20180340 Ver 1_401 Application_20180318

I WETLANDS
1 8c WATERS
Catherine Janiczak
US Army Corps of Engineers
Charlotte Regulatory Field Office
8430 University Executive Park Dr., Suite 611
Charlotte, NC 28262
March 1, 2018
20180340
o [2 (��
k_v a
RE: Sylvan Creek Subdivision, SAW -2015-02027 D
Sylvan Creek Properties, LLC
E
7 2018
Nationwide Permit Verification
Denver, Lincoln County, North Carolina s
Ms. Janiczak,
Attached, please find information pertaining to a Pre -Construction Notification for a Nationwide Permit
Verification request for impacts associated with a residential development, referred to as Sylvan Creek.
The project is located in Denver, North Carolina, just south of NC -16 Business and north of St. James
Church Road. Existing land use throughout the project area is primarily vacant, forested land. A
Jurisdictional Determination Request was issued on November 9, 2015 with the Action ID number
referenced above.
Proiect Purpose and Need
The purpose of the proposed project is to construct infrastructure associated with a residential
development in order to meet growing housing needs in the region. Proposed impacts are necessary for
access to high ground and to provide dual access points for circulation, emergency vehicle access, and
safe ingress and egress for residents.
Project Description
The proposed project includes the construction of the residential development and supporting
infrastructure including subdivision roads, stormwater facilities, amenity area, and common open space.
dance and Minimization
The proposed layout has been designed to provide the minimum number of options for ingress and
egress as dictated by local ordinance. The two proposed crossings have been minimized to the
narrowest profile possible through the use of construction techniques in the form of headwalls. Further,
impacts at crossing S3 have been minimized from original design through the adoption of the NCDOT
"mountain" road standards, which was presented to, and ultimately approved by, NCDOT as a way to
minimize environmental impacts. It was contemplated to shift road crossing S1 southward, towards the
open water, as a way to minimize impacts to the jurisdictional stream channel. Ultimately, this
alternative would involve significantly more impacts to the open water and adjacent wetlands given the
wider cross-section. Taking into account the relatively low quality of the tributary to be impacted it was
determined that the proposed option is the least environmentally damaging practicable alternative.
CHRISTOPHER HUYSMAN
1 70 DEW DROP ROAD
SPARTA, NC 26675
336.406.0906
CHRIS. H [e-mail]
WETLANDS & WATERS, INC.
TAMP BANDY
41 ❑B LB PROPST DRIVE
CONOVER, NC 2861 3
B2B.3112.3437
[e-mail]

Cofferdams will be utilized on the upstream end of each crossing in order to do construction in dry
conditions. Following completion of construction activities culvert bottoms will be replaced with native
substrate and cofferdams will be removed. Compensatory mitigation for temporary impacts associated
with cofferdams is not proposed.
Mitigation
In addition to the on-site mitigation in the form of minimization and stormwater control, the applicant is
proposing to provide compensatory mitigation in the form of an in lieu fee payment through NC Division
of Mitigation Services. Per ongoing discussion with regard to resource quality based upon the results of
NC SAM, the applicant is proposing to mitigate for permanent impacts at crossing S1 at a 1.5/1 ratio and
permanent impacts at crossing S3 at a 2:1 ratio.
Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions about the provided information.
Best regards,
f__
Perry Isner
704.773.4239
CC: Lawrence Mashburn, Sylvan Creek Properties, LLC
Enclosures: Pre -Construction Notification
Site Plan and Impact Exhibits
Property Owner Information
NC Natural Heritage Program Report
NC DMS Letter of Acceptance for In Lieu Payment
NC Stream Assessment Method (SAM) Form
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination
CHRISTOPHER HUYSMAN MUYIMAN & BANDY, INC. TAMP BANDY
1 70 DEW DROP ROAD 41 08 LB PROPST DRIVE
SPARTA, NC 28675 CONOVER, NC 2861 3
336.406.0906 628.302.3437
CHRIS. H [e-mail] [e-mail]

