20180133 Ver 1_More Info Received_20180308

Homewood, Sue
From: [e-mail]
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2018 1:37 PM
To: Homewood, Sue
Cc: 'Dailey, Samantha J CIV USARMY CESAW (US)'; Coggins, Tony C
Subject: [External] RE: Triangle Tyre
Attachments: Kingsboro_NCWAM_BW Rating.pdf, wetlands -2-6-18 site 6.pdf, wetlands -2-6-18 site 8.pdf
11 N 01 not click links or open attachments unless verified. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to Report Spam.
Sue,
I have attached the following and cc'd Sam Dailey so you both have the updated files:
- Revised impact sheets for sites 6 and 8. We double checked and the numbers in the cover letter/application are
correct. Apparently in the rush to submit we inserted an older version with the wrong labels. The versions in the original
application and public notice had the correct preliminary design layout - only the label with the wetland acreage and the
red limit of impact in wetlands has changed. Both impacts are lower than originally depicted in the application.
- NCWAM form for Site 7 (non -404 basin wetland).
I also got your email on the Variance Request and we are currently going through those impacts and will get revisions back to
you. Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thanks
Phil
Phil May
CAROLINA ECOSYSTEMS INC.
[phone]
From: Homewood, Sue [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2018 9:51 AM
To: [e-mail]
Subject: Triangle Tyre
Phil,
I've reviewed the IP application for Triangle Tyre. At this time I offer these "informal" comments. Once I review the variance
application I'll send you comments on that as well.
• As we discussed by phone yesterday, the amounts shown on the impact drawings do not match up with the amounts listed
in the table of impacts in the cover letter.
• Before we can issue a certification we will need: detailed design drawings/impact drawings; a detailed stormwater plan
for the roadway; a dewatering plan for the ponds.
• Have you received a buffer determination letter from RRO yet?
• Could you provide the NCWAM form for the isolated wetland, we need the wetland type to be clearly identified (maybe
add to the cover letter/impact table, or impact drawing)
• One of the streams is listed as a "tributary" rather than an intermittent or perennial stream. Can you clarify this please
• I have concerns about the statement (in multiple places of the cover letter) about the road alignment that indicates further
avoidance/minimization would encroach upon uplands which may cause future impacts from future development. This is
speculative and I don't think it is beneficial to the A&M discussion of the road alignment. I would suggest removing

these statements or it may be possible to instead state that encroachment into the uplands would limit the
marketability/use of Pad C and cause a financial/growth/jobs burden to the County.
Also, after speaking with Karen again, I gave you incorrect information about how to handle the buffer impacts. All the buffer
impacts except those that specifically require a variance should have been included in the IP application as a buffer authorization
request. The variance will cover only the impacts that trigger the variance. I'm certain I can review everything I need in one or
the other application so there's nothing that needs to be done at this point in time but I may need you to tweak some of the
documents/impact drawings as you submit new/additional information in the future.
Thanks,
Sue Homewood
Division of Water Resources, Winston Salem Regional Office
Department of Environmental Quality
336 776 9693 office
336 813 1863 mobile
Sue. Homewood (cDncdenr.gov
450 W. Hanes Mill Rd, Suite 300
Winston Salem NC 27105
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

NC WAM WETLAND ASSESSMENT FORM
Accompanies User Manual Version 5
USACE AID#: NCDWR #:
Project Name Kingsboro Site Date of Evaluation January 25, 2018
Applicant/Owner Name Edgecombe County/NCDOT Wetland Site Name Area 107 Wetland
Wetland Type Basin Wetland Assessor Name/Organization G Price/Carolina Ecosystems
Level III Ecoregion Southeastern Plains Nearest Named Water Body Walnut Creek
River Basin Tar -Pamlico USGS 8 -Digit Catalogue Unit 03020101
County Edgecombe NCDWR Region Raleigh
;Yes E ;No Precipitation within 48 hrs? Latitude/Longitude (deci-degrees) 35.9230, -77.6380
Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area (may not be within the assessment area)
Please circle and/or make note on last page if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference, if
appropriate, in recent past (for instance, approximately within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include, but are not limited
to the following.
