NC0033227_Fact Sheet_20180316

Fact Sheet
NPDES Permit No. NC0033227
Permit Writer/Email Contact Bing Bai,[e-mail]:
Date: March 1, 2018
Division/Branch: NC Division of Water Resources/NPDES Complex Permitting
Fact Sheet Template: Version 09Jan2017
Permitting Action:
® Renewal
❑ Renewal with Expansion
❑ New Discharge
❑ Modification(Fact Sheet should be tailored to mod request)
Note: A complete application should include the following:
• For New Dischargers, EPA Form 2A or 2D requirements,Engineering Alternatives Analysis,Fee
• For Existing Dischargers (POTW), EPA Form 2A, 3 effluent pollutant scans, 4 2nd species WET
tests.
• For Existing Dischargers (Non-POTW),EPA Form 2C with correct analytical requirements based
on industry category.
Complete applicable sections below. If not applicable,enter NA.
1. Basic Facility Information
Facility Information
Applicant/Facility Name: TE Connectivity Corporation
Applicant Address: P.O. Box 3608,Mail Stop 038-34, Harrisburg,PA 17105-3608
Facility Address: 1396 Charlotte Highway,Fairview NC 28730
Permitted Flow: 0.0175 MGD(Outfall 001); 0.288 MGD(GWR Outfall 004)
Facility Type/Waste: Domestic and Industrial wastewater plus Ground Water Remediation
Facility Class: Class 2
Treatment Units: Bar Screen, Aeration Basin, Clarifier, Chlorine Disinfection,
Dechlorination, GW Extraction,Air Strippers,Carbon Filters
Pretreatment Program(Y/N) No
County: Buncombe
Region Asheville
I
Briefly describe the proposed permitting action and facility background: TE Connectivity Corporation
(Formerly named Tyco Electronics Corporation)has applied for NPDES permit renewal, and submitted a
renewal application date June 18, 2015. This permit was modified in 2012 to eliminate Outfall 003 and
allow cooling tower blowdown to be added to Outfall 001.
Page 1 of 9

The facility operates a 0.0175 MGD extended aeration basin serving restrooms and hand sinks for 283
factory employees and intermittent cooling tower blowdown. The cooling tower blowdown is entirely
City of Asheville City water,with no process contact and no added chemicals. Wastewater is discharged
through Outfall 001. Sludge from the WWTP is pumped by Mike's Septic Tank Service and permitted to
be dumped at Brevard Waste Treatment System and MSD.
The facility also operates a GWR designed to remove volatile organic compounds from groundwater. The
GWR consists of six(6) groundwater recovery wells with 4 wells in operation and 2 wells not in
operation. Treated groundwater is discharged through Outfall 004. The treatment process generates no
solids or sludge; therefore,no special handling or disposal of generated solids/sludge is required.
During this renewal application,the permittee requested to remove upstream and downstream temperature
monitoring for Outfall 001, and reduce chronic toxicity test frequency(for Outfall 004) from Quarterly to
Semiannually.
After a review of upstream and downstream temperature data from 2013 through 2017,no evidence is
found that discharged effluent from Outfall 001 caused increase in water temperature downstream;
however, since the facility is discharging thermal wastewater which is a pollutant of concern, the instream
temperature monitoring requirement is maintained in the permit and monitoring frequency is reduced
from monthly to semiannually. The toxicity test frequency reduction request is denied by the Division in
this permit renewal, according to administrative code 15A NCAC 02B. 0508.
2. Receiving Waterbody Information:
Receiving Waterbody Information
Outfalls/Receiving Stream(s): Cane Creek
Stream Segment: 6-57-(1)
Stream Classification: C Trout
Drainage Area(mi2): 17.7
Summer 7Q10(cfs) 6
Winter 7Q10 (cfs): 8
30Q2 (cfs): 9
Average Flow(cfs): 23
IWC (% effluent): 0.45 (Outfall 001); 5.6 (Outfall 004)
303(d) listed/parameter: No
Subject to TMDL/parameter: Statewide Mercury TMDL
Subbasin/HUC: French Broad River Basin/06010105
USGS Topo Quad: E9 SW
Page 2 of 9

