HomeMy WebLinkAbout20180331 Ver 1_Structure 340025 Franklin No Archaeological Survey Required Form_20180308Project Tracictng No.:
16-10-0012
oa��� NO ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REQUIRED FORM ����1
'th� � This form only pertains to ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES for this project. It is not (� � ��
�1sp _ ... �.� {�.
i; ¢,� o.' �i: valid for Historic Architecture and Landscapes. You must consult separately with the r� .;�0
�. �••.:::..��
�;��`�� Historic Architecture and Landscapes Group. � Q
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No: Structure 340025
WBS No: 17BP.S.R.71
County:
Document:
Franklin
State MCC
F.A. No: N/A Funding: � State ❑ Federal
Federal Permit Required? � Yes ❑ No Permit Type.• Not Specified
Project Description: NCDOT's Division 5 proposes to replace Bridge No. 25 on SR 1203 (Green Hill
Road) over Middle Creek in Franklin County. Bridge No. 25 was built in 1950, and is considered to be
structurally deficient and functionally obsolete; therefore, it has been scheduled to be replaced. The
Study Area far the project will be centered on the bridge and measure about 200 feet wide and about
1,403 feet (0.26 mile) long. Overall, the Study Area will encompass about 280,172 square feet (6.43
acres), inclusive of the existing roadway and structure to be replaced.
SUMMARY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW
Brief description of review activities, results of review, and conclusions:
This project was accepted on Friday, October 14, 2016. A map review and site iile search was conducted
at the Office of State Archaeology (OSA) on Monday, October 17, 2016. No archaeological surveys have
been conducted along this particular stretch of SR 1203 (Green Hill Road), and no archaeological sites
have been recorded within one-half (1/2) mile of the proposed project. Digital copies of HPO's maps
(Kittrell Quadrangle) as well as the HPOWEB GIS Service (http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/) were last
reviewed on Tuesday, October 25, 2016. There are no known historic architectural resources located
within or adjacent to the Study Area for which intact archaeological deposits would be anticipated within
the footprint of the proposed project. In addition, topographic maps, historic maps (NCMaps website),
USDA soil survey maps, and aerial photographs were utilized and inspected to gauge environmental
factors that may have contributed to historic or prehistoric settlement within the project limits, and to
assess the level of modern, slope, agricultural, hydrological, and other erosive-type disturbances within
and surrounding the archaeological APE.
Brief Explanation of why the available inforination provides a reliable basis for reasonablypredicting
that there are no unidentified historic properties in the APE:
Although this is a State-funded project, a Federal permit will be required. Permanent and/or temporary
utility and/or drainage easements will not be necessary. The need for additional ROW was not specified;
however, the size and shape of the Study Area have been drawn in a way to capture any possible impacts
beyond the NCDOT's existing 60-foot ROW. At this time, we are in compliance with NC GS 121-12a,
since there are no eligible (i.e. National Register-listed) archaeological resources located within the
project's Study Area that would require our attention. Based on the description of the proposed project,
activities may take place beyond the NCDOT's existing 60-foot ROW along SR 1203 (Green Hill Road).
From an environmental perspective, the Study Area falls within a rural environmental setting in the
northeastern edge of the North Carolina Piedmont Plateau, and is composed of four (4) soil types: Wake-
`7Jo ARCHAEOLOGYSURVEYREQUIRED "form far Minar Transportation Prajects as Qualified in the 2007/2015 Pragrammatic Agreement.
1 of 3
Project Tracking No.:
16-10-0012
Wateree-Wedowee complex, 8-15% slopes (WbD), Wake-Wateree complex, 15-30% slopes (WcE),
Wateree-Rion-Wedowee complex, 15-30% slopes (WdE), and Chewacla and Wehadkee soils, 0-3%
slopes, frequently flooded (ChA). Most of the APE is either considered a flood hazard and consists of
poorly drained soils (i.e. ChA) or consists of sloping topography along the narrow side slopes of the
Middle Creek drainage (i.e. WbD, WcE, and WdE). Preservation of intact archaeological resources
would not be anticipated under such environmental conditions. Although no prehistoric or historic
resources have been recorded in the immediate vicinity of Bridge No. 25, archaeological remains could be
anticipated in well-drained upland locations beyond the limits of the Study Area. A review of current
LiDAR data shows no noticeable landscape features within the Study Area that would be compatible with
such landforms. Remnants of previous roadbeds or crossings of Middle Creek may be present, but would
not be considered historically significant. The Office of State Archaeology (OSA) has reviewed several
projects within the vicinity of Bridge No. 25 for environmental compliance, all transportation-related,
including secondary road improvements (ER 07-1073 [SR 1201]), bridge replacements (ER 96-9021
[TIP# B-3052], ER 84-8022/ER 85-7339), and the Southeast High Speed Rail project (ER 03-1507 [TIP#
P-3819]). Archaeological surveys were recommended only for projects with temporary on-site detours,
the investigations for which resulted in no archaeological sites being documented, even in the floodplain
of the nearby Tar River. NCDOT's Archaeology Group has reviewed several transportation-related
projects for environmental compliance under the Programmatic Agreement (PA) with the State Historic
Preservation Office (NC-HPO) (see PAs: 13-02-0027, 12-10-0013, 12-10-0014, 10-02-0091, 15-02-0051,
15-02-0046, 15-OS-0014, and 12-11-0004). Three of the eight projects listed required an archaeological
survey, resulting in five (5) archaeological sites being recorded. However, surveys were only
recommended based on the presence of previously recorded historic structures or favorable topographical
settings being impacted. As mentioned before, soil conditions (i.e. poorly drained) and topography (side
slopes and non-upland setting) within the Study Area would suggest a low probability for signiiicant
prehistoric and/or historic archaeological materials to be present. Therefore, it is believed that the current
Study Area, as depicted, is unlikely to contain intact and significant archaeological resources. No
archaeological survey is required for this project. If design plans change or are made available prior to
construction, then additional consultation regarding archaeology will be required. At this time, no further
archaeological work is recommended. If archaeological materials are uncovered during project activities,
then such resources will be dealt with according to the procedures set forth for "unanticipated
discoveries," to include notification of NCDOT's Archaeology Group.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
See attached: � Map(s) ❑ Previous Survey Info
❑ Photocopy of County Survey Notes
FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST
NO ARCHAEOLOGY SUR VEY REQ UIRED
�
� �
NCDOT ARCH
❑ Photos ❑Correspondence
Other:
October 25, 2016
Date
`7Jo ARCHAEOLOGYSURVEYREQUIRED "form far Minar Transportation Prajects as Qualified in the 2007/2015 Pragrammatic Agreement.
