20071134 All Versions_R-2518Utility_2016Comments_20170309

Linear Feet of Difference between Permitted Credit Linear Feet of Stream
Site Type Mitigation Linear Feet of Stream Affected by Utilities Pre and Post Ratio Affected by Utilities Notes
Pre-Construction Post Construciton
R-2518A
A Restoration 239 40 80 -40 1:1 40
Preservation 479 40 44 -4 4:1 1
Enhancement 476 43 -43 2:1 21.5
B Restoration 184 0 0 0 1:1 0 No impacts
C Restoration 259 60 100 -40 1:1 40
Impacts the same pre and post- Not receiving credit for
portion of stream where impacts occur since Site was not
D Restoration 262 7 7 0 1:1 0 obtained in ROW
E Restoration 833 323 45 278 1:1 -278 Reduced impacts post construction
Preservation 820 0 0 0 4:1 0
F Restoration 226 80 93 -13 1:1 13
G Preservation 1066 50 78 -28 4:1 7
H Preservation 1362 40 40 0 4:1 0 Impacts the same pre and post
I Restoration 787 0 189 -189 1:1 189
J Restoration 692 202 289 -87 1:1 87
K Preservation 4266 527 641 -114 4:1 28.5
L Preservation 525 137 25 112 4:1 -28 Reduced impacts post construction
M Restoration 276 0 0 0 1:1 0 No Pre or Post Utility Impacts
N Restoration 581 191 165 26 1:1 -26 Reduced impacts post construction
Preservation 148 0 0 0 4:1 0
0 Preservation 2378 933 993 -60 4:1 15
P Preservation 164 0 0 0 4:1 0 No Pre or Post Utility Impacts
Some pre impacts, but retaining wall deleted and portion
of stream was piped. Credit for impacts plus loss of
preservation credit was provided by EEP. See permit
Q Preservation 2297 0 0 0 4:1 0 modification for R-2519A.
R Preservation 1831 0 0 0 4:1 0 Utility lines not moved, so pre and post impacts are the sam�
R-2518B
1 Enhancement 1749 115 369 -254 2:1 127
Total Loss of credit. This includes the sites were we
Total 21900 2745 3201 -456 237 reduced the post construction impacts