20170520 Ver 3 _PCN Application _20180222

February 15, 2018
Kinston
KINi -TON! PUBLIC SE'JR -ITS'"111 Mft CRY
Buildings & Grounds, Business Office, Electric, Engineering, Environmental Services, III I
Fleet Maintenance, Meter Reading, Stormwater, Streets, Wastewater, and Water 2009
Kinston, the right place ... Kinston public Srrvims, the right choice
Ms. Karen Higgins, Supervisor
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Water Resources Division
401 and Buffer Permitting Branch
512 North Salisbury Street
Archdale Building — 9th floor
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
RE: Response to Comments
Waste Water Collection System Improvements
Briery Run Sewer Rehabilitation Phase IV
City of Kinston
Lenoir County
Dear Ms. Higgins:
Please find enclosed one (1) copy of The Plans, Specifications aPre-Construction Notification (PCN)
Form, and supporting documentation which includes Watershed Classification Attachment, Wetlands
Evaluation, and The Categorical Exclusion issued by Water Infrastructure for the above referenced
project. The Plans and specifications have been revised in response to comments from your
November 30, 2017, letter requesting additional information, and this package has also been
submitted electronically.
Plan Details for stream Impacts:
Please enumerate all stream impacts including fill slopes /dissipater pads/ other impacts on
the site plan and clearly label impacts (Stream Impact 1, etc.). The division recommends
highlighting by hatching or shading all impacts areas for temporary impact areas and
permanent impact areas. In addition, please provide cross section details showing the
provisions for aquatic life passage. Also, please provide a detailed engineering plan, profile
view, and cross-section of all proposed culverts. These drawings must include details
regarding stream alignment in relation to pipe alignment, pipe slope, pipe burial, and dissipater
pad [15A NCAC 02H .0502(g)(b, and (b)92)]
The application form, PCN, Plans and Specifications have been revised as follows:
All stream crossings are noted on the Plans and they are enumerated as they are in the
application form, PCN. All crossings will be made using Construction Matting as shown on the
Plans and described in the Specifications and The Application (PCN form) See Section D1 on
Post OKce Box 339 Kinston, North Carolina 28502 Phone [phone] Fax [phone]

page 7 of 12. Construction Matting will be laid on existing grade causing minimal impact to the
area. Construction Matting will be temporary and construction matting will not be allowed to
stay on the ground through the entire project. See the stream crossing detail which will allow
aquatic life to pass over the temporary crossing. No culverts are being proposed. The Stream
Crossing Narrative has been revised to include discussion on Buffers and Station Numbers.
The Wetland Narrative has been revised to remove any reference to Rip -rap stream crossings.
The Plans and the Specifications have also been revised to remove the reference to rip -rap
stream crossings. See Sheet 4 of 14, Sheet 5 of 14, Sheet 6 of 14 and Sheet 9 Of 14 of the
Plans.
Plan Details for buffer impacts:
Please enumerate all riparian buffer impacts on the site plan and clearly label impacts (Buffer
Impact 1, etc.). The Division recommends highlighting by hatching or shading all impacts
areas for temporary areas and permanent impact areas. [15A NCAC 02H .0233(8)(b)(iv)]
This project is Exempt from the rule, since it is ongoing activity for maintenance of a sewer
installed in 1973 (before July 22, 1997. [15A NCAC 02H .023(3)(b)(i)] However, the City
wishes to comply with the rule and maintain the buffer in good faith. The Buffers are noted on
the Plan and the Temporary Impact is construction matting through the buffers, and is noted in
Section D1 on page 7 of 12.. The Buffers are listed and discussed in the Stream Crossing
Narrative, and they are shown on the Plans, See Sheet 4 of 14, Sheet 5 of 14, Sheet 6 of 14
and Sheet 9 Of 14 of the Plans.
Any additions which were made to the narratives and the Application (PCN Form), were done in red.
I trust that changes made in the application, plans and specifications are adequate for approval.
Thank you for your consideration, and we await your approval of the plans. Should you have any
questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me by phone at [phone] or by e-mail
at john.iarrell(ii,)ci.kinston.nc.us.
;Sonceregly,
hn A. Jarrell, IIIP.E.
ty Enineer
Enclosures:
cc: Mr. Steve Miller, Assistant Director of Public Services
Mr. Brian Lucas, Water Resources Manager
Mr. Justin Howard, Engineer
Mr. Charles Sutton, Inspector
Mr. Robert Tankard, Washington Regional Office Supervisor
Mr. Anthony Scarbraugh, Washington Regional Office
Mr. Gary Beecher, US Army Corps of Engineers, Washington
Post OfFce Box 339 Kinston, North Carolina 28502 Phone [phone] Fax [phone]

I_v11iI I� T 'fNl Pel i!E CLIC SE1I�CES1
FUBIIG
Buildings & Grounds, Business Office, Electric, Engineering, Environmental Services,
Fleet Maintenance, Meter Reading, Stormwater, Streets, Wastewater, and Water
Kinston, the nghtplace ... Kinston Puhlic Services, the right choice.
Kinston
2009
CITY OF KINSTON
�7
E�C��O��l� p���®NSTG3�C�TBON NC�TOG�Oc�nT�ON ��1�M9i�i�,L�
FOR
P1 ]AGE W ' MIERY RUN OUTFALL SEWER 6' EHABIM T M
THE CITY OF F(INSTON SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM
RHONDA BARWICIC, ®IRECTOR OF PUBLIC SERVICES
STEVE MILLER, P.E., ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SERVICES
BRIAN LUCAS, WATER RESOURCES MANAGER
JOHN JARRELL, P.E., CITY ENGINEER

ii, 1i iii ii ;'� liirgo7k ffwfi
BRIERY RUN SEWER REHABILITATION PHASE Iv
LIST OF DOCUMENTS
71r1��
1. PRE -CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION (PCN) FORM 12
A. 401 & Buffer Permitting PCN Checklist 3
B. Property and Easement Information 1
C. Project Description (from Erosion and Sediment Control Permit) 2
D. STREAM CROSSING NARRATIVE 6
1. FORM WSCAS, WATERSHED CLASSIFICATION 2
2, USGS MAP of The Project Area 1
3, Briery Run Phase IV Stream Crossing Map 1
4. July 26, 2017 Site determination 2
a. USGS Map of Project Area 1
b. USDA Lenoir County Soils Map of Project Area 1
E. WETLAND NARRATIVE 12
1. Briery Run Phase IV Project Access Map 1
2, Briery Run Phase IV Soils Map 1
3, Briery Run Phase IV Topographical Map 1
F. Neuse River Basin Map 1
G. USGS Topographical Map in a pocket 1
H. NRCS/USDA Soil Map and Survey information 37
I. EREID approval and Categorical Exclusion 3
5. ATTACHMENTS
A. Plans 14 Sheets
B. Specifications 394 Pages
i

Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1,
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
X Section 404 Permit X Section 10 Permit
1b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 12 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑Yes
X No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular X Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express X Riparian Buffer Authorization
Is.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes X No
For the record only
❑ Yes
for Corps Permit:
X No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
X No
1g,
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes
X No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
X No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Briery Run Sewer Rehabilitation Phase IV
2b,
County:
Lenoir
2c.
Nearest municipality I town:
Kinston
2d.
Subdivision name:
N/A
2e.
3.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state N/A
project no:
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
See attached Table: "Property and Easement Information"
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
See attached Table: "Property and Easement Information"
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
City of Kinston, Tony Sears, City Manager
3d.
Street address:
207 East King Street
3e.
City, state, zip:
Kinston, North Carolina, 28501
3f.
Telephone no.:
[phone]
3g.
Fax no.:
[phone]
3h.
Email address:
tony.sears(d?ci.kinston.nc.us
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b.
Name:
4c.
4d.
Business name
(if applicable):
Street address:
4e.
City, state, zip:
4f.
Telephone no.:
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
John A. Jarrell III, P.E.
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
City of Kinston, City Engineer
5c.
Street address:
2360 Highway 258 South
5d.
City, state, zip:
Kinston, North Carolina, 28504
5e.
Telephone no.:
[phone]
5f.
Fax no.:
[phone]
5g.
Email address:
John, 4arrellOci.kinston.nc.us
Page 2 of 12

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
la.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
See attached Table: "Property and Easement
Information"
1b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude (See Form WSCAS) Longitude: -
START: (35.310537) START: (-77.545717)
END: (35.30761) END: (-77.59149)
1c.
Property size:
962.29 acres Easement Area = 11.76 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
proposed project:
Briery Run
2b.
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
See Form WSCAS, and Map of Stream Crossings
which are attached
2c.
River basin: map is available at
http://h2o,enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/
Neuse, See Map
3.
Project Description
3a.
Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
A 30 inch sewer outfall extends East along Briery Run Stream from Airport Road to Wallace Family
Road The adjacent land is presently Zoned RA -6 RA -20 and RA -12 The Sewer
line
runs
along the
edge of the 100 year Flood plain and occasionally dips into the flood plain
and
crosses the
flood
plain
of
Briery Run The surrounding area for the most part is cultivated farm land
The
sewer
line and
the
cleared easement is within Bottom land Forest/Hardwood Swamps9 and
other
Broadleaf
Deciduous
Forest
which are associated with wetlands on the Land Cover Map The Sewer line
is shown
to run adjacent
to
and cross the wetlands associated with Briery Run on the Project Access Map.
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
155.88 See attached Table: "Property and Easement Information" and Project Access Map,
3c.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
24,745 feet See attached Table: "Property and Easement Information" and Stream Crossing Map
3d.
Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The 30 inch concrete sewer was installed in the early 1970s and has developed leaks and is experiencing
deterioration due to hydrogen sulfide The ipe is structurally sound
but the
manholes
have developed
leaks and need to be rehabilitated The City plans to rehabilitate the line and
manholes
using a no dig,
CIPP method Temporary access using construction mats is being proposed
so that
the
impact to the
wetlands will be minimal.
3e.
Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The rehabilitation of the Briery Run Sewer line has been a multi -phase project The proposed Phase IV
will consist of providing access to the 14,824 feet of sewer line using construction mats, 39 of
the
49
manholes will be raised a cured in place rehabilitation of 36 of the
49 manholes
and
a cured
in place
rehabilitation of 4,290+/- feet of the 30 inch sewer line. A Sewer System Evaluation
Survey was
performed and an Engineering Report and Environmental Impact Document were completed
to
determine the scope of the project The final Phase Phase V of the rehabilitation
will
be a
future project
once funding has been established See the attached Erosion Control Project Description with the Erosion
Control Permit Application, for more details.
Page 3 of 12
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments: Areas taken from NC GIS, and NC Land Use
Maps.. See attached Wetland Narrative.
X Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
X Preliminary ❑ Final
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): See attached Wetland Narrative
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
4d.
If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Determinations were made by both the Corps and the State on July 11, 2017. See attached letter
5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ❑ No X Unknown
5b.
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
N/A
6,
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
X Yes ❑ No
6b.
If yes, explain.
This project is Phase IV of a project which has been ongoing for 15 years Rehabilitation of Briery Run
Sewer. Before the project was begun The Waste water treatment plant would experience influent flows in
excess of the permitted limit during heavy rainfall events Phase I was completed in 2001, and included
rehabilitation of 14 manholes and 2,482 feet of 30 inch Sewer line between Highway
I I
and
the
Briery
Run Liftstation Phase II of the rehabilitation included 1,333 feet of 15" sewer and 435 feet of 24" sewer
and replacement of 12 manholes between Rouse Road and Graham Drive and was completed in 2006.
Phase III of the rehabilitation included 1 137 feet of 30 inch sewer line and
replacement
of
12 manholes
between Graham Drive and Airport Road and was completed in 2010 Phase
IV will
rehabilitate
Raise
39 manholes rehabilitate 36 manholes and rehabilitate 4,290 feet of 30" Sewer
line between
Airport
Road
and Wallace Family Road A future Phase V Rehabilitation is planned
for the
Sewer line
between
Wallace Family Road and Highway 11 After Phase V is completed
The
City will
evaluate
past phases
to
fill in gaps left due to the lack of funds because each Phase was limited
because of the
funds
available
for
the project The City plans to complete Phase V in 2019 to 2020 pending approval
of the
funding
and
permitting.
Page 4 of 12

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
X Wetlands X Streams - tributaries X Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b,
2c.
2d,
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested*
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ❑ P XT
Temporary Access
Riverine Swamp
❑ Yes
X Corps
0.15
Crossing
Forrest
X No
X DWQ
W2 ❑ P XT
Temporary Access
Bottomland
❑ Yes
X Corps
0.36
Crossing
Hardwood
X No
X DWQ
W3 ❑ P X T
Temporary Access
Bottomland
❑ Yes
X Corps
0.22
Crossing
Hardwood
X No
X DWQ
W4 ❑ P X T
Temporary Access
Bottomland
❑ Yes
X Corps
0.02
Crossing
Hardwood
X No
X DWQ
❑ P X T
Temporary Access
Bottomland
❑ Yes
X Corps
0.11
W5
Crossing
Hardwood
X No
X DWQ
W6 ❑ P X T
Temporary Access
Riverine Swamp
❑ Yes
X Corps
0.72
Crossing
Forrest
X No
X DWQ
W7 ❑ P X T
TemporaryAccess
Riverine Swamp
❑ Yes
X Corps
0.12
Crossing
Forrest
X No
X DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
1.70
2h. Comments:*Forested around cleared easement. See Project Access Map. Although more than 1 acre is impacted,
the Impact is necessary, temporary (Construction Mats) and minimized. See Section D 1 1a and b on page 7 of 12.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for ail stream sites impacted. *Water ponding at the crossing, Temporary Crossing with Construction Mats.
3a.
3b,
3c,
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 EJ P X T
Temporary
UT to Briery Run*
X PER
X Corps
40
10
Crossing
❑ INT
X DWQ
S2 F1 P X T
Temporary
Briery Run
X PER
X Corps
10
10
Crossing
❑ INT
X DWQ
S3 F-1 P X T
TC
Brieemprary ry Run
X PER
X Cs
15
10
ossi g
❑ NT
X DWQ
S4 ❑ P X T
Temporary
Briery Run
X PER
X Corps
15
10
Crossing
❑ INT
X DWQ
S5 ❑ P X T
Temporary
Briery Run
X PER
X Corps
15
10
Crossing
❑ INT
X DWQ
S6 ❑ P X T
Temporary
UT to Briery Run
X PER
X Corps
5
10
Crossing
❑ INT
I X DWQ
S7 ❑ P X T
Temporary
UT to Briery Run
El PER
X Corps
40
10
Crossing
X INT
X DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
70
Page 5 of 12

3i. Comments:
Of the 7 stream crossings 4 crossings are for briery Run, and 3 are unnamed tributaries to Briery Run
See the Stream Crossing Map,
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indii idually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number —
Permanent (P)
or Temporary
T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 ❑ P ❑ T
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
02 ❑ P ❑ T
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
03 ❑ P ❑ T
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
04 ❑ P ❑ T
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
4f. Total open water impacts
N/A
4g. Comments: N/A
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID
number
5b,
Proposed use or purpose of
pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
P2
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
5f. Total
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
5g. Comments: N/A
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes X No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
N/A
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
N/A
5k. Method of construction:
N/A
Page 6 of 12

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
X Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c,
6d,
6e,
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number —
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P)
for impact
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
or Temporary
required?
T
B1 ❑ P XT
Temporary
Crossing
UT to Briery Run
EI Yes
X No
600
400
B2 El P X T
Temporary Crossing
Briery Run
❑X Yes
600
400
B3 ❑ P X T
Temporary
Crossing
Briery Run
El Yes
X No
600
400
B4 ❑ P X T
Temporary
Crossing
Briery Run
El Yes
X No
600
400
B5 ❑ P X T
Temporary
Crossing
Briery Run
❑ Yes
X No
600
400
B6 ❑ P X T
Temporary
Crossing
UT to Briery Run
❑ Yes
X No
600
400
B7 ❑ P XT
Temporary
Coss
UT to Briery Run
EI
YNo
600
400
6h. Total buffer Impacts
41200
2,800
61. Comments:
The Buffer is In an area that is maintained for the Sewer line maintenance in accordance with the Neuse Buffer Rules
and because the sewer line and the cleared buffer existed in 1973, prior to July 22, 1997, in accordance with 15 NCAC
02B .0233 (3) (b) (i). Any additional impacts to the Buffers will be temporary. Buffer will be reestablished as it was
before the project when project is complete. Impacts to stream crossings, riparian buffers and wetlands will be
temporary and minimized by using construction mats, and any Impacts will be repaired once the project is over.
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
By using construction mats to provide access for the construction equipment, impacts to wetlands, streams and riparian
buffers will be minimized for this project. By using Trenchless techniques in the rehabilitation the impacts to the wetlands,
streams and riparian buffers will be minimized. Part of the construction effort involves reestablishing vegetation so any
temporary impacts will mitigated.
b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
The project will use trenchless technology for the rehabilitation where ever it is possible. Manholes and pipe will be
rehabilitated using cured in place methods wherever it is possible. Construction mats will be used for access, and the
construction mats will be removed as soon as possible. A vegetative cover will be established prior to close out of the project.
Page 7 of 12

2.
Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the
U.S. or Waters of the State
2a.
Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
❑
Yes
X No
Type N/A
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
3c,
Comments: N/A
4.
2b.
If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
4a.
❑
DWQ
❑ Corps
4b.
Stream mitigation requested:
❑
Mitigation
bank
2c.
If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project?
4d.
❑
Payment to in -lieu fee program
square feet
4e.
Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
❑
Permittee
Responsible Mitigation
3.
Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank N/A
3a.
Name of Mitigation Bank: N/A
3b,
Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type N/A
Quantity N/A
3c,
Comments: N/A
4.
Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
N/A
4a.
Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b.
Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c.
If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d.
Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e.
Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f.
Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g.
Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h.
Comments: NIA
S.
Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation
Plan
5a.
If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
The permittee plans to require installation of construction mats for temporary access and no changes will be
made to the flow characteristics of the runoff. Once vegetation is re-established, there will be no evidence that
the project took place.
Page 8 of 12

6.
Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) —required by DWQ
6a.
Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
F1 Yes
X No
buffer mitigation? If Yes you will have to fill out this entire form — please
contact the State for more information.
6b.
If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
Zone
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone
1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone
2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g.
If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to
private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
N/A
6h,
Comments: After the construction project is completed, the Buffer Areas will be returned to the pre -construction
condition.
Page 9 of 12

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
X
Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: Stormwater routing and flow characteristics will not be change by
F-1
Yes X No
the construction project. Diffuse flow will be maintained, and flow will be
overland, and every attempt will be made to reduce point source flows into
collector tributaries.
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
0.00%
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑
Yes X No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: The
project
will not change the flow
characteristics of the stormwater runoff. Silt, Sediment and Erosion Control Plan
insures the water quality of the
runoff, and the project will comply with the previously approved Kinston Stormwater Management Plan for
Nitrogen Control.
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative
description of the plan:
N/A
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? The City of Kinston has
Kinston,
North Carolina
set
up a Stormwater Utility to implement and enforce the Neuse Rules
❑
Phase II
X
NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs
❑
USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑
Water Supply Watershed
❑
Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑
Yes X No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑
Coastal counties
❑
HOW
4a.
Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑
ORW
(check all that apply):
❑
Session Law 2006-246
X
Other: Neuse Rules
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑
Yes X No
attached?
5,
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
X
Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
X
Yes ❑ No
Page 10 of 12
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1, Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
X Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
X Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
X Yes ❑ No
Comments: Categorical Exclusion Letter is Attached. See Letter Dated
November 1, 2016, from Seth Robertson, PE, Chief State Revolving Fund
Section.
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes X No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): NIA
3, Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
X Yes ❑ No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The project will rehabilitate the existing sewer which and not an expansion of the sewer collection system, but the
improved efficiency of the existing sewer line will and allow for increased flow and increased permitted flow. However, no
more flow will be allowed than was included in the original plan when the line was permitted.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Sewage from the development will ultimately be treated by the Kinston Water Reclamation Facility which
presently treats an Average Daily Flow of 4.56 MGD and the design capacity is 11.85
MGD.
The
Treatment
Plant uses the Johannesburg Process which provides tertiary treatment for nitrogen removal
and
denitrification filters are also part of the treatment process by providing
additional
denitrification
and
effluent
polishing by filtration Disinfection is provided by Ultra Violet light.
Page 11 of 12

So
Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a.
Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes X No
habitat?
5b.
Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
X Yes ❑ No
impacts?
X Raleigh
5c.
If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d.
What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
For the Engineering Report and Environmental Impact Document, I used the United States Fish and Wildlife web
site, www.fws.gov,
6.
Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a.
Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes X No
6b.
What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
For the Engineering Report and Environmental Impact Document, I used the United States Fish and Wildlife
website, www.fws.aov.
7.
Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a.
Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes X No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b.
What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
For the Engineering Report and Environmental Impact Document, I used the North Carolina Natural Heritage web
site, www.ncnhp.org.
6. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
Be,
Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
X Yes ❑ No
8b.
If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: As part of this Project the top of all Manholes will be raised to
two feet above the 100 year Flood elevation.
8c.
What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FIRM Maps and GIS Mapping
1lican
rZ2/1Zl%
Tony Sears, City Manager
Ply
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
A Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
Isprovided.)
Page 12 of 12

Version 1.4
January 9, 2009
401 & Buffer Permitting PCN Submittal Checklist
X The application fee (Checks may be made out to "N.C. Division of Water Resources"
$240.00 for 401 Water Quality Certification with minor impacts
$570.00 for 401 Water Quality Certification with major impacts
Express Review Fee (Amount requested on Acceptance Letter)
X Four (4) complete and collated copies of the PCN Application and supporting
documentation (instead of providing 4 copies of the full size plans you may provide two
copies of full size plans along with two copies of 11 X 17 plans)
X Stormwater Management Plan (if applicable — see PCN Form Help File Section E)
I. No Changes in Stormwater Routing or overland flow, and no changes in
impervious area.
1) Please provide three (3) copies of the stormwater management plans along with all
supporting information pertaining to this project including the following:
a. Entire site development/layout plans delineating all drainage areas;
b. Design calculation sheets for all proposed BMP(s) sized for both on-site and
off-site drainage;
c. BMP supplements for each proposed BMP and Required Items Check List
(htti)://portal ncdenr org/web/Ir/bmp-manual) along with all required items;
d. A Notarized Operation & Maintenance Agreement for each stormwater
management facility;
e. Detailed construction drawing sheets shall include
(i) Erosion and sediment control plans;
(ii) Installation and planting schedules for the proposed BMPs;
(iii) Appropriately scaled plan views and cross sectional details of all
BMPs and associated components — inlet and outlet structures,
forebay, respective zones and pertinent elevations.
X If your project is located within a State implemented Riparian Buffer Rule Area, submit the
following along with site plans and PCN form:
1) Three (3) copies of the details for on-site diffuse flow provisions, (refer to
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/Ir/bmp-manual .
X DWR Stream Determination Forms for streams on property and DWR determination
letter for wetlands or streams (if applicable).
The following is the most critical of all the information that you must provide. The quality and
detail of the information will often determine the expeditiousness of the review. The following is
a checklist of the types of pertinent information required at a minimum:
Maps and Plans:
X The most recent version of the 1:24,000 USGS Topographic Map - Please cleanly draw or
delineate the site boundaries on the topographic map.
X The most recent version of the bound and published County NRCS Soil Survey Map -
(required for projects within the Neuse River Basin, Tar -Pamlico River Basin, Randleman
Lake Watershed and the Catawba River Basin, also recommended for all projects) -
Please clearly delineate the site boundaries, etc. on the map. If the delineation obscures

Version 1.4
January 9, 2009
any of the features, it is recommended that a clean copy be provided. Copies of the
current soil survey and/or soil survey map sheets can be obtained from the local NRCS
County Office (hftp://www.nc.nrcs.gLda.govn. GIS soil layers are not acceptable.
X Vicinity map - Please clearly mark the location and approximate boundaries of the property
and project on the map. Please indicate north arrow and scale. Please include applicable
road names or State Road numbers.
X The Site Plan - The most critical map to be provided is the site plan. You must provide full
sized plans. The following is the minimum list of plans that are typically needed.
X Pre-construction/Pre-existing conditions -This sheet (or sheets) must include:
• All jurisdictional and non -jurisdictional wetland, stream, water features, State regulated
buffers (delineated into Zones 1 and 2)
Topographic contours with elevations
Any existing structures and impervious areas
• Existing utility lines and easements
Existing roads, culverts, and other pertinent features
North arrow and the scale (1":50' scale is recommended).
X Proposed conditions -This sheet (or sheets) must include:
• All jurisdictional and non -jurisdictional wetland, stream, water features, State regulated
buffers (delineated into Zones 1 and 2)
Lot layout (if a subdivision or commercial development is proposed) - lots must be
developable without further impacts to jurisdictional and non -jurisdictional wetlands,
streams water features and State regulated buffers. Building envelopes must be
provided when streams, wetlands, riparian buffers, or water features exist on a lot
• All built -out structures and impervious cover
• Final grading contours with elevations
• All utilities and easements (including septic fields on all lots within 100 feet of stream,
wetland, or water features - if applicable)
• Impacted areas — these should correspond with the Impact numbers listed on your PCN
form.
X Drainage Plans -Final drainage plans must include the following:
• Locations and pertinent elevations and sizes of the stormwater collection system and
drainage ways
All inlets and outlets must also be shown with pertinent elevations (All outlets to
wetlands must be at a non-erosive velocity, generally less than 2 ft/sec during the peak
flow from the 10 -yr storm)
• Scaled stormwater BMPs must also be indicated as required by DWR rules and policies
In certain cases (see Section E of PCN form), final stormwater management plans must
also be provided (see Stormwater Management Plan Checklist)
X Proposed Impacts -All impacts to jurisdictional and non -jurisdictional wetland, stream,
water features, and State regulated buffers must be shown and labeled on the site plans at
a scale no smaller than 1" = 50'. All excavation, fill, flooding, stabilization, and other impacts
that will be conducted in or near jurisdictional and non -jurisdictional wetland, stream, water
features, and State regulated buffers must be indicated. Please provide cross sectional

Version 1.4
January 9, 2009
details showing the provisions for aquatic life passage (burial of culvert 20% for culverts 5 48
inches, and 1 -foot for culverts > 48 inches).
Wetland Impacts: SEE NARRATIVE
X Precise grading and final elevation contours must be provided. Existing
vegetation and any clearing must be specified.
X All subsurface utility lines must indicate the location of anti -seep collars.
Construction detail for anti -seep collars must be provided.
X Roadway or other crossings of riparian wetlands may require floodway culverts to
maintain existing hydrological conditions.
X Plans should show that the hydrology of remaining wetlands on the site will be
maintained.
Stream Impacts:
X Stream impacts must be clearly shown on the plans. The centerline as well as
the banks of the stream must be surveyed or located by GPS for the portion of
the stream to be impacted.
N/A The inlet and the outlet of all culverts should be aligned with the stream as
much as possible. Inlet and outlet elevations and streambed elevations should
be indicated. Any inlet or outlet protection must be shown and enumerated on
the impact map(s).
NIA For bottomless culverts or other spans, a vertical cross section should be
provided that shows the minimum distance from each span to each stream bank,
the stream cross section, the height of the span above the stream and the
minimum distance from the edge of each footer to each stream bank.
Additionally, please provide a signed and sealed geotechnical report of
subsurface soils at the proposed bottomless culvert location. The report must
comply with the Division of Highways — Guidelines for Drainage Studies and
Hydraulic Design, prepared by A.L. Hankins, Jr., State Hydraulics Engineer -
1999.
N/A Multiple culverts or sectioned box culverts typically require the use of sills, off
-
setting or other means to match the cross section of the existing stream (in order
to maintain stream stability and provide aquatic life passage). A vertical cross
section of the culverts should be shown overlain with the up and downstream
stream cross section including the stream flood -prone area.
N/A Impacts associated with dam construction must indicate and enumerate all fill
associated with the dam footprint, spillway and any bank stream bank
stabilization. The length of stream impounded must also be indicated and
enumerated.

§
!
§
B
5
E
§
[
{
]
!
E
}
Cd
2f
k\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
(
;§
;(
!)
!§
0m
w(
!m
\
!§
§
!2
!2
r:
§2
J:
Z2
22
22
l2
}{
){
U0
{§f
~
{
/f
27
;f
])
®:
3
z
\
:
-
-
-
§
.
))
\)
])
E
E)
0
00
!2{
/®
§)2
2R
«(
®f
{}
j2
!&
)2
!{
-
!2
3;
!J
«{
«/
){
)\
/\
to;
(()
j{
§)
\)
§)
§)
§7
§i
\)
\\
§\
§\
§k
!)
N)
:7
--
-
(}
)
-
-
_
\(
:/)]
f)
�\
!F
Q
_
§
§k
!
�!
:aK
,!
«,
!:
!:
,!!!§!§&
;
z/
6
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
�

City of Kinston Phase IV Briery Run Sewer Rehabilitation 3/27/17
t p l
The project is located along Briery Run, one of the streams which collects runoff from the
Kinston/ Lenoir County area and flows to Stoneyton Creek and on to the Neuse River. The
rehabilitation of the Sewer line which follows this stream has been a multi phased project. Phase
I, II, and III have been completed. The current project is Phase IV of the Briery Run Sewer
Rehabilitation and is for the rehabilitation of the Briery Run Sewer from Airport Road to
Wallace Family Road. The line is a thirty (30) inch Sewer Outfall, and it is being rehabilitated
because of the deterioration which has occurred, and the extreme amount of Inflow and
Infiltration which is occurring. In order to minimize erosion the rehabilitation will use a no dig
solution. However, access will be difficult, so construction mats are proposed to protect the
wetlands and to reduce and control the land disturbing activities on this project. Any future
maintenance activities on this section of the Sewer line will also use construction mats. In Phase
IV of the Briery Run Sewer Rehabilitation, thirty nine (39) manholes will be raised, then thirty-
six (36) manholes will be rehabilitated using a cured in place liner.in the manhole. This is a no
dig solution, so the only land disturbance will be the access. In addition the project will include
rehabilitation of 4,238 feet of 30 inch concrete pipe with a cured in place liner. The
rehabilitation method is also a no dig solution, so the only land disturbance will be the access to
the site. The construction sequence will be:
1. The First Step will be the installation of the silt fence on the down gradient side of the
access path, and / or between the proposed path and Briery Run Creek.
2. The Second Step will be to install the creek crossings which are a combination of two
rock check dam with a rock lined bottom across the creels.
3. The Third Step in the construction process will be laying out the 14,824 feet of access
construction mats on the path which has already been cleared and is maintained as
required by DWQ. This layout will cause minor disturbance of 3.4 acres as proposed
in the FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY/OWNERSHIP FORM SEDIMENTATION
POLUTION CONTROL ACT.
4. The Fourth Step will be to raise the thirty-nine (39) manholes that are less than 2 feet
above the 100 year Flood elevation.
5. The Fifth Step will be the rehabilitation of the thirty-six (36) manholes using a cured
in place rehabilitation method.
6. The Sixth Step will be the rehabilitation of the sections of the sewer pipe which have
been prioritized the rehabilitation will use a cured in place method.
7. The Seventh Step will be revegetation of the land which will have been disturbed
including the area where the construction mats will have been placed. Once
vegetation has been established, the vegetation will naturally prevent erosion, and

City of Kinston Phase IV Briery Run Sewer Rehabilitation 3/27/17
sediment will be deposited from the runoff which will be slowed by the vegetation.
8. Finally, the Eighth Step once the vegetation is established, the silt fences will be
removed.

STREAM CROSSING NARRATIVE
The Form WSCAS; which lists the location, Name of the stream, County, River Basin,
Stream Index Number and the Stream Classification for each stream which was
crossed; was completed; and it is attached. As part of the Form WSCAS, an 8.5 X 11
USGS map of the project area is attached. In addition an evaluation was done by
Anthony Scarbraugh and Chris Pullinger of the Division of Water Resources in the field
on July 11, 2017, and it was documented by a letter from Robert Tankard dated July 26,
2017. The letter included five stream evaluations, and the field notes on a USDA Lenoir
County Soils Map, and a USGS Map. The Letter and attachments are included. The
Determination was that Briery Run and two of the streams that were crossed were
subject to the Neuse buffer rules. From the Briery Run Phase IV Stream Crossing Map,
Stream Crossing number 7 was not considered subject to the Neuse Buffer Rules.
Stream Crossing number 1, from Station 110+98.2 to Station 111+29.1, consists of a
large ponding area over the sewer line, but the stream flows into the ponding area and
out of the ponding area and into Briery Run. The stream is an unnamed tributary to
Briery Run, and the stream drains overflow from a pond which is up hill from Briery Run
A picture of the crossing is on the bottom of page 3. This crossing is subject to the
Neuse Buffer Rules, but the stream bank is not well defined, and any flow of stormwater
will be overland to the ponding area. It is anticipated that a construction mat will be
used for the construction equipment crossing this stream. No other modifications will be
constructed for access. The top of the Stream Bank is well defined so the edge of water
was used as top of Bank, and the Buffers are delineated as Zone 1 from Station
110+68.2 to Station 110+98.2, and from Station 111+29.1 to Station 111+59.1. Zone 2
is delineated from Station 110+48.3 to Station 110+68.2, and from Station 111+59.1 to
Station 111+79.1. See Plan Sheet 9 Of 14,
Stream Crossing number 2, from Station 68+91.7 to Station 69+11.8, is just east of
Highway 58 North. This stream crossing is a crossing of Briery run, and it is subject to
the Neuse Buffer Rules. The channel and stream bank at this crossing are well defined,
but the Northern bank is approximately 3 feet higher than the Southern bank. The
Northern bank will have to be graded so that construction equipment can cross the
stream at this point. Once the bank is graded, equipment will use a construction mat for
the crossing. Once construction is finished, the stream bank will be revegetated. There
is a picture of this stream crossing on the top of page 4. The Banks are well defined.
No other modifications will be constructed for access. Since the tops of the Stream
Banks are well defined, the Buffers are delineated as Zone 1 from Station 68+61.7 to
Station 68+91.7, and from Station 69+11.8 to Station 69+43.6, Zone 2 is delineated
from Station 68+41.7 to Station 68+61.7, and from Station 69+43.6 to Station 69+70.4,
See Plan Sheet 6 of 14.
Stream Crossing number 3, from Station 65+87.8 to Station 65+97.8, is a crossing of
Briery Run, and it is subject to the Neuse Buffer Rules. The Channel and the stream
bank are well defined and neither approach to the crossing is too steep. It is anticipated
that equipment will use a construction mat for the crossing. There should be no
adverse effect of the construction equipment crossing the stream crossing at this

location. There is a picture of the stream crossing on the bottom of page 4. The Banks
are well defined. No other modifications will be constructed for access. Since the tops
of the Stream Banks are well defined, the Buffers were delineated as Zone 1 from
Station 65+57.8 to Station 65+87.8, and from Station 65+97.8 to Station 66+27.8. Zone
2 is delineated from Station 65+37.8 to Station 65+57.8, and from Station 66+27.8 to
Station 66+47.8, See Plan Sheet 6 Of 14,
Stream Crossing number 4, from Station 64+27.8 to Station 64+38.2, is a crossing of
Briery Run, and it is subject to the Neuse Buffer Rules, The Channel and the stream
bank are well defined and neither approach to the crossing is too steep. It is anticipated
that equipment will use a construction mat for the crossing. There should be no
adverse effect of the construction equipment crossing the stream crossing at this
location. There is a picture of the stream crossing on the top of page 5. The Banks are
well defined. No other modifications will be constructed for access. Since the tops of
the Stream Banks are well defined, the Buffers are delineated as Zone 1 from Station
63+96.7 to Station 64+27.8, and from Station 64+38.2 to Station 64+69.3. Zone 2 is
delineated from Station 63+75.9 to Station 63+96.7, and from Station 64+69.3 to Station
64+90.1. See Plan Sheet 6 of 14.
Stream crossing Number 5, from Station 59+07.2 to Station 59+29.9, is a crossing of
Briery Run, and it is subject to the Neuse Buffer Rules. The Channel and the stream
bank are well defined and neither approach to the crossing is too steep. It is anticipated
that equipment will use a construction mat for the crossing. There should be no
adverse effect of the construction equipment crossing the stream crossing at this
location. There is a picture of the stream crossing on the bottom of page 5. This
crossing is subject to the Neuse Buffer Rules. No other modifications will be
constructed for access. Since the tops of the Stream Banks ar well defined, the Buffers
are delineated as Zone 1 from Station 58+61.9 to Station 59+07.2, and from Station
59+29.9 to Station 59+75.2, Zone 2 is delineated from Station 58+31.7 to Station
58+61.9, and from Station 59+75.2 to Station 60+05.4. See Plan Sheet 6 of 14.
Stream Crossing number 6, from Station 54+9
0.3 to Station 55+05.5, is a crossing of an
unknown tributary to Briery Run, and it is subject to the Neuse Buffer rules. The picture
of the crossing at the top of page 6 shows a Stream with very little water flowing, the
picture was taken in the summer after a prolonged dry spell. The stream flows from the
stormwater pond in the Briery Subdivision. The channel and the banks are well defined.
The stream is an intermittent stream. The Banks are low with little slopes to the
channel. The construction equipment will use a construction mat to make the crossing.
This crossing is subject to the Neuse Buffer Rules, and the Banks are well defined. No
other modifications will be constructed for access. Since the tops of the Stream Banks
are well defined, the Buffers are delineated as Zone 1 from Station 54+60.3 to Station
54+90.3, and from Station 55+06.5 to Station 55+35.5. Zone 2 is delineated from
Station 54+40.3 to Station 54+90.3, and from Station 55+35.5 to Station 55+55.5, See
Plan Sheet 5 of 14.

Stream Crossing number 7, from Station 30+15.9 to Station 30+25.9, is an unnamed
tributary to Briery Run, and according to the field determination by Water Resources on
July 11, 2017, it is not subject to the Neuse Buffer Rules. The evaluation that I made in
the field on September 26, 2017, is based on the picture on the bottom of page 6, which
shows a stream flowing across the sewer line right of way. The channel is well defined,
but the low banks make it difficult to define the Top of Bank. The stream drains from an
upland pond, and an upland field. In addition the wetlands, which are over the sewer
line right of way to the Easl, slowly flows overland to this stream. I believe that this
stream although it may be intermittent, it should be subject to the Neuse Buffer Rules.
Construction equipment will use a construction mat to cross the stream at this location,
and there should be no adverse effects of the construction. This crossing is subject to
the Neuse Buffer Rules, and the Banks are well defined. No other modifications will be
constructed for access. Since the tops of the Stream Banks are well defined, the
Buffers are delineated as Zone 1 from Station 29+85.9 to Station 30+15.9, and from
Station 30+25.9 to Station 30+55.9, Zone 2 is delineated from Station 29+65.9 to
Station 29+85.9, and from Station 30+55.9 to Station 30+75.9. See Plan Sheet 4 of 14.
Stream Crossing #1 stream flows through localized pond to Briery Run

� °«
:33:\'w»
pj®/\
.
kramc _sng3e����
E

Ii
eylop ff°rd ;I
Stream Crossing 4 Briery Run
Stream Crossing 5 Briery Run

OPT,_ . t.
K r _I �'
r
ji
Stream Crossing 6 Unnamed Tributary to Briery Run from Briery Pond
Stream Crossing 7 Unnamed Tributary to Briery Run from Pond and
Wetlands
2

OF W ATFR
FORM WSCAS�03/2012 0 OG
WATERSHED CLASSIFICATION ATTACHMENT
o �
FOR SEWER SYSTEMS
Applicant Name
Proiect Name
City of Kinston
Phase IV Briery Run Sewer Rehabilitation
Professional Engineer Name
Engineering Firm Name
John A. Jarrell, III, P.E.
City of Kinston Engineering Division
Location
t If unnamed, indicate "unnamed tributary to X", where X is the named waferbody to which the unnamed tributary
River
Waterbody Stream
Waterbody
ID
Name of Waterbod '
County
Basin
Index No.
Classification
Lat.
35.312711
Unnamed Tributary to Briery
Lenoir
Neuse
27-81-1-
C,NSW
Long,
Run
77.563996
Lat.
35.309722
Briery Run
Lenoir
Neuse
27-81-1
C,NSW
Long.
77.563853
Lat.
35.507574
Briery Run
Lenoir
Neuse
27-81-1
C,NSW
Long.
77.563853
Lat.
35:308251
Briery Run
Lenoir
Neuse
27-81-1
C,NSW
Long,
77.563967
Lat,
35.31466
Briery Run
Lenoir
Neuse
27-81-1
C,NSW
Long,
77.554783
Lat.
35.313983
Unnamed Tributary to Briery
Lenoir
Neuse
27-81-1-
C,NSW
Long.
Run
77.554884
Lat.
35.31529
Unnamed Tributary to Briery
Lenoir
Neuse
27-81-1-
C,NSW
Long.
Run
77.551207
joins
FORM: WSCAS-03/2012 Page3 of3

1 certify that as a Registered Professional Engineer in the State of
North Carolina that I have diligently followed the Division's
instructions for classifying waterbodies and that the above
classifications are inclusive of the stated project, complete and
correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
x, + EIVI� ®F F®1bM WSCAS-03/2012 "xx
FORM: WSCAS-03/2012 Page 3 of 3

Kinston Public Services -All Utilities Linds):*City ofKinston Kinston Public Services
KinstonlLencir County Address L I Q
i
pe F
ffi OV
ya ko Ilk-
t.tppam L
L
o
5 V 75, +
3 3"i •
9/21 /2017
I•.-
yw
(
9/21 /2017

Water Resources w
Environmental Quality
RSD
July 26, 2017
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Director
City of Kinston DWR ii17-0520 V2
Attn: Mr. Tony Sear, City Manager LENOIR County
207 East King Street
Kinston, NC 28501
Subject: On -Site Determination for Applicability to Neuse River Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 02B .0233)
Subject Property/ Project Name: Briery Run Phase IV Sewer Rehab and Project Access
Address/Location: South of Intersection of Academy Heights Rd and Airport Rd and extending east to
just north of intersection of Briery Run Rd and Wallace Family Rd in Kinston
Stream(s) Evaluated: Briery Run and Uts to Briery Run
Determination Date: 07/11/17 Staff: Anthony Scarbraugh/Chris Pullinger
Determination Type:
Buffer:
Stream:
Z Neuse (15A NCAC 02B.0233)
❑ Intermittent/Perennial Determination
❑ Tar -Pamlico (15A NCAC 02B.0259)
Soil
❑ Catawba (15A NCAC 02B .0243)
❑ Jordan (15A NCAC 02B .0267) (governmental
Subject
and/or interjurisdictional projects)
❑ Randleman (15A NCAC 02B.0250)
Survey
❑ Goose Creek (15A NCAC 02B.0605-.0608)
17-0520 V2 A
Stream
E/I/P*
Not
Subject
Start@
Stop@
Soil
USGS
Subject
-
Survey
Topo
17-0520 V2 A
P
X
Flag: 17-0520 V2
Flag: 17-0520
X
X
A Begin
V2 A End
17-0520 V2 B
P
X
Flag: 17-0520 V2
Flag: 17-0520
X
X
- E
B Begin
V2 B End
17-0520 V2 F
I
X
Flag: 17-0520 V2
Flag: 17-0520
X
F Begin
V2 F End
y7 --'0520V2 G
NSP
X
NSP
NSP
X
17-0520 V2 H
NSP
X
NSP
NSP
X
*E/1/P/NSP =Ephemeral/Intermittent/Perennial/No Stream Present
The Division of Water Resources has determined that the streams listed above and included on the
attached map have been located on the most recent published NRCS Soil Survey of LENOIR County, North
Carolina and/or the most recent copy of the USGS Topographic map at a 1:24,000 scale and evaluated for
applicability to the NEUSE River Riparian Buffer Rule. Each stream that is checked "Not Subject" has been
determined to not be at least intermittent or not present on the property. Streams that are checked
<�
Nothing Compares =._..
State ofNorfh Carolina � Environmental Quality I Water Resources -Water Quality Regional 0lerafions Section-Washingron Regional Office
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, North Carolina 27889
252-946-6481

CITY OF KINSTON
LENOIR County
07/11/2017
Page 2 of 2
"Subject" have been located on the property and possess characteristics that qualify them to be at least
intermittent streams. There maybe other streams or features located on the property that do not appear
on the maps referenced above but may be considered jurisdictional according to the US Army Corps of
Engineers and subject to the Clean Water Act.
This on-site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or affected
parties that dispute a determination made by the DWR may request a determination by the Director.
An appeal request must be made within sixty (60) calendar days of date of this letter to the Director in
writing.
If sending via US Postal5ervice:
c/o Karen Higgins
DWR-401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 2 7699-1 61 7
If sending via delivery service (UPS, FedEx, etc.):
c% Karen Higgins
DWR-401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC27604
This determination is final and binding as detailed above, unless an appeal is requested within sixty (60)
days.
This determination only addresses the applicability to the buffer rules and does not approve any activity
within the buffers. The project may require a Section 404/401 Permit for the proposed activity. Any
inquiries regarding applicability to the Clean Water Act should be directed to the US Army Corps of
Engineers Washington Regulatory Field Office at (910)-251-4629.
If you have questions regarding this determination, please feel free to contact Anthony Scarbraugh at
[phone].
Sincerely,
UCA
Robert Tankard, Assistant Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ
cc: Gary Beecher, USACE Washington Regulatory
Office (via email)
Samir Dumpor, DEMLR WaRO (via email)
WaRO DWR File Copy
LASERFICHE

