The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20151209 Ver 2_Bridge No 273 - NW 3 Permit Application - Haywood County_20180221Corps Submittal Cover Sheet Please provide the following info: 1. Project Name Replace Bridge No. 273 on SR 1346 (White Oak Road) 2. Name of Property Owner/Applicant: NC DepaiKment of Transportation 3. Name of Consultant/Agent: N/A 'Agent authorization needs to be attached. 4. Related/Previous Action ID number(s): N/A 5. Site Address: N/A 6. Subdivision Name: N/A 7. City: White Oak Communi near Ma ie Valle 8. County: Haywood 9. Lat: 35.665729° N Lon�: -83.013682 ° W (Approx. Project Center) 10. Quadrangle Name: Cove Creek Gap (35083-F1-TF-024) 11. Waterway: Messer Branch (C) 12. Watershed: __ French Broad River (HUC 06010106) 13. Requested Action: X Nationwide Permit # 3 General Permit # _ Jurisdictional Determination Request _ Pre-Application Request The following infonnation will be completed by Coips office: AID: Prepare File Folder Assign number in ORM Begin Date Authorization: Section 10 Section 404 Project Description/ Nature of Activityt Project Purpose: Site/Waters Name: Keywords: Trcrnsportation November l8, 2015 Ms. Lori Beckwith, NCDOT Regulatory Project Manager U. S. Army Coips of Engineers I S I Patton Avenue, Room 208 Asl�eville, NC 28801-2714 PAT McCRORY Go+vmor NICHOLAS J. TENNYSON Serrrrory Subject: Nationwide 3 Permit Application Replace Bri<I�e No. 273 on SR 1346 (Whitc Oak Road) over Messer Branch Ftz}�vood Counq� Stnte Project No. 17BP.14.R128 (BD14A-430273) (DWQ Minm• Permit Pee 5240.00) Dear Ms. Beckwitl�: The North Carolina Department of Tr�nsportation (NCDOT) is proposing to replace the subject bridge. Tlie esisting I 8.Y L x 26' W timber bridge needs to be repl�ced due to stnictural deficiency. The proposed replacemeut structure ��ill be a 20' W s 4.5' H x 64' L 6ottomless reinforced concrete box culvert ou ll�e existing location. Stage consiruction will be used to route iraffic during construction. Cnclosed nre n PCN application, Prelimina�y Jurisdictional Form, SHPO forms, plan sheets showin� the proposed work, a USGS quad m1p, photographs, and other pertinent project iuformatiou. Tlie North Carolina Natural Heritage Program database was checked for records of tlueatened and endangered species. There are 51 species listed for H�y�vood County that hlve feder�l status. Tlie bog tuitle (G1�7Nemys uuih(enGe�gii) is lisred as tlireatened due to similarity of appearance to the listed northern bog turtle. The bald eagle (Hnlr�reener leucocephllus) is listed under tl�e B�Id aud Golden Eagle Protectiou Act (HGPA). Nine species, C�rolina noithern flying squinel (Glnrrcouiys snGrinus colorrNrr,$), gray bat (Ad��olis bn•isescens), Indi�na ba[ (dlyo/rs sod�di.r), Appalachian elktoe (E11as�i7idaitn rm�enelinnr�J, spruce-fir tuoss spider (itlicrolresin•n monlivnga), smal I whorled pogonia (lsolrin medeo(ordes), spreading avens (Geiru� rndinluni), rock gnome liclteu (G��iiuiorlerma /rnecrre), and noilhern Iong-eare<I bat (itfy�tis seprentrionalie•, NLEB) are hno�vn from current records aud are listed as either tlueatened or end�ngered. According to the USFWS, i-la}m�ood Couuty is now considered occupied sununer r:�nge for Indi�na bats and NLEB. Appalachian elktoe are tound in some well-oxygenated sueams with moderate to fast Flowing �v�ter and stable, mised substrates of silt, saud, gravel, and/or cobble. S�reams that support �his mussel are typically mucl� larger than Messer Brancli. The only records in Ha��vood County are from the Pigeon River and tl�e lower portions of the East Fork Pigeon aud West Fork Pigeon rivers, tliere are no records from airy tributaries to these rivers. The Pigeon River (Waterville �Nothing Compares`�.�,.. sia�eochonhcalo�n,a I oepanm.n�oPT�uuponailo� � oh�;>fon�a ?5? \1'ebsler RoaJ I Syl�n, I�'urtL Caoiina 2377Y Phone 838-i36�21J1 I Fn� 828a56-IUJ3 Bridge No. 273 — Haywood Page 2 November 18, 2015 Lake) is 0.5 miles downstream of the bridge and this reach oFthe river is over 20 river miles do�vnstream of occupied mussel habitat. With rare exception, gray bats roost in caves year-round. This project only involves a small bridge replacement, so constn�ction work will not extend far from the esisting right-of-way into areas where caves could occur. There are no caves or mines visible near the bridge and, according to USGS data, the nearest underground mine is over 1 mile away. Therefore, gray bats will not be affected by Uie project. Like gray bats, Indiana bats and NLEB �vinter in caves or mines with stable, but not freezing cold temperah�res. However, in summer, they generally roost under the loose bark of trees, either dead with peeling bark or cavities, or live trees with shaggy bark such as white oak, maples, sycamore and hickories. The construction work will require the removal of trees near tlie bridge. Any obstructing trees will be removed from October I S to April I S(winter clearing) when bats should not be roosting iu the area. Also, on June l, 2015 we conducted a survey of the bridge and did not see roosting bats or any evidence of bat usage (i.e. staining or guano). This bridge is only about 6 feet above the water surface and very cool underneath. Witli winter tree clearing, we recommend a"may affect, uot likely to adversely aTfecY' detennination for NLEB and Indiana bat. Small whorled pagonia generally occurs in open, dry, deciduous woods with acid soil, though habitats can include slopes along streams and mesic forest with white pine and rhododendron. Land use adjacent to the bridge consists of maintained road shoulders, a lawn, and forest. There is wooded habitat south and west of the bridge, but it is heavily shaded with rhododendron. A survey was couducted on June l, 2015 and no small whorled pogania were observed. The nearest record for this plant is over l0 miles from the project. The Carolina noithem flying squirrel, rock gnome lichen, spruce-fir moss spider and spreading avens ai�e found in spn�ce-fir forests and other isolated high elevation locations in western North Carolina. However, rock gnome lichen is an exception because it can occasionally be found at lower elevations in deep river gorges with high humidity and some vertical rock faces that are periodically wet. The bridge site has an elevation of only 2,420 feet and lacks rock faces and other habitat conditions required by these species. The project is limited in scope. Erosion and sedimentation control measu��es wi11 be implemented to minimize adverse effects of the work on aquatic liabitats. Habitats for listed species appear lacking at tlie project site and none of these species �vere observed during field visits. For these reasons and H�ose discussed above, �ve recommend that a determination of "no effect" on listed species apply to this project, except for NLEB and Indiana bats. This project was reviewed by NCDOT's Human Environment Unit in 2013-2014. No survey was required for archeological ��sources. There is a house near tl�e bridge tliat is eligible for listing on the National Register, buf the project received a detei7nination of "uo adverse effecY' due to the minimal anticipated impact of the culvert and the use of aluminum guardrails (see attached fonns). NCDOT best management practices will be used to minimize and control sedimentation and erosion on this project. The construction foreman will review all erosion control measures daily to ensure sedimentation and erosion controls are being effectively controlled. If tlie devices are not fimctioning as intended, they will be replaced immediately with better devices. Bridge No. 273 — Haywood Page 3 November 18, 2015 Impacts to Waters of the United States Messer Branch (DWQ Class: C) is sho�vn on Nie USGS topographic map as a perennial stream. The channel is well defined �vith a substrate of sand, silt, cobble and bedrock and is approsimately 6 feet in �vidtli. The stream has sufficient flo�v to support fish and other aquatic life. Messer Branch flows to the Pigeon River. The Pigeon River meets the definition of a Traditional Navigable Water (TNW). For these reasons, we believe Messer Branch is a Relatively Permanent Water (RP� and is under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. In order to constn�ct the project, it will be necessary to impact waters of the United States in the French Broad River Basin (CU 06010106). Specifically, NCDOT is requesting to replace Bridge No. 273 �vitli a"bottomless" concrete culvert. Listed below is a summary of the proposed impacts. Net Site No. Existing Condition Proposed Condition Impacts (feet) 1 18.5' L x 26' W 20' W x 4.5' H x 64' L Bottomless � Timber Bridge Reinforced Concrete Box Culvert Impervious Dikes and Flow lA Free Flowing Stream Diversions 120 lB Free Flowing Stream and Rip Rap Bank Stabilization and I08 Bridge Abutments(Road Fill Floodplau� Benches Total Perm�nent Stream and Tributary Impacts fm• Culvert 0' Total Temporary Stream Impacts for Impervious Dikes and Flow Dive�sions 120' Total Permanent Impact for Bank Stabilization and Floodplain Benches 108' Permits Requested NCDOT is hereby requesting autliorization under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act to proceed with the construction project outlined above. By copy of this letter, 1 am asking Ms. Marla Chambers, Weste�n NCDOT Review Coordinator with the Noith Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) to comment directly to you concerning the 404 Natiomvide Permit request. I am also requesting autliorization under Sectiai 401 of tlie Clean Water Act fi�om the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), Division of Water Resources (DWR). [n addition, I am asking Ms. Cl�ambers and Mr. Ben DeWit, EI, Roadside Environmental Field Operations Engineer (NCDOT), to comment directly to me concerning this permit request. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Mr. Josh Deyton at (828) 488-213 l or me at (828) 586-214 L Your early review and consideration will be gi�atly appreciated. Bridge No. 273 — Haywood Page 4 November 18, 2015 Sincerely, � � ��y �� Division 14 Environmental Supervisor Enclosures cc: Ms. Amy Cliapman, Division of Water Resources — NCDEQ, Raleigh Ms. Kristi Carpenter, Division of Water Resources—NCDEQ, Raleigli Mr. Kevin Barnett, Division of Water Resources—NCDEQ, Asheville Mr. Andrew Henderson, Biologist, US Fish &Wildlife Service, Asheville Ms. Marla Chambers, Western NCDOT Review Coordinator, NCWRC, Albemarle Mr. Josh Deyton, PE, Division 14 Bridge Program Manager, NCDOT, Bryson City Mr. Ben DeWit, EI, Roadside Environmental Field Operations Engineer, NCDOT o�o( wniE9q� > 1' 'I y � � � o OKce Use Only: Corps action ID no. DWQ project no. Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008 Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form A. Applicant Information 1. Processing 1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: � Sectian 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit 1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 3 or General Permit (GP) number: 1c. Has lhe NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? � Yes ❑No 1d. Type(s) of approval sought from fhe DWQ (check all lhat apply): � 401 Water Quality Cerlification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit ❑ 401 Waler Quality Cerlificalion — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization 1 e. Is this nolificalion solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401 For the record only for Corps Permit: because written approval is not required7 Certification: ❑ Yes � No ❑ Yes � No 1 f. Is payment into a miligation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigalion � Yes � No of impacls? If so, altach the acceptance leller from mitigation bank or imlieu fee program. (NC Division of Mitigation Services) 1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h ❑ Yes � No below. 1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes � No 2. Project Information 2a. Name of project: Replace Bridge No. 273 on SR 1346 (White Oak Road) over Messer Branch 2b. County: Haywood 2c. Nearest municipaliry / town: White Oak Community near Maggie Valley 2d. Subdivision narne: N/A 2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or State ��Bp �4.R.128 (DB14A-430273) Design Build Contract Project No: 3. Owner Information 3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: North Carolina DepaRment of Transportation 3b. Deed Book anci Page No. N/A 3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if Mark S. Davis, Division 14 Environmental Supervisor applicable): 3d. Street address: 253 Webster Rd. 3e. Cily, stale, zip: Sylva, NC 28779 3f. Telephone no.: 828-586-2141 3g. Fax no.: 828-586-4043 3h. Email address: markdavis�ncdotqov Page 1 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 4. Applicant Information (ii different from owner) 4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify: 4b. Name: N/A 4c. Business name N/A (if applicable): 4d. Street address: N/A 4e. City, state, zip: N/A 4f. Telephone no.: N/A 4g. Fax no.: N/A 4h. Email address: N!A 5. Agent/Consultant Informatlon (tf applicable) 5a. Name: N/A 5b. Business name N/A (if applicable): 5c. Street address: N/A 5d. City, state, zip: N/A 5e. Telephone no.: N/A 5f. Fax no.: N/A 5g. Email address: N/A Page 2 of 11 B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification 1a. PropeAy identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): N/A 1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.665729 Longilude: -83.013682 1 c. Property size: N/A acres 2. Surtace Waters 2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Messer Branch proposed project: 2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C 2c. River basin: French Broad River Basin (HUC 06010106) 3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing conditions on lhe site and lhe general land use in the vicinity ot ihe project at the time of this application: The site includes a timber bridge on a paved secondary road. Landscape is primarily forests wiih rural residential and limited agriculture. 3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: N/A 3c. List lhe total eslimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 250 3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: To replace a structurally deficient timber bridge with a 20' W x 4.5' H x 64'L "bottomless' reinforced concrete box culverl on existing location. 3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including lhe type of equipment to be used: The culvert will be stage constructed in order to maintain tra�c during construction. Erosion and sedimentation measures will be installed. One half of ihe culvert will be constructed downstream of the old bridge while traffic is maintalned on the old bridge. Traffic will then be placed on the new culvert section and the old bridge will be removed and the remalning culvert section will be completed. Heavy equipment, paving equipment, water pumps, sandbags, and various hand tools will be used to accomplish the work. 4. Jurisdicttonal Determinations 4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained fo? this property ! � Yes � No ❑ Unknown project (including all prior phases) in the past. Comments: N/A 4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made7 ❑ Preliminary ❑ Final 4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consullant Company: N/A Name (if known): N/A Olher: N/A 4d. If yes, lisl the dates of lhe Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and altach documentation. N/A 5. Project History 5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for � Yes � No ❑ Unknown this project (including all prior phases) in fhe past? 5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file° instructions. Page 3 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version Project Information and Prior Project History 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes � No 6b. If yes, explain. Page 4 of 11 C. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary 1 a. Which sections were completed below for your proJect (check all that apply): ❑ Wetlands � Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts If thete are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. 