20140802 Ver 2_401 Application_20180218

NC DWQ, WBSCP Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Re: Pre -Construction Notification Submittal
North Pacolet River Reach 4
Polk County, North Carolina
Anchor QEA of North Carolina, PLLC
231 Haywood Street
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
828.281.3350
IszANCHOR
QEA
Februa 6, PAID
J61q6S,9J_ v�)'
CE
G62018
Attached are five copies of the permit application for the above referenced project. This application
has also been submitted to the US Army Corps of Engineers, Asheville Office.
The permit package includes the Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) form and associated
supporting documents. This application is to renew permit DWR #14-0802 that was issued on
September 3, 2014.
We appreciate your assistance with this project. I can meet you at the site if you would like to discuss
this project further. Please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone] if you have any questions
or need additional information.
Sincerely,
` ,
i
Wyatt Edsel, PE
P:\Projects\Polk SWCD NRCS\North Pacolet Reach 4\Phase 4\Permitting\DEQ Cover Letter.docx

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Pre -Construction Notification Document
Tables
Table 1 Property Owner and Parcel Information
Figures
Figure 1
Stream Reach Map
Figure 2
Site Map
Figure 3
BEHI Analysis Map
Figure 4
Reach 4 Phases
Appendix A — Existing Conditions Photographs
Appendix B — Letters and Authorizations
Signed Agent Authorization Letter
Property Owner Conservation Easement Option Agreement or Letter of Intent
Federally Endangered and Threatened Species Assessment, US Fish and Wildlife
Cultural Resources Inventory
Appendix C — Assessment Data
Bank Erosion Hazard Index (BEHI) Data
Shear Stress Calculations
Assessment of Existing Stream Condition
Appendix D — Plan Sheets and Detail Sheets
P:\Projects\Polk SWCD NRCS\North Pacolet Reach 4\Phase 4\Permitting\TABLE OF CONTENTS.docx

o�oF warF,�oG
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 13 and 27 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
NX 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes NX No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑X No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
N Yes NX No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes NX No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
North Pacolet River Reach 4
2b.
County:
Polk County, NC
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Columbus, NC
2d.
Subdivision name:
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Table of property owners and relevant information is attached as Table 1
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d.
Street address:
3e.
City, state, zip:
3f.
Telephone no.:
3g.
Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑X Other, specify: Applicant and Project Sponsor
4b. Name:
Ms. Kelly Gay, Soil and Water District Administrator
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
Polk County Soil and Water Conservation District
4d. Street address:
156 School Rd
4e. City, state, zip:
Mill Spring,NC 28756
4f. Telephone no.:
828-894-8550
4g. Fax no.:
828-894-2231
4h. Email address:
[e-mail]
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Wyatt Edsel, PE
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Anchor QEA of North Carolina, PLLC
5c. Street address:
231 Haywood Street
5d. City, state, zip:
Asheville, NC 28801
5e. Telephone no.:
828-281-3350
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
P88-75, P76-49
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.19482 Longitude: -82.154944
1 c. Property size:
acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
North Pacolet River
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C
2c. River basin:
Broad River Basin
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Conditions at the site consist of a degraded stream channel, eroding stream banks and a generally narrow and poorly vegetated riparian corridor.
Land use adjacent to the site consists of a commercial sod farm on the eastern adjacent property and low-density residential homesites on the westerr
adjacent parcels.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 3,616
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The Polk County Soil and Water Conservation District (PCSWCD) in cooperation with numerous stakeholders, have chosen to undertake the effort to
D
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Functional uplift within the system will be achieved through bank stabilization efforts along the majority of Reach 4. These stabilization measures will in
D
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project(including all priorphases) in thepast?
❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
Comments: Zan Price and Natalie Bouchard of Altamont EnvironrIg
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
Preliminary E] Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
The upstream Reach 3 project was permitted by the Army Corps on February 17, 2009 (SAW -2008-03363) and NC DWQ on February 13, 2009 (DWC
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑X Yes ❑ No
6b. If yes, explain.
The project is funded by the Clean Water Management Trust Fund (CWMTF) and the funds are released in $400,000 to $450,000 disbursements. The
funding amount dictates the amount of work completed in each phase.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands Q Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W2 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W3 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W4 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
VV6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 P
Stabilization
North Pacolet River
PER
Corps
60
3,616
S2 -
Choose one
-
-
S3 -
Choose one
-
-
S4 -
Choose one
-
-
S5 -
Choose one
-
-
S6 -
Choose one
i -
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3,616
3i. Comments:
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01
Choose one
Choose
O2 -
Choose one
Choose
03 -
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B1 -
Yes/No
B2 -
Yes/No
B3 -
Yes/No
B4 -
Yes/No
B5 -
Yes/No
B6 -
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
High quality riparian areas will be avoided during the project and placed in the permanent conservation easement.
Sequencing of construction will ensure that all disturbed areas are stabilized at the end of each work day. Standard
sedimentation and erosion control practices will be used per an approved E&SC plan.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
All heavy equipment will be kept out of the stream channel during streambank stabilization work to the extent practicable. Disturbance of the channel
bottom, streambanks, and equipment access areas will be held to the minimum extent necessary to allow for completion of the bank stabilization
work. Work will generally be conducted In an upstream -to -downstream direction. Work will be completed in stages such that segments of the project
will be completed and stabilized on a daily basis. Temporary grass/grain cover will be planted on all bare soil after ground disturbance is completed.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes 0 No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ❑X No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ❑x No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject?
Polk County, NC
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
USMP
apply (check all that apply):
Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑X No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs applyHSession
ORW
(check all that apply):
Law 2006-246
❑Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes Q No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑x Yes
❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes
❑X No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (if so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes
❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑Yes
❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
El Yes
0 No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
El Yes
❑X No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
No, this project is to stabilize eroding stream banks and will result in a 50' buffer being placed in a permanent conservation easement that will prohibit
any development in the easement.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ❑X No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
0 Yes ❑ No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
Janet Mizzi (USFWS) was contacted November 13, 2013 regarding the project site, and verified that no federally listed
species of concern are on the subject property. See attached letter in Appendix B. Byron Hamstead was subsequently contacted on 1/19/18 to confirm.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
Janet Mizzi (USFWS) was contacted November 13, 2013 regarding the project site, and verified that no essential fish habitat exists on the subject
property. See attached letter in Appendix B.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ❑X No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
Renee Gledhill -Earley with the North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources was contacted on June 26, 2013, and verified that there are no
known recorded archeological sites within the project boundaries. See attached letter
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑X Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
The project reach is located within the floodway of the North Pacolet River. Prior to initiating activities in the floodway, FEMA regulations require an
evaluation of the impact to flood levels during the base flood (100 -year) discharge. The impacts of the proposed stream bank restoration project on
floodway elevations and widths and 100 -year floodplain elevations were evaluated by developing a revised existing conditions HEC -RAS model
supplemented w/ surveyed cross-section data and subsequently developing a proposed conditions HEC -RAS model. This study was submitted/apprvd
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
The North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Information System (ncfloodmaps. com)
W,e 1 1 Eds,& I
t%_/
�
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Applicant/Agent's Signature
Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant isprovided.)
Page 10 of 10

B 1 C
• B3d - Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The Polk County Soil and Water Conservation District (PCSWCD) in cooperation with numerous
stakeholders, have chosen to undertake the effort to conserve, enhance and restore the North Pacolet
River Watershed. The proposed streambank stabilization of Reach 4 will produce a stable stream with
vegetated streambanks and access to a constructed floodplain. The proposed project will improve
aquatic habitat by: reducing sedimentation, reducing water temperature by increasing shade cover,
improving in -stream aquatic habitat by installing near bank structures in the channel resulting in
improvements to the pool and riffle sequence, and by placing permanent conservation easements to
ensure long-term protection for these improvements and the riparian corridor.
• B3e - Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Functional uplift within the system will be achieved through bank stabilization efforts along the majority
of Reach 4. These stabilization measures will include the construction of a vegetated floodplain bench
that will reduce sheer -stress driven bank erosion by allowing overbank flooding to dissipate flow
velocities within the channel. The incised banks will be graded to a stable 3 Horizontal (H): 1 Vertical (V)
side slope and allow frequent flooding on the newly formed floodplain. Log J -hook structures will be
placed within the channel to reduce near bank shear stress on tighter meander bends. Toe -wood
structures with geolifts will also be installed to protect once vulnerable and unstable cutbanks and to
reduce erosion. The project will include removal of nonnative invasive plant material throughout the
riparian corridor and planting a native riparian buffer. Invasive removal will consist of the use of
mechanical equipment as well as hand removal. Topsoil in the areas where grading will occur will be
removed and stockpiled in a nearby location and stabilized. Upon completion of rough grading
stockpiled topsoil will be spread over graded and disturbed areas, streambanks and the stream buffer to
re -incorporate nutrient rich topsoil and achieve final grade. The entire conservation easement area
(including streambanks) will be re -vegetated using a riparian seed mix and bare root plants. Live stakes
will be used in areas adjacent to the stream. Equipment used to accomplish the above described work
will include track -mounted excavators of various sizes equipped with buckets and hydraulic thumbs,
track trucks and dump trucks to transport and stockpile materials. Various hand tools will also be used
throughout the project. Restoration will generally be completed from upstream to downstream.
Operation of heavy machinery in the water will be avoided to the extent practical in order to complete
the work described in this application. Most streambank stabilization work will be completed from the
streambank. Sedimentation and erosion control practices will be implemented throughout the project
and will consist of: 1) only working in dry weather during low -flow conditions, 2) only exposing areas of
soils that can be stabilized at the end of each work day, 3) installation of temporary silt fence at the toe
of staging and stockpile areas, and on the downslope side of any work areas outside the streambanks,
and 4) installation of seed, coir soil matting, and straw mulch. See attached Plan Sheets and Detail
Sheets.
• 64a Jurisdictional Determinations comments —
Zan Price and Natalie Bouchard of Altamont Environmental met Steve Kichefski and Scott Jones from the
Asheville Regional office of the Army Corps of Engineers at the proposed project site on July 17, 2013 to
review potential wetland areas that were shown on the National Wetland Inventory (NWI) towards the

downstream extent of the project. Mr. Kichefski and Mr. Jones concluded that the areas shown on the
NWI are relic wetlands and are not jurisdictional wetlands.
• 65b - If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
The upstream Reach 3 project was permitted by the Army Corps on February 17, 2009 (SAW -2008-
03363) and NC DWQ on February 13, 2009 (DWQ 09-0007). Construction was completed in 2011. Reach
4 was previously permitted by the Army Corps on March 17, 2014 (SAW -2014-01483) and NC DWQ on
September 3,2014 (DWQ 14-0802). These permits are nearing their expiration date and need to be
reapplied for. Construction was phased due to funding and is currently ongoing.

Table 1
Property Owner and Parcel Information
North Pacolet River
Reach 4
Polk County, North Carolina
Tax Lot
River Right River Left
Easement
Parcel
Owner
Parcel Address
Phone Email
Number
Frontage (ft) Frontage (ft)
(acres)
(acres)
5554 Hunting Country
910-986-9400
P88-75
Tryon Farm LLC
---
3,616
4.15
134.78
(Buy Sod farm [e-mail]
Road, Tryon, NC 28782
manager)
5130 Hunting CountryRoad,
P76-49
Reynolds, Linda Lee
280
---
0.32
20.20
828-859-2744
Tryon, NC 28782
280
3,616
1 4.47
154.98
P:\Projects\Polk SWCD NRCS\North Pacolet Reach 4\Phase 4\Permitting\Table 1_Property_owners

POLK �h/teCI9 CA
Q= eek
DERSON
GREENVILLE
Nosh Saluda River
Legend
Hydrology
- Highway
- Road
County Boundary
QWatershed
Reach 1
Reach 2
Reach 3
Reach 4
Data Sources:
Hydrology - NC OneMap
Roads - Polk County GIS
Orthoimagery - Polk County
Reach 4 Project Area
South Pac et River
ANBURG
FIGURE
ANCHOR WATERSHED MAP
0 4- t-A—A-01 North Pacolet River Reach 4 1
Polk County, North Carolina
DRAWN BY: NATALIE BOUCHARD
PROJECT MANAGER: ZAN PRICE Feet
CLIENT: PSWCD
DATE: 03/21/14 0 5,000 10,000 [P7\POLK SWCD NRCS\NORTH PACOLET REACH 4\TECHNICAL\FIGURES\GIS

North Pacolet Reach 4
Polk County Soil and Water Conservation District
Photos Taken: 2013 and 2014
Page 1
Photograph 1: View from upstream extent of Reach 4, on Hunting Country Bridge Road, facing dowstream on the North
Pacolet River.
Photograph 2: Typical view of near vertical eroding bank on Reach 4.
P:\Polk SWCD NRCS\North Pacolet Reach 4\Submittals\Permitting\2014 PCN\Representative Photographs.Docx

North Pacolet Reach 4
Polk County Soil and Water Conservation District
Photos Taken: 2013 and 2014
Page 2
Photograph 3: Typical view of eroding banks on Reach 4.
Photograph 4: View from Tryon Farm, LLC property on River Left facing downstream. Note the near vertical banks on
River Left.
P:\Polk SWCD NRCS\North Pacolet Reach 4\Submittals\Permitting\2014 PCN\Representative Photographs.Docx

North Pacolet Reach 4
Polk County Soil and Water Conservation District
Photos Taken: 2013 and 2014
Page 3
Photograph 5: View facing banks on River Left on the Tryon Farm, LLC property, at the same location as Photograph 4.
Photograph 6: Typical view of survey crew performing field topography survey and BEHI analysis.
P:\Polk SWCD NRCS\North Pacolet Reach 4\Submittals\Permitting\2014 PCN\Representative Photographs.Docx

Anchor QEA of North Carolina. PLLC ANCHOR
231 Haywood StreetkZ
Asheville. North Carolina 28801 A 4-4— —�
828 281 3350
AGENT AUTHORIZATION LETTER
REACH 4, NORTH PACOLET RIVER
'-')TREAMBANK STABILIZATION AND RIPARIAN
CORRIDOR RESTORATION PROJECT
The Polk County Soil and Water Conservation District hereby authorizes Anchor QEA of
North Carolina, PLLC, (Agent/Consultant) to sign and execute all necessary permits and
coordinate communications with the appropriate regulatory agencies in relation to the
above r&erenced project.
Authorl2ed Printed Name <1�aYob S;Z77 Date
Polk COUnty Soil and Water Conservation District
Authorizod Printed Signature �' I�— �5 Date -©la—
Polk Cou ity Soil and Water Conservation District
C \Vsers\Ke11y\D0wnaads\A9ent Awtharusdan U 11td0C■

OPTION AGREEMENT FOR A CONSERVATION EASEMENT
Prepared by:
After Recording Return to:
NORTH CAROLINA
POLK COUNTY
Tax Parcel No.P88-75
CWMTF No. 2015-416
Restoration/Stormwater Project Manager
North Carolina Clean Water Management Trust Fund
1651 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1651
THIS OPTION AGREEMENT, hereinafter referred to as Option, is entered into this
LAI t day of ,� r 20i'1$ by and between _ Tryon Farm, LLC
("Grantor") and North Caro ina Clean Water Management Trust Fund, 1651 Mail
Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1651 ("Grantee").
RECITALS & PURPOSES

