20061742 Ver 1_401 Application_20061106

^ ~ ^ Kimley-Horn
~ and Associates, Inc.
November 3, 2006
Mr. Thomas Brown
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road
Suite 120
Raleigh, NC 27615
Ms. Cyndi Karoly
NC Division of Water Quality
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27602
Re: Ashton Village
NWP # 18 & 39 Application Submittal
Garner, Wake County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Brown and Ms. Karoly:
On behalf of our client HH Hunt, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. is submitting
the enclosed joint Section 404/401 Pre-Construction Notification for the above
reference project for your review pursuant to Nationwide Permit number 18 and 39,
and General 401 Water Quality Certification number 3402. The following
information is included as part of the application submittal:
• Project Summary Sheet
• Pre-Construction Notification Form
• Site Location Map (Figure 1)
• USGS Topographic Map (Figure 2)
• Aerial Photo of Site (Figure 3)
• NRCS Soils Map (Figure 4)
• Project Plans (Figure 5-7)
• Agent Authorization Letter
• Jurisdictional Determination (Expired)
• Wetland Data Forms (2)
• DWQ Stream Identification Forms (4)
• USACE Stream Quality Assessment Worksheets (4)
• NC EEP Mitigation Acceptance Letter
• Correspondence from DWQ regarding stream buffers
• DWQ Wet detention Basin Worksheets (2)
• Pre and Post-Development Stormwater Layout
20061742

^
P.O. Boz 33068
Raleigh, North Carolina
27636-3068
NOV 3 = 2006
L)~n~; - vVAf1:r~ QUALITY
4NETLANpS ANU STQfti~YMT~R BWUfCFE
^
TEL [phone]
FAX [phone]

~ Kimley-Horn
~ antl Associates, Inc,
During our field review of the site, it was discovered that one of the drainages on the
property had not been included in the delineation conducted in 2001 by another
environmental consulting firm (USAGE AID # 200120733, NBRRO 01-070). Our
client has expended significant resources in the design of the project based on the
original delineation. As a result, Ms. Karoly agreed that the stream feature in
question would not be subject to the requirements of the Neuse Buffer Rule.
Mitigation for impacts to the wetland area is proposed by payment into NCEEP.
Based on our conversations with Mr. Brown, we have proposed a mitigation ratio of
1:1. We feel that this ratio is appropriate given the low functional quality of the
wetlands to be impacted and due to the efforts made to avoid and minimize impacts,
particularly along the buffered stream on the site.
If there is any additional information you need or any way we can assist in
expediting the processing of this application, please do not hesitate to contact me at
[phone].
Very truly yours,
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
~~/( _
Todd J. Tugwel
Environmental Scientist
Enclosures
Cc: Mr. Bo Cook
117 Edinburgh Drive, Suite 100
Cary, NC 27511
Beth Reed, KHA w/enclosures
Dan Miller, KHA w/enclosures
file w/enclosures

~ Kimley-Horn
C ~ _ and Associates, Inc.
Project Summary Sheet
l ,,_~EIVEL
Project Name: Ashton Village
Applicant Name and Address: HH Hunt
Attn: Mr. Bo Cook
117 Edinburgh Drive, Suite 100
Cary, NC 27511
Telephone Number: 919-461-0587
Type of Request: ®PCN (NWP# 18 & 39) ^ Request for JD
Included Attachments: ®Project Plans ®USGS Map
® Agent Authorization ^ Delineation Sketch
® Data Forms (Up & Wet) ®NCDWQ Stream Forms
® NCEEP Confirmation ®Aerial Photo
® Agency Correspondence ®Other: Stormwater Info
Check if applicable: ^ CAMA County ^ Trout County ^ Isolated Waters
^ Section 7, ESA ^ Section 106, NHPA ^ EFH
® Mitigation Proposed (® NC EEP ^ On-Site ^ Off-Site ^ Other)
County: Wake
Waterway: UT to White Oak Creek
H.U.C.: 03020201
Property Size (acres): 25.76
Site Coordinates (in decimal degrees): 35.6841 °N
Nearest City/Town: Garner
River Basin: Neuse River
USGS Quad Name: Garner, NC
Approx. Size of Jurisdiction on Site (acres): +/- 0.4
78.5727 °W
Project Location: The project is located south of the terminus of Timber Drive East, west of Interstate 40 and south of US
Hi hwav 70, in Garner, North Carolina.
Site Description: The site is currently in forest cover with a dirt road along the northwest property line. An earlier phase of
the development is located to the north.
Impact Summary (if applicable): Development of the residential subdivision will require impacts to streams and wetland
resultin from rg ading and the placement of fill material, including riprap and culverts, for the construction of parkin ag reas
buildin . foundations, a stomwater pond, and dissipater pads.
Open Water Wetland (ac) Stream Channel
NWP (ac) Unimportant Aquatic Function Important Aquatic Function
T P T P Tem Perm. Tem Perm.
emp. erm. emp. erm. if ac If ac if ac if Ac
18 0.043
39 0.109 290 0.013

Total 0.152 290 0.013
Total Permanent Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.165
Kimley-Horn Contact: Todd Tugwell -r~~3 Direct Number: 919-677-2104
•0 Box 33068 ~ ~ ~ '° ~~ ~ D • L 919 677 2000
Raleigh, North Carolina f 206 FAX [phone]
276363068 N O v 3 u
YVE'iU~NOS AND ST EpR1~NA~R BRANCii
^ Request for Site Visit
® NRCS Soil Survey
^ Delineation Survey
® USACE Stream Forms
^ Site Photos
^ Other:

Office Use Only: Form Version March OS
20061742_
USAGE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable pr,y'~I+Vi4~.~~
is .. ._.
I. Processing
II.
:r~~EIVED
Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ^ Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: Nationwide 18 and 39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ^
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here:
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), ~~~~/7~2
Applicant Information ~[j ~ i.~
NOV 3
2006
1. Owner/Applicant Information
DENR - WATER (1UNLiTl'
Name: HH Hunt ..~cr nuns, t~D 6YAR-I14HA1
..__._ .
Mailing Address: Attn: Mr. Bo Cook
117 Edinburgh Drive
Suite 100
Cary, NC 27511
Telephone Number: 919-461-0587 ext. 106 Fax Number: 919-461-0589
E-mail Address: wrcook(a~hhhunt.com
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Todd Tugwell
Company Affiliation: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Mailing Address: 3001 Weston Parkway
Cary, NC 27513
Telephone Number: 919-677-2104 Fax Number: 919-677-2104
E-mail Address: todd.tugwell(a~kimley-horn.com
Updated I t/1/2005
Page 1 of 1 l

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Ashton Village
2. T.LP. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 1720741146
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town: Garner
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Ashton Village
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): The project is located
south of the terminus of Timber Drive East, west of Interstate 40 and south of US Highway
70, in Garner, North Carolina. See enclose vicinit~p (Figure 1).
Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.6841 °N 78.5727
6. Property size (acres): 25.76
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: White Oak Creek
River Basin: Neuse River
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The site is located at the end of Timber Drive East, which
turns into a rough-graded dirt road at the orooerty boundary and runs alone the southeastern
side of the site. There is an apartment complex to the northwest of the site and Interstate 40
runs along the northeast side of the site. The parcel is primarily in mixed pine and hardwood
a sheet that
oW
Updated 1 I / I /2005
Page 2 of 11

forest cover. A farm pond, located near the eastern corner of the site, was previously
converted to a sediment basin. The pond receives runoff from a stormwater pond located off-
site across Timber Drive (Rex Wellness Center). The sediment basin was determined by the
Corps to be non jurisdictional as a result of its former conversion to a sediment basin. A
large pile of soil has been stockpiled on the northern portion of the site. A stream system
with adjacent riparian wetlands bisects the site from west to east. The system has three
finders, which join together just before flowing off the site and under Interstate 40. See
enclosed USGS topographic quadran lg_e Fi ug re 2), aerial map~Fi~ure 3), and Wake County
Soil Survey (Fi ug re 4).
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The proposed project includes construction of multi-family residential units. The
development will consist of 13 separate apartment buildings, associated parking, including
covered parkin, amenities, and stormwater control structures. The layout of the
development avoids impacts to the buffered stream system that bisects the property; however
site development will require construction activities within streams and wetland areas outside
the buffer. Additionally, a small portion of Zone 2 of the buffer will be temporarily impacted
by rg aging activities Proposed activities include grading, excavating, and the placement of
fill material, including rip-rap and culverts, as required for development of the site.
Construction will be performed usin heavy equipment such as bulldozers, dump trucks, and
excavators. Timber Drive East will be graded and paved to the entrance of the subdivision
along the southwest side of the property. Stormwater on i~ nag off-site will be routed
through two bypass culverts and back into the existing drainages. On-site stormwater
on inatin~ from the northern portion of the site will be routed to an existing stormwater
basin, which will be enlarged to handle the new input. Stormwater from the south side of the
site will be routed first to a new settling basin, and then to a wet detention basin prior to
being discharged. The stormwater from a 1-inch rainfall event would be discharged outside
the stream buffer directly into the wetland adjacent to the pond. Stormwater flows in excess
of the 1-inch rainfall event would be discharged to a riprap dissipater pad located outside of
the stream buffer and wetland.
1 I . Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The proposed development will provide multi-
family housing to the Garner area, which is under oig n~rapid expansion and is in need of
new residential development to meet demand. The proposed fill is necessary to allow
development of the site. Streams and wetlands have been avoided to the maximum extent
practicable, and unavoidable impacts have been minimized.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 3 of 11