3. Effluent Data Summary
Effluent data is summarized below for the period October 2012 through September 2017
Table 3. Effluent Data Summary for Outfall 001
Parameter Units Average Max Min Permit
Limit
Flow MGD 0.0024 0.01 0.001 MA 0.0175
BODS mg/L 7.98 40.7 <2 MA 30
DM 45
TSS mg/L 12.88 41.5 <2.5 MA 30
DM 45
NH3-N mg/L 2.56 20.1 <0.1 -
DO mg/L 8.77 15.2 2.8 -
pH S.U. 7 9 5.7 6-9 s.u.
Total Residual Chlorine µg/L 16.9 37 < 15 DM 28
Effluent temperature °C 16.1 30.2 1 -
Upstream temperature °C 17.1 25.1 6 -
Downstream temperature °C 17.4 24.8 6 -
Fecal Coliform /100 mL 1.94 340 < 1 MA 200
DM 400
MA-Monthly Average,DM-Daily Maximum
Table 4. Effluent Data Summary for GWR Outfall 004
Permit
Parameter Units Average Max Min Limit
Flow MGD 0.027 0.049 0.001 MA 0.288
Carbon Tetrachloride µg/L <1.3 <5 < 1 -
1,1-Dichloroethene µg/L <1.3 <5 < 1 -
1,2-Dichloropropane µg/L <1.3 <5 < 1 -
Tetrachloroethene(PCE) µg/L <1.3 <5 < 1 -
Trichloroethene (TCE) µg/L <1.3 <5 < 1 -
MA-Monthly Average
Page 3 of 9

4. Instream Data Summary
Instream monitoring may be required in certain situations, for example: 1)to verify model predictions
when model results for instream DO are within 1 mg/1 of instream standard at full permitted flow; 2)to
verify model predictions for outfall diffuser; 3)to provide data for future TMDL; 4)based on other
instream concerns. Instream monitoring may be conducted by the Permittee, and there are also
Monitoring Coalitions established in several basins that conduct instream sampling for the Permittee(in
which case instream monitoring is waived in the permit as long as coalition membership is maintained).
If applicable, summarize any instream data and what instream monitoring will be proposed for this
permit action: The current permit requires instream monitoring for temperature(upstream and
downstream of Outfall 001)due to the discharge of cooling tower blowdown. As shown on the following
table, a comparison of the upstream data with the downstream data shows that the facility's discharge did
not significantly increase(t-testp>0.05)the water temperature downstream in the Cane Creek during the
review period from January 2013 through October 2017.
Table 5. Upstream and Downstream Temperature
Upstream Downstream
T-test p value
°C °C
Average 14.1 14.4
Max 25.1 24.8 0.8
Min 2.4 2.6
Review of instream data from January 2013 to October 2017 indicates that there were no significant
differences between upstream and downstream temperature(ANOVA,p> 0.5). Downstream temperature
exceeded 20°C only when upstream temperature was already above 20 °C, and no evidence was shown
that the discharge was causing the receiving stream temperature to exceed 20 °C. This draft permit
proposes to reduce instream monitoring frequency from monthly to semiannually.
Is this facility a member of a Monitoring Coalition with waived instream monitoring(Y/N):No
Name of Monitoring Coalition: NA
5. Compliance Summary
Summarize the compliance record with permit effluent limits (past 5 years): The facility reported 31 Daily
Maximum limit violations for TRC from 2012 to 2013,no action was taken since all reported TRC results
were less than 50 lig/L. The facility also reported 1 pH limit violation in 2015, and no action was taken
based on BPJ.
Summarize the compliance record with aquatic toxicity test limits and any second species test results
(past 5 years): The facility passed 19 of 19 quarterly chronic toxicity tests.
Summarize the results from the most recent compliance inspection: The last facility inspection conducted
on March 29,2017 reported that the facility was well maintained and operated in compliant.
Page 4 of 9