'1.
a
v C
1 1
f
d f'*�
PI ��tf '1
I
1
ff4 1 B
11
1
F '�
e
let v
1
f
d' L�J,
°�.���
. - oF��
� l
I,�- r�
Y ���.
. °� l
� , I � reef �.
[�Qazolhw�
Management Commfss
Dl�lieion Of Neter Rte.
�. . U? � Bullar 4`
dais % •7Oli
Reviewed by
°�` 1� i
.,,I � �
'� I L. ,r � r � 1 �
�I 4.r� L.f L'= 0 � — .. r
� •N—
,� II _
i
S
..
-wv-
ry
j!e/
;J t 1..
�Y �
.�!1'}
7�r�1-�;S Z
C%��r ��,,;�j
S
����et��� � V I
__ 9 Lf rf
�' � az
F`r. A k.
V y3:.
rf�
'�
_
E
S
����et��� � V I
__ 9 Lf rf
�' � az
F`r. A k.
V y3:.
rf�

� 1 m �., J
I.�
I — � � kY J t t1
� '� -: :i - i � ti .1 � � i ///ff! 1 � - rab f ` PJB
-. � �. ..eta k -- ��/� I nI:
.. `' _ � l
� i+ p�gs�ay�a+�Y; � ;; rJa � - f KL
Y<, i � 1V3A V14 �' f i Ya �,-. J&+ !._ h_ Ka
�� - - \ \_ � __ —�." _—�. ty ni) — �`` _ _. ..� _.���� �.F ��•�✓r �'� ' � 1 �\�� � � / / J Ise
k�
�-
.'Wa .rut v.a��
7 !f ,J�;h
�� I.I;
��
�� ��
��.
�=
-- J/
���� N� hr
J/ //�/J
�"
�,
Kr
,�..�- �1
ha
l�-�� V n
1.� ,..
C�
Fr
La ///
Ka%
Wr s
�' � J(P.
� • 'Y � �'
�ecr 161
C
1
e

On July 11, 2017, Gary Beecher, from the US Army Corps of Engineers, did a
preliminary delineation and evaluation of the site. The evaluation indicated that
most of the area in the Sewer line right of way is wetlands. There were areas
where the up gradient side of the right of way was not wetlands. It was also
noted that the 30 foot wide sewer line right of way had been cleared, and was
being maintained because there were only rudimentary wetland plants in the right
of way. It was explained that the maintenance was required as part of our
Collection System wide permit. There was evidence of ruts where equipment
and/or vehicles had been on the right of way. There was also evidence of
disturbance because there was soil which was not indigenous to wetlands. This
soil is the result of spreading soil from maintenance activities or other activities
that required spreading suitable soil for stabilization of the access to the sewer
line. Mr. Beecher requested that The City Submit a Nationwide Permit.
The Wetlands were investigated by the City of Kinston four different ways.
A. The City GIS map has a layer of mapped jurisdictional wetlands. The map
is attached with the sewer line on the map, The Project Access Map. The
length of sewer line within the wetlands was compiled along with the
length of sewer lines not in wetlands. A spread sheet was developed from
these measurements, and the spread sheet determined the area of
access which was within the wetlands and the area of the access which
was not within the wetlands. See map of Access Area and the
Spreadsheet Measurements taken from GIS Wetlands Map. According
measurements taken from the wetlands map, the sewer line right of way
which is within jurisdictional wetlands is 3.16 acres of 10.78 acres or
29.3% of the right of way is in jurisdictional wetlands.
B. The City also has a GIS Soils Map with the sewer line on the soils map. A
review of the soils information indicates Bibb series and Norfolk series
(specifically Norfolk 6 — 10 percent slopes). By definition a hydric soil
which is used to delineate wetlands is: "A hydric soil is a soil that formed
under conditions of saturation, flooding or ponding long enough during the
growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the upper part' (59
Federal Register 35680, 7/13/94), The Bibb series are Hydric Soils
located in Floodplains, typically flat poorly drained, and often flooded.
Bibb series support a wetland habitat for both plants and animals. Bibb

series soils are definitely a wetland soil. Norfolk series (6 to 10 percent
slopes) are not Hydric Soils. Norfolk soils are sloped well drained soils
which are not subject to flooding. Norfolk soils do not support wetland
plant and animal life. See the Soils Maps of the project area, and the soils
information attached. Measurements were made to determine lengths of
the sewer line which were in Norfolk Soils and the length of the sewer line
which were in Bibb soils. The measurements were compiled into a
spreadsheet, (Access Areas (Measurements taken from GIS Soils Map)),
which is attached. According measurements taken from the soils map, the
sewer line right of way which is in wetland soils is 7.48 acres of 10.78
acres or 69.3% of the right of way is in wetland soils.
C. The City has also has a GIS Topographic Map with the sewer line located
on it. This Map was used to determine if the sewer line were in a sloped
area or a flat area. Although not a true indicator of the presence of a
wetland, topography does indicate areas which are sloped, which are
generally not associated with wetlands and areas which are flat, which can
be generally associated with wetlands. The topographic Map with the
sewer line on it is attached. Measurements were made to determine
lengths of the sewer line which were in sloped topography, and the
lengths of the sewer line which were in flat topography. The
measurements were compiled into a spreadsheet, (Access Areas
(Measurements taken from GIS Topographic Map)), which is also
attached. According measurements taken from the topographic map, the
sewer line right of way which is in a flat wetland area is 8.25 acres of
10.78 acres or 76.5% of the right of way is in a flat wetland area.
D. From the field Investigation it was noted that the 30 foot right of way had
been cleared and was being maintained in accordance with the state
regulations and as part of the City's Collection System Permit for sewer
outfall lines. The right of way was observed in some places to be cut into
the slope of the adjacent hill. When the Sewer line was constructed in the
mid 1970's, the soils which were taken from the trench and not put back
into the trench were usually spread along the right of way or adjacent
area, There was extra soil either because the soil was unsuitable for
bedding of a sewer line, or because of the volume of soil which was
displaced by the 30" Diameter pipe. In some areas of the cleared right of
way there is evidence of plants emerging and presence of animals typical
of the soils in a wetland habitat. Adjacent to the cleared right of way there
is evidence of all types of trees which inhabit wetlands. See pictures
showing Black Gum, Sycamore, Bald Cypress. In addition to many areas
of wet hydric soils, there were also areas with localized and wide spread
2

flooding both on the right of way, and adjacent to the right of way. Based
upon the field observations, The quantity of Wetlands is closest to the
soils map determination. In some cases the disturbance of the right of way
has mixed wetland soil and the non -wetland soil to make determination
and delineation difficult.
For the purpose of this project the entire project access will be treated with the care
which would be afforded to all wetlands. In order to support the construction
equipment, construction mats will be used.
1. The Plans are prepared from a recent survey, and was correlated with As -Built
Plans from 1973. The Plans are for reference purposes only since no digging,
filling or construction is proposed. The rehabilitation of this sewer line installed in
1973 will be a "no dig" rehabilitation, and there will be no grading. The existing
contours and elevations will be unchanged. Construction Mats will preserve the
existing vegetation. If vegetation is damaged, Sections 02850, III, G, 1, 2, and 3, of
the Specifications address all of these issues.
2. The As -built drawings from 1973 do not indicate any anti -seep collars, and none are
planned to be added to the existing sewer line.
3. The roadway access will be temporary, and all Construction Mats will be removed
after construction is complete for each section, Construction Matting will not lay on
plant life for weeks thus killing vegetation. See Section 02850, III, E of the
Specifications.
4. Since the plans do not propose any changes to topography or drainage
characteristics, Overland Flow and the Hydrology of the Wetlands will remain
unchanged.
3

®isturbed Wetlands, Cleared Right of Way
Right of wa�� cleared int® tiae s9©goy ���a� �U°�nr�rn Qravc�fi���7s

•`�'J# M
w �
AWL
L ` f
R- 44 4
f
.CV
46
f;� a s
:y� y

T ML
--
"'� rte, z
r
_
�/q � ate•¢ L..�- �.-u�. ,���� �' - _
i
IN

Wetland Indication Typical Cypress Flute�7 iir�r�l�
Wetland Indication Typical Cypress Knee

Paim
W4�
:.
y � ll -77
j
NY
A IN
- \r•`o - -
IN
IL -IN
y .. -
;. c= _
AI
IN
IN
IN -
71

R
ty
-
"`-c ss"` —�c�It
/ `. I
It
It
9 a
A SIIt
IT It
IImIII NL
_x..

ACCESS AREAS
,d.WS Wetlands Map)
ACCESS
EASEMENT
WETLAND
REGULAR
WETLAND
REGULAR
ACRES
ACRES
ACRES
ACRES
0.03
0.01
0.08
0.02
0.05
0.00
0.15
0.00
0.04
0.03
0.12
0.08
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.04
0.07
0.00
0.21
0.01
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.15
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.10
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.15
0.00
0.09
0.00
0.14
0.00
0.15
:VO.05
0.00
0.20
0.00
0.35
0.00
0.10
.
0.00
0.16
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.15
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.21
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.17
0.00
0.08
0.00
0.23
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.17
0.00
0.08
0.00
0.23
> 0.00
0.04
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.11
3 0.00
0.04
0.00
0.12
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.20
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.16
0.00
0.10
0.00
0.30
0.00
0.09
0.00
0.27
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.18
3 0.00
0.10
0.00
0.29
3 0.00
0.05
0.00
0.14
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.18
0.00
0.08
0.00
0.24
3 0.00
0.02
0.00
0.05
3 0.00
0.05
0.00
0.14
3 0.08
0.10
0.23
0.30
0.06
0.05
0.18
0.14
5 0.02
0.13
0.07
0.40
D 0.19
0.00
0.57
0.00
p 0.13
0.00
0.40
0.00
D 0.09
0.00
0.27
0.00
p 0.10
0.00
0.30
0.00
7 0.04
0.16
0.11
0.49
2 0.00
0.12
0.00
0.35
D 0.00
0.10
0.00
0.31
g 0.05
0.04
0.16
0.12
0 0.10
0.02
0.30
0.07
3 1.05
2.54
3.16
7.62
PERCENT
WETLANDS
PERCENT
REGULAR
10

START
MANHOLE
84J
END
MANHOI
84H
84H
84G
84G
84Q
84Q
84F
84F
84E
84E
84C
84C
84D
84D
84B
846
84A
84A
85A
85A
85B
85B
86A
86A
866
86B
86C
86C
86D
86D
86M
86M
86E
86E
86F
86F
86G
86G
86H
86H
861
861
86J
861
86K
86K
86L
86L
87G
87G
87F
87F
87E
87E
87D
87D
87C
87A 179E
179(
179E
179E
179F 179(
1791
1801
E87B
B
1801
D
1801
1801
E
1811
D
1811
E
181F 182,
A
1828
182
TO1
SoilsMeasurements taken from GIS P....
11

ACCESS AREAS
(Measurements taken from CIS `►opographic Map)
12

IF
• I Ibb
•.o
IF I It I
r.
IF
F IF
Ilke �` • •
, Ln i, lt_
180D (ft, 181D
180C'
'{ 1806 f 181E 1820
%18�2A
IF ILI
F,
"N' iwlabfif�
• lel •�, ..
PC
LL
84J
84Q 84E - OFF _ - S l
179Frr
y
i ' 7
NNI
•
PROJECT �
71 IZ
1NI
Legend
lands
IFIN
r
Deepwater
sfs�
stuarine and Marine Welland
Freshwater Emergent Weiland I
Freshwater Pond
LakeiEdIFNI
Other IF tos N
NI7
iverine
Pump Station`¢ 14 IFNSewer Line Ou.
Kinston City Limits
Sewer Manhole W
, -
E A
"I lop
Weiland Acmss WIN-,
jAmess
.• '
75 0 FIN
.. ','C.. �..,_U& Mb str%°« t,,. wlTrF•LT(`yjl].9 _ yaeialt
:. \ 1. .Q .. ,. r�. .�h'. _. Jw.
�_

i - Ra -- — iY GoA Re Re on Ly
Go
GOA ..__-
T - GOA \
P�H� ' _. -
0F'aJYYH 1 - GoP _ °Hq Na Ra
Pe
o l
Me — j GA BRIERY RUN PHASE IV Nh
t
: �� � � ��_ GOA SEWER REHABILITATION Cv
P iNo P °me
t SOILS MAP
M e.Ra RID
N, �-
91
Nb /\ 2
7"
\ s�
� � v j� 4
GOP A°H
LY Nb —Ly
_ 4 ) � \ - L GO _-- GOA
as
lmet
/ A _
i
w
I
REPL
A
y Ly
_ o
— Nb
GOA
i , ex0ro AGA°E. EIGHTS UD Na - 1 - _
st �`.. _ � � c No FE AO
L%- Nh
DDRB FPR U- _ Nb /('1rC"'
L/ 1
1
Ra` �diNl Na-
_ _ _ .. _ -
®0af'`N z _ q _
L -
Ly
NO
0 Ly
\ 2
GOA 1_,>� rm
L 1 g I
— N
- -- _. - .•'��_- i \ � r en Ami /
- - - GGA Re
Cr
0 NA '''
i
AA Nb
Ly
11\`. No
5� - 1 i a @ Nb I N I w';
SARAHl
1
3 PS y
y ( No v 01 EA 1 lY N
°,S I
1 w �� Po� GH
'i 11 I --_ - -),00
-
Legend - 1._; - -- Q
Soils % W 4� r
GN
lY \
op B 1 C
1313 Na Ra W Na /�� LY - a�� II -.�nN _ I\ GOA
LLL���..JJJ W , _ LES ' Ly % 1
r ;
Lr
Cr Nb W Na Na VALED,F J
GoA Nc WI1 Ra OQ
GOA Go - A�
Na \ \ Nb I'
LY _
Ly Lo -- GOA pg - - GOA
Ra 55t
° R l ' _
ww Manhole - ,�
°
No Nd
82 pg Pump Station Na ) LY ��'�� - "" —`.., /� A'Nb
\\
■
Stream °Ea3 °`H�� ; >J. q Ly 9 "O
Kinst®n City Limits Na P IL
0, GoA
- Na G P BR
SNO U
Miles N ( �: to ,E°H° 3 rye- GOA )
1 0.5 0 °""oGAA
No
H LY 1
INa J° ko �. - --Nb

0- 1
- - 0
_
3e 77,`I
y
ip
o p D
�;;.; • •
kININ
06>
O 0
IN
mm
-
c •' li
.
..�N�
V
o
• r } t On
r SII
jc
l
1
C
m • - • - Q _ ��! �..` =tom- AN
Ir
/tit
fes a.INN
C
Al NN,N-
`e a �.. _ __.. ._ aui � ��,ti P4➢�f+.-t �e �� ,lfllr/1
�• ,.

Q
Y
O
m
d
K
F
ffia"
33
3
�9
"e
zQ
�
€mfg
-
�
zi
a
Ewoomo
a'
�
p
Y
0
x
z
z
o
x
.�
0$9
E
E
ry
m
0
c
O
LL
xuo
o�
U
U
N
V
(U
IU
Q
Y
O
m
d
K
F
3
"e
e
-
�
a
a'
�
p
Y
0
x
z
z
o
x
.�
E
E
ry
m
0
c
O
LL
o�
U
U
N
V
(U
IU

Ilo S®H�� II��°®��n��tn®ffi 4°m®rrrm ](.arm®urs (C®nnffi4g�®nIl� I[�c��®rrCr
an Bibb Soils (BB)
bo craven (Cr)
co (Goldsboro (GoA)
de Leon (L®)
ee Lynchburg (Ly)
ff, Norfolk (Na, NbE Nc)
go Rains (Ra)
h> Wagram (W)
ne W®®dnng>t®n (Wn)

§ �( A
. � m mAm aaa - qma\ amw�m, =ea. .
M
m

LENOIR COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA - SHEET NUMBER 11
` `SOOOF Lv° l�'- F IJr loins sheet 11
�� \yCo IPiO Ra 11 - .`.A6 L J t 2/ LY Ra I- ( ) Go
- - Ga N Nb__
Na
iI
N=iJ
° - '
C' 1 �' _ NafV\ `l
I r Ly I f` �'-Go ti N
l f Co `l`�(� t.�!\� N - I`.b LY - Nb �� �J Pz i�..Nb I'�- I - tLY Nb
o�fVb E Go G -�� L_ `� 1`la=F\�- �R 1\ .
Go Nb
NNN
- Y . //- _ C -If
Re
\SLY
UID
• C- •F;a Ga G LY I -.
\
Ly-) _ \ - /
.�,
f�
Nb Go.
I�V .--�, r1 - _ ,BB,4'
-�. -gyp'_ P ,\ - - Nb ` Nb Go pe IN
-.
;P bY- '� Cc I.- Nz _l�JN IN-
!'�� N
Lie
' ..._. f RE Q; N6 '� - Nb _. \• _ �, (`\� / i -� .,� - ✓' LY _
�r - ��i
/ Ra
r`
/ LY Gco
Na ! ��_
R 1_ f Nb 1 \ 1�- / t° J _- 7 ` LyGo e
Go
R
_ ` I
1 I /
_ 1\ /// 111
pa - _ 1 1 Lr' I f` Na
Nb 'lY , // li.. �r �, G Nb�_ Cr _ \Na �!` _ `\ { _ / `/ J /: �, —` S LY ' Nb a It -
'=1 .
No
�,� I l` l 4, - _ `� \I} II I f r F, ,�'�- _ .` /,/CI��/v
`` Go 1�b11
Q Lie
3 \ -
\- -�\
\\ Na
e
Na
t O r.
_ . - N a L - R �\.` `• . c--� Gs
�I tis' ' - : l -
Z .IRe IIII
-. \�Nb. _ �BB-`-1.` _ Na Nb l__ _�� �� ( r_ ' lab 'I YlA I
L - Nb § Nb YIIC ( C ] r ./ -. Na
f Ka
IVa Nb\ - _ Ly�. _ ! !,- / I1/�( / e
Nb ` _ Go ` [ P !i .f J Cr
- IlI ` 7`' - _' `Y `' }_..: L ` -/ J Wb -Go
IN -��"
y wo
Na \ .V. `\(1`\ I -. �� -_ GO 1 58 r/1 � •. Wa 6� hb IZ �..
Z Pa - - l l� - `\� ��'- `/ BB-\\ .WcJ/ `, Nb IZ
Na.Nb�d _ _l
/Wd
-EL_ _ - Z _F/
:.Ly W
'Ka
IN
.� LY �� j�...-Ka
- _ \,�+J - .1/ B It`Go
� J�/� \� F Nc Ke o JI
W sl \ Cr -66 Nb - yf \. N. ._ _ Nb j 7l—
/. ✓ Jo Nc '-.��•- \_._-
NIC
r (Fi `�` _1 —. - ._f - •�.i ,we Na Nc: Nb 4�� Nb
1Jti N`t • Nb Kb fJb Jo
IIINlaWd
' Na \ IF. fVb _ vicNa - - Na Nb - Na Ny .OJ Wtl _l.
ft y Na LY W� Lie '�"--�/ '/' � \. ) Ke To
Go
v N LY -
G £ Nh
Nb �P Nb Ca �/1 ✓ / �� Kb Jo
@/'�.f FJ=' ,I Ra • Co L' Q� Kb J f 1 Jo Pr
/�a If
'Go \ BB /s Ke I<e L
1 u
ugh P -A0 La ill�
//� U
LY //Pe _ _Co\Co CI 5EP0o- _ LY - fl Nc JO Ka / Jo
: ` id P.a '% Na - N\ Na iii/ r Ke �.�
I/J• Lv B V Nc Jo c, -In I Win
C �!A/ F L-.�-J Ke
(,d" I _ _ N b
Go Re \ _ ,lGo.- Nb ! eof'hb ,`— `/ 55 \
'N
Ra ( Na •.\ Nb /^ - v\ Nc \ 1 / 1 Ka J. Ka O
Pr
\ ;` lam_ ! \ Jo LuLu
J6Lie \N- NO
. Ja /
Nb
j/ \. LY d��y/---F Nb� `Go ., Cv //Nc Ke Pr /Nei
�I'lBE I(b Jo. La ///
`Ij 1 Go 1
0\7 81 - \•.69 /N' _ ��p��p LY Nay''' 66'i .1 Nb /%I<a Kb Ke BB I
v�_II IVc —Nc ,,J/�V I L'�V -..'Na /""� �' Jo\y Jo 1 Ka ..—_Wn_ pa ��
l lNc Na (cut eat).. \. Y / Jo- !lf / -.--
P E.t_ / -. / Nz Nb_ l \�'� BB / Wd N ` f
/ Ke
- (Joins sheet 16) 245000 FEET

LENOLR COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
t' mapping units in that series. Thus, to get full in -
nation about any one mapping' unit, it is necessary
and
to read both the description of the mapping
the description of the soil series to which it belongs.
An important part of the description of each soil
series is the soiPprbfile, that is, the sequence of layers
from the surface downward to rock or other under-
lying material. Each series contains two descriptions
of this profile. The first is brief and in terms familiar
toAhe layman. The second is much more detailed and
is for those who need to make thorough and precise
studies of soils. The profile described in the soil' series
is representative for mapping units in that series. If a
given mapping unit has a profile in some ways differ-
ent from the one described in the series, these differ-
ences are stated in the description of the mapping
unit, or they are apparent in the name of the mapping
.unit. The description of each mapping unit contains
suggestions on how the soil can be managed. Color
terms are for moist soils unless otherwise stated.
Following the name of each mapping unit is a sym-
bol in parentheses. This symbol identifies the mapping
unit on the detailed soil map. Listed at the end of
each description of a mapping unit are the capability
unit and woodland suitability group in which the map-
ping unit has been placed. The page for the description
of each mapping unit can be learned by referring to
the "Guide to Mapping Units" at the back of this
survey.
The acreage and proportionate extent of each map-
ping unit are shown in table 1. Many of the terms used
in describing soils can be found in the Glossary, and
more detailed information about the terminology and
methods of soil mapping can be obtained from the Soil
Survey Manual (6)?
Names in this soil survey do not fully agree with
soil maps in.Duplin County. Differences are the result
of better knowledge of soils, modifications in series
concepts, and the extent of soils within the survey.
The Bibb series consists of nearly level, poorly
drained soils on flood plains. These soils formed in
recent alluvium.
In a representative profile the surface layer is dark -
gray sandy loam about 12 inches thick. The underlying
I extends to a depth of 70 inches., It is mottled,
'Italic numbers in parentheses refer to li
terature cited, p. 64.
Ta BLE 1. -Approximate acreage and proportionate extent.of the soils
Soil Acres Percent
=i ecce --ecce-- 8,189 3.2
soils, frequently flooded ecce --ecce-- ------ 3,327 1.3
' ----------- --------'
i,. lton sand, 0 to 6 percent slopes -------------------------ecce-'- 6,910 2.7
--- ----- 1.0
Ghewaela loam, frequently flooded ___ __________ 2,559
Coxville loam ---
-- ecce ----------'-----ecce--- -
2,047
Craven fine sandy loam, 1 to 4 percent slopes --------------------------------`--_____________ 511 0.2
Craven.$ne sandy Ioam, 4 to 8 percent slopes --------------------------------- - 5.3
Goldsboro .loamy sand, 0 to Z percent slopes ----------------------------------------
-___ecce- 13,564
_ -- 2,303 0.9
Johns s sandy loam --------- -- - - -
- ecceecce----ecce-- -- ecce--- 6,664 2,6
Johns sandy loam ___________________________________________________________
-----ecce-- --- 7,934 361
Johnston soils
4,862 .9
Kalmia Ioamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes ______________ 3,327 1.3
$almia Ioamy sand, 2 to �6 percent slopes ---------------ecce-- 5 680' 2.2
Kenansville loamy sand, 0 to 6 percent slopes ----- -------- _____ 4,094 1.6
Kinston loam, frequently flooded
7,678 3.0
Lakeland sand, 0 to 6 percent slopes ---------------------------------------------------------
Leaf loam '- --
----ecce--=-------- 3,327 1.3
1;279
Lenoir loam ----------
-- .4,094. 1.6
------------------------------- ---
Leon sand-----------ecce----ecce---ecce----ecce-- ecce 5,586 '2.3
Lumbee sandy loam ____ '------------------------------
Lynchburg sandy loam ecce- __ ----
-- ecce-- 12,254 4.8
767 D.3
Meggett fine sandy loam
Murville fine sand ------- � 2,303 0•
eccecentslopes
--ecce-------ecce-----ecce-- --ecce---ecceecce-- 17,659. 6.9
Norfolk loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes-----------------
-------ecce---ecce-- ---'-ecce--
. - ecce 18,141
Norfolk loamy sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes -----------------------------------------ecce-- 3,583 1.4
Norfolk loamy sand, 6 to 10 percent slopes ----------------------------------- - ' '--'
Pactohis loamy sand .----- ------------'-------ecce-------ecce---ecce---ecce--
__ 4,360 1.7
4,862 •9
Pamlico muck---------------------------------------.--------ecce-------------ecce--ecce-- 5,118 2.0.
Pantego loam _
Poealla loamy sand, 0 to 6 percent slopes----------------------------------ecce-------'ecce 28,685 11.2 .
_______ 2,815' 1.1
Portsmouth loam
Rains sandy loam ecce= -ecce-- ecce-------- 18,683 7.3
----------------------
---ecce-- 11,OD5 4.3
Starlings •loamy sand ---------------`"-- --------------------------- '
'__--- 9,725 ... 3.8
Torhunta loam ---
Umbria Ochraqualfs - -- ecce-- ----------------ecce--ecce-- ecce--ecce------ecce-- 611 0.2
--- - - - 8,189 3.2
Wagram loamy sand, D to 6 percent slopes --------------------------------------------------
Wagram loamy sand, 6'to 10 percent slopes .-_--ecce-- - __ 2,303 0.9
- -----------------------------------
2,559 1.0
Waeram loamy sand, 10 to 15 percent slopes --------------- ----------- ------------
-- 511 6.2 '
F oam loamy send, Y to 6 perpent Slopes _ ________________ 7 B7g 3.0
.mgton loamy sand _______________________________________________
-------------
m..+moi255,936 100.0
----------------- ---ecce-

SOIL SURVEY
dark -gray -and gray sandy loam in the upper part
and d grayish -brown loamy sand in the lower part.
Bibb soils are low in natural fertility and content
of organic matter. Permeability is moderate, and avail-
able water capacity is medium. Shrink -swell potential
is dow. The seasonal high water table is at the surface.
These soils flood frequently for brie£•.periods. Flooding
is more frequent in winter and in spring.
ATearly all of the.acreage is wooded. A small acreage
is cultivated and pastured.
Representative profile o£ Bibb sandy loam from an
area of Bibb soils, frequently flooded, in a wooded
area 4 miles south of Hugo, 0.3 mile north of inter-
section of State Roads 1700 and 1731 and 50 feet east
of bridge on State Road 1731:
Al -0 to 12 inches, dark -gray (10YR 4/1) sandy loam;
few, fine, faint, dark reddish -brown stains around.:
old roots; moderate, medium, granular -structure;
very friable; many large roots; very strongly acid;
clear, wavy boundary.
Clg--12 to 45 inches, mottled, dark -gray (IGYR 4/1) and
gray (10YR 5/1) sandy loam; few thin strata of
loam and loamy sand; few, fine, distinct, yellowish -
brown and brown mottles; massive; very friable,
slightly sticky and slightly plastic; few fine and
medium roots; very strongly acid; gradual, wavy
boundary.
G2g--45 to 70 inches, grayish -brawn (10YR 5/2) loamy
sand; massive; very friable; strongly acid.
Reaction is very strongly acid or strongly acid unless the
soils are limed. The A horizon is dark -gray or dark grayish -
brown sandy loam, loam, or loamy sand. The C horizon is
dark -gray, gray, grayish -brown, or fight brownish -gray
sandy loam or loam. In places this horizon has thin strata
of sand and silt loam. The C horizon, below a depth of
about 45 inches, is Ioamy sand or sand. Few to common
brown mottles are in the upper part of the C horizon.
Bibb soils, frequently flooded (BB).—These soils are
in narrow drainageways. Slopes are less than 1 per-
cent. The surface layer is sandy loam, loam, or loamy
sand. In a few of these soils the underlying layer is
nonacid, and marl is at depth of 4 to 7 feet. The areas
are long and narrow and range from 30 acres to sev-
eral hundred acres in size. They are generally larger
than those mapped elsewhere in the county, but map-
ping has been controlled well enough to make the in-
terpretations for the anticipated uses.
Included 'with these soils in mapping are several
areas of Kinston and Johnston soils.
Infiltration is moderate, and runoff is slow. Water
is ponded in places. If properly drained, these soils
are suited to a few locally grown crops. Surface and
subsurface drainage and protection from floods are
needed for all Crops.
Because. of lack of suitable outlets, construction of
drainage systems is difficult in places where marl un-
derlies these soils. Water ponding on the surface, mod-
al high te• table and
crate permeability, a season g water
frequent flooding are the main limitations in the use
and management of these 'soils. Capability subclass
Vw, frequently flooded; woodland suitability
2w9.
Blanton sand, 0 to• 6 percent slopes soil
is on broad, smooth and slightly rounded divides. The
areas range from about 5 to 50 acres in size and are
about as broad as they are long.
Included witb this soil in mapping are -small areas
Of Wagram, Lakeland; and Pocalla soils. In places
Ion narrow areas of Leon soils are included at the
foot of slopes.
Infiltration is rapid, and runoff is slow.,
Blanton
Seraaa;3
The Blanton series consists of nearly level to gently
sloping, well -drained soils on uplands:
. In a representative profile the surface layer is lig
brownish -gray sand about 3 -inches thick. The subst
face layer. is very pale brown sand about 52 inch
thick. The subsoil is 43 inches thick. The upper part
brownish -yellow sandy loam. The middle part
yellowish -brown sandy clay loam -that is mottled wi
brown and gray.- The lower part .is light yellowis
brown sandy clay loam that is mottled with brown ai
gray. Below this layer; to a depth of 120 inehes, is pal
brown loamy sand that is mottled with brown ai
gray..
Blanton soils are very low in natural fertility ar
content of organic matter. Permeability is moderat
and.available water capacity is very low.. Shrink-swe
potential is low. The seasonal high water table remain
below a depth of about 5 feet.
Most of the acreage is wooded. The rest is cultivate
or used for nonfarm purposes.
Representative profile of Blanton sand, 0 to 6 perces
SI
in a wooded area 1 mile southwest of LaGrange
0.2 mile south of intersection of U.S. Highway 70 am
State Road 1323, and 50 feet east of State Road 1323
Al -6 to 3 inches, light brownish -gray (10YR 6/2) sand
very weak, medium, granular structure; very fri
able; common roots; very strongly acid; gradual
wavy boundary.
A2-3 to 55 inches, very pale brown (10YR 7/4) sand
single grained; loose; few lenses of light -gray sant
in the lower part; very strongly acid; gradual
wavy boundary.
B1-55 to 63 inches, brownish -yellow (10YR 6/8) sand3
loam, weak, fine, subangular blocky structure; very
friabie; very strongly acid; gradual, wavy. bound.
ary.
B2t-63 to 80 inches, yellowish -brown (10YR 5/8) sandy
clay loam• common, medium, distinct, strong -brown
(7.5 -YR 518) mottles and few, medium, distinct;
gray (SOYR 6/1) mottles; weak, fine, subangular
blocky structure; friable, slightly sticky and slight-
ly plastic; thin, discontinuous clay films. on faces
of peds; very strongly acid; gradual, wavy bound-
ary.
B3-80 to 98 inches, light yellowish -brown (10YR 6/4)
sandy clay loam; few, medium, distinct, strong -
brown (7.5YR 5/8) and gray (10YR 5/1) mottles;
weak, fine, subangular blocky structure; friable,
slightly sticky and slightly plastic; very strongly
acid; gradual, wavy boundary.
C-98 to 120 inches, pale -brown (JO'YR 6/3) loamy sand,
few, medium, distinct, strong -brown (7.5YR 516)
and gray (16YR 611) mottles; massive; very, fri-
able; few pebbles; strongly acid.
The solum is more than 60 inches thick. Reaction is very
strongly acid or strongly acid unless .the soils.are limed.
The Ap and Al horizons are grayish brown, light brownish
gray, or light gray. The A2 hori,00s.very pale brown or
P
brown. The B horizon is light yellowish -brown, brown-
ish -yellow, yellowish -brown, or strong -brown sandy clay
loam or sandy loam that is mottled with brown, gray, and
red. The C horizon is loamy sand, sandy loam, or sandy
clay loam,

SOIL SURV>;Y
erately slow, and available water capacity is medium
to high. Shrink -swell potential is moderate. The sea-
sonal high water table is at the surface.
Most of the acreage is wooded. The rest is cultivated
and pastured.
Representative profile of Coxville loam, 2 miles
southeast of LaGrange,' in a cultivated field, 0.4. mile
east of intersection of U.S. Highway 70 and State
Road 1327, 0.3 mile southeast of State Road 1327, and
20 -feet southwest of farm road:
�` Ap—D to &inches, dark -gray .(lOYR 4/1) loam; weak,
medium, granular strueture;�friahle; common me-
ilium roots; medium acid; abrupt, smooth boundary.
Blg—S to 12 inches, light brownish -gray' (IOYR 6/2) loam;
£ew, medium, distinct, light yellowish -brown (10YR
6/4) mottles; weak, fine, subangular bloclry strne-
ture• friable; few fine roots; fevtores filled with
dark -gray loam; very strongly acid; clear, wavy
boundary � 10YR 6 1 ela loam; com-
B21tg-12 to 29 inches, gray ( /) y
man, medium, distinct, brownish -yellow (lOYR 6/0)
mottles; weak, fine, angular blocky structure; firm,
sticky and plastic; £ew fine roots; thin, discontin-
uous clay films on faces of peds and on pore walls;
very strongly acid; gradual, wavy boundary.
B22tg-27 to 40 inches, gray (lOYIt 6/1) clay loam; com-
mon, coarse, distinct, brownish -yellow (10YR 6/0)
mottles and few, fine, prominent, red mottles; weak,
fine, angular blocky structure; firm, sticky and
plastic; thin, discontinuous clay films on faces of
peds and on pore walls; very strongly acid; gradual
boundary.
Bag --46 to 62 inches, gray. (lOYR �6/1)'clay loam;�com-
mon, inedium, distinct, brownish -yellow (IOYR 6/0)
mottles and few, medium, prominent, red (2.5YR
4/3) mottles; weak, fine, angular blocky structure;
firm, sticky and plastic; thin clay films on pore
walls; very strongly acid• gradual, wavy boundary.
Cg -62 to 75 inches, light -gray (10YR 7/1) sandy clay loam
�: that has lenses o£ sandy loam; common, medium,
iaint,_�pale-brown {lOYR 6/3) mottles; massive;
friable, slightly sticky and slightly plastic; very
strongly acid.
The solum is 60 inches to -more than SD inches thick. Re-
action is very strongly acid or strongly acid unless the soils
are limed. The A horizon is gray, dark gray, or very dark
gray. The very dark gray part of the A horizon, if present,
' is less than 8 inches thick. The B horizon is light brownish -
gray or gray loam, clay loam, or sandy clay that is mottled
with yellow, red, and brown. The C horizon is sandy clay,
sandy clay loam, or sandy loam.
�®gellle Hoasun (Co). This soil is on broad, smooth
flats on stream terraces and in shallow depressions on
upland intersiream areas. Slopes are less than 2 per-
cent. The areas are'generally small and narrow.
Included with this soil in mapping are small areas
of soils that have a surface layer of sandy loam. Also
included are a few areas of Rains, Lumbee, and Leaf
SO11S.
Infiltration is slow, and runoff is slow. Water ponds
in some places. This soil is diifieult to keep in good
filth and can be worked within only a narrow range
of moisture content.
This soil, if drained, is well suited to a few locally
grown crops, mainly corn and soybeans. Surface and
subsurface drainage is needed forwatertponding on the
Moderately slow permeability,
surface, and a seasonal high water table are the main
limitations in the use and management of this soil.,
"apability unit IIIw-2, drained; capability subclass
TVw, undrained; woodland suitability group 2w9.
The Craven series consists of nearly level.to sloping,
moderately well drained soils on uplands and stream
terraces.
In. a representative profile the surface layer is
grayish -brown fine sandy loam about 8. inches thick.
The subsurface layer is pale=brown fine sandy loam
about 2 inches thick. The subsoil is 42 taches thick.
The upper part 'is light yellowish -brown loam, the
middle -part is yellowish -brown and light yelloy✓ish-
brown clay that is mottled with brown and gray, and
the lower part is gray clay loam that is mottled with
brown and red. Below the subsoil, to a depth of about
80 inches, is gray sandy clay loam that is mottled with
yellow and brown.
Craven soils are medium in natural fertility and low
in content of organic matter. Permeability is slow, and
available water capa'eity is medium. 'Shrink -swell po-
tential is moderate. The seasonal high water table
remains at a depth of about 30 inches..
About one-half of the acreage is wooded. Most of the
rest is cultivated, but a small part of it is pastured.
Representative profile of Craven fine sandy loam, 1
to 4 percent slopes, 9 miles northeast of Sinston, 200
feet east of intersection of State Roads 1804 and 1803
and 25 feet north of State Road 1803 e
Ap-0 to 8 inches, grayish -brown (10YR 5/2) fine sandy
loam; weak, medium, granular structure; very frr
able; many fine roots; medium aeid;'abrupt, smooth
bonndaiy.
A2-3 to 10 inches, pale -brown (lOYR 6/3) fine sandy
loam; weak, medium, granular structure• very fin-
able; many fine roots; strongly acid; clear, wavy
boundary.
B1-10 to 13 inches, light yellowish -brown (lOYR 6/4)
loam; weak, fine, subangular blocky structure; fri-
able; common fine roots; very strongly acid; clear,
wavy boundary.
B21t-13 to 23 inches, yellowish -brown (IOYR 6/8) clay
few, medium, faint, strongbrown (7.5YR 5/3)
mottles• moderate, fine, angular bIoaky structure;
very firm, sticky and very plastic• thin clay films
on £aces of peds; very strongly acid; gradual, wavy
boundary.
B22t-23 to 37 inches, light yeIIawish-brown (IOYR 6/4)
clay; common, medium, distinct, gray (lOYR 6/1)
and strong -brown (7.5YR�5/3) mottles• moderate;
fine, angular blocky structure; very firm, sticky ,
' and very plastic; thin clay films on £aces' of peds
and in pores; very strongly acid; gradual, wavy
boundary.
Bag --37 to 52 inches, gray (YOYR 6/1) clay loam; common,
medium, distinct, yellowish -brawn (1DYR 5/8) mot-
tles and few, medium, prominent, red (2.5YR 4/S)
mottles; weak, fine, angular 'blocky structure; very
firm, sticky and plastic; few fine flakes of mica;
thin clay films ir} pores; very strongly acid; grad-
ual, wavy �bonndary.
Cg -52 to 80 inches, gray (10YR 6/1) sandy clay loam
that has lenses o£ sandy loam and sandy clay•
common, coarse, distinct, brownish -yellow (10Y.It
6/3) mottles and few, medium, distinct, strong -
brown (7.5YR 5/3) mottles; massive; friable, sticky
' and plastic; few fine flakes of mica and soft min- '
eral grains; very strongly acid
The solum is 40 to OD inches thick. Reaction is very
strongly acid or strongly acid unless the soils are Limed.
The Ap and Al horizon is grayish brown or dark gray. The
B horizon is yellowish brown or light .yellowish brown and
is mottled 'with gray and brown m the upper part. It is
gray and mottled with few to common mottle$ of brown,

LENOIR COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
9
gray, and red in the lower part. The gray mottles are be- tential is low. The seasonal high water table is at a
tween 18 and so inches below the surface. The C horizon depth of about 30 inches.
is commonly sandy clay loam or sandy clay. Most of the acreage is cultivated. The rest is pas -
Craven fine sandy loam, 1 to 4 percent slopes (Cr).—' tured or wooded or is used for nonfarm purposes.
This soil is on gently sloping sides of divides. The areasRepresentative profile of Goldsboro loamy sand, 0
in 5 to 30 acres in si are size. This soisouth of Hugo *in a cultis-s
l has he profile range shaped and sc ibed s Tepre enta- vated field,r0 7 m le east of into se t on of State Roads
five for the series: 1726 and 1727 and 50 feet north of State Road 1727:
Included with this soil in mapping are a few areas Ap-0 to 8 inches, grayish -brown (10YR 5/2) loamy sand;
of eroded soil and some areas of soil where the slope weak, medium, granular structure; very friable;
is less than 1 percent. Also included are small areas of few roots; strongly acid; abrupt, smooth boundary.
Lenoir, Goldsboro, and Johns soils and a few short A2-8 to 12 inches, pale -brown (loYR 6/3) loamy sand;
weak, medium, granular structure; very friable;
narrow strips of Bibb soils. Some delineations have a few roots; few pores filled with grayish -brown
few small spots of wet soils in depressions. A wet spot loamy sand from the surface layer; very strongly
symbol is used to show these spots. acid; clear, wavy boundary.
Infiltration is moderately slow, and runoff is slow B1-12 to 16 inches, light yellowish -brown (10YR 6/4)
sandy loam; weak, fine, subangular blocky strue-
to medium.tune; friable;" few fine roots; very strongly acid;
This soil is well suited to all locally grown crops and clear, wavy boundary:
small grain. Practices are needed to control runoff and B21t--16 to 28 inches, yellowish -brown (10YR 5/6) sandy
erosion. Water collects in the low Spots in fields for clay loam; weak, fine, subangular blocky structure;
brief periods after heavy rainstorms. Drainage is friable, slightly
thhin discontinuous 6layand lyfilmsson fay s
needed in places where the particular use requires_a of peels; very strongly acid; gradual, wavy bound -
well -drained condition. ary.
Moderate shrink -swell potential, slow permeability, 'B22t-23 to 45 inches, pale -brown (10YR 6/3) sandy clay
and runoff are the main limitations in the use and man- loam; common, medium, distinct gray (10YR 6/1)
agement of this soil. Capaliiility unit lIIe-1• woodland and brownish -yellow (10YR 6/8) mottles and few,
' medium, distinct, strong..brown (7.6YR 5/8) mot -
suitability group 3w2. ttes; weak, fine, subangular blocky structure; fri-
Craven fine sandy loam, 4 to 8 percent slopes (Cv).— able, slightly sticky and slightly plastic; thin, dis-
This soil is between the gently sloping areas and flood continuous clay films on faces of Peds; very
plains or stream terraces. The areas are narrow and Bsg-45 stod68linches, gray HIYR s/ jus sandy clay loam;
l.�^g and range from 5 to 50 acres in size, - common, medium, distinct, brownish -yellow (10YR
icluded with this `soil in mapping are a few areas of 6/8) and red (2.5YR 4/8) mottles; weak, fine, sub-
sods that have a surface layer of clay , and Also in -
angular blocky structure; friable, slightly sticky
eluded are small areas of Bibb, Norfolk, and Wagram and slightly plastic; thin, patchy clay films in
soils.
Infiltration is slow, and runoff is rapid.
This soil is suited to all locally grown crops, but the
short length and' gradient of the slopes limit the use
of -this soil for row crops. Runoff causes a hazard of
erosion if this soil is cultivated, and practices are
needed to control runoff and erosion.
Moderate shrink -swell potential, slow permeability,
runoff, and slope are the main l mitations in the use
and management of this soil. Capability unit IVe-1;
woodland suitability group 3w2.
Goldsboro Series
The Goldsboro series consists of nearly level, mod-
erately well drained soils on uplands.
In a representative profile the surface layer is gray-
ish -brown loamy sand about 8 inches thick, The
subsurface layer is pale -brown loamy: sand about 4
inches thick. The subsoil_ is 56 inches, thick. The upper
part. is light yellowish -hr sandy loam, the middle
part is yellowish -brown. and pale -brown ,and brown,
loam that is mottled with gray, yellow,
and the Iower part is gray sandy clay "loam that is
mottled with yellow and.red. Below the subsoil, to a
depth of 80 inches, is light -gray sandy clay loam that
is --�ottled with•red and brown.
ldsboro soils are low in natural fertility and con-
tenu of organic matter.. Permeability is moderate, and
available water capacity is medium, Shrink -swell Po
-
pores; very strongly acid; gradual, wavy boundary.
Cg�68 to 80 inches, light -gray (lOYR 7/1) sandy clay loam
that has thin lenses of sandy clay and sandy loam;
few fine, prominent, red mottles and common,
medium, pale -brown (10YR 6/3) mottles; friable,
alightly sticky and slightly plastic; very strongly
acid.
The solum is 60' to about 85 inches thick. Reaction is very
strongly acid or strongly acid unless the soils are limed.
The Ap or Al horizon is grayish brown or dark grayish
brown. The B horizon is sandy clay foam or sandy loam.
The' B1 and B2 horizons are pale brown, light yellowish
brown, or yellowish brown and are mottled with gray,
yellow, and brown. The C horizon is commonly sandy clay
loam or sandy loam.
Goldsboro loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes (Go).—
This soil is near shallow drainageways on broad,
smooth divides. The areas are nearly as broad as they
are long and range from 10 to 30 acres in size: -.
Included with this soil in mapping are a few areas of
soils that have a surface layer of sandy loam and very
fine sandy loam and some . that have . a siltier subsoil
than this soil. Also included are a few small areas of
Norfolk and Lynchburg soils.
Infiltration is moderate, and runoff is slow.
This soil is well suited to all locally grown, crops and
is used mainly for corn, soybeans, tobacco, small grain,
P
plants, and truck crops. If drained, it is well
sfi te4 to tobacco aces where the type f use requires a well. -s,
neededainage is
drained condition.
A seasonal high water table is the main limitation in

10
SOIL SURVEY
lt'.sgure 3.—Tobacco growing on Goldsboro loamy sand.
the use and management of this soil. Capability unit
IIW wcodIand suitability group 2w8.
G>rafer
®><n S�x°a��
The Grifton series consists of nearly level, poorly
drained soils on uplands and stream terraces.
In a representative profile the surface layer is dark -
gray sandy loam about 8 inches thick. The subsurface
layer is grayish -brown sandy loam about 4 inches
thick. The subsoil is 46 inches thick. The upper part is
light brownish -gray sandy loam that is mottled with
gray. The middle part is gray sandy clay loam or
sandy loam that is mottled with yellow and brown.
The lower part is gray loamy sand. Below the sub-
soil, to a depth of 70 inches, is greenish -gray marl that
crushes to sandy Ioam.
Grifton soils are low in natural fertility and content
of organic matter. Permeability is moderate, and
available water capacity is medium. Shrink -swell po-
tential is low. The seasonal high water table is within
10 inches of the surface.
Most of the acreage is wooded. The rest is cultivated
or pastured.
Representative profile of Grifton sandy loam in a
cultivated field 7 miles southeast of Kinston, one-,
( 'ourth of a mile southeast of intersection of State
Roads 1915 and 1903 and south of State Road 1915:
Figure 4.-751e laid out Por installation oA Goldsboro loamy sand.
Ap-0 to s inches, dark -gray (10YR. 4/Y) sandy loam;
weak, medium, granular structure; very friable;
common fine roots; strongly acid; abrupt, smooth
boundary.
A2-8 to 12 inches, grayish -brown (IOYR 5/2) sandy loam;
weak, medium, granular structure; very friable;
common fine roots; strongly acid; clear, wavy.
boundary.
BIg--12 to 15 inches, light brownish -gray (IOYR 6/2)
sandy loam; common, medium, faint, gray (10YR
6/1) mottles; weak, fine, subangular blocky struc-
ture; very friable; common fine roots; strongly
acid; gradual, wavy boundary.
B2ltg-15 to 32 inches, gray (10YR 6/1) sandy clay loam
that has lenses of sandy loam; common, Res, dis-
tinct, reddish-yellow mottles; weak, fine, subangular
blocky structure; friable, slightly sticky and
slightly plastic; common .fine and medium pores;
thin, discontinuous clay, films on faces of peds and
on pore walls; strongly acid; gradual, wavy
boundary,
B22tg--32 to 40 inches, gray (10YR 6/1) sandy loam that
has lenses of sandy clay loam and loamy sand; _
common, coarse, distinct, yellowish -brown (IOYR ,
and m
sli
ghtly plastic; common fine and mediuF
pores; neutral; gradual, wavy boundary.
B3g�0 to 58 inches, gray (YOYR 6/Y) loamy sand that
has thin lenses of sandy clay loam; massive; fri-
able; moderately alkaline; gradual, wavy bound-
ary.
IIGg=58 to 70 inches, greenish -gray (5GY 5/1) marl that
crushes to sandy loam that has thin lenses of clay;
massive; friable; moderately alkaline.