2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f. Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction number — Type of impact Type of weiland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ — non-404, other) (acres) Tem ora W1 ❑ P❑ T N/A N/A ❑ Yes ❑ Corps N/A ❑ No ❑ DWQ W2 � P� T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ W3 � P � T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ W4 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ W5 � P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ W6 ❑ P � T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ 2g. Total wetland impacts N/A 2h. Comments: N/A 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted. 3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g. Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ — non-404, width (linear Temporary (1) (INl)? other) (feet) feet) S1 � P❑ T Bottomless Culvert Messer Branch � PER � Corps 6 0 ❑ INT � DWQ S1A ❑ P� T Temporary Flow Messer Branch � PER � Corps 6 120 Diversions ❑ INT � DWQ S18 � P❑ T Bank Stabilization Messer Branch � PER � Corps 6 108 and Benches ❑ INT � DWQ S2 ❑ P � T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ S3 ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ S4 ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ 3h. Total Permanent Stream aud Tributary Impacts for "Bottomless" Cuivert 0' Total Temporary Stream Impacts for Impervious Dikes and Flow Diversions 120' Total Permanent Stream Impacts for Rip Rap Bank Stabilization and Floodplain Benches 108' 3i. Comments: Page 5 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 4. Open Water Impacts If lhere are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then individuall list all o en water Im acts below. 4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e. Open water Name of waterbody impact number — (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres) PermaneM (P) or Tem ora 01 ❑ P❑ T N/A N/A N/A N/A 02 ❑P❑T 03 ❑P❑T 04 ❑P❑T 4f. Total open water impacts N/A 4g. Comments: N/A 5. Pond or Lake Construction If ond or lake conslruction ro osed, then com lete the chart below. 5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e. Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland Pand ID Proposed use or purpose of (acres) number pond Floode d Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded P1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N!A N/A N/A P2 5f. Total N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5g. Comments: N/A 5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes � No If yes, permit ID no: N/A 5i. Expected pond surtace area (acres): N/A 5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): N/A 5k. Method of construction: N/A 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If project will impact a protected riparian.buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, ihen individually list all buffer impacts below. If an im acts re uire miti ation, then ou MUST fill out Section D of this form. 6a. ❑ Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlico ❑ Other: Project is in which protected basin? N/A ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman 6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g. Buffer impact number— Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Tem ora im aci re uired? 81 ❑ P❑ T N/A N/A � Nos N!A N/A 62 ❑P❑T ❑Yes ❑ No 63 ❑P❑T ❑Yes ❑ No 6h. Total buffer impacts N/A N/A 6i. Comments: N/A Page 6 of 11 D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avold or minimize the proposed Impacts in designing project. The bottomless culvert was designed to meet the hydraulic needs of lhe site. This culvert will not impede or impair aquatic life passage. 1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. All instream work will be performed in a dry work area using an impervious dikes and diversion to divert the water around the work areas. Appropriate BMPs according to the approved erosion and sedimentation control plan will be installed on the project prior to culvert installation. 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S, or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ❑Yes � No impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? 2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ ❑Corps ❑ Mitigation bank 2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? ❑ Payment to in-lieu fee program (NCDMS) ❑ Permiitee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: N/A 3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and lelter) Type N/A Quantity N/A 3a Comments: 4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-Ifeu Pee Program 4a. Approval letter from in-Ileu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes 4b. Stream mitigation requested: N/A linear feet 4c. If using stream mitigalion, stream temperature: ❑ warm ❑ cool ❑ cold 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): N/A square feet 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: N/A acres 4f. Non-riparian wetland miligation requested: N/A acres 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: N/A acres 4h. Comments: N/A 5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan. N/A Page 7 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ 6a. Will lhe project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes � No buffer mitigation? 6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of ihe riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of mitigation required. 6c. 6d. 6e. Zone Reason for impact Total impact Muliiplier Required mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Zone 1 N/A N/A 3(2 for Catawba) N!A Zone 2 1.5 6f. Total buffer mitigation required: N!A 6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee tund). N/A 6h. Comments: N/A Page 8 of 11 E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1a. Does lhe project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified � Yes � No within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? 1 b. If yes, ihen is a diffuse (low plan included? If no, explain why. Comments: N/A ❑ Yes ❑ No 2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan 2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? N/A 2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? � Yes ❑ No 2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: 2d. If lhis project DOES require a Stormwaler Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan: The project is covered by NCDOT Individual NPDES Permit No. NCS000250. ❑ Certified Local Government 2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ DWQ Stormwater Program � DWQ 401 Unit 3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a. In which local governmenPs jurisdiction is this project? N/A ❑ Phase II 3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW apply (check all that apply): ❑ USMP ❑ Water Supply Watershed ❑ dther: 3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No altached? 4. DWQ Stormwater Pro ram Revlew ❑ Coastal counties ❑ HQW 4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply � ORW (check all that apply): ❑ Session Law 2006-246 ❑ Other: 4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been attached? ❑ Yes ❑ No 6. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Revlew 5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? � Yes ❑ No 5b. Have all of lhe 401 Unit submiltal requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No Page 9 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) 1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or ihe � Yes ❑ No use of public (federaVstate) land? 1 b. If you answered'yes' to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑ Yes � No (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? 1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval leiter.) ❑ Yes ❑ No Comments: N/A 2. Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a. Is the site In violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes � No or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? 