A. In consideration of the agreements contained in this Option, Grantor
hereby grants to the Grantee, its successors and assigns, the exclusive right and option to
receive a perpetual Conservation Easement over mutually agreed upon lands owned by
the Grantor, hereinafter referred to as the Parent Tract. The Conservation Easement
shall perpetually protect those lands hereinafter referred to as the Easement Area. The
Parent Tract is located in Polk County, North Carolina and contains 134.78 acres,
more or less. The Parent Tract subject to the Conservation Easement is more
particularly described as follows:
Tax Parcel Number (NCPIN) P88-75.
B. Being a perpetual Conservation Easement, including right of ingress,
egress and regress, that will allow the reconstruction of and permanently protect the
restoration, enhancement or preservation of the North Pacolet River . The Easement
Area is located in the eastern portion of the parent tract. The Easement Area begins at
the centerline of the North Pacolet River and extends outwardly from the top of the
stream bank as restored by work to be conducted by Polk Soil and Water Conservation
District, a minimum distance of 50 feet from the top of the bank, or greater, as
Grantor agrees to convey. Easement Area shall run as the restored stream meanders,
estimated to be approximately 1856 linear feet along the North Pacolet River and
contains 2.13 acres, more or less.
C. The Grantor grants to Polk Soil and Water Conservation District and its
successors, assigns, agents, contractors, and employees the right to erect and use
construction equipment at the site of the Easement Area herein described.
D. Grantee has awarded a grant for the Reach 4 of the North Pacolet River
Streambank Stabilization and Riparian Corridor Restoration to Polk Soil and Water
Conservation District as Grant Agreement No. 2015-416, effective as of Ma v 10,
2016, in consideration of which Polk Soil and Water Conservation District has agreed to
conduct a technical assessment to provide design plans, specifications, and bid
documents, obtain required permits, and record conservation easements in preparation for
restoration of the project site which is approximately 1.2 miles of the North Pacolet River
from Hunting Country Road (SR1501) downstream to the North Carolina state line
("Project").
TERMS, PROVISIONS, & CONDITIONS
A. OPTION PERIOD. This Option shall remain in effect from the date that
this Option has been executed by the Grantor until the 30 of September 2019. This
Option shall be exercised upon posting, by certified mail, a written notice to the Grantor
at the following address:
Exercise shall be deemed timely if such written notice is mailed on or before the date first
set forth in this paragraph.
B. CONSERVATION EASEMENT. It is understood and agreed that the
Conservation Easement herein granted further allows, binds by mutual agreement, that

the Grantor shall convey and the Grantee shall receive a Conservation Easement in
the form attached hereto as Exhibit A to perpetually protect the intent of said Project.
The conveyance of the Conservation Easement shall occur at the completion of the
Project and shall be based upon a metes and bounds description rendered by a
Professional Land Surveyor. Said Easement Area shall run as the stream meanders,
extending approximately 50 feet from the top of the stream bank of said stream as
restored by work to be conducted by Polk Soil and Water Conservation District on the
Project, where physically possible.
C. EVIDENCE OF TITLE. Upon receipt of this signed Option, Grantee
may have title to the Easement Area examined, and if applicable, may obtain a
preliminary title insurance commitment. The title examination and/or commitment must
evidence the Grantor's ability to deliver title at closing as set forth below. All costs
necessary to procure the title examination and, if applicable, the title commitment and
final title insurance policy to be issued at closing, shall be the responsibility of the
Grantee.
D. TITLE. At closing, the Grantor shall convey good, insurable and
marketable title to the Conservation Easement together with all rights necessary to
protect the Easement Area in perpetuity, including legal access, all mineral rights and all
development rights, to the Grantee free and clear of all liens, encumbrances, restrictions,
rights, or exceptions except those of record that are acceptable to Grantee.
E. TITLE DEFECTS. If for any reason the Grantor cannot deliver title at
closing as required by Paragraph C of this Option, the Grantee may elect to a) accept the
Conservation Easement with title as is; b) refuse to accept the Conservation Easement;
or c) allow the Grantor additional time to pursue reasonable efforts to correct the
problem, including bringing any necessary quiet title actions or other lawsuits.
F. SUBJECT TO SURVEY AND DESIGN. It is understood and intended
that the final Easement Area and Conservation Easement under this option is subject to
final design, approval and survey by Grantee with these costs paid for as described in
Grant Agreement 2015-416 .
G. DOCUMENTS FOR CLOSING. The Grantor shall execute and deliver
at closing a Conservation Easement, any owner's affidavits or documents required by a
title insurance company to remove the standard title policy exceptions, and any other
documents necessary to close in accordance with the terms of this Option. These
documents will be prepared at the expense of those specified in Grant Agreement 2015-
416 .
H. PROPERTY TAXES. Any delinquent real estate taxes and all levied
assessments are the Grantor's responsibility and should be satisfied of record by the
Grantor at or before closing. Any deferred taxes on the Easement Area, which become
due as a result of this conveyance, shall be the responsibility of the Grantor. Real estate
taxes for the year in which the transaction is closed shall be the responsibility of the
Grantor and not prorated, as Grantee is not receiving fee simple title.

I. MISCELLANEOUS CLOSING EXPENSES. The Grant Agreement
2015416 specifies who will pay any documentary stamp tax, real estate transfer fee or
any similar charge, and recording fees.
J. POSSESSION. The Grantor will deliver possession of the Easement
Area to the Grantee at closing subject to no leases, mortgages, liens or other reserved
rights.
K. CONDITION OF PROPERTY/ RISK OF LOSS. The Grantor shall
not transfer or encumber any interests in the Easement Area prior to closing. The
Grantor shall keep the Easement Area in its current condition until closing and shall
prevent and refrain from any use of the Easement Area, for any purpose or in any
manner that would diminish its value or adversely affect the intended uses of Grantee.
In the event of any adverse change in the condition of the Easement Area, whether said
change is caused by Grantor or by forces beyond Grantor's control, Grantee may elect
to a) refuse to accept the property; b) accept the Property, or a portion thereof; or c)
require restoration of the Property to its condition at the time this Option was granted.
L. RIGHT OF ENTRY AND INSPECTION. Grantee and its agents shall
have the right to enter upon the Property at reasonable times for surveying, engineering,
conducting environmental inspections and assessments to detect hazardous or toxic
substances, and other reasonable purposes related to this transaction. Based upon the
results of the environmental inspections and assessments, or upon other conditions
revealed to be unsuitable to Grantee, Grantee may elect to refuse to accept the
Easement Area.
M. REMEDIES. In addition to any other remedy specifically set forth in this
Option, Grantee has the right to enforce the provisions of this Option through an action
for specific performance, injunctive relief, damages, contribution or any other available
proceedings in law or equity. The election of any one remedy available under this Option
shall not constitute a waiver of any other available remedies.
N. BINDING EFFECT. This Option becomes effective when signed by the
Grantor and shall then apply to and bind the Grantor and Grantor's heirs, executors,
administrators, successors, and assigns.
O. COMPLETE AGREEMENT. This Option constitutes the sole and
complete agreement between the parties and cannot be changed except by written
agreement.
P. NO WAIVER. No provision of the Option shall be deemed amended or
waived unless such amendment or waiver is set forth in a writing signed by Grantee. No
act or failure to act by Grantee shall be deemed a waiver of its rights hereunder, and no
waiver in any one circumstance or of any one provision shall be deemed a waiver in other
circumstances or of other provisions.
4

IN TESTIMONY THEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands and seals, or if
corporate have caused this instrument to be executed in their corporate names by their
duly authorized representatives as of the dates indicated below.
*Grantorr- 07
NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF M o o r -c
I, AS V, I -C M 9.>y -,j -A;." , a Notary Public in and for the County and State
aforesaid, do hereby certify that G1 avrk w ca trr, , Grantor, personally appeared
before me this day and acknowledged the execution of the foregoing instrument.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and Notary Seal this the
2. °►+`. day of ah `-�j --- 20th.
Notary Public
My commission expires Cyt G,r L t., 2 O -L C�

'rax Pkr"A P -+6 - 40
,2012
Ms. Sandra Reid
Polk County Soil and Water Conservation District
Post Office Box 236
Columbus, North Carolina 28722
Subject: Letter of Intent
Streambank Stabilization and Riparian Corridor Restoration Project
North Pacolet River, Reach 4
Polk County, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Reid,/ ��` l 115 4-
This signed letter represents that I, C ,) �S , property owne6of a parcel adjacent to Reach
4 of the North Pacolet River in Polk County, North Cbrolina, intend to participate In the streambank
stabilization and riparian corridor restoration project along Reach 4 by agreeing to sign an Option Agreement
and to place riparian buffer lands into permanent conservation through recordation of a Conservation
Easement, no less than 50 feet in width from the top of the North Pacolet River streambank landward onto
my property.
Sincerely,

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
November 27, 2013
Ms. Natalie Bouchard
Altamont Environmental, Inc.
231 Haywood Street
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Dear Ms. Bouchard:
Subject: Federally Endangered and Threatened Species Assessment, North Pacolet River
Restoration Project, South of Columbus, Polk County, North Carolina
On November 13, 2013, we received a letter from you (via e-mail) in which you requested our
review and comments on the proposed project. We have reviewed the information presented and
we are providing the following comments in accordance with the provisions of the Fish and
Wildlife Coordination Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 661-667e), and section 7 of the Endangered
Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543) (Act).
According to the information provided, the project consists of constructing stream restoration
and stream bank stabilization measures along 1.2 linear miles of the North Pacolet River.
Measures will include re -sloping stream banks and restoring riparian vegetation within a 50 -foot
corridor along the river. Your letter states that a Clean Water Act 404 Permit application will be
submitted to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for the project.
We have no objection to the proposed actions and support any efforts to restore and protect the
water quality in the project area. Based on the information provided and a review of our records,
no listed species or their habitats occur within the proposed project area. Therefore, we believe
the requirements under section 7 of the Act are fulfilled. However, obligations under section 7
of the Act must be reconsidered if. (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action
that may affect listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered, (2) this
action is subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this review, or (3) a new
species is listed or critical habitat is determined that may be affected by the identified action.
We appreciate the opportunity to provide these comments. If we can be of assistance or if you
have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Bryan Tompkins of our staff at

828/258-3939, Ext. 240. In any future correspondence concerning this project, please reference
our Log Number 4-2-14-042.
Sincerely,
- - original signed - -
Janet Mizzi
Field Supervisor

North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Pat McCrory
Secretary Susan Kluttz
July 29, 2013
Natalie Bouchard
Altamont Environmental, Inc.
231 Haywood Street
Asheville, NC 28801
Re: North Pacolet River Stream Restoration, Polk County, ER 13-1327
Dear Ms. Bouchard:
Thank you for your letter of June 26, 2013, concerning the above project.
Office of Archives and History
Deputy Secretary Kevin Cherry
There are no known recorded archaeological sites within the project boundaries. However, the project area has
never been systematically surveyed to determine the location or significance of archaeological resources. Based
on the topographic and hydrological situation and the density of archaeological sites in the area, there is a high
probability for the presence of prehistoric or historic archaeological sites.
We recommend that a comprehensive survey be conducted by an experienced archaeologist to identify and
evaluate the significance of archaeological remains that may be damaged or destroyed by the proposed project.
Potential effects on unknown resources must be assessed prior to the initiation of construction activities.
Two copies of the resulting archaeological survey report, as well as one copy of the appropriate site forms,
should be forwarded to us for review and comment as soon as they are available and well in advance of any
construction activities.
A list of archaeological consultants who have conducted or expressed an interest in contract work in North
Carolina is available at www.archaeoloov.ncdcr.gov/ncarch/resource/consultants.htm. The archaeologists listed, or
any other experienced archaeologist, may be contacted to conduct the recommended survey.
We have determined that the project as proposed will not have an effect on any historic structures.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/ Fax: [phone]-6599

Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-807-6579 or renee.gledhill-
earleca,ncdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the above referenced
tracking number.
Sincerely,
60KRamona M. Bartos

United States Department of Agriculture
o N RCS
Natural Resources Conservation Service
1835 Assembly Street, Room 950
Columbia, SC 29201
Subject: ECS - Trip Report -Cultural Resources Inventory Date: 12/18/13
Project Location: Pacolet River, Reach 4, Polk Co. NC NRCS File Code: 420
Field Office: Polk Co.
Undertakings: Channel bed stabilization, streambank stabilization and shoreline protection.
Others Involved: Natalie Bouchard, Altamont Environmental Inc.
Visit Date: 12/12/13
Procedures:
The archeological survey of the planned APE included visual reconnaissance of surface soils
inside and adjacent to the planned APE and close inspection of all accessible riverbank soils.
Subsurface archeological investigation included deep shovel testing at 30 meter intervals
along the APE of the riverbank. All excavated soils were screened through 1/4 inch mesh
hardware cloth. This archeological investigation included portions of both sides of the river as
depicted on the attached topo map showing the planned APE.
Findings:
These investigations revealed that soils inside the APE have been heavily affected by river
dynamics. The majority of soils are primarily composed of river Iain silty sand. Very little
evidence of stratified soil layers was evident in river bank exposures or in shovel test pits. At
the time of this survey the flood plain adjacent to this portion of the Pacolet River contained
several areas of standing water. It was also reported by the landowner that the flood plain
areas are very frequently flooded. As a result of the river dynamics in this area it is unlikely
that intact cultural zones exist along the APE corridor.
All visual reconnaissance inside the APE was negative for prehistoric cultural resources
(CR's). Approximately 50 meters outside of the APE of the East side of the Pacolet on the
surface one residual pottery sherd and two isolated quartz debitage flakes were discovered.
Intensive visual inspection and subsurface testing in the portion of the APE adjacent to these
finds were negative for any additional CR's.
Helping People Help the Land
An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

Cultural Resources Inventory - Trip Report - Page 2
Visual reconnaissance revealed potential historic dikes just outside of the APE along the east
side of the river. These dikes range in height from about five feet to around 15 feet. The
landowner believes they are natural formations and not man made. Several shovel tests were
focused on the higher, larger and oval shaped portion of this dike. These shovel tests were
conducted based on the assumption that if this landform was natural and in existence during
prehistoric time there would be high potential for human occupation/utilization of this
landform. Several large trees are present on the dike and appear to be around 100 years old.
Several of the overturned tree root balls were closely inspected. No evidence of any CR's
was discovered anywhere on the dike. The dike soils contain about five to seven centimeters
of topsoil over gravely clay subsoil and show no evidence of human deposition.
All subsurface archaeological shovel tests conducted for this project were negative for CR's.
Follow-up and Recommendations:
No evidence of cultural resources was discovered directly inside the planned APE. This
investigation revealed that there is low potential for intact or meaningful cultural resources to
be disturbed as a result of the planned undertakings.
It is recommended that impacts to the dike that extends along the east side of the river be
minimalized (i.e. don't use this structure for borrow soils, staging areas, do not breach it).
It is recommended that caution and vigilance be used during any ground disturbing activities.
Although it is low, there is still potential for previously undiscovered cultural resources and
human remains to be present when working along a large river floodplain.
Continue with planned assistance. Should any prehistoric or historic cultural resource(s) or
human remains be uncovered during NRCS assisted activities, all work must cease in the area
of the discovery. Steps should then be taken to secure and preserve the discovery and the
Cultural Resources Specialist should be contacted ASAP.
James Errante
NRCS Cultural Resources Specialist, NC -SC
cc:
Michael A. Sigmon, District Conservationist, Polk/Rutherford Co, NC
Matt Flint, State Resources Conservationist

