t d�
.a. f.', i. i fir,, ,. ✓ � :,
f
4 �+
h� f
R4
f F
r Y
-
Xt�b
g fi y t s.
.refs d ✓!i k

AUTHORIZING AGREEMENT
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOT NO. N/A PLAN NO. N/A PARCEL ID:
STREET ADDRESS:
Alternative US Highway 64 (SR 1225), Edgecombe County, NC 28590
Please print:
Property Owner: Leonard Wiggins, County Commissioners Chairman and Chairman of WSD 1
Property Owner:
The undersigned, registered property owners of the above noted property, do hereby authorize
William A. Larsen, P.E of The Wooten Company
(Contractor / Agent) (Name of consulting firm)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of
this permit or certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
Property Owner's Address (if different than property above):
P.O. Box 10, Tarboro, NC 27886
Telephone: [phone]
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the
best of our knowledge.
V " N/A
Aut orized Signatu Authorized Signature
Date: I [� 16 Date:

.+• -
.:r Y I S i
L
4 Y n � �.. r•' tyy
i
y 1
V'V..
A
'
..
� �- y'�!� •rte-
S
AA
I�k
,Y L
1 wf+

Al'
`See Reverse Side For Easy Opening instructions'
EDGECOMBE COUNTY
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
PO BOX 10
TARBORO, NC 27886
ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED
NC DWa, WBSCP UNIT
1650 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27699-1650
00390203

.,.1, a3 4"•': .i '.'.".52,CA: K f3`+ft4v.tt z�r
r1 � •' t � �.• 1'"' a 'k� �' t. rwr5i �,�L�, A 's r + a5� -� at.3 j 9i. i'x�y..
.sus
»lam:°€ q >rxo. w ra €
b
�
F .q
- `�, _ - - Y a {q, _.y :,�• r. -c r�r� ;: �PIMl1BF ''-r
NX ��bS a `� 1 .' [• ��5'::; �'j "Y'�' f^,dx•'aF "3�� t��, Ft�'Y i�f '.+ �f f�''>�4+" _ i r �.
1, ul,
fi y r,
rlkel
r�
a a
if
� y
t-;� 4 pie
♦� � f �. g5 r � err - -, a �� t5 E t -.
t �+
N't
t ,{;'. .. k year. 5 � •,�`. .�y-T.,� � r a r __ t er � - S ey i �'r' 1 i=s.
i, •� '� t ; 3 x �� � �. � � ,.;s Cert
.ry4 -.:, � �aec. <� r �s4 � �; �'jr � •�^g,� � ^ > ti -.e iw � Er_ < i �' t �
1.;• 4f �i �. ,.. -:Y �. P. "S.F'J�g a``}yp_.� A'dL ._fit '¢. 'Y�.': .'
A } �� ,r�iY � �>7 � t y y �;{�' �'�'i+� h k `r¢" - � ,��ai r�� s � •�: � <.� - .r' . �.-.. s � � _
+�ZZ r5

Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre -Construction Notification PCN Form
A. Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 12 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
FE] Yes ® No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ® Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
®Yes ❑ No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
® Yes ❑ No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes ® No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Kingsboro Industrial Park Utility Extension
2b.
County:
Edgecombe
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Tarboro, NC
2d.
Subdivision name:
N/A
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
N/A
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Leonard Wiggins, County Commissioner Chairman and Chairman of WSD 1
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
N/A
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Leonard Wiggins, County Commissioner Chairman and Chairman of WSD 1
3d.
Street address:
201 St. Andrew Street, Room 402
3e.
City, state, zip:
P.O. Box 10, Tarboro, NC 27886
3f.
Telephone no.:
[phone]
3g.
Fax no.:
[phone]
3h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b.
Name:
Same as Owner
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e.
City, state, zip:
4f.
Telephone no.:
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
S.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
William A. Larsen, PE
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
The Wooten Company
5c.
Street address:
301 West 14th Street
5d.
City, state, zip:
Greenville, NC 27834
5e. Telephone no.:
252-757-1096
5f.
Fax no.:
252-757-3221
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
Parcel IDs: 379945674500, 379974720100,
470906609900,470923230500,379986859300
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.928 Longitude: -77.659
1 c.
Property size:
1,500 acres total parcels area.
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
proposed project:
Walnut Creek to Tar River, WS-IV;NSW
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
WS-IV;NSW
2c.
River basin:
Tar -Pamlico River Basin
Page 2 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The proposed project is comprised of two (2) primary sets of improvements: 1) add a new Kingsboro Industrial Park Main
Pump Station, new gravity sewer mains and force mains, and 2) add new water mains. The current land use within the
project area may be primarily classified as wooded, agricultural use with a few surrounding parcels being classified as