16
SOIL SURVEY
sticky and very plastic; few fine roots; 'thin clay
films on faces of peds; very strongly acid; clear,
wavy.boundary.
B22tg-21 to 48 inches, gray (10YR 6/1) clay; many, me-
dium, distinct, brownish -yellow (IOYR 6/8) mottles
and common, medium, prominent, red (2.5YR 4/8)
mottles; moderate, fine, angular blocky structure;
very firm, sticky and";very plastic; thin clay fibres
,on faces of Peds .and in pores; very strongly acid;'
Bag -48 to 62 inches, gray (lOYR 6/1) clay; many, medium,
,distinct, brownish -yellow (joYR 616) mottles and
.few, medium, prominent, red (2.5YR 4/8) mottles;
moderate, tine, angular blocky structure; very
firm, sticky and very plastic; thin clay films in
pores; very strongly acid; gradual, wavy bound-
ary.
Cg -62 to 75 inches, gray (10YR 5/1) clay loam that has
,thin lenses of sandy clay loam; few, medium, dis-
tinct to prominent, brownish -yellow (10YR 6/6)
and strong -brown (7.5YR 5/8) mottles; massive;
firm, sticky and very plastic; very strongly acid.
The solum is more than 60 inches thick. Reaction is very
strongly acid or strongly acid unless the soils are limed.
The Al or Ap horizon is dark gray or dark grayish brawn.
The B1 horizon is pale brown, light yellowish brown, or
brownish yellow and mottled with yellow and gray in the
upper part. Below a depth of about 21 inches, it is gray and
mottled with yellow, brown, and red. The B horizon is clay
• to clay loam. The C horizon is clay loam on sandy clay loam.
The A horizon and the Bl horizon, if present, are slightly
thicker than -the defined range for the series. The contrast in
texture between the surface layer and the subsoil is also
greater. Thase differences do not alter the usefulness or be=
• havior of the soils.
Lenoir lloain (Ln).—This soil is on broad, smooth
divides near shallow drainageways. Slopes are 0 to 2
percent. The areas are nearly as broad as they are
long and range from 10 to 40 acres in size.
Included with this soil in mapping are a few areas of
soils that have a surface layer of sandy loam. Also
included are small areas of Leaf and Craven soils.
Inilitration and runoff are slow. The soil is difficult
to keep in good tilth and can be worked only over a
narrow range of moisture content.
The main tree species is Ioblolly pine. If drained,
this soil is suited to a few locally grown crops, mainly
coin and soybeans. Surface and subsurface drainage
is needed for most crops. Adequate drainage is diffi-
cult to obtain because of the slow permeability. Prac-
tices to improve the soil structure and tilth are needed
to obtain good drainage and aeration.
. Slow permeability, moderate shrink -swell potential,
water ponding on 'the surface, and a seasonal high
crater table are the main limitations in the .use and
management of this soil. Capability unit IIIw-4; wood-
land suitability group 2w8.
The Loon series consists of nearly level, somewhat
poorly drained soils on uplands and stream terraces.
in a representative profile the surface layer is dark -
gray sand about 4 inches thick. The subsurface layer
is light -gray sand about 10 inches thick. The subsoil is
sand 17 inches. thick. The upper part is black and the
lower part is dark brown. The underlying layer, to a
depth of about 72 inches, is light brownish -gray loamy
I and in the upper part and dark reddish -brown and
grayish -brown sand in the lower part.
Leon soils are very low in natural :fertility and con-
tent of organic matter. Permeability is rapid to mod-.
erately rapid, and available water capacity .is 'low.
Shrink -swell potential is very low. The seasonal high
water table is at a depth of about 1S inches.
Most of the acreage is wooded.
Representative profile of Leon sand in an idle fieldh5
miles eastbf Pink Hill, 0:6 mile east of the intersection"
of State Roads 1105 and 1I1S; and 25 feet south of
State Road 1105:
Al -0 to 4 inches, dark -gray {lOYR 4/1) sand; single
grained; loose; about 2P percent of grains coated
with organic matter; also few fine particles of or-
ganic matter; common large roots; very strongly
acid; clear, wavy boundary.
A2-4 to 14 inches, light -gray (I6YR 7/1) sand; single
grained; loose; common roots; very strongly acid;
abrupt, wavy boundary.
B2h-14 to 19 inches, black (5YR 2/1) sand; massive; fri-
able; weakly cemented; thin humus coating on
grains; very strongly acid; clear, wavy boundary.
Bah -19 to 31 inches, dark -brown (7.5YR 3/2) sand; mas-
sive; friable; weakly cemented fragments of dark
reddish brown; thin humus coatings on grains;
very strongly acid; clear, wavy boundary.
C1— 31 to 37 inches, light brownish -gray (10YR 6/2) loamy
sand,-' single grained; loose; very strongly acid;
clear, wavy boundary.
C2--37 to 58 inches, dark reddish -brown (5YR 3/2) sand;
massive; friable; weakly cemented; thin humus
coatings on grains; very strongly acid; clear, wavy
boundary.
C3-58 to 72 inches, grayish -brown (10YR 5/2) sand;
. 'single grained; very friable; very strongly acid.
These soils are sand or fine sand to a depth of 72 inches
or more: Reaction is very strongly acid or extremely acid
unless the soils are limed. The Al horizon is dark gray or
very dark gray. The A2 horizon is light gray or white. The
Bh horizon is black, dark reddish -brown, or dark -brown sand
or loamy sand. The C horizon is loamy sand to sand.
L¢on sand (Lo) This soil is on the outer rims of
I depressions and on broad, smooth interstream
divides. Slopes are 0 to 2 percent. The areas are ir-
regularly shaped and range from 5 to 25 acres in size.
Included with this soil in mapping are a few areas
of 'soils that have a surface layer of fine sand. Also
included are. a few small areas of Woodington, Pacto=
I is; Murville, and Stallings soils.
Infiltration is rapid, and runoff is very slow.
This soil is poorly suited to most locally grown
CT The main tree species are longleaf pine and
turkey oak. Because of the coarse texture and the
humus hardpan subsoil within 80 inches of the sur-
face, this soil is very poorly suited to cultivation except
for specialized craps, such as blueberries.
Leaching of plant nutrients, hardpan subsoil, and a
seasonal high water tablez are the main limitations
in the use and management of this soil'. Capability
unit IVw 1; woodland suitability group 4w2.
The Lumbee series consists of nearly level, poorly
chained soils on stream terraces.
In a representative profde the surface layer is dark -
gray sandy loam about 7 inches thick. The subsurface
layer is light brownish -gray sandy loam about 5 inches
thick. The subsoil is 26 inches thick. The upper part is
light brownish -gray and gray sandy clay loam that is

LENOIR COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Atled with brown and yellow, and the lower part is
y sandy loam that is mottled with brown. Below the
supsoil, to a depth of about 65 inches, is light brownish -
gray sand.
Lumbee soils are low in natural fertility and content
of organic matter. Permeability is moderate, and avail-
able water capacity is medium. Shrink -swell potential
is water table is at the surface.
Most of the w. The acOe age al hwooded. The rests cultivated
and pastured.
Representative profile of Lumbee sandy loam in a
cultivated field 2.5 miles southeast of Jenny Lind, 0.7
mile north of intersection of State Roads 1333 and
1324, and 50 feet west of State Road 1333:
Ap-0 to 7 inches, dark -gray (10YR 4/1) sandy loam;
weak, medium, granular structure; very friable;
common fine roots; medium acid; abrupt, smooth
boundary.
A2-7 to 12 inches, light brownish -gray (10YR 6/2) sandy
loam; weak, medium, granular structure; very fri-
able, common fine roots; common pores filled with
dark -gray material from layer surface; strongly
acid; gradual,, wavy boundary..
Blg-12 to 14 inches, light brownish -gray (10YR 6/2)
sandy clay loam; few, medium, faint, light
yellowish -brown (10YR 6/4) mottles; Weak,'fine,
subangular blocky structure; friable, slightly sticky
and slightly plastic; few pores filled with dark -gray
surface soil; very strongly acid; gradual, wavy
nounaary.
B2tg-14 to 34 inches, gray (10YR
6/1) sandy clay loam;
few, Sue, distinct, brownish -yellow and stxong-
brown mottles; weak, fine, subangular blocky stric-
ture; friable, slightly sticky and slightly plastic;
diseentinuous clay films on faces of peds; :few
fine flakes of mica; very strongly acid; gradual,
wavy boundary.
B3g--34 to 38 inches, gray (IOYR 611) sandy loam; com-
mon, medium, faint, pale -brown (10YR 6/3) met-
tles; weak, fine, subangular blocky structure;
friable disco tinuoustcllay fily lms ndfaces of peds; fewfine
flakes of mica; very strongly acid; gradual; wavy
boundary.
Cg -38 to 66 inches, light brownish -gray (10YR 6/2) sand
le
grainedat ; loose; few hin few lenses
fine fakesoamy of mica; "trougly
acid.
The solum, is about 38 inches thick but ranges from 26 to
40 inches. Reaction is very strongly acid or strongly acid
unless the soils are limed. The Ap or Al horizon is dark
gray or dark grayish brown. The B horizon is gray, light
brownish -gray, or light -gray sandy clay loam or sandy loam
that is mottled with yellow and brown. The C horizon is
sand or loamy sand.
1Lumbee sandy loam (Lu).—This soil is in shallow
dramageways separated by low, broad ridges. Slopes
are 0 to 1 percent. The areas are long and variable in
width and range from about 10 to 100 acres in size.
Included with this soil m mapping are a few areas
of soils that have a' surface layer of very fine sandy
loam and loamy sand. Also included are a few small
areas of Coxville, Portsmouth, Woodington, I and Johns
soils and areas of soils that have a thicker subsoil.
Infiltration is moderate, and runoff is slow.
If drained, the soil is suited to a few locally grown
creps,'ch%efly corn and soybeans. Surface and sub-
s77„4ace drainage is needed before this soil can be
vated or pasiured. The sandy substratum is un-
sianle in ditchbanks and is a limitation to installation
and maintenance of drainage systems.
Water ponding on the surface and a seasonal high
water table are the main limitations in the use and
management. of this soil. Capability unit II1W-8; wood-
land suitability group 2w9.
? UZM r i' i ,,,.
The Lynchburg series consists of nearly level, some-
what poorly drained soils on uplands.
In a representative profile the surface layer is dark -
gray sandy loam about 8 inches thick. The subsurface
layer is light brownish -gray sandy loam about 4 inches
thick. The subsoil is 54 inches thick. The upper part
is pale -brown sandy clay loam that is mottled with
gray and yellow. The lower part is gray sandy clay
I that is mottled with yellow -'and red.
Lynchburg soils are low in natural fertility and con-
tent of organic matter. Permeability is moderate, and
available water capacity is medium. Shrink -swell po-
tential is low. The seasonal high water table is at 'a
depth of about 18 inches.
About half the acreage is cultivated or pastured.
The rest is wooded.
Representative profile of Lynchburg sandy loam in
a cultivated field 0.1 mile north of Savannah School,
0.1 mile northwest of intersection of State Roads 1723
and 1727, and 50 feet west of State Road 17M
Ap-0 to 8 inches, dark -gray” (10YR 4/1) sandy loam;
weak, medium, granular structure; very friable;
common fine roots; medium acid; abrupt, - smooth
boundary.
A2--8 to 12 inches, light brownish -gray (10YR 6/2) sandy
loam; weak, medium, granular structure; very fri-
able; common 'fine roots, many pores filled with
dark-erav material from Ae surface layer; strongly
B1-12 to 15 inches," pale -brown (10YR
6/3) sandy clay
loam; few, Tine, faini, light brownish -gray mottles;
weak, fine, subangular bloehy structure; friable;
common fine roots; few pores filled with dark -gray
material from the surface layer; very strongly
acid; clear, wavy boundary.
B21t-15 to 21 inches, pale -brown (10YR 613) sandy clay
loam; few, medium, faint, light brownish -gray
(10YR 6/2) mottles and few, medium, distinct,
brownish -yellow (10YR 6/6) mottles; weak, fine,
subangular blocky structure; friable, slightly sticky
and slightly plastic; few fine roots; thin, discon-
tinuous clay films on faces of peds; very strongly
acid; clear wavy boundary.
B22tg 21 to 48 inches, gray (JOYR 6/1) sandy clay loam:
common, medium, distinct, brownish -yellow QOYR
6/6). mottles; weak fne, subangular blocky struc-
ture; friable, slighily sticky and slightly plastic;
thin, discontinuous clay films on faces of peds;
ve,y strongly acid; gradual, wavy boundary.
B3g--48 to 66 inches, gray (10YR 6/1) sandy clay foam;
common, medium, distinct andprominent, red
(2.5YR 418) mottles; weak, fine, subangular blocky.
os,.,,nt,,,.o. "Friable" s7ivhtly sticky and slightly Plas-
Cg-66 to 85 inches, light -gray (10Ytt '1/1) sanuy c
- y
loam; few, medium, distinct, strong -brown (7.5YR
5/6) motiles and few, medium, faint, light brown-
ish -gray (10yR 6/2) mottles- massive; friable,
slightly sticky and slightly plastic; extremely acid.
The solum is more than 60 inches thick. Reaction is
strongly acid to extremely acid unless the soils are limed.
The Al or Ap horizon is dark gray or dark grayish brown.
The B horizon is pale brown or light yellowish brown and
mottled with gray and yellow in the upper part. This hori-
gon is sandy clay loam and to a lesser extent sandy loam.

18
SOIL SURVEY
Below a. depth of. about. 21 inches it is gray and mottled
with yellow and red. The C horizon is sandy loam or sandy
clay loam.
ILyilc➢nbur-9 sandy loam (Ly).—This soil is on broad,
smooth flats of interstmam divides. Slopes are 0 to 2
percent. The areas are long and broad and range from
5 to about 100 acres in size.
Included with this soil in mapping are areas of soils
that have a surface layer of very fine sandy loam and
loamy sand and some that have a siltier subsoil than
this soil. .Also included are a few small areas of
Goldsboro, Rains, and Stallings soils.
Infiltration is moderate, and runoff is slow.
Ifdrained, this soil is well suited to most focally
grown crops, chiefly corn and soybeans. The principal
tree species is loblolly pine. Surface and subsurface
drainage is needed for most uses.
The seasonal high water table is the main limitation
in the use and management of this soil. Capability
unit Hw-2; woodland suitability group 2w8. .
The Meggett series consists of nearly level, poorly
drained soil on uplands and stream terraces.
In a representative profile the surface layer is darlt
gray fine sandy loam about 8 inches thick. The sub-
surface layer is light brownish -gray sandy loam about
4 inches thick. The subsoil is 33 inches thick. The up-
per part is gray sandy clay loam that is mottled with
yellow. The lower part is gray clay or sandy clay that
is mottled with brown and yellow. Below the subsoil,
to a depth of about 85 inches, is gray sandy clay Ioam
that is mottled with yellow and gray.
Meggett soils are medium in natural fertility and
low in content of organic matter. Permeability is slow,
and available water capacity is high. Shrink -swell po-
tential is high. The seasonal high water table is at the
surface.
Most of the acreage is wooded. The rest is cultivated
or pastured. '
Representative profile of Meggett_fine sandy loam
in a cultivated field 8 miles east of Sinton, 0.1 mile
south of the intersection of North Carolina Highway
55 and State Road 1806, 0.3 mile southwest of bridge
on ditch road, and 50 feet west of ditch road.
Ap—o to 8 inches, dark -gray (im 4/1) fine sandy loam;
weak, medium, granular structure; very friable;
common fine roots; medium acid; abrupt, smooth
boundary.
A2-8 to 12 inches, light brownish -gray (10YR 6/2) sandy
loam; weak, medium, granular structure; very fri-
able; common fine roots; common pores filled with
dark gray; medium acid; clear, wavy boundary.
B21t9-12 to 17 in gray (10YR 6/1) sandy clay loam;
common, fiponne, angular black structure; friable,
weak, medium, ky
sticky and plastic, common fine roots; common
pores filled with dark -gray sandy loam; slightly
acid; gradual, wavy boundary.
B22tg-77 to 30 inches, gray (10YR 5/1) clay; common,
fine, distinct, strong -brown and yellowish -brown
mottles; weak, coarse, angular blocky structure;
firm, sticky and plastic; thin, discontinuous clay
films on faces of peds and pores; few fine flakes of • lPigure 6—The ItIegget soils are underlain by marl an ramp
mica; moderately alkaline; gradual, wavy bound- places. The marl shown above the waterline in this ditch is a
ary.
limitation to the installation of drau+age systems.
B3g-30 to 45 inches, gray (rOYR 5/1). sandy clay; thin
lenses of sandy Ioam and clay; common, medium,
distinct, brownish -yellow (10 -YR 6/6) and yellow-
ish -brown (1OYR 5/6) mottles; weak, medium,
angular blocky structure; firm, sticky and plastic;
few small fragments of marl; few fine flakes of
mica; moderately alkaline; gradual, wavy boum-
ary.
Cg- 45 to 85 inches, gray (10YR 571) sandy clay loam;
thin lenses of sandy loam and sandy clay; common,
medium, distinct, brownish -yellow (10YR 6/8) and
greenish -gray (5G 5/1) mottles; massive; friable;
few small fragments of marl; moderately alkaline.
The solum is 40 to 60 inches thick. Reaction is medium
acid in the A horizon and the upper part of the B horizon
to moderately alkaline in the lower part of the B horizon
and the C horizon. The A horizon is very dark gray, dark
gray, or grayish brown. where the surface layer is very
dark gray, It is less than 8 inches thick. The B horizon is
gray or light -gray clay, sandy clay, or sandy clay loam that
is mottled with brown and yellow. The C horizon is sandy
loaM, sandy clay loam, clay loam, or clay and in places con-
tains fragments of friable to hard marl.
llh[eggett �nso saaidly P®ammo (Me —This
soil is in shal-
low depressions on broad interstream areas and in
drainageways. Slopes are 0 to 1 percent. The areas are
long and narrow and range from 5 to about 50 acres
in size.
Included with this soil in mapping are a few areas of
soils that have a surface layer of loam. Also included
are a few small areas of Grifton, Lumbee, and Wood-
ington soils.
Infiltration and runoff are slow, and in places the
surface becomes ponded. The soil is difficult to keep in
good tilth, and, because of the moderately high clay
content, it can be worked only over a narrow range of
E content.
If drained, this soil is well suited to a few locally
grown crops, chiefly corn and soybeans. The trees are
chiefly hardwoods and loblolly pine. Surface and sub-
surface drainage is needed before this soil can be cul-
tivated or pastured. In places, this soil is underlain by
marl which, if hard, is a limitation in the construction
of drainage ditches (fig. 6).

L MOIR COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
'High shrink -swell potential, water ponding on the
face, .and a'seasonal high water table are the main
,l nitations in the use and management of this soil.
Capability unit IIIw-2; woodland' suitability group
llw9.
munrville sefles
The Murville series consists of nearly level, very
poorly drained soils on uplands.
In a representative profile the surface layer is black
fine sand about 7 inches thick. The subsoil is 51 inches
thick. The upper part is very dark gray fine sand, the
middle part is black fine sand, and the lower part is
mottled, very dark gray and black fine sand. Below the
subsoil, to a depth of about 87 inches, is gray loamy
fine sand that is mottled with brown and black.
The Murville soils are very low in natural fertility
and medium in content of organic matter. Permeability
is moderately rapid, and available water capacity is
low. Shrink -swell potential is low. The seasonal high
watei! table is at the surface.
Most of the acreage is wooded.
Representative profile of Murville fine sand in a
wooded area east of the intersection of Stat Roads les south of Pink I1103 and ill and 01105
Al -0• to 7 inches, black (10YR 2/1) fine sand; weak, fine,
granular structure; very friable; many large roots;
grains o£ sandh in ; extreof mely acid;anic clear, wavy common
bound-
ary.
! Blh-7 to 20 inches, very dark gray (10YR 3/1) fine sand;
massive; friable; many medium and large roots;
many grains of clean sand, some slightly darker,
slightly firm nodular bodies, extremely acid; clear,
wavy boundary.
B2h 20 to so inches, black (5YR 2/1) fine sand; massive;
deanfriablsa de some lightly darker,w fine and slightly ots; fewfirm nodu-
lar bodies; extremely acid; clear, wavy* 5YR 3 1
B3h-30 to 58 inches, mottled very dark gray ( / )
and black (5YR 2/1) fine sand that has common
grains of clean sand, massive; friable; few me-
dium and fine roots; some slightly darker, slightly
firm nodular bodies; extremely acid; clear, wavy
boundary.
Cg -58 to 87 inches, gray (1oYR 6/1) loamy fine sand;
common, coarse, distinct, very dark brown (10YR
2/2), dark reddish -brown (5YR 2/2), and black
(5YR 2/1) mottles; massive; friable; extremely
acid.
The solum is about 40 to 50 inches thick. Reaction is ex-
tremely acid or very strongly acid unless the soils are limed.
The grains are coated with an organic film, and the soil
has an apparent loamy texture to a depth of about 40
inches or more. The Bh horizon is very dark gray or black
ers of humus
fine
ate grains of sad esand oil sand. In xtendelaces to pockets depth of more than 100
inches.
Murville fine sand (Mu).—This soil is in depressions
on broad, flat interstream areas. Slopes are less than
1 percent. The areas are mostly large and round, but
some are irregularly shaped and small.
small areas
Included with this soil in mapping
of Johnston, Leon, Pactolus, and ToThlmta soils.
Infiltration is rapid, but water ponds on the surface.
' drained, this soil is suited to a few locally grown
crops. If cultivated, corn and soybeans are the chief
crops. The most important tree species are loblolly
79
pine, pond pine, loblolly bay, maple, sweet gum, and
oak. Surface drainage and subsurface drainage are
required if the soil is to be cultivated or pastured.
Water ponding on the surface and a seasonal high
water table are the main limitations in the use and
management of this soil. Capability subclass IC7w,
drained, and VIIw, undrained; woodland suitability
group 2w9.
Pt®rI011K offles
The Norfolk series consists of nearly level to sloping,
well -drained soils on uplands.
In a representative profile the surface layer is gray-
ish -brown loamy sand about 8 inches thick. The
subsurface layer is pale -brown loamy sand about 4
inches thick. The subsoil is 60 inches, thick. The upper
part is light yellowish -brown sandy loam. The middle
part is yellowish -brown sandy clay loam that _is mottled
below a depth of 45 inches with red and gray. The
lower part is brownish -yellow sandy clay loam that is
mottled with gray and red. Below the subsoil, to a
depth of 85 inches, is gray sandy clay loam that is
mottled with yellow and red.
Norfolk soils are low in natural fertility and content
of organic matter. Permeability is moderate, and avail-
able water capacity is medium. Shrink -swell potential
is low. The seasonal high water table remains at about
5 feet below the surface.
Most of the acreage is cultivated. The rest is in non-
farm uses.
Representative profile of Norfolk -loamy sand, 0 to 2
P slopes, in a cultivated field 1.3 miles east of
Newborn Crossroads, 0.4 mile south of intersection of
State Road 1703 and State Road 1729, and 25 feet east
of State Road 1729:
Ap—o to 8 inches, grayish -brown (10YR 5/2) loamy sand;
weak, medium, granular structure; very friable;
common fine roots; strongly acid; abrupt, smooth
boundary.
.A2--8 to 12 inches, pale -brown (loYR 6/3) loamy sand;
weak, medium, granular structure; very friable,
common fine roots; strongly acid; clear, wavy
boundary.
B1=12 to 14 inches, light yellowish -brown (10YR 6/4)
sandy loam; weak, fine, subangular blocky struc-
ture; friable; common fine roots; very strongly
acid, clear, wavy boundary.
B211-14 to 5 inches, yeliowish-brown (10YR 5/8) sandy
clay loam) weak, fine, subangular blocky structure;
friable,
+in�ssatlfissfio"dcntinuoudvlms on faces of
to
blocky structure; Enable, sugnviy suiexy anu s,�K„�+y
plastic; thin, discontinuous clay films on faces of
peds and pores; very strongly acid; gradual, wavy
boundary.
B3-60 to 72 inches, brownish -yellow (10YR 6/6) sandy
clay loam; common, medium, distinct, light brown-
ish -gray (loYR - 6/2) mottles and few, medium,
prominent, red (2.5YR 4/8) mottles' weak, fine,
subangular blocky structure; friable, slightly sticky
and slightly plastic; very strongly acid; gradual,
wavy boundary.
C-72 to 85 inches, gray QoYR 6/1) sandy clay loam that
has thin strata of sandy clay; common, medium,

20
SOIL .SURVEY
'distinct, brownish -yellow (IOYR 6/8) and red
(2.5YR 4/8) mottles; massive; friable to firm.in
sandy Clay strata; slightly sticky and plastic; very
strongly acid.
The solum is more than 60 inches thick. Reaction is very
strongly acid or strongly acid unless the soils are limed.
The Ali or Al horizon is grayish brown or light brownish
gray. The, B horizon is light yellowish brown, yellowish
brown, brownish yellow, or strong brown. The texture cen-
ters on sandy clay loam, but in places the upper few inches
is sandy loam. The lower part of the B horizon is mottled
with gray and red. The C horizon is sandy loam or sandy
clay loam that has thin strata'o£ sandy clay in places.
yJgrfolk Iloaaaay wand, 0 to 2 gnerceant slopes (Na).—
This soil is on smooth, broad, slightly convex. divides.
The areas are irregularly shaped and range from 5 to
about 200 acres in size. This soil has the profile de-
scribed as representative for the series.
fncluded.with this soil in mapping are a few areas of
soils that have a surface layer of sandy loam and very
fine sandy loam and some that have a siltier subsoil.
Also included are a few small areas of Goldsboro and
Wagram soils and a few. soils that have sandy clay sub-
soils,. 40 to 60 inches below the surface. Some delinea-
tions have a sand spot or one or more spots of wet
soils in depressions. These spots of other kinds of soils
Are shown in mapping by special spot symbols.
Infiltration is moderate, and runoff is slow.
This soil is well suited to most locally grown crops
and is used chiefly for tobacco, corn, soybeans, truck
crops, fruit crops, and small grain. It is especially well
suited to tobacco.
There are no major limitations in the use of this
i soil. Capability unit I-1; woodland group 2ol.
Norfolk loamy sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes (Nb).—
This soil (fig. i) is on convex divides. The areas are
long and narrow and range from 5 to 30 acres in
size.
Included with this soil in mapping are a few areas
of soils that have a surface layer of yellowish -brown
sandy Ioam and very fine sandy loam that is 4 to 3
inches thick and some that have a silty subsoil. Also
included are a few small areas of Goldsboro and
Wagram soils and a few areas of soils that have sandy
clay 40 to 60 inches "below the surface. In places,
mapped areas include short strips of Bibb soils in
drainageways, a few small spots of a soil that is sandy
throughout, and spots of wet soil in depressions_ Spe-
cial symbols are used to show these spots.
Infiltration is moderate, and runoff is. medium. and Craven soils: In places mapped areas include nar-
This soil is well suited to most locally grown crops. raw strips of Bibb soils in drainageways.
It is used chiefly for corn, tobacco, soybeans, truck Infiltration is moderate," and runoff is rapid.
crops, and small grain and is especially well suited to This soil is well suited to most locally grown crops;
tobacco. however, the short length and strong gradient of the
Runoff is the main limitation in the use and man- slopes limit the use of this soil for row crops,
agement of this soil. Capability unit IIe-1; woodland Slope and runoff are the main limitations in the
group 201. use and management of this soil. Capability unit
Norfolk loamy sawed, .6 to 10 pereent slopes (Nc).- Ille-1; woodland group 2ol.
This soil is on short side slopes next to drainageways.
The areas are long and narrow and range from 5 to
20 acres in size:
Included with this soil in mapping are a few areas Th
of soils that have a surface layer of sandy loam and
'very fine sandy loam that is 4 to 6 inches thick. Also t err
included in mapping are a few small areas of Wagram
Figare 7.—Pro81e of Norfolk loamy sand.
e Pactolus series consists of nearly level, some-
what poorly drained soils on uplands and stream
aces,
In a representative profile the surface layer is dark

24
SOIL . SURVEY
a limitation to installation and maintenance of drain-
age systems.
Water ponding on the surface and a seasonal high
water table are the main limitations in the use and
management of this soil. Capability unit III _3,
drained; capability subclass Vw, undrained; woodland
Suitability group lw9.
The Rains series consists of nearly level, poorly
drained soils on uplands.
In a representative profile the surface layer is dark -
gray sandy loam about 10 inches thick. The subsurface
layer is light brownish -gray sandy loam about 3 inches
thick. The subsoil is about 72 inches thick. The upper
part is light brownish -gray sandy clay loam, and the
lower part is gray sandy clay loam' that is mottled r
with brown and yellow.
Rains soils are low in natural' fertility and content
of organic matter. Permeability is moderate, and
available water capacity is medium. Shrink -swell po-
tential is low. The seasonal high water table is at the
surface.
Most of the acreage is wooded. The rest is cultivated
and pastured.
Representative profile of Rains sandy loam, in a cul-
soutivth of the intersectionted field 0.4 of State Roae east 'of ds 541rand IB81t I e
and 20 feet south of State Road 1581:
Ap—O to 16 inches, dark -gray (1DYR 4/1) sandy loam;
weak, medium, granular structure; very friable;
many medium roots; medium acid; abrupt, smooth
boundary.
A2-10 to 13 inches, light brownish -gray (10YR 6/2) sandy
loam* weak, medium, granular structure; very
friable, many medium roots; common pores filled
with dark -gray material from AP horizon; strongly
acid; clear, wavy boundary.
Blg-13 to 16 inches, light brownish -gray (10YR 6/2)
sandy clay loam; weak, fine, subangular blocky
structure; friable, slightly sticky and slightly plas-
tic; few fine roots;.common pores filled with dark -
gray material from AP horizon; very strongly acid;
clear, wavy boundary.
B21tg-16 to 34 inches, gray (10YR 6/1) sandy clay loam;
common, medium, distinct, yellowish -brown (10YR
5/4) mottles; weak, fine, subangular bloeky struc-
ture; friable, slightly sticky and slightly plastic;
few fine roots., thin, discontinuous clay films on
faces of peds; very strongly acid; gradual, wavy
boundary.
B22tg-34 to 48 inches, gray (YOYR 6/1) sandy clay loam;
common, medium, distinct, yellowish -brown (10YR
5/4) and grayish -brown (loYR 5/2) mottles and
few, fine, distinct, yellowish -red mottles; weak,
fine, subangular blocky structure• friable, slightly
sticky and slightly plastic; thin, discontinuous clay
fibns on faces of Peds; very strongly acid; grad-
ual wavy boundary.
B23tg-48 to 63 inches, gray (10YR 6/1) sandy clay loam;
few > medium, distinct, yellowish -brown (10YR
5/4) mottles and common, coarse, faint, grayish -
brown (SoYR '5/2) mottles; weak, fine, subangular
blocky 'structure; friable) slightly sticky and
slightly plastic; very strongly acid; gradual, wavy.
boundary. •
Bsg-63 to 85 inches, gray UOYR 6/1) sandy clay loam
that has thin lenses of sandy clay and sandy
loam; few, coarse, faint, grayish -brown (10YR 5/2)
and reddish-yellow (7.5YR 6/8) mottles; massive;
friable, slightly sticky and slightly plastic; very
strongly acid.
The solum is more than 60 inches thick. Reaction is
strongly acid or very strongly acid unless the soils are
limed. The Al or Ap horizon is dark gray or very dark
gray. Where the surface layer is very dark gray, it is less
than 8 inches thick. The B horizon is gray or light -gray"
sandy clay loam and, to a lesser extent, sandy loam that
is mottled' with brown, yellow, and red.
Rains sandy loam (Ra)'.—This soil is in depressions
and on smooth flats in broad interstieam areas. Slopes
are less than I percent. The areas are generally long
and wide and range from 5 to several hundred acres
in size.
Included with this soil in mapping are a few areas
of soils that have a surface layer of loam and very
fine sandy loam and some that have a siltier subsoil.
Also included are a few small areas of Coxville, Lynch-
burg, and Pantego soils.
Infiltration is moderate, and runoff is slow or the
surface is ponded.
If drained, this soil is well suited to a few locally
grown crops, chiefly corn and soybeans. The principal
tree species is loblolly pine. Surface' and subsurface
drainage is needed before this soil can be cultivated
or pastured.
Water ponding on the surface and a seasonal high
water table are the main limitations in the use and
management of this soil. Capability unit IIIw-3,
drained• capability subclass Vw, undrained; woodland
suitab8y group 2w3.
��et.H�flIlfl�'3
The Stallings series consists of nearly level, some-
what poorly drained soils on uplands and stream
Terraces.
In a representative profile the surface layer is dark -
gray loamy sand about 8 inches thick. The subsurface
layer is light brownish -gray loamy sand about 4 inches
thick. The subsoil is 68 inches thick. The upper part
is pale -brown sandy loam that is mottled with gray
and brown, the middle part is light -gray sandy loam
that is mottled with brown and yellow, and the lower
part is light brownish -gray loamy sand that is mot -
tied with gray and brown.
Stallings soils are low in natural fertility and con-
tent of organic matter. Permeability is moderately
rapid, and available water capacity is medium. Shrink -
swell potential is low. The seasonal high water table
is within 15 inches of the surface.
About half the acreage is cultivated. A small acreage
is in pasture, and the rest is wooded.
Representative profile of Stallings loamy sand in a
cultivated field 8 miles south of Kinston, 0.5 mile south
of Woodington on U.S. Highway 258, and goo feet east
of U.S. Highway 258:
Ap—O to 8 inches, dark -gray (10YR 4/1) loamy sand;
weak, medium, granular structure; very :friable;
many fi
ne roots; strongly acid; abrupt, smooth
boundary.
A2-8 to 12 inches light brownishBy(JOYR 6/2) loamy
sand; weak, medium, granular structure; very fri-
able; many fine roots; strongly acid; clear, Wavy
boundary.

i"
V�TH
SOIL SURVEY
Umbrie Oehraqualfs are low in natural fertility and
medium in content of organic matter. Permeability
is moderate, and available water capacity is medium.
Shrink -swell potential is moderate. The seasonal high
water table is at the surface.
Most. of the,acreage is wooded. The rest is cultivated
and pastured.
Representative profile. of Umbrie Oehraqualfs, 0.3
mile south of Loftin's Crossroad, 0.3 mile east of the
intersection of North Carolina Highway 58 and State
Road 1914, and 100 feet south of State Road 1914:
Ap-0 to 11 inches, black (10YR 2/Y) loam; weak, medium,
granular structure; friable; common medium roots;
strongly acid;. gradual, wavy b lOYR 3/1) loam;
AZ -11 to 14 inches, very dark gray
weak, medium, granular structure; friable; com-
mon medium roots; common pores filled with black
surface soil; strongly acid; gradual, wavy bound-
ary.
Blg-14 to 18 inches, grayish -brown (lOYR 5/2) sandy
' clay loam; weak, fine, subangular blocky structure;
friable; common fine roots; £ew pores filled with
black loam; strongly acid; gradual, wavy bound-
ary..
B21tg-11 9 loam Cheommony1 medium, distinet,5 yeIlovrish
' bxown (lOYR-5/6) mtittle5, weak fine, subangular
blocky structure; friable, slightly sticky and
slightly plastic; thin, discontinuous clay films on
faces of peds and pores; medium acid; gradual,
wavy boundary.
B22tg-34 to 42 inches, gray (lOYR 6/1) sandy clay that
has thin strata of sandy loam; few, medium, dis-
tinct, yellowish-brown'(lOYR 5/6) mottles; weak,
fine, subangular blocky structure• friable, slightly
sticky and slightly plastic; thin, discontinuous clay
Elms on faces o£ peds and pores; neutral; gradual,
wavy boundary.
�B3g-2 to 70� inches, gray �(IOYR 6/1) sandy clay loam
that has thin strata of sand and greenish -gray
clay; massive; friable, slightly sticky and slightly
plastic; mildly alkaline.
The solum is more than 6D inches thick. Reaction is
strongly acid in the A�horizon and BY horizon unless the
soils are limed and medium acid to mildly alkalinein the
lower part o£ the B horizon. The A horizon is black or
very dark gray. The B horizon is grayish -brown or gray
sandy clay loam or sandy clay that is mottled with bxovm
and gray. The underlying horizons are soft marl mixed with
loamy sand, sandy clay loam, or clay.
VJan6ric ®chraqualfs (Uo).—This soil is on broad,
smooth flats' on interstream areas. Slopes are less than
1 percent. The areas are wide and long and range
from 20 to about 15D acres in size.
Included with this soil in mapping are a few small
areas of Grifton, Meggett, Portsmouth, and Torhunta
SOILS.
Infiltration is moderate. Runoff is very slow or the
surface is ponded.'
If drained, this soil is well suited to a few locally
grown crops, chiefly corn and soybeans. The important
tree species are loblolly and pond pine. Surface and
subsurface drainage is needed before this soil can be
cultivated or pastured. In pIaees this soil is underlain
by marl, which may present a problem to construction
of ditches.
VJatei ponding on the surface and a seasonal high
water table are the main )imitations in the use and.
management of these soils. Capability unit I7Iw-3;
woodland suitability group 1w9.
� �i:�iii ,•�i�ir
The pPag'ram series consists of nearly level to
strongly sloping, well -drained soils on uplands.
In a representative profile the surface layer is
grayish -brown loamy sand about 8 inches thick. The
subsurface layer is pale -brown loamy sand about 22
inches thick. The subsoil is sandy clay loam 51 inches
thick. The upper part is yellowish brown, the middle
part is brownish yollow.,mottled with red and gray,
and the lower part is light yellowish brown mottled
with brown and gray. Below the subsoil, to a depth of
9D inches, is brownish -yellow sandy clay loam that is
mottled with brown and red.
Wagram soils are low to very low in natural fer-
tility and content of organic matter. Permeability is
moderately rapid, and available water capacity is low.
Shrink -swell potential is low. The seasonal high water
table remains below a depth of about 5 feet.
Most of the acreage is cultivated. The rest is used
for nonfarm purposes.
Repxesentative profile of �agram loamy sand, 0 to
6 percent slopes, in a cultivated field 2.4 miles south-
east of LaGrange, 0.4 mile southeast of intersection of
U.S. Highway 70 and State Road 1520; and 20 feet
east of farm road:
Ap-0 to 8 inches, grayish -brown (lOYR 5/2) loamy sand;
weak, medium, granular structure; very friable•
common fine roots; medium acid; abrupt, smooth
boundary.
A2-8 to 30 inches, pale -brown (lOYR 6/3) loamy sand;
common, medium, faint mottles of uncoated sand;
weak, medium, granular structure; very friable;
few fine roots; very strongly acid; gradual, wavy
boundary.
B21t-3D to 58 inches, yellowish -brown (IOYR 5/8) sandy
clap loam; weak, fine; subangular blocky structure;
.friable, slightly sticky and slightly plastic; thin,
discontinuous clay films on faces of peds; very
strongly acid; gradual, wavy boundary.
B22t--58 to 71 inches, brownish -yellow (lOYR 6/8) sandy
clay loam• common, medium, prominent, red
(2.5YR 4/8) mottles and few, medium, distinct,
gray (lOYR 6I1) mottles; weak fine, subangular
blocky structure• £ruble, slightly sticky and
slightly plastic; thin, discontinuous clay films on
' faces of peds; very strongly acid; gradual, wavy
boundary. -
B3-71 to 81 inches, light yellowish -brown (lO�YR 6/4) .
" � sandy clay loam; common, medium, distinct, strong- '
brown (7.5YR 5/8) and gray (lOYR 6/Y) mottles;
weak, -fine, subangular blocky structure; friable,
slightly sticky and slightly plastic; very strongly
acid; gradual, wavy boundary.
C-81 to 90 inches, brownish -yellow (IOYR 6/6) sandy
clay loam• common, coarse, distinct, gray (1-0YR
6/1) mottles and common, fine, distinct, strong -
brown mottles and common, fine, prominent, red
mottles; massive; very friable, slightly sticky and
slightly plastic; very strongly acid.
The solum is more than 60 inches thick. Reaction is
strongly acid or very strongly acid unless the soils are
limed. The Ap or AY horizon is grayish brown or light
grayish brown: "The B horizon is light yellowish -brown, yel-
lowish -brown, brownish -yellow, ox strong -brown sandy clay
loam or sandy loam that is mottled with red, brown, and
gray in the lower part. The C horizon is sandy clay loam,
sandy loam,. or loamy sand.
OPagraau floamy sand, 0 to 6 percent slogoes (Wb)� -
his soil is on slightly convex divides. The areas are
regularly shaped and range from 10 to about 50

LENOIR COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
acres in size. This soil has the profile described as
-esenta'tive for the serieso
ncluded with Eris soil in mapping are a few areas
of soils that have a surface layer of sand. Also in
eluded are a few small areas of Blanton, Goldsboro,
Norfolk, and Pocalla soils. Short, narrow strips of
Bibb soils in `drainageways and -a few, small depres-
sions of wet soils are also included. Those wet soils
are shown by wet spot symbols.
Infiltration is moderate, and runoff is slow.
This soil is suited to most locally grown crops and
is used chiefly for tobacco, corn, soybeans, and small
grain.
Leaching of plant nutrients, low available water
capacity, and the hazard of soil blowing ate the main
limitations in the use and management of this soil.
Capability unit II8-1; woodland suitability group 3s2.
Wagram loamy saBd, 6 to 110 percent sl®pes (Wo);
This soil (fig. 9) is next to drainageways where side
slopes are short. The areas are long and narrow and
range from 5 to 100 acres in size.
Included with this soil in,mapping are a few areas
of soils that have a surface layer of sand. Also in -
Fig¢re 9.—ProSle of Wagram Ioamy sand.
27
chided are a few small areas of Blanton, Craven, and
Norfollc soils. Narrow strips of Bibb soils in drainage -
ways are also included.
Infiltration is moderate, and runoff is medium.
This soil is fairly well suited to most locally grown
crops, but the short length and gradient of the slopes
limit the use: of this soil for row crop.,,cultivation. Run-
off causes a hazard of erosion if this soil is cultivated.
Leaching of plant nutrients, low available water
capacity, runoff, and slope are the main limitations in
the use and management of this soil.. Capability sub-
class IIIs; woodland suitability group 8s2.
Wagrwn loamy salad, 10 to 15 pexeent sloPes (Wd) .—
Th s soil is between gently sloping uplands and flood
plains or stream terraces. The areas4 are long and
narrow and range from 5 to 75 acres in size.
Included with this soil in mapping are a fewsmall
areas of soil that has steeper slopes and areas of soil
that has a surface layer of sandy loam. Also included
are a few small areas of Bibb, Blanton, Craven, and
Lakeland soils.
Infiltration is moderate, and runoff is rapid.
This soil is fairly well suited to most locally grown
crops, but the short length and gradient of the slopes
limit the use of this soil for row -crop cultivation. Run-
off causes a hazard of erosion if this soil is cultivated.
Practices are needed to control runoff and erosion.
Leaching of plant .nutrients, low available water
capacity, runoff, and slope are the main limitations in
the use and management of this soil. Capability sub-
class IVs; woodland suitability group 3s2.
The Wickham series consists of nearly level to gently
sloping, well -drained soils on stream terraces.
In a representative profile the surface layer is brown
loamy sand about 8 inches thick. The subsurface layer
is light yellowish -brown loamy sand about 7 inches
thiek. The subsoil is 28 inches thick. The upper part
is strong -brown sandy clay loam, the middle part is
yellowish -red sandy clay loam that is mottled .with
brown, , and the lower part is strong -brown sandy
loam. Below the subsoil, to a depth of 65 inches, is
brownish -yellow Ioamy sand.
Wickham soils are low in natural fertility and con-
tent of organic matter. Permeability is moderate, and
available water capacity is medium. Shrink -swell po-
tential is low. The seasonal high water table remains
below a depth of 5 feet.
Most of the acreage is cultivated. The' rest is pas-
tured.
Representative profile of Wickham loamy sand, 1
to 6 percent slopes, m i cultivated field,5.7 miles south
Roe west of intersection of State
ads 100 LaGranBand 1313, and 25 feet northof State Road
1313:
Ap-0 to 8 inches, brown UOYR 613) loamy sand; weak,
medium, granular structure; very friablesm-
mon fine roots; medium acid; abrupt,mo
th
boundary. 10YR 61 4)
A8-8 to 16 inches, light yellowish-bro�r structure;
friable;
sand; weak, medium, graniila
very common fine roots; strongly acid;
abrupt, wavy boundary.

