20090244 Ver 1_401 Application_20090309

11
[i? 1' CWS
Carolina Welland Services
Carolina Wetland Services, Inc.
550 East Westinghouse Boulevard
Charlotte, NC 28273
704-527-1177 - Phone
704-527-1133 - Fax
TO: Ms. Cindi Karoly
NCDWQ
40] [Wetlands Unit
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Raleigh, NC 27604
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
MAR
0 2009
• WATER QUALITY
?AWS OV#A1i?INCH
WE ARE SENDING YOU: ®Attached ?Under separate cover via the following items;
? Prints ? Plans ? JD Package ? Specifications
? Copy of letter ? Change order ? Wetland Survey ® Other
IF ENCLOSURES ARE NOT AS NOTED, KINDLY NOTIFY US AT ONCE
DATE COPIES, ! 1
3/9/09 7 Matheson Avenue Site Permit Application
11 2 3/9/09 1 Application Fee ($570) 11
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
?For approval ?Approved as submitted ?Resubmit copies for approval
®For your use ?Approved as noted ?Submit copies for distribution
?As requested ?Returned for corrections ?Return corrected prints
?For review and comment ?For your verification and signature
REMARKS: Cindi,
Please find attached permit application and permit application fee ($570) for the Matheson Avenue Site Pease do
not hesitate to contact me if you have M questions or comments regarding this project
Copy to: File
Thank. you,
*
L?as Blackwell
Project Scientist
09-0244
3PAIP
s
Date: 3-9-09
CWS Project #: 2008-2527
NORTH CAROLINA • SOUTH CAROLINA • NEW YORK
IF r
Corps Submittal Cover Sheet
9-0244
Please provide the following info:
1. Project Name Matheson Avenue and 30th Street Site
2. Name of Property Owner/Applicant: First Industrial Buildings & Land, Mr. Pete Godley
3. Name of Consultant/Agent: Carolina Wetland Services Inc.-, Mr. Gregg C. Antemann
*Agent authorization needs to be attached.
4. Related/Previous Action ID number(s): N/A
5. Site Address: Matheson Avenue, Charlotte, NC
6. Subdivision Name: N/A
7. City: Charlotte, NC
8. County: Mecklenburg
9. Lat: N35.24803° Long: W80.81262° (Decimal Degrees Please)
10. Quadrangle Name: Charlotte East and Derita, NC, dated 1991 and 1996
11. Waterway: Little Sugar Creek and UT's to Little Sugar Creek
12. Watershed: Catawba (HU # 03050103)
13. Requested Action: J!9@@flV@M
X Nationwide Permit # 39
General Permit # MAR 1 0 2009
DENR-WATER QUAUTy
X Jurisdictional Determination Request ?ANQSANDSTQRMyyATERgW"
Pre-Application Request
The following information will be completed by Corps office:
AID:
Prepare File Folder Assign number in ORM Begin Date
Authorization: Section 10 Section 404
Project Description/ Nature of Activity/ Project Purpose:
Site/Waters Name:
Keywords:
I
L1) cws
Carolina Wetland Services
March 4, 2009
550 E WESTINGHOUSE BLVD.
CHARLOTTE, NC 28273
704-527-1177 (v)
704-527-1133 (fax)
Mr. Steve Chapin
U.S. Army Corps. of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue
Asheville, NC 28801
Subject: Pre-Construction Notification Pursuant to Nationwide Permit No. 39
and Water Quality Certification No. 3705
Matheson Avenue and 30`h Street Site
Charlotte, North Carolina
CWS Project No. 2008-2527
The Matheson Avenue and 30d' Street Site (Parcel ID Nos. 083-021-01 and 083-031-15) is located on
the east side of Matheson Avenue between North Tryon and the Southern Railway railroad in
Charlotte, North Carolina (see location map, enclosed). First Industrial Buildings & Land has
contracted CWS to provide Section 404/401 permitting services for this project.
Applicant Name: First Industrial Buildings & Land, Mr. Pete Godley
Mailing Address: 2420 Bank of America Plaza, 101 South Tryon Street, Charlotte, NC 28280
Phone Number of Owner/Applicant: 704-236-2913
Street Address of Project: Matheson Avenue and 3& Street, Charlotte, NC
Waterway: UT to Little Sugar Creek
Basin: Lower Catawba (HU # 03050103)
City: Charlotte
County: Mecklenburg
Tax Parcel ID numbers: 083-021-01 and 083-031-15
Decimal Degree Coordinate Location of Project Site: N35.24803°, W80.81262°
USGS Quadrangle Name: Charlotte East, North Carolina, 1991 and Derita, North Carolina, 1996
Current Land Use
The current land use for the site is wooded with adjacent industrial and commercial areas. Typical on-
site upland vegetation includes sycamore (Platanus occidentalis), green ash (Fraxinus pensylvanica),
red maple (Acer rubrum), box elder (Acer negundo), American holly (Illex opaca), common
blackberry (Rubus argutus), Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense), Japanese privet (Ligustrum
japonicum), Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), and poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans).
Typical on-site wetland vegetation includes sycamore, green ash, red maple, basswood (Tilia
heterophylla), American holly, common blackberry, Chinese privet, Japanese privet, Japanese
honeysuckle, river cane (Arundinaria gigantea), and soft stem rush (Juncus effusus).
According to the Soil Survey of Mecklenburg County', on-site soils consist of Monacan soils with
Arents (MS) and Urban land (Ur). Monacan soils are somewhat poorly-drained and are listed by the
NRCS as soils with hydric inclusions for Mecklenburg County2
I United States Department of Agriculture, 1971. Soil Survey of Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
2 NRCS Hydric Soils of North Carolina, December 15, 1995.
NORTH CAROLINA • SOUTH CAROLINA
WWW.CWS-INC.NET

Matheson Avenue and 3CP Street March 4, 2009
Nationwide Permit No 39 CWS Project No. 2008-2527
Jurisdictional Determination
On December 18, 2008, CWS's Gregg Antemann, PWS and Josh Frost, WPIT delineated
jurisdictional waters of the U.S. within the project area. Jurisdictional areas were delineated using the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Routine On-Site Determination Method. This method is
defined in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual.' Routine On-Site Data Forms
representative of Wetlands AA - CC and adjacent upland areas are enclosed (DP 1 - DP2).
Jurisdictional stream channels were classified according to recent North Carolina Division of Water
Quality (NCDWQ) guidance. These classifications included sampling with a D-shaped dip net,
taking photographs, and defining approximate breakpoints (location at which a channel changes
classification) within each on-site stream channel. NCDWQ Stream Classification Forms and USACE
Stream Quality Assessment Worksheets representative of Stream A have been enclosed (SCPI -
SCP2). Little Sugar Creek was determined to be a Traditionally Navigable Water (TNW) so no data
sheets were prepared for this channel due to its obvious jurisdictional and perennial classification.
Results
The results of the on-site field investigation conducted by CWS indicate that there are two
jurisdictional stream channels (Stream A and Little Sugar Creek) and three jurisdictional wetland
areas (Wetlands AA - CC) located within the property (Figure 1, enclosed). Jurisdictional waters
include Little Sugar Creek and an unnamed tributary to Little Sugar Creek. Little Sugar Creek is
within the Catawba River basin (HU#030501035) and is rated "Class C waters" by the NCDWQ. On-
Site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. were mapped using a sub-meter capable GPS unit and total
approximately 0.53 acre (23,087 square feet). Linear footage and acreage of on-site jurisdictional
waters are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1. Summarv of On-Site Jurisdictional Waters

7rudjct!on
lu
Y. '

NCDVti+,Q ?

USACE
`

. Approx

ot
A

JurisdictionaY
Pr
r e x

USACElEPA

'

CP N

Stream f

?=r Strewn _, .