6. Water Quality-Based Effluent Limitations (WQBELs)
Dilution and Mixing Zones
In accordance with 15A NCAC 2B.0206,the following streamflows are used for dilution considerations
for development of WQBELs: 1Q10 streamflow(acute Aquatic Life); 7Q10 streamflow(chronic Aquatic
Life; non-carcinogen HH); 30Q2 streamflow(aesthetics); annual average flow(carcinogen,HH).
If applicable, describe any other dilution factors considered(e.g., based on CORMIX model results): NA
If applicable, describe any mixing zones established in accordance with 15A NCAC 2B.0204(b): NA
Oxygen-Consuming Waste Limitations
Limitations for oxygen-consuming waste (e.g.,BOD) are generally based on water quality modeling to
ensure protection of the instream dissolved oxygen(DO)water quality standard. Secondary TBEL limits
(e.g., BOD=30 mg/1 for Municipals)may be appropriate if deemed more stringent based on dilution and
model results.
If permit limits are more stringent than TBELs, describe how limits were developed: Limitations for
BOD are based on Secondary TBEL limits. No changes are proposed from the previous permit limits.
Ammonia and Total Residual Chlorine Limitations
Limitations for ammonia are based on protection of aquatic life utilizing an ammonia chronic criterion of
1.0 mg/1 (summer) and 1.8 mg/1(winter). Acute ammonia limits are derived from chronic criteria,
utilizing a multiplication factor of 3 for Municipals and a multiplication factor of 5 for Non-Municipals.
Limitations for Total Residual Chlorine(TRC) are based on the NC water quality standard for protection
of aquatic life(17 ug/l) and capped at 28 ug/1(acute impacts). Due to analytical issues, all TRC values
reported below 50 ug/1 are considered compliant with their permit limit.
Describe any proposed changes to ammonia and/or TRC limits for this permit renewal: No changes are
proposed from the previous permit limits.
Reasonable Potential Analysis (RPA) for Toxicants: NA
Toxicity Testing Limitations
Permit limits and monitoring requirements for Whole Effluent Toxicity(WET)have been established in
accordance with Division guidance(per WET Memo, 8/2/1999). Per WET guidance, all NPDES permits
issued to Major facilities or any facility discharging"complex"wastewater(contains anything other than
domestic waste)will contain appropriate WET limits and monitoring requirements,with several
exceptions. The State has received prior EPA approval to use an Alternative WET Test Procedure in
NPDES permits,using single concentration screening tests,with multiple dilution follow-up upon a test
failure.
Describe proposed toxicity test requirement: A chronic WET limit at 5.6% effluent at Outfall 004 will
continue on a quarterly frequency.
Page 5 of 9

Mercury Statewide TMDL Evaluation
There is a statewide TMDL for mercury approved by EPA in 2012. The TMDL target was to comply
with EPA's mercury fish tissue criteria(0.3 mg/kg) for human health protection. The TMDL established a
wasteload allocation for point sources of 37 kg/year(81 lb/year), and is applicable to municipals and
industrial facilities with known mercury discharges. Given the small contribution of mercury from point
sources(-2%of total load),the TMDL emphasizes mercury minimization plans(MMPs) for point source
control. Municipal facilities>2 MGD and discharging quantifiable levels of mercury(>1 ng/l)will
receive an MMP requirement. Industrials are evaluated on a case-by-case basis, depending if mercury is a
pollutant of concern. Effluent limits may also be added if annual average effluent concentrations exceed
the WQBEL value(based on the NC WQS of 12 ng/l) and/or if any individual value exceeds a TBEL
value of 47 ng/1
Describe proposed permit actions based on mercury evaluation: Mercury is not a pollutant of concern
for this facility,no limit or monitoring is proposed in this permit renewal.
Other TMDL/Nutrient Management Strategy Considerations
If applicable, describe any other TMDLs/Nutrient Management Strategies and their implementation
within this permit: NA
Other WQBEL Considerations
If applicable, describe any other parameters of concern evaluated for WQBELs: NA
If applicable, describe any special actions (HQW or ORW) this receiving stream and classification shall
comply with in order to protect the designated waterbody: NA
If applicable, describe any compliance schedules proposed for this permit renewal in accordance with
15A NCAC 2H.0107(c)(2)(B), 40CFR 122.47, and EPA May 2007 Memo: NA
If applicable, describe any water quality standards variances proposed in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.3(e) and 15A NCAC 2B.0226 for this permit renewal: NA
7. Technology-Based Effluent Limitations (TBELs)
Municipals
Are concentration limits in the permit at least as stringent as secondary treatment requirements (30 mg/1
BOD5/TSS for Monthly Average, and 45 mg/1 for BOD5/TSS for Weekly Average). YES
If NO,provide a justification for alternative limitations (e.g., waste stabilization pond). NA
Are 85%removal requirements for BOD5/TSS included in the permit? NO
If NO,provide a justification (e.g., waste stabilization pond). Industrial facility treating 100% domestic
wastewater
Page 6 of 9

