20180393 Ver 1_Habitat Assessment_20180319

CAROLINA WETLAND SERVICES, INC.
550 E. Westinghouse Blvd.
Charlotte, NC 28273
704-527-1177 (office)
704-527-1133 (fax)

March 1, 2018

Joe Scarborough
Seefried Industrial Properties, Inc.
3333 Riverwood Parkway, Suite 200
Atlanta, Georgia 30339

Subject:Protected Species Habitat Assessment Report
Project Quattro/CLT Land
Charlotte, North Carolina
CWS Project No. 2017-0565

Dear Mr. Scarborough,

Seefried Industrial Properties, Inc. has contracted Carolina Wetland Services, Inc. (CWS) to
provide a protected species habitat assessment for the Project Quattro/CLT Land site. The
Project Quattro/CLT Land site (Mecklenburg County Tax Parcel Numbers are available on
request) is approximately 158 acres in extent and is located north of the Charlotte Douglas
International Airport along Tuckaseegee Road to the southeast of the I-485 and I-85 intersection
in unincorporated Mecklenburg County (Figure 1).

Methods
In-office Desktop Review
To determine which protected species are listed as occurring or potentially occurring within the
project vicinity and prior to conducting the on-site field investigation, CWS consulted the United
States Fish and Wildlife Service’s (USFWS) Endangered and Threatened Species and Species
of Concern by County for North Carolina online database for Mecklenburg County . In addition, 1
CWS performed a data review using the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP)
Data Explorer on January 3, 2018 to determine if any record occurrences of federally-listed, 2
candidate endangered, threatened species, or critical habitat are located within the project
limits.

Typical habitat requirements for listed species was discerned from multiple USFWS and 3
NCNHP online resources including, but not limited to, specific USFWS species profiles, 4
recovery plans, NCNHP’s Guide to Federally Listed Endangered and Threatened Species of
North Carolina, and List of the Rare Plant Species of North Carolina. United States Department
of Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA-NRCS) Web Soil Survey of
1 United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Raleigh Field Office. Accessed March 9, 2018. Endangered and Threatened Species
and Species of Concern by County for North Carolina. https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylist/mecklenburg.html
2 North Carolina Natural Heritage Data Explorer. Accessed January 3, 2018. https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/.
3 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2006. Optimal Survey Windows for North Carolina’s Federally Threatened and Endangered Plant
Species. http://www.fws.gov/nces/es/plant_survey.html. Accessed March 9 ,2018.
4 Buchanan, M.F. and J.T. Finnegan. 2010. Natural Heritage Program List of the Rare Plant Species of North Carolina. NC Natural
Heritage Program, Raleigh, NC. Accessed from https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylist/nc_counties.html
NORTH CAROLINA - SOUTH CAROLINA
WWW.CWS-INC.NET

Page 1 of 8

Project Quattro/CLT Land March 9, 2018
Protected Species Assessment Report CWS Project No. 2017-0565

Mecklenburg County and aerial imagery were also reviewed for potential habitat communities 5
of listed species within the project vicinity (Figures 2 and 3).

Field Survey
CWS scientists Daniel Roberts, Project Scientist, and Megan Shelton, Staff Scientist I,
conducted a pedestrian habitat assessment of the project area on January 2, and March 9,
2018. Potential habitat for potentially occurring federally-protected species that was identified
during the desktop review was assessed in the field for the quality of physical and/or biological
features essential to the conservation of the applicable species. Additionally, during the
pedestrian habitat assessment, areas were reviewed for applicable federally protected species;
however, formal surveys were not conducted. Identification references for natural communities
include The National Land Cover Database (2011). 6

Results
Based on the NCNHP data explorer review, there are no current records of federally-protected
species within the project limits or within a mile of the project limits (Attachment A). The
USFWS lists seven federally protected species for Mecklenburg County (Table 1). An official
species list has not been obtained from the USFWS Asheville Field Office.