North Pacolet Reach 4
Bank Erosion and Hazard Index
P:\Polk SWCD NRCS\North Pacolet Reach 4\Submittals\Permitting\2014 PCN\BEHI Existing 1 of 2
River Left
Station
Start
Station
End
BEHI Rating
NBS Rating
Bank
Height (ft)
Predicted
Erosion
Rate (ft/yr)
Predicted
Erosion Rate
(ft^3/yr)
Predicted
Erosion Rate
(lbs/yr/ft)
0
300
Moderate
Low
14
0.02
84
34.72
300
350
Moderate
Low
16
0.02
16
39.68
350
475
Very High
Low
16
0.60
1200
1190.40
475
500
Moderate
Low
14
0.02
7
34.72
500
675
Low
Low
2
0.01
3
1.98
675
750
Low
Low
13
0.01
8
12.90
750
775
Moderate
Moderate
14
0.05
18
86.80
775
850
Moderate
Moderate
13
0.05
49
80.60
850
875
High
Low
13
0.10
33
161.20
875
1050
Moderate
Low
12
0.02
42
29.76
1050
1100
Moderate
Moderate
12
0.05
30
74.40
1100
1150
High
Moderate
12
0.15
90
223.20
1150
1325
Very High
Moderate
13
0.75
1706
1209.00
1325
1375
High
Moderate
8
0.15
60
148.80
1375
1400
High
Moderate
8
0.15
30
148.80
1400
1425
Moderate
Low
6
0.02
3
14.88
1425
1525
Low
Low
7
0.01
6
6.94
1525
1600
Moderate
Low
11
0.02
17
27.28
1600
1700
High
Low
10
0.10
100
124.00
1700
1800
High
Low
13
0.10
130
161.20
1800
1875
Moderate
Low
13
0.02
20
32.24
1875
2050
High
Low
11
0.10
193
136.40
2050
2250
Moderate
Low
10
0.02
40
24.80
2250
2400
Moderate
Low
10
0.02
30
24.80
2400
2500
Moderate
Low
17
0.02
34
42.16
2500
2650
High
Moderate
15
0.15
338
279.00
2650
2700
Moderate
Moderate
12
0.05
30
74.40
2700
2775
Low
Low
5
0.01
3
4.96
2775
2825
Moderate
Low
4
0.02
4
9.92
2825
2875
High
Low
5
0.10
25
62.00
2875
2900
Very High
Low
6
0.60
90
446.40
2900
3000
Very High
Extreme
7
1.50
1050
1302.00
3000
3075
Moderate
Extreme
7
0.35
184
303.80
3075
3100
High
Extreme
7
0.35
61
303.80
3100
3200
High
Moderaate
9
0.15
135
167.40
3200
3325
High
Low
12
0.10
150
148.80
3325
3630
Moderate
Low
4
0.02
24
9.92
3630
3800
H igh
Low
10
0.10
170
124.00
P:\Polk SWCD NRCS\North Pacolet Reach 4\Submittals\Permitting\2014 PCN\BEHI Existing 1 of 2

North Pacolet Reach 4
Bank Erosion and Hazard Index
Total 1 13,101
Notes:
1. BEHI = Bank Erosion Hazard Index
2. NBS = Near Bank Shear Stress
3. BEHI analysis performed on June 4, 2013
4. Predicted erosion rates estimated from non published NRCS "North Carolina Stream Bank
Erodobility" curve
5. Assummed soil density of 124 Ib/ft^3
P:\Polk SWCD NRCS\North Pacolet Reach 4\Submittals\Permitting\2014 PCN\BEHI Existing 2 of 2
River Left
Station
Start
Station
End
BEHI Rating
NBS Rating
Bank
Height (ft)
Predicted
Erosion
Rate (ft/yr)
Predicted
Erosion Rate
(ft^3/yr)
Predicted
Erosion Rate
(lbs/yr/ft)
3800
3900
High
Low
10
0.10
100
124.00
3900
3925
Very High
Moderate
11
0.75
206
1023.00
3925
4050
High
Moderate
10
0.15
188
186.00
4050
4325
Very High
Moderate
10
0.75
2063
930.00
4325
4400
High
Low
11
0.10
83
136.40
4400
4800
Moderate
Low
3
0.02
24
7.44
4800
4925
High
Moderate
10
0.15
188
186.00
4925
5000
Very High
Moderate
12
0.75
675
1116.00
5000
5075
High
Low
2
0.10
15
24.80
5075
5400
H igh
Low
12
0.10
390
148.80
5400
5500
Moderate
Moderate
4
0.05
20
24.80
5500
5600
High
Extreme
5
0.35
175
217.00
5600
5700
High
Extreme
10
0.35
350
434.00
5700
6100
Very High
Low
10
0.60
2400
744.00
6100
6116
High
Low
10
0.10
16
124.00
Total 1 13,101
Notes:
1. BEHI = Bank Erosion Hazard Index
2. NBS = Near Bank Shear Stress
3. BEHI analysis performed on June 4, 2013
4. Predicted erosion rates estimated from non published NRCS "North Carolina Stream Bank
Erodobility" curve
5. Assummed soil density of 124 Ib/ft^3
P:\Polk SWCD NRCS\North Pacolet Reach 4\Submittals\Permitting\2014 PCN\BEHI Existing 2 of 2

North Pacolet Reach 4
Bank Erosion and Hazard Index
P:\Polk SWCD NRCS\North Pacolet Reach 4\Submittals\Permitting\2014 PCN\BEHI Existing 1 of 2
River Right
Station
Start
Station
End
BEHI Rating
NBS Rating
Bank
Height (ft)
Predicted
Erosion Rate
(ft/yr)
Predicted
Erosion Rate
(ft^3/yr)
Predicted
Erosion Rate
(lbs/yr/ft)
0
200
Moderate
Low
14
0.02
56
34.72
200
240
Very High
Low
12
0.6
288
892.80
240
325
Moderate
Low
12
0.02
20
29.76
325
450
Low
Low
4
0.008
4
3.97
450
525
Moderate
Low
10
0.02
15
24.80
525
600
Moderate
Low
12
0.02
18
29.76
600
625
Extreme
Moderate
13
2.3
748
3707.60
625
655
Very High
Moderate
15
0.75
338
1395.00
655
690
Extreme
Moderate
13
2.3
1047
3707.60
690
800
Moderate
Low
2
0.02
4
4.96
800
875
Low
Low
2
0.008
1
1.98
875
1100
Low
Low
12
0.008
22
11.90
1100
1150
Moderate
Low
2
0.02
2
4.96
1150
1375
Low
Low
4
0.008
7
3.97
1375
1425
Moderate
Low
10
0.02
10
24.80
1425
1450
Moderate
Low
9
0.02
5
22.32
1450
1550
Moderate
Moderate
11
0.05
55
68.20
1550
1600
Moderate
Moderate
14
0.05
35
86.80
1600
1700
Low
Low
14
0.008
11
13.89
1700
1725
Low
Low
4
0.008
1
3.97
1725
1775
Moderate
Moderate
11
0.05
28
68.20
1775
1825
Moderate
Moderate
13
0.05
33
80.60
1825
1850
H igh
Low
13
0.1
33
161.20
1850
2000
Moderate
Low
8
0.02
24
19.84
2000
2325
High
Low
12
0.1
390
148.80
2325
2600
Moderate
Low
3
0.02
17
7.44
2600
2650
Moderate
Low
11
0.02
11
27.28
2650
2675
High
Moderate
10
0.15
38
186.00
2675
2800
Moderate
Moderate
7
0.05
44
43.40
2800
2850
Moderate
Moderate
10
0.05
25
62.00
2850
2900
Low
Low
9
0.008
4
8.93
2900
3300
Moderate
Low
4
0.02
32
9.92
3300
3340
High
Moderate
11
0.15
66
204.60
3340
3500
Very High
Moderate
14
0.75
1680
1302.00
3500
3550
Very High
Low
12
0.6
360
892.80
3550
3650
High
Low
10
0.1
100
124.00
3650
3700
High
Low
11
0.1
55
136.40
3700
3775
Moderate
High
8
0.12
72
119.04
P:\Polk SWCD NRCS\North Pacolet Reach 4\Submittals\Permitting\2014 PCN\BEHI Existing 1 of 2

North Pacolet Reach 4
Bank Erosion and Hazard Index
Total 1 10,389
Notes:
1. BEHI = Bank Erosion Hazard Index
2. NBS = Near Bank Shear Stress
3. BEHI analysis performed on June 4, 2013
4. Predicted erosion rates estimated from non published NRCS "North Carolina Stream Bank
Erodobility" curve
5. Assummed soil density of 124 Ib/ft^3
P:\Polk SWCD NRCS\North Pacolet Reach 4\Submittals\Permitting\2014 PCN\BEHI Existing 2 of 2
River Right
Station
Start
Station
End
BEHI Rating
NBS Rating
Bank
Height (ft)
Predicted
Erosion Rate
(ft/yr)
Predicted
Erosion Rate
(ft^3/yr)
Predicted
Erosion Rate
(lbs/yr/ft)
3775
3825
High
High
9
0.2
90
223.20
3825
3850
High
High
9
0.2
45
223.20
3850
3925
Moderate
Moderate
10
0.05
38
62.00
3925
4000
High
Low
10
0.1
75
124.00
4000
4250
High
Low
3
0.1
75
37.20
4250
4350
High
Low
10
0.1
100
124.00
4350
4450
Moderate
Moderate
11
0.05
55
68.20
4450
4625
High
Moderate
12
0.15
315
223.20
4625
4700
High
Moderate
13
0.15
146
241.80
4700
4750
Very High
Moderate
11
0.75
413
1023.00
4750
4900
Very High
Low
3
0.6
270
223.20
4900
5000
Very High
Low
10
0.6
600
744.00
5000
5075
High
Moderate
10
0.15
113
186.00
5075
5200
Very High
Moderate
11
0.75
1031
1023.00
5200
5275
Very High
Moderate
4
0.75
225
372.00
5275
5350
Very High
Moderate
11
0.75
619
1023.00
5350
5500
High
Moderate
11
0.15
248
204.60
5500
5600
High
Low
2
0.1
20
24.80
5600
5700
High
Low
2
0.1
20
24.80
5700
5850
High
Low
10
0.1
150
124.00
5850
6116
Moderate
Low
9
0.02
48
22.32
Total 1 10,389
Notes:
1. BEHI = Bank Erosion Hazard Index
2. NBS = Near Bank Shear Stress
3. BEHI analysis performed on June 4, 2013
4. Predicted erosion rates estimated from non published NRCS "North Carolina Stream Bank
Erodobility" curve
5. Assummed soil density of 124 Ib/ft^3
P:\Polk SWCD NRCS\North Pacolet Reach 4\Submittals\Permitting\2014 PCN\BEHI Existing 2 of 2

North Pacolet River
Reach 4 - Cross-section #2
Streambank Shear Stress Calculations
Find shear stress with r = 7RHS
where: y = 62.4 lb/ft' (density of water)
RH = hydraulic radius (ft)
S = average stream slope (ft/ft)
Calculate shear stress for typical design cross-section for depths at the proposed bankfull bench
and the top of the terrace. Using channel dimensions from a cross-section measured by Altamont
personnel in the field (see Figure 1 below), calculate hydraulic radius for the following depth
conditions (*Note: depth measured from deepest part of channel):
• Bankfull Depth 5.6 -ft
• Top of Terrace Depth 12.6 -ft
Set S = 0.00106 ft/ft (based on the longitudinal profile of Reach 4)
Area
RH =
Wetted Perimeter (WP)
Adiust calculated shear stress values to account for straight sections of channel
r.. =1.5T
(Equation 9 of "Stability Thresholds for Stream Restoration Materials — ERDC TN-EMRRP-SR-
29" prepared by Craig Fischenich of the USAE Research and Development Center,
Environmental Laboratory, 3909 Halls Ferry Rd, Vicksburg, MS 39180, May 2001)
Adiust calculated shear stress values to account for channel sinuosity.
)-0.50
.rmax = 2.6521 W
Rc = Radius of Curvature:
Measured Rc values in Reach 4: Minimum: 75 -ft Median: 183 -ft Maximum: 374 -ft
W = Top Width of Channel
(Equation 10 of "Stability Thresholds for Stream Restoration Materials — ERDC TN-EMRRP-
SR-29" prepared by Craig Fischenich of the USAE Research and Development Center,
Environmental Laboratory, 3909 Halls Ferry Rd, Vicksburg, MS 39180, May 2001)
Table 1 below shows the calculated values for shear stress at various water elevations.
PAPolk SWCD NRCS\North Pacolet Reach 4\Submittals\Pennitting\2014 PCN\Shear stress calculations.doc Page 1 of 2

ExIstlg Et—t—, PropoardEI—ti—
Proposed C_wt
Figure 1: Cross-section #2
Sh— ft
n
Cross—Section 2 Shear Stress Dimensions
Table 1: Shear Stress Calculations
Notes:
1. "ft" means "feet."
2. "sf ' means "square feet."
3. "lb" means "pounds."
Permissible shear stress for vegetated coir matting on streambank = 4 — 8 Ib/ft 2
P:\Polk SWCD NRCS\North Pacolet Reach 4\Submittals\Permitting\2014 PCN\Shear stress calculations.doc Page 2 of 2
Top Width
Depth Above
Cross -Sectional
Wetted Perimeter
Hydraulic
of Channel
Shear Stress
Max Shear Stress for
Min Shear Stress for
Median Shear Stress for
Max Shear Stress for
Thalweg (ft)
Area (s f)
(ft)
Radius (ft)
(ft)
(Ib/8�)
Straight Channel (Ib/ft2)
Sinuous Channel (Ib/111)
Sinuous Channel (Ib/ft')
Sinuous Channel (lb/ft2)
5.6 (Bankfull)
243
_._v.-----
62
3.9
58
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.4
0.6
12.6 (Top of
Terrace
982
138.0
7.1
130.0
0.5
0.7
0.7
1.1
1.6
Notes:
1. "ft" means "feet."
2. "sf ' means "square feet."
3. "lb" means "pounds."
Permissible shear stress for vegetated coir matting on streambank = 4 — 8 Ib/ft 2
P:\Polk SWCD NRCS\North Pacolet Reach 4\Submittals\Permitting\2014 PCN\Shear stress calculations.doc Page 2 of 2

AMONT ENVIRONMENTA NC.
231 HAYWOOD STREET, ASHEVILLE, NC 28801
TEL. [phone] FAC. 828.281.3351
www.altamontenvironmental.com
ASSESSMENT OF EXISTING STREAM CONDITION
SUMMARY OF "EXISTING CONDITION" CATEGORIES FOR LEVEL III INVENTORY
Stream Name North Pacolet River, Reach 4
Location Polk County, North Carolina
Riparian Vegetation Narrow to non-existent buffers
provide little reinforcing; root mass in several areas.
Common invasivespresent: privet, multiflora rose, and
honeysuckle
Stream Size, Stream order — 50 sq mi., 3`d Order
Meander pattern Moderate Sinuosity
Channel Stability Rating (BEHI) Low to Extreme
Sediment supply (check appropriate category):
Extreme X
Very High
High
Moderate
Low
Streambed (vertical) stability
Aggrading X
Degrading X
Stable
Width/depth ratio condition:
Normal (stable)
High X
Very high
Streambank erosion Potential:
Bank erodibility:
Near -bank stress:
Extreme X
Extreme X
High X
High X
Moderate X
Moderate X
Low X
Low X
General Remarks:
Observers Z. Price, N. Bouchard
Stream Type G4c to C5 Date 4/17/13
Flow regime Southern Appalachian
Depositional pattern Channel Bars
Debris/channel blockages Woody Debris
Altered Channel State Unstable
Riffle Bankf ill Dimension/shape
Width Min: 56' Max: 65' Median: 61'
Depth Min: 3.8' Max: 4.6' Median: 4.1'
Width/depth ratio Min: 12.2 Max: 16.3 Median: 15.6
Patterns (*show as funct. Of bankfull width)
Meander length ratio* Min: 2.8 Max: 11.7
Median: 7.4
Radius of curve ratio* Min: 1.2 Max: 6.1
Median: 3.0
Belt width ratio* Min: 2.1 Max: 6.0 Median: 3.7
Sinuosity 1.31
Profile
Water surface slope.
0.0011
Valley slope 0.0014
Bed features:
Riffle/pool X
Conver./divrg.
Plane bed X
Spacing*
Describe alterations
Streambanks on both sides of the river throughout much of Reach 4 are very steep, undercut, and rapidly
eroding` Bank height ratios (Top of Bank/Bankfull Height) exceed 2 for the majority of the reach. Therefore, large
flood events are not able to access a floodplain to dissipate energy. This results in increased bank erosion rates. Other
major problems contributing to the degradation in water quality include the lack of a continuous riparian buffer zone
and significant exotic invasive vegetation. Historic landuse practices in the watershed have played a significant role in
the lack of riparian vegetation, as indicated by historical aerial photography from the 1930s which shows pasture and
cropland cleared to the river's edge. The tropical storms of late 2004, which exceeded a 100 -year recurrence interval,
had a devastating effect on the river. The storms caused instantaneous morphological changes through erosion of the
stream channel and banks and accelerated rapid lateral and down valley migration. These and more recent storms
have resulted in the continuing degradation and migration of the river which is evident today.
P:\Polk SWCD NRCS\North Pacolet Reach 4\Submitta1s\Permitting\2014 PCN\Level III Assessment.doc Page 1 of 1

e F71LIE M
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
September 3, 2014
Sandra Reid
Polk County S&WCD
156 School Road
Mill Spring, NC 28722
DE - ATER RESOURCES
401 &BUFFER PE MITTING
Subject: APPROVAL OF 401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION
North Pacolet River Reach 4
Dear Ms. Reid:
John E. Skvarla, III
Secretary
DWR # 14-0802
Polk County
In accordance with your application dated July 24, 2014, approval has been granted for the impacts listed in the
table below. This approval requires you to follow the conditions listed in the enclosed certification(s) or
general permit and any additional conditions listed below.
Project impacts are covered by the attached Water Quality General Certification Number 3885 and the
conditions listed below. This certification is associated with the use of Nationwide Permit Numbers 13 and 27
once it is issued to you by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Please note that you should obtain or otherwise
comply with any other federal, state or local permits before proceeding with your project, including those
required by (but not limited to) Erosion and Sediment Control, Water Supply Watershed and Trout Buffer
regulations.
IMPACTS APPROVED
The following impacts are hereby approved provided that all of the other specific and general conditions of the
Certification, General Permit and/or Buffer Rules are met. No other impacts are approved, including incidental
impacts.
Type of Impact Amount Approved
Permanent
Stream 6100 (linear feet
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
1. This approval is for the purpose and design described in your application. The plans and specifications
for this project are incorporated by reference as part of the Certification/Authorization. If you change
your project, you must notify the Division and you may be required to submit a new application package
Water Quality Regional Operations —Asheville Regional Office
2090 US Hwy 70, Serannanoa, NC 28778
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone]
Internet: http:/Iportal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ws
An Equal opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer

Sandra Reid
September 3, 2014
Page 2 of 3
with the appropriate fee. If the property is sold, the new owner must be 1
letter and General Certification(s)/Permit/Authorization and is responsible for complying with all
conditions.
2. This authorization exempts the Permittee from meeting Condition #7 (Work in the Dry) in the attached
general certification for the placement of in -stream structure material. The Permittee shall take all
reasonable measures to construct in -stream structures while keeping heavy equipment out of the stream
channel. Stream flow will be diverted around work areas as much as practicable. All reasonable steps
must be taken to limit the amount of disturbance in the channel and to therefore reduce downstream
turbidity during construction. This exemption does not relieve the Permittee of meeting stream
standards as indicated in 15A NCAC 02B.
3. Visual monitoring of the project shall be conducted at a minimum of quarterly for the first year, or two
bankfull events (whichever is longer), and then annually until the site is stable (particularly after storm
events) and vegetation is successful. Any failures of structures, stream banks, or vegetation may require
repair or replacement; such activities must be coordinated with the Asheville Regional Office.
This approval and its conditions are final and binding unless contested.
This Certification can be contested as provided in Articles 3 and 4 of General Statute 150B by filing a written
petition for an administrative hearing to the Office of Administrative Hearings (hereby known as OAH) within
sixty (60) calendar days.
A petition form may be obtained from the OAH at http://www.ncoali.com/ or by calling the OAH Clerk's
Office at [phone] for information. A petition is considered filed when the original and one (1) copy
along with any applicable OAH filing fee is received in the OAH during normal office hours (Monday through
Friday between 8:00am and 5:00pm, excluding official state holidays).
The petition may be faxed to the OAH at [phone], provided the original and one copy of the petition
along with any applicable OAH filing fee is received by the OAH within five (5) business days following the
faxed transmission.
Mailing address for the OAH:
If sending via US Postal Service
Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-6714
If sending via delivery service (UPS,
FedEx, etc):
Office of Administrative Hearings
1711 New Hope Church Road
Raleigh, NC 27609-6285
One (1) copy of the petition must also be served to DENR:
Lacy Presnell, General Counsel
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1601

This letter c� o� I"'Tletes M7Ww of the Division under section 401 of the Clean Water Act as described in 15A
NCAC .0500. Please contWt Chuck Cranford at 828-296-4650 or chuck. cranford a,ncdenr.gov if you have any
questions or concerns.
Sincerely,
G. Landon Davidson, P.G., Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations
Asheville Regional Office
Enclosures: GC 3885
Certificate of Completion
cc: DWR ARO 401 files
DWR 401 and Buffer Permitting Unit
ec: Zan Price — Altamont Environmental
. William Elliott- USACE Asheville Regulatory Field Office
G:\WR\WQ\Polk\40 I Mon-DO'Morth Pacolet River Reach 4\APRVL.9.3.14.doex

NORTH PACOLET RIVER -REACH 4
STREAMBANK STABILIZATION PLAN
POLK COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DRAWING SET CONTENT
SHEET
SHEET TITLE
C-1.0
COVER SHEET
C-2.0
SITE INDEX SHEET
C-3.0
PLAN AND PROFILE SHEET - I
C-4.0
PLAN AND PROFILE SHEET - 2
C-5.0
PLAN AND PROFILE SHEET - 3
C-6.0
PLAN AND PROFILE SHEET - 4
C-7.0
PLAN AND PROFILE SHEET - 5
C-8.0
TYPICAL SECTIONS 1
C-9.0
TYPICAL SECTIONS 2
C-10.0
EROSION CONTROL NOTES
C-10.1
EROSION CONTROL NOTES --2-
I
C-
E0 CONTROL DETAILS
C-12.0
DETAIL SHEET I
C-13.0
DETAIL SHEET 2
GENERAL NOTES: (APPLICABLE TO ALL SHEETS
DATA BLOCK
PROPERTY OWNERS:
TRYON FARM LLC, BARBARA TOUSEY, LINDA LEE
REYNOLDS
CONTACT PERSON: SANDRA REID, POLK COUNTY SWCD
[phone]
PROJECT NAME: NORTH PACOLET RIVER REACH 4
STREAM BANK STABILIZATION
PROJECT LOCATION:
HUNTING COUNTRY ROAD, POLK COUNTY, NC
LAT 35.1951944, LONG -82.1550805
PIN #:P88-75, P76-55, P76-97, P76-49
ZONING DISTRICT: OU (OPEN USE)
RIVER BASIN: BROAD RIVER BASIN
CONSERVATION EASEMENT AREA: 11.13 AC
CURRENT LAND USE: AGRICULTURAL AND RESIDENTIAL
PROPERTY SIZE: 166.74
RIVER RIGHT FRONTAGE: 3,600 LF
RIVER LEFT FRONTAGE: 6,100 LF
SOILS: BUNCOMBE LOAMY SAND, RION SANDY LOAM
TOTAL DISTURBED AREA: 13.3 ACRES
VICINITY MAP
of
J
aG
SITE LOCATION
%tom
FR
9�
m�
a
_NORTH CAROLINA
SOUTH CAROLINA
TO SPARTANBURG
I. EXISTING CONDITION TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY OF RIVER AND RIPARIAN AREA PROVIDED BY ALTAMONT
ENVIRONMENTAL.
14. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL INVASIVE PLANT MATERIAL WITHIN THE GRADED AREAS AS DIRECTED BY THE
2. CONTOUR ELEVATIONS BASED ON FIELD VERIFIED SURVEY AND LIDAR DATA.
OWNER OR ENGINEER.
3. ALL IMPROVEMENTS SHALL CONFORM TO NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND NATURAL
15. CONTRACTOR WILL ENSURE THAT NO INVASIVE VEGETATION ARE LEFT ON THE LOGS USED FOR IN -STREAM
NOTE: NOT A CERTIFIED DOCUMENT AS TO THE ORIGINAL
RESOURCES (N THE ARMY CORP OF ENGINEERS AND POLI( COUNTY PERMIT REQUIREMENTS UNLESS NOTED
STRUCTURES.
DOCUMENT BUT ONLY AS TO TME REVISIONS -THIS DOCUMENT
THE P,
OTHERWISE THE PLANS.
16. IF MATERIAL IS TO BE STOCKPILED PRIOR TO GRINDING OR DISPOSAL, THE STOCKPILE LOCATION SHALL BE
ORIGINALLY ISSLED AND SEALED BY ZAN PRICE, LICENSE NUMBER 33141,
FI
4. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS SHALL CONFORM TO THE MANUAL OF UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES
DETERMINED BY THE OWNER OR ENGINEER.
OH OCTOBER S0, 2014. THIS DOCUMENT IS ONLY CERTIFIED AS TO THE
STANDARDS, LATEST EDITION.
17. CONTRACTOR SHALL STOCKPILE LOGS FOR IN -STREAM STRUCTURES AT A LOCATION DETERMINED BY THE OWNER
REVISIONS.
5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT EXISTING PROPERTY MONUMENTATION AND PRIMARY CONTROL. ANY
OR ENGINEER.
SUCH POINTS WHICH THE CONTRACTOR BELIEVES WILL BE DESTROYED SHALL HAVE OFFSET POINTS
ESTABLISHED BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. ANY MONIIMENTATION DESTROYED BY THE
CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REESTABLISHED AT HIS EXPENSE.
6. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO: A.) PREVENT ANY DAMAGE TO PRIVATE
PROPERTY AND PROPERTY OWNER'S POLES, FENCES. SHRUBS, ETC. B.) PROTECT ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES.
C.) NOTIFY ALL UTILITY COMPANIES AND FIELD VERIFY HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL LOCATION OF ALL
UTILITIES PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. NOTIFY OWNER OF ANY POTENTIAL CONFLICTS THAT MAY
EXIST BETWEEN THE EXISTING UTILITIES AND CONSTRUCTION PLANS.
7. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN DRAINAGE AT ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION. PONDING OF WATER IN
STREETS, DRIVES, TRUCK COURTS, TRENCHES, ETC. WILL NOT BE ACCEPTABLE.
6. ANY DAMAGES THAT MAY OCCUR TO REAL PROPERTY OR EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE RESTORED BY
THE CONTRACTOR TO AT LEAST THE SAME CONDITION THAT THE REAL PROPERTY OR EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS
WERE IN PRIOR TO THE DAMAGES. THIS RESTORATION SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE OWNER'S APPROVAL;
MOREOVER, THIS RESTORATION SHALL NOT BE A BASIS FOR ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION TO THE CONTRACTOR.
RESTORATION SHALL INCLUDE, BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO, REGRASSING, REVEGETATION, REPLACING FENCES,
REPLACING TREES, ETC.
9. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING WITH ALL APPLICABLE LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL STORM
WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION LAWS AND ORDINANCES.
10. PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THAT ALL REQUIRED PERMITS AND
APPROVALS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED FROM ALL REGULATORY AUTHORITIES.
11. ALL CUT SLOPES STEEPER THAN I.SA AND ALL FILL SLOPES STEEPER THAT 2:1 SHALL BE OBSERVED AND CERTIFIED
BY A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER LICENSED TO PRACTICE IN THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA-
AROLINA
12.
12. CUT AND FILL SLOPES (EMBANKMENTS) SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH NCDOT STANDARD
SPECIFICATION SECTION 235 OR THE GEOTECHNICAL (SOILS) REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS, WHICHEVER ARE MORE
RESTRICTIVE. AT A MINIMUM, ALL FILL SLOPES SHALL BE PLACED IN 10 INCH MAXIMUM LIFTS COMPACTED TO NOT LESS
THAN 95 PERCENT DENSITY (STANDARD PROCTOR). CONTRACTOR SHALL ARRANGE FOR INDEPENDENT COMPACTION
TESTING RESULTS TO BE PAID FOR BY THE OWNER/DEVELOPER.
13. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL MOVEMENT AND STORAGE OF EQUIPMENT WITH OWNER.
•
Know wheYe low.
. CaB 6ef- Yoo dg
�W
j
W W InN��"
NC FIRM LICK C-2185
rc
LL�
�4�N
r =
oEda
o -
p V n
0 Z
a�=
= aas
43
- m
<m.
w=.
a �
a�
s�
a
Q
Z
J
w O
Of
w U
LLI
=�W�
in 2 J lO
Q OU Z
LLJLLj
CL >
0 O z.
Z U
J
O
IL
g
O 3
U t

—I
t
I EMI
0, mxqq I
C30
TRYON FARM LLC
PIN P88-75
�lp_._
Q e
.0
0
• v� o
BUCKNER,TEGWEN YURKO
PIN P76-21
(NOT PARTICIPATING IN .01
II1 THE PROJECT) /
Q SOUTH CAROLINA
. 00
BEFORE YOU DIG
CALL 1-800-632-4949
N.C. ONE CALL CENTER
Knowwhere bebw. Irs THE LAWI
c before you dg.
141
,,�,YrA.lu.F4-�'
"o.
NC FIRM LICE C-2185
gy �
3 �u
o -
U H
Z
�u
z
:m
i�
Hr
a
Q
� z
W w 0
> U
:E
cl)
x=��
Wu0Z4
z of EL
I_ ooh
z a
vi
O 3
■ A
g N
U LL

i
NC FIRM�LIC# C-2185
� w
3a
oIFaa b
Zn
�u
as
•
t m
i z
0
z
o u
a
W Z
W
J
(� w
> Q
W � �
Lu
LL _j
OQ o Z g
Z
Q z Y ;
Z o
Q C
J
a_
0
M �
g U

Existing Features
----- Alignment
-Existing Thalweg -
North Pacolet River
14.W Station
Existing 1 -Foot Contours
Proposed Longitudinal
Peaked Stone Toe
(See Detail Provided by
Robinson Design Engineers)
r•
SECTION 2
I
/
/
/
CROSS-SECTION 3
W
Lt �4 uu /
LEGEND
Restoration Areas and Measures
–E— Proposed Minimum Conservation — -
Easement-
Proposed Stream Barb
(See Detail Provided by t®
Robinson Design Engineers)
Proposed Bankfull Bench Grading x.10
(See Detail 2, Sheet C-13.0)
x x Proposed Planting Only
} x (See Detail 2. Sheet C-12.0)
Proposed Toewood/Geolift
(See Detail 1, Sheet C-12-0)
Proposed Bar Material To
Be Relocated
Access and Erosion Control
Proposed Temporary Construction Access Route
Proposed Silt Fence
Proposed Stockpile and Staging Area
Proposed Construction Entrance
Limits of Disturbance
1 \
11
�I
I
1
AC ESS FROM
REYNOLDS
PROI RTY I `
Q
NOTES:
1. THE SITE IS TO BE STABILIZED AT THE END OF
EACH WORK DAY BEFORE LEAVING THE SITE
2. STOCKPILE AREAS ARE FOR TEMPORARY STORAGE
OF MATERIAL AND NOT FOR PERMIANENT
PLACEMENT. MATERIAL SHOULD BE HAULED OFFSITE
TO AN AREA PERMITTED FOR ITS PLACEMENT
THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT.
CROSS SECTION 2 CROSS—SECTION 3
840 840
I;
5-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- } - 835
-- L ---- --- --
----------------------------
I CROSS- TION 4
PROPOSED BANKFULL ELEVATION '
31, --- — --- - -_ _\
825 825
EXISTING THALWEG ELEVATION
2 820 2 a 6 m mm gA. �m m mm mm �� mm mm -8210
12.00 13+00 14.DO 15.00 16.00 17.DO 18.00 19+00 20.00 21+00 22.00 23+00 24.00 25«00
BEFORE YOU DIG
� CALL 1-800-632-4949
N_ C. ONE CALL CENTER
Krow whaYs blow.
al•.RS ME Uwl
c+B be yov � ----
/'O,
2ne,
V 1,
�N 18
o
0
�Q lit
a n U p d
V
J
J J
C
O 6 �o
U�Z
� L
t' O)
O
Z v
v O
CY LL
V
O Z
L
C
Q
o
I
T1 I !I,
0
I>
N
h
W QZ
W
_ O
U) j Q
W v
<L ,It J Y
2
0,)00 U OU Z
W a r
1 L IZ 7
Q
0 ~ n
Z Q OU w
Q Z Y
Z o
Q
CL
a
O
az 3
U a
w
S