• Hydrological modifications (examples: ditches, dams, beaver dams, dikes, berms, ponds, etc.)
• Surface and sub -surface discharges into the wetland (examples: discharges containing obvious pollutants, presence of nearby
septic tanks, underground storage tanks (USTs), hog lagoons, etc.)
• Signs of vegetation stress (examples: vegetation mortality, insect damage, disease, storm damage, salt intrusion, etc.)
• Habitat/plant community alteration (examples: mowing, clear -cutting, exotics, etc.)
Is the assessment area intensively managed? �; Yes E+; No
Regulatory Considerations Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ;Yes ;No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
F Anadromous fish
F Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species
F NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect
F Abuts a Primary Nursery Area (PNA)
r Publicly owned property
F N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) (including buffer)
F Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HQW, ORW, or Trout
F Designated NCNHP reference community
F Abuts a 303(d) -listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d) -listed stream
What type of natural stream is associated with the wetland, if any.) (check all that apply)
Blackwater
Brownwater
F Tidal (if tidal, check one of the following boxes) ;Lunar .,Wind
Both
Is the assessment area on a coastal island? Yes ; No
Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver? Yes No
Does the assessment area experience overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions? Yes No
1. Ground Surface Condition/Vegetation Condition — assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface (GS) in the assessment area and vegetation structure
(VS) in the assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable (see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable,
then rate the assessment area based on evidence of an effect.
GS VS
;A E+;A Not severely altered
B B Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area (ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks, excessive
sedimentation, fire -plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure
alteration examples: mechanical disturbance, herbicides, salt intrusion [where appropriate], exotic species, grazing,
less diversity [if appropriate], hydrologic alteration)
2. Surface and Sub -Surface Storage Capacity and Duration — assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration (Surf) and sub -surface storage capacity and
duration (Sub). Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. A ditch <_ 1 foot deep is considered to affect surface water only,
while a ditch > 1 foot deep is expected to affect both surface and sub -surface water. Consider tidal flooding regime, if applicable.
Surf Sub
;A+;A Water storage capacity and duration are not altered.
B; B Water storage capacity or duration are altered, but not substantially (typically, not sufficient to change vegetation).
;C;C Water storage capacity or duration are substantially altered (typically, alteration sufficient to result in vegetation
change) (examples: draining, flooding, soil compaction, filling, excessive sedimentation, underground utility lines).
3. Water Storage/Surface Relief — assessment area/wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Check a box in each column for each group below. Select the appropriate storage for the assessment area (AA) and the wetland
type (WT).
AA WT
3a. A Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water> 1 foot deep
B; B Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 6 inches to 1 foot deep
;C;C Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
D D Depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
3b.;A Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet

B Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is between 1 and 2 feet
;C Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is less than 1 foot

4. Soil Texture/Structure — assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Check a box from each of the three soil property groups below. Dig soil profile in the dominant assessment area landscape
feature. Make soil observations within the 12 inches. Use most recent National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils guidance for
regional indicators.
4a.;A Sandy soil
B Loamy or clayey soils exhibiting redoximorphic features (concentrations, depletions, or rhizospheres)
;C Loamy or clayey soils not exhibiting redoximorphic features
D Loamy or clayey gleyed soil
E Histosol or histic epipedon
4b.;A Soil ribbon < 1 inch
;B Soil ribbon >_ 1 inch
4c. ;A No peat or muck presence
B A peat or muck presence
Discharge into Wetland — opportunity metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface pollutants or discharges (Surf) and sub -surface pollutants or discharges (Sub).
Examples of sub -surface discharges include presence of nearby septic tank, underground storage tank (UST), etc.