2of3
Pr�oject Trackz»g No.:
16-10-0012
Figure L• Kittrell, NC (USGS 1979).
"No ARCHAEOLOGYSURVEY REQU/RED "fornr Jor rL1i�7or T�an.rportation A�jects us Ouu[ified iri the 2007/3015 Progrummutic Agre�ment.
3 of 3
/ Y
�� . .- r i y ) 1 9, iA`� �.
�.�N+�� �l�Y� �� t.
�U � �,8 � ti1 � �� ���.µ� � �.
� '$9 �'�el� �,}�� � 'i� � :?
i 3% � � f
� ; � �,� ! F''
�•I.a. "4'��. ,. 1 � ,f !t'`��fy, • �.��.j� _ � ����
�
r� 4 �� ��� v A � �� i , ' ��t� �,;� �.
st � .,w ' < ,i `<: .,
.�F D� i � � � � �
� � �
A � �a '� � �� �
,�
<r���V�. ,�'�:� ��, �;� Q � � `�'�,�y.�
,, � - � � � :+. �3;; � ,�'n , �, 1 .
. or � y . �, � � .
�:� a �� � ; � � � i {r i ..
.`
� 3'� a'� ;�.�. i
� s�5 r r �i `��
yp.., , ;�� "° ,s-� �a a u ��,
1� "� �� a? � "�''�+t � . � �� � s� 1' k,�F+ �
:.�� � �. �""t'-�.�� � � �
� n �`
'�� 7N '�', � y '�'!
��' - 7 . .. t P ''►
1� � �
�- ��.��� � ���
�t�'` � ► " '� 1 � ��� �' ���� '
� :�; ,�i,� �,� � .�,. ;� � 1> • � ' ,v. �` _ �,� �'�r'`=
� .� � i � �, ���� µ ,,
�� � F �},� 't�,.;
f�:. y ��y . . J i ' w�,:
!.''�i� '.7R "��1 �y �� "4'iT � l . ". �
' J. �r. w _ ,r ..
_�
�i . .. ._ - . _ . - . .. _
� �--
.� .y - -�,- . r
� T
, b , � � v ,t<
F� y�
�� .� "�' , ,�.,.
.S- ^%i�s �c�, ; � ,ly�,, '� ' ���
� t � � .c ia � •
��� ' � �� � � ....
a
i���.:���.�ti•'�+•' ;i Cdt! �s. ���+ .
!i .�.. E ,� .,Z �'�,� y . . .
Qp ��y1. '�.. s ._.. .
, " f�� � ,'i�`y6��` f � e l .�; ..
f J��� '
� �.i�t�l R' � ���,V� �
�°yc` r�t�r �,fig �j
f ' ` '
�fi4�Y .. � i.i�.�MT �
SOUI"rE:
CNES/!
IGN. I,G
��
�..
� -4��� n �:�'-.rid �� �.
I �{
� . .� .!� / .F-��
� � ,:�� ,:� �'� �
��:� ��-�� :��
,
_ -� �
, ,;,, �t. . -. � .
r � .
�.
�y• �. ���
� ` � "' �;�' �i{�
� �,� ,
, • .
. rv �1}s� � r
�� a,�,•_
a
r h `: �� �� 'ti
����� �.�- �. ; .
` �� ������ .
;,` t� .�•,;���
M ' y
�� �� �-�� `�� i �. R:
1. t� , L-' •, �
1
w ,� � �
� - y�
�"-�, f, �, ��
PA 16-10-0012
Replace Bridge No. 25 on
SR 1203 (Green Hill Rd) over
Middle Creek in
Franklin County, NC
�17BPSR71_StudyArea
Q NCHPOpoints
C� Cemetery
Franklin Co. Contour_002
�� Streets
— HYARUT
� Named_streams
OFranklin_Parcels
mapfldhazar
� local_District_Boundaries
I� NCHPO_NR_SL_�OE_Boundaries
Franklin Co. Soils
)–
� 0 35 70 140 210 280
Feet