The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About19960353 Ver 1_Mitigation Evaluation_20090303Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table NC Division of Water Quality Date of Office Review: Evaluator's Name(s): Date of Report: Report for Monitoring Year: Date of Field Review: Evaluator's Name(s): ':1]z 1k Other Individuals/Agencies Present: hl,C (? ??? [ ?? L ? ?Ca ir. ? xes_iCC. ---k, Weather Conditions (today & recent): C.0d (30 Directions to Site: west of Hwy 421, east of River Road, and is bordered on its western boundary by The Cape subdivision 1. Office Review Information: Project Number: 19960353 Project Name: Beach Walk at Kure Beach County(ies): New Hanove Basin & subbasin: Cape Fear Nearest Stream: Cape Fear Water Quality Class of Nearest Stream: SC Mitigator Type: Private DOT Status: non-DOT Project History Event Report Review - Wetlands Site Visit - Wetlands Total Mitigation on Site Wetland: 28.46 acres Stream: Buffer: Event Date 1/5/2008 2/12/2008 Approved mitigation plan available? Yes No Monitoring reports available? Yes No Problem areas identified in reports? Yes No Problem areas addressed on site? Yes No Mitigation required on site: "Add significant project-related events: reports, Associated impacts (if known): received, construction, planting, repairs, etc. During office review, note success criteria and evaluate 9 each component based on monitoring report results. Record relevant data in Sections II and III. On back of sheet, note other information found during office review and/or to be obtained during site visit. II. Summary of Results: Monitoring Success Success Mitigation Component Year (report) (field) Resolved 19960353-1 28.46 acres Wetland Preservation Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 1 of 2 Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table NC Division of Water Quality MITIGATION SUCCESS: Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this project is: successful p (;i succe ful unsuccessful List specific reasons for lack of success for this project: C mr t "u_ V COX GL- Tel-?(?1;11 J1 rc? a- -' rOLA4 or rywJA rte- lie ?xvGr ? ?U-,Se-r\/ c4 0 n PCv? Addition Al comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.): - NLC. CLT }-? i nV-E:?S1? ce(?;Ur?- L44)LrL_L_Q C_o ryla" u-)C x kd U-PlAnd ' fyi (lcyj"?, LL)GOCRXI UDC+kCLrt_U?, ?- _jy?? , % v %_-s lca?rd-e r? oLi aria"-)er- ?r yer ?[C?%??n SYVU Lam( axtd LICLO ) C? VC ' I 1 b u kk, i1? r JV V? ?o ?, v?.Q be ??t LA-0 "-0_U-A'S •7?r yrnt. ,cx? &*0 Smw .as C'L?k . 1h;s Ox-? 0VJLr ?Hebe(-vc&A-i x, ;? fce-l . Mme in ?i) re-wr* cx-) CA- -ef?ruir"ry? ar o ?ha? ?_A KvaL+- /d?rr? do ? . KVC., CA-T- pU, CL+- IAC? l X/ -- c(to -QC)Lvo"'Os 0'e o-r?- Wv4- ,4r"C" 2r?_ k S_Z?-k? jdcwA? aiu- Lo_" --meAc r JC S,(. L L l li 11, c - i r& tom l.1 L- uSe o cur-(-L%" Z .-khe S e_r?d ()J? Si }e, 0CLkX- fie, ?r CA- ? e l r CA (_1 . _L_ Cti b1-ye w ?1v Via-u t- -V-C? ' a_ Vt_.ticd CIO JA" be v. oc?x- &V\--ve_C Dan C9 -rt ?a 5 c?cfi?t'? (AC) cc-oo-rd Cr Ixo- "-aLp ', \Ao *h(" G_QLCL tee- ?bSer-?l . Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 2 of 2 .? Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table NC Division of Water Quality Component: 28.46 acres Wetland Preservation Component ID: 19960353-1 Description: primarily forested wetlands Location within project: , GLQI III. Success Criteria Evaluation: HYDROLOGY - Approved Success Criteria: Wetland Hydrology Indicators: none listed Inundated Saturated in upper 12 inches Monitoring report indicates success Yes No Drift lines Observational field data agrees? Yes No Drainage patterns in wetlands based on mitigation plan? Yes No Sediment deposits based on wetland type? Yes No Water marks List any remaining hydrology issues to address (e.g. remaining ditches, excessive water, etc.) SOILS - Approved Success Criteria: na Are soils hydric or becoming hydric? Yes No List indicators of hydric soils: List any remaining soil issues to address (e.g. erosion, upland areas, etc.): VEGETATION - Approved Success Criteria: Dominant Plant Species none listed Species Story TPAP'1o cover Monitoring report indicates success? Yes No Average TPA for entire site (per report): Observational field data agrees? Yes No based on community composition? Yes No based on TPA and/or % cover? Yes No Vegetation planted on site? Yes No Date of last planting: Vegetation growing successfully? Yes No Specific vegetation plots or site locations with little to no vegetation: Estimated acreage or site percentage of unvegetated areas: Invasive species on site (species, location(s), and % cover): List any remaining vegetation issues to address (e.g. plant survival, concerns, etc.): Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 1 of 2 Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table NC Division of Water Quality NCWAM - Approved Success Criteria or Evaluative Techniques: NCWAM Type on Site: na Coastal Riverine Monitoring report indicates success? Yes No Riparian Observational field data agrees? Yes No Non-riparian (wetter) Attach NCWAM analysis results to this report. Non-riparian (drier) List any remaining NCWAM issues to address (e.g. functionality, developing wetland type, etc.) MITIGATION SUCCESS: Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this component is: successful partially successful unsuccessful List specific reasons for lack of success for this component: Additional comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.): During site visit, document representative conditions and areas of concern. Observe preservation and enhancement areas that may not have specific success criteria. Label and attach photos to this report. Attach maps showing photo locations, areas of concern, and important field observations. - Additional notes related to evaluation of this component: Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 2 of 2