0F W A TF9oG
=� r
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑X Yes ❑ No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
0 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑X No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑X No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑ Yes X❑ No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h
below.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Sylvan Creek
2b.
County:
Lincoln
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Denver
2d.
Subdivision name:
Sylvan Creek
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Multiple Names; see enclosure
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d. Street address:
3e.
City, state, zip:
3f.
Telephone no.:
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent Q Other, specify: Buyer, under contract to purchase
4b. Name:
Lawrence W. Mashburn
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
Sylvan Creek Properties, LLC
4d. Street address:
700 E. Morehead Street Suite 100B
4e. City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28202
4f. Telephone no.:
704.619.3980
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
[e-mail]
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Perry Isner
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Wetlands & Waters, Inc.
5c. Street address:
4108 LB Propst Drive
5d. City, state, zip:
Conover, NC 28613
5e. Telephone no.:
704.773.4239
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
(see enclosure)
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
ILatitude: 35.52545 Longitude: -81.02141
1 c. Property size:
91.25 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Forney Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C
2c. River basin:
Catawba
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Site consists primarily of forested, vacant land, including a large, existing open water. General land use in the vicinity of the project is a combination
of residential, industrial, and institutional.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.3
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 3150
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
To construct a residential subdivision to meet the growing demands for housing in the region and meet the economic expectations of the landowner.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Typical clearing and earth moving equipment will be utilized, including but not limited to pan, excavator, dump trucks, bulldozer, etc.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (includingall prior phases)in the past?
X❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑x Preliminary ❑ Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Chris Huysman & Perry Isner
Agency/Consultant Company: Wetlands & Waters, Inc.
Other: formerly Huysman & Bandy, Inc
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
SAW -2015-02027. Preliminary JD issued on 11/09/2015.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
El Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑X WetlandsX❑ Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 P
Culvert
Headwater Wetland
Yes
Corps
0.06
W2
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W3
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W4
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W5
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W6
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
0.06
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 P
Culvert
UT to Forney Creek
PER
Corps
5
135
S2 T
Cofferdam
UT to Forney Creek
PER
Corps
5
10
S3 P
Culvert
Forney Creek
PER
Corps
8
148
S4 T
Cofferdam
Forney Creek
PER
Corps
8
12
S5
Choose one
S6
Choose one
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
305
3i. Comments:
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivi ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01
Choose one
Choose
02
Choose one
Choose
03
Choose one
Choose
04
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation. then vou MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B1
Yes/No
B2
Yes/No
B3
Yes/No
B4
Yes/No
B5
Yes/No
B6
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The proposed layout has been designed to provide the minimum number of options for safe ingress and egress. Further, impacts at crossing S3 have
been minimized from original design through the adoption of the NCDOT "mountain" road standards, which utilizes a more narrow profile and was
contemplated in order to minimize stream impacts.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
The two proposed crossings have been minimized to the narrowest profile possible through the use of construction techniques in the form of
headwalls. Cofferdams and pump -around will be utilized in order to maintain dry construction conditions. Culvert bottoms will be populated with
stockpiled native substrate. Site will be constructed under an approved sediment and erosion control plan.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑X Yes ❑ No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):X❑
DWQ ❑X Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑X Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑X Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
283 linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
warm
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
❑ Yes ❑ No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes X❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
22
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑X Yes ❑ No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative
description of the plan:
Project is less than 24% impervious and therefore meets Low Impact Development criteria for Lincoln County. Project includes construction of large,
permanent
stormwater BMP designed to Low Impact Development standards. Stormwater management plan will be under review of Lincoln County.
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
Lincoln County
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject?
Lincoln County
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
El Yes ❑X No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
[]Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
El Session Law 2006-246
❑Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes
❑X No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑Yes
❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes
❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes
❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑Yes
❑X No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes
❑X No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Project includes construction of gravity fed sanitary sewer system to tie into existing sanitary sewer trunk line located on site. No
impacts are
associated with construction of sewer.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
®es ❑
YNo
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
5c. if yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
-
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
NC Natural Heritage Program. Project occurs in a county that is located within the range of the Northern Long -Eared Bat, however, as there are no
known occurrences of hibemacula within Lincoln County we are deferring to the Corps for notification.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NC SHPO Arc GIS service
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
FEMA Arc GIS service
6M.
"'�.r.ewe
AL-,
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Applicant/Agent's Signature
Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant isprovided.)
Page 10 of 10

Project
Limits
34.985 AC.•+-
POND
ji C
C)
44.252 AC— _ \
�C ) fi�
/ / \
C)
Qj
eW11' 1 �a� o-
Lt(,trvu • De: x%%% Pc. %%%% BOUNDARY SURVEY
wre 3 -u -,e
• - DEDMON SURVEYS DB: Pc: FOR
¢¢ SC.LLE. t50' PB'. % PO: %
xxx
° SITE LARRY MASHBURN
mccarwnnae u.c ® zmina�,a�� JOB/ xxxxxx%%%XXX%%%%%%%%
xATXBNDRY
SUW. BY: CP D— CP —CRD xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
C1)
• �, ..•
•
.c..
/
;JIB CZ)
•uu x
\;
``
3.971 AC.+-
1
C3)
Cad
C4) \
o.i�erc.sT
35)
�r ✓9� �
e.'
���
38) ts� .
„-
neos o
9%
c�
/
Lt(,trvu • De: x%%% Pc. %%%% BOUNDARY SURVEY
wre 3 -u -,e
• - DEDMON SURVEYS DB: Pc: FOR
¢¢ SC.LLE. t50' PB'. % PO: %
xxx
° SITE LARRY MASHBURN
mccarwnnae u.c ® zmina�,a�� JOB/ xxxxxx%%%XXX%%%%%%%%
xATXBNDRY
SUW. BY: CP D— CP —CRD xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