Surf Sub
A A Little or no evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the assessment area
B B Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the wetland and stressing, but not overwhelming the
treatment capacity of the assessment area
;C;C Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges (pathogen, particulate, or soluble) entering the assessment area and
potentially overwhelming the treatment capacity of the wetland (water discoloration, dead vegetation, excessive
sedimentation, odor)
Land Use — opportunity metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands)
Check all that apply (at least one box in each column). Evaluation involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. Consider sources
draining to assessment area within entire upstream watershed (WS), within 5 miles and within the watershed draining to the
assessment area (5M), and within 2 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (2M). Effective riparian buffers
are considered to be 50 feet wide in the Coastal Plain and Piedmont ecoregions and 30 feet wide in the Blue Ridge Mountains ecoregion.
WS 5M 2M
F A F A F A >_ 10% impervious surfaces
F B r B F B Confined animal operations (or other local, concentrated source of pollutants)
F C F C F C >_ 20% coverage of pasture
F D r D r D >_ 20% coverage of agricultural land (regularly plowed land)
F E F E r E >_ 20% coverage of maintained grass/herb
F F F F F F >_ 20% coverage of clear-cut land
F G r G r G Little or no opportunity to improve water quality. Lack of opportunity may result from little or no disturbance in
the watershed or hydrologic alterations that prevent dainage and/or overbank flow from affectio the
assessment area.
Wetland Acting as Vegetated Buffer — assessment area/wetland complex condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands)
7a. Is assessment area within 50 feet of a tributary or other open water?
;Yes K;No If Yes, continue to 7b. If No, skip to Metric 8.
7b. How much of the first 50 feet from the bank is weltand? (Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the water body. Make
buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland. Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.)
A >_ 50 feet
B From 30 to < 50 feet
C From 15 to < 30 feet
D From 5 to < 15 feet
E < 5 feet or buffer bypassed by ditches
7c. Tributary width. If the tributary is anastomosed, combine widths of channels/braids for a total width.
<_ 15 -feet wide K—, > 15 -feet wide K—, Other open water (no tributary present)
7d. Do roots of assessment area vegetation extend into the bank of the tributary/open water?
Yes K—, No
7e. Is tributary or other open water sheltered or exposed?
Sheltered — adjacent open water with width < 2500 feet and no regular boat traffic.
Exposed — adjacent open water with width >_ 2500 feet or regular boat traffic.
8. Wetland Width at the Assessment Area — wetland type/wetland complex condition metric (evaluate WT for all marshes
and Estuarine Woody Wetland only; evaluate WC for Bottomland Hardwood Forest, Headwater Forest, and Riverine Swamp
Forest only)
Check a box in each column. Select the average width for the wetland type at the assessment area (WT) and the wetland complex at the
assessment area (WC). See User Manual for WT and WC boundaries.
WT WC
A A >_ 100 feet
B B From 80 to < 100 feet
C; C From 50 to < 80 feet
D D From 40 to < 50 feet
E E From 30 to < 40 feet
F F From 15 to < 30 feet
G; G From 5 to < 15 feet
H H < 5 feet

9. Inundation Duration — assessment area condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands)
Answer for assessment area dominant landform.
A Evidence of short -duration inundation (< 7 consecutive days)
B Evidence of saturation, without evidence of inundation
C Evidence of long -duration inundation or very long -duration inundation (7 to 30 consecutive days or more)
10. Indicators of Deposition — assessment area condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands and all marshes)
Consider recent deposition only (no plant growth since deposition).
A Sediment deposition is not excessive, but at approximately natural levels.
B Sediment deposition is excessive, but not overwhelming the wetland.
C Sediment deposition is excessive and is overwhelming the wetland.
11. Wetland Size — wetland type/wetland complex condition metric
Check a box in each column. Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates three aspects of the wetland area: the
size of the wetland type (WT), the size of the wetland complex (WC), and the size of the forested wetland (FW) (if applicable, see User
Manual). See the User Manual for boundaries of these evaluation areas. If assessment area is clear-cut, select "K" for the FW column.