1
24,00
i HD(A
X my
D ZZ
:E 2-T
MC
G) Mr-
rr
r-<
LEGEND
Restoration Areas and Measures Access and Erosion Control
i
Existing Features
/ \ - LPST Tie—back/keyway _ —
/ Alignment (See Detail Provided by — — Proposed Temporary Construction Access Route
Robinson Design Engineers) .x— Proposed Silt Fence
—Existing Thalweg — Proposed Stream Barb
North Pacolet River (See Detail Provided by jIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII Proposed Stockpile and Staging Area
- \ \ Robinson Design Engineers)
\ \ 14.00 Station � Proposed Construction Entrance
Proposed Bankfull Bench Grading Limits of Disturbance
See Detail 2, Sheet C-13.0
Existing 1—Foot Contours � ( )
CROS955ECTION 5 •� —_, �•�+` ` Property Line x x x x Proposed Planting Only
(Polk County GIS)) ;;x(See Detail 2, Sheet C-12.0)
Proposed Toewood/Geolift
ar
Proposed Longitudinal Sl' '�SVTVWii'
P (See Detail 1, Sheet C-12.0)
Peaked Stone Toe
Remove Log Jam and Reuse Logs
(See Detail Provided by Proposed Bar Material To
Robinson Design Engineers) Be Relocated joteqt, Remove Boulder—Toe and Fabric
a 1. THE SITE IS TO BE STABILIZED AT THE END OF
7N �= 1 !/l ,,, \ \ gca`SS-SECTION 6 EACH WORK DAY BEFORE LEAVING THE SITE.
2. STOCKPILE AREAS ARE FOR TEMPORARY STORAGE
/ OF MATERIAL AND NOT FOR PERMANENT PLACEMENT.
• MATERIAL SHOULD BE HAULED OFFSITE THROUGHOUT
THE PROJECT TO AN AREA PERMITTED FOR ITS
PLACEMENT.
., z
S
O-
-50' urPST AND
TOEWOOD%GEOLIFTS
OVERLAP AT THIS
LOCATION
--- ------ ------------ ------1------ — --------- ---
o!
.614 6 4 4
25.00 26+00 27+00 28+00
CROSS-SECTION 5
---- --------------- -----
'h
29+00
----------------------
-PROPOSED
------- ----- PROPOSED BA KFULL
FXISTIN,' THAI
-- - J
30.00 - - 31,00 32+00
EVATIO
{
33.00 34+00...
835
-- -
i.830
i
I I _
825 _
m m'
--820 m l m
35+00 36+00 37+00
BEFORE YOU DIG
CALL 1-800-632-4949
N.C. ONECALL CEN7ER
113 THE IAWI
W Z
W i
U) > Q
W U
J w
V-- = J o
CLtu�CL ar
H
Z o 0
L)
a Z
z 0 I
Q
C
Q)
v J
U
r

1 - 840
LEGEND
Restoration Areas and Measures
Existing Features - Access and Erosion Control
LPST Tie–back/keyway
----- Alignment (See Detail Provided by = = Proposed Temporary Construction Access Route
Robinson Design Engineers) X— Proposed Silt Fence
– -
–Existing Tholweg –Proposed Stream Barb
North Pocolet River I® (See Detail Provided by Proposed Stockpile and Staging Area
14.00 Station Robinson Design Engineers) OFM Proposed Construction Entrance
Proposed Bankfull Bench Grading F'�"
- --- .. Limits of Disturbance
–..._Existing 1–Foot Contours (See Detail 2, Sheet C-13.0)
' OF LOST Property Line X X X k. Proposed Planting Only
380
AND BANK LO (Polk County GIS) X X (See Detail 2, Sheet C-12.0)
BENCH GRADING Proposed Toewood/Geolift
OVERLAP AT THIS Proposed Longitudinal (See Detail 1, Sheet C-12.0)
LOCATION -- }� Peaked Stone Toe Remove Log Jam and Reuse Logs
(See Detail Provided by Proposed Bar Material To
Robinson Design Engineers) �0111Be Relocated jowt Remove Boulder–Toe and Fabric
FUTURE PHASE OF 'WORK `Y
.CROSS–SECTION 7
TRIBUTARY: WOLFE CREEK
(NO PROPOSED STREAMBANK
STABILIZATION ON RIGHTBANK
DOWNSTREAM OF CONFLUENCE)
7
y ROPOSED BAN
835
i,
------------{------,------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- ------ -----I----
L830 '
825 - -
J'� _\EXI$ ING THA -- 'LWEG ELEVATI
u�✓� _d m
P
IA H ✓ih n.N -
P h m
N
m ri N
0
N n lV
n ry
mNg20 `4m mm Nn rvr Nm `nl4
36+00 57.00 36+00 59+00 40.00 41.00 42.00 43+00 44+00
LL ELEVIATION
i
i
-
N
N h ry v� Nm M�
45+00 46+00
`CROSS-SECTION 8
3 -SECTION 8
I
---I-
----- 830 ------
i
L_ I-- -- ! -
J -
O�
m 820
-- --47.00 -- — 48.00 — - - 49.00
•
BEFORE YOU DIG
Uti
CALL 1-800-632-4949
N.C. ONE CAU CENTER
Know whar5
low.
R$ THE L M
c. Oef.
you dig.

" 4� CROSS-SECTI
o � 9
� o
O
_ O
_ -
TRIBUTARY: WOLFE CREEK
(NO PROPOSED STREAMBANK
LEGEND
STABILIZATION ON RIGHTBANK
DOWNSTREAM OF CONFLUENCE)
Existing Features
Restoration Areas and Measures
Access and Erosion Control
STING T
ALWEG
LEVATI
N
_Alignment
Proposed Minimum Conservation ---
Proposed Temporary Construction Access Route
"
- -Existing Thalweg -
Easement
Proposed Log J -Hook
Proposed Silt Fence
Staging Area
North Pacolet River
df,
�
Proposed Stockpile and
-
4+04 Station
�
Bankfull Bench Grading.....
Proposed Construction Entrance
e
®Proposed
(See Detail 2, Sheet C-13.0)
Limits of Disturbance
820
—Existing 1 -Foot Contours
N N
f`
NM
O
0
N
'
, • • •
• ...+
c4
N
+ Proposed Planting Only
+ (See Detail 2, Sheet C-12.0)
n
r
N n
,G
,p
Y)
N
N
N e)
n
CI n
\' •
N
Proposed Toewood/Geolift
a
N O
O
N
N
••
\'••
y�
v
(See Detail 1, Sheet C-12.0)
42+00
43+00 44+00 45+00
46+00 47+00
48+00
'-' '_ •._ .' —_ -- .
— -"t T —
•S,
Proposed Bar Material To
Be Relocated
_ — _ _�
uBEFORE
CALL 1-800-632-4949
N.C. ONE CALL CEN/ER
\`a
Irs THE LAM
-
Call before you ®g.
00
/
`
•
�
O
" 4� CROSS-SECTI
o � 9
� o
O
_ O
_ -
TRIBUTARY: WOLFE CREEK
(NO PROPOSED STREAMBANK
STABILIZATION ON RIGHTBANK
DOWNSTREAM OF CONFLUENCE)
SECTION 7
8
8
_--,-PROPOSE[ BANKF LL ELEVATION 835 835
830 '
830 — — —
�E
STING T
ALWEG
LEVATI
N
820
820
N N
f`
NM
O
0
N
n
NN
n
r
c4
N
tO
n
r
N n
,G
,p
Y)
N
N
N e)
n
CI n
N
N
a
N O
O
N
N
•
N
w
36+00
37+00 36+00 39+00 40+00 41+00
42+00
43+00 44+00 45+00
46+00 47+00
48+00
49+00
YOU DIG
uBEFORE
CALL 1-800-632-4949
N.C. ONE CALL CEN/ER
Know whers below.
Irs THE LAM
-
Call before you ®g.

o$,�.yNyt.Y6! ....33 � .
�JG3j41 3
i
NC FIRM LIC# C-2185
gy
L�§n a rA
�£ta
ua
o �-
J �M
a=.
x aLL a
;m
J e
a
u
m
a
a
W Z
W J
_ o� O
L Q
W U
—� -.t W H
LL=0 L) J O
,::c
Q Z
d.wCLr
Z S
H LL
Z o =o V
U �
Q Z Y
Z J u
O �
a �t5
J
IL
O ;
A
1
U
..
'
---Alignment
Existing Features
Restoration
LEGEND
Areas and Measures
Proposed Minimum Conservation -_=
Access and Erosion Control
Proposed Temporary Construction Access Route
..
• �
_
—Existing Thalweg —
�'t'
Easement
Proposed Log J—Hook
Proposed Silt Fence
•
�_��•
North Pacolet River
®
proposed Stockpile and Staging Area
��
4+00-
Station
Proposed Bankfull Bench Grading.....
Proposed Construction Entrance
(�
�o
�•, —Existing
` ' • . �\
t—Foot Contours
+ +
(See Detail 2, Sheet C-13.0)
Proposed Planting Only
limits of Disturbance
\•.
++
(See Detail 2, Sheet C-12.0)
((ff
+
Y I:
•�•
Proposed Toewood/Geolift
•
,` 1, . • `
•o \ '
(See Detail 1, Sheet C-12.0)
:.,\ -.
%.
'�
•"gyp„
Proposed Bar Material To
Be Relocated
CROSS—SECTION 10
..
r
p0
P
' 1
CROSS -S 9
+�50+00
v
51+00 /
CD
�. �
V
8 84.0
CROSS—SECTION 9
CROSS SECTION 10
840
835
PROPOSE
BANKF
LL ELEVATION
835
—
—
— —
— —
— —
—
—
—
—
830
—
— —
— —
—
—
— —
—
830
825
820
\EXISTING
T
ALWEG
LEVATI
N
820
'd
vI
N
N
N
N
N
MM
N
Y nn
n
O
M
M
H O
r
a
N
� �
<
N m�
MO
<
<f
��
O N
Mo
V
O
O
m Y
Mr
Ob
�i'J
4)
NO
b
•'I
m
._ •G
N
m 4)
"l
M N�
m
N
O
u)
m
yI N
m
.- <
m
r'1 N^
m m
N,:�
<
m m
•d
m
ei
M N
m O
.-
Njrl
m
N
m
NM
eI
N
m O
NM
D)
ci ui
N
m O
i
vi
N
a
MOI
m
v
NM
O Y)
N
m
48+00
49+00 50+00
51+00 52+00 53+00
54+00 55+00 56+00
57+00 58+00
59+00 60+00
61+00 62+00 E
BEFORE YOU DIG
CALL 1-800-632-4949
ju
NG ONE CALL CENTER
Know whets below. Its THE LAwi
Cell before you dig.
o$,�.yNyt.Y6! ....33 � .
�JG3j41 3
i
NC FIRM LIC# C-2185
gy
L�§n a rA
�£ta
ua
o �-
J �M
a=.
x aLL a
;m
J e
a
u
m
a
a
W Z
W J
_ o� O
L Q
W U
—� -.t W H
LL=0 L) J O
,::c
Q Z
d.wCLr
Z S
H LL
Z o =o V
U �
Q Z Y
Z J u
O �
a �t5
J
IL
O ;
A
1
U

B50
+ + + +zu 1+4U + + + + + + +80
Cross—section #1
Cross—section #2
Existing Elewtion—,, Proposed Bonkfull
Elewlion
51
84
84
83
Pro i
(3:1 Slope)
4,
840
41
82
82
835
as El—ti—
t3ffSlope)
31
83
Proposed Toe Wood
13'
82
n
2
+ + + +zu 1+4U + + + + + + +80
Cross—section #1
Cross—section #2
Existing Elewtion—,, Proposed Bonkfull
–0+ + + + +Du U+bu+ + - + +60
Cross—section #3
Existing Elewtion
84
Proposed Bankfull
84
83
83
ez
tie w i
a4
84C
84
83
Pro i
(3:1 Slope)
53
83
83
82
82
–0+ + + + +Du U+bu+ + - + +60
Cross—section #3
Existing Elewtion
84
Proposed Bankfull
84
83
83
ez
845
840
835
n
830
825
-0+2D U+ZU+40 Propos a Wood + + + + + +80
Cross-section #4.
Proposed Bankfull
Cross—section #5
•
•
Know wheft below.
Cdl before you
tie w i
Pr posed Bankfull
Ele tion
. Pr posed Elevation–/
(3:1 Slope)
Proposed Elewti
(3:1 Slope)
Remove Bar Material
845
840
835
n
830
825
-0+2D U+ZU+40 Propos a Wood + + + + + +80
Cross-section #4.
Proposed Bankfull
Cross—section #5
•
•
Know wheft below.
Cdl before you

SHEET NO.
C`A.
MR O
�J
TYPICAL SECTIONS 2
REACH 4
NORTH PACOLET RIVER
POLK COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
-
DRAWN BY:MEG AN FOY
PROJ MGR: G. ALEXANDER PRICE
CLIENT: FOLK COUNTY SWCD
DATE: 6/25/14
=
T.N 4
a s. f •' • NOQs,
N !�—off;
-. :..,�> F.
�4.n,Nm.o�a
E N G I N E E R I N G & H Y D R 0 G E 0 L 0 G Y
_
231 HAYWDDD STREET, ABHEYILLE, NC 28801
rEL.:z:.:eT^�oso FAC. 2'8.281.3351
R N TENVIRONNENTAL.CON
0' 10' 20' 40',�
SCALE 1' = 20'
FnE PATH: P:\FOLK SWCD NRCS\NORTH
PACOLET REACH 4\TECHNICAL\FIGURES\CAD
REV. DATE DESCRIPTI ON BY CHK APV
I N
O
}
m
W
m
W
m
m
P
m
ON
}
m
m
W
m
+
I m m mm
O N G N
m
I m m m m
O N W W
�N W DO
}
m
}
rn
7
_
m
+
m
+
a
o+
+
-
w
a
D
O0
E m
O
o D
v a $
!Q
$ =
v
'o
m
F
o D
0
+
o
+ E.
0
n ^+
0
a
a=
o
v
=
+
_
+
En
o'o
o
n
+
mm
a�
+
+
o
C7+
O
C7
o
n
n
r�
O
0
O
cn
w
+60
cn
}
I
+
�
�
cn
r
n
N+
In
CD
0
r+
0
_
+
O.
+
O
+
o.
+
O
00
CO
+
+
Cn +
+
a
o
y
mV
mo
o
o
,m
o
-
v
0
T
ol
oo
a
}
O N G
m
+
m
Dm m m
N O N
.mp
O
�m
L..L.
.-N G G A
m O m O
G
N O N
+
pN a
+
m O
m
N
m
O
+
O
N£
N O
N
p
O N
d
^^
l/
D
i
n � m
T
O p
T
3 /ATI
i
n w o
v_
N
%
10
SHEET NO.
C`A.
MR O
�J
TYPICAL SECTIONS 2
REACH 4
NORTH PACOLET RIVER
POLK COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
-
DRAWN BY:MEG AN FOY
PROJ MGR: G. ALEXANDER PRICE
CLIENT: FOLK COUNTY SWCD
DATE: 6/25/14
=
T.N 4
a s. f •' • NOQs,
N !�—off;
-. :..,�> F.
�4.n,Nm.o�a
E N G I N E E R I N G & H Y D R 0 G E 0 L 0 G Y
_
231 HAYWDDD STREET, ABHEYILLE, NC 28801
rEL.:z:.:eT^�oso FAC. 2'8.281.3351
R N TENVIRONNENTAL.CON
0' 10' 20' 40',�
SCALE 1' = 20'
FnE PATH: P:\FOLK SWCD NRCS\NORTH
PACOLET REACH 4\TECHNICAL\FIGURES\CAD
REV. DATE DESCRIPTI ON BY CHK APV