28
SOIL SURVEY
B1-15 to 19 inches, strong -brown (7.5YR 5/6) sandy clay
loam; weak, fine, subangular blocky structure; fri-
able; common
ri-
able;'common fine roots; strongly acid; clear, wavy
boundary.
B21t-19 •to 25 inches, yellowish -red (5YR 4/8) sandy clay
loam; moderate, fine, subangular blocky structure;
friable, sticky and plastic; clay films on .faces of
`peds; few flakes of. mica and feldspar grains;
strongly acid; gradual, wavy boundary.
B22t-25 to 38 inches, yellowish -red (5YR 5/8) sandy clay
loam; few, medium, faint, yellowish -brown (10YR
5/4) mottles; weak, fine, subangular blocky strue-
ture, friable, slightly sticky and slightly plastic;
common small flakes of mica and few feldspar
grains; strongly acid; gradual, wavy boundary.
B3-38 to 43 inches, strong -brown (7.5YR 5/8) sandy
loam; weak, fine, subangular blocky structure; very
friable; common small flakes of mica; strongly
acid; gradual, wavy boundary.
—
IIC43 to 65 inches, brownish -yellow (lOYR 6/6) loamy
sand; single grained; very friable; common small
flakes of mica and few feldspar grains; few peb-
bles; strongly acid.
The solum is about 40- to 55 inches thick. Reaction is
strongly acid to slightly acid unless the soils are limed.
The Ap and Al horizons are brown or grayish brown, and
the A2 horizon is light yellowish brown oriole brown. The
B horizon is yellowish -red or strong -brown clay loon, sandy
- clay loam, or sandy Ioam that is mottled with brown in the
. lower part. The C horizon is loamy sand'or sand and gen-
erally contains gravel:
Wickham loamy nand, 1 to 6 percent nH®g¢s (
Wk):
This soil is on smooth, low ridges. The areas ai
longer than they are wide and range from 5 to
acres in size.
Included with this soil in mapping are a few aree
of eroded soils that have a surface layer of yellowish
brown sandy loam and loam. Also included are a fe,
small areas of Kahmia and Kenansville soils. Strip
of Bibb soils in. drainageways and a few small spot
of deep sand or wet spots are also included. Thes
wet spots are shown in mapping by special spot sym
bots.
Infiltration is moderate, and runoff is medium.
This soil is well suited to most locally grown crops
It is used chiefly for corn, tobacco, soybeans, and small
grain.
Runoff is the main limitation in the use and man
agement of this soil. Capability unit IIe-1; woodland
Suitability group 2o7.
The Woodisigton series consists of nearly level,_
_poorly drained soils on uplands and stream terraces.,
In a representative profile the surface layer is very
dark gray loamy sand about 4 inches thick.. The sub-
surface layer is grayish -brown loamy sand about 8
inches thick. The subsoil is 73 inches thick. The upper
part is light brownish -gray sandy loam that is mottled
with brown, the middle part is gray sandy loam that
is mottled with brown and gray, and the lower part is
light -gray loamy sand that is mottled with yellow.
Woodington soils are low in natural fertility and
content of organic matter. Permeability is moderately
rapid, and available water capacity is medium. Shrink -
swell potential is low. The seasonal high water table
s within 12 inches of'the surface.
Most of the acreage is wooded. The rest is cultivate(
and pastured.
Representative profile of Woodington loamy sand u
a wooded area 5 miles south of Kinston, 0.5 mile nortl
of the intersection of State Roads 1161 and 1149, anc
10 feet north of State Road 1149:
Al -0 to 4 inches, very dark gray (10YR 3/1) loamy sand;
weak, medium, granular strtieture; very friable;
many. fine roots; very strongly acid; gradual, wavy
boundary.
A2-4 to 12 inches, grayish -brown (10YR 5/2) loamy sand;
weak, 'medium, granular structure; very -friable-
many fine roots; few medium pores filled with
dark -gray material from the surface layer; very
strongly acid; clear, wavy boundary.
B21tg-12 to 16 inches, light brownish -gray (10YR 6/2)
sandy Ioam; few., medium, distinct, light yellowish -
brown (10YR 6/4) mottles; weak, fine, subangular
blocky structure; very friable; slightly sticky; sand
coated and bridged with clay; few medium pores
filled with dark -gray material from the surface
layer; very strongly acid; gradual, wavy boundary.
B22tg-16 to 32 inches, gray (10YR 611) sandy loam; few,
medium, distinct, light yellowish -brown (10YR 6/4)
and strong"brown (7.5YR 5/6) mottles; weak, fine,
.subangular blocky structure; friable; slightly
sticky; sand coated and bridged with clay; very
strongly acid; gradual, wavy boundary.
B23tg--32 to 47 inches, gray (10YR 6/1) sandy loam; com-
mon pockets of light -gray (10YR 7/1)'and yellow-
ish -brown (10YR 5/4) sand; weak, fine, subangular
blocky structure; very friable; very strongly acid;
gradual, wavy boundary. -
B3g=47 to 86 inches, light -gray '(10YR. 7/1) loamy sand;
few, medium, distinct, brownish -yellow (IOYR 6/6)
mottles; weak, fine, granular structure; Ioose; com-
mon small bodies of clean sand; very strbngly acid.
The solum is more than 60 inches thick. Reaction is very
strongly acid or strongly acid unless the soils are limed. The
Ap or Al horizon is dark gray or very dark gray. The very
dark gray surface layer is less than 8 inches thick. The.B
horizon is gray or light brownish gray and is mottled with
yellow and brown. The upper part is sandy loam, and the
lower part is loamy sand or sandy loam. The C horizon is
sandy loam or loamy sand.
Woodistg2on loamy sand (
Wn),—This soil is on broad,
smpoth flats on interstream areas and in depressions.
_ Slopes are less than 1 percent. The areas are about as.
wide as they are long and range from 10 to 50 acres
in size.
Included with this soil in mapping are a few areas
of soils that have a surface layer of fine sandy loam.
Also included are a few small areas of Lumbee, Rains,
Stallings, and Torhunta soils and small areas of soils
that have an intermittent, thin layer of hardpan and
concretions at a depth of 4 to 6 inches.
Infiltration is moderate, and runoff is slow to'ponded.
If drained, this soil is well suited to a few locally
grown crops, chiefly corn and soybeans. The important
tree species is loblolly pine. Surface and subsurface
drainage is needed if this soil is cultivated'or pastured.
Where the Iower part of the subsoil is sandy, there is z
in in ditchbanks. This is a limitation in drain-
age installation and maintenance.
Runoff and a seasonal high water table are the main
limitations . in the use and management of this soil.
Capability unit IIIw-3, drained; capability subclass
VIw, undrained; woodland suitability group 2w9.

32 SOIL SURVEY
TABLE 2. -Estimated average acre yields of crops under intensive management
Absence of yield means that the crop is not commonly grown on the soil or that yield estimates are not available]
'AUX stands for animal -unit -month. This is a term used w expEGbb su_-__--
months 1 acre will support one animal unit, such as one cow, one steer, one horse, fi
Corn
Soybeans
Tobacco
Cucum-
bers
Sweet-
potatoes
Wheat
Coastal
bermuda
Pasture
Fescue
Coastal
Soil
hay
and
ber-
clover
muda
Lb
Bu
Bu
Bu
Tons
AUMV
AUM%
Bss
Bu.
8'0
Bibb soils, frequently flooded -------------poop--
10
160
35
25
1,600
_--
_
55
3.5
slopes ____---____
Blanton sand, O'fr
.:
___
-
___
740
___
qumtlent
ChewacIa loam, frequently flooded _______
90
40
___
45
---
7.0
---
Coxville loam --------- -- '------ -----------
85
105
40
2,560
---
---
56'
6.0
7.0
---
raven fine sandy loam, 1 to 4 percent slopes ------
___
5.0
6.5
--
Craven fine sandy loam, 4 to 8 percent slopes ------
-46
--
290
3b0
66
6.D
Coldsboro loamy, sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes --------
114
40
3,000
9.0
3rifton sandy loam ------------ --------- --poop--
45
--
2,760
--
270.
___
50
5.0
8,0
1 .0
120
6.0
fohns sandy loam --------- ---------------------
80
40
'
fohnston sods -- - ------ -------------
- -
110
45
2,906
225
300
60
5.5
'•
�ahnia loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes ---------
40
2,800
220
_
55
5.0
ialmia loamy sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes ---poop--
100
30
2,00
300
45
4.5
9.D
Cepansville loamy sand, 0 to 6.percent slopes ___-
70
---
Citiston loam, frequently flooded ____-__--
'
---
---
20
---
--
---
3.D�
___
6.0
.akeland sand, 6 to 6 percent slopes --------poop--
55
35
--
---
--
_--
---
&0
---
100
--
--
8.0
,eaf loam poop ------poop-----------------
95
45
2,206
---
---
---
,enoir loam --------------'---- ______________
--
3.0
---
7.0
,eon sand ---------------------poop--
116
45
--
-,5
---
1140
,umbee sandy loam -----------------------poop---'
110
46
2,6--
5.5
7.0
ynehburg sandy loam --------------------------
Y10
40
---
---
_--
---
8.0
_--
4eggett fine sandy loam ------------------------
Zurville.fine sand _____-- -----------
126
40
3,000
29D
370
60
6.0
_
10.5.
orfolk loamy sand, 6 to 2 percent slopes --poop--
2,96D
280
350
55
6.0
7.5
10.5
loamy 2 to 6 percent slopes ______--
115
35
50
5.5
7.0
IDA
(orfolk sand,
forfolk loamy sand, 6 to 10 percentslopes ---poop
-70
30
---
--
---
3.4
'actolus-loamy sand -----------------------poop-
90
40
.1,800
---
--
---
_--
---
---
amlico muck --------� ----------poop---------
50
---
---
--
---
---
antego loam ---_-----poop--en - opes---------
.110
30
2,000
300
40
5.D
. 9.00
7.
0 to 6 percent slopes ---poop=-
80"
___
walla loamy sand,
110
40
---
---
ortsmouth loam -------- --poop------poop-- -----
110
40
2,200
---
--
8.0
-- -
nine sandy loam ...... -------- ----------------
105
40
2,560
--
___
__-
4.8
SA
11.5
tallings loamy sand -_---------.----------- ___
90
30
---
--
---
. ---
8.0
-'-
orhunta loam - ----poop--pooppooppoop--poop--
100
3D
---
9.0
mbrie Ochraqualfs ------------- -----------
80
30
2,400
___
300
40
6
9.0
8,15
agram loamy sand, 0 to S percent slopes --------
20
2,100
7.5
---
'agram loamy sand, 6 to 16 percent slopes -poop--
70
_--
---
60
6.5
'agram loamy sand, YO to 15 percent slopes ------
-
356
6.0
10•5
'ickham 1 to 6 slopes _____--
165
40
2,000
225
_--
9.5
0
loamy sand, percent
110
40
---
---
'oodington loamy sand ___________ -------------
---
---
..;+., ,.s
., „n�,,,•P
i+ 9e
the number
of
ve hogs, or seven sheep or goats without dam -
ate to the sod,
no significant restrictions or limitations for woodland The management problems evaluated in the three
use or management. The Hurd element in the symbol
indicates the degree of management problems and the
general suitability of the soils for certain kinds of
trees.
In the second column is a brief description of the soils
in the woodland suitability group.
In the third column is a list of some of the commer-
cially important trees that are suited to the soils in
the group. These are the trees that woodland managers
Will, generally favor in intermediate or improvement
cuttings. In column 4 the potential productivity of
these trees is given in terms of site index. The site
index is the average height of dominant trees, in feet,
at age 30 for cottonwood; at age 35 for sycamore; and
at age 50 for all other species or types.
Listed in columns 5 and 6 are commercial broad-
leaved and needle -leaved trees suitable for planting in
soils of each group* columns at the.far right of table 3 are erosion hazard,
equipment limitations, and seedling mortality. Erosion
hazard measures the risk of soil losses in well-managed
woodland. Erosion hazard is slight if expected soil loss
is small, moderate if some measures to control erosion
are needed in logging and construction, and severe if
intensive treatment or special equipment and methods
are needed to prevent excessive soil losses.
Equipment limitation ratings reflect 'the soil con -
ons that restrict the use of equipment normally
used in woodland management or harvesting. Slight
ratings indicate equipment use is not limited to Idnd or
time of year. A rating of moderate indicates a seasonal
H
or need -for modification in methods or equip-
ment. Severe limitations indicate the need for special-
ized equipment or operations.
Seedling mortality ratings indicate the degree of ex-
pected mortality of planted seedlings where plant com-

LENOIR COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
33
petition is not a limiting factor. Normal rainfall, good 25 percent, a moderate rating indicates a loss of 25 to
.ting stock, and proper planting are assumed. A 50 percent, and a severe rating indicates a loss of more
s .ght rating indicates expected mortality is less than than 50 percent of the seedlings.
TABLE 3.—Potential productivity, preferred species of trees, and hazards to management, by woodland suita-
bility groups of soils'
Woodland
suitability Description of soils
groups, soil series, in group
and map symbols
Group 1w8:
Chewacla: Ch.
Group Iw9:
Johnston: JS.
]Kinston: Kn.
Meggett: Me,
Pantego: Pe.
Portsmouth: Pi
Umbria
Ochraqualfs:
Uo.
Group 201:
Nor£ollc: Na,
Nb, Na,
Group 207:
galmia: Ka, Kb.
Wickham: Wk
Nearly level, some-
what poorly
drained soils that
have a loamy
subsoil; on flood
plains, subject to
frequent flood -
Nearly level, paorl
drained or very
poorly drained
soils that have a
loamy or clayey
subsoil; on flood
plains, stream
terraces, and up-
lands; subject to
veryfrequent
flooding; very
high potential
productivity;
suitable for
needle -leaved
trees, broad-
leaved'trees, or a
combination of
both.
Nearly level to slop-
ing, well -drained
soils that have a
loamy subsoil; on
uplands; high po-
tential productiv-
jty; no serious
management
problems; best
suited to needle -
leaved trees.
Nearly level -
and
gently sloping, .
well -drained sods
that have a loamy
subsoil; on
stream terraces;
high potential
productivity;
no serious man-
agement prob-
lems • suited to
needle -leaved
trees, broad-
leaved trees, or a
combination of
both.
Trees pxeferi ed for
Potential productivity management and planting
Trees
Loblolly pine _
Slash pine ___
Sweetgum
Yellow -poplar
Water oak ___
Wi1Iow oak _ _ _
Cherrybark
oak.
Cottonwood
Green ash
Sycamore
Sweetgum' _--
Water oak' _--
Willow oak'_
Loblolly pine
Slash pine'
Cottonwood' _
Loblolly pine .
Slash pine _ _ __
Longleaf pine
Loblolly pine
Slash pine _ _ _.
Longleaf pine
Yellow -poplar
Sweetgum
114
90
90
Y00
100
100
Sweetgum',
green ash'
yellow -pop-
lar', willow
oak', water
oak', white
oak', swam;
chestnut
oak',syca-
more ',
swamp
tupelo.
Loblolly pine
as pine'
and pine'!
bald-
cypress.
90 Soils not suit- Loblolly pine,
90able. slash pine,
70 longleaf
pine.
90
90
70
100
90
Yellow -pop -
lar, sweet -
heriybark
oak,
shumaid
oak, south-
ernred oak,
wh to oak,
black
walnut,
white ash.
Loblolly pine,
slash pine,
Erosion ]quipment Seedling
hazard limitations I mortality
__� Moderate
Slight __I Severe' __.
Mod-
erate.
� Severe.'
ISIight__� Slight ____� Slight.
Siight
__I Slight ____� Slight.
d -leaved
Needle-Ieaved
ecies
speciesrn
•
Loblolly pine,tonwood,
slash pine,etgurn,
bald -
en ash,
eypress.mard,rrybark,amore,ow-pop-
PtUPB10.
swampelo.
114
90
90
Y00
100
100
Sweetgum',
green ash'
yellow -pop-
lar', willow
oak', water
oak', white
oak', swam;
chestnut
oak',syca-
more ',
swamp
tupelo.
Loblolly pine
as pine'
and pine'!
bald-
cypress.
90 Soils not suit- Loblolly pine,
90able. slash pine,
70 longleaf
pine.
90
90
70
100
90
Yellow -pop -
lar, sweet -
heriybark
oak,
shumaid
oak, south-
ernred oak,
wh to oak,
black
walnut,
white ash.
Loblolly pine,
slash pine,
Erosion ]quipment Seedling
hazard limitations I mortality
__� Moderate
Slight __I Severe' __.
Mod-
erate.
� Severe.'
ISIight__� Slight ____� Slight.
Siight
__I Slight ____� Slight.

34
SOIL SURVEY
H
TABLE S.—Potential productivity; preferred species of trees, and hazards to management, by woodland suita
bility groups of soils—Continued
Trees preferred for
Woodland Potential productivity management and planting
suitability Description of soils Erosion Equipment Seedling
groups, soil series, in group Trees Site Broad-leaved Needle -leaved hazard limitations mortality
and map symbols class' species species -
Group 2w2: Nearly level, mod- Loblolly pine _ _ 90 None recom- Loblolly pine, Slight . _ Moderate _ Mod -
Johns: Jo. .erately well Slash pine __ 90 mended. slash pine, erate.
_ drained or some- Longleaf pine - 70 longleaf-
what poorly pine.
Group 2w3:
Rains: Ra.
Group 2w8:
Goldsboro: Go
Lenoir: Ln_
Lynchburg: Ly.
Stallings: St.
Group 2w9:
Bibb: BB.
Coxvi m: Co,
Griftont Gr.
Leaf: Le.
Lumbee: Lu.
Murville: Mu.
Torhunta: To.
Woodington:
Wn.
Group 3s2:
Blanton: Bn.
%enansville:
Ke.
Pocalla: Po.
Wagram: Wb,
We, Wd.
drained soils tb
have a loamy
subsoil; high pr
tential produc-
tivity; best suit
to needle-leavec
trees.
Nearly level, poor:
drained soils the
have a loamy
subsoil;
ubsoil • on up-
lands; high po-
tential pro-
ductivity; best
suited to needle -
leaved trees.
Nearly level, mod-
erately well
drained or some-
whatpoorly
drained soils tha
have a loamy,
clayey or sandy
subsoil; on up -
lauds and stream
terraces; high po-
tential produc-
tivity; suited to
needleleaved
trees, broadleaved
trees, or a com-
bination of both.
Nearly level, poorly
drained or very
poorly drained
soils that have a
loamy, sandy or
clayey subsoil; on
flood plains, up-
lands and stream
terraces' high
potential produe-
tivity; salted to
broad-leaved
trees, needle -
leaved trees, or a
combination of
both.
Nbarly level to
strongly sloping,
well drained or
somewhat exces-
sively drained
soils that have a
loamy or sandy
subsoil; on up-
lands and stream
terraces moder-
ately high
potential pro-
ductivity; best
suited to ueedie-
leaved trees.
dI
P I Loblolly pine'
C Slash pine' __
Longleaf pine'
Sweetgum'
Loblolly pine _ _
Slash pine ____
Longl'ea£ pine _
Sweetgum ---
Water oak _
Yellow -poplar .
Loblolly pine' -
Slash
Sweetgum'
Water oak'
Willow oak'
Green ash'
Cottonwood
90
90
90
90
90
90
100
Loblolly pile 80
flash
Longleaf pine _ 70
l None recom-
mended.
Sweetgum,
yellow -pop-
lar, water
oak, willow
oak, white
oak, swamp
chestnut
oak,
cherrybark
oak.
Sweetgum',
yellow -pop-
lar' willow
oak 1, water
oak',-
cherrybark
oak', oh
oar oak',
green ash',
sycamore',
swamp
tupelo.
Loblolly pin
slash pine
pine.
Loblolly pine'
slash pine',
longleaf
pine.', bald -
cypress.
1',I Slight
_-ISevere'_.
.I Moderate
(Severe'___
_ I Severe'.
ISlight to
mod-
erate.
Severe'.
tTone recom- Slash pine, Slight _ _ Moderate _ Mod -
mended. loblolly crate.
pine, long-
leaf pine.
Group 2w3:
Rains: Ra.
Group 2w8:
Goldsboro: Go
Lenoir: Ln_
Lynchburg: Ly.
Stallings: St.
Group 2w9:
Bibb: BB.
Coxvi m: Co,
Griftont Gr.
Leaf: Le.
Lumbee: Lu.
Murville: Mu.
Torhunta: To.
Woodington:
Wn.
Group 3s2:
Blanton: Bn.
%enansville:
Ke.
Pocalla: Po.
Wagram: Wb,
We, Wd.
drained soils tb
have a loamy
subsoil; high pr
tential produc-
tivity; best suit
to needle-leavec
trees.
Nearly level, poor:
drained soils the
have a loamy
subsoil;
ubsoil • on up-
lands; high po-
tential pro-
ductivity; best
suited to needle -
leaved trees.
Nearly level, mod-
erately well
drained or some-
whatpoorly
drained soils tha
have a loamy,
clayey or sandy
subsoil; on up -
lauds and stream
terraces; high po-
tential produc-
tivity; suited to
needleleaved
trees, broadleaved
trees, or a com-
bination of both.
Nearly level, poorly
drained or very
poorly drained
soils that have a
loamy, sandy or
clayey subsoil; on
flood plains, up-
lands and stream
terraces' high
potential produe-
tivity; salted to
broad-leaved
trees, needle -
leaved trees, or a
combination of
both.
Nbarly level to
strongly sloping,
well drained or
somewhat exces-
sively drained
soils that have a
loamy or sandy
subsoil; on up-
lands and stream
terraces moder-
ately high
potential pro-
ductivity; best
suited to ueedie-
leaved trees.
dI
P I Loblolly pine'
C Slash pine' __
Longleaf pine'
Sweetgum'
Loblolly pine _ _
Slash pine ____
Longl'ea£ pine _
Sweetgum ---
Water oak _
Yellow -poplar .
Loblolly pine' -
Slash
Sweetgum'
Water oak'
Willow oak'
Green ash'
Cottonwood
90
90
90
90
90
90
100
Loblolly pile 80
flash
Longleaf pine _ 70
l None recom-
mended.
Sweetgum,
yellow -pop-
lar, water
oak, willow
oak, white
oak, swamp
chestnut
oak,
cherrybark
oak.
Sweetgum',
yellow -pop-
lar' willow
oak 1, water
oak',-
cherrybark
oak', oh
oar oak',
green ash',
sycamore',
swamp
tupelo.
Loblolly pin
slash pine
pine.
Loblolly pine'
slash pine',
longleaf
pine.', bald -
cypress.
1',I Slight
_-ISevere'_.
.I Moderate
(Severe'___
_ I Severe'.
ISlight to
mod-
erate.
Severe'.
tTone recom- Slash pine, Slight _ _ Moderate _ Mod -
mended. loblolly crate.
pine, long-
leaf pine.

LENOIR COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
"ABLE 3.—Potential productivity, preferred species of trees, and hazards to management, by woodland
suita-bility groups of soils—Continued
Trees preferred for
Woodland Potential productivity management and planting Erosion Equipment Seedling
suitability Description of soils
groups, soil series, in group Trees Site Broad-leaved Needle -leaved hazard limitations mortality
and map symbols - class' species species-
Group3w2: Nearly level to slop- Slash pine ___ 80 None recom= SIash pine, Slight __ Moderate _ Slight,
Craven: Cr, Cv, ing, mainlymod- Loblolly pine _ 80 mended, loblolly
Pactolus: Pa, erately well Longleaf pine _ 70. _ pine,long-
drained soils that leaf pine.
have a loamy or
clayey subsoil; on
uplands and
stream terraces;
moderately high
potential prodne-
tivity; best suited
to needle -leaved
trees.
Group 4s2:
Lalceland: -a.
G'^nup 4w2:
:osl: Lo.
'Group 4w3:
Pamlico: Pc.
Nearly level to
gently sloping,
excessively
drained soils that
have a sandy
underlying layer;
on uplands and
stream terraces;
moderate pohm-
tial produe- '
tivity; best suited
to needle -leaved
trees.
Nearly level
, some-
whatpoorly
drained soils that
have a sandy sub-
soil; on uplands
and stream ter-
races; moderate
potential produe-
tivT ! best
suited to needle -
leave trees.
Slash pine
Loblolly pine _
Longleaf pine
Slash pine _ _ _
Loblolly pine _
Longleaf pine
70
00
70
None recom-
mended.
None recom-
mended.
Slash pine,
longleaf
pine.
Slash pine,
loblolly
pine.
Slight
Slight
early level, very Slash pine ° _ _ _ 70 Swamp Slash pine', Slight
poorly drained Loblolly pine' _ 70' tupelo, loblolly
soils that have Pond pine' _ _ _ _ 00 sweetgum'. pimne', bald-'
sandy underlying cypress,
layers; on floodcypress,
plains-and stream white
terraces; subject cedar.
to very frequent
flnedine�: moder- _
' Site eSass is the numerical designation of the relative po-
tential productivity of the species shown in the table: It is based
on site index, which is the average of the total heights, measured
in feet, o£ the dominant and co -dominant trees in an even -
aged stand at age 30 for cottonwood, at age 35 for sycamore,
and at age 50 for all other species or types. Site index was
rounded to the nearest 10 -foot interval to determine site class.
Use ®g S®m f®>e Wiidlife2
Wildlife is related to soils through an indirect re -
lir ,reship with plants. Wildlife species are associated
given types of plant communities which, in turn,
By JOHN P. EDWdxDS, biologist, Soil Conservation Service.
Moderate _ Mpd-
crate.
Moderate _ I Mod -
crate.
Severe' ___� Severe'.
For some trees, especially broad-leaved species, site class is based
on the comparative site class of other.speeies on the same soil.
' Potential productivity can be attained only where soils have
adequate surface drainage. -
' Tree planting is feasible only on areas where surface drain-
ageis adequate.
Moderate on soils where drainage is adequate,
are directly related to particular kinds of soils. Proper
manipulation of soil, water, and plants to produce
suitable habitat is the most effective way w maintain
and improve wildlife population. It is through the
three-way relationship of wildlife to plants to soils that
interpretations for wildlife are prepared.

W
SOIL SURVEY
The soils of Lenoir County produce a wide variety
of plants that provide food, cover, and protection for
many species of wildlife. Such upland game species as
squirrel, rabbits, quail, mourning doves, foxes, and
songbirds are abundant throughout the county. Popu-
lations of such furbearers as raccoon, mink, muskrat,
and opposum are also abundant. Several species of
such waterfowl as mallards, black ducks, and wood
ducks are abundant along the Neuse River and Con-
tentea Creek and their tributaries.
In table 4 the soils in the county have'been rated
for seven elements of wildlife habitat. Summary
ratings have been made for the three kinds of wildlife
for which one might expect to manage..It should be
emphasized that the ratings were made using criteria
applicable to the individual element. Following is a
brief explanation of each element:
Grain and seed crops are domestic grains or other
seed -producing annuals planted to produce wildlife
food. Examples of these are corn, sorghum, wheat, oats
barley, millet buckwheat, soybeans, cowpeas, and sun-
flowers.
Domestic grasses and legumes are domestic peren-
nial grasses and herbaceous legumes that are planted
for both food and 'cover. Examples are fescue, love -
grass, switchgrass, clover, trefoil, and crownvetch.
Wild herbaceous plants are native or naturally es-
tablished herbaceous grasses and forbs (including
weeds) that provide food and cover. Examples are
goldenrod, beggarweed, partridge pea, pokeweed, and
fescue, .
i Hardwood trees are nonconiferous trees and associ-
ated woody understory plants that provide food and
cover for wildlife species. Examples are oaks, hickory,
autumn -olive, dogwoods, and poplar.
Coniferous plants are cone -bearing trees and shrubs
that furnish wildlife cover or supply food in the form
of seed or fruitlike cones. Examples are pine and cedar..
Wetland plants are annual and perennial wild her-'
baceous plants of moist to wet sites, exclusive of sub-
merged or floating aquatics, that produce food and
cover principally for wetland forms of wildlife. Ex-'
amples are smartweed, wild millet, rushes, sedges,
reeds, wildrice, cutgrass, and cattail.
Shallow -water areas rate the suitability of the soil
for the creation of shallow -water areas. Surface waters
generally have an average depth'of less than 5 feet,
They may be naturally wet areas or areas created by
dams or levees or by water -control devices in marshes
or streams. Examples of such areas are muskrat
marshes, beaver ponds, waterfowl feeding areas, and
wildlife' ponds.
The last habitat element deviates somewhat from
the. direct relationship of soils to plants to wildlife. t
It is listed, however, because of its primary importance to li
to many species of wildlife. area
The summary ratings, for the different kinds of wild-
life one might expect to find or manage for on a given orate
soil are defined as follows:
Open -land wildlife.—Birds and mammals that are vege
generally associated with open areas or the edges of, ti
`,hese areas. These species are found in cultivated areas, favor
pastures, lawns, and idle areas overgrown with grasses, be
herbs, shrubs, and vines. Mourning doves, quail, red
foxes, cottontail rabbits, and many species of songbirds
are typical examples of wildlife one might expect to
find in this group.
Woodland wildlife.—Birds and mammals of wooded
areas containing hardwoods or coniferous trees and
shrubs, or both. Examples are squirrels, woodpeckers,
and gray foxes.
Wetland wildlife.—Birds and mammals that are
found mainly in such wetland communities as swamps,
marshes, or ponds. Examples are.. muskrat, raccoon,
redwing blackbird, and various species of ducks.
The soils are rated for the three kinds of wildlife
using four levels of suitability. This suitability is ex-
pressed by an adjective rating that can be defined as
follows :
Good.—Habitats are easihy improved, maintained,
or created. Few or no soil limitations in habitat
management exist, and satisfactory results can be
expected.
Pair.—Habitats can be improved, maintained, or
created, but moderate soil limitations affect habitat
management or development. A moderate intensity
of management and fairly frequent attention may
be required to assure satisfactory results.
Poor.—Habitats can be improved, maintained, or
created, but the limitations are severe. Habitat
management may be difficult and expensive and
require intensive effort: Results are of question-
able value.
Very poor.—Under the prevailing soil conditions,
it is, impractical to attempt to improve, maintain,
or create habitats:' Unsatisfactory results are
probable.
Such properties as solum thickness, flood hazard,
drainage, available water capacity, and slope are con-
sidered in malting ratings.
When rating soil suitability for wildlife, a two-step
procedure is followed. First, the soils are rated for
their suitability for producing the seven habitat ole-
ments. Then, combinations' of habitat elements are
selected and weighed for. their contribution to produc-
ing a given kind of wildlife habitat.
It should be noted that the ratings given in table 4
are to be used as guidelines and do not provide specific "
site analysis. Further. onsite information and analysis
will be required when developing individual manage-
men
plans.
Knowledge of soils is necessary in planning, develop=
mg, and maintaining areas used for recreation. In
able 5 the soils of Lenoir County are rated according
mitations that affect their suitability for camp
l,. playgrounds, picnic areas, and paths and trails.
In table 5 the soils are rated as having slight, mod-
, or severe limitations for the specified a uses. For
all of these ratings, it is assumed that good cover of
tation can be established and maintained. A limita-
on of slight means that soil. properties are generally
able and limitations are so minor that they'can
overcome easily. A moderate limitation can be over-

LENOIR COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA 37
TABLE 4.—Suitability of soils for elements of wildlife habitat and kinds of wildlife
Elements of wildlife habitat Kinds of wildlife
Soil series Grain Domestic Wild Hard- Conifer- Wetland Open- Wood- Wetland
and and grasses herbace- wood one plants Shallow- land land wildlife
map symbols' seed and ,ons. trees plants water wildlife wildlife
crops leg noes plants areas
Bibb: BB ________________ Very Poor ___ Poor ___ Poor ___ Poor ___ Good ___ Good ___ Poor ___ Poor ___ Good.
. poor.
Blanton: en ________
_____ Poor Fair ___ Good ___ Good ___ Good ___ Poor ___ Very Fair ___ Good ___ Very
poor. poor.
Chewacla: Ch --- -------- Very Poor ___ Poor ___ Gond ___ Good____ Fair ___ Fair ___ Poor ___ Fair ___ Fair.
poor.
Colville: Co Poor ___ Fair ___ Fair ___ Fair ___ Fair ___ Good Fair ___ Fair ___ Fail ___ Fair,
Craven: Cr, C- ___________ Good ___ Good ___ Good ___ Good ___ Good ___ Poor _.._ Very Good ___ Good ___ Very
poor. poor.
Goldsboro: Go-,.___ ---- Good ___ Good ___ -Good ___ Good ___ Good ___ Poor ___ P'oor ___ Good ___ Good ___ Poor.
Grifton: Or ______________ Poor ___ Fail ___ Fair Fair ---Fair ___ Good ___ Fair ___ Fair ___ Fair ___ Fair.
Johns: Jo _____________ Fair ___ Good ___ Good ___ Good ___ Good ___ Poor ___ Very Good ___ Good ___ Very
Poor, poor.
Johnston: JS _____________ Very Poor ___ Poor ___ Poor ___ Poor ___ Good ___ Good ___ Poor ___ Poor _ Good.
poor.
Kalmia: Ka, I<b _-------- Fair __- Good ___ Good ___ Good ___ Good -__ Poor ___ Very Good ___ Good ___ Very
poor. poor.
Kenansville: Ke Fair ___ Good ___ Good ___ Good ___ Good ___ Poor ___ Very' Good ___ Good ___ Very
poor. poor.
Kinston: Kn _____________ Very Poor ___ Poor Poor ___ Poor ___ Good ___ Fair ___ Poor ___ Poor ___ Fair.
poor.
Lakeland: La _____________ Very Poor ___ Poor ___ Very Very Very Very Poor ___ Very Very
poor* poor, poor, poor. poor. �oor. poor.
Leaf: Le _____ ____________ Poor ___ Fair _-- Fair ___ Fair ___ Fair ___ Good ___ Good ___ Pair ___ Fair ___ Good.
Lenoir: Ln ____________-- Fair ___ Good ___ Good ___ Good ___ Good ___ Fair ___ Fair ___ Good ___ Good ___ Fair.
Leon: Lo Poor ___ Poor ___ Fair ___ Poor Poor _ Poor ___ Very - Poor ___ Poor ___ Very
Poor, poor.
Lumbee: In _____________ Poor ___ Fair ___ Fair ___ Fair Fair ___ Good ___ Fair ___ Fair ___ Fair ___ Fair.
?" chburg: Ly Poore_-_ Fair ___ Fair ___ Good ___ Good ___ Fair ___ Fair ___ Fair ___ Good ___ Fair.
gett: Me _____________ Poor ___ Fair ___ Fair ___ Fail ___ Fair ___ Good___ Pau ___ Fair ___ Fair ___ Fair,
lv arville: MU _____________ Very Poor ___ Poor ___ Poor ___ Poor --- Good___ Fair ___ Poor ___ Poor ___ Fair.
poor.
Norfolk:
Na, Nb __________________ Good ___ Good ___ Good ___ Good ___ Good ___ Poor ___ Very Good ___ Good ___ Very
poor. poor.
No _____________________ Fair ___ Good ___ Good ___ Good --- Good ___ Very Very Good ___ Good ___ Very
Poore poor. poor.
Pactolus: Pa Good ___ Good ___ Good ___ Good ___ Good ___ Poor ___ Very Good ___ Good ___ Very
poor. poor.
Pamlico: Pc ____________ Very Poor ___ Poor ___ Poor ___ Poor ___ Good ___ Good ___ Poor ___ Poor ___ Good.
poor.
Pantego: Pe _______ Very Poor ___ Poor ___ Poor ___ Poor ___ Good ___ Fair ___ Pool-.. Poor -___ Fair.
poor.
Pocalla: Po Poor Poor ___ Fair ___ Fair ___ Fair. ___ Very Very Poor ___ Fair ___ Very
poor. poor. -poor.
Portsmouth: Pr ------------ Very Poor ___ Poor ___ Poor ___. Poor ___ Good ___ Fair Poor _ Poor ___ Fair.
poor.
Rains: Ra _____________ Poor ___ Fair ___ Fair ___ Fair ___ Fair ___ Good ___ Fair ___ Fail Fair ___ Fair. -
Stallings: St Fair ___ Good ___ Good ___ Good ___ Good ___ Fair ___ Poor ___ Good __= Good___ Poor.. _
Torhunta: To Very 'Poor ___ Poor ___ Poor ___ Poor ___ Good ___ Good ___ Poor ___ Poor ___ Good.
poor.
Umbrie Oehraquatfs: Us __ Poor ___ Fair _-- Pair ___ Fair___ Pair ___ Good ___ Fair___ Fair ___ Pair ___ Fair.
Wagram: Wb Good ___ Good ___ Good ___ Good ___ Gobd ___ Poor ___ Very Good ___ Good ___ Very
poor. - Poore
Wagram: We, Wd ----Fail ___ Good ___ Good ___ Good ___ Good'___ Very Very Good ___ Good ___ Very
Tool" poor poor.
Wickham: Wk ____________ Good___ Good___ Good___ Good___ Good___ Poor___ Very Good___ Good__- Very
poor. poor.
Weeding Wn ________-- Poor ___ Fair Fair ___ Fair ___ Fair ___ Good___ Poor ___ Fair ___ Fair ___ Fau•.
' All soil's are rated for natural conditions. '
come or modified by planning, by design, or by special door living. Little preparation of the site is required,
maintenance. A severe limitation means that costly soil other than shaping and leveli
ng for tent and parking -
rp`imation, special design, intense maintenance, or a areas. Camp areas are subject to heavy foot traffic
c Anation of these is required. and limited vehicular traffic. The best soils have gentle
`Camp areas are used intensively for tents and small slopes, good drainage, and a surface free of rocks and
canal) trailers and the accompanying activities of out- coarse fragments. The surface is firm after rains but

m
SOIL SURVEY
TABLE 5"—Degree of soil limitations and major features affecting use of soils for recreational development
Soil series
and Camp areas Pienie areas Playgrounds Paths and trails
map symbols
Bibb: BB -------- I, Severe: flooding; wet-
ness.
Blanton: Bn
Chewacla: Gh ___
Coxville: Go
Craven: Cr, Cv
Gcidsboro: Go ___.
Griller:
Johnston: JS
l_ genansville: Ke ___
IIinston: Kn
Lakeland: La ______
Leaf: Le _______
Lenoir: Ln ____
Lumbee: Lu
Lynchburg: LY -----)
Meggett:
Norville: Mu
Norfolk:' Na, Nb,
Nc.
ISevere: sand surface
layer.
__ Severe: flooding; wet-
ness.
-- Severe: wetness; sur-
face ponding where
undrained.
Moderate: slowpermea
bility.
- Severe: wetness; sur-
face ponding where
undrained.
Moderate: wetness ----
Severe: flooding; wet-
ness.
Slight -----------------
Moderate: sandy sur-
face layer; subject
to blowing.
Severe: flooding; wet-
ness,
ISevere: sand surface
layer; subject to
blowing.
Severe: wetness; su•-
faee ponding where
undrained,
Severe: wetness
Severe: wetness; sand
surface layer.
Severe: wetness.; sur-
face ponding where
undrained.
Severe: wetness
Severe: wetness; sur-
face ponding where
undrained.
>evero: wetness; sur-
face ponding where
undrained.
light if slopes are 0 to 8
percent.
Coderate if slopes are 8
to 10 percent,
Severe: flooding: wet-
ness.
Severe: sand surface
layer.
Severe: flooding; wet
ness.
Severe: wetness; sur-
face ponding where
undrained.
Slight ----------------
Slight -------------
Severe: wetness; sur-
face ponding where
undrained,
Moderate: wetness ____
Severe: flooding; wet-
ness.
Slight ----------------
Moderate: sandy sur-
' face layer; subject
to blowing. -
Severe: flooding; wet-
ness.
Severe: sand surface
layer; subject to
blowing.
Severe: wetness; sur-
face ponding where
undrained.
Severe: wetness
Severe: wetness; sand
surface layer.
Severe: wetness; mr-
face ponding where
undrained.
Moderate: wetness
Severe: wetness; sur-
e face ponding where
undrained.
Severe: wetness; sur-
face ponding where
undrained.
Slight if slopes are 0 to
8 percent.
Moderate if dopes are 8
to 10 percent.
Severe: flooding; wet-
ness.
Severe: sand surface
layer.
Severe: flooding; wet-
ness.
Severe: wetness; sur-
face ponding where un-
drained.
Moderate if slopes are 0
to 6 percent; permea-
bility.
Severe if slopes are 6 to
8 percent.
Slight----------`------
Severe: wetness; sur-
face ponding where un-
drained. '
Moderate: wetness _____
Severe: flooding; wet-
ness.
Slight if slopes are 0 to
2 percent.
Moderate if slopes are 2
to 6 percent.
Moderate: sandy sur-
face layer; subject to
blowing.
Severe: flooding; wet-
ness.
Severe: sand surface
layer; subject to blow-
ing.
Severe: wetness; sur-
face ponding where un-
drained.
Severe: wetness
Severe: wetness; sand
surface Iayer.
Severe: wetness; sur-
face ponding where un-
drained.
� Severe: wetness ______
Severe: wetness; sur-
face ponding where un-
drained.
Severe: wetness; sur-
face pending Where un -
[rained:
Slight if slopes are 0 to
2 percent.
Moderate if slopes are 2
ko 6 percent.
Severe if slopes are 6 to
10 percent.
Severe: ' flooding; wet-
ness.
Severe: loose sand sur-
face layer.
Moderate: flooding;
wetness.
Severe: wetness; sur-
face ponding where un-
drained.
Slight.
Slight.
Severe: wetness; sur-
face ponding where un-
drained.
Moderate: wetness.
Severe: flooding; wet-
ness.
Slight.
Moderate: sandy sur-
face layer.
Severe: flooding; wet-
ness.
Severe: loose sand sur-
face layer.
Severe: wetness; sur-
face ponding where un-
drained.
. Moderate: wetness.
Severe: sand surface
layer.
Severe: wetness; sur-
face ponding where un -
mate: wetness.
Severe: wetness; sur-
face ponding where un-
drained.
Severe: wetness; sur-
face ponding were un-
drained.
Slight.