construction schedules. The site was initially reviewed by the Corps and NCDWQ in 2001 to
confirm the delineation of waters of the U.S. and Neuse Buffer Rule limits. The initial site
evaluation, which was conducted by another environmental consultant, was for a larger tract that
included parcels to the north and south of the development proposed in this application. A
survey of the Corps' jurisdictional limits on the site was verified by Ms. Amanda Jones on April
24, 2001 (USAGE AID # 200120733). Confirmation of the extent of the Neuse Buffer Rule was
provided by letter from NCDENR on March 8, 2001. Upon our initial review of the project,
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. discovered a stream and wetland feature located on the
property that had been overlooked in the original assessment. Upon consultation with the Corps
and NCDWQ, it was determined that the feature would be considered jurisdictional and subject
to the permitting requirements of Section 404 and 401, in part because the jurisdictional
determination expired on April 24, 2006. The stream channel was determined not to be subject
to the Neuse Buffer Rule, though, as site planning had progressed in reliance upon the original
findings, and inclusion of the stream as a buffered feature would require substantial plan
modifications and expense on the part of the applicant. A confirmation letter to this effect signed
by Ms. Cvndi Karolv is enclosed as an exhibit to this aniJlication.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
The entire project is presented in this application.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Construction of the project will
require impacts to three areas on the site, with a total impact of 0.152 acres.
Impact Site #1 (Figure 5 & 7)- This impact will consist of excavation, rg ading, and the
placement of fill into a stream and wetland system. Following construction, no portion of the
stream system will remain above the proposed impact area, however off-site storm drainage
that originates from a stormwater retention pond across Timber Drive East will be routed
through culverts placed in the drainage way and dischar;?ed back into the channel below the
filled section of stream. The impact is required for the construction of parking areas and lot
Updated I l / I /2005
Page 4 of I 1

fill. The stream was determined to be intermittent with no indicators of important aquatic
function. The stream channel to be filled flows through three small, riparian wetland areas.
In each of these wetlands, the stream disappears then reforms at the lower end of the wetland.
For this reason, the overall lenPth of stream impact (290 linear feet) is less than the total
valley len tg h (approximately 400 linear feet). The stream banks will be lined with rip-rap for
approximately_20 linear feet at the outlet of the culvert to stabilize the stream at the transition
back into the existing channel. This length has been included in the impact calculation. The
total length of intermittent, biolo ig_ cally unimportant stream channel proposed to be impacted
is 290 linear feet, and the proposed wetland impact is 0.075 acre.
Impact Site #2 (Figure 5 & 7)- This impact will result from the placement of fill into
wetlands necessary for the construction of parking areas and the embankment of a
stormwater retention pond. The fill slope has been pulled back to minimize the impact to
wetlands as much as possible, and the stormwater retention pond has designed to work
around the wetland as much as possible. The loss of wetland associated with this area is
0.043 acre. These impacts have been separately proposed under nationwide permit 18, as
they are for stormwater pond construction.
Impact Site #3 (Figure 5 & 6)- This impact will result from the placement of fill material
necessary to brim a building site to grade, and for the construction of a rip-rap dissipater pad
at the outlet of a stormwater bypass culvert. The total impact to wetlands is 0.034 acre.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list imnacts due to both structure and flooding.

Wetland Impact

NWP Type of Wetland Located within Distance to
Area of
Impact
Site Number Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested marsh 100-year Floodplain Nearest Stream (acres)
herbaceous, bog, etc.) (yes/no) (linear feet)
Impact Site 1 39 Grading and Fill Forested, Riparian No 0 0.075
Impact Site 3 39 Grading and Fill Forested, Riparian No 80 0.034
Total Wetland Impact -Nationwide Permit 39 (acres) 0.109
Impact Site 2 18 Grading and Fill Forested, Riparian No 120 0.043
Total Wetland Impact -Nationwide Permit 18 (acres) 0.043
Total Wetland Impact-All Nationwide Permits (acres) 0.152
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: +/- 0.3 acres
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
Updated I 1 / I /2005
Page 5 of I 1

walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,56

Stream Impact Average
Impact
Area of
Number NWP Stream Name Type of Impact Perennial or Stream Width Length Impact
(indicate on map) Number Intermittent? Before (linear feet) (acres)
Im act
Impact Site 1 39 UT to White Oak Grading, Fill, & Intermittent/ 2 feet 290 0.013
Creek Rip-rap Unimportant
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 290 0.013
Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact
NWP
Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody Area of
Site Number
Number
(if applicable) T e of [m act
YP p lake, ond, estua
~ P ry, sound, bay,
Impact
indicate on ma ocean, etc. acres)

Total Open Water Impact (acres) NA
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Im act (acres): 0.013
Permanent Wetland Impact (acres): 0.152
Tem ora Wetland Im act (acres):
O en Water Impact (acres):
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.165
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 290
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes ®No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ®wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): dam/embankment
Updated I I / 1 /2005
Page 6 of 11

Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): stormwater management
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: forested
Size of watershed draining to pond: 8.64 acres
Expected pond surface area: +/- 0.25 Acres
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. The proposed impacts are
necessary to allow development of the site. The applicant has emplo e~practicable measures
to avoid impacts to streams and wetland on the site. All ripra~ dissipater pads have been kept
out of the buffer. Impact Site #1 cannot be further minimized. This area is in the heart of the
project, and loss of this portion of the development would make the project financially
unfeasible. At Impact Site #2, the applicant has configured the fill slopes from the stormwater
pond to avoid the majority of the wetland. Likewise, the desi;;n at Impact Site #3 minimizes
impacts by incorporating a retaining wall. Impacts at this location have also been limited to an
existing drained pond basin in an attempt to avoid higher quality wetlands downstream.
The stream buffer has been avoided with the exception of a small amount of earthen fill that will
encroach into Zone 2 of the buffer. This fill will be stabilized and revegetated following
completion of the work. All stormwater on inatin~ on the site will flow into a retention fond
prior to being released. Stormwater that originates off-site will be carried through bypass
culverts and released into existin dg rainage channels. To eliminate the potential scour associated
with the stormwater release, rip-rap has been used to stabilize the stream banks at one outfall and
a dissipater pad has been designed for the second bypass outfall. These impacts have been
included in the totals for the project.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to ] 50 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
Updated I I / I /2005
Page 7 of I 1

and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strm~ide.html.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed as
mitigation for impacts to 0.152 acre of riparian forested wetlands at a 1:1 ratio. Payment to
NCEEP will be in an amount necessary to provide for the restoration of 0.152 acres of
riparian forested wetlands. This proposal is based on efforts made by the applicant to avoid
impacts to wetlands and streams, including total avoidance of buffered streams on the site,
and because of the limited aquatic function of the wetlands to be disturbed.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0.152 (USACE only, as
impacts are below DWQ mitigation threshold).
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ^ No
Updated 1 I / I /2005
Page 8 of 11

2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ^ No
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ^ No ^
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify Neuse )? Yes ® No ^
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact Multiplier Required
s uare feet Miti ation
Impact Site 4 (Zone 2) 595 N/A
(Figure 5 & 6)
Impact Site 5 (Zone 2) 870 N/A
(Figure 5 & 7)
Impact Site 6 (Zone 2) 689 N/A
(Figure 5 & 7)
Total 2154 N/A
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone I .
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. All clearing will be limited to Zone 2 of the
Updated I U I /2005
Pagc 9 of l 1

buffer and these areas will be revegetated following completion of the work. Accordingly,
no buffer mitigation is proposed as these activities are exempt per the regulations.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. The proposed impacts will occur at the upper
ends of the jurisdictional streams on the site, so no portion of stream channel will remain
upstream of the impacts. The watershed does extend upstream of the project limits. Storm water
that originates upstream of the site will be carried through two bypass culverts and released
below the project impact areas. The bypass culvert that discharges below Impact Site #1 will be
released directly into the existing stream, which will be armored with riprap along its banks to
prevent scour. The bypass culvert that discharges below Impact Site #3 will be released onto a
dissipater pad constructed at the base of a retaining wall. The pad has been located to minimize
wetland impacts and avoid impacts to the stream buffer.
On-site drainage is comprised of two watersheds. The northern watershed has a drainage area of
23.24 acres (inclusive of on and off-site drainage), with an existing impervious area of 6.8 acres
(29.25%), and a proposed impervious area of 11.64 acres (50.09%). Stormwater from this
watershed will be routed into an existing stormwater basin, which will be enlarged to handle the
increased volume. No modifications to the outlet of this basin are proposed. A worksheet for
this detention basin is enclosed. The southern watershed has a drainage area of 8.64 acres
(inclusive of on and off-site drainage), with no existing impervious surfaces (0%), and a
proposed impervious area of 5.52 acres (63.89%). This watershed will flow into a fore
bay/settling basin and then through a 30-inch pipe and into a wet detention basin. This basin has
been designed to release the storm flow from a 1-inch rain directs to the adjacent wetland.
Preliminary designs incorporated a level spreader outside the buffer for this release; however in
an effort to maintain the hydrology within the adjacent wetland area, the plans were modified to
release this flow directly into the wetland upslope from the buffer. Storm flows in excess of the
1-inch rain would be released onto a riprap dissipater pad situated outside the buffer and adjacent
to the wetland. See the attached DWQ worksheets for the two wet detention basin calculations.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater will be treated through the Town of Garner wastewater treatment facility. An
existing 15" sanitary sewer line, which serves the development to the north, is located adjacent to
the property.
XIIL Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Updated I I / 1 /2005
Page ] 0 of 11

Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description: The
proposed residential development will not induce further development. The surrounding area
has already been developed, includin~~e commercial center located north of the proposed
project. This project is proposed to meet the existing demand of the Garner area.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).

Applicant/Agen~Sign~ure Date ~
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Updated 1 I / 1 /2005
Page I 1 of 11

.,

s
U wall . or Ra
m UC

`~ Gamey Ra o e
~

~
70 ~ ~ Ga~~er_Ro'
US•~
of
m
o
v
~
m

0 m
r
J
~ a
L
0~~~
Y

US=70•E ~
o E
a
•~pF .x _, c quburn•Ra~
I
a
I~ o
m
d
m Ra
~
eia
a
GS
A
of
Hillandal i-L-n ?~
m a
~
r
m

~
v
~ dF
a
~_
Salt-Hill•Rd
Fox Trap~Ct
o^ `^ 278 Waterfeld-Dr
FC~chards ' ~
~igma-Dr
yej'o
Ackerman.Rd
--~
J

a
'.
F2

O
N

=
m m
0
E
m
Q _ LL
j o
~ ~v
~ ~, m
4`
a`~SkYline.pr oc
U

~ A IY-Ct
!
F
!!!
~ !!!
2d aShioq.~ ,Q
~ tw
a
Title Location Map
Project Ashton Village
Prcparca For: Garner, Wake County, North Carolina
HH F1[JNT Date Project Number Figure
11/1/06 012570001 1
T:ApnA012570001 Ash[on VillageASeetion 404 - 401 penni[ingArigurc Ldoe Prepared by Laura Lung ~~n .„,"""'""„„~.h.