I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
THE POLK COUNTY SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT (PCSWCD) IN COOPERATION WITH
NUMEROUS STAKEHOLDERS, HAVE CHOSEN TO UNDERTAKE THE EFFORT TO CONSERVE, ENHANCE AND
RESTORE THE NORTH PACOLET RIVER WATERSHED. THE PROPOSED STREAMBANK STABILIZATION OF
REACH 4 WILL PRODUCE A STABLE STREAM WITH VEGETATED STREAMBANKS AND ACCESS TO A
CONSTRUCTED FLOODPLAIN. THE PROPOSED PROJECT WILL IMPROVE AQUATIC HABITAT BY: REDUCING
SEDIMENTATION, REDUCING WATER TEMPERATURE BY INCREASING SHADE COVER. IMPROVING IN -STREAM
AQUATIC HABITAT INSTALLING NEAR BANK STRUCTURES IN THE CHANNEL RESULTING IN IMPROVEMENTS
TO THE POOL AND RIFFLE SEQUENCE, AND BY PLACING PERMANENT CONSERVATION EASEMENTS TO
ENSURE LONG-TERM PROTECTION FOR THESE IMPROVEMENTS AND THE RIPARIAN CORRIDOR.
It. EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS
THE PROPOSED SITE IS LOCATED DOWNSTREAM OF THE HUNTING COUNTRY ROAD BRIDGE IN POLK
COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA. THE SITE IS PRIMARILY AGRICULTURAL LAND WITH SOME WOODED AREAS
AND RESIDENTIAL AREAS
III. ADJACENT PROPERTIES
THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES ARE AGRICULTURAL AND RESIDENTIAL.
IV. OFF-SITE AREAS
THERE ARE NO OFF-SITE AREAS.
V. SOILS
ACCORDING TO THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURAL NATIONAL COOPERATIVE SOIL
SURVEY SOIL MAP, THE SITE SOILS CONSIST OF BUNCOMBE LOAMY SAND AND RION SANDY LOAM.
VI. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SILT FENCE, AND/OR OTHER CONTROL DEVICES, AS NEEDED, DURING
CONSTRUCTION TO PROTECT WORK AREAS FROM UPSLOPE RUNOFF/OR TO DIVERT SEDIMENT LADEN
WATER TO APPROPRIATE MEASURES AND STABLE OUTLETS. EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES SHALL BE
INSTALLED AND FUNCTIONAL PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. ADDITIONAL
CONTROL DEVICES MAY BE REWIRED DURING CONSTRUCTION IN ORDER TO CONTROL EROSION AND/OR
OFF-SITE SEDIMENTATION.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES
THROUGH THE COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT AND THROUGH THE ESTABLISHMENT OF VEGETATION
SUFFICIENT TO PROVIDE EROSION PROTECTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REMOVAL
OF ALL THE TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES PRIOR TO PROJECT CLOSE-OUT.
ALL VEGETATIVE AND STRUCTURAL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES SHALL BE
CONSTRUCTED AND MAINTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF
THE NORTH CAROLINA EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANNING AND DESIGN MANUAL.
A. STRUCTURAL PRACTICES
(.TEMPORARY GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE/EXIT PRACTICE NO. 6.06: A CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
SHALL BE PROVIDED AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS AT THE EXISTING ROADS. EQUIPMENT WHEELS SHALL BE
CLEAN WHEN ENTERING UPON A PAVED ROAD. ALL VEHICLES ENTERING AND EXITING THE PROJECT SITE
SHALL USE A CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE.
Z.SILT FENCE PRACTICE NO. 6.62: SILT FENCE BARRIERS SHALL BE PROVIDED WHERE SHOWN AND AS
NEEDED TO PREVENT SEDIMENT FROM LEAVING THE SITE.
3.TREE PROTECTION PRACTICE NO. 6.05: INSTALL TREE PROTECTION FENCING IN SPECIFIED LOCATIONS
PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL AND EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT BE
LOCATED WITHIN TREE PROTECTION AREAS.
4.ROLLED EROSION CONTROL PRODUCTS PRACTICE NO. 6.17:
INSTALL MATTING PER SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CHANNEL, DIVERSIONS, AND SLOPES.
B. MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES
(.CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE PLANNED SO THAT GRADING OPERATIONS CAN BEGIN AND
END AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.
2.STRAW MULCH AND TALL FESCUE SHALL NOT BE USED IN RIPARIAN AREAS.
3.RIPARIAN VEGETATION ESPECIALLY TREES AND SHRUBS, SHOULD BE PRESERVED AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE.
NATIVE WOODY VEGETATION (EG. RHODODENDRON, DOG HOBBLE, SILKY DOGWOOD, SYCAMORE, RIVER
BIRCH, RED MAPLE) SHOULD BE TRANSPLANTED AND RE-ESTABLISHED WHEN FEASIBLE.
4.IF NECESSARY, SLOPES, WHICH EXCEED EIGHT (8) FEET SHOULD BE STABILIZED WITH SYNTHETIC OR
VEGETATIVE MATS, IN ADDITION TO HYDROSEEDING.
5 DISTURBED AREAS FOUND TO BE ERODING EXCESSIVELY WITHIN I YEAR OF PERMANENT STABILIZATION
SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH ADDITIONAL STABILIZATION MEASURES UNTIL THE PROBLEM IS CORRECTED.
6.LITTER, CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS, OILS, AND FUELS THAT COULD BE EXPOSED TO STORM WATER MUST
BE PREVENTED FROM BECOMING A POLLUTANT SOURCE IN STORM WATER DISCHARGES.
C. VEGETATIVE PRACTICES
LTOPSOILING PRACTICE NO. 6.04: TOPSOIL WILL BE STRIPPED FROM AREAS TO BE GRADED AND
STOCKPILED FOR LATER USE. STOCKPILES ARE TO BE STABILIZED WITH TEMPORARY VEGETATION AND
HAVE SILT FENCE INSTALLED ALONG THE LOWER PERIMETER TO PROTECT DOWNSTREAM AREAS.
2. TEMPORARY SEEDING (TS), PRACTICE NO. 6.10: TEMPORARY SEEDING SHALL BE PROVIDED ON SITE TO
PROVIDE STABILIZATION UNTIL SITE DEVELOPMENT OCCURS. APPLY SEED BASED ON THE TEMPORARY
SEEDING SCHEDULE ON THE PLANS.
3.PERMANENT SEEDING (PS). PRACTICE NO. 6.11: PERMANENT SEEDING SHALL BE PROVIDED ON SITE TO
PROVIDE STABILIZATION FOR ALL DISTURBED AREAS. APPLY SEED BASED ON TEMPORARY AND
PERMANENT SEEDING SCHEDULE SHOWN ON THE PLANS.
4.MULCHING (M), PRACTICE NO 6.14: ALL PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY SEEDING SHALL BE STRAW
MULCHED IMMEDIATELY UPON COMPLETION OF SEED APPLICATION. STRAW ON STEEP SLOPES SHALL BE
ANCHORED UNLESS SEEDING WAS PROVIDED BY MEANS OF A HYDROSEEDING (OR APPROVED EQUAL), IN
WHICH CASE, MULCHING IS NOT REQUIRED.
D. MINIMUM STANDARDS
STABILIZATION OF DENUDED AREAS:
PERMANENT OR TEMPORARY SOIL STABILIZATION SHALL BE APPLIED TO DENUDED AREAS WITHIN 14 DAYS
AFTER FINAL GRADE IS REACHED ON ANY PORTION OF THE SITE. TEMPORARY SOIL STABILIZATION SHALL
BE APPLIED WITHIN 7 DAYS TO ALL DENUDED AREAS. PERMANENT STABILIZATION SHALL BE APPLIED TO
AREAS THAT ARE TO BE LEFT DORMANT FOR MORE THAN ONE YEAR.
STABILIZATION OF SOIL STOCKPILES:
DURING CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT, SOIL STOCKPILES AND BORROW AREAS SHALL BE STABILIZED
OR PROTECTED WITH SEDIMENT TRAPPING MEASURES. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR
TEMPORARY PROTECTION AND PERMANENT STABILIZATION OF ALL STOCKPILES ON SITE AS WELL AS
BORROW AREAS AND SOIL INTENTIONALLY TRANSPORTED FROM THE PROJECT SITE.
PERMANENT VEGETATIVE COVER:
A PERMANENT VEGETATIVE COVER SMALL BE ESTABLISHED ON DENUDED AREAS NOT OTHERWISE
PERMANENTLY STABILIZED. PERMANENT VEGETATION SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED ESTABLISHED UNTIL A
GROUND COVER IS ACHIEVED THAT IS UNIFORM AND MATURE ENOUGH TO SURVIVE AND INHIBIT EROSION.
TIMING AND STABILIZATION OF SILT TRAPPING MEASURES:
SEDIMENT BASINS AND TRAPS, STORM INLET PROTECTION, SILT FENCING AND OTHER MEASURES
INTENDED TO TRAP SEDIMENT SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS A FIRST STEP IN ANY LAND DISTURBING
ACTIVITY AND SHALL BE MADE FUNCTIONAL BEFORE UPSLOPE LAND DISTURBANCE TAKES PLACE.
STABII
LIZATON OF EARTHEN STRUCTURES:
STAB ILIZATON MEASURES SHALL BE APPLIED TO EARTHEN STRUCTURES SUCH AS DAMS, DIKES AND
DIVERSIONS IMMEDIATELY AFTER INSTALLATION.
CUT AND FLL SLOPES:
CUT AND FILL SLOPES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN A MANNER THAT WILL MINIMIZE EROSION. SLOPES
THAT ARE FOUND TO BE ERODING EXCESSIVELY WITHIN ONE YEAR OF PERMANENT STABILIZATION SHALL
BE PROVIDED WITH ADDITIONAL SLOPE STABILIZING MEASURES UNTIL THE PROBLEM IS CORRECTED.
D. MINIMUM STANDARDS (CONTINUED)
CONCENTRATED RUNOFF DOWN CUT OR FILL SLOPES:
0 CONTAINED W
CONCENTRATED TEM RUNOFF SHALL NOT FLOW DOWN CUT OR FILL SLOPES UNLESS CONT (THIN AN
ADEQUATE TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT CHANNEL, FLUME OR SLOPE DRAIN STRUCTURE.
WATER SEEPAGE FROM A SLOPE FACE:
WHENEVER WATER SEEPS FROM A SLOPE FACE, ADEQUATE DRAINAGE OR OTHER PROTECTION SHALL BE
PROVIDED.
UNDERGROUND UTILITIES:
THE EXACT LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE DETERMINED BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO
CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO VERIFY UTILITIES (NOT SHOWN ON
PLANS) THAT EXIST WITHIN THE AREAS OF CONSTRUCTION.
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS ROUTES;
WHERE CONSTRUCTION VEHICLE ACCESS ROUTES INTERSECT PAVED OR PUBLIC ROADS, PROVISIONS
SHALL BE MADE TO MINIMIZE THE TRANSPORT OF SEDIMENT BY VEHICULAR TRACKING ONTO THE PAVED
SURFACE. WHERE SEDIMENT IS TRANSPORTED ONTO A PAVED OR PUBLIC ROAD, THE ROAD SURFACE
SHALL BE CLEANED THOROUGHLY AT THE END OF EACH DAY. SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED BY
SHOVELING OR SWEEPING AND TRANSPORTED TO A SEDIMENT DISPOSAL AREA STREET WASHING SHALL
BE ALLOWED ONLY AFTER SEDIMENT IS REMOVED IN THIS MANNER. THIS PROVISION SHALL APPLY TO
INDIVIDUAL DEVELOPMENT LOTS AS WELL AS TO LARGER LAND -DISTURBING ACTIVITIES.
TEMPORARY EBS CONTROL MEASURE REMOVAL:
ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE REMOVED WITHIN 30 DAYS
AFTER FINAL SITE STABILIZATION OR AFTER TEMPORARY MEASURES ARE NO LONGER NEEDED. TRAPPED
SEDIMENT AND THE DISTURBED SOIL AREAS RESULTING FROM THE DISPOSITION OF TEMPORARY
MEASURES SHALL BE PERMANENTLY STABILIZED TO PREVENT FURTHER EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION.
E. DAILY MAINTENANCE
ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL STRUCTURES AND SYSTEMS SHALL BE MAINTAINED, INSPECTED,
AND REPAIRED AS NEEDED TO INSURE CONTINUED PERFORMANCE OF THEIR INTENDED FUNCTION. ALL
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE CHECKED AT THE END OF EACH DAY AND AFTER
EVERY RAINFALL EVENT. -
LDAMAGE TO EROSION CONTROL MEASURES CAUSED BY CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC OR OTHER ACTIVITY
SHALL BE REPAIRED BEFORE THE END OF EACH WORKING DAY.
2. MAINTAIN ALL SEEDED AREAS UNTIL A UNIFORM STAND IS ACCEPTED.
3.PROVIDE FOR EQUIPMENT WASHING AS NEEDED TO PREVENT THE TRANSPORT OF SOIL ONTO EXISTING
ASPHALT ROADWAYS. ANY SEDIMENT ON THE PAVEMENT SHALL BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY.
4.SILT FENCE BARRIERS WILL BE CHECKED DAILY FOR UNDERMINING OR DETERIORATION OF THE FABRIC.
SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED WHEN THE LEVEL REACHED HALF WAY TO THE TOP OF THE BARRIER.
5 TOPSOIL SHALL NOT BE PLACED WHILE IN A FROZEN OR MUDDY CONDITION, WHEN TOPSOIL DR
SUDGRADE IS EXCESSIVELY WET, OR IN A CONDITION THAT MAY OTHERWISE BE DETRIMENTAL TO PROPER
GRADING OR PROPOSED SODDING OR SEEDING. THE TOPSOIL SHALL BE UNIFORMLY DISTRIBUTED TO A
MINIMUM COMPACTED DEPTH OF 2 -INCHES ON 3:1 OR STEEPER SLOPES AND 4 -INCHES ON FLATTER
SLOPES.
6.AREAS WHICH FAIL TO ESTABLISH VEGETATIVE COVER ADEQUATE TO'PREVENT RILL EROSION WILL BE
RESEEDED AS SOON AS SUCH AREAS ARE IDENTIFIED.
7.WHERE EROSION OR WASHOUT IS OBSERVED IN MULCHED AREAS, ADDITIONAL MULCH SHOULD BE
APPLIED.
B.TREE PROTECTION AREAS SHALL BE INSPECTED DAILY. REPAIR AND REPLACE FENCING AS NEEDED.
VII. SOIL STOCKPILES AND BORROW AREAS
LOCATIONS OF SOIL STOCKPILES SHALL BE DETERMINED BY THE CONTRACTOR WITH THE APPROVAL OF
THE OWNER/DEVELOPER AND ENGINEER. ALL STOCKPILES SHALL BE LOCATED ON SITE AND PROTECTED
WITH SURROUNDING SILT FENCING AND STABILIZED WITH A VEGETATIVE COVER. CONTRACTOR IS
REQUIRED TO PROVIDE EVIDENCE OF VALID GRADING PERMITS FOR ANY OFF-SITE BORROW AREAS. THE
CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A SUPPLEMENTARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN FOR ALL SOILS
INTENTIONALLY TRANSPORTED OFF-SITE IF THE TRANSPORTED MATERIAL DISTURBS MORE THAN 10,000
SQUARE FEET IN AREA
SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION
I. FLAG THE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION.
2.MARKLIVE TREES TO BE PROTECTED AND INSTALL TREE PROTECTION FENCING AS NECESSARY.
3.PRIOR TO ANY GRADING ACTIVITY, CONSTRUCT A STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE AT EVERY POINT OF
THE TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE, AND PRIOR TO ANY OTHER CONSTRUCTION
L ALL PERIMETER EROSION CONTROL DEVICES INCLUDING SILT FENCE.
S FOR REMOVAL. ANY WOODY DEBRIS THAT WILL BE USED FOR BANK
R IN -STREAM STRUCTURES WILL BE MARKED AS SUCH AND MOVED TO
CONTROL DEVICES THROUGHOUT
I DOWN. CONSTRUCTION SHALL
9.GRADE THE CHANNEL TO THE CHANNEL DIMENSIONS AS SPECIFIED ON THE PLANS.
IO.INSTALL INSTREAM STRUCTURES AS SPECIFIED ON THE PLANS.
II.STABILIZE ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITH PERMANENT OR TEMPORARY VEGETATION AS NECESSARY.
12.EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL GROUNDCOVER IS ACHIEVED THAT IS UNIFORM
AND MATURE ENOUGH TO SURVIVE AND INHIBIT EROSION.
13. REMOVE TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES.
14ZAMSILIZE AFFECTED AREAS.
GENERAL SEEDING/PLANTING NOTES:
(.CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN SOIL ANALYSIS FOR PROPOSED PLANTING AREA IN ORDER TO DETERMINE
REQUIRED SOIL AMENDMENTS.
60 GIBSON STREET
COLUMBUS, NC 28722
PH: 828-894-8218
WWW. POLK.CES.NCSU.EDU
UPON RECEPTION, PROVIDE COPY OF SOIL REPORT TO OWNER.
2.AREAS TO BE SEEDED SHALL BE RIPPED AND SPREAD WITH AVAILABLE TOPSOIL 3' DEEP ON SLOPES 2:1 OR
FLATTER. TOTAL SEEDBED PREPARED DEPTH SHALL BE 4' TO 6' DEEP. IF SOILS ARE COMPACTED DURING
GRADING LOOSEN TO A DEPTH OF 6' TO 8'.
3.LOOSE ROCKS, ROOTS AND OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SURFACE TO PREVENT
INTERFERENCE WITH ESTABLISHMENT AND MAINTENANCE OF VEGETATION.
4.APPLY LIME AND SOIL AMMENDMENTS ACCORDING TO SOIL TEST RECOMMENDATIONS. WHEN NOT SPECIFIED
APPLY AT THE FOLLOWING RATES: -
4000 LB/ACRE OF GROUND AGRICULTURAL LIMESTONE,
1000 LB/ACRE OF 10-10-10 FERTILIZER
DRY SOIL, GRASS -LINED CHANNELS SHALL USE:
3000 LB/ACRE OF GROUND AGRICULTURAL LIMESTONE
500 LB/ACRE OF 10-10-10 FERTILIZER
S.ROUGHEN SEEDBED SURFACE PRIOR TO APPLICATION. GROOVE OR FURROW SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1.
6.SEEDING SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SEEDING SCHEDULE.
7.TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT SEED SHALL BE APPLIED TOGETHER.
IIARRIGATION MAY BE REQUIRED SO THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REACH 90% 2-4 INCHES OF COVER BEFORE
CLOSE OUT OF PROJECT.
9.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO FOLLOWING ALL RULES OF THE NCDENR LAND QUALITY SECTION AS
OUTLINED IN THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MANUAL.
SEEDING SCHEDULE
TEMPORARY SEEDING SCHEDULE RIPARIAN AND NON -RIPARIAN AREAS:
A SINGLE SPECIES SELECTION FOR TEMPORARY COVER IS ACCEPTABLE. A MIXTURE OF TWO OR MORE
TEMPORARY SPECIES MAY BE NECESSARY ALTHOUGH APPLICATION RATES SHOULD NOT EXCEED THE TOTAL
RECOMMENDED RATE PER ACRE.
COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME RATE PER ACRE
OPTIMAL PLANTING DATES
RYE GRAIN SECALE CERAELE 30 LBS
AUG. 15 - MAY 15
WHEAT TRITICUM AESTIVUM 30 LBS
AUG. 15 - MAY 15
GERMAN MILLET SETARIA ITALICA 10 LBS
MAY 15 - AUG. 15
BROWNTOP MILLET UROCHLOA RAMOSA 10 LBS
MAY 15 - AUG. 15
PERMANENT SEEDING SCHEDULE RIPARIAN AREAS (INSIDE CONSERVATION EASEMENT AREA):
SEEDING SHALL BE APPLIED IN LOCATIONS SPECIFIED ON THE PLANS OR BY THE ENGINEER. SEED MIX FOR
THE RIPARIAN AREA SHALL BE ERNST MIX* ERNMX-304 INC MOUNTAINS RIPARIAN MIX) AS MANUFACTURED
BY ERNST CONSERVATION SEEDS WWW.ERNSTSEED.COM OR SIMILAR APPROVED BY ENGINEER. SEED SHALL
BE APPLIED AT 20 LBS PER ACRE.
PERMANENT SEEDING SCHEDULE NON- RIPARIAN AREAS (UPLAND AREAS):
COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME RATE PER ACRE
RED CLOVER (TRIFOLIUM PRATENSE) 10 LBS
CREEPING RED FESCUE (FESTUCA RUBRA) 20 LBS
SOURCE: NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WILDLIFE RESOURCES SEED MIXES FOR REVEGETATION OF
DISTURBED SITES.
MULCH SHALL BE APPLIED AT THE RATE OF:
4000 LB/ACRE (60-80 BALES/ACRE) OF STRAW.
CHANNELS - ALL VEGETATION LINED CHANNELS, SWALES, DITCHES ETC. SHALL HAVE CHANNEL MATTING AS
SPECIFIED AND INSTALLED AS DESCRIBED ON THE DETAIL SHEET.
GRADED SLOPES AND FILLS - ALL SLOPES GREATER THAN 3:1 SHALL HAVE SLOPE MATTING AS SPECIFIED,
AND INSTALLED AS DESCRIBED ON THE DETAIL SHEET.
ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE SEEDED AND MULCHED WITH AN APPROVED GROUNDCOVER WITHIN 14
CALENDAR DAYS. ANY SLOPE 50 FT. IN LENGTH OR GREATER SHALL BE SEEDED AND MULCHED WITH AN
APPROVED GROUNDCOVER WITHIN 7 CALENDAR DAYS.
EROSION CONTROL MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE
SEDIMENT FENCE (SILT FENCE): INSPECT SEDIMENT FENCES AT LEAST ONCE A WEEK, AND AFTER EACH
RAINFALL. MAKE ANY REWIRED REPAIRS IMMEDIATELY. REMOVE SEDIMENT DEPOSITS AS NECESSARY TO
PROVIDE ADEQUATE STORAGE VOLUME FOR THE NEXT RAIN AND TO REDUCE PRESSURE ON THE FENCE.
TAKE CARE TO AVOID UNDERMINING THE FENCE DURING CLEAN. REMOVE ALL FENCING MATERIALS AND
UNSTABLE SEDIMENT DEPOSITS AND BRING THE AREA TO GRADE AND STABILIZE IT AFTER THE
CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA HAS BEEN PROPERTY STABILIZED.
CONSTRUCTION ROAD STABILIZATION: INSPECT CONSTRUCTION ROADS AND PARKING AREAS PERIODICALLY
FOR CONDITION OF SURFACE. TOPDRESS WITH NEW GRAVEL AS NEEDED. CHECK ROAD DITCHES AND
OTHER SEEDED AREAS FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION AFTER RUNOFF -PRODUCING RAINS. MAINTAIN
ALL VEGETATION IN A HEALTHY, VIGOROUS CONDITION. SEDIMENT-PROOUCING AREAS SHOULD BE TREATED
IMMEDIATELY.
DUST CONTROL: MAINTAIN DUST CONTROL MEASURES THROUGH DRY WEATHER PERIODS UNTIL ALL
DISTURBED AREAS HAVE BEEN STABILIZED.
SURFACE ROUGHENING: PERIODICALLY CHECK THE SEEDED SLOPES FOR RILLS AND WASHES. FILL THESE
AREAS SLIGHTLY ABOVE THE ORIGINAL GRADE, THEN RE -SEED AND MULCH AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.
LAND GRADING: PERIODICALLY CHECK ALL GRADED AREAS AND THE SUPPORTING EROSION AND
SED
MENTATI CONTROL PRACTICES, ESPECIALLY AFTER HEAVY RAINFALLS. PROMPTLY REMOVE ALL
SEDIMENT FROM DIVERSIONS AND OTHER WATER -DISPOSAL PRACTICES. IF WASHOUT OR BREAKS OCCURS,
REPAIR THEM IMMEDIATELY. PROMPT MAINTENANCE OF SMALL ERODED AREAS BEFORE THEY BECOME
SIGNIFICANT GULLIES IS AN ESSENTIAL PMT OF AN EFFECTIVE EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL
TEMPORARY GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE/EXIT: MAINTAIN THE GRAVEL PAD IN A CONDITION TO
PREVENT MLO OR SEDIMENT FROM LEAVING THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC
TOPDRESSING WITH 2 -INCH STONE. AFTER EACH RAINFALL, INSPECT ANY STRUCTURE USED TO TRAP
SEDIMENT AND CLEAN IT OUT AS NECESSARY. IMMEDIATELY REMOVE ALL OBJECTIONABLE MATERIALS
SPILLED, WASHED, OR TRACKED ONTO PUBLIC ROADWAYS.
ROLLED EROSION CONTROL PRODUCTS (CHANNEL MATTING):
INSPECT ROLLED EROSION CONTROL PRODUCTS AT LEAST WEEKLY AND AFTER
EACH SIGNIFICANT RAIN EVENT. REPAIR IMMEDIATELY. ANY AREAS OF THE MATTING THAT ARE DAMAGED
OR NOT IN CLOSE CONTACT WITH THE GROUND SHALL BE REPAIRED AND STAPLED. IF EROSION OCCURS
DUE TO POORLY CONTROLLED DRAINAGE, THE PROBLEM SHALL BE FIXED AND THE ERODED AREA
PROTECTED. MONITOR AND REPAIR THE MATTING AS NECESSARY UNTIL GROUND COVER IS ESTABLISHED.
TREE PRESERVATION AND PROTECTION:
REPAIR ANY DAMAGE TO PROTECTED TREE AS FOLLOWS:
SHOULD DAMAGE TO CROWN, TRUNK, OR ROOT SYSTEM OCCUR. REPAIR ROOTS BY CUTTING OFF THE
DAMAGED AREAS AND PAINTING THEM WITH TREE PANT. SPREAD PEAT MOSS OR MOIST TOPSOIL OVER
EXPOSED ROOTS. REPAIR DAMAGE TO BARK BY TRIMMING AROUND THE DAMAGED AREAS, TAPER THE CUT
TO PROVIDE DRAINAGE, AND PAINT WITH TREE PAINT. CUT OFF ALL DAMAGED TREE LIMBS ABOVE THE
TREE COLLAR AT THE TRUNK OR MAIN BRANCH. USE THREE SEPARATED CUTS TO AVOID PEELING BARK
FROM HEALTHY AREAS OF THE TREE.
tom , 33141 :
NC FIRM LIC* C-2185
g
ai
a'
z x
o -
p UM
z e
0
zu =
o as p
3m
ar
z
Ll
m
r
r
a
V J
W Q
_Z
O J
Z W X
J >
O
z Q u 0
Z 3
0EL
3z zZ
L)
0�/�A z
V JJ J 3
L1 CL
W
O
O• N
U LL