residential. The existing conditions specific to the utility main crossing are graded agricultural fields with naturally
occurring drainage ditches. Future land use for the new Kingsboro Industrial Park Main Pump Station will be primarily
industrial and commercial.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
51.93 acres
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
Walnut Creek = —7,000 feet
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the project is to provide the water and sewer utilities in and around the Park in order to foster future
industrial development in the area.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The proposed project is comprised of two (2) primary sets of improvements: 1) add a new Kingsboro Industrial Park Main
Pump Station, new gravity sewer mains and force mains, and 2) add new water mains, for the purpose of serving future
industrial development in the area. The project is more specifically defined as follows:
• 20,050 LF of New 16 -inch Water line Extension
• 14 Fire Hydrant Assemblies
• 2,550 LF of New 18 -inch New Gravity Sewer Extension
* 1,800 LF of New 30 -inch New Gravity Sewer Extension
• (17) New 4 -feet Diameter Gravity Sewer Manholes
• 6,670 LF of New 10 -inch Force Main Extension
• Construct New Duplex, 2,800 GPM Submersible Wastewater Pump Station
Waterlines, force mains, and gravity sewer mains will intersect and cross streams exactly eight (8) times. Five (5) will be
across intermittent streams and ditches and three (3) will be across perennial streams. Five (5) stream crossings will be
mitigated by directional drilling, and thus do not impact the buffer nor the streams. Three (3) other stream crossings will
take place with an average stream width of 30 feet and an impact length of 16 feet, each. Total buffer impacts will include
10,896 square feet in Zone 1 and 31,485 square feet in Zone 2.
A track -hoe will be used in the excavation process with other associated equipment needed for utility installation. To
cross NCDOT roads, a process of boring and jacking will be utilized.
Page 3 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
2a.
2b.
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ®No El Unknown
2e.
Comments:
Wetland impact
Mark Hussey, The Wooten Company employee, delineated
Type of jurisdiction
the jurisdictional area.
number —
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
El Preliminary El Final
(Corps - 404, 10
of determination was made?
Permanent (P) or
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company:
DWQ — non -404, other)
Name (if known):
Other:
4d.
If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
N/A
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Corps
® DWQ
5b.
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
® Yes ❑ No
6b.
If yes, explain.
The new wastewater pump station, to be constructed next to Alt. U.S. Hwy. 64, will be phased into its final build -out peak
capacity of 4.0 MGD and a design average daily flow of 1.6 MGD (i.e. 2,800 GPM, pumps in parallel at 1,400 GPM each,
at 85 -ft Head). The first phase will provide a capacity of 500 GPM to an existing 10 -inch force main; the second phase
will provide a capacity of 1,400 GPM with a duplex pump through a future 14 -inch force main; and the final phase will
result in an additional pump to a triplex pump station, resulting in 2,800 GPM to a future 14 -inch force main.
A portion of the proposed sanitary sewer project is intended to serve as a temporary transmission system until the second
phase of the sewer system can be designed, constructed and certified. After the construction of the 14 -inch force main,
the 10 -inch force main extension will serve as an emergency bypass for the existing QVC Blvd. pump station. At the time
of Phase 1 construction, the sewer main will serve Triangle Tyre, a Chinese tire manufacturing company, and Corning
Pharmaceuticals, which together produce about 0.320 MGD and 0.010 MGD, respectively. More industries are expected
to move in and develop within the Park. Therefore, the infrastructure is being sized for future park demands and not only
the immediate customers. All flow is anticipated to be commercial/industrial in nature.
In addition to the utility construction proposed, a future road is under design that will begin at Kingsboro Road, follow
Walnut Creek toward the Northeast, cross the creek and tie in to U.S. HWY 64 Alt at Dunbar Road. This roadway is
being permitted separately by another firm and outside of this application.
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ® Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ❑ P ®T
Excavation
N/A
® Yes
El No
❑ Corps
® DWQ
0.02
Page 4 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