WT WC FW (if applicable)
CA CA CA >_ 500 acres
C B r, B C B From 100 to < 500 acres
C C E C E C From 50 to < 100 acres
C D L] D E D From 25 to < 50 acres
C E L] E C E From 10 to < 25 acres
C F L] F C F From 5 to < 10 acres
C G L] G CG From 1 to < 5 acres
E H E H C H From 0.5 to < 1 acre
C I L] I C I From 0.1 to < 0.5 acre
CJ CJ CJ From 0.01 to < 0.1 acre
C K C K E K < 0.01 acre or assessment area is clear-cut
12. Wetland Intactness — wetland type condition metric (evaluate for Pocosins only)
CA Pocosin is the full extent (>: 90%) of its natural landscape size.
C B Pocosin is < 90% of the full extent of its natural landscape size.
13. Connectivity to Other Natural Areas — landscape condition metric
13a. Check appropriate box(es) (a box may be checked in each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This
evaluates whether the wetland is well connected (Well) and/or loosely connected (Loosely) to the landscape patch, the contiguous
metric naturally vegetated area and open water (if appropriate). Boundaries are formed by four -lane roads, regularly maintained utility
line corridors the width of a four -lane road or wider, urban landscapes, fields (pasture open and agriculture), or water > 300 feet wide.
Well Loosely
CA CA >_ 500 acres
C B C B From 100 to < 500 acres
CC C C From 50 to < 100 acres
D D From 10 to < 50 acres
E E < 10 acres
C F E F Wetland type has a poor or no connection to other natural habitats
13b. Evaluate for marshes only.
Yes C No Wetland type has a surface hydrology connection to open waters/stream or tidal wetlands.
14. Edge Effect — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes and Estuarine Woody Wetland)
May involve a GIS effort with field adjustment. Estimate distance from wetland type boundary to artificial edges. Artificial edges include
non -forested areas z 40 feet wide such as fields, development, roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors and clear -cuts. Consider
the eight main points of the compass. Artificial edge occurs within 150 feet in how many directiions? If the assessment area is clear-cut,
select option "C."
CA 0
B 1 to 4
EC 5to8
15. Vegetative Composition — assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes and Pine Flat)
CA Vegetation is close to reference condition in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of appropriate
species, with exotic plants absent or sparse within the assessment area.
B Vegetation is different from reference condition in species diversity or proportions, but still largely composed of native species
characteristic of the wetland type. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clearcutting or
clearing. It also includes communities with exotics present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata.
CC Vegetation severely altered from reference in composition, or expected species are unnaturally absent (planted stands of non -
characteristic species or at least one stratum inappropriately composed of a single species), or exotic species are dominant in
at least one stratum.
16. Vegetative Diversity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for Non -tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
CA Vegetation diversity is high and is composed primarily of native species (<10% cover of exotics).
Z B Vegetation diversity is low or has > 10% to 50% cover of exotics.
CC Vegetation is dominated by exotic species (>50% cover of exotics).

17. Vegetative Structure — assessment area/wetland type condition metric
17a. Is vegetation present?
Z Yes L: No If Yes, continue to 17b. If No, skip to Metric 18.
17b. Evaluate percent coverage of assessment area vegetation for all marshes only. Skip to 17c for non -marsh wetlands.
L]A
>_ 25%
coverage of vegetation
L] B
< 25%
coverage of vegetation
17c. Check a box in each column for each stratum. Evaluate this portion of the metric for non -marsh wetlands. Consider structure
in airspace
above the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT) separately.