Table 1. Unofficial List of Federally-Protected Species Potentially Occurring within the
Project Quattro/CLT Land Site, Mecklenburg County, NC.
Major Group Scientific Name Common Name Federal Status* Record Status
Plant Helianthus
schweinitzii
Schweinitz's
sunflower E Current
Plant Echinacea
laevigata Smooth coneflower E Current
Plant Rhus michauxii Michaux’s sumac E Current
Animal Lasmigona
decorata Carolina heelsplitter E Current
Animal Bombus affinis Rusty-patched
bumble bee E Historic
Animal Myotis
septentrionalis
Northern-long-eared
bat T Current
Animal Haliaeetus
leucocephalus Bald eagle BGPA Current
* E - Endangered, T - Threatened, BGPA - Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act

Six terrestrial community types were identified within the project area during the field survey.
These community types consist of mixed forest, deciduous forest, herbaceous land, pasture, low
intensity developed areas, and actively maintained road side right-of-ways (Figure 3). Of the
identified on-site community types, herbaceous land, pasture, and actively maintained road side
right-of-ways are considered potential habitat for federally threatened or endangered species
5 United States Department of Agriculture, 2017. Web Soil Survey of Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. Accessed 3/9/18.
Source: https://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/HomePage.htm
6 MLRC. National Land Cover Database, 2011. https://www.mrlc.gov/nlcd11_leg.php

Page 2 of 8

Project Quattro/CLT Land March 9, 2018
Protected Species Assessment Report CWS Project No. 2017-0565

that could potentially occur within the project limits. A brief description of each species habitat
requirements and determination of effect findings are listed below by species.

Schweinitz’s sunflower ( Helianthus schweinitzii )
Habitat Description:
Schweinitz’s sunflower is a perennial herb with yellow rays and yellow centers. They
can reach heights of five feet. Populations are limited to the piedmont of North and
South Carolina. It has been listed as an Endangered species under the ESA since 1991.
The typical habitat for this plant includes roadsides, old pastures, transmission line 7
right-of-ways, open areas, either natural or human-maintained habitats, or edges of
upland woods. Major characteristics of soils associated with suitable Schweinitz’s
sunflower habitat include thin soils, soils on upland interstream flats or gentle slopes,
soils that are clay like in both composition and texture (and often with substantial rock
fragments), soils that have a high shrinkage swell capacity, and those which vary over
the course of the year from very wet to very dry.
Biological Analysis:
Potential on site habitat for this species is limited to herbaceous land and actively
maintained road side right-of-ways along Todd Road and pasture and low intensity
developed areas found off of Tuckaseegee Road (Figure 3, Photographs 1 and 2,
attached). The desktop review and field survey assessment determined that these areas
have the proper soils, slopes, and occasional disturbances to potentially support
Schweinitz’s sunflower. While no individuals of Schweinitz’s sunflower or other
Helianthus species were observed during the field assessment on January 2, and March
9, 2018, this survey was conducted outside the optimal survey window of late August to
October. However, plant remnants identifiable to genera can often be seen after
flowering (personal observation). Although no known population records of the species
occurs within one mile of the project area in the NHP database, potential habitat is
present, which leads CWS to conclude that the project might affect the Schweinitz’s
sunflower and a targeted species survey may be required to make a conclusive
biological determination.

Smooth coneflower ( Echinacea laevigata )
Habitat Description:
Smooth coneflower is a tall, perennial herbaceous plant found in areas with abundant
sunlight where competition in the herbaceous layer is minimal. It has been federally
listed as Endangered under the ESA since 1992. Typical habitat for this plant includes 8
meadows, open woodlands, the ecotonal regions between meadows and woodlands,
cedar barrens, dry limestone bluffs, clear cuts, and roadside and utility rights-of-way. In
North Carolina, the species normally grows in magnesium- and calcium- rich soils
associated with gabbro and diabase parent material, and typically occurs in Iredell,
Misenheimer, and Picture soil series. It grows best where there is abundant sunlight, little
competition in the herbaceous layer, and periodic disturbances (e.g., regular fire regime,
7 United States Fish and Wildlife Services. 1991. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Helianthus schweinitzii
(Schweinitz’s sunflower) Determined to be Endangered. http://ecos.fws.gov/docs/federal_register/fr1852.pdf.
8 United States Fish and Wildlife Services. 1992. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Echinacea laevigata (Smooth
Coneflower) Determined to be Endangered. http://ecos.fws.gov/docs/federal_register/fr2140.pdf.

Page 3 of 8

Project Quattro/CLT Land March 9, 2018
Protected Species Assessment Report CWS Project No. 2017-0565

well-timed mowing, careful clearing) that prevents encroachment of shade-producing
woody shrubs and trees. On sites where woody succession is held in check, it is
characterized by a number of species with prairie affinities.