W2 ❑ P ®T
Excavation
N/A
® Yes
❑ Corps
0.20
❑ No
® DWQ
W3 ❑ P ® T
Excavation
N/A
® Yes
❑ Corps
0.05
❑ No
® DWQ
W4 ❑ P ® T
Excavation
N/A
® Yes
❑ No
❑ Corps
® DWQ
0.04
W5 ❑ P ® T
Excavation
N/A
® Yes
❑ No
❑ Corps
® DWQ
0.06
W6 ❑ P ® T
Excavation
N/A
® Yes
❑ Corps
0.09
❑ No
® DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
0.46
2h. Comments: All Wetland impacts, except Wetland Impact 1, will be the result of installation of gravity sewer lines; Wetland
Impact 1 will be the result of water line installation. The area of wetland impact was calculated utilizing MicroStation. Wetland
impacts are minimal enough to be exempt from mitigation requirements.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ❑ P ®T
Excavation
UT to Walnut
® PER
❑ Corps
30
16
Creek
❑ INT
® DWQ
S2 ❑ P ®T
Excavation
UT to Walnut
❑ PER
❑ Corps
30
15
Creek
® INT
® DWQ
S3 ❑ P ® T
Excavation
UT to Walnut
❑ PER
❑ Corps
30
17
Creek
® INT
® DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
48
3i. Comments: Impacts include 15 to 17 linear feet of open cut with an average stream width of 30 feet. Stream impact 1 (S1)
is equivalent to Buffer impact 1 (131), Stream impact 2 (S2) is equivalent to Buffer impact 7 (137), and Stream impact 3 (S3) is
equivalent to Buffer impact 17 (B17). Stream impacts are considered "allowable" and do not require mitigation.
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number —
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ❑ P ❑ T
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
02 ❑ P ❑ T
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
03 ❑ P ❑ T
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
04 ❑ P ❑ T J
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
4L Total open water impacts
N/A
4g. Comments: There are no open water impacts.
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
Page 5 of 12
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5a.
Pond ID
number
5b.
Proposed use or purpose of
pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
P2
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
R Total
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
5g. Comments: There is no pond or lake construction.
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes
No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
Page 6 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse ® Tar -Pamlico ❑ Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number —
Reason for
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
impact
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet
(square feet)
Temporary
required?
61 ®P ❑ T
Stream
Crossing w/
UT to Walnut Creek®
❑ Yes
No
2,202
1,735
open cut
B2 ®P ❑ T
Excavation
UT to Walnut Creek
® Nos
N/A
1,210
B3 ®P ❑ T
Excavation
UT to Walnut Creek
El Nos
1,335
4,941
B4 ®P ❑ T
Excavation
UT to Walnut Creek
® Nos
N/A
2,053
B5 ®P ❑ T
Excavation
UT to Walnut Creek
❑® Nos
871
1,668
B6 ®P ❑ T
Excavation
UT to Walnut Creek
Nos
99
1,624
B7 ®P ❑ T
Stream
Crossing w/
UT to Walnut CreekEl
® Yes
No
2,743
628
open cut
B8 ® P ❑ T
Excavation
UT to Walnut Creek
®❑ Nos
547
3,854
B9 ®P ❑ T
Excavation
UT to Walnut Creek
®❑ Nos
45
1,572
B10 ®P ❑ T
Excavation
UT to Walnut Creek
® Nos
N/A
425
B11 ®P ❑ T
Excavation
UT to Walnut Creek
® Nos
N/A
1,142
B12 ®P ❑ T
Excavation
UT to Walnut Creek
® Nos
N/A
560
B13 ®P ❑ T
Excavation
UT to Walnut Creek
® Nos
N/A
668
B14 ® P ❑ T
Excavation
UT to Walnut Creek
® Nos
N/A
738
B15 ®P ❑ T
Excavation
UT to Walnut Creek
® Nos
N/A
2,533
B16 ® P ❑ T
Excavation
UT to Walnut Creek
®❑ Nos
330
1,922
B17 ®P ❑ T
Stream
Crossing w/
UT to Walnut Creek®
❑ Yes
No
2,724
4,212
open cut
6h. Total buffer impacts
10,896
31,485
6i. Comments: Buffer impacts 2, 4 and 10 through 15 are only impacted in Zone 2. The area of buffer impact was calculated
utilizing MicroStation. Three stream crossings (1 perennial and 2 intermittent) will be open cut to install utilities, and mitigation
measures will be utilized to minimize impacts. Buffer impacts 3, 5-9, and 16 require mitigation while others are considered
"allowable" impacts. All impacts are considered permanent as future utility easement will need to be maintained.
Page 7 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Some of the utility lines will be constructed in previously disturbed land adjacent and within the NCDOT right-of-way. For
others, impacts will be minimized by using proper sedimentation and erosion control measures, directional drilling, gravity
alignment, construction sequencing, and by limiting the amount of disturbed area to what is shown on the plans. Trench
boxes are also anticipated to reduce disturbed area.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Minimizing trench width, minimizing sediment runoff by using sedimentation and erosion control measures, and
immediate seeding and mulching.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
® Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
® DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project?
❑ Mitigation bank
® Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type:
Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
® Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
5,970 square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments: Mitigation for non -electric utilities in Zone 1 Buffer
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 8 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
® Yes ❑ No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
Allowable w/ Mitigation
5,970
3:1 Ratio
17,910
Impacts
Zone 2
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
17,910
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
Payment to private mitigation bank
6h. Comments:
Page 9 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
® Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments:
❑ Yes No
This project does not create more than 1 acre of impervious surface; therefore, it
does not need a diffuse flow plan.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
0.63%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
This project does not create more than 1 acre of impervious area; therefore, a Stormwater Management Plan is not
required.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
N/A
❑ Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Edgecombe County
❑ Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
® Water Supply Watershed
® Other: Local
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ HQW
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
FEI Yes ❑ No
Page 10 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
® Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
At the time of the construction, the sewer main will serve Triangle Tyre, a Chinese tire manufacturing company, and
Corning Pharmaceuticals, which together produce about 0.320 MGD and 0.010 MGD, respectively. More industries are
expected to move in and develop within the Park and therefore the utilities are being considered for current and future
development. All flow is anticipated to be commercial/industrial in nature. As more industries develop the Park, the
County will create easements around the utilities to allow for future maintenance. Edgecombe County has established
stormwater and development ordinances that regulate development. Thus, future development will be regulated such
that nearby downstream water quality is not impacted. No soils are anticipated to be contaminated during or after the
project's completion.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Edgecombe County owns, operates, and maintains its wastewater collection and pumping systems. The Park's
wastewater will be conveyed through Edgecombe County WSD 1 to the 21 -MGD Tar River Regional Wastewater
Treatment Plant (WWTP) for treatment; the WWTP is owned and operated by the City of Rocky Mount.
Page 11 of 12
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
E] Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
Fish & Wildlife Service and the National Heritage Program (See table in Appendix E)
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA Essential Fish Habitat Mapper v3.0 (See Appendix E)
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
A list of sites in Edgecombe County has been supplied in the Appendix. There are no historic sites located within the
project area. See Appendix F for a list of historic sites in Edgecombe County.
Data source: National Register of Historic Places
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
® Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
The project consists of buried sewer lines connecting between manholes. All manholes have been raised to a minimum
of 2 feet above the 100 -year flood elevation (60 feet). The pump station wet well and generator have been elevated to 2
feet above the 100 -year flood elevation.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
NCFIRM maps were used to estimate the flood elevation. See Appendix G for floodplain map.
William A. Larsen, PE
VX/X.11 ,
_Z,,��/
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
I
Date
Applican A nt's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is rovided.
Page 12 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