AA
WT
CL
�A
EA
Canopy closed, or nearly closed, with natural gaps associated with natural processes
o
�
E B
E B
Canopy present, but opened more than natural gaps
v
E;C
E:C
Canopy sparse or absent
o
L]A
L:A
Dense mid-story/sapling layer
L]B
L:B
Moderate density mid-story/sapling layer
E;C
E:C
Mid-story/sapling layer sparse or absent
A
A
Dense shrub layer
B
B
Moderate density shrub layer
(0
E;C
E;C
Shrub layer sparse or absent
9
E;A
E:A
Dense herb layer
L] B
L: B
Moderate density herb layer
L]C
L:C
Herb layer sparse or absent
18. Snags — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
L]A Large snags (more than one) are visible (> 12 -inches DBH, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
EB Not
19. Diameter Class Distribution — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
L]A Majority of canopy trees have stems > 6 inches in diameter at breast height (DBH); many large trees (> 12 inches DBH) are
present.
L] B Majority of canopy trees have stems between 6 and 12 inches DBH, few are > 12 -inch DBH.
EC Majority of canopy trees are < 6 inches DBH or no trees.
20. Large Woody Debris — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Include both natural debris and man -placed natural debris.
L]A Large logs (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches in diameter, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
EB Not
21. Vegetation/Open Water Dispersion — wetland type/open water condition metric (evaluate for Non -Tidal Freshwater
Marsh only)
Select the figure that best describes the amount of interspersion between vegetation and open water in the growing season. Patterned
areas indicate vegetated areas, while solid white areas indicate open water.
L]A EB EC ED
\Q';F'
22. Hydrologic Connectivity— assessment area condition metric (evaluate for riparian wetlands and Salt/Brackish Marsh only)
Examples of activities that may severely alter hydrologic connectivity include intensive ditching, fill, sedimentation, channelization,
diversion, man-made berms, beaver dams, and stream incision. Documentation required if evaluated as B, C, or D.
L]A Overbank and overland flow are not severely altered in the assessment area.
L] B Overbank flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
L]C Overland flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
L] D Both overbank and overland flow are severely altered in the assessment area.
Notes

Wetland Site Name
Wetland Type
NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
Area 107 Wetland
Basin Wetland
Date January 25, 2018
Assessor Name/Organization Price/Carolina Ecosyster
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
NO
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N)
Condition
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N)
NO
Sub -function Rating Summary
Function Sub -function
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention
Condition
NA
Sub -Surface Storage and Retention
Condition
NA
Water Quality Pathogen Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Habitat
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NA
Particulate Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NA
Soluble Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NA
Physical Change Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NA
Pollution Change Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity HIGH
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N) NO
Habitat Physical Structure Condition HIGH
Landscape Patch Structure Condition LOW
Vegetation Composition Condition MEDIUM
Function Rating Summary
Function
Metrics/Notes
Rating
Hydrology
Condition
HIGH
Water Quality
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NO
Habitat
Condition
MEDIUM
Overall Wetland Rating HIGH

.: \Users\KellyWi\Desktop\.:ob Files\17-029-Project Diomond/WETLANDS/wetlonds-2-2- 18.d vg <s to 6] 02/06/2018 - 5:23:09 PM
CONSULTING ENGINEERS, P.A.
�r P.O. sox 7966
PROJECT:
SITE 6
JOB N 17-029
Q Q Q Rocky Mount, N.C. 27804
WETLAND IMPACT
DATE: 2/6/2018
Phone: [phone]
Fax. [phone]
PROJECT DIAMOND
www-applonenglneers-cam
EDGECOMBE COUNTY, NC
SHEET ib: j OF
LEGEND
CWetlands
�+
-------------- Existing topography
Proposed topography '
titi 1
Property line
L`', �.