Biological Analysis:
A NCNHP data record review revealed that there are no current occurrences for this
species within the project limits, or within a one-mile radius of the project (Attachment A).
Though disturbed open areas conducive to early succession species are present in the
project area, these areas consist of saprolite and residuum weathered soils, absent of
magnesium and calcium and are therefore not suitable for smooth coneflower
(Photograph 3 attached). Due to the lack of habitat and known occurrences, CWS 9
concludes that this project will not affect smooth coneflower.

Michaux’s sumac ( Rhus michauxii )
Habitat Description:
Michaux’s sumac is a rhizomatous shrub. It is densely hairy with compound leaves
exhibiting evenly-serrated leaflets. Flowers are small, greenish to white, in terminal
clusters. Fruits are red drupes produced from August to October. It has been listed as
an Endangered species under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) since 1989. It is 10
found on the coastal plains of Virginia to Florida, with most populations occurring in
North Carolina. It prefers sandy or rocky open woods with basic soils, as well as,
highway right-of-ways, roadsides, or edges of artificially-maintained clearings.
Biological Analysis:
A NCNHP data record review revealed that there are no current occurrences for this
species within the project limits, or within a one-mile radius of the project (Attachment A).
Though disturbed open areas conducive to early succession species are present in the
project area, these areas consist of acidic Enon and Wilkes soils that are not suitable for
Michaux’s sumac (Figure 2). Additionally the Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
states in its Michaux’s sumac profile page that the species is considered historic in
Mecklenburg County . Due to the lack of habitat and known occurrences, CWS 11
concludes that this project will not affect Michaux’s sumac.

Carolina heelsplitter ( Lasmigona decorata )
Habitat Description:
The Carolina heelsplitter was historically known from several locations within the
Catawba and Pee Dee River systems in North Carolina and the Pee Dee and Savannah
River systems, and possibly the Saluda River system in South Carolina. In North
Carolina, the species is now known only from a handful of streams in the Pee Dee and
Catawba River systems. The species exists in very low abundances, usually within 6 feet
of shorelines, throughout its known range. The general habitat requirements for the
Carolina heelsplitter are shaded areas in large rivers to small streams, often burrowed
9 United States Department of Agriculture, 2017. Web Soil Survey of Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. Accessed 12/28/17.
Source: https://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/HomePage.htm
10 United States Fish and Wildlife Services. 1989. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants;Determination of Endangered
Status for Rhus michauxii (Michaux’s sumac). http://ecos.fws.gov/docs/federal_register/fr1601.pdf.
11 Suiter, Dale. Fish and Wildlife Biologist. Raleigh Ecological Services Field, USFWS. Michaux’s Sumac Species Profile page. Last
updated August 24, 2017. Accessed January 3, 2018 https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/es_michauxs_sumac.html

Page 4 of 8

Project Quattro/CLT Land March 9, 2018
Protected Species Assessment Report CWS Project No. 2017-0565

into clay banks between the root systems of trees, or in runs along steep banks with
moderate current. Recently, the Carolina heelsplitter has been found is in sections of
streams containing bedrock with perpendicular crevices filled with sand and gravel, and
with wide riparian buffers. 12
Biological Analysis:
A pedestrian foot survey conducted on January 2, and March 9, 2018 revealed that three
of the four on-site streams originate on-site and are connected to downstream waters via
a pipe, which does not provide a suitable connection to downstream waters that Carolina
heelsplitter could utilize during its matting phase (Photograph 4 and 5) . Ticer Branch is
highly incised with kudzu as the main vegetation along the banks. The lack of bank
stabilization due to poor vegetation has resulted in highly unstable banks and stream
bottoms, and instability throughout the stream has caused high amounts of sediment to
flow into the stream, resulting in high turbidity, which is not conducive habitat for the
Carolina heelsplitter (Photograph 6). Due to the breaks in biological connectivity to
downstream waters, highly turbid waters, and a lack of well shaded in stream
microhabitats CWS concludes that this project will not affect the Carolina
heelsplitter.