8. Antidegradation Review (New/Expanding Discharge):
The objective of an antidegradation review is to ensure that a new or increased pollutant loading will not
degrade water quality. Permitting actions for new or expanding discharges require an antidegradation
review in accordance with 15A NCAC 2B.0201. Each applicant for a new/expanding NPDES permit
must document an effort to consider non-discharge alternatives per 15A NCAC 2H.0105(c)(2). In all
cases, existing instream water uses and the level of water quality necessary to protect the existing use is
maintained and protected.
If applicable, describe the results of the antidegradation review, including the Engineering Alternatives
Analysis (EAA)and any water quality modeling results:NA
9. Antibacksliding Review:
Sections 402(o)(2)and 303(d)(4)of the CWA and federal regulations at 40 CFR 122.44(1)prohibit
backsliding of effluent limitations in NPDES permits. These provisions require effluent limitations in a
reissued permit to be as stringent as those in the previous permit,with some exceptions where limitations
may be relaxed(e.g.,based on new information, increases in production may warrant less stringent TBEL
limits, or WQBELs may be less stringent based on updated RPA or dilution).
Are any effluent limitations less stringent than previous permit(YES/NO): NO
If YES, confirm that antibacksliding provisions are not violated: NA
10. Monitoring Requirements
Monitoring frequencies for NPDES permitting are established in accordance with the following
regulations and guidance: 1) State Regulation for Surface Water Monitoring, 15A NCAC 2B.0500; 2)
NPDES Guidance, Monitoring Frequency for Toxic Substances(7/15/2010 Memo); 3)NPDES Guidance,
Reduced Monitoring Frequencies for Facilities with Superior Compliance(10/22/2012 Memo); 4)Best
Professional Judgement(BPJ). Per US EPA(Interim Guidance, 1996),monitoring requirements are not
considered effluent limitations under Section 402(o) of the Clean Water Act, and therefore anti-
backsliding prohibitions would not be triggered by reductions in monitoring frequencies.
For instream monitoring,refer to Section 4.
11. Electronic Reporting Requirements
The US EPA NPDES Electronic Reporting Rule was finalized on December 21,2015. Effective
December 21, 2016,NPDES regulated facilities are required to submit Discharge Monitoring Reports
(DMRs) electronically. Effective December 21, 2020,NPDES regulated facilities will be required to
submit additional NPDES reports electronically. This permit contains the requirements for electronic
reporting, consistent with Federal requirements.
Page 7 of 9

12.Summary of Proposed Permitting Actions:
Table 6. Current Permit Conditions and Proposed Changes for Outfall 001
Parameter Current Permit Proposed Change Basis for Condition/Change
Flow MA 0.0175 MGD No change 15A NCAC 2B .0505
BODS MA 30 mg/L No change TBEL. Secondary Treatment
DM 45 mg/L Standard
TSS MA 30 mg/L No change TBEL. Secondary Treatment
DM 45 mg/L Standard
NH3-N Monitor 2/Month No change 15A NCAC 2B. 0500
DO Monitor weekly No change 15A NCAC 2B .0500
Fecal Coliform MA 200/100 mL No change WQBEL. State WQ standard, 15A
DM 400/100 mL NCAC 2B .0200
TRC DM 28 µg/L No change WQBEL. State WQ standard, 15A
NCAC 2B .0200
Effluent Monitor weekly No change 15A NCAC 2B. 0500
Temperature
Instream WQBEL. State WQ standard, 15A
temperature
Monitor monthly Monitor 2/year NCAC 2B .0200. Monitoring
reduction based on BPJ.
pH 6—9 SU No change WQBEL. State WQ standard, 15A
NCAC 2B .0200
MGD—Million gallons per day,MA- Monthly Average,DM—Daily Max
Table 7. Current Permit Conditions and Proposed Changes for Outfall 004
Parameter Current Permit Proposed Change Basis for Condition/Change
Nom
Flow MA 0.288 MGD No change 15A NCAC 2B .0505
Carbon Tetrachloride Monitor semiannually No change 15A NCAC 2B. 0500
1,1-Dichloroethene Monitor semiannually No change 15A NCAC 2B. 0500
1,2-Dichloropropane Monitor semiannually No change 15A NCAC 2B. 0500
Tetrachloroethene(PCE) Monitor semiannually No change 15A NCAC 2B. 0500
Trichloroethene(TCE) Monitor semiannually No change 15A NCAC 2B. 0500
Chronic limit 5.6% WQBEL. No toxics in toxic
Toxicity Test No change amounts. 15A NCAC 2B.0200
effluent and 15A NCAC 2B.0500
MGD—Million gallons per day,MA- Monthly Average
Page 8 of 9