' . {
/'~ j{j ; i -f ~ y 1 i . ~ ~j(~'~~ S"~ ems,
~
.^
~ l ~~
'~Li i ~ , ~ ~ K ~, 1' '~
'~~ ,~ _ _ ~ '-~
/ 1
~' ~ , C...: - , J eta :.y-~
__ .
• _ _. y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _

3 \ , ~ e ~'~""~-~., 354 '„~ ~f Y V~ -~~ 1 +~
}( .f / d
.

4 ~. \ }
C-
' , ~ `~
~~
-•
,

~ a
a
.,
1fJ,F l f /.l..l

~ ~~ =~ , -~
,~ ~ ~~ ~.~
~`.
/

I1"'~-~-~ I
_."~
._. - r. ~`-~ ~ \
~

_ , . _, .,
,
,,~
^ ~ ~~, ~ ~^
4 ; ,~ ~f~ ~ ~ f ~ < j ,
/j /
'.
,,
. ~
~'~
~
~~
-s~~ ~
~
-
~
~
1
~
• ~\
~
~
, J
}
~
~..
`
~
~ . ~ ..~
_.-
.-
'
.
~ ; .
' . _ _
° C^~ ~:.
._ `_
y ~ t~ t
j \l
ff
~~

.,
r
r
•
` 111
<.~
f'~",1 ~'' I 'i ~= ~ Q t '~ ~ rte... ) l~ ~ ./ - 1
,r,,
-^
_ ~
~_ ~
1 /~'.'-^-~~~-..J g ~ ~ /` _ . f (1~ /~ "v',s nom. ~
j
~
1
l
~f
~`
4
^
J
i ~
~~ y
~~ /~/r
~U
_ ~
.~.__ ~ 4.....~ i / ~
..
/ f d
.- "ti-.a ~ '. ~ ~ ~ / >T 't 1' 1 J
-
~
"
~
~f~
'
- ,
,~
r
i ~~
7 + ^
_.-..
F~ .,f'-,~ ~ ~',w,`"'_'^'_ _ _ 4 t..-^~ A e r 7 if 1 (/^r!, t
.~. ~ _
-~ 4 .l' ~V ~ .., '~ ,.. r, tr ~ ~ ~ ~ '~
,_. ,
__ ~- ~.
_
_._,. - l1
(( jF/(~~'',~^, ~ ~ 7~-~.( /rte '1 `~ \: i~.
r _ -..
~`~ ~ ~ ~.
r

Title USGS Topographical Map (Garner, NC, 1987)

P VP~r`d t.o Project Ashton Village
Garner, Wake County, North Carolina
HH HUNT Date Project Number Figure
11 / 1 /06 012570001 2
T:Ap~A012570001 Ashton VillageAscction 404 - 40l pcnnitingU'igum 2.doc Prcparcd by Laura Lang Gin ne~r.k

. •r
,.~ 4° i,- ~' a '~ _ + ~. *~ , ~ _.
.,
~2 ~ ~ t• U1 .~ ~ I Q ~ c.i /. ~ .i. ~ Yd Y ti~x
.,~ >r 1 ~ ~~ ~~ ~. z ~-
.+ r 'Y'3. - ~ , - rmn Rd
I lill3nd alt1 L-n ~ ~-
~_i F Ri
1 yyj~~~~ h 6 0~ ~ y ^~
,'
;r _ + ~~'
F ~_f raW'
~ t $ ~' ''"k ~ 2708
_ :~ ~ ~ ut~~n x - ' W,ilarfield-D --
' '
xt ~ ~, 1
-7 ~. Ai ~ airU mob,- ~ ~ ?.. - ~ ^' .~., .K ~ _ "Sig'm~ Ur t',-
p.~ '» a *a^ ~ ~ ~. mat IG m ~ .. r~ S, t '. ~s. ~ ~:,
- p:: "~tL 'a'~.. t W 3+1 t 'er~._'~ i '~v a #~ .,d" ~ ~ A. SY ~ y - i
r g~ t p..k.d ~ ~~~~w,~ ~~" r .'8 i°~~Y; : .~ yep "
a ,
~ ~.
_'
Y 11 Z '~T
r - JJJ~FF ***Ill~fff W.I ~j.
Ar:'h na Ill 'f ( i ~,.~ ~ e „, i. t
P ~~ ~ ~~ / ~~ ~ ~! ~
Y ~ s ~ ~ r °~M n~~,, t I ~~ ~ ~ .r~.
~~, , ~~ , ~ ~d°"g ' t, ..
f ~ ~ ~a ~ '.per ; t
/y/ 8 ~t
Title Aerial Photograph 1999
Project Ashton Village
rrcparcd Por: Gamer, Wake County, North Carolina
HH HUNT Date Project Number Figure
11/1/06 012570001 3
T:Apn~0125~0001 A+hron VillageAsection 404 - 401 panniting\h'igure 3doc Prepared by Laura Lang ~~ ~k,a"p",~,,m.

T:\ n\01?570001 Ashton Villa ~c\Section 404 - 401 rmitin \Fi pure 4.duc Pre ared b Laura Lan ~~~ ~~m, m.
P b P~ K b P' Y K

#~i '_ ~ ~.
~~ ! ( f
-~ ~' _ o
~ ~~1 _ ° ,_ ~~ ~ ~~ ,~
~~ ~ y ~ t ~ - ~ N ~ ~ .
,~.~ y ~ ~ ~
I ~~.
F ~ j,
f ; ~ i ~ ~ ~r ~~ I t. r ,~ , .~
r
~~ r
~ ~ ~ ~.
Jam' 4 ..,. „ ; ' ,
t
~~
,. ~. _
~, '~~' _ ~ ! a~
~ I ~ ~ bear ~ _- r t~'" ~ t .,,,~~,~ I ,
~ ~ , ~::.~- ~ ~ ,~~- , r , ~ ~
^~ t ,a, ~~~ !'4 **. ~ `:; /. .~i~ ''~~ ~A ~1 ~@ ~` 1. `
i ~ ~ ~ ~` \
r
~ ~ ~ ,. r_ ,
~ ~~ -
~ _ > ~°~ 5 , ~_~• ,
~ CD ~ ~ f , : ~ z '' ~ ~ J ~ l ~ 7 ~ ~. ~.
~ `~ ~ ~ f~ ~, ~ T..: ~ ,~~
I _ -~ ~ r µ.
~ i ' ~~ t ~'~ V " ~I ~ s
F (( f!
mimi 1 r 1~ rt
I~ I ,. it - 1 ,~..II t. '_. L ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
__
~._~;.~.`.r.. ..._ _
,-~" l`~
I ~ ~«
Z i -~ J ~ ' _ .~Y e ... ~,.' Sti ~~ f
I `.
. ~~
m; ~ , ~ _ _ ~ ; ~, ~ .~ ~
-~.
Z ~-- -- -~----- ----
..
d
.~ „
~......
,.
~~ ~.~.
2>~
~~
0 ~ ~Za
fA P; a
3 w
> ~ >~u
,~~ ~. ~~
.~ ~ ,~ ~~
'- ~
i ~ ~~

1
^ ~^
i z
"~
4 ^
~~
~Q~
m
~~
S
~ o
w ~
m
C7
~~
M~~
W ~TT
Z
m~
~v
z

(' ~
i~
~'
i
11
u
I
a
~a
_ ..~~ J

oz
3I ~ P
`, .1
5 •^ ~ I
~ '~ ~ ~
' ~~,
~ ~~ `p
' yy~
3,. ~.
a
~ ~
9
_..-Y slstlp'S 141
~.sc ~ __
~ - ~;
~ ~ ! ""d -
-1
,~
~ - ~
4 ~ {
,~ t 1-b Yre r.
31 ~ aa
~„ r,
~ ~.. ,~ - ~,~,~ ~ _ ~~ 1
1
I. ~°i i ' ~ '~;
I: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~_.-~ ~~ - ..-f
f'~ ~ ~..~
''fitt ~~i1 ,.r g~~ <~ /-~ / ~~~~~`
ad>°-' 11111 t ~~ .~~
~ ~~ t ~
~~ { - '\ - ,
~ SSS ~ 11 ~~~.
~,-' - ' --
j
+ ~ u ~b
y
1 € . ~ e -"~
..
~ z ~ ~
~ ~ - ~ _ __ r
~ i - ~ '*-- - ~ ~~ ~ j
---
m L_ ' ~--- ~---- ~ . - __
_ 1_~
,,... •\
^c
z
'J~6
~,
~a
~w
p~p~pp
AA
g~
~~

.~
~e
1 v~d d ~~
- ~, ~ ~ ~
I
~ ~ q
I
,4 ~ ` I
~r 1- --- ~ pd:,- --- s ~ I ~ ~~ ~` ~ ~ t ~ ~~
~ ~~ ~I` ~ 1 ~ 1, ~ ~~1, ~ .~~/' I~ Ilf
! ? TTTtrr .-7 i, I- ( I `' ~~~~ t Sf~ ~~~~ ~tY! ~ T I
~~
i ~ ~. ~ ~ < < 1. ~ .~. ~ ~ ~ ,~r,
~ - ~ ~
.~ .
~ ~. I ,~.a~ ~ i
• ~ +
~~
~~
_••-
m ~ ~ ~ ,.~
.`
~ z ~ ~ a
~ ~ ~ ~~ ..
, 3p ~ .-~; ~~,~ .~^ . ~ ,~ - ~ I
Z Z ~ . ~\ ! , ~' ~C j ~i _ ~`~~.°"!r ~" ~''~ ``~ ~, / ~ ~ ~~ llll ~ I ~j rl
I" ~ ~" ~ 1 ti - ~, ~ ~,li ~ ' >
r _ f, ~ 11 ~'; ~~ ... ~ ~~ i I i
~ ~ ~
~ _ `
~_..... .. ~ ,~~ n ~ ~ , ~ -- 'C' i ~ _ ~'
.-~'~ ~~ ~ 1, l~~u~ ~
,. ~ ~
,~ z ~ ~
.~
F ~ ~.~~ - ~t.~ ~
.. ~ ~ ~~~
t~ ..
~- ,-' I ~ I _ ~ .. ~-'~ `~ ~ ~_ ~x ,_
> ,
J
p ~`°° _ ~ G
.,,o m
®,, I ~ ~ ~ ~-,~.. ~ ~ ~
,~~ ~ , , ~~
~~ ~~~ ' ~ ~
/1 Y ~ ~~
O 2 "(.~-• ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ S~
~ o I ~ Y ~ ~ ~
~' ~ ~ Q
i~ ~~ ~,~,+~ill .-'; 3 ~ -~ QZi
Q ~ ~ -!
III ~ "P ~ i
~.. ~ - ~
.... _~ ~L''--'~-----------------~