2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑ Yes � No 2c. If you answered "yes° to one or bolh of the above questions, provide an explanation of lhe violation(s): N/A 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) resuit in � Yes � No additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water qualily? 3b. If you answered "yes° to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no,' provide a short narrative description. This is a rural secondary road. The bridge is being upgraded to standard load limils and width to improve safety for the traveling public. The bridge (culvert) upgrade is not anticipated to have any significant impact on tuture development. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a. Clearly detail the uitimate lreatment methods and disposilion (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. N/A 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or � Yes ❑ No habilat? 5b. Have you checked wilh the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act � Yes ❑ No impacts7 ❑ Raleigh 5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. � Asheville 5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? North Carolina Natural Heritage Dalabase and site specific surveys conducled during the bridge scoping process. Page 10 of 11 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes � No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? N/A—There are no marine or estuarine communities within the Blue Ridge Physiographic Province. 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or t�ibal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation � yes � No status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? The bridge project was reviewed by NCDOTs Numan Environment Unit in 2013-2014 and there will be "no effecP on archaeological resources and °no adverse effect° on historic architecture. These findings have been approved by the State Historical Preservation Office (SHPO) lhrough MOA with NCDOT (see attached forms). 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-desfgnated 100-year floodpiain? ❑ Yes � No 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: FEMA requirements were taken into consideration by the NCDOT Hydraulics Unit during the design of the bridge (see attached Hydraulic Report in the plan sheets) 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? NC Floodplain Mapping Program Mark S. Davis / Division 14 Environmental Supervisor � //-l� '/,.7 ApplicanUAgenYs Signature Date AppllCanUAgenYs Pflnted Name (AgenPs signaWre is valid only rf an authorization lettei from the applicant is provided.) Page 11 of 11 _'_il_.. l '�,._;'.'C� � . I I} A` IIg.. :I � ,� -.+nn.� _t- N�� .ouuu u �' '�^ 4a-a3027,i �OO.CO � �,\ - ' � - ,.:� _ ,� � - `" /n1 \ --r:-/ . �� r. � _ . - -. . � � �- - ' �. � a. �.°' . ` . , . `�' �� ` '� <-� S1B rip rap and benches — _ __ _._ , c F F - . GR��JS ��.♦ f ErTN'EP `�`��'S.+ �:.. T< 2`O .. 1 culvert - -�- _ — �L-., l I CYW C a �_._ \! /� $.� �-. �� - � � � r. I _I _ �,�. ni . A--. p �Fvl . � 'a N -�.o::; �. , o�'� o o � .�1T. r:. - c �� = Old Bridge � = New Culvert _'_ . ' ' _ :'p � _. � . � / / . � -_ - - - F - S � .� _ _ C p�F FI � _ c. � , . �.. ,. , � � nn -i / s �'9 . u � ._C � � T � \, �r � � uo F.v � C' �.,S T \ �T �� R£lrpJ: A5u _ .�/ T �\ S AG\p � h�se� �F,:ct SF CUT DITCH C � 1 rt `��j� V- � � �c,< SEE D:'A7� :. p �" � GRFU 350 TL-2 �;, . •� � ` nn�n _i_ �� -L- PT S1a.13+G070 � � � v �, T � �� . N� uua u F"il.'�: I . � �i,- �r f h.� .. � ` �\ " _ �� -r :� '�y.., �.a', � ,� � PP.OPOSED BOTTOP.ILESS PRECAST COWCRETE CULVeRT 20' X 4,_0• 13+11,00 45' SKE1'? S1A �T_.,. i ,,. � , ?� \ << .,.Pe:�;o�s . ,�� DR:ES '� \ \j f/� - ' L- FC S�a. f3rS9Jc `�\-"' rL0 � � �. . \f �,\� �� \ ``� , r >, �\ V North Carolina Dm arbnCnt of 7nns ortaUon � I fiAfnv�y P P :�t On 1t��,iltCf Highway Stormwatcr Pro9ram i'� i STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN �'�`� �Venion 2.41: RelvamE DecemEer]0�4� fOF NCDOT PROJECTS WBS Element: 17BP.'14_R.128 D6� TIP No.: Coun ies : Havwood Pa e t of 2 Genonl Prqect Information WBSElement: �i6P.�4.R.128D816A�30273 TIPNumhec Pro'tttT e: BridpeP.e lacement Date: 2/122015 NCDOT Contact Michael Shumsk . PE Contractor / Desi ner. Ronald Ferquson / Louis BerOer Atltlress: � 020 Birc� Ridge Drive Adtlress. � 001 Wade Ave. Room #16 $ulle 400 RaleiQh, NC 2i610 Raleiqh, NC 2i605 Phone: 919) 707-6627 Phone: 919) 866 4400 Email: mshumsk nctlotAov Email: derQuson(o�louisberqer.mm Ci Rown: Wa nesville Coun (ies: Ha ood River Basin s: French Broad CAMA Coun 7 No WeUands within Prqect Limits? No Pro'ettD¢scri tion Pro ect Len th lin. miles or fcet: �D6 Surroundin Land Use: Rural, ResitlenSial, Wootls Pro osed Pro'ect Existin Site Pro'ect Built-U on Area ac. 02 ac, 0.1 ac. Typical Cross Sec[ion Descriptlon: Proposed Section is 2-10' lanes having 4' pavetl shoulders in some locations witn 3' Exiscing section is approximately 20' feet wide BST 2-lane road wit� variable wid[h grasseC shoulders grassetl shoultlers AnnualAvgDailyTaffic(veh/hr/tlay): Desipn/FuWre'. 220 Yeac2034 �istinq: 22a Year 2014 Generul ProjecS Narative: The puryose olthis project is to replace Bndge No. 4302�31ocatetl on SR 1346 (White Oak Road} wer Messer Branch. The existing strucnre is a single span britlge 18'-6" (Description of MinimizaGon af Water timber floor on timberjoists with timber caps. post and silis on conc�ete botings. The pmposed replarnment is a 20'-0" x 4'-6" bottomless culvert The exis9ng roadway consisls Qualiry Impacts) apprcximately of a 20' paved roadway with g2ss shoulders. The roadway improvements wnsists o1240' lanes having 4' pavetl shoultlers left and right in some lofafions with 3' 92ssed shoultlers. During construction, White Oak Road will remain open to traHic as the project will be a stage consWct. The existing tlrainage pattems will be maintaineG antl mnoff will be tlischargetl as far from the s[ream as prac[icable throughou: the consVuction process and fnal wmpletion. Watort Intortnafion Surface Water Botl 7: Messer 8ranch NCDWR Stream Intlez No.: 5-35 NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Botly Prima Classifiwtiorr. Class C Su lemental ClassifiwEon: None Other Stream Classification: Im airmenis' Threatenetl/Endan ered S ecies7 No Commenis: NRTR Stream 10: N/A BuRer Rules in Effect N/A Pro ect Inclutles Britl e 5 annin Water Botl 7 No �eck Drains Dischar e Ovor BUHer7 N/A Oissi aWr Pads Provided in Buffer? N/A Deck Drains Disehar e Wer Water Botl ? NIA Qf yes. provitle justi(ication in the General Pmject Nartative) Qf yes, tlescribe in the General Projed Nartative; if no, justify in the (II yes. provide justification in the General Prqect Nartative) Gene21 Project Nartative) I Ii�,�IHr�I' North Carolina Department of Transportation �It�nit��'illf•i �•�- • Highway Stormwa[er Program �;��,' STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN � �� Vcrsion 2.01; Raloasotl Decrtmbor YO'IS� FOR NCOOT PqOJECT$ WBS Element: 17BP.14.R.1� TIP No.: Coun (ies): Ha ood Pa e 2 of 2 Bridge to C ulvert Avoidance and Minimization Pro osetl trutture Summa Sheet No. & Station Sheet No.: 4 SWtion: L 13+71.0� Number of Culverts: 1 Draina e Area (ac or sq mi): O.E7 sq mi Gulvert WitltR/Diameter (ft): 20'-0" SurtaceWaterBod: (1)MesserBranch CUIvertHeiht(ft�: 4'-6" Culvert T e: Precast concrete bottomless box culvert Culvert Len th (ft) 64'-9" Avoitlance and Minimization Efforts: The existing stream (Messer 62nch) antl an unnamed tributary parallel [he roadway for most of the project limits. The proposed alignment was (Britlge to Culvert) shifted to minimize impacts lo the existing channel due to fill slopes. Wingwalls were elongated and placed parallei to the roadway [o avoid impacts. Preliminary geotechnical investigations showed nonerodible rock within 5 feet. antl a boUomless stmcture was utilizetl to minimize tlisWrbance oi the natural channel bed. Stream Slo e Fish antl/or Aquatic Life Passa e Existin Avera e Stream Slope (% �: 2.94 % Ezisting Low Fiow Channel Dimensions Low flow channel is appoximately 8' wide and Proposed Culvert Slope (% �: 3.37 % in the Stream: arountl 1'tleep. Channel dimensions vary tlue Culvert Burial to mountainous and mcky terrain. Proposetl Culvert Burial Depth (ft): N1A Existing Streambed Material: Betlrock, cobble, sand, gravel Proposetl Low Flow Dimensions Low Flow channel is appoximately 8' wide antl Through the Culvert: around 1'tleep. Channel dimensions vary due Proposetl Sills/Baffles: No sills or baffles will be utilized with the bottomless to mountainous and rocky terrain. stmcNre. x�sting ow ow e ocmes m t e SVeam (ffisl: 6'� ropose ow ow e oci ies roug the Culvert (ft/s�: 6"7 Alternating Low Flow Silis/Baffles: No 5i115 or baffles wfll be utilized with the battomless stmcture. CulvertlSVeam Ali nment Stream Pattems Upstream antl Downstream The proposed s[ream aiignmen[ resembles [he existing alignment antl shoultl not hinder fsh passage in comparison to existing conditions. 