l
6
1 46�A
^i qY
s
G
•;.
.'44
y
�4
q
kf:
tl
TZ
�
x
i
S{ Y
..
A 1. 4
�x
4 yea S ijy ,i
Y f.
s
t i
M
t
4
t:
l
6
1 46�A
s
G
•;.
.'44
�
q
kf:
l
6
•;.
}�,�'
x ra
�
J
�
tl
TZ
i
e Ab•Y�i� `�T � Z{„ ��

NARRATIVE FOR THE PRE -CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION
KINGSBORO INDUSTRIAL PARK UTILITIES EXTENSION
EDGECOMBE COUNTY WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT NO. 1
FEBRUARY 2018
11
THE WOOTEN COMPANY
301 West 14th Street. Greenville, NC 27834
Firm License: F-01 15
TWC: 2488-GX

A. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Location of Project
The proposed utilities project is located along NC Alt. Highway 64, Kingsboro Road, Harts
Mill Run Road, CSX Railroad Main, and NC Highway 64 within Edgecombe County Water
and Sewer Districts No. 1 and 2. This utilities project will be owned by Edgecombe
County's Water and Sewer District No. 1, where it resides. All of the land located within the
Park is owned by Edgecombe County. The majority of the work will take place within
previously disturbed NCDOT right-of-ways and utility easements along US Highway 64,
CSX Railroad Main, Harts Chapel Road, and Harts Mill Run Road in addition to the
community around Midlake Mobile Home Park (MHP). A vicinity map has been attached
which shows the exact project location in Edgecombe County.
Type of Development
Water Main
The water line portion of the proposed utility project will be a linear construction project
consisting of installing approximately 20,050 LF of 16 -inch water main and 14 fire hydrants.
Gravity Sewer
The gravity portion of the proposed sanitary sewer project will be a linear construction
project consisting of installing approximately 2,550 LF of 18 -inch and 1,800 LF of 30 -inch
gravity sewer and 17 sanitary sewer manholes.
Pump Station & Force Main
The force main portion of the proposed sanitary sewer project will be a linear construction
project consisting of installing approximately 6,670 LF of 10 -inch force main. The force
main project is dictated as a portion of the temporary transmission system until the second
phase of the sewer system can be designed, constructed and certified. After Phase 2 of
the project is completed, this extension will serve as an emergency bypass for the existing
QVC Blvd. pump station.
The collected wastewater in the Kingsboro Industrial Park will be conveyed to the new
Kingsboro Industrial Park Main Pump Station, which is located on a parcel owned by
Edgecombe County adjacent to Alt. US Highway 64. The wastewater will then be pumped
through approximately 6,670 LF of a new 10 -inch force main to an existing transmission
network to the 21 -MGD Tar River Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP), which is
owned and operated by the City of Rocky Mount.
The Kingsboro Industrial Park Main Pump Station on Alt. US Highway 64 is designed with a
build -out peak capacity of 4.0 MGD and average daily flow of 1.6 MGD. The station will be
phased into its final buildout flow, with the final phase resulting in a triplex pump station,
which will provide a capacity of 2,800 GPM through a 14 -inch force main. The Kingsboro
Industrial Park Main pump station, which has a final -phase capacity of 2,800 GPM at 85 -ft
TDH, will maintain greater than 2 feet per second velocity in the receiving force main.

Earth Disturbing Activities
The project will involve open -trench installation for the 16 -inch water mains, the 18 -inch
and 30 -inch gravity sewer lines, and the new 10 -inch force mains. Construction of the
Kingsboro Industrial Park Main Pump Station will require excavation and general site work.
The width of the installation trench will vary based on the depth of the utility. At the
deepest parts, the disturbed area will be approximately 30 feet wide including the spoil pile.
Three drainage ditches (deemed to be an intermittent unnamed tributary to Walnut Creek)
will be open cut to install the 18- and 30 -inch gravity sewer proposed for those locations.
Pressure lines will be installed with horizontal directional drilling and gravity sewers will be
suitably installed for low -flow periods. Sedimentation and erosion control measures will be
used throughout the project, but most importantly at the main stream crossing and at the
many small ditch crossings. The required erosion control measures will be installed prior to
construction. A track -hoe will be used in the excavation process with other associated
equipment for sewer system installation. To cross NCDOT roads, a process of boring and
jacking will be utilized.
Existing Drainage Patterns
Edgecombe County is generally broad and flat sloping from west to the east. The County
is located in the Tar -Pamlico River Basin and within Fishing Creek, Little Fishing Creek,
Rocky Swamp and Beech Swamp Subbasin (03-03-04). The majority of the area located
within this project area drains to road side ditches and/or unnamed tributaries, which
ultimately flow to Walnut Creek. Walnut Creek flows directly to the Tar River that bisects
the County.
B. EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES
A copy of the latest approved sediment and erosion control plan must be on file at the job
site. Timely and proper attention shall be required for prevention of offsite erosion and
sedimentation. Various levels of erosion control are proposed in the engineering
documents. If it becomes evident that additional erosion and sedimentation control
measures are needed they shall be installed immediately by the contractor. A temporary
cover sufficient to restrain erosion must be provided within the 21 calendar days of
completion of any phase of land disturbance. A permanent ground cover, sufficient to
restrain erosion, must be provided within the shortest of 14 working or 90 calendar days
after completion of the construction or development.
2. A buffer zone, sufficient to restrain sedimentation, must be maintained between the land -
disturbing activity and any adjacent property or watercourses. Maintain / Do Not Disturb
existing vegetative cover in areas of no construction.
3. All disturbed areas will be seeded within 30 days following construction in accordance
with the seeding schedule as shown on the plans. We have attached the seeding and
mulching specifications to this document which gives the rates for fertilizer, tack, seeding
and mulch. Due to the nature of construction activities, the contractor will be limited to 5
acres of disturbance at any given time during construction.
4. Temporary sediment control primarily will consist of temporary check dams and arc filters
which will be placed along the existing roadside ditches. The rock check dams shall be a
maximum of 1,000 LF apart and the volume of storage shall accommodate this sediment
as shown on the engineering documents. In the proposed project area, the slopes along

most of the roadside ditches are so flat that the spacing allows for a great amount of
storage before over flowing into the next drainage system.
In order to eliminate erosion from traveling downstream, arc filters will be utilized when
sewer lines bisect drainage culverts on the upstream side of the culvert.
Silt fence will be utilized in areas next to the blue line stream to prevent erosion of the
disturbed soil for the sewer line crossing. In the location of ditch crossings, rip rap is to
be placed at the opening of the storm drainage pipe to prevent erosion of the disturbed
soil for the pipeline crossing. Silt fence shall also be used to prevent erosion in areas
where bore and recovery pits are to be constructed and at open culvert crossings the silt
fence is to be tied into the temporary sediment traps or check dams as shown in the
engineering documents. Silt fence will also be utilized at the pump station site. Since the
velocity of flow through the roadside ditches is less than 2.5 fps, lining is not required but
there may be areas where the contractor will be required to place matting if drainage
ditch disturbance occurs.
6. If the contractor chooses to place any of the material on the adjacent roadway the
contractor shall be required to place screening over the roadway surface prior to
beginning the operations to assist in cleaning up the roadways after construction.
C. TIME SEQUENCE OF OPERATIONS
Construction is anticipated to begin in the summer of 2018. Permits are being secured
now and once the project is awarded, construction will be able to start. The contractor is
required under the contract to comply with all state regulations regarding erosion and
sedimentation control. Once the sediment and erosion control measures are in place, the
contractor will begin installing the sewer lines, manholes, and pump stations. The
contractor shall complete all construction within the easements and rights -of -ways as
shown on the plans. All utilities must be checked and tested and any areas that can be
seeded should be done as soon as possible.
Once the subsurface infrastructure is complete and tested, the contractor shall finish
grading and seeding remaining areas. Seed bed preparation details have been added to
the drawings. Hydro -seeding will not be used on this project. In areas where the trench
line is within the bottom of a ditch, erosion control matting shall be used to stabilize the
soil.
The erosion and sediment control measures are to be checked weekly and after any
rainfall event. Repairs shall be made immediately to the sediment and erosion control
measures as needed during the project.