r1
A °
mo�c�ir�i
_err_tt l_NIR.�,� 4 ©rat�o�
�j6 rar:raeyog
"A5 mr�ravo
mrmi �ormSl '
Ili m�rxc�o© -
J mt,r®om
, ocrrm�om
� A rnora�oc� -
mr'1rCSJOt�
�'�IrmmFQ4illm
2 84" CMP REINFORCED CONCRETE ENDWALL Ntt
COLLECTOR STREET C CULVERT PROFILE
SCALE: HOR: 1'=40', VERT: 1"=4'
GRADING LEGEND
.me.Nw � °`sra��oR.a«ae
rxoroxc uwwowrn
D
— — — --
---------- N(xRH
r 74a
STEWART
G�N.
GENERAL NOTES:
],wcioR wLLREDuiRm i0 PucEEi-Ic Bu+s Y IBE
n ME T"PIPE WLKRR .3 PND D'rE WIM n NIrvINUN J'
GO�in anD � IExCM R B' 1E55 Mu. EnOwN1.
J. fgtu5 ME M BE USED FOR ME CONSMUCBON OE ME BOiiW -B.
a. wNl MI xx SS (» SNOwN IS NO! t0NVR t0
/4CEPfN%E. BUi SE USED ONLY
IN COUWnxG EnUwNl WNRIRES.
B. u✓0 PWRSiOB�SE PNUIELYEMExiOP pP Bt5E'ZT—' BE l6i xOUGN.
®seeeet�MHUMN
eee�ee /n
."MIN
ULl
n IN
iS�rccra�dcrEaNd��m �
� 8R=1111111 � ��\\lA
cLo -
348' RCP REINFORCED CONCRETE ENDWALL NIS
#31 X -SECTION
SCALE: HOR: 1"=40', VERT: 1"=4'
��InnI■■�166��I
NN
w
�1'
ii !
1
■
f
r 74a
STEWART
G�N.
GENERAL NOTES:
],wcioR wLLREDuiRm i0 PucEEi-Ic Bu+s Y IBE
n ME T"PIPE WLKRR .3 PND D'rE WIM n NIrvINUN J'
GO�in anD � IExCM R B' 1E55 Mu. EnOwN1.
J. fgtu5 ME M BE USED FOR ME CONSMUCBON OE ME BOiiW -B.
a. wNl MI xx SS (» SNOwN IS NO! t0NVR t0
/4CEPfN%E. BUi SE USED ONLY
IN COUWnxG EnUwNl WNRIRES.
B. u✓0 PWRSiOB�SE PNUIELYEMExiOP pP Bt5E'ZT—' BE l6i xOUGN.
®seeeet�MHUMN
eee�ee /n
."MIN
ULl
n IN
iS�rccra�dcrEaNd��m �
� 8R=1111111 � ��\\lA
cLo -
348' RCP REINFORCED CONCRETE ENDWALL NIS
#31 X -SECTION
SCALE: HOR: 1"=40', VERT: 1"=4'
nw dna
o is m
GRADING AND
DRAINAGE PLAN
ata'iuis:atxwm
BOB-
_ 1 OF 1
NN
w
f
9
sn ..fix..
.. _
•Y' ms
___
_
._ .......
m
nw dna
o is m
GRADING AND
DRAINAGE PLAN
ata'iuis:atxwm
BOB-
_ 1 OF 1

PIN: 3695-71-8948
Acres: 33.742
Physical Address: N NC 16 Business Hwy
Denver, NC 28037
Owner Listing: Denver Baptist Church Inc.
Mailing Address: 3545 N NC 16 Hwy
Denver, NC 28037
PIN:
3695-81-7891
Acres:
44.24
Physical Address:
3387 N NC -16 Business Hwy
Denver, NC 28037
Owner Listing:
Van Wingerden Dirkje
Mailing Address:
Van Wingerden Aart W
Mailing Address:
Van Wingerden Thomas B
Mailing Address:
16400 Huntersville Concord Rd
Huntersville, NC 28078
PIN:
3695-81-0206
Acres:
1
Physical Address:
Saint James Church Rd
Denver, NC 28037
Owner Listing:
Swaim Ann Smith
Mailing Address:
7107 Executive Cir
Mailing Address:
Denver, NC 28037
PIN:
3695-70-9976
Acres:
3.98
Physical Address:
Saint James Church Rd
Denver, NC 28037
Owner Listing:
Sherrill Allen
Mailing Address:
4909 Stratford Dr
Mailing Address:
Denver, NC 28037
PIN:
3695-80-1889
Acres:
3.95
Physical Address:
Fieldcrest Ln
Denver, NC 28037
Owner Listing:
Sherrill William G
Sherrill Regina H
Mailing Address:
PO Box 373
Denver, NC 28037

PIN:
3695-80-1585 (partial)
Acres:
3.892 total
Physical Address:
7013 Fieldcrest Ln
Denver, NC 28037
Owner Listing:
Warford William H
Mailing Address:
7013 Fieldcrest Ln
Denver, NC 28037
PIN: 3695-80-6831
Acres: 1.85
Physical Address: Fieldcrest Ln
Denver, NC 28037
Owner Listing: Sherrill Tyrus Jr (Heirs)
Mailing Address: 2871 Wesleyan Church Rd
Lincolnton, NC 28092
PIN: 3695-80-0760 (partial)
Acres: 2.578 total
Physical Address: Saint James Church Rd
Denver, NC 28037
Owner Listing: Little Janet S AKA Folsom Janet S
Mailing Address: PO Box 92
Denver, NC 28037

.pec ST.� y
North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
Natural Heritage Program
Governor Roy Cooper
January 23, 2018
Perry Isner
Wetlands & Waters, Inc.
2712 Minden Rd.
Pleasant Garden, NC 27313
RE: Sylvan Creek
Dear Perry Isner:
Secretary Sus! H. Hamilton
NCNHDE-5136
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide information
about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
A query of the NCNHP database, based on the project area mapped with your request, indicates that there are
no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, or conservation/managed areas
within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there may be no documentation of natural
heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have
been surveyed. The results of this query should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists.
In the event that rare species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may
update our records.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that have been
documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these records suggests that
these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area if suitable habitat exists and is
included for reference. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed area within a one -mile radius of the
project area, if any, are also included in this report.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation planning, project
review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria for regulatory decisions.
Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published without prior written notification to the
NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP
data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a Dedicated Nature
Preserve (DNP), Registered Heritage Area (RHA), Clean Water Management Trust Fund (CWMTF) easement,
or Federally -listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance, please
contact Rodney A. Butler at rodney.butler(a)ncdcr.gov or 919.707.8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
MAILING ADDRESS- Telephone [phone] LOCATION -
1651 Mai! Service Center www.ncnlip.org 121 West Jones Street
Raleigh, NC 276+-1651 Raleigh, NC 27603