LLNOIR COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA 39
T'BLE 5.—Degree of soil limitations and major features affecting use of soils for recreational development
—Continued
Soil series
and Camp areas Picnic areas Playgrounds Paths and trails
map symbols ` _
Pactolus: Pa _______ Moderate: wetness, Moderate: we
Moderate: wetness; Moderate: sandy sur-.
sandy surface layer, sandy surface layer. sandg "surface layer. face layer.
Pamlico: Pc _______ Severe: wetness _______ Severe: we
_______ Severe: wetness. _______ Severe: wetness, r
Pantego: Pe _______ Severe: wetness; sur- Severe: wetness; sur- Severe: wetness• sur- Severe: wetness; sur-
face ponding where face ponding where un- face ponding where un- face ponding where un -
undrained. drained, drain@d. drained.
Pocalla: Po ________ Moderate: sandy sur- Moderate: sandy sur Moderate: sandy sur- Moderate: sandy sur-
face layer; subject face layer; subject to face layer; subject to face layer,
to blowing* blowing. blowing.
Portsmouth: Pr __ _ Severe: wetness; sur-. Severe: wetness; sur- Severe: wetness; sur- Severe: wetness; sur-
' face ponding where ' face ponding where un- face ponding where un= face ponding where un -
undrained, drained, drained. drained.
Rains: Re _________ Severe: wetness; sur- .Severe: wetness; sur- Severe: wetness; sur- Severe: wetness; sur-
face ponding where face ponding where un- face ponding where nn- face ponding where un -
undrained. d,
ained. drained. drained.
Stallings: St _______ •Severe: wetness Moderate: wetness .____ Severe: wetness _______ Moderate: wetness.
Torhunta: To ______ Severe: wetness; sur- Severe: wetness- sur- Severe: wetness; sui- Severe: wetness; sur-
` " face ponding where face ponding where un- face ponding where un- face ponding where on.
undrained, drained. drained.- drained.
Uambrie Ochraqualfs: Severe: wetness; sur- Severe: wetness; sur- Severe: wetness; sur- Severe: wetness; sur-
Uo. face ponding where face ponding where un- face ponding where un- face ponding where un -
undrained. drained. drained. -'drained.
^am: Wb, We, -Moderate: sandy sur- Moderate: sandy sur- Moderate if slopes are 6 Moderate: sandy sur-
vJd, face layer; subject face layer; subject to to 6 percent; sandy face layer.
to blowings blowing. surface layer; subject
to blowing.
Severe if slopes are more
than 6 percent.
Wielrham: Wk_____ Slight__________________ Slight__________________ Slight if slopes are 0 to Slight.
.. 2 percent. -
Moderate if slopes are 2
to 6 percent. '
Woodington: Wn ___ Severe: wetness; sur Severe: wetness sur Severe: wetness; sur- Severe: wetness; sur-
face ponding where face ponding where un- face ponding where un- face ponding where
undrained. drained. drained. & undrained,
not dusty when dry, and is Exec from flooding during
periods of heavy use.
Picnic areas are attractive natural or landscaped
tracts used mainly for preparing meals and eating out-
doors. These areas are subject to heavy foot traffic.
Most of the vehicular traffic, however, is confined to
access roads. The best soils are firm when wet but not
dusty when dry; are free of flooding during the season
of use; and do not have slopes or stoniness that greatly
increase -cost of leveling sites or of building access
roads.
Playgrounds are areas used intensively for baseball,
football, badminton, and similar organized games. Soils
suitable for this use need to be able to withstand jn-
teP'-4ve foot traffic. The best soils have a nearly level
s1. ce free of coarse fragments and rock outcrops,
gdoa drainage, and freedom from flooding during
periods of heavy use. Their surface is firm after rains
but not dusty when dry. If grading and leveling are
required, depth to rock is important.
Paths and trails are used for local and cross-country
travel by foot or horseback. Design and layout should
require little or no cutting and filling. The best'soils
are at least moderately well drained, are firm when
wet but not dusty when dry, are flooded not more -than
once during the season of use, have slopes of less than
15 percent, and have few or no rocks or stones on the
surface.
�aagan¢eriag Uses of the S®aLs
'
This section is useful to those who need information
about soils used'as structural material or as foundation
BaLr H. Jo1aEs, civil engineer, Soil Conservation Service, as-
sisted in
writing this section.

SOIL SURVEY
upon which structures are built. Among.those who can
benefit from this section are planning commissions,
town and city managers, land developers, engineers,
contractors, and farmers.
Among properties -o£ soils highly important in
engineering axe permeability, strength, compaction
characteristics, soil drainage condition, shrink -swell po-
tential, grain size, plasticity, and soil reaction. Also
important are depth to the water table, depth to bed-
rock, and soil slope. These properties, in various degrees
and combinations, affect construction and maintenance
of roads, airports, pipelines, foundations for small
buildings, irrigation systems, ponds and small dams,
and systems for disposal of sewage and refuse.
Information in this section of the soil survey can
be helpful to those who -
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Select potential residential, industrial, com-
mercial, and recreational areas.
Evaluate alternate routes for roads, highways,
pipelines, and underground cables.
Seek sources of gravel, sand, or clay.
Plan farm drainage systems, irrigation sys-
tems, ponds, terraces, and other structures for
controlling water and conserving soil.
Correlate performance of structures already
built with properties of the kinds of soil on
which they are built, for the purpose of pre-
dicting performance of structures on the same
or similar kinds of soil in other locations.
Predict the trafficability of soils for cross-
country movement of vehicles and construction
equipment.
Develop preliminary estimates pertinent to
construction in a particular area.
f the information in this section is presented Sin engi-
al veering are given in table 6. These estimates are made
for typical 'soil profiles, by layers sufficiently different
to have different significance for soil engineering. The
estimates are based on field observations made in the
r:
.mcourse of mapping, on test data for these and similar
soils, and on experience with the same kinds of soil in
other counties. Following are explanations of some of
the columns in table 6.
Flood hazard is described in terms of the frequency
of occurrence and the duration of flooding. Frequency
and duration classes are defined in the Glossary.
Depth to seasonal high water table is the distance
aom.the surface of the soil to the highest level that
ground water reaches in the soil in most years.
Soil texture. is described in table 6 in the standard
terms used by the Department of Agriculture. These
terms take into account relative percentages of sand,
silt and clay in soil material that is -less than 2 milli-
meYers in diameter. "Loam," for example, is soil ma-
terial that contains 7 to 27 percent clay; 28 to 50 per-
cent silt, and less than 52 percent sand. If the soil
contains gravel or other particles coarser than sand,
an appropriate modifier is added; for example,
"gravelly loamy sand." "Sand," "silt," `clay," and some
of the other terms used in USDA textural classification
are defined in the Glossary of this soil survey.
Liquid limit and plasticity index indicate the effect
of water on the strength and consistence of soil ma -
everal estimated soil properties significant
and others, and the AASHTO system adopted by the
American Association of State Highway and Trans-
portation Officials (1).
In the Unified system (2) soils are classified accord-
ing to particle -size distribution, plasticity, liquid limit,
qnd organic matter.. Soils are grouped in 15 classes:
eight classes of coarse-grained soils, identified as GW,
GP, GM; GC, SW, SP, SM, and ,SC; six classes of fine-
grained soils, identified as ML, CL, OL, MH, CH, and
OH; and one class of highly organic soils, identified as
Pt. Soils on the borderline between two classes are
designated by symbols for both classes; for example,
HL CL.
The AASHTO system is used to classify soils accord-
ing to those properties that affect use in highway con-
struction and maintenance. In this system, a soil is
placed in one of seven basic groups ranging from A-1
through A-7 on the basis of grain -size distribution,
liquid limit, and plasticity index. In group A-1 are
gravelly soils of high bearing strength, or the best soils
for subgrade (foundation). At the other extreme, in
group A-7, are clay soils that have low strength when
wet and that are the poorest soils for subgrade. Where
I data are available to justify a further break-
down, the A-1, A-2, and A-7 groups are divided as
follows: A -1-a, A -1-b, A-2-4, A-2-5, A-2-6, A-2-7,
A-7-5, and A-7-6. As additional refinement, the engi-
neering value of a soil material can be indicated by a
group index number. Group indexes range from 0 for
the best material to 20 or more for the poorest. The
AASHTO classification is given in table 6 for all soils
mapped in the survey area.
l properties significant to engineering
Most o
in tables 6, 7, and 8, which show; respectively, sever
estimated soil properties significant to engineering,
interpretations for various engineering uses, and re-
sults of engineering laboratory tests on soil samples
This information, along with the soil map and other
parts of this publication, can be used to make inter
pretations in addition to those given in table 7. It also
can be used to make other useful maps.
This information, however, does not eliminate the
need for further investigations at sites selected for
engineering works, especially works that involve heavy
loads or that require excavations to depths greater
than these shown in the tables, generally depths greater
than 6 feet. Also, inspection of sites, especially the
small ones, is needed because many delineated areas of
a given soil mapping. unit may contain small areas of
other kinds of soil that have strongly contrasting
properties and different suitabilities or limitations for
soil engineering.
Some of the terms used in this soil survey have
special meaning to soil scientists that is not known to
all engineers. The Glossary defines many of these terms
commonly used in soil science.
Engineering soil classification systemsThe
e two systems most commonly used in classifying
samples of soils for engineering are the Unified system
used by the SCS engineers, Department of Defense,

LENOIR COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA 41
t iaL As the moisture content of a clayey soil is suitability of the soils for all listed purposes other
_eased from a dry state, the material changes from than for drainage of crops and pasture, irrigation,
a semisolid to a plastic state. If the moisture content ponds and reservoirs, embankments,and terraces .and
is further increased, the material changes from a diversions. For these particular uses, table 7 lists those
plastic to a liquid state. The plastic limit is the moisture soil features not. to be overlooked in planning, installa-
' content at which the soil material changes from the tion, and maintenance.
Semisolid to the plastic state, and the liquid limit is Soil limitations are indicated by the ratings slight,
the moisture content at which it changes from a plastic moderate, and severe. Slight means that soil properties
to a liquid state. The plasticity index is the numerical are generally favorable for the stated use or, in other
difference between the liquid limit and. the plastic . words, that limitations are minor and can be easily
limit. It indicates the range of moisture content within overcome or modified by special planning and design.
which a soil material is plastic. Liquid limit and Moderate means that the soils have one or more proper -
plasticity index are estimated in table 6. ties unfavorable for a particular use, or that the prob-
Permeability is that quality of a soil that enables it lem can be overcome by proper planning, careful
to transmit water or au. It is estimated on the basis ' design, and good management. Severe means that soil
of those soil characteristics observed in the field, partic- properties are so unfavorable and so difficult to correct
ularly structure and texture: The estimates in table 6 or overcome as to require major soil reclamation,
-do not take into account lateral seepage or such special designs, or intensive maintenance. For some
transient sail features as plowpans and surface crusts. uses, the rating of severe is divided to obtain ratings
Available water capacity is the ability of soils to of severe and very severe. Very severe means that one
hold water for use by most plants. It .is commonly or more soil properties are so unfavorable. for a partic-
defined as the difference between the amount of water ular'use that overcoming the limitations is most diffi-
in the soil at field capacity and the amount at the cult and costly,
wilting point of most -crop plants. Soil suitability is rated by the terms good, fair, and
Reaction is the degree of acidity or alkalinity of a poor, which have, respectively, meanings approximately
sail, expressed in pH values. The pH value and terms Parallel to the terms slight, moderate, and severe.
used to describe soil reaction are -explained in the In the following paragraphs are explanations of some
Glossary.of the columns in table 7.
Shrink -swell potential is the relative change in Topsoil is used for topdressing an area where vegeta.
volume to. be expected of soil material with changes in tion is to'be established and maintained. Suitability is
-ture content; that is, the extent to which the soil affected mainly by ease of worling and spreading the
I
! mks as it dries out or swells when it gets wet, soil material, as in preparing a seedbed; natural fer-
Extent of shrinking and swelling is influenced by the tBity of the material, or the response of plants when
amount and kind of clay in the soil. Shrinking and fertilizer is applied; and absence of substances toxic to
swelling of soils'cause much damage to building founda- Plants. Texture of the soil material also affects suit -
tions, roads, and other structures. A high shrink -swell ability. Also considered in the ratings is damage that
potential indicates a hazard to maintenance of strue- will result to the area from which topsoil is taken.
tures built in, on, or with material having this rating.- Sand and gravel are used in great quantities in many
Corrosivity, as used in table 6, pertains to potential kinds of construction. The ratings in table 7 provide
soil -induced chemical action that dissolves or weakens guidance about where to look for probable sources. A
uncoated steel or concrete. Rate of corrosion of un- soil rated as a good source of sand or gravel generally
coated steel is related to soil properties such as drain- has a layer at least 3 feet thick, the top of which is
Age, texture, total acidity, and electrical conductivity within a depth of 6 feet. The ratings do not take into
of the soil material. Gorrosivity for concrete is- in- account thickness of overburden, location of the water
fluenced mainly by the content of sodium or magnesium table, : or other factors that affect mining of the ma -
sulfate, but also by soil -texture and acidity. Installa- terials; and they do not indicate quality of the deposit.
tions of uncoated steel that intersect soil boundaries or Road fill is soil material used in embankments for
soil horizons are most susceptible to corrosion than roads. The suitability ratings reflect the predicted
installations entirely in one kind of soil or in one soil performance of soil after it has been placed in an
horizon. A corrosivity rating of low means that there is embankment that has been properly compacted and
a low probability of soil -induced corrosion damage. A provided with adequate drainage, and they reflect the
rating of high means that there is a high probability relative ease of excavating the material at borrow
of damage, so that protective measures for steel and areas.'
more resistant concrete should be used to avoid or Pond reservoir areas hold water behind a dam or
minimize damage. embankment. Soils - suitable for pond reservoir areas
have low seepage, which is related to their permeability
Engineering
interpretations of soils
and depth to permeable material.
The estimated interpretations in table 7 .are based Pond embankments are raised structures of soil ma -
on the engineering properties of soils shown in table
6,, nn test data for soils in this survey area and others
n` )y or adjoining, and on the experience of engineers
ai.,, soil scientists with the soils of Lenoir County. In
table 7, ratings are used to summarize limitation or
terial constructed across drainageways in order to
impound water. These embankments are generally less
than 20 feet high, are constructed of `homogeneous"
sail material, and are compacted to medium density.
Embankments having core- and shell -type construction

42
' � Soil series '
and
map symbols
Bibb: BB _____________
Blanton: Bn"________--
Chewaela• Ch __ _
Coxville: Go.__________.
Craven: Gr,"Cv ________
Goldsboro: Go _________
Gri£ton:. Gr ____________
Johns: Jo --__--_---__
Sohnston: JS __________
$almia: Ka,�K6 ________
%enansville: Ke ________
SOIL SIIRVEY
None. � - 2.5.
None, ' 2.5
. Ponding'. 0
None. 1.5
Very fre- .0
quest; '
long
periods.
Vose. 6
Vose.
E
0-13
13-52
52-80
0-12
12-aD
0-15
15-40.
40-70
0-14
14-34
34-65
0-8 "
5-38'
38-60
0-Y4
14-38
38-65
0-24
24-36 '
36 -SD
TABLE 6. Estimated soil properties
' [The symbol > means greater
Classification
' � � _ Liquid Plastid
USDA Unified AASHTO limit index
texture
0
Sandy loam
_�.
SM, SM -S(
.__
Depth to
�
SM
�. Floud. :.
seasonal
100
51- 75
hazard:
� high
Depth
SM or SP=
frequency;
water
£rom
SM
��duration
table �
snr£ace
SC
Ft
Ia
Frequent;
A-4 or A-6
0=45
brie£.
0
45-70
15-25
� Loamy sand
_ _
.' None.
� "5 " �
0-55
lDD
ML, CL or
55-98
NP
A�7 �
98-12
Fregnent;
1.5
0-12
brief.
0.6-2.D
p.12-0.15
CL
12-27
Sandy loam,
�A-4 or A-6��
27-65
Ponding'.
0
0-12�
_ ML -CL or
CL
Clay loam- :_
-OL' ""
Sandy clay �
. SG, .CL,
12-62,
ML -CL, .
A-2 or A-4
62-75
None. � - 2.5.
None, ' 2.5
. Ponding'. 0
None. 1.5
Very fre- .0
quest; '
long
periods.
Vose. 6
Vose.
E
0-13
13-52
52-80
0-12
12-aD
0-15
15-40.
40-70
0-14
14-34
34-65
0-8 "
5-38'
38-60
0-Y4
14-38
38-65
0-24
24-36 '
36 -SD
TABLE 6. Estimated soil properties
' [The symbol > means greater
Classification
' � � _ Liquid Plastid
USDA Unified AASHTO limit index
texture
0
Sandy loam
_�.
SM, SM -S(
.__
Loamy sand,
�
SM
NP
sand.
100
51- 75
A-4
Sand________
� 8-10
SM or SP=
_ _
NE
A-4 or A-0
SM
" NP -13
Sandy clay
20-30
SC
A-2 or A-4
loam, sandy
NP -].0
A-4 or A-6
20� 0
loam. "
"A-6" �
30-40
15-25
� Loamy sand
_ _
SM '
Y00
Loam _______
lDD
ML, CL or
_ _
NP
A�7 �
ML -CL
30„8
Clay loam ___.
42-60
CL or ML -
0.6-2.D
p.12-0.15
CL
__
Sandy loam,
�A-4 or A-6��
SM, SC, or'
loamy sand.
S1VI�C
Loam _ _ _ _
_ ML -CL or
CL
Clay loam- :_
-OL' ""
Sandy clay �
. SG, .CL,
loam. �
ML -CL, .
A-2 or A-4
or SM -SC
Fine sandy
ML
loam; loam.:
4-11
Clay, clay
CH � '
loam.
Sandy clay
'SC or CL
loam.
Loamy sand __
SM
,Sandy clay.
�.SM-SC, CL,
loam, sandy
CL -ML or
loam.
SC
Sandy loam __
SM
Sandy clay
SC.
loam, sandy
A-2. or A-3
loam.
NP -3
Loamy sand,
SM
sandy,
'i-2
loam.
NP -10
Sandy loam __
SM
Sandy clay
� SM -SC, SC ��
loam, sandy
or CL,
loam.
CL -ML
Sand ________
SM or
SP -SM
Mucky'loam __
OL
Fine sandy
SM
loam, sandy
.
loam.
Sand ________
SM or
SP -SM
Loamy sand __
SM
Sandy clay
SC
loam, sandy
loam.
Sand ________
SP -SM or
SM
Loamy sand __
SM
Sandy loam __
SM, SC or
SM -SC
Loamy sand,
SP -SM or
sand.
SM
A 2 or A-4
<35
NP -7
A-2
.__
NP
A 2 or A-3
__
NP
60-70
100
51- 75
A-4
18-30
� 8-10
A-2
_ _
NE
A-4 or A-0
<40
" NP -13
A-4 or A-0
20-30
4-11
A-2 or A-4
<30 "
NP -].0
A-4 or A-6
20� 0
;4-12
"A-6" �
30-40
15-25
A-4 or A-6.
�20-30
�5-15
Y00
51-76
lDD
A-4 ..
_ _
NP
A�7 �
� 51-60
30„8
A-7 �
42-60
20-30
0.6-2.D
p.12-0.15
A-2
__
NP
�A-4 or A-6��
16-35
'4-Y7
"A� or A-4-
<20
NP -3
A-4 or A-6
20-30
8-17
A-2 or A-4
15-30 �
NP -3 '
A-2 or A-4
NP
A-4 or A-6 -
19-35
4-11
A-2 or A�
NP
__
IVP
A-2 or A-4
<25 "
NP -3
A-2 or A-3
_ _
NP
A-2
<i6
NP -3
A-2 or A-4
25-30
7-10
A-2. or A-3
<25
NP -3
i-2
<20
NP -3
'i-2
<30
NP -10
1-2 or A-3
__
NP
signiftc¢nt in engineering
than; <means less than]
Perenn
No. 4
(4.7 mm)
95-Y00
loo
YOD
loo
lD0
loo
100
96-100
loo
I00
YDO
100
100
Y00
100
loo
loD
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
loo
100
100,
100
loD
lab
;age less than 3
inches pae
No. 10
No. 40
(2.0 mm) .
(0.42 mn
! water
90-100
60-70
100
51- 75
loo
51-7b
s5 -loo
so so
95-SDO
51-75
100
85-95
100
90-100
96-Y00
60-70
100
85-100
lDD
so -1 Do
Y00
80-9,5
SOD
75-95
100
�90-Y00
100
80-90
Y00
51-76
lDD
sono
95-100
loo-
Y00
laD
95-100
so -loo
Y00
100
Y00
100
95-100
9D-100
Y00
100
sD-loo
60-95
so-so
51-75
60-70
60-90
51-79
so -loo
i0-75
fY-70
.5-90
.5-90
D-lDo
1-75
D -7o
1-75
LENOIR COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
,ing sieve -
No: 20(
(0.074m
30-40
15-sa
5 -Yb
3s -5o
16-30
60-75
70-80
16-40
60-75
7-0-80
36-55
51-65
70-95
36-55
15-3a
36-55
30-40
36-50
20-40 "
30-40
36-5b
6-Y6
80=90
30-45
5-15
Y5.�0
30-50
5-15
15-30
20-35
5-26
2.0-6.0
.60-2.0
.60-2.0
2.0-6.0
0.6-2.0
6.0-20
0.6 2.0
2.0-6.0
6.0-20
2.0-6.0"
0.6-2.0
6.0-2.0
6.0-20
z.o-s.o
6.0-20
0.12-0.15
0.10-6.15
0.12-0.14
O.YO-0.14
Q.Y2-O.Y5
0.03-0,06
I
I
0:20-0.26
Oi10-0.14
002-0.06
0:96-0.10
0:12--0.15
1
7.02-0.05
1.05-0.10
LIO-O.Y4 '
1.02-205
43
Corrosivity
Reaetion� Shrink-•
swell Uncoated' '
potential steel Concrete
PH
4.5-5.5
4.5-5.5
4.5-5.5
4.5-5.5
4.5-5.5
5.1-6.0
5.1-6.0
5.1-6.D
4.5-6.0
4.5-5.6
4.5-5.5
4.5-6.0
4.5-5.5
4.5-5.5
4.5-5.5
4.5-5.5
6.1-5.5
5.1-6.0
6.1-5.4
Low ____ High _: ____ Moderate
Low.
Low _____'Low ______ High.
Low.
Low..
Low _____ High _______ Moderate.
Low.
Low.
Low ----- High _--_-- High.
Moderate.
Low.
Q�
� High ------� High.
Low.
Low _____ Moderate ___ High.
Low.
Low _ _ _ _ � High _ _ _ _ _ _ _I Moderate.
Low.
Low.
4.5-5.5'
Low _ _ _ _ _
Moderate _ _ _
High.
Permeability
Available
! water
n)
i capacity
! o� Pei' in
I Per hr
faoil
0.6-2.0 �
� 0.10-0.14
2.a-s.D
, D.os-o.lo
I
6.0-20
'0.02-0.05
O.G-2.0
10.10-D.13
6.0-20
0.05-0.10
0.6-2.0
' 0.15-0.19
0.6-2.0
-.0.17-0.19
0.6-2.0
'0.06-0.14
0.6-2.0 -
'O.lb-0.19
4.5-5.5
Low.
o.z-D.s
o.14-D.la
0.2-0.6
'0.13-0.16
Low ______
X0.12-0.18
0.6-2.0
Low.
0.06-0.2 .
X0.12-0.15
0.06-0.2
0.12-0.15
' 2.0-6.0
I
0.06-0.08
0.6-2.D
p.12-0.15
2.0-6.0
.60-2.0
.60-2.0
2.0-6.0
0.6-2.0
6.0-20
0.6 2.0
2.0-6.0
6.0-20
2.0-6.0"
0.6-2.0
6.0-2.0
6.0-20
z.o-s.o
6.0-20
0.12-0.15
0.10-6.15
0.12-0.14
O.YO-0.14
Q.Y2-O.Y5
0.03-0,06
I
I
0:20-0.26
Oi10-0.14
002-0.06
0:96-0.10
0:12--0.15
1
7.02-0.05
1.05-0.10
LIO-O.Y4 '
1.02-205
43
Corrosivity
Reaetion� Shrink-•
swell Uncoated' '
potential steel Concrete
PH
4.5-5.5
4.5-5.5
4.5-5.5
4.5-5.5
4.5-5.5
5.1-6.0
5.1-6.0
5.1-6.D
4.5-6.0
4.5-5.6
4.5-5.5
4.5-6.0
4.5-5.5
4.5-5.5
4.5-5.5
4.5-5.5
6.1-5.5
5.1-6.0
6.1-5.4
Low ____ High _: ____ Moderate
Low.
Low _____'Low ______ High.
Low.
Low..
Low _____ High _______ Moderate.
Low.
Low.
Low ----- High _--_-- High.
Moderate.
Low.
Q�
� High ------� High.
Low.
Low _____ Moderate ___ High.
Low.
Low _ _ _ _ � High _ _ _ _ _ _ _I Moderate.
Low.
Low.
4.5-5.5'
Low _ _ _ _ _
Moderate _ _ _
High.
4.5-5.5
Low.
4.5-5.5
Low,
4.5-5.5
----------
High -----
High.
4.5-5:5
Low.
4.5-5.5
Low.
4.5-5.5
Low_____
Moderate__
High.
4.5-5.5
Law.
4.5-5.5
Low.
4.5-6.0
Low__.__
Low ______
High.
4.5-5.5
Low.
"
4.5-5.5
Lnw.

I
44 SOIL SURVEY LENOIR COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
i
TABLE 6. Estimated soil properties significant in engineering -Continued j
Soil series
and
map symbols
Flood
hazard:
_ frequency;
duration
Depth to
seasonal
high Depth
water from USDA
table surface texture
Classifieation
Unified =- AASHT0 4
Liquid
limit
Plastici
index
Ft
Fn
Mnston: Ko __________
Frequent;
0
0-6 Loam --------
CL
A-6
25-35
16-20
.
brief
6-50 Clay loam
___ CL
- A-6
15-40
12-18
-
periods:
50-65 Clay loam
_ _ ML, CL or
A-4 or A-6,
<40
NP -18
ML -CL
A2
Lakeland: La ---------
None.
5
0-90 Sand ___..___
SP -SM
A-2
__
NP
Leaf: Le _____________
Ponding.
0
0-10. Loam ______
CL
A-4 or A-6
30-40+
8-15
10-80 Clay, clay
CL or CH
A-7
41-55
19-37
loam,
Lenoir: Ln ___________
None.
1.6
0-11 Loam _---___
ML, CL or
A-4
<36..
NP -10
ML -CL
' 11-75 Clay, clay
CL
A-6 or A-7
30-49
2020
loam.
Leon: Lo_____________
None.
1.5
0-14 Sand ________
SP -SM -
A-2 or A-3
<24
NP -3
14-37 Sand, loamy
SM or
A-2 or A-3
<15
NP -3
sand.
SP -SM
_
'
37-72 Sand ----- _
_ SP -SM
A-2 or A-3
<16
NP -3
Lumbee: Lu __________
Ponding.
0
0-12 Sandy loam
_ SM
A-2 or A=4
<20
NP -3
12-38 Sandy clay
SC or
A--4 or A-6
19-35
4-15
loam, sandy SM -SC
loam.
38-65 Sand________
SP -SM or
A-2 or A-3
NP
SM
Lynchburg: Ly________
None. _,
1,5
0-12 Sandyloam_
SM
A-4 or A-2
.<25
NP -3
-
12-85 Sandy clay
SO or CL,
A-4 or A-6
20-40
4-16
loam.
ML -CL,
SM -SC
Meggett: Me _________
Ponding.
0
0-12 Fine sandy
SM
A-2 or A-4
__
NP
'
loam,sandy
loam.
12-45 Clay, sandy
SC, CL or
A-7
45-65
25-40
clay, sandy
CH
clay loam,
45-85 Sandy clay
SC
A-4 or A-6
25-44
7-20
loam.
Murville: Mu _________
Ponding,
0
0-58 Fine sand ___
SP -SM
A-2 or A-3
NP
.
58-87 Loamy fine
SM
A-2
__
_ _
NP
sand.
Norfolk: Na, Nb, No __
None.
5
0-12 Loamy sand _ .
SM
A-2
<16
NF -3
12-85 Sandy clay
SC, SM -SC,
A-4 or A-6
<35
4.-15
loam.
CL, CL -
ML
Pactolus: Pa
None.
1-2.5
0-38 Loamy sand _
SM
A-2
__
NP
38-75 Sand_______
SM or
A-2 orA-a
NP
SP -SM
__
_ Pamlico: Pc __________
Veryfre-
0
0-33 Muck
Pt
NP
quent;
__
33-65 Loamy sand,
SM or
__
A-2
__
long
sand.
SP -SM
periods,
Pantego: Pe __________
Ponding.
0 -
0-14 Loam,sandy
ML, SO or
A-4
<40
NP -10
loam..
CL -ML
-
14-74 Sandy clay'
SC or CL
A-6
25-35
11-25
loam,
Pocalla: Per _____.____
None.
5
0-22 Loamy sand,
SM or
A-2"orA-3
NP
sand.
SP -SM
__
22--40 Sandy loam _
SM, SCOT
A-2
<80
NP -10
SM -S C
I
40-66 Sand
A-2 or A-3
NP
SP -SM
_,
66-80 Sandy loam _
SM, SC or A-2
«0
NP -10
SM -SC
Percentage Iess than 3 inches passing sieve- Corrosivity
'y Permeability (Available Reaction Shrink-
No. 4 - No. 10 No. 40 No. 200water swell Uncoated
ac
(4.7 mm) (2.0mm) (0.42 mon) (0.074 mm) ' ca capacity r -potential steel Concrete
lln e an
7n Per Ar f Boil PH
I
100 100 85-95 60-75 2.0-6.0 0,15-0,20 4.5-5,5 Low ----- High _ _ _ _ _ __ High,
100 100 90-100 70-80 0.6-2.0 0.15-D.26 4.6-5.6 Low.
1.00 90-100 90-100 70-80 0.6-2,0 0412-0.16 4.5-5.5 Low
100 100 51-70 5-12 6.0-20 i 0.02-0.05 4.5-5,0 Low _____ Low _______ Moderate.
100 100 85-95 60-76 0.06-.20 , 0.15-0.20 4.6-5.5 Low ____ Very high High.
100 100 90-100 75-95 0.06-,20 0.15-0.20 4.5-5,5 Moderate,
100 100 85-98 60-85 0.6 2.0 . 0.15-0.20 4.5-5,5 Low _ _ _ _ High _ _ _ _ _ _ _ High.
100 100 90-100 60-95 0.06-,20 - 0.15-0-18 4.5-5,6 Moderate,
100 100 80-100 5-12 6:0-20 0.02-0,05 4.0-5,5 YeTylaw Low _______ High.
100 100 80-100 5-20 2.0-6.0 0.05-0,10 4.0-5,5 Very low.
100 100 80-100 5-12 600-20 0.92-0.05 4.0405 Very low.
100 100 60-70 . 30-40 2.0-6.0 0.10-0.12 4.6-6.0 Low _ _ _ _ High _ _ _ _ _ _ _ High.
100 96-100 65-90 36-50 0,6-2.0 0.12-0.15 4.6-5.5 Low.
100 .90"100 51-70 5-15 6.0-20 0.03-0.06 4.5-5.5 Low,
100 100 60-70 "30-49 2.0-6.0 0.16-0.14 40-6,0 Low ____ High _______ .High.
100 100 80-90 36-55' 0.6-2,0 012-0.15 4,0-5.5 Low,
100 100 60-85 30-49 2.0-6,0 0.10-0.15 6.6-6.5 Low ____ Very high __ Low.
100 96-100 80-95 45-75 0.06-0,2 0.15-0.18 6.1-&4 High,
100 95-100 70-90 36-50 0.06-0,2.,0.15-0.18 6.6-8,4 Moderate.
100 100 65-80 5-12 6,0-20 10.06-0.08 4.0-5,0 Low ____ High _______ High.
100 100 51-76 15-30 2.0-6,0 0.06-0.08 4.04,0 Low.
100 100 51-75 15-30 2.0-6.0 '0.06-0.08 4.5-5.5 Low____ Low _______ High.
100 100 80-90 36-55 0.6-2,0 0.12-0.15 4,5-5,5 Low,
100 100 51-75 15-30 6.0-20- :0.06-0.10 4.54.5 Low ____ Low _______ High,
109 100 51-70 6-15 6,0-20 X0.02=0.05 4,5-5,5 Low.
,
-- -- -- -- 0.6-2,0 &24-0.26 4.0-5,5 ---- High ---'-- High,
100 100 51-75 10-30 2.0-6,0 0,03-0.08 4.0-5,5 Low.
a
100 100 65=100 36-65 2:0-640 15-0,17 4.0-5.5 Low____ High_______ High,
100 96-100 80-100- 36-56 0.6-2,0 p.13-015 4,0-5,5 Low.
I
100 100 51-97 5-30 6.0-20 0,05-0.10 4.6-6,0 Low ____ Low _______ High.
100 100 60-97 20-40 0.6-2.0 0.10-0.14 4.5-5.5 Low.
100 100 51-97 5-20 6.0-20 0.05-0.08 4.5-5.5 Low.
100 100 60-97 30-40 0.6-2,0 0.10-0.14 4.5-5.5 Low.
L

1
�'
46
SOIL SURVEY "
TABLE 6. Estimated soil properties
Soil series
and
' Flood
hazard:
Frequency;
Depth to
seasonal
high
water
Depth
from
USDA
Classification
Liquid
limit
Plasticity
index
-Unified�•�
AASHTO
map symbols
duration �
table
surface
texture
piping and
in
sandy sub-
61=75
erosion.
stratum at a
(1.06-0.08
depth of about
Low.
45 inches.
100
95-100
51-70
Portsmouth: Pr
Ponding
0
0-13
Loam ____ __
ML or
A-4 �.
20-40
3-10
________
4.0-5.5
Low.
Y00
100
ML -CL
60-70
30-40
2.0-6.0
0.08-0.12
4.5-6.0
Low _ _ _ _ _ High _ _ _ _ _ _ " Higb.
13-38 �
Sandy clay
SC or
A-4 or"A-6
19-35
4-15
soils -Continued
100
100
loam, sandy
SM -SC
0.62.0
0.10-0.14
4.5-5.5
Low.
100
95-100
60-70
loam:
0.6-2.0
0.11-0.15
4.5-5.5
Low.
Excavated
ponds Dwellings
38-70 �
Sand ________
SP -SM or
A-2 orA-3
__
NP
filter fields
lagoon) and streets
industries
(trench and
SM
3ains: Ra
Ponding
0
0-13
Sandy loam __
SM, SC or
A-2 or A-4
<20
NP -10
_____________
able flood I flooding;
flooding; sea-
flooding; sea -
permeability. conal high
SM -SC
damage to poorly
conal high
conal high
water table.
water table.
13-63
Sandy clay
SC or �
A-4
15-30
4-20
moderately
moderately
loam.
SM -SC
rapid perrhe-
rapid perme-
63-85
Sandy clay
SC
A-2 or A-6
20-40
11-20
substratum at
substratum at
loam.
a depth of� �
� -
a depth of
Stallings: 5[ ___________
None.
1
0-12
Loamy sand _
SM
A-2
__
NP
inches: � '� ' '
'
12-42
Sandy loam _
SM
A-2 or A-4
<25
NP -3
42-80
Loamy sand _
SM
A-2
_ _
NP
To
Ponding.
0
0-14
Loam ______
ML
A-4
__
NP
.'orhunta: __________
14-36
Sandy loam _
SM
A--4 or A-2
_ _
NP
36-65
Loamy sand,
SM or
A-2 or A�
_ _
NP
sand.
SP -SM
Jmbrie Ochraqualfs:
Frequent
0
0-14
Loam ______
ML, CL,
A-4
<40
NP -YO
Uo.
Ponding.
CL -ML
14-70
� Sandy clay
CL or SC
"A-6 or A-7
30-4$
15-30
.
loam, sandy
clay.
�agram: Wb, Wc, Wd __
None.
5
0-30
Loamy sand __
SM
A-2
<20
NP -3
30-90
Sandy clay
SC, SC -SM
A-4 or A-6
21-30
5-12
loam.
Tickham: Wk� _________
None.
6 �
0-15
Loamy sand _
SM
A-2
__
� NP
15-43
Sandy clay
SC, SC -SM, �
A-4
<30
NP -10
loam, sandy
SM
loam.
43-65
Loamy sand _
SM
A-2
NP
_ _
�oodington: Wn _____
Ponding.
1
0-12
Loamy sand _
SM
A-2
NP
12-47
Sandy loam _
SM, SC or
A-4 or A-2
<30
NP -10
SM -SC
47-85
Loamy sand _
SM
A-2
NP
'Shallow water commonly stands during or £olIowing a rain.
Suitability as source of -
Soil series
and
map symbols Topsoil Sand Gravel Road fill
Bibb: BB ______ P'oor: poorly -Poor: impxob- Poor: improb-�' Poor: poorly
drained, able source. able source. drained.
i
TABLE 7. Interpretations of
[Dashes indicate that information is not
Limitations for -
Pond
85-95
reservoir
Pond
areas
embanj�ents
4.0-5.5
Low _ _ _ _ _ High _ _ _ _ _ _ High.
Severe: mod-
Moderate: poor
eratety rapid
resistance
to
permeability
piping and
in
sandy sub-
61=75
erosion.
stratum at a
(1.06-0.08
depth of about
Low.
45 inches.
100
' � LENOIR COUNTY, NORTII CAROLINA 47
svgniftcant in engineering -Continued ,'I
Percentage less than 3 inches passing sieve- ' Corrosivity
Permeability Available .Reaction Shrink -
No. 4 No. 10� � No. 40 No. 20D water � swell Uncoated
�. (4.7 mm) (2.0 mm) (0.42 mm) (0.074 mm) �eapaeity potential steel' Concrete
100
100.
85-95
15-30
60 -?5
D.6-2.0
,0.14-0.18
4.0-5.5
Low _ _ _ _ _ High _ _ _ _ _ _ High.
100
95-100
60-85
36-50
0.62.0
O.Y3-0.15
4.5-5.5
Law.
100
61=75
15-30
6.6-20
(1.06-0.08
4.5-5.5
Low.
100
100
95-100
51-70
5-15
6.D-20
;0.02-O.DS
4.5-5.5
Low.
100
60-70
30-40
2.0-6.0
0.10-0.16
4.0-5.5
Low.
Y00
100
100
60-70
30-40
2.0-6.0
0.08-0.12
4.5-6.0
Low _ _ _ _ _ High _ _ _ _ _ _ " Higb.
95-100 -.51-75
15-3D
6.0-20 0.06-0.10 4.5-5.5
Low.
enginee��ing properties of the
soils -Continued
100
100
80-90
36-50
0.62.0
0.10-0.14
4.5-5.5
Low.
100
95-100
60-70
30-40
0.6-2.0
0.11-0.15
4.5-5.5
Low.
Excavated
ponds Dwellings
Septic -tank
�
Sewag¢ Local roads
Light
Sanitary
landfill'
�. (aquifer
fed)
filter fields
lagoon) and streets
industries
(trench and
Y00
100
51-75
15-30
6.0-20
0.06-0.10
4.5-5.5
Low -____ Moderate__ High.
100
100
60-70
30-40
2.0-6.0
0.10-0.14
4.5-5.5
Low.
100
100
61=75
15-30
6.6-20
(1.06-0.08
4.5-5.5
Low.
100
� 100
85-95
60-75
2.0-6.0�
0.10-0.15
4.0-5.5
Low _ _ _ _ _ High _ _ _ _ _ _ High.
Y00
100
60-70
30-40
2.0-6.0
0.10-0.16
4.0-5.5
Low.
Y00
95-100
51-75
5-25
6.0-20 -
0.02-0.05
4.0-5.5
Low. '
100
100' 51-75
150
6.0-20 0.06-0.08 4.5-6.0
Low_____ Low
______ High.
100
96-109 60-90
3fi-50
2.0-6.0 0.13-0.15 4.5-5.5
High ______�
Low.
lOQ I
.100
I 80 95 �
.I 36-60
I 0,6-2.0
10.15-017
100
I 6.1-8.4
36-50
I Moderate.)
Low.
100
100' 51-75
150
6.0-20 0.06-0.08 4.5-6.0
Low_____ Low
______ High.
100
96-109 60-90
3fi-50
2.0-6.0 0.13-0.15 4.5-5.5
Low.
. 100
100 ,51-75
15-30
2:0-6.0 0.06-0.10 5.1-6.6
Low--___ Low
______ Moderate.
100
160 60-90
36-50
0.6-2.0 0.13-O.lb 5.1-6.5
Low.
90-100
90-100 51-7D
1520
6,0-20 0.05-0.16 5.1-6.5
Low.
-
lOD
100 61-75
15-30
6.020 6.06-0,10
Low___=_ High______
High.
I00
100 60-76
30-40
.4.5-5.5
2,6-6.6 0;10-0.14 � 4.5-5.5
Low.
100
95-100 -.51-75
15-3D
6.0-20 0.06-0.10 4.5-5.5
Low.
enginee��ing properties of the
soils -Continued
available or
that the practice is not applicable]
.. Degree
of limitations and
major soil feiatures affecting selected.use-
Excavated
ponds Dwellings
Septic -tank
�
Sewag¢ Local roads
Light
Sanitary
landfill'
�. (aquifer
fed)
filter fields
lagoon) and streets
industries
(trench and
area method)
Moderate:
Severe:
Severe: �
Severe: prob- Severe:
Severe:
Severe:
moderate
� flooding; sea-
flooding; sea-
able flood I flooding;
flooding; sea-
flooding; sea -
permeability. conal high
conal high
damage to poorly
conal high
conal high
water table.
water table.
embankment; drained.
water table.
water table;
'
moderately
moderately
rapid perrhe-
rapid perme-
ability; sandy "
ability; sandy
substratum at
substratum at
'
a depth of� �
� -
a depth of
about 45 I
about 45 inches.
inches: � '� ' '
'