air k� zM1.
Major Elements of DWL Construction General ft mit
'Thls do0til¢fl• ir` onf8iillil'!C Wy4i Glemeitt8 D jtF�:'ipCD4it4ly-revised Nbrih Caro)ind Divigidn of Water Quality. (QWQ) GtoilfttUot}bu'.
: cpetal>P with emphasis placed lipse elemeritti foal differ from. the provious permrt(exPim'_ 4?!t Augugt2,
:2011}, Sittcs"dhe;aummary list belrnv cannot contain details of cxecy change, the wmpletc Permd;sbould:bc usedlaassutc,3it1I
implement -655 10.:http'l//Portal.ncderr.org/web/wq/ws/zutr005twc6on
The may. change in the Permit float ft prey one one is the snorts;
1) c:rourrdSLbd'aation•. 6—s 0 pply g—d dabihzAind poriApq1c
I;-- The'VG laws and rotes relecingagtllnI'cld eenl Actreq"
ct pl v gourd stabilaspptfixithiry'.2l ,,�$ccd-the bellyX.P A.eyvir mems and 9-momitst �lewith aptatgrl8dv ivory group,
� uron and fypA-dpA'ejeped pexmnaYl@ly crnrtains
rc., ants for ground cover Within 14, zdmsome places, 7days.,
Site Area.
$ta bilu.a[iou
StabWzation.Time
Deuri fi¢n
Time Fnme
Frame Esce tions
r Perimcrecdikesi
-
. _
awaleyy d tprips
x date
Ng9F
andhdp,s
A lftb_Qalitg
'•ValoiflQl4
pda�
*rJ4
Zona
if elopns'Wd 10` or
V Ww sF*mless
7d, ays
in length and are
tlWa>:a
not steLpea than,2:1,
14 days arc allowed..
?-40 futsloI*
un Slopes g3 ¢r
M
14, day.
Brest41-60 fimt
il ARVIQset:aaa_a,
wil6alopes Hatter
Ls day`A
periet tent—dd
'titmi41
I
IrloWZones
' "katiarCre)!u[i#Tups mDY 9C Prfi2tpy`b2 uYlne'FsnhlpmAauUl«itf
�ba5tdmt weatkfe;ot.opfersite'ipaifiC 6orrltidotisiliata[skG ACvrt�batuc
irapeaWeablk';(.Se4ryt1aII.9�`%{b).j
2) Building tVavtes lfandling
No paint m li_grud wastesip, steam or storm. drains
lledicaied—u far de nni idan, construction and other
wastee: input be locatd W .11dfu alorm 61Fain&,a0/i gtCeantA
unless, no reasonable -alteratives available.
Is Bad5eu-material. stockpiles most:be located 5(' from Acerin
draina.:and streams unless noxcasrmable Aternativea
Wadable.
c Cwcrete mare{ials Toast be otmb611t:.$;r4drgnta04gittp
siirface wricrs, wetlands, orliufferti
3) Dmhargos to ltderally-listed ti ate rs -
Requir enlsecthc cos in {an us pamiE.
•. The pemut allows redvetiumfrnm the 20 acre minumm� it
the l,?uudor, ofUlyCc1 detenniaes that other I3.1d1's protide
c uivalcnt PProtection.
1
Major Elements of DWq Construction General Permit- Cantinued
4) Incpertr ��
• Same weekly inspee-nottregi&etu tiu
a Same rain gauge & inVectione after LW min event'.
• Tnepections ueonly, required doing "normal.busiaess
l 7nspeCfiWtxepnthmusi:-ba madable,on-site doing
Susiaesa ltpursTtplessa4'apFSific pxemptlprt3,�
1ptn.ved-
Rebardi; mustbolcyptTm 3p—and-etilabla upon•
Tcquat6-
" F14rtrptdcally.•avai[abte letoide tnaytie subsdtpted
under cerialn conditions
5)[mplrmeniat�onof Vew Permit Conditions ,.
,« limjcdspermittedundauwprmiouspermi"m
continue to fullow the prav(; wly-permilaed oondi(iogc
x Complete:applicationsncccived�ptiot
In Augat �:--=
C2K fn0dw o6ndthons ofappmv.. appli #ah,
e. Applications necei-d aftei Aogusl 3 2011 mustcobTlg
with new,pamit-tufitions
August 4* lftl-.
6) Conditwns in F.—ion dt Sdinllnt.tioft Control Plans'
Uesiguation oa 0. plans where the 7 and 14 -day ground
stabiliZatian requiremeot4 of the NPUES permitapply,
Doigttatiw sat- t4 plana Whftkasins that comp!} Wlb tW
suff-wrlhd—L=gudremede.vf` the NPIIF-Spennit ane
!9Fat�:
7).
Suriding 4'astes-rIF¢dlln ,,ro l p°` F "x.";, ?xxx
,:...
c an�UiWd[ wbi a>xt<wommm Urs
It dDedicated areas for:demolirt .,—tiucficnand other
WaatRsibpated. 5Q`I;patstorm drains and streams unle4s
b6 i6sonable aleetn"ativet art available..
Farfbcn-rffiitdai anckpeln 1¢tated.5D' frvnalotm:
s aim -n iesa ud teivanable'alte rot itvaitsbie.
► I';Cuflcietc, noteiidisdnUst-1W emntroIled.T6 BVoid comad
with surface wafers, wetlands, nr bntFem
B) Sedioae¢kBas(ns ..
w Dullc boa nbea must withdraw from basin smUce
�ni;r�dt�tgrgg aryaig los¢ tbatt 7 segs: _
3+�rlX'p�i'4'appttrvedilu�nlaltl4i
i tumLereau;a:E'es[F�Hmta-sfnip8¢sw8tiamatflire'atra�+eSer!<f�memipeari�rtmral:i2en6Yyeros.clerePoa,gtormdwdliu5aamq�re�appryrareis
Iaca6onoftLe"5ealmrvbere tTie�ra-.eviWdrewelmpdrenicit cppty:
oOD.mal Impac4by 0tc1)W q J%Or%1ct-Qpality
t
[RGINALLY
THIS SHEET IS AN ADDITION TO THE ORIGINAL SEALED SET.
CERTIFIED DOCUMENT AS TO THE ORIGINAL
ENT BUT ONLY AS TO THE REVISIONS - THIS DOCUMENT
ISSUED AND SEALED BY ZAN PRICE, LICENSE NUMBER 33141,
TOBER 30, 2014. THIS DOCUMENT IS ONLY CERTIFIED AS TO THE
ONS.
BEFORE YOU DIG
13 CALL 1-800-632-4949
N.C. ONE CALL CENTER
Know what below. IR THE Awl
Call before you dig
'FcPtH CARO
E
GM
ip wig
,elm•...
NC FIRM LIC• C-2185
3
3
T
i U d J
z
�u_
Qaa
o
o
Me
r
>m
zm
nF
m
a
v
N
0 Q
W Z
J
of 0
U w of
z U
Q W
of QU Z
U Z 9
z � 5
O = Z 5
Uat
o z.
z O U
Z Y v
O
0
O
Wo
14
O m
U