Rusty Patched Bumble Bee (Bombus affinis)
The Rusty patched bumble bee was listed as Endangered under the ESA in January 2017. 13
Rusty patched bumble bees once occupied grasslands and tallgrass prairies of the Upper
Midwest and Northeast, but most grasslands and prairies have been lost, degraded, or
fragmented by conversion to other uses. According to USFWS guidance, “the rusty patched
bumble bee is likely to be present in scattered locations that cover only about 0.1% of the
species’ historical range. It is within these limited areas USFWS recommend that federal
agencies and others consider the need to consult with the Service on the potential effects of
their actions or the potential need for an incidental take permit under section 10(a)(1)(B). For the
remaining 99.9% of the historical range, USFWS advise agencies and others that this bumble
bee is not likely to be present and that consultations or incidental take coverage is not
necessary.” According to USFWS’ Rusty Patched Bumble Bee Interactive Map, Mecklenburg 14
County is not within the 0.1% historical range as no high potential zones or low potential zones
are present within Mecklenburg County. Therefore, the proposed project will not affect the
rusty-patched bumble bee.

Northern long-eared bat ( Myotis septentrionalis )
The northern long-eared bat (NLEB) is one of the species of bats most impacted by the
white-nose syndrome disease. Summer habitat (roosting habitat) of the NLEB includes forests
and woodlots containing live trees and/or dead snags greater than three inches diameter at
breast height with cavities or crevices. Winter habitat (hibernacula) of the NLEB includes caves,
12 NCDOT TE Animal Habitat Descriptions. 2015.
https://connect.ncdot.gov/resources/Environmental/Compliance%20Guides%20and%20Procedures/TE%20Animal%20Habitat%
20Descriptions%20Mar_6_2015.pdf
13 United States Fish and Wildlife Services. https://www.fws.gov/midwest/endangered/insects/rpbb/index.html
14 United States Fish and Wildlife Services. https://www.fws.gov/midwest/endangered/insects/rpbb/index.html

Page 5 of 8

Project Quattro/CLT Land March 9, 2018
Protected Species Assessment Report CWS Project No. 2017-0565

mines, rocky areas, or structures that mimic similar conditions such as culverts greater than
48-inch in diameter. The NLEB was listed as Threatened (T) on April 2, 2015. 15

A Standard Local Operating Procedure for Endangered Species Act Compliance (SLOPES) was
established for NLEB between the USFWS Asheville and Raleigh Ecological Offices and the
United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Wilmington District, on January 31, 2017. 16
This SLOPES defines how the USACE will make determinations of effect to the NLEB on
projects in which the USACE is the lead federal agency. Alternative Local Procedure 2 (ALP 2)
applies for the Project Quattro/CLT Land site as the action area is within range of the NLEB, 17
the action area is located outside of a red 12-digit HUC as defined by the Asheville Ecological
Services Field Office, and consultation by the USACE is required on other listed species or 18
critical habitat.

The final 4(d) rule exempts incidental take of NLEB associated with activities that occur greater
than 0.25 miles from a known hibernaculum site and greater than 150 feet from a known,
occupied maternity roost from June 1-July 31. In accordance with ALP 2 and the final 4(d) rule
(effective as of February 16, 2016), any incidental take that may result from associated activities
is exempt under the 4(d) rule. Therefore, this project is exempt under the 4(d) rule.

Bald eagle ( Haliaeetus leucocephalus )
The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act, enacted in 1940, prohibits anyone, without a 19
permit issued, from "taking" bald eagles, including their parts, nests, or eggs. Habitat for the
bald eagle includes cliffs and forested areas typically within 1.0 mile of estuaries, large lakes,
reservoirs, rivers, seacoast, and as they become more abundant, stands of undisturbed forest.

A desktop-GIS assessment of the project study area, as well as the area within a 1 mile radius
of the project limits, was performed on December 28, 2017 using 2016 color aerials. No water
bodies large enough or sufficiently open to be considered potential feeding sources were
identified. Since there was no foraging habitat within the review area, a survey of the project
study area and the area within the project limits was not conducted. Additionally, a review of the
NCNHP database on January 03, 2018 revealed no known occurrences of this species within
1.0 mile of the project study area. Due to the lack of habitat, known occurrences, and minimal
impact anticipated for this project, CWS concludes that this project will not affect this
species.