r -Length .
Pp

Acrea
e
Feature : .
?+ Intermittent o Classification Assessment Linear g
Ripanos-
t
! Pefeiinial
Score
Score
Feet(ji)
Classification
Stream A Non-RPW Unimportant SCP1, 22, 13.5 52,41 566 0.04
Intermittent SCP2
Little Sugar TNW Perennial N/A N/A N/A 513 0.24
Creek
Channel Subtotal: 1,079 0.28
Wetland AA Abutting Non-RPW N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.02
Wetland BB Abutting Non-RPW N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.01
Wetland CC Abutting Non-RPW N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.22
Wetland Subtotal: N/A 0.25
On-Site Total: 1,079 0.53
3 Environmental Laboratory. 1987. "Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual", Technical Report Y-87-1, US Army Engineer
Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi.
4 North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1999. Stream Classification Method. Version 2.0.
5 ,HU#,, is the Hydrologic Unit Code. Hydrologic Unit Map, State of North Carolina. U.S. Geological Survey. 1974.
2
Matheson Avenue and 30" Street March 4, 2009
Nationwide Permit No 39 CWS Project No. 2008-2527
Non-Relativelv Permanent Waters
Stream A flows south across the project area and is approximately 566 linear feet (If) in length (Figure
1, enclosed). Stream A was evaluated to be an unimportant intermittent stream with a moderate
sinuosity, moderate flow, weak substrate consisting of silt to small boulders, and an average ordinary
high water width of 24 feet. Due to the evidence of flow for less than three months a year, Stream A
was classified as a Non-Relatively Permanent Water (RPW) according to USACE/EPA guidance
(SCPs 1 and 2). Stream A scored both a 41 and 52 out of a possible 100 points on the USACE Stream
Quality Assessment Worksheet and both a 13.5 and 22 out of a possible 71 points on the NCDWQ
Stream Classification Form, indicating intermittent status. These two SCPs were taken both upstream
and downstream of Wetland CC (Figure 1, enclosed). Representative photographs of Stream A are
enclosed as Photographs A, E, and F.
Traditional Navigable Waters
A portion of Little Sugar Creek is within the project limits. This section of Little Sugar Creek was
determined to be a Traditionally Navigable Water (TNW) and therefore also perennial. The on-site
portion of Little Sugar Creek has both a FEMA floodplain limit and Mecklenburg County SWIM
buffer.
Wetlands
Wetland AA (approximately 0.02 acre), Wetland BB (approximately 0.01 acre), and Wetland CC
(approximately 0.22 acre) are located within the floodplain of Little Sugar Creek and its unnamed
tributary (Stream A) (Figure 1, enclosed). These forested wetland areas are abutting Stream A.
Dominant vegetation within these areas includes sycamore, red maple, and Chinese privet. Wetlands
AA-CC exhibited low chroma soils (10YR 3/1), oxidized rhizospheres, and drainage patterns. A
Routine On-Site Determination Form representative of on-site upland areas is enclosed as DPI. A
Routine On-Site Determination Form representative of Wetland AA-CC is enclosed as DP2.
Representative photographs of Wetland AA-CC are enclosed as Photographs B, C, and D.
Agency Correspondence
Cultural Resources
A letter was forwarded to the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) on February 18, 2009 to
determine the presence of any areas of architectural, historic, or archaeological significance that
would be affected by the project. As of the date of this submittal, a response from SHPO has not yet
been received.
Protected Species
A letter was forwarded to the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) on February 18,
2009 to determine the presence of any federally-listed, candidate endangered, threatened species or
critical habitat located within the project area. As of the date of this submittal, a response from
NCNHP has not yet been received.
Purpose and Need for the Project
The purpose of the project is to construct a mixed-use multi-family residential and commercial
development within an existing industrial area. In order to gain access to the site a new road will be
constructed adjacent to Matheson Avenue which will result in unavoidable impacts to jurisdictional
waters.
Matheson Avenue and 30th Street March 4, 2009
Nationwide Permit No 39 CWS Project No. 2008-2527
Avoidance and Minimization
Impacts to on-site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. have been reduced to the maximum extent
practicable. Proper sediment and erosion control measures will be used to minimize disturbances to
downstream waters. All work will be conducted in the dry.
Other site access alternatives were looked at but were not feasible. One alternative was to construct the
road south of Little Sugar Creek (Exhibits IA and 1B, enclosed). However, sight distances could not be
achieved from Matheson Avenue into the site (Exhibit 2, enclosed). Sight distance could be achieved by
entering the site via the 40' right-of-way of College Street (not constructed). Using this access would
require crossing Little Sugar Creek which bisects the site from the existing Matheson Avenue culvert to
just north of the railroad and Cullman Avenue. Access from Cullman Avenue was explored but the
railroad track is elevated 10'to 12' above Cullman Avenue and the site. Also, the floodway extends
along the entire length of the railroad track at Cullman Avenue making it impossible to cross without
impacting flood elevations. Bridge alternatives were also considered (Exhibit 3, enclosed) but costs,
without installation, would be over $1,000,000.00 which is not practical for the approximately 7 acres of
developable property. The only plausible alternative was to cross Little Sugar Creek over an extension
of the existing Matheson Avenue culvert within the Matheson Avenue right-of-way (Exhibit 4,
enclosed).
Crossing the Matheson Avenue culvert was selected as the best alternative and impacts were reduced
to the maximum extent practicable. 2:1 slopes have has been used to minimize the length of culvert
necessary for the Little Sugar Creek crossing. The impacted portion of Unimportant Intermittent
Non-RPW Stream A will be relocated to a new channel along the toe of embankment. This new
channel will be stabilized with jute matting and livestakes (Figure 2, enclosed). Total stream impacts
have been reduced to 263 if and impacts to jurisdictional wetlands have been completely avoided.
Proposed Impacts to Jurisdictional Waters
Unavoidable impacts to jurisdictional waters total approximately 501f of perennial stream channel and
213 If (0.015 acre) of unimportant intermittent stream. Stream impacts are the result of stream
relocation, culvert extension, rip-rap installation, and splash pad installation. Total net permanent
impacts to jurisdictional waters equal 1221f. All of the impacts are related to the construction of the
proposed access road. There are no impacts to jurisdictional wetlands. Proposed impacts and the
relocated stream cross-section are illustrated in Figure 2 (enclosed). Unavoidable impacts to
jurisdictional waters are summarized in Table 1, below.
Unavoidable impacts to Unimportant Intermittent Non-RPW Stream A total approximately 213 If.
Approximately 213 if of Unimportant Intermittent Non-RPW Stream A will be filled and the stream
relocated to a new 157 if channel located at the toe-of-slope of the proposed access road. This will
result in a net loss of 72 if of unimportant intermittent stream channel. A cross section of the
proposed relocated stream is enclosed as Figure 2.
Unavoidable impacts to Little Sugar Creek (TNW) total 50 if and are the result of culvert extension
and splash pad installation. The current culvert under Matheson Avenue will be extended in order to
provide adequate space and support for the proposed road. A profile of the proposed culvert extention
showing impacts is enclosed as Figure 3. This extension will include the installation of a four-barrel
box culvert which will extend upstream 40 if from the existing culvert. The dimensions of the boxes
are 2-4.7' W x I PH x 40'L and 2-10'W x 12'H x 40'L. Proposed cross sections match those of the
existing culvert, and are shown as Figure 4. A 10 if splash pad will be installed at the inlet of the
culvert.
4
Matheson Avenue and 30`h Street March 4, 2009
Nationwide Permit No 39 CWS Proiect No. 2008-2527
Table 1. Summarv of Impacts to On-Site Jurisdictional Waters
Impact Tj pe
Jurisdictional- Intertiittentl , m -1 % A?proiimite Approximate
Feature Perennial Tempo ra '
)'
Ge Acreage
Non-RPW Unimportant Fill 213 (1571f 0.015
Stream A Intermittent relocated)
Little Sugar Culvert 40 0.023
Creek (TNW) Perennial
Splash Pad
10
0.006
Stream Impacts Total 26j If 0.043 acre
On behalf of First Industrial Buildings & Land, CWS is submitting a Pre-Construction Notification
Application with attachments in accordance with Nationwide Permit General Condition No. 27, and
pursuant to Nationwide Permit No. 39 and Water Quality Certification No. 3705 (enclosed).
Compensatory Mitigation
Construction of this project has limited the amount of total net permanent impacts to 501f
of perennial stream channel and 72 if (0.015 acre) of unimportant intermittent stream. All on-site
wetlands (0.25 acre total) will be avoided. Since total impacts to mitigatable streams are under 1501f
no mitigation is currently being proposed for this project. All remaining on-site jurisdictional stream
and wetlands will be buffered with 4.42 acres of buffers and protected by deed restriction (Figure 5
and 6, enclosed). This buffer includes the 100 ft S.W.LM buffer on Little Sugar Creek, and a
minimum of 10 ft wide buffers on all other on-site streams and wetlands.
Matheson Avenue and 30`h Street March 4, 2009
Nationwide Permit No. 39 CWS Proiect No 2008-2527
Please do not hesitate to contact Gregg C. Antemann at 704-527-1177 or [e-mail] should
you have any questions or comments regarding these findings.
C'14 06?a Z -_ - C.
Thomas J. Blackwell Gregg, C. Antemann, PWS
Project Scientist
Principal Scientist
Enclosures: USGS 7.5' Charlotte East and Derita, NC Topographic Quadrangle
NRCS Mecklenburg County Soil Survey
Figure 1 - Approximate Jurisdictional Boundary Field Map
Figure 2 - Proposed Project Impacts (Plan View)
Figure 3 - Proposed Little Sugar Creek Impacts (Profile View)
Figure 4 - Proposed Little Sugar Creek Impacts (Cross-Section View)
Figure 5 - Proposed Stream and Wetland Buffers
Figure 6 - Project Overview
Exhibits 1- 4
Jurisdictional Determination Request Form
Agent Authorization Form
Pre-Construction Notification Pursuant to Nationwide Permit No. 39
NCDWQ Stream Classification Forms (SCP1 - SCP2)
USACE Stream Quality Assessment Worksheets (SCP1- SCP2)
Significant Nexus Determination Documentation Forms (SCPI- SCP2)
Ordinary High Water (OHWM) Documentation Forms (SCPI- SCP2)
Jurisdictional Drainage Map
Routine Wetland Determination Data Forms (DP 1- DP2)
Representative Photographs (A - F)
cc: Ms. Cyndi Karoly, N.C. Division of Water Quality
Mr. Mark Cantrell, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Mr. Wanda Fuller, Burton Engineering Associates
Mr. Pete Godley, First Industrial Buildings & Land
File at Carolina Wetland Services, Inc.
6
Image Coutesy of the U.S. Geological Survey
7.5 Minute Topographic Map Series. Charlotte East and Derita Quadrangles, North Carolina,
Dated 1991 and 1996 respectively.
Appro-innate Scale F = 2000'
hiathesan Avenue and 30th Street Febru,an,18, 2009
Nationmide Permit No 39 Pruiect No. 200&2527
Matheson Avenue and 30th Street February 18, 2009
Nationwide Permit No. 39 Proiect No. 2009-2527
Shit Survey Courtesy of the USDA-MRCS
n?
1
MRCS sail Suwey of Mecklenburg County, North Carolina, Sheet Nos. 4 and 7. Dated 1976.
Appeommate Scale F = 2000'
v M
> N
? m N
a) m
(n c
660/41/ZO
= ?[ Oul ONV7 ONV S% m o
out I
?? 09 = o
0988-:59 (170L) Xed 4888-:99 (VOL) N C ? U Q ( 1?.
MZSZ ON 'aAol3a4O.004 aIInS - TH maliule3 0969 7diy-Lsoon e U N E m cm
C a'' C W 6.0 Z C N
rl-
MONNWId (INtfl 061 09 0 - N z v c p }
S2133NION3 IIN0 ? G) Z W o , V °c
L C N U
S31VIOOSSV ??111/1111/ SONVIi3WHOT 6 az M V 0 T
• ......
J Z
NI?13DNION3 w
?:Ee. •?P .b?'• __ oo N Z
Noi?jn8 .. ... b?.SS30: o o
o. _j m U) V N
261
wN z:u'=? .lS H10C / .3/\V U U a `a
I
N N V
%
?
??
Z .22
CL 04
CL a) W
Q' ,C F= E Y
JG 0' o <R U) m L-NO 0 m
L N Z LL N OD O
N N R ° a
? W ?u ? ?? I ,n, I I I I I ? ..
a E
? ¢ is C j .o I I?,I ' III
N2 50? °i II if ! !illy I Ili 11 Ly
O ?
W (n l &I'j?, ! II,I,I I I
s z o 1? Izllll !.
it I
a II'
W U ?I 1' /.'zII llil' !I
Y
z a fn ?I I ) /?i III if II
Z QW W H ami ??'i a!?zIII ail TOO
Q- UJ _J O i I Ij c7 !
w 04
o::ol r n?f a73r? (n O W m EL
Vi
Z Of
r UW ?Q 0? a°i z ro 1/ ?C _a
cn F- Z a)
s° Qz 0 _j co -40, CL
Y 1 f-
x a)
%? ^_ . - ;': ?? 11NN LL Q U fn 28 0 E I I c`o m 'd 31
° U) I I C o
-00(,
° o0
\•. ? _ • Z N
I ??I U)
cool,
yN3WN _. H d _1!i I - ?-
3?
V_ WX3
3NoZ aNd N w3Sd
3?,dM00
WH?d , M S??,? r y / 35 „c2 d did Vi _ _ I ,1 s -
3, i,/ i? pad p a
?-pISSI Q ?i •d?d ?- %\` / O OLNd3 3 =-
n N d ??nd% 0 1 1 1 1 I i I o
NOISN3 l ! y I
d mod' o dog ,?!G? / Q?g? -/ E lain no ?+.9 I I iml` II'
?voa
q 0c C \ °' Ij III I I -< 1
-. i 15j4Nn (D p I ??, I I CID
_6n o I. al
"L9
" ° !l ( III }" I 1 z
~ ' Sl^1?? .5? / o -06 5
--'' r ?%' - 3N.oZ--3D} ? cn -S33 _ I III I I I I ! , ..
N - I I I I I 1 ;' i I' _ yo. C-
-- a3_ dNdW 00? 0) , o IIf I II I -
I? 3NOZ 3Sn ?j on r` U / I II II' r m
t, I~ 1 W W I I V`
`? `d??1 S a a` s cn ?? ?? I I!. I!I' i IF 1
cep 000 o'ff' I _
iiiiiw
a -113 ?'IdNOStl35 .- 't'
wv3a19 I
-
Q ? 1
N E
(u a)
/ "?/ 3Nn 39NIN-4 C1 Q
:' ?? I I m
I ,
3 l °? S 0 . -f -_-_._-- o0 )_ i11Nf1.1?w0D - O9 I Q a
aI II ,! r °'?rl f / / ;49'£69'l3'U0 i ?'1 tllll ?tl I 'c o N 9'489' 321J I
d M.
?`? .I I ! 'I`II '?48'i?69 13 '?J?5' g 8*? !III ?I I
IJL_
W' 0v to'o I I i 3Utl0Rf21V % t voe?? 4691 `oJ { \
k..
u I O ONVl13M I j avoU d0 0N3 - _b69 a 9 4 I
% 969 1
klt a vi?M \1, S , nand U3SOdo-dd t I I1) ? I I \ ` 10 -lu
f r,! / / , M? , 13]]as I ?, 1 1
E Z. S.
-103 X-1?11M 2i 01?)
G,
c: a)
4 I b I' I i C? cn X48'669 "13 '2iJ 3 I I I?: I
I
tf 4
j I ooa"= I
I j E m 20-ZZ0-c20 al "13Davd
I I ` J ! l 1` I o 92 30Vd Z6ZLI, X008 0330 - I
D z 1 8 VNI V 1108 '1'f '1108 '0 21331NN3( i r
t i ? ,I t_ !r I I l
DPUDM 'DPUDM ' I.: L L L x j I, 'f od' Z)5C?a1?:13 Nb'- 'aalln}
'iN , -- r•nn_/ri /- 'I_I-., ,.-,r ^r n;?, ?t,t .•i 'F/-?. n•?,?-- .,^•i-. nnr.a^r.r•,.-..n?ri.\F. •.r,-,\I;r?<_r?i.?l-?i^.,_. nr r-???n :'r,.\
'1s3nO3a NOdn 03NMAN ""'....."""•
39 01 SI aNV iowOild ?p .....„„ b'•,,, 9911-es9lvoL-d I909-Egg WD
3113021 d
,,•• jr.?P? •..?? ,; ,? olzez oN •auol,.u? oo? aurys. -aa+`?wlai o9e9
H3H10ANVNOa3sn39Ol =of+ ??- '3AV N0S3H-LVN JNIlSIX3
ION SI ll'latld NI HO 31OHM {q -1O `'wig sa3Nrvrld arvvr - -- •BLL
zt.:I Sa33NION3lNl7 3094S
NI 031doo ao aaona0ad3a
39 Ol ION SI oNV S3IVIOOSSb' b??bym ??2o?c ON '31101WHO "GU A31009 )IOIHO N 0 LLZ
,0 +....... p
S31VIOOSSV JNIa33NION3 '•,,N ;?, ,,, ONW33NION3 NVId SS30OV 31VAIHd (INV'GH .13100] NOIHO - L 3SVHd
(7
3°11SIVN? Va4Skil Nol2ina NOISIn1aens '1S 0£ / '3AV NOS3H1dW 3:
la
J
U) e e 0u s d
co M tl
J
0 Ox
Fr o W
00 _ >0 q

•e ?

1
1
1
1

'36 a W
anon xi113aaV
I B3N vls S-E
and
N3

i

f
/
/
/

/ /
I ?
of
0I
of
?I
I

\
I
I
I I
I ^ n I .9

l
yayp
a?
qb
Y
Y

W
J
LL
O
Z
??O
vJ
W
r
V
Z
vJ
X
W
v M
> N
m N
a) m
?dO O
C U
'o c U y
C = _
a) o Z
W
4- z
W
W
O O
0 C:)
L. Lo m I
•tu Lo = 7
V U
0
w
0
0
a
Ir
a
ca
lu ry
UM
Z W
W IL
wp
W Q
m
O
a
N
a`
E13
eaN
Y ,= C N
? M O O
V N
c
` Z
c Z
? d d
> •?
°
o a
?
U) dr3
Q C.)
O
a
M
W
Mm
U.
w
0
m
C3
`2
U
U
w
0
r
m
w
W
K
a
?a
0
Z
Q
Li
Q
Z
00
w0
Qw
M N
? ? el II
~? IVY
O a =>
U
?a
U
H
Q
w
U
op-11, 'upuon 'I:I •(1141-11 00'hZ 1 00'9C) 0 PuDd-0 H08V 'C1d009S01110 111,IM
'Rd 19:0*:C 6002/Z/Z '-lfJ-di0S3H1VnX3-0S0 'bmp11o9600CC>\6.xp\-1o11y11ry_?1ai15410C Y00-CC6\0M0\:d
'1S3f103?1 NOdf103NHm3a
38 Ol SI ONV 103f021d
H3H10 MV NO 03sn 38 Ol
ION SI II'121Vd Ni HO 31OHM
NI 031dO0110 03DnGO 1d3d
38 Ol ION SI ONV
S31V10OSSV ONIN33NION3
NOmns AO, A183dOHd
3141 SI ONIMVHO SIHI
.................. e ¢¢O:p JJQo WWt?-((1?_
y 6 bpd LLLLLLLLNIIII w ::'???? ' U
ul
a
a a x
0 O
z = o 0
0 m w
WW O Q O N
I'„ w 0 ' B p
?aU S 30 W
z
° a W m 5 o i@
.- w H O O w w 0
o W S REEF wF chi
On ? - 01.
a UJ d W
w is
p/1 O wp O Z W G W S W W O
z ZN W F? F-
Z W U w p O Y F (] (q z
¢ o w ?d a7 pzp
z U w > w U U p U
O xF O U WO =i ? LL
3.3 a ?Q
an
Q
N
m
o no
u
'o 00 0
?O p0u
xI- c0ow
m? w?UO
p4W
SU 0QW
LL
s
a
O
0989-E99 (VOL) n.A • MU"99 (VOL)
MUZ OW-11-11o40. OOL a11-S"PH-111ad 0969
6H3NNVld ONV'I
13H33M.N3lIAIO
S31`dI OOSSV
JNI2133NION3
NOlans
W
8
z
Q
2
a
C/)
U
z
It
U
O
U
Q
[1
2
3
CO
x
0
z
w
w
m
U
Z
O
U
L
n
rz ;z
9V'SL9-9 TMM ONIM 60'61,+0S'V"'°
WIL9 -1311VM ONIM 840E+09 V.
9Z'699 -13 ONIN3dO Z9'SZ+05'Vl
09'899'13 0NINUO Z9'91+09'Vl
LL'899'13 0NIN3d0 69'L1+09 Vl
41,'699'13 01,1IN3dO LL'0 L+09 VLS
09699'13 0NIN3dO ZE-90-09 -VI
ZL'699 -13 ONIN3dO 91'90+09'Vlf
ZSOL9 -13 ONINMO LO'00+09 Vll
98'699'13 ONIN3d0 ZO'66+61,'VI(
99'OL913 T1VM ONIM 99'C6+64V1
SOU9'13 11VM ONIM VVE9+61,'V15
?e?e6e6m6??66?e
w
O
m
(V
WX
J ?
5
UN
OZ
mZ
Z W
X
Xco DO
X
t`
V
N
M

N
c'a
C
C
m N
U N m
N r- X
..
=3
(nom O vi
s
U N f,
eod
?
O Q a
+ R{ c
cu c C < -
0 DOD

Z z d
M Cc CD
z U?UN
ec M
O (, N e0 O
C) a Z
Q

L F
O
? V

m?^
Ln
m Ln -? } av o
V U 03 - CL

o m CO)
d
?U?
v
v
a co)
t U
O

a z

I CL

O
q w j 0.
W
U [0
`
LU
W C] O
-, /
LL
LU Q
°
R W R ?
R R R N R R

3 ti Xi ? $ $ RI

° m $
S ? r
m
g

° r E €
° W 0
Q ?
$
- k s

o 0

=
? m
=W
g ?
w
F?-
? e
PK P W!
NA
Sao
LL= ° M
U OQC
z
m
U Q
} O
F W
m
n
s°?
g ? ? ffi
g?
S
°o
O
x
O
F
W
D-
D
Zo
E X08
014LL
10-45
MHO N MLZ
J N31HO - L 3SVHd
m 4OS3HiVV4
?
Y
W
U
w
0
m
W
K
a
a
Sy /

ca
o T
Z
co 02
CD` E
1L Y a m N m$?`7 W Z p
? ca ri Poo a cc
e U

3
0 ?S

I
$ I 4
I
.I
•? I I
I I ? ? I

i l
II ?
? I I
I?
W ZV. 33 ,y
W ¢O it
W OC rn
Nao 0
?
In Lou < L)
z O Z
¢wzR
m J O m
O w Z
rn
2 1,
oJu
9?9 m w
u7 WC, T
2 W K = W
to Z ?IT-JJ $E
J J = _
Lij
LL M O 2
z O-?U[~i7 Z0
g t/1U00¢
? m W
?g ? a
p JW V)W
00 0[]~? C
W O Q W F OW W
LLLLLLLLl111
Z xv?mz
z? 0za1a?
W? zdwom?
Z2 U,
(LI ? F3:
:3 D
~W n0Lu0Z
? Z ?0 W >- W
z CL
¢ W O
U U U ??^^\\
F F-]
Lu
0I
L-Li
Z F
Z
O W
to
U
J
Lu-_
CJ
O
K
W J
z
Z?
U
Z
rn
V W
J
W U
x
U? g

p vw
€

3

a

0i

H
W
O
W
rX
m
411
O yGGGUW?X
Z K m
m1
w
U ?ygp
? tl
c?
U)
O
m
CN
>4
0
CV
0n
W
O
m
d'
CV
0
U.1
O
cn
I-
0
a
1.0
V m
Uan
L 11.11 Ll

U
O
a
U
O
K
Z
O
W
N
^pu^u •.,u.. •I:y •(.eq-1 00>Z . 00'9[) 0 pu^d.a HONV VL 009SU1aa0 'gall^)^
'.d G,:LS:£ 6002/Z/Z '1%31d3 inn-90 '6...p*..uq>00CC4\6..p\....... Iaai1..... 400-££4\W,\:d
1
a) M
3 s6 I 1 I I I t \\
rg I ?? P ??. ? ? U Q 1
?Il O ? 4 I ?, I I j wl ll? \ \?
??..// c'• I I I A I\
cli
Z V^ / I I I N I "\
00
.? W N I r I d II w ?. ?'' L I
t \
W Z i J l i it I II?i'1 ,I N \ ' :?,? !1
(n I I I F 11 i hI 0 I W \ '?.. ?.\ \ \
o 02
v 1.5-4 it w N \ \.
0
J'
z CL
w C) x V.
D z r) Co
j Z LL li 11 , YA_
MW< ?= • ;
?g U) 0c) II I is , ?? \
00
to "'?a•._." li 7l / ??
lp ap?? ?n I ;) 1 1 I
Gj.
.10
MIME LL
min m momiII I r y II a??t / `.> ilir;lfRi
s01!'Jms
rn 'I I I I III I I /r/? / ?/
fil-
?m?! I 1 II \ ? ?J? i`
?l????tttttttt t4
a
,??? `??•?•••• V ,'?I ? I ? III I? lU JI•., IV / d*/ d/??
`?+Otisx1a. •.•???i ' 1 to'luII I j
• s
.•?i7i ' II 1141 II
QJoc _?O?
USco QN WSU"?C
-ul LU Z: -Z
?%_ ?•0? 4. ,.:
46
??1... / rh I Q I I j' 41 N
''??t4ur ???? I /? II o1 I' I IV / h
/ W Iii s I I I I I? //
/ I i? I O I 9m° o
i 'I I o•ob IIS i
I / `? ? j Nmd
/ 09
I 11=m? ? ? .,WIN J
m I jog ! T I Iii a j l
T I Iw I ? I
yl
?I H?mJe? / / I a6 ? I I ?t y, IIIC I ry I?J
I i
°
w a I v \ I I I.>l\a
1 N NI ? II ` \ ??
I I Q 1 1
B ?ROP. RIW

m
?Na
?41
oa,ry
°
N m Nq
?
1y?°
s
m°?
L%
a
31ST ST ET 1 \ 1
Im OPEN)
11.1. .
J \
O O
U ? y
J W
w
~ o
$w ?
$
oU,
U

? ? 11
,
yI W
w
CL

w
311 ,00'04
10.9031, N
f
= M?BY,ZGBC N ,
3
"
1 ?
O
ly U
N'

?A.I W
l ? 1
'all
?'
rN
? Olo
W
>`2 ' N •1
Z

W U? 1
7
0 1 r
IIY3B15_ \ \
_ nbNO`
\3?? ?'» 3?7D?N
m\
ee \fU`\ 1 ` \
p?, ??11 \ W
7 1 \ ?
N ia0n\p
a \?
7
U
1
F g?
41?-
., W c?iq
? z
Q mm°
v
,1 Cj
Ow
Zp
1Y\\ 1
\ Sb '1z
U
> 04
U) In N W
a) m
U) cz
=3
Sn
4) o o *&A
C U 40 C to
? u? ? ? 3 ar; := cw
Q
O
r's
N O n C?
m E IcSi r 0
oQcZi
LO > R? <o"Q
`O a mcCo,
oorx?
C.) 91 : m
w 1w.
_ U W U.
w®Ilsq- +
V 1 I v
? q mg
\I '
e ,
e ,
e ,
e °
1 ,
° e
,
1 1
1 1
1 '
1 '
.1
1 ?
1 '
w
O ll i
O 11 ?? -
e
o at I,
II C)
I '
E- _
1 '
ti Q I '
I '
1 I
I I
I , 1
I I
I '
I I
I I I
I I
_i31ST T
31 140• R/`++ ( T
51.1 1
I 1 99.97•
?i I I
1 I
I 1
111
11
11
I I I
II
1 1
1 I
1 I
I 1
1 1
'1 9
I I
1 1
I I
!/0
1 1
I 1
I I
1 1
1 1
1 I
I 1
1.
I 1
I I
1 1
I I
1 1
I 1
I
I I
K 1 ??+
121
I
['M"? [? 1M° 11pLLY15 ? 1 I
1 '
I 1
I'

9 1 1
1 '
1 '
, I
j3
?g??°
?4
?
I r 1 I
I
?
?
R
??Ci>a?
E°BM? I I
/
I
I ' I W
' II
I I it
II
I
' I ? °R4mgcE
1 111 ?
1v

611
1\iy
Ill
?ituo?a aNnoaoaanH?'? ` ??? i II
??''yti r (aR 4 pal go?_
f?
u
E

3
Q
Wo
?V
soalae •,Wz)
DPUDM 'DPUDM 'l=l /l x ,I[ '?'od,39B d]INVl 'jalln}
v M
C
> N
d m co
v c
d) 075 N
`
(a g
U
CU
yO
m N L <
+? O O
ZW
55 A,
M (Q w
C LU p z
x0 C) ` f
UILO Mm
U m
0
W
?
0.
N a
Z
S
.M
w
d ?
cc C-4
? c N
> M m
0 V N
U
V M t O
O 44 e 0 Z
F+
d m ? d
a o .?
d C c 11
c a
U. m U ?
Z90-80OZ 'ON NOU113d
0998.9SS Om x.d •t999-E99(VOL)
UZSZ ON *GWM 3 OM 491nS 71d MOWlod 0969
SN3NNVld 0NYi
NVId 31lS Mivuism-ii 91ILL
SH33NION3lM 145
S31VIOOSSV
' CD
ONIU33NION3 NVId SS300V ?lVM3ARIO ONV
ON A31000 N3IHO a
0 %I w
1 t
?
Nolbna 13MUS 430E/3nN3AV NOS3H1dW
?
?
?oa(63.1 U9 ° °° rc
• 0 1 I! I
I
\?? ? II l; 1

q. I ?
? m <'
I
?
?
?a
r
y
a
o
?
?
10257 QL
0 q
I f
y?o?{& .?H`' ? II I
Ws!
O?RIZilari0<KOili 9:0 ?? I .•. qll
? ?I

?? +> Z I
\ b' h °tia 11 ? ? ? I -
\ k`nos l J Z I ?
i V
N \
m
W LL
,?,JLL.
IL III ?? la
I I.
II
?.. J` I I ; i I II : W ,
/ II ti.
'I i ? III Ij
? I I II ?
III ? ?
I r I I II' y '?
AIJ I III 12 ,
/ X021 ; /, -
? II I
o II k? ?
l1I I (?
/ I rl ( 4
- -------'_-----I / I all I III h
I ? I E I Ilr ?.
1 ?/ I I
1
I ?, . , Ilr I pig I I ?
/ r W III ,
? 1 IPI? I ?.
g / I \ I ' Ig?
i r ruw vavvl+w ?I P k ? ??
I ::a'„:Q \ I Ir
I' I I I I, \ u I I
55.5' PRUP? `` "? \ 11 I \ '? \ \` \
CC.
v rJ a `? ,
x----x----x- LL w -vr .Wj\\ \ ?t
} ` W \ V
t ` \\
(n, ! o Q UQ \ \\
Lu ? = it ? I ? > < \ \ \\\1\ ?1
I I
V ! \\ I
r.wv?Y I ,I
OQ M .ul,90.tt NI \
U I \
N?L
Faa' i `\Yi
SBA , -,-,-.-. I
i
O
03 ; *"?^ : ooi aanins X10 ANN
0a °aegdoad
U O -, -
!rte
w
----------- t I \ ooivi
? I I
/' /
N3L 1

~t
a x ??
'?
O
4 ?

,
1 \ 55
\ '
1 B 1

a \O
1 '1
\ 1

LL I •
• , 1
I ?
1

o l

1
I I
- ?t I 1
I 1

) I I I

!
? - m I
1 1
i r
i \ II
I I

\ '` \ 1,
I 1
Q
` \ 1
1
` 1
F 1
m ;
1
k,
•I
O 1
I ,
I I
?
I? I I \ \ I

m
!
!
I W
¢F1
, I
1 ;
y
1., I
; 1 W
? 1'rUp''fuul

1 ' I

1 1
I I
1 ? I W
! I
lpppx+ ? N i. m
1
1
,

Jl ? ? 0Nno a •,? ' '
I

I
I
.aye--?_„? x' I 1 ,p1
f

I
® s
s
_ °o
a sr ?+
9
U

co
O
I ' co
N
z
!i z
1 O
II
LU
EL
) I I
I I I
I
I
I
I
6
Wr
U N
? aww PX..-? I
I
I
I I
I
I I
I
W11 'OPUOx •l:l '(1-WI 00'4Z . ODIC) 0 PUOd.. HDMY 'C.d,WgSa..o '••IIO,
'YIV 90:9Z:9 60OZ/C/Z 'NVId 3115 3ALLYMSM11'6x.p'90YZ01 -ZUmSN3U-BUIUOI.8-o.og90DCC6\6wp\.O,,gl,ry-1...,S410C 600-CC6\OM0\:d
a,
13 Tr
,?-
! { op \ ..?
jig
t ?? p
N
! i t cl l
/ 1. < < I o v 1
> I .1 1 ? ?H ,10 w aa?oo' I - "C'fp'•
I _OOL ,
\ 95 f
J ?
6 d'S:?d21 :)tZpal Ntll Jalln Wd SZ LT-ZT 3 Z/9Z/pT'la W' ?Op-££ti Mfl H10 1J (3\:d
34-11
11
_,_ f `) l
t 1 ?11?) 1 ??..\ ?? O
V.I +_ I 1 if .? I
? y3 I
v
C/D
ell Ci)
111
f ? I jl - 1 1 ? . ? 1• ?? ? ? I O ?--
/ ! 1 1 1 r 3?' /? \
h ` \
? f f 11 . ? I ? .f ? f'
1 f( 1f j 1 ?I f / • ? ; ? i 1
f
1 .I ? I I
I ,? t / i { \
1 tl
I' 1 1 3 1? ? 1 /'I
all
l `
9d- 3 ?ZOdI 21 Nd ?alln ' tl i0 80 T\ ?I I
I 1 \9 \:d
1/l I ?
11= ?I
1
x ? \
I
11 ?? . I r 8 `
GOO
/I I f
I?
? al
' v /
m I ' I r
?I, - - t. ? 1. ,•, I -- __'-- ? r i -
I
r u
a 1
( 1 1 ,b III 'I` I
5 -
77777
I ,
I '
1` ?1 II
I
r,
:Ik n I ? 11
r ? I
r C ?+ -
r a•J i WSW
I? - i,
a,
I a, ?, I I "I I ? - _ rr i rl
Ii 1 - e
-a .71
- rih `i, I r
r , ti. Off, ? _ _
Blois
-. 2
J I PI
I
I
1 I i
z ,.
i
71
77.
r I
.y 5 11 A? Y \ _
M ..y L
:I
i
I
__.._.. _ _. r .
,
?1 »t
1 ?•
6?`, ? tr
?..
r
' +?LiX[Tja114sia aj3v'6anrun ''w? Pa:9n:fti n 71f;W7 `? larn-ccJ?!i'14 It CU Ind ????• ,
.r
X ` %
LU \
1\ I
I
.I
1.
5. M/H% ?r
s
`.A \\ ? \?
o
\ •\ \?
%
?s .

0 14
Ao-
w
O
/io?
' / / '// 4

?N
o \
0
?i ,?A-
0
1,
9
`? d

.00
s o
47
o
oo ,

" 4.0

N-1 N, N%
O
N, o?

/
/i
10-
/

•6
'
OV do
' 0
/
0/
I I 1100-
I I ?
I ?
64 >(
DPUDM {DPUDM '00LI•I.
a'

O
r
\ a

04
1S3nb3a NOdn 03Nanl3a
38 Ol SI ONV 103rOad
.l a3HI0 ANV NO O3Sn 38 Ol
/• ION SIll'laVdNI1103'IOHM
L NI O31dO3 NO 03OMOad3a
• 3S Ol ION St ONV
S3IVIOOSSV ONIa33NION3
Nolan dO Aw3dOad
3HI SI JNIMVaa SIHI
LU
09BB'taa WL) Xad -warns (voU
0=ON'90-P040-00L WPS - 7)8 mwllu Osas
SUBNNYId aNY1
SHMNISNa I WO
S31VIOOSSV
SNIb33NIJN3
Noluna

0

_d
cti
fipD

a?
,2
m°
o.
mm
44

00
\\ >011
Lo
drd S
z ohi
w?$
og
d
00
?o
LID \0000/
%l
;
-b
1N3WNJI-1V
AVMMn 10 AdVNIW1-13?ld
ON '3.LLORIVH-0
3nN3AV NOS3HIVIN

4000
N
O
O
rn \
NI
U \
O
L11
Cf) W
O
, \
000 j 61 r?
Sax
d?
d-
O 00

DPUDM 'DPUDM '9Z29Z'Z:l '„Ll x ,.LL '?'Dd'?5?ba??131Nd1 '?allnd
REQUEST FOR JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
DATE: March 4, 2009
COUNTY Mecklenburg County, North Carolina TOTAL ACREAGE OF TRACT Approximately 16 acres
PROJECT NAME (if applicable) Matheson Avenue and 301h Street
PROPERTY OWNER/APPLICANT (name, address and phone):
First Industrial Buildings & Land
POC: Mr. Pete Godley, at [phone]
2420 Bank of America Plaza, 101 South Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC 28280
NAME OF CONSULTANT, ENGINEER, DEVELOPER (if applicable):
Carolina Wetland Services, Inc.
POC: Mr. Gregg C. Antemann, at [phone]
550 East Westinghouse Blvd.
Charlotte, NC 28273
STATUS OF PROJECT (check one):
( ) On-going site work for development purposes
( X) Project in planning stages
(Type of project: N/A )
( ) No specific development planned at present
( ) Project already completed
(Type of project: )
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED:
Check items submitted - forward as much information as is available. At a minimum, the following first two items must be
forwarded.
(X) USGS 7.5-Minute Charlotte East and Derita, NC Topographic Quadrangles
(X ) NRCS Mecklenburg County Soil Survey
(X) Approximate Jurisdictional Boundary Field Map
(X) Proposed Project Impacts (Plan View)
(X) Proposed Little Sugar Creek Impacts (Profile View)
(X) Proposed Little Sugar Creek Impacts (Cross-Section View)
(X) Request for Jurisdictional Determination Form
(X ) Agent Certification of Authorization Form
(X) NCDWQ Stream Classification Forms (SCPI - SCP2)
(X) USACE Stream Quality Assessment Worksheets (SCP I - SCP2)
(X) Significant Nexus Determination Documentation Forms (SCPI- SCP2)
(X) Ordinary High Water (OHWM) Documentation Forms (SCPI- SCP2)
(X) Jurisdictional Drainage Area Maps
(X) Routine Wetland Determination Data Forms (DPI - DP2)
(X) Representative Photographs (A - F)
Signature of Property Owner or
Authorized Agent
Mr. Gregg C. Antemann, PWS
DEB-24 2009 03:20P FROM:FIRST INDUSTRIAL B R 17043768740 TO:7045271133 P.2
hereby certifY that I have aut r
Inc. to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary to the processing, issuance, and
acceptance of this permit application and any and all standard and special conditions
AGENT CERTIFICATION OF AUTHORIZA'T'ION
representing First Industrial Buildings & Land
1 ized Gregg C. Antemann of Carolina We
attached.
We hereby certify that the above information submitted in this application is. true and
accurate to the best of our knowledge.
*plficant's e
Date
G.
Agen s gnature
Februga 24, 2009
Date
Completion of this form will allow the agent to sign all future application correspondence.

o?ot W ArAz9,
r
1 1 > ?
0 9- 0 2 4 4
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.0 November 2008
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the ® Section 404 Permit ? Section 10 Permit
Corps:
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 39 or General Permit (GP) number: Water Quality Certification No.
3705
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ? Yes ® No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ? Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401
because written approval is not required? Certification:
? Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program.
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
For the record only for Corps Permit:
? Yes ® No
? Yes ® No
? Yes
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? I ? Yes
2. Project Information
2a Name of project: Matheson Avenue and 31P Street Site
._a... Unr-Ldanhi im
® No
® No
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Charlotte
2d. Subdivision name: N/A
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no: N/A
3. Owner Information
3a. Name on Recorded Deed: First Industrial Buildings & Land
3b. Deed Book and Page No. 19500-233 and 18009-711
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable): N/A
3d. Street address: 2420 Bank of America Plaza, 101 South Tryon Street
3e. City, state, zip: Charlotte, North Carolina, 28280
3f. Telephone no.: 704-236-2913
3g. Fax no.: N/A
3h. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 1 of 13
PCN Form - Version 1.0 November 2008 Version

Section A. Applicant Information, continued
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ? Agent ? Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: Mr. Gregg C. Antemann
5b. Business name Carolina Wetland Services, Inc.
5c. Street address:
5d. City, state, zip:
5e. Telephone no.:
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
550 East Westinghouse Boulevard
Charlotte, North Carolina, 208273
704-527-1177
704-527-1133
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 13
PCN Form - November 2008 Version
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 083-031-15 and 083-021-01
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): 35.24803'N - 80.81262'W
1 c. Property size: 16 acres

2. Surface Waters

2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Little Sugar Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: Class C
2c. River basin: Catawba

3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The current land use for the site is wooded with adjacent industrial and commercial areas..
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.25 acres
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
1,079 linear feet of jurisdictional stream channel

3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the project is to construct a mixed-use multi-family residential and commercial development within an
existing industrial area. In order to gain access to the site a new road will be constructed adjacent to Matheson Avenue
which will result in unavoidable impacts to jurisdictional waters.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
This project will involve the construction of new road over the exiting culveret at Matheson Avenue. The existing culvert
will be extended approximately 40 If upstream and a 10 If splash pad will be installed at the inlet. Approximately 213 If of
stream will be filled and relocated into a new 157 If stream channel. A trackhoe and other standard
construction/excavation equipment will be used for this project.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
? Yes ® No ? Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type ? Preliminary ? Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: N/A
Name (if known): N/A Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
N/A
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for E] Yes ®No ? Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
Page 3 of 13
PCN Form - Version 1.0 November 2008 Version
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ® Yes ? No
6b. If yes, explain.
This is a two phase project. Phase 1 of the project envolves the construction of the new access road for the site. Phase
2 will envolve the construction of the mixed use development. All impacts to jurisdictional waters of the U.S. are
associated with Phase 1 of the project. There are no impacts associated with Phase 2.
Page 4 of 13
PCN Form - November 2008 Version
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
? Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ? Buffers
? Open Waters ? Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number - Type of Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or impact (if known) DWQ - non-404, other)
W1 ? P ? T El Yes El No [-I Corps
? DWQ

W2 ? P ? T
? Yes ? No ? Corps
? DWQ
W3 ? P ? T ? Yes ? No ? Corps
? DWQ

W4 ?P?T El Yes El No ? Corps
?DWQ
W5 ? P ? T ? Yes ? No ? Corps
? DWQ
W6 ? P ? T ? Yes ? No ? Corps
? DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts

3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (i
ncluding temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact 3b. 3c.
Type of Stream name 3d. 3e.
Perennial (PER) or Average stream width (feet) 3f.
Impact
length
number - impact intermittent (INT)? (linear feet)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)

S1 ®P ? T
Fill Unimportant
Intermittent Non-
? PER ® INT
3
213
RPW Stream A

S2 ®P ? T Culvert
Installa- Perennial TNW
Little Sugar
® PER ? INT
10
40
tion Creek
Splash Perennial TNW
S3 ®P ? T InPadla- Little Sugar ® PER ? INT 10 10

tion Creek
S4 ? P ? T ? PER ? INT
S5 ? P ? T ? PER ? INT
S6 ? P ? T ? PER ? INT
3g. Total stream and tributary impacts 263
3h. Comments: Total Net Permanent Impacts equal 122 If (0.016 acre)
Page 5 of 13
PCN Form - Version 1.0 November 2008 Version
Page 6 of 13
PCN Form - November 2008 Version
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory, continued
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory, continued
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If and or lake construction ro osed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or (acres)
number purpose of pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded

P1

P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ? Yes ? No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. ? Neuse ? Tar-Pamlico ? Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ? Catawba ? Randleman
6
6b.
Buffer impact
number -
Permanent (P)
or Temporary 6c.

Reason
for impact 6d.

Stream name 6e.

Buffer
mitigation
required? 6f.

Zone 1 impact (square
feet) g•

Zone 2 impact
(square feet)
B1 ? P ? T ? Yes ? No
B2 ? P ? T ? Yes ? No
B3 ?P?T ?Yes ?No
6h. Total buffer impacts
Ai r`nmmanfc-
Page 7 of 13
PCN Form - November 2008 Version
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Impacts to on-site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. have been reduced to the maximum extent practicable. Proper
sediment and erosion control measures will be used to minimize disturbances to downstream waters. All work will be
conducted in the dry.
Other site access alternatives were looked at but were not feasible. One alternative was to construct the road south of
Little Sugar Creek however, sight distances could not be achieved from Matheson Avenue into the site. Sight distance
could be achieved by entering the site via the 40' right-of-way of College Street (not constructed). Using this access
would require crossing Little Sugar Creek which bisects the site from the existing Matheson Avenue culvert to just north of
'
'
to 12
the railroad and Cullman Avenue. Access from Cullman Avenue was explored but the railroad track is elevated 10
above Cullman Avenue and the site. Also, the floodway extends along the entire tract at Cullman Avenue making it
impossible to cross without impacting flood elevations. Bridge alternatives were also considered but costs, without
would be over $1,000,000.00 which is not practical for the approximately 7 acres of developable property.
installation
,
The only plausible alternative was to cross Little Sugar Creek over the existing Matheson Avenue culvert in the Matheson
Avenue right-of-way.
Crossing the Matheson Avenue culvert was selected as the best alternative and impacts were reduced to the maximum
d to minimize the length of culvert necessary for the Little Sugar Creek
b
een use
extent practicable. 2:1 slopes have
crossing. The impacted portion of Unimportant Intermittent Non-RPW Stream A will be relocated to a new channel. This
new channel will be stabilized with Jute Matting and livestakes (Figure 2, enclosed). Total stream impacts have been
reduced to 263 (122 permanent) linear feet (If) and impacts to jurisdictional wetlands have been completely avoided.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Proper sediment and erosion control measures will be used to minimize disturbances to downstream waters. Ali
construction activities will be conducted in the dry.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ? Yes ® No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ? DWQ ? Corps
? Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this ? Payment to in-lieu fee program
project?
? Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
Page 8 of 13
PCN Form - Version 1.0 November 2008 Version
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation, continued
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ? Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: warm, cool, cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h.. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation? ? Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.

Zone
Reason for impact Total impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
Total buffer mitigation required:
6c. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6d. Comments:
Page 9 of 13
PCN Form - November 2008 Version
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Fiow man
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ? Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
? Yes ? No
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included?
2. Determination if the Project Requires a Stormwater Management Plan
No
2a. Does the project require a Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit? ? Yes
2b. Is the project subject to General Certification 3704 or 3705? . ® Yes [] No
3. Determination of Stormwater Review Jurisdiction
? Coastal counties
3a. Is this project subject to any of the following state-implemented stormwater En HQW
management programs (check all that apply)? ? ORW
If so, attach one copy of the approval letter from the DWQ and one copy of the ? Session Law 2006-246
approved stormwater management plan. E] Other:
:?:?Ci of Charlotte
3b. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
No
3c. Is this local government certified to implement a state stormwater program. ®Yes
If so, attach one copy of the approval letter from the local government and one copy
of the approved stormwater management plan (or one copy of the approved
Stormwater management plan stamped as approved).
4. Information Required for DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
4a. What is the overall percent imperviousness according to the most current site plan? >24%
4b. Does this project contain any areas that meet the criteria for "high density" per ? Yes ® No
General Certifications 3704 and 3705?
4c. If the site is over 24% impervious and/or contains high density areas, then provide a brief narrative description of the
stormwater management plan.
This project is located in a Distressed Business Area. Under Charlotte Mecklenburg's Post Construction Ordinance
Phase 1 of this project qualifies for a program that allows the development to pay a fee of $60,000 per impervious acre
($42,319.48 for Phase 1) towards regional stormwater improvements in lieu of a traditional stormwater management plan.
Stormwater will be put in place for Phase 2 of the development as required by code. Phase 2 does not qualify for the
Distressed Business Area Fee program as impervious area will likely exceed 5 acres. Burton Engineering Associates are
currently designing a Stormwater Plan for Phase 2 of the development and will coordinate with NCDWQ to ensure its
acceptance.
4d. Has a completed BMP Supplement Form with all required items been submitted I ? Yes ® No
for each stormwater BMP?
Page 10 of 13
PCN Form - Version 1.0 November 2008 Version
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
t
St
l
? Yes ® No
a
e
or
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the Nationa
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval Yes ? No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
d
d
S
? Yes ® No
s,
tan
ar
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ? Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ? Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
This project will lead to additional development (Phase 2) however downstream water quality will not be impacted.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The proposed project will tie into the Charlotte Mecklenburg sewer system.
Page 11 of 13
PCN Form - Version 1.0 November 2008 Version
F. Supplementary Information, continued
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or 15? Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ? Yes ® No
impacts?
? Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
? Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
A letter was forwarded to the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) on February 18, 2009 to determine the
presence of any federally-listed, candidate endangered, threatened species or critical habitat located within the project
As of the date of this submittal, a response from NCNHP has not yet been received. CWS also looked at the
area
.
Natural Heritage Elemental Occurences (NHEO) and the Significant Natural Heritage Areas (SNHA) GIS layers and found
a Historical NHEO within or near the project area.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ? Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA Fisheries: http://sharpfiin.nmfs.noaa.gov/website/EFH_Mapper/map.aspx
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ? Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
A letter was forwarded to the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) on February 18, 2009 to determine the presence
of any areas of architectural, historic, or archaeological significance that would be affected by the project. As of the date
of this submittal, a response from SHPO has not yet been received.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ® Yes ? No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: This project has been hydrologically modelled and designed to
result in no net rise in flood level. The project engineer is coordinating with the local floodplain administrator.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA FIRM Map No. 37119C0167E
Gregg Antemann, PWS C
Z
Principal Scientist T-?r 3/4109
Applicant/Agent's Signature
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name (Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant Date
is provided.)
Page 12 of 13
PCN Form - November 2008 Version
Significant Nexus Determination (SND) Documentation Form
(per U.S. AIL 14Y CORPS OF ENGINEERS JURISDICTIONAL DETERNIINATION FORM INSTRUCTIONAL GUIDEBOOK 5-30-07)
fjDate t2 • 1ge .0% v, r
Relevant Reach 20 0
Site A'Su 1'a . 1 U-x+ S't?2 "T Investigator(s) ?- (c-A
Y N Effect
19 ? Speculative or Insubstantial Effect on TNW
Fx-1 ? Effect on Chemical Integrity
® ? Effect on Physical Integrity
G2 ? Effect on Biological Integrity
Flow
Notes
Volume 'WAr-,A fv"tr L S l' LA it 'g7 4k, W Low
Duration
a 3 m-04-ws A
--V- C 5 <~1?vnJ M?
Frequency 1rON?t1 t7Ccor D ?npLOw? Lv U.1 SP<LLS
Proximity to T'NW (? kT4%-,1 200
FT a (-'-ML Sulam cag-Vc
Hydrologic, ecologic, and other functions performed by the tributary and all of its
adiacent wetlands.
5ib/L m-
11 Y
C? srm [9 o

Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWIVI) Documentation Form
(per U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-05)
Date t2 • I !? ' Observation Point

Site Investigator(s)
_
S W A Primary Indicators
? ® ? Natural line impressed on bank
? ? ® Shelving
? F ? Changes in character of soil
? ® ? Destruction of terrestrial vegetation
© ? ? Presence of litter and debris
® ? ? Wracking
© ? ? Vegetation matted down, bent or absent
? ® ? Sediment sorting
? ® ? Leaf litter disturbed or washed away
? 5a ? Scour
? ? Deposition
? Q ? Multiple observed flow events
? [?r ? Bed and banks
? ? © Water staining
? ' ? © Change in plant community
S = Strong W = Weak A = Absent
Notes
Secondary Data Sources
? Lake and stream gage data ? Flood predictions
? Elevation data ? Historic records of water flow
? Spillway height ? Statistical evidence
Y N
OHWM I ?
I `
I-I
L'WS
5G / NO- I
jl?v? t G?4
Sketch of dimensions and notes.
1 10
s
slrPr,o,z
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: Z . o v C6 -- - -- -project vM.+h's 12,4 l4 ?= 3 0A Latitude: N 3 ° S 2'
Evaluator- 13%NF °j'- Site: Sc_ 2 Longitude:
? w r6va 7S7'
Total Points.
stream is of ieasf inferrriittent 2 r County: Other
if>_ 79 or perennial if?-, Y3 1 J •7 IZ K La wl %3 e. g.
Quad Narrp:
A. Geornor bolo
eom _ i? _._-9X t _ b#otal = ?o • ,:.:..:
AiJSen#
.w k
:::.:.. IUt?sd rate . ..........,
Son
1'. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 € •--
2. Sinuosity
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 1 ? - i 3
4_ Sail texture or stream substrate sorting 0 ICY I 2 3
5. Activ elreiic floodplain 1 ? 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 2 3 -~
!. Braided channel 0 1 1 2

4 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 l 2 3
9 'Natural levees 1
1 2 --
3
10. Headcuts 0 1 3
11. Grade controls

---........ -.........................

0.5
-
- -----------

5
12. Nlatural valley or drainagaway
?._..? - - -- _-- ----- •--•--------••- -_....._._.._...__......_..._......... ---•+...... . 0
.... ..
.
? ..
0 __._.__. __....... -. 1.
___.......__
5
13. Second or greater order channel on ex istina ; ..................
..... _
.. - ...._-w...... ............................. -. ........ ---•-........
USGS or MRCS reap or other documented hlo = 0 Yes= 3
evidence.
!Nan-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in rnartual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 5• )
14. GroundwraterrlavAdischarge - `0 - 2 3
15. Water in channel and ? 48 hrs since rain, Ir

l
z
Water in channel --
di, r
+
i
?
0-
O

Q?
?'
" -
'
o
a
nr
n t
........... ,._-_
16. Leaf itter - - ---.---_--'--- ------_-
1 __
-0.5--.- - -
i -
-
a-
17. Sedirrent on plants or debris e,.5, # 1 1
5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack fines) 0
5 .

19. Hydric soils (redoxirnorphic features) presents
No - 0 .
_
-?- Yes - 1.5

C_ Biology (Subtotal = 2? 1
203. Fibrous roots in charnel 3 7 ? 1 0
21`. Rooter) plants in channel

22. Crayfish , 2
0.5 1
1
5-?
23. Bivalves 0 1 i 2 .
3
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 1
5
25. Amphibians - --- -
0 - .
----- -- --- --- - ---- -
-'
26_ Macrobenthos (note do ersity and abundance) 0 0
5 a 1

. 27. Filamentous
7algae; periphy#on
-_- .
-? _-..
_.-? ------ --- 1.5

----.-;

28. Iron oxidizing bacteria4ungus.

•
-
0.5 2
-?- - --- --y- -
1- 3
-__._--i
29'. Wetland plants in strearnbed FAC = 0.5; FAGWlf
` = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0: er = 0
!terns 20 and 21 fows on the presence of upland plants. item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Notes: (use back side of this form for addilional r:oies.) Sketch:
............................ -..... ................ -------------------
LD t4 ^AG r3(r Cc- ----------

C.?tC1

V wUD ti"*-'1 gi 6.i 'Fo 0. r`' So L-F
OFFICE USE ONLY: USACE AID#
a
DWQ #_.
SG(y * 7

STREAM QUALM ASSESSIVEIT WORKSB+ E`I'
L Applicant's Name: F725 i 1 a D S^2 t?-t,
3. Date of Evaluation: 12 • 1 $ , y $
5. Name of Stream Iv a-
7. Approximate Drainage Area:_ 3
9 Length of R h E ai ?'
2. Evaluator's Name: C. C-0, -r- , I a r
4. Time of Evaluation: f o,,-
6. River Basin: L A
8. Stream Order. / t-r-
eac v uated Z 6 y L F 10. County:- N(? FC L 87+ L yM9
11. Location of reach under evaluation (include nearby roads and landmarks): ?n „? ?.• ,,-y1e••. „v.
12. Site Coordinates (if known): N 3,5 `L C2' W DOu 4 On.
75?'
13. Proposed Channel Work (if any): C.AL- v -;:W -r
14. Recent Weather Conditions:
15. Site conditions at time of visit:-- *0 a
16. Identify any special waterway classifications known. ----Section 10 -Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters i0utstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters -Water Supply Watershed (I-I')
17. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES (E)f yes, estimate the water surface area:
18. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES 19. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES
20. Estimated Watershed. Land Use: Residential '2v % Commercia5 -0 % Industi=d .
_°'o A? CILIturai
_% Forested _% Cleared / Logged _% Other
21. Bnnkftill Width: -- Z - 31. 22. Bank Height (from bed to top of bank): ?{-
23. Channel slope down center of stream: -Flat (0 to 2%) --)? Gentle (2 to 4%) -Moderate (4 to 101/o) _ Steep. (>10%)
24. Channel Sinuosity: Straight Occasional Bends Frequent Meander -Very Sinuous -Braided Channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to each
characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics identified in the
worksheet Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or
weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character
of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more
continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of
100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 1 k Comments:
Evaluator's Signature ? Date 2 . / -V . d $
This channel evaluatio m is untended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals ht
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers in order to make a preliminary assessment of
stream quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 05/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 Y 26.
STREAYI QUALITY ASSESSA + NT WORKSHEET