13. Public Notice Schedule:
Permit to Public Notice: 01/09/2018
Per 15A NCAC 2H .0109& .0111,The Division will receive comments for a period of 30 days following
the publication date of the public notice.Any request for a public hearing shall be submitted to the
Director within the 30 days comment period indicating the interest of the party filing such request and the
reasons why a hearing is warranted.
14. Fact Sheet Addendum (if applicable):
Were there any changes made since the Draft Permit was public noticed(Yes/No):NO
If Yes, list changes and their basis below:NA
15. Fact Sheet Attachments (if applicable):
• Instream Temperature Summary
• WET Summary
• Limit Violation Report
• NH3-N and TRC WLA
Page 9 of 9

Upstream and Downstream Temperaure (°C)
Date Upstream Downstream Date Upstream downstream
1/24/2013 3.9 4.3 8/29/2015 18.5 18.4
2/27/2013 7.6 7.9 9/10/2015 16.8 17
3/21/2013 4.1 4.5 10/30/2015 4.5 9.4
4/18/2013 9.9 10 11/20/2015 7.7 7.6
5/29/2013 16.5 16.8 12/31/2015 9.6 9.5
6/20/2013 16.1 16.3 3/30/2016 8.3 8.5
7/17/2013 16.9 17.2 4/27/2016 10.1 10.1
10/30/2013 12 12 5/25/2016 14.8 15.1
11/25/2013 2.4 2.6 6/29/2016 18.7 19.2
12/17/2013 4 4 7/28/2016 25.1 24.8
2/21/2014 9.9 10 8/23/2016 22.8 23.5
3/31/2014 13.1 13.1 9/28/2016 22.1 22.4
4/25/2004 12.6 12.7 10/25/2016 16.4 17
5/12/2014 14.2 14.3 11/29/2016 12.8 13.5
6/12/2014 14.1 14.1 12/30/2016 12.6 12.2
7/22/2014 21.6 21.6 1/31/2017 13.1 13.6
8/18/2014 14.6 14.5 2/28/2017 10.7 11.3
9/29/2014 18.9 19 3/16/2017 9.4 10.2
10/27/2014 7.3 7.1 4/4/2017 6 6
11/24/2014 19 19.1 5/2/2017 18.4 18.7
12/30/2014 14.3 14.3 6/6/2017 18 18.6
1/13/2015 19.9 19.8 7/6/2017 19.7 19.7
3/31/2015 6.7 6.7 7/11/2017 19.6 19.7
4/28/2015 11.6 11.9 7/18/2017 19.6 19.6
5/27/2015 16.4 16.7 7/25/2017 20 20
6/17/2015 17 17 8/1/2017 19.5 19.8
7/29/2015 18.5 18.4 9/5/2017 19 19.4
8/25/2015 17.7 18 10/4/2017 17.6 18
Upstream Downstream
Average 14.14643 14.4053571
Anova: Single Factor
Groups Count Sum Average Variance
Column 1 56 792.2 14.14643 30.60726
Column 2 56 806.7 14.40536 29.42997
ANOVA
irce of Varia SS df MS F P-value F crit
Between Gn 1.877232 1 1.877232 0.062536 0.8029987 3.927394
Within Grou 3302.048 110 30.01862
Total 3303.925 111
P value > 0.05, no statistical difference between upstream and downstream