C
4
J
J
-q
48
SOIL SURVEY
TABLE 7. Interpretations of
LENOIR COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA 49
i
engineering properties of the soils—Continued
Excavated ponds
(aquifer fed)
Seveie: deep to
water table in
dry season.
Severe: rapid
permeability
in substratum.
Moderate:
depth to
water table in
dry season.
Moderate:
depth to
water table in
dry season;
slowly perme.
able aquifer.
Moderate:
depth to
water table in
dry season.
Moderate:
depth to
water table in
dry season;
marl substra-
tum.
Moderate:
depth to
water table in
dry season.
Degree of limitations and major soil features affecting selected use
Dwellings Septic -tank
filter fields
Slight __________ Slight ________
ISevere:
flooding; sea-
sonal high
water table.
Severe: sea-
sonal high
water table.
Severe: clayey
subsoil.
Moderate: sea-
sonal high
water table.
Severe: sea-
sonal high
water table.
Severe: sea.
sonal high
water table.
Slight -------- __I Severe:
flooding; sea-
sonal high
water table.
ievere: depth Slight ------
to water table
in dry season,
Severe: depth I Slight -------
to water table
in dry season.
Severe:
flooding; sea-
sonal high
water table.
Severe: sea-
sonal high
water table;
moderately
slow perme-
ability.
Severe: sea-
sonal high
water table;
slow perme.
ability.
Severe: sea-
sonal high,
water table.
Severe: sea-
sonal high
water table,
Severer sea-
sonal high
water table.
Severe:
flooding; sea-
sonal high
water table.
Slight ________
Slight
Moderate:
moderate
permeability,
Severe: j depth
to seasonal
high water
table.'
Severe: depth
to seasonal
high water
table.
Severe: .depth
to seasonal
high water
table. !
I
Severe: depth
to seasonal
high water
table.
Severe: .depth
to seasonal
high water
table.
Severe: depth
to seasonal
hi
gh water
table; sandy
subtratum at
a depth! of
about 34
inches; •rapid
permeability.
Severe:
flooding; -
rapid perme-
ability (sea-
sonal high
water table.
t
Severe: rapid
permeability;
sandy stibstra-
tum at a
depth of about
38 aches.
Severe: rapid
permeability;
sandy sub-
stratum at a
depth of about
36 inches.
Local roads Light
and streets industries
Slight ________ Slight ------
Severe:
flooding,
I Severe:
poorly
drained;
clayey tex-
ture.
I.Severe:
clayey tex-
ture.
Slight _
Severe:
poorly
drained.
Moderate:
somewhat
poorly
drained.
Severe:
flooding;
very poorly
drained.
Right
Slight -----
Severe:
flooding; sea.
sonal high
water table.
Severe: sea-
sonal high
water table;
clayey sub-
soil.
Severe: clayey
subsoil.
Moderate: sea-
sonal high
water table.
Severe: sea-
sonal high
water table.
Severe: sea-
sonal high
water table.
Severe:
flooding; sea-
sonal high
water table.
Slight if 0• to 4
percent slopes.,
Moderate if 4 to
6 percent
slopes.
Slight if 0 to 4
percent slopes.
Moderate if 4 to
8 percent
slopes.
Sanitary
landfill
(trench and
area method)
Slight.
Severe:
flooding; sea-
sonal high
water table.
Severe: sea-
sonal high
water table.
Severe: sea-
sonal high
water table.
Severe: sea-
sonal high
water'table.
Severe: sea-
sonal high
water table;
marl substra-
tum.
Severe: sea-
sonal high
water table;
rapid uerme-
ability; sandy
substratum at
a depth of
about 34
inches.
Severe: sea-
sonal high
water table;
flooding; rapid
.- permeability;
sandysub-
stratum at a
depth of about
38 inches.
Severe: sandy
substratum at
a depth of
about 38
inches; rapid
permeability.
Severe: rapid
permeability;
sandy sub-
stratum ata
depth of about
36 inches.
Suitability as source of—
Limitations for—
Soil series
Pond
and
map
Topsoil
Sand
Gravel
Road. fill
reservoir
areas
Pond
embankments
symbols
3lanton: Bn
Poor: sand
Poor: execs-
Poor: improb-
Good ___.------
Mmoderate
der resistance poor
Moderate:
..-
surface layer.
sive fines.
able source.
permeability,
piping and
erosion.
lhewacla: Ch --
Good . --------
Unsuited: ex-
Unsuited: ex-
fines;
Fair: some-
Moderate:
moderate
Moderate:
good to poor
. cessive.fines;
high
cessive
seasonal high
what poorly
drained.
permeability.
resistance to
seasonal
water table;
water table;
piping and
subject to
subject to
erosion; _me-
dium compress
flooding; prob-
flooding;
ibility,
able source
probable
below depth of
source below
about 4 feet.
depth of about
4 feet.
loxville; Co ._-
Fair:, limited
Unsuited: ex-
Unsuited: ex-
Poor: poorly
drained,
Slight ____-----
Moderate:medium m-
_
amount of
cessive fines.
cessive fines.
pressibility;
suitable ma-
fair slope
terial.
stability.
;raveni' Cr, Cv
Fair: limited
Unsuited: ex-
Unsuited: " ex-
Poor: low
Slight _____-----
Moderate:
edium com-
-
amount of
cessive fines.
cessive fines.
slaength,
pressibility;
suitable ma-
fair slope
terial.
stability.
foldsboro: Go
Poor: loamy
Poor: improb-
Poor: improba-
Good --- _-------
Moderate:
SlightSlight__________
_
sand surface
able source:
ble source.
permeability-.
layer.
Gr-____
Poor:
Poor:. improb-
Poor: improba-
Poor: poorly
Moderate:
Moderate: good
to
:Tifton:
poorly
drained.
able source.
ble source.
drained.
moderate
permeability.
poor resist -
ance to piping
and erosion.
Jo
Good.
Poor: exces-
Poor: excessive
Fair: some-
Severe: rapid
Moderate: good
to
ohns: - .__
_
sive fines;
fines; probable
what poorly
permeability;
poor re -
to
probable
source below
drained.
sandy substra-
sistanee
source below
depth of about
time at a
depth of 34
piping and
erosion;
'
depth of about
4 feet,
inches.
medium
4 feet,
..
permeability.
Poor: very
Poor: improb-
Poor: improba.
Poor: very
Severe: rapid
Severe: poor
ohnston: JS __
able source.
ble source.
poorly
permeability;
resistance to
poorly
drained.
sandy sub-
piping.
drained.
stratum at a
_
depth of about
38 inches.
:almia: Ka,
Poor: loamy
'Poor: excessive
Poor: excessive
Good ___________
Severe: rapid
Moderate: good
to poor re -
Kb,
sand surface
fines; proba-
fines; proba-
ble be-
permeability
in sandy sub-
sistance to
layer.
ble source
below depth
source
low depth of
stratum at a
piping and
of about 4
about 4 feet.
depth of about
erosion.
feet.
38 inches.
:enansville: -
Poor: loamy
Fair: few
fines.
Poor: ' excessive
fines;
Good ___________
Severe: rapid
permeability•
.Moderate:
medium
Ke,
sand surface
proba-
ble source be-
sandy sub-
permeability;
layer.
y
low depth of
stratum at a
poor resist -
about 4 feet,
depth of about I
ante to piping
36 inches. I
and erosion.
LENOIR COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA 49
i
engineering properties of the soils—Continued
Excavated ponds
(aquifer fed)
Seveie: deep to
water table in
dry season.
Severe: rapid
permeability
in substratum.
Moderate:
depth to
water table in
dry season.
Moderate:
depth to
water table in
dry season;
slowly perme.
able aquifer.
Moderate:
depth to
water table in
dry season.
Moderate:
depth to
water table in
dry season;
marl substra-
tum.
Moderate:
depth to
water table in
dry season.
Degree of limitations and major soil features affecting selected use
Dwellings Septic -tank
filter fields
Slight __________ Slight ________
ISevere:
flooding; sea-
sonal high
water table.
Severe: sea-
sonal high
water table.
Severe: clayey
subsoil.
Moderate: sea-
sonal high
water table.
Severe: sea-
sonal high
water table.
Severe: sea.
sonal high
water table.
Slight -------- __I Severe:
flooding; sea-
sonal high
water table.
ievere: depth Slight ------
to water table
in dry season,
Severe: depth I Slight -------
to water table
in dry season.
Severe:
flooding; sea-
sonal high
water table.
Severe: sea-
sonal high
water table;
moderately
slow perme-
ability.
Severe: sea-
sonal high
water table;
slow perme.
ability.
Severe: sea-
sonal high,
water table.
Severe: sea-
sonal high
water table,
Severer sea-
sonal high
water table.
Severe:
flooding; sea-
sonal high
water table.
Slight ________
Slight
Moderate:
moderate
permeability,
Severe: j depth
to seasonal
high water
table.'
Severe: depth
to seasonal
high water
table.
Severe: .depth
to seasonal
high water
table. !
I
Severe: depth
to seasonal
high water
table.
Severe: .depth
to seasonal
high water
table.
Severe: depth
to seasonal
hi
gh water
table; sandy
subtratum at
a depth! of
about 34
inches; •rapid
permeability.
Severe:
flooding; -
rapid perme-
ability (sea-
sonal high
water table.
t
Severe: rapid
permeability;
sandy stibstra-
tum at a
depth of about
38 aches.
Severe: rapid
permeability;
sandy sub-
stratum at a
depth of about
36 inches.
Local roads Light
and streets industries
Slight ________ Slight ------
Severe:
flooding,
I Severe:
poorly
drained;
clayey tex-
ture.
I.Severe:
clayey tex-
ture.
Slight _
Severe:
poorly
drained.
Moderate:
somewhat
poorly
drained.
Severe:
flooding;
very poorly
drained.
Right
Slight -----
Severe:
flooding; sea.
sonal high
water table.
Severe: sea-
sonal high
water table;
clayey sub-
soil.
Severe: clayey
subsoil.
Moderate: sea-
sonal high
water table.
Severe: sea-
sonal high
water table.
Severe: sea-
sonal high
water table.
Severe:
flooding; sea-
sonal high
water table.
Slight if 0• to 4
percent slopes.,
Moderate if 4 to
6 percent
slopes.
Slight if 0 to 4
percent slopes.
Moderate if 4 to
8 percent
slopes.
Sanitary
landfill
(trench and
area method)
Slight.
Severe:
flooding; sea-
sonal high
water table.
Severe: sea-
sonal high
water table.
Severe: sea-
sonal high
water table.
Severe: sea-
sonal high
water'table.
Severe: sea-
sonal high
water table;
marl substra-
tum.
Severe: sea-
sonal high
water table;
rapid uerme-
ability; sandy
substratum at
a depth of
about 34
inches.
Severe: sea-
sonal high
water table;
flooding; rapid
.- permeability;
sandysub-
stratum at a
depth of about
38 inches.
Severe: sandy
substratum at
a depth of
about 38
inches; rapid
permeability.
Severe: rapid
permeability;
sandy sub-
stratum ata
depth of about
36 inches.

50
Soil series
and
map symbols Topsoil
Kinston: Kn _
Poor: poorly
drained.
Lakeland: La _ Poor: sand
surface layer.
Leaf: Le ----
Poor: poorly
drained. -
Lenoir: Ln ___ Fair: limited
amount of
suitable ma-
terial.
Leon: Lo ----- Poor: sand
surface layer.
Lumbee: Lu __� Poor: poorly
drained.
Lynchburg:, Ly Faix: limited
amount of
material.
Meggett: Me' _ Poor: poorly
drained.
Murville: Mu_ _.f Poor: very
poorly
drained.
SOIL SURVEY
Suitability as source o£—
Sand Gravel
Poor: excessiv
fines; seasons
high water
table; subject
to flooding;
probable
source below
depth of abou�
4 feet.
Fair: few
fines.
Unsuited:ex-
cessive fines.
Unsuited: ex-
cessive fines.
Fair: few
fines.
Poor: exees-
sive fines;
seasonal high
water table;
subject to
flooding; prob-
able source be-
low depth of
about 4 feet.
Poor: improb-
able source.
Unsuited: ex-
cessive fines.
Fair: exces-
sive fines and
organic -matter
content.
Poor: exces-
sive flues; sen
sonal high
water table;
subject to
flooding; prob
able source
below depth in
about 4 feet.
Poor: improb-
able source.
Unsuited: ex-
cessive fines.
Unsuited: ex-
cessive fines.
Poor: improb-
able source.
TABLE 7. Interpretations of
Poor: exces-
Limitations for—
. Severe: rapid
Moderate:
Pond
drained.
permeability;
Road fill
reservoir
Pond
water table:
sandy sub-
areas
embankments
Poor: poorly
Moderate:
Moderate: good
drained.
moderate
to poor re-
erosion; suit.
permeability.
sistance to
38 inches.
able material
piping and
water table.
erosion; me-
below depth
dium eom-
'
of about 4
pressibility.
Good _______---
Severe: rapid
Severe: poor
permeability.
slope sta-
Poor: improb-
Fair: some-
bility; high
Moderate: poor
-
permeability;
moderate
resistance
poor resist-
drained.
ance to piping
piping.
Unsuited: ex-
and erosion.
Poor: poorly
Slight --------
Moderate: hig
drained.
compressi-
shrink -swell
bility.
Fair: some-
Slight -------
Moderate:
what poorly
row material.
high com-
drained.
pressibility.
Fair: some.
Severe: rapid
Severe: poor
what poorly
permeability;
slope sta-
drained.
sandy sub-
bility; high
stratum at a
permeability;
depth of about
poor resist -
37 inches.
ance to piping
and erosion.
Poor: exces-
Poor: poorly
. Severe: rapid
Moderate:
sive flues;
drained.
permeability;
seasonal high
good to poor
seasonal high
water table:
sandy sub-
resistance to ,
water table;
seasonal high
tratum at a
piping and
subject to
surface
depth of about
erosion; suit.
flooding; prob-
Severe: sea-
38 inches.
able material
able source
water table.
at a depth of
below depth
about 38 ,
of about 4
inches.
feet.
Poor: improb-
Fair: some-
Moderate:
Moderate: poor
able source.
what poorly
moderate
resistance
to
drained.
permeability.
piping.
Unsuited: ex-
Poor: poorly
Slight __________
Moderate:
cessive fines.
drained; high
thickness of
shrink -swell
suitable bor-
potential.
row material.
Poor: improb- Poor: very
able source. poorly
drained; high
content of
organic mat-
ter.
Severe: mod- Severe: poor
erately rapid slope sta-
permeability. - bility; high
permeability;
poor resist-
ance to piping
and erosion,
I Sl
LENOIR COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
engineering properties of the soils—Continued
riegree of limitations and ajor soil features affecting selected use—
Excavated ponds Dwellings Septic -tank Sewage -Local roads Light landfills'
(aquifer fed) filter fields lagoons and streets industries (trench and
area method)
Moderate: Severe: Severe: Severe:. Severe: Severe: Severe:
depth to flooding; sea- flooding; sea- $oodvrg; .flooding; flooding; sea- flooding;
sea-
water table in sonal high sinal high seasonal high poorly sonal high sinal high
dry season, water table. water tableo
water' table, drained. water table, watetable.
ISevere: depth
to water
tabloid dry
season.
ISevere: very
slow perm
ab lity of
aqu fer:
Severe: slow
permeability
of aquifer.
Moderate: -
depth to
water table in
dry season.
Moderate:
depth to i
water table in
dry season.
Zoderate:
depth to
water table in
dry season.
Moderate:
depth to
water table in
dry season.
ght--------- S.
Slight --------- Slight -----
Severe: mod-
Severe: slow
crate to high
permeability;
shrink -swell
seasonal high
Potential;
water table:
clayey subsoil;
seasonal high
water table;
surface
ponding.
Severe: sea-
Severe: sea -
sinal high
sonal high
water table.
water table
'Severe: sea-
sonal high
water table.
Severe; sea-
sonal high
water table.
.evere: sea-
sonal high
water table,
evere: sea-
sonal high
water table;
high shrink -
swell pot os-
tial.
:Vere: sea-
sonal high
water table.
slow perme-
ability,
Severe: sea-
sonal high
water table.
Severe: sea-
sonal high
water table.
Severe: sea-
sonal high
water table.
Severe: sea-
sonal high
water table;
slow perme-
ability.
Severe: sea-
sonal high
water table.
__I Severe: rapid
permeability,
I Severe: sea-
sonal high
water table.
I Severe: sea-
sonal high
water table,
Severe: sea-
sonal high
water table;
rapid perme-
ability, sandy
substratum at
a depth of 37
inches.
Severe: sea-
sonal high
water table;
rapid pezme-
ability, sandy
substratum at
a depth of
about 38
inches.
Severe: sea-
sonal high
water table.
)evere: sea
sonal high
water table.
Severe: sea-
sonal high
water table;
moderately
rapid pernne-
ability,
Slight
I Severe:
Poorly
drained.
I Severe:
Unified
group is CL.
Moderate:
somewhat
poorly
drained.
Severe:
poorly
drained.
Moderate:
somewhat
poorly
drained.
;evere,
poorly
drained;
high shrink -
swell poten-
tial.
evere: very
poorly
drained.
Slight if 0 to I
Percent slope
Moderate if 4 ti
8 percent
slopes.
Severe: sea -
sinal h gh
water table;
clayey; mod-
erate shrink -
swell poten-
tial.
I Severe: sea-
sonal high
water table.
Severe: sea-
sonal high
water table.
Severe: sea-
sonal high
water table.
Severe: sea-
sonal high
water table.
Severe: high
shrink -swell
potential
seasonal kigh
water table,
levere: sea-
sonal high
water table.
Severe: rapid
permeability.
Severe: sea-
sonal high
water table.
I Severe: sea-
sonal high
water table.
Severe: sea-
sonal high
water table;
rapid perme-
ability; sandy
substratum
at a depth of
about 37 inches.
Severe: sea-
sonal high
water table;
rapid perme-
ability;sandy
substratum at
a depth of
about 38 inches.
Severe: sea -
sinal h gh
water table.
Severe: sea-
sonal high
water table;
marl substra-
tum,
evere: sea
sonal high
water table;
moderately
rapid perme-
ability.
51

52
i
Soil :ser.,
map symE. Topsoil
Norfolk: Na,
Nb, No.
Pactolus: Pa
Pamlico: Pc _
Pantego: Pe
Pocalla: Po ---
Portsmouth:
Pr,
Rains: Ra _____I
Poor: loamy
sand surface
.layer.
_) Poor: loamy
sand surface
layer.
1 Poor: very
poorly
drained.
Poor: very
poorly
drained.
Poor: loamy
sand surface
layer.
Poor: very
poorly
drained.
Poor: poorly
drained.
SOIL SURVEY
Suitability as source of—
Sand Gravel
Poor: improb-
able source.
Fair: some
fines.
Poor: improba-
ble source.
Poor: improba-
ble source.
Poor: exces-
sive fines.
Poor: exces-
sive fines;
Probable
source below
depth of about
4 feet.
Poor: improba-.I
ble source.
Stallings: St ___ Poor: loamy Poor: impxoba-
sand surface ble source. -
layer.
Poor: improb-
able source.
Poor: improb-
able source.
Poor:improb-
able source.
Poor: improb-
able source.
Poor: improb-
able source.
Poor: improb-
able source.
Poor: improb-
able source.
Poor: improb-
able source.
TABLE 7. Interpretations of
Limitations for—
Pond
Pd-I
reservoir Pond
areas embankments
Moderate: Slight
moderate
permeability. .
Fair: some-
what poorly
drained.
Poor: very
poorly
drained; or-
ganie surface
layer.
Poor: very
poorly
drained.
Good
Poor: very
poorly
drained.
Poor: poorly
drained.
_Fair: some-
what poorly
drained.
Severe: rapid
permeability.
Severe: mod-
erately rapid
permeability;
sandy sub-
stratum at a
depth of 33
inches.
Moderate:
moderate
permeability.
Severe: rapid
permeability;
sandy sub-
stratum at a
depth of about
40 inches.
Severe: rapid
permeability;
sandy sub-
stratum at a
depth of about
38 inches.
Moderate:
Moderate:
poor resist-
ance to piping
and erosion;
Poor slope
stability; me-
dium to high
permeability,
Severe: poor
slope sta-
bility; high
compressi-
bility.
Slight_____
Moderate: in
dium perrui
ability; poor
resistance to
piping and
erosion.
Moderate:
good to poor
resistance to
piping and
erosion; suit-
able material
at a depth of
about 38
inches.
Slight _________
moderate
Legree
of limitations and
major soil £e
permeability.:
Dwellings
Septie-tank
Sewage
Severe: rapid
7 to
Moderate:
lagibns
permeability;
Slight if 0 to 8
poor resist -
Moderate if i
sandy sub-
percent
ante to piping
7 percent
stratum at a
slopes.
and erosion;
slo es mb
depth of about
Severe if more
medium per -
ability.
42 inches,
meability;
Percent slopes.
Moderate:
fair slope
Severe: sea -
somewhat
sonal high
stability,
Poorly
drained.
1!
LENOIR COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
engineering properties of the soils—Continued
I Moderate:
depth to
water table it
dry season.
Slight
Slight__________
Severe: deep
to water table
in dry season,
Slight---
doderate.,
depth to
water table in
dry season,
loderate:
depth to water
table in dry
season.
Moderate if
Legree
of limitations and
major soil £e
Excavated ponds
Dwellings
Septie-tank
Sewage
(aquifer fed)
7 to
filter fields
lagibns
Severe: deep
Slight if 0 to 8
Slight if 0 to 8
Moderate if i
to water table
in
percent
percent slopes.
7 percent
dry season.
slopes.
Moderate if
slo es mb
I Moderate:
depth to
water table it
dry season.
Slight
Slight__________
Severe: deep
to water table
in dry season,
Slight---
doderate.,
depth to
water table in
dry season,
loderate:
depth to water
table in dry
season.
Moderate if
more than 8
Crate gerii
m
more than 8
percent slopes.
ability;,
percent
Severe if
7 to
slopes,
Slight.
percent slog
Severe: sea-
Severe: sea-
Severe: sea-
sonal high
sonal high
sonal high
water table.
water table,
water table
slopes.
"
rapid perme
Severe if more
ability.
Severe: sea-
sonal high
water table,
surface
ponding and
flooding.
Severe: sea-
sonal h gh
water table.
Slight
Severe:
_ sea-
sonal high
water table.
severe: sea-
sonal high
water table.
evere: sea-
sonal high
water table.,,
Severe; sea-
sonal high
water table;
flooding,
leveret aea-
sonal high
water table.
light
---------
Severe: sea.
serial high
water table.
Severe: sea_
sone] high
water table.
Severe: sea-
sonal high
water table.
Severe: sea-
sonal high
water table;
flooding; high
in content of
organic mat-
ter; mod-
erately rapid
permeability;
sandy sub-
stratum at a
depth of 33
inches,I
Severe: 'sea-
sonal high
water table.
Severe: rapid
Permeability;
sandysub-
stratum at a
depth of 40
inches.
Severe: sea-
sonal high
water table;
rapid perme-
ability; sandy
subtratum at
a depth of
about 38
inches.
:were• sea-
sonal high
water table,
vere: sea- I
sonal high
water table;
moderately
lapid perme-
Lbility; sandy
ubstratom
t a depth of
bout 42
aches.
res affecting selected use—
Local roads
Light
Sanitary
landfill'
and.streets
industries
(trench and
area method)
Slight if 0 to 8
Slight if 0 to 4
Slight.
percent
percent slopes.
slopes.
Moderate if 4 to
Moderate if 8
8 percent
to 10 percent
slopes.
"
slopes.
Severe if more
than 8 to 10
Percent slopes.
Moderate:
Severe: sea-
Severe: sea -
somewhat
sonal high
sonal high
Poorly
drained.
water table.
water table;
rapid perme-
ability.
ISevere: very
poorly
drained;
flooding.
Severe: very
poorly
drained.
Slight ________
Severe: very I
poorly
drained.
severe:"
poorly
drained
.
federate:
somewhat
poorly
drained.
Severe: sea-
serial high
water table.
Severe: sea-
serial high
water table.
Slight if 0 to 4
Percent slopes.
Moderate if 4 to
8 percent
slopes.
Severe: sea-
sonal high
water table.
Severe: sea-
sonal high
water table.
evere: sea-
sonal high
water table.
Severe: sea -
serial high
water table;
flooding; mod-
erately rapid
permeability;
sandy substra-
tum at a depth
of 33 inches,
Severe: sea-
sonal high
water table,
Severe: rapid
permeability;
sandy substra-
tum at a depth
of 40 inches,
Severe: sea-
sonal high
water table;
rapid perme-
ability; sandy
substratum at
a depth -of
about 38
inches,
Severe: sea-
sonal high
water table.
Severe: sea-
sonal high
water table;
moderately
rapid perme-
ability, sandy
substratum at
a depth of 42
inches.
53

SOIL SURVEY
TABLE 7.—Interpretations of
' Onsite studies of the underlying ssrasa, waver L
Suitability as source of—
Limitations for—
Soil series
.percent
55
engineering properties of the
soils
Pond
hold sewage within a depth of 2 to 5 feet long enough
.and
map symbols
— Topsoil
Sand
Gravel
Road fill
reservoir
Pond
embanlanents
embankment is compacted to medium density and the
Severe: depth
Slight ---------
Slight ----------
to water table
areas
Sanitary
Torhunta: To __
Poor: very
Poor: improba-
Poor: improb-
Poor: very
poorly
Severe: rapid
permeability; -
Moderate:
poor resist-
(aquifer fed)
poorly
ble source,
able source.
drained,
sandy sub-
once to piping
-
dxained.
stratum at a
and erosion;
Slight __________
'
Severe: sea-
Severe: sea-
Severe: very
depth of about
medium per -
.
sonal high
sonal high
sonal high
poorly
36 inches,
meability;
water table.
water table.
water table;
drained.
water table.
fair slope
rapid perme-
"
stability.
Umbric
Poor: very
Unsuited: ex-
Poor: improb-
Poor: very
Moderate:
moderate
Slight:. very
poorly
Ochraqualfs:
poorly
cessive fines.
able source,
poorly
drained,
permeability.
drained.
UO,
drained,
a depth of
a depth of
Wagram: Wb,
Poor: loamy
Fair: probable
Poor: improb-
Good -----------
Severe: mod-
erately rapid
Moderate:
poor resist -
We, Wd,
sand surface
source.
able source,
permeability.
anee to
layer,
PIPMs•
Wickham: Wk_
Poor: loamy
Poor: exces-
Poor: exces-
Good___________
Severe:rapid
Mooaresist-
poor
sand surface
sive fines;
sive fines;
probable
permeability;
sandy sub-
anee to piping.
L
layer.
probable
source below
source below
stratum at a
depth of about
depth of about
depth of about
,
4 feet.
4 feet.
43 inches.
Woodington:
Poor:*poorly
Poor: excessive
Poor: improb-
Poor: poorly
drained.
Severe: rapid
permeability;
Moderate: resist-
p oor
Wn.
drained.
fines,
able source.
sandy sub- •
ante to piping
'
stratum at a
and erosion;
depth of 47
medium per -
inches.
meability;
fair slope
stability,
a.,, , ==u
are not rated in this table: Embankment foundation,
reservoir area, and slope are assumed to be suitable for
pond construction. Soil properties that affect the em-
bankment and the availability of borrow material are
considered. The best soils have good slope stability,
low permeability, slight compressibility under load,
and good resistance to piping and are thick enough
for easy excavation,'
An aquifer -fed excavated -pond (fig. 12) is a body of
water created by excavating a pit or dugout into a
ground -water aquifer. Excluded are ponds fed by run-
off and also embankment -type ponds where the depth
of water impounded against the embankment exceeds
3 feet. The assumption is made that the .pond is
properly designed, located, and constructed and that
the water is of good quality. Properties affecting
quifer-fed ponds are the existence of a permanent
water table, permeability of the aquifer, and properties
that interfere with excavation, such as marl.
Dwellings (without basements), as rated in table 7,
are not more than three stories high and are supported
by foundation footings placed in undisturbed soil. The
features that affect the rating of a soil for dwellings
are those that relate to capacity to support load and
resist settlement under load, and those that relate to
ease of excavation. Soil properties that affect capacity
to support load are wetness, susceptibility to flooding,
density, plasticity, texture, and shrink -swell potential,
Those that affect excavation are wetness, slope, and
depth to marl.
Septic tank filter fields are subsurface systems of tile
or perforated pipe that distribute effluent from a septic
tank into natural soil. The soil material,ffrom a depth of
1� inches to 6 feet is evaluated. The soil properties
considered are those that, affect both absorption of
efduent and construction and operation of the system.
Properties that affect absorption are permeability,
depth to water table, and susceptibility to flooding.
Slope is a soil property that affects difficulty of layout
and: construction and also the risk of soil erosion;
Slight: maz•1 Severe: sea -
substratum somal high
interferes water table.
with excava-
tion in places.
Severe: sea- Severe: "sea-
sonal high I sonal high
water table. water table.
Severe: depth
Slight if 0 to S
LENOIR COUNTY, 14ORTII
CAROLINA
.percent
55
engineering properties of the
soils
Moderate if 8 to
hold sewage within a depth of 2 to 5 feet long enough
Moderate if 8 to
15 percent
Slight if �0 to 8
Degree
of limitations and
major soil features affecting selected use—
slopes.
embankment is compacted to medium density and the
Severe: depth
Slight ---------
Slight ----------
to water table
'
Sanitary
Excavated ponds
Dwellings
Septic -tank
Sevtage.
Local roads
Light
landfill'
(aquifer fed)
filter fields
lagoons
and streets
industries
(trench and
-
traffic all year. They have a subgrade of underlying
area method)
Slight __________
Severe: sea-
Severe: sea-
Severe: sea-
Severe: very
Severe: sea-
Severe: sea-
.
sonal high
sonal high
sonal high
poorly
sonal high
sonal high
water table.
water table.
water table;
drained.
water table.
water table;
rapid perme-
rapid perme-
ability; sandy
ability; sandy
substratum at
substratum at
a depth of
a depth of
about 36
ahout 36
inches.
inches.
Slight: maz•1 Severe: sea -
substratum somal high
interferes water table.
with excava-
tion in places.
Severe: sea- Severe: "sea-
sonal high I sonal high
water table. water table.
Severe: depth
Slight if 0 to S
Slight i£ 0 to 8
to water table
.percent
percent slopes.
in dry season.
slopes.
Moderate if 8 to
hold sewage within a depth of 2 to 5 feet long enough
Moderate if 8 to
15 percent
Slight if �0 to 8
15 percent
slopes.
pacted soil material. The assumption is made that the
slopes.
embankment is compacted to medium density and the
Severe: depth
Slight ---------
Slight ----------
to water table
'
Those that affect the pond floor are permeability,
in dry. season.
organic matter, slope, and.depth to marl (if marl is
t
Moderate: Severe: sea- Severe: sea -
depth to water somal high somal high
table in dry water table. water table.
season*
need to be made for landfills deeper than 5 to 6
Severe• mod-
erately rapid
permeability.
Severe: (rapid
permeability;
sandy ¢ub-
stratum at a
depth of 43
inches:
Severe: Y sear
somal O
a
-
lateral seepage, and downslope flow of. effluent. Soils
Severe: sea -
that are underlain by sandy layers have the potential
somal high
risk of contaminating nearby water supplies.
drained,
Sewage lagoons are shallow ponds constructed to
water table,
hold sewage within a depth of 2 to 5 feet long enough
for bacteria to decompose the solids. A lagoon' has a
Slight if �0 to 8
nearly level floor, and sides, or embankments, of com-
Severe: mod -
pacted soil material. The assumption is made that the
percent slopes.
embankment is compacted to medium density and the
slopes.
P(is protected from flooding. Properties that -affect
permeability.
the pond floor and the embankment' are considered.
8 percent
Those that affect the pond floor are permeability,
`
organic matter, slope, and.depth to marl (if marl is
t
present). The soil properties that affect the embark-
Severe if more
ment are the engineering properties of the embank-
slopes.
ment material as interpreted from the Unified soil
classification.
.
slopes.
Local roads and streets, as rated in table 7, have
an all-weather surface expected to carry automobile
traffic all year. They have a subgrade of underlying
Severe: very
Severe: sea-
Severe: sea -
poorly
somal high
sonal high
drained,
water table,
water table,
Slight if �0 to 8
Slight if 0 to 4
Severe: mod -
percent slopes.
erately rapid
slopes.
Moderate if 4 to
permeability.
Moderate if
8 percent
MOT than
slopes: -
S percent
Severe if more
slopes.
than 8 percent
.
slopes.
Slight ____
Severe:
Poo
drained.
Severe: sea-
sonal high
N
Slight________
ater table.
Severe: rapid
permeability;
sandy substra-
tum ata depth
of about 43
inches.
Severe: sea- -
.sonalhigh
water table;
rapid perme-
ability; sandy
substratum at
a depth"of 47
inches.
soil material; a base consisting of gravel,'crushed rock,
or soil material stabi&zed with. Ione or cement; and a
fiexible or rigid surface, commonly asphalt or concrete.
These roads are graded to shed water and have
ordinary provisions for drainage. They are built mainly
from soil at hand, and most cuts and fills are less. than
6 feet deep.
Soil properties that most affect design and construc-
tion of roads and streets are load -supporting capacity
and stability of the subgrade , and the workabffity
and quentity of out and fill material available.. The
AASH and. Unified classifications of the soil lila- .
aerial, and also the shrink -swell potential, indicate load -
supporting capacity. Wetness and. flooding affect. sta- .
bility of the material. Slope, depth to marl, and wetness
affect ease of excavation and amount of cut and fill
needed to reach an even grade.
Ratings for light industry (fig. 13) are for the
undisturbed soils that are used to support building
foundations. Emphasis is on foundations, ease of exca-

56 SOIL SURVEY
- LENOIR COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA 57
TABLE g,-- Engineering test data
_ [Tests performed by North Carolina State Highway Commission, Department of Materials and Tests, Raleigh, N.C.]
Moisture -density' Mechanical analysis' Classification
Soil name Parent Report No. Percentage g
and location material S70NC54– Depth Maximum Optimum I g passing sieve— Percentage smaller than-
dry density moisture Lquid Plasticity
No. 10 No, 40 No. 200 0.05 0.02 0.005 0.002 - limit index AASHTO' Unified
mm) (0,074 n,mmm m
) m mm mm
1% Pot Pct
Coastal Plain sediment. 5-1 0-8 107 16 100 97 69 61 50- 27 j 16. 25 5 A-4(7) CL -ML
Coxville loam: 5-3 12-27 109 17 100 98 81 75 66 4438 37 20 A-6 (12) CL
2 miles southeast of LaGrange, 04 mile 6-6 62-75 122 11 100 91 40 37 29 22 1 19 22 7 A-4(1) SC
stof and State intersection
ad f1 27, 0.3 Highway
70e "
southeast of State Road 1327, and 20
feet southwest of farm road. (Modal) -
Old Coastal Plain alluvium. 13-1 0=8 112 11 100 90 20 18 12 6 4 16 NP ° A-2-4(0) SM
Salmia loamy sand: 13-4 16-28 115 14 100 88 36 34 30 26 28 29 9 A-4(•0) SC
4 miles northeast of Kinston, 0.2 mile 13-7 43-65 101 16 100 99 11 9 7 6 4 24 NP A-2-4(0) SM -SP
east of inon of N,C1 5 and
State Ro dtersec1810,tiand 2 fe t south of
State Road 1810. (Modal)
Coastal Plain sediment and old 14-2 8-22 109 12 100 97 13 11 9 6 4 17 NP A-2-4(0) SM
Pocalla loamy sand: .14-4 26-40 118 11 100 97 24 22 21 17 15 17 NP A-2-4(0) SM
7 miles south of LaGrange, 0.6 mile east alluvium. 14-6 40-66 101 15 ( 100 97 17 7 4 3 2 22 NP A-2-4(0) SM
of intersection of N.C. Highway 55 and
State Road 1002, and 20 feet north of
N.C. Highway 55. (Modal)'
Coastal Plain sediment. 19-1 0-6 102 16 100 .90 11 9 6 3" ' 2 24 NP A-2-4(0) SM -SP
Leon sand: 19-3 14-19 117 10 100 89 17 16 14 9 6 15 NP A-2-4(0) SM
5 miles east "of Pink Hill, 0.6 mite east of
intersection of State Road 1105 and
State Road 1118, and 25 feet south of
State Road 1106. (Modal)
107 15 ± 100 98 81 70 53 26 15 25 3 A-4(8) y fine sandy loam: Coastal Plain sediment. YS -1 0-8 18-4 21-48 ( ) ML
8 miles east of Sinton and 50 feet south- 104 20 i 100 99 89 81 69 51 41 49 27 A-7-6 (17) CL
Lenoir ver
west of intersection of State Road south -
18 -6 62-75 109 16 . 100 98 66 60 50 39 34 41 23 A-7-6 (lY) CL
1806
and State Road 1807. (Modal) -
Coastal Plain Sediment -
2 -1 0-9 88 26 -E 100 95 52 47 40 23 15 38 9 A-4(3) ML
Pantego loam: 2-4 19-50 112 15 99.5 95 51 47 43 34 2S 27 15 A-6 5) CL
9.5 miles south of Kinston, 1.2 miles 2-6 64-74 113 14 99 94 46 41 33 31 28 30 13 A-6(3) SC
southwest of intersection of State Road _
1922 and State Road 1925, and 25 feet
northeast of State Road 1922. (Modal) _
calculations of grain -size fractions. The mechanical analyses used in this table are not suitable for use in naming textural
'Based on AASHTO Designation T 99, Method A and i (1). classes for soil.
° Mechanical analyses according to the AASHTO Designation T 88 (Y p cedts o f this procedure frequently may differ
somewhat from results that world have been obtained by the soil survey procedure of the Soil Conservation Service (SCS). Based on A STM Stand, Designation 6 1(2), (1).
xe cal -
in the
ed on the O pro ed r ,t e finermateri riding that ao rsernthan 2 moillimete ster oinadia et r. In thnd the variouse SCS s it survey procedure, ractions a- ' NP emeans onplae. D 2457-69 (.E).
the fine material h; analyzed by the pipette method and. the material coarser than 2 milometers in diameter is excluded from
vation" far underground utilities, and corrosion po- ular traffic. Some soil properties that affect suitability
tential of Uncoated steel pipe. The undisturbed soil is for landfill are ease of excavation, hazard of polluting
rated'for spread footing foundations for buildings less ground water, and trafliicabilitwithste deet soils
trhave
e,
than three stories high or foundation' loads not in moderately slow permeability,
excess of that weight. Properties affecting -load-sup- and are friable and easy to excavate. Unless otherwise
porting capacity and settlement under lanndd shr nketswell about6 feet a d, therefore, limitation nly nratings ofy to a s light
th of
flooding, texture, es of eit i density,
behavior. Properties affecting excavation are wetness, or moderate .may not be valid if trenches are to be
flooding; slope, and 'depth to marl. Properties affecting much deeper than that. For some soils," reliable pre -
corrosion of buried uncoated steel pipe are wetness, diectardless of that -,be ions can everye to a site should be investigateth of 10 or 15 feet; d
xture, total acidity, and electrical resistivity.. g
Sanitary landfill is a method of disposing of refuse before it is selected,
in. dug trenches. The waste is spread in thin layers, Soil test data
compacted, and covered with soil throughout the dis-
posal period. Landfill areas are subject to heavy vehic- Table 8 contains engineering test data for some of
the major soil series in Lenoir County. These tests were
mum dry density. As a rule, maximum strength of
made to help evaluate the soils for engineering pur-
earthwork is obtained if the soil is compacted to the
poses. The. engineering classifications given are based
maximum dry density.
on data obtained by mechanical analyses and by tests
Tests to determine liquid limit and plasticity index
to determine liquid limits and plastic limits. The me-
measure the effect of water on the strength and con-
ehaoical analyses .were made by combined sieve and
sistence of the soil material, as has been explained for
hydrometer methods.
table 6.
Moisture -density (or compaction) data are important
in earthwork. If a soil material is compacted at suc-
cessively higher moisture content, assuming that the
Formation and* Classification
compactive effort remains constant, the density of the
of the So' ts
compacted material increases until the optimum moil.
Lure content is reached. After that, density decreases
Any one soil has a unique combination of a great
,
w th increase in moisture content. The highest dry
many soil characteristics. An individual soil, as one
density obtained in the compactive test is termed maxi-
individual body on the landscape, varies in the size of

60
SOIL SURVEY
_- along the large drainageways. As fallen leaves, twil
roots, and whole plants decay, plant nutrients and c
ganic acids are released to percolate down through t
soil horizons. Roots take up some of the nutrients. C
game 'acids act to dissolve the more slowly'solut
mineral components and hasten the rate of removal
soluble inorganic materials from the surface horizor
The effect of these organic acids on soil formation
conditioned by climate. Climate modifies the rate
chemical reaction and the rate of leaching and, to
large degree, determines the kinds of plants and an
mals living in and on the individual kinds of soil.
Organic matter decays more rapidly in the surfai
horizons of such well -drained soils as the Norfol.
Wagram, and Kenansville soils because the periods
saturation are shorter than they are for the poorl
drained soils. There is very little accumulation of a
ganic matter in the surface horizons of the wel
drained soils, and their surface horizons remain light
colored. Decay of organic matter is retarded in the
surface horizons of the poorly drained soils, such
Portsmouth, Torhunta, Murville, and Johnston
because the periods of saturation last from one da
to several weeks each year. The excess moisture re-
tards
tards the oxidation, allowing wet soils to accumulate
high content of organic matter in the surface horizon,
This causes the surface to be darker colored than th
surface of well -drained soils.
Also, the organic matter probably is the energy
source for micro-organisms involved in oxygen con-
sumption in saturated A horizons. The wet soils have
'anger periods of saturation, and the biological activity
can reduce the oxygen levels of the ground water s
anaerobic conditions can exist for several days o
weeks.
The reducing conditions along with the saturation
are postulated to be responsible for gray colors in th
subsoil of the poorly drained soils.
Time
The sequence of horizons in the soil profiles requires
a long time to develop. Some of the differences among
the kinds of soils reflect differences in their age. Older
soils generally have better defined horizons than young
soils. In Lenoir County the older Norfolk, Wagram,
and Goldsboro soils on the smoother, nearly level up-
land divides have well-developed horizons. These nearly
level soils have formed in Coastal Plain surfaces that
are essentially unchanged for as much as 10 million
years or since Upper Mocene time.
- - By contrast the more recent -soils, -such-as Bibb,-
Kinston, Johnston, and Chewacla, formed in alluvium
that has not been in place long enough to develop well-
defined horizons.
Relief
The relief in Lenoir County is largely the result of
dissection by the Neuse River and. its tributary
streams. Landscape dissection, acting through its in-'
fluence on water table depths and geologic removal of
soil material by slope retreat, affects the formation of
oils in Lenoir County.
The deepest water tables are near the short, sharply
xounded side slopes: Deep water tables are associated
with thick A2 horizons, fine -textured B horizons, bright
colors in the B horizons, and a decrease in and eventual
disappearance of bodies low in content of clay. The
Wagram and Norfolk soils reflect those characteristics
that are associated with well drained conditions.
The shallow water tables are associated with thin A2
horizons, low -contrast mottling, and presence of bodies
low in content of clay. The soils in the interstream
areas, such as Lynchburg, Rains, and Pantego, reflect
those characteristics that are associated with high
water tables:
The removal of soil material by geological erosion
has caused the solum of soils that formed on side
slopes to remain thin.
.iiiu� ml il�r �n�il�
1_ Soils are classified so that we can more easily re-
member their significant characteristics. Classification
enables us to assemble knowledge about the soils, to
as see their relationship to one another and to the whole
soils, environment, and to develop principles that help us to
y understand their behavior and their response to ma-
nipulation. First through classification, and then
a through use of soil maps, we can apply our knowledge
of soils to specific fields and other tracts of land.
e The narrow categories of classification, such as those
used in detailed soil surveys, allow us to organize and
apply knowledge about soils in managing farms, fields,
and woodlands; in developing rural areas; in engineer-
ing work; and in many other ways. Soils are placed
in broad classes to facilitate study and comparison in
o large areas such as countries and continents.
r The system of soil classification currently used was
adopted by the National Cooperative Soil Survey in
1965 W5 (y)> (8)•
e The Soil Taxonomy has six categories. Beginning
with the broadest, these categories are order, suborder,
great group, subgroup, family, and series. In this sys-
tem the criteria used as a basis for classification are
soil properties that are observable and measurable. The
properties are chosen, however, so that the soils of
similar genesis, or mode of origin, are grouped. In
table 9 the soil series of Lenoir County are classified
according to the Soil Taxonomy. Classes of the Soil ,
Taxonomy are briefly defined in the following para-
graphs.
ORDER. Ten soil orders are recognized. The proper-
ties used to differentiate among soil orders. are those
that tend to give broad climatic groupings of soils. The
tLree-exceptions to this are the-theIneeptisols; -
and Histosols, which occur in many different climates.
Each order is named with a word of three or four
syllables ending in sol.
sSDBORDER. Each order is subdivided into suborders
that are based mainly on those soil characteristics that
seem to produce classes with the greatest genetic sim-
ilarity. The suborders narrow the broad climatic range '
permitted in the orders. The soil properties used to
separate suborders are mainly those that reflect either
the presence or absence of waterlogging, or soil differ-
ences resulting from the climate or vegetation. The
names of suborders have two syllables. The last sylla-
ble indicates the, order.

LENOIR COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA 61
TABLE 9. Soils classified according to current system
Series Family Subgroup I Order
Bibb _______>______________
Taxadjunets to the Lenoir series because the combined thickness of A and Bl horizons ranges from
Coarse -loamy, siliceous, acid, thermic ___
Typic Pluvaquents
Entisols.
Blanton ------ __------- _-----
Loamy, siliceous, thermie _______________
___________________
Grossarenie Paleudults
Ultisols.
' Chewacla ___________
Fine -loamy, mixed, thermic
_ __
Fluvaquentic Dystrochrepts __________
Inceptisols.
Coxville ________________
Clayey, knolinitic, thermic _'___________
Typic Paleaquults
Ultisols.
Craven ______________________
Clayey, mixed, thermic ------- -------- _
____
Aquic Hapludults
Ultisols.
Goldsboro ---- _------ _-------
Fine -loamy, siliceous, thermic _________
____________________
Paleudults
Ultisols.
Grafton ___________�. _________
Fine -loamy, siliceous, thermic __________
.Aquic _____________________
Typic Ochraqualfs
Alfisols.
Johns _______________________
Fine -loamy over sandy or sandy -skeletal,
____________________
Aquic Hapludults
Ultisols.
- siliceous, thermic.
----------------
Johnston _ __________
Coarse -loamy„ siliceous, acid, thermic ____
Cumulie Humaquepts _____
Inceptisols.
Aalmia ___----------- __
"Fine -loamy over sandy or sandy -skeletal,
Typic Hapludults
Ultisols.
siliceous, thermic.
_____________________
Kenansville __________________
Loamy, siliceous, thermic ______________
Arenic Hapludults ____________________
Ultisols.
Kinston _____________________
Fine -loamy, siliceous, acid, thermic ______
Typic Fluvaquents _________
Entisols.
Lakeland ___________
Thermic, coated ______________________
Typic Quartzipsamments _____________
Entisols.
Leaf _______________
Clayey, mixed, thermic _________________
Typic Albaquults
Ultisols.
Lenoir_ _____________________
Clayey, mixed, thermic _________________
__________
Aeric Paleaquults
Ultisols.
Leon ________________________
Sandy, siliceous, thermic _______________
___________________
Aeric Haplaquods ___________________
Spodosols.
Lumbee ________________
Fine -loamy over sandy or sandy -skeletal,
Typic Ochraquults
Ultisols.
"
siliceous, thermic.
___________________
Lynchburg ___________________
Fine -loamy, siliceous, thermic _______:_
Aeric Paleaquults ___________________
UItisols.
Meggett ___________________
Fine, mixed, thermic _________________
Typic Albaqualfs ____________________
Alfisols.
Murville __________________
Sandy, siliceous, thermic ______________
Typic Haplaquods ________:__________
Spodosols.
Norfolk ____________________
Fine -loamy, siliceous, thermic _________
Typic Paleudults
Ultisols.
Pactolus ____________________
Thermic, coated ______________________
____________________
Aquic Quartzipsamments
Entisols.
Pamlico _____________________
Sandy or sandy-skeletal,.siliebous, dysic,
__
Terrie Medisaprists
'
thermic.
_____________
"
-Histosols.
Pautego _____________________
Fine -loamy, siliceous, thermic __________
Umbrae Paleaquults
Ultisols.
Pocalla ______________________
Sandy, siliceous, thermic ______________"
_____________
Axenic Paleudults
Ultisols.
Portsmouth __________________
Fine -loamy, siliceous, thermie _________
__________
Typic Umbraquults ______
U'ltisols.
Rains ___
Fine -loamy, siliceous, thermic _________
Typic Paleaquults
Ultisols.
Stallings ____________________
-Coarse-loamy, siliceous, thermic ----- Z_
__________________
Aerie Paleaquults
Ultsols.
Torhunta ____________________
Coarse -loamy, siliceous, acid, thermic ____
___________________
Typic Humaquepts __________________
Inceptisols.
T�liram _____________________
Loamy, siliceous, thermic ______________
Arenic Paleudults
Ultisols.
ham ____________________
Fine'loamy, mixed; thermic _____________
_______________
Typic Hapludults
Ultisols.
V. .dington __________________
Coarse -loamy, siliceous, thermic ________
______
Typic Paleacfuults ____________________
Ultisols.
10 to 74 inches in about
70 percent of the unit, and the character of change in texture between the A and the BZt horizon is on the limit to an abrupt
textural change.
GRPviT GROUP. Soil suborders are -separated into group mainly on the basis of properties important to
great groups on the basis of uniformity in the kinds the growth of plants or on the behavior of soils when
and sequence of major soil horizons and features. The used for engineering. Among the properties considered
horizons used to make separations are those in which are texture, mineralogy, reaction, soil temperature,
clay, iron, or humus have accumulated; those that have permeability, .thickness of horizons, and consistence.
pans that interfere with growth of roots, movement A family name consists of a series of adjectives pre -
of water, or both; and thick, dark -colored surface hori- ceding the subgroup name. The adjectives are the class
zons. The features used are the self -mulching proper- names for texture, mineralogy, and so on, that are used
ties of clay,. soil temperature, major differences in as family differentiae as shown in table 9.
chemical. composition (mainly calcium, magnesium,
sodium, and potassium), dark -red and dark -brown
colors associated with basic rocks, and _the like. The _ _G.eeyal Nature f -the. ® tp�
namesss of great groups have Three or four syllables and
are made by adding a prefix to the name of the sub- This section gives general facts about Lenoir Coun-
order. ty. It briefly discusses physiography, relief and'drain-
SUHGROUP.. Great groups are subdivided into sub- age; water supply; climate; settlement and develop -
groups, one representing the central (typic) segment meat; transportation; and industry.
of the graup and others called intergrades that have
properties of the group and also one or more proper= Physiography, g$�lfef, and Drainage
ties bf another great group, suborder, or. order. Sub-
groups may also be made in those instances where soil Lenoir County is in the Coastal Plain physiographic
properties intergrade outside of the range of any other province. The soils are underlain by unconsolidated
great group, -suborder, or order. The names of sub- sand, silt, and clay except for small intermittent areas
gi s are derived by placing one or more adjectives on the southeast side of the county. *These small areas
be ,,re the name of the great group. are underlain by friable to weakly cemented, greenish -
FAMILY. Soil families are separated within a sub- gray marl that has a high content of sand, Most of

bVater m , mttucture
ENVIRONMENTAL OUALITY
PAT MCCRORY
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
KEM H. COLSON
City o J
30 Box 4
Subject: Engineering Report Funding Approval
City of Kinston
Briery Run Sewer Rehabilitation Phase IV
Project No.: CS370527-11
The IDivision of Water Infrastnrcture (Division) has completed its review of the subject
engineering report. Eased upon this review, the Division has determined that the referenced
project is eligible for funding as follows:
Elignble
Rehabilitation of the Briery Run Sewer Olutfali Line between Airport Road and
Wallace Family Road to include lining of approximately 4,295 linear feet of 30 -
inch gravity sewer via CIDP; and 49 manholes; installation of permanent access to
the sewer easement, stabilization of stream banks and erosion control.
Based upon detailed review o£ the bid documents, it may be determined that portions of
the project are not eligible for funding and the total loan amount maybe reduced.
in accordance with G.S. 120-157.1 through
157.9, enacted on June 24, 2011, local
government units with projects that require debt to be issued greater than $1,000,000 must
submit a letter to Committee Chairs, Committee Assistant, and the Fiscal Research Division of
the General Assembly at least 45 days prior to presentation before the Local Government
Commission. You are responsible for submitting this letter and providing a copy to the Division,
Projects funded through the CWSddF program must comply with the federal Brooks
Act
€or the selection of architectural, surveying, and engineering services. CWS}21F projects cannot
be exempted from qualification based selection of these services under N.C.G.S.143-64.32. The
Professional Engineering Services Procurement form on our website will need to be submitted as
documentation of compliance for any services to be reimbursed. Any services provided that
were not selected in compliance with federal requirements will be ineligible for reimbursement.
t

dr. Sears, City Manager
November 1, 2016
Page 2 of 2
Please note that the milestones bellow must be met to ma am assurance of funding under
the State Revolving ]Fund.
Bid and Design Package Submittal:
May 1, 2017
Bid and Design Package Approval:
September 1, 2017
Advertise Project, Receive Bids, Submit Bid Information, and
January 2, 2018
Receive Authority to Award:
Execute Construction Contract(s):
February 1, 2018
if you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact Anita E. Reed, PE by
email at [e-mail] or at [phone].
Sin�cerel�y,_ })
Seth Robertson, PE, Chief
State Revolving Fund Section
Attaclunent
cc: John Jarrell, PE, City Engineer, Kinston NC
Mark Hubbard, PE via email
Anita E. Reed, PE
Susan Kubacki via email
James Baltzer, PE
SRF (BRJfaW RAL)
�' 'Nothing Compares: �_
Slate ofNonh Cazolina � Envrtoomenml Quality�Wacer ln6aswcnae
1633 Mail Service Ceater, Raleigh, Nonh Carolina 27699 � Location 512 N. SalishwyStree6Raleigh, North Caralma 27604
919 707 9160 T __

`�VVVU.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR rhe National Map KINSTON QUADRANGLE
G U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY US Topo NORTH CAROLINA
science for a changing world 7.5-MINUTE SERIES
77°37'30" 35' 32'30" 77°30'
Z62ook E '63 264 '65_ 166 '`67- 268 270 2 440 000 FEET 272
35'22'30' -- _ - - � 35°22'30,
EURANRS RD 9p ss17
4G/��0�
yl
75
3B1700mN O
AIRY ceoGROVE CHURCH
CH RD
-
ha
r
wOOtel1S
Crossroads
PC �
TION RD
DAWSON STA 58
"OLE RUSH LN
ry_ z
590000 0
175. 0tiF x -�- tea• -�- --- -- FEET
I.. -ea• J.. — _.ACS..-. - "'I* R0 -11-- _ . ..-.. -
y°
`sib
3915
-- -� 7s
75
- -
3915 �� _ TpYLGR -
Mewborns o
- Crossroads m
INSTITUTE RD
. __
15 _ ` s 3914
C /�, i r r C
3814 TAYLOR SPENCE RD o - �- - �V I'.�QPtNS� N 'y RD
m
t AMERO GSTON
i Kinston Reglonal..,S.
�J oERD
3 Jetport at
P CNG
Stallings Field
J
' 1 a
�.ELNORE FARMS RD
—75
v_ 75 's13
0.D
D
/I
13 �- / H M DEAD EN R
WN/TLEVDR 1--� \^ _
0
u
---
f
"12
3912
z o
+° m 75ngers�'
E /
ON991
M L p r_/00<rai
CPS�PZ\
R
-. -- ��-` 9q•°p� q n ^^i
IE
N MILL IILONMAN IL ,
TILGHMA 1'/ 3911
pQJ. nn
n
ACADEMY HEIGHTS RD l /
j 835
OQg95 _ l 15
RUN ep _
; AR '9910
1743 z BRI Y _ J I
3810. � NW ` � -z" 4 V _ a _ � S`•9$ _ 1, fP°.k}1
HODGES RD 444.< a 11
' Poi's
�\ 3
M
_ _ - 11.1 7• n % �j �J I 75 INDIGO LN
A A m
x �f
Y
J O
3909 _- _ -n.. - C4REaQo RILEYRD ��XIgI,CrOq QO `� j v_.{55 '�
\ 1
CRE A 0 S 1 opy �\ \ 55
5TW0p0 ORFPE° <T�pS vQ �Ps \ D°R > .� _ - o
SPP R' q OP MEP m CUNN/
c EEN rz NON
1730" W Q �To�Q ° �r2 0 0 0 4MN0 . �� 1T30,�
+5°gypFARM ti
FOX RUN DR \ y1P ?SCC a^ OP ` 2M 3— 50
- -. -.. RD 3906
p E"Z (•P
1108 STOCKTON RD v� t / 0010
m \ O
q : O
Q LL
W F
UIf\PLAZA BLVD °O ez�o
� 6 `
PARR0TT4VFDPRBY AVE x DIXON ST DONN RD
c p T
N II n > WILLIAMS 5T -
Av
CAMERON DR �_ sOM ✓
z ti w NIESTMINSTERLN oHILL ST 3907
FARM LN o ^ JOTjs m� CAVALIER CIR �- DANIELS ST o E HIGNLPNp
A 1
3907 D' ¢ EE ENH
NT - -_
O ,.•, h 3 a W HIGHLAND AVE �F ;0 9 �q� }
p �� SPECTP .. EDWARDS AVE U W WILJ PZC Harveytown ?°��
BROWN ST -�
-._..y J o z v ON J5, 11--
` A W n W 4VF Om 55
o KINSTON A o ,
G_0y 15.
�Hinea ✓� Bus D A - c E P r� lr q en rrRO O
c SUMMIT / U
a o �
• m WRF _ RD/N S HOD 5 z BF `' N SRF �' V6
3 I ��!- HA G i ES AV PARK AVE A
Junction UP FSr y
7 M E GRAINGER AVE
:per h .
N6 yI VERMO - Bus > AVE
WASH/NG TON AVE Z "~'
WL Bus
,L 70
m 47 ,
MP. lJ m�_LANTrC W W W Bus
ti
.ac J 3 � _
V _
Q
N
Rraer _ a Sg EWASHINGTONST 4 Georgetown
118
MANN/NG Sr
FIELDS Si :.
- W
_.. _ 25� _ .� ._� LL -- -_- '_- E BLOUN7 ST T E ILL RD Oak Hilt
LL.
Ia 2 m i
ESTNUT S7
12 CHr-
ep u —' - _ E CORDON ST 'sU5
W R H -e�F
y
.~ V
E CASWELL Sr
W CASWELL ST o
05 W RD -� E KING ST ZJ CEDAR LN - - �'• ,.
11 -
Z� 70 55
258 Bus Maplewood d ry�,���,. , I i - t _ ."5 Ii ti's
f-. °
sY• \
ESHI
\_
1-25 X25'
-- - CI N LINCOLN ST LL25
850000 ._ _...> ._ Ls- - __ bPyp° .z`' - -_ -�-
_ - W 25 04 N
FEET
UNIVERSITY ST y - _.
�. 55 70 Bus M '•zs. __. _ - 15
70 - - _ - Tj 15 �l
5 'I`- 25
35015'
I,= _ _ U i 35°15'
35°t6' '62 363 26412 420 000 FEET -- '66 267 366 '69 '70 '71 '72"`-E
77°37'30" 35' 32'30" 77030'
Produced by the United States Geological Survey * SCALE 1:24 000 ROAD CLASSIFICATION
North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83) Expressway Local Connector
Worid Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and 1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2 NORrR
1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator, Zone 18S q• 4y• ROLINA A.
Secondary Hwy LOcaI Road
10 000-foot ticks: North Carolina Coordinate System of 1983 172 MILS 1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000 Ram 4WD
q• 0 1 p
This map is not a legal document Boundaries may be MR!
generalized for this map scale. Private lands within government MILES .Interstate Route US Route O State Route
reservations may not be shown. Obtain permission before 1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 QUADRANGLE LOCATION
entering private lands. UTM GRID AND 2016 MAGNETIC NORTH FEET
DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET
Imagery ..................................................NAIP, June 2014
Roads................................ U.S. Cense Bureau, 2015 - 2016 U.S. National Grid CONTOUR INTERVAL 5 FEET 1 Snow Hill
Names..........................................................GNIS, 2016 100,000.mSqus a ID NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 1 2 3 2 Hookerton
Hydrography ....................National Hydrography Dataset, 2014 3 Alden
Contours............................National Elevation Dataset, 2008 TE This map was produced to conform with the 4 5 4 Falling Creek
Boundaries ............ Multiple sources; see metudata file 1972 - 2016 National patial Program 5 Dn
gram UST apo Product Standard, 2011. 6 Deep Run
Wetlands ......... FWS National Wetlands Inventory 1977 - 2014A metadata file associated with this product Is draft version 0.6.19 6 7 8 7 Rlvermont KINSTON, NC
Grid Lone o°.yR.tbR B Dover
1a5
ADJOINING QUADRANGLES 2016

`�VVVU.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR rhe National Map KINSTON QUADRANGLE
G U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY US Topo NORTH CAROLINA
science for a changing world 7.5-MINUTE SERIES
77°37'30" 35' 32'30" 77°30'
Z62ook E '63 264 '65_ 166 '`67- 268 270 2 440 000 FEET 272
35'22'30' -- _ - - � 35°22'30,
EURANRS RD 9p ss17
4G/��0�
yl
75
3B1700mN O
AIRY ceoGROVE CHURCH
CH RD
-
ha
r
wOOtel1S
Crossroads
PC �
TION RD
DAWSON STA 58
"OLE RUSH LN
ry_ z
590000 0
175. 0tiF x -�- tea• -�- --- -- FEET
I.. -ea• J.. — _.ACS..-. - "'I* R0 -11-- _ . ..-.. -
y°
`sib
3915
-- -� 7s
75
- -
3915 �� _ TpYLGR -
Mewborns o
- Crossroads m
INSTITUTE RD
. __
15 _ ` s 3914
C /�, i r r C
3814 TAYLOR SPENCE RD o - �- - �V I'.�QPtNS� N 'y RD
m
t AMERO GSTON
i Kinston Reglonal..,S.
�J oERD
3 Jetport at
P CNG
Stallings Field
J
' 1 a
�.ELNORE FARMS RD
—75
v_ 75 's13
0.D
D
/I
13 �- / H M DEAD EN R
WN/TLEVDR 1--� \^ _
0
u
---
f
"12
3912
z o
+° m 75ngers�'
E /
ON991
M L p r_/00<rai
CPS�PZ\
R
-. -- ��-` 9q•°p� q n ^^i
IE
N MILL IILONMAN IL ,
TILGHMA 1'/ 3911
pQJ. nn
n
ACADEMY HEIGHTS RD l /
j 835
OQg95 _ l 15
RUN ep _
; AR '9910
1743 z BRI Y _ J I
3810. � NW ` � -z" 4 V _ a _ � S`•9$ _ 1, fP°.k}1
HODGES RD 444.< a 11
' Poi's
�\ 3
M
_ _ - 11.1 7• n % �j �J I 75 INDIGO LN
A A m
x �f
Y
J O
3909 _- _ -n.. - C4REaQo RILEYRD ��XIgI,CrOq QO `� j v_.{55 '�
\ 1
CRE A 0 S 1 opy �\ \ 55
5TW0p0 ORFPE° <T�pS vQ �Ps \ D°R > .� _ - o
SPP R' q OP MEP m CUNN/
c EEN rz NON
1730" W Q �To�Q ° �r2 0 0 0 4MN0 . �� 1T30,�
+5°gypFARM ti
FOX RUN DR \ y1P ?SCC a^ OP ` 2M 3— 50
- -. -.. RD 3906
p E"Z (•P
1108 STOCKTON RD v� t / 0010
m \ O
q : O
Q LL
W F
UIf\PLAZA BLVD °O ez�o
� 6 `
PARR0TT4VFDPRBY AVE x DIXON ST DONN RD
c p T
N II n > WILLIAMS 5T -
Av
CAMERON DR �_ sOM ✓
z ti w NIESTMINSTERLN oHILL ST 3907
FARM LN o ^ JOTjs m� CAVALIER CIR �- DANIELS ST o E HIGNLPNp
A 1
3907 D' ¢ EE ENH
NT - -_
O ,.•, h 3 a W HIGHLAND AVE �F ;0 9 �q� }
p �� SPECTP .. EDWARDS AVE U W WILJ PZC Harveytown ?°��
BROWN ST -�
-._..y J o z v ON J5, 11--
` A W n W 4VF Om 55
o KINSTON A o ,
G_0y 15.
�Hinea ✓� Bus D A - c E P r� lr q en rrRO O
c SUMMIT / U
a o �
• m WRF _ RD/N S HOD 5 z BF `' N SRF �' V6
3 I ��!- HA G i ES AV PARK AVE A
Junction UP FSr y
7 M E GRAINGER AVE
:per h .
N6 yI VERMO - Bus > AVE
WASH/NG TON AVE Z "~'
WL Bus
,L 70
m 47 ,
MP. lJ m�_LANTrC W W W Bus
ti
.ac J 3 � _
V _
Q
N
Rraer _ a Sg EWASHINGTONST 4 Georgetown
118
MANN/NG Sr
FIELDS Si :.
- W
_.. _ 25� _ .� ._� LL -- -_- '_- E BLOUN7 ST T E ILL RD Oak Hilt
LL.
Ia 2 m i
ESTNUT S7
12 CHr-
ep u —' - _ E CORDON ST 'sU5
W R H -e�F
y
.~ V
E CASWELL Sr
W CASWELL ST o
05 W RD -� E KING ST ZJ CEDAR LN - - �'• ,.
11 -
Z� 70 55
258 Bus Maplewood d ry�,���,. , I i - t _ ."5 Ii ti's
f-. °
sY• \
ESHI
\_
1-25 X25'
-- - CI N LINCOLN ST LL25
850000 ._ _...> ._ Ls- - __ bPyp° .z`' - -_ -�-
_ - W 25 04 N
FEET
UNIVERSITY ST y - _.
�. 55 70 Bus M '•zs. __. _ - 15
70 - - _ - Tj 15 �l
5 'I`- 25
35015'
I,= _ _ U i 35°15'
35°t6' '62 363 26412 420 000 FEET -- '66 267 366 '69 '70 '71 '72"`-E
77°37'30" 35' 32'30" 77030'
Produced by the United States Geological Survey * SCALE 1:24 000 ROAD CLASSIFICATION
North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83) Expressway Local Connector
Worid Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and 1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2 NORrR
1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator, Zone 18S q• 4y• ROLINA A.
Secondary Hwy LOcaI Road
10 000-foot ticks: North Carolina Coordinate System of 1983 172 MILS 1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000 Ram 4WD
q• 0 1 p
This map is not a legal document Boundaries may be MR!
generalized for this map scale. Private lands within government MILES .Interstate Route US Route O State Route
reservations may not be shown. Obtain permission before 1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 QUADRANGLE LOCATION
entering private lands. UTM GRID AND 2016 MAGNETIC NORTH FEET
DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET
Imagery ..................................................NAIP, June 2014
Roads................................ U.S. Cense Bureau, 2015 - 2016 U.S. National Grid CONTOUR INTERVAL 5 FEET 1 Snow Hill
Names..........................................................GNIS, 2016 100,000.mSqus a ID NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 1 2 3 2 Hookerton
Hydrography ....................National Hydrography Dataset, 2014 3 Alden
Contours............................National Elevation Dataset, 2008 TE This map was produced to conform with the 4 5 4 Falling Creek
Boundaries ............ Multiple sources; see metudata file 1972 - 2016 National patial Program 5 Dn
gram UST apo Product Standard, 2011. 6 Deep Run
Wetlands ......... FWS National Wetlands Inventory 1977 - 2014A metadata file associated with this product Is draft version 0.6.19 6 7 8 7 Rlvermont KINSTON, NC
Grid Lone o°.yR.tbR B Dover
1a5
ADJOINING QUADRANGLES 2016

Buildings 8k Grounds, Business Office, Electric, Engineering, Environmental Services,
Fleet Maintenance, Meter Reading, Stormwater, Streets, Wastewater, and Water
I)aei st®ai, Abe irghk place „o Xmistop Fmblic Nemees, the mht claoim
Kinston
m
Sf�E ff=ICATIOI S F•'
PHI;Sc I ' RI RUI OO UTF LL SE'���i=R 11E1-i/AG ILI , ,�ST(Q
RF F:.OSAMT8 zU'l': Ii 3I=1
BRIAN LUCAS, WATER RESOURCES MANAGER
JOHN JARRELL,ENGINEER
FIS L DRA �IfG-FOR RE IE R ISf�OS L
0 F R lw A! TRU TI•
r�ETWW
fie• zz, do

11_NST'O�N' 1'U�LJLI�C SECR'VICIES
Buildings & Grounds, Business Office, Electric, Engineering, Environmental Services,
Fleet Maintenance, Meter Reading, Stormwater, Streets, Wastewater, and Water
Kinston, the rightplace ... AiOSE017 -'rahlic.Services9 the right ch®ice.
Kinston
I11
2009
a 9 SS/
<4 E
0�
.
GIN
;e.
91
epoega900 Ago �ppoo
42 Z?4
THE CITY OE KINSTON SEWER COL,!-ECTION SYSTEM
CWSRF PROJECT NUMURR CS370527-17
RHONOA BARWICK, ®IRECTOR OE PURI -IC SERVICES
STEVE MILER, P.E., ASSISTANT ®IRECTOR OF PUBEIC SERVICES
BRIAN LUCAS, WATER RESOURCES MANAGER
JOHN JARREL,L, P.E., CITY ENGINEER
1Fr0rimQi Dp.AW90NG.F®6'3 RMCW PUSP®SES ONLY
P 22V 2617

�EC'ni e 00001
ABLE G CONTENTS
�Hk S� IV IER 'UN �iUTF�LL ROW a a 'EH : HIS TATIC
® m GUN 0 SACT ®UMPUM EI�uTv
SCECT90M 9 PAGES
1. Bid Advertisement. .. I go., I I I go. I a V a on. a..........................00010 1
2. Description of Work and Instructions to Bidders........ 00100 13
3, Bid Form....., I..". go. 66, a.. V*1111.1..11 "I .a d am to .... k.Abb,00330
.."..................................................00330 7
4, American Iron and Steel....................a..................00340 6
5, MBE / WBE (DBE) Compliance Statement ...1.111....... 00360 9
6. Davis Bacon Requirements ...................................00380 20
7, Bid Bond...........................................................00411 3
8, E -Verify Affidavit ..... Pon 6 ...... ...104 .............................00470 15
9, Non Collusion Affidavit .........................................00480 1
10, Equal Employment .........................:... ... ......... ..... 00490 1
11. Notice of Award .................................................. 00498 2
12. Contract............................................................00500 8
13. Notice to Proceed .................. n ................. a.......ago 00521 2
14, Performance Bond .............................................. 00611 6
15. Payment Bond ................................................... 00621 6
16. Certificate of Insurance ........................................ 00631 2
17. Attorney Certification ............................:............:. 00671 F 1
18, Financial Certification................................a....... 00672 1
19. General Conditions .................................... a........ 00700 73
20. Supplementary Conditions .................................... 00800 16
®IVISI®B� m 1 ®GEI�IERA� C®N®I`�I®ISS
SECTION # PACES
21. Summary.... ......... ......... 01010 1
22, Time Damages ................................................... 01011 1
23, Project Coordination .........:.................................. 01041 1
24. Cut and Patch .................................................... 01045 3
25, Field Engineering "."I man "I 111.skapa mop P.V Ban", 1PP1.1111111 Pa. 01050 1
26. Basis of Payment ................................................ 01150 3
27. Payment Application ............................................01152 9
28, Change Order .................................................... 01153 8
29. Meetings.......................:...................................01200 2
30. Submittals......................................................... 01300 4
31, Temporary Utilities .............................................. 01510 2
32. Barriers............................................................. 01530 2
33. Traffic............................................................... 01570 2
34. Material and Equipment ........................................01600 5
35, Contract Closeout ............................................... 01700 3
36. Cleaning...........................................................01710 2
37. Warranties and Bonds ......................................... 01740 2
i

CSI ISi - SITE '�� mlry
38.
Excavation Trenching of Backfilling for Pipe Lines .......02221
13
39.
Waste Material Disposal...................6..........................
02227
1
40.
Erosion Control....6.......................6.......:.......................02540
6
41.
Sanitary Sewer ..................................................
02560
17
47_
Sewer Repair ....................................................
02561
2
43.
Clean and TV ....................................................
02562
5
44.
Cured —in Place Pipe ..........................................
02565
5
45.
Gravity Sewer Point Repair .... .....I II A .....................
02568
10
46.
Bypass Pumping ................................................
02585
6
47.
Manholes..........................................................
02600
6
4S
Manhole Rehabilitation ........................................
02601
9
49.
Replacement of Manholes .....: ...... ......".... ..........
02603
6
50.
Pipe and Fittings..........................................................
02700
15
51.
Pipe Line Tests,. .............. ....... P ..... k ..................
02725
10
52
Access Road I...............I..I.A......10.........0............4
02850
6
53. Cast in Place Concrete .........................................03100
2
13

S TIO O!2IIIIISUP
CIT OF I STO I
AD 'TIS ENT FO�FIDS`
did No. t�S 19-®9-9d
Pursuant to Section 143-129 of the General Statutes of North Carolina, as amended, Sealed Bids will be
received by the City of Kinston, North Carolina until 3:00 PH on Monday, October % 2017, at the
Purchasing Coordinator's Office - In the Public Service Complex, 2360 Highway 258 South, Kinston, North
Carolina 28504. Bids shall be enclosed in a sealed envelope and clearly marked on the outside of the
envelope, Cid: PS IGwO947, Bids will be opened and read at 3:00 PM Monday June 12, 2017, in the
Small Training Room of the City Public Service Complex at Kinston Public Service Complex, 2360
Highway 258 South, Kinston, North Carolina.
lace
tion .i Dido •d. 30iinch sewer , pipe. Rehabilitate
p io i I 0feet of 30 inch sewer pipe ucured in place o line the old
2g5t➢4. The plans, specifications, and contract documents will be available starting February 23, 2009 for
inspection at the City of Kinston Public Services Complex, at the North Carolina Offices of the Carolinas
Associated General Contractors office in Charlotte and Raleigh, North Carolina and at the McGraw-Hill
Construction Dodge in Raleigh, North Carolina. Complete copies of the plans, specifications and contract
documents may be obtained online at www.icinstonpublicservices.com, by mail or in person from the City of
Kinston Engineering Section by those qualified and who will make a bid, upon a deposit of twenty-five.
dollars ($25.00) in cash or certified check (payable to the City of Kinston). The full plan deposit will be
non-refundable for those contractors submitting bids. The full deposit will be returned to contractors not
submitting bids provided all documents are returned in good condition at least seven (7) days prior to the bid
date.
Each proposal shall be accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check or cert
ified check on some bank
or trust company insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation in an amount equal to not less
than 5% of the total amount of the proposal. In lieu thereof, a bid bond which conforms to the provisions
of G.S. 143-129, as amended may be submitted by the bidder. Any proposal not accompanied by such
deposit shall be void and will not be considered. Contractors are hereby notified that they must have the
proper license under the State Laws governing their respective trades. Contractors must be licensed and
general contractors must have license classification for Building Contractor. All bids will require a
performance bond and a payment bond at time of contract execution (not required as part of the bid
package).
It is the responsibility of the bidders to insure that his/her bid is received before the hour given
above. No bidder may withdraw his bid within 90 days of the date of bid opening. The right is reserved
by the City to accept or reject any or all bids and to accept the bid deemed to be in the best interest of the
City.
For Questions contact: The City Engineer By: Tim Wood
John Jarrell Purchasing Coordinator
[phone]
Publication Date(s): September 3, 2017
Run 1 time: Kinston Free Press
The City of Kinston is an Equal Opportunity Employer

v t t1 Ali 9i I !U Ali
A. COno iTUCt Road to Access Manholes
1. Road shall stabilize the Soil
2. Road shall allow water to filter through
3. Road shall have vegetation established
4. Stream crossings shall not hinder flow of water
B. Line All Manholes using CIl'P Method
1. All manholes will be raised above the 100 year flood elevation.
2. Plug any leaks which may affect the curing of the liner
3. Rehabilitate the manholes using a cured in place liner
C. Line 30 inch Sewer Outfall using Cured in Place Pipe.
1. After review of the Pre -construction Televised Inspecfion Sections of Pipe
will be prioritized according to condition.
2. The sections of Pipe in the worst condition will be rehabilitated first.
3. 4,300 ± feet of Pipe will be rehabilitated using Cured in Place Pipe.
D. Clean and Televised inspection
1. Prior to pipe lining Pipe will need to be cleaned and have televised
inspection completed and reviewed by the engineer.
2. After the pipe lining has cured, a televised inspection of the pipe liner will
need to be done and reviewed by the engineer.
111. � 0�I"!I �0�! 'h��I'a:�•��, N�h� Ut T
I !�
A. Complete sets of the Bidding Documents maybe obtained fiom the Office of the
Engineer in the number and format stated in the advertisement or invitation to bid.
B. Complete sets of Bidding Documents shall be used in preparing Bids; neither
Owner nor Engineer assumes any responsibility for errors or rnisinterpretafions
resulting from the use of incomplete sets of Bidding Documents.
C. Owner and Engineer, in making copies of Bidding Documents available on the
above terms, do so only for the purpose of obtaining Bids for the Work and do not
authorize or confer a license for any other use.

A. To demonstrate Bidder's qualifications to perform the Work, Bidder shall submit
with its Bid (a) written evidence establishing its qualifications such as financial
data, previous experience, and present commitments, and (b) the following
additional information:
Evidence of Bidder's authority to do business in the state where the
Project is located.
2. Bidder's state or other conhactor license number. If Bidder is not licensed
in the State of North Carolina, submit evidence of its ability to obtain a
North Carolina license within the time for acceptance of Bids.
3. Subcontractor and Supplier qualification information; coordinate with
provisions of Section 12 of these Instructions, "Subcontractors, Suppliers,
and Others."
4. Disadvantaged Business Enterprise [DBE] Forms and Affidavits.
B. A Bidder's failure to submit required qualification information with the bid will
disqualify Bidder from receiving an award of the Contract.
C. No requirement in this Secfion 3 to submit information will prejudice the right of
Owner to seek additional pertinent information regarding Bidder's qualifications.
D. Bidder is advised to carefully review those portions of the Bid Form requiring
Bidder's representations and certifications.
A. Site and Other Areas
1. The Site is identified in the Bidding Documents. By definition, the Site
includes rights -of --way, easements, and other lands furnished by Owner for
the use of the Contractor. Any additional lands required for temporary
construction facilities, construction equipment, or storage of materials and
equipment, and any access needed for such additional lands, are to be
obtained and paid for by Contractor.
00700 - 2

B. Existing Site Conditions
Subsurface and Physical Conditions; Hazardous Environmental
Conditions
a. Supplementary Conditions identify:
i. Those reports lrnMM to Owner of explorations and tests of
subsurface conditions at or adjacent to the Site.
ii. Technical Data contained in such reports and drawings.
b. Owner will make copies of reports and drawings referenced above
available to any Bidder on request. These reports and drawings are
not pari of the Contract Documents, but the Technical Data
contained therein upon whose accuracy Bidder is entitled to rely,
as provided in the General Conditions, has been identified and
established in the Supplementary Conditions. Bidder is responsible
for any interpretation or conclusion Bidder draws from any
Technical Data or any other data, interpretations, opinions, or
information contained in such reports or shown or indicated in
such drawings.
a If the Supplementary Conditions do not identify Technical Data,
the default definition of Technical Data set forth in Article 1 of the
General Conditions will apply.
2. Underground Facilities: Information and data shown or indicated in the
Bidding Documents with respect to existing Underground Facilities at or
adjacent to the Site are set forth in the Contract Documents and are based
upon information and data fuuiished to Owner and Engineer by owners of
such Underground Facilities, including Owner, or others.
3. Adequacy of Data: Provisions concerning responsibilities for the adequacy
of data furnished to prospective Bidders with respect to subsurface
conditions, other physical conditions, and Underground Facilities, and
possible changes in the Bidding Documents due to differing or
unanticipated subsurface or physical conditions appear in Paragraphs 5.03,
5.04, and 5.05 of the General Conditions. Provisions concerning
responsibilities for the adequacy of data famished to prospective Bidders
with respect to a Hazardous Environmental Condition at the Site, if any,
and possible changes in the Contract Documents due to any Hazardous
Environmental Condition uncovered or revealed at the Site which was not
shown or indicated in the Drawings or Specifications or identified in the
Contract Documents to be within the scope of the Work, appear in
Paragraph 5.06 of the General Conditions.
00100 � 3

C. Site Visit and Testing by Bidders
Bidder shall conduct the required Site visit during normal working hours,
and shall not disturb any ongoing operations at the Site.
request, and to the extent Owner has control over the Site, and
schedule permitting, the Owner will provide Bidder access to the Site to
conduct such additional examinations, investigations, explorations, tests,
and studies as Bidder deems necessary for preparing and submitting a
successful Bid. Owner will not have any obligation to grant such access if
doing so is not practical because of existing operations, security or safety
concerns, or restraints on Owner's authority regarding the Site.
'Bidder shall comply with all applicable Laws and Regulations regarding
excavation and location of utilities, obtain all permits, and comply with all
terms and conditions established by Owner or by property owners or other
entities controlling the Site with respect to schedule, access, existing
operations, security, liability insurance, and applicable safety programs.
4. Bidder shall fill all holes and clean up and restore the Site to its former
condition upon completion of such explorations, investigations, tests, and
studies.
D. Owner's Safety Program: Not Used.
E. Other Work at the Site
1. Reference is made to Article 8 of the Supplementary Conditions for the
identification of the general nature of other work of which Owner is aware
(if any) that is to be performed at the Site by Owner or others (such as
utilities and other prime contractors) and relates to the Work contemplated
by these Bidding Documents. If Owner is party to a written contract for
such other work, then on request, Owner will provide to each Bidder
access to examine such contracts (other than portions thereof related to
price and other confidential matters), if any.
A. It is the responsibility of each Bidder before submitting a Bid to:
1. examine and carefully study the Bidding Documents, and an
y data and
reference items identified in
the
Bidding
Documents;

2. visit the Site, conduct a thorough, alert visual examination of the Site and
adjacent areas, and become familiar with and satisfy itself as to the
general, local, and Site conditions that may affect cost, progress, and
performance of the Work;
3. become familiar with and satisfy itself as to all Laws and Regulations that
may affect cost, progress, and performance of the Work;
4. carefully study all: (1) reports of explorations and tests of subsurface
conditions at or adjacent to the Site and all drawings of physical
conditions relating to existing surface or subsurface structures at the Site
that have been identified in the Supplementary Conditions, especially with
respect to Technical Data in such reports and drawings, and (2) reports
and drawings relating to Hazardous Environmental Conditions, if any, at
or adjacent to the Site that have been identified in the Supplementary
Conditions, especially with respect to Technical Data in such reports and
drawings;
consider the information known to Bidder itself; information commonly
known to contractors doing business in the locality of the Site; information
and observations obtained from visits to the Site; the Bidding Documents;
and the Site -related reports and drawings identified in the Bidding
Documents, with respect to the effect of such information, observations,
and documents on (1) the cost, progress, and performance ofthe Work; (2)
the means, methods, techniques, sequences, and procedures of
construction to be employed by Bidder; and (3) Bidder's safety
precautions and programs;
6. agree, based on the information and observations referred to in the
preceding paragraph, that at the time of submitting its Bid no fixrkher
examinations, investigations, explorations, tests, studies, or data are
necessary for the determination of its Bid for performance of the Work at
the price bid and within the times required, and in accordance with the
other terms and conditions of the Bidding Documents;
L
ecome aware of the general nature of the work to be performed by Owner
and others at the Site that relates to the Work as indicated in the Bidding
Documents;
8. promptly give Engineer written notice of all confl
icts, errors, ambiguities,
or discrepancies that Bidder discovers in the Bidding Documents and
confirm that the written resolution thereof by Engineer is acceptable to
Bidder;
9, determine that the Bidding Documents are generally sufficient to indicate
and convey understanding of all terms and conditions for the performance
and furnishing of the Work; and
00100 e 5

10. agree that the submission of a Bid will constitute an incontrovertible
representation by Bidder that Bidder has complied with every requirement
of this Article, that without exception the Bid and all prices in the Bid are
premised upon performing and furnishing the Work required by the
Bidding Documents,
A. A pre -Bid conference will be held at the time and location stated in the invitation
or advertisement to bid. Representatives of Owner and Engineer will be present to
discuss the Project. Bidders are encouraged to attend and participate in the
conference. Engineer will transmit to all prospective Bidders of record such
Addenda as Engineer considers necessary in response to questions arising at the
conference. Oral statements may not be relied upon and will not be binding or
legally effective.
�C�I�i1�Yi17�01�7�,7:�IfY:V11[I)IE.Y\c117\"1717\11171
A. All questions about the meaning or intent of the Bidding Documents are to be
submitted to Engineer in writing. Interpretations or clarifications considered
necessary by Engineer in response to such questions will be issued by Addenda
delivered to all parties recorded as having received the Bidding Documents.
Questions received less than seven days prior to the date for opening of Bids may
not be answered. Only questions answered by Addenda will be binding. Oral and
other interpretations or clarifications will be without legal effect.
B. Addenda maybe issued to clarify, correct, supplement, or change the Bidding
Documents,
VIII. BID SECURITY
A. A Bid must be accompanied by Bid security made payable to Owner in an amount
of five percent of Bidder's maximum Bid price (determined by adding the base
bid and all alternates) and in the form of a certified check, bank money order, or a
Bid bond (on the form included in the Bidding Documents) issued by a surety
meeting the requirements of Paragraphs 6.01 and 6.02 of the General Conditions.
B. The Bid security of the apparent Successful Bidder will be retained until Owner
awards the contract to such Bidder, and such Bidder has executed the Contract
Documents, fiunished the required contract security, and met the other conditions
of the Notice of Award, whereupon the Bid security will be released. If the
Successful Bidder fails to execute and deliver the Contract Documents and
furnish the required contract security within 15 days after the Notice of Award,
Owner may consider Bidder to be in default, annul the Notice of Award, and the
Bid security of that Bidder will be forfeited. Such forfeiture shall be Owner's
exclusive remedy if Bidder defaults.
00100 = 6

C. The Bid security of other Bidders that Owner believes to have a reasonable
chance of receiving the award may be retained by Owner until the earlier of seven
days after the Effective Date of the Contract or 91 days after the Bid opening,
whereupon Bid security furnished by such Bidders will be released. .
D. Bid security of other Bidders that Owner believes do not have a reasonable
chance of receiving the award will be released within seven days after the Bid
opening.
A. The number of days within which, or the dates Uy which, the Work is to be
substantially completed, and completed and ready for final payment, are set forth
in the Agreement.
I I �i l lI1Di � I I IIS ID � 1�TIl/��l�llD(��
A. Provisions for liquidated damages, if any, for failure to timely attain a Milestone,
Substantial Completion, or completion of the Work in readiness for final
payment, are set forth in the Agreement.
A. The Contract for the Work, as awarded, will be on the basis of materials and
equipment specified or described in the Bidding Documents, and those "or -equal"
or substitute or materials and equipment subsequently approved by Engineer prior
to the submittal of Bids and identified by Addendum. No item of material or
equipment will be considered by Engineer as an "or -equal" or substitute unless
written request for approval has been submitted by Bidder and has been received
by Engineer at least 15 days prior to the date for receipt of Bids. Each such
request shall comply with the requirements of paragraphs 7.04 and 7.05 of the
General Conditions. The burden of proof of the merit of the proposed item is upon
Bidder. Engineer's decision of approval or disapproval of a proposed item will be
final. If Engineer approves any such proposed item, such approval will be set
forth in an Addendum issued to all prospective Bidders. Bidders shall not rely
upon approvals made in any other manner.
B. All prices that Bidder sets fort
h in its Bid shall be based on the presumption that
the Contractor will furnish the materials and equipment specified or described in
the Bidding Documents, as supplemented by Addenda. Any assumptions
regarding the possibility of post -Bid approvals of "or -equal" or substitution
requests are made at Bidder's sole risk.

A, A Bidder shall be prepared to retain specific Subcontractors, Suppliers, or other
individuals or entities for the performance of the Work if required by the Bidding
Documents (most commonly in the Specifications) to do so. If a prospective
Bidder objects to retaining any such Subcontractor, Supplier, or other individual
or entity, and the concern is not relieved by an Addendum, then the prospective
Bidder should refrain from submitting a Bid.
]�, Subsequent to the submittal of the Bid, Owner may not require the Successful
Bidder or Contractor to retain any Subcontractor, Supplier, or other individual or
entity against which Contractor has reasonable objection.
C. Bidders shall submit qualification statements for Contractor's or subcontractor's
and equipment proposed to perform the following portions of the Work:
i. As stated on the bid form.
J<D. Additionally, the apparent Successful Bidder, and any other Bidder so requested,
shall within five days after Bid opening, submit to Owner if requested, an
experience statement with pertinent information regarding similar projects and
other evidence of qualification for each other such Subcontractor, Supplier, or
other individual or entity. If Owner or Engineer, after due investigation, has
reasonable objection to any proposed Subcontractor, Supplier, individual, or
entity, Owner may, before the Notice of Award is given, request apparent
Successful Bidder to submit an acceptable substitute, in which case apparent
Successful Bidder shall submit a substitute, Bidder's Bid price will be increased
(or decreased) by the difference in cost occasioned by such substitution, and
Owner may consider such price adjustment in evaluating Bids and making the
Contract award.
E. If apparent Successful Bidder declines to make any such substitution, Owner may
award the Contract to the next lowest Bidder that proposes to use acceptable
Subcontractors, Suppliers, or other individuals or entities. Declining to make
requested substitutions will constitute grounds for forfeiture of the Bid security of
any Bidder. Any Subcontractor, Supplier, individual, or entity so listed and
against which Owner or Engineer makes no written objection prior to the giving
of the Notice of Award will be deemed acceptable to Owner and Engineer subject
to subsequent revocation of such acceptance as provided in Paragraph 7.06 of the
General Conditions.
00100 - 8

A. The Bid Form is included with the Bidding. Documents.
All blanks on the Bid Form shall be completed in ink and the Bid Form
signed in ink. Erasures or alterations shall be initialed in ink by the person
signing the Bid Form. A Bid price shall be indicated for each section, Bid
item, alternate, adjustment unit price item, and unit price item listed
therein.
2. If the Bid Form expressly indicates that submitting pricing on a specific
alternate item is optional, and Bidder elects to not furnish pricing for such
optional alternate item, then Bidder may enter the words 'No Bid" or "Not
Applicable."
B. A Bid by a corporation shall be executed in the corporate name by a corporate
officer (whose title must appear under the signature), accompanied by evidence of
authority to sign. The corporate address and state of incorporation shall be shown.
The corporate seal shall be affixed and attested by the corporate secretary or an
assistant corporate secretary.
� C. A Bid by a partnership shall be executed in the partnership name and signed by a
partner (whose title must appear under the signature), accompanied by evidence
of authority to sign. The partnership's address for receiving notices shall be
shown.
D. A Bid by a limited liability company shall be executed in the name of the fum by
a member or other authorized person and accompanied by evidence of authority to
sign. The state of formation of the firm and the firm's address for receiving
notices shall be shown.
E. A Bid by an individual shall show the Bidder's name and address for receiving
notices.
F. A Bid by a joint venture shall be executed by an authorized representative of each
joint venture in the manner indicated on the Bid Form. The joint venture's address
for receiving notices shall be shown.
G. All names shall be printed in ink below the signatures.
H. The Bid shall contain an
acknowledgment of receipt of all Addenda, the numbers
of which shall be filled in on the Bid Form.