*1^-1.. re^— -.
m
t
DonCh"
I
**kgo*d
WWO"
aln
y W"t
KU Woodcf"t
PW*
Of" CRY ED
04d Spana
Mocc*of*v4d CKingsboro Industrial Park
EWE

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIORHARTSEASE QUADRANGLE
U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY MY� 1 IC♦ T♦n^x0—CAROLINA-EI—C—E CO.
0
bnxYwwY (o ). S.IMMUIE SEN6
]r♦s 17 rN 'SS w NO
e —
a —
i
e,,�
_ —�- � �i A•� 'AAA '"�i.—` �\,
e
l' 6
_
e
m
. nR
xsiaax rsst
♦ r5) r11 S♦ ax Jo 56 'S] 'S8 'S9 ♦n '6] 'fil
aJucW M M. UnkxE Splw
*-IS.— SCALE 1:24 000 C
mlw x•w1. rnKunw — Ram
m,w frw aox[r z � ♦
- �wr.envx wuxx rm,N ♦u uy - -ym - � - x.r __—__- '"�+
.,u,.vuan um,. ur ¢a�m�wn,�n,wn s �♦6� ��.. � vv _ `� .>r.\, , � m� a �ma
V �newu w. w O9wm � e
w♦wrxn.r,aovx = m
wuerevxwaxm
ry - "" � mxmux xrzrvusrz[r ' emu
w • xwrx w[uux v[arru nroxor,w 7.1;=..
oti• ,
s veixn.
mown mown ♦ � s ♦xexrmv, �
ixe., r, ,. m n m,.q.nc2auaaum,cn wove mime ��
m up imue n. wt xne.ucva,u, rmRrm irirw rnxw Nvwn. zN,. _-
...emerm.s„na.,a uo amxrn sm.na na.n . r ♦ �.� HARTSEASE, NC
2016 _
isa

t
�gl i
.�,dt S n f •,. a
i•
p • . _ , _ _a
I a • ._-_- _•------ 4—
Proposed
0
US 54 ALT WE S [Proposed G b" Sewer Pump Station :� a
a yBpi
s o,
10 Sewer Force Main
T
it i 00D5„ RYRD
tY •-y, -w. _ :.. dt 4 ° . •.._.. i +c" , f
OR, HW ^OUNT
m F
= I
} :: 6� Water Line •::'
. ,,c1�w p G.
.e Jt
EXt7 J�8 NEST- �_, ,-.
^- - _ >,ae_ST .. o" c :::"..• 16"Waterline
T—,
:, .... �� Proposed " • "o•
and 30
f'
L e
r , Sewer Outfall WALK ° f
PS
� / U
' w
---- --
0VC8LVD C•a'-,.,..�s�'Y ` i = ti fp�y.���" .
�1 DEE
...,. -- - -'� : _ :.. . ... s• � t: LAKEVIEW DR t
ns Tra
qNn ESX� drtaa6h
sus s , Proposed
16" Water Line
st s
,W/NOCREST LN
o
,e/0,
I
COM -
m D
IE
OUN
HALIFAX /�iC N
pay COUNTY �\
x
Oak • �� Hotiytwd
0
Dorfches 7 ��♦
� MARTIN .,.
E p _ Leggett COUNT/
�
oak ^'4 Speed % C(ly
Rocky Mount t
%«� ,—•_.
COUNTY Tarboro `
t Hassell
/Princeville r
EDGECOMBE U
Sharpsburg project COUNTY I
fi _ SER LNC' I • `�
AreaIt Robersonville
THE WOOTEN COMPANY LANCE.DOZ ? ° jam` j Elm ; 3 Coneroe�l _ �Parmee
city
Pinelops
^vry �rqp '•� Wt, tl y+ WILSON COUNTY t e
w w«
r t
n rirree a. ' ',� ., f` �' •n v Maccleafield 13
i
PITT COUNTY
Kingsboro
Legend
+ Proposed Hydrant
+ Existing Hydrant
— US Route
Industrial Park
+ Proposed Manhole
's Existing Pump Station
— Ramp
Utilities Extensions
PS I Proposed Pump Station
— Existing Water Line
---- Rail Road
00
W
= Proposed 18" and 30" Gravity
Existing Gravity
1,250 2,500
Minor Water Feature'
-ugecombe County, NC
Proposed 10" Force Main
Existing Force Main
9
Major Water Feature Feet
1
Proposed 16" Water Line
- Existing Buffer
Parcel
February 2018
Street
Q Site

INDEX TO MAP SHEETS
EDGECOMBE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
$1.l. 1:253,440
1 0 1 2 3 I Mlles
I I 1

EDGL"COMBE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA — SHEET NUMBER 13
Scale 1.20000

6'
GyD:G.oA
Nob WaB\Bn6�1NaC _ Nob Ww WaC '. W
a8�
a WaB �Bn6 WaB NoB
N innB= RaA NOB BB DpB
iA i WaB. RaA i gg _ WaC EzA AyB r
GNoB U s LyA . WaC ` WaB - GoA GOA GoA Ay6 €' \~►
GyD WaB WaC-,NoC RaA No_B ,(moi �>
Al WaD ExA (AyA AyB U Aaq `
—ter NoBNo6WaB
WaB Ay__
Y
Ra," ExAA AGr
ExA AYB WaC NoB �� ExA
4BB
WaB \\' AYA A WaDA B L
of . AYA ...
ExA� Ayg.: NoB,`+ {' '
Gr—AyB ExA % 1 �,�
_ AyB Gr BB A 1
AExA _ --A B / Y -
-
AA AA GYM
y
DpB,
tsest Ln�• -