WIDTH TO BE EQUALTO
PROPOSED DRIVE WIDTH
36'-0' MINIMUM _ 4'-0' EXISTING
6' /
ROAD 7
Ir�
W HUMP TO DIVERT RUNOFF
FROM EXISTING ROAD
NOTES:
I. A STABILIZED PAD OF CRUSHED STONE SHALL BE LOCATED WHERE TRAFFIC WILL BE ENTERING OR LEAVING A CONSTRUCTION
SITE TO OR FROM A PUBLIC STREET.
2. STONE TO BE RAILROAD TYPE BALLAST.
3. THE ENTRANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH WILL PREVENT TRACKING OR FLOWING OF SEDIMENT ONTO PUBLIC
STREETS OR EXISTING PAVEMENT. THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSING WITH ADDITIONAL STONE AS CONDITIONS DEMAND
AND REPAIR AND/OR CLEANOUT OF ANY MEASURES USED TO TRAP SEDIMENT.
4. ALL SEDIMENT SPILLED, DROPPED, WASHED OR TRACKED ONTO PUBLIC -STREETS MUST BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY.
5. WHEN NECESSARY WHEELS MUST BE CLEANED TO REMOVE SEDIMENT PRIOR TO ENTERING A PUBLIC STREET, WHEN WASHING IS
REQUIRED, IT SHALL BE DONE ON AN AREA STABILIZED WITH CRUSHED STONE WHICH DRAINS INTO AN APPROVED SEDIMENT BASIN.
6. FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE PLACED UNDER THE ENTRANCE/EXIT AND SHALL BE HIRAM 500 OR EQUAL.
i CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
NOT TO SCALE
METAL TEE POST (TYP.)
4' ORANGE POLYETHYLENE
LAMINAR SAFETY FENCING
6' MAX SPACING
NOTES:
1) INSTALL PROTECTIVE FENCING BEFORE CONSTRUCTION OR ANY SITE ACTIVITY BEGINS.
2) FENCE SHALL BE RACED AROUND THE CRITICAL R00T ZONE OF THE TREE TO BE PRESERVED.
3) THE CRITICAL R00T ZONE SHALL BE DETERMINED BY EXTENDING A CIRCLE AROUND THE TREE WITH A ONE -FOOT RADIUS FOR
EVERY INCH OF TREE CALIPER MEASURED AT BREAST HEIGHT OR TO THE DRIPLINE OF THE TREE CANOPY, WHICHEVER IS GREATER.
4) NO DISTURBANCE IS PERMITTED WITHIN THE TREE PROTECTION AREA INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: GRADING, FILLING, PARKING,
DRIVING OR MANEUVERING OF EQUIPMENT, STORAGE OF MATERIALS OR DEBRIS, DISPOSAL OF WASTES OR CONCRETE WASHOUTS, AND
ATTACHING OF NAILS, ROPES ,CABLES, SIGNS OR FENCING TO ANY PRESERVED TREE.
5) TREES AND SHRUBS CLOSELY GROUPED MAY BE ENCLOSED IN A SINGLE ENLARGED BARRICADE.
5) PROTECTIVE FENCING SHALL BE MAINTAINED AND REMAIN IN RACE UNTIL CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE.
�1 TREE PROTECTION
NOT TO SCALE
9- HIGH RIP RAP BERM FACED WITH #57
WASHED STONE.
4' BREAK
PROVIDE SILT FENCE BREAKS EVERY 200 8' MAX.
FEET OF FENCING OR AT LOW POINTS. VARIABLE AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER
MIN. 12-1/2 GA.
MIN. 10 GA. INTERMEDIATE
LINE WIRES WIRES
-k1h
GRADE
STEEL POSTS:
5' LONG W/ANCHOR PLT.
W10EFRONT VIEW
- MIR. WT. 1.25LB/FT
ANCHOR PLATE MIN AREA= 1450'
WOVEN WIRE:
TOP 8 BOTTOM WIRES: 10 GAGE MIN.
INTERMEDIATE WIRES: 12 } GAGE MIN.
WIRE STAPLES:
- 1 P LENGTH MIN.
- NO. 9 STAPLE
SILTFENCE FABRIC:
- NCDOT CLASS B
NOTES:
I. USE SILT FENCE ONLY WHEN DRAINAGE AREA DOES
NOT EXCEED 1/4 ACRE PER IOOLF AND NEVER IN AREAS
OF CONCENTRATED FLOW.
2. SILT FENCE SHALL NOT BE USED IN DITCHES CREEKS
OR OTHER AREAS RECEIVING CONCENTRATED FLOWS.
3. SILT FENCE SHALL NOT BE USED FOR INLET
PROTECTION.
SILT FENCE
SIDE VIEW
1.33 uALN FT STEEL POST
WOVEN WIRE FABRIC
SILT FENCE FABRIC
,—FILL SLOPE
NOT TO SCALE
Know whe . below.
Call before you
. 1 f
NC FIRM LIC# C-2185
� y
� � o
u�
T6.
� i aa9
NM i
to i
J
v w �
3
i
0
a
V J
Q a
Z
U o
C) LLJ
7 Q
_j U
O W
U 0Z 2
0 CL F- 2
U F-
Q Z O
c/) Q
O CL
w
O
U

WRAP END OF COIR FIBER MATTING AROUND GEOLIFT
2'X 2' WOODEN STAKES AT 12'0.C.
GEOUFT WITH COIR FIBER MATTING (900 GIM 2)
LIVE CUTTINGS
SEED NOSE OF EACH LIFT WITH RIPARIAN
SEED MIX AND COVER WITH WHEAT STRAW
(TYP )
ROOT WADS AND BRUSH
CANTILEVERED OVER LOGS
/ ANGLED FOUNDATION LOG
v� —�� DIAMETER
PROPOSED BANKFULL STAGE
LOW FLOW STAGE
FOUNDATK)N LOGS:
1S- 25- FROM BANK TANGENT
1
I BANK
ROOT WADS CANTILEVERED
OVER FOUNDATION LOGS
FILL VOIDS WITH FILLER MATERIAL
ONCE ROOT WADS ARE RACED
-L
FOUNDATION LOGS AND ROOT WADS
PLAN VIEW (STEPS 4-6)
STEPS: I /"</���/ice'
1. RESHAPE CHANNEL PROPOSED CHANNEL
2 DIVERT FLOW FROM BANK
3. PRE -DIG CHANNEL BED FOR TOE WOOD
{. PLACE FOOTER LOGS (FOUNDATION) AND BE
SURE ANGLES ARE NOT PARALLEL TO CHANNEL FLOW.
5. PUCE ROOT WAD LOGS CANTILEVERED OVER FOUNDATION LOGS.
S. PLACE FILLER MATERIAL (E.G. SMALL LOGS, LIMBS, TREE TOPS AND BRUSH)
PARALLEL TO ROOT WADS.
7. ADD TEMPORARY COUNTER WEIGHT TO SUBMERGE LOGS.
B. PUCE SHALLOW BACKFILL.
9. REMOVE TEMPORARY WEIGHT AND PUCE LIVE CUTTINGS.
EXISTING GROUND
10. PLACE BACKFILL OVER CUTTINGS.
11. INSTALL GEOUFTS. PLACE IN W LIFTS AND COMPACT TO NOT LESS THAT 95
PERCENT DENSITY (STANDARD PROCTOR).
TOE WOOD/ GEOLIFT
NOT TO SCALE
CONSERVATIONEASEMEFIT
BOUNDARY
ZONE 2:
RIP. BUFFER—
NN
�—TYPICAL CRO55 SECTION --�
LIVE STAKES
COIR MATTING
1r2- VEGETATION PLANTING DETAIL AND SCHEDULE
NOT TO SCALE
aBEFORE YOU DIG
CALL 1-800-632-4949
N.C. ONE CALL CENTER
K—haftb.l—, 9S THE LAWI
Call befm You cp.
L
27261
„/n
0
w3
a rn
�U
a
m �
v a u
U
J
J J
C
ITL o a.
Fi•a U o
U =Z
rrt O
z N
`(r7j V
O
;( E
V
L U
Ir
U Z
C
Q
U
Y
0
O
w
0
0
Q
Z
J
O
F— > Q
LLI R v
2 v -W,�
U) (6) o00
IL
a
��mz
Wo o
D z oY �
a
0
D
d
L!
U �

BACKFILL WITH SELECT MATERL
FOOTER LOG
MIN 17 DIAME
TIE INTO S'
�j LOG VANE ROCK J -HOOK
AS DIRECTED BY
.S MARKED TO REMAIN.
ROCK SILL
BANKFULL
I— BANKFULL WIDTH
BACKFILL WITH
SELECT MATERIAL
FILTER FABRIC
SECTION A -A
._ BANKFULL ELEVATION
112 BANKFULL ELEVATION
\$ S%SLO,,S
LOOS SHALL REMAIN MOSTLY '� ��'X/FZ/
SATURATED SO THEY WILL
DETERIORATE SLOWER. STREAMBED ELEVATION FOOTER BOULDER
SECTION B -B STREAM BRED ELEVATIONI
NOT TO SCALE
c EXCAVATE AND GRADE INCISED BANKS
n4 C
o$
EXISTING ELEVATION OF INCISED BANKS
10. 2%
1
3 / I BANKFULL ELEVATION
(SEE PROFS FOR ELEVATIONS)
CREATE BENCH AT BANKFULL CREATE A MINIUMUM 2%
ELEVATION TO THE EXTENT INSTALL GEOFABRIC AND PLANTINGS CREATE A MINIU UM BENCH
SPECIFIED BY THE ENGINEER PER PLANTING DETAIL.
REMOVE EXCESS BAR MATERIAL AS
DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER
BANKFULL BENCH AND GRADE TO STABLE SLOPE
NOTTO SCALE
2* �-
UPHILL
COtn MATTING (17'P.)
STAKE (TYP)
L2141' TOE OF SLOPE
vLL
E MATTING IN
'TRENCH
A B G H NOTES:
C 1,PREPARE SOIL. SOW SEED AND PLACE STRAW WHERE FABRIC IS TO SE
... F INSTALLED PRIOR TO INSTALLING EROSION CONTROL FABRIC.
TOP OF BANK 2.EROSION CONTROL FABRIC SHALL CONSIST OF 900 GRAM50UARE METER
CHANNEL D E WOVEN COIR FABRIC OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT.
APPROXIMATE LOW 3.FASTENERS SHALL BE 24 NCH WOODEN STAKE OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT,
FLOW SURFACE INSTALLED AT A RATE OF 3.4 STAKES PER SQUARE YARD. NOMINAL
SPACING IS 20 INCHES PERPENDICULAR TO FLOW AND 24 INCHES
PARALLEL TO FLOW.
Y MIN. 2' MIN. 4.FABRIC SHALL BE SECURED TO THE GROUND SUCH THAT FABRIC DOES NOT
SEPARATE FROM GROUND MORE THAN 1 INCH WITH A REASONABLE TUG.
I I ADDITIONAL FASTENERS WILL BE REQUIRED IF FABRIC FAILS THIS PULL
EXTEND FABRIC A
MINIMUM OF 2 FEET —
BEYOND TOP OF BANK
A B u E F G
LOW FLOW ELEVATIO
COIR MATTING STREAM BANK DETAIL
TEST.
5.OVERLAP BETWEEN ADJACENT RUNS OF FABRIC SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 6
FLOODPLAIN INCHES. FABRIC SHALL OVERLAP IN THE DOWNSTREAM DIRECTION
PARALLEL TO FLOW AND DOWNSLOPE PERPENDICULAR TO FLOW.
6.FABRIC SHALL EXTEND A MINIMUM OF 2 FEET BEYOND BANKFULL. FABRIC
SHALL EXTEND BELOW LOW FLOW SURFACE 1 FOOT OR TO CHANNEL
BOTTOM, WHICH EVER IS LESS.
TTERMINAL ENDS OF FABRIC SHALL BE BURIED IN A 81NCH DEEP TRENCH AND
STAKES AT 3' SECURED BY 24 INCH WOOD 2X2• STAKES SPACED 3 FEET APART. TOE OF
SPACING FABRIC SHALL BE SECURED WITH 24 INCH WOOD 2'X2' STAKES SPACED 3
FEET APART.
S. DISTURBANCE SHALL BE LIMITED TO WHAT CAN BE COMPLETED THAT DAY.
TOP OF BANK SITE SHALL BE STABILIZED AT THE END OF EACH WORK DAY.
SECURE EDGE OF FABRIC AND TOE PER NOTE 7.
NOT TO SCALE
O
a
N
a
.Z
J
IX 0
F—> Q
W v
qt w F-
_ = J CCO
Q Z
-jwa
W O0
Z Y
J
O
a
BEFORE YOU DIG
9
CALL 1-800-632-4949
N.C. ONECALL CENTER
KOowwhfY wow.
RS THE LAWI
O
a
N
a
.Z
J
IX 0
F—> Q
W v
qt w F-
_ = J CCO
Q Z
-jwa
W O0
Z Y
J
O
a