8anks of the Culvert that Could Affect Fish are s[abilized with Class II Rip Rap both upstream and downstream of the culvert. Passage and Bank Sta6iliry: Bed Forms Impacted by Culvert (riffles, Existing s[ream profle indicates one pool and a glitle section wi[hin culvert. These wiil not be impacted. pools, glides, etc.): � Low Flow Floodplain Bench Requitetl? No (provide justification) Sharp Bends at Inlet/Outiet? Yes ExisCing stream alignment has a motlest bend at the iniet and outlet of the culvert as the stream runs parallel to the roatl at (describe culvert alignment with stream) upstream end. Proposetl culvert alignment closely matches the existing alignment. Stream Realignment Necessary? (provide No 'ustification) Bank Stabilization: Class II rip rap is placed at the upstream and downstream ends of the culvert. Rip rap eMentls 10' from ihe upstream end and 20' from the down tr m n . Outlet velocities Natural Stream Channel 2- r Velocity (£t/s�: 6.9 Natu�al S[ream Channel'10- r Veloci (ft/5�: 6J Proposed Culvcrt 2- r Outlet Velocit �ftls): 6.9 Proposetl Culvert 10- r Outlet Veloci (ft/s�: 6J Roadwa Geometric Consitlerations EvaluaYe/Describe Roatlwa Geometric Constraints: The roadway and culvert is a stage construct to the tlownstream side of the culvert to allow the existing roadway to remain open to traffc. This method yields a longer culvert than i[ would having a closed road with an offsigh[ detour. NaWrai stream alignmen[ running parallel to the rodaway also poses constraints as any witlening has the po[ential of flling in ihe existing channel. �� ' ��'` r 4A'`�'�.'� �. '�j!f s '�� ,. .� � . / � � :.A.'S��t y.. � t * Y � � , `� , y)-��;�,�� „ (� :l, �� _, / ;.� ;�•�I! �:��qil�-.'� 'Y` � �, '�� 11 � �' . �. R f� JY ,��.� � ' . �r . G ` !e* � �� ,� .��y :�J ��1 � �E �� -��+M. �,��.: �' r. Y'S �� r1�� .��i .._� . :�`' '� ��j' 4. K<: l �� y� "_M � '�. a�,X r �� *�,f 'i� y� .. S'f . '�� .y, � a.�':i 'S�� ,! f - . . � �+ `.��s�� '�� *1�;� _ �� ' .a- �� _ c . _� ��i5�F . }� � j�� -� �r� �. F � � �� + A� .,�,'1� 4 '' �i� ' M�� ♦ �s.f �v �' �: ��e� . , �a. � ��y� . 'It ,�� ' �f� �� , .�' � � Y '�, =�g -�? r ,,� ,� '�` �t� ,. �. � �/` , j� r ` � �"' �;�'hi,� r� � �-�� 4 ! �7�-, � y�' . •� �Kx�t4 ,.��.-� - �� ,'� z „' �. \ ' l 7� :.� ' i � �+ � � r�� .r+ �f�. .��i >'� � � tiy � a. ��.. � . . .- . 1r' "/i Bridge Number 273 " f�ML ~k _ r�,. � � . +! `^,,-!� � e� �. � � � -, _; 1. .� ,¢ !y3 a-`r � .:� !"!"-� ,T ,si-�� #� r :'� �. � �F V��' ' � �" t � ' �°+' �'�� r �r .3;� 'k �J �� ,+� i J' '�'{� 7.'i�,a�. -.. .� - �� xd.*1/..�' �� r ;ta`V . �� ' -� i - � .�=� f� . ' /j� �'AFE',E'� . ' 4 !~ `�'f� `� � �,t '�� i ��. 1�. ! ' � ' ��} � : . �t 2 � t ; t �. .�i� �� 1�'� �.� � � - , :. - '� _��{• . � ��,�.'�� ' x'` #! ��f 4 r =' � r A� t ,"��,�.r ��;. jy� , � i �� +. 1 � �,' �'�li�' �1 "f ' �: �!, f*S. ._ � �� e, s a •i�': ,�;'�. ? � ' .�� • i�,,� �,,i�'` : �, . � ' ` - " � �� ;� „� y4 �a f. �.( p.. r� i �� . �* •1r�r� ♦ �>f � f �` y e , '' �! P �_ �v � � �. � ��-',� .�.f : . f � j.�� `.��i J ,'� � h y r ;. "�t+� !t � '_�,,. _ �� . � ^'!e , T� � � � '',�c .Zi�u; - '�` S'. � �7• n ':t' � A � M�,, `'�� q4�� j� � .`��' �'�' � "� - ;i:. � ; S ;�� . •kr' - ;e ^�t � M�R . - � r�J r .��' �' Y- ' � . .�,i' . �f �' . .��,�,. ,'�.� ' � �_ I � �r� . ' '� � , f � � ai, � � b. �� I�� :,I�Jj. i�e�i�5(��rC . a�P,�rclinf� ,�.,t :��«i, V f i,,-.�'��vG .i: • ) l �� 1.>�ii I �ar� _. .. -- — -- -- - .. � N Bridge Number 2�3 over � Messer Branch on SR 1346 W E Haywood County, NC 0 50 100 200 S Feet Haywood County Briclge q273 on SR 1346 over Messer Branch June 1, 2015 Looking southeast towards bri�ge. ;��,} z ';�, �}` .- � ' ;_4 a�a.'+�'� . � �. � .. 1�' ' ie . � 9 wX t.." : ��' -� i y t s. . \.•� . �� t . `4 :irm V�: � .�l^ � S .. /`�c.. — ' _ .. a � � _ _. � a�' ,� . y ` ��' � � `! z �: � -' � .. � �� . . '', �� = u, ,�, a, � .�� =ii 7 , , P .� � _� ��, '�,; ,�, � e�� _ �. .� ��-� :� .. �� , % � �t, t � y I:��.f ' , �;�� :.-� - ; y, .� E� � Ir �'� k �' Looking northwest towards bridge. Haywood Counry Bridge H273 on SR 1346 over Messer Branch ,;�,� � - �-�- - �,;; June 1, 2015 -,,,-.<_� � . . i '�;I s�*` 'I � � � � � � �'��; h��s -. _ ,r'ss�s .�i Looking downstreain from bridge. "A . ;p . �4"-R i�y. .'� "' °�"j, � � ``�' y ��Jrt�t. .� ' ; � ,!� �� . �j��.r•,(+r '��•. . �� . . .:� T�;7N L . �'t.�;_i -� _'�, � �. � . d'�:. Looking upstream from bridge. Haywood County Bridge N273 on SR 1346 over Messer Branch hme 1, 2015 v .' �'�-.;�..�•"`�': .� �'. . _- , ,� ��,_�, ' -- �,:�� _ - I �- � - � � =_-_ = --- _ . - - � ., ,r . . ►�,=,�� _.�;� � �� -�A "�� . . � . :, s�i={ �' �'- �' s.�f-„�,�" � ,,.�,� -' "' � 'T+ `-:� r°�.; � . j t! � �� , . :T . . � . . . . .. .. .��" - _. . Looking upstream under bridge. �,:: :. , �= �„ �,,� � �' _ ;� �� ATTACHMENT A PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM BACKGROUNDINFORMATION A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):9-�a-zo�s B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD: NC Depariment of TranspoAa�ion, Mark Davis, Division 14 E�vironmental OFficer 253 Websler Road, Sylva, NC 28779 C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Replace bridge 273 on SR 1346 (While Oak Road) (n Haywood County (USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES AT DIFFERENT SITES) State: NC County/parish/borough: HarW�a Clty: MaggieValley Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 35.sss�zs °N; Long. -as.o�ssez °�/�/, Universal Transverse Mercator: 3�l�as.�,asas7a�.azo�a n Name of nearest waterbody: MeSSe�B�e��n Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area: Non-wetland waters: xoo linear feet: 6 width (ft) and/or acres. Cowardin Class: R3ug� Stream Flow: PeRe�iai Wetlands: �a acres. Cowardin Class: Na Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10 waters: Tidal: �a Non-Tidal: �a 0 E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY): � Office (Desk) Determination. Date: 9-�4-ZoiS � Field Determination. Date(s): SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD (check all that apply - checked items should be included in case file and, where checked and requested, appropriately reference sources below): � Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicanUconsultant: Ncoor ❑ Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the app�nt/consultant. Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report. Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. ❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps: ❑ Corps navigable waters' study: ❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: ❑ USGS NHD data � USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps ❑✓ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: ��zakco�ac�eekcaP ❑ USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. ❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: ❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s): ❑ FEMA/FIRM maps: � 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929) ❑ Photographs: ❑ Aerial (Name & Date): or � Other (Name & Date): � Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response leiter: � Other information (please specify): 2 1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site. Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in this instance and at this time. 2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre-construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting an approved JD constitutes the applicanYs acceptance of the use of the preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD will be processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331, and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33 C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This preliminary JD finds that there `may be" waters of the United States on the subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information: IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarilv been verified bv the Corps and should not be relied upon for later iurisdictional determinations. � - �-is Signature and date of S gnature and date of Regulatory Project Manager person requesting preliminary JD (REQUIRED) (REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature is impracticable) Estimated amount of aquatic Class of resourcein aquatic Site Number Latitude Longitude Cowardin Class review area resource 1 35.665729 -83.013682 R3U61 200 Ifnear feet Non Section 10 — non-wetland ��r . ::} ' ' �s. Pr jaf T nrkir�g Na. (hdmml Ure) 13-08-0037 HISTORIC ARCHIT�CTURE AND LANDSCAP�S ASS�SSMCNT OT �rT�CTS FORM This form only pertains to Historic Architecture and Landscapes for this project, It is not valid for Archaeological Resources. You must consult separately with the Archaeology Group. PROJ�CT TNrORMATION Project No: Str. 430273 County: Haywood WBS Nn.: 17BP.14.R.94 Docrtment PCE or MCC T �e: Fed AirlNo: N/A Trurrling: � State ❑ Federal redernl � Yes ❑ No Perrui! NWP3, NWP14, TVA Pern�i! s : TY/�e s : Proiecl De.scri»liori: Replace Bridge No. 273 over Messer Branch from Waterville Lake on SR 1346 (White Oak Road). SUMMARY Or HISTORIC ARCHITGCTUR� AND Descriution ofrevieiv aclivilies, resul/s. nnrlconclrrstons: Review of HPO quad maps, HPO GIS information, liistoric designations roster, and indexes wns unde�teken on August l9, 2013. There is a survey site within the APE, HW S10 the Teague House. A survey was required to assess eligibility. The Teague House was determined eligible for listing in the National 2eKister of Historic Places under Criterion C. A5SrSSM�NT Or ErF�CTS Proper[y Nnnre: Teague House Slnfus: Detennined Eligible SrrrveySiteNo.: HW510 PIN.• 8702-82-4565 Fffec/s ❑ No Effect � No Adverse Effect ❑ Adverse Effect Lxalnnnfion of�ffeclsDelerini�rnlio�r. �"J i��`�Zra:� l'.`�Gc%� i�2qlkf:2MG\'1 1�(Jc.,�Uf� IS �UnMndM �.U�.y6i�' W�� •1L111�n1 �+,��:.Ci. ��rv�HUM �uf,:�I$ W:�I �9d IJar List ot �nvironnrenln! Coinniilmertts: Hiqoricardilleclurem�dLmxfrc asG17�6C7SASSkSSifliMformforMinarTrmupo�mllai Proje�rtneQunf�nllrrtlalWll'iaKnmunmlcAgrnnrem. Page 1 of 2 SUPPORT DOCUM�NTATION [�Map(s) �Previoiis Saivey Info. [�Photos ❑Correspondence �Design Plans I'INDING 13Y NCDOT AND STAT� ffiSTORIC PI2�S�RVATION OrrIC� Historic Archikecture and Landscapes —ASSESSMENT OF EPFECTS NCDOT Architectaral Historian Date v..c State Historic Preservatiou Office Representah'�6�e Date HinnricArcLlrenuremidl.mutrcoye�lil�PliC7SdSSIiS7;llGN7/orm/arAlirMrT spnnmiaiP �n.catQirolifxvfiniGe2007P.�Xn,A,��wxm.�.�e�,em. Page 2 of 2 0 - t ,+„a .� .�' c. � , � � � � i � )' � " • � .'r � r�',r'.a " !r ' L: N,. 1!'� • I{ L d � '� . � K '.� ' � �� . ;p � e �4 � ,Y �sy , ;• . . r.. 'rti � � ..3 �� .• �� ' t < ' ,..d� � r �j: ..M' ! f � � 'y, s �,_ . `� .• ��' 'i"�' r� r _ �,� � �`� � Y � ��. ) - , "?: � ' � �i ��'F� / � J _ �`R.(�i�� , ff�. 11 l��c . . � ,, . ' ', .y.�. r« �� _ � • �r��%^�fr ��,� ,> � - r ��- � • - r 1,` �.�. v ' i, S - - ��.J . -s � ' �'+ �A ,. � �� ' �� ;,�.) i �� Y [ �•C `�t .,e y . . .,�- � �,L � 1- �� `_u 41i y, ._ 1.'_ . r F.I a �t.., . i, * ' . f � � T_ . � S�'�,, >� M1�T, J U.� 1 J `. �` - � .� t� Y' / +• C 3" r. .. {. - - -- ----z � .r- - - �7� 3 . �: �: �i• Y;�;., .<}�' . _ � M _ �� / : .� � -�rr��. �y . . I ;�}� ' i � . 1 �',py�y„ p r,l. , . f � ��;:7,�/, L;.-'.:',�;t.:r�',_ . , � ' , '` . t: LOOICiNG F?AS"i� t: �. - - �� `� - LOOKING W ES7' , iC'�: ;� �, . - `-�;-� :, I _ - � � . � fl � ::Ji , ir l i �I . I I t �� ;�; ��: , :;�; � � ;�,f. ;�I.-. � �. .. AC.:�� ` .I ' �, � . ,�.. LOOI�ING DOWNSTR�AM ,..,; ;_ , �,s,✓h, ;l� �; �,� ' ��1 F Sy �I Wn� �.T � 'n � ,rir lt` � i; ; � ��`',.� � i i._ I &� T '~ t ��'�� , ,-� ,�.$.,i �' -�� e7y � > >�` �}j ��+�p�� .;t `�. '� �p)� ,. �ty��'.;J,,. . ��.. ,.,, I � . ' �l� �� ,i.., �� - .� . -t�o�� : ' ��. ��"� F. � _�i ' ``_� � � � > „ , � . ti�tiL� �i<}. F � ��.�� ` `^- �. . � �t ♦ �{ b?S � ' ''i: t . , � ., � � -1.'t _...j - l . �' - 1 - .� _ � ;' - , , -..� - '� �, ; `#,��'.� -� ., , �r _ y � �_ r � .-! _. .. ,\ J' . , '� �?'� .��"�. � �a—�t ��, ='�c� :rE. � . , •, � �� . -�,�'' � � ,. : ��\ �', �. �'�L : � ..�,,� � ,; -' �lY�,,�. � al `� �� r— L i -� R� i" ` `�..�` .t .�r ;• �� r � �� r � . � �/` a�� v , k. �. / � g ' f J ��'� � � ' � .e.� _x. �e.�=r� — 1! `n ' i ; i'1 � . _, � �,`� . � r , � '. I ;. ;i , � ; � ; � '.i. � :- � �, �a � , , �. ,. , �l 'I ;t;� { , ' ��' � �' , �? ';��, l K.; �'' �`1 r " � S' � I :._ j i�.. � �:- . � . . . i - i� .;�v�"� 1'` .�`i,^ i�l �.. .': �> i ��s-..�-�rr�i•�.T }`if'r'r �r-av�r ��i�. . -__ k � { f �F . I( Y 5h ��, ' ' jl j� '��i•1 f �, i��F t i,., �' . E K �I �a ` Li�'�■i'll r S * '7'rr �� , '�vC �F4"� ��1� ;��.� -.St'� � j� r� � , � u a� �lt v; i, �� 1 �� . '}} 4 i1 i,�� i� i;� �� f� yt ., �rr ri� � �� ;4�' �,�% \' ' i �4 n � � � , ,� '� p� °. . � ;,. �� ` 's; ` , d �.f� � _�' ' �,� "�" �11�'7 ' �i'�� Hf, ,�t � ��. _ _ - � Nl�: r�"•_'� � �' {L l -, " � � ; � V (pt �' j � � � � ;. „ i�� ,' � ��,..; i1 i r � �t�i ; � �1 �� i " A Ji ' � � ��r' , ' i. k� �}i��1��3fil {�� r�(� ,.� - t�k, r y� �: ��`..� � �� (f .i;�1� ti � i � �•3: i�?,; � �, r, +��. l. � a < <, � ,� ,� ` f r ' E, `�,`F'�' �4Ea` 'd��1��`R, �, ,��',. 5 ,�,� � t�� , �:i" � �, _ ��4 ` �i� i� z�� i` �`'`� ' � (� �.. �. ? ,-� _ � _, r, �� / e �� ;I.Irh., . .�.:i ,�```°�` 1 �v, �. � ' �, . . ; -, �. p 4 ��.- �� , .�-c ` '' ., . _ -� �k�m(%�� I��, ln,,n��m l� u��e; �. 13-08-0037 ot7�a NO ARCHA�OLOGICAL SURVEY R�QUIR�D TORM �0'.�'0: , 'm ��'�°��"��4 �a�+l� Tliis fonn only pertains to ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES for fhis project. It is not j�', }o ,","�G''�� vnlid for Hisroric Architecture and I.Tndscapes. You must consult separately witli tlie ��/ �y_�.+�`'�� Historic Architecture and I.andscapes Group. �QO PROJ�CT INrORMATION ProjectNo: 5trH430273 Co�rrsry: Hnywood NBSNo: 17BP.14.R.94 Doci�ment: MCS I*:A. No: n/a Fiuiding: � State ❑ Federal FedernlPernlitRequired? � Yes ❑ No PermitType: NWP3,NWP14,TVA Project Desci•ip(ion: This prnject�ropases to repince Brldge No. 273, ivhich cnrrles SR1396 ({V!�lte Onk Rd) over Messer lfrnnck iu Hnyivoorl Cotinty, Na•th Cnrollnn. According to A�e environnieuMl input reqnest, l/re nndertnki�ig tnvolve.s the in p/nce repincenrent of tlie s[ructere alaig the ex/sNn� n/ig�uneut, thereby nefidinizingyotentinl sr�rfnce mid su�snrfnce dislurGnnces n[ d�is IocnNori. An off- sife demrrr rorrte is nnticipn�ed. Tke nrcliaeolagicnlAren ofPotentin( Effecls (APL�) !s cenfered rrpo�i Brrdge 273 muf �uensuves 600f1 in le�tglh (300ft fi�om ench Grldge end yaint) mtd ISOf! iu ivirllh (75f� frmii ench side of tfie SR1�46 center-line). SiJMMARY OR CULTU72AL R�SOURC�S It�VI�W Brief descrlpllon of revleiv nctivities, resrdls of revieiv, nnd carclrrsions: The project area (s located in the north-central por[lon of the county, east of White Oak Mountaln and directly south o( Wa[erville Lake. Messer eranch, included wlthin the French eroad Niver Drainage Basin, constitutes a second order stream flowing south to north through the project area. It emptles Into the Plgeon River/Waterville Lake a short distance north of the brldge locatlon. A strongly slopfng topography characterizes the majority of the APE and area surrounding this relatively incised stream valley. A map revlew and site ffle search was conducted at the