Soil Map—Edgecombe County, North Carolina
(Kingsboro Industrial Park)
MAP LEGEND
MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest (A01)
Spoil Area
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
Area of Interest (AOI)
Q
Stony Spot
1:20,000.
Soils
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
Soil Map Unit Polygons
Very Stony Spot
measurements.
r,r
Soil Map Unit Lines
Wet Spot
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Other
Web Soil Survey URL:
®
Soil Map Unit Points
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
,•
Special Line Features
Special
Point Features
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
Blowout
Water Features
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
Streams and Canals
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Borrow Pit
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
Clay Spot
Transportation
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
i F ►
Rails
Closed Depression
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
0%10
Interstate Highways
of the version date(s) listed below.
X
Gravel Pit
US Routes
Soil Survey Area: Edgecombe County, North Carolina
.11
Gravelly Spot
Major Roads
Survey Area Data: Version 13, Sep 19, 2016
0
Landfill
Local Roads
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
Lava Flow
1:50,000 or larger.
4&
Marsh or swamp
Background
.
Aerial Photography
aerial images were photographed: Apr 23, 2015—Feb
25,t2(Os)
a�t
Mine or Quarry
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
®
Miscellaneous Water
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
0
Perennial Water
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
V
Rock Outcrop
Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
o
Severely Eroded Spot
Sinkhole
Slide or Slip
oe
Sodic Spot
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 10/17/2017
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3

Soil Map-Edgecombe County, North Carolina
Map Unit Legend
Kingsboro Industrial Park
UusDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 10/17/2017
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3
Map Unit SymbolMap
Unit Name
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
AaA
Altavista fine sandy loam, 0 to
5.5
0.4%
3 percent slopes
AyA
Aycock very fine sandy loam, 0
62.1
4.2%
to 2 percent slopes
AyB
Aycock very fine sandy loam, 2
316.9
21.3%
to 6 percent slopes
116.7
BB
Bibb soils
7.8%
Bn13
Blanton sand, 0 to 6 percent
16.0
1.1%
slopes
DpB
Duplin sandy loam, 2 to 5
5.5
0.4%
percent slopes
ExA
Exum very fine sandy loam, 0
111.1
7.5%
to 2 percent slopes
-
GoA Goldsboro fine sandy loam, 0
26.4
1.8%
to 2 percent slopes
Gr Grantham very fine sandy
38.5
2.6%
loam
9.1
0.6%
GyC Gritney fine sandy loam, 6 to
10 percent slopes
GyD Gritney fine sandy loam, 10 to 4.0
0.3%
15 percent slopes
0.4%
LyA Lynchburg fine sandy loam, 0 6.0
to 2 percent slopes,
Southern Coastal Plain
----
NoB Norfolk loamy sand, 2 to 6 241.3 li 16.2%
percent slopes I
NoC
Norfolk loamy sand, 6 to 10
3.4 0.2%
percent slopes
Pa
Pactolus loamy sand
6.8 0.5%
Pt
Pits
1.8 0.1
RaA
Rains fine sandy loam, 0 to 2
89.6 6.0%
percent slopes, Southern
Coastal Plain
W
Water
20.0 1.3%
WaB Wagram loamy sand, 0 to 6 324.2 21.8%
percent slopes
I
WaC Wagram loamy sand, 6 to 10 55.1 3.7%
percent slopes
WAD Wagram loamy sand, 10 to 15 28.0 1.9%
percent slopes
Totals for Area of Interest 1,487.9 100.0%
UusDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 10/17/2017
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3

1/30/2018 Edgecombe County Endangered Species, Threatened Species,Federal Species of Concern, and Candidate Species
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Endangered Species, Threatened Species,Federal Species of Concern,
and Candidate Species,
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
Updated: 11-13-2017
Common Name
Vertebrate:
American eel
Bald eagle
Carolina madtom
Eastern Henslow's sparrow
Pinewoods shiner
Red -cockaded woodpecker
Roanoke bass
Southern hognose snake
Invertebrate:
Atlantic pigtoe
Green floater
Tar River spinymussel
Yellow lampmussel
Yellow lance
Vascular Plant:
Nonvascular Plant:
Lichen:
Scientific name
Anguilla rostrata
Haliaeetus leucocephalus
Noturus furiosus
Ammodramus henslowii susurrans
Lythrurus matutinus
Picoides borealis
Ambloplites cavifrons
Heterodon simus
Fusconaia masoni
Lasmigona subviridis
Parvaspina steinstansana
Lampsilis cariosa
Elliptio lanceolata
Federal Record Status
Status
FSC
BGPA
FSC
FSC
FSC
E
FSC
FSC
FSC
FSC
E
FSC
P
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Historic
Current
Obscure
Current
Current
Current
Current
Historic
Definitions of Federal Status Codes:
E = endangered. A taxon "in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range."
T = threatened. A taxon "likely to become endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all or a
significant portion of its range."
C = candidate. A taxon under consideration for official listing for which there is sufficient information to support
listing. (Formerly "C1" candidate species.)
BGPA =Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. See below.
FSC=Federal Species of Concern. FSC is an informal term. It is not defined in the federal Endangered Species
https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylist/edgecombe.htmi 1/2