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Sylvan Creek
January 23, 2018
NCNHDE-5136
No Element Occurrences are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name Owner Owner Type
NC Department of Transportation Mitigation Site NC Department of Transportation State
Catawba Lands Conservancy Easement Catawba Lands Conservancy Private
Catawba Lands Conservancy Preserve Catawba Lands Conservancy Private
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde-natureserve.org/content/help. Data query generated on January 23, 2018; source: NCNHP, 04 October 2017. Please resubmit
your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 3

NCNHDE-5136: Sylvan Creek
N
January23, 2018
Project Boundary
Buffered Project Boundary
!. jj Managed Area (MAREA)
Page 3 of 3
N."'14994
1:26,713
0 0.225 0.45 0.9 mi
0 0.35 0.7 1.4 km
SoumesEsri, HERE, DeLorrne, Interrap increment P Corp., GEBGO. USGS,
FAO, NPS. NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN. Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan,
MET]. Esri China JHong Kong), sadsstopo, Mapmylndia. ® OpenSt—tMap
wntritutors, and the GIS User Community

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
user manual version A. -i
USACE AID #: NCDWR #:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5 -minute topographic
quadrangle, and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same property,
identify and number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for
detailed descriptions and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch" section if supplementary measurements were
performed. See the NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name (if any): Sylvan Creek 2. Date of evaluation: 01/23/18
3. Applicant/owner name: Larry Mashburn 4. Assessor name/organization: Perry Isner, W&W, Inc.
5. County: Lincoln 6. Nearest named water body
7. River basin: Catawba on USGS 7.5 -minute quad: Forney Creek
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 35.52616 -81.02063
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number (show on attached map): T1 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 150'
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): 2 ❑Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 5 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? ❑Yes ❑No
14. Feature type: ❑Perennial flow ®Intermittent flow ❑Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: ❑ Mountains (M) ® Piedmont (P) ❑ Inner Coastal Plain (1) ❑ Outer Coastal Plain (0)
16. Estimated geomorphic ❑A\i ®B
valley shape (skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
17. Watershed size: (skip ®Size 1 (< 0.1 mit) ❑Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 mit) ❑Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 mit) ❑Size 4 (z 5 mit)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes ❑No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑Section 10 water ❑Classified Trout Waters []Water Supply Watershed (❑1 ❑II ❑III ❑IV ❑V)
❑Essential Fish Habitat ❑Primary Nursery Area ❑ High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
El Publicly owned property ❑NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect []Nutrient Sensitive Waters
❑Anadromous fish ❑303(d) List ❑CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
❑Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
[I Designated Critical Habitat (list species)
19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in "Notes/Sketch" section or attached? [:]Yes ®No
1. Channel Water - assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
®A Water throughout assessment reach.
❑B No flow, water in pools only.
❑C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction - assessment reach metric
®A At least 10% of assessment reach in -stream habitat or riffle -pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates, debris jams,
beaver dams).
❑B Not
3. Feature Pattern - assessment reach metric
❑A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
®B Not
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile - assessment reach metric
®A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing damming,
over widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of
these disturbances).
❑B Not
5. Signs of Active Instability - assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down -cutting (head -cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip -rap).
❑A < 10% of channel unstable
❑B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
®C > 25% of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction — streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
®A ®A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
❑B ❑B Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access, disruption of flood flows through streamside area,
leaky or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching])
❑C ❑C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision,
disruption of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples:
impoundments, intensive mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a
man-made feature on an interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors — assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
❑A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
❑B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
❑D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
❑E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in "Notes/Sketch"
section.
❑F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
❑G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
❑H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
El Other: (explain in "Notes/Sketch" section)
®J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather — watershed metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a
drought.
❑A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
El Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
®C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream — assessment reach metric
❑Yes ®No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In -stream Habitat Types — assessment reach metric
10a. ❑Yes []No Degraded in -stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in -stream hardening [for example, rip -rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b.
Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
❑A
Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mossesW
❑F 5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats) r E
[:]G Submerged aquatic vegetation
❑B
Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent w❑H
Low -tide refugia (pools)
vegetation x t
❑I Sand bottom
❑C
Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees) ca❑J
5% vertical bank along the marsh
❑D
5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots
❑K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
®E
Little or no habitat
*********************************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS
11. Bedform and
Substrate —assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11a.
❑Yes
®No Is assessment reach in a natural sand -bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11b.
Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
❑A
Riffle -run section (evaluate 11c)
❑B
Pool -glide section (evaluate 11d)
®C
Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11c.
In riffle
sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach — whether or not submerged.
Check at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) =
absent,
Rare (R) = present but < 10%, Common (C) = > 10-40%, Abundant (A) = > 40-70%, Predominant (P) = > 70%. Cumulative
percentages should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP
R C A P
❑
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Bedrock/saprolite
❑
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Boulder (256 — 4096 mm)
❑
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Cobble (64 — 256 mm)
❑
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Gravel (2 — 64 mm)
❑
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Sand (.062 — 2 mm)
❑
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm)
❑
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Detritus
❑
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Artificial (rip -rap, concrete, etc.)
11d.
❑Yes
❑No Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)