Letter of Authorization
HH Hunt authorizes Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. to act as our limited agent
to prepare and coordinate in the application to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
for 404/401 permits and jurisdictional determinations associated with the Ashton
Villages development located in Garner, Wake County, North Carolina.
Authorization will terminate on either final agency action or upon written
notification from either parties involved.
` ~~~
(Signature of Client)
C~c'~dV?d' ~~~ 2.dO~p
Date

U.S. ARMY~COI2PS OF ENGINEERS
Wilmington District
Action ID: 200120733
County:
Vl~~-~ '~
APR 2 5 ?'SCI .: ~
L_____-_~_---~
NOTIFICATION OF .NRISDICTIONAL DETERMINA'
Property
Owner Garner Land Comuany
Attn: Jahn Collett'
Address 2228 East Morehead St., Suite 200
Chazlotte, NC 28236
Telephone Number 704-376-6523
authorized
Agent Soil & Environmental Consultants Inc.
Attn: Brad Sather
Address 11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Telephone Number 919-846-5900
Size and Location of Property (waterbody, Highway name/number, town, etc.): The property is
bounded to the west by Interstate 40 and to the east by White Oak Road (SR 2547}, approximately 1800ft
south the intersection of US Hwy 70 and White Oak Road (SR 2547), southeast of Garner, Wake County,
North Carolina.
Basis for Determination: -The site contains wetlands and stream channels with indicators of ordinary
high water mazks, located adjacent to and including unnarrxed tributaries of White Oak Creek, above
headwaters, in the Neuse River Basin.
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
There are waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, on the above described property which we strongly suggest
should be delineated and surveyed. The surveyed wetland Iines must be verified by our staff before the Corps will
make a final jurisdictional determination on your property.
Because of the size of your property and our present workload, our identif cation and delineation of your wetlands
cannot be accomplished in a timely manner. You may wish to obtain a consultant to obtain a more timely
delineation of the wetlands. Once the consultant has flagged a wetland line on the property, Corps staff will
review it, and, if it is accurate, we strongly recommend that you have the line surveyed for final approval by the
Corps. The Corps will not make a final jurisdictional determination on your property without an approved survey.
X The waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, on your lot have been delineated, and the limits of the Corps
jurisdiction have been explained to you. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described property which are subject to
. the permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean. Water Act (33 USC I344). Unless there is a change in the law
or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the
date of this notification.
PIacement of dredged or fill material in wetlands on this property without a Department of the
Army Permit is in most cases a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1311). A
permit is not required for work on the property restricted entirely to existing high ground. If you
have any questions regarding the Corps of Engineers regulatory program, please contact
Amanda D. Jones at telephone number (919) 876 - 8441 extension 30 ,
Project Manager Signature (x~lAf,L
Date April 24, 2001
SURVEY PLAT OR FIELD SKETCI~ OF
Expira~on Date April 24, 2006 __
THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY AND THE WETLAND
DELINEATION FORM MUST BE ATTACHED TO THE YELLOW (FILE) COPY OF THIS FORM.

DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual
ProjectlSite: Ashton Village Date: 1 01512 0 06
Applicant/0wner: County: Wake
Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. (Todd
Investigator: Tugwell, Laura Lang) State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on this site? Yes Community ID: Forested
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation?) No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? No Plot ID: Wetland 1
~.......
Vegetation
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Liquidambar styrac~ua T FAC+ 9.
2. Acer rubrum T FAC 10.
3. Impatiens capensis H FACW 11.
4, Polygonum spp. H OBL 12.
5. Microstegium vimineum H FAC+ 13.
6. 14.
7, 15.
g, 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FACU): 100%
Remarks:
Hydrology:
RECORDED DATA:
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
x No Recorded Data Available
FIELD 08SERVATIONS:
Depth to Surface Water: NIA (in)
Dep#h to Free Water in Pit: 8 (in)
Depth to Saturated Soil: 0 (in)
WETLAND HYDROLOGY lND1CATORS:
PRIMARY lND1CATORS:
Inundated
X Saturated in Upper 12 inches
X Wafer Marks
Drift Lines
X Sediment Deposits
X Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
SECONDARY 1NDlCATORS:
Water Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Fac-Neutral Test
Other
12 inches

SOILS
,.::..a -•.~.morns,,.rocs.c,.~r..n;;a~.avwe.;~e, - c~.:~:wnrs:ra~n>.~-.:~r~ ver+re.:~.:.nrrawr, v.--z~ -r~wzemnc-+wsrv. ~nnsssoYr~w•r-a~awmro«x+wraros~n~~snrN.~ps
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phrase): Wedowee sandy loam Drainage Class: Well-drained
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Kanhapludults
PROFILE DESCRIPTION
Field Observations
Confirm Mapped Type? (YIN) No
Depth
(inches
Horizon Matrix Color
(Mansell Moist) Mottle Colors
Mansell Moist Mottle
Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions,
Structure, etc.
0-6 A 10 YR 412 Sand loam
6-14 B 10 YR 612 7.5 YR 5/4 few Sand cla loam

HYDRIC SOIL [NDICATORS
Histosol
Histic Epipedon
Sulfidic Odor
Aquic Moisture Regime
X Reducing Conditions
X Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors
Concretions
High Organic Streaking in
Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Other (Explain in remarks)
Hydric Soil Present? (Y/N) Yes
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION (Y/N)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
Hydric Soils Present? Yes
Is this sampling point a Wetland? Yes
Remarks:

DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual
ProjectlSite: Ashton Village Date: 1oI5I200s
Applicant/Owner: County:
Kimley-Horn and Associates, inc. (Todd
Investigator: Tugwell, Laura Lang} State:
Do Normal Circumstances exist on this site? Yes Community 1D:
~~
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation?) No Transect lD:
~~
Is the area a potential Problem Area?
Vegetation
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Pinus laeda T FAC
2. Liqurdambarsryrac~ua T FAC+
3. Acer rubrum T/S FAC
4. Ilex opaca T!S FAC-
5. Toxicodendron radicans VI FAC
6.
7.
8.
No Plot ID:
~.,~._
Wake
NC
Forested
Upland 1
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
9.
10.
11.
i2.
13.
14.
15.
16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, ar FAC (excluding FACU): 80%
rae.r~r~~•
Hydrology:
RECORDED DATA:
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
x No Recorded Data Available
FIELD OBSERVATIONS:
Depth to Surface Water: NIA {in}
Depth to Free Water in Pit: ~ 12 (in)
~-
Depth to Saturated Soii: >12 {in}
PRIMARY INDICATORS:
Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 inches
Water Marks
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
SECONDARY INDI CA TORS:
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 inches
Water Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
1=ac-Neutral Test
WETLAND HYDROLOGY INDICATORS:

SO[LS
Map Unit Name
{Series and Phrase): Wedowee sandy loam Drainage Class: Well-drained
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Kanhapludults
PROFILE DESCRIPTION
Field Observations
Confirm Mapped Type? (Y/N} No
Depth
inches}
Horizon Matrix Color
(Munsell Moist Mottle Colors
(Munsell Moist Mottle
Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions,
Structure, etc.
0-6 A 10 YR 5l4 Sand Loam
6-12 B 10 YR 416 Sand c1a loam

HYDRIC SOIL INDICATORS
Histosol
Histic Epipedon
Sulfidic Odor
Aquic Moisture Regime
Reducing Conditions
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors
Concretions
High Organic Streaking in
Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Listed on Na#ional Hydric Soils List
Other (Explain in remarks)
Hydric Soil Present? {YIN} No
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION (YIN)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes
Wetland Hydrology Present? No
Hydric Soils Present? No
Is this sampling point a Wetland? No
Remarks:

North Carolina Division of Water Quality -Stream Identification Form, Version 3.1
Date: 911 312 0 0 6 Project: Ashton Vllage Latitude: 78°341$.83" W
Evaluator: BER Site: Downstream pond Longitude: 35°44'5.94" N
outlet
Tota! Points: 19

Stream is at least intermittent WAKE
COUnty: Other Garner, NC
e.g. 4uad Name:
if z 19 or perennial if ~ 30
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 9.5 Absent ~;,.." .
1a. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosit 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle- ool se uence 0 1 2 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sortin 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relic flood lain 0 1 2 3
6. De ositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Braided channel 0 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial de osits 0 1 2 3
9a. Natural levees 0 1 2 3
10. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
11. Grade Control 0 0.5 1 1.5
12. Natural vane or draina a wa 0 0.5 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS ma or other documented evidence. No = 0 Yes = 3
a Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussion in manual
B. Hvdrologv Subtotal =
14. Groundwater flow/dischar e 0 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water inchannel -- dry or growing season 0 1 2 3
16. l_eaf[itter 1.5 1 0.5 0
17. Sediment on lants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
18. Or anic debris lines or files {Wrack lines 0 0.5 1 1.5
19. H dric soils redoximor hic features) resent? No = 0 Yes = 1.5
C. Biology Subtotal = 3.5
20 . Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 1 0
21 b. Rooted lants in channel 3 2 1 0
22. Cra fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 0 1 2 3
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Am hibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Macrobenthos note diversit and abundance) 0 0.5 1 1.5
27, Filamentous a] ae; periph ton 0 1 2 3
28. Iron oxidizin bacteria/fun us 0 0.5 1 1.5
29b. Wetland lants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5; SAV = 2.0; ocher = 0
u Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.} Sketch:
limited diversity of habitat for macrobenthos. Observed 3 salamanders.