Summary
Based on the literature search and the results of the on-site assessment for suitable habitat of
federally-protected endangered, threatened, and candidate species, suitable habitat was not
observed within the project limits for the smooth coneflower, Michaux’s sumac, bald eagle, and
Carolina heelsplitter. Suitable habitat was observed for Schweinitz’s sunflower. Additionally, the
project area is not located within the 0.1% historical range of the rusty-patched bumble bee.
15 United States Fish and Wildlife Service. 2016. 4(d) Rule for the Northern Long-Eared Bat; Final rule.
https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2016-01-14/pdf/2016-00617.pdf
16 USACE http://saw-reg.usace.army.mil/NLEB/1-30-17-signed_NLEB-SLOPES&apps.pdf
17 The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) 2016. https://www.fws.gov/midwest/endangered/mammals/nleb/pdf/WNSZone.pdf
18 The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) 2016. Northern Long-Eared Bat.
19 https://www.fws.gov/midwest/MidwestBird/eaglepermits/bagepa.html

Page 6 of 8

Project Quattro/CLT Land March 9, 2018
Protected Species Assessment Report CWS Project No. 2017-0565

CWS has concluded that activities within the project area will not directly or indirectly jeopardize
the continued existence of smooth coneflower, Michaux’s sumac, bald eagle, rusty-patched
bumble bee, and Carolina heelsplitter. However, Schweinitz’s sunflower might be affected.
Additionally, based on the project area location, no tree removal activities will occur within a
150-foot radius of a known, occupied NLEB maternity roost from June 1-July 31 and no trees
will be removed within 0.25 miles of a known hibernaculum at any time of year. Therefore, any
incidental take on NLEB that may result from associated activities is exempt under the 4(d) rule
and notifications will follow the SLOPES agreement . Biological determinations requirements 20
for federally protected species are summarized in Table 2 (below).

Table 2. Biological Determination Requirements Summary Table for Federally Protected Species
Scientific Name Common Name Federal
Status*
Effect on Listed
Species
Biological
Determination
Required
Helianthus schweinitzii Schweinitz's sunflower E Might Affect Yes
Echinacea laevigata Smooth coneflower E Will Not Affect No
Rhus michauxii Michaux’s sumac E Will Not Affect No
Lasmigona decorata Carolina heelsplitter E Will Not Affect No
Bombus affinis Rusty-patched bumble bee E Will Not Affect No
Myotis septentrionalis Northern-long-eared bat T Exempt/Excepted Yes**
Haliaeetus
leucocephalus Bald eagle BGPA Will Not Affect No
* E - Endangered, T - Threatened, BGPA - Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act
** - Required in accoradnce with SLOPES, ALP 2 agreement.

20 http://www.fws.gov/asheville/htmls/project_review/NLEB_in_WNC.html

Page 7 of 8

Project Quattro/CLT Land March 9, 2018
Protected Species Assessment Report CWS Project No. 2017-0565

A biological assessment was not conducted for this project. All biological determinations of
effect represent the best professional opinion of CWS and are not official determinations of
effect. It is the responsibility of the lead federal agency to render an official determination of
effect. Should the lead federal agency agree with CWS’s initial findings of no effect, then no
USFWS consultation is required to comply with Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act.
Should the lead federal agency’s determination of effect differ from the findings of CWS, formal
or informal consultation with USFWS may be required.

Thank you for the opportunity to provide these services on this important project. Please do not
hesitate to contact Daniel Roberts at 704-527-1177 ex. 707 or [e-mail] should you
have any questions or comments regarding this report.

Sincerely,

Daniel Roberts Christine A. Geist, PWS, CE
Project Scientist Principal Scientist

Attachments:Figure 1: USGS Site Location
Figure 2: USDA-NRCS Soil Map of Mecklenburg County
Figure 3: Aerial Imagery
Attachment A: NCNHP Data Review Report
Attachment B: Representative Photographs (1-6)