SC, to Z
SiLynificant Nexus Determination (SN-D) Documentation Form
(per U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM INSTRUCTIONAL GUIDEBOOK 5-30-07)
Date (2 . 1 1b.c)Cb
Relevant Reach
Site - 0AA':,A<1 aw A-V C. • Investigator(s)
Y N Effect
C4 ? Speculative or Insubstantial Effect on TNW
Ec ? Effect on Chemical Integrity
C} ? Effect on Physical Integrity
? Effect on Biological Integrity
Flow
Notes
Volume •?? v --:F -.2--S w?,39 X 0--g
l?h 1 H
Duration 7 3 f---a A-vd
Frequency - "75 ?? rte= -DA-1 S 4t'S v--?
Proximity to TNW /- -moo 1:1,a.tis 1&4v A- 71j Vj
Hydrologic, ecologic, and other functions performed by the tributary and all of its
adiacent wetlands.
Y N
S
ND ® ?
L
ZOO L V'
L 4- t ?'1N

Ordinary High Water Mark (OHNNM) Documentation Form
(per U.S. Army Corns of Engineers Regulatorv Guidance Letter 05-05)
Date Z• ?? • n 4 Observation Point S c e t 4o' 2
Site -JA& )- V7r v%j AV . • Investigator(s) 31-q -t- (-4-4
S W A
FLI ? ?
? 29 ?

? ® ?
2 ? ?
Q ? ?
? ® ?
? ® ?
? a ?
? R ?
? © ?
? © ?
CA ?'© ?
? ?
? ?
Primary Indicators
Natural line impressed on bank
Shelving
Changes in character of soil
Destruction of terrestrial vegetation
Presence of litter and debris
Wracking
Vegetation matted down, bent or absent
Sediment sorting
Leaf litter disturbed or washed away
Scour
Deposition
Multiple observed flow events
Bed and- banllc3
Water staining
Change in plant community
S = Strong W = Weak A = Absent

Notes
?tJL
Secondary Data Sources
Lake and stream gage data ? Flood predictions
Elevation data ? Historic records of water flow
Spillway height ? Statistical evidence
Y N
OHWM [a ?
CWS
'(jamF a 3, 1
v
t nr c-i,5 ,?
Sketch of dimensions and notes.

.-
I Providence
-i _
r >
Id ;?? _ `? 1 ?. ,
3 %:• 1362 10,
?v

f
64 _
521 y
y
1 1 3780
= 3628 3445
1345
? 1
ti 1451
{ i?36
L
© 2003 DeLorme. XMap& -TN Scale 1 : 126,720

www.delorme.com
MN (6.8 ?
ry o ? z
3
0 7 2 3 q 5
V 1" = 2.00 mi Data Zoom 10-6
D= _12Im 1®D 2.M
www.delorme.com "m"�``'N''�I o mD ,DD em eDD ,Dm
1" = 2,000.0 ft Data Zoom 13-1

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Matheson Avenue and 30th Street Date: 12/18/08
Applicant/Owner: First Industrial Buildings and Land County: Mecklenburg
Investigator(s): Gregg Antemann, PWS and Josh Frost, WIT State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID: upland
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No Plot ID: DP1
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species
1 Platanusoccidentalis Stratum Indicator
Tree FACW- Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
9 Lonicerajaponica Herb FAC-
2 Fraxinuspennsylvanica Tree FACW 10 Toxicodendronradicans Herb FAC
3 Acer rubrum Tree FAC 11
4 Acernegundo Tree FACW 12
5 Ilex opaca Shrub FAC- 13
6 Rubus argutus Shrub FACU+ 14
7 Ligustrum sinense Shrub FAC 15
8 Ligustrum japonicum Shrub - 16
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
67%
Remarks:
67% of the dominant
plant species are FAC or wetter.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in remarks):
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
X No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
_ Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Water Marks
Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits (on leaves)
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: 12+ (in.) % FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Only one secondary indicator of wetland h dY rology is present Does not satisfy parameter.
11 1
Routine On-Site Data Forms Page 1 of 2 2/17/2009

SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Monocan Soils and Arents (MS) Drainage Class somewhat poorly
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): thermic Fluva uentic Eutrochre is Confirm Mapped Type. Yes No
Profile Descri tion:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-12" A 10YR 4/6 N/A N/A sandy loam
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime % Listed on Local Hydric Soils List (Inclusions)
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
No indicators of hydric soils present.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (Circle)
Hydric Soils Present? Yes ?Nto Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:
Approved by HQUSACE 2/92
Routine On-Site Data Forms Page 2 of 2 2/17/2009
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Matheson Avenue and 30th Street Date: 12/18/08
Applicant/Owner: First Industrial Buildings and Land County: Mecklenburg
Investigator(s): Gregg Antemann, PWS and Josh Frost, WPIT State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID: wetian
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No Plot ID: DP2
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species
1 Platanusoccidentalis Stratum
Tree Indicator
FACW- Dominant Plant Species
9 Lonicerajaponica Stratum
Herb Indicator
FAC-
2 Fraxinuspennsylvanica Tree FACW 10 Arundinariagigantea Herb FACW
3 Acer rubrum Tree FAC 11 Juncus effusus Herb FACW+
4 Tilia heterophylla Tree FACU 12
5 Ilex opaca Shrub FAC- 13
6 Rubus argutus Shrub FACU+ 14
7 Ligustrum sinense Shrub FAC 15
8 Ligustrum japonicum Shrub - 16
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
60%
Remarks:
60% of the dominant
plant species are FAC or wetter.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in remarks):
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
X No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
X Inundated
X Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Water Marks
_
X Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits (on leaves)
X Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: 0-3 (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) _
X Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: 0 (in.) X FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Indicators of wetland hydrology are Dresent
Routine On-Site Data Forms Page 1 of 2 2/17/2009
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Monocan Soils and Arents (MS) Drainage Class somewhat poorly
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): thermic Fluva uentic Eutroe reps Confirm Mapped Type. Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-6" A 10YR 4/6 N/A N/A coarse sand
6-12" B 10YR 311 N/A N/A clay loam
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon _
High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime X Listed on Local Hydric Soils List (Inclusions)
Reducing Conditions _Listed on National Hydric Soils List
X Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors X Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Indicators of hydric soils are present. Oxidized rhizos pheres present.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
(Circle)
Hydric Soils Present? Ye No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:
Data point is representative of a iurisdictional wetland area.
1 11
Approved by HQUSACE 2/92
Routine On-Site Data Forms Page 2 of 2 2/17/2009
I W
Matheson Avenue and 30th Street February 24, 2009
Nationwide Permit No 39 Project No. 2008-2527

'
a
ti
r
?' ` , J
Y f{ r A 4 ?
t
? ? '?
r
fh 9
t r
Y q' /
a .1` Y
Y?
s
A' ?
w
$ 4 ,?} .
.J
?
?,
? Fr
? Py'

' ' 1 `mi'l x
`
`
?d
? -L
?'
: jrgq
t iF ?y
'.
4? C?? x
Lc.
,k-• }T 'f. _.'
?,
3 r
t• '
r
'?
s
- ' ?? f
t d-
?$1 fl
' ' i
SFr .f
C
P
.
a
g
.
,
t a y2 . xy, i
;y? rdf 4
1
i
t y
's
'
}?
*
y?_ ?
r
,
C 1
1
T
'
? F
, t: 'Ji
L yT
_
u2
I
' ..4
"
LY.«. ^
.i -?i .
iSA
r
i.
M
?
,
N+rt'-
iy?
l
?
t5
,5? l .,
y !
•?
_
y
i
°?
! f .dY APS
?i+
? /4 ky?-
r x ?'3[
?l
ARM,
-
_
-
-
YJ
4
Y ?i
a
-a 1 ,?r
.-?.

N

„f +?r _ iX e e ?'e

Photo A. View of Unimportant btemuttent Non-RPW Stream A, facing upstream (SCp f).

`i ?,*y" rt i
j?
t f
' 4
-
1 s M? k
a ?
+
i
qq? T
I

1 ?.
7 kk i
yy

t
,
A yy
t 1 r 1
.s.
l
`
d 1
a?
S

y .
y
Y
T „ !
. J .\i S? ?
C y
L (^ q?
14 t- I
,4}. .. `lkR F.
s'tit+.?1t? ???.rf??r's,.
?
E
?'r? ??.? ?J
?? ? ? ?•t? ?` 4,lrt k 'J'?!1 i' sd? \ ti' - V ?y=K ar -?91
y,xyf?'`?+ Y ? .?tL`. i/c,,. 3s € ?5???'?f? 'aR.:-??w? t ` ? ?SY,r ?.1 us,?

Z&

t .. F'•k ,C a
%
..

Photo B. View of Wetland AA, facing south.

Matheson Avenue and 30`' Street February 24, 2009
Nationwide Permit No. 39 Proiect No. 2008-2527

Matheson Avenue and 300 Street February 24, 2009
Nationwide Permit No. 39 Project No 2008-2527