North Carolina Division of Water Quality -Stream Identification Form, Version 3.1
Date: 9/13/2006 Project: Ashton Village Latitude: 78°34'18.83" W
Evaluator: BER Site: upstream niche point Longitude: 35°44'5.94" N
Tots! Points: 23.5 Other
Stream is at least intermittent County: WAKE e.g. Quad Name: Garner,NC
if Z 19 or perennial if z 30
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 11.5 ~xq ~sen~ tl~l~,eak ~ ,~ ~a e r- rte. ~ ~Sco~,
1 a. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosit 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel struc#ure: riffle- ool se uence 0 1 2 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sortin 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relic flood lain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Braided channel 0 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial de osits 0 1 2 3
9a. Natural levees 0 1 2 3
10. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
11. Grade Control 0 0.5 1 1.5
12. Natural valle or drains a wa 0 0.5 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS ma or other documented evidence. No = 0 Yes = 3
a Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussion in manual
B. Hvdroloav Subtotal =
14. Groundwater flow/dischar e 0 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water inchannel --dry or growing season 0 1 2 3
16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5 0
17. Sediment on lants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
18. Or snit debris lines or piles Wrack lines 0 0.5 1 1.5
19. H dric soils redoximor hit features resent? No = 0 Yes = 1.5
C. Bioloav Subtotal = 6
20b. Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 1 0
21b. Rooted plants in channel 3 2 1 0
22. Cra ish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 0 1 2 3
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Macrobenthos note diversit and abundance) 0 0.5 1 1.5
27. Filamentous a1 ae; periph on 0 1 2 3
28. Iron oxidizin bacteria/fun us 0 0.5 1 1.5
29b. Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5; SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
b Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Notes: (use back side of this form for additions! notes.) Sketch:

North Carolina Division of Water Quality -Stream Identification Form, Version 3.1
Date: 9/13/2006 Project: Ashton Village Latitude: 78°34'18.83" W
Evaluator: BER Site: niche point Longitude: 35°44'5.94" N
'Total Polnts: 25
Stream is at feast intermittent County: WAKE Other Garner, NC
e.g. Quad Name:
if a 19 or perennial if z 30
A. Geomorphology Subtotal - 12.5 Absgnt~~ ~.-ea,~c~„, ~11~',I,o gr e
~~ Strong moo;
1a. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosit 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle- ool sequence 0 1 2 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sortin 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relic flood lain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Braided channel 0 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial de osits 0 1 2 3
9a. Natural levees 0 1 2 3
10. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
11. Grade Control 0 0.5 1 1.5
12. Natural valle or drains a wa 0 0.5 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channe[ on existing
USGS or NRCS ma or other documented evidence. No = 0 Yes = 3
e Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussion in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 6.5
14, Groundwater flow/dischar e 0 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel -- dry or growing season 0 1 2 3
16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5 0
17. Sediment on (ants or debris 0 0.5 1 1,5
18. Or anic debris lines or files (Wrack lines) 0 0.5 1 1.5
19. H dric soils (redoximor hic features) present? No = 0 Yes = 1.5
C. Biology Subtotal = 6
20°. Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 1 0
21b. Rooted plants in channel 3 2 1 0
22. Cra i'sh 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 0 1 2 3
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Am hibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversit and abundance 0 0.5 1 1.5
27. Filamentous al ae; periph on 0 1 2 3
28. Iran oxidizin bacteria/fun us 0 0.5 1 1.5
29b. Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5; SAV = 2.0; Ofher = 0
n Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) Sketch:

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stt-eam Identification Form, Version 3.1
Date: 9/13/2006 Project: Ashton Village Latitude: 78°34'18.83" W
Evaluator: BER Site: Downstream from Longitude: 35'44'5.94" N
confluence
Total Points: 36.5 Other
Siream is at (east intermittent County: WAKE Garner, NC
e.g. 4uad Name:
if z 19 or perennial if ? 30
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 19 ~~bsel~ ea ~
~ _~dle~~ ~S1~on • . ~~Sc~r+'".'
1 a. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosi 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool se uence 0 1 2 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sortin 0 1 2 3
5. Activelrelic flood lain 0 1 2 3
6. De ositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Braided channel 0 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvia! de osits 0 1 2 3
9a. Natural levees 0 1 2 3
10. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
11. Grade Control 0 0.5 1 1.5
12. Natural valle or draina a wa 0 0.5 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. No = 0 Yes = 3
e Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussion in manual
B H drolo Subtotal =
14. Groundwater flow/dischar e 0 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel --dry or growing season 0 1 2 3
16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
18. Or anic debris fines or ilex Wrack lines) 0 0.5 1 1.5
19. H dric soils redoximor hic features resent? No = 0 Yes = 1.5
Rinfnn~ Suhtnfa! = 8.5
20°. Fibrous roots in channe! 3 2 1 0
21 . Rooted plants in channel 3 2 1 0
22. Cra fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 0 1 2 3
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1,5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversit and abundance 0 0.5 1 1.5
27. Filamentous al ae; peri h ton 0 1 2 3
28. Iron oxidizin bacteria/fun us 0 0.5 1 1.5
29b. Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5; SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
b Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) Sketch:
Limited habitat for macrobenthos

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name:- _HII Hunt
2. Evaluator's name: BAR
3. Date of evaluation:- _9/l3/04 4. Time of evaluation 2:OOpm____
5. Name of stream:_UT to White Oak Creek _ Downstream pond outlet 6. River basin:- Neuse_
7. Approximate drainage area:-+-/- 25 acres 8. Stream order:~lst
9. Length of reach evaluated:_300 feet County:_Wake
12. Subdivision name (if any): 11. Site coordinates (if known}: prefer in decimal degrees.
Latitude (ex. 34.872312}: 35.6841 °I~l Longitude (ex. -556611); 78.5727° W
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial} Photo/GIS Other GIS Other GPSX
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream{s) location}:-South of
terminus of Timber Drive East, west of I-40, south of Highway 70-Garner, NC
14. Proposed channel work (if any):_Placement of fill
15. Recent weather conditions:~Rain approximately 48 hours prior to field review
16. Site conditions at time of visit:_Sunny and Clear
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section I0 'T'idal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:-+/-1 acre_
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: _10~ % Residential
_50_% Forested
20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
40_% Commercial
_% Cleared /Logged
22. Bankfull width:- 3-4 feet 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):_
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%} ^X~Gentle (2 to 4%)
Industrial % Agricultural
Other ( }
6 inches - 2 feet
Moderate (4 to 10%) Steep (>IO%)
25. Channel sinuosity: _X_Straight Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest}, the stream
may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score
assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score {from reverse): 46 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature
Date
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in gathering
the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream quality. The total score
resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a particular mitigation ratio or
requirement. Form subject to change -version 06/03. To Comment, please call 914-876-8441 x 26.

Stream Quality Assessment Worksheet
#
i
i
Ch Ecore ion Point Ran e
Score
aracter
st
cs Coastal Piedmont Mountain
1 Presence of flow! persistent pools in stream 0 - 5 0 - 4 D - 5 2
(na flow orsaturation = 0; stron flow = max Dints
Z Evidence of past human alteration 0- 6 0- 5 0- 5 2
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max Dints
3 Riparian zone 0- 6 0- 4 0- 5 2
no buffer = 0; Conti uous wide buffer = max Dints
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0- 5 0- 4 0- 4 3
(extensive dischar es = 0; no dischar es = max Dints
,.~
5 Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
2
d no dischar e = 0; s rin s, see s, wetlands, etc. = max Dints
.V.,
6 Presence of adjacent floodplain
0 - 4
0 - 4
0 - 2
2
~
~ (no flood lain = 0; extensive flood lain = max Dints)

~ Entrenchment! Ooodplain access
0 - 5
0 - 4
0 - 2
1
a dee I entrenched = 0; fre uent fioodin = max Dints
8 Presence of adjacent wetlands
j 0- 6 0- 4 0- 2 2
acent wetlands = max Dints
(no wetlands = 0; large ad
9 Channel sinuosity 0- 5 0- 4 0- 3 1
extensive chamtelization = 0; natural meander = max Dints
IO Sediment input 0- 5 0- 4 0- 4 t
extensive de osition= O; little or no sediment = max Dints
11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate NA" 0 - 4 0 - 5 l
fine, homo enous = 0; lar e, diverse sizes = max Dints

12 Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0-4
0-5
4
F (dee 1 incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max Dints
13 presence of major bank failures 0 - 5 0 - 5 0 - 5 5
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max Dints
~
~ 14 Root depth and density on banks 0 - 3 0 - 4 0 - 5 3
F no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max Dints
~ 15 ]impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production 0 - 5 0 - 4 0 - 5 2
substantial im act =0; no evidence = max Dints
16 Presence of riffle-poollripple-pool complexes 0- 3 0- 5 0- 6 2
~ (no riffles/rip les or Dols = 0; well-develo ed = max Dints)
Q
17 Habitat complexity 0- 6 0- 6 0- fi 2
~ little or no habitat = 0; fre vent, varied habitats = max Dints
Q
18 Canopy coverage over streambed
0 - 5
0 - 5
0 - 5
3
(no shadin ve elation = 0; continuous cano y = max Dints
x
t9 Substrate embeddedness NA• 0- 4 0- 4 2
(dee 1 embedded = 0; loose structure = max
20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4) 0 - 4 0 - 5 0 - 5 0
~. no evidence = 0; common, numerous es = max Dints
(~ 2l Presence of amphibians 0- 4 0- 4 0- 4 2
~ (no evidence = 0; common, numerous ty es = max points

~
22 Presence of Tish p- 4 0- 4 0- 4 0
no evidence T 0; common, numerous es = max Dints
~
23 Evidence of wildlife use
0 - 6
0 - 5
0 - 5
2
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible too ]o0 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 46
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name:
HH Hunt
3. Date of evaluation: 9/13/04
2. Evaluator's name: BAR
4. Time of evaluation 2:OOpm
5. Name of stream:_UT to White Oak Creek _ upstream of niche point 6. River basin:-_Neuse_
7. Approximate drainage area:-+/- 25 acres 8. Stream order:^lst
9. Length of reach evaluated:_300 feet County:_Waka
12. Subdivision name (if any):
Latitude (ex. 34.8723 t 2): 35.6841 ° N_ _,_
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees.
Longitude (ex. -55661 I ): 78.5727° W
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial} Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
GPS_X
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying streams} Iocation):_South of
terminus of Timber Drive East, west of I-40, south of Highway 70-Garner, NC
14. Proposed channel work (if any):_Placement of fill
15. Recent weather conditions:_Rain approximately 48 hours prior to field review
16. Site conditions at time of visit:_Sunny and Clear
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known; Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed {I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:+/-1 acre_
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Dees channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: _IO _ % Residential 40_% Commercial % Industrial % Agricultural
_50_ _% Forested % Cleared /Logged _T% Other ( )
22. Bankfull width: 3-4 feet 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 6 inches - 2 feet
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat {0 to 2%) _X Gentle (2 to 4°1°) Moderate {4 to 10%) Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: _X_Straight Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2}: Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classifccation, etc. Every characteristic must be scared using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream
may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score
assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 200, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the Highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 57 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature Date,
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in gathering
the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream quality. The total score
resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a particular mitigation ratio or
requirement. Form subject to change -version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