MONITORING REPORT(MR)VIOLATIONS for: Report Date: 01/02/18 Page: 1 of 3
Permit: NC0033227 MRs Between 10 - 2012 and 1 - 2018 Region: % Violation Category:Limit Violation Program Category:%
Facility Name:% Param Name % County: % Subbasin:% Violation Action:%
Major Minor:
JIM
PERMIT: NC0033227 FACILITY: Te Connectivity Corporation-Tyco Electronics COUNTY: Buncombe REGION: Asheville
Corporation
Limit Violation
MONITORING OUTFALL/ VIOLATION UNIT OF CALCULATED %
REPORT pp LOCATION PARAMETER DATE FREQUENCY MEASURE LIMIT VALUE Over VIOLATION TYPE VIOLATION ACTION
10-2012 001 Effluent Chlorine,Total Residual 10/03/12 2 X week ug/I 28 31 10.7 Daily Maximum No Action,BPJ
Exceeded
10-2012 001 Effluent Chlorine,Total Residual 10/10/12 2 X week ug/I 28 37 32.1 Daily Maximum No Action,BPJ
Exceeded
10-2012 001 Effluent Chlorine,Total Residual 10/11/12 2 X week ug/I 28 30 7.1 Daily Maximum No Action,BPJ
Exceeded
10-2012 001 Effluent Chlorine,Total Residual 10/24/12 2 X week ug/I 28 29 3.6 Daily Maximum No Action,BPJ
Exceeded
10-2012 001 Effluent Chlorine,Total Residual 10/31/12 2 X week ug/I 28 35 25 Daily Maximum No Action,BPJ
Exceeded
11_2012 001 Effluent Chlorine,Total Residual 11/07/12 2 X week ug/I 28 35 25 Daily Maximum No Action,BPJ
Exceeded
11_2012 001 Effluent Chlorine,Total Residual 11/08/12 2 X week ug/I 28 30 7.1 Daily Maximum No Action,BPJ
Exceeded
11_2012 001 Effluent Chlorine,Total Residual 11/15/12 2 X week ug/I 28 31 10.7 Daily Maximum No Action,BPJ
Exceeded
11-2012 001 Effluent Chlorine,Total Residual 11/21/12 2 X week ug/I 28 33 17.9 Daily Maximum No Action,BPJ
Exceeded
12-2012 001 Effluent Chlorine,Total Residual 12/06/12 2 X week ug/I 28 29 3.6 Daily Maximum No Action,BPJ
Exceeded
12-2012 001 Effluent Chlorine,Total Residual 12/07/12 2 X week ug/I 28 34 21.4 Daily Maximum No Action,BPJ
Exceeded
12-2012 001 Effluent Chlorine,Total Residual 12/12/12 2 X week ug/I 28 30 7.1 Daily Maximum No Action,BPJ
Exceeded
12-2012 001 Effluent Chlorine,Total Residual 12/13/12 2 X week ug/I 28 35 25 Daily Maximum No Action,BPJ
Exceeded
12_2012 001 Effluent Chlorine,Total Residual 12/18/12 2 X week ug/I 28 31 10.7 Daily Maximum No Action,BPJ
Exceeded
12_2012 001 Effluent Chlorine,Total Residual 12/19/12 2 X week ug/I 28 37 32.1 Daily Maximum No Action,BPJ
Exceeded

MONITORING REPORT(MR)VIOLATIONS for: Report Date: 01/02/18 Page: 2 of 3
WPermit: NC0033227 MRs Between 10 - 2012 and 1 - 2018 Region: % Violation Category:Limit Violation Program Category:%
Facility Name:% Param Name % County: % Subbasin:% Violation Action:%
Major Minor: %
PERMIT: NC0033227 FACILITY: Te Connectivity Corporation-Tyco Electronics COUNTY: Buncombe REGION: Asheville
Corporation
Limit Violation
MONITORING OUTFALL/ VIOLATION UNIT OF CALCULATED %
REPORT ppl LOCATION PARAMETER DATE FREQUENCY MEASURE LIMIT VALUE Over VIOLATION TYPE VIOLATION ACTION
12-2012 001 Effluent Chlorine,Total Residual 12/27/12 2 X week ug/I 28 33 17.9 Daily Maximum No Action,BPJ
Exceeded
01-2013 001 Effluent Chlorine,Total Residual 01/24/13 2 X week ug/I 28 35 25 Daily Maximum No Action,BPJ
Exceeded
04-2013 001 Effluent Chlorine,Total Residual 04/04/13 2 X week ug/I 28 32 14.3 Daily Maximum No Action,BPJ
Exceeded
05-2013 001 Effluent Chlorine,Total Residual 05/09/13 2 X week ug/I 28 35 25 Daily Maximum No Action,BPJ
Exceeded
05-2013 001 Effluent Chlorine,Total Residual 05/14/13 2 X week ug/I 28 30 7.1 Daily Maximum No Action,BPJ
Exceeded
05-2013 001 Effluent Chlorine,Total Residual 05/15/13 2 X week ug/I 28 37 32.1 Daily Maximum No Action,BPJ
Exceeded
05_2013 001 Effluent Chlorine,Total Residual 05/22/13 2 X week ug/I 28 33 17.9 Daily Maximum No Action,BPJ
Exceeded
07_2013 001 Effluent Chlorine,Total Residual 07/02/13 2 X week ug/I 28 36 28.6 Daily Maximum No Action,BPJ
Exceeded
07_2013 001 Effluent Chlorine,Total Residual 07/10/13 2 X week ug/I 28 31 10.7 Daily Maximum No Action,BPJ
Exceeded
07_2013 001 Effluent Chlorine,Total Residual 07/11/13 2 X week ug/I 28 35 25 Daily Maximum No Action,BPJ
Exceeded
07-2013 001 Effluent Chlorine,Total Residual 07/17/13 2 X week ug/I 28 30 7.1 Daily Maximum No Action,BPJ
Exceeded
08-2013 001 Effluent Chlorine,Total Residual 08/06/13 2 X week ug/I 28 31 10.7 Daily Maximum No Action,BPJ
Exceeded
08-2013 001 Effluent Chlorine,Total Residual 08/14/13 2 X week ug/I 28 37 32.1 Daily Maximum No Action,BPJ
Exceeded
08-2013 001 Effluent Chlorine,Total Residual 08/21/13 2 X week ug/I 28 33 17.9 Daily Maximum No Action,BPJ
Exceeded
08_2013 001 Effluent Chlorine,Total Residual 08/22/13 2 X week ug/I 28 30 7.1 Daily Maximum No Action,BPJ
Exceeded
08-2013 001 Effluent Chlorine,Total Residual 08/29/13 2 X week ug/I 28 34 21.4 Daily Maximum No Action,BPJ
Exceeded