N OFR TH
�o Limits of disturbance
Temporary diversion ditch
Slit fence 4
r SK -123
1 140'x70'x3'PITr —
3" SKIMMER w/2.75" ORIFICE +rr i j r'--` �/Y ,
18 FT WEIR
PER NCDQT ET. EC -Z8 AFI
! 1 r
ow 0L
/ - ❑
■
1 I
SK -124
130* x 60' 3' PIT
3" SKIMME w/2.75" ORIFICE
18 FT WEE
r PER N ET. Ej-Z
�- I
lr -
I r SITE fi A
1_ WETL 0.7059 Ac.`-
�r - � -
(30,750 SF)
WATER IMPACT "
0.0884 Ac.
rr r, 1fi, fir= +
__ (3,850 SF)
•� � �_ � 'f
\� n+i yql i irlrrrilrf� +rrr'f�i� !- ` yy II
REFERENCES:
r` iilrf 4rr�i1. PROPERTY LINE REFERENCE: SURVEY BY JOYNER
frrr5+dliiil
4F, ++,�ifr�i�/firtp; ' `�� KEENY, PLLC. GATED 12/12/17.
r% _rr +rr+rrrrirl 2. EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY FROM SURVEY DATED
' f iii 12/18/17 BY JOYNER KEENY, PLLC.
3. STREAM AND WETLAND LOCATIONS FROM SURVEY
DATED 08/27/08 PROVIDED BY JOYNER KEENY,
o PLLC.
- - - 4. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHOWN FOR PHASE I
SCALE IN FEET CONSTRUCTION IS TO PROTECT EXISTING WETLANDS.
5. PROP05ED CONTOURS SHOWN HEREON ARE NOT
0 100 200 250 300 FOR CONSTRUCTION AND ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE.

\Users\KellyWi\Desktop\Job Files`,17-029—Project Diornond\WETLANDS\wetlonds-2-2-18.dwg [site 8] 02/05/2018 — 5:23:55 PM
CONSULTING ENGINEERS, P.A. PROJECT: SITE 8 JOB x 17-029
lr P.C. Box 7966
R 96,17 L7 Rocky Mount, N.C. 27804 WETLAND IMPACT DATE: 2/6/2018
Phone: [phone]
Fax. [phone] PROJECT DIAMOND
www-pppipnenyineers-ppr" EQGECOMBE COUNTY, NC SHEET ,y: 1 OF
LEGEND
Wetlands _ 'r rr�
------------- Existing topography
r 1
Proposed topography
, r �
Property line Ir r N 0R T H
LD Limits of disturbance
— Temporary diversion ditch
Silt fence �� 1
■ ti , ■ r r '
r1 � - � ♦ -Ir1/: ti 1 /
r ♦ , I I 1
SITE 8
1
` I I WETL 7.7120 AC. �+ 1
r■rr rr `���-- rr
(335,934 SF)
j 535 LF TRIBUTARY DITCH
' rr
� I I
1 P Ota
1 1` r ,1 • Y l ' I~ rl � I �,_ Illltl ■Jr■` `` ` \
FJ�"per_- ---1
111 _
,_ , 11 , ' ` 111 , -� _ �.:�� -___ : ♦ ; 1
-- _- ill\� -� � ♦��llrSy~� - �rilr 1+ �._Mo- rl �r jr ��' 11 l
�?--■J- ' ' Jr
jr
z: OAD
MA
y--��,.c:'►`.:: tir.+.c,��'Z��. JM1YI` ' r ti ___J ,r
t j j IN �..�..1..�..� ,
I f I 1 REFERENCES:
1. PROPERTY LINE REFERENCE: SURVEY BY JOYNER
KEENY, PLLC. DATED 12/12/17.
J I 2. EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY FROM SURVEY DATED
12/18/17 BY JOYNER KEENY, PLLC.
} 3. STREAM AND WETLAND LOCATIONS FROM SURVEY
J I DATED 08/27/08 PROVIDED BY JOYNER KEENY,
j 111 PLLC.
C 4. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHOWN FOR PHASE I
SCALE IN FEET CONSTRUCTION IS TO PROTECT EXISTING WETLANDS.
5. PROPOSED CONTOURS SHOWN HEREON ARE NOT
0 300 600 750 900 FOR CONSTRUCTION AND ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE.