Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout19961136 Ver 1_Mitigation Evaluation_20090305Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table NC Division of Water Quality Date of Office Review: 514-_ /Jq Date of Report: - Date of Field Review: Other Individuals/Agencies P esent: Weather Conditions (today & recent): Directions to Site: near Lillington, NC 1. Office Review Information: Project Number: 19961136 Project Name: Senter Sand & Gravel County(ies): Harnett Basin & subbasin: Cape Fear Nearest Stream: UT of Upper Little River Water Quality Class of Nearest Stream: Mitigator Type: Private DOT Status: non-DOT Total Mitigation on Site Wetland: 2.5 acres Stream: B ffer Project History u Approved mitigation plan available? &e? No Monitoring reports available? No Problem areas identified in reports? No Problem areas addressed on site? Yjjj? No Mitigation required on site: "?/i)oT /V OM `Add significant project-related events: reports, Associated impacts (if known): received, construction, planting, repairs, etc. During office review, note success criteria and evaluate each component based on monitoring report results. Record relevant data in Sections II and III. On back of sheet, note other information found during office review and/or to be obtained during site visit. II. Summary of Results: Monitoring Success Success Mitigation Component Year (report) (field) Resolved 19961136-1 2.5 acres Wetland Creation Evaluator's Name(s): it A - Report for Monitoring Year: Evaluator's Name(s): P //.IAA All v H1 A) 12 Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 1 of 2 Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table NC Division of Water Quality MITIGATION SUCCESS: Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this project is successful ially successful unsuccessful List specific reasons for lack of success for this project: Additional comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.): Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 2 of 2 Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table NC Division of Water Quality Component: 2.5 acres W.'ettland Creation _ Component ID: 19961136-1 Description: AlaI2 -IV AJA S'Ubo A/ a P 1/1 Location within project: 4T EST/? FAAJ Q A'K&4 0) ),14rEA III. Success Criteria Evaluation: HYDROLOGY - Approved Success Criteria: Wetland Hydrology Indicators: saturation within 12" of surface exceeding 12.5% of GS, which Inundated equates to a minimum of 28 cons. days in Hartnett Co based on a Saturated in upper 12 inches GS of 226 davs Monitoring report indicates success Yes N Drift lines Observational field data agrees? Yes ui Drainage patterns in wetlands based on mitigation plan? Yes No Sediment deposits based on wetland type? Yes No Water marks List any remaining hydrology issues to address (e.g. r maining ditches, excessive Ovate ,etc. i A? 0)'?a??? /?N G? l fin- ?ONI? SOILS - Approved Success Criteria: Are soils hydric or becoming hydric? Yes List indicators of hydric soils: List any remaining soil issues to address (e.g. erosion, upland areas, etc.): VEGETATION - Approved Success Criteria: Dominant Plant Species survival rate of 320 trees/acre at the end of 5 years Species Story TPA/'1o cover i Monitoring report indicates success? Yes No (;) Average TPA for entire site (per report): Observational field data agrees? Yes No based on community composition? Yes No based on TPA and/or % cover? Yes No Vegetation planted on site? Yes No Date of last planting: Vegetation growing successfully? Yes No AW? Specific vegetation plots or site locations with little to no vegetation: w 44 it Aff ??92?' r ?JGCt Estimated acreage or site percentage of unvegetated areas: Invasive species on site (species, location(s), and % cover): List any remaining vegetation issues to address (e.g. plant survival, concerns, etc.): Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 1 of 2 Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table NC Division of Water Quality NCWAM - Approved Success Criteria or Evaluative Techniques: NCWAM Type on Site: na Coastal Riverine Monitoring report indicates success? Yes No Riparian Observational field data agrees? Yes No Non-riparian (wetter) Attach NCWAM analysis results to this report. Non-riparian (drier) List any remaining NCWAM issues to address (e.g. functionality, developing wetland type, etc.): MITIGATION SUCCESS: Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this component is: success u partially successful unsuccessful List specific reasons for lack of success for this component: Additional comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.): During site visit, document representative conditions and areas of concern. Observe preservation and enhancement areas that may not have specific success criteria. Label and attach photos to this report. Attach maps showing photo locations, areas of concern, and important field observations. Additional notes related to evaluation of this component: Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 2 of 2 Mitigation Area Map ?f PIM 1M°p' o? ?o t\ ff f, l \ p a?? 0 O 1 Q Area Shown in T, Location Map 1 1 \ d \ , p Y-Y !OD' Q' 30D' 4qp' "' Hanson S.kc" SENTER PLANT - LILLINGTON, N.C. 611P SVW 1OCODWS or 1RMISECtWs Wr W aWAIM *7LM 8 I:.,W SeOer Wetlands.dwq J.C./N.M.W OCT '01 1" 1 OF 1