1/30/2018 Edgecombe County Endangered Species, Threatened Species,Federal Species of Concern, and Candidate Species
Act. In North Carolina, the Asheville and Raleigh Field Offices of the US Fish and Wildlife Service (Service)
define Federal Species of Concern as those species that appear to be in decline or otherwise in need of
conservation and are under consideration for listing or for which there is insufficient information to support
listing at this time.Subsumed under the term "FSC" are all species petitioned by outside parties and other
selected focal species identified in Service strategic plans, State Wildlife Action Plans, or Natural Heritage
Program Lists.
T(S/A) = threatened due to similarity of appearance. A taxon that is threatened due to similarity of appearance
with another listed species and is listed for its protection. Taxa listed as T(S/A) are not biologically endangered
or threatened and are not subject to Section 7 consultation. See below.
EXP = experimental population. A taxon listed as experimental (either essential or nonessential). Experimental,
nonessential populations of endangered species (e.g., red wolf) are treated as threatened species on public land,
for consultation purposes, and as species proposed for listing on private land.
P = proposed. Taxa proposed for official listing as endangered or threatened will be noted as "PE" or "PT",
respectively.
Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BG PA)_
In the July 9, 2007 Federal Register( 72:37346-37372), the bald eagle was declared recovered, and removed (de-
listed) from the Federal List of Threatened and Endangered wildlife. This delisting took effect August 8,2007.
After delisting, the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (Eagle Act) (16 U.S.C. 668-668d) becomes the
primary law protecting bald eagles. The Eagle Act prohibits take of bald and golden eagles and provides a
statutory definition of "take" that includes "disturb". The USFWS has developed National Bald Eagle
Management Guidelines to provide guidance to land managers, landowners, and others as to how to avoid
disturbing bald eagles. For mor information, visit http://www.fws.goy/migratory birds/baldeagle.htm
Threatened due to similarity of appearance(T(S/A))_
In the November 4, 1997 Federal Register (55822-55825), the northern population of the bog turtle (from New
York south to Maryland) was listed as T (threatened), and the southern population (from Virginia south to
Georgia) was listed as T(S/A) (threatened due to similarity of appearance). The T(S/A) designation bans the
collection and interstate and international commercial trade of bog turtles from the southern population. The
T(S/A) designation has no effect on land management activities by private landowners in North Carolina, part of
the southern population of the species. In addition to its official status as T(S/A), the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service considers the southern population of the bog turtle as a Federal species of concern due to habitat loss.
Definitions of Record Status:
Current - the species has been observed in the county within the last 50 years.
Historic - the species was last observed in the county more than 50 years ago.
Obscure - the date and/or location of observation is uncertain.
Incidental/migrant - the species was observed outside of its normal range or habitat.
Probable/potential - the species is considered likely to occur in this county based on the proximity of known
records (in adjacent counties), the presence of potentially suitable habitat, or both.
https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylist/edgecombe.htmi 2/2

C hi tre , https ecosSws.9ov
Ovater Supr+' Drfnk,,ng 'JJater boo CLmaze Data Ontiri, to AicGIS - NCCj(DT 2, tO NC CHNI: Lii\"-- NZ NCOEQ - App icati Plocd R s�,' Inforona, �,jC Rivc
EV, S
ECOS Environmental Conservation Online System
U -)serving the Nalai e ot Atnerica
oi
ECOS Species Reports Species By County Report
Species By County Report
The following report contains Species that are known to or are believed to occur in this county. Species with range unrefined past the state level are now
excluded from this report If you are looking for the Section 7 range (for Section 7 Consultations), please visit the IlPaC application.
County: Edgecombe, North Carolina
Need to contact a FWS field office about a species? Follow this link to find your local FWS Office
Group Name Population Status Lead Office
Birds Red -cockaded Wherever Endangered Mississippi Ecological
woodpecker (Picoides found Services Field Office
borealis )
Clams Tar River spinymussel Wherever Endangered Raleigh Ecological
(Eilipho steinstansana) found Services Field Office
Clams Yellow lance (Elliptic Wherever Proposed Assistant Regional
lanceolate) found Threatened Director -Ecological
Services
Recovery Plan
Red -cockaded Woodpecker
Recove[y Plan, Second
Revision
Tar River Spinymussel
± CSV
Recovery Recovery
Plan Action Plan
Status Stage
Implementation Final
Progress Revision
2
Implementation Final
Progress Revision
1
ECOS Home Accessibility About the US FWS
About ECOS Privacy USA.aov
-
Contact Us Notices

2/2/2018
EFH Mapper
EFH Data Notice: Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) is defined by textual descriptions contained in the fishery
management plans developed by the regional Fishery Management Councils. In most cases mapping data can
not fully represent the complexity of the habitats that make up EFH. This report should be used for general
interest queries only and should not be interpreted as a definitive evaluation of EFH at this location. A
location -specific evaluation of EFH for any official purposes must be performed by a regional expert. Please
refer to the following links for the appropriate regional resources.
Query Results
Map Scale = 1:72,224
Degrees, Minutes, Seconds: Latitude = 35055'43" N, Longitude = 77039'24" E
Decimal Degrees: Latitude = 35.93, Longitude = -77.66
The query location intersects with spatial data representing EFH and/or HAPCs for the following
species/management units.
EFH
No EFH was identified at the report location.
Pacific Salmon EFH
No Pacific Salmon Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) were identified at the report location.
HAPCs
No Habitat Areas of Particular Concern (HAPC) were identified at the report location.
EFH Areas Protected from Fishing
No EFH Areas Protected from Fishing (EFHA) were identified at the report location.
https://www.habitat.noaa.gov/protection/efh/efhmapper/ 1 /1

r"--
Edgecombe County
4 ,iii
LeggMt
C-) 303
10, Speed
try
ry Rocky ount G O ase (IT)
[E) Penelo
act We
ads Woodcrest Edg mbe
Park
Sharpsbur
GD
D, cry (iTD
Pinetops Old Sparta
CZD I
Wilbanks Macclesfield Crisp (:4:3)34
Kingsboro Industrial Park
F ---I
1345
Hobgood
10,