Offlce of 5[ate Archaeology (OSA) on Tuesday, August 20, 2013. No previously documented archaeological sltes are located within the projects APE or adjacent to the study area. Five archaeologlcal surveys have been conducted in thls general vicinity which resulted In the recordatlon of numerous prehistoric archaeologlcal resources (Stephenson 1985, Snedeker 1986, Brown & Rogers 1990, Noel & Snedeker 1993, Espenshade & Garrow 1998). These sites are almost exclusively relegated to upland contexts such as hllltops, ridges, and knolls. In some cases, benches and ridge-toes were also utllized, but to a far lesser degree. Severe soll deflation was noted at the majority of the upland sites. As a result, few were deemed significant, and therefore did not necessitate avoidance or inclusion on the Natlonal Register of Historlc Places (NRHP). The relatively high upland site densitles in this section of Haywoad County are Ilkely a consequence of the severe terrafn, lack of habitable floodplains, and resource orfentatlons. Based on lhis in(ormation, the constricted Messer Branch s[ream valley would Ilkewise harbor prehistorlc sites on well-dralned, upland landforms or well-drained, elevated stream terraces. Follawing revlew of nearhy prehistoric archaeologital sites and others fn Haywood County, the APE does not flt the typical location expected to uncover past activity assoclated with prehistorlc occupatlons. An fnspectfon of Natlonal Reglster of Historic Places (NRHP), State Study Listed (SL), Locally Designated (LD), Determined Ellgible (DE�, and Surveyed Site (SS) properties employing resources avallable on the NCSHPO website concluded that none of the above designated properry types were located within or adjacent to the project area. Historfc maps ot Haywood County tvere appraised for evidence of former s[ructure Iocations, land use patterns, or other conOrmation of historic occupation at this locale and archaeological/historical reference materials were "No ARCNAEOLOGYSURY6YREQU/F6D"fonn fw AfL�or iM�upormlfon AnJertr ru QunM1J/rd fn Ihe7007 Nugrmm�wlleAgrnmml. 1 of 2 fnspected as well. In general, the historical review established an absence of NRHP Iisted properties, archaeological sites, or cemeteries within the APE. Further, topographic, geologic, environmental, and NRCS soil survey maps (C�, BsE) were referenced to evaluate ecologlcal, geomorphological, hydrological, and other elements that may have resulted in past occupation at thls locatlon. Construction design data was examined far determining the potentfal impacts to the APE ground surFaces. Aerial photographs (NCDOT Spatial Data Viewer) and the Google Street View map applicatlon (when amenable) were also examined/utllized for addltional assessment of hydrological, agricultural, modern earth- moving, and other erosive disturbances that may typify the APE. BrlefL�.rNlnnntiai of ivlry ihe nvnilnGle rnforn�ntlo�t provides a re(inble 6nsis for renso�inb[y predicting tlint Niere nre uo unidwttified Gistoric properJies in N�e APli: The proJect APE contafns no NRHP Ilsted hlstoric propertles, previoosiy documented archaeological si[es, or cemeteries. Predicated on aerial imagery, soil and topographic data, the Bridge No. 273 APE holds li[tle to no potential of embracing signi0cant NRHP eligible archaeologlcal resources. The curving of the SR1346 roadway, and the similarly snaking Messer eranch create severely sloping ground surfaces wi[hfn and proximal to the APE. Only the northeas[ern project quadrant embraces a landform (terrace w/ CkA solls) worthy of habi[atlon. Two domestic structures and a cemetery (Teague) are depicted at th(s location (USGS Cove Creek Gap topo) In Ihe past, whlle aerlal imagery relates today, the presence of one house and a large agricultural garden plot fronting Messer sranch. Potential exists for uncovering a few historlc or prehistoric arti(acts from this landform Iocatlon, but the house and cemetery are located beyond any potentlal impact areas, and the probabllity of documenting intact, signfflcant archaeological deposits in the actual APE (s unlikely. Since the 6ridge replacement is diminutive in scope, state-funded, and proposes no alteratlon of undlsturbed ground areas beyond the existing ditch-Iines, meaningful arthaeological sites/deposits are unlikely to be affected by the project. No further archaeological input or work wlll be necessary for this NCDOT brldge replacement project. SUPPORT DOCUM�NTATION See attaclied: � Map(s) � Previous Survey Lifo � Pliotos �Correspondence ❑ Pliotocopy of County Survey Notes Odier: RINDING BY NCDOT ARCIIA�OLOGIST NOARCF/ALOLOGYSURVEYRE UIRL'D '�C� �uc;r� ,�la,ltrr.v]�t� �/?�/ NCDOT "NoABCffAEOLOGYSURVGYREQ(IIR6D"fomr forAfinorTrnrupormllon Projer(a nr QimI1JlM 6i Ihe 1007ProgmnunniteAgreemenl. 2af2 430273 SCALE124000 � - - � �, -- , - - , - - -tl t ��, 1� ,. �1 • � � ;� �� , �� ,. � � ' � i ��\ � � � � 1� � �� 4 � , i � � _ t` ff � � �S L )'� ! p�' .,. ��I �{ � 1 P 4 ,S . 1 �,1' 7�'�jA �' --�fF1 l 4 �, � v �1 S�i.. / lPa „_}�� +,\S ''�'��r �T�ie'�� r �, %� i �} k �y�Y : � � ` � �' �'y ; ` F�'V �I '-�[`S�T �!! - , . � 1 :' ` � i , �'l � �� ,p �r-�ro'1�F'�Yir k T��1�, 1 �5 �i �l, �'}g �'� � 4��, �i t nw Tll� a'.. ' .� i,. - � � �y.' . , _ , �� . . `1 �f t i=: . _ . . . � � � � '� � ., � . . � � .'�.\ `,� �. .'� � �,�� S �� J� ��, .. .. � >�� `� � '�� , . . . . �� ' � ,�). � � �� 7�.h�`'`,. 4 , , t `� �� ' �F e� � �I� f _,:' .� �' �,.:� �� . +! CxA—Cullowhec�Nil4r�asi coinplex, 0 to 2 percen[ slopes, frequently fiooded Map Unit Set[Ing • Elevation: 1,200 to 2,000 feet • Menn annunl precipitnfion: 45 to 70 inches • Meon unnual nir tempernfu�e: 4G to 57 degrees F • Froshfree period: SIG to 170 days Map Unit Compositlon a Cullowhee,Jrequen[fyJloode�midsimilnisoils:AOpercent Nikwnsi, /iequently Jlooded, nnd slmilar soils: 30 percent Descrlptlan of Cullowhee, Frequently Flmded Setting e LnndJorm: Flood plalns • Down-slopeshnpe:Linear e Across-slopeshnpe:Concave Pnrent moferinl: Loamy alluvlum over sandy and gravelly alluvlum Propertles and t{ualitles • Slope: 0 to 2 percent • Depth !o restrictive feo[ure: 20 to AO lnches to strongly contrasting textural straUficatlon • Orninnge doss: Somewha[ poorly drained • Cnpncity oj the mast IfmlfGig fnyer [o tmnsnri[ vmter (Ksnt): High (1.98 to 5.95 in/hr) • Depth fo wn[er fnble: About 18 to 2A Inches • FrequenryafJlooding:Frnquen[,None • Fiequencya/ponding: None • Avoilnble wote� cnpncify: Lotv (a6out 3.6 Inches) Interpretive groups • Formfnnd dnssiJlmflon: Not prlme farmland • Landcapabillty(nanlydgated):4w • NydrologlcSollGroup:A(D Typftal proflle • Oto131nches:Finesandyloam • 13to23lnches:Loamysand • 23to351nches:Loamysand • 35 to 80 inches: Extremefy Rrevelly sand 9sE—Bresstown-Junaluska complex, 30 to 50 percent slopes Map Unit Setting • Elevatlon:1,680to4,520feet • Mea» annual preciplfaflon: 50 ta 60 Inches • Mean annual oir tempe�afure: 46 to 57 degrees F • F�ost jree pedod: 124 to 176 days Map Un�t Compositton • Brosstown and slmllarsoils: 45 percent • lunaluska and s!mllarsoils: AO percent DescripNon of Brasstown SetUng • LandJorm: Mountain slapes, ridges • Landfam posiflon �[wo-dimensionalJ: eackslope • Landjorm positlon (three-dimenslonal): Side slope • Down-slapeshape:Convex • Across-slopeshape:Convex . Paren[ materfal: Residuum weathered from phyllite and/or meta sandstone that is affected by sall creep in the upper solum Properties and quallties , • Slope: 30 to 50 percent • DepthtorestddlveJeature:40[o601nchestoparalithichedrock • Oialnageclnst:Welldralned • Capacity of the most llmftinglayer to transm7t wote� (Ksat): Moderately higb (0.20 to O.S71n/hr) • Depth to wafer fable: More ihan 80lnches • FrequencyoJJlaoding: None • FiequencyoJponding:None • Avofln6le watercapucity: Moderate (about 7.31nchesJ Interpretive groups • Farmland classiJlcation: Not prime farmland • Landcapa611(ry(noni��iqntedJ:6e Hyd�oingicSoll Group: B Typical pro(Ile • Oto4lnches:Channeryflnesandyloam • 4ro45inches:Channerysandyclayloam • 45 to SO lnches: Channery tine sandy loam • SOto801nches:Weatheredbedrock Descrtptlon of lunaluska Setting • Landform: Mountain slopes, ridges • [andform positlon (two-dimenslonalf: Oackslope • Cand/o�m posfflon jthree-dlmenslonop: Side slope • Down-slapeshope:Convex • Across-slopeshope:Convex • Parent materlal: Residuum weathered from phylli[e and/or meta sandstone that is affected By soll creep in the upper solum Properties and qualities • Slape: 30 to 50 percent • Dep�hforestdcNveJeatme:20to40inchestoparalithicbedrock • Drainagecfass:Welldralned • Capacity a/ the most /lmlting layer to transmlt water (Ksa[J: Moderately high (0.20 to D.571n/hr) • Oepth to wa�er lable: More than 80 inches • FrequencyofJloodinr�:None • FiequencyoJponding:None • Avallable wntercapnclty: Low (about S.Olnches) Interprettve groups • Farroland dassificntlon: Not prime farmland • Landcopa611fty(nonlrr(gotedJ:6e • Hydrologlt 5011 Group: C Typical profile • 0 to5 inches: Flne sandy loam • S to211nches; Sandy clay toam • 21 ro 36 inches: S[ratified fine sandy loam to sandy clay loam • 36[o801nches:Weathered6edrock , , , v � -'� � ;: � c. , � � } _: �a Top I; ' U�k - . - � �; .. . � , �.