12. Aquatic Life — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. ®Yes ❑No Was an in -stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. ❑No Water ❑Other:
12b. ❑Yes ®No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to "individuals" for Size 1 and 2 streams and "taxa" for Size 3 and 4 streams.
❑ ❑Adult frogs
❑ ❑Aquatic reptiles
❑ ❑Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
❑
[]Beetles
❑ ❑Caddisfly larvae (T)
❑ ❑Asian clam (Corbicuia)
❑ ❑Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
❑ ❑Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
❑ ❑Dipterans
❑ ❑Mayfly larvae (E)
❑ ❑Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
❑ ❑Midges/mosquito larvae
❑ ❑Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
❑ ❑Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula)
❑ ❑Other fish
❑ ❑Salamanders/tadpoles
❑ ❑Snails
❑ ❑Stonefly larvae (P)
❑ ❑Tipulid larvae
❑ ❑Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland
runoff.
LB RB
®A ®A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑B ❑B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑C ❑C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples: ditches, fill, soil
compaction, livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage — streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water >_ 6 inches deep
❑B ❑B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
®C ®C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
®Y ®Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
❑N ❑N
16. Baseflow Contributors — assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
❑A Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges)
❑B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
❑C Obstruction passing flow during low -flow periods within the assessment area (beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom -release dam, weir)
❑D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron in water indicates seepage)
❑E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
®F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors — assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
❑A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
®B Obstruction not passing flow during low -flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit)
❑C Urban stream (>_ 24% impervious surface for watershed)
❑D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
❑E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
❑F None of the above
18. Shading — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider "leaf -on" condition.
®A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
❑B Degraded (example: scattered trees)
❑C Stream shading is gone or largely absent

19. Buffer Width — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider "vegetated buffer" and "wooded buffer" separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB
RB
®A ®A ®A
®A z 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
❑B ❑B ❑B
❑B From 50 to < 100 feet wide
❑C ❑C ❑C
❑C From 30 to < 50 feet wide
❑D ❑D ❑D
❑D From 10 to < 30 feet wide
❑E ❑E ❑E
❑E < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB RB
❑A ®A
Mature forest
®B ❑B
Non -mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
❑C ❑C
Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
❑D ❑D
Maintained shrubs
❑E ❑E
Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but
is within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22:
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A Row crops
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B Maintained turf
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem Density — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
®A ®A Medium to high stem density
❑B ❑B Low stem density
❑C ❑C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB RB
®A ®A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
❑B ❑B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
❑C ❑C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contributes to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
®A ®A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
❑B ❑B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
❑C ❑C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non -characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity — assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. ❑Yes ®No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons. ❑No Water ❑Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
❑A < 46 ❑ B 46 to < 67 [__1C 67 to < 79 ❑ D 79 to < 230 ❑ E >_ 230
Notes/Sketch:

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Sylvan Creek Date of Assessment 01/23/18
Stream Category Pb1 Assessor Name/Organization Perry Isner, W&W, Inc.
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (YIN) NO
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N) NO
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Intermittent
USACE/
NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary
All Streams
Intermittent
(1) Hydrology
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(2) Baseflow
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(2) Flood Flow
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
HIGH
HIGH
(4) Floodplain Access
HIGH
HIGH
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
HIGH
HIGH
(4) Microtopography
NA
NA
(3) Stream Stability
LOW
LOW
(4) Channel Stability
LOW
LOW
(4) Sediment Transport
LOW
LOW
(4) Stream Geomorphology
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
NA
NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
NA
NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
NA
(1) Water Quality
HIGH
HIGH
(2) Baseflow
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Thermoregulation
HIGH
HIGH
(2) Indicators of Stressors
NO
NO
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
HIGH
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
NA
NA
(1) Habitat
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(2) In -stream Habitat
LOW
LOW
(3) Baseflow
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(3) Substrate
LOW
LOW
(3) Stream Stability
LOW
LOW
(3) In -stream Habitat
LOW
LOW
(2) Stream -side Habitat
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Stream -side Habitat
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Thermoregulation
HIGH
HIGH
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
NA
(3) Flow Restriction
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone
NA
NA
Overall
MEDIUM
MEDIUM

Lincoln County Property Record Card
Parcel 34090 Appraisal Year 2017 Pin 3695-71-8948
Physical Location N NC 16 BUSINESS HWY Map 3695-04
Owner
DENVER
Owner
DENVER BAPTIST CHURCH INC
Mailing
3545 N NC 16 HWY
Address
DENVER NC 28037
Account
0174334
Fire District
DENVER
Township
CATAWBA SPRINGS
Neighborhood
0595A
Description
SHELLAM LD
Category
REAL
Sales History
Deed Last Transaction Date Type Qualif
1994-0107 12/27/2007 WD NO
1994-0107 12/27/2007 CMB NO
1228-606 3/19/2001 WD NO
Land Segments
Land Zone
Segment Code
5 ELDD B -N CZ
6 ELDD B -N CZ
Deed
1994-107
Deed Year
2007
Plat
A-192
Deed Acres
33.742
Map Acres
33.742
Land Market Value $1,087,310
Improvement Market Value $0
Total Market Value $1,087,310
Sale Price Stamps Deed Name
$4,200,000 $0 DENVER BAPTIST CHURCH
$0 $0 DENVER BAPTIST CHURCH INC
$145,000 $0 R-ANELL HOUSING GROUP, LLC
Land
Land
Tvpe
Code
Quantity
AC
CU
6.666
AC
CU
27.076
Total Acres
33.742