Page 8 of 8
FIGURE NO.SCALE:
CWS PROJECT NO:
COORDINATES:
DATE:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
SCALE:
CWS PROJECT NO:
COORDINATES:
USGS Site Location 1of3
I
2,000 0 2,0001,000 Feet
CAG
2017-0565 JDR
Legend
Proje ct L imits (1 58 ac.)
QuatroMecklenburg CountyCharlotte, NC
Wilkinson Boulevard
3/8/20181 in ch = 2,000 feet
G:\My Drive\2017 Consulting\2017 Projects\2017-0565 ProjectQuattro\PETS\ArcGIS\Figure 1_USGS.mxd
REFERENCE: USGS 7.5 MINUTE TOPOGRAPHIC QUADRANGLE(S): MOUNTAIN ISLAND LAKE, NC AND CHARLOTTE WEST, NC (2017).
35.24 3977, -80.964377
Tuckaseegee Road
FIGURE NO.SCALE:
CWS PROJECT NO:
COORDINATES:
DATE:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
SCALE:
CWS PROJECT NO:
COORDINATES:
S I-85 Hy
N I-85 Hy
Wilkinson BvN I-485 Inner HyS I-485 Outer HyT uckaseegee R dI-485 RaStarnes RdTodd Rd
Exit 10 I-85 RaWesterwood DrSears RdExit 10a I-85 N Ra
Exit 10b South Gastonia Ra Exi
t 30b North Huntersvi
l
l
e RaJo ye l a n d C r
Kerrybrook Cr
Exit 9 Wilkinson Bv RaSouth Outer Columbia RaExit 30 I-485 Ra
S I-85 Ra
Exit 30a South Pineville RaPerimeter West DrWesterwood Village DrPlacid Lake DrExi
t
10a
I
-85 N RaI-485 RaI-485 RaI
-
4
8
5
Ra
Exit 9 Wilkinson Bv RaMO
EnB
CeB2
CeD2
MO
WkE
WkB
PaF
EnB
CeD2
MeB
Ur
WkF
CeB2
WkB
WkE
CeB2
CeB2
PaE
HeB
CeB2
CuB
PaE
MkB
PaE
MkB
HeB
WkF
PaF
CeD2
UL
PaF
EnB
CeB2
PaF
WkD
WkB
PaF
Ur
PaE
WkF
WkD
WkE
CeD2
EnD
W
WkE
CeD2
WkF
WkD
PaE
PaF
PaF
MeD EnD
WkE
CeB2
W
MeB
WkF
WkB
MeD
WkD
CeB2
PaE
CeD2
WkD
MO
WkB
PaE
EnBPaF
WkE
PaE
EnD
PaE
CeB2
CuB
MeD
CeD2
WkD
WkD
CeD2
CeD2
CeB2CeB2
CeB2
CeD2
CeB2
WkE
WkB
WkB
PaF
EnB
PaE
CeD2
CuB
CeD2
CeD2
PaE
WuD
CeD2
CeD2
W
EnD
W
W
CeB2
CeB2
CeD2
WkB
WkD
CeB2
CeB2
CeD2
W
W
CeB2
CeB2
EnB
MO
CeD2
WkD WkD
USDA-NRCS Soil Surveyof Mecklenburg County 2of3
I
1,000 0 1,000500 Feet
CAG
2017-0565 JDR
Legend
Proje ct L imits (1 58 ac.)
QuatroMecklenburg CountyCharlotte, NC
3/8/20181 in ch = 1,000 feet
G:\My Drive\2017 Consulting\2017 Projects\2017-0565 ProjectQuattro\PETS\ArcGIS\Figure 2_Current Soils.mxd
REFERENCE: USDA-NRCS SOIL SURVEY OF MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NC, DATED 2016.
35.24 3977, -80.964377
Hydric Coverage (%)CeB2 Cecil sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded No 29.2CeD2Cecil sandy clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately eroded No 9.6EnBEnon sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes No 11.5EnDEnon sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes No 7.1WkBWilkes loam, 4 to 8 percent slopes No 10.7WkDWilkes loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes No 13.5WkEWilkes loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes No 9.1WkFWilkes loam, 25 to 45 percent slopes No 9.2100%
Soil Unit Name and Description
Total Coverage:
FIGURE NO.SCALE:
CWS PROJECT NO:
COORDINATES:
DATE:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
SCALE:
CWS PROJECT NO:
COORDINATES:
S I-85 Hy
N I-85 Hy
Wilkinson BvN I-485 Inner HyS I-485 Outer HyI-485 RaT uckaseegee R dTodd Rd
Exit 10 I-85 RaO l d D o w d R dSears RdStarnes RdExit 10a I-85 N RaWesterwood DrExit 9 Wilkinson Bv RaE
xit 3
0
b
N
o
rth
H
u
nte
rs
ville
R
a
Exit 10b South Gastonia RaMarshall DrJoyeland CrKerrybrook Cr
South Outer Columbia RaExit 30a South Pineville RaF i e l d r i d g e R d
Exit 30 I-485 Ra Placid Lake DrWesterwood Village Dr
Exit 9 Wilkinson BvExit 10a I-85 N R aI-485 RaI
-485 RaAerial Map 3of3
I
1,000 0 1,000500 Feet
CAG
2017-0565 JDR
Legend
Proje ct L imits (1 58 ac.)
Roads
Tax Pa rcels
QuatroMecklenburg CountyCharlotte, NC
3/9/20181 in ch = 1,000 feet
G:\My Drive\2017 Consulting\2017 Projects\2017-0565 ProjectQuattro\PETS\ArcGIS\Figure 3_AerialMap.mxd
REFERENCE: BACKGROUND AERIAL IMAGERY PROVIDED BY ESRI, ACCESSED 2017. BACKGROUND GIS LAYER(S) PROVIDED BY MECKLENBURG COUNTY GIS DEPARTMENT, DATED 2017.
35.24 3977, -80.964377
NCNHDE-5547
March 9, 2018
Daniel Roberts
Carolina Wetland Services