I. Postal and e-mail addresses and telephone mmnber for communications regarding
the Bid shall be shown.
The Bid shall contain evidence of Bidder's authority and qualification to do
business in the state where the Project is located, or Bidder shall covenant in
writing to obtain such authority and qualification prior to award of the Contract
and attach such covenant to the Bid. Bidder's state contractor license number, if
any, shall also be shown on the Bid Form.
A. Unit Price
1. Bidders
shall submit a
Bid on
a unit
price basis for each item of Work
listed in
the unit price
section
of the
Bid Form.
2. The "Bid Price" (sometimes referred to as the extended price) for each
unit price Bid item will be the product of the "Estimated Quantity" (which
Owner or its representative has set forth in the Bid Form) for the item and
the corresponding "Bid Unit Price" offered by the Bidder. The total of all
unit price Bid items will be the sum of these "Bid Prices"; such total will
be used by Owner for Bid comparison purposes. The final quantities and
Contract Price will be determined in accordance with Paragraph 13.03 of
the General Conditions.
3. Discrepancies between the multiplication of units of Work and unit prices
will be resolved in favor of the unit prices. Discrepancies between the
indicated sum of any column of figures and the correct sum thereof will be
resolved in favor of the correct sum.
4. Allowances
a. For cash allowances the Bid price shall include such amounts as
the Bidder deems proper for Contractor's overhead, costs, profit,
and other expenses on account of cash allowances, if any, named
in the Contract Documents, in accordance with Paragraph 13.02.B
of the General Conditions.
III
A. With each copy of the Bidding Documents, a Bidder is furnished one separate
unbound copy of the Bid Form, and, if required, the Bid Bond Form. The
unbound copy of the Bid Form is to be completed and submitted with the Bid
security and the other documents required to be submitted under the terms of
Section IX, ATTACHMENTS TO THIS BID, of the Bid Form.
00100 a 10

lE$. A Bid shall be received no later than the date and time prescribed and at the place
indicated in the advertisement or invitation to bid and shall be enclosed in a
plainly marked package with the Project title (and, if applicable, the designated
portion of the Project for which the Bid is submitted), the name and address of
Bidder, and shall be accompanied by the Bid security and other required
documents. If a Bid is sent by mail or other delivery system, the sealed envelope
containing the Bid shall be enclosed in a separate package plainly marked on the
outside with the notation "BID ENCLOSED." A mailed Bid shall be addressed to
Purchasing Manager, Finance Department, 2360 Highway 258 South, Kinston,
NC 28504.
(C. Bids received after the date and time prescribed for the opening of bids, or not
submitted at the correct location or in the designated manner, will not be accepted
and will be returned to the Bidder unopened.
1. �umll i� l�a� � m f•nmry �� � ���i l;,lm
A. A Bid may be withdrawn by an appropriate document duly executed in the same
manner that a Bid must be executed and delivered to the place where Bids are to
be submitted prior to the date and time for the opening of Bids. Upon receipt of
such notice, the unopened Bid will be returned to the Bidder.
lg, If a Bidder wishes to modify its Bid prior to Bid opening, Bidder must withdraw
its initial Bid in the manner specified in Paragraph 16.01 and submit a new Bid
prior to the date and time for the opening of Bids.
C. If within 24 hours after Bids are opened any Bidder files a duly signed written
notice with Owner and promptly thereafter demonstrates to the reasonable
satisfaction of Owner that there was a material and substantial mistake in the
preparation of its Bid, that Bidder may withdraw its Bid, and the Bid security will
be returned. Thereafter, if the Work is rebid, that Bidder will be disqualified from
fiuther bidding on the Work.
A. Bids will be opened at the time and place indicated in the advertisement or
invitation to bid and, unless obviously non-responsive, read aloud publicly. An
abstract of the amounts of the base Bids and major alternates, if any, will be made
available to Bidders after the opening of Bids.
A. Bids will be opened at the time and place indicated in the advertisement or
invitation to bid and, unless obviously non-responsive, read aloud publicly. An
abstract of the amounts of the base Bids and major alternates, if any, will be made
available to Bidders after the opening of Bids,
rr y-

A. Owner reserves LOU right to reject any or all Bids, including without limitation,
nonconforming, nonresponsive, unbalanced, or conditional Bids. Owner will
reject the Bid of any Bidder that Owner fords, after reasonable inquiry and
evaluation, to not be responsible. If Bidder purports to add terms or conditions to
its Bid, takes exception to any provision of the Bidding Documents, or attempts to
alter the contents of the Contract Documents for purposes of the Bid, then the
Owner will reject the Bid as nonresponsive; provided that Owner also reserves the
right to waive all minor informalities not involving price, time, or changes in the
Work.
B. If Owner awards the contract for the Work, such award shall be to the responsible
Bidder submitting the lowest responsive Bid.
C. Evaluation of Bids
e. In evaluating Bids, Owner will consider whether or not the Bids comply
with the prescribed requirements, and such alternates, unit prices, and
other data, as may be requested in the Bid Form or prior to the Notice of
Award.
ano For the determination of the apparent low Bidder when unit price bids are
submitted, Bids will be compared on the basis of the total of the products
of the estimated quantity of each item and unit price Bid for that item,
together with any lump sum items.
D. In evaluating whether a Bidder is responsible, Owner will consider the
qualifications of the Bidder and may consider the qualifications and experience of
Subcontractors and Suppliers proposed for those portions of the Work for which
the identity of Subcontractors and Suppliers must be submitted as provided in the
Bidding Documents.
E. Owner may conduct such investigations as Owner deems necessary to establish
the responsibility, qualifications, and financial ability of Bidders and any
proposed Subcontractors or Suppliers.
A. Article 6 of the General Conditions, as may be modified by the Supplementary
Conditions, sets forth Owner's requirements as to performance and payment
bonds and insurance. When the Successful Bidder delivers the Agreement
(executed by Successful Bidder) to Owner, it shall be accompanied by required
bonds and insurance documentation.

A, When Owner issues a Notice of Award to the Successful Bidder, it, shall be
accompanied by the unexecuted counterparts of the Agreement along with the
other Contract Documents as identified in the Agreement. Within 1S days
thereafter, Successful Bidder shall execute and deliver the required number of
counterparts of 'the Agreement (and any bonds and insurance documentation
required to be delivered by the Contract Documents) to Owner. Within ten days
thereafter, Owner shall deliver one fully executed counterpart of the Agreement to
Successful Bidder, together with printed and electronic copies of the Contract
Documents as stated in Paragraph 2.02 of the General Conditions.
A, Owner is exempt from state sales and use taxes on materials and equipment to be
incorporated in the Work. Refer to Paragraph SC -7.09 of the Supplementary
Conditions for additional information.
specs\OOIOOreselecvic
00'i00 a �3

SECTI• 00��0
�f11
1111111[111010 21
I. TH15 EIC IS SUP!��I ED l O:
TIM WOOD, PURCHASING MANAGER
CITY OF STr
FINANCE DEPARTMENT, PURCHASING DDiVISI4 1 ��,!��
0 Highway 260 South,
Kinston, NC 2085'1
B. The undersigned BI®DEf� proposes and agrees, if this BID is accepted, to
enter into an Agreement with OWNER in the form or included in the
Contract Documents to complete all work as specified or indicated in the
Contract Documents for the Contract Price and within the Contract Time
indicated in this BID and in accordance with the Contract Documents.
ll, :IDD�� � ACi 'C�L'L�DGEfi���lTS
A. BIDDER accepts all terms and conditions of the General Conditions and
Supplementary Conditions, including without limitation those dealing with
the disposition of Bid Security. This Bid will remain open for nine days after
the day of the Bid opening. BIDDER will sign the Agreement and submit
the Contract Security and other documents required by the Contract
Documents within five (5) days after the date of OWNER'S Notice of Award.
In submitting this BID, BIDDER represents, that:
A. BIDDER has examined and carefully studied the Bidding Documents, and
any data and reference items identified in the Bidding Documents, and
hereby acknowledges receipt of the
following addenda:
B. BIDDER has visited the Site, conducted a thorough, alert visual
examination of the Site and adjacent areas, and become familiar with and
satisfied itself as to the general, local, and Site conditions that may affect
cost, progress, and performance of the Work.
00330-1

C. BIDDER is familiar with and
has
satisfied itself as to all Laws
and
Regulations that may affect
cost,
progress, and performance
of the Work.
1. Reports of explorations and tests of subsurface conditions at or
adjacent to the Site and all drawings of physical conditions relating to
existing surface or subsurface structures at the Site that have been
identified in the Supplementary Conditions, especially with respect to
Technical Data in such reports and drawings, and
2. Reports and drawings relating to Hazardous Environmental
Conditions, if any at or adjacent to the Site that have been identified
in the Supplementary Conditions, especially with respect to
Technical Data in such reports and drawings.
3. locality where work is to be performed, the legal requirements,
(federal, state and local laws, ordinances, rules and regulations) and
the conditions affecting cost, progress or performance of the Work
and has made such independent investigations as BIDDER deems
necessary;
E. BIDDER has considered the information known to BI®DER itself;
information commonly known to contractors doing business in the locality of
the Site; information and observations obtained from visits to the Site;
Bidding Documents; and any Site -related reports and drawings identified in
the Bidding Documents, with respect to the effect of such information,
observations, and documents on
1. The cost, progress, and performance of the work
2. The means, methods, techniques, sequences, and procedures of
construction to be employed by BIDDER; and
3. BIDDER'S safety precautions and programs.
F. BIDDER agrees, based on information the information and observations
referred to in previous paragraph (III.A.5), that no further examinations,
investigations, explorations, tests, studies, or data are necessary for the
determination of this Bid for performance of the work at the price bid and
within the times required, and in accordance with the other terms and .
conditions of the Bidding Documents
G. BIDDER is aware of the general nature of work to be performed by ®WNER
and others at the Site that relates to the Work as indicated in the Bidding
Documents.
H. BIDDER has given Engineer written notice of all conflicts, errors,
ambiguities, or discrepancies that BIDDER has discovered in the Bidding
Documents, and confirms that the written resolution thereof by ENGINEER
is acceptable to BIDDER.
00330 — 2

1. The Bidding Documents are generally sufficient to indicate and convey
understanding of all terms and conditions for the performance and
furnishing of the Work.
J. The submission of this Bid constitutes an incontrovertible representation by
BIDDER that BIDDER has complied with with every requirement of this
Subsection (III), and that without exception the Bid and, all prices in the Bid
are premised upon performing and furnishing the Work required by the
Bidding Documents,
v ei��E�s cE�TiFir-aTio�J
�I®®ER certifies that:
A. This bid is genuine and not made in the interest of or on behalf of any
undisclosed person, firm or corporation and is not submitted in conformity
with any collusive agreement or rules of any group, association,
organization or corporation;
B. BIDtDER has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other EI®DER
to submit a false or sham bid;
C. EI®®ER has not solicited or induced any person; firm or corporation to
refrain from bidding;
D. BIDDER has not engaged in corrupt, fraudulent, collusive, or coercive
practices in competing for the Contract.
1.' "Corrupt practice' means the offering, giving, receiving, or soliciting of
anything of value likely to influence the action of a public official in the
bidding process;
2. "fraudulent practice" means intentional misrepresentation of facts made
a. To influence the bidding process to the detriment of OWNER,
b. To establish bid prices at artificial non-competitive levels, or
c. To deprive OWNER of the benefits of free and open competition;
3. "collusive practice" means a scheme or arrangement between two or
more BIDDERS,with or without the knowledge of OWNER, a purpose of
which is to establish bid prices at artificial, non-competitive levels; and
V. "coercive practice" means harming or threatening to harm, directly or indirectly,
persons or their property to influence their participation in the bidding process or
affect the execution of the Contract.
00330 — 3

I. 8011013111H
A.
BIDDER will complete the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents for
the following price(s):
lYIIJ1I/fiBER
ITEM
QUANTITY
UNIT
UNIT PRICE
TOTAL
1
Temporary Access
15,000
FT,
2
Pre -construction TV Inspection
155700
FT..
3
Point Repair on 30" Sewer
5
EA.
4 a
Raise Manhole 1 foot
6
EA.
4 b
Raise Manhole 2 feet
8
EA.
4 c
Raise Manhole 3 feet
18
EA.
4 d
Raise Manhole 4 feet
7
EA.
4 e
Raise Manhole 5 feet
3
EA.
4 f
Raise Manhole 6 feet
1
EA,
5
Replace Manhole Cover
4
EA.
6 a
Rehabilitate Manhole (12 to 13 feet) CIPP
27
EA.
6 b
Rehabilitate Manhole (13 to 14 feet) CIPP
10
EA.
6 c
Rehabilitate Manhole (14 to 15 feet) CIPP
1
EA.
7
Rehabilitate 30 " Sewer CIPP
4,159
FT
8
Post Construction Televised Inspection
4,159
LS.
9
Bypass Pumping
1
LS,
10
Erosion Control
ILS,
11
Mobilization 1
1
LS,
3'OTAI.
►.�i�i ti�ilrl�l�
B. BIDDER acknowledges that
1. Each Bid Unit Price includes an amount considered by BIDDER to be
adequate to cover Contractor's overhead and profit for each separately
identified item, and
2. Estimated quantities are not guaranteed, and are solely for the purpose of
comparison of Bids, and final payment for all unit price Bid items will be
based on actual quantities, determined as provided in the Contract
Documents.
C. Bonds required under Paragraph 6.01 of the General Conditions (Section 700) will
be based on the Contract Price.
00330 — 4

VIIL TIME E OF CDIV�[i PPLr.ETI[OPV
A. BIDDER agrees that Work will be substantially complete within 180 calendar days
after the date when the Contract Times commence to run as provided in Paragraph
4.01 of the General Conditions (Section 00700), and will be completed and ready
for final payment in accordance with Paragraph 15.06 of the General Conditions
(Section 00700) within 210 calendar days after the date when the Contract Times
commence to run.
B. M DDIER accepts the provisions of the Agreement as to liquidated damages..
VIIIIII. A'II'�'ACII3[ly1[ElOTq'S 7['® TDIIS BIID
The following documents are submitted with and made a condition of this Bid:
A. Required Bid Security;
B. List of Proposed Subcontractors (provided in Section 00360 DBE forms Pages
00360 — 4);
C. List of Proposed Suppliers of materials and equipment (Attachment A);
D. Evidence of authority to do business in the state of the Project; or a written
covenant to obtain such license within the time for acceptance of Bids:
E. Contractor's License Number: _
F. American Iron and Steel Forms (Section 00340)
G. NC Division of Water Infrastructure MBE/WBE (DBE) Compliance (Section
00360 Pages 00360 —1, 00360 —2 and 00360 - 5);
H. DBE Affidavits (Section 00360 End of Section);
I. EPA Form 6100-3: DBE Subcontractor Performance Form (Section 00360 Page
00360 — 4);
J. BIDDER Qualifications Statement (Section 00420)
1. Schedule A (Current Experience).
2. Schedule B (Previous Experience).
3. Schedule C (Major Equipment).
4. Audited balance sheet for each of the last 3 years for firm in Section 1.
5. Evidence of authority for individuals listed in Section 7 to bind organization to
an agreement.
6. Resumes of officers and key individuals (including Safety Officer of firm
named in Section 1.
7. Required safety program submittals listed in Section 13,
8. Additional items as pertinent.
Noncollusion Affidavit (Section 00480)
L. Certification of Nonsegregated Facilities (Section 00485)
M. E -Verify Affidavit (Section 00470 Page 00470 - 4)
N. Iran Divestment Act (Section 00470 Page 00470 - 5)
I<XX. The terms used in this Bid with Initial capital have the meanings stated in the instructions
to Bidders (Section 00100), the General Conditions (Section 00700), and the
Supplementary Conditions (Section 00800).
00330 — 5

By:
(Signature)
(Printed name)
(If Bidder is a corporation, a limited liability company, a partnership, or a joint venture,
attach evidence of authority to sign.)
Attest:
(Signature)
(Printed name)
Title:
Submittal Date:
Address for giving notices:
Telephone Number:
Fax Number:
Contact Name and e-mail address:
Bidder's License Number:
Classification:
Limitation:
Employer's Tax ID Number:
Corporation:
Corporation Name:
State of Incorporation:
Corporate Seal:
00330-6

SE�TIO Oi�a(�
AMERICAN IR®N AND S u =L QAISy
Gi ii r� fo S'F ' oject� iiV tli C�.iolifI
A. This state summarizes the requirements under Subsection 436 (a)(2) of
the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2014 that SRF recipients only use
Iron and steel products produced in the United States. The Environmental
Protection Agency provides full guidance on the requirements at the
following website:
http://water eDa qov/cirants funding/aisreauirernents.cfm.
B. Recipients of subject SRF awards must submit the executed C�rrillf6��4I®n
for SRF Projects and any waiver requests with their Bid Package. The
recipient cannot receive a promissory note with out these items.
C. Manufacturers can use the template "compliance Certification" fio
document that materials are "produced in the United States."
1. Certification for SRF Projects
2. AIS Waiver Instruction
3. Materials covered by AIS
4. Template Compliance Certification for Materials Covered by AIS
5. Template De Minlmis list

American Iron and Steel (AIS) Certification for SRF Projects
ecipien s o oubjeut bmr�awards must submit this executed form and
any waiver requests with their Bid Information package to State SRF
program in order to receive funding.
B. The (Applicant) certifies that their contractors
performing construction, alteration, maintenance and repair of the public
treatment works under project number will comply
with subsection 436 (a)(2) of the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2014
and only use Iron and steel products produced in the United States.
Contractor
(print)
(sign)
(date)
Owner
(print)
(sign)
(date)
00340 - 2

Ills AIS Wavier inMrucUons
A. Approved national waivers can be found at this website
http//water, epa, g ov/grants_funding/a i sreq u i re m e nt. cfm
B. Please note that a national waiver for "de minimis" iron and steel
components has been approved. A table is included in this document for
use in documenting what items are to be considered as covered under this
waiver. Vote that no single de minimis item can be more than I% of the
total material cost of the project and the total of all de minimis items must
not exceed 5% of the total material watt of the Protect.
C. Waiver Requests are provided for in subsection 436(b) of the Act. It
states they will be granted if the Administrator of the EPA finds that:
7. Applying subsection (a) would be inconsistenf with the public
interest:
2. Iron and steel products are not produced in the United States in
sufficient and reasonably available quantities and of a satisfactory
quality; or
3. Inclusion of iron
and
steel products
produced
in the United
States
will increase the
cost
of the overall
project by
more than 25
percent.
D. A checklist of
items for
a complete
waiver application
package can be
found in EPA
guidance
document for AIS found here:
http•//water epa
go"rants funding/upload/AIS-final-guidance-3-20-94
pdf
9. Submit DWSRF waiver request to lfincent.tomaino a ncdenr. ov.
2. Submit CWSRF waiver request to mark.hubbard�ncdenr.gov.
3. The State will forward these to the EPA for a final determination.

KINSTON,
MAYOR
MURPHY
COUNCIL MEMBERS
JOSEPH TYSON
ROBERT SWINSON IV
FELICIA SOLOMON
SAMMY AIKEN
WYNN WHITTINGTON
CITY MANAGER
TONY SEARS
UEGEND
too, attoot, tootoot RIGHT WAY«�
UNDERGROUND TEUERHONE
UNDERGROUND GASEMSTING SEWER
It
.� "w 1�'O���n�\A�'BRIERY
�
N. pljtl�l�"T"poor.
�'� to
..of"t.
141111,
`
BRIERY RUN PHASE IV M &+W M STA Io4­HW
BRIERY RUN PHASE IV STA 42+M M SItA M+W
BRIERY RUN PHASE IV STA 56+00 TO UA 7�0
RUN PHASE IV STA �W M STA gBoi­0
�
wr�I/�.
.r
.�.�.,�
BRIERY RUN PHASE IV STA �W M STA 112+M
BRIERY RUN PHASE IV STA 112+01) TO STA 126oloW
PflEPARED BY GTY OF KINSTON ENGNEERING SECTION.
NOT
RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
NOTE: LOCATION OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND
UTILITIES ARE APPROXIMATE, CONTRACTOR IS
REQUIRED TO CONTACT NORTH CAROLINA ONE -CALL
(1-800-632-4949)72 HOURS PRIOR TO BEGINNING EXCAVATION,
NOTE: PROPER WORK ZONE TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE
ERECTED AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MUTCD GUIDELINES.

// \\�
/ \
I � � ���
rrp� � �
\ �
5rA I4Po \ \ �
pp�� `','
�� ASC I SIA Step �l � Y ALy� �M � �.— _ rfiP
(�N�IEET ��S I yu4 N � �Aw,y1� PROP
BAR R m xiPpi rtE
I�� � SI'IILN� � �// M M _
STA Si3S4 \ �
uAxxac IePe sTA� 64
R/JSE YANHdE 4 FEFt
I � �// (Et fEET ABOVE 100 YEAR ftOeO)
/ Y�
I
I
I
FINAL DRAWING -FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
NOTES:
1. TEYPORNiT N£x.1N0 IMPACT CONSRiYC110N
uAmxc sz OETNI.
SI��W ` ` � _ Aii4���'1
�- _ 11P 'IPIT N����w
r � _.
-/ „ STA BhXI
V//C Y.WHOIE 1BTA
RNSE YAXHIXE a fEET
(St fElT ABOVE 100 YGR PLOW)
RwAelurATE YAxxau:
``'�,/' usE aRm iH Pu¢ uxPx
c
�A 11�a,
lbw I \
kRE� ILWo)
E LHpl
Im�ii��i1'i'�1f'iii`iii����������������■■����������������i■������������������i.���m
Q�.'1
alex
0
a
�Un N
W O
oa
w
Z w
Q f Z
�— � O ci
N d t� i
Z � � �
� �
Y w � x
U ?
Q � W m
W
(� Z 1f1
� � w N�
U a M ''.
F— O
U O
W � �
� O
W �
� �- >_ H
Z z W �
� O (/) O
D' t- Q �
� ~ a o
� J "f'
LLJ mQ O
� = a
m W F-
� �
�� �
� �_- �
��� ��� ��
_ �''n 'II
� ���
SHEET NO.
2
OF�4_ SHEETS

KINSTON,
MAYOR
MURPHY
COUNCIL MEMBERS
JOSEPH TYSON
ROBERT SWINSON IV
FELICIA SOLOMON
SAMMY AIKEN
WYNN WHITTINGTON
CITY MANAGER
TONY SEARS
UEGEND
too, attoot, tootoot RIGHT WAY«�
UNDERGROUND TEUERHONE
UNDERGROUND GASEMSTING SEWER
It
.� "w 1�'O���n�\A�'BRIERY
�
N. pljtl�l�"T"poor.
�'� to
..of"t.
141111,
`
BRIERY RUN PHASE IV M &+W M STA Io4­HW
BRIERY RUN PHASE IV STA 42+M M SItA M+W
BRIERY RUN PHASE IV STA 56+00 TO UA 7�0
RUN PHASE IV STA �W M STA gBoi­0
�
wr�I/�.
.r
.�.�.,�
BRIERY RUN PHASE IV STA �W M STA 112+M
BRIERY RUN PHASE IV STA 112+01) TO STA 126oloW
PflEPARED BY GTY OF KINSTON ENGNEERING SECTION.
NOT
RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
NOTE: LOCATION OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND
UTILITIES ARE APPROXIMATE, CONTRACTOR IS
REQUIRED TO CONTACT NORTH CAROLINA ONE -CALL
(1-800-632-4949)72 HOURS PRIOR TO BEGINNING EXCAVATION,
NOTE: PROPER WORK ZONE TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE
ERECTED AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MUTCD GUIDELINES.

// \\�
/ \
I � � ���
rrp� � �
\ �
5rA I4Po \ \ �
pp�� `','
�� ASC I SIA Step �l � Y ALy� �M � �.— _ rfiP
(�N�IEET ��S I yu4 N � �Aw,y1� PROP
BAR R m xiPpi rtE
I�� � SI'IILN� � �// M M _
STA Si3S4 \ �
uAxxac IePe sTA� 64
R/JSE YANHdE 4 FEFt
I � �// (Et fEET ABOVE 100 YEAR ftOeO)
/ Y�
I
I
I
FINAL DRAWING -FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
NOTES:
1. TEYPORNiT N£x.1N0 IMPACT CONSRiYC110N
uAmxc sz OETNI.
SI��W ` ` � _ Aii4���'1
�- _ 11P 'IPIT N����w
r � _.
-/ „ STA BhXI
V//C Y.WHOIE 1BTA
RNSE YAXHIXE a fEET
(St fElT ABOVE 100 YGR PLOW)
RwAelurATE YAxxau:
``'�,/' usE aRm iH Pu¢ uxPx
c
�A 11�a,
lbw I \
kRE� ILWo)
E LHpl
Im�ii��i1'i'�1f'iii`iii����������������■■����������������i■������������������i.���m
Q�.'1
alex
0
a
�Un N
W O
oa
w
Z w
Q f Z
�— � O ci
N d t� i
Z � � �
� �
Y w � x
U ?
Q � W m
W
(� Z 1f1
� � w N�
U a M ''.
F— O
U O
W � �
� O
W �
� �- >_ H
Z z W �
� O (/) O
D' t- Q �
� ~ a o
� J "f'
LLJ mQ O
� = a
m W F-
� �
�� �
� �_- �
��� ��� ��
_ �''n 'II
� ���
SHEET NO.
2
OF�4_ SHEETS

G
ne z nEr
� ioo iErn P
E xANNCIE
IN PLACE xNFA
� \
\ \ �
``',(/,
c � \ \
\�
� � �\
„-� ',� \`
NOTES:
L. mLPaxNLv xEnwvo ixPAer coxsmucnax
xxmxo sEE CElNL
�4i'g
FINAL DRAWING -FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
/�-- '^ o
/ oa
rc
/ � D
� m
/ d
h z a
� Z W
�'h Oi Z
� O ti
N
,moi \ �_ E � Z W = o
�c o 0
SN,> � Y W � Y
U ?
YusT„A��v�sse a Li j �
ryANg � 10 `�/', O � W N
x�g i�� LCb � �(/. N Z N
�W SEE LNIERR�' „CC I— U �
Z
J W
U m e
a «
Lxc�' ts`
���' f�i'iS'ii�l�■■■�
■■�''�iii'i■il�■■■■
���■■■IIS■■■�
�����iiii���� ;
SHEET N0.
3
OF1�SHEETS
�I
SHEET N0.
3
OF1�SHEETS

N®R � � � %l
1. C N0 ()) STA JDMSB TD STA J nD q�
TFLP y CADS9NC NIPACT CONSiBUCNCN "'f
"MNO SFE DETAIL
2 DLPD,IANY M° IMPACT(]) CCNSDSICPDN MATDND
ZDNE 1 STA BBBBSB m STA J 1&9 AND STA JDi2S9 N STA b4SSB
ZDNE R STA 2BBBS9 TO STA 1B16SB AND STA J01SS0 TO STA JlH]SB �4
S i PMW M D IMPACT CdISi6NC1NSV O
MATDNC SFE DETNL
c
c
\\ FINAL DRAWRELEASED FE ONLY
ORCONSTRUCTION
NOT
VKI
114655 R�
— — — S,- Y 3 FW lB6yE 1 KM
``'�,/'� 41F PoIABBRATE MANNCfE IIE6
c 6g CUBFD INP,ACE
F T,61 Ff£1
ro e
SWAMUTAX JCB, � �Tw YACCe35
° PFEr a Jo w n BDAo s,tl'
SIA JZB,SB CH RPE Mm cUSO W %ACE ` F
(Z fM'WNC1E B AT TZIVCE J#Aa � S 930 4
1 M' c
4�0
man)
�F DT uAw �B,6.
(h FirrPo, LL' J Tg `C
UgkftTAiEYM't D 1FAR TF
CVAky Ay w, pE DOD)
u
F O
� O
W W +
z
� ouwi0
? 0
J 0
W_ 00
D' ¢
m W F
i
SHEET NO,
T
OF��SHEETS

--__
-- _
/ � _
/ � _
/ `
/ \
\ \
\ � �
SIA xJfpO
SIA yµ� � 3'li �x4 � \ \
sTA D RLPORMr YI//.
�t FFi! 3 � 3Y W �� SIA yy� ASS RDAD !�
s,A +>+DD
�/��. J33B II1I g � SIA MIDJ
`l`/C SIA IgIT1l � W A �n..0 A,
as+oo
_1
NOTES:
FINAL
DRAWING—fOR
REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
+. aDsvxc (n> 5IA nNSDJ ro STA 3sIw5
��
NOT RELEASED
FOR CONSTRUCTION
TEMPORARY CSOSYNC IMPACT Cd+51S11CFiDN
wrnxc sEE DEan
z TEUFaawr BOFFER DIPACT (e) wxsFRucncx uArnxO
ZDNE 1 STA 3Hn01 TD STA SMSD.J IND STA
65f053 ro STA
SS+SSS
LNlE 2 STA SH10A TD STA 5He0.J AND SIA
W]55 TC STA
55!35,5
] IEYPORARY YfltAND IMPACT CONSRYIC+Ip!
g
YAl11HG SFE DETAR
1
;�
A °, FFEF��W�� --
� n3� ao' w � _ '(C
L
`�� +°^ TEAR n��
� o
Z w �
0 � Z N
E-- � 0 U
Z w = o
��sn
Y W � x
U Z
Li j �
p oc w '^
W eD
y Z N
�, U yf
J W s
(,� m o
a /�'
� o
� o
U +
W �'-)
� O �
W � Q
N �� �
Z
� O � OF
� i= a
a=o
� H- d o
� � +
W m �
� a
m W H
� �
SHEET NO.
5
OF�a_SHEETS
��
o
g
�
���
�
a
SHEET NO.
5
OF�a_SHEETS

NOTES:
1.
CR(XMNG (2) BTA. 68101.7 N STA. 60411.8
).
CROSSNG f61
GTA. 5040).2 TO WA. %45.0
TF31PORMY CROSBNG IMPACT CONSTRUCTION
Y m YNO
IMPACT CONSTRUCTION
MATTW SEE DETAIL
gEdi0S9uK
2
TEMNNARY BUFFER IMPACT (2) COHSIRUCTON MATTING
5
TEMPORARY BUTFR
IMPACT (5) OOiSIRUCTOf MATTO
ZONE 1 STA. 68451.7 TO STA 68401.7 AND STA 6"11.8 TO STA. W" d
ZONE i STA
58461.0 TO STA. 50107.2 AND SM 60+20.0 M STA. 3"751
ZONE 2 STA 63441.7 TO BTA. 68461.7 AND STA. 6"45S TO STA. 6"70.4
ME 2 STA,
SB+31.7 T1 STA 5"61.0 MD SM 5"752 W STA. 6"054
J.
CROS9N0 (3) WA GB+W.B M WA 65+07.6
0.
1F16PORMY I ETANO IMPACT CONSTNCTON
TEMPO6ARY CHUMMING IMPACT CONSIRIICiIdN
MATINO SEE
MAIL
MATTING SCE MAL
A
TTGNPNARY sOFER IMPACT (J) COlSW 011 YATTOG
ME 1 WA 65+57.8 TO WA S"W.6 AND WA 651W.B TO WA 661]7.6
SNE 2 STA 65137.8 W BTA 65+57.8 AND STA IMI+V8 M WA 6"47.8
5
CRC STNO (4) WA 6 V.8 M WA 04+SA2
TEMPORARY CROWING NPACT CdiSTRIICTOI
MATTING SEE DETAIL
G.
TEMPORARY WFFER IMPACT (4) CONSIRIICTON MATTING
ZONE 1 STA 63+057 M STA WV48 AND STA 6"352 TO WA 6 69.3
ZONE 2 WA 6J+750 M STA 63406.7 AND WA BM60.3 M WA 6N051
eov 7EEr s ed' 06• w `M'he;(R
AIA} TZS A
Ta%2�"I1{6�.'w
\'Ew
S 7'ro 29�
SA412407 02 'do
/
/
WA 01+71
MMHOE 1706
flAISE MMNOE J ]FET
(2+ iEET ABOVE 100 TEAR fiAW)
RdA61MAW MANHOE
SE "REB IN PLACE MINER �!\/
FINAL DRAWING -FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
•� 2
O
12
eo•11a � F
STke111�(21 O N
��6A5 K
N3N
m
€ $ 66
£ g
SHEET N0.
6
OF�.�SHEETS -

I,
FINAL DRAWING -FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
NOTES:
1. IFMPCpMY MflLWD IMPACT NN511NIC11IX!
4ATiINO SEE DETAIL
S x DEpi
Sky
aCt
YWiccT,�tFEDm `C
Ir
FTro r \ STA ED✓+xaTnM`
Ito AlOy� \ MANMEE V Di FEET �n�oFm �
`1a/ — — — rtu+� me � i rr/a rt°°ul y4
`C mmoiX
`�/� � mumu`" nAa o
I�■■■�r'��■III■■I����■■■■■■■■■■■i���r'i��ii■■■■■���■■■■■■■■��■�!�L�I�!■■■■■s■■■■■�
■■■■■Ci■III■■I■■r0=.LCL■■■■■■=I==■■■■■■:I'J=S5■■■��lI�II■■■:�■■■■■■■■■■■■
SHEET N0.
7
OF�L SHEETS
mai
SHEET N0.
7
OF�L SHEETS
910
SHEET N0.
7
OF�L SHEETS

r
sTA o»azT °P°'�n
4NiHOLE B)D
PNff YANNOLE S RET '� 0 � CRY A
M `� CORS IN PUCE UNFA FLODJ) �Y � S >1P �.
A +
gCi �� M
4� po //—_ \� �
� ��
M+ � / / � \ \ \ ` � �
>'' � ���\
J'��� M ;fix � � / / �
yA / / `� � `1//.
�� / � `�
/ .(�j
w / `F
s / ,/„
� `�(�
,lyp1� 9 � fad 5TA 07+526 `C
MANXIXE B)D
STA BM)S.S / PNff YNRIOU: i fWT
\ / / (Z+ {FET ABDVE 100 YEAR RW'U)
MANNOIE 6R � � PENAPoUTATE YANHOIE
\PNff YANHOIf 4 RET / / Uff CUPED IN PIACE UNFR
(x+ RET APove im YFAR RNoo)
RFHABIUTATE YAHHOU:
DISE WREO IN IMR UNEA / /``'(,/'�
� \ —� ' c
c
\ III I I 1.
FINAL DRAWING -FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
t. iFbPORARY YkMVD IMPACT CONSIPIICTON
uAmxc ffE oSTNL
NOTES:
96+00 97+00
~ O
Z W �
Q � Z
~ a �
Z w � c
0 0 �
Y W � Y
U ?
O � W
W W m
� Z N
U Z r
~ J W =
U m o
d N
O
w �
� a � �
Z
— cn
� o v``'i o
o' t= Q
>- as o
� _J +
W 0] �
� a
CO w I¢-
� N
SHEET N0.
8
OFI�SHEETS
!:
}
t
B�
�
�
�
�
�
���
�,s
a
SHEET N0.
8
OFI�SHEETS
!:
}
SHEET N0.
8
OFI�SHEETS

SP1_1�l7:7e\5T/IlmYi]MATAXYM0121111 i61.IA1
NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
o
a
N
0O
O
!A
S
w na.0 FEET s .T° 11• w s> 15%2' µ•°lyE ] W ,E 1 SAZ o
♦ q�'�' D'O�j.a w'� 5 ",f w ('g uw ""O` $? 4'Q' i
bo
zg,riA`4.'wi�'h010 �� yaa g1N i h53 'iI Z rQi
41 4
LLI
Y
TFYPDRMACCESS PDM\4I,g4,'M��l�.
S -1P STA 1)6+1&T / \ ' �Y Q (/) 2
YAMN86+11.4 x aP Wow / \�(� R� YMHdE BW \ V' �- z
DIE al
WA IM+W.4 J NNM YMHIXE ] FEET z LLJO
PNOE NMHDIE 6 FEET RT FEwCE / MANm m H(x \ '� (S+ fEET AEOYE 100 YEM fIODD) �// \ 0 1Z -
I2+ FEET MOW 10D 1EM F100D) (2 Y PUN) ] FEEE \ UK CUM I YMHDIE
RDIAmm I NIlAm / IS+ fF IT MOVE 100 }FAR fL00D) . WRED IN PUCE IMEj \ 1. W Z Y
Ug WRED IN PUCE MNEA / RENAIwM I MMM C'
USE WRM IN PUCE MNIR — —� — � � � 3 U Z
WA IW+02 NOTES: I,- >
NMH= .TO 1. MOMNO (1) STA 110+652 HI Vol. 111+20.1 O W (= Op
IIME MMXDIE 4IFFY TENPpfMY CROS9XC IMPACT CWSIPIIC11pN (n Z W
I2+ FEET mW 100 YEAR fL000) 'FEkI0 S¢ DEM. lV
J,, USE WREO M PUCE UNFA 2 ME TEIIPWWAaFTER11M66R M STA 11" MD STA 1101+20.1 TD STA I11+58.I ~ J 14A
ME S STA 110+1&] M WX 110 I1.2 M111+58.1& 111+58.1 M STA 111+70.1 m O
1ELPDRMY w D IYPAU CCNSIRUMM N
MATPNO ME INIM. d N
4;06�
■tea■lii■i■■■■■iii■■■i■■■■■■■■111■■■■■S■Qi■■■� ' . 1.
■■■■■■■■■111■■■■■■111■■�■■■111■■■■■■II■■■■■■■■■■■■■111■■■■■���■■■■ :.
■�■■■■■■■11�■■■■■■111■■■���11�������11��������������1���=====■■■�� '
----------
���
SHEET NO.
9
OF��SHEETS

(x+ EEEf ABOVE IDO TENT flDOD)
arae xal�q. A, rl AD
_ _ s'
\ \ \ \ \ \ S1lT� '��� �� � WTyIYA VS
`F ` \ \ � � "'t' i `tFT w i I
sr
N t9w0 _ A —
_ 1927 fEET x � �
STA 1184xa4
uAxxalE Ber
I . � RNSE YM'HgE S FFET
`l(`/C (x+ iFEf A801£ 100 1FAR it0ro)
RENABIIITATE YANNpE
uff aRm x� Rua uxER
������/ -
srA Ixlilal
9L�T� � uANIMRE SxE
RNff YANHOIE i iDOT
(xi f4T ABOVE IDD YEM i1L00j
REHNBLITAIE MANHDIE
uff aREo ix RucE uxm
FINAL DRAWING -FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
NOTES:
1. IEYPORMY MflIAND NIRADT CDNSRIUCIxM
MATING SEE DETNL
_9
D
h
Z w
O � Z
� O
N a
Z o 0
Y W z
LI- j �
O � W
W W
(n Z_
� U �
J W
U �
Q.
�W�
Z
VI
m
Z
�
'
O
�-
O
�
W
W
L+O
�
O
N
�
�
>
la -
N
z
Z
w
�
o
(n
o
�
�a�
Sao
>-
�
�
+
W
CO
N
�'
a
.-
m
W
Q
�
�
!n
�W�
Z
VI
m
Z
SHEET N0.
10
OF��SHEETS
�
;,
SHEET N0.
10
OF��SHEETS

�/r A. 1 yT.E FEET N !� " " L
A. 11 �gq�Al
1 ♦E � _ _-_ __ RI
S0.T f9lfE � � �
STA 116fS1.) Y(/
/ YAHHCIE SEC C
/ RZSE YAHXOfE J ifE'F
FEET AEO4E 100 xM iLOW)
RpIA&IETATE MANNOfE
usE CURm w PucE uxm
R:�
1168
NOTES:
1. 1EYPCRARY NEIIANO IYPACT CQVSTRIICTON
YATIINO SFE DETAE
\ Y�°� '� w
� M N�
\ 1P 1Tti 1� s
� �`' �' �'
\ ��1
\ �
\ /
\ --- /
n. ,...,
133}00
FINAL DRAWING -FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
M33'i£Ef X EO° �' W / /
9ET FExa /
.�p1 �
��f1E'" � STA 11GXi1
IT'S V� _ _ _ - _ � YAIIHpE &M
AY P +SE YNIXUIE � iFEf
( FTEf AB01£ 1 W lE1fl f1L00)
�AWITATE YANNME
WRFD IH PUCE IINFA
-/Y`('/C
-;
♦- N
Z W H
Q � Z
� � � v
Z w � c
Y U z x
Ll. � �
O � W m
w w
N Z N
� � w �
U a M
0
� o
� w o
� o �
z
� o � O
D' F
} �_ a o
o' � +
W m N
� a
m '_,.'
� F
SHEET N0.
11
OF��L SHEETS
��
���
�,a
� a
SHEET N0.
11
OF��L SHEETS
��
a
���
SHEET N0.
11
OF��L SHEETS

gyp• alas FFar s A�w� kG�
� .^ce i ' sLr rEYa srA ur+INS .A
YANN(XE 2 fRT
eFH (Z+ FFEE mNIw tee w:1N FLOeU)
S'O'N ale N it xs j M WM
I v NLxAI uwaE
x
f� WW V(`/` U E UTA PLACE uxEA
r 3°
j�, lti
Ap
�.y9 ffLAyf�N' t.Q" .N's
•,+gym � %V`
i
i
im FEET s TI* MY- '
9LT FENCE
FINAL DRAWING -FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
Y� '.,iry>,1 � s ei' L' W rzvae FFET s of al' W
MAFg � eFE vd, eILT FFNce
(1+ REF ft vem
aft) ` ..4�
� aN im rl�
NOTES:
1. 1FYPpMNY WEYANU IYPACT WNSFNUMM
YATIINC SEE DETAIL
V Q
F Q
(J� d
w � Q
z a V
O ((% O
J +
wm
� a
mW Q
i
SHEET N0.
12
OF�SHEETS
■■!:�'�■1l:����■■■■■■■■li:i�il3�■��■�i��l'ii111■�li�i����
Osis�'i�■■111■■■■=■O��■S■111S:C■■■T.■I�iiii'O■ii■■111■SII■■■■■
■■I■■■i■111■■■■■■■■■■■■II■■■■■■■■■■■■■III■SII■■�■�
��L����■I�����moi■i■il■i■■ei■�■■11®IISant
Hills
11
!'.�'!
■ifiliEilliliiiiili'(Yi..------------°--------------A---•------
®®■■■■►WrilYii�■■■■■■����«■■■■■■�IIiWI�%■■■\r�Wili■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
144+00 145+00 145+00 147+00 148+00 149+00 150+00 151+00 152+00 153+00
V Q
F Q
(J� d
w � Q
z a V
O ((% O
J +
wm
� a
mW Q
i
SHEET N0.
12
OF�SHEETS

/ �` moi, �
/ �
� \�
l I Jii su ��\
�ao�
157}00
m
NOTES:
i. rturaxwx xcnµo iuv�cr coxsmucnax
u�mxo s¢ orru�
FINAL DRAWING -FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
r o
Z w '"
� � Z �
I— � O ci
N a � z
Z w �
Y
� � �
W C7 4
� z
� > �
0 � W �
W �
y Z N
U y
J W =
U m e
0. N
V M
� U �
� O �
W �
_ �
Z Z W
� O N �
�' 1— Q
Q = O
>- �_ a o
� � �
w m¢ �
� _
m W Q
� r
�' � � �
t
�„
g
� ���
SHEET N0.
13
OF��L SHEETS

FINAL DRAWING -FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
T P
PUCE NIP RAP UP TOP Q NFIR ym
SIDES OF MTCH
CONSTRUCTION NAT ii• AIM. 0
ON VETLMO SOIL OARD CWl
CONSTRUCTION MATS VETUEO MLim,
DITCH SLOPE tt
WATER SWFACE AND VEMTATIOI Y .
VETLAND SML ELEVATION
STREAM BEDAND BANK.^ • ..... 20.
70P OF BANK BEYOND 1 MIN MIN. a— TOP OF HEIR
coNSTmIrnoN NATs
wER vETLaxn smL
SECTION
SECTION
mxsrxucrmx xATs
IN STREAM CROSSING
PLAN VIEW
STREAM CROSSING
xm To scuE
- SECTION
vETurm Soa
ACCESS TYPICAL CROSS—SECTION
NOT m SCALE SI E
I
.zs•
4P
CHECK DAM DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
SECTION
ROCK CHECK DAM
DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
NOT TO
S E AREA
oE+rr�Iort
PFPoYflIN MNR.
7 DAYS
"E
AYAIES, DNCNR
AVD S m
aTENO(MD'Ml
DAYS
NONE
YDPR NOSIER
7 DAYS
NDPEV ARE Itl OR
1N.Vl kI
LRS IN LEMOR AND
bii. 14 OAn .TMLLLµMAD.
SLOPES kf OR
14 DAYS
M FDR SLDPES
MTIFA
1HAN W f£F'I
IN IJE O
IN NDM
IN ARlAi
4 DAS'µfOR
)fiESM
F MM
4P
CHECK DAM DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
SECTION
ROCK CHECK DAM
DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
NOT TO
F MM
Rill
Limit
MIT
aA
SO IN 64 DAM 16
ALF
SIDE
VIEW
DETAILKA
SILT FENCE
NATE ESR/Aaq
aso STONE su a e•. 1—
` NAIONUM SIZE OF 12' Z W ci
� �
Z
O
N Q N z
a j
Z_ o o G
Y En �, x
z
>
O d W h
W
W
Z
z
J W
U �
CL.
q,A... 1..0.E` ,c
O W
Lu F- LIQ
2
Q la—
= J J
� m Q
Z Q LLIot!F
� W 0
V)
W W
W_ U
W U
IM N Q
$ 9�
9 9L{E �T Ned 7
SHEETENIJMBER
OF 14 SHEETS