Stream Quality Assessment Worksheet
~
Ch
t
i
ti Ecore ion Point Ran e
Score
arac
er
s
cs Coastal Piedmont Mountain
1 Presence of flow !persistent pools in stream 0 - 5 0 - 4 0 - 5 4
no flow or saturation = 0; strop flow = max Dints
2 Evidenct of past human alteration 0- 6 0- 5 0- S 5
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max Dints)
3 Riparian zone 0- 6 0- 4 0- S 2
(no buffer = 0; Conti uous, wide buffer = max Dints
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0- S 0- 4 0- 4 3
extensive dischar es = 0; no dischar es = max Dints
,.a
S Groundwater discharge
0 - 3
0 - 4
0 - 4
2
U no dischar e = 0; s rip s, see s, wetlands, etc. = max Dints
~
6 Presence of adjacent floodplain
0 - 4
0 - 4
0 - 2
0
no flood lain = 0; extensive flood lain = max Dints
~ ~ Entrenchment / floodplain access 0- 5 0- 4 0- 2 2
a dee 1 entrenched = 0' fre uent floodin = max Dints
8 Presence of adjacent wetlands
j 0- 6 0- 4 0- 2 2
acent wetlands = max Dints
(no wetlands = 0; large ad
9 Channel sinuosity 0- S 0- 4 0- 3 1
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max Dints
10 Sediment input 0- S 0- 4 0- 4 3
(extensive de osition= 0; little or no sediment = max Dints
I I Size & diversity of channe! bed substrate NA* 0 - 4 0 - 5 2
fine, homa ertous = D; lar e, diverse sizes = max Dints
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0 - 5 0 - 4 0 - S 2
~ (deepl incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max Dints
'~ 13 Presence of major bank failures 0 _5 0 - 5 0 - 5 5
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max Dints
~
14 Root depth and density on banks
0 - 3
0 - 4
0 - 5
3
no visible roots = 0; dense roots throw hout = max Dints)
~ I S Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production 0 - 5 0 - 4 0 - 5 3
(substantial im act =0; no evidence = max Dints
I6 Presence of riffle-pooUripple-pool complexes 0- 3 0- S 0- 6 2
~ no riffles/ri les or Dots = 0; well-develo ed = max Dints
4' 17 Habitat complexity 0- 6 0- 6 0- 6 3
little or no habitat = 0; fre went, varied habitats = max Dints
~
1 & Canopy coverage over streambed
0 - 5
D - 5
0 - 5
3
(no shading ve etation = 0; continuous cano = max Dints
~'

19 Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0 - 4
0 - 4
4
(dee I embedded = 0; loose structure = max
20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4) 0 _4 0 - 5 0 - 5 0
~ (no evidence = 0; common, numerous es -max Dints)
(~ z l Presence of amphibians 0- 4 0- 4 0- 4 3
O {no evidence = 0; common, numerous es = max Dints)

O
22 Presence offish
0-4
0-4
0-4
0
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous ty es = max Dints
~ 23 Evidence of wildlife use 0- 6 0- S D- 5 3
no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max Dints)
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 57
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name:, _HH Hunt.
3. Date of evaluation: 9/13/04
S. Name of stream: UT to White Oak Creek _ niche point,
7. Approximate drainage area:-----+/- 25 acres
9. Length of reach evaluated:_300 feet County:_Wake
12. Subdivision name (if any):
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 35.6841 °1V
2. Evaluator's name: BAR
4. Time of evaluation
6. River basin: Neuse_
8. Stream order: 1st
Z:OOpm
11. Site Coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees.
I.ongitude(ex.-556611): 78.5727° W
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Qrtho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
GPS X
I3. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):_South of
terminus of Timber Drive East, west of I-40, south of Highway 70-Garner, NC
14. Proposed channel work (if any):_Placement of fill
1S. Recent weather conditions:_Rain approximately 48 hours prior to field review
16. Site conditions at time of visit:____Sunny and Clear
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known:
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters
Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:-+/-1 acre
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: _10 _ % Residential ~ 40_% Commercial % Industrial % Agricultural
~SO T% Forested % Cleared /Logged % Other ( )
22. Bankfull width: 3-4 feet- 23. Bank height (fro m bed to top of bank): 6 inches - 2 feet w~
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%} _X_Gentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10%) Steep {>10%)
2S. Channel sinuosity: ~X_Straight Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream
may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. "f he total score
assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Scare (from reverse): S3 Comments:
Evaluator's Signatu
Date
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in gathering
the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream quality. The total score
resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a particular mitigation ratio or
requirement. Form subject to change -version 06/03. To Comment, please ca11919-876-8441 x 26.

Stream Quality Assessment Worksheet
#
ti
Ch
t
i Ecore ion Point Ran e
score
s
cs
arac
er Coastal Piedmont Mountain
1 Presence of flow /persistent pools in stream 0 - 5 0 - 4 0 - 5 4
no flow or saturation = 0; strop flow = max Dints
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0- 6 0- 5 0- 5 5
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max Dints)
3 Riparian zone 0- 6 0- 4 0- 5 2
no buffer = 0; Conti wows, wide buffer = max Dints
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0- 5 0- 4 0- 4 3
{extensive dischar es = 0; no dischar es = max Dints
,.a
5 Groundwater discharge
0 - 3
0 - 4
0 - 4
2
U no dischar e = 0; s rip s, see s, wetlands, etc. = max Dints
,~
6 Presence of adjacent floodplain
0 - 4
0 - 4
0 - 2
0
~ (no flood lain = 0; extensive flood lain = max Dints
,x ~ Entrenchment /floodplain access 0- 5 0- 4 0- 2 1
a+ dee 1 entrenched = 0; fre went ^oodin = max Dints
8 Presence of adjacent wetlands
j 0- 6 0- 4 0- 2 0
acent wetlands = max Dints)
(no wetlands = 0; lar a ad
9 Channel sinuosity 0- 5 0- 4 0- 3 1
extensive channe[ization = 0; natural meander = max Dints
10 Sediment input 0- 5 0- 4 0- 4 2
extensive de osition= 0; little or no sediment = max Dints)
I 1 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate NA* 0 - 4 0 - 5 2
fine, homo enous = 0' lar a diverse sizes = max Dints
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0 - 5 0 - 4 0 - 5 1
F dee I incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max Dints
13 Presence of major bank failures 0 - 5 0 - 5 0 - 5 5
severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max Dints
~.
CA
i4 Root depth and density on banks
0 - 3
0 - 4
0 - 5
3
Q (no visible roots = 0; dense roots throw hout = max Dints
~ 15 Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production 0 - 5 0 - 4 0 - 5 3
substantial im act =0; no evidence = max Dints
16 Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes 0- 3 0- 5 0- 6 4
~ (no riffles/ri les or Dols = 0; well-develo ed = max Dints
~
17 Habitat complexity
0 - 6
0 - 6
0 - 6
3
~ little or no habitat = 0; fre went, varied habitats = max Dints
~
t8 Canopy coverage over streambed
0 - 5
0 - S
0 - 5
3
(no shading ve elation = 0; continuous cano y = max Dints
~ 19 Substrate embeddcdness NA* 0 - 4 0 - 4 3
dee l embedded = 0; loose structure = max
20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4) 0 - 4 0 - 5 0 - 5 0
~„~ (no evidence = 0; common, numerous es = max Dints
~ 21 Presence of amphibians 0- 4 0- 4 0- 4 3
Q (no evidence = 0; common, numerous s = max Dints
"'~
22 Presence offish
0 - 4
0 - 4
0 - 4
0
no evidence = 6; common, numerous es = max Dints)
23 Evidence of wildlife use 0- 6 0- 5 0- 5 3
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max Dints

Total Points Possible l00 l00 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on f-rst page) 53
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
I. Applicant's name:~
3. Date of evaluation:
2. Evaluator's name: BAR
4. Time of evaluation 2:OOpm
5. Name of stream: UT to White Oak Creek Downstream of confluence 6. River basin: Neuse
7. Approximate drainage area:+/- 25 acres 8. Stream order:_lst
9. Length of reach evaluated:_300 feet County:_Wake
12. Subdivision name (if any}: 11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees.
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 35.6841 ° N Longitude (ex. -556611): 78.5727' W
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other GPS X
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach rnap identifying streams} location):_South of
terminus of 'l'imber Drive East, west of I-40, south of Highway 70-Garner, NC
14. Proposed channel work (if any):_Placement of fill _______
15. Recent weather conditions:~Rain approximately 48 hours prior to field review
16. Site conditions at time of visit:~Sunny and Clear_
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:-+/-1 acre_
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: _10_ % Residential _ ___40_% Commercial % Industrial % Agricultural
_50_% Forested % Cleared /Logged % Other ( )
22. Bankfull width:___3-4 feet 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank}: 6 inches - 2 feet
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%} _XYGentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10%) Steep (>10%
25. Channel sinuosity: _X_Straight Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream
may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score
assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and i 00, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 46 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature.
Date
This channel evaluation farm is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in gathering
the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream quality. The total score
resulting from the completion of this farm is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a particular mitigation ratio or
requirement. Form subject to change -version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
HH Hunt
9/13/04

Stream Quality Assessment Worksheet
#
ti
Ch
t
i Ecore ion Point Ran e
Score
arac
s
er
cs Coastal Piedmont Mountain
I Presence of flow /persistent pools in stream 0 - 5 0 - 4 0 - 5 4
no flow orsaturation = 0; stron flow = max Dints
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0- 6 0- 5 0- 5 5
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max Dints)
3 Riparian zone 0- 6 0- 4 0- 5 4
no buffer = 0; Conti uous, wide buffer = max Dints
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0- 5 0- 4 0- 4 3
(extensive dischar es = 0; no dischar es = max Dints
,.~ 5 Groundwater discharge 0- 3 0- 4 0- 4 2
U no dischar e = 0• s rin s see s wetlands, etc. = max Dints
~
6 Presence of adjacent floodplain
0 - 4
0 - 4
0 - 2
1
no flood lain = 0; extensive flood lain = max Dints
x ~ Entrenchmeut !floodplain access 0- 5 0- 4 0- 2 3
A. dee 1 entrenched = 0; fre uent floodin = max Dints
8 Presence of adjacent wetlands
~ 0- 6 0- 4 0- 2 0
no wetlands = 0; lar a ad
acent wetlands = max Dints
9 Channel sinuosity 0- 5 0- 4 0- 3 4
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max Dints
10 Sediment input 0- 5 0- 4 0- 4 2
(extensive de osition= 0; tittle or no sediment = max Dints
11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate NA'~ 0 - 4 0 - 5 2
fine, homo enous = 0; lar e, diverse sizes = max Dints
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0 - 5 0 - 4 0 - 5 4
~ (dee ly incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max Dints
"~ 13 Presence of major bank failures 0 - 5 0 - 5 0 - 5 5
~ severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable hanks = max ints
~ 14 Boot depth and density on banks 0 - 3 0 - 4 0 - 5 4
~ (no visible roots = 0; dense roots throw hoot = max Dints
rn 15 Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production 0 - 5 0 - 4 0 - 5 4
substantial im act =0; no evidence = max Dints)

16 Presence of riffle-poollripple-pool complexes
0 - 3
0 - 5
0 - 6
2
(no riffles/ri les or Dols = 0; wall-develo ed = max Dints
Q
1 ~ Habitat complexity
0 - 6
0 - 6
0 - 6
4
~ {little or no habitat = 0; fre vent, varied habitats = max Dints
16 Canopy coverage over strcambed 0- 5 0- 5 0- 5 5
no shadin ve elation = 0; continuous cano = max Dints
19 Substrate embeddedness NA' 0- 4 0- 4 4
(dee I embedded = 0; loose structure = max

20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0 - 4
0 - 5
0 - 5
0
no evidence = 0; common, numerous es = max Dints
~ 21 Presence of amphibians 0- 4 0- 4 0- 4 4
O (no evidence = 0; common, numerous es = max Dints)
'~
O
22 Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
0
~ no evidence = 0; common, numerous ty s = max Dints
23 Evidence of wildlife use 0- 6 0- 5 0- 5 3
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max Dints
Total Points Possible 100 l00 l00
TOTAL SCORE {also enter on first page) 69
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

1fl-3©-'06 12;35 FBOM-DENS EEP 9197152881 T-329 P02/02 U--895
• •--
~~~ os stem
PROGRAM
October 25, 200b
Bo Cook
HH Hunt
117 Edinburgh Drive, Suite I00
Cary, NC ?7511
Project: Ashton Village County; Wake
20061742
T.he purpose of this letter is to notify you that [he North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NC EEP) is willing to
accept payment for impacts associated with the above referenced project. Please no[e that this decision does not assure that
the payment will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility of tho
applican[ to contact [heso agencies to determine if payment to the NC EEP will be approved-
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter. Tf we have not received a copy of the issued 444
Pertnit/441 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. Tt is the applicant's responsibility [o send
•• --- "" copies of the 404/401/LAMA permits to NC BEP. Once NC EEl' receives a copy of the 404 Permit and/or the a01
Certification an invoice will be issued and payment must be made.
Based on the information supplied by you the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation arc summarized in the
fallowing table.
x~ver Basin Wetlands Stream Buffer Buffer
Cataloging. (Acres) Linear ]rest
( )
• Zone 1
Zone 2
Unit
(Sq. Ft.) (Sq. Ft.)
lti arian Non-Ri arian Coastal Marsh Cold Cool `Warm
Meuse 0.152 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
a~o?0201
Upon receipt of payrncnt, EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation for the permitted impacts
up to a 2:1 mitigation-to-impact ratio, {buffers, Zone 1 at a 3:1 ratio and zone 2 a[ a 1.5~ 1 ratio). The type and amount of the
compensatory mitigation will be as specified in the Section 404 Permit and/or 401 Water Quality Certificatioa, and/or
CAMA Permit. The mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Memorandum ofUnderstanding between the N. C.
Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at [phone].
Sincerely,
~• ~i~~
Willis .Gilmore, PE
Director •
cc: Cyndi Karoly, Wetlands/401 Unit
Monte Matthews, USACE-Raleigh
Eric Ku12, DWQ- Raleigh
Filo
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1fi52 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 / 919.715-04761 www.nceep.net

.~
.- Ki~iay-Hrm
August 2$, 200ti
P 0 9ez 33~'~58
Ms. Cyndi Karoly R~i!e~g~,NertnGz•~+rr:a
Supcn isor, 401 OvcrsighUFxpress Review Permitting [:nit 2'035~30E~
NC Division of Water Quality
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27602
Re: NBRRO 01-070 -Letter Clarification
NCNB Tract -White Oak/ Ashton Village
Wake C°ounty
Dear Ms. Karoly
As a follow-up to our meeting on August 17, 2006 regarding the above referenced
NCL)WQ Neuse Butler determination letter, the 'T'own of Darner has requested
documentation of the meeting for their tiles. A copy of the determination letter
dated March 8, 200 k is attached for your reference. This letter serves as a summary
of our meeting discussion and a request for NCDWQ signature for confirmation of
the results of the meeting.
In summary, there are two drainage features nn the Wake County soils and USGS
mapping for the parcel currently owned by our client, I-iHNunt, for the proposed
Ashton Village development. These drainages are indicated as features R and S in
the NCDWQ determination letter. The letter states that feature R (below point
$62A) is subject to the Neuse buffer regulations and feature S is not subject to the
buffer rules. When trying to locate the stream R buffer origin point 862A, questions
regarding the letter arose when our client obtained the field surveyed stream points
from the surveyor.
"I'he surveyed stream points (including stream origin point 862A as referenced in the
letter) were actually located along stream feature S which was stated as non-subject
in dre letter. Based upon follow-up discussions with the environmental consultant
that did the field work in 2001, it was concluded that due to the overgrown
conditions of the site during their field investigations, the stream referenced as R on
their mapping that was tield reviewed by NCDWQ was actually stream S (as
depicted by the surveyed points) and that. stream. R was not identified by the
consultant or field reviewed by NCDWQ. The consultant and NC[)WQ
representative thought they were conducting a field review of stream R when in fact
they were on stream S. Stream R was never field reviewed by the consultant or
NCDWQ.
~E~ _ .. - ~E~~~
_~_ ; . _ ~ ti50

~ ~(~rn!c r-Hc~r
As discussed in the meeting, significant financial investments and land planning
decisions regarding this property have been made based upon avoiding impacts to
the stream reach S based upon field survey data and NCDWQ's'001 letter. It is our
understanding that although stream reach R was not reviewed in the field by
NGDV1~'Q. that NCDWQ will stand by its original field determination letter and not
require any additional Neuse buffer determinations on the property due to the tact
the anginal letter has no expiration data. Therefore, stream feature S which was
reviewed by NCDWQ in the field (and referenced as feature R in the 2001
determination letter} will be the only feature subject to the Neuse River riparian
buffer regulations. ({owever, if the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers determines that
feature R is a jurisdictional stream, NCDWQ will have regulatory authority over the
stream and subsequent stormwater management requirements through the Section
401 permitting process.
"Thank you for your assistance with this matter. If you have any questions, please
contact me at [phone].
Very truly yours,
KIML.EY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
E3ath Keed, PWS
Environmental Scientist
if NC©WQ concurs with the information detailed Ln this letter, please sign
below and return to my attention at KHA:
~~
Cyndi 'aroly
Supervisor, 401 Oversight/F,xpress Review Permitting Unit
Enclosures:
Cc: file w%enclosures
13o Cook - ttL1(-Lunt w% enclosures
[tartan Britt - KttA wlanclosures
Dan Miller - KFLA w/enclosures

20061742
Project No. DWQ (to be provided by DWQJ
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - 401 WET DETENTION BASIN WORKSHEET
DWO Stormwater Management Plan Review:
A complete stormwater management plan submittal includes a wet detention basin worksheet for each basin,
design calculations, plans and specifications showing all basin and outlet structure details, and a fully executed
operation and maintenance agreement. An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for additional
information and will substantially delay final review and approval of the project.
I. PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following information):
Project Name: ~SHTa~ ~il.~.-AL-~
Contact Person: boat _ Mt~~..ER- Phone Number: (q ~g Z x,53 ~1~`L~ ~
For projects with multiple basins, specify which basin this worksheet applies to: ~xiSt~l~Sa si ~ ~ ,~
Basin Bottom Elevation 323.00 ft. {average elevation of the floor of the basin)
Permanent Pool Elevation ~2b A ao ft. (elevation of the orifice invert out)
Temporary Pool Elevation `32 B . 30 ft. (elevation of the outlet structure invert in)
Permanent Pool Surface Area ZI?~ ~R 1 sq. ft. (water surface area at permanent pool elevation)
Drainage Area 2 3. Zy . ac. (on-site and off-site drainage to the basin)
Impervious Area jl. 15N ac. (on-site and off-site drainage to the basin)
Permanent Pool Volume 5~5, 5'if 8 cu. ft. (combined volume of main basin and forebay)
Temporary Pool Volume S 3R t $7 cu. ft. (volume detained on top of the permanent pool)
Forebay Volume //, 1700: cu. ft.
SA/DA used 2.. 0 b (surface area to drainage area ratio)
Diameter of Orifice 3 in. (draw down orifice diameter)
II. REQUIRED ITEMS CIIECKLIST
The fallowing checklist outlines design requirements per the Stormwater Best Management Practices manual
{N.C. Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources, November 1995) and Administrative Code
Section: 15 A NCAC 2H .1008. Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have
been met and supporting documentation is attached. If a requir•entent has not been met, attach an explanation of
why.
Applicants Initials
DM The temporary pool controls runoff from the 1 inch stone event.
DM The basin length to width ratio is greater than 3:1.
~M The basin side slopes are no steeper than 3: I .
t~M A submerged and vegetated perimeter shelf at less than 6:1 is provided.
AA~1 Vegetation to the permanent pool elevation is specified.
OM An emergency drain is provided to drain the basin.
DM The permanent pool depth is between 3 and b feet (required minimum of 3 feet).
bM The temporary pool draws down in 2 to 5 days.
OM The forebay volume is approximately equal to 20% of the total basin volume.
__. p~N1 Sediment storage is provided in the permanent pool.
QM Access is provided for maintenance.
iaM A minimum 30-foot vegetative filter is provided at the outlet.
t~ A site specific operation and maintenance (O&M) plan is provided.
DhL A vegetation management/mowing schedule is provided in the O&M plan.
DNI Semi-annual inspections are specified in the O&M plan.
D~1 A debris check is specified in the O&M plan to be performed after every storm event.
DM A specific sediment clean-out benchmark is listed (elevation or depth) in O&M plan.
p~ A responsible party is designated in the O&M plan.
FORM SWG100 09!97 Page 1 of 1

Project No. D
(to be provided by DWQ~
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - 401 WET DETENTION BASIN WORKSHEET
DWO Stormwater Management Plan Review:
A complete stormwater management plan submittal includes a wet detention basin worksheet for each basin,
design calculations, plans and specifications showing all basin and outlet structure details, and a fully executed
operation and maintenance agreement. An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for additional
information and will substantially delay final review and approval of the project.
I. PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following information):
Project Name : _ aSNTn~ 1 l1 t ~~~ti>v
Contact Person: 1>a~,1 ~N11Lt-E~tZ. Phone Number: (`~ 1q_} b5 3 - 2`1 31
For projects with multiple basins, specify which basin this worksheet applies to: P{e~~s~GO 6n~s«t ~ ~
Basin Bottom Elevation __ 3 t 5. +70 ft. (average elevation of the floor of the basin)
Permanent Pool Elevation 320 ~ Of7 ft. (elevation of the orifice invert out)
Temporary Pool Elevation 321. 00 ft. (elevation of the outlet structure invert in)
Permanent Pool Surface Area. i °1 , 23~ sq. fl:. (water surface area at permanent pool elevation)
Drainage Area S. Io H ac. (on-site and off-site drainage to the basin)
Impervious Area $ . S 2 ac. (on-site and off-site drainage to the basin)
Permanent Pool Volume -~ 1, 1 i 5 cu. ft. (combined volume of main basin and forebay)
Temporary Pool Volume 20, i 54 cu. ft. (volume detained on top of the permanent pool)
Forebay Volume !2 j 3iy cu. ft.
SA/DA used .Z . 5 $ (surface area to drainage area ratio)
Diameter of Orifice 3 in. (draw down orifice diameter)
II. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
The following checklist outlines design requirements per the Stormwater Best Management Practices manual
{N.C. Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources, November 1995) and Administrative Code
Section: 15 A NCAC ZH .1008. Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have
been met and supporting documentation is attached. If a requirement has not been met, attach an explanation of
why.
Applicants Initials
DM The temporary pool controls runoff from the 1 inch storm event.
i7M The basin length to width ratio is greater than 3:1.
tiM The basin side slopes are no steeper than 3:1.
i~M A submerged and vegetated perimeter shelf at less than 6:1 is provided.
Del Vegetation to the permanent pool elevation is specified.
DNS An emergency drain is provided to drain the basin.
{~N1 The permanent pool depth is between 3 and 6 feet {required minimum of 3 feet).
'nM The temporary pool draws down in 2 to 5 days.
D~`'l The forebay volume is approximately equal to 20% of the total basin volume.
Sediment storage is provided in the permanent pool.
7+M Access is provided for maintenance.
D~/1 A minimum 30-foot vegetative filter is provided at the outlet.
nN1 A site specific operation and maintenance (O&M) plan is provided.
~NI A vegetation management/mowing schedule is provided in the O&M plan.
l~M1~ Semi-annual inspections are specified in the O&M plan.
A debris check is specified in the O&M plan to be performed after every storm event.
~ A specific sediment clean-out benchmark is listed (elevation or depth) in O&M plan.
Dt`'~ A responsible party is designated in the O&M plan.
FORM SWG100 09/97 Page 1 of 1

w
Q U
J Z
J_
~ W
Z Z
O oC
~Q
~~

t
~ ~-
_- ~~3
~' ~
ZF ~ M
' \ ~ ~.,
f

' I
~ ".
/
/ .
r - ~ ,C
~ -
©Y n f
-
- ~
~. ~ ~ J
~
I
~ '
~ !l~l I:
~
..
~
~~~
,
I i
C
,~
_, 1
~
~' I - ~1~
.
,.
-
" `~ 1~
~
.
t
~~ `~~.
,,
~~
V:
~J
~
~
• ~ ~
~
Cn

~~ ~
~ CC
L ~
O =

C~ ~
~ N u> O
~ 6 -
'~ ~, O ~ U
~
_~ _~
X o a
- T U
n
i
U
d) U
~ Q ~ ~

i
'~

N
N
°'o II Q
z [il p
U~ U
U ~
~ ~ <L CO ~ O `~ N p

t7 ~ ~ ~;
N II ~ o ~ o
0 3 r~ x
~ D ~ ~ z - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
N O C- c( ~ C
II R L '~ u~ ~

J
~

(n c.

U °
o ~ a
~ ~
.° ~ o Q
l
~~~ ~
Q._
~ o

~'>
~
Cv'~ %n, ~ ~ ~ a~ a,
C ~ o ~

'~' L~~j H ~ ~ ~ ~
,< '
~ C7
~~
~ ~~~
y~~,`~~~
/,~ /~
4 - __ k
(j,~,.,.
i. N r ( ~ ~ - _ I ~~
I
~ i ~
Z
~~
_ 1 I
\ W
F

I
~,
~
(I '( '~~ -~
z ~ I
4~ ~ ij~ ~,~ , i
~ ~~,-", ~
x a
z
~
/
~
/
X03
I '
I((~~~~ ' \~ l\~~ `(
~~
i ~ ~ ~W i .
~~.
~ 4
F
.
~
~ ,~/! ~'q ~N%i ~ ~ ~
~\ ~ x
,i1 ' ~ ' , jj wf ~ ~
\ \ ~ \ ` y W
~~~~ ~~~ ~~~r~~~ ~Z ~~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ U
~--
~ ~~ ~~i
/ :~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~1 ~ ~ ~ ~; Eiu
~ i A ~ i ~ ~ ~ `~ Y c~ 6
~~~ 1,
. /'
~~~ ~~
c^ 4
U]
Q1
U
Q L
~ ~
n h7
6] y ~ ~
it U cD O
Q N
~, ~ c O II
~I U C Q ~ C.
_~_ Q c ~ o
!), d~ ~ u~ ~ ...
U
II m Q U
~ 5 ~
(n, a o j L) c~
~' c' ~ w
~ ~\ ° ~ o
~ ~.
c~ O t5 ai .,~~, aJ
.X ~ Q ~
W H 'S ~ ~ 1-

W
Q U
J Z
J _
~ ~
W
ZZ
O ¢
~a
~~
o aa

, ~o
.,
~:~
3 a
" ~ ~

e
a
J ~
.. -.. ..
- __. _. _ _ __..__....
_.
-
__.. ... W O
__
Z
_....
-. ... _..
.. -_. _.
_. _. -_. .
. --__. ...... _ W
=O
~ a

-- _,
_
. " z
-

_,
~ r ~
_.
-~
r
~ I ..~ s t ~'' ~
1
~ a
~
~ ~ ~ _
'~I ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~
, W

J
~ '
' ~ ~ ~ 1~
y
~~~A~ 1
K

/
_
~
.
~ \ i/ ~

1 t
1
~
~ Q

D
v ~~
~_ 1 /Fldr ~ YI
~
~ ,1
1 ;~ W
: ,,x,
~ ~ ~' ~
(
~ O
'~, ~ ' ~.~
'~'~ ~ '
~y`' (
t,
~ ~ i
~ O
r!~
~
~ L ~~
~ ~
~ i li. ~
~
~
~ _ F , ~
~,
~ I i i ~'il ~
' 1
x 7 ~y~1A ~
, ~ _ ~~ ~ ~
~ C
~
'
~
~ n _ ~ N
~ -
-~
~
f
~ ~~ I -
~ ~~: ~
,AI ~
~'" ~
~ ~
4- ~
~ ~'' 1 I' ~
~ ,
f. c i r. ~~' ~ -s i ' ~ i ~ 1 ~ ~ 1 ~
'
~A ~~~A ~ ~

f~ ~ / ~ I 1 ~

,
. .. ~ ,
-
.

~ ~ ~ 1 /
;~
'~

„
_._
~
. _
... _. _. .. ._
~ ` O ~
~^
~ ° Z
d
~--~
o
_ o
p ~ - °
e
~:
~
~ ;n C
o d W
~ ~ ! °
~~
~ z ~ ~ ~ z
U

r
UJ ~ ~ ~ tp

~
O U

U
~. U
O Q
3
~
bt
B~
+' ~ ~ Q t~_ ~~ ~3

.- ~
N ~
'., is
~9

-+-~
O
~ ~
U O~
¢
~
G to U
"~ ~~~ ~
. N U
N U rr7 ~
~
Q
' N
n e
CO
~
~ ~~ U ~
Q ~ CO
I
0
lf) $i
!g
/~ ~
V
l O ~
~
~ ~ (~ ~ L (P In
r ~,r~
~
C ~~ C
O 4- U C7 Ln 9 C
~ 1J Q ~ O~ ~-
~ 6
g
d ~~ ~ Q C ~ C ~ ~
~ N 7 0
M C~ Z D ~ ~ O
CO E ~ Z_ ,~, ~ ~ O
~ ~ U; Z ~,
yet
~ ~, o ~ ~ ~ ~ c~ ° ~ ~ ~' N V e e c
a; ~' °~

~
~
I tt ~ ~
~
II ~ c ~ ~
~ m
(/~ II ~ ~ ~ ~
~
I
~ li E
~:
~ -a o ~ U c~ ~ ° ° ~ U r~ ~ ° ° '~ U c~ e ~
N ~ ~ T7 O ~ Cj ~ '~ _ ,N i C~ O Z7 _ '~ i

~
O a ~ ~ ~
~
~ ~ a ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ e ~ ~
~. Se$
~~~
-'a~ ~
~ .~ ~
o
~
~ ~ C
i o
~ . q i
~ _
S F_.
I- ~ ?
i
~ I- S I
~ H ~ I d i~
.. ._ i; ~66
i ~ Gb a~