Lincoln County Property Record Card
Parcel 34096 Appraisal Year 2017 Pin 3695-81-7891
Physical Location 3387 N NC 16 BUSINESS HWY Map 3695-04
Owner
Owner
VAN WINGERDEN DIRKJE
Deed
11E-355
Neighborhood
VAN WINGERDEN AART W
Deed Year
2009
Category
VAN WINGERDEN THOMAS B
Deed Acres
44.24
Mailing
16400 HUNTERSVILLE CONCORD RD
Map Acres
44.528
Address
HUNTERSVILLE NC 28078
Fireplace
1850-
Account
0234513
233
712
Fire District
DENVER
Township
CATAWBA SPRINGS
Neighborhood
0595T
Description
HOWARD LD
Category
REAL
Sales History
Deed
Last Transaction
TypeQualify
Code
1
Date
2
11E-
12/19/2009
CMB NO
355
ELDD PD -R
Bathrooms
11E-
12/19/2009
EST NO
355
HEAT PUMP
Fireplace
1850-
9/1/2006
WD NO
233
712
Basement
Land Segments
Land
Zone
Segment
Code
1
ELDD PD -R
2
ELDD PD -R
3
ELDD PD -R
4
ELDD PD -R
Improvements
Improvement 1
Description SPLIT LEVEL
Quality Grade C+10
Year Built
1965
Effective Year
1965
Built
Quantity
Stories
1
Rooms
8
Bedrooms
4
Bathrooms
2
Half Baths
0
Heat/Air
HEAT PUMP
Fireplace
1
Finished
$0
WINGERDEN AART & THOMAS
712
Basement
Unfinished
0
Basement
Main Finished
1618
Area
Market Value $126,648
Improvement 1
Description SPLIT LEVEL
Land Market Value $519,177
Improvement Market Value $127,148
Total Market Value $646,325
S-7 R mps
Deed Name
Price
Type
Code
Quantity
AC
VAN WINGERDEN DIRKJE & AART W VAN
$0
$0
WINGERDEN & THOMAS B VAN W
7.338
SI
VAN WINGERDEN DIRKJE AND AART W VAN
$0
$0
WINGERDEN AND THOMAS B
36.19
Total Acres
VAN WINGERDEN TEUNIS & DIRKJE & VAN
$900,000
$0
WINGERDEN AART & THOMAS
Land
Land
Type
Code
Quantity
AC
B1
1
AC
U
7.338
SI
PB
1
AC
U
36.19
Total Acres
44.528
Click here to zoom to this record

Quality Grade C+10
Year Built
1965
Effective Year
Built
1965
Stories
1
Rooms
8
Bedrooms
4
Bathrooms
2
Half Baths
0
Heat/Air
HEAT PUMP
Fireplace
1
Finished
712
Basement
Unfinished
0
Basement
Main Finished
1618
Area
Market Value $126,648
Click here to zoom to this record
Miscellaneous Improvements
Improvement Description Area Year Built Market Value
2 STORAGE BARN NO FINISH 1 0 $500
2 STORAGE BARN NO FINISH 1 0 $500

Lincoln County Property Record Card
Parcel 58241 Appraisal Year 2017 Pin 3695-81-0206
Physical Location SAINT JAMES CHURCH RD Map 3695-04
Owner
Owner
SWAIM ANN SMITH
Deed
816-236
Mailing
7107 EXECUTIVE CIR
Deed Year
1993
Address
DENVER NC 28037
Plat
F-488
Account
0072901
Deed Acres
1
Map Acres
1.001
Fire District
DENVER
Land Market Value
$5,480
Township
CATAWBA SPRINGS
Improvement Market Value
$0
Neighborhood
0594
Total Market Value
$5,480
Description
SHERRILL LD RD 1380
Category
REAL
Sales History
Last Transaction
Deed
Sale
TvoeQualify -mos
Deed Name
Date
Pr
816- 1/6/1993
WD NO $0
$0
SHERRILL KEITH WILLIAM & KATHLEEN
B
233
SHERRILL
816- 1/6/1993
WD NO $1,000
$0
SWAIM ANN SMITH
236
Land Segments
Land
Zone Land
Land
Segment
Code Tvoe
Code Quantity
1
PD -R AC
D
1.001
Total Acres
1.001

Lincoln County Property Record Card
Parcel 32399 Appraisal Year 2017 Pin 3695-70-9976
Physical Location SAINT JAMES CHURCH RD Map 3695-04
Owner
Owner
SHERRILL ALLEN
Deed
579-515
Mailing
4909 STRATFORD DR
Deed Year
1981
Address
DENVER NC 28037
Deed Acres
3.98
Account
19541
Map Acres
3.035
Fire District
DENVER
Land Market Value
$16,616
Township
CATAWBA SPRINGS
Improvement Market Value
$0
Neighborhood
0594
Total Market Value
$16,616
Description
SHERRILL LD RD 1380
Category
REAL
Sales History
Deed Last Transaction
Date
0579- 6/23/1981
0515
579-515 6/23/1981
TvoeQualify pr leStamps Deed Name
CVT NO $0 $0 SHERRILL ALLEN
WD YES $0 $0 SHERRILL ALLEN W & MARIAN MASON
SHERRILL
Land Segments
Land Zone
Segment Code
1 ELDD PD -R
Land Land
Tvue Code
AC D
Total Acres
Quantity
3.035
3.035

Lincoln County Property Record Card
Parcel 32520 Appraisal Year 2017
Physical Location FIELDCREST LN
Owner
Owner SHERRILL WILLIAM G Deed
SHERRILL REGINA H Deed Year
Mailing PO BOX 373 Deed Acres
Address DENVER NC 28037-0373 Map Acres
Account 19691
Pin 3695-80-1889
Map 3695-04
561-733
3.95
3.945
Fire District DENVER Land Market Value $21,598
Township CATAWBA SPRINGS Improvement Market Value $0
Neighborhood 0594 Total Market Value $21,598
Description SHERRILL LD RD 1380
Category REAL
Sales History
Deed Last Transaction Date
Type Qualify Sale Price Stamps
Deed Name
561-0733
CVT NO $0 $0
SHERRILL WILLIAM G & REGINA
Land Segments
Land Zone
Land Land
Segment Code
Type Code
Quantity
1 PD -R
AC D
3.945
Total Acres
3.945

Lincoln County Property Record Card
Parcel 34085 Appraisal Year 2017 Pin 3695-80-1585
Physical Location 7013 FIELDCREST LN Map 3695-04
Owner
DENVER
Owner
WARFORD WILLIAM H
Mailing
7013 FIELDCREST LN
Address
DENVER NC 28037
Account
43388
Fire District
DENVER
Township
CATAWBA SPRINGS
Neighborhood
0594
Description
R. HICKS LD
Category
REAL
Deed
737-507
Deed Year
1990
Deed Acres
0
Map Acres
3.892
Land Market Value $49,611
Improvement Market Value $154,255
Total Market Value $203,866
Land Segments
Land Zone
Segment Code
3 ELDD R -T & P
4 ELDD R -T & P
6 ELDD R -T & P
Improvements
Improvement 1
Description RANCH
Quality Grade C+10
Year Built
1972
Effective Year
Tvue
Built
1972
Sales History
1
Rooms
6
Bedrooms
3
Deed Last Transaction Date
TM
Qualify
Sale Price
Stamps
Deed Name
0737-0507 3/8/1990
CMB
NO
$0
$0
WARFORD WILLIAM H
737-507 3/8/1990
WD
YES
$0
$0
WARFORD WILLIAM H
0737-0507
CNV
NO
$0
$0
HICKS ROY DOUGLAS
737-0507
CVT
NO
$0
$0
WARFORD WILLIAM H.
Land Segments
Land Zone
Segment Code
3 ELDD R -T & P
4 ELDD R -T & P
6 ELDD R -T & P
Improvements
Improvement 1
Description RANCH
Quality Grade C+10
Year Built
1972
Effective Year
Tvue
Built
1972
Stories
1
Rooms
6
Bedrooms
3
Bathrooms
2
Half Baths
0
Heat/Air
HEAT PUMP
Fireplace
1
Finished
0
Basement
Unfinished
1332
Basement
Main Finished
2318
Area
Market Value
$148,504
Improvement
1
Description
RANCH
Quality Grade
C+10
Year Built
1972
Effective Year
Built
1972
Stories
1
Rooms
6
Land
Land
Tvue
Code
Quantity
AC
D
2.892
AC
B
1
Si
WS
1
Total Acres
3.892
Click here to zoom to this record

Bedrooms
3
Bathrooms
2
Half Baths
0
Heat/Air
HEAT PUMP
Fireplace
1
Finished
0
Basement
1152
Unfinished
1332
Basement
1152
Main Finished
$5,493
2318
Area
Market Value $148,504
Miscellaneous
Improvement
Area
Year Built
Market Value
2
180
1972
$258
2
180
1972
$258
3
1152
1981
$5,493
3
1152
1981
$5,493
Improvements
Description
Area
Year Built
Market Value
SHED OPEN POLE
180
1972
$258
SHED OPEN POLE
180
1972
$258
STORAGE BARN NO FINISH
1152
1981
$5,493
STORAGE BARN NO FINISH
1152
1981
$5,493

Lincoln County Property Record Card
Parcel 32514 Appraisal Year 2017
Physical Location FIELDCREST LN
Owner
Pin 3695-80-6831
Map 3695-04
Owner
SHERRILL TYRUS JR (HEIRS)
Deed
Mailing
2871 WESLEYAN CHURCH RD
Deed Year
Address
LINCOLNTON NC 28092-8242
Deed Acres
Account
19681
Map Acres
Fire District
DENVER
Land Market Value
Township
CATAWBA SPRINGS
Improvement Market Value
Neighborhood
0594
Total Market Value
Description
SHERRILL LD RD 1380
Land
Category
REAL
Tvue
541-896
1.85
1.891
$10,353
$0
$10,353
Sales History
Deed Last Transaction
Date
Tvue Qualify
Sale Price Stamps Deed Name
541-0896
CVT NO
$0 $0 SHERRILL TYRUS JR
Land Segments
Land
Zone
Land
Land
Segment
Code
Tvue
Code Quantity
1
PD -R
AC
D 1.891
Total Acres
1.891

Lincoln County Property Record Card
Parcel 86604 Appraisal Year 2017 Pin 3695-80-0760
Physical Location SAINT JAMES CHURCH RD Map 3695-04
Owner
Owner
LITTLE JANET S AKA
Deed
1928-355
Stamps
FOLSOM JANET S
Deed Year
2007
Mailing
PO BOX 92
Plat
14-178
Address
DENVER NC 28037
Deed Acres
2.578
Account
0123294
Map Acres
2.482
Fire District
DENVER
Land Market Value
$13,588
Township
CATAWBA SPRINGS
Improvement Market Value
$0
Neighborhood
0594
Total Market Value
$13,588
Description
#2 LT KATHLEEN B SHERRILL
Quantity
Category
REAL
O
Sales History
Deed Last Transaction Date
jQualif
Sale Price
Stamps
Deed Name
1928-0355 5/15/2007
CMB NO
$0
$0
LITTLE JANET S
1928-355 5/15/2007
WD NO
$0
$0
LITTLE JANET S
05E-487 11/3/2005
SPL NO
$0
$0
SHERRILL, KATHLEEN
Land Segments
Land Zone
Land
Land
Segment Code
Type
Code
Quantity
1 ELDD R -T & P
AC
O
2.482
Total Acres
2.482