�;��i i. „1 i . ,�;. ' . . _ ' .. �..� �.-� � �l .-I'�; i .� S. �...?� c�. : t ' , � r , i , � �o�, .o� �n _ ; � -,' + , - �G��v ,.- � ^ : j ;;' � ( I �, '. I ` `=o, d, "'i t %. I - � �� 14hob. �� i� � �f i_.� ! .. >.� . -,00; F f �7a(�'� �:;, .'- _, � S'r � -.�, _ -� . � � � Q' � �j.. , . �,.; � , ; y� �»5� ' "- �1'=, � /- � i � 611ry7ap / � E^EV 2258�.. + I ' ` - i � �. �. � ` �) � �. ! �;,� � i' � ,:one —�,� ,� % \ 1 /�, � � - � � ) I f�^� ' - - - � , l�� (' � '1 ! i ;� r� > a .._ , --., �. � ) '' �.� , ��' � ,,�y J�� `- n� � � � .3� _��'. i � , i' / (w �1' . . I r � . ` A5'h� \��py -. ,i ��.. . �� ✓'' , . � ' , A/ � � ,i�� .a � ��i � �: / S � �I� � .3 � <11 � �.i� d G+ . 2 � I 1"� j/ % l � t! � / ` �1 C, i �!; � �� .f / �� o �' f r "' a s g� � i l Y� � f� � � � / � �� f � 3 �., � ��✓�'y ��\�. J �� I V/ ,� ( � iw'. a ., '``' ; � �,�.z a ;' `��'� ��r` ,i, i : : s � �; � � r � � , � i �,� � r/ � -.. O . � . .� l .ai31�� . ,r A 1 _ r � _ 6J�.e16 :: /,tl'1 � � � . ., � I. �—'�k - �, ..� j. �'f ta� �� r -.�s�;�( � ' j � f ` ! ' �•`�' . � { 5+ �� a � u t— � ��a r�D �' � �''� � �f�ti � o� f 'l �, , � i�G .\��I��' �n` AL Jn2G ri . \�{ '.. ytq J I� 1\ � � �v � � � .h y �t+r !� � v '4°�� ` � i c�i � r sh � ti , � _ � ' .��,' ,, l �k`= � �:f � ..-.�,s� Iro�lnumi � � �P°9 ~ � � � � � , � �;�z,�` � � �1� �.auiA�i��{Ao� � � i �i � `•��^ i �� o� . -1 i �F �l�i .:�'�. ,f` - ' r..l�\11 . ` ti . , m °� (. . :.!375 / .. ' �Fe ��1 �. �. t `r � j;, • I � 9p . `�b��j. (,fi( ��/ � { -� �� 17d 3� � �� !i' � f` I '> �' � � q ;I � {✓�',� ` . .L/ 1} � ' f � ' ��1 ">,�� - � � /, / � %�` \ n 9 d . `c� � M1 , ✓"w��ps q� � ' °1°^':: ar ( �`�� ' + rl �� r i , : . a SP�\n9 P ��c �� . bj ,. � �n , ,. .`�.i�p \ ( . - - - � � -- a ,� . l � ' � �' = ' 1 4 . c-�cks . > �\ ��'� n'— � __' -� �. � n n 1 �, c � �: o - � '� .O� ; Zf' :� � �'r --- 1 IGEO . .. �. _ �, � � 1 ��o �); � � - �! . . r� :.� . �o.,, � i, �,rr � � �: 1 .. F i(�. G, ��,�! , . �� n�L¢�9ye C�rgel(�Gap ' , .� , ` r , ,I , - .�� i .. . �� iJ�� i.,- '1'' � ' a. w : \ ' �� r�M�x •, �� Ines Cree'k S a'' I i ,� " E�� / D� 'f �` 1 �; �. , � r ..1-1�: � � � �� / �� 5f � 4 FAll6-l'.V . II �� I 7��,i1+�Uk0b`LL�� h�^1�1•�$��ln.A �5 �` ��,�. AO�'y1 L� lirn�icb y� � � . � � � / '� f,�-. � } �.. Q�P �tao\g' `!i; �� .4�' 3.,.`S —`��/ w �r -` .., , - � � . a � _ r� � ., �"eG,/�� 1�/' I � i Bobcal Rd Rgadma�qr _ - - � .� ..; _ ��n-yt/7_ � . :: ... Sz�k �yp 1 ��_ �w ..� �, 4�1. . �� O C I_ °'��y rhKx ��r��'•1 ntl��Heqp�',. �� _ � _JC�O yWtaN �, � � -�� i � �� ..• � yS � :� _i,°.5� !"f"' �BI..i'R � _ , ',l o � � � � . 8 )� �Zo � � ` ' � 5,;� �1 �... , �-; i�� p`��^Yq�:; ��:^�� BQ. ' i � ad��ac� � .. � . ' ,FellhLn _k �i„rp i ,� � � ;�"�,� a _ Q,o . - i . '.. � � � � � � �o�Q�� ,•i 1 II. Q�'� . ' .. WI •� ��' ^P•' � .. �. � � � . ' �'�mm��ib l: � . . � - ' 3' � 1.V ObS0171e � � Q l ! � � I t4`� .c I ��cs I � � ( 'I _ �) d ; , � `" l _�- , � � W. ' Tk % ' � � , / ``- : � a� . �r�` ' T L' t �,� . ( 0 i t1 ,IC_. ��° � , � , i �{' \J `'.�_i - ( / -, :,' � l, . _ . �ac . . ' , . �°\� � � ��.�� ( !' � � 50�a . . : �. ' . "� � .�� .\ .... .. \��.. _ . m / i lQ �.l �f � � A1�,1/ � �;R�� ' � � � y 0 G, � �i9 I .. . (i.' � �j�I � � �C �- ChasMdt - "' �� . P' � �. U .� _ .- plats Y � �.. (� . i" , ... �C� � Wall Top . , -\ (' � .. � ��,`\ .. Che , ia `r - .. i �c1 1 . 1 . `� . , 4�� - �ee� �� v.161'�� m. _ � x�i�_ �� D� \ :\ '�a,nvoOD � -s ¢L4: :^ a � c � S"� _ _ !NJCS']Vl�ee.^.nk6ap�:Chueh � l:WOS�ORra�yieF6urt E�0 - - �a -, . _ _" __ �.sRn r . � � ' Ftti0.i2Rc.!rro ^. _�m.�osc ' Sh<ttan � �\ i W ord ' r 9�' '/'o MMpi3jHuaRiq•crs4v.:l. yyya�i�S.M_C�r.�uNCF3C��y_I . . .. I�d':u 6 , � C : ` . � —��_..\ Pamthc . -. .. � Crnk \� �. `�: ,-s_ �.. �\� '.. Hap\5� HN103.°,.?sCa"�i � S� �a oo:,' — ��, — �, �� ' ' oiici9h:s� :. i ' � . � K � � . _ ___ �F,o��y �' ] . � p � _ . _ _. .._ _a°`a"C.J c. __. '�., �� . �_ �. �;� � - � `- ... , y ,.` _ � -� .,.;,;,' , � � . � � . "_ '� f'- _-; �. � _ �', - � � � � . . - , I�; f.� i � y � , � : : , + ; " �—'"_'��'!"s� ' �\� \ ' F �� -. _ ' ', • . . ��+ V�' • . _ . f ' = _ - ' . . ,• i • . ' -� - - - 1 . - . . :� - - __ - - _ l,. . .w � s. ,�' . ' �ra►'r� ' -`:��•_ .,' r� { - � d � . \ � - :. - ,�-^�`� -. ,:�: �~. ' `�L `a , . ; . I, � . � ,.�'' '�� ' - ��;�� y� .3• . � � � �� , . � � ,� ' L. ` t ', ' j T' i -V. � \1 : : , , � , :.+ `„ � <� � - .. �o -�x . > � '> • �. �'--- - ' �.- � . . � ' %. �t , � i . ,� r _, . ...\ ; �. . �" � �!. _ K�rr . � ..' , ,` y ` � ' J ' �. •` .. -�f' ' i � t ` � , ^ —'�l� �. .I � 1 '��y � - ', ' �'. . ` �. i 1.� �,i. � 1 C..�� '_ . . i- - •. . -. . . ' I' se�.a.. uMcs ' � ao�m �e�,�. ..�,. ��. ��- . 25f[' , i _ :o�a .,�.o,a.. �o.� ,; .l - . - _ � -. sav o.r�..�� nao - . _ . �_ _ '. � . � . - ,. � �s .. . � a ■ , , �� I t:, -. y i '� . „ � .�..'�_• i� � . , . . . • -�.V'� 1�� 1�. • ' .. ,,,� . .. .. _ +�V`- ` , . • - : t • '��iy� , I� ' � ~ � ♦ y�, ' � ♦ � R ~ ` � l y � ��°,��t' � � . � , i . �•`•' �+� ' y '�: ' � ' ; �' . ' ' _ ' � •� . i I � D . �� . - . - - � , . }r �'31''' : � �a�tt �' t I � �y� �' `� , : `��r ` %. ��; �� ,.�. ii M� c;/T.' . - � . � � 4�, '� ' `�^ f � . `� ` ' . � ". �-_ . Yr �. • �r ti� `r, � ` '. < '� � t . � '�rf ,, � � � � _ " � . . .t'� x ��' �, . ` ' ' . . - , �- J i � • ''�. � x , J . � y?"�' ' — , r: - . . .�y„e, , a �' ' , �`I �� i . i -♦ . � . 6 • ��-_- � � _ ` ' . � � .i' -R; , .., �4 ' L�. �. . q . •. � ♦ � `u; � , i' . I,� _ n i 5 i t 'r' 'r ' • ' ' . � � . �, ,y . .. _ f 'i. . _ a�. "i!' I .. , � . ,_ .L 4,��' ', \ • � I'i , ' ' , .I � • . � �^� I+ -..�. �" . — Y. . J i � .. j ,. . . _ �r� , I _� J^ � , �' . y J ^+ +� . , . � "`` 2 � ,�r xz.e.,, ¢ I�i W�. + y � 40 VSG> Irs .� s o.« e:.... o�a snatea�. c.'cz`�,f..�C•.,b� usoa' uscs�� i�in..ea *a. i�o. a!�cn,:ace: ..�wo:.� 'tas�� i�..r..r �SI'1 Y�' i � i�T"'�Qir� SDVOA�vl4May " ,'y2_ .�'i iy �'� �' �-j��R� 4'S�+ . _ Y r- . .I �'i I+f ,� N\ . ,�� .j .♦ �Y. - 4 .� - . ( j y � 7- . -� .1 � � r �ia � �T S� �:;< r,,.�� i r �.r�. �� ':�: . g f - `F r '�' � !r� � ' d,. ,� ' i r�" � '�':i� �3 �.a^ �,-� �! � '� '4 �} � � rC�r`` � i }''i- �,+ Y'��,r�.�.��7i��'■,� y�T� t ;+ry � *l. ' '.'f � ' � ,: /, ` �t ,�j` t � ��p �Yi� r ��•� �1� ��' 1` � ��'iH ' , , r � �-�' '�. . 1 j '� I �.t• V ��•Lw. :r F '�, `� ',.`'i N �%!. •. �� i . . - .. '�1�� l ... �� ' � �',�{�„` 'F-. . . ,�,' `'' # `? �{ � � r '� t �I � � ��: � :+: r � .h.: - t. •� ,i ' / f_ yi� � ' .. n- ,' � F\ -��,1 d�� k�_ '• ' �. ��'1. U" .. •. � / � ' .,!.A,' W ��-� r �?.Fa°1:.ti'. ' ' ,w� +�.. ;i. ��-; 1` * � � . a7.i��i�"- , y � �r. I� ,� . ._ S �-_ _-- _- .. �'Y � _' _ _ _ _ __ _ 'S� -_. 1..• _ _ - _ _ _ _ - �� y,m N,r� -- ' �� . �� 'ii � . F � � .�... � � h q � � .. .'� r � .. �. � '-i "��,�:.��+,+- .��' r.. , �� !,* � � , _ �, � y:. . • : ��'' y � ; � �'' �t �.. �� n. * �' ' • - �tR° • !'►'a, .'� ` * � '� 4s ' t+ ;, ��'I. � � ,. �� . � . h �y _ � � ` • .la � �-: '�i�j-"+ l ` l ' � f r • , I/ � axx +v{ :,� .��,�� l' ' a � �� j, . L'i�/ �� .-.��Ik' ��:1 � • _ , �� _ �� , � ` _�, , r r,r � � ,, �- �•. - .w-, � j� I,'�c ' - �� .�� , ��