550 E. Westinghouse Blvd
Charlotte, NC 28273
RE: Project Quattro/CLT Land; 2017-0565
Dear Daniel Roberts:
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide information
about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
A query of the NCNHP database, based on the project area mapped with your request, indicates that there are
no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, or conservation/managed areas
within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there may be no documentation of natural
heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have
been surveyed. The results of this query should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists.
In the event that rare species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may
update our records.
The attached ‘Potential Occurrences’ table summarizes rare species and natural communities that have been
documented within a one-mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these records suggests that
these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area if suitable habitat exists and is
included for reference. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed area within a one-mile radius of the
project area, if any, are also included in this report.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation planning, project
review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria for regulatory decisions.
Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published without prior written notification to the
NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP
data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a Dedicated Nature
Preserve (DNP), Registered Heritage Area (RHA), Clean Water Management Trust Fund (CWMTF) easement,
or Federally-listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance, please
contact Rodney A. Butler at [e-mail] or 919.707.8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Project Quattro/CLT Land
Project No. 2017-0565
March 9, 2018
NCNHDE-5547
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic
Group
EO ID Scientific Name Common Name Last
Observation
Date
Element
Occurrence
Rank
Accuracy Federal
Status
State
Status
Global
Rank
State
Rank
Freshwater
Bivalve
450 Lasmigona decorata Carolina Heelsplitter 1918-Pre X 3-Medium Endangered Endangered G1 S1
Vascular Plant 13743 Delphinium exaltatum Tall Larkspur 1800s Hi?5-Very
Low
---Endangered G3 S2
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name Owner Owner Type
Mecklenburg County Open Space Mecklenburg County Local Government
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/content/help. Data query generated on March 9, 2018; source: NCNHP, Q1 January 2018. Please resubmit your
information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 3
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Page 3 of 3

Quattro Site January 18, and March 9, 2018
Attachment B: Photopage CWS Project No. 2017-0565

Photograph 1. View of suitable Schweinitz's sunflower habitat with improper soils for smooth coneflower
and Michaux’s sumac.
Photograph 2. View of suitable Schweinitz's sunflower habitat with improper soils for smooth coneflower
and Michaux’s sumac.

Photopage 1 of 3

Quattro Site January 18, and March 9, 2018
Attachment B: Photopage CWS Project No. 2017-0565

Photograph 3. View of unsuitable habitat for smooth coneflower with improper soils for Schweinitz’s
sunflower and Michaux’s sumac.

Photograph 4. View of unsuitable Carolina heelsplitter habitat.

Photopage 2 of 3

Quattro Site January 18, and March 9, 2018
Attachment B: Photopage CWS Project No. 2017-0565

Photograph 5. View of break in biological connectivity of Carolina heelsplitter habitat.
Photograph 6. View of sedimentation, turbidity, and kudzu covered incised banks in Ticer Branch,
unsuitable for Carolina Heelsplitter habitat.

Photopage 3 of 3