Midgatian Services
ENVIROMMEMTAL"ALITY
February 28, 2018
Lawreance Mashburn
Sylvan Creek Properties, LLC
700 E. Morehead Street, Suite 100B
Charlotte, NC 28202
Project: Sylvan Creek
ROY COOPL:I(
MICHAEL �. RF,GAN11
Expiration of Acceptance: 8/28/2018
County: Lincoln
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to
accept payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as
indicated in the table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -
lieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will
be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or
authorizations associated with the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification/CAMA permit within this time frame, this
acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS
receives a copy of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and
payment must be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid by
an applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the
impact amounts shown below.
Type I Impact
Catawba 03050101 Riparian Wetland 0.06
Catawba
03050101
Warm Stream
283
Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010 and
15A NCAC 02B .0295 as applicable. Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at [phone].
cc: Perry Isner, agent
Sincerely,
Ja es. B Stanfill
Ass anagement Supervisor
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 1 217 W ]ones Strect, Suitc 3000
919 707 8976 T

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action ID: 2015-02027 County: Lincoln U.S.G.S. Quad: Denver
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property Owner: Silver Hammer. Ane. / Ann.: Lawrence Mashburn
Address: P.O. Box 37229
Charlotte. NC 28237
Teleirlmrne Number: 704-619-3990
Size (acres): +/+/_9p Nearest Town: peeveL
Nearest Waterway: UT Forney Creek and Forney -reek Coordinates: 3&5255 N.91.0214 W
River Rasin/ HUC: Upper Catawba (030501011
Location description: The site is located on a tract of land fall or Darts of omrtd HN 34090. 32514.34096.59241
37399, 32520.34085. mad 86604) at 3387 North NC Hiehwsv 16 Business in Deaver Lincoln County North Carolina
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
X Rased on preliminary information, there may be wetlands on the above described property. We strongly suggest you have
this property inspected to determine the extent of Department of the Army (DA) jurisdiction. To be considered final, a
jurisdictional determination must be verified by the Corps. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action
under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331). If you wish, you may request
an approved JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Cnrps district for further instruction. Also, you may provide
aew information for further consideration by the Cotes to reevaluate the JD.
B. Approved Determination
_ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law or
our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
_ There are waters of the U.S. including wetlands on the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWAx33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
We strongly suggest you have the wetlands on your property delineated. Due to the site of your property and/or our
present workload, the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner. For a more timely
delineation, you may wish to obtain a consultant. To be considered final, any delineation must be verified by the Corps.
_ The waters of the U.S. including wetlands on your project area have been delineated and the delineation has been
vnified by the Corps. We strongly suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be
reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to
CWA jurisdiction on your property which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be
relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.
The waters of the U.S. including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat
signed by the Corps Regulatory Official identified below on . Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed Iiye years ftom the date of this notification.
Thcre are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clem Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our
pablisbed regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act
(CAMA). You should contact We Division of Coastal Management to determine their requirements.

Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US and/or wetlands without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). If you have any questions regarding this
determination and/or the Corps regulaluiy program. please contact David Brown at 828-271-7960, ext. 232 or
david.w.brown(o�usace.army.mil.
C. Basis for Determination:
The site contains wetlands m determined by the 198' Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual and the
Regional Supplement to the Corps of EngbWers Wetlands Delineation Manual: Eastern Mountain and Piedmont
Region, Version 2.0. These wetlands are abutting to stream channels located on the property that exhibit indicators of
ordinary high water marks and have perennial flow. The site also contains open water (an impoundment) that abut the
wetlands and is an impoundment of a stream channel located on the site. The stream channels on the property are an
unnamed tributary (LIT) of Forney Creek, relatively permanent waters (RPW), and Forney Geek (RPW). UT of
Forney Creek flows into Forney Creek, which flow into Killian Creek (RPW), and then flows into Dutchmans Creek
(RPW). Dutchmans Creek flows into the Catawba River, a traditional navigable water (TN W) and a Section 10 water
at the Mountain Island Lake dam in Mecklenburg County, NC. The Catawba River joins the Santee Cowper Rives ill
South Carolina before entering the Atlantic Ocean. The Ul' of Forney Creek and Forney Creek, have bed and bank,
are blue line features on the USGS 7.5 minute topographic quadrangle map, and exhibit indicators of ordinary high
water mark.
D. Remarks:
The waters of the U.S., at this site, were verified on-site by the Corps on October 6, 2015 and are as approximately
depicted on the attached Approximate Depiction of Waters and Wetlands Map, Figure 1, (dated July 17, 2015) and
subwitted by f Iuysman and Bandy, Inc.
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identity the limits of Corps' Clean water Actjurisdictiuu for the
particular site identified in this request. The del ineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation
proviEions of the Food Security Act of 1985- If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation
in USDA programs, you should request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources
Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in
B. shave)
This correspondence constitutes an appioved jurisdictional determination for the above described site If you object to this
determination. you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. if you request to appeal this
detennination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Jason Steele, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room IOM 15
Atlanta, Georgia 303U3-8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for
appeal under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP.
Shou d you decide to submit an RFA form. it must be received at the above address by N/A.
"It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this
correspondence."
Corps Regulatory Official:—_ ----
David Brown
Issue Date of JD: November 9.2015 Expiration Date: Five years from Issue Date