MONITORING REPORT(MR)VIOLATIONS for: Report Date: 01/02/18 Page: 3 of 3
Permit: NC0033227 MRs Between 10 - 2012 and 1 - 2018 Region: % Violation Category:Limit Violation Program Category:%
Facility Name:% Param Name % County: % Subbasin:% Violation Action:%
Major Minor: %
PERMIT: NC0033227 FACILITY: Te Connectivity Corporation-Tyco Electronics COUNTY: Buncombe REGION: Asheville
Corporation
Limit Violation
MONITORING OUTFALL/ VIOLATION UNIT OF CALCULATED %
REPORT ppl LOCATION PARAMETER DATE FREQUENCY MEASURE LIMIT VALUE Over VIOLATION TYPE VIOLATION ACTION
07-2017 001 Effluent Chlorine,Total Residual 07/10/17 2 X week ug/I 28 29 3.6 Daily Maximum No Action,BPJ
Exceeded
02-2015 001 Effluent pH 02/23/15 Weekly su 6 5.7 5 Daily Minimum Not No Action,BPJ
Reached

C1 0 0 0 0
N
N
z zaaaa z z z , , , ,
0 10 0 0 0
O 0 0 0 0
V7 V) N V) Vf
N N N N N N N N - N
N N N N N N N N N
0 'o m m m ' O ' a m m o m a LL m m '
a a a a a a a a a s a a fo m fo
a a a un
> N
▪ U Z ry
- Cf Cl C!
O os O O O O
O) < v 0 L) N O) N
- LL LL LL LL LL I
O. G a a O_ Cl)
LL -, a
O O O CO
V; e--I c-I s i
•
00 U N U m U m U LO U
D m Vf VI D
Q '" H H VIV/ < N < Q
LL CI. j
m Q oo Q a a a_ a'7 a coQ a is Q
Q
O co O
.--1
O N .-1 N m
E O E O E O E O O
co co mLL fo mLL m m LL LL
a LL a a a
N N N N N N = N N N N N N N IA VI IA 'A
N N N N N N VI f6 N N N N N N '1"
N N N
CO OS 03 03 03 ' ' ' ' ' ' ra N CO 03 CO CO CO CO 03 N V1 N N
a a a a a a a C a a a a a a a �o OS �a a
- a a a a
a
`^. -a m
I� I- O V N
O O co
Q Q r...:
J
0. ci
01 1 N 1 1 < N 1 1 1 1 1 > N i i i , , > N i i i i i 2 N . A . . i w
1 a 1 1 1 1 c-I •-
M
c c c c c U
0 0 0 0 a)
0
'C 'O W..) T) T) c
z z CC cc cc Cl)co
..
N a)
m N N N N N n
[6 l0 l0 f0 f0 CU
N
UD
T..) Tv
Q
N V V
S II
N
C OV E a) E v E N E N
C• O co o o w o >
in C - in = in La m C C La La La La ~ C La La v1 - C - in v1 in u
i0 ns N N C0 CO 0 i i i 0 c0 c0 f6 f6 0 f6 10 t6 t6 f0 N N N N l0
s- Z Q LL a '� a s Z Q z Q a a a a Z Q a a '� a s z Q a LL CO CO CO ,„
C >• >• ? Y ? a a 0-
E
>
CC C• C C C C
CO O O O O .0
c.rn
qA O
C O C 1L
II
C 0 C O C 0 O 0
O O 0 O O O •- O H
2 ----.t n .-1 2 v �' 0
O L N - (r) ,_ N t N - I 4- n t NL N L Ol V c-1 L