North Carolina
State Historic Preservation Office
Department of Cultural Resources
Office of Archives and History
NORTH CAROLINA LISTINGS IN THE
NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES
BY COUNTY
As of December 19, 2017
EDGECOMBE COUNTY
The Barracks (Tarboro) 2/18/1971
Batts House and Outbuildings (Speed vicinity) 4/5/2006
Bracebridge Hall (Old Sparta vicinity) 2/18/1971
Bracebridge Hall Boundary Increase and Additional Documentation (Macclesfield vicinity) 12/16/2005
Calvary Episcopal Church and Churchyard (Tarboro) 2/18/1971
Cedar Lane (Leggett vicinity) 4/15/1982
Coates House (Tarboro) 4/3/1973
Coolmore Plantation (NHL) (Tarboro vicinity) 2/18/1971
Cotton Press (Tarboro) 2/18/1971
Eastern Star Baptist Church (Gone) (Tarboro) 4/2/1980
Edgecombe Agricultural Works (Tarboro) 4/2/1980
Edgemont Historic District (Rocky Mount) 11/12/1999
Edgemont Historic District Boundary Expansion (Rocky Mount) 9/14/2002
The Grove (Tarboro) 2/18/1971
Howell Homeplace (Tarboro vicinity) 12/20/1984
Lincoln Park Historic District (Rocky Mount) 1/20/2012
Lone Pine (Tarboro vicinity) 11/6/1987
Mount Prospect (Gone) (Leggett vicinity) 11/20/1974
Dr. A.B. Nobles House and McKendree Church (Mercer vicinity) 6/19/1980
Oakland Plantation (Tarboro) 4/2/1980
Old Town Plantation (Battleboro vicinity) 1/20/1972
Piney Prospect (Old Sparta vicinity) 2/18/1971
Porter Houses and Armstrong Kitchen (Whitakers vicinity) 9/14/2002
Princeville School (Princeville) 1/9/2001
Quigless Clinic (Tarboro) 10/27/2000
Railroad Depot Complex (Gone) (Tarboro) 4/2/1980
Redmond-Shackleford House (Tarboro) 12/12/1976
Rocky Mount Central City Historic District (Rocky Mount) 6/19/1980
Rocky Mount Central City Historic District Boundary Incr. & Decr. & Add. Doc. (Rocky Mount)
8/27/2009
Saint John's Episcopal Church (Battleboro) 2/18/1971
Saint Paul Baptist Church (Tarboro) 4/2/1980
William and Susan Savage House (Leggett vicinity) 8/25/2014
Tarboro Historic District (Tarboro) 4/2/1980
Tarboro Town Common (Tarboro) 9/30/1970
Vinedale (Pinetops vicinity) 7/15/1982
Walston-Bulluck House (Pender Museum) (Tarboro) 2/18/1971
Wilkinson -Dozier House (Conetoe vicinity) 10/23/1974
Worsley -Burnette House (Conetoe vicinity) 5/24/1990

FLOOD HAZARD INFORMATION
NEE FIN REPOIIT M LONE OESCRIPRONSANO INDEII MM
THE INFORMATION DEMCIED ON THIS MAP AND SUPPORTING
DOCUMENTATION ARE ALSO AVAILABLE IN DIGITAL FORMAT AT
HTTP://FR IS.N C.GOV- FR IS
-WNhlulBm FblA Ehvatlln�
MOLAL-8W.ADephzm EAO.AH Mc.An
NPE
NAiAMMFM ,fill u D ® R.10- y FmlAway
— 0.2%Annual Chance Fl— Hack, Areas
d 1%Anneal Chance FmoA Math Average
DepM L—Than 01x: F -., MIR Drainage
Artan of leas Then OIIe Squam Mlk zwea
Furore Cantlkons l%Annual
Chance FI..d Hamrtl 11,111
OMEAMFASOi �A...ft RMuceA Fbotl Rkk tluemle.ee
F100D N"7"R° See noted z�"e.
DIRER Ames OetelmineAm Ee Oumke Me
MEM, 0.2%Annual Chance Flootlplaln zone>
--- Channel, CulverC or Smrm Sewer
n Aaa .d or Pmvi,11111ly A-0itetl
GENERALlevee, DIM,ar Flootlwell
SIRIICNRES .......... N --ft. Leine, DIM ar Fin.d..II
NOM Carolina G¢ltlmk SlaveY bench marh
® Ne0.1 Geotle6e S. -y bench mark
Cmbaswrfst ACNP Survey helmh mark
��--Ko— C—Secrbni-1%Annual Chance
Water S.O.A. Ekvetmn (BFE)
li----- Coastal Tranced
----- C1asblTranssct Baseline
PmNle Baseline
Hytlmgrephic Feature
ORIfU'itll Study
FFANRE: IUNSAIvtkn B ... d.q
NOTES TO USERS SCALE
A,am.....m,n...arnm�..mm. SInch-600feet 1:6,000
rxxaa m name ra n r s.. < m.m me.,nwna. O 250 500 1,000
s � main. -.m n..aa,ma. mninmmnsa x.Pmn. a.nnae.� Matin
red.mmnnneoaevnn.m.a.nn.eea.,.r.emuvn,n.,wa.n v.r n. x.smn 0 75 150 300
Um01I Motlerab Wm Actlbl (UMWA)
TEM m1nI) 117E
F.
® CRRSArea Dmerwke Pmbltetl Ar
PANEL LOCATOR
T311
3A' 37203799001
t
MP REVISED
11/03/04
NORTH CAROLINA FLOODPLAIN MAPRNG PROGRAM
E NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM
�I
L - NSURANCE RATE MAP
uD NORTH CAROLINA
�—+
CL, ..x.,3799 ;-
rW
c
'.enol Gomlai,�s
�i
aMAunm rob
' N folfmNefmuxT. > > n� ,
C
O
O
CE
G
O
Z
3A' 37203799001
t
MP REVISED
11/03/04

µ
k
xea�
IALI
mg,
r'
AMOih_
?
8. �F

w
Mitigation Services
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
February 27, 2018
Eric Evans
Edgecombe County
PO Box 10
Tarboro, NC 27886
Project: Kingsboro Industrial Park
ROY COOPER
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Expiration of Acceptance: 8/28/2018
County: Edgecombe
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to
accept payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as
indicated in the table below_ Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -
lieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will
be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or
authorizations associated with the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification/CAMA permit within this time frame, this
acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS
receives a copy of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and
payment must be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid by
an applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the
impact amounts shown below.
River Basin I Impact Location I Impact
Tar -Pamlico 03020101
Zone 1
Impact Quantity
5,970
Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010 and
15A NCAC 02B .0295 as applicable. Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at [phone].
Sincerely,
James. Stanfill
Asset' nagement Supervisor
cc: William Larsen, PE, agent
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 1 217 W. Jones Strew, Suite 3000
919 707 8976 T