O) N U m U coco U LO c N O U
O O O O O
U U U N U ULL LL m m m m m �L m � LL � , , L LL , , , , i To
c 04
c-1 (-I c-1 c-1 c-I
Cn a N O tDa) cc O
E- = y1 C
C N N N N C EI a E N E N N N N N C N N '4 '&9)
D E
4-4 F. 1 N O bA 1 00 1 N N b0 1 N N N O 00 1 N y, N y1
N f0 R 0 0 CD =N N (0 (0 N 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 > N 0 0 N N N -O
•- m a LL 0- 0- 0- CO m F m a s a cc m a a a a a C m a a CO a CO CO
a)
O a ra E L
I- LO Co co O] LL
a
CD N M V) t.0N N N N N UE N M V V1 LO
N N N N N a> N M V Vl0
N N N a-I c-I >ea
N M V Vl0
N c-I c-I c-I c-I - N M Vl0
c-1 c-1 c-1 c-1 c-1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0
NNNNN ONNNNN NNNNN C NNNNN NNNNN C
g LL LL N
9- U 0W 0LL LL 0 a 0a LL d
LL
O) LL U U Q LL a
I� - N
0) Y w0 h N -0 v CO a
_C H U H U I� Z I- Z IT U

NH3/TRC WLA Calculations
Facility: TE Connectiity
PermitNo. NC0033227
Prepared By: Bing Bai
Enter Design Flow (MGD): 0.0175
Enter s7Q10 (cfs): 6
Enter w7Q10 (cfs): 8
Total Residual Chlorine (TRC) Ammonia (Summer)
Daily Maximum Limit(ug/l) Monthly Average Limit(mg NH3-N/I)
s7Q10 (CFS) 6 s7Q10 (CFS) 6
DESIGN FLOW (MGD) 0.0175 DESIGN FLOW (MGD) 0.0175
DESIGN FLOW (CFS) 0.027125 DESIGN FLOW (CFS) 0.02713
STREAM STD (UG/L) 17.0 STREAM STD (MG/L) 1.0
Upstream Bkgd (ug/I) 0 Upstream Bkgd (mg/I) 0.22
IWC (%) 0.45 IWC (%) 0.45
Allowable Conc. (ug/I) 3777 Allowable Conc. (mg/I) 173.5
Ammonia (Winter)
Monthly Average Limit(mg NH3-N/I)
Fecal Coliform w7Q10 (CFS) 8
Monthly Average Limit: 200/100m1 DESIGN FLOW (MGD) 0.0175
(If DF >331; Monitor) DESIGN FLOW (CFS) 0.02713
(If DF<331; Limit) STREAM STD (MG/L) 1.8
Dilution Factor(DF) 222.20 Upstream Bkgd (mg/I) 0.22
IWC (%) 0.34
Allowable Conc. (mg/I) 467.8
Total Residual Chlorine
1. Cap Daily Max limit at 28 ug/I to protect for acute toxicity
Ammonia (as NH3-N)
1. If Allowable Conc > 35 mg/I, Monitor Only
2. Monthly Avg limit x 3 =Weekly Avg limit (Municipals)
3. Monthly Avg limit x 5 = Daily Max limit (Non-Munis)
If the allowable ammonia concentration is > 35 mg/L, no limit shall be imposed
Fecal Coliform
1. Monthly Avg limit x 2 =400/100 ml =Weekly Avg limit (Municipals) = Daily Max limit(Non-Muni)